Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
freedom of information act | |
| results have shown that the american college of obstetricians and gynecologists knew that the mrna injections were commonly fatal to babies in the womb And $11 million was spent to bribe OBGYNs to lie to pregnant women about the safety of the injections and convince them to get the shot. | ||
| U.S. nursing home data clearly shows that the mRNA shots were killing the elderly. | ||
| The mRNA shots are now causing cancer. | ||
| The CDC admits at least 118,000 children have died suddenly in the USA since the rollout of the mRNA COVID vaccines. | ||
| The actual count is likely much higher, and that was reported a year ago. | ||
| Nothing has really changed. | ||
| The historical mass murder continues, and the perpetrators remain free, pushing for round two and winning the Nobel Peace Prize. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Their discovery led to a monumental medical breakthrough, but even they were surprised when they learned today they're receiving one of the world's most prestigious awards. | |
| The Nobel Prize in Medicine, the last thing a pair of scientists expected when the phone rang at 3.40 this morning. | ||
| My husband picked up and he was talking to somebody and then he just handed over and said, this is for you. | ||
| Did you believe it at first? | ||
| Not really, you know, because, you know, people can make jokes. | ||
| I also thought it was a prank or an anti-vaxx joke or something. | ||
| This has to be a prank. | ||
| Some anti-vaxxer is, you know, playing with us and, you know, this can't be real. | ||
| We wait and the press conference starts and it was real. | ||
| We couldn't get funding. | ||
| We couldn't get publications. | ||
| We couldn't get, really, people to notice RNA as something interesting. | ||
| It had failed clinical trials, and pretty much everybody gave up on it. | ||
| I mean, everybody was skeptical. | ||
| We didn't care. Katie and I certainly didn't go into science for money or for awards. | ||
| We did it because of interest and curiosity. | ||
| We've got clinical trials for seven vaccines going on right now. | ||
| We've got work on cancer vaccines, vaccines for autoimmune diseases, for allergies. | ||
| We've got gene therapy moving into clinical development. | ||
| We've got a variety of therapeutics. | ||
| So, you know, it's already been going on for many years, and this has just given RNA the recognition. | ||
| Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. | ||
| That's the latest from Greg Reese Nobel Peace Prize for a shot that killed over 100,000 American children. | ||
| Isn't that something else? | ||
| Isn't that just crazy? | ||
| Honestly, it's... | ||
| I think it's time for Nuremberg 2.0. | ||
| I think it's time. I think we have enough evidence. | ||
| I think there's enough proof out there. | ||
| I think 120,000 dead children is enough for us to say, yeah, maybe this wasn't such a great idea. | ||
| Maybe it was in fact a giant mass murder plot. | ||
| And now they're giving each other Nobel Prizes. | ||
| It's all wonderful. This is the American Journal, Infowars.com. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com is where you go to support us. | ||
| We have a lot of videos to get to today. | ||
| I'll try to get to as many videos as possible in the first hour. | ||
| Your call is in the second hour. | ||
| Then we'll be joined by reporter in the field, Simon from Florida, in the third hour to talk about some of the latest developments out of China as they seem to be making major positive moves in their Erection of a new world order. | ||
| A new, new world order. | ||
| The NNWO. Is it a good thing? | ||
| Is it a bad thing? We'll discuss with Simon and figure all that out. | ||
| We'll take your calls throughout the show as well. | ||
| Stay tuned. We'll do the Daily Dispatch on the other side. | ||
| A lot of news today. | ||
| A lot of news to get into today. | ||
| We'll get to as much of it as possible. | ||
| Pretty funny videos too. | ||
| We'll start off with some mocking Biden in the old traditional way. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stay with us. It's Thursday, October 5th, dear by Lord, 2023. | |
| And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to The American Journal. I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| I really do have so many videos to get to today, and I'm going to try to get to as many as humanly possible. | ||
| Let's not waste any time. Let's just get into it. | ||
| Here it is, your daily dispatch. | ||
| All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Thursday, the 5th of October, 2023. | ||
| From Newsweek exclusive, Donald Trump followers targeted by FBI as 2024 electioneers. | ||
| The federal government believes the threat of violence and major civil disturbances around the 2024 U.S. presidential election is so great that it's quietly created a new category of extremists that it seeks to track and counter. | ||
| Donald Trump's army of MAGA followers. | ||
| Just going to let that sink in for a second. | ||
| So the FBI has created a category of domestic terrorists that is simply Republicans. | ||
| It's people that support the former president of the United States. | ||
| Of course, because of the, what do they say, widespread threat of violence and major civil disturbances. | ||
| I mean, can you imagine if you had, like, tens of thousands of people on the streets of every major city just running rampant and committing violence, causing chaos, burning down whole buildings? | ||
| I mean, something like that happened. | ||
| It would clearly come out of the ranks of the MAGA Americans, right? | ||
| I don't even want to call this absurd because it's not absurd. | ||
| It's deliberately provocative. | ||
| It's deliberately... The challenge for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the primary federal agent charged with law enforcement, is to pursue and prevent what it calls domestic terrorism without direct reference to political parties or affiliations, even though the vast majority of its current anti-government investigations are of Trump supporters, according to classified data obtained by Newsweek. | ||
| The current FBI official says the FBI is in an almost impossible position. | ||
| Says one current FBI official who requested anonymity to discuss sensitive material internal matters. | ||
| The official said that the FBI is intent on stopping domestic terrorism in any repeat of the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol. | ||
| But the Bureau also must preserve the constitutional right of all Americans to campaign, speak freely, and protest the government. | ||
| By focusing on former President Trump and his MAGA supporters, the official said, the Bureau runs the risk of provoking the very anti-government activists that the terrorism agency hopes to counter. | ||
| Gee, what are you going to do? | ||
| What's going to happen? It's like you're stuck between the terror threat that you fabricated and created and false flagged into existence and upholding the Constitution by not targeting one political party for extinction and calling them terrorists. | ||
| Gee, what are we going to do here? | ||
| I mean, it's just... People on Twitter and stuff are saying, well, yeah, but they have been targeting that. | ||
| You get there's a difference... | ||
| Between saying like we're going after domestic right-wing dangerous domestic terrorists and then just coming out and saying actually we're just targeting Trump supporters like one of the categories in our domestic extremist platform is supporters of the former president and like we've talked about this before they're like This is essentially going to be the future of America. | ||
| We're going to technically have two parties. | ||
| It's just support for one party will get you surveilled and, you know, on a terrorist watch list. | ||
| And, you know, your social credit score will steeply decline. | ||
| You can vote for them. I mean, you can do it. | ||
| Nobody's stopping you from being a Republican. | ||
| I mean, there's a free country after all. | ||
| You can vote your conscience. | ||
| It's just, you know, if you do... | ||
| Just be quiet about it. | ||
| Just don't speak up about it. Just don't talk too loudly about your political position and just sit quietly and passively while the other side of the aisle, their message and their policies and their platform is blasted into your face 24-7 from every media outlet and every politician and even the supposedly unpolitical law enforcement. | ||
| It's completely insane. | ||
| So we'll go back to that in just a little bit. | ||
| Meanwhile, Biden approves new section of border wall as Mexico crossings rise. | ||
| Oh, look at that. | ||
| Oh, what do you know? | ||
| Guess Joe Biden's a terrorist now. | ||
| Guess Joe Biden and Alejandro Mayorkas are MAGA-American domestic terrorists and must be investigated by the FBI because they dare to suggest... | ||
| That we do something to slow down the flow of illegal migrants. | ||
| US President Joe Biden's administration is to build a section of border wall in southern Texas in an effort to stop rising levels of immigration. | ||
| Around 20 miles will be built in Starr County along its border with Mexico where officials report high numbers of crossing. | ||
| Building a border wall is the signature policy of Donald Trump as president and fiercely opposed by Democrats. | ||
| In 2020, Mr. Biden promised that he would not build another foot of wall if elected. | ||
| He has, in fact, torn down sections of the previously built wall. | ||
| His administration passed a proclamation soon after taking office that said building a wall across the southern border is, quote, not a serious policy solution. | ||
| Yeah, what about ladders, dude? | ||
| Remember ladders? Walls don't work because ladders. | ||
| So, you know, it's nice. | ||
| Yeah, a little 20-mile segment of wall, that'll do it. | ||
| That'll stop the flow of 2 million migrants a year over our southern border. | ||
| You put up a little, you know, what you gotta do is you gotta build a wall over 0.01% of that border. | ||
| Problem solved. You did it. | ||
| More than 245,000 crossings have been made just this year in the Rio Grande Valley alone. | ||
| So yeah, we'll talk more about immigration a little bit later. | ||
| Meanwhile, the Donald Trump political kangaroo court reality show continues. | ||
| New York AG Letitia James calls Trump's voluntary court appearances, quote, a political stunt. | ||
| Just sort of just perfect. | ||
| It's sort of just the perfect example, the perfect illustration of like the leftist, liberal, just nonsense mindset. | ||
| Where it's like they sue Donald Trump. | ||
| They charge him with something. | ||
| They demand that he be in court. | ||
| Then when he shows up to court, they say, this is a political stunt. | ||
| You're just doing this for, you know, your own aggrandizement. | ||
| It's just what they do. | ||
| It's just what they do. | ||
| They do something. | ||
| They attack. They launch an offensive against you. | ||
| And however you respond to it, suddenly it's, oh, you're just using this for attention. | ||
| This is the sacred American court system. | ||
| How dare you treat it so frivolously by showing up when we demanded that you showed up? | ||
| It's just, I mean, these people, man, I swear to God. | ||
| New York Attorney General Letitia James blasted as a political stunt the former President Trump's voluntary appearance and violent rhetoric in the civil fraud trial against him. | ||
| Now what they mean by violent rhetoric, and we'll show you the clip a little bit later, Letitia James is saying basically that by speaking out against her, he is inspiring violence. | ||
| Now there's not been any violence committed. | ||
| What he's saying is not in any way violent at all. | ||
| But this is the way that their mind works. | ||
| See, your free speech is dangerous because apparently disagreeing with them immediately means you're commanding your followers viciously attack them physically. | ||
| I mean, it makes no sense. It's utterly and ridiculous, utterly and completely retarded. | ||
| It is retarded. These people, Letitia James, is, I'm happy to report, retarded. | ||
| Meanwhile, we have this German far-right political party leader attacked with a syringe at a party. | ||
| One political commentator has dubbed the incident as a possible assassination attempt. | ||
| Leader of a far-right German political party has been taken to a hospital following a violent incident reportedly involving a syringe. | ||
| The far-right Alternative for Germany party was due to speak at an election rally in Bavaria on Wednesday, but the German news agency DPA says an incident took place in Ingolstadt. | ||
| Few details are released about the exact nature of the event. | ||
| Apparently he was in a crowd and was jabbed and possibly injected with some sort of syringe, which is, I guess, to be expected as the German government and media and the EU all keep telling their followers that to support a right-wing party in Germany, you know, democratic Germany, these are your democratic ideals at work, to support one of these parties means you are a Nazi that hates everyone, that isn't a... | ||
| Aryan male and that violence against you is not just warranted and justified but actually necessary. | ||
| Whether it's the government doing that by raiding their offices and arresting their leaders or they outsource it to their more radical fringe followers, the point is that violence against the right is being activated. | ||
| Finally, Trump says he's willing to serve as Speaker of the House, saying he'll do whatever's best for the country as that saga continues. | ||
| Yeah, we'll touch on that as well. | ||
| Stay tuned. A lot of videos to show you on the other side. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal, Infowars.com, band.video. | ||
| We have some heavy topics to talk about, but we also have some very silly things to discuss. | ||
| And we'll start with one of the silly things. | ||
| We'll start with one of the more... | ||
| Well, I guess it's... | ||
| I don't know. It's kind of funny. | ||
| It's kind of funny. It's Joe Biden. | ||
| It's a full two-minute video from, I think, the Republican... | ||
| some Republican propaganda outlet on Twitter. | ||
| And it's just two full minutes of Joe Biden just being out of his mind, just not being there, just being Mr. | ||
| Magoo, which is funny. | ||
| I admit it is funny. | ||
| If it was like, you know, not the President of the United States, if it wasn't the leader of the free world, if it wasn't his man, the man with his finger on the nuclear button, if it wasn't the executive leader of America at a time when our international enemies are growing and Strength and power, it would be very funny. It would be very funny if this wasn't the downfall of America that we're watching in real time. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number six. | ||
| 120 seconds of Joe Biden showing he's totally fit to be president. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. I, um... | |
| Anyway... | ||
| The best way to get something done, if it holds near and dear to you that you like to be able to... | ||
| Anyway. From Charlotte, another line going from Florida down to Tampa. | ||
| Of Putin's kleptocracy, yeah. | ||
| And, and, and, Joan, Shingang, I'm going to pass my password, Shinga, $15,000, $159,000 billion let. | ||
| America is a nation that can be defined in a single word. | ||
| I was going to put him in a foot, foot, foot. | ||
| The idea... | ||
| Los Angeles and... | ||
| What am I doing here? | ||
| For two reasons. | ||
| One, to... | ||
| We haven't been able to communicate it in a way that is... | ||
| Let me say it another way. | ||
| With the nature... | ||
| Not... | ||
| A solid meeting... | ||
| With... | ||
| With... | ||
| They make a very good point. | ||
| Here's the deal. Here's what drives the driver in the states that are affected. | ||
| Here's what you can do, the drivers. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We want to expand pre-K for three and four-year-olds, millions of pre-K. | |
| The, um... | ||
| Remember, if you oppose him, you are a terrorist. | ||
| You're a MAGA domestic terrorist for wanting to make America great again if you don't support that Barely animated corpse. | ||
| You are a terrorist, according to the FBI. You will be hunted down and destroyed. | ||
| You must support the lifeless husk. | ||
| Now, interestingly, there's a whole bunch of clips from a bunch of different speeches. | ||
| After every one of those clips, he took a three-week vacation. | ||
| Eh, something. Every one of those clips preceded a three-week vacation in Delaware. | ||
| He spent a lot of time on vacation. | ||
| I guess in a way we should be happy that he's not more articulate, that he's not even remotely charismatic or convincing or inspiring or empowering. | ||
| I guess we can be happy that hopefully in some way his just sheer incompetence in living is slowing down the progress of the agenda of the people who actually control him. | ||
| It's just total, it's just... | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I'm always torn between just half thinking it's hilarious. | ||
| The other half just not thinking it's funny at all. | ||
| It's not even a little bit funny. | ||
| Because after all, this isn't actually funny. | ||
| It's not actually funny. | ||
| It's actually extremely serious. | ||
| Jason Bermas on X posted this. | ||
| Take a good look at how Americans are being portrayed in the establishment media. | ||
| This is only going to get worse once Trump is arrested or if Trump gets arrested. | ||
| This is the cover of the Newsweek article that talks about MAGA Americans being a new category of domestic terrorists in the official FBI system. | ||
| The enemy within Of course, I think that's Joe Biggs leading a march. | ||
| The enemy within, and it's just a bunch of sort of middle-class white dudes. | ||
| Just some low-income white dudes, just plumbers and physical laborers. | ||
| Just the heart and soul of this country. | ||
| Just some of the best, most disrespected people in the entire world. | ||
| This of course is not a picture of anything violent. | ||
| Nobody here is doing anything to inflict pain or harm or in any way negatively impact anybody else. | ||
| This is in fact a picture of a peaceful protest. | ||
| The American media is now publishing cover art That shows American men simply protesting peacefully, waving signs and flags. | ||
| The American flag, I remind you. | ||
| They have a picture of a bunch of veterans protesting with American flags with a big title, The Enemy Within. | ||
| Just in case, still a little bit unclear as to whether we're at war or not. | ||
| That should clear things up. | ||
| The FBI targets MAGA as the 2024 election nears. | ||
| Now, the reason they're saying this, and in fact, somebody responded, I posted this yesterday on Twitter, somebody responded to it, put it extremely well, retweeted it. | ||
| They just said they're admitting it now to attempt to scare Trump supporters into staying silent and keeping their heads down. | ||
| Speak up and never comply. | ||
| I do think that is a very big part of it, right? | ||
| They didn't have to admit they were spying on Trump supporters as if we're Al-Qaeda or ISIS. I mean, just think about this. | ||
| They have a domestic terrorist label for people who, like on their own FBI label, want to make America great again. | ||
| Another four-letter acronym for a terrorist group. | ||
| You got ISIS, the Islamic State, keeps slaves in cages, and it's just like the most awful thing ever. | ||
| And then you have MAGA, who they want to make America great again. | ||
| They love America and want America to be great, so they're domestic terrorists now. | ||
| Again, I don't need to elaborate on it. | ||
| I know I'm just saying the same thing over and over again, but let it really sink in where we are now. | ||
| Let it really seep into your neurons what the American government themselves are announcing in this strategic revelation in Newsweek. | ||
| That as the 2024 election comes, they will be targeting anybody who supports the Republican candidate as a literal terrorist. | ||
| Just think about it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
| Welcome back, you domestic terrorists. | ||
| Be interested to know what the audience thinks about this. | ||
| We'll open up phone lines in the second hour. | ||
| Today's show is obviously, you know, part of it is, well, there's a lot of stuff to go into this. | ||
| So the story at Newsweek is Donald Trump followers targeted by FBI as 2024 electioneers, right, in a blatant show of election interference. | ||
| So I think they want, they really want two things. | ||
| They want You to be afraid to support Donald Trump out of fear that you'll be considered a domestic terrorist. | ||
| And they want to prove the actual extreme people correct in a hope to inspire them to fulfill the claims that are being made by the FBI. The FBI doesn't actually have anything to point to as evidence for MAGA being domestic terrorists except for the orchestrated Nonsense known as January 6th. | ||
| Aside from a couple hours that January afternoon where the only people who died were protesters who were murdered by the police. | ||
| That's their proof of domestic terror. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, they showed up without weapons and we killed five of them. | |
| They're domestic terrorists. | ||
| That's all they have. That's it. | ||
| It wasn't as big or as fiery as they wanted it to be. | ||
| So they want to inspire, like, they actually want, you know, MAGA Americans to fire the first shot, as is typical of literally any war all the way back to ancient Roman times, right, where you have to have the casus belli. | ||
| You have to have the reason to go to war. | ||
| Civil War, Fort Sumter, right, and it was... | ||
| Abraham Lincoln doing the exact thing that would precipitate a response from the South in order to claim the South fired first. | ||
| Pearl Harbor and ignoring the overwhelming signals where the American government knew exactly when and where the Japanese were going to attack but allowed it to happen anyway in order to get the American people on board for that war. | ||
| Or the Lusitania, or the Spanish Main. | ||
| Whatever it is, America, just like every government throughout history, is very sensitive To not accepting blame for starting the hostilities. | ||
| So in this way, they simply announced that we're just the FBI doing investigations. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're very sensitive to the political aspects of this. | |
| We will treat it with the utmost respect while simultaneously doing everything they can to goad Americans into being domestic terrorists. | ||
| That's what they're desperate for. | ||
| It comes across pretty obviously in this article. | ||
| I can't say it's a good bet. | ||
| I can't say the FBI is making a wise decision here. | ||
| But what it really reveals is like they actually are terrified of Trump winning at the election booth. | ||
| Like they really, really, really, really don't want him to win because they know that if he wins, then he'll be able to dismantle this whole corrupt system. | ||
| So Their effort to stop him at the election office involves calling his supporters domestic terrorists, investigating them, getting them to silence themselves, getting them to shut up, just in some way ratcheting down and clamping down on the ability of his supporters to speak up and spread their message and gain more support. | ||
| After all, every one of his policies, more or less, is now being either pursued by or clamored for By the Democrats. | ||
| Joe Biden's building a wall. | ||
| We got videos today of a neighborhood in Chicago, mostly black neighborhood, 90% Democrat or more, like 98% voted for Democrats, and they are furiously demanding that the illegal immigrants be expelled. | ||
| So clearly, all of his policies were correct. | ||
| They've retracted and removed all of his policies. | ||
| Everything got so much worse. Now they're actually implementing Trump's policies. | ||
| But if you support his policies, you're a domestic terrorist. | ||
| Now they're trying to limit support for Trump, obviously, and they're trying to You know, create this feedback loop where they intimidate and shut down Trump supporters while infuriating others. | ||
| They want to push those others, right, by doing things like the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping scenario where they have people, as we speak, infiltrating MAGA movements and encouraging violence. | ||
| Probably using this article, right, you probably have FBI agents right now Using this article and going, see guys, we gotta fight back now before they come forth. | ||
| Use them to commit violence, to then justify the FBI labeling MAGA Americans as violent, therefore increasing the ratcheting down that's done on the Trump supporters. | ||
| But again, just to wrap your mind around how far America has gone at this point. | ||
| It's really... Just horrifying. | ||
| I mean, it's the most cliche thing, but all of this can be understood with just flipping the rolls. | ||
| And it literally wouldn't even happen, but it's the type of nightmare fever dream that was shoved down everybody's throats while Trump was in office. | ||
| But can you imagine... | ||
| If Trump as president had his FBI label all Democrats domestic terrorists, what? | ||
| Are you kidding me? | ||
| That's what they're doing. | ||
| The Democratic establishment, the Democratic This regime is labeling its political enemies domestic terrorists and sending the federal police after them. | ||
| This is the Stasi. It's not even disguised anymore. | ||
| It's not even hidden under a thinly veiled claim of like, well, we're not going after MAGA-American. | ||
| We're going after the right-wing domestic extremist. | ||
| They aren't even doing it. They're just saying, no, MAGA is extremist. | ||
| And of course, the programming of this language has gone on for quite some time with Joe Biden giving the speech where he's talking about MAGA, extreme MAGA, super MAGA, all these words they have tacked onto MAGA to make it seem like something other than what it is, | ||
| which is a slogan of a political campaign for a presidency that was massively successful for the entirety of its tenure until they released the Really, it's kind of come from a basket of deplorables in 2016 to domestic terrorists in 2023. | ||
| Yeah, more or less. More or less. | ||
| And so the FBI says, the FBI is in an almost impossible position. | ||
| It's not that impossible. | ||
| The impossible position here is... | ||
| They want to use the power of the federal government to destroy a political party, but the Constitution doesn't allow them to do that. | ||
| That's the impossible position. | ||
| It's not like, well, if we don't call the MAGA supporters terrorists, they'll blow things up. | ||
| They know that's not true. | ||
| They know that's not the case. | ||
| This is not an impossible position. | ||
| This is a choice the FBI is making between following the Constitution and actually serving their legitimate role And targeting the political supporters of a president who will stop them from doing this. | ||
| Right? They say the Bureau runs the risk of provoking the very anti-government activists that the terrorism agencies hope to counter. | ||
| Yeah, there are no terrorism agencies, you psychopaths. | ||
| Like, what are you talking about? | ||
| They say especially at a time when the White House is facing congressional Republican opposition, claiming that the Biden administration has weaponized the Bureau against the right wing, it has to tread very carefully. | ||
| Do I need to explain this? | ||
| In an article about how the Biden administration is weaponizing the Bureau against the right wing, that's the title of this article, that's the whole point of this article, they're saying, well, we have to tread very carefully because the Biden administration is under pressure from congressional Republicans who are saying the Bureau is being weaponized against the right wing. | ||
| It's this utter madness, man. | ||
| I don't even know what to say anymore. | ||
| Like, it's so... | ||
| It's inexplicable how this is America at this point. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's crazy. Welcome back, folks. | |
| We're going to just continue digging through this Newsweek article for a moment. | ||
| We'll connect this to what's happening to Donald Trump in the courthouse. | ||
| Because after all, it's not like the Bureau has been weaponized. | ||
| It's not like the FBI has been weaponized. | ||
| Because that insinuates that everything else is just chugging along normally. | ||
| The courts have been weaponized, as we see with Donald Trump and Owen Troyer and all of the January 6th defendants in cooperation with the DOJ and the FBI. But it's not just the FBI, it's the whole of the DOJ, but it's also the CIA and the DNI. It's the entire intelligence apparatus, not just the FBI, the entire intelligence apparatus. | ||
| Created and tasked primarily with international concerns are now turning their gaze inward, as it says that would happen under the lockstep document in the hack attack segment. | ||
| Somehow they predicted this 15 years ago. | ||
| Riddle me that. But it's not just the courts either. | ||
| It's not just the Department of Justice and the courts and the executive and the FBI. The Postal Service is spying on Trump supporters. | ||
| The Capitol Police are creating branches in Florida and Texas to spy on and potentially intervene in MAGA demonstrations. | ||
| It's the school system that's been completely co-opted. | ||
| Let's not forget about the IRS targeting conservatives. | ||
| Of course. Yeah, the IRS is a major one. | ||
| I mean, look at what's happening with Elon Musk as Biden comes out against Elon Musk at the same time they're investigating SpaceX for... | ||
| Violating the law by not hiring illegal immigrants. | ||
| And they're investigating Tesla about their bookkeeping. | ||
| Just everything. Every institution has been weaponized. | ||
| Every investigative agency has been weaponized. | ||
| The political process itself has been weaponized. | ||
| The voting process has been weaponized. | ||
| It's all been weaponized against Republicans. | ||
| Don't just think this is just the FBI. So this article in particular is the... | ||
| It's a statement from the FBI, from the powers that be. | ||
| For particular purposes, one of them being to normalize this, to act like this is completely normal. | ||
| And once again, we're in this situation where this would not be confusing 50 years from now. | ||
| Yeah, I bet it'd be like pretty scary if you were in Nazi Germany in the 1930s when like the Reichstag's on fire and all these communists are burning things and we got to, the federal police, I mean, they don't do things based on politics. | ||
| They swear, but these communists, they're dangerous. | ||
| They have to wrap them up. Like, yeah, I could understand how in the 30s Nazi Germany, all your information is coming from Nazi newspapers, that this would be a confusing thing where you're like, I think what they're doing is legitimate. | ||
| I mean, this seems really dangerous. They did burn the Reichstag after all, and it's only 50, 60, 70 years later that we look back and go, oh, this was all orchestrated, this was all fake, this was all just... | ||
| Very clearly at this point, there's no debate, this was just a tyrannical authoritarian political party weaponizing the federal government against its enemies to gain and maintain total control of the political process so they could commit evil unopposed. | ||
| Yeah, it's pretty obvious. Well, look around you. | ||
| That's what's happening right here. | ||
| In 50 years, this isn't going to be something people are going to have to speculate on. | ||
| It's going to be obvious, okay? The powers that be, the democratic establishment, took this, took the great meandering, the great wandering through of the Capitol, where again, the only people that were killed were the protesters themselves, murdered in cold blood, and their murderers celebrated and interviewed about what heroes they were on national TV. None of this is confusing. | ||
| None of this should be Speculative. | ||
| None of this is up for debate. Like, it's just very clear what they're doing right now, and it's the exact same tactic and policy that was pursued by the Bolsheviks, that was pursued by the Nazis, that was pursued by the, you know, Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, or the, you know, Vietnamese communists before the Vietnam War. | ||
| Like, this is just what they do. | ||
| This is just what tyrants do. | ||
| It's just the typical path they take. | ||
| I think everybody gets that that's watching this. | ||
| But it's important to sort of try to explain it a little bit more. | ||
| Again, this one sentence, especially at a time when the White House is facing congressional Republican opposition claiming the Biden administration has weaponized the Bureau against the right wing, it has to tread very carefully. | ||
| So, I mean, you get that, right? | ||
| And it's sort of the same thing. | ||
| It's... A vague connection to what Letitia James says, and we'll show her clip in just a second. | ||
| But it's like they target Donald Trump for a million investigations. | ||
| None of them have any basis. | ||
| All of them are fraudulent. | ||
| Most of them get thrown out. It doesn't make any sense why they're pursuing this guy over and over if you don't understand the... | ||
| You know, fact, just pure and simple reality that Democrats are using their positions of power in the political structure to go after their political enemies. | ||
| It's as simple as that. There's nothing confusing about this, and I've been doing a good job disguising their intentions. | ||
| And so, you know, they say like, well, we're suing you and you have to show up. | ||
| You have to come to this courtroom and subject yourself to my screeching. | ||
| And so he shows up and they go, he is showing up to make this a publicity stunt about him. | ||
| And he is violating the sacred practice of our courtroom. | ||
| And it's just like... What are you supposed to do with these people? | ||
| Where the FBI is openly admitting they're targeting Trump supporters, they're targeting right-wingers, they're targeting them based on their politics, they're targeting them without any hint or suggestion that their beliefs may lead to violence. | ||
| It's just a different political belief. | ||
| There's nothing violent about it. | ||
| And then they say... Then they blame the Republicans for being concerned about this, essentially. | ||
| They're saying, we're targeting Trump supporters, but we have to be careful because the Republicans are over here causing trouble and riling everybody up saying we're targeting Trump supporters. | ||
| It is literally like we're just run by literal psychopaths. | ||
| It really reminds me nothing more than just like Watching an interrogation with a murderer who is, like, getting all mad. | ||
| They're like, you guys are so suspicious of me. | ||
| Like, why are you guys putting this on me? | ||
| It's like, because you killed a person, idiot. | ||
| Yeah, you deserve the level of vitriol and anger against you. | ||
| You're trying to, like, retroactively justify the murder... | ||
| By saying how everybody's mean to you now that you murdered a guy, right? | ||
| So you have violated the Constitution. | ||
| You are egregiously destroying the very foundations of so-called democracy that you supposedly are protecting. | ||
| And you're acting confused at why everybody's mad at you and hates you and wants to destroy you now. | ||
| It's not that complicated. | ||
| Don't be the thing that you are and people won't hate you. | ||
| The FBI said we are committed to protecting the safety and constitutional rights of all Americans and will never open an investigation based solely on the First Amendment protected activity including a person's political beliefs or affiliations. | ||
| Keep that in mind. | ||
| Let's just hang on to that. | ||
| And then we jump to the next page. | ||
| And it says, Well, see, all of these things that you just listed here are First Amendment protected speech. | ||
| So... You know, remember that thing you were saying on the last page? | ||
| That last page that we were just reading where you're like, we do not open investigations about First Amendment protected speech. | ||
| But if you question the election, you're going down. | ||
| If you oppose the COVID pandemic regulations, you're going down. | ||
| I mean, they're just lying. | ||
| I mean, again, not that confusing. | ||
| You don't have to have a degree in political science to work this out. | ||
| They're just lying. Point blank. | ||
| And isn't it amazing how often we can hear about threats despite them never coming to fruition? | ||
| They say threats from domestic violent extremists have increased in the last two years. | ||
| Oh, the threats are increasing. | ||
| Over the last two years, the threats have been increasing. | ||
| Really, has there been any violence? | ||
| No. No, there hasn't. | ||
| But the threats, they've been increasing. | ||
| Well, threats of what? Has anything actually come to... | ||
| You mean people are talking. You mean people don't like that you are investigating peaceful Americans as domestic terrorists because of their political beliefs, and that to you constitutes a threat. | ||
| So threats are rising. | ||
| Well, the threats are rising, folks. | ||
| So many threats. They're rising everywhere. | ||
| I can't believe how many threats we're dealing with. | ||
| Are any of them actually... Carried out? | ||
| No. Are any of them actually anywhere close to being carried out? | ||
| No, not really. No, they just... | ||
| We make them up, actually. | ||
| We, the FBI, read into your belief that the election was stolen. | ||
| We say, therefore, you want to destroy the American government. | ||
| Therefore, that's a threat. Wow, the threats are rising. | ||
| There's so many threats everywhere. And further increases in threats will likely correspond to potential flashpoints such as high-profile elections and campaigns or contentious current events. | ||
| Oh, the potential flashpoints are likely to correspond with potential threats. | ||
| It's just... So there's none. | ||
| There's none. There's nothing. | ||
| There's no flashpoints. There's no threats. | ||
| You're making it up in order to justify your targeting of a political opponent, you tyrants, you authoritarians, scumbags. | ||
| We'll move on here. | ||
| There's so much other stuff to cover, but... | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, I don't think it'd be... | |
| I'm going to be out of the question and spend the whole show on this one article because of what it illustrates about the mindset of the people in charge. | ||
| You know, one thing I'll say, talking to an FBI agent when I was working on a film and this guy was the advisor, and they would always talk about the goal line like thinking about it like a football game and their whole thing is like we don't we never want to be defending the goal line because that you know essentially it's like you can stop the terrorist as they cross over into the end zone right as a last stopgap measure but we want to stop them at the 50 yard we don't want to ever get even close to the end zone In other words, | ||
| if you have a terrorist who wants to bomb a courthouse, you don't want to stop them with the bomb in the courthouse. | ||
| That's the last case scenario. | ||
| You want to stop them way ahead when they don't even have the bomb yet, when they're just trying to get people on board to their conspiracy. | ||
| That's when you want to intervene and stop them. | ||
| You want to stop them, you know, fourth down at the 50. | ||
| You don't want to have to do any goal line defense. | ||
| The question is, how far... | ||
| What yard line do you start at? | ||
| I get the idea of not wanting to just be defending at the goal line, like trying to stop the disasters right before they happen. | ||
| You do want to intervene a little bit earlier. | ||
| But you're intervening so early that the people you are supposedly intervening with aren't even planning to do any. | ||
| They aren't even headed towards the end zone. | ||
| You're infiltrating the other team's locker to poison their players. | ||
| This is... Deliberate. | ||
| All of this is deliberate. But I'll finish up with this little segment. | ||
| Of course, they do mention in this article that this has been a concerted, in other words, a coordinated effort by the entire Democratic establishment with Biden tweeting last September, Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans are a threat to the very soul of this country. | ||
| As well as statements from his various Homeland Security advisors and Attorney General Merrick Garland. | ||
| Essentially insinuating that if you support Donald Trump, you are a terrorist. | ||
| Again, I just want to relate what they say about we are committed to protecting the safety and constitutional rights of all Americans. | ||
| We'll never open investigation based solely on First Amendment protected activity, including a person's political beliefs or affiliations. | ||
| But then you skip ahead to The FBI co-authored restricted report called domestic violent extremists emboldened in aftermath of capital breach elevated domestic terrorism threat of violence likely amid political transitions and beyond. | ||
| Very catchy title. | ||
| But the FBI co-wrote this article where they shifted the definition of anti-government, anti-authority, violent extremism from quote, the furtherance of ideological agendas to the furtherance of political and or social agendas. | ||
| For the first time, such groups could be so labeled because of their politics. | ||
| So let's see. Page two, they say we never start investigations based on political beliefs. | ||
| And then on page three, they're saying, well, but furtherance of political agendas can be grounds for launching an investigation. | ||
| Again, what I come away with with this is one thing they want to intimidate Trump supporters into not speaking out. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| In an effort to diminish his chance at the ballot box because they are terrified of him winning and they're also trying to encourage and fabricate the extremism they keep telling us about that never actually exists and you can't actually point to anywhere. | ||
| What this says to me is that's more important than ever that we speak out in opposition to this tyrannical activity by the federal government, that we support Donald Trump as he is clearly the target of all of this. | ||
| And that we have to do something about this whole structure. | ||
| And again, it's not just the FBI, it's the whole DOJ. But if they're not stopped now, it will be impossible to stop them. | ||
| They have to be dismantled. | ||
| Destroyed, eliminated from existence politically, nonviolently, but permanently. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
| So many more videos to show you. | ||
| We are going to move on now. | ||
| We'll open the phone lines for your calls as well. | ||
| I have to say, there's, you know, it's tough. | ||
| It's tough being me, you know? | ||
| As people on Twitter will tell you, there are so many organizations and people and secret societies that control me. | ||
| It's like an impossible task to balance. | ||
| I am both a secret Nazi and an agent of Mossad. | ||
| I am, of course, a Freemason gatekeeper. | ||
| I also am a NASA shill. | ||
| I apparently am very concerned at the task that they've given me, right? | ||
| I've been told to fulfill a task. | ||
| I'm dedicated to that because after all, I've reaped such great rewards. | ||
| I made an offhanded comment yesterday at the very end of a segment with Chase here. | ||
| We were taking a call. The guy said, Flat Earth is a PSYOP. And I said, Yep, it is. | ||
| It is. It's a PSYOP. And that was the statement I made. | ||
| And then on Twitter, I'm just... | ||
| Literally, I should find the things people call me, except... | ||
| It's hard because I block them. | ||
| I block them on Twitter. | ||
| Because it's just not... | ||
| You know... | ||
| I don't know, man. | ||
| It is truly bizarre. | ||
| It's truly bizarre. | ||
| It makes me question everything. | ||
| Right? When you've got people... | ||
| We're like convinced that I'm a Jesuit trained globe earth shill. | ||
| I know that the earth is flat but I'm desperate to keep the lie of globe earth going for my masters at NASA. Every morning I wake up and I get a sternly worded letter from the people who control me. | ||
| It's very insulting. | ||
| It's very insulting to me. | ||
| Not even insulting. It's just like... | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? | |
| I don't know, man. It's like demoralizing to me. | ||
| I don't know. I guess there's more important things to get into. | ||
| I was just laughing yesterday talking to one of my good friends from all the way back in middle school. | ||
| And it's just... | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's like... | |
| We're just laughing, going like, oh yeah, they trained you. | ||
| I've been trained. | ||
| I'm a trained operative. | ||
| I've never been trained by anybody in anything. | ||
| I want to let you know right now. | ||
| I wouldn't even educate it very well. | ||
| Everything I've learned, I've learned by myself. | ||
| Everything I do, I do by myself. | ||
| Every morning I come in here, I talk to nobody until I'm sitting behind this desk and speaking my mind completely out of the blue. | ||
| It's very insulting to me when credit is given to some shadow institution. | ||
| I don't even... | ||
| I'm not even sure if it exists or not. | ||
| Like, what are they? I don't even know what the Jesuits are. | ||
| It's very frustrating. It's very annoying. | ||
| Especially considering the fact that... | ||
| Look, I... Well, I can't even... | ||
| It's like, I love this job. | ||
| This job is very... This job is not easy, okay? | ||
| Okay. This job has not launched me to the top of fame and fortune. | ||
| Let's just say that, okay? | ||
| The idea that, like... | ||
| I think that's what's most insulting about it. | ||
| The insinuation is that I'm dishonestly selling out the truth because I'm being rewarded with... | ||
| What, this? | ||
| Like this? Adrenochrome. | ||
| Well, of course I get adrenochrome on the side. | ||
| Obviously. Obviously. It's just like, wouldn't you... | ||
| You could at least acknowledge that I have enough self-respect to demand a little bit more for violating my conscience, right? | ||
| I'm just going to throw it away for a good job. | ||
| No, I need millions. | ||
| I want the movie roles. | ||
| I want the spot on mainstream news if I'm going to sell out. | ||
| It's so insulting. | ||
| It's so annoying. Because I'm not... | ||
| I'm not even like... | ||
| There's things like Flat Earth where I'm just like, yeah, I just don't believe it. | ||
| And literally there are people online that are just like, well, he's a Masonic NASA gatekeeper who is afraid... | ||
| I've got to find this one comment because it was so funny how it was like he's so afraid of the lie collapsing as if I'm part of a giant conspiracy to keep Flat Earth away from people because we don't want them waking up after all. | ||
| It's absurd and it's insulting because nowhere, nowhere is more open than InfoWars. | ||
| Nowhere is more upfront about where we get our information, who we talk to, what we believe. | ||
| The whole point of InfoWars, I've said it a million times, the first day I was here, within the first couple days I was here, Owen Troyer was talking to Alex Jones back when the control room was where all the reporters were. | ||
| I can't remember what they're talking about, but Owen is describing how he's going to say things. | ||
| He's like, I think I'm going to say this thing. | ||
| And I hear Alex. It was like one of the first things I heard Alex say in person when I first worked here. | ||
| And he just said, say whatever you want, just tell the truth. | ||
| And walked away. Like, that's our motto. | ||
| That's what we do here. | ||
| That's our instructions from on high. | ||
| There's one person that could control me. | ||
| It'd be Alex Jones. But he doesn't. | ||
| You don't even want to. We disagree on things sometimes. | ||
| Sometimes I say things on my show, then I watch the Alex Jones show, and I'm like, ah, geez, yeah, I got that wrong. | ||
| He was right about that. Like, just last week, it was the... | ||
| Like, my sort of... | ||
| I guess it's a similar interpretation, but we were talking about, like, Fauci and the CIA, and I was saying, like, no, the Fauci's not telling the CIA what to do. | ||
| They're just part of the same organization. | ||
| They're just like... There's no real delineation between these, it's just they're a part of the cabal. | ||
| One's in a position in the CIA, one's in a position in NIH, but in the, you know, reality. | ||
| And then, you know, I watch Alex, and Alex is saying, well, Fauci actually is higher up than the CIA. He is telling the CIA what to do because he is, you know, higher up in the hierarchy, the Council on Foreign Relations, you know, control grid that they have going. | ||
| We don't even have the same interpretations of these things 100% of the time. | ||
| Maybe 90% of the time, because... | ||
| We tend to just go for truth and truth tends to sound like each other no matter who's expressing it. | ||
| But that to me is I think sort of the most insulting and frustrating thing is that like we go so far out of our way to be totally upfront, totally honest. | ||
| Any person that honestly watches us, especially habitually, I don't understand how you can come away with a conclusion that We're even self-controlled. | ||
| Like, I don't even know what I'm going to say half the time. | ||
| Very insulting, very fresh. | ||
| You have to have a high IQ to watch InfoWars. | ||
| I think that's what it is. You have to have a high IQ to enjoy American Journal, because after all, half the time I'm being extremely sarcastic and joking, and the other half I'm being extremely sincere, and I refuse to change my delivery to reflect which one I'm going with. | ||
| But I don't even try to entertain it because there's no winning. | ||
| No one's going to be like, oh, gee, you're right. | ||
| It's like whatever I say is going to be twisted into proof that they were right the entire time or whatever. | ||
| So it's not even worth it. | ||
| But it does annoy me because... | ||
| People who don't actually watch us read this, and it just goes like, you know, somebody's on Twitter reading stuff, and they see somebody making some claim that I'm some gatekeeper, controlled opposition nonsense, and they just, you know, then they're talking to their friend. | ||
| They're like, well, I heard Infowars is like controlled opposition. | ||
| They don't understand it, but it gets spread, and it just in some small way damages our reputation amongst the people that should know better. | ||
| After all, it's not like our reputation can be any more damaged in the mainstream, but for the free-thinking, conspiracy-minded individuals, it's extremely annoying to have those people questioning me in particular when it's just like I go so far out of my way to make enemies of the mainstream by being so upfront about everything. | ||
| And all this to say, I hope that you support us, and we really do appreciate that you support us, and I really do hope That it comes across how utterly real everybody at InfoWars is all the time. | ||
| Even behind the scenes. We don't even have drama behind the scenes, like the crew and stuff, because everybody's just upfront and honest about what they're feeling at a certain time. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It never builds to the point that there's, like, quiet strife with factions. | |
| It doesn't happen here. | ||
| So support InfoWars. Support the truth. | ||
| Alright, welcome back, folks. This is American Journal. | ||
| We have so much to cover, and I've just—well, that one Newsweek article really tells you everything you need to know about where we are in this country. | ||
| So let's—we're going to move on, though. | ||
| We're going to move on. I was going to talk about Letitia James and the Trump show, but no. | ||
| No, we're not doing that. We're moving on. | ||
| We're talking about some other stuff, some international stuff. | ||
| We'll talk about the invasion. I just have a lot of videos that I want to get to, and I haven't gotten to any. | ||
| So what am I doing? Is the UK primed for a reversal? | ||
| After all, the UK has gone further down the road towards globalist government than just about anybody else, as large swaths of the country are now not English anymore, completely, totally altered, just given over to foreigners and their foreign ways. | ||
| And it seemed like it was beyond rescue. | ||
| And being in Britain, back when I went on that secret mission for Infowars, because there was a big right-wing pushback, something the government was doing, and Britain actually banned anybody from reporting on it. | ||
| So any news organization with an outlet in Britain was... | ||
| Prevented from reporting on what was going on, but Infowars doesn't have any British outlets, so I went over there to violate their restrictive speech policy. | ||
| And while I was there hanging out with some of the right-wing Brits, it was very much the idea of, like, it's over, you know, let's fight to get the scraps, but, like, you know, Rome is burning, essentially. | ||
| And yet, there have been some very interesting reversals out of the UK when it comes to things like transgenderism. | ||
| And even the willingness for regular Brits to speak up about the extermination campaign against them, the genocidal invasion taking place on that island nation. | ||
| So I'm going to go down to clip number two here. | ||
| This is posted with the title, Articulate Aryan Zoomer Operating at 30 Power Level Makes Owen Look Very Silly Here. | ||
| So this guy, Owen, I think his name's Owen Jones, very far left guy. | ||
| Idiot out of Britain. | ||
| Really showing his true colors and flailing to come up with some sort of argument in favor of the policies that have destroyed his home country. | ||
| And a young man, very Chad physiognomy, just laying down the obvious truth that no person, no group of people, deserves to be forcibly replaced in their own country. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number two. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What do you think, Eno Powell? Neil Power's obviously a very divisive figure. | |
| What do you think of him, though? Personally, what I think of him is a lot of stuff he was saying, although very divisive at the time, has come to pass. | ||
| Some cities are no longer diverse. | ||
| They are no longer diverse in the sense that there isn't a mix of cultures, where it's now been completely replaced by one culture over another. | ||
| Like where? A lot of boroughs of London, where the white working classes have been moved out in exchange for a lot of people from other... | ||
| What do you mean, they've been moved out? | ||
| Well, a lot of the council space in central London now, in some of those boroughs, have been completely demographically changed to a completely alien culture to what it would have been 50 years ago. | ||
| But what do you mean, an alien culture? I mean, in East End London, it used to be very Jewish, and now it's more Muslim, but that's always been the case. | ||
| So that's a very alien culture to what it was then, isn't it? | ||
| I mean, they're British Muslims. | ||
| Yes, but it's an alien culture. | ||
| It's a different culture. | ||
| Alien culture means... | ||
| Alien as in unfamiliar. | ||
| Yeah, but it's not alien to being British. | ||
| Being British means you can be Muslim or Jewish or Hindu. | ||
| I'm not saying it's to being British. | ||
| I'm saying it's to the culture of the area, to the beliefs and belief structures of the area, to the institutions that once were there, being replaced by new institutions now and new beliefs and new ideologies and new cultures and new religions. | ||
| Well, they're different religions, of course. Completely changing it. | ||
| Yeah, I mean... | ||
| But a religion is an entire cultural and ideological outlook on the world. | ||
| There's still white working-class people who live there... | ||
| ...who go to school with people from different backgrounds... | ||
| ...and they mix with people from different backgrounds. | ||
| They're not monocultures. You still have white working-class people in Tower hundreds. | ||
| I'm talking about whether or not the native people in those areas... | ||
| ...feel that they are now in their homeland... | ||
| ...or if their homeland confronts them as something other... | ||
| ...something which distracts them from what they believe themselves to be. | ||
| Well, I think millions of people are actually happy with being diverse. | ||
| I mean, London has huge amounts of mixed relationships where people from different cultures quite literally set families up together. | ||
| I mean, that's a good thing, surely. I'm not saying it's good or bad. | ||
| It's neither here nor there. Diversity is not inherently good. | ||
| It's not inherently bad. That's not my fault. | ||
| I think it's inherently good. Why do you think that? | ||
| Because I think you get an interesting exchange of cultures and worldviews and that makes for a more interesting and dynamic society. | ||
| But why does a mix of cultures and worldviews provide something good, necessarily? | ||
| Because we learn from each other. Yes, but let's say there's some archetypal brilliant worldview, the best possible worldview, right? | ||
| Would you then say, oh, let's make it more diverse and mix it with other worldviews? | ||
| No. I think my favorite part about that is the young man clearly has giant hickey on his neck. | ||
| But hey, that's the type of confidence you get, being a Chad well-spoken Brit, I guess. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Could have been his curling iron. | |
| Yeah, maybe he's a paintballer. | ||
| You know, maybe he's got paintball. | ||
| Paintball wounds look much cooler. | ||
| No, he spent last night... | ||
| Necking with a bird. | ||
| And he wakes up in the morning to destroy liberals on camera. | ||
| It's the Chad lifestyle. | ||
| It's the Chad lifestyle. He's like, what do I care if you have to say? | ||
| You should have seen the girl I was with last night. | ||
| You're nobody. You're nothing. | ||
| And it's amazing to hear a Brit like Owen Jones. | ||
| Essentially, the argument he's making is that Britain is not a culture. | ||
| It does not exist. So this is more than just like... | ||
| We're destroying your culture. | ||
| It's like we're insinuating that your culture, your way of life, your heritage and country and nation does not exist. | ||
| And to insinuate that it does or that it could in any way be preferable to a foreign culture is insulting and has to be silenced. | ||
| Which in itself is incredibly insulting to be told your culture essentially doesn't exist. | ||
| That's what he was saying there. | ||
| So we're seeing... Like, interesting stuff out of you. | ||
| Like, people actually standing up for themselves. | ||
| Hopefully it's not too little too late. | ||
| But another thing that's been changing in Britain is that new laws are going to stop sex offenders from changing their name and sex. | ||
| So, there's a big problem with sex offenders, like raping women, getting charged, then saying, oh, actually, I am a woman, and being put into women's prison, happening in Britain quite a bit, too. | ||
| And so they're stopping that. And they're, you know, undoing that process, not allowing them to do that anymore, which is a wonderful thing. | ||
| And then you have the Prime Minister of Britain, Rishi Sunak, or British name. | ||
| Coming out and giving a speech where he very forcefully tells the truth, saying, a man is a man and a woman is a woman, to raucous applause. | ||
| Yes, this is politics in 2023, stating a man is a man and a woman is a woman will get you thunderous applause because that's how far we've fallen. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number 16. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We are going to change this country, and that means life means life. | |
| Now, that shouldn't be a controversial position. | ||
| The vast majority of hard-working people agree with it. | ||
| And it also shouldn't be controversial for parents to know what their children are being taught in school about relationships. | ||
| Patients should know when hospitals are talking about men or women. | ||
| And we shouldn't get bullied. | ||
| And we shouldn't get bullied into believing that people can be any sex they want to be. | ||
| They can't. A man is a man, and a woman is a woman. | ||
| That's just common sense! | ||
| The sky is blue! | ||
| Two plus two equals four! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Some semblance of sanity in our country! | |
| Amazing! Round of applause for the simple statement of fact. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We should also never be afraid to talk about the thing. | |
| I mean, I wish we didn't have to say it but I'm glad he is. | ||
| I'm glad somebody is just pointing out the obvious. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. Remember to go to Infowarsstore.com to support everything that we do here. | ||
| We make it so easy for you to support us. | ||
| After all, it's not just your information, our information that you're getting by supporting Infowars. | ||
| The information is free. | ||
| That's courtesy. | ||
| InfoWars, what you're getting when you go to InfoWarsStore.com is an incredible supplement that is well worth the cost at full price. | ||
| And yet they're often on massive discount, including vitamin mineral fusion back in stock and 25% off. | ||
| Can't imagine that'll last long as it is one of our top sellers. | ||
| Real Red Pill Plus, Bodies and DNA Force Plus, all of those incredible, incredible supplements are 25% off. | ||
| Buy them together in the Trifecta Pack and get a full 40% off your purchase. | ||
| That is a massive discount on some of the best supplements money can buy. | ||
| And of course, you can rest easy knowing that all the money you spend at InfoWarsStore.com goes directly into this globalist fighting machine, this powerful weapons array in the information war. | ||
| So we thank you so much for your support. | ||
| We promise to do our parts to earn your support and trust by continuing to be outspoken proponents for humanity, liberty, justice, the American way, freedom, freedom of speech, and the morals and foundational beliefs that underpin those ultimately important values. | ||
| Of course, The FBI thinks we're terrorist MAGA Americans for things like wanting a country, wanting a border that's protected by the... | ||
| The crew's trying to get me in trouble now. | ||
| I just noticed they put the globe behind me. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. Yes, fulfill the will of our NASA masters. | |
| Indeed. But yeah, hey, you want a wall, you're a terrorist. | ||
| You want a sovereign United States, you are... | ||
| under investigation by the FBI despite the fact that you know those ideas are correct and right and now being reflected by not just us MAGA domestic terrorists but The people in charge of the border. | ||
| Mayorkas declares immediate need for a border wall in Texas, waives 26 environmental laws. | ||
| You know, it's just, it's like, okay, for one thing, finally, I guess, right? | ||
| He's like, we need it immediately. | ||
| Well, you needed it four years ago when you stopped it from happening. | ||
| You needed it back when the entire Congress and... | ||
| Media landscape united against the policy of a wall for some God knows what reason. | ||
| Like, who knows? Who knows why you people do what you do? | ||
| You just do it, and it's infuriating. | ||
| Stops us from doing what's necessary, and then backfires tremendously. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If you think about it, Donald Trump ran on Make America Great Again in 2016. | |
| In 2024, he's just going to run on Make America America Again. | ||
| That would be good. Mag. | ||
| Mog. We will mog them. | ||
| Make America America again. | ||
| That'd be nice. So part of it is like, okay, good. | ||
| Like, finally, yeah, build the wall. | ||
| Great. Wonderful. | ||
| Doesn't mean that you're doing your job. | ||
| You're still allowing in... Hundreds of thousands of people a month, so a wall is just going to make it easier for you to do that, probably. | ||
| It's probably just going to funnel people directly into the processing centers. | ||
| It's not actually going to help very much, especially when you have the government itself sending out apps for people just to get on planes and come in illegally. | ||
| I mean, it's just all nonsense. | ||
| It's also infuriating how the Democrats can just do this sort of stuff. | ||
| Like, when Republicans want something, when we want the same thing. | ||
| Not even like we want something. We both want the same thing. | ||
| We both want the wall, right? When Republicans do it, it's a crisis. | ||
| AOC's crying at the border. | ||
| There's children in cages. | ||
| My God! I mean, it's just... | ||
| It's a full-on blitz to stop the wall being built. | ||
| Then when the Democrats want it built, they're just waving laws. | ||
| Like, that's what all this is about. | ||
| They're essentially just... Just using a workaround to just ignore environmental protection laws that are there to stop construction of the wall. | ||
| There's like, well, it's an acute and immediate need, so I will be exercising the authority that's invested in me to override all of the restrictions to stop me from doing this, and we'll do it anyway, regardless of what the restrictions are. | ||
| It's just the way Democrats do things. | ||
| In fact, there's another story here. | ||
| Universities are evading Supreme Court's anti-affirmative action ruling, Congress hears. | ||
| It just never goes the other way. | ||
| Not only would they not get away with it, Republicans don't even try it. | ||
| Conservatives don't even try it. | ||
| Where it's like, well, the law says that we can't build a wall, so we can't build a wall. | ||
| That's it. Like, never once do you hear them just like, well, we're doing it anyway, and we'll see you in court. | ||
| But that's what the Democrats do, and nobody even speaks up. | ||
| Nobody even says a word. It's probably good, as what we're seeing now is just... | ||
| Mobs, hordes, thousands of illegal immigrants storming the border all at once and overwhelming the entire thing. | ||
| The video came out yesterday. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 10. | ||
| Massive group of migrants attempts to storm the El Paso border last night. | ||
| Here it is. Oh look, it's a scene from hell. | ||
| Oh look, it's a live feed directly from the satanic abyss. | ||
| This screeching, frenetic... | ||
| Strobe light, just like foggy mass of humanity storming towards our border. | ||
| Because after all, they're all such helpless asylum seekers. | ||
| You know, all of these people just terrified of being persecuted by their government, I'm sure. | ||
| So just, okay, just full-on invasion, full-on, complete, total, open border invasion. | ||
| Takeover of America taking place. | ||
| Stories at Infowars.com. | ||
| Shocked video. Waves of illegals storm U.S. border at El Paso. | ||
| You can see that. As well as some other videos of things like Karine Jean-Pierre, secretary at the White House, saying the flow of the border is totally uncontrolled, juxtaposed with the people on the border, saying the flow is out of control, it is unmanageable, and we are drowning in our attempts to prevent it. | ||
| Of course, it's not just at the border these things are happening. | ||
| Places like Chicago and New York where the brutal reality of their policies are coming to fruition. | ||
| Clip number five. | ||
| This is a group of blacks in Chicago. | ||
| These people in this video, in the neighborhood therein, voted over 90% Democrat, voted for exactly what they're experiencing. | ||
| Clip number three, blacks in Chicago realizing they're being replaced by illegals and they're now being lectured by their woke black leaders as to why they must give up their birthright as Americans to foreigners as a part of this globalist scheme. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. City leaders tried explaining the decision, but the crowd did not want to hear much of what they were saying. | |
| My name is Beatriz Ponce de Leon. | ||
| I'm the deputy mayor for immigrant, migrant, and refugee rights. | ||
| You were right! | ||
| You were right! | ||
| And if you think it was loud inside, it was just as rowdy outside because many people were not allowed in because they reached capacity. | ||
| We're not here to dismiss your feelings. | ||
| Feelings and emotions ran high by the fact, once again, the community was blindsided that migrants were moving in, an ongoing thing by the Johnson administration. | ||
| Our tax bills are paid into the Park District. | ||
| Nobody asked us for permission. | ||
| Nobody asked us how we felt about it. | ||
| Actually, they did. You voted for it. | ||
| Actually, this was like a main, like, point of contention between Republicans and Democrats, and you voted for the Democrats. | ||
| What do you mean they didn't ask you about it? | ||
| On one hand, it's silly to entertain this because these people voted for this and then they got what they voted for and now they're like, what? | ||
| Nobody asked us about this. Like, yes, they did. | ||
| So, what are you talking about? | ||
| But on the other hand, are they going to keep voting for this? | ||
| Are they going to keep voting Democrat? | ||
| And like not realize what they're voting for? | ||
| What you're voting for is the destruction of America, your country. | ||
| This is your country. I know the media tries to convince you that like blacks aren't American, that like you should be separate or you shouldn't adhere to like the laws of America. | ||
| Like I get that the whole impetus now is to... | ||
| Try to tell people that America is evil and must be destroyed, but now you're seeing it in practice and it turns out that you're American. | ||
| It turns out that America is your country and the thing you're advocating for being destroyed is the system that benefits you if you're asking to destroy it in favor of foreigners who are not American and don't deserve anything from America. | ||
| They haven't contributed. They haven't been here at all ever. | ||
| They just showed up yesterday and they are now the priority above you Who, as many black Americans are, have had roots in America longer than European Americans. | ||
| So that's why nationalism is the answer. | ||
| That's why nationalism is the key. | ||
| No matter what our differences are, if we can all come together and support America first and foremost, it wouldn't be a big problem. | ||
| None of this other stuff would be a big problem. | ||
| They've got you people all confused and not hitting against your own interests, trying to justify it to you. | ||
| You don't have to fall for it. You can actually vote them out. | ||
| Let's talk a little bit more about immigration here in America and around the world. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm going to be welcoming Simon from Florida for the first half of the next hour. | |
| Talking about the international landscape, especially when it comes to China's major movements they're making. | ||
| But this post was from Viral News NYC. While I was at the Roosevelt Hotel Migrant Processing Center, I spoke with migrants who just arrived in New York City by plane. | ||
| He told me he came from California, and the Salvation Army paid him and his migrant friends to come to NYC. Here's one of the groups sending migrants besides Governor Abbott. | ||
| And it's actually a letter from the Salvation Army, who, correct me if I'm wrong, private charity, right? | ||
| A letter to a TSA employee saying the individual standing in front of you has recently been discharged from a U.S. immigration detention center as part of the Migrant Protocols Program and must cross the country to present themselves at an ICE check-in approximately two weeks from now. | ||
| So this is the letter that they give to the people who never show up for that second meeting, by the way. | ||
| Tens of thousands, like 90% of them just don't show up. | ||
| They're currently showing you all identification in their possession, which should be adequate for them to be able to be searched in secure flight. | ||
| Please find them in secure flight and allow entry if cleared. | ||
| So, like, why is this private charity organization writing letters as if they're the U.S. government? | ||
| Why are they directing the U.S. government to accept insufficient identification in order to get people on a plane? | ||
| What empowers the Salvation Army to make declarations like this? | ||
| Doesn't make any sense. And this is again from at Viral News NYC. And there's actually a very convenient phone number there for anybody that wants to call in. | ||
| So that's nice. So you can add Salvation Army of Riverside and Moreno Valley to the list of... | ||
| Suspects. List of co-defendants when the crime that's being carried out right now of the invasion of the United States is eventually reversed and penalized and punished. | ||
| I guess that'll be another group of people that will have to be sentenced for their participation in the circumventing of American law. | ||
| I don't know why they think they can do this. | ||
| I guess because they're getting away with it. | ||
| So maybe we can solve that problem pretty easily. | ||
| Meanwhile, the stories at Gateway Pundit, we'll show you the video here now, censored version. | ||
| Who the F do you think you are? | ||
| A New York man colorfully chews out and then turns the table on security team after they refuse to let him film footage of a facility housing illegal aliens. | ||
| So just like is happening elsewhere in New York, you've got Foreigners from other countries, citizens of other nations coming into America, being permitted to enter by the Biden administration, being processed by the American government for falsified asylum claims. | ||
| in a totally illegal fashion put on planes whether by the Salvation Army or by the government of Texas shipped to New York so imported by the government housed by the government on taxpayer dollars and if you try to answer questions or even want to protest this the government will then arrest you throw you in prison or violate your rights In protecting the foreign invaders. | ||
| Okay? So this is an inside job, invasion orchestrated, carried out, protected by the American authorities in the most treasonous activity the world has ever seen. | ||
| This was caught on video. | ||
| We'll go down to clip number four. | ||
| This New York resident arguing with somebody with a very deep... | ||
| Accent. That's one of the bizarre things about this. | ||
| You have American on American soil filming a public street being ordered to stop by some foreign dude who's protecting a bunch of foreigners inside the hotel. | ||
| It's weird. It's happening. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Yo, what is it? | |
| Oh, it's a shelter. Oh, good looking. | ||
| It's a shelter, my Pete. | ||
| You're not supposed to do that. | ||
| Excuse me? You're not supposed to film here. | ||
| That's what I'm saying. You're not supposed to film here. | ||
| What is this? I don't know. | ||
| You know you don't have a right to do this. | ||
| I don't know. I don't know what this is. | ||
| You don't have a right to film in here. | ||
| That's what I'm telling you. What is this over here? | ||
| And who are you? Okay. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You want to know who I am? Please, sir. | |
| You don't have a right to film here. | ||
| I'm talking to you right now. | ||
| You don't have a right to film here. Can you please? | ||
| Who are you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't know. | |
| Who are you? | ||
| They don't want nobody out here. | ||
| They don't want nobody where? | ||
| They're standing in front of the building with a camera. | ||
| Oh, you're bugging. | ||
| And you really want to be recording, man. | ||
| You're bugging. | ||
| All right, you wait. | ||
| Why you surrounding me? | ||
| Why you surrounding me? | ||
| You wait. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, now you want me to wait? | |
| No, you wait. | ||
| What's up? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What's up with you, yo? | |
| Relax. | ||
| Relax. | ||
| Why you surrounding me? | ||
| What's up, yo? | ||
| Relax. | ||
| Relax. | ||
| We can talk to anyone, PD. | ||
| Talk to who? I don't talk to popos. | ||
| I'm not a snitch. Turn around. | ||
| Don't talk to them. Turn around. Stop playing with me. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Look at this one. Look at this bird. Yo, who are you, bro? | |
| Why you on my property? On your property? | ||
|
unidentified
|
My property. Yo, stop playing with me, yo. | |
| Don't you realize he's trying to bait you? | ||
| I'm about to knock him the f*** out. | ||
| That's what I'm about to do. He's got to move back. | ||
| What the f*** is all y'all doing, bro? | ||
| Especially you, bro. Who the f*** do you think you are? | ||
| You don't come to the sidewalk and talk to me like that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You hear me? You hear me? | |
| Make this the last time you approach a member of the public giving them orders on the sidewalk. | ||
| Stick to your job. This is our job to tell you to move. | ||
| You don't tell me to move. | ||
| I don't go by... Who are you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Doing my job. Who are you? | |
| Doing my job. Your job is inside, not outside, bro. | ||
| Who? Security. What security? | ||
| Look at you. Look at the cop right here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What's your name in basketball, brother? | |
| I don't know how to read. What is it? | ||
| What is it? Say it off for the people, bro. | ||
| 7807. Name? Thank you very much. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There you go. Now you keep it moving and don't f*** with me before I knock you the f*** out, nigga. | |
| I love this shit. This is sidewalk. | ||
| I don't know what this is. I don't know who you are. | ||
| You don't come outside and give me orders. | ||
| Alright? And I'm still here. | ||
| And you came too and gave me an order. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And why? Well, you still here. | |
| Everybody, there you go. You're getting orders. | ||
| Get your watch inside, bro. Don't come to the side. | ||
| We're giving members of the public orders. | ||
| God bless America. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I love that guy. We've got to find out who that guy is. | |
| I hadn't watched that. Eli, please come on the show. | ||
| You're a hero and a champion and a true American. | ||
| We love you. That's just the best thing ever. | ||
| I loved that. I want to watch that again. | ||
| That was awesome. That's what it is to be an American. | ||
| That's like, just straight up. | ||
| Who do these people think they are? | ||
| Literally, foreigners. Foreign accents. | ||
| Came and speak English. Coming out and ordering around Americans. | ||
| Thinking that Americans are just gonna, you know, accept the symbol of authority. | ||
| If you speak like you're authoritarian, people are gonna go, oh, I'm not allowed to film. | ||
| Oh, sorry, I'm not allowed to film. Sorry, I didn't know I wasn't allowed to film. | ||
| Instead, you get this dude like, what did you just say to me? | ||
| It's beautiful. It's perfect. | ||
| It's perfect. It reminds me that we played that Chinese guy who was talking about how there was a bookshop that refused to allow Xi Jinping to hold his reading there. | ||
| And this infuriated the Chinese guy. | ||
| He was like this. I can't remember what he called it. | ||
| He was like this arrogant American. | ||
| And it's like, yeah, he's an American. | ||
| That's his right. | ||
| Is that not the most beautiful thing that America has ever done? | ||
| Like, if you have an establishment, if you own a business in America, it doesn't matter if it's literally the president of China. | ||
| You can say, get the hell out of my store. | ||
| You can say, no, I'm not doing that. | ||
| It doesn't matter if it's the prime minister of Timbuktu telling you to get off the sidewalk. | ||
| You can say, who the hell do you think you are ordering me around? | ||
| I'm an American in America, so why don't you, you know, check your tone? | ||
| It's great stuff. It's really brilliant, amazing stuff. | ||
| This is how it should be treated. And of course, the underlying thing going on here is that you've got... | ||
| We don't know who these people are, who's paying for them, what government facility this is. | ||
| They say it's a refugee... | ||
| So you've got private security telling Americans they can't film this place where they are harboring illegal immigrants. | ||
| They're harboring... Lawbreakers and fugitives. | ||
| And they're using foreign security officers to try to intimidate Americans out of exposing it. | ||
| Whoever you are, Eli, I want you on the show. | ||
| I want you on this show. | ||
| I want you doing this every day. | ||
| That was amazing and fantastic and exactly what we need at this point in time. | ||
| That was invigorating. That was inspiring. | ||
| That was Jonesian. | ||
| That was Schroyerific. | ||
| That was people using their First Amendment in the way it was intended. | ||
| Incredibly powerful stuff. | ||
| Now we're going to move on from this. We're going to go to some more international news in the third hour. | ||
| Just in the meantime, Texans for Strong Borders posted this on Twitter. | ||
| With 6.2 million Texas homeowners and $58 billion in expenses to educate illegal immigrants, every Texan household has paid around $9,295 over the past decade educating illegal aliens. | ||
| Just educating them. $58 billion taken from you to educate foreigners. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| While we get set up with Simon from Florida, I got a couple awesome videos to show you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Resistance to the plan. | |
| The New World Order global government plan is marching on regardless of what... | ||
| The fact that everybody hates it, right? | ||
| Because for the sake of democracy, we have to ignore the will of the people. | ||
| Great. There are people standing up against this in various stages. | ||
| The first is the Hungarian PM, this Hungarian Prime Minister, calling out Biden Soros and the EU for trying to push their agenda on Hungary. | ||
| Let's watch clip number seven. | ||
| He says this autumn Hungary's opponents are expected to come forward to make their demands simultaneously. | ||
| What the Soros Empire, the Brussels bureaucrats, and the Democrats in America want from us is what we cannot and, I think, do not want to give them. | ||
| The U.S. administration will continue to want us involved in the war, to supply arms, and to give more money to Ukraine, but at least to allow Brussels to give Ukraine our money. | ||
| Brussels wants us to let migrants in, And build migrant ghettos for them. | ||
| And let sexual propaganda into schools. | ||
| And for us to yield economic decision-making powers to them. | ||
| And furthermore, to relinquish autonomous foreign policy and the right to have foreign policy, issues decided on a unanimous basis. | ||
| They are threatening that if we do not do all this, they will put continuous pressure on us Withhold funds from Brussels, and through the coffers of the Soros Empire, pay the Hungarian left, the Hungarian government's domestic opponents. | ||
| What can we say to this? | ||
| Firstly, that Hungary does not belong to the club of Jowal countries, who, when they receive a phone call from Brussels, simply answer, Secondly, we can say that Hungary cannot allow anyone to restrict its independence and sovereignty. | ||
| This is not only because of common sense, and not only because of historical experience, but also because the Hungarian constitution simply does not allow it, and indeed expressly forbids it. | ||
| It's a brilliant laying out there of what it's like to be a target of this unified cabal. | ||
| And you can see the various methods they have of forcing you into submission. | ||
| And if they can do it one way, they do that. | ||
| If they can do it another way, they do that. | ||
| It doesn't matter to them. What matters is you submit and that you accept their ideological poison and concede to your own destruction. | ||
| That's where it's being resisted at the highest levels. | ||
| Now let's look at where it's being resisted on the lowest, smallest, but perhaps even more important levels, places like Kootenai County in Idaho. | ||
| Here's a candidate, I believe, for city council talking about resisting smart cities in a brilliant and powerful way. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch clip 12. So what I'll say about CDA 2030 is, yeah, it's a nonprofit, and I think the city pays it $40,000 a year, if I'm not mistaken. | |
| 25, says Dan. | ||
| But no, I mean, I've read 40. | ||
| We could debate that at another time. | ||
| But yeah, it's a non-profit. | ||
| And if you look at CDA 2030, it lines up perfectly with the UN Agenda 2030, and it's all the same jargon. | ||
| And so, and I would challenge anyone, too. | ||
| If anyone says, oh, that's a conspiracy theory, go to the UN's website and search for it, and there's probably a 50-page document that you can download on PDF. Just right here, UN, handbook on smart urban innovations. | ||
| Perfect example right there. | ||
| But what I'd say about the CDA 2030 is I do think they have a higher agenda, and I do think they're coming in and implementing a global agenda in our community. | ||
| And yeah, I do think that that's something that violates the standards that we set in this community, and I do think that this should be more community-driven. | ||
| And if I'm elected, I want to look at all the money we're spending on NGOs, dark money organizations, and consultancies. | ||
| That's how you do it, folks. Dismantle this from on high and at your local level. | ||
| We'll be right back. All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| This is American Journal, Infowars.com. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com is where you go to support us. | ||
| Vitamin and mineral fusion is back in stock, one of our top-selling products ever, and yet you're getting it at 25% off. | ||
| It can really replace almost all of your, you know, typical vitamins that you take. | ||
| Why sit there and down... | ||
| You know, pill after pill of C, D, E, B12, calcium, magnesium, zinc. | ||
| Just get it all at once in a delicious fruit drink mix. | ||
| Vitamin Mineral Fusion. It really does taste good. | ||
| Add it to a cup of cold water or put it in a smoothie and you are set for the day. | ||
| That's the power of Vitamin Mineral Fusion. | ||
| Now back in stock and on sale at 25% off. | ||
| Now I'd like to welcome to the show our reporter in the field, One of our most powerful investigators, Simon from Florida, calling in about what's going on in the international stage, what we can expect in the very near future. | ||
| It was last week that a white paper was published in China called A Global Community of Shared Future, China's Proposals and Actions. | ||
| And this white paper has extremely interesting, in some cases disturbing, implications for the future of the planet. | ||
| Thank you so much for calling in, Simon, or thank you for being on today. | ||
| What do people need to know about China's plans for the very near future and what they call a community of a shared future? | ||
| What does this mean? Essentially, they're proposing that the world... | ||
| Can be governed in a win-win manner, which is essentially that through cooperation and living in harmony, we can actually change the nature of international relations such that it's not a zero-sum game. | ||
| Pi can get bigger and everyone can get a greater share. | ||
| That's That's the essence of what they're proposing in that document that's actually 12,720 words long. | ||
| It's a huge treatise. | ||
| It's literally their proposal for the future of the world, because we're now in this integral, this transition period, where the UN is literally negotiating a document called the Pact for the Future of the World. | ||
| That in theory is going to be agreed by consensus and presented at the future of the World Summit next year. | ||
| But it appears that right from the outset that any hopeless consensus is completely broken down. | ||
| We're now forming into two power blocs, the Americas and the West, versus China, Russia, Confederation, and We've got professors such as Mearsheimer and Ferguson, and also Henry Kissinger, who have all said that we've entered a new old war. | ||
| Literally, whilst you've been on air, President Putin has been addressing the Valdai discussion club, and he's given a very, very detailed speech. | ||
| He's saying that Russia is prepared to make significant contributions to the New World Order, by which he means the New New World Order, because it's been agreed by all the major powers that the New World Order that was declared in 1991, what was called the Post-Cold World Order, has abruptly come to an end. | ||
| And we've had extraordinary exchanges in the last Seven days between the US State Department in the form of the Global Engagement Center, that's one of the bodies that was having Twitter and the other social media forums censor even American citizens' contributions to online discussions. | ||
| Ironically, they're now accusing the Chinese of being engaged in all manner of misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, propaganda. | ||
| They've responded extremely strongly. | ||
| All the diplomatic inhibitions are off. | ||
| And indeed, when McCarthy fell, the Chinese media said that U.S. politics is now a host of demons Dancing with riotous revelry. | ||
| And that's the chapter heading from a Chinese book called The City of Terror. | ||
| I mean, there's some really, really extreme occurrences occurring. | ||
| And I appreciate that many in the audience who are struggling to make ends meet and just overwhelmed with their daily existence. | ||
| And actually finding that the state is turning against them, as we're seeing not only with the border, but those voters in Chicago are laterly discovering that following down-the-ballot party politics has actually not been in their own best interest. | ||
| You know, unfortunately, and it's traumatic even for me to say this, America's at the turning point where we're having to ask ourselves, like the comedy sketch, are we the bad? | ||
| Right, well, okay, so just to wrap our minds around this, because, you know, obviously China is going to be a little bit confused at the fact that we have a governmental system that at least theoretically allows for us to peacefully remove leaders that we don't like, and they just have to deal with that. | ||
| I can see how that can seem chaotic or disturbing to people who are in a communistic system where everything is done in a top-down measure. | ||
| I get how that could be confusing to them, but essentially you had the communist—originally you had the Cold War with communism and, you know, capitalistic, free, liberal societies sort of going head-to-head. | ||
| And this term, New World Order, first came about, and people know, like, George H.W. Bush, using it in 1992 right at the tail end of the—like, the Cold War was over, the Soviet Empire had fallen— And the idea was that this was the end of history. | ||
| We settled it once and for all. | ||
| Liberal democracy was the way forward, and America was going to be sort of the monolithic top dog and run the world. | ||
| That was their vision of the New World Order. | ||
| That has sort of run its course, and now there's the new New World Order. | ||
| I mean, what's the trick here? | ||
| Because what China seems to be saying is... | ||
| Not a bad thing, is that they want true diversity, as in they want countries with their own sovereignty to be able to interact in a peaceful manner without one dominating another. | ||
| Like, is this just lip service that disguises a... | ||
| A bad policy? Or is this what they're actually intending? | ||
| Like, what's actually behind this? | ||
| I have the whole white page here, but obviously it's way too much for most people to read. | ||
| But they say things like, we should increase inter-civilizational exchanges to promote harmony, inclusiveness, and respect for differences. | ||
| There are more than 200 countries and regions, over 2,500 ethnic groups, and a vast number of religions in our world. | ||
| Such cultural diversity is what makes the world colorful. | ||
| Like... I agree with that. | ||
| I mean, why am I agreeing with this white paper from China when they seem like they're standing up against the monolithic, monoculture, plastic, globalized homogenization that our leadership seems to be promoting? | ||
| Am I missing something here, or does this not sound like the worst thing in the world? | ||
| Clearly, one can take, or not least, the social credit system with The Chinese governance model, but they're making it explicitly crystal clear that at least from their point of view, | ||
| they're not seeking to export the Chinese government model to every country in the world, and they say that repeatedly. | ||
| And they're very much looking to form a confederation Of cooperating friendly countries, not people scrabbling over the scrap, as you mentioned in your conversation with some British conservative political activists. | ||
| So they're saying that the world has A great number of pressing issues. | ||
| And one of the things that they are essentially baiting the West with is its focus on climate change. | ||
| Now, I mean, we really are at a tipping point here. | ||
| And I know I can sound kind of melodramatic and people can accuse me of exaggerating. | ||
| But, you know, in the last three weeks, We've had Secretary Blinken on the 13th of September. | ||
| We've had the Russian foreign minister. | ||
| We've had the Chinese president. | ||
| We've had the U.S. president. | ||
| And we've had the Chinese foreign minister all saying the same thing. | ||
| I don't think you're exaggerating anything at all. | ||
| all and we'll be back on the other side to discuss more. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back folks. | |
| We'll be right back. | ||
| I gotta say, I am having trouble knowing what to make of this Chinese white paper they came out with. | ||
| We have the whole thing here. It is a very, very thick document called A Global Community of Shared Future, China's Proposals and Actions. | ||
| And that term crops up over and over again. | ||
| Global Community of Shared Future. | ||
| I mean, that's the watchword. | ||
| That's what they keep saying over and over again. | ||
| But it's like you read it And they're saying a lot of the right things. | ||
| I mean, what they're saying doesn't sound bad, and it sounds better in many cases than similar things that are said by our own Western globalist hegemony. | ||
| They talk about climate change, but they actually don't talk about climate change. | ||
| They say things like... We should build an ecosystem that puts Mother Nature and green development first. | ||
| Humanity may have the ability to utilize nature and even transform it, but it's still a part of nature. | ||
| We should care for nature, not place ourselves above it. | ||
| And then, of course, you just picture the pollution in Chinese rivers and the smog blotting out the sky in Beijing and, you know, the cloud seeding programs. | ||
| So, like, you know, I'm not, like, falling for this, knowing, you know, looking more at their actions than their words. | ||
| But they don't seem to be pursuing an outwardly, like, openly destructive green program that, you know, targets industry for total shutdown. | ||
| It's instead more of a, you know, we have to grow, we have to keep building, but we have to do it in a way that is in some way sustainable, which I can't disagree with. | ||
| I even say things like, we have to beat the swords of war into the plowshares of peace. | ||
| That's a quote from the Bible. | ||
| Big countries treat smaller ones as equals instead of seeking unilateral dominance or imposing their will on others. | ||
| I mean, we just stuck between a rock and a hard place because, again, they say a lot of nice things in this white paper. | ||
| How much of it do they actually mean, Simon? | ||
| Simon from Florida is on air with us. | ||
| Simon from Flory2 on Twitter. | ||
| We can follow. He's constantly updating with, you know, really, in many cases, obscure foreign news outlets publishing things that are of great interest to Americans but don't find their way typically to American media. | ||
| So Simon's an amazing source for that and does a lot of time thinking and understanding, you know, what things like... | ||
| What does this white paper mean? | ||
| And they talk about the five-point proposal or the five goals, and again, they just continually repeat, almost like a mantra, global community of shared future, global community of shared future. | ||
| Help us again understand this, Simon, because as you point out, you've got leaders from these countries that are in some cases at de facto war with one another, and yet they're saying the same thing, and we do seem to be driving towards globalism. | ||
| What is behind this, Simon? If I may, let me just make three points. | ||
| This came out on Tuesday last week. | ||
| It came out at approximately midnight New York time. | ||
| I saw it at 1.15, and I then worked for 18 straight hours on it. | ||
| I read it twice. I pulled out 20 key paragraphs, just those of other analysts, and then produced on the same day An 85-minute documentary about this one document that people can go and watch on weaponized news on Rumble or Facebook. | ||
| That's how seriously I like to look at it. | ||
| Okay? I mean, it is really epoch-defining. | ||
| And it's coming to a head in 10 days. | ||
| This isn't something that's like multi-generational. | ||
| People have to wait until they're 100 years old to see the results. | ||
| There's the third Belt and Road Initiative Forum in Beijing. | ||
| Not this coming weekend, but the following weekend. | ||
| President Putin is flying to Russia, to China for that. | ||
| He's going to be the keynote speaker, and the President of China is acting as the host. | ||
| They've already reported that they're holding even the actual start, date, time, location, and the identity of the countries attending that they've simply given a list, not even a list, but they said it's over 110 countries in secret so that America can't put pressure on individual countries or do anything to sabotage the event. | ||
| It's absolutely incredible that something that's involving half of the planet is being orchestrated in secret, and we're 10 days away from it. | ||
| That's also an extremely auspicious day on the Chinese lunar calendar, the 15th of October. | ||
| When people are talking about the global north and the global south, on certain days in the Chinese lunar calendar, They say that a particular direction is the evil direction, and you shouldn't send anything that way or travel on a journey in that direction or take a new job that involves moving to a new location in that direction. | ||
| And the evil direction on the 15th of October is the north, so the global south is the good. | ||
| Now, communists supposedly shouldn't be thinking about those kind of things, but it's like saying that every Russian communist during the last hundred years Never ever believed in God. | ||
| And we know they did. | ||
| So, I mean, I can't really express in the time we have available how serious this issue is. | ||
| If people are interested, I know that it's not for everyone. | ||
| They can go and look at that literally 85-minute documentary that I filmed explaining the key paragraphs. | ||
| For example, in that enormous document, That I covered on Weaponized News on Facebook and Rumble. | ||
| There was one sentence in it, in 12,720 words, with the Chinese saying, we are internationalizing the use of the renminbi, which is a fair way of saying the Chinese yuan. | ||
| Nobody anywhere in the Western media, eight days, nine days later, have picked up on that What we saw happen this week is Saudi Arabia announced that they're now going to accept the Chinese AliPay system. | ||
| They've announced that they've done a tourism partnership with China. | ||
| Starting next year, they're looking forward to 3 million Chinese tourists coming in a year. | ||
| They're going to use their Chinese debit card, and that basically makes the Chinese yuan Directly convertible into the Saudi Arabian rial without going through the US dollar. | ||
| That's a huge development that they flagged in this document in one sentence out of 35 type pages. | ||
| And I spotted that, I broadcast about it, and then the consequences of that happened literally six days later. | ||
| So, I mean, I'm literally waiting with trepidation to see what Putin's speech is going to be and what Xi is going to announce and what these 110 other countries are going to say. | ||
| Because what Blinken and Biden have made abundantly clear is that essentially the concept of neutrality that had previously been challenged in March at the Munich Security Conference with regards to people picking aside On Ukraine is now being completely done away with for the future of the systems of government for the entire planet going into the future 100 years. | ||
| That's what the Turks and the Chinese are talking about the next century forward, literally. | ||
| Just like with Like I said, I think you are not over-exaggerating what a big deal this is. | ||
| You can follow Simon on Twitter at SimonFromFlory2 and follow WeaponizedNews on Rumble. | ||
| Alright, welcome back. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| This is the American Journal, InfowarsStore.com. | ||
| We need your support now more than ever. | ||
| Thank you so much for supporting us. | ||
| As we continue to be the premier platform for opposing the New World Order in all of its various nefarious forms. | ||
| I still have a lot of stories to cover and some great videos to show you. | ||
| And we're going to talk about some crime as well. | ||
| Let's go first to clip number five here. | ||
| As this has been a trademark, in fact, yesterday or the day before, there was an article that was like, yeah, it turns out labeling the current economy Bidenomics might not have been the best idea, considering that everyone is doing badly, more or less. Considering that the economy is in the toilet, maybe combining your name with it wasn't the best maneuver there. | ||
| Maybe. Maybe not. | ||
| And of course, it's not even good in the official reports, and the official reports are lying to make things seem better than they are. | ||
| So the reality of Bidenomics is just your savings being hollowed out, everything being more expensive. | ||
| I mean, I keep repeating the stat. | ||
| It's probably higher at this point. | ||
| But $720 a month, the average family is spending more on basic necessities? | ||
| Like, that is such a huge amount for the average American. | ||
|
unidentified
|
$700 a month. | |
| That's a new car. | ||
| That's a house. It's like... | ||
| That's multiple vacations a year. | ||
| They're just robbing from you quietly, secretively, by slowly but surely ratcheting up the price of everything. | ||
| In their overall ultimate goal of you will own nothing and you will be happy. | ||
| They are driving us inexorably towards a debt-based society where ownership is a thing of the past. | ||
| Especially with big purchases. | ||
| We've talked about this before. What are the consequences of a death of savings? | ||
| Certainly you're not going to be buying houses or cars. | ||
| Now it's hard to even buy your phone if you've bought a phone in the last couple years. | ||
| Like, they really just want you to rent your phone. | ||
| They don't want you to own anything. | ||
| What you can own is, like, a couple pairs of clothes, you know, the food that you... | ||
| Like, anything consumable, you'll be able to purchase with your social credit score. | ||
| But anything permanent, anything you can... | ||
| Pass on to your children. | ||
| Like that's a thing of the past. | ||
| You really do have to understand that they are forcibly remaking economy itself. | ||
| What the economy is. | ||
| Capitalism that developed as a natural progression of just barter and trade to using money as symbols of wealth. | ||
| You give me what I want. | ||
| I give you what you want. | ||
| We both benefit. Natural progression of just human interaction is being reformed and forcibly reshaped To where every purchase and every monetary interaction you have is a vector for their control, is a vulnerability for them to exploit. | ||
| They're announcing this. | ||
| They're telling you that's called stakeholder capitalism. | ||
| It's called social credit. | ||
| And they're doing it. And a part of this, of course, is things like what happened with Russell Brand or what happened with Alex Jones for that matter. | ||
| Where you'll be prevented from actually engaging with the economy if you go against them. | ||
| And the way that works now is to have somebody come up with an accusation from 20 years ago and the corporations decide unilaterally to destroy your income. | ||
| But once it's all unified into a singular system, it won't even be that complicated. | ||
| You won't even know why you've been cut off. | ||
| They won't even have to give you a reason. | ||
| And that'll keep everybody in line and self-censoring to prevent the possibility that they be cut off. | ||
| So let's take a look at two things now. | ||
| First, we're going to look at what has happened as a result of these people gaining more power and this policy and these programs being put into place. | ||
| And then we're going to look at where this goes and what's being announced by The world controllers at places like the World Economic Forum. | ||
| So first we go to clip number five. | ||
| Costco guy. She's pointing out how much higher food prices are than what's being reported by the government. | ||
| He's a 7% inflation, try 75%. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Madras lentils, $15.99. | |
| I bought those a year ago for $6.99. | ||
| I keep getting told that we got, you know, 6%, 7% inflation. | ||
| You gotta be kidding me. Let's look at what else we got going on here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We literally bought this chicken broth, $5.69, two months ago. | |
| So there she's showing proof. | ||
| It was $5 a month ago. | ||
| It's $10 now. | ||
| That went from $5.99 to $12.49 for flour. | ||
| Here you go. Butter was $9.99. | ||
| 49 cents was significantly higher now. | ||
| Chicken prices hit record highs under Biden administration as U.S. inflation keep beef pork out of reach. | ||
| Again, this is by design. | ||
| It's not an accident. | ||
| It's on purpose. | ||
| It's not that hard to figure out. | ||
| The same people that are like, you should not eat meat anymore, are then buying up all of the meat production and shutting it down to replace it with bugs. | ||
| Like, this is all a part of a plan, an operation, a boiling of the frogs, hoping that you don't notice that your food's only going up a couple cents every week, but within half a year, you're paying twice as much for simple necessities. | ||
| This is This is the process by which they inculcate you into slavery, into owning nothing. | ||
| Klaus Schwab has announced the end of car ownership. | ||
| And again, not a suggestion, not a... | ||
| Not an idea that they're workshopping because they think that it would be better to not have- No, no. | ||
| They're doing it. | ||
| It's happening. Unless you stop them, this is the future. | ||
| You will own nothing. | ||
| Everything will be Access controlled by people who despise you and your subservience to them will determine your level of comfort and luxury and access to basic things like transportation, food and water. | ||
| That's what they're doing now. | ||
| They've announced it. They're doing it. | ||
| It's in process. It's already in the works. | ||
| The corporations are already on board. | ||
| Major car companies are already announcing they are no longer producing combustible engines. | ||
| They are going full electric, which is impossible because there's a variety of different limiting factors that prevent the replacement of every gasoline car with an electric car. | ||
| Just the lithium required, the minerals required to build the batteries for the cars. | ||
| There's not enough in the world to replace every car. | ||
| The electricity generation that we're capable of is not sufficient to drive even half of the cars if they were all electric. | ||
| So they're putting you in a position where it's not just a suggestion that you get an electric car. | ||
| It will be impossible for you to own a car at all, meaning all cars will be community-owned and access to the vehicles and therefore to transportation itself will The access will be controlled by these tyrannical scumbags and used specifically to get you to submit to whatever they want to do next, which their ultimate goal is total depopulation. | ||
| Here is clip number eight, Klaus Schwab announcing the end of car ownership. | ||
| We meet for the 20th. | ||
| I hope I will have the pleasure still to be invited for the meeting. | ||
| When we meet for the 20th Governance Summit, you will use the app. | ||
| Like Uber. But not anymore. | ||
| To call some driver. | ||
| But... Automatically guided car, a self-driven car, will come to your hotel or wherever you are and will bring you to the airport. | ||
| No, Los Angeles is one of the cities with the heaviest traffic who told me in 2030, Los Angeles will be private car-driven free. | ||
| And this will allow to transform highways into parks, And other public spheres. | ||
| It's utopian nonsense. | ||
| Utter bullcrap. | ||
| It's about control. It's always been about control. | ||
| Alright, welcome back folks. | ||
| Final segment of American Journal this morning. | ||
| I'm actually not gonna be here tomorrow. | ||
| I've got a dentist appointment. Chase will be sitting in the chair tomorrow. | ||
| We'll still figure out what we're going to do for Monday. | ||
| We don't know if I'll be here or what we'll do. | ||
| I'll be here Monday, but I'll know whether I'll be hosting this show or Chase and I will be co-hosting the Alex Jones Show. | ||
| We'll have to figure that out. | ||
| But we are mixing things up here as we continue to deal with, well... | ||
| Everything going on, our co-workers being sent to prison, lawsuits being launched, and all the other attacks that we're under that would have destroyed us if not for your support at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| We really do thank you for that. | ||
| We really do hope that we are living up to our end of the bargain in providing you the information and spirit of resistance that is required for opposition to this globalist Scheme of death that they're running. | ||
| We're going to talk a little bit about crime here. | ||
| But first, this just broke from just the news. | ||
| A decision by the Supreme Court. | ||
| Schools cannot ban merely offensive speech on gender identity appeals court rules. | ||
| No, it's not the Supreme Court. | ||
| This was a... Tamra Farah says, | ||
| American Strategies President Tamara Farah explains how schools are creating a gender ideology problem in children, saying, quote, Five-year-olds do not go to kindergarten thinking about changing their sexual identity. | ||
| Fifty-six years after it exempted anti-war teenagers from First Amendment protections while on campus, a federal appeals court in America's heartland affirm students' speech rights in public school on an equally contentious subject today. | ||
| St. Louis-based 8th 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a preliminary injunction on Monday against an Iowa school district policy that threatens suspension and expulsion for, quote, intentional and or persistent refusal to respect a peers' gender identity, finding it's likely too vague to survive legal scrutiny. | ||
| A school district cannot avoid the strictures of the First Amendment simply by defining certain speech as bullying or harassment, as did the Linmar Community School District. | ||
| The three-judge panel ruled in a case that drew friend-of-the-court briefs by dozens of conservatives and religious groups in 18 Republican-led states in favor of the plaintiffs. | ||
| A similar group of court watchers is asking the Boston-based First Circuit, which oversees Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Rhode Island, to also overturn a lower court's ruling that students do not have the right to assert the existence of sexual binary while on school grounds. | ||
| I mean, my God, it's... | ||
| This is a good ruling. | ||
| Essentially what the ruling is saying is that you're allowed to acknowledge reality. | ||
| So that's good. That's nice. | ||
| The school district, the appeals court has now said the school districts cannot punish children for recognizing existence, recognizing reality, being in line with the physical world and the reality of it. | ||
| So that's nice. | ||
| We got that going for us. | ||
| The fact that it had to get to an appeals court to get to this point, sort of troubling. | ||
| And when you think about this in the correct mind frame, that is, the LGBTQP plus ideology is in fact a spiritual, religious, moral foundation. | ||
| You know, all of this becomes absurd, right? | ||
| Essentially, they're just reaffirming that schools cannot dictate religion to the students. | ||
| Which should be obvious, but we have to go to court to prove this, I guess. | ||
| And like, you know, what it is based on It goes back to the Vietnam War and the Supreme Court deciding about, you know, students wearing black armbands to Des Moines schools to protest the Vietnam War. | ||
| Which in that case, you know, that would be like an opinion, right? | ||
| That would be something that's pretty obvious as an American. | ||
| You have a right to disagree with the American government. | ||
| That's kind of our whole thing. | ||
| So that's an easy decision to make. | ||
| In this case... It's not really an opinion that you're allowed to express. | ||
| It is in fact reality. | ||
| You are now allowed to express as a student in school that gender sex is a binary. | ||
| which is just the reality of the situation. | ||
| A flurry of court activity related to gender identity in school continued Tuesday in Wisconsin. | ||
| A state court struck down the Kettle Moraine school district's policy of hiding gender transitions as an intrusion on parents' rights to control the medical and health care decisions about their children. | ||
| And yet again, we're in this situation where it's like, what is the punishment for trying to do this? | ||
| What is the punishment for wasting everyone's time and all the resources that it takes to combat this attempt to steal children from their parents? | ||
| The people that did this, the people that instituted this policy that has now been struck down by a court, What is the punishment they're receiving? | ||
| Because should they not receive punishment if you have people using their position of just moderate, like low-level power, these petty tyrants, and their position as principal or guidance counselor? | ||
| Who is violating the rights of parents by hiding, disguising, propagandizing students into transgenderism and then hiding that from the parents. | ||
| Like, what is the punishment for that? | ||
| Because, as the court has now indicated, that's not legal by any means. | ||
| That's not something that you're constitutionally permitted to do just because you are the guidance counselor at the school. | ||
| We're in another one of these situations where it's like, all right, If I go to a park with nothing but a trench coat on and flash a bunch of kids, I'm a criminal. | ||
| But if I do it in a locker room, it's okay? | ||
| Like, where is the consistency here? | ||
| And once you decide, like, okay, actually it's not okay just because you're doing it in a locker room and claim you're a woman, like, where's the punishment? | ||
| And where's the punishment for the people that have allowed this to happen? | ||
| Where are the... Where's the legal precedent for, like, attempted tyranny? | ||
| Like, I guarantee you these people who set these policies, these now, you know, judged to be illegal policies, I guarantee you they're still in their positions, and they're not going to just, like, respect the ruling of the court. | ||
| They've been convinced, and they are, in fact, in a religious position They're not about to stop. | ||
| They're about to find a way around it. | ||
| They're about to change their language a little bit to technically comport with the law while still doing what they want. | ||
| And it's not like I have to speculate about this. | ||
| Universities are openly doing this in opposition to the Supreme Court and their decision about affirmative action. | ||
| They're just still doing it. | ||
| They're told, like, no, you can't ask about You know whether they were you know you can't give them extra points for being a minority or being a protected class like you can't do that and so the schools just go okay well instead we'll ask them to write essays about their life experience and we'll give them a grade on that it's just the same thing but like technically subverting the law technically skirting around the law so they're technically not in violation of it but the spirit of the law is very clearly being violated So what do you do when we're in this situation where it's like there's some small faction of people that are trying to change a lot of their favor. | ||
| It's a massive allyship of millions of people all working in their individual position to subvert the law and get around it and do what they don't want you to do anyway and force it down your throat, whether or not it's legal. | ||
| So, I mean, there's got to be Maybe this will open up the door for personal lawsuits. | ||
| Maybe that would be a good way to do this. | ||
| Just put the schools on the defensive. | ||
| One of these parents of one of these students who has been transitioned secretly, they need to sue the school district out of existence as a signal to every other school district that goes, gee, if we allow this to happen, we're not going to exist anymore. | ||
| Because there needs to be some sort of punishment for people that so egregiously violate your parental rights. | ||
| So this is a good step. | ||
| This is nice. This is good to know that you're allowed to express reality in public school. | ||
| That's a good thing, no doubt. | ||
| What are the aggressive, offensive moves that need to be made? | ||
| How do we prevent this from ever even getting to court in the first place? | ||
| How do we prevent the tyrants at the petty level before it ever gets to the higher one? | ||
| That's the question I want to know. | ||
| It's going to do it for us. Alex Jones in 90 seconds. | ||
| Chase Geiser in studio tomorrow. | ||
| I will see you on Monday, folks, with brand new teeth. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The most powerful InfoWars life formula yet. | |
| DNA Force Plus is now back in stock for 25% off while supplies last. | ||
| This elite formula contains the most cutting-edge enzymes, potent antioxidants, and traditional naturally occurring ingredients to protect the vitality of your buried DNA. The powerhouse ingredients in DNA Force Plus include QQQ, CoQ10, | ||
| organic reishi mushroom, astrologous root, We're good to go. | ||
| Grab the combo pack with DNA Force Plus and Body Soul Support. |
Export Selection