All Episodes
Sept. 13, 2023 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:11:59
The American Journal: COVID Cancellations Return as California High Schools Cancel Football Games - FULL SHOW - 09/13/2023
Participants
Main voices
c
chase geiser
17:59
h
harrison smith
52:07
k
keith woods
23:24
Appearances
e
elon musk
01:52
g
greg reese
03:45
Clips
a
alex jones
00:56
o
owen shroyer
00:59
Callers
jefferson in virginia
03:00
max in wisconsin
00:45
qc in virginia
02:34
sean in california
02:19
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
greg reese
Elections have been rigged for centuries because government is a form of slavery, which is why what the founding fathers of these United States gave us is so revered.
They drafted a form of government unlike any other in history, a revolutionary form of governance based upon the foundation that all men are created equal and independent.
And that all are born with the inherent and inalienable right to the preservation of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
George Washington wrote, If men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences that can invite the consideration of mankind, Reason is of no use to us.
The freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the slaughter.
Benjamin Franklin wrote, Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government.
When this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins.
And this is where we are at today.
Our First Amendment states that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and And it has been stripped away from us by tyrants.
News host Owen Troyer is being charged with the crime of questioning the results of the 2020 presidential elections, the most blatant election fraud in U.S. history.
And he did so peacefully, which is his God-given right under the U.S. Constitution.
Schroyer isn't being charged with conspiracy, incitement, or any actual crime at all.
He is being charged for exercising his freedom of speech.
The sentencing document goes on for pages, quoting him for saying what Americans on both sides of the crippling two-party system have been saying for over a century.
In short, that the government is tyrannical and criminal, which should be obvious to just about everyone at this point.
And this is not a crime.
It is the first line of defense against tyranny, our freedom to call it out.
The document mentions a simple misdemeanor that involves Schroyer being on Capitol grounds.
This was a violation of a court order that resulted from a 2019 arrest when Schroyer stood and protested a House Judiciary Committee meeting.
But this is not the crime he is being charged with.
The 30-page sentencing document is nothing but hot air being blown by a legal team held on the leash by tyrants who occupy the halls of our government.
What Schroyer is actually being charged with is best summarized on page 20, where it states, his statements and actions after January 6 illustrate his complete lack of remorse.
To date, despite a number of opportunities he has taken to speak about the election in January 6, He has yet to sincerely demonstrate genuine remorse for his conduct.
In other words, he won't shut up about the stolen 2020 election.
This is his God-given right.
But the criminals who have hijacked we the people's government are letting the rest of us know that those days are over and we are now their slaves to be experimented on, thrown in jail, and murdered.
Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese.
harrison smith
All right, folks, that's the latest from Greg Reese covering, of course, the top story from yesterday on Shroyer's sentence to two months in prison.
Not sure when he'll start that jail time, that prison time, but...
We'll be joined in the second hour of today's program by Keith Woods, who helped lead the hashtag ban the ADL campaign on Twitter.
We'll talk to him about keeping that energy alive and actually making some Tangible gains against that singularly powerful and illegitimate organization.
A lot of stuff to talk about today, so stay with us.
Here's Smith, this is American Journal, Infowars.com, band.video.
Share those links, folks.
A lot of videos to show you today.
26 on my list.
We'll get to maybe half of them.
unidentified
It's Wednesday, September 13th, year of our Lord, 2023.
And... You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
harrison smith
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to The American Journal.
I am your host, Harrison Smith.
Infowars.com, band.video.
So we're going to share these links.
unidentified
There's lots to discuss today.
harrison smith
Lots of videos to show you.
We'll, of course, be talking a little bit about Owen Schroer's sentencing yesterday and his appearance on TimCast.
We'll show you some clips from that.
There's a lot of other stuff to talk about as well, especially the impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden.
We'll show you Kevin McCarthy's statements and statements from the Democrats.
And we'll go back in time and look at the first Trump impeachment, do a little compare and contrast to the way in which the Democrats defend each other and the Republicans are quick to throw each other under the bus.
It really is a lesson in governance.
So let's just get right into it.
to it.
Here it is, your daily dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Wednesday, the 13th of September 2023.
CIA tried to pay off analysts to bury findings that COVID lab leak was likely.
Central Intelligence Agency offered to pay off analysts in order to bury the findings that COVID-19 most likely leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China.
A new whistleblower has testified to Congress.
A senior-level CIA officer told House committee leaders that his agency tried to pay off six analysts who found that SARS-CoV-2 likely originated from a Wuhan lab if they changed their position and said the virus jumped from animals to humans, according to a letter sent Tuesday to CIA Director William Burns.
According to the whistleblower, at the end of its review, six of the seven members of the team believed the intelligence and science were sufficient to make a low-confidence assessment that COVID-19 originated from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, the House panel chairman wrote.
The seventh member of the team, who also happened to be the most senior, was the lone officer to believe that COVID-19 originated through zoonosis.
That's jumping from animals to humans.
The whistleblower further contends that to come to the eventual public determination of uncertainty, the other six members were given significant monetary incentive to change their position, they said, noting that the analysts were, quote, Windstrup and Turner also asked for documents and communication between the CIA and other federal agencies, including the State Department, the FBI, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Energy Department.
But, you know, this is not surprising.
It is actually to be expected.
As, after all, the CIA was working with Peter Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance to create COVID-19.
The heads of the CIA were instrumental in organizing Event 201, the tabletop exercise they held to program the government's responses to COVID around the world.
Avril Haines actually presided over Event 201, was a...
You know, main manager and coordinator of that event.
She, of course, is now the director of national intelligence.
That is the head of the head of the intelligence apparatus, the organizing superstructure that governs all of the various intelligence agencies.
So COVID-19 was an intelligence operation from the beginning.
And it's not a surprise that the CIA would bribe scientists to, in fact, that's One of the things they actually talked about doing and practiced doing in Event 201.
So again, not a surprise, not unexpected.
It is nice to see whistleblowers telling the truth about this.
Meanwhile, our next story here in your Daily Dispatch is one that we covered quite a bit yesterday, but...
It's new as of this show.
InfoWars host Owen Schroyer sentenced to 60 days in January 6th case from NBC News.
The conspiracy theorist was with Alex Jones on the ground of the Capitol.
Alex Jones, who are now calling Person 1, Person 1 on the Capitol on January 6th, but never entered the building and, in fact, used his influence and popularity with the crowd that day to stop people from going in.
He should be awarded a medal.
He will be appealing this decision, and he's out on parole, I guess, or whatever you call it.
He's out until they can appeal it.
And it really is incredible.
Not credible. We'll get a little bit more into that a little bit later, but we covered it sort of ad nauseum yesterday, so I think we'll have the pertinent information, but we will show you some clips from the TimCast appearance from...
Meanwhile, interesting story here.
France orders Apple iPhone 12 sales halted over radiation.
French regulators on Tuesday ordered Apple to halt sales of the iPhone 12 for emitting too much electromagnetic radiation.
The French agency that regulates radio frequencies, the AFNR, said testing found that the model admits more electromagnetic waves susceptible to be absorbed by the body than permitted.
The AFNR said it quote ordered Apple to remove iPhone 12 from the French market from September 12th due to the model exceeding the limit for electromagnetic absorption by the body.
Said accredited labs found absorption of electromagnetic energy by the body at 5.7 watts per kilogram during tests, simulating when the phone was being held in the hand or kept in the pocket.
The European standard is a specific absorption rate of 4.0 watts per kilogram in such tests.
Yeah, pretty concerning, especially since the iPhone 12 is the iPhone that came out several years ago.
This is one of those things that, as sort of Liberal and globalist and socialist and lazy and stupid as Europe is a lot of the time.
I was going to say no offense, but you can be offended.
That's fine. Offense intended, Europeans.
Now, as much as they are just backwards on so many things, they do still have...
Some modicum of sense when it comes to health.
Like the food is better there, it's healthier, it's not bogged down in seed oils, and they actually have things like government agencies that regulate how much radiation is being pumped into your body.
Of course, that's not going to stop them from erecting 5G telephone poles every 50 meters.
But it is something that we could do a little bit better here in America.
Meanwhile, Mexico UAP slash UFO hearing has occurred.
Mexican Congress had a hearing where they displayed supposed alien mummies.
They were apparently recovered in Peru in a diatom mine.
They were found in 2017 between Palpa and Nazca.
They're apparently not part of our terrestrial evolution.
Carbon dated at approximately a thousand years old.
They're not mummies apparently.
The bodies are intact. And they claim this is totally real.
It looks fake to me.
I don't know. It looks a little bit super fake to me.
So I'm not exactly buying it.
But they're treating it as real.
And maybe this is like take two.
I mean they tried to do the whole UFO thing.
Acknowledgement thing in this country.
Hearings where they had supposed whistleblowers talking about alien crafts and nobody cared.
So they're like, alright, let's do it like an M. Night Shyamalan movie.
Let's do a Mexican revelation of the mummies in Congress.
And that will really get people going.
Yeah, I'm not falling for it, really.
I don't buy it.
I don't think it's real.
Somebody on Twitter just saying, yeah, those are sloths.
Yeah, we're looking at sloths here.
I don't know if it's sloths, but it seems totally fake.
But maybe it's real.
Maybe there are tiny little cute little aliens living in Peru.
For the last thousand years.
Maybe it's true. Who's to say?
Who's to say? Well, we'll show you the video a little bit later.
Meanwhile, we have this. Russia's Navy port at Sevastopol on fire after massive Ukraine missile attack.
In the overnight and morning hours of Wednesday, a major attack has ensued on Russia's key Black Sea naval port of Sevastopol.
Multiple social media videos emerged showing massive blazes at the Sevastopol shipyard with possible deaths and at least 24 people being reported injured.
This, of course, was the same...
A naval base that Elon Musk refused to allow them to use Starlink to attack.
Yes, it is another escalation in the totally unwinnable but persistent Ukraine war, which they now have announced that they are willing and ready to fund through 2032.
So don't worry, folks.
It's just the beginning of this conflagration.
Finally, we have this.
Speaker McCarthy orders impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden.
Yeah, about time.
About time.
This, of course, comes after Matt Gaetz put pressure on McCarthy to actually live up to the promises he made in the battle for becoming House Speaker.
We'll cover this in the next segment.
unidentified
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith
This is the American Journal, Infowars.com, band.video.
We'll be joined in the next hour by Keith Woods.
And then we're doing the same thing as yesterday.
Once again...
unidentified
I don't want to say in fours it's infested.
I'll be polite.
harrison smith
Once again, we're having troubles.
unidentified
I don't want to say in fours it's infested.
harrison smith
Not of our own making, but being inflicted upon us.
And once again, I will be hosting the first hour of The Alex Jones Show.
Chase Geyser will be sitting in for me the last hour of this show, probably taking your phone calls once again.
So there it is. So that's what we got.
And of course, we're not going to talk too much about what's going on with Owen today, as there's not too much new news about that.
Maybe we will go to this clip here.
This is clip 18. Here's Owen Troyer on Tim Cash yesterday.
I suggest you go watch the whole episode if you have time.
Tim Cash, of course, Tim Pool's live stream show.
He had Owen Troyer on yesterday.
And Owen totally killed it.
Very impressive stuff.
And again, go watch the whole show if you have time.
It really is worth it.
But we'll go to a clip here now.
This is clip number 18. Here's Owen Troyer on TimCast.
owen shroyer
We see where the financial elite, the global elite, believe that they have the moral high ground and it's their duty to tell us how to live.
And what's really frustrating, and I'm not a big historian, but...
I've had people reach out to me and veterans and people and they say, Owen, in my day, we used to invade countries for what they're doing to you.
We used to go into banana republics and we would shut that down and we would try to restore a constitutional republic or maybe even form a democracy as they would at least used to claim.
And so what's frustrating is that we went through an entire century of testing this methodology, right?
What works better?
Communism or free market capitalism?
Look at what was built in the West versus the fall of Russia, right?
Or if you want maybe a better example, look at North Korea compared to South Korea.
Well, now it's like we have to learn the lessons of the 20th century all over again?
harrison smith
Just a small little snippet there, but yeah, he absolutely killed it.
And you can go to Infowars.com to find that video.
And just on that note, before we move on to the impeachment stuff, I think that things get lost when you talk about communism versus capitalism because nobody was fighting for capitalism during the Cold War.
Capitalism was an aspect.
It was the economic system that came along with freedom, but it was freedom.
It was God. It was freedom.
Belief in something higher.
It was a love of humanity that people were fighting for.
It was during the Cold War that we put In God We Trust on our money to differentiate ourselves from the atheistic communists.
If you were to ask people, you know, back then, if they wanted to go fight Russia, you'd say, what are you fighting for?
They wouldn't say the dollar.
They wouldn't say capitalism.
It was God, freedom, it was the things that the communists targeted and destroyed through their economic system.
Capitalism is just the economic system of freedom.
It's just the fair way to do things when you actually value free choice, free enterprise, individual responsibility.
I always think that gets confused when people talk about why communism is bad.
I don't think it's bad necessarily because it's a bad economic system.
There is that. The economic system is simply an addendum.
It's an add-on. It comes along with the territory of an ideology of inhuman slavery, of mass manipulation, coercion, collectivism, and atheism.
These are the bad things that we're fighting against.
It just so happens that capitalism is...
What comes about when you leave people alone to make their own decisions.
And that's really what we're what we're facing here because boy oh boy are we entering a just a bizarro Twilight Zone world where everything is backwards and I'm just I'm realizing it more and more that like we have to move beyond the discovery phase.
Think about it like a trial. All of the evidence has been presented, whether it's for Biden's corruption or just the overall, and even the Biden corruption.
You have to understand how thorough this is and how I'm not even sure this impeachment is going to matter because when you look at what has occurred with Biden and Hunter Biden and the cover-ups, I mean, we really have reached critical mass in that it's not one powerful kingpin.
Joe Biden is not the top of the heap ordering everybody to do things.
They're all sort of acting independently.
They're all playing their part.
So you've got Hunter Biden being the bag man for Joe Biden, collecting payment, being the vessel through which Joe Biden launders his all-gotten gain.
It's not up for debate.
It's not questionable. And, of course, the talking point is the inversion of truth, the talking point that all the Democrats are running with, like NPCs, like ants, like all being ordered and being, like, chemically compelled to all say the same thing.
They all say no evidence. There's no evidence.
There's evidence-free indictment.
There's evidence-free impeachment.
There's no evidence. No evidence.
No evidence. The reality is that they're...
I mean it's not even questionable.
It's not even like up for debate.
The man is on camera bragging about what he did.
He took money from foreign powers.
He changed American policy because he took that money from the foreign powers.
Like it's not complicated.
It's not hard.
It's not speculative. He admitted it on camera in front of everybody.
We know all of this.
So I mean it's so absurd for them to claim that there's no evidence.
But Then you think about all of the evidence that's contained in the Hunter Biden laptop.
Then you think about the 51 intelligence agents who lied and wrote a completely false statement, signed their name to it, put it out on the media claiming that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation.
Is that a crime?
I mean... I don't...
It's certainly shameful.
It probably should be a crime if you've got the intelligence agencies signing their name to a complete falsehood.
I mean, if they were under oath, it'd be perjury.
There's some sort of perjurious activity going on there.
But I don't think it was Joe Biden, you know, threatening these guys or manipulating these guys into doing it.
I don't think these guys were fooled by anybody.
They know exactly what they're doing.
And so just like the Clintons, the Bidens are not Not necessarily kingpins of a criminal enterprise.
They are cogs in a machine.
And when you want to impeach Joe Biden and you really start looking at the crimes that he was involved in, you really start looking at what was going on in Ukraine in 2014 and 2015 and 2016, you know, all the way up until Trump got elected.
You look at the way that it was the State Department and you've got Hunter Biden in there, but you also have John Kerry's family.
You've got Mitt Romney's family.
The Pelosi's are in there doing the same thing.
This is not an impeach-one-man-solve-the-problem thing.
This is a systemic corruption that we have to root out.
Impeachment of Joe Biden is a good start, but when you really look at the full-scale rot that has taken hold of the American government...
unidentified
It's not going to stop with Joe Biden.
harrison smith
It's not Joe Biden, folks.
It's all of them.
Joe Biden's just a pawn.
unidentified
Folks, welcome back.
I'm going to mix it up a little bit.
harrison smith
I'm not gonna talk about the impeachment.
unidentified
I think, you know, I don't hear about the impeachment.
harrison smith
Go watch Fox News or something, I guess.
The only thing I'll say is that just compare the Democrats' response to this to the Republicans' response when they first launched the impeachment on Donald Trump.
We have a video. Of Hakeem Jeffries.
We'll go to clip number five here.
This is the way that the Democrats are responding to the impeachment of Joe Biden, rampant criminal.
Here's Hakeem Jeffries, moron.
unidentified
House Democrats will defend President Biden today.
We will defend President Biden tomorrow.
We will defend President Biden next week.
harrison smith
We will defend President Biden next month.
We will defend President Biden next year.
unidentified
We will defend President Biden until the very end.
harrison smith
Yeah, we know.
We know. You're unscrupulous.
You are loyal to a fault.
You are Uninterested in the proper function of government.
And you will defend even people you know are criminals if you think he gives you power.
We understand. We understand.
And once again, I mean, it's just, it's the same thing as we talk about in everything, where it's not that, you know, Trump did something and got impeached and Biden did something and got impeached, but Republicans don't defend Trump.
Trump didn't do anything.
Trump actually was investigating the thing that Biden is now being impeached for, right?
He was calling Ukraine to try to get to the bottom of why billions of dollars of American welfare was withheld from Ukraine in order to put pressure on a prosecutor that was investigating a company that Biden's family had a large stake in.
He was investigating that when he was impeached.
So just no underlying crime at all, nothing to actually impeach him for, all completely fabricated.
Whereas Joe Biden has a litany of crimes he's been engaged in for the last several years.
Look at that waddle.
I'm telling you, we're being ruled by cartoon characters.
When you look at the Democratic Party, is it not the biggest freak show on earth?
I mean, they're all...
Every single one of them is like some sort of bad caricature of a human being.
They're all like Beavis and Butthead or like Ren and Stimpy characters, honestly.
Jerry Nadler, the 400-pound ogre goblin thing.
Adam Schiff, the pencil-necked little balloon-headed scumbag.
I mean, every single one of them.
You've got... The Democrat from...
John Fetterman is just this hulking ogre that's mentally retarded.
An AOC who was literally a waitress that...
Actually auditioned for some shady cabal that was like, we've identified through our algorithms a Congress seat we can capture through manipulation of racial politics.
Let's audition for sexy women to take this role.
And she's gotten better now at pretending she knows what the hell she's talking about in the beginning of her Tenure as a congresswoman, she'd go on interviews and they'd ask her questions.
She'd be like, I haven't been told that answer yet.
I have to go back and ask my people before I answer that question.
Literal cutout puppet person.
Joe Biden just literally can't string three words together.
He's the biggest embarrassment you can ever possibly imagine.
Nancy Pelosi. He's walking around like some sort of doll that's been left out in the sun too long.
Dianne Feinstein literally cannot handle her own household affairs but refuses to give up her seat.
Pelosi is running for re-election, by the way.
Chuck Schumer is just like...
He's just a literal vampire walking around, just like...
I mean, these people, this absolute circus...
Clown car of incompetence and criminality.
I mean, it is shocking.
And look, Mitch McConnell is an old turtle anyway.
You've got Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham who nobody on the real right wing actually likes.
They just are embedded.
They just have power that's like...
You can't tear away from them.
Somebody in Congress is afraid to talk about them.
And you have Kevin McCarthy, who's just a limp-wristed weirdo.
But it's nothing compared to these Democrats, man.
It really is nothing compared to the sheer, unrelenting freakishness of the Democratic Party.
And the only reason I bring this up is because, like, I was talking to a family member recently where they were saying...
They're talking about George Santos.
Who cares about George Santos?
He's a freshman congressman.
And they're like, well, you know, we were Republicans.
But then everything with George Santos, it's like, well, you can't trust either side.
Both sides are liars.
And it's like, okay, you have one freshman congressman who lied about going about where he went to school.
And nobody supported him.
Nobody had his back.
The mainstream Republican Party has completely cut him out.
They can't... Just get rid of him.
Like, you can't just kick somebody out of office.
If people voted for him, that was their responsibility to double-check his resume.
If they didn't and voted for him anyway, there's nothing the other congressman can do.
There's no function of kicking a member of Congress out because other congressmen don't like him because they figured out he lied in his campaign.
But then you—so it's like—but this is the way the media works, and this is like the power of the media is that somehow they play it up in the public— view that like this one dude George Santos lying about where he went to school and jobs that he had as a freshman congressman with no institutional support whatever that's equal to just the endless raft of Lies that Joe Biden himself said on the campaign trail.
I mean, can you even...
When you talk about the Biden impeachment, can you even remember the number of lies that Joe Biden told about not being in contact with Hunter Biden, not knowing anything about his business work, not getting any money from the Russians, just lie after lie after lie?
George Santos can make up...
He could say that he's the shark from Jaws.
It doesn't matter what he likes.
It'll never come up to the lies that the president has told, let alone everybody else in the Democratic Party.
So as much as you don't want to play into the two-party paradigm, it's completely insane to me that people...
Take anything the Democrats say seriously whatsoever.
When they come out and say stuff like that, like Hakeem Jeffries, just being like, we don't care.
We don't care and we will continue.
Because then you look back at what...
The Republicans were saying, this was September 24th, 2019, when they launched the first impeachment against Donald Trump for daring to ask about the corrupt activities of the previous administration.
McConnell says, Senate will find out what happened on whistleblower complaint.
They're just like, yeah, well, you know, we have to have a responsible, rather apolitical, or at least bipartisan probe of the matter.
They wanted a bipartisan probe.
They wanted to help the Democrats probe this matter.
When it was completely fake, totally fraudulent, out of thin air, a defensive move to stop Donald Trump from looking into the corrupt activities in Ukraine, a defensive move that may very well have led to the massive and unrelenting war that we're now facing.
Would have been nice to have some backbone back then when there was no evidence, when there was no crime, when it was a completely fraudulent impeachment brought about by people who had an endless lust for getting rid of Donald Trump and were willing to act on absolutely any completely fabricated evidence to bring that about.
I mean, where was the solidarity back then?
Where was anybody in a position of power in the Republicans saying, Yeah, this is total BS. This is obvious.
This is a dog and pony show.
This is a witch hunt. We're not going to do it.
Instead, it was Donald Trump on his own while Mitch McConnell and the Republicans were cooperating with the Democrats to bring him down.
Then you bring it crime, you bring impeachment charges against Joe Biden for the just litany just just years upon years to just endless evidence from Devin Archer and Tony Bobulinski and Victor Shokin and the phone calls that were recorded in the emails that were recovered and the payments that were paid in the eighty three thousand dollars a month and the you bring impeachment charges against Joe Biden for the just litany just just years upon years to just endless evidence from Devin Archer and Tony Bobulinski I withheld a billion dollars.
I got this guy fired a guy, by the way, who nobody had claimed was corrupt ever in the Ukraine hadn't had any complaints against him.
Nobody else in Europe had ever filed any complaints to claim that Shokin was in some way worthy of being kicked out of office.
But he got kicked out of office.
Why? Because Joe Biden took bribes to change the policy of the American institution.
And then following all of this was the cover-up upon cover-up upon cover-up.
We're the lies by the CIA and the intelligence agency, writing the letter, calling Hunter Biden's laptop, Russian disinformation, covering it all up.
I mean, it just, it goes on and on and on.
And then they say there's no evidence.
And then they say that they're going to support him no matter what, till the end, this year, next decade, next century.
We will defend him forever, regardless of the overwhelming evidence.
And then when it comes to Trump, it's, we must participate with the Democrats to make sure this probe is bipartisan.
And we just, we wonder why we lose.
All right, folks, welcome back.
This is American Journal, Infowars.com.
Infowarsstore.com is where you go to support everything that we do here.
DNA Force Plus is still 25% off.
Of course, you can donate to Alex's legal fund at defendjones.com.
InfoWarsStore.com is the best place to go to support us, not just for us, but for you as well, as we have fantastic products like DNA Force Plus, incredibly powerful supplement, 25% off, massive discount on that, as well as Brain Force Plus, the Nootropic, really impactful energy supplement, as well as BodEase, great turmeric, 95% curcuminoid.
Relief supplement, bodies, 25% off, and so much more.
And we'll do it.
We'll get into it.
Let's just take a look at what was unveiled yesterday in Mexico.
Aliens? Aliens unveiled in Mexico?
Don't tell the Biden administration.
They'll start sending checks. You thought New York was bad right now with a bunch of Nicaraguans hanging out on the sidewalk.
Just wait until there's little green men running around everywhere taking up hotel space.
So we'll go to these videos.
Story of Sky News. 1,000-year-old alien corpses displayed in glass cases in Mexico.
A journalist and UFO enthusiast spearheaded the event and testified under oath and told politicians in Mexico about the estimated age of mummified specimens and the techniques used by scientists to examine them.
You see the picture of the cute little guy.
It just doesn't look real to me.
I don't know. It's just my initial instinct is to say this looks like a bad fake.
It's like a bad fakery to me.
They are alleged non-human alien corpses shown to Mexican politicians.
I'll say it again.
I mean, it really does look like they tried to drum up the whole UFO thing Fear Factor, PSYOP, a month ago with the congressional hearings, and it just didn't work.
It didn't take. They didn't get the fish on the hook, so now they're trying again, and they're making it more like an M. Night Shyamalan movie.
That's really what, I mean, it reminded me of Signs more than anything else.
Mexico City events spearheaded by journalist and UFO researcher Jamie Mousen, who testified under oath that almost a third of their DNA is, quote, unknown, and the specimen were not a part of, quote, our terrestrial evolution, Mexican media reported.
These specimens are not a part of our evolutionary history on Earth, he said in his presentation to Mexican government officials and representatives from the U.S. They are not beings recovered from a UFO crash.
Instead, they were found in a...
Diatom or algae mines.
Algae mines? What the hell is that?
And subsequently became fossilized.
They're not mummies.
They're fossils, I guess.
He said scientists used radiocarbon dating to gather DNA evidence and x-rays had shown one to have eggs inside of it.
Okay, let's go to clip number two here.
Alleged non-human alien corpses shown during a public hearing in Mexico's Congress.
Here's what happened yesterday.
He says there are beings, non-human, that are not part of our terrestrial evolution and that after disappearing, we do not.
There is a subsequent evolution according to the university.
The National Autonomous Government of Mexico who carried out the analysis of carbon, carbon-14, these beings are around a thousand years old.
Of antiquity, that is.
They are not beings that were recovered in birds that are crashes.
What the heck is this saying? They are beings that were buried in mines of diatoms, diatomaceous earth.
unidentified
Diatom is a bug.
harrison smith
It lies with 17 million ancient phytoplankton, which was abundant at that time.
When it disappeared, it became possible.
It was gibberish.
That was pure gibberish. Clip 16 is them unboxing the aliens.
We can go to that now.
Alien unboxing on Mexican YouTube.
You know, again, we're in this weird, I mean, if this was like the 90s or something, this would be the biggest thing ever.
It's this weird stage that we're in right now where you go on Twitter and There's a post about this.
Every other post is about these little aliens.
Look how tiny that little guy is.
Yeah, it looks like signs, I'm telling you.
unidentified
But it's so weird.
harrison smith
You go to Twitter, every other post is about this.
Every other post is one of these videos or a hot take about this.
You go on, like, news sites, and there's not a single word.
There's not a single word. Google News has nothing about this.
No news site has anything about this.
You have to search it out yourself, and Sky News reports on it and a few other places.
I mean, it looks like a Hollywood production.
They also apparently released UFO footage, clip number 24.
UFO footage that the Mexican government released today.
It's clip number four. Let's watch that.
Okay, you see lights in the sky.
unidentified
This is the 12th of September.
This is the 12th of September.
harrison smith
What are the odds?
What are the odds that you find mummified alien bodies in a mine in Cusco, in Peru, on the same day you have UFOs spotted?
By the way, when you're that far away from a light source and you're zooming in like that, the distortion comes from the digital frame capture that's happening.
It doesn't actually look like that.
It's just the way that the lens takes in the light that gives it that weird look.
Like if you zoom in on a street light from that far, it has that same sort of wavy, undulating kind of style.
For our radio listeners, it's just they're zooming in on a light in the sky.
Thrilling stuff. Really incredible.
I guess we have to have a global government now.
I guess now we have to surrender our sovereignty to a global government because the aliens probably say so.
It's a very weird situation to be in where just nobody cares.
Nobody cares about this.
We think they're lies.
I think they're lies. I don't think these are real aliens.
I don't think they're real at all. And you can see lots of different pictures about this or from this.
You can see that, you know, there's one where it's like an x-ray and it looks like it has eggs in it.
It's like, okay, that doesn't make any sense.
It's not what it looks like when you x-ray things that actually give birth through eggs.
Ryan Graves, a former U.S. Navy pilot who in July claimed the number of UFOs or UAPs on identified anomalous phenomena was being grossly underreported, he was also in attendance.
So that was the same guy from yesterday.
I don't know. Maybe I won't be here in the third hour.
Maybe Chase can take your calls and maybe you can tell him what you think about all this.
I think it's all total nonsense.
But, you know, we might as well cover it because no one else is.
And I just think...
I think we have a lot of stuff here on Earth to worry about.
I don't think...
I don't think I'll ever buy that we have aliens visiting us here on Earth.
I think we have demons. I think we have spiritual creatures.
Maybe in a form dimensionally affecting us.
But I don't think that they were exploring diatomaceous earth mines in Peru and got trapped.
None of it makes any sense, quite frankly.
But, that's a big story today, so I felt like we should cover it.
I felt like we have to cover it.
Before we move on, or we are moving on now, before we welcome Keith Woods, I want to go to this video.
Clip number 25, because a lot of stuff is going on in Ukraine right now.
Russia's naval port at Sevastopol is on fire after a massive Ukraine missile attack.
This is the same port and naval base that...
Ukraine wanted to attack via Starlink, and Elon Musk refused to allow them to do so.
But opposing Ukraine is not going to be allowed under the New World Order program, and luckily they've brought a transvestite out to threaten us about this.
Let's go now to clip number 25.
Ukraine is apparently going to hunt down Russian propagandists around the world.
unidentified
world.
harrison smith
Let's watch.
unidentified
Russia hates the truth that their obsessive focus on a Ukrainian volunteer is simply allowing the light of the Ukrainian nation's honesty to shine brightly.
harrison smith
Don't you love...
unidentified
Good Lord.
The teeth of the Russian devils will mash ever harder, and their rabid mouths will foam in uncontrollable frenzy, as the world will see a favorite Kremlin propagandist pay for And this puppet of Putin is only the first.
Russia's war criminal propagandists will all be hunted down, and justice will be served as we in Ukraine are led on this mission by faith in God, liberty, and complete liberation.
harrison smith
Come and get me, bro.
Help me get me. Who's he talking about there?
Is that a threat to Tucker Carlson?
I mean, if you disagree with them, you're a Russian propagandist.
So thanks to the man in a wig and a dress telling me about the truth.
All right, welcome back, folks. Second hour of American Journal has begun.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
My guest is Keith Woods.
He is a writer and a political commentator.
He's been putting out video essays on his YouTube at Keith Woods for over four years now and has recently started putting out written work on his Substack this year.
He also hosts a podcast called Understanding Platonism, and that can be found on Spotify as well as other streaming platforms.
Keith can be found on X, formerly Twitter, at KeithWoodsYT.
Twitter, KeithWoodsYT.
On YouTube, at KeithWoods.
And his sub stack is KeithWoodsPub.
Thank you so much for joining us once again, Mr.
unidentified
Woods. It's great to be here as always, Harrison.
harrison smith
Well, I had to get you on because you were really one of, if not the leading voice pushing the hashtag ban the ADL movement.
I mean, I don't want to call it a trend.
I mean, this really took over Twitter for a while and still has a lot of legs.
I don't want to let this flame die, this flame of freedom that you've lit.
Just tell us about the hashtag.
What brought this about?
keith woods
Why should we ban the ADL? So this started with a tweet I did in early August where I made a pretty simple case.
The ADL is on Twitter and they're using their platform to try and destroy Twitter.
Because back in November, actually before Elon Musk officially took over the platform, they called for a huge advertiser boycott, which we've now discovered cost Twitter X 60% of their advertising revenue.
So the case for me was pretty simple.
The terms of service on X are already prohibiting people using the platform to challenge the platform's financial viability.
So I said, you know, this organization, they're using their platform here to try and destroy Twitter.
Twitter should just ban them, ban the ADL. Now, at the time, that was kind of a throwaway tweet at the start of August.
I had said to a couple of people, you know, maybe in the future we could get some kind of campaign going around this.
But this was really brought back into the news just at the end of August there, when this really kicked off, the 31st of August.
And it didn't kick off for no reason.
What put it back in the news was Jonathan Greenblatt, the head of the ADL, announced that he'd had a very productive conversation with the new CEO of X, Lindy Iaccarino.
And I think there was a general mood of pessimism that, you know, we were quite optimistic last year about Elon's takeover, about his promise of a general amnesty.
And it's been very hit and miss since then.
You know, the amnesty was never delivered.
A lot of prominent figures, Alex Jones isn't back on there, Nick Fuentes, some others haven't been restored.
And it just seemed like we were gradually going back to the bad old times.
You know, this new CEO was announced.
Then she was bringing in Greenblatt and these sort of civil rights leaders.
And so a lot of people started posting things kind of exposing the ADL and Elon was interacting with some of this.
And so I responded to Elon and I pointed back to my original tweet from early August.
And I said, hey, this is an anti-wide, anti-free speech organization.
They're holding you to ransom.
Kick them off. Let's ban the ADL. And it's got a way bigger response than I expected.
It was people across the political spectrum.
And you just realize that the ADL, all of these years, they've extended this definition of extremists and hate speech and anti-Semitism.
And it's like, at a certain point, they've got everyone like that's outside of the kind of left-wing consensus.
They've got Libs of TikTok and Matt Walsh and all these people labeled extremists.
And it's like the truth, so many people under the bus, That's like at a certain point, there's enough people that they can kind of pick the bus up and throw it back, you know?
So this really exploded.
It was number one trend worldwide within hours.
There was 100,000 posts under the tag in under 24 hours.
I think after a few days, but there was over 300,000 posts.
It got so big that Elon Musk had to acknowledge it.
And it really kicked off this conversation that I think is ongoing about the role of this organization and other activist organizations like it And the question of who decides?
Who decides what is acceptable in the public square?
Is it going to be the laws of the countries, as Elon said should be the case when he took over?
Or is it going to be a private citizen like Jonathan Greenblatt, who has appointed himself the arbiter and has the power to enforce that because he has all this financial leverage?
harrison smith
Yeah, exactly. We're going to get into all of this.
That was a great little breakdown.
I think maybe we'll start off because Elon Musk actually commented about this yesterday.
So maybe we'll start with his comment on that and we'll get into how we take hashtag ban the ADL to the next level and get them off, not just off Twitter, but maybe out of our police departments.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Folks, if there's one organization in America that has power that it has not earned, has accrued for its self-influence that it wields against the American people, it's the ADL. I think they should be banned from the country, but banned from Twitter is a good start.
But we're going to get into it with Keith Woods.
He is my guest, writer and political commentator.
You can follow him on YouTube at Keith Woods, on Twitter at KeithWoodsYT, and his substack is KeithWoodsPub, KeithWoodsPUB.
And, I mean, there's so many, just what you brought up.
In the first five minutes there from the fact that they exploit companies, they have undue power, they're self-appointed, this Jonathan Greenblatt guy, in no way deserves to have the veto power over the public square.
And that's not even getting into the way they train every FBI agent and have 150 mayors signed on to their programs.
I mean, their reach is incredible.
Before we go to the video of Elon Musk commenting on the hashtag ban the ADL, Phenomenon that's taken place.
How can you even fathom and how do you try to explain to people the power that ADL has?
Because it's really astonishing, isn't it?
keith woods
Yeah, like you said, it reaches into every area of life.
In 1993, they discovered that the ADL was just in their California headquarters.
They discovered that they were spying on thousands of private citizens, hundreds of organizations.
I mean, like you said, there's a case to be made for just banning it outright as a domestic spying operation.
But the reach of their influence in social media has really expanded beyond what anyone would have thought possible a few years ago in recent years.
And I started with these advertiser boycotts.
You know, this is the source of their power.
You have all of these civil rights, NGOs, lobby groups.
But the ADL, more than any organization, has the power to kind of use its influence over finance and over big companies to force its will on these big tech companies.
There's a speech from 2019, this guy, Sacha Baron Cohen, Borat, who made a living out of making fun of ethnic stereotypes and so on.
But he was so riled up over a discussion of Jewish people that was happening on social media that he basically called on the ADL and on civil society organizations to shut down free speech on the internet.
And the ADL began this so-called stop hate for profit coalition, which Actually, Facebook was their first target.
It's easy to forget now because Facebook is just so censorious.
Most people like us don't even bother with Facebook.
But at the time, Zuckerberg did have some principles on free speech.
For example, he said that he wanted things like Holocaust denial to be allowed on the platform just on a free speech basis.
The ADL announced a boycott in 2020 of Facebook, and it was the first real test of this strategy, where they got over 300 companies together to boycott Facebook.
And over the course of that summer, 2020, They actually took off 8% of Facebook's stock price with that boycott.
And it forced Mark Zuckerberg and the Facebook CEO to have a sit down with Jonathan Greenblatt and change their terms of service.
So, you know, you break it down and it effectively works like a mafia organization.
You know, they do the boycott, they make their threats, and the owners of these big tech companies have to go in and sit down with Greenblatt and listen to his demands.
And again, this is a private citizen.
The only reason he gets this kind of influence, the only reason he gets to be the arbiter of speech on the internet is because he has this kind of influence over these financial means of control.
But it escalated after Facebook.
They pushed heavily for Trump to be banned.
They got this stop hate coalition together again.
They demanded Trump be banned.
They even gave an ultimatum to these platforms.
We want him gone by January 20th.
The platforms gave in again.
Wasn't enough for Greenblatt.
He said they were going to punish these platforms even more unless they made the bans permanent.
And then they extended this to Twitter when Elon Musk took over.
And like I said, it was very interesting when Musk responded this week because we finally found out the extent of the damage that the ADL did.
You know, a few of us, me and others, began trying to highlight this, saying, look, they are the ones that pushed this boycott in November.
They are the reason that Twitter lost all his advertising revenue.
Right. Elon came out and confirmed it was 60%, and he also confirmed that the advertisers told TwitterX directly that the main reason For their counsel and advertising was because of the ADL. And Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of ADL, has gone on a little interview circuit recently where he's denied this.
harrison smith
He said, no, we never did a boy.
We asked him to do a pause.
I mean, he's the most weaselly dude you can possibly imagine.
And yeah, they obviously did it.
And so let's go to that.
That statement from Elon Musk, he was at the All In event.
It was called All In, All In Podcast, I guess.
And he Skyped in there and he said this about the ADL. Let's go now to clip number six here.
He says they've been captured by the woke agenda.
We'll comment on that on the other side, but here's Elon Musk.
unidentified
Do you want to talk about the ADL and what the status of that is, whether you're pursuing a lawsuit or not, or where that stands?
elon musk
I think we'll have to see about that.
Yeah, I mean, the fact of the matter is that ADL did initiate a boycott.
They don't call it a boycott, they call it a pause.
You know, a pause that is never-ending is a boycott.
And we saw a massive drop in U.S. advertising.
We saw basically no change in advertising in Asia, but domestically, ADL is strong.
We saw a 60% drop in advertising.
So, you know, that's pretty intense.
And this is despite, you know, showing repeated analysis of the system, including third-party analysis of the system, which actually showed that the number of views of hateful content declined.
So, you know, the third parties who have all the data analyzed and said, actually, there's less hate speech.
The issue, I think, with the ADL is not a question of hate speech.
It's not a question of anti-social acceptance, obviously.
It's that the ADL and a lot of other organizations have become activist organizations which are acting far beyond their stated mandate or their original mandate.
And I think far beyond what donors to those organizations think they are doing.
You know, one of the things that the ADL was extremely opposed to, and in fact was instrumental in happening, was that the ADL was instrumental in getting Donald Trump deployed.
And then when we, you know, we restored the account, they made it super clear that they regarded simply restoring his account on Twitter and Alex, that constituted hateful speech.
He hasn't even said anything.
harrison smith
All right, so we can go back to this video if we want.
It's a little bit longer of a clip, but let's just comment on what we've heard so far, Keith.
When you heard this, was this a revelation to you, or did you sort of know?
What's your takeaway from hearing Elon Musk go public about this?
keith woods
Well, the biggest revelation was the extent of the loss of revenue from the ADL. In my original tweet, I did include a graph that showed how much their advertising revenue fell after the advertiser boycott.
But Elon did confirm that these advertisers gave the ADL as the main reason, because perhaps people tried to make excuses for the ADL and say, well, these advertisers would have canceled anyway, as if the advertisers are super concerned about hate speech and all this stuff.
And he also confirmed that it was 60% of advertising revenue, which is obviously massive.
Billions of dollars. Yeah.
As far as the banning of Trump, I mean, again, people have been trying to defend the ADL over the course of the week and saying that the stuff is exaggerated.
It's like, All of this stuff is on their website.
They brag about this. They brag about the success of their stop hit for coalition profit and getting a sitting president of the US ban off all social media.
And they include, you know, in black and white on their website, the tread, that this ban has to be permanent or we're going to continue this boycott.
So this is all out there.
It's an extortion racket.
It's forcing censorship.
It's been doing so for years.
The only problem is we haven't had the focus on it.
We haven't had the awareness. And that's the positive thing about the last couple of weeks is now it's not just this vague censorship agenda.
Now people are focusing on, wait, who is actually behind this?
Why is this happening? How come the richest man in the world can't even give us free speech?
harrison smith
Yeah, who is this group of people that's more powerful than Twitter, more powerful than Elon, more powerful than the President of the United States?
And, I mean, I thought I knew about the ADL, but over the last week with hashtag ban the ADL, I've learned about stuff they've been involved in that blew my socks off.
So we'll get into all of that, the response, the way people are trying to cover this up.
More on the other side with Mr.
Keith Woods at KeithWoodYT on Twitter.
Hashtag ban the ADL. Ladies and gentlemen.
The Anti-Defamation League, the ADL, or as I like to call it, the S-A-J-O, the Self-Appointed Jewish Overlords, because that's what they are.
They're self-appointed, they're a Jewish organization, and they apparently have accrued unto themselves the ability to censor the internet at will and destroy your company if you oppose them.
Nobody ever voted to give them this right.
There's no legitimacy in what they do.
They're just doing it, and they call you an anti-Semite if you oppose what they're doing, even if you're Jewish.
And of course, a lot of the people they target are Jews, and this is dated all the way back to the late 80s when they were spying on other Jewish organizations.
I mean, they're a power structure.
They're a mafia. That's how they operate.
And I want to show you a very interesting clip in just a minute.
Before we do that, you brought up the distinction between What they call a boycott and what they're really doing, which is extortion.
And this is something I've brought up quite a bit on my show when talking about the ADL, is a boycott is something from the ground up.
It's something that happened with Bud Light, where Bud Light does something and the customers of Bud Light say, you know what?
I'm going to buy a different beer today.
and that they just do it.
And it doesn't even necessarily require organization, but it's a ground-up mass show of opposition to something that a company is doing.
The ADL is not that.
That's not what they're doing.
They're doing extortion.
They're going to the heads of corporations and demanding that they not advertise on platforms.
That's not a boycott, is it, Keith?
keith woods
No, and it's just so dishonest.
Like you said, you know, Jonathan Greenblatt went on this damage control tour, and he said, oh, we're just a small nonprofit.
We're just concerned about violence against Jewish people.
That's the reason our organization exists.
We believe in free speech.
It's like, well, what does that have to do with demanding that the president of the U.S. be permanently banned off all social media?
He made this outrageous statement that we had nothing to do with Twitter's loss of advertising revenue.
Maybe just the advertisers were concerned about the rise in hate speech.
It's like, we have the receipts, we have the screenshots, we have the public statements of the ADL Calling for this huge advertiser boycott.
And now we have the owner of the platform confirming that the advertisers did confirm that it was the ADL that was the main reason that they dropped the advertisement.
So, you know, it's just totally dishonest from Greenblatt.
No one is buying this anymore.
You know, they have to turn off all the comments on their X page and so on, because people see what's going on here.
As far as the extortion goes, you know, an interviewer who, the interviewer was actually Jewish, asked him this question.
Did you seek any kind of donations for the ADL when you were communicating with Twitter?
And Jonathan Greenblatt's response was to call that an anti-Semitic trope and to say he couldn't answer that question because it contained an anti-Semitic trope.
And of course, Elon went on Twitter and confirmed that actually, yes, Greenblatt did seek donations for the ADL while doing this.
So, you know, another thing we're discovering from all of this is how quick the ADL is to use these accusations of hate and anti-Semitism to just shut down any criticism of itself.
And we've seen that a lot of times in the course of the last couple of weeks.
harrison smith
Yeah, it's totally self-serving.
It's totally exploitative. And one of the interesting, or to me, sort of funny responses to this is in defense of the ADL, by saying, well, they've lost their way.
They were a good organization, but they've been captured by leftists, and that's the real issue.
When you look back at the history of the ADL, and we've covered it extensively, I mean, it was founded to basically cover up a murder and a rape of, what was his name, Leo Frank in Georgia.
Leo Frank. In 1913, he was convicted.
He was sentenced to death.
And then the ADL was basically formed to be a mafia of elites to put pressure on the governor to get him pardoned.
He was never acquitted of this crime.
He just was pardoned by his powerful friends.
And then he was lynched.
And that's how the ADL was founded.
So, I mean, has this ever been a good or has it just lost its way, Keith?
keith woods
No, it's never been a good organization.
It's always been an explicit ethnic supremacist lobbyist organization.
It was founded to defend Leo Frank because he was a wealthy, connected Jew, and it believed he should get off the crime because he was a wealthy, connected Jew.
And there's not even a question, again, about his guilt.
You know, this is another thing that's labeled an anti-Semitic trope now, is to just say this guy was guilty.
But 13 different courts of appeals and judges combined found him guilty.
There was DNA evidence.
There was 20 of his female employees that testified against him that he had sexually assaulted them.
There wasn't even a question of his guilt.
But the ADL, you know, through powerful lobbying, has tried to rewrite this history.
Leo Frank's own private investigators found him guilty.
Even the wealthy, connected Jewish businessmen in Atlanta that were funding his defense confided afterwards that they thought he was probably guilty.
So there really is no question about this.
It's always been a lobby group in this way.
As far as the wokeness, I mean, if you want to talk about how woke this organization is, sure, they advocate super I think we're good to go.
If you want to talk about their wokeness, see how they apply that logic to Israel, right?
And Tucker did this himself very excellently, highlighted it on his show, that on their website they say that it's wrong to expect Israel to extend voting rights to Arabs or to allow Arabs to migrate to Israel because it would, quote, subvert Israel's nationalist identity.
So the ADL, they're very woke in the U.S., right?
They're very woke when it concerns silencing nationalists, silencing conservatives in the West.
When it comes to Israel, not so much.
They support Zionist policies.
They support nationalist policies explicitly.
And you begin to see this double standard is motivated by their own ethnic supremacy, the people involved.
So there's no consistency here.
There's no captured by wokeism.
Like you said, it's an ethnic mafia.
They have their own interests, and they've never been a force for good in any way.
harrison smith
Yeah, it's really not even that complicated.
And, you know, the Italians tried this as well.
The Italian mafia, I think it was Joe Colombo, founded the Anti-Italian Defamation League, actually got sued by the ADL for, like, copyright and shut down.
And so, yeah, it's like, look, we're going to point out that this is a mafia mafia.
Operating with, you know, ethnic supremacy in mind and wielding the power that they've illegitimately gained to silence their opposition.
I mean, it's really not that complicated.
And I'm glad that people are talking more openly about this because, as you point out, this isn't just about censorship online.
That's a major issue and they're a primary force behind that.
And what they're doing is stakeholder capitalism that the World Economic Forum is spearheading this idea that corporations have a responsibility to use their economic power to get what they want.
They did it in Georgia with the voting rights bills in 2020 and 2021 after the election was stolen.
This is all part of the same globalist operation, the same sort of modus operandi that they have to wield this power against the American people and silence everyone.
keith woods
And, of course, what they call hate... And you mentioned the Italian mafia.
I mean, they've had close ties with the Jewish mafia as well.
I mean, in the same way it was set up to defend the honor of Leo Frank because he was a wealthy, connected Jew...
Mo Dalitz, who was a very prominent Jewish gangster in the 20th century, the ADL actually gave him a torch of liberty award in 1982 to celebrate his wonderful achievements to civil society.
You know, this lifetime gangster, mobster, criminal.
So yeah, it's always been a way for these connected people to kind of launder their reputation, to use it to silence criticism of very powerful, very corrupt people, whether it was Leo Frank, Mo Dalitz.
So yeah, a very sordid, very dark history.
harrison smith
And it would be one thing if they were just a PR firm, but they are actually training FBI. They're actually providing the stats that our Justice Department uses to target investigations.
This is a major, major influence operation.
It's totally illegitimate.
It really has to be destroyed, in my opinion, peacefully, politically.
Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Harrison Smith here, American Journal, Infowars.com.
Remember to go to Infowarsstore.com to support everything that we do here.
That's how we get funding. That's how we fight off the attacks that we're constantly under.
And make no mistake, the ADL, not our biggest fans, which is...
It's funny because, you know, on one hand, we're called like Mossad agents because we refuse to fall into the paradigm.
We refuse to talk bad about the Jews as a group.
We don't hate Jews. I love Jews.
A lot of my friends are Jews.
We've got the best Jews, folks.
But it doesn't matter.
We're against globalism.
We're against We're against enslavement of humanity.
We're against people utilizing historical trauma or historical racism in order to gain power today that they use to silence people.
I mean, this is what the ADL does.
And honestly, to me, it has nothing to do with who they are.
We'd be calling them out if the Christian group was doing this.
And I hate even having to make that.
But I understand that people...
They do get the wrong idea.
They do get the wrong impression when you're talking about the ADL that is an explicitly Jewish organization.
They think that's anti-Semitism.
And it's not. And so I hate that we're still in a space where we have to make that claim.
And the way that we've put it before is, imagine talking bad about the KKK and people are like, wow, so you hate white people?
It's like, well, I hate the KKK. I don't like them.
Take from that what you will, I guess, however it goes.
And I guess since I mentioned that, I mean, what's your take on that, Keith?
Because, again, I feel like Dirty even having to say, even having to be like, but I'm not an anti-Semite, I'm not, but trust me.
But I guess we're still sort of in that realm where these words have so much power.
That's why these labels are used to silence people.
keith woods
Yeah, and that's why the ADL makes that have so much power.
It's like, you know, Elon for the last two weeks and Twitter has been putting out these statements about fighting anti-Semitism on the platform.
It's like, well, Jews are a very, very, very small minority of the world and of ex-users.
Why is that specifically such a focus?
I mean, imagine if there was an Italian mafia that had this kind of control over these platforms through financial manipulation, and they said it was anti-Italian to criticize the Italian mafia.
I think we would all see what game was being played there, right?
And one thing I've tried to highlight in recent days and weeks I don't think people realize how far the definition of antisemitism has been extended by the ADL, right?
They came out and called Elon Musk antisemitic months ago because he criticized George Soros.
And I've posted this to my Twitter.
On their website, it says that any criticism of George Soros Even if it doesn't mention his Jewish ethnic identity, is anti-Semitic because it echoes anti-Semitic conspiracy theories about George Soros.
They said that a speech that Donald Trump gave where he promised to cast out warmongers, communists, and globalists echoed anti-Semitic rhetoric.
So when you look at what the ADL includes as anti-Semitism, it's like at a certain point you can't really say anything.
Except, you know, the kind of politics that Jonathan Greenblatt approves.
One thing I've been highlighting as well is this so-called IHRA working definition of antisemitism.
Now, DADL promotes this globally.
It's increasingly being adopted by countries that have hate speech laws, which effectively makes this kind of speech illegal.
But again, we talk about the ADL. Is it a woke organization?
Has it been captured by wokeism?
This new definition of anti-Semitism they're pushing includes criticism of Zionism.
It says that if you compare Israeli policies to Nazi Germany, that makes you an anti-Semite.
It says if you don't think that an explicitly Jewish state should exist, if you're not a Zionist, if you don't believe in the foundation of Israel, that makes you an anti-Semite.
Now, can you imagine applying that standard to anyone else?
Can you imagine if you said that anyone who doesn't believe in a German ethnostate or a white ethnostate in North America, they're anti-white or they're anti-German?
Of course, that would mean that the ADL is anti-white and anti-German because they say that nationalism is hate.
They try and de-platform people that advocate for those kinds of things.
So they're expanding the definition of anti-Semitism to really include anti-criticism of Israel, anti-criticism of the ADL. I mean, they came out straight away, and the first statement they made on this is they said banned the ADL was a movement of white supremacists, conspiracy theorists, and internet trolls. Right.
Now, I don't know if you saw, but I mean, I was looking back on the early tweets.
You were actually, to your credit, you were one of the first person to promote this.
I don't think people would typically consider you a white supremacist.
I would hope not. I mean, Laura Loomer was posting this.
A guy I follow, Indian Brunson, was one of the first to post it.
It was actually a pretty diverse group, but when you're Jonathan Greenblatt, everything looks like a white supremacist, right?
Right. But yeah, it's totally cynical, and it's a way to silence criticism.
It's a way to stop conversation happening about who rules us and what's the motivations.
harrison smith
It's the weapon that they've identified as being effective, and it only works against good people, right?
People that aren't hateful are the only ones that will be, you know, affected by being called antiseptic.
If you're actually a hateful person and someone calls you, you go, yeah, I am.
What are you going to do about it? But it's good people that go, oh, no, I don't want to hurt anybody.
They're the ones who can be cowed down, who can be, like, bullied into submission by calling them bad names.
It's a sad thing.
And of course, as you point out, Israel is a foreign country.
So we've got foreign operatives having control over American speech.
There's nothing right about that.
I don't care what country it is.
In this case, it happens to be Israel.
Again, it wouldn't matter which country it is.
You're not allowed to, you know, then label all of us hateful bigots because we don't like the national government programs of a foreign state.
I mean, this should be obvious, but we have to explain this sort of stuff, I guess.
And speaking of that, I want to go to this clip.
This is clip number 10.
This was posted on Twitter the other day, and you can see it's a little bit older, probably from the mid-90s.
It's a former Mossad agent explaining how they would shut down criticism and they would take on dissidents In America by invoking B'nai Barith, which is the sort of parent foundation of the ADL. So let's go to this clip.
This is a former Mossad agent saying how they would use claims of anti-Semitism to silence political opponents.
unidentified
Now I know what they do because I used to ask them to do it.
It's on C-SPAN. When I was in the Mossad, and we had a guy that gave us problems in the U.S., and he was speaking out, and he was talking like Pete talked once and said, Israel is bombing Lebanon with cluster bombs.
We say, hey, who's that guy?
You know? Pete Makakfi, we used to call him.
Yeah. Which is Pete the Cockroach.
Because he makes a lot of noise and you can't get rid of him.
So what you do is you get in touch With a guy in the station in New York, or in the station in Washington, you say, tell the guys at B'nai B'rith to label him.
And of course the campaign starts, and before you know it, the guy's labeled.
And he's an anti-Semite.
Because that's what we say he is.
And that's one stain you cannot wash.
Now, it shames me as a Jew to tell you that.
But that's the fact.
harrison smith
And it's wrong. There it is.
I mean, it is wrong. It is a foreign state using their influence in America to silence political dissidents.
And this dates back. New York Times has an article from 1993 talking about the ADL being sued for maintaining a wide-ranging network of unlawful surveillance directed at Arab Americans and other supporters of Palestinian rights, opponents of South African apartheid, and critics of United States policy in Central America, among others.
So I don't know if you'd seen that video before, Keith, but what's your take on that?
keith woods
I hadn't actually seen that before.
You know, it's interesting how much stuff even I've discovered since this BandiADL campaign got going.
You know, we were really kind of pulling the curtain back on this organization.
Which, yeah, it doesn't surprise me.
unidentified
me.
keith woods
I mean, right away, you know, they tried to, went digging up every statement or tweet I've ever made, and they found some joke tweet I made about Ben Shapiro videos radicalized me, and then they said I was, you know, a self-declared anti-Semite, and they put that in all their publications.
One of them was the Times of Israel, and the Times of Israel, its owner, Seth Claremont, three and a half million dollars to the ADL every year.
So it's very easy to see the way this operates.
I mean, I think the first sort of mainstream publication to cover banned the ADL was actually the Rolling Stone.
And in their article, they said it was an anti-Semitic trope to say that the ADL exercises any power over censorship.
Now again, we can go to their website, the ADL and their public statements say, we got Trump banned, we got Facebook to rewrite their policy, we paused advertising on Twitter.
So if it's an anti-Semitic trope to acknowledge the ADL's own statements, Then, you know, I guess we're all anti-Semites.
Because how are we going to deal with that situation, right?
harrison smith
But that's how it works, though, isn't it?
You can say the same things.
You can explain the same facts.
If you're for it, then it's fine.
If you're against it, then you're an anti-Semite.
It's the same thing. We can say the same thing.
We can say the ADL got Trump kicked off.
If you think that's a good thing and you're celebrating the ADL, then good on you.
If you say, I don't like that they did this, now you're an anti-Semite and prepared to have your life destroyed.
Totally unfair. Totally anti-free speech.
Totally against everything Americans should be for.
Final segment with Keith Woods on the other side.
Don't go anywhere, folks. All right, ladies and gentlemen, this will be our final segment with Keith Woods.
You can follow him on Twitter at KeithWoodsYT.
You can follow him on YouTube at KeithWoods.
And his substack is KeithWoodsPUB, KeithWoodsPUB.
And... Again, there's so much good information on your feed, really on just the hashtag ban the ADL trend that's really dominated Twitter for a while.
And here's the thing I'm worried about, Keith.
I'm worried that this comes and goes and the ADL retains all of its power because clearly this has done a major, this has had a major impact on their reputation.
You've got all sorts of, as you pointed out in the last segment, like right wing Jews refusing to allow the ADL to speak for them.
Right.
From the lives of TikTok could create a lot.
Chaya.
What's her name?
Chaya Reichich.
And even Ben Shapiro is calling him out.
I mean, Adam King, you know, Bandit video is like launching a whole like anti-ADL movement trying to get them out.
What I don't want is for them to take some damage reputationally and then sort of go quiet.
And this just passes by and it's a trend that's forgotten.
I want I really want to see mayors and police departments break off engagement with this group.
They're they're a hate group.
They are a supremacy group.
There's no reason why they should be training our FBI agents or indoctrinating our police into their beliefs.
This is absurd.
So how do we how do we take hashtag band the ADL from Twitter to the real world hashtag?
How do we break their power that they've illegitimately gained through their coercive and extortionary tactics over the last decades?
How do we make a real impact for free speech in a positive way from this?
keith woods
Yeah, I think it's already been a win regardless.
You know, some people said, well, if they don't actually get banned from the platform, this will be a failure.
Look, it was number one trend worldwide.
There was over 100,000 tweets.
All of the right really united on this issue.
Even if they didn't advocate the specific policy of banning them, everyone was expressing their opposition to the ADL, whether that was Matt Walsh, Charlie Kirk, Ben Shapiro.
And it really shone a spotlight on this organization.
No one is really defending them now.
They always had that position, a kind of a privileged position of not being painted into that corner as a partisan left-wing group.
They had this prestige where they could speak for the whole Jewish community.
That was the source of their power.
Now, increasingly, Jews, they're trying to wash their hands of this, right?
The ADL is very bad optics, right?
Ben Shapiro, Stephen Miller, a lot of right-wing Jews have come out and denounced it.
And the problem for the ADL, even if they don't get banned or if they don't get bankrupt by Elon Musk's lawsuit, is they're increasingly painted into that corner of it's just another partisan left-wing group.
And okay, maybe they'll run a hit piece on it.
It just doesn't carry weight anymore.
It's like, okay, they think I'm an extremist.
Well, they also think Donald Trump is an extremist, and everyone who criticizes George Soros is an anti-Semitic extremist.
harrison smith
George Soros, the Nazi collaborator, by the way.
I have to keep emphasizing that, like...
The dude literally has done interviews where he's like, when I was putting Jews on trains, it was the best time of my life.
It's so crazy to me.
I'm sorry to interrupt, but that's just the craziest part.
You criticize a literal Nazi collaborator and you're an anti-Semite.
I want to make that clear for people who don't know that little fact about George Soros.
keith woods
I'm sorry to interrupt, Keith. Whatever happens from here, I think they've lost a huge source of their prestige and credibility, which was that they spoke for the organized Jewish community.
And I think it's going to be hard to recover from there.
Also, there's going to be a spotlight now.
You know, when the next time Jonathan Greenblatt has a meeting with the Twitter CEO, the next time they're pushing for more stringent hate speech legislation or policies on these websites, the right has a target now.
You know, we're not just going to be, it's not going to be a few people in the corners of social media pointing out that this is going on.
Everyone is focused on Greenblatt.
They're focused on the ADL. And we have something to oppose.
Now, it's very difficult in terms of you look at what they can muster with these companies and that they can just wipe off billions in advertising revenue.
That's something that's much harder to oppose just with knowledge, just with the spotlight being shown on the organization.
You know, those are connections and influence that have been built up over decades.
But I think one thing that's been positive, you know, the Bud Light boycott was positive.
I think you're starting to see people on the right realizing the past couple of years The left isn't playing around, and organizations like the ADL aren't playing around.
And whatever principles you may have about consumer choice and free speech are well and good.
But if you allow people that don't respect those things and just want to dominate you and have tyranny over you, then you're not going to have those principles.
And so we've seen, I think, the right get more activated in terms of boycotts, in terms of targeting their enemies.
You know, in terms of criticizing their enemies, making them targets of criticism.
And I'm hoping in the next few years we'll start to see more things like that.
Something like a right-wing cancel culture of run.
Something like pressure on these corporations, on the level of financials.
Yeah. Typically on the right,
there's this attitude of, I'll throw the person exactly to my right under the bus to protect myself.
I'll disavow their views, I'll say that I'm more moderate, and that'll keep me safe for now.
And that worked for a while, but like I said, the ADL is at a point where it's thrown so many people under the bus, That they can get together and pick up the bus, right?
And at a certain point, I think this was one case where there wasn't that constant disavowal, there wasn't not trying to associate whatever.
This was a collective movement of, okay, we might not agree on immigration, we might not agree on this issue, that issue.
We all agree that Twitter and that social media should be a free public square.
We all agree that this private, unelected citizen, Jonathan Greenblatt, should not be the one to decide what we're allowed to say online.
And on this issue, we can be united.
And I thought that was a huge positive, that you had these establishment conservatives like Charlie Kirk.
Dinesh D'Souza was big on board with it.
People like Matt Walsh, Ben Shapiro.
I thought it was good that, for once, the right was united on something where we could actually make ground in terms of there was a clear target, there was a clear issue that needed to be addressed here, and it has gone all the way to Elon Musk.
A lot of it is up to Elon next.
Will he go through with this lawsuit?
I don't know what chance he has of winning, but even the discovery, if that lawsuit were to go ahead, would be a real positive.
He's also promised the ADL files where we'll find out the extent of their lobbying for censorship.
And I think in the case of an organization like the ADL, you know, maybe sunlight is the best disinfectant.
We already know that Elon revealed that they lobbied to ban libs of TikTok, Chai Ratchik, off Twitter.
And I think it would be very interesting what else we would find out in a potential ADL files.
harrison smith
Well, it's very exciting, and you're right.
It has been a victory.
I should appreciate the fact that this is sort of unprecedented and what Hashtag Ban the ADL has accomplished in terms of awareness and in terms of unifying people on the right.
I haven't seen anybody on the right defend the ADL except people like Ron Coleman saying, well, it was okay in the 80s, but beyond that, you're completely right.
This has been a massive, massive victory.
I just... I'm just done being satisfied with victory.
I want total, complete victory.
I want these people to not have any power anymore.
So I love what's happened already.
I want to keep it going and I want to remove from public influence these people who do not have our best interests, do not have the American foundational beliefs.
Belief in free speech.
They're against all of these things.
I don't want them having power over our tech or over our law enforcement, as they do to such an extent now.
Thank you, Keith Woods, for being with us today.
KeithWoodsYT on Twitter, YouTube, Keith Woods.
His substack is KeithWoodsPub.
That's Keith Woods, P-U-B. Thank you so much for being with us here today, Keith.
keith woods
It's been great to be here.
And like I said, Harrison, you were actually one of the first people to promote this to a big audience on Twitter X. You deserve credit for that as well.
And yeah, thanks for having me.
harrison smith
Well, thank you very much.
And we do what we can.
Like I said, the ADL are not exactly our friends here at Infowars, which I should mention, we are under massive attack.
We are under continuous censorship, whether it's lawsuits and legal challenges or Our reporters being thrown into prison for their free speech.
We are under constant attack and we rely on you, the info warrior out there, to keep us above water, to keep us afloat, to keep us in the fight and facing off against these globalist factions that are trying to destroy us.
The best way to do that is to go to Infowarsstore.com, get one of the supplements, get one of the incredible products that we have, whether it's the air filters, the water filters, the gear, the t-shirts, everything.
That you buy from InfoWars Store goes directly into funding this mission to free America from the corrosive influence of non-governmental organizations, governmental organizations, and psychological manipulation being carried out by the globalists.
We will continue as long as we possibly can.
We are only limited by...
The actions of our enemies and the gas in our tank.
So give us a refill at Infowarsstore.com.
As you know, we are in this till the end.
We are all in. We are double down on this hand, and we'll play it until we can't anymore.
So thank you for supporting us.
I'm going to get out of here.
I'm going to be hosting the first hour of The Jones Show, so I'm going to go prepare for that.
Chase Geyser is once again going to sit in here for the last hour, maybe take your phone calls, maybe cover his own stories.
Regardless, thank you to Chase.
For filling in, I'll see you at 11 a.m.
Central Time on The Alex Jones Show.
Alex will be in a little bit later.
unidentified
Stay with us. You're watching The American Journal with your host, Chase Geyser.
Watch live right now at band.video.
chase geiser
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
I am your host for the last hour today, Chase Geyser.
He's going in for the great Harrison Smith.
He's going to be on the Alex Jones Show in the next hour for the first hour because I believe Alex is being deposed today for the umpteenth time.
Make sure you call in 877-789-2539.
Again, that's 877-789-2539 because I do want to take calls this hour.
I had a great time filling in for the great Owen Schroer yesterday.
As you all know, he has been sentenced to 60 days in prison for his free speech.
We've heard from callers, we've heard from leftists online that it wasn't free speech that he was sentenced for, but anyone who's actually looked into it is well aware that if it wasn't for free speech, then it wouldn't have been mentioned excessively in the sentencing request documents from the prosecution.
It's very clear that he's being targeted because of his association with Infowars, because he's a high-profile name, and not because of anything that he actually did, but rather because of what the government doesn't want you to do.
See, the government is afraid that more and more Americans will speak out against their tyranny, against their corruption, and it's doing everything it can to prosecute high-profile people in order to intimidate regular Americans out of fighting for their own rights.
Because you see, your rights are an incredible inconvenience to the establishment political class.
Make sure you call in 877-789-2539.
I want to hear from you as to what you think about this most recent news regarding Owen Schroer.
I don't know if you guys watched Timcast last night with Tim Pool and saw Owen's appearance.
I thought he did a great job on the show there.
And I also want to hear what you think about the most recent news developments just in general.
What you think is going to happen in 2024 and why it is that you're not voting for Mike Pence.
I mean, we're going for Mike Pence, right?
Right, guys? Mike Pence?
2024? Anyway, so much crazy stuff going on.
I've had a hell of a week, I'll tell you.
I don't know if you guys saw, I know that Harrison covered it a couple days ago.
Had a very interesting exchange with a long-time friend that I've been thinking about for 72 hours.
Basically, the friendship's been terminated because of my association with Infowars as my friend.
Made clear to me, this is someone who I was very close with, someone whose wedding I officiated, in fact.
And for a long time, I thought that talk of civil war was just hyperbolic.
It's not going to happen.
Things have to get so much worse. And I do agree that things have to get worse.
But now I'm at the point where this is going to happen.
This is inevitable. I don't know If another just all-out civil war didn't break out.
I mean, it's getting to the point where there's no reconciliation, right?
Divorce is inevitable. And there's no way to fix this.
We're not going to fall in love with each other again.
It's over. We had a great time.
It was very romantic and passionate in the beginning.
But at this point, I just don't see how it's going to work out.
I don't see how it's gonna work.
I hope and pray that America is the type of nation that can actually accomplish healing and mending these issues for the first time in the history of any nation that's reached this level of corruption.
I hope and pray and fight for that, but it's gonna get to the point where...
We're just going to have to say to hell with it, I think.
I really think that there's just going to be a breakup.
So we'll be taking more calls in the next segment.
Again, that's 877-789-2539.
Keep calling in. I want to hear from you.
Make sure you guys visit Infowarsstore.com.
Support the Infowar. We are just barely in the black trying to make ends meet here at Infowars.
So anything you can do to support us is much appreciated.
All the products are absolutely great.
I love Turbo Force.
I love Brain Force Plus.
I think during the break I'm actually going to take some Turbo Force.
Yep, it's over here. I'm going to take some Turbo Force during this first break and I'll be ready for your calls in the next segment.
That's 877-789-2539.
Again, 877-789-2539.
I want to hear from you and what you think about everything going on in the world today.
Whether you think civil war is an inevitability or whether we can heal this country, and if so, how can we do it?
it make sure you call in folks and stick with us and don't forget to visit infowarsstore.com and come right back for the next segment welcome back to the American Journal folks where we are snapping next in cash and checks as always
We'll be taking calls this hour, 877-792539.
First up, I want to hear from Alex in Michigan, who says Owen Schroyer, inside job, is topic of discussion.
Alex, how are you today, sir?
unidentified
Hey, thanks for taking my call.
chase geiser
Yes, sir. Thank you for calling in.
unidentified
Yeah, regarding Owen, it's all a Jesuit inside job.
chase geiser
Oh my god!
unidentified
The Jesuits? Alright, I'm going to let you say your piece, bro.
Do it. The Jesuit January 6th was definitely an inside job.
And so is the ADL. It's all an inside job of the Jesuits because the Jesuits run the ADL. The Archbishop of New York is probably the most powerful Jesuit in the country.
And he controls all the mafia in New York.
They all answer to the Archbishop.
And that goes to all the major cities that are controlled by the Archbishops.
And I just made a video on my channel NinjaAlex420 on Bitchute and Rumble exposing Jesuits in the city.
chase geiser
You didn't put it on YouTube?
unidentified
It was banned. I'm banned on YouTube.
chase geiser
I figured you were.
Okay, well, thank you for your call.
Thank you for letting us know that it is all an inside job.
Andrew from New York. Andrew, how are you?
unidentified
So, uh, the grid is, like, kind of, like, weak right now.
Like, they spend all this money on, like, just, like, Pelosi's, like, bagging.
Like, um, they don't spend money on the grid.
And, like, they had the stupidest people on Earth just stop oil.
They were attacking, like, the substations, like, part of the infrastructure of the grid.
But, like, the way I think about it is, like, if the globalists really had the control that they think they do, like, they would have took down the grid, like, Like, I think what happened is, like, they're still losing, like, their power.
Like, there's still, like, the fifth generation, like, war and stuff.
But, like, Trump is, like, in charge of, like, the world, like, military alliance.
He had, like, everybody, like, in the world, like, capitulate to him.
Like, when he was, like, the president, like, he got, like, the money back from, like, the Vatican.
And, like, he had the...
Royals in England and stuff.
I think if the globalists really had the power, they would just EMP and we'd be locked in the houses in the 15-minute cities and waiting for gene therapy shots from the door grow.
I think that the globalists are getting defeated.
I think that Well, thank you, Andrew. I appreciate that succinct and coherent response.
chase geiser
Let's hear from Sean in California.
Sean, how are you? Good to meet you, too.
I'm doing well, man. Thanks for asking.
What's up? Awesome.
sean in california
Hey, well, I originally was going to try to pass a word on to Harrison.
I messaged him through his Telegram channel.
I just gave it to your guys as well.
Clip on Rumble, you'll want to see.
Questioning Lahaina Emergency Proclamation Meeting, showing one of the remedies that people have where you go straight for the jugular on these public officials.
And this can be done on people when they're abusing their power and their authority.
They swear an oath to the Constitution.
They overstep their bounds.
They've breached that contract.
A constitution is a charter.
A charter is a contract.
Hence, the social contract is the term they like to throw out there.
So for folks like Owen, Owen's situation, he should have never taken that plea bargain at the start.
He should have challenged these courts right off the bat, not had an attorney.
Two callers go as referencing Jesuits.
You'll love the connection between the bar and the Vatican.
But fact of the matter is, attorneys like to play the long game.
Maybe they can win a case later at the Supreme Court and get some clout off of it.
Or you win early.
You represent yourself. You get it done and dealt with.
So you're never at the mercy.
You're never on the defense.
You're on the offense in the court.
Because in the game of life, you can't be taking a step back to the bar attorneys.
You can't be doing it to Jesuits, Freemasons, Mossad.
Pick your secret society.
They want you on the defensive.
Now, you had a topic right before you went to break here.
Yeah. I'm having a brain fart because I just rambled off on that.
Civil War. Civil War.
The way you're going to get out of that is the people have to be able to self-govern.
This means go back to common law, general general assemblies.
From those assemblies, you form grand juries when these officials step out of line, present evidence of their crimes, serve the writ to quo warrantial like the kid in Lahaina.
Again, the Rumble video is questioning Lahaina emergency proclamation.
If you want to fill a minute or two, play that video.
I'll step back and let that kid's words speak for himself.
But he went right for the jugular on those officials.
The people of Hawaii and Lahaina are speaking up, and they're not going to let themselves get steamrolled by the likes of an Oprah or a Dwayne Johnson, who's compromised for those who don't know.
And I'm going to leave it at that.
If you've got anything to bounce off me, Chase, I'm more than welcome to, or you can play the video.
chase geiser
I appreciate your call.
We'll certainly take a look at the video at some point and then see if it's something we want to run, though.
I do appreciate you letting us know about it.
Let's hear from Steve in Alaska next.
unidentified
Steve, how are you, sir? Okay, let me get you all blue.
chase geiser
All right, you there? Yes, sir.
unidentified
How are you? Okay, so quick comment on the last interview that Harrison did concerning the ADL. There's a list out there.
It's called the S-H-I-T list.
I won't say the word. It's self-hating Israel threat is what it stood for.
You used to be able to search this thing, and basically what it is is it's Jews who speak out against Israel.
They put them on a list, and they target them.
Now, you can still find this in a deeper dive now, of course, because of the algorithm censoring it.
So that's just information for listeners and other people that really want to see how deep that rabbit hole goes.
On the issue of these people and the position that they're forcing us into, you can't go to a schoolyard bully and say, quit bullying me.
You're hurting my feelings.
sean in california
That doesn't happen.
unidentified
They don't stop.
They will keep coming until they are stopped.
Unfortunately, We don't know who's going to win, right?
So do we have our constitutional republic at the end?
I don't know. But I'm going to tell you what.
When I was a kid and kids used to punch me in the mouth in the schoolyard, I got sick and tired of it because I was a small kid.
So I took a skateboard to them and they quit hitting me.
And that's unfortunately going to have to happen.
Now, yeah, I got punished for it.
Things could have turned out worse.
And in the end, that's what Americans are going to end up having to do.
They're going to have to... Realize if they don't stand, they're done.
We're done. You know?
chase geiser
Yeah, yeah. I'm totally with you, but here's where I struggle, man.
And it's not that I disagree with you because I don't.
But we use words like stand up, fight back, resist, do not comply.
What does that actually mean?
Like, how?
unidentified
Well, it's going to depend upon how far gone it is.
Um... Think about the whole January 6th thing and everything that they said that it wasn't.
Now, if those were armed Americans, we could have walked right into Congress and we could have basically put all of those people in jail, on trial, and nobody could have done a darn thing about it.
And it wouldn't have had to resort to violence.
All these corrupt politicians, they need to get hard and feathered.
And it's unfortunately going to happen.
Hey, take them down to violence, just like it did with the school yard bullies, you know, that I dealt with as a kid.
You know, and like I said, I'm not advocating that, and I don't want that.
I want to see other Americans get hurt, but that's what they're going to force us to.
And if people don't realize that and they don't get ready for it, you know, better be ready than not.
But yeah, I honestly see it coming, and it scares the shit out of me.
Sorry to my language. It scares the hell out of me.
Because of the fact that I don't know how it's going to end.
You know what I mean? That does scare me.
But just for the rest of it, yeah, we're going to end up having to do everything from the grand juries that people have talked about.
chase geiser
Well, thank you so much for calling in.
I do appreciate it. Make sure you stick with us, folks.
We'll be back right after this break.
Visit InfoWarsStore.com.
unidentified
Get something for yourself or a loved one and support the InfoWars.
chase geiser
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks.
We will be taking more calls for the rest of the hour.
Call in 877-789-2539.
I want to hear from Michael in Virginia for the first call of this segment.
Michael in Virginia, the revolution is already in process, not being televised.
What do you have to say? Exactly.
qc in virginia
The revolution has already begun.
It's in process. First, our military are going to take over the...
These tyrants. It's already in the process.
Like I said, it's not going to be televised.
Now, how do we accomplish this?
Well, look, we have weapons.
We have arms. Our Constitution, our rights.
We have all these documentations our fathers and fathers put in place for us to defend ourselves against tyrannical rule.
So we're not using them.
We're just showing them. We're waving them.
Hey, hey, hey. They're going to arrest us.
Put on masks. Take these vaccines.
You guys are jokes. You're not going to do anything.
What we do is, should do, is walk up there with our arms.
And now rights to do so and say, look, we're taking over.
Move out of our way.
Move out of our way. Now we have a right to defend ourselves.
If you put your hands on us, then we have a right to defend ourselves.
We didn't start it, but guess what?
We're going to finish it.
It's going to take a while, but that's how we do it.
Now, if they don't do anything, they step aside and just let us go forward, then we take back armed, peaceful, resistant.
That's what we're about.
chase geiser
That's how we do it. So you think that the military is going to actually have a takeover of the government?
unidentified
Did I misunderstand? The military is already in the process of what you want to call the coup.
qc in virginia
There's something about that, yeah.
It's already in process.
Look, like I said, it's not going to be told.
It's just going to happen. And then it will be televised after it occurs.
What I'm saying is that no rightful ruler will broadcast his strategy until his enemy is defeated.
He plots their destination.
He knows where he's going to go.
He knows how to get there, and he makes the moves to do it.
So that part is not going to be told to say, hey, guess what?
I'm General so-and-so, and I'm taking over.
Nobody's paying what I'm saying to any mind.
These guys are fools.
The FBI, all these guys are stupid.
I'm a crazy lunatic.
But in any case, yeah.
Yeah, so they don't take me serious.
But in any case, look, that's how we do it.
And it's going to happen.
Like I said, it's already in process one way or the other.
They're afraid of us using our right to defend ourselves and take back our government.
They don't expect us to walk up there and say, look, move out of the way.
You guys, this is the evidence.
You guys are not moving fast enough.
You're not doing what you're supposed to do.
In the meantime, you're selling us out.
We're losing our freedoms.
Well, guess what? We're going to defend it.
We're soldiers or whoever we are.
And it's going to happen. Now, you put your hands on us, we have a right to defend ourselves.
If not, then move aside.
chase geiser
Well, thank you so much for your call.
I do appreciate your input there.
I want to hear an extra Mike in New York.
Mike, how are you? Good, Chase.
Can you hear me okay? You sound great.
unidentified
All right, because I want everybody to hear this.
You know, I'm really sick and damn tired of people slandering info wars and you guys.
When we both know that the only person who saved more people than Infowars is Jesus Christ himself.
And I know it's kind of a bold statement, but I'm sick and tired of it.
You go in the comment sections of this stuff, everybody's trying to rip them apart.
Oh, they're hiding this, they're doing that.
They work for the... What are you doing?
What have you done? These people, right?
You have one, two, ten followers on Twitter, and you're sitting here smashing somebody who has done more for the community and America itself than maybe the world, than anybody.
So, and not only that, but you guys take the slings and arrows, and you take, it's like, what has to happen?
Does Owen have to go to prison for two months in order to prove that he's legitimate?
Like, It's just bogus, man.
Not only that, but we got these fake accounts on Twitter pretending to be Owen, and we can't even get him banned.
Meanwhile, he can't even be on there.
It's all just a joke, man.
I just want to give you guys your praise.
When I first started listening to InfoWars, man, I was clueless.
I didn't know what was going on.
I can speak for myself.
I'm 110% more aware than I've ever been in my life.
And, you know, I've been black-pilled, I've been white-pilled, but, you know, we're winning, you know?
I'm white-pilled right now.
We're winning. No one can handle this, you know?
Even if he has to go to prison or whatever, he'll be okay.
He's a warrior, you know?
And just what you guys do for us, man, like, and to hear these people get on here and just run their mouth and then, you know, oh, it's this, oh, it's that.
It's like, regardless of what it is, like, You know, you're not progressing anything by just sitting here bringing people down.
It just doesn't work.
chase geiser
Yeah, well, and there's a couple things that I think about that.
The first thing, first of all, I appreciate your call and your positive support.
It means a lot to not just me, but I think everybody here, I think you can safely say and speak for them that we appreciate it.
But the first thing is, There was a long time when I was trying to grow my following, particularly on Twitter, with my podcast, there was a long time where I was discouraged because I wasn't getting any hate, right?
I was growing, you know, here's 10,000 followers and 20,000 followers and 30,000 followers and up to 40,000 and 50,000.
But nobody was bashing me in the replies.
And it wasn't until just recently that We're right around the 180,000 followers mark.
Now when I post, I get it in the replies.
And I'm not trying to make this about me, but I'm using this as an example because it feels so good!
To get hate from the left.
It is a badge of honor.
Anybody who ever hates on you online is never doing better than you.
Almost never doing better than you.
And if you're not getting hate from the most hateful people, from the leftists, from the enemies of America, then you're not doing it right, folks.
So, although Infowars may sometimes be perturbed or annoyed at the hate that we get from retards all over the world...
Let it be known that ultimately when push comes to shove, we are very grateful to know that those who hate life itself, those who hate America, those who hate God, Jesus Christ, Alex Jones, those who hate all those who fight for all that is good against all that is evil, hate us?
Then what does that say other than We're doing it right, folks.
It is the greatest endorsement ever to be hated by evil.
It is the greatest endorsement ever to be classified as the enemy of Satan.
And whether you believe in Satan literally or not, I'm talking about that which is the adversary to all good.
So, thank you so much for your call, Mike, and your support.
I do appreciate it. And haters, keep on hating.
I love to hear it as well.
I want to hear from Zero in New York.
Zero, what do you have to say, buddy?
unidentified
Hey, I just wanted to say, you know, legally, mass invasion of a country, that's an act of war.
Yes. A government that fails to protect their country against this mass invasion, that's an act of treason.
chase geiser
Yes. All right.
unidentified
What is the punishment for treason in America?
Hang on. I mean, it's not impeachment.
You court martial. You get court martialed under a military tribunal.
Yep. You call for an expedited public trial.
This is not acceptable.
These little probes and stuff that they're doing, they're part of the problem.
chase geiser
Yep, you're absolutely right.
You've got to have mass deportation. You're absolutely right.
Stop paying taxes. Stop paying taxes.
Stop paying taxes. Stop paying taxes.
Thank you so much for your call.
I really do appreciate it. We're going to be taking more calls in the next segment, 877-789-2539.
Again, that's 877-789-2539.
and make sure that you visit Infowarsstore.com to keep us on the air fighting against all of this evil in the world.
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. .
Chase Geiser filling in for the great Harrison Smith.
The next 30 minutes or so, we will be taking calls.
877-789-2539.
You know, this is one of my favorite songs of all time.
I knew a very good man, a very devout Christian man cried one time when this song was on.
Older guy. I didn't understand why.
And now when I listen to it, I realize that he was thinking of the lyrics as coming from the perspective of Jesus Christ.
And I think it's pretty interesting.
I'm going to take a call from Jefferson in Virginia.
Jefferson, I know we spoke yesterday on the War Room, and I know that I cut you off and I hung up on you, and I felt bad about it later, and I'm sorry that I hung up on you, dude.
jefferson in virginia
That's all right, Chase. I understand you're a little worked up about the Jews and the administration.
chase geiser
Yeah, yeah, I was worked up about everything yesterday, so I apologize, dude.
jefferson in virginia
Go ahead, buddy. That issue is actually about Zionism.
It's not about Jews. When you crossed your eyes, it was hilarious.
chase geiser
Thank you. I appreciate it.
jefferson in virginia
Anyway, we have to admit that Owens essentially walked into a trap of his own making.
He made an agreement with the government not to go on capital grounds with the intent to disrupt anything, and that's the caveat, the intention.
Did he have any intent to disrupt anything?
That's his only out, really.
Right. He caught himself in a trap where they can argue, we don't really care what your intent is because what your words say is that death to tyrants is okay and you're a danger to the public and the government and all that sort of stuff.
So he's done it to himself in some sense.
His lawyers seem to always want to win on appeal rather than win the case at hand.
And I like Norm Pattis.
I interact with their show in the morning on the regular.
Law and Legitimacy is a good show every morning at 8 o'clock a.m.
Eastern Time. When it comes to the Civil War aspect, continuity of government exists so that the military can step in and we have all these governors of all the regions that can basically step in.
When the government goes south on us, we don't have trust in the government anymore.
We're supposed to be able to switch it over to a continuity of government system where we don't have to worry about partisan politics ruling our life anymore.
They just go about making the government function properly.
So that's the interim step between going to battle with these people.
Truth and reconciliation has to be the way we go in the future where we basically give these people immunity if they're willing to tell us the truth about what they were up to.
A million-man march with arms going into Washington, D.C. is just going to be the same thing that happened on January 6th.
They're just going to hijack it and make the violence break out and then call it an unlawful assembly.
chase geiser
Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. Yeah, I'm with you on that, and I understand your perspective on the Owen issue.
The only issues that I take with that perspective are that, first of all, I think that the outcome of the 2019 issue with Owen was questionable.
I think that, yes, of course, there was the agreement that he wouldn't come back to the Capitol and all that stuff, but can you really consider it a genuine, authentic agreement When you're sort of coerced or muscled into pleading or agreeing to something that you don't really want to do, like, you know, if we made a deal at gunpoint, if I held a gun to your head, I'd never do that, of course, so this is a metaphor.
And I said, you know, you agree to pay me $50 a month for the rest of your life, and then you agree to do it.
I mean, is that really you agreeing to do it, or is it just you're under pressure to do it because of the coercion that I'm exacting on you?
That's the first issue. And the second issue I have, man, is...
The reason I think this is a free speech issue and not simply entering a restricted zone issue for Owen is because the sentencing document cited things that Owen said on his show after the fact.
As evidence that he should be sentenced to prison, right?
So I'm not even saying that he was found guilty necessarily for a free speech issue, although I don't disagree with that notion.
What I'm really saying is the sentencing itself specifically seems to be an attack on his free speech or his free speech seems to be the reason for the sentencing recommendation to begin with.
That's the issue that I have.
jefferson in virginia
What do you think? Well, I agree that his words, his First Amendment rights are being used to enhance his sentencing.
So it's an aggravating factor.
Rather than getting five days in jail for violating his prosecutorial deferral agreement, he's getting 60 days when he could have gotten 120.
But the point is, yes, they're using his speech as an excuse to ramp up the penalty.
But that's not a conviction.
He's not being convicted of his speech.
He's being sentenced at a higher rate because of what he says, and he's a threat to the government by what he says, is their thinking.
You know, it's very close to being a First Amendment violation, but it's not technically such.
It's not a free speech issue.
I mean, I know he thinks he's a journalist and he's supposed to be able to go wherever the story takes him.
You know, if the Capitol were on fire that day and he ran inside to save people, the government would still say he was guilty of being where he wasn't supposed to be.
chase geiser
That's a fact, man.
That's a good way of putting it. Jefferson, thank you for your call.
I appreciate it. I want to hear from Robert in Florida.
Robert, what's going on?
Hey, how are you? I'm good, man.
How are you doing? Good.
unidentified
I have two parts to your question.
First, I'm sorry about your friend.
I've had several of those ever since the pandemic happened.
Thank you. And the first part is the World War III escalation.
Kim Jong-un and Putin meet today saying that they're going to dismantle or get rid of all the evilness in the world.
The United States has been taken over by evilness.
People are so willing to sit on their couch and watch Monday Night Football or whatever it is and not stand up for their rights.
I've been watching a lot of these videos on these auditors that go to different places exercising their rights.
And it shows you what people can and can't do.
A lot of people don't know what the Constitution is.
I have several children.
I tried to implement it every day in their lives, explaining to them what their rights are as a human being.
People would just rather, you know, go along to get along, but sometimes you gotta stand up like Owen and speak, you know?
chase geiser
Yep, that's the truth of the matter, man.
That is the fact of the matter.
We have been taken over by evil ourselves.
And I do appreciate your call.
I want to hear from Tin Man next in Texas.
Tin Man, one of my favorite people of all time.
unidentified
What's up? Hey Chase, what's up?
chase geiser
Nothing. How you doing? Pretty good, pretty good.
unidentified
Yeah, I was calling because I heard you talking about, you know, we need to come up with ways to fix the problem.
I mean, we all know about the problem, you know, as far as the clubs and all that.
Like, well, my idea is, you know, is kind of what one of your first callers was talking about with the common law thing.
Because we don't have to go with the bar, you know, with the admiral law.
We can use common law.
But we could go even further than that.
Because you can use the same tactics that ADL is using right now, but on judges.
chase geiser
Just blackmail them and say, hey, we're going to slander your name unless you rule in our favor?
unidentified
Yeah, pretty much.
chase geiser
I don't think that you can legally blackmail a judge of a court, man.
unidentified
Yeah, I'm not saying you blackmail them, but it's the same basis.
Like, you can take them where the Bar Association will basically ban them.
So they're like stuck between a rock and a hard place, you know what I mean?
chase geiser
Yeah, well, I have a problem with this.
I don't understand why... In order to practice law in the United States, you don't have to pass the bar.
Like, why is it that you have to be licensed to practice law in the United States?
People talk about Abraham Lincoln as being one of the greatest lawyers of all time, famous lawyer from the 19th century, learned how to read by the light of fire and candles in a one-room cabin.
You never pass the bar. They didn't even have a bar back then.
Anybody who wanted to practice law could just open up shop.
Because back then we had some semblance of freedom in this country, but now you have to be part of the little club to even be considered a lawyer in this country.
That's part of the problem altogether, in my own opinion, right?
Like, why is it that we've established this sort of class of people that are allowed to practice law and a whole entire other class of people that aren't, even though we're all citizens and subjects to the same law?
unidentified
Well, that's definitely a club deal.
But I couldn't even take it further than that because we were talking about this last night on the TMI show.
Okay, so you have the judges that are...
Card-holding members of the bar.
And you have the DA, which is also a card-holding member of the bar.
So you automatically have a conflict of interest in every single case.
chase geiser
Yeah, that's a great point, Tim, man. We do have to cut to break.
Make sure you guys visit Infowarsstore.com.
Support the Infowars. Support Alex Jones at DefendJones.com.
Support Owen at DefendEllen.com as well.
Welcome back to the American Journal.
This is Chase Geiser filling in for the great Harrison Smith, who will be hosting the Alex Jones Show for the first hour before Alex comes on later today.
More calls in this segment.
Let's hear from Harley in Texas.
Harley, what's on your mind?
unidentified
Hello, Chase.
I talked to the editor of the I asked him about the possibility of solidarity to the protesters in Bernalillo County,
New Mexico, against the declaration of that governor that took away the Second Amendment there and the open carry and the concealed carry permits and everything.
What if everybody that can openly carry in the United States just started carrying for the next 30 days as a show of support for them?
Do you think that would help?
chase geiser
I think that's a great idea.
I'm gonna do it. I'm gonna start doing it.
I'm gonna start open carrying everywhere.
unidentified
That's a great idea. Yeah, help me and get the word out, okay?
chase geiser
Yeah, absolutely. That'd be a great thing for everybody, all the listeners there who can legally open carry.
Let's do it for the next seven days and let everybody in New Mexico know that we support them and their right to bear arms as protected by the Second Amendment of the United States and show the governor of New Mexico that she can't cross certain lines.
Thank you so much for that. I appreciate it.
Let's hear from Seven Stricken, Washington.
unidentified
What's going on? Hey, good morning, friends.
Good morning. I want to really talk about the duty of civil disobedience, specifically the book that was written by Henry David Thoreau.
It's not really a book.
It was about a 30-page essay.
And in it, there was a poll tax that he totally disagreed with.
So he blatantly, belligerently broke the law We're good to go.
To disobey it. Yep.
And we see this recurring theme throughout American history.
One of the greatest examples of it would be Martin Luther King Jr.
Yeah. Exactly.
So when it comes to Owen Troyer, I hear all this stuff.
And let me say this much. I'm a United States Marine.
I served back in Iraq.
I'm no stranger to violence.
Right now, there's so much going on.
The ADL fondles itself when it hears people like Marines come on and say, hey, we need to take up arms and go march on Washington.
Wrong answer. Wrong answer.
There's so much going on right now.
They could use that for a false flag and make January 6th look like nothing.
I mean, it really was nothing.
But at the end of the day, they could really make this and twist it around.
So that's the wrong answer.
What needs to happen is Owen needs to go in there.
He needs to...
Let's face it.
Everybody knows who he is.
He's not going to have a bad time in jail.
In fact, he's probably going to be like Dr.
Evil sent in jail. And the truth is, they have made him.
He's going to come out with unbelievable cred.
So he needs to buck up.
He needs to go ahead and do his sentence.
And we need to know how we can put money in his commissary fund.
Like, that needs to be known.
We need to know how to send him letters.
And I'd really like for him to come on to the war room, you know, once or twice a week or whatnot and speak from jail.
And use this to totally trampoline himself into superstardom, because that's what this will do.
And I have this to say about it.
Fuck around and find out.
You know, that's about it.
You know, everybody needs to chill out, but if anybody comes to your place and they're trying to harm you and your family, you have a right to defend yourself.
Don't go out looking for...
We do not need to be offensive right now.
But if anybody comes towards you to try to harm you or burn down your house or whatnot, take them out.
chase geiser
Yep. Great call.
Thank you for calling in. I appreciate it, man.
Let's hear from Tove in Ontario.
Tove, what's going on? How you doing, Chase?
Good. It's good to hear from you again.
unidentified
Yeah, it's me again.
I've been thinking about this for a long time, and I know a lot of the info warriors are not...
And myself included, we dwell upon politics.
I kind of see that as like a sports game or a movie.
I don't believe it's reality.
I believe it's just the show.
I think that the real power bases are using that to distract us.
Like, you know, about the upcoming election.
I think most of the U.S. government is compromised.
How do you feel about that?
chase geiser
Yeah, man. Absolutely.
100%. I don't know if the elections are a puppet show or not.
I certainly think that they are unfair.
I think that conservatives have to win by a greater than 50% margin in order to actually win.
And I think that most of our leaders are compromised.
Absolutely. If they're not corrupted by external sources, just corrupted by their own lack of character in handling and tolerating the own power that they've accrued.
So 100%. That's what we're fighting against here at InfoWars.
And I do want to hear from Wild in Wisconsin.
unidentified
Wild, how are you, sir? Hey, Mr.
max in wisconsin
Chase Geiser. I'm kind of like the Ying to Owen Jang.
You know, he's like the cuck player.
I'm like the cuck creator.
So I'm like super mad that this has happened to him.
And I just don't know.
You know, I think I'm just going to like quadruple down You know, work ten times harder, you know, because it's just, I feel so bad for Owen.
You know, I'm worried that he's not only, if nothing happens to him in jail, I'm worried, of course, something's going to happen to him in jail.
Someone's going to attack him, rape him, or whatever.
But even if nothing happens, he's going to come out such a hard-ass and bad-ass that I'm concerned that he's going to be a different person.
And I like the Owen Schroer we have now.
So, I don't know. I think I'm just going to, like, destroy the entire rabbit hole.
chase geiser
Yeah, well, I think Owen's going to be fine.
Obviously, 60 days in prison is not something that he deserves.
It's something that we're all very frustrated and angered by.
But if I know anything about Owen, I know that he's one tough cookie.
And I don't think anybody's going to mess with him.
I think that he's going to be just fine.
And I think he'll come out with even more conviction than he has going.
And obviously, he's fighting tooth and nail to appeal, do everything that he can to fight back.
And hopefully this case can eventually reach the Supreme Court because I do think that it is a free speech issue.
And of course, we're all supporting Owen.
And you can support him too by going to defendowen.com and giving anything that you can, even if it's just a dollar.
That would be awesome.
Let's hear from BS Assassin.
BS Assassin, we've got a couple of minutes.
unidentified
What's up? What's up, everybody?
It's real simple. You want to fix this country?
We have an anti-Christ mafia that took over our financial system.
How ridiculous is that?
Henry Kissinger and all these little cronies.
That's the mafia, fellas.
They took over our financial system, right?
So they print funny money.
How ridiculous is that?
They're bribing people with paper, with demonic symbols on them.
That's what's going on.
So that's what we have to recognize.
We have to charge them as a global mafia, go after every one of them with this stupid fiat currency, We take back our financial institution, make local banks.
Every community has its own bank where all tax money goes for and is accounted for.
We create community projects where we circulate all the money and we work symbiotically with the land using nature with nature, not freaking anti-Christ science to destroy nature.
chase geiser
I love your call.
I appreciate your input, but we do have a breaking story that I'm going to cover, so I'm going to have to terminate the call.
This just in, Vivek Ramaswamy slams DOJ FBI over Owen Schroer's sentence, reveals plan to shut down the FBI. In the next 90 seconds, we're going to cover this.
U.S. presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy slammed the DOJ and FBI over the sentencing of Infant Wars host Owen Schroer to 60 days in prison for his speech.
Ramaswamy, 38, also stressed the dangers of using police power to silence political dissent and added he would use his power as president to pardon all nonviolent January 6th protesters and political prisoners.
Yesterday, a man by the name of Owen Schroer was sentenced to prison for speech, not violence, on January 6th for marching around the Capitol using a bullhorn and shouting things like 1776, no violence, didn't enter the Capitol, that's it, said Ramaswamy Wednesday on X. I don't know the guy and I have no idea if he's a good person or not, but that's not what our justice system is supposed to determine.
Yesterday, man, and this quote cited here, of course, there is no greater threat to the First Amendment than the use of police power to silence political dissent.
He continued, on day one, I will pardon all nonviolent January 6 protesters and political prisoners, the DOJ used evidence provided by the FBI to pursue this man and countless others.
Republican presidential hopeful then posted an illustration of his goals and announced his coming live stream of the detailed plan to shut down the FBI and other federal agencies.
Outstanding to hear this from Vivek.
You can see it on his Twitter account.
I've had the honor and privilege of interviewing Vivek, which is featured on Bandot Video as well.
Make sure you stay tuned for The Alex Jones Show in the next hour.
And in the meantime, if you believe in what we're doing here at Infowars, go to Infowarsstore.com and fight back by buying something for yourself or a loved one from any of our great list of products.
Take care, folks.
unidentified
Thank you.
alex jones
Thank you.
Smells amazing, and it's some of the strongest coffee I've ever drank.
Ladies and gentlemen, these three single-source Colombian coffees are now available at Infowarsstore.com exclusively.
Escape the Prison Planet Light Roast.
Tastes great. It's the strong one.
Really strong. But these are all close second and thirds.
Medium Roast. Wake up America.
Woo! That's what my go-to.
Dark Roast, tip of the spear, tastes the best and is amazing and is still very, very strong.
Export Selection