Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Meet Oliver Schwab. | |
| He's the managing director of the World Economic Forum. | ||
| His sister, Nicole, is a member of the executive committee for the World Economic Forum. | ||
| In July of 2021, she said that COVID was a huge opportunity to have their great reset. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I see it as a tremendous opportunity to really have this great reset and to use these huge flows of money, to use the increased levers that policymakers have today in a way that was not possible before. | |
| Their father, Klaus Schwab, is the founder of the World Economic Forum. | ||
| Seven years ago, he announced plans to start tracking the entire population and to merge everyone with a central machine, what he now calls the Great Reset. | ||
| The Schwab family is working together with other families because that's how Team Evil works. | ||
| You can call them the Illuminati if you like, but they have no official name, and they are not illuminated. | ||
| There is no telling how many family bloodlines are involved, but they keep it in the family for three main reasons, and they all have to do with power. | ||
| First, and most simply, as a way to gain and maintain their fortune. | ||
| Secondly, is to carry out long-term secret objectives. | ||
| These families use insurance companies and private trusts to protect their own fortune from the fiat debt-based system that they created and to generate the kind of money needed for a 100-year plan. | ||
| The older generation outlawed natural medicine, introduced petrochemical pharmaceutical drugs, and polluted the environment. | ||
| And now the younger generation is here to fix it with their totalitarian Great Reset. | ||
| It's a multi-generational plan that works because of family loyalty and also because of the third reason why they keep it in the family. | ||
| Trauma-based mind control. | ||
| Most victims of the CIA's trauma-based mind control program, MKUltra, have come from families with a history of child abuse because multi-generational child abuse makes a child more susceptible to mind control. | ||
| And most of the characters we see as world leaders are not only actors on a stage, they are oblivious because they have suffered a lifetime of abuse and mind control. | ||
| The overwhelming majority of people on Team Evil are not all in on it. | ||
| They simply do as they are told. | ||
| They follow orders and they don't ask questions. | ||
| These families see having children as a means of gaining power and wealth. | ||
| They see their own children as property, as slaves to do the family's bidding. | ||
| But perhaps it's more like a cult than a family. | ||
| Nearly a million child orphans were distributed throughout America and the Commonwealth in the late 1800s by an international secret society called the Odd Fellows. | ||
| Delivered primarily by train, many of these orphans were born in private homes owned by the Odd Fellows and their offshoot, the Daughters of Rebecca, an all-female Masonic organization That featured symbols of mass breeding and fertility. | ||
| Philip Eugene de Rothschild says that the Rothschild family alone has produced over 100,000 children in these secret breeding programs. | ||
| Most of the U.S. presidents during this time were Freemasons. | ||
| Four of them were Odd Fellows. | ||
| And at last count, 34 U.S. presidents are directly related to Charlemagne, King of the Franks, who is believed by these Illuminati bloodlines to be of the Merovingian bloodline, a genetic set that they highly value. | ||
| And Team Evil has always been obsessed with genetics. | ||
| So it really isn't that strange to point out the similarities between Justin Trudeau and Fidel Castro, Angela Merkel and Adolf Hitler's mother, Barbara Bush and Aleister Crowley, or even Obama and Akhenaten. | ||
| The only way these families and their abused mind control minions are able to control the rest of us is by dividing us. | ||
| And if we the people could change that, then we could change everything. | ||
| Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Wednesday, August 2nd, year of our Lord, 2023. | |
| And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to The American Journal. I'm your host, Harrison Smith, InfoWars.com, band.video. | ||
| Well, they've done it again, folks. | ||
| Yes, they have indicted Trump for the 900th time. | ||
| That'll be our main story today. | ||
| Of course, we'll be taking your calls on all of that. | ||
| We'll start off with a bunch of videos. | ||
| We'll show you statements about the indictment, the response from Donald Trump, statements from some of the other people involved, as well as I don't know. | ||
| I guess we'll just go through the list. | ||
| The list of things that make this indictment utterly ridiculous. | ||
| Well, let's begin today as we do every day with our daily dispatch. | ||
| All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Wednesday, the 2nd of August, 2023. | ||
| Special counsel charges Trump with conspiracy to defraud the U.S. Former President Donald Trump was indicted Tuesday on charges he conspired to defraud the country he used to lead and attempted to prevent the peaceful transfer of presidential power to Joe Biden. | ||
| quote the purpose of the conspiracy was to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 election presidential election by using knowingly false claims of election fraud to obstruct the government function by which those results are collected counted and certified the indictment from special counsel jack smith's office says the indictment marks a historic moment for a nation less than 250 years old the first time a former president has faced criminal charges for trying to overturn the bedrock of democracy sorry sorry uh sorry | ||
| overturn the bedrock of democracy i'm i mean it is funny It is funny when you think about it, when you think about the hordes of deep state agents manipulating things behind the scenes and then calling themselves the bedrock of democracy. | ||
| It's just ridiculous enough to be hilarious. | ||
| A free and fair election. | ||
| While Trump's failure to reverse his defeat was a credit to the guardrails of that democracy, the ability to prosecute him may renew the stress test on the constitutional design. | ||
| The allegation that Trump used, quote, dishonesty, fraud, and deceit to subvert the 2020 election with pervasive and destabilizing lies about Russian collusion. | ||
| I'm sorry, about election fraud. | ||
| Sorry. | ||
| Sorry, it's just when you read this and you think about what happened from 2016 to 2020, it's odd that... | ||
| That shockingly, like everything perfectly fits with the Russia collusion narrative, right? | ||
| Destabilizing lies, dishonesty, fraud, deceit to subvert the 2016 election. | ||
| And it all makes perfect sense when you think about it as a case they were charging the Russia collusion narrative. | ||
| Creators, manufacturers, liars that created that destabilizing and pervasive lie. | ||
| But I'm sorry, we're talking about Trump here. | ||
| Sorry, it comes after a sprawling investigation that included testimony from dozens of White House aides and advisors ranging in seniority up to former Vice President Mike Pence. | ||
| The indictment accuses Trump of taking part in three criminal conspiracies. | ||
| One, to defraud the United States by using dishonesty, fraud, and deceit. | ||
| To obstruct the electoral vote process. | ||
| Two, to impede the January 6th congressional proceeding at which the collected results of the presidential election are counted and certified. | ||
| And three, against the right to vote and to have that vote counted. | ||
| He's due to be arraigned on charges on Thursday. | ||
| So again, we will show you the statements from hitman Jack Smith. | ||
| Merrick Garland, the response from Trump, Vivek Ramaswamy, lots of videos to go to here in this first hour. | ||
| Meanwhile, in response to this, Matt Green, or I'm sorry, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz renew calls to defund Jack Smith over latest Trump indictment. | ||
| Representatives Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene are renewing their calls to defund the office of Special Counsel Jack Smith, who on Tuesday indicted former President Trump on charges stemming from his efforts to remain in power following the 2020 election. | ||
| Trump was charged with four counts on Tuesday. | ||
| Gates, a staunch Trump supporter, introduced the bill to prohibit federal funding for Smith's office shortly after Trump's announcement, an effort he renewed calls for on Tuesday as news broke of Trump's indictment. | ||
| A quick reminder that the only notable accomplishment of Jack Smith's entire career up to this point has been when he charged the former Virginia governor with corruption, got a conviction only for it to be unilaterally and unanimously overturned by the got a conviction only for it to be unilaterally and unanimously overturned by the higher courts because it was However, it had the intended effect that he was unilaterally and unanimously overturned by the higher courts because it was utterly baseless and fraudulent. | ||
| That is, it destroyed the former governor's political career, bankrupted him, left him a political non-entity, despite the charges being fabricated and the conviction being overturned. | ||
| That may be what's going on here. | ||
| It's also just very odd. | ||
| To be in America at a time when the federal government can appoint a special counsel to just go after a guy for whatever. | ||
| Election tampering in Georgia, January 6th, the riot, claims about the 2020 election. | ||
| Just go get him on something. | ||
| I mean, that's literally what's happened here. | ||
| This is not one accusation about one event that they put a special counsel to investigate. | ||
| They literally just gave him Carte Blanche to just go after Trump for whatever, and he's doing that. | ||
| So regardless of the outcome of the myriad indictments that have come down so far, the point of it is to stymie Trump's political agenda and destroy the actual democracy that this country still clings to. | ||
| Meanwhile, all of this, most of it, the primary purpose of all of this is to keep the deep state alive, which of course thrives on, relies on, demands endless, very expensive, horrifying, and extremely useful war. | ||
| It's all about war. | ||
| No breakthrough yet in Ukraine's counteroffensive. | ||
| If Ukraine supporters were hoping for a breakthrough after Kiev's forces made a push in the southeast of the country earlier this week, they were sorely disappointed. | ||
| The latest attack, which saw Ukraine throw in thousands of Western-trained reinforcements to drive south from the town of Ornikev, has not yet yielded significant results, U.S. Defense Department officials told NatSec Daily this week, with one noting that the gain is being measured in the hundreds of meters. | ||
| Ukraine now has 150,000 troops committed to the operation across three axes of attacks, including multiple Western-trained brigades, said one of the DOD officials, who, like others interviewed for this newsletter, was granted anonymity to discuss operational details. | ||
| But Kiev is still keeping a number of forces in reserve as soldiers continue probing heavily mined Russian defenses for weak spots. | ||
| And of course, we covered yesterday the revelation made by the Hungarian foreign minister that the EU has already agreed to fund the Ukraine war for the next four years. | ||
| So we can expect this back and forth trench warfare, World War I style, slaughtering thousands over a few feet of land for at least the next four years or so. | ||
| So we'll keep that money flowing, keep the blood flowing and keep the deep state in power for that much longer. | ||
| Meanwhile, from Fox News, a hospital insider warns trans kids on hormones frequenting ER for harming themselves in cry for help. | ||
| Maine Health, one of the largest systems in the state, an insider says, who's familiar with patient care information, says, transgender children who are taking hormonal pharmaceuticals for chemical sex changes are subsequently showing up with serious mental health crises, including psychotic breaks from reality in acute emergency settings. | ||
| The source made their concerns known to do no harm, an organization seeking to restore the medical field to science-based care. | ||
| Patients with psych emergencies are admitted to the emergency room in severe scenarios when urgent stabilization is needed. | ||
| Psych-related emergency room visits are due to the patient being in danger to themselves or others, verbal threats of violence, hallucinations, cutting themselves, and attempting suicide. | ||
| So again, just to put a little bow on just how utterly mad everything is at this point. | ||
| It really is crazy. We'll get into that a little bit more later. | ||
| Finally, we have this story. | ||
| BlackRock MCI and MSCI are being investigated by House Select Committee on China. | ||
| The House Committee alleges that BlackRock, while not breaking any laws, facilitates flow of U.S. capital to Chinese entities. | ||
| BlackRock Global Fixed Income CIO Rick Ryder discussed how rising interest rates could affect the bond trade. | ||
| U.S. House Committee is launching a probe into BlackRock, the largest asset management company in the world, and about how they are draining American resources and sending them directly to our enemies in China. | ||
| Something they've been quite open about doing for some time using ESG laws and climate change rhetoric to completely eliminate American financial power and therefore sovereignty. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be back. Folks, welcome back. | |
| This is the American Journal, Infowars.com, band.video. | ||
| Of course, the Trump indictment is top on our list today. | ||
| We have the full indictment here, all 45 pages of it. | ||
| We'll go through that here in just a moment. | ||
| Let's start with some videos. | ||
| First we'll go to special prosecutor, establishment hatchet man, Jack Smith. | ||
| Clip number 11, special counsel Jack Smith described the Capitol insurrection as an unprecedented assault that was fueled by lies. | ||
| All of this, of course, surrounding January 6th, the dust-up, the great meandering, the wandering through of the Capitol, the event at which a million Trump supporters showed up to Washington, D.C., There was about 45 minutes, brief scuffles, when the police started firing tear gas into a totally peaceful crowd. | ||
| And it ended with five protesters brutally murdered by police. | ||
| And this, of course, is being treated as an armed insurrection. | ||
| Despite nobody being armed, there not being any plan or predetermined goal in place other than Than to contest the results of the 2020 election, which is the reason that everyone was in town. | ||
| It's kind of a funny thing. | ||
| Even people that are conservative, pretty up-to-date, follow politics. | ||
| I mean, it's a simple question. | ||
| What were they doing on January 6th? | ||
| Why were they there on January 6th? | ||
| Why was the Capitol occupied on the 6th of January 2021? | ||
| The obvious answer is to certify the election. | ||
| Why do you need to certify the election if it's a foregone conclusion if it's not possible to not certify the election? | ||
| The only reason that they were there on January 6th was to register complaints and, if necessary, launch an investigation or send the election back to the legislature. | ||
| I mean, it's self-evident what was going on. | ||
| It's bizarre that people are acting like this is unconstitutional. | ||
| That's not a thing. It's like, why have election certification if you have to certify? | ||
| If the only thing that you're going there to do is just certify, that doesn't make any sense. | ||
| It doesn't make any sense to get the entire Congress and the entire Senate into a building to just watch the certification happen. | ||
| No, that's when you lodge complaints. | ||
| That's when you make claims of Inconsistencies, potential voter fraud, and then at the discretion of the Vice President and with the approval of the Houses of Congress, you could have a 10-day investigation period. | ||
| You could send it back to the states. | ||
| There's various mechanisms you could use to try to remedy or address the claims of voter fraud or inaccurate investigation. | ||
| Vote counts or whatever the case may be. | ||
| That's happened before in history. | ||
| So again, it's odd that people Are like, well, but the election was done and that's it. | ||
| There was nothing they could do. | ||
| It's like, then why were they there on January 6th? | ||
| The whole point of going there was to register complaints. | ||
| The whole point of a million people showing up was to show that this was not some fringe, like, four people in the country thought that the election was fraudulent. | ||
| It was actually probably one of, if not the biggest protests in American history in D.C., bigger than the Million Man March. | ||
| Because this represented a mass movement of tens of millions of people across the United States with a million people actually able to show up there. | ||
| It really is amazing. | ||
| That they're doing this in such a blatant way. | ||
| I guess it's nice as a fan of history, we get to experience what it must have been like under the Soviets or the Nazis or something, right? | ||
| Maybe people can't comprehend that like, you know, in the Soviet Union, when you were reading the Pravda newspaper or whatever, You know, they wouldn't just be like, yeah, these people are getting in the way of our evil plans, so we are disposing of them. | ||
| Obviously, they had this same sort of setup. | ||
| Well, we are designating a special prosecutor who will be totally independent. | ||
| We'll get to the bottom of this. Like, you have to dress up your corruption in the language and symbols of legitimacy. | ||
| That's how it works. So that's just what's happening here. | ||
| It couldn't be more obvious. | ||
| Jack Smith's entire Persona is just like evidence of this. | ||
| He's done this before, as we discussed in the Daily Dispatch. | ||
| Destroying somebody's political career over false claims that were eventually thrown out. | ||
| And he was overseas, you know, working for the UN for a while. | ||
| And then he was recalled... | ||
| And basically, given the task, just get Trump. | ||
| Get Trump on something. Whatever. | ||
| You know, three or four investigations, all completely separate from one another, but all under the purview of Jack Smith, apparently. | ||
| So let's go now to this comment from Jack Smith. | ||
| We'll play Trump's reply on the other side, but here is clip number 11. | ||
| Special Counsel Jack Smith describing the indictments. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here it is. Good evening. | |
| Today, an indictment was unsealed, charging Donald J. Trump with conspiring to defraud the United States, conspiring to disenfranchise voters, and conspiring and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding. | ||
| The indictment was issued by a grand jury of citizens here in the District of Columbia, and it sets forth the crimes charged in detail. | ||
| I encourage everyone to read it in full. | ||
| The attack on our nation's capital on January 6th, 2021 was an unprecedented assault on the seat of American democracy. | ||
| As described in the indictment, it was fueled by lies. | ||
| Lies by the defendant, targeted at obstructing a bedrock function of the U.S. government, the nation's process of collecting, counting, and certifying the results of the presidential election. | ||
| The men and women of law enforcement who defended the U.S. Capitol on January 6th are heroes. | ||
| They are patriots and they are the very best of us. | ||
| They did not just defend a building or the people sheltering in it. | ||
| Yeah, they killed four or five innocent people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They put their lives on the line to defend who we are as a country and as a people. | |
| They defended the very institutions and principles that define the United States. | ||
| Since the attack on our Capitol, the Department of Justice has remained committed to ensuring accountability for those criminally responsible for what happened that day. | ||
| This case is brought consistent with that commitment and our investigation of other individuals continues. | ||
| In this case, my office will seek a speedy trial so that our evidence can be tested in court and judged by a jury of citizens. | ||
| In the meantime, I must emphasize that the indictment is only an allegation and that the defendant must be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt In a court of law. | ||
| I would like to thank the members of the Federal Bureau of Investigation who are working on this investigation with my office, as well as the many career prosecutors and law enforcement agents from around the country who have worked on previous January 6th investigations. | ||
| These women and men are public servants of the very highest order, and it is a privilege to work alongside. | ||
| Oh my god, the self-satisfied, self-congratulatory back-patting Just unbelievable. | ||
| Just unbelievable how blatant this is. | ||
| All over January 6th, what is this, the 100th trial we've had about this? | ||
| I don't want to give our enemies too much credit, but you have to admit that they really pulled this off. | ||
| And not just the stealing of the election. | ||
| You know, it was my contention early on That they would steal the election in a way. | ||
| And again, it's like, I don't know if I want to, again, give our enemies too much credit, but I thought of this. | ||
| Could they not think of this? | ||
| And do they not have the power to pull something like this off? | ||
| Cheat in the election in such a way that it's obvious that they cheated, specifically to bring about an intense response. | ||
| I know. I know it sounds crazy, but it's quite literally what happened. | ||
| They cheated in such a blatant and forthright way that, of course, the Trump supporters are going to get angry and rise up. | ||
| Like, if they cheated in a way that was convincing, in a way where everything went smoothly and it just actually looked like Joe Biden won... | ||
| You know, there probably wouldn't have been a big pushback. | ||
| Because, you know, all of this is predicated on the assumption that, for one thing, the 2020 election was legitimate, which it obviously wasn't, and that all of the claims of voter fraud were originated by Donald Trump himself, and that was the only source of it. | ||
| Which is odd because for those of us that were actually watching the election with the critical eye. | ||
| But we were pointing out the inconsistencies, pointing out the fraud before Trump even made a statement. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So like how how could it. | |
| Just none of this makes any sense. | ||
| And again, when you read the indictment, if you just think about it in context of the Russia collusion narrative, it actually all makes perfect sense. | ||
| And it's funny... As you read the indictment, how far they're stretching. | ||
| So, let's just... | ||
| We'll go to Donald Trump's statement here first. | ||
| We'll go to a couple more videos of statements, but then we'll read the indictment and actually explain what I'm talking about here. | ||
| Because it says things like... | ||
|
unidentified
|
Like, it's weird. | |
| It's like... | ||
| Despite having lost, the defendant was determined to remain in power. | ||
| He spread lies about there having been outcome determinative fraud in the election that he'd actually won. | ||
| The claims were false. | ||
| The defendant knew they were false, but the defendant repeated and widely disseminated them anyway, making his knowingly false claims appear legitimate. | ||
| And then the very next paragraph says, the defendant has a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim falsely that there had been outcome-determinative fraud in the election that he'd won. | ||
| He was also entitled to formally challenge the results of the election through lawful and appropriate means, such as seeking recounts or audits by popular vote. | ||
| So it's just kind of weird. | ||
| It's weird that it's like, he did this and this and this. | ||
| And also, that's perfectly legal and allowed to do it, but we're charging him anyway. | ||
| So we'll, again, get into the intricacies of this indictment and the absurdity that comes to light when you actually read it. | ||
| We'll also just revisit the 2020 election a little bit as well, because, again, all of this is predicated on the 2020 election being totally legitimate and cool and fine. | ||
| And they keep referencing, as you've just heard Jack Smith say, that what Trump did undermined the bedrock foundation of our democracy, which is the ability to vote and have that vote counted and know that that vote is being treated equally to all the others. | ||
| that what Trump did undermined the bedrock foundation of our democracy, which is the ability to vote and have that vote counted and know that that vote is being treated equally to all the others, | ||
| which is exactly like that is what was destroyed by the actions of the Democrats which is exactly like that is what was destroyed by the actions of the Democrats and their corporate partners like Mark Zuckerberg in the 2020 election with mail-in ballots by superseding the state legislators and having secretaries of state or other unauthorized people unilaterally change the voting system without any oversight, without any guarantees that the new system would be as safe or | ||
| They absolutely destroyed the confidence that anybody could have in their electoral process because for months ahead of the election, batches of ballots were found in dumpsters, ballots were being delivered, 10 of them to a single home. | ||
| There's no... I.D., verification allowed. | ||
| I mean, they upended the entire electoral system unilaterally, without lawful precedent, without reason. | ||
| All because of a virus that, by the way, they created in a lab and released on purpose and then imposed lockdowns in blatant disregard of the scientific evidence that that wouldn't help. | ||
| But it did give them the excuse to do the mail-in ballots that they used to cheat anyway. | ||
| So... It is just the most mind-boggling projection you've ever seen of people who destroyed the electoral system in this country. | ||
| Wrote articles about it, Time Magazine, bragged about it, explained how they did it. | ||
| Not confusing at all. | ||
| And then somebody, Donald Trump, who questions the results of this completely upended and reimagined electoral process, he's the one being charged and being blamed for undermining this ultimate bedrock of democracy. | ||
| It would be funny if it wasn't our country being stolen from us right out in the open. | ||
| So let's go now to Donald Trump's response to this. | ||
| Clip number 13. | ||
| Here's Trump's statement on this new indictment. | ||
| Here it is. The country is in a very dark place right now. | ||
| But even after everything the deep state has done to me, I will never give up on America. | ||
| Mark my words. In 2024, we will win back the White House. | ||
| We will make America great again. | ||
| I have no doubt about it. | ||
| They come at me from left. | ||
| They come at me from right. | ||
| The rhinos, the communists, the Marxists, the fascists. | ||
| We will not only survive, we will be stronger than ever before. | ||
| We're fighting a fight like nobody ever thought possible, and we're winning. | ||
| We won in 2016. | ||
| We had a rigged election in 2020, but got more votes than any sitting president. | ||
| We're going to win like never before, and we're going to make America great again. | ||
| I can truly say, I believe, better than ever before. | ||
| Thank you for all of your support and for all of your prayers. | ||
| Now again, these indictments, these trials, are certainly having a massively negative impact on the Trump campaign. | ||
| That's the point of them. We're good to go. | ||
| Then it doesn't really matter. | ||
| Once they get Trump out of the race, once they destroy him politically and bankrupt him and demoralize everybody who supports him, then they can let him out and overturn it, send it to the higher court. | ||
| Oh, this whole thing was fraudulent. Let him go. | ||
| But he'll already have been destroyed politically by that point, which is the true design of this. | ||
| But that being said, even if he is convicted, even if he's sent to jail, You can get elected president from jail, and you can pardon yourself. | ||
| Like, there's nothing in this that would stop Trump from being president. | ||
| It will just hobble him completely, right? | ||
| It'll force him. And this is the point of it, right? | ||
| He's got, what, four different random pending cases in four different jurisdictions. | ||
| The amount of money this costs, the amount of energy this costs, and attention this costs. | ||
| will make it impossible for him to effectively carry out a campaign for the presidency, which again is the point because this is a strictly political, clearly corrupt, actual threat to the foundation of our democracy. actual threat to the foundation of our democracy. | ||
| And again, we'll get into some of the other responses and get into the nitty-gritty of the indictment itself on the other side. | ||
| I do want to remind you that this is part of a singular, unified, monolithic pattern taking place in not just politics but the corporate world as well. | ||
| InfoWars also has been subject to these types of hobbling lawsuits and attempts to prevent us from doing what we do. | ||
| And you can fight back against that directly by going to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| We'll continue to address these fabricated indictments, continue to rest for the truth, and defend the rights of the American people to not have their country go to war against them. | ||
| They do to expect to lose. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
| We'll open up the phone lines for your calls in the next hour. | ||
| But let's go through some of the responses to what has been the seemingly biggest indictment so far. | ||
| Centering around January 6th. | ||
| I also want... | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I know I've brought this up quite a bit. | ||
| I really think it's important to illustrate just how orchestrated all of this has been. | ||
| That they probably could have cheated in a way that would have flown under the radar. | ||
| That would have made all of claims of voter fraud ridiculous. | ||
| They didn't do that. | ||
| And it really did seem to me early on that they were... | ||
| Like, playing to lose on purpose. | ||
| Even people like Tim Pool. | ||
| I used to watch his coverage of the election all through 2020. | ||
| And even he kept being like, are the Democrats trying to lose? | ||
| Like, what is going on here? Why is this campaign so bad? | ||
| Why are they making so many mistakes that seem like they're willfully losing? | ||
| I'm I would always say they really are. | ||
| They really are trying to lose. | ||
| They really are trying to set it up to where they do not win legitimately. | ||
| They cheat to win. | ||
| It's obvious. They prevent any actual investigation into it. | ||
| They prevent any You know, actual questioning of it. | ||
| But they do it in such a way that, like to Trump supporters, it's just obvious that they cheated. | ||
| Because what they want, it's not just to win the presidency in a legitimate matter, right? | ||
| These people that care about our democracy and the voting is the foundation of our... | ||
| They didn't want to just win the election, have Trump concede, and then stick around and be in the background totally unfettered by lawsuits or whatever. | ||
| What they wanted was to cheat in such a blatant way that it pissed Trump supporters off. | ||
| They wanted to create a violent backlash. | ||
| This is the way that they work, similar to the Friends of Democracy. | ||
| Um, documents that have been leaked showing, you know, Antifa using Black Lives Matter creating on purpose violent interaction so that they could have what they call a feedback loop of violence against police, police violence against protesters, | ||
| you know, feeding into a sense of chaos and and Everything being out of control so they can justify federal involvement in local police forces so they can centralize control in D.C. over all the local police stations. | ||
| They in no way were trying to avoid a violent backlash. | ||
| They were trying to foster it, create it, and ensure it. | ||
| And that all culminated in January 6th where they... | ||
| You know, withheld the appropriate number of police that would have been necessary to defend the Capitol where they had the fake pipe bomb that has gone essentially totally uninvestigated. | ||
| No hope whatsoever of ever finding who the pipe bomber was but it was a convenient way to actually get all of the senators and congressmen out of the Capitol prior to the planned violence at the Capitol. | ||
| Planned by Capitol Police and the FBI and the undercover agents and the Antifa contingents that were there undercover. | ||
| All of this was orchestrated. | ||
| All of this was carried out by design. | ||
| And again, I would think that this would be too much for even the globalists to orchestrate and carry out or plan But it was also completely foreseeable, as I foresaw all the way back in August of 2020, back when people were still wondering how long the lockdown would last. | ||
| I don't know if y'all remember this, through the summer of 2020, It was constantly being extended by just little bits and little bits, right? | ||
| Two weeks to slow the spread. | ||
| Okay, we're going to push it a little bit farther. | ||
| Okay, all of June we're going to be in lockdown, but July we'll be out. | ||
| Okay, July we're going to be down. | ||
| August came around. People were going, this can't go on much longer. | ||
| It's been four months already. | ||
| I can't believe it. Gee, are we going to make it to six months under lockdown? | ||
| That would be crazy. And it was an obvious sort of calculus to run to go, okay, all of this is about getting the mail-in ballots, most of it at least. | ||
| It's about getting the mail-in ballots so they can cheat. | ||
| Okay, once they get the mail-in ballots and cheat, it's going to be obvious that they're cheating, and that's going to piss off the Trump supporters. | ||
| The Trump supporters are going to want to rise up in some way to oppose this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Also, they've got to show up in person because they've been censored online. | |
| Well, yeah, I mean, it destroyed the entire campaign. | ||
| I mean, going back... | ||
| I'm sure Trump would have done things differently. | ||
| I think he would have probably not hesitated to deploy the National Guard to destroy the Black Lives Matter riots that were actually an insurrection, actually causing massive damage, actually hurting the American people and focused entirely on looting private stores rather than Ever actually going to the capitals where the people who make the decisions that they're supposedly protesting work and operate? | ||
| I would also probably, and would be justified in doing so, cancel the 2020 election. | ||
| Just say, look, things are too crazy right now. | ||
| There's no way we could ever trust the results of this election, so we're not going to have one. | ||
| That's true, and that's what happened. | ||
| I mean, we don't need to go through all of the various lies and deceptions that were Carried out because of the mail-in ballot program. | ||
| But by acting like this never happened, they're able to carry this off. | ||
| I guess the way to think about this is there's two possibilities. | ||
| And you can consider each one of them equally. | ||
| Just in a fantasy realm, what if the election was totally legitimate? | ||
| What if it was perfectly valid? | ||
| What if every vote that got cast got appropriately counted? | ||
| I mean, this isn't true. But in fantasy world, imagine that the 2020 election was totally legitimate. | ||
| Then what's the big crime? | ||
| Big crime is that Trump said there were suspicious things about it. | ||
| There was a massive protest in Washington D.C. that only got violent when police started firing munitions into a peaceful crowd. | ||
| When they had like three people against a crowd of 100,000. | ||
| So if the election was totally legitimate and everything Trump said about the election being fraudulent about having won is totally false. | ||
| Again, this is fantasy world. | ||
| Then the big crime is that he questioned the election, which is not a crime because Democrats have done that every election in my memory, that they've lost. | ||
| They did it in 2000, the hanging chads. | ||
| They did it in 2016. | ||
| For the entire four years, they claimed the election was illegitimate, tainted by Russian collusion, etc., etc. | ||
| So that's not a big crime. So if the election was totally legitimate and Trump just questioned it, It's literally exactly the same as happened to him in 2016. | ||
| Wouldn't be that big of a deal. | ||
| And none of this really makes sense if that was the case. | ||
| If, however, the election was fraudulent and was stolen, then everything that's happening kind of makes perfect sense. | ||
| That it was the thieves of the election. | ||
| It was the corrupt manipulators and cheaters that undermined and hijacked our electoral process are still in power. | ||
| Still after four years of destroying Donald Trump's presidency over false claims, they are now launching indictments over a protest that got out of hand. | ||
| I mean, it's all absurd. It's all so totally crazy. | ||
| Again, we'll get into the actual... | ||
| Actually, you know what we'll do is we'll start the next hour with the statement from Vivek Ramaswamy since it's about five minutes long, and he does an excellent job. | ||
| He's also filed some FOIA requests about this indictment. | ||
| That we'll tell you about in the next hour. | ||
| Again, my prediction in August of 2020 was that lockdowns would continue until the election, that Dems would use mail-in voting to blatantly cheat, Trump would call it out, refuse to concede, they would say he's refusing to accept the election and is acting like a dictator, and they would activate the military to forcibly remove him. | ||
| All of these things happen. Like, how did I know? | ||
| How did I know in August that this would happen? | ||
| And is it so crazy that if I could have seen this pattern take place that the people in power also could have seen how this pattern would manifest and would actually make it happen? | ||
| And then of course it I believe what they really wanted was for this to be a much bigger deal. | ||
| Like, they really did want and expected January 6th to be like an armed insurrection. | ||
| They were so excited to have, like, oath keepers, info warriors, and proud boys be heavily armed and come and try to attack and kill congressmen and senators. | ||
| Like, that's really what they wanted. | ||
| They did everything they could to bring about that eventuality. | ||
| It didn't happen. Everybody in January 6th was unarmed. | ||
| To the 99.9 percentile, we're totally peaceful, including QAnon shaman and others. | ||
| They didn't get exactly what they wanted, but they're charging ahead anyway. | ||
| What they wanted was a violent insurrection so they could launch a counter-terrorist campaign. | ||
| Military attack on Trump supporters. | ||
| We didn't actually get violent, but they're doing it anyway. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You came down to this southern town last summer. | |
| Another sad moment in our country's history. | ||
| The 45th president of the United States, Donald Trump, has yet again been indicted by the Biden DOJ, a political party in power that is now repeatedly using police force to indict and arrest and potentially eliminate its political opponents from competition. | ||
| This is a politicized prosecution. | ||
| It is a political persecution through prosecution. | ||
| Now in a third indictment just in a matter of months against the person who is still at present the lead contender in the Republican primary for U.S. president. | ||
| I want to be very clear. I am running for U.S. president in that same Republican primary. | ||
| It would be easier for me if Donald Trump were eliminated from competition. | ||
| That's not how I want to win. | ||
| This is not about politics to me. | ||
| This is about first principles. | ||
| We do not want to become a country where the party in power is able to use banana republic-like tactics to eliminate its political opponents. | ||
| Yet I'm sad to say that's exactly where we are. | ||
| The allegations in this indictment fall flat. | ||
| It is wrong and incorrect and inaccurate to place blame for what happened on January 6th at the feet of Donald Trump. | ||
| I said this at the time. | ||
| I've said it ever since then. | ||
| I continue to say it today. | ||
| I would not have made the same judgments that Donald Trump did in how he handled that day. | ||
| But that's different from saying that he committed a crime. | ||
| He did not. | ||
| He specifically told the protesters that day to behave peacefully. | ||
| The First Amendment in this country gives political protesters the ability to express themselves and their opinions freely. | ||
| Donald Trump was not responsible for what happened on January 6th. | ||
| You want to know what was responsible? | ||
| I said this in the days after January 6th, 2021, just as I say it today. | ||
| Systematic, pervasive censorship in this country. | ||
| That was after a year where we had told people across this nation that you had to stay locked down in your house, in your basement, and shut up, sit down, do as you're told. | ||
| If you question that, you're racist, you're anti-science, your social media accounts were silenced. | ||
| You had to stay home and lock down unless you were part of BLM or Antifa, in which case it was perfectly fine to roam the streets of this country and burn many of them down. | ||
| That was the double standard that then applied and said that if you said the virus originated in a lab in Wuhan, you were again a racist and had your Internet accounts shut down. | ||
| You were then told you had an election where you could express yourself to put the right person in charge of fixing these problems. | ||
| And instead, your accounts were suppressed if you sent a mere message saying that the Hunter Biden laptop story from the New York Post was real and. | ||
| You had your accounts locked. | ||
| Even the New York Post had its own account locked. | ||
| And if you repeatedly then tell people they cannot speak, that is when they scream. | ||
| If you repeatedly tell people they cannot scream, that is when they tear things down. | ||
| And I think we are making a grave mistake in this country by trying to pin the blame for that at the feet of one man. | ||
| If we refuse to learn our mistakes from our mistakes in the past, we are doomed to suffer an even worse fate in the future. | ||
| I worry that will create a country where January 6, 2021 was a friendly parley compared to what's actually to come. | ||
| I'm running for president to make sure we don't march towards some kind of national divorce. | ||
| But the first and most important step that we as candidates can take in this race is to speak and speak forcefully on the side of principle. | ||
| To say that even if we're competing against Donald Trump, as I am, I do not want to see him eliminated from competition using these politicized tactics. | ||
| It is wrong for our country. | ||
| It is wrong for our future. | ||
| I call on my fellow candidates to condemn it, and I call on President Biden to do the right thing and drop these politicized charges. | ||
| That's going to be a first step towards uniting our country. | ||
| Absolutely incredible statement from Vivek Ramaswamy, doubling down on pledge to pardon Trump, says censorship is to blame for January 6th. | ||
| Really a fantastic statement showing more backbone. | ||
| Even people like Mike Pence or Ron DeSantis, the establishment, would rather have us choose as our champions. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. We'll be opening up the phone lines for your calls this hour. | ||
| I'll go ahead and do that right now. | ||
| The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| We have a bunch of good first-time callers yesterday. | ||
| So if you're a regular caller, we don't do only first-time calls today, but... | ||
| We might ask you to call back later if you're a regular caller. | ||
| So if you've never been on air before, please do call in today. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Lots of stuff to get into with this indictment. | ||
| Let's get into some of the responses to it first. | ||
| Or some of the more details surrounding it. | ||
| First of all, the judge that will be overseeing this. | ||
| Supposedly randomly selected. | ||
| But what a coincidence. | ||
| She happens to be the judge who has been more brutal and less forgiving on the January 6th defendants than any other judge so far. | ||
| article called face off with DC punisher the federal judge who will oversee former president trump's latest criminal case is known for harshly sentencing january 6 rioters and formerly worked at a law firm associated with first son hunter biden judge tanya chutkin was randomly selected to oversee trump's criminal case | ||
| the nation's capital was declared last year by the associated press as the quote toughest punisher of rioters in the 2026 insurrection sending all 11 defendants before her behind bars. | ||
| The 61-year-old judge was nominated by Barack Obama and was technically confirmed by the Senate. | ||
| She previously worked for the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner, where Hunter Biden served as of counsel. | ||
| From 2002 until she was confirmed as a federal judge in 2014, according to a biography. | ||
| So again, they choose the judge who has most severely punished the insurrection, as they call it. | ||
| And these terms have meanings that have to be appropriately applied. | ||
| A one-day protest that gets mildly violent for a few hours in which the only people left dead at the scene are protesters murdered in cold blood by police officers. | ||
| It doesn't arise to the claim of insurrection, not by a long shot. | ||
| and most of the people that she has thrown behind bars for years in some cases are people who did things like walk through the open door of the Capitol while the police were holding the door for them. | ||
| The concept, and this is, again, the problem. | ||
| It's like you can't just deal with the indictment as it is. | ||
| It's like the indictment itself is predicated on the lie that January 6th was some sort of violent insurrection, which is so stupid. | ||
| The only thing that could have kept Trump in office, and everybody knew this and all of the talking heads, we talked about this. | ||
| Like, the only thing, the last hope, was that on January 6th, the Republicans contest the election results. | ||
| To allow the proceedings to take place as they were supposed to is the only thing that could have possibly stopped the election. | ||
| So they're suggesting that by preventing the only thing that could have stopped the election, Trump's forces are trying to stop the election. | ||
| It makes no sense whatsoever. | ||
| On the face of it, it is absurd, these claims. | ||
| And that's why I've been getting into the fact that there was nobody armed and there was no organization trying to stop the election. | ||
| I mean, it's just all fabricated. | ||
| So you can't just deal with the indictment. | ||
| You have to deal with January 6th being an insurrection, totally fake. | ||
| You have to deal with the reason why people... | ||
| Well, first of all, why the congressmen and senators were even there on January 6th to contest the election. | ||
| That was the point, and many of them had actually pledged to do just that. | ||
| People like Ted Cruz said they would lodge objections. | ||
| They would demand a 10-day pause in investigation before certifying the election in order to investigate some of the claims that were made. | ||
| They said they were going to do that. | ||
| And then when the riot broke out on January 6th, they decided to not lodge that complaint anymore. | ||
| For no reason. | ||
| As if, you know, a couple people fighting back against police who attacked them out of nowhere somehow means the election is legitimate now when it wasn't before. | ||
| I mean, again, this just makes no sense whatsoever. | ||
| And we've gone through January 6th with a fine-toothed comb over and over again, showing you in the timeline of the Videos from every different angle where you have a crowd of people behind the barriers, not attacking anybody, and then police officers from like 45 feet up just hurling grenades into the crowd to drive them into the police and create the conflict. | ||
| I mean, it was all 100% orchestrated. | ||
| It couldn't have been more obvious. | ||
| But again, to deal with January 6th, you have to explain that the The election was in fact stolen. | ||
| Again, you've got two possibilities. | ||
| The election wasn't stolen and people were protesting a legitimate election, which is their right and is still perfectly legal and there's still nothing wrong with that. | ||
| But if the occurrence is that the election was stolen and these people were protesting a legitimate grievance with evidence and facts as was actually the case, then what has proceeded from it is the most Outrageous violation of every democratic ideal that we've ever had. | ||
| But some of the suspicious timing has been brought to people's attention. | ||
| Donald Trump Jr. tweeted this. | ||
| Anyone else noticing a pattern here? | ||
| The corrupt bureaucrats of the Biden regime charged Trump literally the day after every single disastrous Biden crime family story. | ||
| Rather than looking into the millions sent to the Biden's kids and their grandkids from virtually all of the enemy's All of our enemies, they go after political enemies knowing that their lackeys in the media will use the bogus charges to cover for Joe Biden, the most corrupt president in the history of our nation. | ||
| There's no such thing as this much coincidence. | ||
| And if you've been paying attention, you'll realize we've become a banana republic. | ||
| It's truly disgusting. The FBI released documents to Congress alleging the Bidens took a $10 million bribe from Burisma. | ||
| On June 8th, the next day, Jack Smith indicts Trump in the Mar-a-Lago documents case. | ||
| On July 26th, Hunter Biden goes to court and rejects a sweetheart plea deal after it was revealed the DOJ tried to give him blanket immunity from future prosecutions. | ||
| And then the very next day, July 27th, Jack Smith adds more charges for Trump in the Mar-a-Lago case. | ||
| July 31st, Hunter Biden's former business partner testifies to Congress that Joe Biden was on over 20 calls with his son's business partners and Burisma executives pressured them to fire the prosecutor. | ||
| And the very next day, on August 1st, Jack Smith indicts Trump again for January 6th. | ||
| The very fact that a single special prosecutor is presiding over and carrying out both the investigation into the Mar-a-Lago documents case and the Georgia phone call and January 6th, like, really, there's nobody suspicious of that. | ||
| I mean, really, they literally just appoint a special prosecutor to just go after Trump immediately. | ||
| And they just say, pick a card, any card. | ||
| Like, pick a thing, anything. | ||
| Just go after him for something. | ||
| Like, why one person would be in charge of these three totally separate, completely independent investigations under one person to go after Trump? | ||
| Like, it makes no sense in that it is completely fraudulent and corrupt and an obvious act of a police state going after its primary political opponent. | ||
| It's dissident. I mean, even Putin isn't this obvious. | ||
| Putin will do a subtle poisoning. | ||
| He'll do something subtle. | ||
| This is like in your face. | ||
| And again, it's a part of the programming. | ||
| Just like how they cheated so overtly that it was bound to piss off Trump supporters, they are now carrying out that same practice. | ||
| They are charging Trump and pursuing him and persecuting him in such a Blatantly, egregiously fraudulent and political way. | ||
| It's almost like they're doing this on purpose to try to incite some sort of actual insurrection or revolution or rebellion. | ||
| Which again... | ||
| It's hard to stay focused because even when you talk about a coup or an insurrection, what comes to my mind is the fact that Nancy Pelosi conspired with the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and actually announced that they had usurped the president's power as commander-in-chief. | ||
| That is an actual coup. | ||
| That actually happened. | ||
| The House Speaker and the military conspired to deny the President his lawful authority. | ||
| They did that right out in the open. | ||
| The layers to this are truly astonishing. | ||
| We'll get into some more absurdities on the other side. | ||
| And again, we'll read the indictment. | ||
| Think about whether this indictment and the terms and phrases used apply more to Donald Trump or to the Democrats who have been running with the Russia collusion lie since they invented it in 2015. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| We'll get to your phone calls shortly. | ||
| This is from Greg Price on Twitter, at Greg underscore Price 11. | ||
| You know, we'll get to that in just a second, because it relates to the reading of this indictment. | ||
| So this is from the indictment, the introduction. | ||
| It says, To make his knowingly false claims appear legitimate, | ||
| create intense national atmosphere of mistrust and anger, and erode public faith in the administration of the election. | ||
| Now if we go back to the beginning and change just a few minor details, you could actually make sense of this. | ||
| Because again, if the election was not legitimate, then how does this make any sense? | ||
| And there has been no... Overarching investigation of the election. | ||
| There has been no investigation, no legitimate airing of the claims in any courtroom in America. | ||
| The DOJ, and this is widely publicized, Bill Barr and others, shut down the investigation. | ||
| I mean, there were investigations into things like the Pennsylvania truck driver who testified to having brought tens of thousands of ballots from New York to Pennsylvania only to have them completely disappear outside the chain of custody. | ||
| This was being investigated locally until the DOJ came in and said, this is a federal case. | ||
| We'll take over from here. | ||
| And then they just shuttered the investigation and didn't look into it. | ||
| Certainly didn't take it to a courtroom of any sort. | ||
| So that's happened over and over again. | ||
| So while they like to assert that these claims have been adjudicated and there was no validity to any of them, there is just undeniable proof that these things happened. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A ton of them were also thrown out without even looking at the evidence. | |
| Of course, yeah. We went over so many charges in previous shows that had been thrown out where they didn't even get to looking at the evidence. | ||
| Yeah, none of them were allowed to present evidence. | ||
| None of them were actually called to testify. | ||
| The only testimony Testimonials that we have were done by independent groups who had them sign legitimate legal affidavits under penalty of perjury, making claims that they saw firsthand eyewitnessed fraud take place. | ||
| Those things happened, but they were never allowed to be... | ||
| You know, they like to assert that the 2020 election was totally legitimate and all the claims have been adjudicated and found to be false. | ||
| That's not true. It's not remotely true. | ||
| We have, like, physical, tangible, eyewitness video. | ||
| We have all of the evidence, just mathematical evidence of the inconsistencies. | ||
| And again, you have to talk about this because this is all predicated on the election being totally legitimate. | ||
| So if the election wasn't legitimate, if it really was stolen, then is any of this wrong? | ||
| Like, they portray it with the assumed prerequisite of the election is legitimate and everybody knows that. | ||
| If that's not the case, then none of these claims make any sense. | ||
| It's like, just on a personal note, if, you know, if I'm accused of something, if I'm accused of, like, Stealing something from somebody. | ||
| And so they come after me and they make claims about me. | ||
| They say that I stole something and they try to get it back. | ||
| They break into my house, try to get the thing I stole back. | ||
| And if I actually stole it, then none of those things are crazy. | ||
| But if I didn't steal it, then it's like, hey, this person's harassing me. | ||
| They're making claims that are fake. | ||
| They're breaking into my house to try to steal things from me. | ||
| Like, it... We're good to go. | ||
| You're inciting violence. It's not them creating chaos by completely changing the entire electoral process and imposing mail-in ballots without going through the legislature and having mailboxes and Harvard ballasting funded by billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg. | ||
| They explained about that's what's caused the chaos. | ||
| That's what's caused the uncertainty. | ||
| And this is like a perennial thing with Trump. | ||
| It's ubiquitous. | ||
| And again, I don't understand people's vision on this. | ||
| I saw a video yesterday, some comedian going, you know, I think people voted for Joe Biden because they were sick of all the chaos that Trump started. | ||
| You know, the chaos surrounding Trump. | ||
| And it's like, Trump didn't start the chaos. | ||
| Trump was chaotic in the sense that he didn't do things the way that normal candidates do. | ||
| But go back over his presidency. | ||
| He was perfectly respectable the entire time. | ||
| I mean, nothing he said has ever been as insane as the things that Joe Biden has said. | ||
| You know, Trump never said we're going to try to, you know, carry out regime change in Russia, threatening Vladimir Putin's life. | ||
| Like, that's crazy. | ||
| That's destabilizing. That's pushing war with nuclear power. | ||
| Trump was shaking hands and crossing the border of North Korea, making peace across the board. | ||
| So where was the chaos Trump was creating? | ||
| It was the chaos that was created around Trump by people who hated Trump. | ||
| This is what I don't get. | ||
| How are you blaming the victim? | ||
| How are you blaming the person who didn't do anything wrong? | ||
| He didn't conspire with the Russians. | ||
| The chaos around him was the people completely fabricating claims about him conspiring with the Russians. | ||
| This is what I don't get. | ||
| It wasn't Trump that created the chaos. | ||
| It was the people attacking Trump that created the chaos. | ||
| Just like when Trump would hold rallies and Antifa would show up and attack people, they would go, Trump's a violent person. | ||
| Trump supporters caused violence at their rally. | ||
| They just went to a rally. | ||
| It was the other people showing up and causing the violence. | ||
| So time and time again, Trump and Trump supporters and conservatives are blamed for the chaos that's created by them sending adjutants to attack Trump supporters at rallies. | ||
| By them launching a false investigation into Russia and creating chaos around his entire presidency in the election. | ||
| By them cheating in the election in an obvious and brazen way for which there is tangible video and audio evidence that created the outrage and the chaos and the uncertainty, not the claims about the fraudulent election. | ||
| Just time and time again, the victims are blamed. | ||
| Time and time again, the people that have perfectly legitimate grievances are the ones attacked, killed, murdered, thrown in jail for not ever having done anything wrong, but for pointing out the things that the deep state has done wrong. | ||
| And so unbelievably infuriating. | ||
| So all this is to say that if you were to change a few minor details in this, you could say despite having lost, the Democrats were determined to remain in power. | ||
| So for more than not just two months, but four years, following Election Day on November whatever 2016, The Democrats spread lies that there had been outcome-determined set of fraud, Russian collusion, in the election, and that they had actually won. | ||
| These claims were false. | ||
| The Democrats knew they were false, but the Democrats repeated and widely disseminated them anyway to make these knowingly false claims appear legitimate, create intense national atmosphere of mistrust and anger, and erode public faith in the administration of the country. | ||
| Like, that's what actually happened. | ||
| We actually did go through four years of anger, mistrust... | ||
| Because of the knowingly false claims made by the Democrats in 2016 that laid the groundwork for everything else that has come afterwards. | ||
| So again, treat this as anything other than a political persecution is absurd. | ||
| Mike Pence's And the Ron DeSantis supporters out there that are claiming otherwise, you absolute traitorous quizlings will get what's coming. | ||
| All right, again, folks, this entire indictment is predicated on the assumption or rather the assertion that the 2020 election was totally legitimate and valid despite evidence—we'll show you later in the show—incontrovertible evidence. | ||
| Of fraudulent manipulation of the mail-in vote system that was imposed by Fiat as a response to the lockdowns imposed by Fiat, which were themselves a response to the virus that was created in a lab and released on purpose by elements of the deep state that carried out the rest of this stuff. | ||
| So, it's a deep and convoluted conspiracy, but a conspiracy nonetheless. | ||
| And again, when you read this indictment, If the election was totally legitimate and everybody knew it then maybe some of this would make sense. | ||
| But if the election had legitimate concerns about it then none of this makes any sense at all. | ||
| It makes a lot more sense when these exact same words are applied to not just the 2016 election as we just laid out We're good to go. | ||
| Just it wasn't Trump that did it. | ||
| Greg Price has this on Twitter. | ||
| Reminder, 51 former intelligence officials, including five former heads of the CIA, went on record during the 2020 election to say that Hunter Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation. | ||
| We later learned that not only was the laptop in fact real, but they did it in coordination with Joe Biden's campaign and a few of them have even admitted they did it because they wanted Joe Biden to win. | ||
| Not only have none of these been charged with, quote, conspiracy to defraud the United States, but all of them still have their security clearances today. | ||
| Pretty incredible. Pretty incredible. | ||
| So it's not just that, well, Trump did it and they did it, and Trump's the only one getting charged. | ||
| Trump didn't do this. | ||
| They did do this. Trump's being charged. | ||
| They're not. It's entirely separate, different, and worse. | ||
| So we're going to go out to your phone calls here in just a second. | ||
| And I know Sean from California wants to talk about a topic that we actually have a video about. | ||
| So we'll go to that video first. | ||
| Before we go to that video, I want to go to a video of Van Jones on CNN explaining the fact that candidates are, in fact, allowed and in some cases are legally obligated to oppose election results that are contentious or questionable. | ||
| So let's go now to clip number 12. | ||
| Here's Van Jones on CNN explaining how candidates are legally allowed to question elections. | ||
| Vice president, federal law says all election disputes at the state level need to be wrapped up by December 8th so the electors can cast their ballots on December the 14th. | ||
| Now, each state governor has got to certify the electors' votes and then send them on to Congress. | ||
| So the results aren't official until the new Congress counts those ballots on January the 6th. | ||
| Now, it's usually a straightforward process, but let's say one of the candidates questions the legitimacy of the state's count. | ||
| The governor could choose not to certify the elector's votes. | ||
| Or, though this is really unlikely, the state legislature could decide to contest the election and send a different count to Congress, meaning Congress could end up with no results or with competing results from the same state. | ||
| Now, that's a violation of federal law, so Congress would no longer have to honor that state's electors at all. | ||
| Now, the House and the Senate can then decide which result is valid or throw out the votes from that state altogether. | ||
| Now, I know you think I'm crazy, but this actually happened. | ||
| It was 1876, shortly after the Civil War. | ||
| Samuel Tilden won the popular vote, but there were 19 electoral votes in dispute. | ||
| Congress had to step in and broker a compromise. | ||
| Rutherford Hayes was eventually named president in exchange for the end of Reconstruction and the withdrawal of federal troops from the South. | ||
| Here's where things get even more interesting. | ||
| If a candidate still doesn't have a majority of electoral votes by the end of this process, the 12th Amendment says the House of Representatives decides who will be president, and each state delegation gets one vote. | ||
| The Senate picks the vice president. | ||
| No matter what happens, somebody has got to take the oath of office on January 20th. | ||
| So help me God. If both the president and the vice president are still undecided, the Speaker of the House temporarily gets that job. | ||
| So again, what President Trump was attempting to do was perfectly constitutional, perfectly valid, and would have worked if not for the instigation of a riot on January 6th. | ||
| They caused a bunch of people that were going to lodge complaints like Ted Cruz to withdraw their complaints and instead certify the election despite knowing that there were major questions about the election. | ||
| And in fact... Mike Pence was one of these. | ||
| I just put in a video from Mike Pence on January 4th. | ||
| Maybe we'll get back to that. | ||
| But I do want to go to Sean's call before we do, because I know this is what he wants to talk about. | ||
| Trump's attorney, perhaps a former attorney, talks about how this could actually backfire as all of the claims of voter fraud that were prevented from being adjudicated or looked into... | ||
| In 2020, might now be reopened as because of this case, his lawyers now have subpoena power to actually demand some of the evidence that was withheld in 2020. | ||
| So let's go now to clip number seven. | ||
| Here's Trump's attorney. What's the pushback to that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Very easy and very simple. | |
| It's not just issues of fraud, it's also the fact that procedures were changed. | ||
| Undeniably so, that procedures at the state level were changed without the ability of the legislature to weigh in. | ||
| And what President Trump was raising when he asked Vice President Pence to send it back to the state legislatures was to give the legislature in each state of those contested states one last chance to make a determination because the reality is that the state legislatures in every state has the ultimate responsibility for qualifying electors. | ||
| So what Mr. Trump did was exactly constitutionally precise and in order. | ||
| There was nothing legal about that and he was required. | ||
| To take steps as President of the United States to ensure that that election was held in a valid way. | ||
| All of that now is being criminalized. | ||
| The one thing I will say though, in 2020, Mr. | ||
| Trump's campaign had a few weeks to gear up and present evidence and it was very difficult. | ||
| We now have the ability in this case to issue our own subpoenas and we will re-litigate every single issue in the 2020 election in the context of this litigation. | ||
| It gives President Trump an opportunity that he has never had before, which is to have subpoena power since January 6th in a way that can be exercised in federal court. | ||
| So there you go. Indictment of Donald Trump is a terribly tragic day and shows speech now criminalized. | ||
| That according to the Trump attorney as well. | ||
| So they may actually be able to go back and look at some of these claims because, again, if the 2020 election was fraudulent, which it was undeniably, I mean, we have all the proof of the fraudulent stuff, but also just the imposition of mail-in ballots itself was done outside constitutional authority. | ||
| Should not have been counted. | ||
| Should not have been allowed. I mean, they just say, like, well, it was an emergency, so we did it anyway. | ||
| That's not an excuse. | ||
| If you can prove the election was fraudulent, then none of this indictment makes any sense whatsoever. | ||
| Let's go to Sean in California. | ||
| Sean, what is your comment on this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Morning, Harrison. Am I coming in clear today? | |
| Yes, sir. Awesome. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| First, I want to comment that Judge Tanya, I can't even pronounce her last name at the moment. | ||
| I don't know if you've seen her publicity photo, but she's got some crazy eyes like Brian Stelter does. | ||
| So I'm not saying I wouldn't pick her for a babysitter, but I definitely would keep her away from kids. | ||
| You know what I mean? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Take a look at that photo. | |
| Look at the eyes. | ||
| It's always in the eyes, like they say in Scarface. | ||
| And you're correct in bringing up Trump's defense attorney talking about litigating the election. | ||
| They haven't been able to get any of this evidence into the court. | ||
| Now Donald Trump can use all of this evidence that's been collected over the last, what, three years, two years as his defense. | ||
| And there's another thing that we're missing out on, the documents scandal of him having documents supposedly relating to Iran. | ||
| What if he happened to get a hold of those because maybe it had something to do with somebody who sent pallets of cash over to Iran and has loose ties to the Muslim Brotherhood? | ||
| Would be a shame if those documents were also made public in that particular trial. | ||
| So I'm not saying there's sporty chess going on, but in terms of discovery, Trump has the Trump cards this time. | ||
| It could be very interesting moving forward. | ||
| And again, even if he's convicted, he can still be elected president. | ||
| And that'd be kind of awesome, running from prison. | ||
| So this could not be as bad as it seems at the moment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. Welcome back, folks. | |
| American Journal, InfoWars.com, InfoWarsStore.com is where you go to support this outlet as we have been We're really on the forefront of the election fraud coverage and absolutely everything else. | ||
| And of course, we also are paying the price for January 6th as the investigation has attempted to portray Infowars as... | ||
| Some sort of instigators in a coup, and they're attempting to use that, as well as other lawfare means to bring us down. | ||
| So please do support us, as we've paid the price for our support, and we only ask that you help to undo some of the persecution against us by going to infowarshow.com and keeping us on the air. | ||
| I'll go out to your phone calls here again shortly. | ||
| We'll be joined by Tyler Nixon at 10.30 Central Time to discuss what's going on here. | ||
| But I want to do a couple things. | ||
| First, I want to read this statement by Vivek Ramaswamy. | ||
| Somebody reposted this saying, with this action that Vivek did, he has done more than the entirety of the Republican Congress himself. | ||
| Vivek Ramaswamy says, I'm also filing a separate FOIA request with the DOJ to uncover any similar communications relating to the just issued January 6th Trump indictment. | ||
| We should demand accountability and transparency. | ||
| In U.S. v. Alvarez, he says,"...the Supreme Court held that political candidates have a First Amendment right to knowingly make inaccurate statements. | ||
| If you're going to indict a former president and leading presidential candidate, it better not be based on unprecedented legal theory. | ||
| Further, it's more than a stretch to call something criminal if somebody is seeking legal counsel from their own lawyers." Jack Smith has created a dangerous precedent by criminalizing the behavior of Trump's lawyers who offered him legal advice, labeling them co-conspirators instead. | ||
| This jeopardizes the future of our legal system. | ||
| If we fail to admit the truth, January 6th will be just a preview of far worse to come. | ||
| We must reunite in this country, but the path forward will not be easy. | ||
| And you have to agree with that. | ||
| Now, in the indictment, they routinely mention... | ||
| January 6th being the time that certification is supposed to happen or the time when you're supposed to lodge complaints. | ||
| And they repeatedly and only refer to Vice President Pence as a ceremonial role. | ||
| Every time they mention Vice President Pence in his role as President of the Senate, they reassert that it's somehow a ceremonial role. | ||
| He doesn't actually have any power, which is false and wrong and unconstitutional. | ||
| But they keep asserting that. | ||
| And of course, Mike Pence himself has come out and made statements basically against Donald Trump, saying that, well, if anybody puts themselves above—this is Mike Pence's statement here— Mike Pence today issued the following statement on the news of former President Trump's indictment. | ||
| Today's indictment serves as an important reminder. | ||
| Reminder, anyone who puts himself over the Constitution should never be president of the United States. | ||
| Saying, I will have more to say about the government's case after reviewing the indictment. | ||
| The former president is entitled to the presumption of innocence, but with this indictment, his candidacy means more talk about January 6th and more distractions, as if that's his fault. | ||
| As if him being charged for this, it's somehow his fault that it's being brought up. | ||
| Ridiculous. And traitorous. | ||
| And weaselly and transparent and political suicide for that matter. | ||
| But that's not what he was saying back on the days before January 6th. | ||
| In fact, here is Mike Pence two days before the insurrection telling Trump supporters, telling the American people that he knows that there are questions about fraud in the 2020 election. | ||
| And that on January 6th, they will bring these up, contest them, investigate them, and making all the promises that he now says make you ineligible to be president. | ||
| Here is Mike Pence on January 4th, 2021. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, I know we all got our doubts about the last election. | |
| Oh, do we? And I want to assure you, I share the concerns of millions of Americans about voting irregularities. | ||
| Interesting. And I promise you, come this Wednesday... | ||
| We'll have our day in Congress. | ||
| We'll hear the objections. | ||
| We'll hear the evidence. | ||
| But tomorrow is Georgia's day. | ||
| So there you go. Vice President Pence two days before January 6th promising that on January 6th they would hear the objection, they would have their day in Congress to resolve these obvious inconsistencies in the 2020 election. | ||
| Quite a bit of a change in tune. | ||
| Why is he not being charged as well? | ||
| That's a good question, isn't it? | ||
| So before we go out to your phone calls, I want to just play two videos because this indictment routinely again asserts that the 2020 election was totally valid. | ||
| And they even mention, he says, that President Trump spread lies about election fraud, including dozens of specific claims that there had been substantial fraud in certain states, such as that large numbers of dead, non-resident, non-citizen or otherwise ineligible voters had been cast or the voting machines non-citizen or otherwise ineligible voters had been cast or the voting machines had changed votes for the defendant to votes They say these claims were false and the defendant knew they were false. | ||
| And they talk about how they were using mail-in ballot as an excuse to question the legitimacy of the election. | ||
| Now, I made a little compilation months before the election of 2020. | ||
| And again, the point of this is to show you the overwhelming number of inconsistencies, questionable events, proven voter fraud that occurred in the months leading up to the election because of the mail-in ballots. | ||
| And you see just a bunch of headlines flash on the screen. | ||
| Feel free to pause at any point. | ||
| Read the article. Every single one of them is a different case. | ||
| Every single one of them is a different piece of evidence from across the country of the thousands and thousands and thousands of Exactly what he said. | ||
| Dead people receiving ballots, non-residents receiving ballots, people finding pallets of ballots on the side of the road being discarded after having been filled out. | ||
| So, again, you won't be able to read all these headlines, but you'll get a good image of just how messed up this electoral system was by the actions of the Democrats, the actions of the lockdowners, the actions of the corporate masters like Zuckerberg as they poured millions of dollars into this mail-in ballot scam that actually undermined our election, that actually created the chaos and division that they're now blaming on Donald Trump. | ||
| Here is a little video I did called Mail-in Ballots are Totally Legit and There's Nothing Wrong. | ||
| You have been charging for months that mail-in balloting is going to be a disaster. | ||
| You say it's rigged, that it's going to lead to fraud. | ||
| This is going to be a fraud like you've never seen. | ||
| 100,000 ballots were rejected, FBI founds mail-in ballots in the trash, mailed to a cat, that guy was convicted, 50,000 double voters, 140,000 receive absentee ballots, just goes on and on. | ||
| There's an infinite number of stories with thousands of ballots, each one, tens of thousands in some cases. | ||
| Every single one of these is some massive issue with mail-in ballots that they are now saying were totally false and that Trump knew they were false, even though they're totally real and these are all mainstream media articles. | ||
| 100% mainstream media. | ||
| Memory sticks stolen. | ||
| Ballasting. 18,000, 7,000, 100,000, 110,000, 200,000. | ||
| I mean, every single one of these stories is unique. | ||
| Every single one of these stories is a different story. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is a horrible thing for our country. This is not going to end well. | |
| So there you go. They claim that these statements are all totally false when I just showed you a compilation of about 120 stories. | ||
| Mainstream media articles talking about the problems with mail-in ballots. | ||
| They created this issue. They created this problem. | ||
| But as a final thing, I want to go to clip number four here. | ||
| Start at 8.51. This is an audio recording of vote counters in Detroit being trained to cheat in the mail-in election. | ||
| Let's watch. It says, step six, count challenged ballots, destroy provisional ballots. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What do you notice about his name? | |
| What's the red flag? | ||
| This is a training course that ballot observers went through. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sense and receive. | |
| Do not what? Do not issue him a ballot. | ||
| Mr. Allen, we haven't received your ballot. | ||
| Thank you very much for voting. | ||
| Would you like I wrote a sticker? | ||
| Right? He's already voted. | ||
| There's no reason for him to vote again. | ||
| At all. | ||
| Ever. That day. | ||
| He's done. But what if he gets what? | ||
| Loud, rude, rude. | ||
| That's not me! I didn't vote! | ||
| I want to vote! | ||
| And just ask the purists, right? | ||
| What can you do? | ||
| Your chairperson can issue him what type of ballot? | ||
| A provisional. A provisional envelope. | ||
| Why? Where's it going? | ||
| Not in the tabulator. | ||
| Not in the tabulator. | ||
| It's going in that envelope, right? | ||
| Mm-hmm. We have how many days? | ||
| Six. We'll pick this up on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. Welcome back, folks. | |
| Third hour's begun. We'll go out to your phone call shortly. | ||
| This is the time to relitigate the 2020 election and point out all the fraudulent things. | ||
| But I just want to choose one example because it relates to many of the claims made in this indictment. | ||
| Again, they assert or assume, they claim that the 2020 election was totally valid and all the claims that mail-in balloting created the atmosphere where fraud was not just possible but undetectable. | ||
| And this is one of the cases of... | ||
| How fraud took place. So I want you to understand what you're listening to here. | ||
| This is an actual recording in Detroit training the ballot counters in that area. | ||
| And this whole video is about 12 minutes long. | ||
| We're just playing a minute or so of it. | ||
| But earlier in the video, they actually explained to the poll workers that if somebody is watching what you're doing and you don't want them to watch what you're doing, claim that they're too close, that they're violating COVID safe distancing rules, and you can actually summon the security guard and kick out the poll observer so they're no longer watching what you're doing. | ||
| They actually explained to them how to do that and how to avoid oversight by abusing the COVID rules. | ||
| But that's just part of it. | ||
| What you're hearing here is them explaining that Now, we know the mail-in ballots were sent out in batches, absentee ballots sent out to anybody and everybody, sometimes to the wrong address, sometimes people that were supposed to get it didn't get it, they didn't request it, they didn't know they were getting it. | ||
| So what they're addressing is the question of what happens when somebody comes in, says, I want to vote, you look and it shows that you already have a mail-in ballot received for them. | ||
| Well, if you already have a mail-in ballot received, you're supposed to tell them, oh, we already have your ballot, you don't need to vote in person. | ||
| But then they say, what happens if that person goes, no, I didn't send in a mail-in ballot? | ||
| So what happens if Harrison Smith goes to the poll and goes, hi, I'd like to vote, and they say, oh, Harrison Smith, you already voted. | ||
| And I go, no, I didn't. I didn't vote. | ||
| I did not send in a mail-in ballot. | ||
| I didn't want to send in a mail-in ballot. | ||
| I didn't send one in. What they do at that point is let you think that you're voting in person and then destroy the ballot that you did in person in favor of the mail-in ballot that the person who's voting claims they never sent in. | ||
| Blatant fraud. This is how it worked. | ||
| They sent out mail-in ballots to anybody or everybody. | ||
| You could just go into your neighbor's mailbox, steal their mail-in ballot, fill it out, vote for Joe Biden, send it back in. | ||
| Then when your neighbor goes in to vote... | ||
| In person, they trick that person to thinking they're voting in person when really they're counting the fraudulent ballot that they received in the mail weeks earlier. | ||
| That's literally what they're training people to do here. | ||
| So let's go back to the video. We can rewind it just a little bit. | ||
| You hear them say, if they keep saying, I never voted. | ||
| I haven't voted. That's not my vote. | ||
| I never mailed in a ballot. | ||
| What are you supposed to do? You give them a provisional ballot, you let them fill it out, and then you destroy it. | ||
| And you count the vote that they say they never made. | ||
| Insane, but this is really the training. | ||
| This is the audio. This is evidence. | ||
| This is not speculation. This is not what if. | ||
| This is how it worked. Let's go back to the video. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We have how many days? | |
| Six. So what is the Department of Elections going to do with it? | ||
| Destroy it. | ||
| That's it. Destroy it. | ||
| We can take it down. We can take down the video. | ||
| Has that ever been adjudicated? | ||
| Has that ever been looked into? | ||
| How many people in Detroit or anywhere else where these training instructions were sent out to went in to vote in person having never sent in a mail-in ballot only to be told somebody already voted for you And if they got mad, if they got loud, if they said, that's not fair, I never sent in a mail-in ballot. | ||
| Whoever's mail-in ballot you have, it's not mine. | ||
| I never sent one in. | ||
| And they say, okay, well, we get it, sir. | ||
| You never sent in a mail-in ballot. | ||
| Well, here, have a provisional ballot. | ||
| We'll send this one in. So the person goes, okay, thank you. | ||
| My God. They go. | ||
| They vote. They fill out the provisional ballot. | ||
| They give it back. The poll worker goes, thank you for your vote, sir. | ||
| Here's a sticker. And then they trash the provisional ballot they just filled in. | ||
| Training deception. | ||
| Training the poll workers to lie to the voters and to accept the unverified, unverifiable mail-in ballots over the in-person vote. | ||
| So again, all of what's going on with this indictment is predicated on the election being legitimate. | ||
| That is just what we just showed you is real first-hand eyewitness recorded audio evidence of just one of the ways that the mail-in ballot system allowed for fraud. | ||
| Never investigated. | ||
| Never saw that on mainstream media. | ||
| It's real. It's the actual training that the poll workers went through. | ||
| Any claim that this election was legitimate is undeniably false, and that destroys their entire narrative. | ||
| All right, ladies and gentlemen, we'll go out to your phone calls now. | ||
| We'll be joined by Tyler Nixon midway through this hour. | ||
| Remember to go to InfoWarsStore.com not just to support this outlet, which is unflinchingly Told the truth about the 2020 election. | ||
| In the face of all the attacks that we've been under, we will continue to champion the truth. | ||
| But also because the products at InfoWars store are awesome and very good for you. | ||
| And a fantastic price with the new Christmas Savings in August sale. | ||
| We're getting up to 60% off our bombshell products, including Vitamin Mineral Fusion, which has been out for months. | ||
| A fan favorite that is finally back. | ||
| Secure yours today and maybe stock up because we don't know when this is going to sell out. | ||
| Vitamin Mineral Fusion, an incredible combination of your daily vitamins, You know, amount of vitamins for everything from vitamin A, C, D, E, K, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, vitamin B12. You're getting, in the case of vitamin B12, you're getting 4,000% or more of your daily value that you need. | ||
| Vitamin Mineral Fusion, an incredible product. | ||
| I know people have been eager to have back on the shelf. | ||
| Well, it's back. Get it now at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| With that, we go out to your phone calls. | ||
| Let's go to... Robert in Brooklyn. | ||
| Robert in Brooklyn wants to talk about the Trump indictment, saying the judge is the worst. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. Robert, you're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. Hi. Good morning. | |
| Morning. Just a few points. | ||
| First of all, this Rebic Ramaswamy, he on Friday, apparently around Friday, he seems to say that we should re-enter the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the TPPP. That's not very good. | ||
| But the other thing is with this... | ||
| This Tanya Chutkin, whatever her name is, a Washington, D.C., judge, the chief nerd, he tweeted out that this judge had imposed sentences on January 6th protesters even worse than the prosecution had asked for. | ||
| So this is horrible, and the idea that anything good is going to come out of it is very unlikely, including in discovery, because this judge just seems to be ridiculous. | ||
| But I will say this. | ||
| Although I hope that Robert Kennedy or Donald Trump become the next president, if Donald Trump, because of this horrible kangaroo situation in Washington, D.C., goes to jail, to a certain extent, he has to look in the mirror because he didn't issue a pardon in his last week in office to all the J6 people. | ||
| He should have issued a pardon. | ||
| Now, you know, that doesn't mean he deserves to be screwed like this. | ||
| But to a certain extent, he should have known better. | ||
| This cognitive dissonance that he had, for example, his support of the capital punishment for people convicted of dealing drugs, when you have such a corrupt judicial system, there's no integrity. | ||
| So it's just this cognitive dissonance. | ||
| You know, maybe if he's in jail, maybe he'll improve his attitude. | ||
| He'll issue pardons, he'll clean up the judicial system, and he'll do what he said he was going to do in terms of draining his wealth. | ||
| I get it, yeah. Hindsight is 20-20. | ||
| I'm sure he would have made a lot of different decisions if he could go back in time. | ||
| I don't doubt that for a second. | ||
| But you also remember he was being impeached over it. | ||
| Like, the first thing that happened with January 6th was that in the week afterwards, he was being impeached for it. | ||
| So, you know, politically, he was under a lot of pressure from that and from some other things. | ||
| I mean, they were trying to send him to jail a week after this. | ||
| So... I don't know. | ||
| Hindsight's 20-20, sure. | ||
| Maybe going back, you would have done something like that. | ||
| At the time, we had no idea the extent to which January 6th would be used to destroy the conservative MAGA movement in America. | ||
| That's something that you only have with hindsight. | ||
| Going back in time was the wrong decision, I guess, but at the time... | ||
| It was understandable why he would choose the path that he took. | ||
| So I'd be a little bit more forgiving on the guy since you're operating from knowledge three years after the fact. | ||
| But thank you for your call, Robert. | ||
| I do appreciate it, and I agree with you about the judge for sure. | ||
| Let's go now to Dean in Florida. | ||
| You want to talk about the insurrection in Donald Trump? | ||
| Go ahead, Dean. You're on the air. Hi, how are you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good, thank you. Hi, so I wanted to talk about the fact that Trump is being insurrected unfairly because he's done nothing wrong, but I can tell, I mean, all these old cases basically just files everywhere. | |
| There's, like, people lying, people, you know, manipulating. | ||
| It's Washington, all a bunch of babies. | ||
| But my question is, if all of this passes and he becomes president, what is next on the fight for America? | ||
| because after he's been persecuted as president, he's been really under-scrutinized for a reason because he's done nothing wrong. | ||
| And, you know, what his next premier graph is? | ||
| I mean, ideally... | ||
| What the Republicans always say is they're always like, well, the Democrats shouldn't do this because they wouldn't like it if it was done to them. | ||
| We should do it to them. Ideally, Trump would get into office and just use all of the incredible precedent that these people have set with the January 6th commission and calling Americans the number one terror threat and sending the FBI and the DOJ after innocent people. | ||
| Every one of these things that they're doing, they're forging a weapon against us. | ||
| But if Trump gets back into office and actually has the support of the Congress and the people... | ||
| All of these weapons could be turned against the Democrats and utterly decimate them because they actually are guilty of the things that they're claiming we're guilty of. | ||
| So it could be an amazing thing if he used the same language that Jack Smith is using to go after him, to in turn go after Hillary Clinton and Adam Schiff and everybody else. | ||
| Adam Schiff spent three years saying that Russia collusion was real while being told in closed-door meetings that there was no evidence of it. | ||
| How is that not conspiracy to defraud the United States? | ||
| Joe Biden told America during the 2020 presidential debate that the story of his son's laptop was Russian disinformation when it was his campaign that fed those false claims to the media. | ||
| How is that not conspiracy to defraud the United States? | ||
| If Trump can get through this and actually become president, he has been given a raft of weapons, an entire armory of weapons to absolutely decimate the deep state and destroy his political opponents. | ||
| So that would be the pie-in-the-sky best-case scenario. | ||
| But it's absolutely possible, and you would hope that after being through what he's been through, Trump wouldn't have the delusion of bipartisanship that he went into 2016 with. | ||
| So that would be my answer to that. | ||
| Thank you for the call, Dean. Let's go to Tomahawk in Texas. | ||
| Tomahawk, you have a poem for us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead, Tomahawk. Hello, Harrison. | |
| Am I coming in loud and clear? | ||
| Loud and clear. Thanks for calling. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. My poem is called When I Go to Heaven, What You'll Tell God. | |
| So it goes like this. | ||
| I voted for Trump. | ||
| I have faith in Trump, even though he ran Operation Warp Speed, and I created the shot to genetically modify your creation. | ||
| I had faith in Trump, even though he said Ghislaine Maxwell was a fine woman and was on Epstein's flight log six times. | ||
| I lived and breathed the mainstream news and commented on how dumb they were every day and how the left are the arbiters of all evil, and the answer was to vote for Trump. | ||
| I triumphantly revealed how the elections were rigged, And the answer is to vote in the rigged system for Trump, who didn't pardon the thousands of imprisoned peaceful protesters on January 6th or Julian Assange when he could have, but I have faith he will do it next time if we elect him. | ||
| I preached against the global leaders while simultaneously supporting the Trump family, who are members of the global leaders, and praised Russia's Putin Who is also an admitted global leader, because in my ideology, whatever the left hates, I praise, which makes me unbrainwashable because I love Trump. | ||
| I praise Elon Musk for owning Twitter and letting me on there, and even though he wants to entrap the minds of all humans with genetic modification and neural link and everything else, then wears the Batman shield proudly. | ||
| I have faith in him because he says there are two genders and lets me on the DARPA-created Twitter. | ||
| I feel the tension to Republicans who don't do anything for the people, but they do hate the left like me, on Fox News anyways. | ||
| And even though I know it's a uniparty, it's lesser of two evils on TV. So that's my team, and I fight for them. | ||
| Wow, amazing. It's incredible. | ||
| You've said nothing that we haven't heard a 10,000 times, Tomahawk. | ||
| Congratulations. You've brought up a bunch of petulant nonsense that completely fails to take into account the wider attack that we're under and the fact that supporting somebody for president, especially when they're under a concerted and relentless attack from the deep state, is somehow... | ||
| Being brainwashed? No, it's amazing. | ||
| Wow, he said Ghislaine Maxwell, nice lady. | ||
| Well, throw him in the gulag then. | ||
| I mean, he's burning in hell, I'm sure, because he said, yeah, Ghislaine Maxwell, she's fine. | ||
| Oh, my God. | ||
| Oh, he invented the DNA, even though it just would have come out anyway, and he really had nothing to do with it and was taking credit for something that he wasn't actually involved in. | ||
| So, incredible, Tom Hawk. | ||
| Wow, I'm blown away. You've opened my eyes. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| We'll be joined shortly by Tyler Nixon to discuss the Trump indictment. | ||
| I want to share some other thoughts about the Trump indictment here. | ||
| This is from Martyr Made. | ||
| On Twitter, he says, That is absolutely correct. | ||
| Victor Davis Hanson. | ||
| Noted historian says this. | ||
| Special counsel Jack Smith added new indictments against Donald Trump, among them conspiratorially, unlawfully discounting legitimate votes. | ||
| Was Smith here referencing Stacey Abrams, who for years claimed she was the real governor of Georgia, barnstorming the country to overturn the vote count? | ||
| Or maybe Smith referred to ex-President Jimmy Carter. | ||
| He discounted the 2016 vote by claiming Trump won only due to the Russians. | ||
| Or did Smith mean Hillary Clinton, who discounted Trump as an illegitimate president, prompting her to join the, quote, resistance against an elected president? | ||
| Or maybe Smith meant the Hollywood crowd, who cut commercials after the 2016 election, begging viewers to pressure the electors to refuse their constitutional duties to honor their state's popular vote and instead, in insurrectionary fashion, vote for Hillary Clinton? | ||
| Or was Smith thinking about the 32 Democrat House members in Senate... | ||
| Senator Barbara Boxer in January 2005 who tried to toss out the legally certified vote in Ohio to swing the election to John Kerry. | ||
| Or maybe Smith was referring to Molly Ball's 2021 time essay where she bragged of the 2020 cabal and conspiracy hatched by Democrats, Silicon Valley and corporatists to spend half a billion dollars to change state voting laws, censor the news, modulate the 2020 street protest and absorb the work of state precinct workers. | ||
| Was he? I don't know. | ||
| He wasn't talking about any of those things. | ||
| No, it's only illegal when Trump does it, even when he doesn't do it. | ||
| Even when he actually didn't carry this out. | ||
| Again, I don't know. I don't know what people's perception. | ||
| I don't know. I don't know how you're so short-sighted. | ||
| To think that what's happening here is some sort of game? | ||
| To think that, like, you think Trump is in on this? | ||
| You think Trump is not the real deal? | ||
| I mean, you hear the same things about Infowars, which is why it's so annoying to hear this, where it's just like, You're under attack from the most powerful forces in the entire world. | ||
| You are left with a seemingly hopeless situation in which you can't vote your way out of it, but you sure as hell can't fight your way out of it. | ||
| You're not about to go to war with the most powerful and invasive deep state spy apparatus and military institution the world has ever seen. | ||
| So, I mean, what's the hope here? | ||
| To be under attack like this, and then to have people blame you for it, have people claim that this is somehow a big charade, that things are not as they seem. | ||
| It's just like, sometimes, folks, things are just as they seem. | ||
| Sometimes. What other... | ||
| What outcome would you expect if you have a true outsider? | ||
| If Trump is the real deal and actually an outsider, actually a threat to the establishment, actually represents a populist uprising against the entrenched, deep state, unelected globalists that run our country, how would you expect things to roll out? | ||
| Because I would expect things to roll out exactly as they are rolling out. | ||
| I mean, I've been debating this since 2016 with people going, you really think Trump's the real deal? | ||
| And it's like, well, let's see. | ||
| If somebody could represent a threat to the system, who would they have to be? | ||
| They would have to be super rich so they could fund their own campaign without corporate donors. | ||
| They'd have to have name recognition across the country already established. | ||
| They would have to have a network through their business ties to influential organizations People around the country. | ||
| I mean, it's Trump. | ||
| Without Trump, there'd be nobody else that could pose a threat to the establishment like he has. | ||
| So I don't, you know, just play it out in your mind. | ||
| What would happen if it was a legitimate threat to the establishment versus what would happen if he was somehow playing a part of their game? | ||
| We know what it's like when he plays a part of their game because Barack Obama would be a good example of that. | ||
| Claim to Be a lot of the same things Trump was, right? | ||
| Claimed that he would stop the wars, claimed that he would stop the abuses of the federal government on the American people, and he gets into office and he just becomes a hero of the establishment as he conforms completely to the deep state agenda and carries it out more effectively than almost anybody else before him. | ||
| If Trump was not the real deal, that's what would have happened. | ||
| Do you think the FBI... Likes being exposed like this? | ||
| Do you think they like having everybody realize that they are completely fraudulent and fabricate FISA warrants and lie about really important things during presidential elections to benefit one candidate over another? | ||
| Like, do you think they like being exposed like this? | ||
| That's all part of the plan. | ||
| Some things are just as they seem sometimes. | ||
| I don't understand why that's so hard for people to understand. | ||
| In other cases, I don't understand, like, the vaccine thing, man. | ||
| It's like, where were you in 2020? | ||
| Were you around? | ||
| Were you paying attention? You know that every time Trump got up and took credit for the vaccine, we had Infowars, knowing long ahead of anybody how dangerous the vaccine was, what an obvious plot, The whole thing was, and Trump would get up and take credit for it, and nobody cared because it wasn't actually him. | ||
| He was taking credit for something he actually had nothing to do with. | ||
| Nobody knew that. He's forgotten that, apparently. | ||
| Okay. The only thing he did... | ||
| When it comes to the vaccine is he stopped them from withholding it until Biden got into office. | ||
| That's all he did. Nothing else would have changed. | ||
| Nothing else would have been different except that America would have been several months further down the line of economic destruction as people were too scared to go back to work without a vaccine. | ||
| Something that Trump didn't do that the mainstream media did. | ||
| Trump the entire time was telling people don't be scared of the virus. | ||
| Don't shut down your state. | ||
| Don't stop working. | ||
| Again, it's bizarre. | ||
| It is truly bizarre. | ||
| People's interpretation of what's going on in the world. | ||
| Completely divorced from reality. | ||
| But that's fine. | ||
| We're going to be joined by Tyler Nixon on the other side. | ||
| Go to Infowarsstore.com to support this actually independent free speech network. | ||
| Christmas savings in August. | ||
| You're getting up to 60% off all of the incredible products we have, including vitamin mineral fusion, which is now 25% off and back in stock after months of being unavailable. | ||
| Secure your vitamin mineral fusion today at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Pick up some Silver Bullet while you're there, too. | ||
| We'll be right back with Tyler Nixon. | ||
| We'll be joined shortly by Tyler Nixon to discuss the Trump indictment. | ||
| What effect will this have on the wider populace? | ||
| Street journalist Shane Ritchie went out to ask folks on the street how this would affect their support for Trump. | ||
| Let's go to clip number eight here. | ||
| This is from Shaney Rich. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you think that Trump should be indicted for the third time? | |
| Hell no. Why? Because, like, my people f*** with him. | ||
| A lot of people are saying that it's like a witch hunt. | ||
| Do you agree with that? Hell yeah. | ||
| Do you think that they're just doing this because he's too popular and he's going to beat Biden? | ||
| Yeah, hell yeah, for sure. Everybody's going to vote for Trump. | ||
| You think he won 2020? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. Oh, my mama, everybody. | |
| My grandma voted for Trump. | ||
| Everybody's going to vote for Trump. Oh, so you're saying Trump 2024. | ||
| Definitely Trump 2024. | ||
| Why do you think they're trying to destroy him? | ||
| Pretty incredible stuff. There's a lot of videos like that. | ||
| I want to go now to this video. | ||
| This is from today on CNN. Trump's attorney making statements about the new indictment. | ||
| If we have that video, let's go to that now. | ||
| CNN not ready for Trump's attorney. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What was not true? | |
| That there were states where ballots were sent out without people asking for them, where there were changes in verification, where there were instances where ballots were not being supervised at drop-off places. | ||
| The president was told, given advice, that under these circumstances, the state legislatures have the ultimate ability to qualify electors. | ||
| He followed that advice. | ||
| Now, you may disagree as to whether or not those things actually occurred or not. | ||
| That's why we have political debate. | ||
| We don't have criminal trials over that. | ||
| We have the discussion like we're just having. | ||
| But it matters if those things actually occurred or not, John. | ||
| Not under the First Amendment. But it matters if those things actually occurred because... | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not at all, because under the First Amendment... | |
| It does matter if there was actually fraud. No, the First Amendment allows... | ||
| But, John, let me stop you there, because if he's saying that there was fraud, the First Amendment doesn't allow the President of the United States to go and claim there was fraud when he was told there was not fraud and then try to subvert the election by overturning legitimate electors. | ||
| I mean, it says it right here in the actual indictment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. The First Amendment protects all speech. | |
| If we're going to have a... A situation where the Department of Justice is going to fact-check politicians and indict politicians for political speech and whether or not they're factually accurate, then this country will shut down politically because it's a never-ending cycle of tit-for-tat. | ||
| And that's the risk of injecting politics into the criminal justice system. | ||
| So right now, people disagree with President Trump. | ||
| What's going to happen four years from now if somebody disagrees with President Biden in terms of what he said during the election? | ||
| That's why we don't criminalize political speech. | ||
| Political speech under the First Amendment has an almost absolute protection. | ||
| Nobody gets to judge whether it's True or not, except the American people. | ||
| And we do that in an election. | ||
| We do that in an election. | ||
| We do that, in the case of a president, by impeachment. | ||
| but we don't indict people. | ||
| He's exactly right, of course. | ||
| And as we've been pointing out throughout the show today, if you were to actually apply this standard across the board, The only people really blatantly guilty of this would be the Clintons and the Obamas and the Comeys for spreading the Russia collusion narrative. | ||
| Joe Biden for his claims about his business dealings with Hunter Biden and the Hunter Biden laptop and the 51 intelligence community agents who claimed that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation. | ||
| I mean, all of those are provably and have been proven to be total knowing willful falsehoods. | ||
| But Trump's the only one who's... | ||
| being indicted for claims that weren't even false to begin with as we pointed out a million times you don't even have to prove fraud when it comes to voting the fact that there was no chain of custody alone Is enough to throw the votes out and to question them and to challenge them, just like you can't convict somebody on a murder charge without a chain of custody when it comes to the evidence that you present in court. | ||
| If ballots just show up one day and you have no idea where they came from or who sent them or any way to validate them, they should not and cannot be counted, but they were anyway. | ||
| So with that, we bring on our guest, Tyler Nixon, political strategist. | ||
| He is, of course, an Army veteran, constitutionalist, a counsel at law, and political strategist focused on various causes of liberty. | ||
| You can follow him on Twitter at RealTylerNixon. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us, Tyler. | ||
| Harrison, it's great to be with you. | ||
| Great to be back on InfoWars. | ||
| Well, just give me your reaction. | ||
| Give me your breakdown. When you saw this Trump indictment, what was your takeaway? | ||
| Not surprised, but no less outraged and disgusted beyond belief at this pustule Jack Smith. | ||
| I mean, this is like—I don't know what nerd farm they harvested these law school rejects from, who are complete zealots and have an axe to grind with the world and are willing to subvert— The very foundations, frankly. | ||
| I mean, Jack Smith is a jackhammer on the foundations of this republic and the core rights for which this government was promulgated to protect, not least free speech, the ability to state controversial views, and no less from the president, the sitting president of the United States. | ||
| I mean, the indictment is a laughable, political, partisan narrative. | ||
| And, you know, frankly, I very much think that as much—you know, I expect this from these demonic leftist trash from hell. | ||
| And I'm sorry, I just have no—Joe Biden is so disgusting, and these people are just repugnant. | ||
| But it's the Republicans who refuse to stay—I mean, the bill bars of the world, frankly, the— The Chris Christie's, these rhino pustules who have sold the country down the river in their absolute derangement over Donald Trump and their denial of whatever they thought their rights to power, their entitlement to power might be, Mitt Romney and others. | ||
| It is these these quizzling, half-hearted, so-called Republicans who are the problem. | ||
| You know, we need to obviously purge the government as much as possible of the leftist demons. | ||
| But at this point, frankly, I think the battle is within the Republican Party. | ||
| The fact that that Kevin McCarthy could make a statement that, well, we're just going to sort of pursue things. | ||
| There ought to be articles of impeachment voted out of the House today against Merrick Garland and Joe Biden. | ||
| And Jack Smith ought to be also impeached, frankly, and defunded immediately. | ||
| I mean, this is just disgraceful. | ||
| It is no respectable, honest, rational attorney or even, frankly, just an observer, an honest intellectual or just a person with half a brain could look at this alongside, frankly, of the Hunter Biden saga and the Joe Biden—I mean, the fact that these same people who are going after this man, President Trump, On the most contrived phony charges, stacking them up to the tunes of dozens of counts. | ||
| Putting it in a district court where the partisan differential is upwards of, what, 90 percent or so, where he has no chance of a fair trial. | ||
| They know this. And then engineering—and don't tell me this was a random draw of this judge, a black female Obama appointee with an axe to grind who's willing to be the most harsh January 6th sentencing, even though the charges—I mean, don't even—well, Yeah, I'm sorry. I'm really worked up about this because as an attorney and someone who swore an oath in the military as well as as an attorney to the Constitution, I mean— You know, everything's at stake right now, and people need to wake up. | ||
| This isn't just political games at the top. | ||
| This isn't just your usual, oh, you know, it's partisan warfare between—they're all the same in Washington, you know, like the Republicans, they're all the same. | ||
| No, they're not, okay? | ||
| We're dealing with a seditious treasonous in the case of Joe Biden because of his dealings with foreign nations. | ||
| Frankly, a syndicate of criminals that has taken over our government that is no longer our government. | ||
| We have the instrumentalities and the power and the vast resources of this entity that's the administrative state and the U.S. government, but it's no longer controlled by our representatives or people who are legitimate. | ||
| It is controlled by a pack of criminals. | ||
| I don't know how far they think they're going to push it. | ||
| But, you know, they're risking unraveling the fabric of our society. | ||
| And, you know, I think this is what they want, because as you astutely pointed out, or as others have, this is the conditions by which they consolidate their power, by which they further promulgate Draconian, authoritarian laws, totalitarian laws, so-called laws, dictates in order to basically just tyrannize and rule and persecute, further persecute down the line. | ||
| I mean, you know, if they do this to Donald Trump, nobody's— Frankly, Tyler, I think you're being too kind and too soft on these absolute scumbags. | ||
| More on the other side of Tyler Nixon, folks. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. No, I think you're exactly right. | ||
| This really is—this is the struggle of the century. | ||
| Will America be free? | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Final segment of the show, joined by Tyler Nixon at Real Tyler Nixon. | ||
| Tyler, I think you are treating this with the appropriate opprobrium and outrage and vitriol that this deserves. | ||
| It truly is. | ||
| And it's combined with what's happening with the FBI and the censorship and the prosecution of the January 6th prisoners. | ||
| I mean, all of this is combining to present the ultimate conflict in American history. | ||
| That is, who runs our country? | ||
| Is it the duly elected representatives? | ||
| Or are the deep state, permanent, unelected, bureaucratic class operating without any oversight and completely rogue in the manner of the Stasi or the KGB? I mean, they are, obviously. | ||
| And if the Congress can't get a hold on this and the American people can't express their outrage and undo some of this, then that's it for the American experiment. | ||
| We are no longer a republic. | ||
| And I thought one thing you brought up that's important to note in this is this has become again a dividing line. | ||
| It's become a litmus test where you see all of the worst so-called Republicans treating this maybe not celebrating the indictment but treating it as a very serious and important and it deserves the respect as after all we're trying to preserve the constitutionality and And it's people like John Bolton and Mike Pence and Bill Barr and Mitt Romney. | ||
| I mean, this isn't a left and right thing. | ||
| It's not a Republican-Democrat thing. | ||
| It's a globalist establishment control freak tyrant versus populist freedom lover thing. | ||
| So I thought that was an important point that you made. | ||
| Do you want to expand on that a little bit? | ||
| Yeah, I especially want to expand on the total, totally odious Quisling of all Quislings, Mike Pence. | ||
| I mean, you want to, you know, I never liked that guy. | ||
| I feel like Tony Montana. | ||
| I never liked, I never trust that guy. | ||
| I never liked that guy. When he's talking about Sosa, or not Sosa, what's his name? | ||
| Yeah, but you had a bad feeling about Pence from the beginning. | ||
| No, no. I mean, I knew. I knew. | ||
| He is one of these—he was a Bible-thumping phony from Jump Street, and he was foisted on Trump. | ||
| I'm sure it was like, look, we're going to take you down. | ||
| We're not going to—the old sword of Damocles. | ||
| We're not going to have our support. We're going to hamstring you unless you let Pence— Mike Pence, he's a consensus choice. | ||
| As I've said before, I knew for sure exactly what Mike Pence was all about when Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer, in the most grotesque display of disrespect and just totally... | ||
| Juvenile ranker sat there and haggled with Trump in the Oval Office, and Mike Pence sat there like a friggin' statue and didn't say a word. | ||
| He couldn't step up and interject even once to defend the administration, much less the president himself, who was making valid points against these two complete fraud artists, these incumbent, lifer, political trash, who have been dismantling every bit of rule of law and have been behind all this garbage. | ||
| And he sat there stone-faced. | ||
| That tells you what you need to know about Mike Pence right there. | ||
| And frankly, the fact that he could turn around so quickly and not just become not supportive of Trump, but openly I mean, give me a break, Mike Pence. | ||
| You have no chance in hell of getting anywhere near the Republican nomination. | ||
| So it's just a vanity thing. | ||
| Even outside of the political, just on a personal level, what a weasel, what a scumbag, what a stab-in-the-back traitor. | ||
| He gives John Dean a run for his money, honestly. | ||
| And we played the video a little bit earlier where on January 4th, two days before January 6th, he was saying, we'll have our day in Congress and we'll lodge those objections and we'll undo this election that we all know was fraudulent. | ||
| So, I mean, he was a part of this from the beginning. | ||
| I mean, maybe that was it, that they're saying, hey, you made the speech, so you're either on our side or you're going to be with Trump and the defendant. | ||
| So he folded like a... | ||
| Or he's just a pandering cheap politician who does what's in his best interest. | ||
| But I wanted to point out, though, as I mentioned when we were chatting, I have to say Donald Trump, this is a product of the fact that Jared Kushner was too busy foisting pardons for rappers and whoever, and his father, frankly. | ||
| Jared Kushner's father, who was a criminal, got a pardon. | ||
| But all those people who were clearly going to be targeted even before Trump relinquished the presidency, we knew for 14 days, based on their overreaction and the complete ridiculous, you know, the way they had this narrative all ready to go. | ||
| And it was just, oh, sedition, you know, an insurrection and totally over dramatize it. | ||
| He should have known and he should have, frankly, realized and he should have immediately said, you know what, everybody, as I'm leaving, I don't care what, you know, a blanket pardon, anybody who didn't commit a didn't commit a chargeable act against an individual, meaning you assaulted a police officer. | ||
| If you were just simply present, it was a crime of, you know, strict liability or near mere presence caused this or trespassing, whatever, anything below a violent offense against a person that could be said to be a witness, whatever. | ||
| If he pardoned all those people, he wouldn't be where he is today. | ||
| They would have had nothing to go on. | ||
| They would have maybe been outraged and tried to, you know, flail a lot. | ||
| And they might have even still run their January 6th Star Chamber nonsense commission. | ||
| But I don't think they could have. | ||
| I think they've built up this ability now with this judge that he's going to go before, who's been the most harsh, draconian sentence giver of all the judges, right? | ||
| And, you know, it's sort of conditioned them to be ready to just, like— Slam dunk him and put him in prison. | ||
| I mean a former president. I can't even believe I'm saying this. | ||
| These people are truly – I mean they're hell dogs. | ||
| They're just straight out of hell, frankly. | ||
| But I wonder how much effect that would have even had. | ||
| I mean it's a difficult position we're in where we're talking about how to use the legal system where they just run roughshod over the legal – I mean it almost doesn't matter what the – He pardons them for their activity on January 6th, and they go, yeah, well, we used what they did on January 6th to investigate them for this other thing. | ||
| We're going to charge them with that. They have all these ways of working around, and the corruption is so easy for them with the universal and ubiquitous control they have over the mainstream media and the judicial system and the DOJ. I mean, they've got us in advice here. | ||
| I want to ask you—we only have a few minutes left, but this is breaking— As a lawyer, do you think that this is a ray of light, a silver lining to the cloud? | ||
| Could this backfire? And could we actually see Trump have subpoena power and actually get to the bottom of some of these claims that have been ignored by the main You know, I wish, and I refer you to the case of US v. | ||
|
unidentified
|
stone. | |
| We had absolutely evidence from national security officials, former national security officials, lined up to say that the entire Russian collusion, whatever, narrative or allegations was a hoax, that the Democrats, you know, it was an internal leak, whatever have you, to disprove essentially it was an internal leak, whatever have you, to disprove essentially the core, the foundation of the point of having him come in and testify and whatever led to the charges, the so-called what they call process | ||
| Now, Trump, I would say, does have the advantage at least of the fact that the indictment directly touches on and mentions his belief or his thoughts or his motives concerning the election fraud. | ||
| So that does become an issue more so than with Stone, where it was whether or not he made false statements to the committee, not whether their committee's investigation was justified. | ||
| But they're parallel. | ||
| So what happened with Stone? | ||
| But the parallel is this. | ||
| You've got a judge who's just going to, you know, motions in limine are going to be filed by the government. | ||
| They're going to say the election was valid and it's been proven by, you know, it was certified by Congress and therefore it's not in question. | ||
| That's not relevant to the, you know, whether what Donald Trump, but it is relevant and they're not going to be able to get around that so easily. | ||
| But this judge, I guarantee you, will contort herself just as, and frankly, the jury doesn't matter. | ||
| I mean, you know, there's a ray of hope, but with this judge, I wouldn't count on it. | ||
| But it certainly—I mean, the problem is they're going to convict him. | ||
| They might even, you know, sentence him before he even gets to the presidency, and hopefully he could win. | ||
| And, you know, appeals take—I mean, I would hope the U.S. Supreme Court would take up an emergency appeal. | ||
| I would hope that that court would intervene even before this goes anywhere, because it is such a brazen abuse of power. | ||
| The indictment is such an affront to core constitutional rights, and frankly, it's such an absolutely bald-faced attempt to interfere with the election. | ||
| The man is the absolute top contender challenging the sitting president. | ||
| I mean, it is banana republic. | ||
| It's really a black eye on our country. | ||
| I mean, this isn't just, you know, taking out some of his supporters or some of his key allies, going after the man himself with totally contrived charges while they let the criminal president and his, you know, crackhead son run amok and act as like the third or the second defense team for him as they're, quote, negotiating his plea deal, leaving out all of the serious crimes. | ||
| Yeah. And that is, of course, the ultimate irony is that the indictment against Trump for election, you know, interference is itself election interference of the most egregious and obvious form. | ||
| So we're dealing with like levels of irony that are just dizzying. | ||
| And I thank you. | ||
| I think you actually have... | ||
| The absolute appropriate response to this, treating it with, again, the vitriol, the dismissiveness that this truly deserves while addressing and recognizing and appreciating the fact that this really is the ultimate conflict between whether the American people Thank you, | ||
| Tyler Nixon. Follow Tyler Nixon on Twitter at RealTylerNixon. | ||
| and stay tuned to Alex Jones in 90 seconds. | ||
| Alex Jones in 90 seconds. | ||
| They're hitting us with hundreds of chemicals that the EPA has authorized companies and industry to use. | ||
| One of the top pesticides used is atrazine. | ||
| The allowable level the government admits that they allow to be in your water supply is enough to sterilize you and basically turn your sun into a feminized mutant. | ||
| Look it up. Don't let them do this to your family. | ||
| We have the very best gravity-fed filter system out there. | ||
| Highest rated at half the price of leading competitors. | ||
| The Alexa Pure, ready to ship to you right now. | ||
| We have replacement filters for folks who have already gotten it. | ||
| It does 10,000 gallons before you replace them. | ||
| It is amazing. It's great for your home, your business. | ||
| You can put swamp water in it, tap water, well water. | ||
| Almost everything's contaminated. This is how you take control of the fluids in your body and counter the globalist onslaught. | ||
| Get yours today at InfoWorksStore.com for a limited time. | ||
| We're running a 10% discount. | ||
| That is a huge discount to start at the lowest price out there. |
Export Selection