All Episodes
Jan. 3, 2024 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:12:15
Leftists Caught Directly Aiding Invasion at Southern Border! - The American Journal - FULL SHOW - 01/03/2024
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
01:40:33
Appearances
d
denis rancourt
01:05
g
greg reese
04:53
Clips
a
alex jones
00:59
d
dr michael j ryan
00:13
h
hillary clinton
00:16
j
jamie raskin
00:57
j
jon bowne
00:42
Callers
icarus in wisconsin
00:55
matt in wisconsin
01:09
max in wisconsin
00:08
patty in boston
01:46
tim in seattle
01:56
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
- Oh, mine's a little dark.
I just feel a lot of concern that 2024 may be the year of a Black Swan event.
jon bowne
Black Swan. It is the favorite New World Order term.
The New World Order would have us believe that a Black Swan event is an unfortunate event.
Created by the Russians, MAGA domestic terrorists, or anonymous hackers.
Not a looming premeditated war game genocidal treasonous act by an establishment fueled by the insanity of a totalitarian eugenesis movement that is now careening off the tracks.
Like Event 201, with its strategic vaccination culling.
dr michael j ryan
The scenario you will be presented with this morning could easily become one A shared reality one day.
I fully expect that we will be confronted by a fast-moving, highly lethal pandemic of a respiratory pathogen.
unidentified
COVID-19 mRNA genetic injections have killed 17 million people.
Absolutely stunning. Can you please tell us more about the paper?
denis rancourt
That's the global number.
We studied many countries in Latin America and in the equatorial region, so we have a representative sample of the world, we believe.
Many injections, what, it's 10% of the world population, 9% of injections, or the other way around.
So the number we extract from our analysis allows us, we calculate the toxicity of the vaccine.
For all ages, and the number allows us, given the number of doses that have been given worldwide, to conclude that 17 million people would have been killed by this vaccine.
And having it by time, like by week or by month, and by age group means that you can actually see when there's a rollout of a booster, for example, which happens very quickly in time for a given age group, you can actually see immediately following it A maximum in the all-cause mortality, so an excess mortality actual peak that's temporally associated with that rollout.
We see that repeatedly for each rollout.
unidentified
Consistently across all countries?
denis rancourt
All the countries that have sufficient data where you're able to look at it and you have both the vaccine data and the mortality data, this is what we see.
unidentified
There's a little company called Seagan that no one's ever heard of, and they are developing a new type of cancer drug called an ADC. It's like a chemotherapy drug that's designed to specifically target cancer cells while sparing healthy cells.
Well, this company's been losing a lot of money.
And Pfizer just bought them for $43 billion and admitted that they expect over $10 billion in revenue due to a massive rise in cancer over the next coming years.
Now, gee, I wonder what possibly could be That Pfizer knows is going to increase the cancer rates.
It couldn't be the Pfizer vaccine for COVID that had so many cancer-causing agents, including the SV40 simian virus that was found in the old polio vaccine that gave over 100 million people cancer.
jon bowne
The globalists have already clearly telegraphed that they are behind an inevitable black swan event.
And the rabbit hole is deep.
hillary clinton
But we also have to look ahead.
Because you know what? Our opponents certainly are.
Right-wing extremists already have a plan to literally steal the next presidential election.
And they're not making a secret of it.
unidentified
Larry Fink of BlackRock sent a letter out to the world saying that ESG is a priority for the asset manager and really was looking to encourage companies to embrace ESG. I believe there will be a future, Eric, that all investments are going to be looked through sustainability.
The concept of providing Canadians with a universal basic income has sparked significant debate on if UBI is a viable solution for ensuring financial security.
The EU is investigating Elon Musk's ex, formerly known as Twitter, while the bloc's regulator is probing the social media platform for its suspected failure to counter illicit content and disinformation, a lack of advertising transparency, and what it calls a suspected deceptive design of the user interface.
harrison smith
All right, folks, you can find and share that full video at Banned.video.
It's the latest from John Bound, the NWO's 2024 Black Swan Tell.
That's an exclusive report, again, at InfoWars.com and Banned.video.
We are live again this Wednesday morning.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
We will be back on the other side for your Daily Dispatch.
A lot of news to cover today, folks.
Good Lord, there's a lot of news.
So stay with us.
unidentified
It's going to be a big one. It's Wednesday, January 3rd in the year of 2024.
And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
harrison smith
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to my first show of 2024.
This is The American Journal.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
Thank you to Chase Geyser for filling in for me.
Ready to hit the ground running here in the new year.
We'll be taking your calls today.
Primarily with the new year in focus, what do you think lies ahead?
And what do you think we should be doing to counter the disasters we know that are coming down the pipeline?
Hope everybody had a good New Year's break, if you got one.
I had a lovely time.
I also had some very interesting conversations that maybe I'd like to get into a little bit later.
We'll save it for later. I'll save it for later.
I was at a wedding all weekend.
And you know, it's nice to have the opportunity to chat with normies every once in a while.
No offense to my good friends.
They're a little bit lost.
They're a little bit lost. And just really quickly, just really quickly, I was having this one conversation, and I brought up the fact that the American government sold crack cocaine to ghettos in L.A. in the 80s.
To illustrate a different point, I'll just bring this up as an example to illustrate a larger point of what was going on.
But they'd never heard of that.
And again, sort of struck with this, like, it's like the iceberg, the conspiracy pyramid, and, you know, things like U.S. government selling crack to black communities.
It's like way, it's like very, very shallow on the depth of the iceberg chart.
People still don't know. And again, we're reminded every once in a while with people like Bill Maher having no idea who Klaus Schwab is or what the World Economic Forum is.
It's like, we have a lot of work to do here because this is just the bare minimum you should know.
But anyway, I brought that up and the person I was talking to was saying they kind of didn't believe me and I just had to be like, no, this is just a Regularly accepted thing.
I brought this up as an example of something that's just well known.
It's proven. There have been mainstream media reports and congressional hearings.
It was part of a grand contra.
People went to jail. This is not speculation.
It's not a conspiracy theory.
It just happened.
It's just something that happened.
So you should know about it and think about it probably and the maybe implications behind it.
But their response to this was like, isn't that a scared way to live?
That's what she said to me. She said like, when you think that the government is doing that type of stuff to you, isn't that just like a scared way?
Aren't you just like living in fear kind of thing?
And it's just like, it's not really up to me whether...
Or not to believe this.
It's just true. It's just something that is true.
It's just something that the government did.
The fearful thing is to be so scared of the implications or so overwhelmed by the reality that you refuse to accept what is true.
I'm not motivated by fear when I understand something that is true that the government did.
It's like saying, aren't you living in fear by not walking around in a rainstorm with a big metal pole?
It's like, no, you just know that lightning strikes tall metal objects.
That's just the thing. That's just the reality.
You're not living in fear by just recognizing the reality going on around you, especially when the reality consists of perhaps dangers that you or your family or community could face.
But I had a number of interesting conversations that, again, helped me to maybe reorient where we are in the information war and what's needed to expand awareness and awakening throughout the population.
And it's like so annoying to I really thought we were the point that we were beyond talking about things like the government selling crack to black communities.
I thought everybody knew that at this point.
But no, apparently not.
Apparently not. So apparently we have a lot more work to do than I previously expected.
But that's alright. The awakening is still happening.
And that conversation itself, I hope, did some small part in progressing the awareness of people of just the sheer level of evil that we're up against.
It is kind of scary knowing that your government would deliberately destroy an entire community.
On top of that, it's even more upsetting that they would throw you in prison.
For doing the thing that they helped to orchestrate.
Even more so than that, they were doing it in order to make money to sell weapons to carry out conflicts across the world.
It's like the layers of evil that you're dealing with.
I admit, they're a little bit scary.
It's a little bit scary.
But it's far scarier to me to not know that these things are going on.
Like... You know, treading water...
I'd rather know what we're up against so we can face it and confront it and deal with it than just live in ignorant bliss while the dangers swirl around us unseen.
With that, let's begin today as we do every day with our Daily Dispatch.
Here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Wednesday, the 3rd of January, 2024.
Harvard president quits.
Here's a headline from AP News.
Claudine Gay resignation highlights new conservative weapon.
That's right, folks.
It's a new conservative weapon, plagiarism.
We're going to get into this story.
I'm, again, just almost left dizzy with the way this is being covered and talked about.
Apparently this was a partisan attack by conservatives and it brought about the downfall of this DEI-loving president of Harvard, Claudine Gay.
Obviously, it had nothing to do with conservatism or DEI or conservative opposition to the path academia is headed down.
If that was the case, then, well, every president of every university would be on the chopping block.
And this would have happened years ago.
No, for years, conservatives have been bemoaning and complaining and condemning the Blatant hatred and division and socialism and communism being pumped out by the university system.
And nothing has happened.
There's been no reaction.
There's been no care or concern or positive development from conservative interests.
No, this has to do with her not being Zionist enough.
And you know this is the case because the person that she's been replaced with, the interim president...
Believes everything she did in terms of DEI and anti-conservative messaging.
He just also is a Zionist.
So it's just, we've gone from somebody with a 97% completion rate, 97% complicity rate for the approved beliefs, to 99 or 100%.
It's that measly one to three percent of disagreement that the current world order cannot stand.
And of course, that's why she was removed.
And we'll get more into that later.
Meanwhile, Trump appeals main secretary of state ballot ban to state superior court.
President Trump appealed the main secretary of state, Shanna Bellows, 2024 ballot ban to the state superior court on Tuesday.
And we'll get into this a little bit more later.
Former President Trump's legal team on Tuesday appealed Maine Secretary of State Sheena Bellows' ruling that deemed him ineligible from appearing on the state's GOP primary ballot to Maine Superior Court, the state's top trial court.
Again, we'll get into this.
Long story short, this woman unilaterally removed Donald Trump from the ballot because she's a leftist activist who just did it.
She just did it. I mean, whatever method they...
And we'll get into not just the one in Maine, but of course this happened in Colorado.
It's been reversed because he's appealed it to the Supreme Court.
And we'll get into what the Democrats want to do to the Supreme Court for just the mere possibility that the Supreme Court might not decide on their side, might not be in favor of some random woman removing the De facto presidential candidate from the ballot.
And if the Supreme Court doesn't capitulate to this completely undemocratic activity, the Democrats will probably pack and or destroy it.
Because they're tyrants.
Because they're psychopathic tyrants, folks.
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Continuing with our Daily Dispatch.
From InfoWars.com, U.S. national debt rises to $34 trillion in a historic first ever.
U.S. national debt has surged over $34 trillion for the first time in history, according to fiscal data published by the Department of the Treasury.
As of December 29, 2023, the U.S. national debt reached...
Look at all those numbers.
$34,001,493,655,565.48 for the first time in history of the United States, the data showed on Tuesday.
Just incredible.
Earlier findings by the Congressional Budget Office indicated that the national debt would nearly double in scale over the next 30 years.
Michael Peterson, the CEO of Peterson G. Peterson Foundation, a financial firm founded by the Nixon era Secretary of Commerce, noted in a statement that regardless of the new year, the U.S. national debt standing, quote, remains on the same damaging and unsustainable path.
$34 trillion in debt.
But we always have a couple hundred billion to start wars in Ukraine or...
Sell weapons to Israel or fund our own invasion at the southern border to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars a year.
Meanwhile, strike on Hamas leader in Lebanon sends tensions spiking across the Middle East.
The UN and France have called for restraint as fears of further escalation of the Israel-Gaza war around the region rise in wake of the strike on Hamas leader in Lebanon late on Tuesday.
Saleh al-Arori, a senior official in Hamas' political bureau, was killed along with six others in the attack on the outskirts of Beirut.
Israel has not taken responsibility, but concern was rising on Wednesday that the conflict's That the conflicts that its war with Hamas have sparked across the region could expand further.
And it looks like that is almost certainly the case.
It almost looks like they want that to be the case.
Almost. It's almost like any escalation since the very beginning has been purposeful, by design, easily avoidable, and yet nobody can do anything to stop it.
And we'll get into that a little bit later as well.
Finally, we have this. Jimmy Kimmel threatens to sue Aaron Rodgers for suggesting a connection to Jeffrey Epstein.
Notorious woke late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel has strongly criticized New York Jets player Aaron Rodgers issuing a threat to take legal action.
Kimmel's response comes in the wake of Rodgers suggesting on ESPN's The Pat McAfee Show that Kimmel may have ties to the notorious Jeffrey Epstein.
Kimmel said that Rodgers' quote, He warned Rogers to cease such statements, emphasizing that further discussion on the matter might unfold in a court of law.
He said, That was what Kimmel posted on X. I feel like he's missing an opportunity here.
I feel like this is a way out, Kimmel.
This is a great excuse.
Embrace it. Even if it's not true, this is your chance to stop being an insufferable jackass and blame all of your previous actions on being blackmailed by Israeli intelligence or whoever Jeffrey Epstein worked for.
I feel like this is the perfect time.
He's like, you're right, I'm not actually an insufferable liberal.
I'm not actually such a just heinously off-putting, putrid excuse of a man.
All that stuff I've been saying for the last five years, it's because...
Of Jeffrey Epstein and I'm being blackmailed and they made me say all that stuff.
That's not me. I'm not really the person that I appear to be over the last several years.
That was all an act that I was being forced to put on and now it's out in the open and a weight has been lifted on my shoulders and I can go back to being a normal, funny, good-natured person that doesn't openly despise my fellow Americans at a deeply hateful level.
I think it's a good excuse. I think it would be a good excuse.
It'd be a good time for Jimmy Kimmel to blame everything that he's done over the last four years on being blackmailed.
Why not take that chance?
Otherwise, if you're not on the Epstein list and you're not being forced to behave the way that you are, then you're just actually a bad person.
I guess those are the options.
During the ESPN interview, Rogers implied that Kimmel was among the individuals who frequented Epstein's infamous private island, allegedly taking advantage of the underage girls trafficked by Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Speculation has arisen regarding the impending release of an unredacted list of associates in the new year.
And we'll get into some of those lists, some of the unredacted lists, some of the suspicious parts of the list.
Is the list even anything new?
Or has it been out forever?
Does it really matter?
That's my sort of take on it.
It's like, even if we've known this, this is an opportunity to, again, remind everybody who Jeffrey Epstein was, what he was up to, the level of connections that he had, how he didn't kill himself, how he Ghislaine Maxwell is tied in through her father, Robert Maxwell, to the intelligence agencies as he was a triple agent at the time, the USSR, Israeli Mossad, and British intelligence.
She seemed to actually have been teasing at one point while in hiding, posting a picture.
She's reading a book about CIA assassinations, seemingly attempting to draw the CIA speculation into the narrative.
It's a good excuse.
It's a good chance to discuss some of these things.
And some of the lists I've seen do have some novel information, some new information, including interesting references to some mysterious figures that haven't gotten a lot of attention before.
And also who all almost universally died mysterious deaths.
Either supposedly through suicide or very bizarre accidents.
That would almost be an interesting exercise in and of itself is cross-referencing the names on the flight charters.
To unexpected and early demises.
So we'll get into that a little bit later as well.
And I feel like it's good to be back, obviously, you know, even just missing a single day here.
I feel like, you know, it's like riding a bike, right?
But you do, you feel like, I just haven't been here for a couple days already.
I'm like, what do I do again?
Where do I plug my thing in?
What am I doing again?
How do we do this?
It's like, you got to get back in the swing of things.
But it feels like now's the time to, like I said in the first segment, hit the ground running.
And from Thanksgiving to Christmas to New Year's, it's all sort of inconsistent.
But now we're here. Now it's 2024.
The road ahead of us is unbroken, straight, and broken.
Frankly, heading into unknown lands.
So we're going to open up the phone lines a little bit later for your calls, get your input on what's been going on recently, but also what's ahead in 2024.
I do ask you to help us make 2024 the most successful year in Infowars history, not just because we are emerging from the attacks that we've been under, the censorship that we've been under, a renaissance of sorts, a rebirth, phoenix-like from the ashes.
As Infowars and Alex Jones are back on Twitter, it's an election year.
I want this to be hugely successful, not just for Infowars, but through Infowars for the rest of America and the world.
Support us at Infowarsstore.com.
The New Year's Mega Super Sale is on.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
unidentified
This is the American Journal.
The story we're going to cover now. - Bye.
harrison smith
It's one of those stories that when you pay attention and you are watching the news from the beginning, you watch things unfold, it's a type of story that makes you feel insane because it exists in a maelstrom of insanity from the rest of society.
Now, I don't know why people can't just report this honestly.
Since we all saw the timeline take place, we all saw it unfold.
Of course, talking about the Harvard president quitting, Claudine Gay is her name.
unidentified
And.
harrison smith
The way the AP News reports this, As Harvard president quits, Claudine Gay resignation highlights new conservative weapon.
So the way this is being framed is as if this was a conservative, right-wing, MAGA, America First movement to oust the Harvard president by using plagiarism as an excuse when really it's about DEI and politics.
Leftist infiltration of the university and the academia system.
What are they talking about?
Do people believe this?
It's just one of those things where you go, this was about her not capitulating to the demands of the Zionists.
Is anybody confused about that?
This all stems, and the AP article itself, in the first sentence, acknowledges that this all stems from the congressional hearing where, as they put it, quote, she was unable to say unequivocally that calls on campus for the genocide of Jews would violate the school's conduct policy.
That's not exactly how it went.
Actually, I It really goes like this.
For decades, the people funding universities, the contributors to the funds, the people in the government who get tax dollars for the university, I mean, it's all moved inexorably towards DEI, anti-white, critical race theory, leftist identity politic communism, and she represents...
Sort of being at the forefront of that, Harvard, as probably the most prestigious university in America, was on the forefront and was the tip of the spear in this drive, and she fit in perfectly with that.
And at every step of the way, she was vetted by committees and alumni and various organizations within Harvard.
Every time they approved of her stances, every time they Knew exactly who she was and what she believed and how she got to where she was and they helped her move forward.
They gave their approval moving forward.
And despite years and years of conservative backlash against this, outcry against this, protesting against this, Absolutely no shadow of hesitation has ever entered into the realms of academia in their onward drive towards communism.
Never once has the outrage of Americans just infuriated, aghast, and appalled at the language coming out of organizations like Harvard.
You just have to search like Harvard anti-white or something, and it's just, you know, official Harvard publications, official Harvard newspapers, official Harvard courses, the abolishing whiteness, and whiteness is a danger and must be destroyed.
I mean, this has gone on and on and on, and everybody's known this, and everybody's been fine with it.
And then October the 7th happened.
October 7th happened in Israel, and Hamas attacked Israel.
And then Israel... Responded with a bombardment campaign that as of now has killed upwards of 22,000 people, the majority of which are women and children, including over 10,000 children at this point.
And in opposition to this and in solidarity with the people of Gaza, not necessarily the ones who are in or even supportive of Hamas and certainly not the ones that carried out the terrorist attack, but the ones being bombed relentlessly.
Solidarity movements cropped up in universities around the country.
And they would have slogans they would chant, one of which would be something like, from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.
Which to the people chanting it, for the most part, means exactly what it says.
The people of Palestine will be free, free from occupation, free from coercion, free from You know, AI machine guns at gates blocking them into their neighborhoods.
I want to see this.
I haven't seen this story yet. Ibram X. Kinsey.
But regardless, chanting things like, from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.
Now that statement is interpreted...
By some people, including congressmen, as a call to genocide.
And so then they have a congressional hearing where they ask the university presidents, is it within campus policy to allow calls to genocide?
Now, as far as I know, you can correct me here.
There were never any demonstrations at heart.
First of all, there were never any, I mean, nothing even close to like an official statement saying things like abolish Jewishness, you know, Jewishness, you know, your DNA is an abomination, like all the stuff that you see from official university publications about white people, just actually genocidal rhetoric from like university professors and people who design courses.
Ignitev, I think was his name.
Noel Ignitev or something.
Literally like abolishing whiteness.
He's like, that's my life goal.
And he was a tenured Harvard professor.
Like, you know, actual legitimate calls for genocide from actually university organs and publications.
Nothing of the sort, even remotely like that, in terms of calling for genocide of Jews.
If anything, it came from just the students themselves gathering and protesting.
But even in that case, you didn't have them out there in university, you know, the Harvard Square in Boston chanting abolish Jewishness or, you know, death to all Jews and nothing like that.
Yeah, abolishing whiteness has never been more urgent.
Noel Ignatieff showed us how.
He showed us how. University professor.
A little bit different here.
But then the protest that actually occurred at Harvard You didn't have them actually calling for genocide.
You had them saying things like, from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.
That's interpreted as a call to genocide.
Then she's asked, do you allow calls to genocide?
And they're like, well, people are allowed to say whatever they want, and they're allowed to say, from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.
That's a subjective interpretation if you say that that is therefore a call to genocide all Jews.
Like, this doesn't make any sense.
But as soon as that happened, that Not just Claudine Gay, but she's actually the second university president to be forced out of her position, forced to resign, as not just the media outrage over her failure to use university resources to silent student protest, but also apparently she plagiarized something.
I mean, it's just... It has nothing to do with plagiarism.
It has nothing to do with her being a DEI, a DE, D-I-E, whatever, diversity, equity, and inclusion supporter.
And we'll get into who is replacing her and how her replacement shows that this has nothing to do with conservative backlash or a push towards getting rid of DEI. Nothing of the case is happening.
That will continue unabated.
Now we'll just have Zionism and...
Sort of the idea that white people are bad, but Jews aren't white, baked in to the university system forever.
And anybody who strays from that prescribed belief will be ousted.
And how this can be portrayed as a conservative backlash or having anything to do with plagiarism.
Does anybody really believe that?
unidentified
All right, welcome back, folks.
harrison smith
Yes, we do have a lot of other topics to discuss, including developments in Israel and Iran.
All right.
This morning, a massive blast killed 103 people and wounded 141 at a ceremony honoring a slain general in Iran.
As Israel seems to be taking new directions in Gaza, And taking the attack north to Lebanon and to Iran as, yes, it seems like they are choosing war throughout the entire region as we watch this absolute humanitarian catastrophe and what may very well eventually lead to a world war scenario in which hundreds of millions die and it's all just unfolding before us.
And we'll get to that. We'll also get to some new invasion numbers, some new developments in Ukraine, some actually surprising and some other not so surprising but very disturbing developments in election fraud in the attempt to rig the election in 2024 by removing Trump from the ballot.
A lot to discuss still ahead, but let's continue with Just the bizarre way that the resignation of the Harvard president is being discussed in mainstream media, even right-wing media.
Again, from this AP article, the downfall of Harvard's president has elevated the threat of unearthing plagiarism, a cardinal sin in academia, as a possible new weapon in conservative attacks on higher education.
Claudine Gay's resignation Tuesday followed weeks of mounting accusations that she lifted language from other scholars in her doctoral dissertation and journal articles.
The allegations surfaced amid backlash over her congressional testimony about anti-Semitism on campus.
That's kind of a key part there.
Kind of a key aspect of this.
It's kind of like it was never really about plagiarism in the first place.
It's kind of like...
Just whatever. Just whatever needs to be used.
And plagiarism, it's a convenient weapon, I guess.
It's a convenient tool to be used.
But it wasn't like she was discovered to be a plagiarist and this is all unfolded after that.
She refused to condemn and silence student protesters.
And so she got a target on her back.
And just like has happened with Elon Musk and Donald Trump and Alex Jones and so many others, they'll find whatever it takes to get rid of the person they want to get rid of.
It has nothing to do with the actual reason they're getting rid of her.
It's just the excuse they use.
Just like the DA in New York doesn't actually care or even probably think that Donald Trump overvalued Mar-a-Lago, They couldn't care less.
It was never an issue.
But it's whatever they need to use to destroy Donald Trump.
Just like the DOJ doesn't actually have a reason to pursue charges against SpaceX for their hiring practices.
But Elon Musk bought Twitter and opened it up to be a free speech platform, so you gotta get him on something.
You gotta stop him somehow.
And in this case, Claudine Gay, president of Harvard, as much as I... I think she's a terrible person and maybe did plagiarize.
I don't even know or care because this isn't what it's about.
Refused to adequately condemn statements made by Harvard protesters.
I mean, it's just the song and dance going on here is so bizarre.
So bizarre, especially as they In this article alone, spread anti-white misinformation in an attempt to portray what's going on to Claudine Gay as somehow right-wing, Christian, Trump-supported white people who are responsible for this.
It's just like...
unidentified
Okay.
harrison smith
Christopher Ruffo, it says in this article, a conservative activist who helped orchestrate the effort, celebrated her departure as a win in his campaign against elite institutions of higher education.
On X, formerly Twitter, he wrote, quote, scalped as if gay was a trophy of violence invoking a gruesome practice taken up by white colonists who sought to eradicate Native Americans.
unidentified
You get what I'm trying to say?
harrison smith
Like, you see what they're doing?
unidentified
You see what they're doing?
harrison smith
Do you get how this looks to anybody that is aware of what's actually going on?
Again, this has absolutely nothing to do with her being anti-white.
This has nothing to do With a conservative push, except I guess that Rufo sort of saw this as an opening or an opportunity to push the deplatforming that was going to happen anyway because she wasn't sufficiently Zionist.
So because this is, I guess, if you wanted to say a Zionist weapon against colleges, This new weapon, they say conservative.
It's not really conservative because it has nothing to do with her unconservative ideas.
Because she had those when she was appointed to Harvard.
She had those for years while she was president of Harvard.
She faced protests from right-wingers and everybody else for years.
It didn't matter. Nothing actually happened.
So then... She refuses to silence anti-Zionist protesters.
So she gets targeted and ousted and subject to a harassment and elimination campaign.
And then that campaign is blamed on white people being racist.
Okay, great. And then on top of that, I thought it was a strange way to talk about scalping.
A gruesome practice taken up by white colonists who sought to eradicate Native Americans.
As if that was ever a goal of white settlers.
But of course, it's like the blood libel is just so casual now.
Just toss it out there.
I just Googled history of scalping.
And of course, just like I thought I remembered, Native Americans in the Southeast took scalps to achieve the status of warrior and placate the spirits of the dead.
While most members of Northeastern tribes valued the taking of captives over scalps, amongst plain Indians, scalps were taken for war honors, often from live victims.
This isn't something that white colonists did in an effort to genocide the Native Americans.
It's something that white colonists picked up from Native Americans and Who invented and practiced scalping as a sort of way to collect war trophies.
But you're not going to see that.
You're not going to see that in AP News, right?
A truthful sentence would go something like on X, formerly Twitter, he wrote scalped as if gay was a trophy of violence invoking a gruesome practice of the Native Americans as they sought to Kill each other in endless wars of territorial dispute.
They're not going to say that, obviously.
Rufo goes on to say, we must not stop until we have abolished DEI ideology from every institution in America, etc., etc.
Here's the thing. You got rid of Claudine Gay.
Has that done any damage to DEI? No, not even in the slightest, actually.
And again, we can go into some more ways articles are portraying this, New York Times.
How a proxy fight over campus politics brought down Harvard's president.
We all washed it?
I don't know. And it's weird because it's conservatives that are giving them these talking points, right?
Liz Wheeler. A crushing loss to DEI, wokeism, anti-Semitism, and university elitism, wrote the conservative commenter Liz Wheeler.
So this is... Zionists scalp the Harvard president for not cracking down on free speech on campus.
Then conservatives go and take credit for it.
And then... All of these other news outlets point to those statements and say, see, this was a conservative movement who got her fired for being black.
It's just so nonsense.
And of course, her replacement, Alan Garber, who's been named the interim president, is a Jewish man.
Who is fully in favor of DEI. Who is in no way less committed to socialist ideals and anti-whitism than Claudine Gay was.
So there's actually been no development in that regard.
He's just been replaced by somebody that believes everything she believed but is also a Zionist.
greg reese
Great victory. In trauma-based mind control, trauma is used to hack into the mind and body's defense systems in order to train a person's behavior.
This is accomplished in three steps.
In step one, the victim's identity is destroyed.
This is achieved by depriving the victim of their basic needs and inflicting pain upon them until they become exhausted, confused, and disoriented.
In this state, they no longer trust themselves and become receptive to guidance from an outside authority.
Step two, through a strict system of rewards and punishments, the victim is imprinted with a new identity.
The new identity is trained to self-isolate by having it denounce everything associated with the previous identity.
And finally, with Step 3, through the continued use of trauma, the rebuilding of the victim's new self is crafted and maintained however the mind controller chooses.
For this to work, the subject must remain oblivious to the fact that they are being trained.
This is accomplished by keeping them in a helpless, victim state of mind with the use of trauma.
The entire method requires regular ritualistic abuse to keep the target in the victim state.
Declassified documents show how drugs and sensory overload are used to inflict trauma upon the public.
But high-level slaves are often procured from families with an established history of child abuse.
Intergenerational or multi-generational trauma abuse is when a person abuses their child, and that child grows up to abuse their child, and that person grows up to abuse their child, and so on.
This increases a person's susceptibility to trauma-based mind control.
Experiments with mice have shown that the offspring of a traumatized pregnant mother are born depressed and exhibit problems socializing with others.
A nurturing upbringing by a healthy surrogate mother did not reverse the abnormal behaviors, indicating an in utero transformation of the brain.
And bioinformatic analysis revealed long-lasting alterations in the DNA. This is why the CIA is known for targeting children from families of multi-generational child abuse.
They are easier to mind control.
This is why world leaders are all from the same bloodlines.
This brutal technique has been used and understood for centuries.
And if a group of people vying for power wanted a loyal army of soldiers, the easiest way would be by breeding them.
And the evidence shows that this is how our society was created.
From the middle of the 19th century and well into the next, hundreds of thousands of orphans were distributed and sold in the United States, and millions worldwide.
They were advertised, delivered by train, and sold at fairs.
In America, these orphans were being managed and distributed by a private organization from Britain known as the Odd Fellows, many of whom were orphans themselves.
The ancient Order of Odd Fellows is an international fraternity whose members, such as Albert Pike and several U.S. presidents during the orphan train years, We're often members of Freemasonic lodges as well.
With their first official lodge in the United States established in 1819, the Oddfellows are officially committed to educating orphans, but they seem to have been procuring them and breeding them as well.
The Oddfellows' first female chapter, The Daughters of Rebecca, was founded right before the orphan trains began, and a depiction of their work shows hints of mass breeding and surrogate motherhood.
They worked closely with the Oddfellows at large institutions known as orphan asylums and foundling asylums, where many members themselves were born.
The Rothschild banking dynasty provided funding for several of these orphan asylums.
According to Philip Eugene de Rothschild, the family has privately bred over 100,000 offspring, including Adolf Hitler.
This is why pedophilia is so prevalent among the families of world leaders.
While it is used for extortion, its primary function is for trauma-based mind control.
Because to the mind controller, trauma equals transformation.
And there is nothing more traumatizing to a person than pedophilia.
If you had a million mind-control slaves placed in positions of power, then you could control entire nations, but only if the masses were also kept in a relative state of trauma.
Greg Reese reporting.
harrison smith
I'm Jared Now, Bandai Video, trauma-based mind control.
unidentified
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Let's talk about rigged elections.
harrison smith
The fact that the previous election was rigged and that they are currently in front of everybody.
Ricking the next one. .
Sound the open blatantly in an obvious fashion.
And we can get into the effort to eject Trump from the ballot.
Same place already happened in Colorado.
It's happened now in Maine. There's about 20 other states that are attempting to do this.
And how, again, I mean, just on top of the lawfare, right?
On top of the other attacks against Trump, it's just another thing.
And it's just like, this can't be allowed to go on.
It just can't. We just can't let this continue.
This is not... How a republic or a democracy works, it is an impossible standard to require that any outsider who wants to be a politician, anybody who is not brought up through the ranks by the establishment, should be subjected to a whole swath of legal challenges.
Throughout the entire—I mean, from Russiagate and the Spygate scandal to the Mueller investigation, etc., etc., and then on to afterwards, January 6th, and the impeachments and the treason trial and the insurrection charges that he was acquitted of but is now being used to justify his being removed from the ballot in just—just blatant, just obvious, blatant, egregious violation of due process.
It just couldn't be more obvious.
And even if he's cleared on all of these, it's still not acceptable.
You still can't have a system that attacks its enemies from a thousand different directions with a hundred different excuses, each more thinly veiled than the last.
Because you understand now every one of these states that chooses to remove Trump from a ballot based on a charge for which he was acquitted in a trial.
In other words, they are just unilaterally declaring him guilty of a charge without allowing him to defend himself and in opposition and violation of the previous time he was actually tried with it and was actually allowed to put on a defense and did actually get acquitted from it.
But for every one of these states, he's got to now mount a defense.
He's got to now hire lawyers and file petitions and get it to the Supreme Court.
Make arguments there and hope it gets through there.
I mean, it's impossible.
It's an impossible standard to have to reach.
And it's just exactly the same playbook that they're running with Elon Musk.
They don't want him opening up X to free speech.
They don't want him Giving oxygen to fires that they would rather go out.
Discussions they would rather people not have.
And so they attack him a million different other ways.
You can't just ignore him.
You can't just go, ah, well, DOJ is full of crap.
I'm going to ignore it. No, they'll shut his business down.
They'll confiscate his material wealth.
They'll throw him in prison.
Like, you have to confront this. So, for every one of these states, they aren't giving Trump a chance to Defend himself before they make the decision.
They're just making the decision unilaterally, like tyrants, like dictators.
If you boil Western civilization down to one thing, it's trial by jury.
That's sort of the supreme accomplishment of Western civilization's continuing arc towards liberty and out of the quagmire, out of the suffocation of tyranny.
It's been a long and difficult process over centuries.
From the Magna Carta to the Mayflower Compact, like every step of the way we've had to try to establish some mechanism by which human beings are free from the arbitrary and capricious Exercise of power from other human beings.
And at the core of this is the jury of your peers and the right to a public trial.
Without these things, we are no better than Nazi Germany or Bolshevik Russia.
But that's what's going away now.
That's what's being stolen from us.
That's what's being robbed from us.
And even if they don't succeed, even if Trump gets back on the ballot by defeating it at the Supreme Court, And he may.
And if he does, I mean, he's the only one that is capable of doing that because he's the only one with the both grassroots groundswell support and the money to actually mount defenses in every one of these states where this is done.
It's just, this is intolerable.
This cannot be allowed.
Of course they're doing it under the guise of saving democracy because they really can't help themselves.
They really have to go full or well every time.
When it's just obvious, this is just the exercise of illegitimate power.
They're accruing to themselves, and we'll get into just what the Democrats are willing to destroy in the pursuit of this power, to make an example out of Trump.
Yeah, Democrats are doing it this time, but the Republicans are complicit in this.
They've allowed this to go on the entire time.
They've done nothing equivalent in return.
There's been no tit-for-tat The only thing that's happened is finger-wagging and warning about the dangerous precedent this sets as if the Democrats are stupid, as if they think, as if the Democrats are going to sit there and go, God, gee, you know they're right.
If we do this, then what's to stop them from doing it to us?
Well, because they never do it to you, because nothing is ever done, even when the precedent is set.
See, they do things without the precedent being set.
They just do it. No precedent, no right.
Complete abject violation of not just our laws as written out verbatim by the letter of the law, but the spirit of the law as well.
The underlying principles are being just eviscerated, violated to an incomprehensible degree.
So they just do it without the president.
Then they set the precedent and Republicans still don't do anything.
Still don't pick up that precedent and then show them, you know, fulfill the threat.
So Democrats just routinely call the bluff of Republicans.
Go, you better not do those roles.
We might do it to you. Democrats go, no, you won't.
And they do it. And Republicans go, yeah, you're right.
We're not going to do it. Infuriating.
But that's how they're rigging the next election.
Right in front of us, out in the open.
Not even trying to hide it.
They're just doing it. But why wouldn't they?
They literally did it before.
And again, you don't have to speculate.
You can make, and we have, made the case for how the 2020 election was stolen in front of everybody's eyes in an obvious way through mail-in ballots, through The illegal implementation of so-called emergency measures that destroyed the ability for anybody to determine whether or not the election was stolen.
If you're just sending out mass numbers of ballots to anybody and have absolutely no method of determining whether or not a ballot is legitimate or not, but you just count all of them That's a stolen election.
The outcome of that election cannot be considered legitimate.
Even in the absence of hard proof that it was stolen, you can't say that it wasn't.
It is impossible to say that it wasn't stolen because of the things that they did out in the open.
Again, not speculation, just the laws that they passed, but they weren't actually laws and they didn't actually pass them.
Just the measures that they imposed on everybody.
That were blatantly unconstitutional, blatantly rigged the election.
And we'll go through a list here from Gateway Pundit.
It is a sizable one of just some of the election fraud that took place in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.
Again, none of it's speculation.
None of it having to do with internet servers in China or Italy.
Just the way that the Democrats, like they're doing right now in front of all of us by kicking Trump off the ballot.
During COVID, they simply, by fiat and without justification or precedent in law, rigged the election in front of everybody.
And they wrote articles about how they did it.
Someone needs to be punished for this.
unidentified
Music.
harrison smith
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the American Journal Infowars.com band.video.
This article from Gateway Pundit, details post by President Trump on Truth Social, where he laid out evidence of election fraud in the 2020 presidential election.
Just acknowledged, in fact, I'll read the statement from Trump because he goes over exactly where this information comes from, then we'll go over some of the more damning points of this article.
The article title is Wisconsin and Pennsylvania Highlights from Explosive Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States.
Earlier today, President Trump truthed out an all-exclusive summary report of the 2020 election in anomalies and discrepancies in the six key swing states.
Earlier today, the Gateway Pundit published an article highlighting some of the key takeaways from Georgia as well.
Donald Trump said this. Here they focus on Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.
The 32-page anonymous report can be found and read in its entirety at the bottom of the article.
The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin law in a 4-3 decision issued in July 2022.
Wow. But they did it, didn't they?
And it was always known to be illegal.
They always did it in an extra-legal fashion.
Nobody knew this. We talked about it at the time that it was happening.
But they just did it. Nobody stopped them.
Wisconsin Election Commissioner Megan Wolf unilaterally declared ballot drop boxes could be used to vote in the 2020 election, even though WEC's commissioners never voted to adopt this memo.
Again, you just get one person, get the election commissioner, just unilaterally just decide, just appropriate for themselves the power to universally change the electoral system in a way that was done haphazardly, just appropriate for themselves the power to universally change the electoral system in a way that was done haphazardly, without foresight or any sort of mechanism None of those things were done.
No discussion was had.
They just one day decided, yeah, we're going to have drop boxes.
Anybody can drop them off.
No voter ID clarification.
No law whatsoever that can guarantee that the votes being counted are the legitimate ones being cast.
It's nothing of the sort. They just did it.
They just did it. Okay.
Now this is speculation again.
None of it is. They just did it.
Right out in front of everybody.
In the city of Milwaukee, nearly half of its votes were cast by mail, totaling 217,424 ballots.
The city deployed 15 dropboxes, with election officials claiming that the dropboxes would be under 24-hour surveillance.
However, after the election, not a single municipality in the county produced video surveillance of dropboxes in response to open records requests.
Again, they just unilaterally say, yeah, dropboxes are going to be allowed now.
No, no voter, you know, you don't have to show up on the day of, you don't have to prove you're the one voting, you know, you don't have to prove that the ballot was even sent to you.
If you happen to find one in somebody else's mailbox and send it in, there's nothing we can do to confirm or reject that ballot.
So they'll just count it.
Insane, but that's what they did.
And the one thing that they said they were going to do, it would be like, well, but the Dropbox will be monitored.
We'll have surveillance. We'll make sure to surveil it constantly and make sure it's all legit.
Then they just didn't even do that.
Okay. In 2020, there was a surge of indefinitely confined votes in Wisconsin, resulting in 220,404 votes cast from individuals who were exempted from showing voter ID. Okay.
So in other words, you still have to show voter ID unless you were listed as indefinitely confined, which again is a carve-out.
It's an exception to the rules made for people in specific circumstances, circumstances in which they are indefinitely confined.
In other words, if they are immobile, they're in an iron lung or something, right?
If they are incapable of actually getting to the poll, right?
Then we have a little exception, a little carve-out.
In this rare circumstance, you don't have to show your voter ID. Then they decided that because of COVID, everyone was indefinitely confined, so nobody had to show voter ID. Once again, like they always do, they're taking these aspects of our free and open society that tries to have law with a heart,
tries to make laws in a way that takes into account Exemptions and circumstances outside of the norm.
Sort of the beauty of an open Western system.
The same thing they do with asylum, right?
You have this exemption, you have this carve-out, you have this very rare circumstance where, hey, look, if your government is hunting you because of your ethnicity, we can sort of scoot around the Immigration process for you.
Because it's an emergency. Because you'll die if we don't.
So, okay, we'll have this thing called asylum.
We'll have this thing called refugee status.
And it just means that you don't have to go through the process like normal people because of the threat against your life.
It's a good thing. It's a nice thing.
We get to be a safe haven for political dissidents around the world.
But then that's taken advantage of, and suddenly everybody's a refugee.
Suddenly everybody's indefinitely confined.
Suddenly everybody is taking advantage of this thing, which means either we have to not have the nice thing anymore, we have to not have these little carve-outs, not have these little exceptions, we have to rewrite the law to be brutal and unkind to people in unfair circumstances, or we just have to have a system that is openly taken advantage of and do nothing wrong.
And it goes through all the numbers, how the number of people who are considered indefinitely confined and don't have to provide an ID rose by nearly 400% in one county alone, 500% in another county, 300% in Milwaukee County, and 300% overall.
With 77% of the people listed as indefinitely confined, never having been listed as that before.
The Wisconsin Election Commission ordered nursing homes to violate the law by not allowing special voting deputies inside their facilities, which led to election fraud where incapacitated elderly residents had vote cast in their name with the assistance of nursing home staff, which actually led in counties Milwaukee, Dane, and Racine to 100% turnout in nursing homes.
They sent ballots by the dozens to nursing homes.
The people working at the nursing homes filled out those ballots and sent them in.
No guarantee at all that the people who they were voting on the behalf of actually wanted the vote cast in that way.
The Office of Special Counsel referenced this case and has evidence that this grantee That was funded by CTCL, was quote, directly involved in all aspects of management of election officials, was entrusted with the only set of physical keys to the city's central count location, managed the transportation of ballots, and instructed the counting of unlawful ballots that had arrived to the central count location beyond the lawful time window.
So this is talking about Michael Spritzer Rubenstein, a former Democratic Party operative who served as the de facto elections administrator and basically had total access to all of the absentee ballots before the election and had the choice as to whether or not to count those ballots.
And he decided pretty much arbitrarily to do so even if they were cast outside of the lawful window.
Meaning it was a violation of the law.
Meaning that the vote was rigged.
Meaning that the votes cast were not valid, were not legal, should not have been counted.
And the number of them shows they had a massive effect in the outcome of the nationwide election.
Folks, continuing on our...
Report of just how blatantly the election in 2020 was stolen.
Now they're doing it again in 2024.
In a more egregious degree.
In Wisconsin, you have not just drop boxes, which were illegal, being implemented without any security requirements, Protocols whatsoever to ensure that they weren't abused or facilitated voter fraud,
including a lie about it being surveilled and the drop boxes themselves were deemed illegal by the Supreme Court because obviously it's like to change the election laws, you have to go through the Wisconsin Election Commission.
Okay, well, did you do that? No.
All right, well, then it's illegal. The process is you take a vote, you debate it, you do it publicly, you implement it, making sure that there's guarantees and security, protocols that prevent exploitation of these new laws.
Instead, what they did was some lady said, actually, Dropboxes are cool now, and then that was it.
So you didn't do the process.
It's illegal. It's just really not that complicated at all.
But in addition to that, you had these supposedly indefinitely confined votes, which means that voter ID was not required, despite the fact that people who were indefinitely confined did not fit that description normally and, as one would expect, under the rules, but rather they were told to call themselves indefinitely confined in order to not provide voter ID. Literally.
Like, literal.
I'm not just saying. They actually told people, you don't want to provide your voter ID, call yourself indefinitely confined.
Because, you know, COVID. Okay.
But then in addition to that, you have this guy Michael Spritzer Rubenstein, a former Democratic Party operative who apparently was just the de facto elections administrator who had access to all Green Bay's absentee ballots days before the election.
He was directly involved in all aspects and management of the election officials, entrusted with the only set of physical keys to the city's central count location, managed the transportation of ballots, and instructed the counting of unlawful ballots that had arrived at the central count location beyond the lawful time window.
Again, how do you make changes to the election system?
You go through the election commission.
Did you do that? No, they just did it by fiat.
That's illegal. The ballots have to be counted, or they can only be counted if they arrived on or before election day.
But they went ahead and counted the ones that arrived after.
Totally illegal. They aren't allowed to do that, but they did, and they were counted.
And that election was certified.
That's what was being protested on January 6th.
Investigator Peter Breniger disclosed in a Senate hearing last month that the Executive Director of Elections in Milwaukee, Claire Wodalvog, not only returned to grab a USB stick left behind, leaving law enforcement suspicious, but also had a huge truckload of ballots arrive long after the polls were closed and while observers were forced out, similar to what happened in Fulton County, Georgia.
So once again...
We could, and you could investigate, and I guarantee you could prove that what was done when the election watchers, the poll watchers and observers were forced out, I guarantee if you were to actually investigate it, especially if you had a time machine, if you could actually go back and have a first-hand view as this was going on, you would definitely see fraud taking place.
Even absent that, you don't have to actually prove the fraud took place Because you can't.
Because that's what happens when you kick out the observers.
When you kick out the observers, none of those votes should be counted because you don't have observers there to say whether they're legitimate or not.
So just like they did in Fulton County, Georgia, kick out the observers.
They say, we're done counting. No more votes today.
You can go home. Observers go home.
They bring in a truckload of ballots and count them in the absence of observers.
You can't consider those legitimate, even if they are.
They can't be considered that because there was no one there to guarantee it.
And that's just Wisconsin. All six swing states where this happened, that we identified before the election even happened, is places where they would do something like this, have instances of very similar fraudulent activity.
Pennsylvania is another one detailed in this article.
Months after the election, there were 121,240 more votes than voters, according to the Pennsylvania Department of State.
By law, Pennsylvania cannot certify an election with this type of discrepancy.
120,000 more votes than voters, folks.
Need we say more?
Well, there's plenty more.
Republican lawmakers, led by State Representative Frank Ryan, were tracking the vote discrepancy in real time in the statewide uniform registry of electors, called the SURE system.
Ryan, a certified public accountant, initially reported that there were more than 170,000 votes.
More votes than voters in the presidential race, more than twice the margin of victory in Pennsylvania.
Quote, These numbers just don't add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania's presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error, the lawmakers said.
The Pennsylvania Department of State's office called this obvious misinformation while actually admitting that the only way to determine the number of voters who voted in November from the sure system is through the vote histories, which they said Philadelphia, Allegheny, and other counties had still not completed.
So it's an admission that the election was certified without ensuring the number of votes and voters matched in the Shure system.
So they come out saying, this is blatant misinformation.
It's like, really? So what's the real information?
They're like, well, we've never reported it.
Okay, so you have no idea whether this is accurate or not because you failed to do the things that you're legally required to do.
Pennsylvania credited 71,893 people for voting who returned mail-in ballots after Election Day, and these individuals were included in voter history files.
We've got 50,000 received between November 4th and 6th, 11,570 received between November 7th and 11th, 10,000 received on or after November 12th.
Nearly a week after the election was concluded, they were still accepting mail-in votes in total violation of the law.
The Secretary of State at the time, a man named Brookvar, claimed that only 10,000 ballots were received between the close of polls on Election Day and November 6th.
So, he must have underestimated that by, well, a good 500%.
And then, of course, that doesn't even include the ones after November 6th, of which there were also tens of thousands.
A lawsuit filed in Delaware County revealed video evidence of election officials discussing destroying election evidence from the November 2020 election.
It's a felony, one official says, after talking about the need to get rid of voting pads and second scanners.
Not to mention, USPS contracted trucker Jesse Morgan reported that his trailer disappeared while transporting 24 pallets of completed ballots from New York to Pennsylvania.
Estimates claim the 24 pallets could contain between 130,000 and 280,000 ballots.
But again, this is what happened, right?
They just completely violated every possible control in place to prevent election fraud.
You're supposed to have a chain of custody for all of the steps that a ballot passes through, and it was just violated as a matter of routine.
This guy's delivering a pallet of trucks, 130,000 ballots, delivering it, by the way, from one state to another.
That's illegal. And then his truck was just gone.
It was just like stolen. It was just disappeared.
Just all of those votes. Don't know where they went.
Don't know if they were counted. Don't know if they were legitimate.
It was just done. It was just done out in the open.
They have a whole other article about this on Gateway Pundit.
All in one place. President Trump truths out summary report on all swing states.
The Georgia highlights here.
Fulton County, Georgia, most populous county in the state, has no digital record of all person votes cast in original results.
Not a single ballot purportedly cast during the early in-person voting was witnessed to and signed off by poll managers as required by Georgia election rules.
Seals were broken and memory cards removed from tabulators for the results of these And it just goes on and on and on.
So not only do we have to...
Actually litigate this from 2020.
Of course, the challenges to a free and fair election in 2024 are even more massive and disturbing and illegal.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
We're going to go ahead and give out the phone number now if you would like to call in.
We'll be taking your calls throughout the final hour of today's broadcast.
The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539.
That's 1-877-789-2539.
Now taking your calls.
Still a lot to cover. We're just going to get into the invasion, some of the developments in Israel.
We are going to continue to talk about voter fraud in this segment.
Not just voter fraud, but election rigging in a variety of different ways.
But I want your calls about 2024.
What are going to be the big challenges and what do we need to be focusing on in 2024 to achieve victory?
This will be a decisive year for the fate of humanity.
How is our energy best employed?
That's the question I want you to answer.
1-877-789-2539.
Also, of course, help keep Infowars on air throughout this ultimately important year for the fate of the human race.
Go to Infowarsstore.com to keep us on the air and in the fight.
Again, we are just now breaking through The huge number of attacks we've been under the last few years.
Achieving victory at an unprecedented rate.
And we need your help to continue this fight.
Infowarsstore.com is how you provide that help with the mega super sale that's on now.
You're getting up to 60% off, plus double Patriot points and free shipping on just about every product in the store, including some new bombshell products and the old classics like Survival Shield X2. Which is so immensely popular and may very well be selling out soon.
Go now to InfoWarsStore.com to get a fantastic product.
It's down and out, or DNA Force Plus, or Vitamin D3 on huge discount, plus free shipping, double Patriot points.
It's the super mega sale at InfoWarsStore.com.
It'll only go on for a few more days.
So go now, get the massive discount, get the incredible product, and rest easy knowing that you are supporting InfoWarsStore.
The most despised outlet from the worst people in the world.
Now there is some good news here in terms of fighting back against voter fraud.
True the Vote wins intimidation case over Georgia voter challenges, and this is especially important in a video, you know, in relation to a video we're about to go to.
But here's the ruling yesterday.
A federal judge ruled Tuesday in favor of the conservative group True the Vote, deciding that mass challenges of Georgia's voter eligibility did not amount to illegal voter intimidation.
This is the attempt that they were making to essentially say that asking that votes be legitimate amounts to voter intimidation.
Saying people should have voter ID was somehow being construed or portrayed as a racist attempt to stop black people from voting.
Absurd, nonsense, ridiculous.
And that's been borne out by the results of this decision.
U.S. District Judge Steve Jones wrote in a 145-page order that there was insufficient evidence that True the Vote tried to threaten or coerce voters.
Jones' ruling is a defeat for Fair Fight Action, a voting rights group founded by Democrat Stacey Abrams that was the lead plaintiff in the case.
They alleged that True the Vote and its allies violated the Voting Rights Act when they challenged the eligibility of a quarter million Georgia votes before runoffs that decided control of the U.S. Senate in early 2021.
County election boards rejected the vast majority of the voter challenges.
Quote, not only have plaintiffs failed to overcome the fact that their actions did not result in any direct voter contact or alone include or direct county boards or elections to pursue eligibility inquiry, but there's no evidence that the defendant's actions caused or even attempted to cause any voter to be intimidated, coerced or threatened in voting. but there's no evidence that the defendant's actions caused or
Again, obviously, the founder of True the Vote, Catherine Engelbrecht, called the ruling, quote, a resounding vindication in an email to supporters, saying, quote, today's ruling sends a clear message to those who would attempt to control the course of our nation through lawfare and intimidation.
American citizens will not be silenced.
So that's some good news.
That's a moderate amount of good news.
And of course this whole attempt to stop True the Vote from trying to true the vote, trying to actually have...
A voting process that we can trust and rely on is being led by Mark Elias and the Biden Department of Justice.
A federal court in the Northern District of Georgia today affirmed that citizens have the right to lawfully petition their government in support of election integrity without fear of persecution or prosecution.
In a resounding vindication, TTV successfully defended its actions of December 2020, aiding Georgia citizens in filing elector challenges based on data showing over 364,000 voters appeared to be ineligible to vote due to change in residency.
So again, and that's what this was.
This is a good way to put it, this article from truthevote.com, saying that it's affirmed the rights of citizens to lawfully petition the government in support of election integrity, because that's what they're attempting to prevent you from doing.
That if you think that your election integrity is being violated, that the election is being run in an eligible and illegal way, they want you to think that by challenging the election system, by pointing out that it's being done illegally, you'll be charged with voter intimidation and punished, perhaps jailed, under the new safe laws or whatever, face laws.
These new laws they have in place, similar to the ones where you get arrested if you're protesting outside of an abortion clinic.
If you try to express your First Amendment right of petitioning the government for redress of grievances, you should not then be punished and condemned and charged with violating the Voter Rights Act.
It's ridiculous, but that's what they're doing.
Court rules absentee ballots with minor problems are okay to count.
Wisconsin election clerks can accept absentee ballots that contain minor errors, such as missing portions of witness addresses.
A court ruled Tuesday in a legal fight that has pitted conservatives against liberals in the battleground state.
Dane County Circuit Court ruled in favor of the League of Women Voters in Wisconsin in its lawsuit to clarify voting rights protections for voters who absentee ballots have minor errors in listing witnesses' addresses.
The ruling means that absentee ballots with certain technical and witness address defects will not be rejected in future elections, the League said.
Why should information on ballots be complete or accurate?
unidentified
it.
harrison smith
Just ridiculous. I mean, they're just, but again, they're just doing it.
They're just doing it.
And what is it, Matt? You pointed out to me that this also has to do with the signatures.
Matt stepped out, but this is a brand new article.
I haven't had time to read it because it was just delivered to me.
It just broke here. And I know it has, there's something to do with the signatures don't have to match either.
So we've got a positive development in Georgia where they say, yes, you are allowed to actually question the election without being condemned as violating the civil rights of your fellow Americans, but a negative outcome to this court ruling in Wisconsin where they basically say, yeah, your ballot doesn't have to be accurate or complete.
We'll be able to count it anyway.
Incredible. And of course, this is important when it comes to the Decisions being made by random women in Maine to kick Trump off the ballot.
We can go down to clip number six.
Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows explains why she blocked Trump from the primary ballot, and it all has to do with claims similar to the one that was just defeated in Georgia, claiming that somehow by...
Requesting a legitimate election process, you are violating the civil rights of Black people.
Makes no sense, but that was integral to her decision to removing Trump from the ballot.
unidentified
She explains here. I qualify Donald Trump for the ballot, but under main law, any registered voter can bring a challenge.
And that's, in fact, what happened.
There were three challenges.
One of those challenges was brought by two former Republican state senators and a former Democratic state senator.
And I was required by the law to hold a hearing within five days and then to issue a decision.
This is something that I did not choose to do, but that I was obligated to do under main law and the Constitution.
This is not a criminal matter, and Section 3 of the 14th Amendment does not require a conviction.
That definitely makes it a more complex and close question, as I acknowledged in my decision.
It was not a close call on the question of whether January 6, 2021 was an insurrection.
harrison smith
She's got to decide.
There's a different clip I want to show you where they talk about how this all started with the ACLU and the SPLC and the similar claims being made like the George outcome here.
But I guess that's the precedence now.
I guess we can just... Take that.
All right, well, there's no question to me that 2020 Black Lives Matter was an insurrection.
So I guess anybody that supported that is now guilty of aiding and abetting an insurrection and can be removed from the ballot.
I mean, I guess if there's no standard, if there's no actual thing you have to decide and provide evidence for your decision, they're just doing it.
unidentified
So let's just do it. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Third hour has begun. We'll go to your phone calls this hour.
harrison smith
Phone lines are already full up, so we'll go to those very shortly.
Let's keep talking about, again, one of the most egregious violations of the democratic process that America's ever seen.
A real, actual threat to the beloved and sacred democracy.
The leftists won't shut up about.
I have trouble believing that anybody would fall for this crap in their own lives.
I really have trouble believing that anybody's being fooled by this.
Like, I think they very clearly know exactly what's going on.
They have to, right?
They have to pretend like what they're doing is being done Upholding the sacred values of our democracy, and you saw in the last clip with the main Secretary of State saying, I didn't want to do this.
This wasn't my choice.
I was obligated to do it.
You look at her history, and it's just replete with the desire to get Donald Trump off the ballot.
It's like the article...
Published a few days ago on the 28th of December, John Bolton, quote, the West may have no option but to attack Iran.
Oh, really? Oh, they might have no option but to do the thing that you've wanted to do and talked about for years?
You expect us to not know that you have wanted this the whole time?
What I mean is that in your personal life, if you have somebody that you know wants to do something, In violation of your desires, right?
If you have somebody that wants to steal something from you or violate you in some way, and they just won't shut up about it, and they keep, like, they're obvious about their desires, and then something happens where they're like, well, I have no choice but to do this thing.
It's like, nobody would fall for this.
Nobody would fall for this in their personal lives.
Or you have somebody who is a democratic activist, Who routinely talks about wanting to get Trump off the ballot.
She works for the SPLC. She works for the ACLU. She conspires with other secretaries of state to get the right excuse to kick Trump off the ballot, which is what she obviously wanted the entire time.
You don't have to sit here and pretend like their excuses are valid.
You don't have to sit here and go, well, but she's just doing what she's obligated to do.
No, she's just doing what she wants to do.
And she's couching it and disguising it in the most thinly veiled excuse of saying that this is what the law prescribes.
It's not. They're just doing it.
Nobody's falling for this.
So the people on the other side of the aisle who are acting, or even on our side of the aisle, as she pointed out, there's two Republican state senators that helped to kickstart this process to remove Trump from the ballot.
They aren't sitting there going, well, he did do an insurrection, and so I guess this is just what happens.
They know exactly what they're doing.
It's just a will to power.
They're just doing it.
And there is no bottom to the depths that they will plunge in the pursuit of ultimate power.
I'll show you clips on the other side.
I've got two clips to show you in the next segment.
One of Secretary of State Bellows admitting that this is all being orchestrated by the ACLU and SPLC. And another showing what Democrats are willing to destroy in pursuit of this illegal disqualification of the lead presidential candidate for the Republicans.
There's nothing sacred to these people.
There's nothing that they're doing that is at odds with their desires because they're so honor-bound to their obligations of office.
They will destroy anything that gets in their way, up to and including the Supreme Court of the United States.
unidentified
All right, welcome back, folks.
harrison smith
Again, just to...
unidentified
Just to illustrate what a widespread...
harrison smith
You and me, we're up against.
I mean, they really are legion, and it really is astounding.
It's like awe-inspiring how well they've infiltrated every single process.
Corporate world, the academic world, the universities, the electoral systems at a state level, at a city level, at a county level, at the federal level.
It's just we are inundated.
With these people, these activists who are hell-bent on using whatever power they're able to accrue to themselves, which they don't earn legitimately, but is gifted to them, is that they are appointed to these positions by working their way up through the myriad of organizations,
governmental or otherwise, that exist to undermine and destroy the things that make us Strong and able to resist the move towards the totalitarian communistic control system that they desire.
It really is, well, Zero Hedge puts it, jarring.
It's jarring.
Colorado and Maine is just the start of the Trump ballot blocking.
Twenty states have suits in progress.
They say as jarring as it's been to witness the anti-democratic one-two punch in which a court in Colorado and an unelected bureaucrat in Maine decided Donald Trump cannot appear on the primary election ballots.
There are many more states where litigation is underway to ban the candidate who's currently leading the national race.
In addition to Colorado and Maine, there are currently active lawsuits challenging Trump's eligibility in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Louisiana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.
According to a New York Times survey of the situation.
unidentified
Hmm.
Hmm.
harrison smith
you you And as you heard the Secretary of State say, They're just deciding, yeah, January 6th was totally an insurrection.
It was totally Donald Trump's fault.
He therefore is disqualified under this 200-year-old rule that was written explicitly to prevent enemy generals from being appointed.
Like, none of it even makes sense.
I mean, it's so far outside of the bounds and restrictions and...
Intention of this law in the first place, the insurrection rule, that rule isn't even for elected officials.
It explicitly was there to prevent appointments by the president of people who had actively participated in the civil war against the United States government.
So it wasn't even there.
It's not even written to stop people from being on the ballot.
You can still elect whoever you want.
It was never a rule.
There was never a law written that said if you participate in the insurrection, you can't be elected.
You can't be on a ballot.
It's written, say, appointments.
Appointments can't be made of Confederate generals.
By a president of the United States.
Just completely, they're just taking a vague law from 200 years ago with a specific intent and purpose, just deciding it applies to January 6th unilaterally, and deciding it applies to presidential ballots, despite it not having anything to do with that.
So they're just doing it. Again, it's just like...
It's like, okay, I mean, they're just...
It identifies as an insurrection.
It's not an insurrection, but they've identified it as one, so it is one now.
It's really up to Republicans at this point to just do the same thing.
We just got to do the same thing.
I mean, they're not going to stop doing this.
They're not going to be punished for doing this.
They're not going to pay any price for this abject violation of the spirit and the letter of the law.
In an absence of them being held to account and punished for this as a way to prevent this type of manipulation and anti-democratic activity in the future, if this is just going to be how it is, then I guess it's just how it is.
I guess now maybe the Texas Secretary of State can just say, well, I think that the mail-in ballots represents an insurrection.
I think that the Black Lives Matter riots represents an insurrection.
Joe Biden said he liked those, so he's now participated in insurrection.
He's now removed from the ballot.
I mean, why not, right? If we just had a Republican Party that just even remotely fought to the degree that Democrats do, none of this would be an issue at this point.
Let me play these two videos so I can get to your calls.
The first is the Zoom call where Secretary of State Bellows admits This is all started and organized and initially instituted by the SPLC and the ACLU. And again, they reference claims of voter intimidation that, as of yesterday, have been thoroughly destroyed in court.
But it doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter if any of it's true.
They're just doing it. So, like, just none of it matters.
It doesn't matter. Let's go now to clip number eight.
unidentified
What are your thoughts on our biggest threats facing our democracy at this point in time?
Well, what Secretary Griswold just said and named is something that was unimaginable two years ago or ten years ago, and that is election sabotage.
It is a crystal clear example of what's happening all across the country.
So we need to organize to make sure we have better leaders in positions of power to fight back against that.
Secretary Benson talked about voter suppression, and that's something that when we started our careers at the ACLU and Southern Poverty Law Center, It's fighting back about systematic, structural voter oppression, targeting specifically Black and brown voters.
It's rooted in white supremacy.
That is something we have to continue to do work on.
And Secretary Merrill talked about the For the People Act and the Freedom to Vote Act.
We must have federal standards all across the country.
And then finally, just to echo my colleagues, this is rooted in a deliberate and organized campaign To discourage people from participating in our democracy.
It is an attack on our very democracy itself.
Because when everyone participates, everything that we care about, social justice, climate justice, economic justice, we win.
Those on the other side are trying to discourage people from participating.
That's what this really is about.
We have to fight back to protect our democracy, to protect everything.
harrison smith
That's such a good point.
Oh my god, such a good point.
So there's, you know, when we all got our start at the SPLC and ACLU, right?
This is a...
I mean, it's just evidence of the infiltration.
How thoroughly infiltrated our entire system is by these types of groups who champion causes that are completely invalid.
Like the suggestion that requiring voter ID somehow disenfranchises black people.
It just makes no sense, but this is what motivates these people, these ridiculous lies.
And of course, You know, it just contributes to, like this New York Post, main Democrat who booted Trump from ballot met with Biden, called Electoral College white supremacy.
You know, she's just like anti-Trump, Biden partisan, calls the Electoral College white supremacy, calls voter ID white supremacy.
She's an extremist who's primarily motivated in disenfranchising white Americans and destroying the ability of Donald Trump to be elected president.
That's what she's doing.
There's no confusion or Vagery about this.
Just obvious. She's just doing it.
She's doing what she's wanted to do the entire time, and she's couching it under whatever legal machinations that she can summon.
But of course, he's appealing that to the main Superior Court, and it may very well go to the Supreme Court, as is happening with the case in Colorado.
But what happens if the Supreme Court decides with Trump?
Well, let's go to clip number one.
We'll have to go to that on the other side, because it's a little bit longer.
Spoiler alert, they'll destroy the Supreme Court.
They're going to destroy the Supreme Court.
We'll come back in with the clip, but it's Jamie Raskin basically saying that if the Supreme Court doesn't side with us, then we'll destroy it.
If the Supreme Court doesn't justify and allow and Give credence to their attempts to unlawfully, by fiat, unilaterally removing Trump from the ballot.
They don't go along with that.
The Democrats will pack and or destroy the Supreme Court.
They'll impeach sitting Supreme Court justices.
Again, nothing, nothing is sacred to these people.
jamie raskin
Nothing. Well, finally, the Supreme Court has developed what they're describing as a code of ethics.
It's not binding in the sense that they're not going to anyone else.
They could have gone to, for example, circuit court justices.
You could have had state Supreme Court justices on a panel.
They're deciding for themselves, again, whether they're in violation of their code of ethics.
But I think anybody looking at this in any kind of dispassionate, reasonable way would say, if your wife was involved in the big lie and claiming that Donald Trump had actually won the presidential election and had been agitating for that and participating in the events leading up to January 6th, that you shouldn't be participating in...
So he should recuse himself.
He absolutely should recuse himself.
The question is, what do we do if he doesn't recuse himself?
harrison smith
And of course, the implication there is nothing's off the table.
They'll destroy the Supreme Court just as quickly as they destroyed the electoral system.
Whatever stands in their way to power has to be eliminated.
There's the... Statement that Clarence Thomas must recuse himself from ruling on Trump's 2024 eligibility because obviously if your wife participates in a constitutionally protected activity, if your wife thinks that the election wasn't legitimate, I guess you can't be on the Supreme Court anymore.
What? These people are going to stop at nothing.
There is no limit to To their activities, right?
There's nothing where they're like, well, we played a good game, but at the end of the day, the Supreme Court's the Supreme Court and they can make the decision.
No, no. If they can't win in the election, they'll rig the election.
If they can't rig the election, they'll just disqualify your candidate from the ballot.
If they can't disqualify your candidate from the ballot because of the Supreme Court, then they'll destroy the Supreme Court.
Nothing... It's going to stop these people internally.
They have to be stopped.
There has to be action taken against the people that are as we speak and in the open and in front of all of us attempting to deconstruct our entire governmental system in an open actual insurrection taking place as they usurp power that is not theirs constitutionally.
As they make laws without the authority to do so, they're dismantling every process that limits their power one by one.
And unless we stop them, they're just going to keep going.
Because there's nothing in them, there's no internal reality to their claims of our sacred democracy and the, you know, Importance of hearing every person's voice.
They don't care.
They don't care. They don't care at all.
They could not care less.
If it prevents them from exercising illegitimate power, then they're going to destroy it.
We have to stop them.
And it's as simple as that.
So how do we stop them?
That was my question for you.
And we put out the phone number.
We've got a lot of calls. We'll go first to people that want to answer that question.
Line number 122 in Wisconsin has an answer as to where our energy is best spent in the next year.
Go ahead, 22, you're on the air. Hey, Harrison.
matt in wisconsin
I usually like talking about the esoteric stuff, the spiritual stuff.
That stuff matters a lot. But I think this year, especially after J6, we need to have more boots on the ground.
And here in Milwaukee, they're having the RNC. And I'm really concerned about my hometown city getting in trouble, like Kenosha or last events.
You know, the DNC is the month after in Chirac.
icarus in wisconsin
Then the month before in July is the RNC in Kilwaukee.
max in wisconsin
And, like, I'm worried that the people from Chicago and stuff there are all going to get trucked in.
icarus in wisconsin
And before, when they had the DNC, they were already filling up the campsite in Milwaukee area for a while.
max in wisconsin
And I think it's going to be a...
matt in wisconsin
Pretty, like, wild time over here.
And I just hope a lot of people, a lot of patriots come and have a good time and be peaceful.
And I'd really like to see a lot of, like, a debate-a-thon.
icarus in wisconsin
Like, a bunch of tables set up with different topics and people from both sides debating with, like, live streams.
matt in wisconsin
And, like, people can vote on the chat to, like, get a new person or boot someone off if they're not talking good topics or interesting topics.
icarus in wisconsin
Thought it would be, like...
Pretty interesting. Also, maybe get some headway politically, you know, instead of just pundits talking, you know, have normal people discussing hot issues like abortion.
And then you were talking about the rigging that happened here in Wisconsin.
There's a video I can't find anymore of that lady coming in with the thumbstick downtown.
matt in wisconsin
And if you're a local, there's like multiple entrances into the courthouse and downtown courthouse building.
icarus in wisconsin
And they purposely use this sketchy tunnel.
That never has parking.
matt in wisconsin
So they kind of got busted trying to go into the tunnel.
icarus in wisconsin
And it like literally goes like under the courthouse.
matt in wisconsin
And it was a bizarre video because she's like, as she's carrying in rigging the election, she's like, I'm doing this for the transparency of the election process.
icarus in wisconsin
It's like the middle of the night and you're creeping in with masked goons into a tunnel under the courthouse.
matt in wisconsin
So I can't find that video anymore if you can find that.
icarus in wisconsin
I'd be interested to see that because I think that's one of the things Trump was referencing there.
harrison smith
We'll have to look for that video.
I don't remember that one myself, but I certainly believe it exists, and it's no surprise that it's hard to find.
I want to get to more calls, but I appreciate your overall point, which is more feet on the ground, more people in the real world getting involved, having discussions.
I mean, we really do need a reinvigoration of 2016.
Again, you want to get to the conspiracy theory.
Why do you think COVID-19 locked down the world just during the months of the presidential election in 2020.
They didn't want a repeat of 2016 where you had crowds of people actually engaging in the real world.
You had the birth of powerful people Political activists like Owen Schroer going out and getting involved and speaking their minds on the street and going viral on video and then making a career out of it.
Like, that's what they want to prevent.
That's why they wanted everybody locked down throughout 2020, 2024.
Either they're going to have to come up with a reason to lock everybody down again, or we're going to need people on the ground doing what we did in 2016, which is when the election, shift the culture, change the discussion.
And dominate. Let's go now to...
Thank you for the call, 22. Let's go to Bruce in California.
What's your strategy for 24, Bruce?
unidentified
Oh, boy. You've got a tall order for us tonight here, man.
Great show, by the way.
Buy the product, everybody.
Stay focused.
Let's focus locally like the previous caller was doing.
Here in California, 10 miles outside of L.A., You want to focus on how to stop them in boots on the ground?
Go to the city council meetings and start exposing the corruption in their little non-profits where they come in there and they dish out this general fund money to their friends.
Cut off their money. Secondly, go to planning commission meetings.
Those are usually a week prior to the city council meetings and that's where you'll get the permits and codes and building codes so you can then bring up ESGs We're good to go.
Voter fraud? Because they're the ones that handle the election information.
harrison smith
We've got to get involved locally, whether it's going to planning meetings or going to the precinct meetings, becoming precinct chairs, and helping to guide the Republican Party's movements.
We need to be involved locally.
We need a mass number of people.
If everybody listening to me got involved right now, the change that we could rot would be unimaginable.
Alright folks, you can support the American Journal, The War Room, The Alex Jones Show, Band.Video, all the great content creators we have there, in addition to the incredible articles and writers we have at Infowars.com.
All of that is brought to you by Infowarsstore.com.
We have a new product.
I haven't been able to try this yet, but I plan on it, and it'll be a great way to...
Help you to fulfill your New Year's resolutions.
Take your New Year to the next level with Next Level Foundational Energy from Dr.
Jones' Naturals. It's called Next Level Foundational Energy from Dr.
Jones' Naturals, a cutting edge dietary supplement designed to elevate your energy levels and support your overall well-being.
Unleash the power of L-methylfolate and a potent vitamin B complex to give your body the essential nutrients it needs for optimal performance.
It's exclusively available at Infowarsstore.com.
It's being introduced with the introductory discount of 30% off, plus you're getting the free shipping and double Patriot points as part of the mega sale.
So say goodbye to energy crashes and welcomed the sustained vitality throughout the day with our combination of L-methylfolate and B vitamins.
There's B vitamin complex, the L-methylfolate boost, and it gives you really fantastic mood and cognitive support.
And of course, we prioritize the bioavailability of our ingredients to ensure that you receive the full spectrum of benefits from each component, maximizing the impact on your energy levels.
Take the first step towards a more energized and vibrant life with the next level foundational energy at Infowarsstore.com today.
With that, out to your phone calls.
Patty from Boston has called in about, as he puts it, the idiot at Harvard.
The plagiarist Patty?
She was wrapped up in a plagiarism scandal.
Patty, don't you know it was about plagiarism?
She was kicked out for plagiarism.
patty in boston
Right, right. Well, so we could kick her out for plagiarism.
We could kick her out for anti-Semitism.
We could kick her out for just general ignorance.
But yeah, you take your pick.
The point I want to make is that she should not have been allowed to resign.
She should have just been canned.
You know what I mean? Just fire her.
And you do it publicly and you say, we fired her because she tolerated anti-Semitism.
We fired her because she engaged in plagiarism.
We fired her for any number of reasons.
Reasons that she's given us in public lately.
But you don't get to resign.
And that's the problem I have with it.
But the thing that I think is really funny about the whole situation is that pretty much every right-wing broadcast yesterday and today and for the next week or whatever is going to talk about how this is an outrage at Harvard and all that stuff.
I don't think that right-wingers get to have an opinion on academia until they take an even passing interest Like, you can't complain about who runs Harvard until you're smart enough to get into Harvard.
And most conservatives just aren't.
And that's the reality.
That's why there are no conservative professors at Harvard or Yale, because you're all too, frankly, dumb.
Like, it just doesn't—you don't even care about academia.
You know what? Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and Alex Jones all have in common?
They all dropped out of college.
Until you guys do something radical, like, I don't know, graduate, maybe you don't get to have an opinion on who runs Harvard.
harrison smith
Yeah, I mean, you know, how much better would our lives be if we'd subjected ourselves to four years of anti-American, communistic indoctrination?
We're really missing out, aren't we?
We're not smart enough to understand white people bad, and slavery still determines the income of black people in the United States.
I mean, the problem with academia, I mean, honestly...
It's just a shame.
It's just a damn shame what's happened to the university system throughout America, especially in the Ivy Leagues, because we're not accepting people on the basis of merit.
We're not getting the best and brightest and smartest.
It's people who check certain boxes.
It's people who fulfill certain ethnic requirements or whatever.
I mean... You know, I would love to see universities that pumped out high-quality engineers and doctors, but instead you've got, I mean, just to...
Just to completely obliterate everything you're saying, Patty, my sister is actually in Harvard Medical School and would routinely discuss the absurdities she was being subjected to in the education system, where they are actually going into, you know, you would think like out of anything, the medical industry would be one thing you'd go, hey, let's not let this become infiltrated and poisoned by the race Critical race theory nonsense because it's a matter of life and death.
But no, it's very much inundated with topics of white privilege and how the medical industry can be a useful tool in bringing about equity of outcome.
I mean, it's a poisonous infiltration that's taken on.
It's truly toxic, Patty.
And, I mean, if you care about Harvard and Stanford and all of the Ivy League schools, this should be something that you're very concerned about.
patty in boston
Stanford is not an Ivy League school, first of all.
harrison smith
Well, whatever.
The high-level, you know, whatever.
Yeah, Dartmouth and Brown.
Okay, whatever. The high-level old-school universities that were all pretty much initially established as, like, religious institutions whose charter and original intent was very much conservative, and yet it's been infiltrated and subverted, and now it doesn't matter if you're, you know, get a perfect score on your SAT and have a 4.5 GPA in high school and have every extracurricular under the sun.
If you're a white guy, You're probably not getting in.
It's not because you're stupid.
It's because the university is stupid and poisonous.
But I appreciate your insulting call, Patty, calling us dumb.
patty in boston
I appreciate the fact that you take an insulting call and don't get all bent out of shape about it.
You're a good dude, Harrison.
harrison smith
You know, if anything you said had even a remote shimmer of truth, I might be insulted, but I do not get insulted at lies and deception.
So thank you for the call.
Let's go to Mike in Chicago now, because you also want to talk about Claudine Gay and From the River to the Sea.
Go ahead, Mike, you're on the air. Yeah, geez, I don't know how to follow up with that.
unidentified
I mean, come on. First off, Great to have you back, Harrison.
Your show's excellent. You know, none of these people in the media, government, or academia actually care about us, you know?
If I was making the sheets they're trying to pull over all our eyes, I'd put Mike Lindell out of business.
I mean, from the river to the sea, it's mockery.
I mean, they don't care. They hate the Jews.
They hate everyone who isn't, you know, aligned ideologically with them.
So, you know, they justify rape, death, and, you know, they're totally happy doing that.
harrison smith
Of course. I mean, where do you think, you know, so many of these ideas are coming from?
unidentified
You know, he wants to align with these people and say, hey, yeah, they're great conservatives.
They're the bad ones. They're stupid.
harrison smith
He's got it, Stoney.
I mean, you know, we're dumb.
We're all dumb over here.
We just don't get the highfalutin, big thinking of the city folk.
No, these people are just poisonous scoundrels that destroy everything with their ideological bent.
And it's up to us to stop them and not be cowed by their claims of racism or hate or anything like that.
Especially just looking at it on a...
Even playing field. Really, all we want is an even playing field.
All we want is for academic institutions to value academics above everything else.
All we want is for the politicians that we elect to do the things we elected them to.
It's not complicated what we want.
We don't necessarily want all of these institutions to serve us at the expense of everybody else.
Just do the thing you're supposed to do.
If you're a university, educate your students.
Students to be the best adults, human beings, positive contributors to society that you can be.
But instead, they're churning out just ugliness and vitriol and hatred and division.
And really, if anybody has a sibling or a kid that's gone to university in the last decade, you've seen how rapidly the poison infects the minds of young people.
I mean, people go to school and they start out You know, in August, as bright-eyed, bushy-tailed freshmen, and by Thanksgiving break, they're radical, tattooed, you know, chopped their hair off and changed their gender, and it's just like the brainwashing that takes place at the universities...
There's one positive outcome.
It's how powerful these institutions are and who's controlling them and how they control them through their gifts and benefits and the money that they spend to explicitly design the curriculum to their desire.
unidentified
Look at that. Russ Daniels on Twitter.
harrison smith
Education does not equal intelligence.
There's only a small fraction of Dems that reach a higher level of education.
The majority of educated people are, in fact, Republican.
Only in the post-graduate realm where the Democrats outnumber Republicans in terms of academic attainment.
And I would like to see that broken down more into...
Postgraduate studies that are required by like medical or legal professions and ones that are just because the leftist has no actual ability to contribute to a functional society except to live as permanent students studying things that never have any impact on anybody.
I wonder. With that, we go out to your phone calls.
Tim from Seattle wants to talk about what to do in 2024.
Thanks, Colin. And Tim, you're on the air.
tim in seattle
How's it going, Harrison? Happy New Year.
Happy New Year. America, the best thing to do is not be Patty from Boston.
To actually have hope and legitimacy in this effort.
Because, you know, it's going to be a police state with autonomous robots, space lasers, zapping people.
If culture can't figure out how to Make connections with our neighbors.
So I've developed this kind of concept called the Million Town March.
And I've, like, the last weekend, a few of us, we went to grocery stores with signs talking about the inflation rate, talking about how bad their pocketbook has been hit in the economy.
And we're just trying to build bridges between the political discussion because there's a lot of things that Americans can discuss and talk about without politics at all.
So I encourage everybody to try to do that.
Be on the streets, go to your city councils, go to every single meeting you possibly can that is organized by the state announced, and then make sure that your outrage is heard, because they're not caring.
If you think that they're going to come to their senses, they're not.
They're going to continue with the democide until it's over with, or until we stop them, until we give them enough consideration to put everything on pause, regroup, and then possibly humanity has a chance.
But if we're silent and not being in the streets, we're effed.
harrison smith
100%. I like that.
The Million Town March.
You need a website or something, Tim, that we can point people to.
tim in seattle
I have a website.
I did a website. With all people living in obscurity, it's kind of hard to get traction.
But there's a website, milliontownmarch.com.
It should be still up.
You can register your town.
You can participate. There's all kinds of chats and forums and stuff like that.
But people really need to take this into heart because we're constantly, day after day, Begging the Lord for solutions.
Like, what can we do? What can we do?
Give us strength. Give us strength.
Well, God already gave us strength.
He already gave us the know-how.
He already gave us the knowledge. And all we have to do is just have the conviction to follow it.
harrison smith
100%. Thanks for the call.
As always, Tim, Million Town March.
I'm for it. And we really do need to activate Everywhere, right?
I mean, if there's 10 people in your town, that's 10 people more than your enemies if you're organizing and collaborating and working towards making a difference.
Do not underestimate what you can achieve, especially if you can then bring other people in, and it'll really be a snowball effect.
You bring in ten people, they bring in ten people, suddenly you've got a hundred, suddenly you've got a thousand, suddenly you're changing the world.
I mean, that really is how it needs to work.
And hopefully InfoWars can help sort of lead the charge on that as, again, we've been so battered down by all the strife and struggles and trials we've been through.
We haven't been able to be on the forefront of on-the-street activism, but we're looking to change that in 2024 and reclaim our place not just as readers of the news, but as activists who help to put into motion campaigns to change what we read in the news, to counter the lies of the news, not just discuss it.
I look forward to more of that in 2024, and I look forward to Tim's actions as well.
Let's go to No Spike Mike in the Ozarks.
I want to talk about the judiciary.
Go ahead, Mike, you're on the air.
unidentified
Hello, Harrison. How are you?
Good, thank you. I wanted to talk just a minute about the judiciary and the warning that Thomas Jefferson gave us about 250 years ago.
He already knew that it was going to be an issue.
One of the things he said was the judiciary of the United States is the only subtle core of sappers and miners constantly working underground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric.
And actually, I read this out of the book that I got from Infowars, The Citizen's Rulebook.
And I was talking to your screener earlier, and he said maybe that those would be available again for us to begin to hand out.
Because I can tell you, often I'm running into people that really don't understand what their rights are.
It's not being taught in school anymore.
I taught in the public schools for 21 and a half years.
I've been retired now, oh, about eight years.
I'm still fairly young, 56.
But anyway, I know for a fact what they have been teaching in public schools, and it's not about our country, and it is not about the Constitution.
And what little there is of that education, of course, it is bent toward multiculturalism, blah, blah, blah, go down the list, as you have outlined often.
harrison smith
Yeah, and again, it's not even necessarily about enumerating the rights that are guaranteed in the Constitution.
The real problem is lack of understanding as to why those rights are even important.
And that's the thing. You could say, you know, we are guaranteed privacy, but...
Nobody cares if nobody even understands why privacy would be a thing that you would want in the first place.
I mean, that's how you get people saying, well, you got nothing to hide.
You shouldn't care about the violation of your privacy.
It's like, if you don't even know why you have the rights that you have, how are you going to uphold them?
And whether it's privacy or free speech or the ability to vote or anything of the sort, you need to actually understand the foundational ethics and morality that undergird our system In order to even understand the value our system provides in the first place.
Thank you so much for the call. No spike, Mike.
Let's go to Flex in Washington.
You want to talk about, again, the academic world.
Go ahead, Flex. You're on the air.
unidentified
Dude! Harrison, what's up, Holmes?
Hey, man. Holy cow.
What a year. Dude, deployed bodies.
Last I talked to Owen, man, he told me about the nerve renew.
That's bitchin' brain force.
And the... I don't know.
I wrote it too small. Hey, man, the CRT, dude, it went in a different direction, but they brought that up, dude.
And that... I'd rather talk about the border, dude.
You guys are killing it with this.
And I'll just go with that.
We'll go with the CRT thing here in a minute.
But with the border, dude, with China and Islam coming through...
And I heard about the sleeper cells, and people were talking about it, man.
And it's devastating, but Alex pinpointed on something geniuses.
Yes, it'll pop off if and when.
And we've talked for years, man.
You, I mean, everybody and everybody else on the crew, I mean, but 2016, if we remember, dude, those caravans, that's the same thing that you and...
All of that is being pushed over the same thing in Tommy Robinson's era.
Same exact thing. Now, with when it comes to When it comes to what's happening with Islam coming up, and a lot of the callers, man, you hear that sweetheart, and you want to tell them, don't worry about the idea of falling of America.
There's plenty of us guys going all the way back to the Bush and the Desert Storm eras.
I watched Obama come in during my second tour, but there are plenty of skeleton crews here in America.
And this is when it comes down to the CRT thing.
And I hate this. I hate this.
As a Christian, you've said it many times.
Like, somebody calls in and says something about the Jews.
I don't care what you look like.
Dude, you're nerdy. I'm cool looking.
I don't care. Who cares?
Who cares? You know what I mean?
I'd rather talk to somebody.
harrison smith
I think I get what you're saying.
Look, I haven't really covered the invasion as much as I planned to.
Today, we'll have to make up for that.
Tomorrow, a part of me is just like...
It's just like it's still happening.
The border's still open. They're still making ridiculous excuses.
I got videos of Alejandro Mayorkas blaming climate change.
He's blaming the Trump or the Texas Greg Abbott administration for the border being open.
It's just like... At a certain point, it almost feels like I'm complicit in even talking about it because it's so ridiculous.
It's so outrageous.
The matter is simple and it's the same as it's been since Joe Biden was elected.
The border is wide open.
The invasion is being funded by our government in cooperation with non-government or super governmental organizations like the UN and a variety of consortium of NGOs.
They're flooding America to the tune of 300,000 people a month.
They're setting records every single month.
Millions upon millions upon millions upon millions have crossed since Joe Biden got into office and opened up the border.
We have to stop them.
What more is there to say?
We have to stop them. We have to shut the border.
We have to impeach and imprison the people that have so treasonously opened our country to invasion.
And I'll just keep saying that until it happens.
There's not much more to say beyond it.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
Infowars.com forward slash show.
alex jones
Please listen to me very carefully.
If you don't have enough vitamin D3 in your body, which particularly happens in the winter months because sun and your skin produce vitamin D3 naturally, If you don't have enough vitamin D in your body, you will get viral infections and the viruses will replicate in your body.
That's the number one cause of viral infection and viral replication and illness.
Vitamin D3 is so incredibly important.
We have the highest quality organic vitamin D3 back in stock winter sun for 40% off with free shipping and double Patriot points for the new year.
So this 2024 Do the right thing.
Protect yourself. Protect your family.
Get Winter Sun at InfoWarsStore.com.
And then more importantly, take it.
It's the highest quality.
Winter Sun, 40% off.
Free shipping. Double Patriot points.
InfoWarsStore.com.
But whatever you do, get vitamin D3 organic and take it.
Vitamin D3 is beyond critical.
Export Selection