Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
So I think you've heard from the FDA and CDC, they've made an announcement on the new vaccine. | ||
So certainly they said that there will be an updated vaccine in September, mid-September, I believe. | ||
So we know that, as you all know, vaccinations against COVID-19 remains the safest protection for avoiding hospitalization, long-term health outcomes, and death, which is why we are going to be encouraging Americans to stay up to date on their vaccines. | ||
The criminal governments of the world are about to attack we the people again with the masks, lockdowns, and deadly vaccines. | ||
And people are already masking up. | ||
As a Weimar judge was just sentenced to two years in prison for trying to lift the last mask mandate, Germany is set to mandate the masks starting again this October. | ||
Corporations are announcing mask mandates. | ||
Colleges are announcing mask mandates and threatening to disenroll students if they don't get the clot shot. | ||
The CDC admits the masks are useless, and the NIH published a study saying that the N95 masks can expose people to toxic compounds linked to seizures and cancer. | ||
unidentified
|
The mainstream media, like CNN, has been brainwashing these people to be, like, just under, like, a spell of democratic stuff. | |
And it's making them wear these masks that are unnecessary and making them lose oxygen. | ||
And it's bad. | ||
It's so bad for the community. | ||
And we need to fight back. | ||
I know I'm a kid, and to be honest, we need to be like Power Rangers. | ||
We need to fight back. | ||
We need to fight back against evil. | ||
Because CNN and the mainstream media are evil. | ||
They are trying to make us under a spell. | ||
And we need to resist it. | ||
We need to resist masks. | ||
We need to resist all of it. | ||
Okay? And we need to fight back! | ||
The strange blood clots are still being found in the dead bodies of the vaccinated. | ||
The vaccinated appear to be shedding the spike proteins and the nanotech that we know is in these lethal cocktails. | ||
Nanotech that is growing inside the hearts and brains of the infected. | ||
The shots have made millions infertile. | ||
And we know that Pfizer aggressively campaigned for pregnant women to get the shot even after knowing it could kill their babies. | ||
It is estimated that the shots have murdered millions, conservatively. | ||
According to the CDC's data, the more COVID-19 vaccine doses in an area, the greater the increase in mortality and death. | ||
The hordes of unchecked people being flooded into our country through the open border are not required to be given a COVID vaccination. | ||
Lucky them. But Joe Biden says a new vaccine is coming for every American, whether they've gotten it before or not. | ||
We are being given a second chance to say no to these psychopathic criminals in our government. | ||
unidentified
|
You can stick your vaccine mandates up your ass. | |
You can stick your vaccine mandates. | ||
Stick your vaccine mandates. | ||
You can stick your vaccine mandates up your ass. | ||
You can stick your vaccine mandates. | ||
Stick your vaccine mandates. | ||
You can stick your vaccine mandates up your ass. | ||
Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. | ||
That is the latest from Greg Reese. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, you can stick your vaccine mandates up your donkey. | ||
We'll be right back with your Daily Dispatch. | ||
Some people say that we curse on this show. | ||
No, we just make oblique references to barnyard animals. | ||
What's wrong with that? | ||
Absolutely nothing. That's what. | ||
Big show we have for you today. | ||
Roger Stone will be joining us at the 9.30 time slot. | ||
Very excited to talk to him. Your phone calls and all today's news coming up. | ||
unidentified
|
Stay with us. It's Thursday, August 31st, year of our law in 2023. | |
And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Welcome to The American Journal, infowars.com, band.video. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Lots of stories to cover today. | ||
Roger Stone will be joining us in this second hour. | ||
We'll be taking your calls throughout the third hour. | ||
We're talking about political persecution. | ||
It's a large part of today's topic. | ||
Really nothing tying all this stuff together. | ||
Just the conspiracy. | ||
Just the single worldwide conspiracy to create a monolithic world government that is undemocratic. | ||
And tyrannical in aspect. | ||
And we'll get into what exactly that looks like here in just a second as we have some pretty bombshell stories in our Daily Dispatch. | ||
So let's get into it. | ||
Here it is, your daily dispatch. | ||
All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Thursday, the 31st of August, 2023. 23. | ||
Vanguard joins BlackRock in rejecting more ESG proposals from shareholders. | ||
The Vanguard group says it has only approved 2% of the environmental and social resolutions brought by shareholders in 2023, down 12% from last year. | ||
Joining BlackRock in rejecting a significant number of climate and social items amid pushback against the environmental, social, and governance movement previously promoted by the investment titans. | ||
Vanguard reported in its Vanguard Investment Stewardship Brief for the U.S. region released Tuesday that it received a greater number of environmental and social proposals in this proxy season, with shareholders bringing 359 such resolutions compared to just 290 in 2022. | ||
The mutual fund giant said it saw a 50% increase in proposals related to environmental matters alone, and the most common subject was target setting for greenhouse gas emissions. | ||
We often use the phrase like scam upon scam, how we've got scams built on the back of other scams. | ||
In this case, the scam of fiat currency is being manipulated by the scam of multinational conglomerate hedge fund managing organizations to push the environmental social government scam to make money off of the climate change scam. | ||
And you wonder why we're in the trouble that we're in. | ||
Meanwhile, Biden's DOJ will not comply with subpoenas for two FBI agents in Hunter Biden case. | ||
On Tuesday night, the House Judiciary Committee was informed by Biden's Department of Justice that it would not be cooperating with subpoenas issued to two FBI agents involved in investigations into Hunter Biden over limits set forth for their depositions. | ||
In a letter obtained by the Washington Examiner, DOJ Assistant Attorney General Carlos Uyarty, told Committee Chairman Jim Jordan that subpoenas, quote, lack legal effect and cannot constitutionally be enforced because Jordan had prohibited DOJ lawyers from being lack legal effect and cannot constitutionally be enforced because Jordan had prohibited DOJ lawyers from | ||
The subpoenas issued by the committee prohibit the attendance of agency counsel at appearances by two FBI employees where the committee has indicated it will ask questions regarding information they learned within the scope of their official duties, including regarding the ongoing criminal investigation. | ||
He said that compelling testimony from the FBI, Baltimore Field Office, special agents, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. | ||
The point is they are just not complying because they don't have to because they're the ones with guns. | ||
So what are you going to do about it? | ||
That's the takeaway. That is essentially the takeaway. | ||
They just get subpoenaed for two FBI agents and they're just like... | ||
Make us. Why don't you come here and make us do it? | ||
We don't want to. We're not going to. | ||
End of story. Really flexing their independence over the duly elected civilian oversight via the Congress. | ||
Really just letting everybody know what the new situation is. | ||
People that actually have to respond to the demands of their voters. | ||
They're not in charge anymore. | ||
The people in charge are the unaccountable deep state spy agencies. | ||
And that's the ultimate conflict taking place in America today. | ||
Meanwhile, Mitch McConnell freezes for a second time during press event. | ||
For the second time in just over a month, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell appeared to freeze while speaking to reporters at a press conference event in Covington, Kentucky. | ||
The 81-year-old paused for more than 30 seconds when asked if he would run for re-election in 2026. | ||
Here's a video of it. | ||
You just have to think. | ||
What's flashing through his mind right now? | ||
What horror film flashbacks is Mitch McConnell having? | ||
That's honestly what it seems. | ||
It seems like somebody with PTSD or something. | ||
When you're like, I hear you were in Vietnam. | ||
And they just like stare off in the distance and are just seeing like burning children screaming and fire consuming entire villages. | ||
Just like, what has Mitch McConnell seen in his time as... | ||
Politician over the last uncountable number of decades. | ||
AIDS attempted to prompt the senator, but it took several more seconds for Mr. | ||
McConnell to recover. He then answered two more questions, which had to be repeated by the staff. | ||
He made no comments about his health before leaving with AIDS. Okay. | ||
Great. That's great. | ||
I love it. Let me get that. | ||
Have we ever played the Ryan Long... | ||
Skit about the retirement home for politicians. | ||
It's very good and painfully apt. | ||
Painfully apt. You know, the interesting thing about Mitch McConnell, the reason he's so powerful, the reason he's so supported by the entire Republican Party is because he has managed over the last several decades to control all of the funding. | ||
He decides where the money goes, who gets money to carry out their money. | ||
Re-election campaigns. | ||
So anybody that's in office has to kowtow to him to have any hope of having enough funds to remain in office. | ||
Which really makes you realize this is just how Washington works. | ||
Whether it's Joe Biden getting a position as vice president to then use the American people's tax money to withhold it and blackmail Ukraine into no longer investigating his son's business. | ||
Or whether it's Mitch McConnell deciding who gets to run as a Republican each and every year or each and every cycle. | ||
You just get to a position where you control other people's money, then you use that money to advance your own interests, and that's how corruption flourishes. | ||
One headline amongst many today from NPR News this time, as COVID cases increase, mask mandates are making a comeback. | ||
Yes, they're acting surprised about this. | ||
We have more questions. Articles from other outlets, New York Times. | ||
Is it time for mask mandates to come back? | ||
No, you are not. This is not a flashback. | ||
You've not traveled back through time to 2020. | ||
This is, in fact, your real life. | ||
And yes, they're trying to do it again. | ||
Honestly, I don't know how much time we can spend talking about masks. | ||
I don't, I just, I can't do it. | ||
I can't. Relitigate the argument that we won over and over and over again for the past three years. | ||
This has been decided. | ||
The arguments were made. | ||
The outcome is certain. | ||
We won this argument. | ||
We defeated your mask mandates. | ||
We proved the vaccine wrong. | ||
We have come out on top of all of this. | ||
We're not going to litigate it again. | ||
We're just going to laugh at you this time. | ||
It's just incredible. Finally, we have this story. | ||
Relates to what I said at the beginning of this segment. | ||
U.S. military to unleash thousands of war robots over the next two years. | ||
The scale and scope of the U.S. announcement makes it clear the future of conflict has changed. | ||
The age of warfighting robots is upon us. | ||
Good Lord. And this is a little bit different. | ||
In fact, the original headline made a note that they were autonomous, which is a very important differentiation between something like a UAV, an unmanned aerial vehicle that's controlled by some dude in an office in Scottsdale versus robots that think an unmanned aerial vehicle that's controlled by some dude in an office in Scottsdale versus robots that think for themselves, find their | ||
The United States military plans to start using thousands of autonomous weapons systems in the next two years in a bid to counter China's growing power. | ||
U.S. Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks announced in a speech on Monday the so-called Replicator Initiative. | ||
Oh good, oh good, they're naming it like a James Cameron movie. | ||
Wonderful. We'll call it the Replicator Initiative. | ||
That sounds intimidating, doesn't it? | ||
We'll produce high volumes of affordable systems for all branches of the military. | ||
So just so we're clear, one of the primary and possibly the only moderately convincing argument for globalism is that it will end war. | ||
Hey, if there weren't nations, the nations wouldn't go to war. | ||
This is an important distinction, though. | ||
They're replacing what we now know as war of two countries fighting each other. | ||
It'll be replaced by a central... | ||
Global government that will control autonomous legions of robots that will hunt down and destroy anybody who does not join their system. | ||
That's war from now on. | ||
All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to the show, Lots of big stories to cover today. | ||
Legion's military robots being used by the globalists. | ||
Just saw a video posted. | ||
I'll put it in the folder if we want to censor the guy curses in it, but... | ||
I don't know if it's true or not. | ||
Maybe if one of our callers has an Alexa. | ||
But if the dude asks Alexa who's gonna win... | ||
The 2024 election, and apparently Alexa, the Amazon AI, responds that there will not be an election in 2024 because the War Powers Act will be invoked once the hot war with China and Russia starts. | ||
It's just like, we need a board. | ||
We need like a pros and cons list from the point of view of the globalists of massive world war with China and Russia, and Iran for that matter. | ||
What is the downside for them? | ||
I mean, they're not the ones who are going to be fighting it. | ||
Their lives really won't change. | ||
The billionaires, the money managers, the politicians. | ||
They'll be good. | ||
This is why it's a requirement for all info warriors to watch Dr. | ||
Strangelove. More importantly, the subtitle, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. | ||
In case you're not familiar, that whole story is about a cataclysmic doomsday device that will destroy the earth. | ||
And the people in Washington realized that if such a thing were to happen, well, all of the important politicians from Washington, D.C. would have to go into some sort of underground bunker with a bevy of fertile women to keep the human race going. | ||
And they realized maybe it wouldn't be such a bad thing to have nuclear exchange. | ||
Now, in this case, it's not... | ||
Just going into their deep underground military bases and parallel government structures underneath mountains near D.C. But it's also the depopulation program that they're engaged in, the reorganization of the entire economy that they're engaged in. | ||
Obviously, it'll be a great opportunity to have a bunch of European people kill each other, just do away with the white race as a whole through massive... | ||
Exchange of nuclear weapons. | ||
Really, there's no downside for them. | ||
It's just, how do they lay the groundwork for us to get there? | ||
It really does seem like they're doing it. | ||
Again, we have lots of stuff to cover. | ||
We're going to talk to Roger Stone at 9.30 this morning. | ||
We'll take your phone calls throughout the show as well. | ||
But I want to go to some videos here of Tucker Carlson. | ||
He did an interview yesterday with Adam Carolla. | ||
He made some pretty incredible statements. | ||
And I want to go to some of these now. | ||
First, we'll go to this clip of clip number 10. | ||
Tucker Carlson talking about the danger that faces Donald Trump as each and every scheme to destroy him politically has failed. | ||
What will the deep state resort to? | ||
Let's watch. What do you think the future holds? | ||
Is it— I don't know. | ||
I mean, are they going to let Trump be president? | ||
Of course. I mean, look, if—you know, they protested him. | ||
They called him names. | ||
He won anyway. | ||
They impeached him twice on ridiculous pretenses. | ||
They— Fabricated a lot about what happened on January 6th in order to impeach him again. | ||
It didn't work. He came back. | ||
Then they indicted him. | ||
It didn't work. He became more popular. | ||
Then they indicted him three more times, and every single time his popularity rose. | ||
So if you begin with criticism, then you go to protest, then you go to impeachment, now you go to indictment, and none of them work, what's next? | ||
I mean, you know, graph it out, man. | ||
We're speeding toward assassination, obviously. | ||
And no one will say that, but I don't know how you can reach that conclusion. | ||
You know what I mean? Like, they have decided, permanent Washington, both parties, have decided that there's something about Trump that's so threatening to them, they just can't have him. | ||
I mean, they're putting him on trial in March of next year in the J6 case. | ||
Which basically consists of trying to send him to prison for the rest of his life for complaining about the last election. | ||
That's literally what it is. Again, if this were happening in Moldova, the State Department would issue an all-hands-on-deck order to let the world know this is not a legitimate government. | ||
And yet, our government is doing it. | ||
It's hard to overstate how bad this is, and I don't know where it's going, but there's a collision that's clearly imminent. | ||
And by the way, the president is senile in a way that's impossible to deny. | ||
Biden's not running the government. | ||
I don't know. I've never been this worried about anything as I am about where this is going. | ||
Yeah, hard to disagree with that. | ||
Todd Carlson says he fears for Trump's life. | ||
We're speeding toward assassination. | ||
Again, you've got all these different threats on the horizon. | ||
And we've said for years now at this point, Going to war with Russia, going to war with China, or some event that sparks off a massive uprising here in America would give the powers that be all the excuse that they would need to not just unleash the American military on the American people as they really seem eager to do. | ||
How many times have we heard them gleefully threaten just that? | ||
You think you're going to take us out with your AR-15s? | ||
Have you ever seen a drone strike in action? | ||
It's just like, good lord. | ||
If we didn't have a good reason to distrust you already, you seem a little bit too eager to threaten us with cluster bombs. | ||
And of course, it doesn't even matter how it would go. | ||
It's like, just take the scenario of Donald Trump gets assassinated. | ||
Trump supporters rise up, start getting violent. | ||
True civil war breaks out. | ||
It's like, okay, the patriots start to win the war. | ||
You think the American government wouldn't send out an SOS to the UN and to China and to Russia? | ||
And this is how it works, right? | ||
Look at the French Revolution. | ||
What happened when the people rose up against the nobility and the Sun King? | ||
Well, they tried to flee to Austria to get Austrian soldiers to come back and put down the French people. | ||
This is what the nobility does. | ||
This is what the international elite have done for hundreds of years. | ||
You keep your people down. | ||
If they rise up, you get help from your compatriots in other countries. | ||
So you've got this class of elite that are international in character. | ||
And then the people that are national in character. | ||
And so if the people rise up, you reach out to your supposed enemies in the other nations because your loyalty or the important thing to you is to keep the system going. | ||
The system of nobles ruling over peasants. | ||
The system of globalist corporations controlling the world. | ||
So of course they'd go to China or they'd go to Even Russia. | ||
Do you think their animosity towards Russia is such that they wouldn't actually request Russia come attack American people to maintain their power? | ||
Of course they would. And that's if the Patriots start to win. | ||
If the Patriots start to lose, they don't need to call anybody. | ||
They might do it anyway, but they'll just put you down, out and out. | ||
So it's really a lose-lose situation that we're being put in here. | ||
I do think there's ways out of it. | ||
You just have to play it very carefully. | ||
While also being extremely aggressive. | ||
That's how we have to walk. | ||
We'll be back on the other side with more Tucker Carlson clips. | ||
More just fun talk. | ||
They're arming the IRS and hiring tens of thousands of new agents to come after your hard-earned money to fund their foreign interventions, their Fun and games they're playing. | ||
They're creating armies of autonomous robots. | ||
The deep state is asserting its total independence over the duly elected civilian oversight. | ||
And they're trying to push COVID 2.0 with the mask mandates and billions of dollars in new vaccine sales. | ||
It's all coming down, folks. | ||
Will there even be an election in 2024? | ||
I'm just trying to think if I was a globalist schemer. | ||
If I was one of these globalist schemers, remember your goal... | ||
We need to make... | ||
I'm thinking for a while. | ||
I want to make a game. I want to make... | ||
Like a reverse SimCity. | ||
You know, SimCity, you start with nothing and you build a city. | ||
I wanted to play a game where you play as a globalist and you start with a well-functioning, happy, prosperous city and you have to try to destroy it without getting caught, causing an uprising, being lynched in the street by the citizens. | ||
It's a delicate game you have to play. | ||
You might have different structures in the city. | ||
You'd have to, you're like, you're trying to make everybody more poor, but then the church is interfering, so you have to subvert the church and get people embedded there so they can bring that down to facilitate your poverty program. | ||
Like, how do you destroy a well-functioning, prosperous community Unified society without getting caught, without them realizing what you're doing and without them pushing back. | ||
That's the ultimate goal of the globalist. | ||
The globalist's whole plan is how do we do this without experiencing pushback, without letting people know what we're up to. | ||
It's not an easy game to play, and we know that their tactics usually go, I mean, much like a Like a witch or a devil from old fairy stories. | ||
First, they invite you to join them. | ||
First, they make it easy. First, they try to bribe you. | ||
300, right? Just a little dirt, a little salt, just a little symbol of your submission. | ||
And we'll be happy. We'll be satisfied. | ||
And you'll actually benefit. Not only will it not be a struggle for you, you'll do better by submitting to us. | ||
And when that doesn't work, here comes the force. | ||
So that's where we are now. And you see more and more people waking up. | ||
You see more and more people realizing how tyrannical everything is. | ||
I mean, I've seen so many videos over the last just few days, whether it's the Trump mugshot video and people realizing how wrong it is to have a former president have his mugshot taken in one of a variety of different indictments that he's facing for criminal charges, facing 700 years in prison over almost nothing. | ||
I mean... We're good to go. | ||
So people are waking up. So if you're a globalist, you're seeing people wake up. | ||
If you're playing this game, the like awareness bar of the citizens is getting higher and higher, higher into that threatening zone. | ||
So you got to try to tamp that down. | ||
You got to try to keep that down while simultaneously starting a war, launching COVID 2.0. | ||
I mean, the awakening is really what scares them. | ||
Unity of the people against them is really what scares them. | ||
That's why they have the two-party system. | ||
That's why they cause division. And the truth being exposed is really what terrifies them. | ||
When their entire structure is built on lies, a little bit of truth could be the spark that sets the whole thing aflame. | ||
So that's what we'll keep firing into them. | ||
We got some more videos from Tucker Carlson's interview here. | ||
I want to go to this one, clip number seven, because as a media insider, Tucker Carlson confirms what I was rambling about like two days ago. | ||
I don't know if we put it out as a segment or not, but I think it's an important lesson to learn. | ||
I was trying to think of how to express this. | ||
It's almost like the media has a... | ||
a religion where the government is the church where the intel agency are the saints and the cardinals and the popes and what they say is true because they say it and it is a sign of heresy to oppose the statements of the intel agencies and the statements of the intel agencies require no proof you take them on faith So that's basically what Tucker Carlson is saying here. | ||
And again, it's not complicated or hard to figure out. | ||
Literally, if the intelligence agencies say it, it is treated as true, unquestionable, in much the same way that the outcome of a court case is seen as true and unquestionable. | ||
They're just like, look, it's gone through the system. | ||
Both sides made their argument. | ||
This is what the judgment was. | ||
That is the judgment. That is truth from now on. | ||
These people will look you in the eye with a straight face and tell you O.J. Simpson is innocent because that was the outcome of the trial, so that's what they have to adhere to. | ||
They do the same thing with intel agencies. | ||
I've talked too long to show you that clip because he says it at the very end of the clip. | ||
So we'll go to another clip here. We'll go to that clip in the next segment. | ||
But first, here's Tucker Carlson as the... | ||
InfoWars article notes, media didn't care that Obama was having gay sex and smoking crack. | ||
Here's Tucker Carlson calling Obama a gay crackhead. | ||
Let's watch. Or is a parasite on government, effectively, including people I love and know really well. | ||
And the media is, too, by the way. | ||
I mean, the media is reporting on government, but it's also dependent on government. | ||
You know, in 2008, it became really clear that Barack Obama had been having sex with men and smoking crack. | ||
And a guy came forward, Larry Sinclair, and said, I'll sign an affidavit. | ||
And he did. I'll take a lie detector. And he did. | ||
I smoked crack with Barack Obama and had sex with him. | ||
Well, that was obviously true. | ||
Nobody reported it, not because they were squeamish about sex or drugs, but because the Obama campaign said anyone who reports from this gets no access to the Obama campaign. | ||
And so they didn't report on it. | ||
So that happens—that's just one small example—but that happens all the time with lots of different issues. | ||
Now, do you believe that transpired, or do you believe the guy is legitimate, or both? | ||
Oh, the Larry Sinclair story? | ||
Oh, that definitely happened. | ||
Oh, for sure. I mean, I've talked to Larry Sinclair about it, and—oh, definitely it happened. | ||
I mean, if you—Larry Sinclair's been in and out of prison during one period—I mean, you know, 40 years ago, he was in and out of prison. | ||
He's got a criminal record, by definition. | ||
He's, you know, poor. | ||
He's got a disordered life. | ||
He's missing a tooth. | ||
Like, he's not, you know, an Atlantic fellow. | ||
He's not going to the Aspen Ideas Festival. | ||
I think he has a record of deception. | ||
Obviously, he does. | ||
But this story, if you listen to it in detail, is clearly true. | ||
I mean, there's just—I'm going to do an interview with him, and you can hear it. | ||
And again, it's not going to change the world that Barack Obama likes dudes. | ||
I think this was well known. | ||
Barack Obama said so himself in a letter to his girlfriend. | ||
By the way, that's kind of Barack Obama's business. | ||
I'm not attacking him for liking dudes. | ||
I'm just saying the amount of lying in the media about it was unbelievable. | ||
Like, people knew this was true. | ||
And it was quite obviously true at the time. | ||
And people who covered the campaign didn't say anything about it because they didn't want to lose access to the campaign. | ||
They didn't want to lose access to the campaign. | ||
And do you remember the leaked video from Project Veritas about the woman complaining about the fact that she had had the story of Jeffrey Epstein before anybody else? | ||
Why did ABC scuttle that story? | ||
Well, because they didn't want to lose access to the royal family. | ||
But this is one of those things where they don't want to report on it, and they need the excuse not to. | ||
They could still report on it. | ||
They could report on it and demand access, and if they aren't given access, that in itself becomes a story. | ||
Like, it's not a good look for a campaign. | ||
Look, they reported this story, and then you cut them off. | ||
They actually have to give you access to try to defeat your story. | ||
So this is the game that they play. | ||
Oh, well, we can't report on that or else we'll lose access to Barack Obama and the red-headed prince. | ||
unidentified
|
This is the information war, ladies and gentlemen. | |
I'll show you how information is being deployed, but it is important to understand. | ||
unidentified
|
This is the information war. | |
Globalists understand, the people in power understand the importance of information. | ||
They understand that it's through control and selective dissemination of information. | ||
They can wield power without having to resort to force. | ||
A little secret that they've known for quite a long time. | ||
I want to go again to this final clip from Tucker Carlson where he talks about the intelligence agencies having control over the mainstream media as if it wasn't obvious already. | ||
And I'll say again that I think we've reached critical mass in this country of I don't know what you'd want to call them. | ||
Some of them are totalitarians. | ||
The other ones are bootlickers. Some of them are genuinely good people being tricked. | ||
Other ones are devious tricksters, tricking the good people. | ||
I guess globalist is the term you could use. | ||
Evil is the other. Maybe evil is just the good blanket term. | ||
Once you reach a critical mass of evil, unsavory, unqualified, whether they're incompetent or Competently evil, like whatever it is, we've reached enough saturation in this society that conspiracy is no longer necessary. | ||
The intelligence agencies don't necessarily need, although they actually do have people who are agents trained in the intelligence agencies, like trained at Langley and then sent in guise as a journalist, as a producer. To actually be embedded in the newsrooms. | ||
If you just have the people in the newsrooms who understand implicitly that you do not question the dictates of the deep state, whatever comes out of the official channels of the intelligence community is to be treated as absolute gospel truth, unquestionable. | ||
Like you don't need a person embedded in the newsroom to make sure that happens if you have your civilians so well healed and well trained That they carry out your schemes just as a matter of course. | ||
So I think that's where we've gotten to at this point. | ||
Things like Operation Mockingbird aren't even really necessary anymore. | ||
Because you have an entire system that's built like a filtration system to weed out people who are good, people who ask questions, people who are willing to put the truth above what benefits them. | ||
You don't even make it anywhere near the top if you have any of the qualities that would make you a danger to the deep state globalist paradigm. | ||
You're weeded out way, way early on. | ||
And so if you ever make it to the point where you're anchoring a show on CNN or acting as a head producer for ABC or whatever these things are... | ||
By the point that you get there, you've proven that you are willing to go along with the psychopath, that you're willing to serve the machine at the expense of your fellow human beings. | ||
That's a very dangerous situation for a society to be in. | ||
So here's Tucker Carlson explaining how that works. | ||
Clip number seven. What's your take on a wolf blitzer type? | ||
unidentified
|
Because whenever I... Take a close look at his history, actually. | |
I'm always like, why would he do this? | ||
Why would he say a bunch of stuff he doesn't believe or he must know is untrue? | ||
He sat there as this sort of elder statesman of news and just sort of lied right through COVID and many other subjects. | ||
Why would he do that? | ||
Why would he do it to his legacy? | ||
You know, I worked with Wolf for years, never had a problem with him. | ||
It was always nice. | ||
You know, no one wants to hear it, and I'm sure most people won't believe it, but I can tell you, having lived it for many years, it's true. | ||
The intel agencies have a big effect on what is broadcast on television and what you see on Facebook and Google as well. | ||
I mean, they're all up and down Facebook and Google, as I'm sure you know. | ||
And, you know, there are a lot of anchors who, including... | ||
People I know well and have worked with at different networks. | ||
I'm thinking of one in particular, a national security reporter, who was just a mouthpiece for the Pentagon and the CIA and is knowingly telling lies on their behalf. | ||
It's very, very common. Very common. | ||
And I can think of a number of people at CNN who I know for a fact are doing that exact thing. | ||
propaganda from the intel agencies knowingly and i'm sure they've got some internal rationale that allows them to get up in the morning and face themselves despite having done something that dishonest but i'm just telling you bottom line i know that is that is true i'm not speculating at all um and in particular on the national security stuff | ||
there are very well-known national security reporters and i'm thinking of one female national security reporter in particular who just reads lies from the national security state. | ||
And it's wildly frustrating. | ||
And it would just make me mad. | ||
I mean, even if—I don't agree with the lies, okay? | ||
But even if I did agree with the lies, I would be offended because they're lies. | ||
They're lies. Like when, you know, when CIA and the Pentagon were claiming that Bashar al-Assad used poison gas against his own people. | ||
There was no evidence that was true. | ||
I mean, maybe it was true. | ||
There was no evidence it was true. | ||
None. Zero. | ||
And I called them out, and they could not provide any evidence. | ||
And yet every national security—and it was a big deal. | ||
I mean, we killed a lot of people in response. | ||
We sent in missiles and killed a lot of people. | ||
We took human life in response to that claim. | ||
And it was, as far as I can tell, a lie. | ||
And every national security reporter, every channel repeated it uncritically. | ||
The Biden administration blew up Nord Stream and, you know, created the largest act of industrial sabotage in history, the largest man-made CO2 emission in history in environmental crimes. | ||
It's a huge deal this happened. | ||
And every national security reporter just looked right into the camera and said, well, we think Russia did it. | ||
Well, they knew Russia didn't do it. | ||
That's a lie, and they knew it was a lie. | ||
So I just think—and again, I'm not speculating. | ||
I spent my life in this business, so I've seen it. | ||
People underestimate the degree to which the people sitting on the news, possibly even Wolf Blitzer, are repeating talking points from the intel agencies and doing it on purpose. | ||
It's scary, man. Really scary. | ||
Well, it's how it works in totalitarian countries. | ||
You know. Maybe I should just be thankful. | ||
Maybe I should just be thankful because Tucker Carlson clearly is taking a lot of heat. | ||
He's doing a lot of great stuff. | ||
I just find myself day in and day out just unsatisfied with everybody. | ||
With everybody. Like right there. | ||
It's a great point. Tucker Carlson is making great points. | ||
Why is he being so opaque about who he's talking about? | ||
I think of one woman in particular, national security correspondent. | ||
What's her name, Tucker? This is what I don't get. | ||
This is what sets Infowars apart from everywhere else. | ||
Do you think we'd sit here and hint vaguely at somebody we know in the media that does this? | ||
I want to ask Tucker Carlson, this woman that you're talking about that just tells bold-faced lies to the camera on behalf of the intelligence agencies. | ||
Do you owe her something? | ||
Did she do something for you as your life has been destroyed by the machinations at Fox News as they've smeared you across every major media platform? | ||
Do you owe anything to this woman? | ||
She helped you? If not, what's your name? | ||
Just say who she is. | ||
This is what I don't understand. | ||
Again, this is what sets... | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, but if she gets outed, right, if he names her name, then she will probably no longer be a conduit for intelligence, and then they'll replace her with someone else who he doesn't know. | |
I guess, but is that better than her being out there doing this? | ||
unidentified
|
Eh, knowledge is power. | |
You know, at least he knows who to trust. | ||
He does, but we don't. | ||
That's the thing. I just don't get it. | ||
And like, even there, it seems like he was sort of vaguely hinting at the fact that Wolf Blitzer is like a CIA asset. | ||
Why not just say that? | ||
Why not just say that? | ||
And I mean, it really is incredible the power the intelligence agencies have. | ||
And we've explained here before many, many times the Eagle II document, like the intelligence agencies are not American. | ||
They are international in nature. | ||
They do not take their orders from the, you know, chain of command that you might see in some civics lesson about the structure of the American government. | ||
They are independent operators using America as a home base for their own exploits. | ||
And the media plays a crucial role in this. | ||
And so the media will play a crucial role in breaking us out of this. | ||
I hope you can support Infowars in our mission to illuminate the behind-the-scenes Masters of the world that are driving us towards enslavement, war, and chaos. | ||
Go to InfoWarsStore.com right now to support us in this mission. | ||
We'll be back in the third hour with Roger Stone. | ||
A lot more videos and a lot more stories, bombshell stories today, folks. | ||
Go to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
All of your purchases there go directly towards funding this singular outlet for truth and, I guess, bravery in the media landscape. | ||
InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
Go there today. Welcome back. | ||
Second hour of American Journal is on. | ||
How's this for a headline for you? | ||
This is from yesterday from The Guardian. | ||
Donald Trump vows to lock up political enemies if he returns to the White House. | ||
That's right, folks. | ||
This is terrifying. | ||
They're very scared of this. | ||
Can you imagine a president using his power to prosecute his political enemies? | ||
They're outraged at this potential non-existent eventuality when it comes to Donald Trump. | ||
When it's happening to Donald Trump as we speak, I don't think I need to elaborate on how ridiculous this is. | ||
But just to illustrate it for you, here's a little compilation by Grabian showing that they understood just how dangerous this was when it was Trump. | ||
Here. Now that he's got the right attorney general in position to do it, we now know they really have been trying to gin up criminal prosecutions and criminal investigations into the president's perceived enemies. | ||
Politically motivated persecution, right? | ||
Courtesy of Bill Barr. | ||
I'll roll in the FBI on you. | ||
That's how banana republics work, right? | ||
unidentified
|
The home of the 45th president of the United States has been raided by the FBI. Mr. | |
Trump is using the Justice Department to go after his perceived enemies. | ||
I feel worried about the prospect of the Justice Department being used as a tool of this president or any. | ||
In our little banana republic, any capable prosecutor can get a grand jury to hand down an indictment of something as innocent as a ham sandwich. | ||
unidentified
|
An indictment was unsealed, charging Donald J. Trump. | |
Breaking news on former President Trump. | ||
He's been indicted for the fourth time in five months. | ||
Bill Barr, on the president's behalf, is weaponizing the Justice Department to go after the president's enemies. | ||
When you win an election, you don't seek to just prosecute the losing side. | ||
The president using the Justice Department as a weapon to get what he wants. | ||
Department of Justice is totally politicized. | ||
Sicking the Department of Justice on political opponents. | ||
unidentified
|
Threatening to imprison his political rival, Banana Republic style. | |
Trying to exact revenge against all of his enemies. | ||
Tin pot dictator in a Banana Republic. | ||
Is acting more like a Banana Republic dictator. | ||
He's using government resources to go after his political opponent. | ||
Essentially, we are a banana republic. | ||
We are seeking to have a bogus and criminal investigation into a political opponent. | ||
And that's using the Department of Justice to also target Trump's political opponent for nefarious reasons. | ||
This is a massive abuse of power and a betrayal of our values. | ||
The president of the United States is targeting a family member of a political opponent. | ||
This is the type of thing that happens in a banana republic. | ||
And trying to take out a political rival in Joe Biden. | ||
Criminally investigating an American political rival, someone the president is worried about losing to in the next election. | ||
To investigate my principal opponent or a principal opponent in the upcoming election. | ||
Houston, we have a problem. | ||
Don't you think that's something that should be investigated when the incumbent political party opens a counterintelligence investigation on the candidate of the opposing party? | ||
We know Trump is itching to politicize the Justice Department and the Attorney General has been super shady. | ||
The President is weaponizing the Department of Justice to bring cases against his enemies. | ||
The Department of Justice is in an existential crisis. | ||
Again, it's yet another example of the Justice Department basically losing all of its independence in this administration. | ||
This is now about corrupting the next election, and for me, this was crossing the red line. | ||
A president who is actively trying to potentially steal the upcoming election. | ||
But to try to take out a political rival. | ||
The end goal being 2020. | ||
Donald Trump and his attorney general are using the Justice Department. | ||
The only difference between this and a banana republic is that Trump does not eat fruit. | ||
The 2020 election is really the last chance we have to stop our system from fully sliding into a corrupt banana republic. | ||
Bill Barr has done everything that Donald Trump has wanted him to do. | ||
Yeah. | ||
We're living in a banana republic right now. | ||
When you start using the Justice Department to go after your enemies, that's very, very dangerous. | ||
Donald Trump is using the Department of Justice to go after his enemies in any way that he can. | ||
Having the head of the Chiefs have a lot of money. | ||
Here's the important distinction between what they were talking about and what we're talking about now. | ||
Donald Trump was not actually doing that. | ||
Joe Biden actually is, right? | ||
So this isn't a matter of, well, when we do it, it's okay. | ||
When they do it, it's okay. No, we aren't doing it, but they were freaking out and saying that we're in a banana republic. | ||
Now that Joe Biden is doing that and is prosecuting his political opponents with a weaponized DOJ, they're all on board and in favor of it. | ||
It's a little bit different. We'll be back with the second hour of American Journal. | ||
Don't go anywhere. Second hour is on here at AmericanJournalInfoWars.com. | ||
Band.video. Very glad to have you here with us on this Thursday morning. | ||
We'll be joined by Roger Stone later in this hour. | ||
And before we welcome him, we'll show you a little hit piece on MSNBC. They're still trying to blame Roger Stone for January 6th. | ||
And we'll give him a chance to respond to that. | ||
So good day to have Roger on since they chose today or yesterday to roll out this hit piece, this newest canard. | ||
Very excited to talk to him. | ||
In the meantime, we have a lot of other political stuff to talk about here. | ||
I think I want to go to one more clip. | ||
This is Don Bongino, clip number one. | ||
Again, just returning for a moment to this guardian story. | ||
unidentified
|
Like, it's kind of troubling. | |
It's like troubling how much of a cult these people are in. | ||
Donald Trump vows to lock up political enemies if he returns to White House. | ||
And they're outraged at this, talking about what a horrible thing. | ||
He is currently being persecuted by his political enemies who are trying to lock him up. | ||
That's why like at a certain point, you know, I just got to wonder what's going on in people's minds. | ||
Like when they read this, I guarantee you the majority of people that read this are just like, Donald Trump, this is why he can't be in office because he would lock up. | ||
It's like, I don't know, man. | ||
If you can't see the hypocrisy, if you can't see what's going on here, And it reminds me of things like the vaccine passport, where it's like, you know, your first instinct is probably the right one. | ||
That fear-mongering that we just witnessed, the first five minutes of this hour, we showed the compilation of all these people really scared about us being a banana republic. | ||
I mean, they truly understand how horrifying it is to imagine a... | ||
A place like America, a republic, a place that values freedom, coming under the control of an administration that uses the Department of Justice to go after its political enemies, turning itself into a tin-pot dictatorship banana republic, they understood what a big deal this was when it wasn't happening. | ||
Right? When it wasn't actually happening, they were freaking out about it, fear-mongering about it, telling you what a big deal it is. | ||
Now that it is actually happening, they're in favor of it, and they're telling you what a good thing it is that it's happening. | ||
Like, if you can't see through this on your own, I'm not sure there's anything I can say that can help you. | ||
So the article again, Donald Trump vows to lock up political enemies if he returns to White House. | ||
Hillary Clinton says she feels profound sadness over Trump's many indictments. | ||
Under four indictments, he faces 91 criminal charges related to election subversion, retention of classified information, hush money payments to an adult film star. | ||
He denies wrongdoing and claims to be the victim of political persecution. | ||
Trials are scheduled next year. | ||
Again, it wasn't hard for them to understand what political persecution looked like When it was the specter of Trump potentially doing it at some point, oh, they were very worried. | ||
Now that it's here, that's a good thing. | ||
And it reminds me of vaccine passports. | ||
When we first said, early of 2020, vaccine passports were the ultimate goal of the COVID lockdowns, people freaked out and were just like, what? | ||
That would be insane. There's no way. | ||
That's crazy. | ||
What a violation of human rights that would be. | ||
Give them a year to soften up and suddenly they're scanning their QR code happily. | ||
So the instinct here is the right one. | ||
Somehow they divorce themselves from that natural instinct when it benefits them. | ||
Do they genuinely believe the things they're saying or is it all a show? | ||
Does it even matter? | ||
These people are scum and they are destroying everything. | ||
And again, I just cannot emphasize enough how bizarre it is to have the same people, the same media pundits, talk about something that's not happening, Donald Trump using the DOJ to go after his political opponents, something that did not happen. | ||
Calling it a banana republic, crying crocodile tears, saying how scared they were this was happening when it wasn't happening. | ||
And when it is happening, like, again, it's not just like, well, you were in favor when it was Trump, but now you're mad that it's Biden? | ||
No, we've been consistent on this. | ||
These people flip-flop to a greater than 180 degree. | ||
I mean, it's a flip-flop, you know, total inversion reversal, but to even a greater degree because it's not they're doing something and we like it, the other people are doing something and we don't like it. | ||
I think you get it. I think you understand. | ||
Here's Don Bongino talking about just one of the plethora, the smorgasbord, the huge selection of indictments that Trump is facing. | ||
I'm talking about Judge Chutkin and Jack Smith completely violating every restriction of law and morality to try to get Donald Trump. | ||
unidentified
|
Here's Don Bongino. They've got to get the D.C. trial first before anything. | |
Trump stands a damn good chance in Florida, and the Georgia case and the New York cases are a total joke. | ||
If they lose, they'll win on appeal. | ||
The D.C. case, which is a farce, is their greatest chance of conviction. | ||
Dan, you're saying opposite things. | ||
You're saying a D.C. case against Trump is a farce, but they stand a good chance of conviction. | ||
Yes! They've got a judge who's not a judge. | ||
She's a liberal activist in Chutkin. | ||
They've got a prosecutor who's just a straight-up communist in Jack Smith. | ||
And they've got a jury pool of 95% of people who hate Trump. | ||
They could accuse him of felonious mopery in the umpteenth degree, and they'd get a conviction. | ||
So because of that, Chutkin needs to push this trial first to push all the other trials back so that Trump has to run as a, quote, convicted felon. | ||
They will do anything to get this guy on trial. | ||
So they announced the timeline. | ||
The trial's going to start March 4th of this year, this coming year. | ||
Now, here's the crazy thing. | ||
That's only five months between indictment and the trial. | ||
This is actually from the court filing. | ||
So somebody asked in the court, hey listen, has there ever been another case this big in this district where you indicted a guy and the trial was only five months later with almost no time to prepare? | ||
Let me read to you from the court filing. | ||
This is from the prosecutor themselves. | ||
And the government hasn't identified any cases in this district where the length of time between indictment and trial was roughly five months. | ||
Hat tip Julie Kelly on this, by the way. | ||
Although they did point to the Manafort case in Virginia, which went to trial roughly five months after the superseding indictment. | ||
There has never been a case, ever, that has been pushed from indictment to trial five months. | ||
But let's start now with only one of the most important cases in American political history. | ||
Let's just set precedent now. | ||
Judge Chutkin is a freaking embarrassment, and Jack Smith is a straight-up commie. | ||
Folks, this is going to get worse. | ||
Chutkin's like, ah, F-discovery. | ||
You guys will figure it out. | ||
Judge, we have to go through 12 million pieces of paper. | ||
Don't worry. The prosecutor will tell you what's important. | ||
Oh, okay. That sounds legit. | ||
Thanks, Judge. Gee said it right. | ||
It's a good point. He said, just so you know, I gotta get you guys mics in a new studio, because it's a good point. | ||
How can people not see this? | ||
I'll answer it for you. People do see it. | ||
The left does see it. | ||
They love it. This is what they want. | ||
When your entire governing ethos is about abusing power as a collectivist, this is what abusing power looks like. | ||
They do see it. They do see it. | ||
They know exactly what they're doing. | ||
I think that's sort of the best point. | ||
And I think that sort of solves what I'm dealing with here, where it's like, that's what I'm wondering, like, how do people not see this? | ||
You were so freaked out about Donald Trump potentially doing this, but now that's actually happening, you can't see it? | ||
But this is the thing, and this is what we talk about, the sort of cult programming and the extremist programming that's going on, the idea that's embedded in people's heads that Trump is Hitler. | ||
You're stopping genocide by doing whatever it takes to stop Trump. | ||
So why shouldn't I break the law? | ||
It's sort of a form of that where it's like they have convinced themselves that Donald Trump is an existential threat, that him being in charge makes the country a banana republic. | ||
So, you know, they're in this mindset. | ||
It's like, well, why shouldn't I cheat? | ||
They're cheating. The opponents are cheating, so why shouldn't I cheat? | ||
Except the opponents aren't cheating. | ||
But if you believe that they are, then that gives you the excuse to cheat yourself. | ||
And in your mind, you're like, I'm just leveling the playing field. | ||
If they're going to do it, we're going to do it. But we're not doing it. | ||
They are. Maybe they can't see that. | ||
Maybe they don't care. Maybe it's just... | ||
Ruthless desire for power at all costs. | ||
And the dishonesty just comes part and parcel with that. | ||
We'll be more on the other side. | ||
It doesn't stop. Hey, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
In this segment, we will play a clip from MSNBC, a hit piece on Roger Stone. | ||
Not the type of thing we would normally play, but we are going to be welcoming Roger Stone in the next segment. | ||
First, we'll set him up, and then we'll let Roger knock him down. | ||
So we'll go to that in just a minute. | ||
In the meantime, I want to do two things. | ||
I want to finish up a conversation about political persecution, especially when it comes to Donald Trump. | ||
I want to talk a little bit about Blue Zones, something that is getting a lot of attention right now, but not being reported accurately, and we'll try to correct that. | ||
Again, Donald Trump vows to block up political enemies. | ||
Viewer turns to the White House, which... | ||
Is exactly right, and as this next story notes, mutually assured destruction is the only solution for political lawfare. | ||
You know, the reason that this type of overreach is opposed many times is because it sets a precedent. | ||
But it doesn't actually set a precedent if the other side doesn't adhere to that precedent. | ||
In other words, now that they have unleashed political lawfare... | ||
That has to be the name of the game. | ||
Nobody wants it. We all understand what a damaging tit-for-tat, back-and-forth this can create. | ||
But the other option is just losing completely to it. | ||
It's a story by Steve Friend at Uncover DC. Lays it out quite thoroughly. | ||
Sort of relating it to the Cold War. | ||
And the reason nuclear missiles were never launched is because... | ||
Each side knew that if they did, the other side would launch theirs, and that would be that. | ||
So that's the way that we need to be with Democrats. | ||
You've launched the lawfare, and it's not even speculation at this point. | ||
They've done it. They have forged these weapons. | ||
So now it's up to us whether we Simply stand there and go, you shouldn't have forged those weapons while they cut us down with the weapons that they forged, or we can seize those weapons and use them against the people that forged them and make them regret ever forging them in the first place. | ||
That's where we are. That's the choice we have to make. | ||
There's only one choice to make. | ||
It is to engage in this battle, not run away from it. | ||
So they can cry all they want. | ||
They have set the precedent. | ||
Now it's time for us to exploit that. | ||
They have made their bed. Now it's time to screw them in it. | ||
See what I'm saying? I think that should be obvious, but there it is. | ||
ConservativeBrief.com has this story. | ||
Legal experts rip Jack Smith for Trump January 6th charge, saying he's bulldozing the First Amendment. | ||
And again, we'll get Roger Stone's comments on all of this once he joins us in the next segment. | ||
In the meantime, there's a story from CBS talking about a new Netflix series. | ||
Want to Live to 100? Blue Zone's expert shares longevity lessons in new Netflix series. | ||
So there's four places that they've chosen to highlight where people routinely live to 100 and beyond. | ||
They're called Blue Zones, and they are places where, again, people's health outcomes are just significantly better than anywhere else in the world. | ||
The four areas are Okinawa, Japan, Sardinia, Italy, Ikaria, Greece, Nicoya, Costa Rica, and Loma Linda, California. | ||
Interestingly, none of the blue zones attribute their long life and longevity to bizarre, creepy medical interventions. | ||
I guess to live a long time, you've got two options. | ||
You can go the Silicon Valley route of filling yourself up with plastic and consuming children's blood and rubbing water Liquified foreskins on your face. | ||
Or you can just live healthily. | ||
And here's the secret, religiously. | ||
That's the real secret behind Blue Zones that they don't like to highlight. | ||
They talk about vegetarianism. | ||
They talk about avoiding meat. | ||
They talk about exercise. What they don't talk about is the fact that almost all of these places have religious diets where they fast for certain amounts of time. | ||
And do other stuff like that. I want to talk about this more, but I've got to go to this video. | ||
Here is MSNBC talking trash about Roger Stone. | ||
He'll be on in the next segment to respond. | ||
But first, here's MSNBC's lies. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Roger Stone, quite close to two interference plots in the last two elections in a row, 2020 and 2016. | |
Now we're in these 2020 trials going forward, so an important point here is how all of this is kind of Roger Stone's thing. | ||
Those two elections came after Stone inserted himself into what was America's most notorious contested election in the recent era, before 2020. | ||
That would be the 2000 recount and Supreme Court case. | ||
Roger Stone declared that he was the one who helped hatch this key pressure effort that some may have forgotten, but boy did it matter. | ||
It was one thing that may have helped Republicans bounce back in Florida in that pivotal time. | ||
It's the so-called Brooks Brothers Riot, which used spectacle and intimidation to try to stop part of the vote counting which otherwise was supposed to continue under law. | ||
The crowd of people going in there, storming that room, trying to take it over, and forcing that board to change its rules. | ||
It was an orchestrated Republican protest. | ||
It became known as the famous Brooks Brothers riot. | ||
unidentified
|
The idea that you would take pride in being an operative who stopped an election. | |
Reveals that for the Republicans, elections are nothing more than a dirty trick to hold on to power. | ||
One man's dirty trick is another man's civic participation. | ||
unidentified
|
There you have it. History can enlighten the present, so can biography. | |
This is Stone's biography. | ||
Those dirty tricks came back with a vengeance in 2020. | ||
I bet you know the playbook. | ||
Use a hyped pretense of alleged misconduct or fraud on the other side as a measure to then just try to steal the race. | ||
Now, in 2000, it was a legitimate close race. | ||
It ended with GOP victory in court. | ||
But some Republicans began to see that as a kind of a battle plan to reboot, regardless of the facts. | ||
It was stone on tape pining for a repeat of 2000 before the 2020 vote even came in. | ||
I really expect a 2000-like result with a long, drawn-out squabble over who won. | ||
unidentified
|
What did he mean? Investigators may want to know, though Stone pled the 5th, the January 6th committee still managed to show how, again, these two men's strange history, Trump and Stone, intersected again on the eve of this insurrection as a now-indicted Trump aide. | |
I want you to really take in this next piece of evidence. | ||
The now-indicted Trump aide, Meadows, was calling Stone on January 5th At Trump's direction. | ||
Is it your understanding that President Trump asked Mark Meadows to speak with Roger Stone and General Flynn on January 5th? | ||
That's correct. That is my understanding. | ||
And Ms. Hutchinson, is it your understanding that Mr. | ||
Meadows called Mr. Stone on the 5th? | ||
I'm under the impression that Mr. | ||
Meadows did complete both a call to Mr. | ||
Stone Completed the call to Stone. | ||
So take this together. | ||
Stone is a convicted Trump adviser known for his dirty tricks. | ||
Stone was spending those same early January days in direct contact with now convicted seditionists, the Oath Keepers. | ||
There's footage of that on the day of January 6th. | ||
And Stone spent that post-election period with another convicted seditionist, Proud Boys leader Enrico Tarrio. | ||
You're looking at a video of them together in mid-December 2020 in the lead-up to what became the later steps towards the January 6th activities. | ||
So, of all the possible things on then-outgoing President Trump's mind on the eve of his last stand on January 6th, What was he doing? | ||
Trump was personally directing calls to felon Roger Stone. | ||
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
I have to apologize to you for showing you four uninterrupted minutes of MSNBC on this platform. | ||
We wouldn't usually do such a thing to you. | ||
We wouldn't inflict that on our audience. | ||
But we had to because, as I said before, we had to set it up so Roger Stone can knock him down. | ||
Roger Stone joins me now. | ||
He is, of course, a seasoned political operative, speaker, pundit, and New York Times bestselling author as a veteran of 10 national presidential campaigns. | ||
Roger has served as senior campaign aides to presidents Nixon, Reagan, and Trump. | ||
His show, The Stone Zone Live with Roger Stone, streams live Monday through Friday at 5 p.m. Eastern on Rumble and StoneZone.Live. | ||
You can follow him on Twitter at RogerJStoneJR, RogerJStoneJr, and the website again, StoneZone.com. Welcome to the show, Roger. - Sure. | ||
Harrison, I'm going to be honest with you, I just tuned in to see what kind of necktie you would be wearing. | ||
I chose it very carefully for you. | ||
I see you're wearing a t-shirt. | ||
I'm not offended at all. | ||
It's an InfoWars t-shirt, the height of fashion. | ||
This is my, of all the InfoWars t-shirts, this is the one that triggers liberals the most. | ||
Go to the drugstore, go to the grocery store, go to the liquor store. | ||
This t-shirt drives liberals crazy. | ||
They start growling and It's really something else. | ||
So they start foaming at the mouth. | ||
And liberals will start foaming at the mouth, and conservatives will give you the sly thumbs up because they know what the deal is. | ||
But, Roger, we just heard Ari Melber lay out a very thin case, somehow taking footage from 2000, trying to tie you to January 6th. | ||
Just what is your response to the new hit piece out of MSNBC? Yeah, this is—I mean, Ari Melber, who I think is demented, actually deranged, has some weird obsession with me. | ||
They attacked me three different nights last week, again last night. | ||
And he knows that everything he is saying is a lie. | ||
First of all, he knows that Alex Jones and I were both cleared by the FBI of having anything whatsoever to do with the illegal acts of the Capitol on January 6, way back in August of 2021. | ||
As reported by Reuters, he knows that Joshua James, who pled guilty to insurrection, testified under oath in the New York administrative trial of New York City Police Officer Salvatore Greco that I had nothing whatsoever to do with any of the Oath Keeper's activities on January 6, neither advanced knowledge nor involvement. | ||
He knows that, according to The Washington Post, which confirmed with three separate sources, that I was never in any war room at the Willard Hotel, and that I was completely uninvolved in the efforts by Mayor Giuliani and a bunch of other people I don't even know. | ||
to delay the certification of the election of the Electoral College in the U.S. Senate. | ||
He knows I have nothing whatsoever to do with the efforts to challenge the election result in Georgia. | ||
And I don't know, other than Donald Trump and Rudy Giuliani, I don't think I know, I guess maybe Sidney Powell, I don't know any of those people, but I was not even in touch with them in that period. | ||
He knows all of this. | ||
So this is a technique. | ||
Where you pound on something in the hopes that some prosecutor somewhere will begin to believe that it's true. | ||
It's exactly what happened in the Russian collusion hoax. | ||
We learned only after I was pardoned by President Trump when on November 2nd, pardon me, November 3rd, 2020 by court order, The Department of Justice was forced to disgorge the last remaining hidden redacted section of Robert Mueller's report, in which he admitted that he had actually found no evidence of Russian collusion or WikiLeaks collaboration or any other crime on my part. | ||
So, if I lied to Congress about Russian collusion that never actually happened, how exactly does that work? | ||
What would be my motive to lie? | ||
I had nothing to cover up, because there was nothing to cover up. | ||
This is bitterness, because I escaped the deadly snare set for me by Robert Mueller and Rod Rosenstein in the Russian collusion hoax. | ||
I escaped, nearly escaped death in a dank Georgia prison. | ||
And the radical left is very, very bitter about it, Harrison, This is a pack of lies. | ||
This is a fake news salad. | ||
But they just won't stop. | ||
And I must tell you, the death threats against me and members of my family are up by 50 percent. | ||
The ugly scenes in public are up substantially, all generated by the haters at MSNBC. They know I can't sue them because I'm a public figure. | ||
MSNBC hosts questions why Roger Stone hasn't been charged despite role in 2020 plot. | ||
Very simple, because Roger Stone did nothing wrong. | ||
Roger has no involvement in any 2020 plot. | ||
And as for the video, he's absolutely right. | ||
I did say on a video that under Article II of the U.S. Constitution, the state legislatures have the authority to award electors and send them to the Electoral College based on the popular results of the local election. | ||
No, Ari, we do not elect the president by popular vote. | ||
Everyone knows that, evidently everybody other than him. | ||
So it's guilt by association, mostly. | ||
Stone is a good friend of the president. | ||
Stone came in contact with members of the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys, therefore. | ||
Therefore, nothing. Proof, evidence. | ||
There is not a witness, a phone call, a text message, a chat group, an encrypted message. | ||
There is no evidence whatsoever that I knew in advance about, participated in, or condoned any illegal activity on January 2nd, nor was I involved in the efforts, other than speaking about them, to delay the certification of the Electoral College by the U.S. Senate or to challenge the results in any state. | ||
Those are the facts. | ||
There they are. And you know, it's sort of tough for me. | ||
Half of me wants to laugh at this because it's so absurd. | ||
It's so cartoonish. | ||
But then this isn't a joke. | ||
It's very real. As you're pointing out, people hear this. | ||
They believe it. They get bamboozled by it into thinking that you somehow have anything to do with this. | ||
This affects your life. | ||
And as you point out, there is a pipeline, isn't there, between the media and prosecution. | ||
They can set up narratives and Almost as a messaging to prosecutors out there saying, here's how you can lay out your case. | ||
Now go after him. | ||
So, I mean, just tell us about, you know, what your life has been like having to go through this time and time again. | ||
Because it's not a joke. It's not funny. | ||
It's actually got to be horrible to have to continually fight these people off. | ||
It really has turned our life upside down. | ||
But for my faith in Jesus Christ and my fervent prayer, I don't think President Trump would have had the courage and the strength to pardon me in an election year. | ||
And by now, in all honesty, I would most likely be dead, since I was, at the time, 68 years old and a lifetime sufferer of asthma. | ||
Putting me in a COVID-19-infested prison was a sure way to get rid of me. | ||
But I escaped that snare through my faith, and now it is my faith that sustains me. | ||
My wife and I have lost everything, to be absolutely clear. | ||
Our home, my car, my savings, most of my insurance, my ability to travel freely in safety. | ||
You lose all of these things. | ||
I still have my free speech rights and my faith in God, and I intend to fully exercise both of them. | ||
And no, I will not shut up. | ||
Sorry. Yeah, nor should you. | ||
And of course, I think you're exactly right about how they intended to do you in, I guess you could say. | ||
But talk a little bit about this pipeline between the media and prosecutors and how this tactic is being used. | ||
So what happens here is that a media outlet like MSNBC, which is not really a media outlet, it's a propaganda front, repeats a lie over and over again until it reaches critical mass on Twitter. | ||
Once it reaches critical mass on Twitter, now known as X, All these leftists believe it, including some who are in government, and then they go out and they basically fabricate crimes against you, or they storm your home and grab your computer and your phone in hopes that they're going to find evidence of what is not really there. | ||
That's exactly how it works. | ||
It's how it worked last time. | ||
It's how they're hoping it will work this time, but they are wrong. | ||
And I think that's sort of the central question that we've been asking all throughout today is like, are these people being tricked? | ||
Do they really think what they're doing is saving the republic and they're just dumb? | ||
Or are they this dishonest and manipulative and just outright evil? | ||
And at the end of the day, it really doesn't matter, does it, Roger? | ||
Because the outcome is the same. | ||
It's persecution against people like yourself, Donald Trump, Alex Jones, all of us on the right. | ||
It really doesn't matter what the... | ||
What the reality is in the minds of our persecutors, because the persecution is real. | ||
We'll be back on the other side with Roger Stone. | ||
Follow him on Twitter at RogerJStoneJR. | ||
We'll be right back with more. | ||
unidentified
|
Don't go anywhere. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | |
This is American Journal. I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Roger Stone is my guest. | ||
He hosts the Stone Zone Live with Roger Stone each and every weekday at 5 p.m. | ||
Eastern on Rumble and StoneZone.Live. | ||
You can follow him on Twitter at RogerJStoneJr. | ||
RogerJStoneJR, that is. And the website, again, StoneZone.com, where you can find all of his books and all of his great work and, of course, where he streams the Stone Zone Live with Roger Stone. | ||
Monday through Friday at 5 p.m. | ||
Well, you weren't in contact with Donald Trump in the lead up to January 6th, as you've made abundantly clear, despite the lies of the mainstream media. | ||
But I understand that you are in contact with him these days. | ||
How is Trump doing, Roger? | ||
And have you heard any word from him? | ||
And how is he holding up under these indictments? | ||
That's exactly right. | ||
I actually had no contact with him from December 27th of 2020 until March 24th of 2021. | ||
When he invited my wife and I to visit him at Mar-a-Lago after my wife's successful war against stage four cancer, which was very kind of him. | ||
So this idea that Stone was moving seamlessly between Trump and these extremist groups is complete bullshit. | ||
The president is really quite amazing. | ||
I traveled for four days with him about three weeks ago. | ||
We went to Iowa. | ||
We went from there to Las Vegas. | ||
We went from there to California and then back to New Jersey. | ||
His spirits are amazing. | ||
He's resilient. He's buoyant. | ||
He's determined. | ||
He's resolute. | ||
He's angry, but he should be angry because no former president has been treated this way. | ||
He exercised his First Amendment right to question the anomalies and irregularities in a presidential election and to seek documentation of election fraud. | ||
Those are all constitutionally protected activities, yet he finds himself charged with a crime. | ||
That's because he's leading in the polls. | ||
That's because he poses an existential threat to the two-party duopoly and the globalists and the neocons And the one-worlders who really want to extinguish the U.S. Constitution and erase our constitutional freedoms. | ||
He stands in the way of those who seek power over our personal lives and want to reduce us to serfs. | ||
And therefore, there is no question that despite the fact that he's not perfect by any means, he is still our last, best hope to save the nation. | ||
And I'm very encouraged by his very strong statement in which he's called them out about the next pandemic. | ||
Let's be very clear. | ||
The pandemic was real in the sense that the virus was real, but it was developed with U.S. taxpayer dollars and weaponized in a Chinese lab. | ||
Absolutely indisputably. | ||
And Dr. Anthony Fauci lied about it under oath before Congress, which is amazing, because that's what they tried to send me to jail for. | ||
Even though I didn't lie, he did. | ||
But he hasn't been held responsible for that. | ||
That allowed them to rationalize the introduction of mail-in ballots. | ||
You see, the way this works is they use the voting machines to determine how many more votes they need to win. | ||
When they open the machine results, they realize they have lost. | ||
That tells them how many votes they need to manufacture in order to win. | ||
Then they dump these paper ballots in the middle of the night. | ||
If you're going to tell me in three major states at 3 o'clock in the morning, 300,000-plus paper ballots just popped up out of nowhere without explanation, and you shouldn't question that or we'll send you to jail, That's exactly where we are today. | ||
So I'm just amazed at his energy level. | ||
I'm amazed at the fact that he's gone up in the polls. | ||
This current hurricane in Florida, which we're feeling some of the results of, really is the death knell for the candidacy of Governor Ron DeSantis. | ||
The state insurance company is insolvent. | ||
He has hidden that fact from the people. | ||
If your home is destroyed or if you have damage to your property in this hurricane and you're with Citizens Insurance, which is the state-owned insurance company, you're not going to get paid. | ||
And if you're with one of the regular insurance carriers and you're dissatisfied With the pennies on the dollar that your insurance company offers you to replace your home or, let's say, your roof, well, under a tort reform bill signed by Governor DeSantis, you have no ability to sue them. | ||
So take it or leave it. | ||
He's done. He's finished. | ||
He's through. He'll actually never hold public office again at the end of this term as governor. | ||
He's limited by state law to two terms. | ||
He talks a good game on America First. | ||
But he is actually the most corrupt governor in Florida history in terms of trading enormous contributions for public policy. | ||
Nine and a half million dollars he took from Florida Power and Light. | ||
And then yesterday, in the middle of his press briefing, Florida Power and Light cut the electricity. | ||
It was really kind of ironic and fitting. | ||
You know, I mean, DeSantis' campaign is going to have to go down in history as one of the biggest political blunders of all time. | ||
He was set up to be the successor to Donald Trump. | ||
If he had just maintained that position and supported the real president of the United States, Donald Trump, then he would have had the presidency locked down for 2028. | ||
Why he decided to go up against him is just completely insane. | ||
I mean, do you think that he is convinced by all of the charges that, like, Trump will be taken out and he'll just de facto have to be the next, you know, candidate? | ||
Because other than that, I don't see how this makes any sense. | ||
And I don't think Donald Trump's going down. | ||
I don't want to talk about Ron. I want to talk about Donald Trump. | ||
We know Ron DeSantis is a—I think you're right. | ||
I think this was the death knell of him. | ||
My question is, you know—go ahead. | ||
They're related subjects, yes. | ||
I think he thought that when Donald Trump was charged, either federally or in the States, that his candidacy would collapse. | ||
And I have to admit, what has happened is counter-indicated, but in truth, Donald Trump's campaign for the presidency has been turbocharged by the lawfare war against him. | ||
With every federal indictment, he goes up in the polls. | ||
With every state indictment and federal indictment, his campaign coffers are filled with small and medium-sized contributions. | ||
So the basic rationale for a challenge to Donald Trump By Governor DeSantis and all the other candidates running was that he would collapse and wilt under this left-wing state lawfare against him, and it has had the exact effect. | ||
Yes, it's counterintuitive, but then everything about Donald Trump is counterintuitive. | ||
There are different rules for him. | ||
He is a force of nature, and he is the unstoppable force. | ||
Well, but let me ask you this. | ||
Has he learned his lesson? | ||
I mean, so many people are so frustrated at Trump. | ||
They've given up on him. You know, on our side, they go, look, we already elected him once. | ||
What did he do for us? He didn't get anything done. | ||
He was hamstrung constantly. He got rid of people like Roger Stone. | ||
He stopped talking to Alex Jones. | ||
He was absorbed by the swamp. | ||
I mean, has he learned his lesson? | ||
And if he gets into office again, does he understand the magnitude of what he's up against? | ||
And will he have people like yourself by his side advising him rather than the Bill Barr's of his previous administration? | ||
Well, first of all, I would reject the idea that he didn't do anything. | ||
He built the most robust economy in American history, record job growth, record wage growth, lowest levels of unemployment among all Americans, black, white, Asian, Hispanic, young, old, urban, rural. | ||
He brought billions of dollars back into the country. | ||
He appointed hundreds of conservative judges at all levels of the federal judiciary. | ||
He gave us the justices that overturned Roe v. Wade. | ||
He rebuilt our military muscle, which had been allowed to atrophy. | ||
He kept us out of foreign wars. | ||
unidentified
|
The Russians wouldn't dare invade Ukraine. | |
The Chinese wouldn't dare have gone into Taiwan if Donald Trump were still in the White House. | ||
No, I completely agree. | ||
I'm sort of playing devil's advocate here because I totally agree with everything that you're saying. | ||
People are unsatisfied, though, and they're worried that he hasn't learned his lesson. | ||
Is he going to have good people this time? | ||
Because it's his cabinet that really screwed us. | ||
I think he's addressed that. | ||
I mean, I think he's made it very clear. | ||
He will wipe out the deep state. | ||
He will clean house at the intelligence agencies. | ||
He will clean house at the Justice Department. | ||
He will clean house at the Department of Homeland Security. | ||
He will seal our borders. | ||
You know, I think that he went to Washington as a non-politician, and he naively believed there were Republicans and Democrats. | ||
The Republicans were with him. | ||
The Democrats were not. | ||
He never understood that he had a fifth column within the Republican Party that was bent on his destruction from day one. | ||
You could not have any clearer statements than the ones he's made in the last six months. | ||
He knows who the bad guys are, and this time he's going to wipe them out. | ||
Now, today they attack him for saying that he's going to lock up his enemies, but the people saying this are trying to lock him and his allies up. | ||
It's Alinsky's rules writ large. | ||
Everything they accuse him is exactly what they are doing. | ||
We haven't even touched on the epic corruption of the Bidens yet, which somewhere Richard Nixon is rolling in his grave, I assure you. | ||
Oh, 100%. And I have faith in Donald Trump. | ||
I think he can do it. I think you're right with his recent statements. | ||
He's coming out so strong against the people that deserve it. | ||
And if not Donald Trump, then who? | ||
I mean, he really is the last hope. | ||
And people who doubt him, I mean, I'd love to see their suggestion for who else could do this. | ||
And Ron DeSantis, the Bush boy, is not the guy. | ||
Roger Stone, I wish we had more time. | ||
There's so much stuff we could talk about. | ||
Everybody should watch the Stone Zone Live with Roger Stone Monday through Friday, 5 p.m. | ||
Eastern on Rumble at StoneZone.live. | ||
StoneZone.com is the website. | ||
Roger J. Stone, Roger J. Stone Jr. | ||
on Twitter. Thanks for being with us, Roger. | ||
Thanks, Chris. God bless you. | ||
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Third hour is on. We'll open up the phone lines for your calls this hour. | ||
Remember to go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Not to support us. Do it for your own sake. | ||
Do it for your own health. | ||
Do it for your own well-being and comfort and ease of living. | ||
Incredible products. Just go check them out. | ||
Just go to info. Even if you don't want to buy anything, just go start looking at the products, checking out the ingredients, seeing what it can do for you. | ||
And I guarantee you there's something for everybody at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
And best of all, you do support us. | ||
You do keep us on the air. It is a true 360 win. | ||
And of course, we frankly deserve it. | ||
Now, I'm not one to toot my own horn, as it were, but we have broken so many stories on this platform. | ||
We have been on the forefront of so many paradigm-shifting occurrences. | ||
And one of the biggest may be the fact that we were the first Of any news outlet, all the way back in April of 2020, we broke the story of the lockstep document, the Rockefeller program. | ||
It had been written about in 2014 on Infowars.com. | ||
But it wasn't until April of 2020 that we saw the whole play in action. | ||
And this video has recently gone viral. | ||
The whole thing is seven minutes. We'll play a couple minutes of it here. | ||
But this is myself on the war room, April 15, 2020, breaking down for the first time in American media the lockstep document. | ||
And this has been spread around quite a bit. | ||
And it's a good reminder, as NPR says, as COVID cases increase, mask mandates are coming back. | ||
And the New York Times asks, is it time to wear a mask again? | ||
Yes, they're doing it again, folks. | ||
But we are heading them off at the pass. | ||
Here is just a little edit of the news we broke all the way back in April of 2020. | ||
Let's watch. This document was published in 2010. | ||
It's called Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development. | ||
This was put out by the Rockefeller Foundation. | ||
This first scenario is called Lockstep. | ||
In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit. | ||
Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20% of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months. | ||
The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies. | ||
International mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, breaking global supply chains. | ||
Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers. | ||
Even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. | ||
However, a few countries did fare better, China in particular. | ||
The Chinese government's quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of its borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery. | ||
I agree. | ||
It's a plan, folks. It's all a plan. | ||
This is all according to plan. | ||
unidentified
|
Highly intrusive, real-time tracking of a largely compliant population. | |
That was the key to the eventual lifting of the lockdown in Wuhan. | ||
China did a lot of things right. | ||
Some countries did respond very quickly and get their testing in place, and they avoided the incredible economic pain. | ||
This document continues from 2010, I remind you. | ||
China's government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. | ||
During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. | ||
Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. | ||
Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty and their privacy to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. | ||
Citizens were more tolerant and even eager for top-down direction and oversight. | ||
In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms, biometric IDs for all citizens, for example. | ||
In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements. | ||
All right, folks, this is a seven-minute edit of the Event 201 podcast. | ||
slash Rockefeller Foundation lockstep document coverage we did all the way back in April 2020. | ||
It was published by Ivor Cummings at Fat Emperor on Twitter and edit by Wide Awake Media. | ||
You can find it on my Twitter. | ||
And please do support us as we will continue to tell you the truth about things that haven't even happened yet in opposition to the lies the mainstream media is telling you about what's happening now. | ||
Still so much to cover in the third hour of American Journal for this Thursday morning, last day of August 2023. | ||
How time flies, folks. | ||
We'll open up the phone lines for your calls this hour. | ||
In fact, we'll go ahead and do that right now. | ||
If you want to call in the number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
That's 1-877-789-2539. | ||
Again, I'm going to try to go with names that I don't recognize. | ||
guys. . | ||
I love our regular callers. | ||
They're regular callers for a reason, because they're fantastic, but I really have been enjoying getting new callers in and hearing from them for the first time. | ||
So if you're a new caller, today's the day to dial in. | ||
1-877-789-2539. | ||
We're going to talk about some stuff not entirely political now. | ||
Move on a little bit from that. | ||
Although it's all tied in together. | ||
But previously, before we talked to Roger, we were talking about the blue zones. | ||
And I think this is an important point to make as people who are talking about this are not discussing it honestly for the most part. | ||
CBS News has the story, Want to Live to 100? | ||
Blue Zones expert shares longevity lessons in new Netflix series. | ||
In a four-part series called Live to 100, Secrets of the Blue Zones, streaming on Netflix, Dan Buettner, the explorer and best-selling author who has studied Blue Zones for 20-plus years, takes viewers on a journey to regions with the highest number of centenarians or people who live to 100. | ||
So there are locations on the planet where you have an extremely high percentage of people living to those triple digits. | ||
Four of the most potent ones are Okinawa, Japan, Sardinia, Italy, Ikaria, Greece, Nicoya, Costa Rica, and Loma Linda, California. | ||
By stepping inside their homes and through interviews with Buechner, Viewers learn about the foods that fuel this impressive population and other aspects of the lifestyles they lead on a daily basis that positively impact their health. | ||
They say the four principles that span each zone, because obviously each zone is a little bit different, right? | ||
Sardinia is not so much like Okinawa, except that maybe they're both by the sea. | ||
But the four principles they have identified are, one, eating wisely, two, moving naturally, three, connecting with others, and four, having a purpose or outlook. | ||
I think this is important, and it illustrates the importance and the connectivity of physical health and spiritual and mental health. | ||
And it's no wonder... | ||
That we have such poor outcomes here in America when we are being poisoned both spiritually and physically. | ||
Our foods are unnatural, processed. | ||
If you want to eat healthily, you have to have a ton of money to do that, and that's not always the easiest thing. | ||
And at the same time, we are constantly being fed literal, spiritual, mental poison by our mainstream media that is hell-bent, it seems, on dividing us, separating us, not just from our fellow human beings, but from our history and our heritage and the traditions that have been passed on for generation upon generation. | ||
Seems like you can't turn on any show, whether it's the news or mainstream media, documentaries, or just like a sitcom. | ||
You turn it on and it's just, it's saturated with these messages of family's not important. | ||
What's important is you, is doing what you want right now, regardless of how it impacts anybody else. | ||
And the reality is they're setting you up for death. | ||
They're poisoning you inside and out, physically and metaphysically. | ||
And what they want to highlight in the blue zones are foods. | ||
Of course, they take this and they try to incorporate it into the wider depopulation scheme of the New World Order and the Great Reset, the World Economic Forum, right? | ||
They're going to force you to not eat meat unless it's meat that they create in a lab somewhere in a disgusting abomination against nature. | ||
But they point to vegetarianism and they say that's why people live longer. | ||
I think that's probably the least important part of the Blue Zones. | ||
I think the much more important parts are the spiritual parts, are the community aspects, are the exact parts of these communities that they've identified as being long-lived. | ||
That are different than other places. | ||
Now you'll notice that the people that live the longest aren't the people whose entire lives seem to be consumed by finding shortcuts to live the longest. | ||
You've seen all these stories of these guys that are like, I take my son's blood and put it in my veins. | ||
I'm going to live forever. | ||
Just like, no, you're a creepy weirdo. | ||
Even if you do live forever, what type of existence is this? | ||
These are guys whose entire lives, their every waking moment is consumed by doing things to try to live forever. | ||
And it's almost counterintuitive. | ||
The reality is, if you want to live for a long time, if you want to have a good, fulfilling, long life, that's not what you focus on. | ||
You focus on the here and now. | ||
You focus on living in the moment, not being stressed, appreciating the people around you. | ||
And you'll notice that most of these are foreign places, right? | ||
There's only one place that's in America, and it's Loma Linda, California. | ||
So maybe this goes contrary to what I was just asserting, because one of the things that is important about these blue zones is there's an extremely high concentration of blue zone, like what you could label blue zones, in places that follow traditional religious diets. | ||
Especially Orthodox Christian diets. | ||
See, in Orthodox Christianity, you're actually supposed to fast pretty regularly. | ||
I mean, it's kind of a lot. | ||
It's like abstain from meat on Fridays, and then almost every week, there's at least a day or two where you're supposed to fast in remembrance of a saint or something of the sort. | ||
And these... Dietary calendars were not designed to make you live longer, but that seems to be the outcome. | ||
It seems almost like some sort of divine intervention. | ||
Things that these communities are doing to achieve spiritual health are in turn granting them physical health. | ||
Again, this is like a Only on Infowars will we go from hardcore political coverage to talking about this stuff, but this is the reality. | ||
This is actually how our universe operates. | ||
And it's important to recognize this and tune into this. | ||
Not just to take advantage of it, because you want to live forever. | ||
We don't want to live forever. | ||
In fact, we want to stop the people that are trying to live forever. | ||
What we want to do is have good lives, and it turns out that by living a spiritually healthy life, that translates, in many cases, to a physically healthy life. | ||
And the beautiful thing is, even if it doesn't, by having a spiritually fulfilling life, by being connected to your fellow human beings, by tuning in to the real world around you, Nature, people, even technology, like by actually engaging in this stuff and not just becoming a zombified consumer of entertainment and an individual completely bastardized and deracinated and separated from your fellow human beings. | ||
Even if you die early, it's like your life has been so much better. | ||
I'd take 50 years in a loving community than 200 years Like a bug in a cell under a New World Order paradigm. | ||
So Loma Linda, California... | ||
Is the outlier here, as it's not one of these places where the traditions reach back hundreds and hundreds of years. | ||
I mean, places like Japan and Sardinia, they have this continuity of culture, and Greece especially. | ||
It's continuity of culture that extends thousands of years. | ||
Loma Linda, obviously different than that, except there's something interesting about Loma Linda, and it's something they don't really mention. | ||
They don't make a big point of. | ||
They'll talk about the sun. | ||
They'll talk about the active lifestyle. | ||
They'll talk about the... | ||
Focus on vegetarianism. | ||
We'll talk about all those things, the physical things. | ||
But those aren't the things that separate Loma Linda apart. | ||
The thing that separates Loma Linda apart is the fact that it is a colony of Seventh-day Adventists. | ||
It was founded in the 1840s. | ||
The church flourished during the 20th century. | ||
Today, a community of about 9,000 Adventists in the Loma Linda area are the core of America's Blue Zone region. | ||
They live as much as a decade longer than the rest of us, and much of their longevity can be attributed to vegetarianism and regular exercise, plus Adventists don't smoke or drink alcohol. | ||
But importantly, they observe the Sabbath where they take 24 hours to disconnect. | ||
They keep their stress levels low. | ||
They have big families where generations all live together. | ||
and it turns out they live for 100 years. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | |
Welcome back. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome to your phone calls. | |
This segment... | ||
I assume there's any other stories that I desperately need to get to here. | ||
Let's go to your phone calls now, and then we'll cover... | ||
I want to cover what's happening in Hollywood, the stack of news that I saved from yesterday. | ||
I think that'll be fun to discuss, but there's important goings-on here. | ||
We have two... | ||
We call them powerhouses of the InfoWars audience, Hobbs and Simon. | ||
We'll go first to Hobbs in Nebraska. | ||
Hobbs, I understand you have a special guest for your podcast tonight. | ||
Tell us all about it. Thanks for calling in. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, yeah. Good morning, Harrison. | |
Good morning, InfoWarriors. | ||
It is your boy, Hobbs, with Roads to Liberty, of course. | ||
And, yes, I will be speaking with Jaden, the Gadsden flag kid that's in the news all over the place tonight. | ||
Him and his parents are coming on the show. | ||
We're going to have them both for the full hour. | ||
Even if we can't pad out the entire hour tonight with his story, we'll get him and his family input on some of the other news that's going on in the world tonight. | ||
So if you guys are interested in joining us in the chat, go to the Roads to Liberty page on YouTube or Rumble and we'll be looking out for your chat. | ||
Alright, and I'll retweet that. | ||
So if people want to find it, they can go to my Twitter. | ||
I know you posted something about this, so I'll find it here and retweet it in just a second. | ||
But Road to Liberty podcast, having on Jade and that 12-year-old was kicked out of school for having a don't tread on me flag. | ||
That's a great guest. | ||
And what I've seen of his appearances or his statements on video, he's a well-spoken young man. | ||
And it'll be exciting for you to talk to him and his parents about the experience they've been through. | ||
I'd love to hear. I really want to hear how the other kids responded to what happened. | ||
Because if there's something I know about middle school kids, they're not exactly fans of authority. | ||
And I wonder if he's become sort of a hometown hero for these kids for standing up and actually winning against the administration. | ||
I'm kind of jealous that you're getting to talk to him. | ||
So I'll be tuning into that, I think. | ||
Roads to Liberty on Rumble and YouTube. | ||
And I'll retweet the link to it, hopefully by the end of the show today. | ||
Thanks for the call, Hobbs, and good luck with that. | ||
Congratulations. I look forward to hearing what young Jaden has to say. | ||
Incredible stuff. Let's go now to Simon in Florida. | ||
Simon, thanks for calling in. | ||
About a couple of different topics, you're on the air. | ||
Hello there, Harrison. Well, actually, I heard from some of your fellow Infra Warriors that you had mentioned me briefly on Sunday and said that there were some issues that you wished to discuss. | ||
Otherwise, I'll talk about China and some goings on in Africa. | ||
But was there a subject that you particularly had that you wanted to cover? | ||
I don't quite remember what it was exactly. | ||
I think it was just BRICS and Africa. | ||
I mean, there's so much going on in that regard. | ||
And I think I was just talking about what we talked about on Friday and just gave you credit for staying on top of all this stuff. | ||
So I think it had to do with Africa. | ||
I think that was what I was looking to you to provide some illumination on. | ||
What is happening in Africa? So we have some distinct goings on there. | ||
We've had another coup in the country of Gabon, where the sitting president, who's been in power himself for 12 years, just changed the constitution in order to be eligible for a third term after he took over from his father, who had been in power for 42 years, having been put in place by the French seven years after supposed independence. | ||
And indeed in the election for the third term, President Bongo on his, well, close to his 64th birthday, won with 64%. | ||
So even Joe Biden's campaign didn't manage to tie up his percentage to match his age exactly. | ||
So if President Bongo does indeed end up being deposed, I think he may be an excellent consultant for the Biden campaign. | ||
But we've got other goings-on in Niger, where some time ago the new ruling Junta gave the French army 30 days' notice to leave the country, and that runs out this weekend. | ||
But they've also given the French ambassador recently just 48 hours' notice Which has now expired to get out the country. | ||
They've said that his ambassadorial credentials are no longer accepted and that they've decided therefore to cut off the water, the electricity and the food supply to the French embassy. | ||
And that's very ironic since food aid and electricity have actually been cut off to their entire country after the coup that happened four weeks ago. | ||
So it's been interesting to see whether or not the Russians would kind of like make any direct statement. | ||
Obviously, Victoria Nuland flew into Nigeria and then went to South Africa. | ||
It's been reported by a young lady reporter for The Grey Zone that what took the South African officials back was the state of doubt Yeah. | ||
Yeah. | ||
And so they expected her to turn up kind of issuing orders. | ||
And she really seems very, very uncertain, which is kind of reflected in the way that the U.S. State Department hasn't actually called the coup a coup, which is odd. | ||
And So I wonder if they're being so sort of delicate in their dealings because of how much this has to do with China. | ||
We have this story from today. | ||
GlobalTimes.cn reports China-Africa to inject stability, positive energy to a turbulent world, according to the Chinese defense minister. | ||
And it just talks about the growing number of positive China-Africa cooperation You know, initiatives that are taking place. | ||
I mean, China is really making a move on Africa, and it seems like the old colonial powers of France and America kind of just don't know how to deal with it. | ||
You're right. You may well have actually seen that from my Twitter feed, Simon from Glory 2, when I forwarded it to you, I think, a couple of times because it was actually very, very significant. | ||
I actually had the pleasure of discussing that with George Galloway on Sunday as well. | ||
What's been going on there is they invited all of the ministers of defense and their basically chiefs of staff, like the equivalent of General Mill in America, and then all of the military attaches from their embassies in Beijing. | ||
About 50 of the countries participated. | ||
And with that same chat that we've talked about on several occasions with Chinese defense minister, who himself is under sanctions from the United States, they've made it very, very clear. | ||
And this is expressed in the article that you referred to. | ||
It's also been picked up belatedly by Zero Edge in saying that they stand willing to help the militaries of Africa, pretty much all of them, 50 out of 54 countries, to resist imperialism. | ||
Right. | ||
Right. And, of course, this is exactly what happened during the Cold War. | ||
We had the Soviets and America intervening continuously in the Third World, places like Africa, playing off one each other, trying to bribe one another. | ||
Fascinating stuff. Thank you, Simon. | ||
All right, folks, we've heard from our regular contributors, Hobbs and Simon. | ||
Great information, as always. | ||
Very excited. Hobbs got that exclusive interview with the young man Jaden. | ||
Looking forward to that. And, you know, this is what it's about. | ||
Infowars does not want to stand alone. | ||
We in no way want to be the only ones doing this. | ||
We want to inspire you and show you, by example, that you don't need a degree. | ||
You don't need to be welcomed by the mainstream media. | ||
You can just do these things. | ||
You can just Tell people this information. | ||
You can be a part of this. | ||
You really have to be a part of this for this to exist, let alone thrive and succeed in our mission of rescuing humanity from the clutches of a technocratic globalist elite who, as we speak, are building, I'm not exaggerating, an army of robots to enforce their dictates as unthinking drones of murder. | ||
So... We need you. | ||
This is the clarion call. | ||
We are so proud to serve as a home base for all of these patriots out there fighting back in the information war. | ||
But we encourage you to take part in this, not just be a passive observer. | ||
Do it by going to infowars.com and sharing the links. | ||
Do it by going to band.video and downloading yourself, re-uploading it, sharing the links there, and of course going to infowarsstore.com and supporting everything that we do. | ||
As, you know, relates to the story we were talking about with the blue zones, I mean, health is a multifaceted thing, and the big lie of the pharmaceutical-controlled medical industry is that the solution to everything is a pill and that all you need is a medical intervention to live that much longer. | ||
The reality is... | ||
As we see with the exploration of blue zones around the world. | ||
It's about spiritual health. | ||
It's about community health. | ||
It's about keeping your stress levels down by having faith in God and knowing That we're in his hands. | ||
If you can lower your stress and certainly eat healthily, but importantly, it almost doesn't matter how healthily you eat in places like America because even if you eat nothing but salads and Baked fish, like you're not getting the nutrition that you need because the soil is depleted. | ||
Eat the good foods, that's great, but you need to be supplementing those with high-quality supplements from InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
And it really is the spiritual battle that we're in that will determine whether... | ||
You're granted longevity or not. | ||
And we hope to be doing this battle on all of these fronts, the information war, the spiritual war, and the physical battle that we're all in with the unhealthiness of modernity. | ||
Bodies is, of course, back in stock, 25% off. | ||
So many great supplements on sale at Infowarsstore.com can help you make up for the shortfalls of modern life. | ||
And the information, of course, Not always great news, but hopefully we can inspire people. | ||
What they say is that it's like meaning and purpose. | ||
If you have meaning and purpose, it's almost a placebo effect. | ||
It's amazing how effective the placebo effect can be. | ||
They can even tell you it's a placebo. | ||
They can give you a sugar pill and go, this is just a sugar pill, it's a placebo, but it will... | ||
You know, cure your eczema. | ||
And it will. It's like your brain has this weird way of just doing it. | ||
Like the power, we have the power. | ||
Our immune systems are so powerful. | ||
Our minds are so powerful. | ||
And if you're not taking advantage of that, then, you know, you're... | ||
You're missing out on the greatest medical secret the world's ever seen. | ||
And just like those people that live in Sardinia and Okinawa, their diets were not designed by men in lab coats to be exactly what you need and how you need it and blah, blah. | ||
It's just through tradition. | ||
It's through word of mouth. | ||
It's through just what your grandparents knew to do, you keep doing, and it turns out it's more effective than anything that Harvard has come out with in the last hundred years. | ||
And that's all we do. We take the traditional medicines, we take the traditional home remedies that people have known about forever, and we just package it in an easy, convenient, and affordable way for you to take advantage of these things. | ||
So, listen to your grandmother. | ||
Eat the bone broth and the turmeric. | ||
And all of the wonderful things that nature has given us that we don't need to adulterate or alter in any way. | ||
We just need to empower and extract it. | ||
And we do it for you at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Let's go to your phone calls now. | ||
We'll cover Hollywood in the next segment. | ||
We have a couple first-time callers, including Roger in Connecticut, who's a student at a well-known college. | ||
Thanks for calling in. Roger, you're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Hey Harrison, thank you for having me on. | |
I'm a big fan of the American Journal and all the work y'all do on Infowars. | ||
I especially want to thank you guys for waking me up. | ||
I mean, Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones are really the ones that drove me to my awakening. | ||
And what I wanted to talk about is that classes began this week, and I specifically want to discuss the issue of transgenderism in the classroom. | ||
I have a professor of philosophy who began the class by saying, You are not allowed to have a pronoun in this class. | ||
We're only going to be using the term they. | ||
And I genuinely believe this is a plot by the elite to remove gender identity for the purpose of no longer promulgating sexual reproduction and furthering the population crash to get us down to the level of 500 million. | ||
I mean, this is in mainstream media, high-level universities. | ||
I'm wondering, what do you think is the extent to which they're doing this? | ||
And then I also wanted to discuss The percentage of students at my school that are on some form of psychoactive medication, whether that be Prozac, hormones, SSRIs, I'm at the point where I can't even drink water anymore. | ||
Because this is all, you know, it's going into sewage and then this is polluting our streams. | ||
When water wasn't safe historically, people drank beer. | ||
So now I only drink beer. | ||
Because... That's the only way I can filter out the mind-controlling substance. | ||
So I'm just wondering what you think on that. | ||
And the solution to 1984 is 1776. | ||
Amen. Hey, the solution to 2023 might be 1776 when it gets right down to it. | ||
Obviously, you can filter your water, and it's good to filter your water. | ||
I'm glad you're on top of things. | ||
I don't know if beer for breakfast would be my choice, but hey, it's out there. | ||
That more had to do with contamination of bacteria. | ||
We don't have to worry about bacteria as much as we do, as you pointed out, the SSRIs and the atrazine and all the fluoride, the stuff that either seeps into the water accidentally or is put there on purpose. | ||
For the exact reason that you laid out. | ||
And when it comes to the pronoun thing, that's a weird sort of twist to say we're not going to do any pronouns. | ||
Everybody's going to go by they. | ||
And I think it serves a multitude of purposes. | ||
I think the one you've identified is certainly an accurate one, right? | ||
That they want to diminish and sort of destroy the mutual benefit that males and females have for one another. | ||
The beneficial and positive benefit Dichotomy that exists between men and women. | ||
They want to diminish you down to just this gray nothingness with no attributes, no independence, nothing unique that you can do that other people can't do. | ||
They want everybody in this hellish Harrison Bergeron world of... | ||
Lowest common denominator. | ||
Obviously, it contributes to the depopulation program, but importantly, it contributes to the spiritual death and connection to reality by concealing and covering up and distorting the beauty of nature, which does exist in many places as a dichotomy, as male and female. I mean, they're at war with nature, they're at war with God, and I think, you know, as you... | ||
What you're saying sort of illustrates that. | ||
Of course, philosophy, the root meaning is the love of truth. | ||
So I would love for you to ask your teacher how destroying the male and female dichotomy is in any way in service of truth rather than destroying it in favor of a convenient lie. | ||
But thank you so much for the call. | ||
Thank you for your support. And good luck resisting... | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. What they try to do to people. | |
Yeah, absolutely. Keep fighting and keep your head up and hope to hear from you again. | ||
We'll go to some more calls in the next segment. | ||
I've been rambling too much. | ||
We'll get to your calls. We'll go to the Highwayman in Illinois next. | ||
Stay with us. Go to Infowarsstore.com to support us as it becomes increasingly clear. | ||
True... I don't know what you'd call it. | ||
There's got to be a word better than evil, right? | ||
I mean, because it is evil. | ||
It's definitely evil. | ||
I want to call it that. | ||
It's like a disgusting, low-class evil that you need some word that just sounds like... | ||
All right, folks, we'll go out to your phone calls here in just a second, but I got to cover Hollywood because I have a plea to make. | ||
I have a plea to make. | ||
I have a... I have an opportunity for you, okay? | ||
We'll start off this coverage with a tweet from one of my favorite Twitter accounts of all time, Oiled Field Rando, at Oiled Field underscore Rando. | ||
He retweets President Biden. | ||
President Biden says, Now is the time for all Americans to speak up when history is being erased, books are being banned, and diversity is being attacked. | ||
Yes, we have to stand up when history is being erased. | ||
Oiled Field Rando responds, So what's Fort Bragg called now? | ||
Oh, right. No, we erase history when it's stuff we don't like. | ||
Literally, actually, tangibly destroy history. | ||
Tear down statues, boil them down into liquid, flush them down the toilet, add a symbol of how much you despise the people that came before you. | ||
That's them destroying history when teachers are just like, yeah, I don't think I want to demonize all the white kids in my class. | ||
They're like, you're destroying history. | ||
It's a lie that they're saying, these Biden types. | ||
Books are being banned. | ||
Well, hardcore pornography is being banned in elementary schools. | ||
That's not the same thing. | ||
But regardless, I thought that was a great point since, once again, just like everything we talk about today, whether it's, you know, oh my gosh, Trump is going to prosecute his political enemies. | ||
It's like they're so hypocritical. | ||
It's at this level that's hard to comprehend as they actively, systematically destroy our history. | ||
Like a 1984 level total destruction and rewriting of history. | ||
They decry the rewriting of history. | ||
Now, there's another tweet here. | ||
This is from Vanity Fair. I'm going to reveal it piece by piece. | ||
Produced by Jay-Z, they say, the Book of Clarence pulls in classical biblical figures like Jesus and Mary Magdalene, but with an unexpected twist. | ||
What do we think the unexpected twist is? | ||
What would you not expect the twist would be? | ||
Here's what I do expect. | ||
I expect them all to be black. | ||
Oh, look at that. They're all black. | ||
They're like, how unexpected. | ||
We did the same thing we've done to literally every property that we've gotten our hands on. | ||
What an unexpected twist. | ||
It's the most expected twist you could possibly have. | ||
There are some other options, right? | ||
I mean, they could have made Jesus trans. | ||
They could have made the apostles gay. | ||
Like, there's plenty of ways to... | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, that's coming....desecrate the biblical story. | |
That is certainly coming. | ||
But, no, they've remade Troy with Achilles being black. | ||
They've remade... Little Merman. | ||
I mean, everything. So it's just hilarious that, like, they do this to every movie for the past 10 years, and they're still like, what an unexpected twist. | ||
And the thing is, I actually think this is a little bit different than other things because it's religious. | ||
I actually don't care that much. | ||
Although, you know, the good guys in the movie are black and all the bad guys are white. | ||
So there is that. All the Roman guys are still portrayed as white people. | ||
And they're actually trying to promote this as if this is somehow historical reality, which it's not, obviously, right? | ||
Jesus wasn't black. Just in case you didn't know, he wasn't African, so he wasn't black. | ||
But I actually don't care as much about this. | ||
Because it's black people making a movie about the Bible, so it's going to be black people as stars of the Bible. | ||
Like, that's... It's not a story for one type of people, and while it's historical, it's something that should be shared by everybody. | ||
So I actually don't really care about this as much. | ||
It's just funny to me that they call it unexpected. | ||
Like, we don't expect them to do this, obviously. | ||
The other funny thing about this is apparently it's a British filmmaker who made his feature directorial debut with a movie called The Harder They Fall. | ||
He says his new movie, The Book of Clarence, is an epic set in the biblical era following a man who attempts to become one of Messiah's apostles. | ||
He says, quote, I always wanted to explore the Bible stories, but from the angle of a person that sells Jesus his sandals, the woman or man who owns the hair salon, which of course the obvious response is, yeah, it's called Life of Brian. | ||
It was hilarious and made 50 years ago. | ||
They already did this movie, and I can tell you right now, it's better than yours. | ||
Certainly funnier than yours. | ||
But again, I don't really even have that big of an issue in this. | ||
It's just, you know, they got to make the white people evil, of course, or the evil people white, of course. | ||
And it actually seems like Jay-Z has some comment in this where he's like, most of the stories told in the Old West didn't have people of color. | ||
We know they existed. | ||
We know they've been here just as long as everybody else. | ||
When he asked about why black people are playing... | ||
Jesus in this, which it's like, okay, is he suggesting that this is historically that Jesus was black? | ||
Because he wasn't. And you can portray him however you want, but don't go messing with history, which is exactly what they're doing. | ||
As Disney's Robin Hood gets a, quote, extremely woke remake. | ||
The Quartering posted this on Twitter. | ||
This is the cast of the new Robin Hood show, and it's Robin spelled with a Y, a fully race and gender-swapped reimagining. | ||
Guess who the bad guys are? | ||
You're right. It's the two white actors. | ||
One plays a cop and the other an evil rich guy. | ||
All the good guys are black and Robin Hood is a woman. | ||
Wow, amazing. This sounds like the worst movie of all time. | ||
Nearly all of Disney's live-action remakes have come with a certain stigma. | ||
The most grievous offender on the list seems to be the reviled Snow White, starring Rachel Zegler, who just is open about her hating the character in the movie Snow White in the stupidest way. | ||
When most people hear the name Robin Hood, there's a good chance they picture Disney's famous Foxy variant from the animated film. | ||
Although there have been dozens of adaptions, they more or less follow the same formula. | ||
However, like so many stories from the public domain, Robin Hood and his adventures in Sherwood Forest have received multiple modern adaptions. | ||
Robin Hood, spelled with a Y, is a modern, gender-swapped version of the original legend. | ||
Jesse Romeo heads the series as the titular heroine. | ||
It's a woman. | ||
A sharpshooting vigilante who leads the hood, described as a masked hip-hop group that makes viral videos online. | ||
Oh, great. | ||
Well, with that one sentence, you've guaranteed I will never see this movie ever, ever. | ||
Just what a terrible thing that sounds like. | ||
That sounds awful. | ||
So here's my plea. Here's my suggestion. | ||
Here's my offer to the Infowars audience. | ||
There's somebody out there that wants to make a Robin Hood movie. | ||
We'll make the best Robin Hood movie ever made. | ||
There's somebody out there that wants to invest. | ||
I think we could do it for a million dollars. | ||
I think a million dollars, we could make a hundred million dollars. | ||
I think we could make the best movie of all time with one million dollars and the Robin Hood legend, the classic legend told in all of its glory. | ||
No modern nonsense to go with it. | ||
I'll play Robin Hood. I think Alex Jones could either be Fry or Tuck. | ||
I think he'd be hilarious in that role. | ||
He could also be Guy of Gisborne. | ||
You want to see Alex Jones playing a bad guy, playing the archetypal government tyrant. | ||
That could be very fun. | ||
unidentified
|
What were you going to say, Matt? Oh, the perfect Robin Hood movie already exists. | |
The Disney one? No. | ||
unidentified
|
Which one? Robin Hood, Men in Tights. | |
Oh, yeah. No, no, ours would be better. | ||
Ours would be better. I think Owen could play Much or maybe Will Scarlet. | ||
I don't know who we'd have as Maid Marian. | ||
I see maybe Eva Vlardingerbrook could play her. | ||
Is that cultural appropriation? | ||
She's Dutch, so she's not English. | ||
I'm serious. I want to make a Robin. | ||
It's public domain. Anybody can make a Robin Hood movie. | ||
I want to make a Robin Hood movie. | ||
I'll use AI to do it. | ||
I'll just take the classic Robin Hood tome that I have that just tells the old legend from the British Isles and just go, put this in script form. | ||
It'll just be all the same, just exactly the same, nothing changed, and we'll just shoot it verbatim. | ||
It'll be amazing. It'd be so good. | ||
Instead, what you get is Robin in the Hood where the merry men are women and they're a hip-hop group that makes viral videos. | ||
Just kill me now. | ||
Sounds awful. Just sounds unbelievably bad. | ||
So I want to do it. I want to make the Infowars Robin Hood movie. | ||
I want to star as Robin Hood. | ||
I want Alex Jones playing a major character. | ||
I want Owen Schroyer playing a major character. | ||
I want everybody in the InfoWars orbit getting a cameo. | ||
I don't know who would play Little John. | ||
Not sure. Maybe Scott. | ||
Scott's like seven feet tall. | ||
Maybe he can play Little John. | ||
I think we could do it. | ||
I think we should do it. | ||
I think we will do it, but we need your help. | ||
If you have a million dollars lying around, you want to fund the greatest adaption of Robin Hood the world has ever seen, you get in contact with me. | ||
All right. I've rambled too much about Robin Hood. | ||
I'm so sorry. I'm sorry. | ||
I don't have time to go to calls. | ||
We're about to end the show. I'm sorry, Highwayman and Joe and John. | ||
I'm not going to be able to get to you. | ||
I do apologize. I gotta tell people to go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Infowarsstore.com, we will not be on the air if you do not support us. | ||
We will not be able to make Robin Hood an Infowars story if you do not go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
We are just expanding and growing and doing new and incredible things with the new technology. | ||
Taking back social media. | ||
We are just beginning, folks. | ||
It may seem like InfoWars has been in this for a long time, and we absolutely have, and we've survived because of your contributions, but we are just starting, folks. | ||
The last 20 years has been building the launch pad. | ||
Help us now complete the rocket and take off to a future that we can be proud of. | ||
InfoWarsStore.com is where you go to support us. | ||
Go there now. Get bodies at 25% off. | ||
Stay tuned for Alex Jones. A lot of listeners have complained in the last two years that our amazing high-quality coffee has not been available. | ||
And that's because the prices went up too high for the raw beans and the quality had gone down some. | ||
I turned down so many companies that wanted to work with us. | ||
But now, we have brought back the coffee and it's even better from a national supplier that's veteran-owned and veteran-operated. | ||
It's powered by the company, Minuteman Coffee. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, this is the best-tasting, best-smelling, strongest coffee that I have ever drank. | ||
It is game-changing. | ||
All you got to do is buy a bag of it and try it. | ||
I know you're going to be hooked, which will then fund our Operation A360 Win. | ||
Go to InfowarStore.com right now for Escape the Prison Planet Light Roast. | ||
That's the strongest. The amazing medium roast Wig of America. | ||
And finally, the best tasting, dark roast, tip of the spear, now exclusively available at InfoWarsStore.com. |