Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
Last month, Yuval Noah Harari, deemed the false prophet of the World Economic Forum, Yuval Noah Harari, deemed the false prophet of the World Economic Forum, predicted that artificial intelligence would be capable of writing a new Bible, not before smearing the Christian Bible as an outdated book with no | ||
You know, the printing press, radio, television, they broadcast, they spread the ideas created by the human brain, by the human mind. | ||
They cannot create a new idea. | ||
You know, Gutenberg printed the Bible in the middle of the 15th century. | ||
The printing press printed as many copies of the Bible as Gutenberg instructed it, but it did not create a single new page. | ||
It had no ideas of its own about the Bible. | ||
Is it good? Is it bad? | ||
How to interpret this? | ||
How to interpret that? A.I. can create new ideas, can even write a new Bible. | ||
He goes on to say that these new ideas within the A.I. Bible would be more correct than any other religious text because they're derived from a super intelligence, a non-human entity. | ||
Because he denies the existence or inspiration of God, he says it's simply a dream to imagine God's divine inspiration behind the Holy Bible. | ||
You know, throughout history, religions dreamt about having a book written by a superhuman intelligence, by a non-human entity. | ||
Every religion claims our book, all the books of the other religions, humans wrote them. | ||
But our book, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
It came from some superhuman intelligence. | ||
In a few years, there might be religions that are actually correct. | ||
Just think about a religion whose holy book is written by an AI. That could be a reality in a few years. | ||
Harari says that artificial intelligence can make decisions all by itself, the first technology that can do this, implying that this AI Bible would be written by free will rather than be dictated by the design of its programming. | ||
He sees AI as above human beings. | ||
And again, since Harari is an atheist, he places the AI technology above all human intelligence, elevating it to the status of a god in his eyes. | ||
It's the first technology ever that can make decisions by itself. | ||
I hear a lot of people saying, oh, all these worries about AI, every time there is a new technology, people worry about it, and afterwards it's okay. | ||
Like when people invented writing and printing presses and airplanes, they were so worried, and in the end it was okay, AI will be the same. | ||
It's not the same. | ||
No previous technology in history could make decisions. | ||
You know, even an atom bomb Actually empowered humans, because an atom bomb can destroy a city, it cannot decide which city to bomb. | ||
You always need a human to make the decision. | ||
AI is the first technology that can make decisions by itself, even about us. | ||
Next, Yuval Noah Harari mischaracterizes what Christians have believed throughout time in order to illustrate why an AI metaverse would be just like heaven. | ||
Here he claims that ancient Christians believed their carnal bodies, their physical bodies, were held in highest regard. | ||
And you have this discussion for, you know, for thousands of years about what humans really are. | ||
Are they an immaterial soul or an immaterial mind? | ||
Are they embodied beings, embodied entities? | ||
And this was a major philosophical topic that you see, say, in ancient Christianity, this discussion that Jesus and the first Christians, influenced by Jewish traditions, they believed very firmly that humans are bodies. | ||
Which is why Christ rises in the body. | ||
He's resurrected in the body. | ||
However, Romans 8 clearly reveals the doctrinal position that ancient Christians believed, as well as modern-day Christians. | ||
Quote, Harari then claims that Christ's heavenly kingdom is of the earth. | ||
Boldly saying that Christ told his followers of a future physical kingdom. | ||
Alright folks, welcome to the American Journal. | ||
That is the latest from Redbilled TV. False Prophet says AI God will create a new Bible. | ||
unidentified
|
It's Wednesday, June 28th, year of our Lord, 2023. | |
And... You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
All right, good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Welcome to The American Journal. | ||
What a show we have for you today. | ||
Lots of stuff to talk about. | ||
Actually, a heck of a lot. | ||
A lot of videos to show you as well. | ||
Taking your phone calls throughout the show. | ||
We have a lot to get into. | ||
So let's just do it. Let's not waste any time and get right into it. | ||
Here it is, your daily dispatch. | ||
All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Wednesday, the 28th of June, 2023. | ||
Reuters.com has come out with an investigation spending their time wisely looking into which political elites have family links to slavery. | ||
Yes, what we really need to know right now. | ||
Thank you, Reuters. | ||
Thank you for this investigative research, this exhaustive delve into the family history of all these people. | ||
Interestingly, what they've come out with is that basically every single president has family ties back to slave owners, except for Donald Trump. | ||
Many lawmakers, they say, look no further than their own family histories to find a much more personal connection to slavery in history, a brutal system of oppression that resulted in the deadliest conflict in U.S. history. | ||
In researching the genealogies of America's political elite, a Reuters examination found that a fifth of the nation's congressmen, living presidents, Supreme Court justices, and governors are direct descendants of ancestors who enslaved black people. | ||
Dear God. Among 356 members of the last sitting Congress, Reuters determined that at least 100 descended from slaveholders. | ||
Of that group, more than a quarter of the Senate, 28 members can trace their families to at least one slaveholder. | ||
These lawmakers from the 116th are Democrat and Republican alike. | ||
They include some of the most influential politicians in America, such as Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham, Tom Cotton, and James Lankford. | ||
Democrats Elizabeth Warren, Tammy Duckworth, Jean Shaheen, and Maggie Hassan. | ||
In addition, President Joe Biden and every living former U.S. president except Donald Trump are direct descendants of slaveholders. | ||
Jimmy Carter, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and through his white mother's side, Barack Obama, Trump's ancestors came to America after slavery was abolished. | ||
I think that's sort of the most amazing takeaway from all this, that we have such heritage Americans in America. | ||
In politics, I wouldn't have expected that. | ||
That would have been surprising to me. | ||
So yeah, really amazing. | ||
Fantastic stuff, Reuters. | ||
Lots of really pertinent things to today's world. | ||
You know, this is exactly what we need. | ||
What we need right now is, you know, major media companies demonizing white people for what their ancestors did hundreds of years ago. | ||
Thank you for that. | ||
No, it's very important. | ||
It's very meaningful, obviously. | ||
You know, this really means a lot. | ||
I'm sure if you... | ||
We're to carry out this same type of rigorous investigation into the poorest white Americans. | ||
You would also see a pretty... | ||
A large percentage of this type of thing happening because, you know, it was everybody back then and it actually has no bearing whatsoever on the fate of those descendants of slaveholders nowadays. | ||
But, you know, thank you. | ||
Thank you for that. Thank you for just once again bringing up the specter of a shameful past in order to demonize white people today. | ||
Really necessary and good. | ||
And black people too, obviously. | ||
And Native American people as well, like Elizabeth Warren. | ||
This is what we need the mainstream media for. | ||
Thank you for that, Reuters, really. | ||
What would we do without you? | ||
We'll talk a little bit more about that later, but just complete nonsense. | ||
But hey, good on Donald Trump. | ||
Good on Donald Trump being the only living president in history to not be a descendant of slaveholders. | ||
Just incredible. Of course, they only go back to America. | ||
I mean, what if he went back even further? | ||
I think that might be an interesting investigation as well. | ||
Meanwhile, New York Times confirms IRS whistleblower claims about Hunter Biden probe, but they bury it in the 21st paragraph of their report. | ||
The DOJ was accused of blocking U.S. Attorney David Weiss from bringing harsher charges against the president's son. | ||
New York Times confirmed one of the bombshell claims made about the Justice Department's mishandling of the probe into Hunter Biden, but buried it deep in its Tuesday report. | ||
After Biden pled guilty to two misdemeanor tax violations and entered a pretrial diversion agreement regarding the felony gun registration charge, the House Ways and Means Committee released testimony from two IRS whistleblowers who alleged that President Biden's son received preferential treatment from the Justice the House Ways and Means Committee released testimony from two IRS | ||
IRS whistleblower Gary Shapely claimed the U.S. attorney David Weiss alleged to multiple witnesses that he was told by the DOJ that he could not bring charges against Hunter Biden in California and Washington, D.C. | ||
Attorney General Merrick Garland denied there being any interference in the probe. | ||
However, the Times is now confirming that Weiss did, in fact, make such claims about the DOJ. Notably, that confirmation wasn't mentioned until the 21st paragraph of the Times' lengthy report titled, Competing Accounts of Justice Department's Handling of Hunter Biden Case. | ||
Times did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for comment. | ||
Garland denied any wrongdoing by the DOJ last week. | ||
So, just to tie this in a nice bow, basically, it was a cover-up. | ||
It was basically a cover-up. | ||
Basically, Andrew Weiss... | ||
Was tasked with investigating Hunter Biden when it came to actually... | ||
Putting the fruits of his investigation into some sort of case and charging Hunter Biden with the crimes for which he had been discovered to be guilty or at least suspected to be guilty. | ||
Merrick Garland came down from on high to stop that from moving forward. | ||
I see a lot of people talking about this in terms of the Biden crime family and the Biden crime syndicate, which obviously They are. | ||
Obviously, that's an accurate reading of the situation. | ||
But it's also worth understanding that Biden himself is just a puppet of the much larger, shadowy factions of the deep state who use him as a very useful tool for getting what they want and having blackmail hanging over his head. | ||
So this is just the way it works. | ||
Talked about it a million times, whether it's the Clintons or the Bidens. | ||
Not that these people have some... | ||
Power over everybody else is that they themselves are puppets of the higher power of the shadowy deep state permanent bureaucracy that uses them for what they need and rewards them for their participation by protecting them from consequences of their actions. | ||
We'll get more into that a little bit later. | ||
Meanwhile, from Business Insider, China kicks off World Economic Forum's Summer Davos. | ||
Chinese city of Tianjin is hosting the World Economic Forum's Summer Davos. | ||
Can't you just picture Henry Kissinger in a Speedo and Klaus Schwab laying on the beach sunning himself in sunny China. | ||
Saudi Arabia sent a top delegation to the event. | ||
Reflecting the importance of its oil trade relationship with China, Chinese Premier Li Qiang opened the conference, acknowledging global challenges and warning about future public health crises. | ||
The Chinese city of Tianjin is buzzing with activity. | ||
C-suite executives, government officials, and media members from all over the world have made their way to attend the first in-person World Economic Forum or WEF event in China since the pandemic began. | ||
It's the Summer Davos, and you'll see 1,500 participants discuss topics centered around entrepreneurship, the driving force of the global economy. | ||
Which is just, of course, the name they give to their global government slavery system that they're attempting to first perfect and really tune in there in China and then export to the rest of the world. | ||
Incredible stuff. Meanwhile, this is sort of an update to a story we covered yesterday. | ||
Alleged document from Trump Audio in Bedminster is not a part of the DOJ charges. | ||
So yesterday we covered the bombshell breaking leak of audio of Trump talking about the war in Iran that he helped to stop. | ||
And apparently that document having to do with the war in Iran, not actually a part of the charges that he's facing. | ||
So just another round of confusion and distraction and manipulation, courtesy of the mainstream media and our Department of Justice. | ||
Finally, we have this story. | ||
We'll get into this on the other side. | ||
Quote, we're coming for your children chant at NYC Drag March elicits outrage, but activists say it's taken out of context. | ||
That's from NBC News, where they... | ||
Are covering for the people who are chanting, we're coming for your children, by saying it's out of context. | ||
And frankly, they've been saying this forever. | ||
So what's the big deal? | ||
We'll tell you what the big deal is on the other side. | ||
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
This is the American Journal Infowars.com and Band.videos where you go to find these videos, links, clips, articles, and everything else we have to offer. | ||
unidentified
|
Infowarsstore.com is where you go to support us. | |
We have a lot to talk about from the Trump indictments to Biden corruption, war in Ukraine, and so much more. | ||
Tucker Carlson, once again, dropped an absolutely incredible episode of his new Twitter show. | ||
Yesterday, I want to go to at least the first couple minutes of that as he breaks down the Ukraine war and what it's all been about. | ||
We'll get into it, but first, let's return to this story from the Daily Dispatch. | ||
Just, what are you doing? | ||
What are you doing, guys? | ||
What are you doing, gays? | ||
NBC News posted this on Twitter and has been dragged for it, no pun intended, since. | ||
They say the, quote, coming for your children chant has been used for years at Pride events, according to longtime March attendees and gay rights activists, who said it's one of many provocative expressions used to regain control of slurs against LGBTQ people. | ||
I don't understand. I don't understand what that is supposed to mean. | ||
Regain control against LGBTQ people? | ||
So, what? | ||
How is that? I don't understand. | ||
No, I legitimately don't understand. | ||
Oh, well soon, soon. | ||
Here, let me interpret this for you. | ||
Okay, yeah, help me out here. So you know how, like, black people are the only people who can say the N-word? | ||
Well, that's not true, but yeah, they say that. | ||
Well, now, well, now, LGBTQP people are going to be the only people who can say the P-word. | ||
Oh. Yep. What's up, my pedo? | ||
What's up, my pedo? | ||
Yep, because they're coming for your children, right? | ||
Yeah, okay. They're taking back the slurs. | ||
I see. They're taking the slurs back. | ||
They're taking, I see. So if you're out here calling somebody a fairy, and they're just like, yeah, well, we're coming for your children. | ||
Wait, what? Yeah, they can call each other fairies. | ||
You use the F word? | ||
It's over, bro. Might as well fire yourself. | ||
The really funny part about this is that this actually got hit with Community Notes, which is sort of the updated Twitter version of fact-checking, which is actually... | ||
Far more effective and accurate than traditional fact checks, right? | ||
The way Twitter's changed it up is it used to be that fact checks were places like Snopes and other left-wing media outlets would come along and provide their so-called fact check that would be like, oh, well, yes, while they did say this, they didn't, in fact, mean it. We can read minds more at Snopes.com. | ||
like just total nonsense where they would just try to obfuscate and disguise reality with rhetorical hogwash. | ||
But now it's a little bit different. | ||
Now it's more like the actual context that you need. | ||
And this has a hilarious community notes correction underneath it. | ||
It says, quote, coming for your children is not a historical part of pride. | ||
The chant appears to originate from the San Francisco Gay Men's Choir singing a song with this title two years ago in 2021. | ||
This article is thus a misrepresentation of pride's history. | ||
In fact, this must have changed because when I first saw this, it mentioned that it doesn't even quote anybody in the article to back up what the claims of the title of the article makes. | ||
So the statement on Twitter says that, you know, according to longtime March attendees and gay right activists, the we're coming for your children chant has been used for years. | ||
But then that doesn't actually appear anywhere in the article, which is which is interesting. | ||
Here's the article itself in NBC News. | ||
It says, over the weekend, a short video circulated widely on social media of an unidentified person at a New York City Pride March Pride festivity saying, we're coming for your children. | ||
They can't even say that, honestly. | ||
So here they are trying to defend... | ||
A bunch of gay people saying, we're coming for your children. | ||
A bunch of trans activists saying, you know, essentially your children belong to us. | ||
We will pervert and destroy them. | ||
And they're trying to defend this. | ||
Why they would want to defend this? | ||
God only knows. Satan. | ||
Satan only knows. But they can't even do that. | ||
They have to misrepresent what it is. | ||
It was a short video that circulated of not an unidentified person, but a crowd of unidentified people chanting this statement. | ||
They can't even be honest about that. | ||
In the 21-second clip circulated by a right-wing web streamer channel, dozens of people march in the streets and are clearly heard chanting, we're here, we're queer, we're not going shopping, but one voice is... | ||
We're here, we're queer, we're not going shopping? | ||
What is that even supposed to mean? | ||
They... What? | ||
We're here, we're queer, we're not going shopping. | ||
Gay people love shopping. | ||
unidentified
|
I don't understand what that's supposed to mean. | |
The old chant was, we're here, we're queer, get used to it. | ||
Right? We're here, we're queer, we're not going shopping. | ||
Okay, alright. I think that's enough. | ||
I think that's enough of that. | ||
I think the gay pride movement has run its course when you're chanting such utterly meaningless drivel, acting like you're standing up against some sort of oppressive regime by being like, we're not going shopping! | ||
It's like, what the hell are you talking about? | ||
Go home. Just go home. | ||
There's no point in you being here or saying any of this. | ||
Just go home already. | ||
Incredible. But they say one voice that is louder than the crowd, it's not quite clear whose or whether the speaker was a member of the LGBTQ community. | ||
It was probably one of those undercover transes. | ||
Probably a trans trans. | ||
It's a straight man pretending to be a gay woman. | ||
Probably what it was. | ||
It's heard saying, at least twice, we're here, we're queer, we're coming for your children. | ||
I mean, we have that video. | ||
Can we go to that video? Can we fact check this NBC News article real quick? | ||
I mean, maybe I'm remembering it wrong. | ||
Are the gays chanting, we're here, we're queer, we're not going shopping? | ||
Because that doesn't even make sense. | ||
So can we go to this video? | ||
So I see like at least four people in this video alone. | ||
We're coming for your children. | ||
They're like, but they're not sure who it is. | ||
Maybe it's the crowd of people chanting it. | ||
So, I mean, you know, I don't know what to tell you folks. | ||
It's like they rely on your ignorance. | ||
They rely on you not knowing what the reality is. | ||
Like, I guess people are sitting down and reading this and they come away with this idea that like, well, there's a bunch of gay people chanting about shopping for some reason. | ||
And there's one provocateur who's probably a right wing Trump supporter embedded within the gay community to make them look like pedophiles saying we're coming for your children. | ||
But actually, they've been saying this for years. | ||
And this is a core component of the gay rights agenda coming for your children. | ||
But actually, it's a good thing. | ||
And so, again, we take a little trip on the wheel of conspiracy and we go from it's not happening and you're sexist and racist and homophobic for even saying it to, OK, well, yeah, somebody is chanting that, I guess, to, yes, they are chanting it. | ||
Yes, it is a core belief and it's a good thing. | ||
And you're a racist and a homophobe if you disagree with it. | ||
So we've gone full circle. | ||
We're... Just like you could have just said, yeah, you're right the first time. | ||
But see, they understand how sort of horrifying and objectionable this is. | ||
They understand that most people reject this outright, so they have to try to hide it. | ||
unidentified
|
You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
All right, we do have more to talk about here. | ||
But actually, no, the title of our live show today corresponds to all of this. | ||
We're entering the phase of narrative collapse as public rejects globalism. | ||
We'll see this with a number of attempts by the mainstream and even the alternative media that occurred over the last few days where it's just like, what are you doing, folks? | ||
What are you trying to do? | ||
What do you think you're achieving with this? | ||
We have another story with Pedro Gonzalez. | ||
What's his name? | ||
Yeah, Pedro Gonzalez. | ||
Which, you know, they published this full-fledged research paper about Pedro Gonzalez where they dox anything he's ever said in private messages or make some very edgy jokes about everybody, really. And what I've seen from this is an overwhelming positive response when it comes to Pedro. | ||
People being like, wow, I didn't like Pedro before, but now that you've shown me this, I see he's actually a great guy. | ||
Like, what do you think you're achieving here? | ||
What do you think the effect is going to be now that you have utterly lost all credibility, nobody believes anything you say anymore, the lies that you've been spreading for decades are coming to light, And you're doubling down on it. | ||
Do you really think this is an effective use of the medium? | ||
Do you really think that what you're doing here is convincing people that your enemies are the bad guys? | ||
I don't think that's happening. | ||
I think it is a full-on narrative collapse and they're desperately trying to keep it together. | ||
It's not working. | ||
It's just not working. | ||
So there's a lot of other news that we'll get to. | ||
And we need to get to, I mean, just from whistleblowers exposing the Hunter Biden cover-up to the manipulation of the Trump document scandal. | ||
I mean, there's so much to get into, but this article is hilarious and I want to stick with it. | ||
Okay, it's the NBC News article. | ||
We're coming for your children. | ||
Chanted, NYC drag march elicits outrage, but activists say it's taken out of context. | ||
As you read this article, what you realize is that it's not taken out of context in the slightest. | ||
It's all totally in context. | ||
And what you think that they're saying is exactly what they're saying. | ||
And they tell you this in the article. | ||
Again, not sure if they thought there'd be a different takeaway from this article. | ||
Not sure if they thought that people would walk away going, those brave, powerful people. | ||
Strident cross-dressers. | ||
They're so powerfully standing up against the slurs of the straight community. | ||
No, nobody is coming away from this article talking about this. | ||
Everybody that you quote in this article is like literally a demonic groomer that is totally open about it. | ||
It's wild that they think that this is going to have a positive effect, but they do. | ||
I swear they do. They say, to conservative pundits, activists, and lawmakers, the video confirmed the allegations they've levied in recent years that the LGBTQ community is, quote, grooming children. | ||
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I guess so. | ||
Again, I just don't understand. | ||
So, we'll continue here and then we'll circle back to that. | ||
They say to Brian Griffin, hilarious, the original organizer of the NYC Drag March, If that's the worst they heard, it's only because he wasn't there this year. | ||
Griffin said that he chanted obscene things in the past like, kill, kill, kill. | ||
We're coming to kill the mayor. | ||
And joked about pubic hair and sex toys during marches. | ||
People at drag marches regularly sing, quote, God is a lesbian. | ||
It's all just words, Griffin said. | ||
It's all presented to fulfill their worst stereotypes of us. | ||
Okay. Cool. | ||
Great. So all those people, yeah, Brian Griffin. | ||
This is the guy. It's presented to fulfill their worst stereotypes of us all. | ||
I don't get this. I don't get this. | ||
It's like, you know, you sit there and you're like, gee, everything you guys are doing seems to be like perverted and pedophilic and It's deeply demonic and evil, and they're like, yeah, it is. | ||
It is. If that's the stereotype you have at us, it's true. | ||
It's all true. We do want to come after your children. | ||
We do worship Satan. | ||
We do want to kill the mayor. | ||
And it's just like, yeah, I know. | ||
No, I know. That's why I said it. | ||
That's why we said the thing that we said earlier. | ||
I'll take bad optics for 500, please. | ||
Right? Well, and that's the thing. | ||
This is like if... Like, Trump supporters were just like, yeah, we just go around, you know, throwing the Roman salute, wearing Nazi, wearing swastikas on our armband, you know, just to fulfill the stereotype. | ||
Like, okay, don't do that. | ||
Just maybe don't do that. | ||
Like, your fellow gays should be going, hey dude, you're not helping here. | ||
Fulfilling their stereotypes does not somehow debunk their stereotypes. | ||
You're just proving them right about everything. | ||
Which is really confirmation that they were right the entire time. | ||
Like, it's not like you guys weren't grooming children and weren't acting like satanic psychopaths and people just came up with this. | ||
And then you were like, well, if you're going to say it, then I'm going to do it. | ||
It's like, no, you were always doing this. | ||
Just you're open about it now. | ||
You're just like flamboyant about your sickening evil at this point. | ||
So, again, not sure what you think you're proving. | ||
Not sure what you're trying to prove. | ||
It's just, yeah, we've been right the entire timeline. | ||
Like, we get it now. Thank you for letting us know. | ||
See the weird thing? Okay, you know, you just brought up... | ||
I think, you know, Satan, when you think about it, is supposed to be, like, tempting and kind of sexy. | ||
Satan takes one look at these hedonistic orgies and he's like, yo, leave me out of this. | ||
No, I think he loves it. I think Satan is all about this. | ||
I think he thinks this is the best thing ever. | ||
Yeah. I mean, I think a lot, they're like literally doing God's work, if you think about it, because they're turning people towards God. | ||
Okay, all right, I can see that. | ||
The casual observer who happens upon a pride parade is probably like, oh man, I need to go back to church. | ||
Right, okay, yeah, I can see that. | ||
I can see that happening. Let's keep reading this article because it really just does. | ||
It just gets worse and worse. | ||
It's all just words. | ||
It's presented to fulfill their worst stereotypes of us. | ||
Yeah, no, we know. There's a reason there's the stereotypes. | ||
You're fulfilling them. Thank you. | ||
The, quote, coming for your children chant has been used for years at pride events. | ||
Yeah, guys, you're acting like this is something new. | ||
We've always been coming for your children. | ||
We've always been trying to groom and pervert and co-opt and coerce your children. | ||
This isn't anything new, you guys, okay? | ||
So stop acting like this is something that just started happening. | ||
We've always been wanting to pervert and co-opt your children. | ||
Okay, great. Thank you. | ||
And GayRide's activist who said, it's one of many provocative expressions used to regain control of slurs against LGBTQ people. | ||
K, how's that going for you? | ||
Do you feel like you've regained control of that? | ||
Interesting. In this case, they say right-wing activists are jumping on a single video to weaponize an out-of-context remark and further stigmatize the queer community. | ||
Yeah, that might be a decent argument if you hadn't had made the opposite argument for the rest of the article. | ||
Right? It's just, it's one video, it's out of context, it was one guy chanting, although the video shows everybody is chanting it, and you can read their lips and hear their voices saying it, so we're just lying to you openly, blatantly, with video evidence of our deception, but... | ||
Yeah, we're going to spend the whole article talking about why this is a great thing and why we do it all the time and why it's necessary to do it all the time. | ||
And then we're going to act like, actually, it's just one thing that was out of context and we didn't actually mean it. | ||
It's this schizophrenic, mentally ill attempt to deceive that is spiraling out of control. | ||
Nobody's buying it. Everybody gets what you're all about now. | ||
You're letting us know. You're telling us who you are and we are simply believing you. | ||
Coming from somebody who, you know, didn't care about gay marriage when it was happening, except to the extent that it's not marriage, just a contract that the government is there to guarantee whether it agrees with it or not. | ||
Anyway, it's just, you know... | ||
It's all backfiring. It's all backfiring on them. | ||
And I can't imagine... | ||
I can't imagine being a gay person right now being like, really? | ||
unidentified
|
Really, you guys? We've made... | |
We've gone so far. We've made so many strides. | ||
We've finally, for the first time in, you know... | ||
Lifetime of being gay, having to hide it, having to conceal it. | ||
You finally get acceptance. | ||
You finally get equality. | ||
And you just go, and we're coming for your children and we're worshiping Satan and we're going to take your kids. | ||
Welcome back, folks. | ||
We do have more important things to talk about here. | ||
We're going to stick just a moment on gay pride. | ||
We're also going to talk about the absolute hilarious meltdown that Brian Krassenstein, what's his name? | ||
Krassenstein, is having on Twitter about pride as well. | ||
I know, Matt, you had one more thing you wanted to say serious about it, and there's a video comparison to the original pride march to today, so we're going to see how far pride has come. | ||
Incredible. Sure. Well, let me just read a few more things to this. | ||
I mean, it's so bizarre how they do this. | ||
So, first they say, yes, we always say this sort of stuff. | ||
You know, we chant this all the time. | ||
But also, if you show us chanting this, you're attacking us, and it's out of context, and we never say that. | ||
So, you know, stop acting like this is what we do. | ||
But it is what we do all the time. | ||
time like it's just this schizophrenic like mentally ill kind of take on all of this they talk about conservative politicians and pundits have increasingly referred to advocates for lgbtq rights as quote groomers associating people who oppose laws that restrict drag performances see what they what they leave out what they leave out of this little note here | ||
They say, Or classroom discussions of gender identity with pedophiles. | ||
Tell you what, if you are a man who's dressing up like a woman for sexual gratification and then performing a lascivious dance in front of children, you're a pedophile. | ||
So, okay, glad we got that out of the way. | ||
They say the charge is an echo of a decades-old trope Anti-gay activists have used to paint the community as a threat to the country's youths, which they, again, spend the rest of the article talking about how it is absolutely true. | ||
And clearly, I mean, this is the whole point, right? | ||
Like, it's taken out of context, they say. | ||
It's actually been used for years, this chant of we're coming for your children. | ||
So, you know, which one is it? | ||
Which one is it? This is what happens when you start to deceive, right? | ||
Yeah. What a tangled web you weave when you practice to deceive like that. | ||
This is the tangled web of deception when your entire identity is just utterly divorced from reality. | ||
And you know what you're doing is wrong and objectionable. | ||
You know what you're doing is going to turn people off and make people hate you. | ||
and so you like a narcissist abuser have to try to gaslight them into thinking they're the ones who are bad for pointing out what you're doing it doesn't work it's not going to work and And this entire article is a hilarious exercise in backlash. | ||
But they say this allegation, some advocates say, endangers LGBTQ people. | ||
Well, if the claim that your groomers endangers LGBTQ people, then I guess when you're chanting, we're coming for your children, it's those people chanting that are putting LGBT people in danger. | ||
Seems pretty obvious to me. | ||
Quote, it's really scary to us, says Fussy Lomain, a drag performer and activist who was at this year's march and declined to give their real name because of safety concerns. | ||
Oh yeah, I'm sure. | ||
I'm sure, as we know, nothing more dangerous than being a... | ||
unidentified
|
Anyway. | |
Sorry, I'm trying not to use slurs since obviously they're reclaiming them. | ||
It doesn't represent everybody. It represents that individual. | ||
I thought it was a dumb idea and I started chanting on top of it with alternative verses. | ||
Okay, is it a dumb idea or is it taking back the slurs? | ||
Is it a stupid idea that's making everybody think that you're groomers and pedophiles? | ||
Or is it a powerful stance against demonization of people calling you groomers and pedophiles? | ||
Which one is it? The video elicited outrage from right-wing pundits who called the marchers demonic and evil. | ||
Yeah, but see... They dress up like demons and they do evil things. | ||
In the same way, they're like, well, if you're going to call us demonic and evil, then we're going to dress up as demons and perform drag shows where we show ourselves graphically cutting open our own bellies and pulling babies out and aborting them and then eating them live. | ||
Yeah, you think we're evil and demonic? | ||
Well, what about now? It's like, yes, obviously. | ||
Yeah, you're evil and demonic. We get it. | ||
No, we get it. You don't have to do all that stuff. | ||
We understand. We get it. | ||
You don't have to put the horns on your head. | ||
You don't have to perform the creepy, evil activities that you love doing. | ||
We understand you're creepy and evil and demonic. | ||
You don't need to show us anymore. | ||
We get it. Thank you. | ||
Thank you. Similarly, citing fears for his safety in light of backlash over the video clip. | ||
Did you love this? They're just, like, pretending that there's some sort of, like... | ||
They're the French resistance, and they're like, oh, we can't let anybody know that we're drag queens. | ||
Meanwhile, they're just, like, out on the street, naked, just, like, flopping their... | ||
Anyway. Yeah, but they're all very scared, frightened of their safety. | ||
Oh, those dangerous right-wingers. | ||
They keep telling us we're the most dangerous terrorist group of all time. | ||
Oh. They say it's a bad joke being used to serve the interests of parasitic, predatory political propaganda and policy. | ||
Okay. So why'd you do it? | ||
Why do you keep doing it? | ||
I mean, this is, honestly, it needs to be a skit of, like, just a dude in, like, the full Nazi regalia, swastika on the arm, little gay mustache, like Hitler, just being like, these, you know... | ||
They're demonizing us with this propaganda calling us Nazis. | ||
I mean, what are we supposed to do? | ||
It's dangerous, this political propaganda, predatory, parasitic propaganda calling us Nazis. | ||
They're just like full-on, just like this little spiky helmet and everything. | ||
It's like, why do they keep calling us Nazis? | ||
Yes, hail Hitler. Thank you. | ||
Hi. How you doing? I don't get it. | ||
It's like, oh, you don't? Oh, you don't get it? | ||
You don't understand? When you dress up like demons and saying we're coming for your children, you don't understand why that might be used to make people think that you're groomers that are coming for your children? | ||
Is this hard to understand? | ||
Is this hard to conceive? | ||
Impossible. Impossible to conceive with these people. | ||
We won't tolerate harm towards any child and advocate for the protection of encouragement of every child to be able to live their true lives, authentic lives, free from fear and persecution. | ||
Okay, so this is a particularly interesting paragraph. | ||
This is from a person named Huckle Fairy Ken. | ||
Okay. We won't tolerate harm towards any child and advocate for the protection and encouragement of every child to live their true lives, their true authentic lives, free from fear and persecution. | ||
You know, from people like their parents. | ||
You know, I mean, it's just like, do you not get how that sounds? | ||
Do you not get how that... | ||
Again, let's just use the Nazi thing because that's just what you do on the internet, right? | ||
This is just like... | ||
Look, we will not tolerate any harm against the parasitic foreign influence of the Judeo-upper class. | ||
I don't even know how Nazis are to say things, but... | ||
It's like you get that when you've got a gay guy dressed up in a dress, calling himself Huckle Fairy Kin, being like, we want to protect children from the hate of their parents. | ||
You get that that makes you look like a groomer. | ||
You get that that's you being a groomer, being a pedophile. | ||
You understand that we see right through that, and you're not tricking anybody. | ||
We don't want anybody to harm children with their insistence that children are innocent and not sexual. | ||
Oh, is that him? Yeah, that's him. | ||
Okay, alright, so that's Huckle Fairy. | ||
We just want to protect kids, okay? | ||
He just wants to read bedtime stories to your kids. | ||
Yeah, we just want to read bedtime stories to your kids and protect them from the negative influence of your religion and your way of life. | ||
Like, yeah, you're talking like a groomer. | ||
You're talking like a creepy groomer pedophile. | ||
So what are you doing? What are you doing? | ||
So funny, man. They ask people not to dress up in drag or leather to make their event more palatable to certain communities. | ||
Wow, so they hate gay people too, huh? | ||
They hate gay people too. Apparently the We're Not Going Shopping chant that nobody is chanting in that video, despite NBC lying to you and saying otherwise, comes from when they used to march around malls, I guess. | ||
I don't know. I don't get it. | ||
We keep talking about this on the other side. | ||
It's just one of those things you really have to dedicate time to going through paragraph by paragraph. | ||
Okay, just the last part. | ||
Finishing up here. According to multiple Drag March regulars, the Coming for Your Children variation has been used before. | ||
Last year, Gothamist reported people at the Drag March counted 10% is not enough. | ||
Groom, groom, groom. | ||
So what's the deal? | ||
Are you not groomers? | ||
Are you groomers? | ||
Are you not satanic, demonic pedophiles? | ||
Or do you love reveling in the satanic, demonic pedophilia of your entire movement? | ||
Are you not wearing leather so you can trick people into thinking you're normal? | ||
Or are you wearing leather dog masks so you can be your true authentic self? | ||
I mean, which is it? We know which one it is. | ||
It's the one that you can't help but express. | ||
It's the one that you can't help. | ||
It's the stereotypes you can't help but fulfill and the creepy, demonic attitude that you can't help but events every second that you're given license to be who you truly are. | ||
We get it. We understand it. | ||
Again, you think this is a positive move for the gay community? | ||
You couldn't be more wrong. | ||
I feel real bad for the just regular gays out there that are like, I just, I'm just gonna go to my job. | ||
Please don't associate me with these people. | ||
There are none. Alright, welcome back, folks. | ||
unidentified
|
Final segment here of, uh, the gays. | |
Matt, you pulled a video for us. | ||
Break this down for us. | ||
Oh, I got some insights for you. | ||
Okay, first thing, first thing. | ||
This whole discussion got started off with, we're coming for your children. | ||
Yeah. We're coming for your children. | ||
Now, if we were to take them at kind of their noble motive, right? | ||
Take them at face value. | ||
They're coming for their children. What are they doing? | ||
They're trying to win... | ||
The hearts and minds, right, of the children. | ||
These children, they've got impressionable minds. | ||
Yes, like USGIs in Afghanistan. | ||
They're winning the hearts and minds of the Taliban. | ||
I see that there are probably some activists who totally believe that, right? | ||
But unfortunately, their actions really don't match what their end goal is, right, which is winning hearts and minds. | ||
Okay. The first article I kind of want to show here, this is an oldie but a goodie out of the Washington Post. | ||
It's about Edward Lansdale. | ||
He is the guy who came up with this doctrine, winning the hearts and minds of the people, right? | ||
And it's been really at the center of how we fight wars in the modern era, right? | ||
We enlist people from other countries to fight these proxy wars, right? | ||
We're winning the hearts and minds of those people. | ||
So in the culture war here, you've got people who in 1970, right, in the first gay pride parade, right, they came out and they wanted to start winning the hearts and minds of the children. | ||
And we can kind of show some of this footage. | ||
It's actually on YouTube as well if anyone at home wants to kind of take a look at this. | ||
And you can kind of compare and contrast here scenes of kind of one of the original pride parades, right? | ||
And scenes of pride parades today and kind of where it's come, right? | ||
Because you do have to think about it. | ||
So for our TV viewers, this is a video of one of the first Pride parades? | ||
The first Pride parade. The first Pride parade. | ||
In 1970. Wow. | ||
Right? 1970. And we can kind of skip ahead here a little bit, too. | ||
And you'll see, you know, these are scenes of decency. | ||
People are fully clothed. | ||
Occasionally, you know, you might see someone without their shirt on. | ||
But, like, it's something that... | ||
Again, if you're a casual passerby, if you're someone who sees this, you're like, oh, you know what? | ||
They're not as bad as they're probably made out to be. | ||
But they are normal people after all. | ||
Right, right, right. And so now you get to a place where these people who are participating in pride, they probably grew up being bullied. | ||
They probably grew up with some type of trauma for their inclinations, who they're naturally attracted to. | ||
You're saying that sexual trauma is what leads to being gay? | ||
Well, no. What I'm saying is that that is a true fact. | ||
That can happen. People who are abused, that can be in effect. | ||
But people who are participating in today's pride parades, they're not trying to win over the hearts and minds of people. | ||
They're trying to stick it to people who don't agree with them. | ||
They're trying to stick it in people's faces. | ||
Which is kind of at the heart of the Explainer NBC article, right? | ||
They're like, oh, well, you know, it was taken out of context, right? | ||
Well, really, it wasn't taken out of context because we can tell that there was kind of a Maleficent... | ||
Maleficent, yeah. | ||
Maleficent... Malicious. | ||
Malicious intent behind the we're coming for your kids. | ||
Maybe they're not actually coming for people's kids, but what they want to do is they want to scare people. | ||
Hey, you know, don't mess with us. | ||
Hey, this is what we're doing. | ||
We are in charge now. | ||
Way proud of it. And they're rubbing it in people's faces, which is why it leaves a bad taste in a lot of people's mouths. | ||
Poor choice of words, but I completely get what you're trying. | ||
Yes, they're rubbing it in your face and it's leaving a bad taste in your mouth. | ||
I completely agree, Matt. | ||
You know, baby. No, it's so funny because also it's like, you know, this is Infowars. | ||
Like, we have never cared about the gays necessarily. | ||
Like, we've always been libertarian. | ||
It's always been you have the right to do what you want. | ||
And it's one of the great things about the West that, like, you can do what you want and the government isn't going to step in and want to surveil you and want to find out what your sexual inclination is and do this. | ||
And it's like all that's going away. | ||
We're losing all of that while simultaneously you've got gay people literally coming for your children. | ||
Things are bad. I feel bad sometimes because I do things and I see people complain about it. | ||
In fact, I saw a post on 4chan the other day that I guess it was during the show I mentioned Matt Walsh's thread where he was calling pedophiles Nazis and it was just a giant list of Jewish people. | ||
He was like, see, Nazis! It was all very confusing. | ||
And I mentioned that, and I guess I mentioned it in like the first five minutes of the show, and I was like, yeah, I'm going to talk about this later. | ||
And then I just never talked about it, never got around to it. | ||
And I see unfortunate by being like, he got to talk. | ||
Somebody came in and told him not to talk about this. | ||
Oh, he's being censored. | ||
I just want to make it perfectly, abundantly clear. | ||
Nobody ever tells me anything to say or not say on this show. | ||
Full stop. Nobody ever. | ||
Before the show, after the show, during the show. | ||
Doesn't happen. I get to say whatever the hell I want. | ||
I get to talk about whatever I want. | ||
It's the beauty of having a platform like this. | ||
I don't even have to worry about... | ||
I mean, except for radio sensors and not using four-letter words, which I agree with and think is a good thing. | ||
It's like... It's a ridiculous claim. | ||
Nobody ever tells me what to say and what not to say. | ||
And I was thinking about this because earlier I mentioned Brian Krasenstein. | ||
I want to go into a thread of his. | ||
But this is what ends up happening. | ||
I'm like, okay, you know what? It's all haphazard. | ||
This is all just off the cuff. | ||
All this news is breaking. | ||
All of this is like headline news that's like just coming out or it's like being delivered to the desk as we talk about it. | ||
So we don't know what we're going to spend a lot of time on or not. | ||
Some things we maybe should spend more time on. | ||
Some things we don't like for this. | ||
It's like, OK, we'll start off, you know, the last article of the Daily Dispatch. | ||
I'll spend a moment talking about this NBC article. | ||
And then you start reading the article and it's like, oh, my God, we got to get into this more. | ||
You start reading more into the article and you're like, oh, my God, there's paragraphs at the back that I got to I got to talk about. | ||
And then Matt's pulling up videos of the historical thing, got ideas he wants to express. | ||
So this is all just happening in real time. | ||
This is a live broadcast and I've tried to get as much important news as I possibly can under the line and in between the commercial breaks. | ||
That's just what we do. | ||
I'm not going to get into the Brian Krasenstein thing today. | ||
I'd like to. I mentioned it earlier, but I'm not going to be able to get to it because we spent so long laughing and breaking apart this NBC article about how they totally aren't doing the thing that they are doing and how it's good that they're doing it, but how you shouldn't think about it. | ||
Like... This is just what happens. | ||
We're flying by the seat of our pants here. | ||
We take your calls. We go where those lead us. | ||
So I apologize. It's entirely my fault if I ever say, like, oh, I'm going to cover this and I never get around to it. | ||
Not because I got to talk. | ||
It's not because somebody heard me and came, you're not allowed to talk about that. | ||
Avoid it from now on. | ||
It doesn't happen. I'm just completely open with everybody. | ||
No other show would even do a little dissertation like this because they want it all to be behind the sheen of... | ||
Movie magic, TV magic. | ||
They want everybody to think that it's all pre-planned. | ||
That's just not the way we operate. | ||
It's InfoWars. We are... | ||
This is the beauty of InfoWars. | ||
We can talk about a hilarious NBC article for as long as it takes to get through it. | ||
We can have guests that nobody else will have on. | ||
We can then... | ||
Go from geopolitics to history and the occult and the pyramids and flat earth and Antarctica. | ||
This is what InfoWars is all about. | ||
It's a freewheeling, responding to news as it comes in program. | ||
And I think that's what makes us different than everybody else. | ||
And we're only allowed to be like this. | ||
We're only able to be like this because of your support at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
Because without your support, we wouldn't be here. | ||
We wouldn't have the crew. We wouldn't have the... | ||
We wouldn't have the satellite uplinks. | ||
We wouldn't have any of that stuff to actually get the broadcast out. | ||
But on top of that, if we had instead of you, the American people at Infowarsstore.com, some corporate overlord telling us what to do and what to say, then I would have to be censored. | ||
I would have people coming in and telling me what I can and can't say and making sure I hit certain points. | ||
We're free from that. | ||
Hopefully you appreciate that. | ||
I know I appreciate that more than I could ever possibly say. | ||
And, you know, it's always just obviously a... | ||
My interminable struggle is just trying to fit in all the important news while also providing like a little bit of humor and laughter and lightheartedness so that we don't get demoralized under the continuous onslaught that we face. | ||
So thank you so much for supporting us. | ||
Thank you for giving us this platform where we can have such a unique and freewheeling good time with all this insane news. | ||
And please do go to Infowarsstore.com to ensure that happens into the future. | ||
Yes, we have declared independence from the British, independence from the globalists, independence from the tyranny over the minds of man in any form that it comes. | ||
Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Tyranny over the expectations that our fellow right-wingers have about what we should or shouldn't support or talk about or do. | ||
We are totally independent. | ||
It's why Alex Jones has been successful for so long, and we are just doing everything we can to continue that incredible lineage and heritage of freedom and, again, I think freewheeling is the best way to put it. | ||
So Infowarsstore.com is how you support us. | ||
Infowarsstore.com, Independence Day Super Sale. | ||
You're getting double Patriot points, plus up to 60% off all of these incredible products. | ||
This is just anecdotal. | ||
Purely anecdotal, but my sister's family, they have four kids under four. | ||
Wild. It's a wild house. | ||
Very fun. A lot of sickness going around. | ||
A lot of persistent coughs and things that come home from preschool. | ||
So my sister was like, we're doing a new regime. | ||
We're never going to get sick again. | ||
And one of the primary parts of this new regime was she bought three Alexa Pure Breezes from InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
It has one in each kid's room and then one in the living room. | ||
Now, it's purely anecdotal. | ||
They haven't gotten sick since. | ||
They have not gotten sick since they installed these Alexa Pure Breezes. | ||
So I don't know. I'm not taking credit for it. | ||
I'm just saying... These things are incredibly powerful. | ||
They can clean out the air. | ||
You don't know what affects that dirty air or mildew or whatever it is that's floating around your house. | ||
It gets sucked up. | ||
It goes in the carbon filter, like three carbon filters in these things. | ||
And again, it's just using nature. | ||
It's just using the natural attributes of these materials. | ||
I talked about it one time when I was cleaning up sort of this art desk that we have. | ||
And it's amazing because we've got this long series of cups with all the different pens and pencils and markers and everything. | ||
And then we have one of those cups is filled with charcoal that you use to draw, right? | ||
And while all the other ones have a little bit of dust on it, the one with charcoal is like just covered in dust bunnies. | ||
It's just because it's a natural consequence of static electricity. | ||
I don't really necessarily understand it, but it's just like all of our supplements, right? | ||
It's not that we're coming up with some new scientific abomination that might have a positive effect that we're putting forward. | ||
It's just like, you know what? | ||
You eat turmeric, it helps with your inflammation. | ||
You... Take fish oil, it gives you crazy dreams. | ||
Like, these are just natural things that people have noticed for thousands of years, and that's the beauty of InfoWars, is we're just taking this ancient knowledge that people might want to ignore in favor of some, you know, chemical created in a lab somewhere, but it's not necessary. | ||
We just go back to the old school. | ||
We go back to the things that your grandmother knew worked, bone broth and things like that. | ||
We just repackage it for the modern day, give you this all-natural, incredibly powerful. | ||
We don't need to create anything. God has given us everything we could ever possibly need. | ||
So we just help you to get what God has already created. | ||
And that even is the case for the water and the air filters. | ||
God has created this crazy effect where charcoal or whatever this material is, graphite, it attracts dust. | ||
It just does. We didn't need to create it. | ||
We didn't need to invent it. We didn't need to change anything about it. | ||
You just leave a piece of this stuff out. | ||
It'll just be covered in dust the next day because that's what happens because it has a negative charge and the thing has a positive charge. | ||
I'm no scientist. I can't explain it, but... | ||
You don't need to. You observe it and then you make a product out of it. | ||
So now you have this filter that when air passes through it, the electrical binding, however it works, attracts the dust, cleans out your air. | ||
It's incredibly powerful, incredibly effective, incredibly cheap now that it's on sale at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
That's all we do. That's all we do is we just take what is ancient and natural and good and been known about for a thousand years and just help you get it at the best price so it can improve your life like it has improved the lives of human beings since it was discovered and noticed by some caveman at some point. | ||
We're just going back. We're going back to Caveman style. | ||
We will return to Monkey here at InfoWars. | ||
And again, we're not going to get into the Krasenstein saga. | ||
We'll have to save that for another day. | ||
It's still unfolding. But it's sort of just a rehash of what happened with NBC where it's like these people say things and then they try to simultaneously... | ||
Reject what they said before while doubling down on it. | ||
It's very bizarre. But again, it's my fault. | ||
We spent too much time on the NBC article. | ||
We're going to move on. We're going to get to the world news. | ||
We're going to get to the international news. | ||
Infowarsstore.com to support us. | ||
Alright, welcome back folks. You know, one of our main missions here at the command center presiding over this war of information is to keep people motivated and Dedicated to what is in no way a lost cause, | ||
but rather is a slowly but surely swelling movement of human beings opposing their corporate, unelected, despotic masters. | ||
And we say it all the time. | ||
I mean, when you look at warfare since the dawn of time, since the dawn of ages, I mean, it's all about Fear versus confidence. | ||
It's all about whether you are demoralized or not. | ||
So we're not going to let ourselves demoralize. | ||
There's no reason to be demoralized. | ||
And one of the One of the main things, I mean, you see these hyperventilating articles, we're not doing what we're doing, but we are doing it, and it's good, and you can't say that it's bad, but if you say that it's bad, you're falling for our trick. | ||
We got you. You know, it's just like, okay, you people are freaking out because clearly your deception is faltering, it's failing, right? | ||
I'm thinking there's some... I mean, maybe it's Wizard of Oz, right? | ||
The guy just like frantically trying to pull the curtain back, just being like, no, stop paying attention to us. | ||
Stop looking over here. It's that sort of idea. | ||
Or somebody just with a mask and it's just peeling off and they're just like, no, trust me, I really am Joe Biden. | ||
No, really, I am. It's failing. | ||
It's completely collapsing across the board. | ||
The other aspect is the cultural aspect, the success of the Bud Light movement. | ||
Boycott. The success of the Target boycott. | ||
The success of these mass movements of people just rejecting the corporations that are going along with this. | ||
BlackRock going, yeah, we're not going to call it ESG anymore because you guys figured that out and we can't get away with it, so we're going to hide that from now on. | ||
It's also the... The cultural aspects, I mean, Tucker Carlson going on Twitter and making these episodes that are getting just millions upon millions of views, hundreds of millions in just a few hours. | ||
The documentary from Matt Walsh, Speak of the Devil. | ||
What is a Woman? Getting like 100 million views in two days on Twitter. | ||
These are incredible numbers. | ||
And the... Music as well. | ||
The Boycott Target song that was number one on iTunes in all categories, higher than Taylor Swift, higher than any other artist, was Nick Natoli and his song Boycott Target. | ||
I mean, that's an achievement. That's the real deal. | ||
That's not just like some virtue signaling from some right-wing outlet patting themselves on the back. | ||
That's domination of an entire media outlet in terms of The Apple iTunes Store, the biggest media or music system in the world. | ||
Another song that's come out recently that's just been getting awesome, amazing traction is this song by Hi-Rez that we played and sort of premiered first on this show after he sent it to us the morning that he made it. | ||
Since then, it's gone absolutely viral, and he himself, Hi-Rez the rapper, has been going on shows all over the place promoting this and promoting some other things as well. | ||
He actually took the opportunity during Pride Month to come out on, I believe it was Newsmax the other day, or OAN, it was OAN, so he was on OAN the other day, and Hi-Rez the rapper came out live on TV, pretty incredible stuff. | ||
Let's go now to clip number eight. | ||
unidentified
|
Last thing I wanted to say, in honor of Pride Month, I'm coming out as a full-fledged Alex Jones supporter, so I just wanted you guys to know Alex Jones was right, and I fully support him, and I was scared to say that, so mom, I'm sorry. | |
I love it. Amen to that. | ||
Keep up the great work, guys. | ||
Amen to that. | ||
Thanks a lot. Thank you. Amen to that. | ||
That's Hi-Rez the Rapper giving Alex Jones a shout-out on live TV. Everybody loves Alex Jones. | ||
There's just no denying it. | ||
I told you about it the other day when we went to the stand-up thing with Gavin McGinnis and... | ||
Anthony Cumia and... | ||
Alex Jones comes out and literally it's everybody standing ovation for like five minutes. | ||
They didn't expect him. It's not even his show. | ||
He just comes out and it's everybody literally doing the bowing thing. | ||
There's like, we're not worthy! | ||
Just like yelling. And Rob from the crew is wearing the Alex Jones for President t-shirt as soon as we walk out. | ||
Literally in one minute, there's four different people coming up being like, is he really running for president? | ||
Can I really vote for him? The amount of love Alex Jones gets is really undeniable. | ||
And of course, Tucker Carlson is sort of following along in this tradition. | ||
I want to go down to the first couple minutes of Tucker Carlson's episode from last night. | ||
He gets into the Hunter Biden stuff later in the episode, but the first few minutes he sticks to Ukraine and the absurdity of the Ukraine war being a war for democracy with a great little montage as well. | ||
So let's go now to Tucker Carlson's episode 8, I believe, that he put out on Twitter yesterday talking about Zelensky and the war for democracy. | ||
Let's watch. Hey, it's Tucker Carlson. | ||
You may have found yourself wondering recently, as the world slides closer to nuclear annihilation than any time in human history, why exactly are we at war with Russia? | ||
It seems like there's a pretty significant downside to this particular foreign policy decision, starting with economic collapse and ending potentially with extinction. | ||
So is there a good reason we're doing it? | ||
So many innocent young people have been killed. | ||
So many hundreds of billions of dollars have been wasted, some of them from the U.S. Treasury. | ||
So what's the point? | ||
Are we really doing this so the Biden family can repay its debts to the oligarchs who financed their beach house in Rehoboth? | ||
Are we doing it so our government can continue to lie about its illicit biolabs in Eastern Europe? | ||
So that flabby losers like Toria Newland and Tony Blinken can feel like they're doing something important with their sad, empty lives? | ||
Really? Honestly, there's got to be a better reason for waging this the most pointless war of all. | ||
What is it? Well, thankfully, we have an answer. | ||
The war against Russia, ladies and gentlemen, the war against Putin and for Ukraine, is, in fact, a war for democracy. | ||
Watch and recall the motive. | ||
The president has said many times we're focused on what we can do to support Ukraine's effort to fight for their democracy. | ||
Democracy must prevail. | ||
The Ukrainian people are fighting the fight for their democracy and in doing so for ours as well. | ||
unidentified
|
Assisting and helping Ukraine win this fight for democracy and freedom. | |
And of course Ukrainian President Zelenskyy understand that what's at stake in Ukraine is bigger than just his nation. | ||
It is literally a battle for freedom and democracy themselves. | ||
They are showing the world what an existential fight for democracy looks like. | ||
unidentified
|
President Zelensky and the Ukrainians have changed the course of history for the better. | |
And we unequivocally are with the Ukrainian people in their fight to remain a sovereign democracy. | ||
Unequivocally with the Ukrainian people to remain a democracy. | ||
It's a bipartisan view. | ||
Democracy must prevail. | ||
You just heard noted democracy expert Nancy Pelosi say, the daughter of the mobbed-up mayor of Baltimore. | ||
As Pelosi puts it, the Ukrainian people are fighting the fight for their democracy and for ours as well. | ||
That's right, for ours as well. | ||
Without Ukrainian democracy, in other words, we can have no democracy here. | ||
If the Ukrainians aren't free, neither are we. | ||
We must make sure they can vote in Kiev so we can continue to vote in Kansas City. | ||
It's really that simple. And yet tonight, we regret to tell you that we have a problem. | ||
It looks like they're not going to be able to vote in Kiev anymore. | ||
And no, for once, it's not Putin's fault. | ||
Democracy in Ukraine seems to be suspended by the world's foremost democracy advocate himself, Field Marshal Zelensky. | ||
unidentified
|
Watch this. This is a global question. | |
If we win, there will be. | ||
There will be no wartime and no war. | ||
An election should not be held in peace. | ||
unidentified
|
It should be held in peacetime when there is no war according to the law. | |
So when do you have an election? | ||
Well, he says if we win, we'll let people vote. | ||
Otherwise, no. You vote when we feel like it, because ultimately we're completely in charge and make all the rules. | ||
Your job is to obey or be punished. | ||
That's our version of self-government. | ||
Self means me. | ||
I'm the government. Now, that's not just any autocrat. | ||
That's our chief ally in the war for democracy. | ||
Yeah, but it's happening everywhere else in Europe as well. | ||
Powerful stuff from Tucker during his seventh episode published on Twitter. | ||
Tucker on Twitter. All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
We're halfway through the program today. | ||
This is American Journal, Infowars.com, band.video. | ||
I can't tell you too much about what we're doing. | ||
You'll hear about it in the next few days, I think. | ||
Sort of the rebirth of Infowars that you're witnessing right now. | ||
We've been under a pall, under a shadow of persecution. | ||
For a little while. Frankly, we just got sick of it. | ||
Just like, alright, enough of that. | ||
We're just gonna shake it off. Rise like phoenixes from the ashes. | ||
Reclaim our spot in the sun. | ||
So we're making a lot of big moves. | ||
Obviously, a part of this has been the re-ignition of long, dormant social media. | ||
platforms like Instagram and TikTok. | ||
We've been dominating some of these. | ||
Some of our videos on these platforms have millions of views. | ||
Some of them we don't even realize have millions of views. | ||
The one that we've been playing as a promo during commercial breaks for a while where I'm just listing off all the confirmed conspiracy theories. | ||
It starts with Elon Musk being asked, what conspiracy theories have been confirmed? | ||
Then I just start rattling them off. | ||
That video I put on TikTok and Got taken down. | ||
Got a community note strike or whatever. | ||
I wasn't able to follow anybody for a couple days and videos down. | ||
Little did I realize other accounts had uploaded that video and it has millions of views across TikTok. | ||
How they get away with it? No idea. | ||
Not sure. Obviously, they're not under the same scrutiny that we're under. | ||
But it's good to see. It's good to see more people picking up that torch and bringing light into the darkness. | ||
Just one of the videos of somebody re-uploading that onto TikTok. | ||
500,000 views. | ||
This is an invitation for you, by the way. | ||
If you see anything that you like on this program, take it down. | ||
Download it. We have a download button on band.video right there. | ||
You don't even have to download a plug-in. | ||
You don't have to go to some sketchy third site and copy and post our link. | ||
Click the download button. Full HD. Beautiful stuff. | ||
Go find some video editing software. | ||
There is... Hundreds of videos, even on your phone. | ||
The video editing on phones is pretty incredible these days. | ||
I mean, it's nothing like what you can get on PC, but even that you can get for totally free. | ||
So, this is an invitation for you. | ||
Do you want to have a TikTok account with millions of views? | ||
Download our videos and put them up on TikTok yourself. | ||
You're welcome to do that. | ||
We don't care. Monetize it. | ||
Make money off it. Make it your career. | ||
Just do whatever you want. Take our stuff, upload it, If you can, you'll brand it. | ||
Send people back to Bandai Video. | ||
Let people know where it came from. | ||
At the end of the day, it's all about the information. | ||
So, please, if you're out there, if you're one of these people that's downloaded our video and re-uploaded it and gotten millions of views, congratulations. | ||
Keep doing it. You're not going to get a cease and desist from us. | ||
My God. Do it as much as you could ever want. | ||
That is a really wonderful way to share it for us. | ||
So, we are... | ||
We're going to launch some new initiatives here in the next few days. | ||
Very excited for that. Stay tuned and support us by going to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
Now, with that being said, let's move on to our next little breaking news where, again, you just... | ||
It's hard to wrap your mind around just what these people think they're getting away with. | ||
Okay? So we've covered this saga in the past from one Matt Hancock. | ||
From the Telegraph, in March of this year, they say Matt Hancock should be arrested for willful misconduct in public office. | ||
The Slythy Tove can... | ||
What does that mean? The Slythy Tove... | ||
I'm going to translate this into American. | ||
Again, this is from March of this year. | ||
They say within days of Sue Gray, the investigator of Partygate, being announced as Sir Keir Starmer's new chief of staff, there is an urgent question in Parliament. | ||
Quite right, too. | ||
When it comes to judging the conduct of the Tory government, the civil service is about as impartial as the Taliban commander at a girls' reading group. | ||
But was that really the national question most urgently in need of an answer? | ||
For eight days now, the Telegraph has published the most breathtakingly damning stories about the misuse of power and, quote, science by Matt Hancock and his – Hancock, that's pretty good – and his cabal during the pandemic. | ||
I don't know about you, but having read so much about their callow political posturing and callous disregard, especially for children and the elderly, my outrage bucket is empty and I'm reduced to throwing up bile. | ||
So pretty strident words about what this Matt Hancock fellow got up to. | ||
So what was revealed were WhatsApp messages revealed in the Telegraph's lockdown files. | ||
Basically showing that they were using terror tactics to, quote, frighten the pants off everyone to keep us all behaving like good little boys and girls. | ||
So sharing reassuring news, such as our hospitals are coping surprisingly well with spare beds in the East and South, would have been out of the question because it would have weakened his control over us. | ||
So, in other words, this Matt Hancock guy had a deliberate policy of fear. | ||
Only have bad news. | ||
Stifle the good news. | ||
Create bad news if you don't have any to spread. | ||
To get people fearful. To override their logical processes in their brain. | ||
To appeal straight to their most base beliefs and base reactions. | ||
This is all psychological programming. | ||
This is a psychological operation. | ||
This is what it looks like in effect. | ||
In actuality. | ||
And so he... | ||
It's still around, apparently, and has now came out with a new statement. | ||
This guy got busted. | ||
His personal messages were revealed showing that he was purposely creating this atmosphere of fear to take advantage of, to keep us all locked down, everybody in the UK to keep everybody in a state of fear and lockdown and paralysis. | ||
And then this story is from Michael Peasinger today. | ||
Earlier today, this is yesterday actually. | ||
Earlier today, former UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock, who advocated and led use of terror messaging to drive support for and compliance with lockdown measures throughout 2020, choked back tears as he told the government's official COVID inquiry he is profoundly sorry for each and every COVID death and hope lockdowns will be much earlier and much more stringent during the next pandemic. | ||
Can you even wrap your mind around this? | ||
The dude gets caught creating this fear factory, you know, psychological operation, and he actually makes a video crying, saying he's so sorry that he didn't do it more and harder. | ||
Completely insane. So let's go now to this video. | ||
Clip number two, former UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock says he's profoundly sorry, not for lying and locking everybody down when they didn't need to, but for not doing it sooner and with more verve. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. I am profoundly sorry for the impact that had. | |
I'm profoundly sorry for each death that has occurred. | ||
And I also understand Why, for some, it will be hard to take that apology from me. | ||
I understand that. | ||
I get it. But it is honest and heartfelt. | ||
And I'm not very good at talking about my emotions and how I feel. | ||
But that is honest and true. | ||
And all I can do... | ||
Well, we'll come to that. | ||
Again, I've never seen anything like this. | ||
I've never seen anything like this. | ||
This dude is caught lying to the British people, manipulating them willfully, putting them in a state of fear to take advantage of them, to lock them down unnecessarily, causing untold numbers of miseries. | ||
...deaths. Keeping people out of hospitals who would otherwise have discovered cancer diagnoses early enough to treat, who now have to suffer the long, slow, agonizing death of cancer because this guy wouldn't let them go to the hospital. | ||
And he comes out and has a deep, heartfelt apology for not doing it more and sooner. | ||
Throw this man in prison. | ||
Dismantle everything he's talking about before it's too late. | ||
This is now an urgent existential crisis. | ||
Destroy this man and everything he believes in. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
We've covered how the so-called COVID inquiry in UK was really doomed from the start, which is a shame because It's almost understandable. | ||
I mean, when you really understand it, when you're at the Infowars level, when you're seeing this from the bird's eye, 30,000-foot view, when you know before anybody else does what the virus is, where it came from, Wuhan Institute of Virology, the way it was going to be used to leverage a vaccine mandate, when you know it was being used to You know, perpetuate the lockdown in order to get the mail-in ballots, cheat in the election. | ||
Like, when you see all of it happening before it ever comes to fruition, it can be very frustrating to then have to sit and watch everybody else fall for the lies continuously. | ||
You hold out a little bit of hope because you go, look, these people are in a state of panic. | ||
They're in a state of fear. They're in a state of confusion and purposefully orchestrated madness, basically. | ||
And maybe once the clouds clear, once the... | ||
Air is free once again, and people can look back and go, well, wait, none of that worked? | ||
Wait, the social distancing was based on nothing other than human psychology and what you thought people would put up with? | ||
The lockdowns had no scientific basis and did nothing to stop the virus spread whatsoever, and in fact created a whole host of other problems? | ||
Well, now we can go back. | ||
I mean, there's no statute of limitations on this. | ||
So a lot of these were like crimes against humanity. | ||
And some you can excuse as well, they were trying their best and just didn't succeed in what they wanted. | ||
But others were clearly and acknowledged deceptions from the people who were put in place and had the authority to carry out these orders. | ||
And so you thought maybe like after everything settles down and the dust settles and everybody can see clearly again, we can look back and go, oh, we were tricked. | ||
We were fooled. We're going to set things right to never let this happen again. | ||
And then it was like right off the bat when they're like, we've announced a COVID inquiry to figure out what happened during the COVID pandemic and what we did right and what we did wrong and whose fault it was. | ||
And the first thing they said was like, and the primary focus of the COVID pandemic Board, as we look back, should be the racial disparities. | ||
Was this a racist activity? | ||
Were non-white people harmed by this? | ||
And it's just like, okay. So you're not going to come to any conclusions. | ||
You're going to use this, once again, to further divide and further expand and accelerate your destructive policies. | ||
So I never had hope about this COVID inquiry, but to see the way it's being played out now is a whole new set of levels of deception. | ||
Not just new level of deception, it's like nine new levels of deception. | ||
It's actually incredible. | ||
And so just to, again, remind ourselves what the fury was like in March when Matt Hancock had his WhatsApp messages revealed, and see just how horrifically destructive these policies were, return to this Telegraph article. | ||
The author says, Oh, silly me, I forgot. | ||
Matt Hancock said he wanted to, quote, So sharing reassuring news, such as our hospitals are coping surprisingly well with spare beds in the East and South, that would have been out of the question because it would have weakened his control over us. | ||
What had begun as a commendable impulse to keep people safe had warped without any necessary scrutiny into how can we keep power? | ||
Continue on. WhatsApp messages published in the Daily Telegraph's lockdown files, which was considered by his predecessor to make NHS beds available to COVID patients from France. | ||
At that time, the British people were not allowed to access treatments. | ||
Thousands upon thousands of operations were canceled, and non-COVID patients were sidelined to, quote, support the NHS. But apparently Mr. | ||
Hancock considered it was appropriate to invite the French to use our medical facilities. | ||
What is the Secretary of State's view on what that says about the true state of NHS capacity? | ||
And was the nation perhaps deceived? | ||
This is in quotes because this was actually one of the questions put forward by an MP during question time there at the Parliament. | ||
As the lockdown files revealed, Matt Hancock even discussed a plan with his aide, Alan Nixon, to, quote, take off the table a learning disability hub in Bury. | ||
Where the MP, James Daly, was about to vote against the government. | ||
So yeah, they were... | ||
This isn't speculation. | ||
This is a conspiracy theory. | ||
I'm reading from one of the most popular, the most respected mainstream news outlets in all of the UK. | ||
And they have the appropriate level of outrage in this article about what was done. | ||
They say, just when you think he sunk as low as humanly possible, he ponders using children with special education needs as leverage. | ||
Yes, 100% enthused Hancock. | ||
By unhappy coincidence, I've just now had an email from Rob, a father with an autistic son that... | ||
This is what Rob wrote. The knock-on effect for our family has been devastating. | ||
And the article notes, well, that's another Hancock triumph, a 14-year-old boy who successfully had the pants frightened off of him. | ||
To quote Hancock, hope you feel proud of yourself, Matt. | ||
So this guy who does this, who quite literally sends an untold number of Psychologically impaired children into total breakdowns and now it's like this poor father is like luckily the anti-psych meds have him back on board like people have been driven to suicide they've been driven to depression and had to resort to pharmaceutical interventions just get back on track because of the fear that this guy purposefully willfully by design and with institutional power fabricated in the minds of the It's not just Matt Hancock in this article from yesterday, | ||
michaelpsinger.com. | ||
S-E-N-G-E-R is how you spell singer here. | ||
He says one need not have a background in law enforcement to recognize that these words of Matt Hancock apologizing for not doing this more and harder. | ||
You don't have to have a background in law enforcement to recognize that these are the words of an entirely unrepentant sociopath. | ||
Worst of all, he says, may be the fact that 17 members of the pro-lockdown pressure group Independent SAGE have been asked to give evidence at the COVID inquiry. | ||
For those who've been paying attention, this is a far cry from how optimists hoped the aftermath of the COVID response would eventually play out. | ||
Independent SAGE is nothing but a questionably funded group of extremists with no relevant credentials proselytizing the dubious goal of zero COVID while hijacking the name of an official government body to fool the public into believing they have some legitimacy. | ||
In short, Independent SAGE is nothing but a disinformation organization that caused unfathomable harm by convincing citizens and officials to pursue an illusory goal using illiberal methods and with very real and catastrophic costs. | ||
To have Independent SAGE give evidence at the COVID inquiry means the potential criminals have, quite literally, been given a role in prosecuting the case. | ||
And it's incredibly well said. | ||
And he goes on about this. | ||
The title of this article is UK COVID Inquiry Reveals Just How Vast an International Communist Conspiracy May Be. | ||
And that's exactly what this was, as of course, the lockdown measures that were never a part of the pandemic preparation in Western countries was adopted wholesale from the Chinese communist playbook that we saw was so effective in China, of course. | ||
So this COVID inquiry has become a complete farce, has become a total cover-up, and half the people that are actually... | ||
Intending to use the COVID inquiry to get some sort of answers are concerned about the racial dynamics at work. | ||
Were non-white people affected more? | ||
I don't know. What about the 14-year-old white child who was terrified into a state of We're good to go. | ||
So this COVID inquiry in the UK, you can basically chalk up as a total, complete cover-up at this point. | ||
And this article goes on and on. | ||
The leading instigators of lockdown are getting away with it all, at least so far. | ||
Admittedly a bit defeating, but ultimately there is an objective reality. | ||
And the reality is that these policies destroyed countless millions of lives and transferred trillions in wealth from workers to the very richest for virtually no human benefit. | ||
So... I mean, you never expected the government to investigate itself in any legitimate way, but now we have evidence that it just goes far beyond that, and they're actually using it to further their destructive policies. | ||
We'll continue to cover this and so much more in the third hour, as well as your phone calls, but remember to go to Infowarsstore.com to take advantage of the Independence Day July 4th Super Sale. | ||
It is on, up to 60% off, plus double Patriot points at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
You're getting massive discounts on just about every product At the InfoWars store, including the Alexa Pure Breeze and Alexa Pure Pro water and air filtration systems. | ||
But on top of that, you've got the Tooth Face, you've got the Turbo Force, you've got the InfoWars MD line, the Dr. | ||
Jones Natural line, the InfoWars Platinum line. | ||
Everything on sale now up to 60% off plus double Patriot points on the July 4th Independence Day sale Infowarsstore.com. | ||
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
After seven years of violent revolution, our American founders were well aware that political factions were most often used to divide and conquer the people. our American founders were well aware that political factions were And they knew that the republic they created would only last as long as the people could remain educated. | ||
In 1816, Thomas Jefferson wrote, if a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be. | ||
By the end of the Civil War, the two-party system became the norm. | ||
The globalist system we face today was born. | ||
And the deliberate dumbing down of the American citizen began with our great-great grandparents. | ||
In the late 1800s, the Skinner-Pavlovian method was brought into American schools by Johns Hopkins. | ||
These psychological methods allowed teachers the ability to program students' behavior in the same way that Pavlov did with dogs. | ||
In 1934, the Carnegie International Endowment for Peace published the report on the Commission on Social Studies, which explicitly stated the goal of eventually taking away people's land, and noted that most people would obviously oppose this. | ||
The solution was to begin using the school system to recondition the minds of children. | ||
In 1976, the bicentennial year of the Declaration of Independence, 124 congressmen signed the Declaration of Interdependence, which stated that two centuries ago our forefathers brought forth a new nation. | ||
Now we must join with others to bring forth a new world order. | ||
And it pledged to give children special attention in distributing a common education to suit their goals. | ||
By the 1990s, this globalist dumbing-down system was perfected, and America began exporting it worldwide in what is known as outcome-based education. | ||
Starting in 2010, Common Core began in the United States. | ||
It outlined what students were expected to know at each grade level and enforced ways to assess those standards. | ||
Charlotte Iserby, author of The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America, has traced most of this agenda stemming from the Order of Skull and Bones at Yale through both Republicans and Democrats. | ||
Two wings of the same globalist bird, which understood that dumbed-down people have a base desire for a simple dualistic choice. | ||
In 1953, the Rockefeller Foundation funded the Robbers Cave Experiment, wherein 11-year-old boys, who thought they were signing up for summer camp, were organized into two separate tribes and were manipulated into fighting each other. | ||
Which was easily accomplished by having a single resource that the two groups competed for. | ||
The Henry Toshfell experiments of the 1970s showed that by simply dividing people into two groups, they would naturally identify with their own group and discriminate against the other. | ||
The basic ego mind is constantly making preferences. | ||
No matter how dumb you are, you have an opinion about everything. | ||
And if you can keep the population dumb enough and give them two parties to choose from, they will innately identify with one and despise the other. | ||
This allows the globalist system the cover they need to implement unpopular policies, such as a central bank digital currency, while we, the people, ignorantly fight each other. | ||
United we stand, divided we fall, and we've been falling for it for generations. | ||
The American people have been so thoroughly dumbed down that we think freedom is the ability to choose between two parties working for the same control system. | ||
And Greg Reese really getting to the heart of the issue there, the two-party system and the dumbing down of America. | ||
That's the latest from Greg Reese, premiered just minutes ago on Band.video. | ||
Go there now, watch the whole thing, share it around. | ||
Incredible stuff. Once again, InfoWarsStore.com is where you go to support all of this content. | ||
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. All right, welcome back, folks. | |
The third hour of American Journal has begun. | ||
begun we still have a lot more to cover that's tough I'm dumb thinking about that video we just watched from Greg Reese Sort of a damned if you do, damned if you don't kind of situation, right? | ||
Like, you don't want to play into the two-party duopoly system where they've got you choosing one side or another while they're both just alternate aspects of the same beast. | ||
But, at the same time, From my perspective, one side's clearly better than the other. | ||
I don't know. I don't know how you do it. | ||
I don't know how we deal with this because... | ||
You know, it's like... | ||
Yeah, you know, it's both sides of the same coin at the end of the day. | ||
But one side... Has all the extremists, all the psychopaths, can't tell the difference between men and women. | ||
They're like, they just buy every lie, hook, line, and sinker, from the war in Ukraine to COVID-19 to the vaccines. | ||
They are just perfectly willing to throw their fellow Americans into gulags for not supporting the thing that they didn't know existed yesterday. | ||
I mean, so, I don't know. | ||
It's a little bit confusing. | ||
It's a little bit... Damned if you do, damned if you don't. | ||
Because we're going to talk about politics now, and it's like, look at what's going on with politics. | ||
And sure, you can go back to the Bush years and see that the Republicans had the same... | ||
When it's a blue-blood Republican, when it's an old school, when it's somebody whose dad was the president and before that was the head of the CIA and helped to kick off the drug-running operation that eventually culminated in Iran-Contra with, by the way, Edward Lansdale, who we covered earlier, as kicking off the hearts-and-mind tactics in Vietnam, which was, of course, just a way to extend the period of the war. | ||
It's the same thing that happened with FM 32 or whatever it's called. | ||
I mean, it's all tied in very intimately together. | ||
So you can go back and see when Republicans were... | ||
Play in the game with the Democrats. | ||
They also got protection and support from the deep state. | ||
But Trump comes along, chooses the Republicans as his platform, and really shatters the whole paradigm. | ||
I don't think the same rules apply quite so much now, because we'll see the way that Trump is being treated versus Joe Biden. | ||
We actually have a couple videos I want to go to here. | ||
But let's start with I was going to start with the Biden. | ||
Here it is. New York Times confirms IRS whistleblower claim about Hunter Biden probe. | ||
They bury it in the 21st paragraph of the report. | ||
The DOJ was accused of blocking U.S. Attorney David Weiss from bringing harsher charges against the president's son. | ||
New York Times actually confirmed that that is what David Weiss said. | ||
He said he wanted to bring more severe charges against Hunter Biden, which, again, in the realm of law enforcement, is a very obvious and typical, and it might be a little bit skeezy, but it actually works tactic that they use. | ||
We're like, you hang over a guy's head. | ||
Look, man, you've had a wonderful life of smoking crack and sleeping with sex slaves and fondling your niece. | ||
Like, you've had a great time for the last couple decades. | ||
That's all going to be over now, and you're going to spend the rest of your life being the... | ||
Being the toy of a giant black felon that is never going to leave the jail cell with you. | ||
So that's your future unless you help us out. | ||
Unless you give us some information. | ||
Unless you show that you're willing to participate in this quest for justice and help us to untangle some of the web of deception that you and your father have weaved. | ||
The game is up. The jig is up. | ||
You're going to jail for years. | ||
Unless you help us with some of the financial stuff. | ||
Help us figure out, you know, exactly what went on there. | ||
Maybe even testify on behalf of justice and against your father, who you clearly are not exactly enthusiastic about helping. | ||
That's the way this should work. | ||
The way this should work is they go, look, we got you on the federal crime of lying on your gun application. | ||
You, just like anybody else in America, you're going to go to jail for years for this. | ||
But we can look past this. | ||
We can come to some sort of plea agreement if you help us with these other things. | ||
Like, that's the way it should work. | ||
That's the obvious way that this should go. | ||
No doubt that's what would have happened if it was a Trump kid. | ||
But they don't do that. Instead, you've got David Weiss apparently wanting to charge him with something bigger. | ||
And D.C. Attorney General Merrick Garland stepping in and interfering and stopping him from doing that. | ||
It's been confirmed by the New York Times at this point and of course it's been confirmed by the various and at this point multiplying IRS whistleblowers. | ||
We talked about this. So first we'll go to IRS whistleblower Gary Shapely. | ||
Here's a report from CBS, an interview with this IRS whistleblower. | ||
unidentified
|
Clip number 13. If this was any other person, they likely would have already served their sentence. | |
Gary Shapley was a lead IRS supervisory agent in Operation Sportsman. | ||
The investigation into Hunter Biden. | ||
Shapley said he uncovered conduct that warranted more serious charges. | ||
There were personal expenses that were taken as business expenses. | ||
Prostitutes. Sex club memberships. | ||
Hotel rooms for purported drug dealers. | ||
How much did Hunter Biden owe in taxes? | ||
So from 2014 to 2019, it was $2.2 million. | ||
The back taxes were paid off. | ||
And last week, the Trump-appointed U.S. attorney in Delaware, David Weiss, reached an agreement with Hunter Biden. | ||
The president's son would admit to a firearm charge and plead guilty for his failure to pay taxes. | ||
If a judge signs off, the deal means no jail time. | ||
Testimony we have just released details a lack of U.S. Attorney independence. | ||
And Shapley told lawmakers that U.S. Attorney Weiss was blocked from bringing stronger charges. | ||
But U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland said last week that Weiss was not. | ||
I'd say he was given complete authority to make all decisions on his own. | ||
I documented exactly what happened, and it doesn't seem to match what The Attorney General or the U.S. Attorney are saying today. | ||
Shapley provided lawmakers this contemporaneous email he wrote after an October meeting last year. | ||
Shapley says Weiss told him the opposite, that Weiss is not the deciding person on whether charges are filed. | ||
It was just shocking to me. | ||
Shapley, who is still working for the IRS, told us that even before President Biden took office, he was directed to avoid leads involving Hunter's father. | ||
There were certain investigative steps we weren't allowed to take that could have led us to President Biden. | ||
And you wanted to take him. | ||
We needed to take them. | ||
We're up from the very top, and Shapley is not the only whistleblower. | ||
There's now a second whistleblower from the IRS confirming what he's saying. | ||
Let's watch. Well, breaking another whistleblower is sounding the alarm in the Hunter Biden tax probe, claiming U.S. Attorney David Weiss was not making decisions and was not really in charge. | ||
That validates what we have already heard from Gary Shapley, the whistleblower who has gone public. | ||
David Spunt is live at the Justice Department with the latest. | ||
David, what do we know about this second whistleblower? | ||
unidentified
|
Trace, not much. We just know his name is Mr. | |
X. Of course, it's not his real name, but he wants to be anonymous. | ||
He told congressional staff last month he became emotional after seeing the way that this probe was handled from the beginning. | ||
Mr. X worked under the more publicized whistleblower Gary Shapley, and a letter released last week mixed Mr. | ||
X says it was clear to him that Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney David Weiss was not running the probe. | ||
Quote, he had to follow the normal process. | ||
He had to go to Washington, D.C., the U.S. Attorney's Office, them saying no. | ||
So he really wasn't in charge. | ||
He had to follow the process, end quote. | ||
But just three weeks ago, Trace Weiss wrote and signed a letter addressed to House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan. | ||
We obtained a copy. | ||
It reads in part, I want to make clear that, as the Attorney General has stated, I have been granted ultimate authority over this matter, including responsibility for deciding where, when and whether to file charges. | ||
Now, given the discrepancy between what Weiss allegedly said in the meeting and what he wrote in the letter, House Republicans want to hear from him and others in his office under oath. | ||
All right, folks, so we'll return to this on the other side and break down more about what has now been confirmed from, like, every source except for the criminals involved. | ||
They're the only ones still denying this. | ||
Everybody else sees what's going on. | ||
Welcome back, folks. I'm going to go ahead and open up the phone lines right now. | ||
Give us a call here at American Journal. | ||
Take calls for the rest of the show. | ||
1-877-789-2539. | ||
1-877-789-2539. | ||
That being said, we are going to continue to talk about what has been revealed from this Hunter Biden probe. | ||
As well as some breaking video from Joe Biden. | ||
It's both breaking in the sense that it's breaking news. | ||
It's also breaking in the sense that Joe Biden's mental faculties are breaking down like an old car in real time. | ||
Pretty incredible to see. | ||
Pretty incredible, in fact. | ||
We'll go to those videos in just a second. | ||
But again, just to fully understand what's going on here, they are busted at every level. | ||
They're busted, like Joe Biden is busted, being in cahoots with Hunter Biden and intimately familiar with and involved in his business practices. | ||
Complete lie that he told during the campaign. | ||
Busted in that the intelligence community with the FBI and CIA signing a 50-person letter to say that the laptop that Hunter Biden had was fake, completely busted, totally revealed to be a baseless, flagrant lie, disinformation in order to rig a presidential election. | ||
Hunter Biden got caught evading taxes, got caught lying on his form to try to get a gun. | ||
Caught, caught, caught, caught, caught, but not punished because we caught them manipulating the investigation from the highest levels of the Justice Department. | ||
Merrick Garland himself implicated in this and then lying about that. | ||
Almost impossible to exaggerate or overstate The level of corruption that has been revealed in just the last few years as this saga has unfolded before us. | ||
Again, you don't have to listen to us. | ||
You can go to the mainstream news. | ||
You can go to the New York Times. | ||
You can go to Fox News. | ||
You can go to CBS News with that whistleblower, Gary Shapely. | ||
This is... A fact. | ||
This is undisputable, indisputable, undeniable. | ||
This is reality. | ||
The Biden crime family has both swindled and lied and manipulated and sold America out and engaged in treasonous activity with our geopolitical enemies routinely over the last several decades. | ||
They have enriched themselves by tens of millions because of it. | ||
Whisper blowers have revealed this investigations into it have been stymied and diverted and not allowed to happen because of the activities and intervention. | ||
Of people in the DOJ, the FBI, as well as Congress and Senate were protecting Biden and helping him to carry out this criminal activity. | ||
It's blatant at this point. | ||
Again, it's totally undeniable. | ||
The question is, will the Republicans in office grow a pair in time to actually do something about this? | ||
I have my doubts. So that second video that we watched was a second whistleblower who has come forward. | ||
The story's at Infowars.com. | ||
Second whistleblower comes forward, claims U.S. Attorney David Weiss wasn't really in charge of the Hunter Biden case. | ||
He's going by Mr. X. | ||
Second Biden whistleblower called himself Mr. X has come forward claiming U.S. David, U.S. Attorney David Weiss appointed by the DOJ to investigate Hunter Biden did not actually have unilateral authority to charge him. | ||
The first IRS whistleblower Gary Shapely alleged to Congress in May that Weiss had confessed that bombshell revelation to him in a private meeting. | ||
U.S. Attorney Weiss was present for the meeting. | ||
He surprised us by telling us on the charges, quote, I'm not the deciding official on whether charges are filed, unquote. | ||
Shapely attorney Mark Little said on Fox News on Tuesday. | ||
Now a second anonymous whistleblower, Mr. | ||
X, has come forward to corroborate Shapely's allegations. | ||
Weiss had to follow the normal process. | ||
He had to go to Washington, D.C., the U.S. Attorney's Office, them saying no. | ||
The whistleblower's testimony to the House Ways and Means Committee read that he wasn't in charge. | ||
He had to follow the process. | ||
Hunter last week pled guilty to two federal tax charges and reached a plea agreement with Weiss's office to a gun charge that resulted in the DOJ recommending probation. | ||
Weiss assured the House Judiciary Committee in a letter on June 7th that he had the ultimate prosecutorial authority to charge Hunter. | ||
Weirdly, Weiss is playing into this idea. | ||
He's actually lying cover-up for the fact that he was manipulated, so he shouldn't get away with this either. | ||
If the allegations from the IRS whistleblowers are proven true through the House Republican investigation, we will begin an impeachment inquiry on Biden's Attorney General Merrick Garland, he wrote on Twitter. | ||
Of course, Merrick Garland was slated to be a Supreme Court justice under Obama. | ||
Until Obama thought they'd play a cute little game where they would put forward Merrick Garland and then let the Republicans deny that. | ||
Assured, absolutely positive that Hillary Clinton would then get into office and they could put somebody even more extreme on the bench. | ||
I mean, all this is manipulation and political showmanship. | ||
But we've got a couple videos that just came out a few minutes ago. | ||
Of Biden being asked about his participation with his son and the fact that his son said quite blatantly, my dad is here in the room with me while we're doing this. | ||
Let's go first to this clip of Hunter Biden with a reporter asking, was he involved and how was he involved in his son's treasonous and illegal business activities with the Chinese government? | ||
unidentified
|
President Biden, how involved were you in your son's Chinese shakedown text message? | |
Were you sitting there? | ||
Were you involved? Were you involved? | ||
No! Yeah. | ||
It happens every time, doesn't it? | ||
It's like every single time he gets a little bit of pushback, the both literally and figuratively mask slips. | ||
And he's just like... No! | ||
No! But you were though. | ||
But actually you were and actually we have proof that you were. | ||
And actually the pictures from Hunter Biden's phone show that he was at your house while making those text messages and you were also there. | ||
So you were there. | ||
You want to explain it? He's just like... | ||
No! Just like... | ||
Just feel the demon coming up from beneath him. | ||
You've got to understand how... | ||
It's like this with all these people. | ||
Kamala Harris is the same way. | ||
You can see the reports from people on the inside. | ||
It's just like people are just, everybody around them is in a constant state of fear, not knowing when the smiling, genial facade will fall and the true Joe Biden will come out. | ||
It's a finger in your face and it's, I will kill your family, you son of a... | ||
It's just true. | ||
It's just the way these people are, how they got to where they are. | ||
Now, this has caused a major breakage in the mental facilities of Joe Biden. | ||
He's clearly shook by this. | ||
He's clearly, like, he's been caught out. | ||
It's just, he's trying to run out the clock at this point. | ||
He's like, maybe I'll die before they bring the punishment down. | ||
But it's coming, and it's freaking him out. | ||
So, let's go now to this other clip from the questioning outside of the White House. | ||
Here's Joe Biden just showing his mental fatigue. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. It's hard to tell, but he's clearly losing war in Iraq. | |
Yeah, you heard it, folks. Putin is losing the war in Iraq. | ||
The war in Iraq is just not going well for Putin. | ||
Can we get rid of this guy for the sake of our country and our existence? | ||
Can we get rid of him and everybody around him, please, for the love of God? | ||
Now to your phone calls now. | ||
Still some open lines if you want to call in. | ||
1-877-789-2539. | ||
We'll go to Jefferson in Virginia first. | ||
Go ahead, Jefferson. You're on the air. | ||
Hey, good morning, Harrison. How are you? | ||
Good, thank you. Have you thought about having Robert Owens from the John Birch Society back on Constitutional Corner? | ||
No, but I'd be happy to. | ||
Let me make a note. | ||
I'd certainly like for us to have at least an hour discussion about whether Kamala Harris is going to be an ineligible president of the United States or not, based on her native-born status rather than being a natural-born status. | ||
He's about the only person you've had on that agrees with me. | ||
The other guest you might get on would be John Eastman, but he's being disbarred in California right now, so he's got a lot on his plate already. | ||
But the litigation that people always refer to about Kamala Harris is based on the Ankeny case in Indiana, where three judges, We sued the governor of Indiana to say you can't let Obama be on the ticket For a president, because he's not a natural-born citizen, even though he was a natural citizen. | ||
His mother was a citizen of the United States. | ||
He had naturality, but he didn't qualify as a natural-born citizen because his father was not a citizen. | ||
So they brought that case in Indiana, and it was ruled basically that being born here makes him a natural-born citizen. | ||
That's obviously an error. | ||
They even said they ignored the language of the Wong Kim Ark ruling from the Supreme Court. | ||
But the real question is, how did these guys get standing to bring the case in the first place? | ||
If you and I can't get standing to bring a case against Kamala Harris, how did these guys in Indiana get standing? | ||
How was that granted when they weren't the proper plaintiffs to bring the case in the first place? | ||
So, we have this sort of false ruling, false litigation, limited hangout that keeps us from being We're good to go. | ||
And they think the argument is dumb. | ||
I don't think the argument's dumb. | ||
I don't think it's stupid. I think it's valid. | ||
I think it's... I don't know why more people don't bring it up. | ||
I think the good news is that absolutely nobody wants Kamala Harris to be president. | ||
I mean, the way that you're laying it out, she probably shouldn't be allowed to be vice president anyway. | ||
But I think the good news in all of this is that nobody... | ||
I don't even think Kamala Harris wants to be president. | ||
I don't think her husband wants her to be president. | ||
I don't think Joe Biden wants her to be president or anybody. | ||
Turns out that Kamala has the worst net negative of any vice president in history. | ||
Yeah, right. The worst poll numbers ever of all time. | ||
Worst approval rating as vice president, as sitting vice president. | ||
I really don't think it's a bad argument, Jefferson. | ||
I think it's a good argument. | ||
I think once you lay it out there, it's a shame that people aren't picking it up and more people aren't talking about it, but obviously you've brought it to our attention. | ||
As far as I can tell, you're exactly right. | ||
She's not eligible to be president, and maybe somebody will bring a case, and it'll get attention. | ||
But as of now, it's sort of a bummer that nobody seems to care that much. | ||
But I'm on your side, Jefferson. | ||
I think it's a good point. I don't think it's a stupid thing to talk about. | ||
I think it's extremely legally valid, what you're saying. | ||
I'd love to hear Ivan Raquin discuss what he thinks of this issue. | ||
He considers himself a constitutional scholar. | ||
If you can get him on, Just briefly and have him address the issue why he doesn't make an issue of it himself or where he stands on it. | ||
I've tried to contact him through Twitter on this, but he said he brought it up years ago but didn't really follow up on it. | ||
But I'd like to hear him. Anyway, somebody should be on just to discuss the issue and why we're all confused about whether the 14th Amendment Was an amendment that changed Article 2 requirements, criterion for eligibility. | ||
Everybody sort of points to that, and then they point to the Indiana Ankeny misruling by their judge. | ||
Well, you know, God willing, we'll never have to actually contend with a Kamala Harris presidency. | ||
But if we do, I'm sure that will become a bigger and more important issue. | ||
Thank you for the call, Jefferson. | ||
I do appreciate it. Let's go to Obadiah in Las Vegas. | ||
You say Biden is definitely not going to prison. | ||
I hate to agree with you, Obadiah, but I pretty much do. | ||
But go ahead. What are your thoughts on this? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, I mean, can you name when the last time a major politician did get suffered consequences of doing anything illegal? | |
Yeah, Donald Trump. We got proof of Nancy Pelosi... | ||
I mean, Hillary Clinton's whole campaign or administration destroyed cell phones with hammers. | ||
Yeah, she did. | ||
unidentified
|
You know, so they just rub it in our face. | |
It's the other part of the ritual. | ||
Yeah. So I wouldn't even be surprised if Hunter Biden runs for president and gets into the presidency. | ||
Oh, Chad Obadiah, but it's true. | ||
I think you're exactly right. | ||
No, I've got nothing to combat you with. | ||
I think you're exactly on the word I want to. | ||
So, yeah. Thanks for that call. | ||
unidentified
|
And even with Donald Trump, on that news conference, he said that he could shoot somebody in the middle of Fifth Avenue in the head and not lose any voters. | |
And not lose any supporters, yeah. | ||
That's a little bit different than, I mean, and come on, you can't, like, obviously he's being hyperbolic, but I get the point. | ||
Yeah, the point is made. | ||
But, yeah, none of these people, I mean, the most frustrating part is that they're the same ones out there every single day being like, nobody is above the law as they float well above the law. | ||
unidentified
|
Final thoughts, Obadiah? I was just going to say, all you got to do is trade that shot in the head to the shot in the arm with a poisonous vaccine, and hundreds of millions of people are dead and lost their quality of life, and he's still running for president. | |
And you've still got people voting for him. | ||
You've still got people saying that we need him as the president. | ||
We do need him as president and you should vote for him because those vaccines were coming out whether he did anything or not. | ||
So I just, you know, again, this is Trumpian grandstanding where he's taking credit for something that he kind of didn't have anything to do with. | ||
So I don't know how you can actually blame him for that. | ||
But again, I don't want to get into that conversation. | ||
We've had it too many times. | ||
So let's go to John in Ontario. | ||
Now, thank you for the call, Obadiah. | ||
You want to talk about this Greg Reese report on the left and right paradigm. | ||
Pretty powerful stuff, John. Go ahead. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, absolutely. And hello to all the info warriors out there. | |
God bless you. Yeah, I mean, this idea of the manipulated left-right paradigm, putting people into a war, you know, it's It's strange because no matter what we do, we are in a battle of good versus evil. | ||
That's one side versus the other. | ||
Even Jesus said, if you're not with me or against me, and of course it says in Genesis that he said enmity, which is war between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent. | ||
So we're always stuck in this left-right paradigm as it were. | ||
And I like to think of it sort of like, you know, where we're in a cockfight and The public is there and they're watching the fight and they're betting and they're seeing who's going to win this fight. | ||
And we as Info Warriors are invested in the fight. | ||
We're the ones, you know, with our rooster in the ring trying to win that fight. | ||
And so, you know, the appeal we have is a lot different than, say, fighting a war because what we're trying to do is I don't know if the public is really following that or if we're going to be able to move forward from this point or if we're sort of just trapped in this moral debate that can never end. | ||
No, I think that's a very good point. | ||
It's something that I've actually been meaning to bring up, especially with Owen having to go to D.C. and having to face prison time for not breaking a law, for being on public property. | ||
Just completely absurd. | ||
And it's like... InfoWars, this is why we're dangerous. | ||
This is why they're trying to take us out, is because we aren't just observers. | ||
We aren't just talking heads that are just mentioning what's going on. | ||
We are activists. We want to inspire you to be activists, and we have paid the price for that. | ||
We'll keep fighting. We'll keep being in the ring, the man in the arena, the cock in the ring, as John puts it. | ||
We'll be right back. Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Final segment of American Journal. | ||
Really the only story that I wanted to cover in more detail here. | ||
You really don't even need that much more detail. | ||
We covered it in the Daily Dispatch this morning. | ||
And simply this. | ||
The audio leak that we covered yesterday that the mainstream media has been running with where Trump is saying they're trying to start a war in Iran. | ||
They're blaming me on the war in Iran. | ||
Look at this. Look at this paper. | ||
It's secret. It's totally secret. | ||
I could have declassified it, but I didn't. | ||
Here it is. Isn't that amazing? | ||
Total bombshell, of course. | ||
Just blows his case apart. | ||
I mean, send the man to jail right now. | ||
Except, of course, now the latest is that this alleged document that Trump is talking about in the audio clip, not actually a part of the DOJ charges. | ||
Catherine Herridge reported on Tuesday that the document at the heart of the leaked audio of Donald Trump discussing General Mark Milley's plan to evade Iran is not actually a part of the DOJ case against him. | ||
Trump has said he's done nothing wrong and repeated that while on the campaign trail in New Hampshire on Tuesday. | ||
Trump said, we had a lot of papers, a lot of papers stacked up. | ||
In fact, you could hear the rustle of paper. | ||
Nobody said, I did anything wrong. | ||
Trump's consistently said he declassified all the records he took from the White House, Harris reported. | ||
Meanwhile, talking heads and pundits have said the recording could be used against Trump as evidence of wrongdoing, claiming that he had the document with him while he was discussing the Iran plan. | ||
However... That's not actually one of the documents in the case. | ||
It's been revealed by Herridge and CBS that the document Trump was allegedly discussing at Bedminster is not among those documents that Trump is accused of having retained. | ||
The whole thing was just one big gigantic nothing burger. | ||
CBS News has the story, Iran memo not among the 31 records underlying charges in Trump federal indictment. | ||
The Defense Department memo on Iran at the heart of the now public audio recording that captured a July 2021 meeting with the former president Donald Trump is not a part of the 31 counts of willful retention of national defense information charged in special counsel Jack Smith's indictment of the former president, | ||
a source now familiar with the matter confirmed to CBS News, which is interesting because CNN did present it as being a crucial and integral part of the Evidence against Donald Trump, but how you could be using that evidence against Donald Trump when it's not even the document that he's being charged with makes no sense at all. | ||
So, again, not too much more to get into that other than this is yet another media hoax intended to manipulate and convolute the entire discussion about this and convince people that We're good to go. | ||
Much, much, much, much less likely that they'll see a follow-up the next day saying, oh, actually, that has nothing to do with the document thing. | ||
So they'll just go around. They'll be talking with their friends. | ||
They'll be having discussions about this. | ||
And they'll say, I heard it. I heard the tape. | ||
The dude had secret documents that he was hidden. | ||
He's guilty. Throw away the key. | ||
But it has absolutely nothing to do with the case being brought against him. | ||
This is the way that you use the ignorance of the American people to bamboozle and confound them. | ||
With that, we go back out to your phone calls. | ||
We've got Travis in Kentucky. | ||
Now, this is a crazy story, Travis. | ||
You say that... Well, I'll go ahead and let you tell the story. | ||
Thank you for calling in, Travis. You're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
What happened to you? Well, it kind of all started with just flying my flag out front, upside down. | |
And people starting and posting that on Facebook and everything. | ||
Explain that, because I know our audience probably knows, but for people that are unfamiliar, hanging the American flag upside down, a lot of people see that and they go, this is disrespectful, or this guy hates America. | ||
What does it really mean? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, what it means is our entire nation is in distress. | |
And I'm trying to signal that to everyone else around me. | ||
I was hopeful that, you know, I would actually stop and have the balls to, you know, ask a question other than to just take pictures and hopefully they need the answer. | ||
Okay, so you hang your flag upside down as a sign of distress saying our country's in trouble. | ||
So then what happens? Right. | ||
unidentified
|
And so then, but I used to, I was working in downtown Louisville restoring houses and whatnot. | |
But I noticed that they've been working on a 15-minute city. | ||
At least a segment of one in downtown Louisville. | ||
And so I took some video of that and was posting that. | ||
But the same day that I posted the videos, I got kicked off of the social media sites I was trying to post them on. | ||
And not only that, when I got home, I was met with police and I was arrested and then put into a maximum security dorm and then directly But three days after that, I was jumped by six guys. | ||
They ruptured my spleen. | ||
Whoa. In prison? | ||
unidentified
|
I got that removed. Yeah, well, in jail. | |
While awaiting trial, which I have zero criminal records. | ||
Nothing at all. So, I'm sorry, what are they charging you with? | ||
I mean, what did they throw you in jail for? | ||
unidentified
|
What they ended up throwing me in jail for was... | |
A supposed police report that was filed by an elderly lady that the only matching description they had to me was that I drove a red sedan and there was a red sedan in the description. | ||
But there was no plate described or anything like that. | ||
So I really don't know how the charge got to even go through it all, but it's getting thrown out as far as the charge goes. | ||
And, you know, and lawyers are about to have their fun. | ||
I'm just kind of looking up on it, though, really, because, man, things were getting rough with the economy and everything else, so this might actually end up being kind of a leg up to get my family out of this city. | ||
Wow. Okay, so people start noticing you because you hang your flag upside down. | ||
You notice that they're starting to build the infrastructure out in Louisville for a 15-minute city. | ||
You film some of that yourself and upload it in Louisville, Kentucky, right? | ||
Yeah. And then you get arrested off some spurious later dropped charge because you drive a red sedan and somebody else somewhere else committed a crime with a red sedan. | ||
They throw you in jail, beat you so badly they rupture your spleen and you have to get it removed and then they just drop the charges. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, you got it summarized right there in a nutshell. | |
Yeah. So yeah, they've got the charges, and the thing that they've tried to do to defend themselves, I guess, so far, at least at the Department of Corrections, is they open charges on the individuals that assaulted me. | ||
But that only is going to go so far. | ||
You know. But yeah, I just wanted to really call in, and I appreciate what y'all do up there. | ||
I watch every day. | ||
But... Yeah, the political persecution is really reaching down to the little man even. | ||
Well, that's pretty wild, man. | ||
I mean, just as you're talking, I was just searching, you know, 15-Minute City Louisville, and they're doing it. | ||
I mean, they're not exactly shy about it. | ||
15-Minute Louisville, guiding growth to improve livability. | ||
So, I mean, clearly they are doing this. | ||
I'd love to air the video that you shot. | ||
I'm not sure if you were able to get it up on social media at any point. | ||
unidentified
|
I've still got the video. I can still send it to you. | |
That's not a problem. If you want to upload it to Twitter and DM it to me, my DMs are open. | ||
At Harrison H. Smith, I think is my name. | ||
What is my name on Twitter? Yeah, at Harrison H. Smith on Twitter. | ||
Send me that DM and I'll be looking out for it. | ||
unidentified
|
Alright, I'll definitely get on there. | |
Just say, this is Travis from Kentucky, Louisville, 15-Minute City. | ||
I'll make sure to look at that and we'll play that video as soon as we get it. | ||
I'm sorry you had to go through that, Travis. | ||
unidentified
|
God bless. No, it happened for a reason. | |
It happened for a reason. It opened my eyes up to a whole higher power and everything else that I needed to see. | ||
So it's going to be alright in the long run. | ||
Well, that's a very admirable perspective to take on a man that don't... | ||
You know, don't let him defeat you. | ||
Clearly, you've got the resilience to carry on the fight. | ||
Wow, incredible stuff. Thank you so much for that call, Travis. | ||
I really do appreciate it. | ||
And, you know, hopefully things turn around for you. | ||
Maybe get out of Louisville before they enact the 15-minute kill zone around you. | ||
That sounds horrifying. Thank you for that call. | ||
I do want to quickly go to BS Assassin. | ||
You've got a poem for us. | ||
We only have about a minute and a half left in the show. | ||
But BS Assassin, let me hear the poem you have for us, please. | ||
unidentified
|
Good morrow, sir. Here we go. | |
Pieces of me drift out to sea, never to return. | ||
I am only left with what is left of me, just the pieces that are burned. | ||
Confused by evil's teachings, I was condemned to a desolate island destined to die. | ||
But I will not die. | ||
No, my friend, instead I shall rise. | ||
Rise like a mighty phoenix from the ruins of my life. | ||
Blinded for so long, but now I see the light. | ||
unidentified
|
Even when everything goes wrong, we must fight, because heaven is life. | |
Ah, beautiful stuff. Reminds me of Count of Monte Cristo. | ||
Got some Edmond Dantes in there. | ||
Condemned to death, only to arise more powerful than ever before. | ||
Powerful stuff. B.S. Assassin, thank you so much for that. | ||
Thank you to all of our great callers and all of our great listeners. | ||
And of course, everybody who shares our content by going to band.video, clicking that share button gives you the disguise link. | ||
Download it yourself. Upload it yourself. | ||
Go to AmericanJournal.info to find all of our social media where you can help our crusade, our jihad, as we retake the so far unclaimed ground of social media. | ||
Thank you so much for your help in all of this, and we will be back tomorrow for more. | ||
Remember to go to Infowarsstore.com to support us. | ||
It is the Independence Day, July 4th Super Sale, 60% off. | ||
Up to 60% off our top-selling products, all products really, and you get double Patriot points. | ||
Go now to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
A lot of people have asked me, why is InfoWarsStore and InfoWarsLife not at a probiotic for more than three years? | ||
The answer is simple. We only bring you the highest quality to lowest prices. | ||
We had a top maker, top certified of probiotics for more than seven years. | ||
They got bought by a libtard company and said, we're not doing business with you, Mr. | ||
Jones, anymore. Finally, we got a probiotic just as good or better We're the top lab that loves our show. | ||
We're able to private label it under InfoWarsMD as our probiotic formula. | ||
So you can get a super high quality probiotic for amazing gut health and more at InfoWarsStore.com for 25% off right now. | ||
Now wherever you get your probiotics, it's something everybody should be doing. | ||
But I'm asking you to try our probiotic. | ||
I think you're going to have an amazing effect and it funds our entire operation. | ||
So get your InfoWarsMD probiotic today at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
It's a high quality formula and it keeps us on the air. |