Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

June 23, 2023 - American Journal - Harrison Smith

02:11:52

The American Journal - FULL SHOW - 06/23/2023

Source

Participants

Main voices

harrison smith

01:27:39

matthew ehret

24:51

Appearances

alex jones

03:13

tucker carlson

04:06

Callers

patty in boston

01:15

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		Big Brother, we don't love you no more.
		Big Brother, we can't trust you no more.
		They keep on pulling and pushing until we all end up wishing and now we can't take no more.
		Big brother, living like 1984.
		Every day in 1984 with the world economic form.
		Don't forget to mention social credit implements in the score.
		If you're kicked out and you poor, I'll get declined at the store.
		They got us divided and fighting, distracting us from the war.
		Bursing our food and our water, confusing our sons and our daughters.
		You're lonely then and be happy, convincing you less is more.
		Controlling the population, creating invasionation.
		Have you complacent and placing in your trust in government agencies?
		What George Orwell have written today is no longer fiction.
		They implemented a system that put us all into prison.
		They want you to be the bugs in the pot, not taking care of your body.
		No religion and worshiping government and not God.
		Big brother, we don't love you no more.
		Big brother, we can't trust you no more.
		They keep on more than I'm pushing until we all end up wishing and that we can't take no more.
		Big brother, I'm living like 1984.
		Government tracking our phones, everything we eat, GMO.
		They want us all driving electric control everywhere that you go.
		I ain't riding with Biden and I ain't trusting Trudeau.
		But the back door, these politicians, the left place around the globe.
		Taxing on carbon emissions.
		They don't want you guarding your children.
		They don't want you having no knowledge.
		They want us all in the prison.
		Gender confusing the youth.
		Their agenda is proof.
		I don't trust these fat checkers every time they censor the truth.
		Hell, we overpopulated if our birth rate is shrinking.
		Go ahead, ignore your instincts.
		Morals right now to sink.
		All the freedoms that you thought you had, they gone in the blank.
		Sir, you're under arrest.
		You've had too much to think.
		Big brother, we don't love you no more.
		Big brother, we can't trust you no more.
		They keep on pulling up pushing until we all end up wishing and now we can't take no more.
		Big brother, living like 1984.
		Big brother.
		Big, big, big brother.
		Big brother.
		Big brother.
		In just a few short weeks, I'm going to be going on tour in the UK and Europe.
		Glasgow. All right, folks.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		That was Hi-Rez with his latest songs.
		He posted on Twitter saying the global government aren't going to like this song.
		They're just not going to like it.
		You know what? To... To back that up, I think this is a sentiment that's becoming more and more prevalent across the world.
		Let's go down to clip number 11, since Hi-Rez mentioned Trudeau.
		How are the people in Canada feeling about Trudeau?
unidentified		Let's find out. Number three question, Mr.
		Trudeau, is you've sold us out to globalism.
		You are not working for Canada.
		You are working for your globalist partners.
		I wonder how much they're paying you to betray Canada.
		What do we do with traitors in Canada, Mr.
		Trudeau? We used to hang them.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Hang them for treason.
unidentified		And you're doing that very same thing to us now.
		We know what you're doing.
		But you can start with the oil question.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Ooh, pretty straightforward there.
		Straightforward anger and fury.
		Appropriate, I'd have to say.
		As we know, Justin Trudeau, along with Mark Root and President Biden, and well, just about every major political figure in the West these days, they're all members of a mafia.
		They are all beholden to their masters of the World Economic Forum, the real global government that meets once or twice a year, comes together, sets policy, and then...
		It goes back to their national headquarters to implement what's been decided.
		That is a global government.
		People are waking up to it at a greater rate than ever before, and you can see how incredibly We'll cover that and so much more on the other side.
		So the American Journal stay with us, folks.
unidentified		It's Friday, June 23rd, year of our Lord 2023.
		And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
		Watch it live right now at band.video.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		All right, good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
		Welcome to The American Journal, broadcasting to you today, live on this Friday, June 23rd.
		Lots of stuff going on around the world today.
		Tons of news about Hunter Biden coming out.
		Just the latest in a extremely long list of whistleblowers.
		Seems like there really are some good people in government with a backbone.
		We see what's going on.
		See the stories being spun in the mainstream news.
		Just can't take it anymore.
		And are releasing the facts to the only people that will hear them.
		That is Republicans in Congress.
		Talk quite a bit about that.
		We're also going to talk about History of transgenderism, as laid out by Matt Walsh, causing quite a bit of consternation, controversy over there on Twitter.
		Also, last night, I sat down, started putting together, I want to do a full-fledged report on the Peter Hotez versus RFK Jr.
		The debate debacle, you might say.
		Track the whole thing from beginning to end.
		Tell everybody, lay down for everybody, this is more than just about a debate.
		These people are demanding unquestionable authority to dictate every aspect of your life and won't even discuss the issues.
		It's actually a major concern, should be for all of us, because it's not just about health issues.
		It bleeds into everything.
		They want those vested with institutional power to be unquestionable and not even have to deign to explain their decisions to the plebs.
		And it's a major issue.
		So I sat down and I started putting it together.
		It turns out Tucker Carlson did it for me.
		It turns out me and Tucker Carlson are on the same wavelength today.
		You just might be a little bit ahead.
		So he came out with his fifth or sixth episode.
		His sixth episode called Bobby Kennedy is Winning.
		All about Peter Hotez and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
		And really did an incredible job.
		The whole thing is 20 minutes long.
		We'll show you some select clips here later in the show.
		But I actually want to start before we even do the Daily Dispatch.
		Let's take a look at clip number 12 as our fellow InfoWarrior.
		It's in the belly of the beast, Owen Schroer, fighting for his freedom from a tyrannical government.
		It's not a good place to be in.
		It's a weird place to be in.
		Operating as if we still have the First Amendment, and yet we're being forced to learn that that is not so much the case anymore.
		Let's go now to clip number 12.
		This is the Alex Jones video, is it not?
		This is from Alex Jones' show yesterday.
		With a little bit of extra editing on it.
		Let's go to clip number 12 where Alex discusses how quite open they are publicizing and activating their blueprint to make American citizens into terrorists.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Let's watch. It's all Owen Schroer admits he's guilty.
		Yeah, in a plea deal to not face years in prison rigged, which I'm not supposed to get into the details of.
		You'll see what happens in court tomorrow, and they may go back on it.
		They may go ahead and just try him and throw his ass in prison.
		Yeah, the charging says he went in the Capitol.
		He didn't. But the feds don't care.
		They got judges and people that say, I don't care.
		The FBI is allowed to lie in court books.
		Okay? Yes, they're trying to train the military publicly.
		We show you the training videos.
		The constitutionalists and Christians and gun owners are white supremacists.
		And under a white supremacist definition, you're a terrorist.
		We have to admit it's illegitimate and admit it's out of control and admit that the very central government that is doing all this has dissolved the borders.
		They have jurisdiction over the Navy and the military, the coining of currency, and the borders.
		That's where interstate commerce and all of that comes out.
		I don't just sit there and rattle on about January 6th because most people know it was a stage provocateur event and that rehabs are just the tip of the spear.
		And our listeners know that and they don't want to just hear the same thing they already know over and over again.
		But let me just say this right now.
		There have been major new developments that affect every one of you out there, including myself, and is a big deal.
		And so when we talk about January 6th, when we talk about issues like this, it is important to understand that this is their blueprint to brand the American people as terrorists.
		Period. They wanted to say that Trump and I got with Roger Stone and planned to attack the Capitol.
		When I say 1776, I mean the spirit of 1776 and the fight for the hearts and minds and souls of the people.
		It's why it's called an info war.
		Information war is 90% of war.
		I'm at war with lies.
		I'm at war with corruption.
		But nope, the military is not my department and leading paramilitary counteroffensives to the globalist coup is not my department.
		And it's not because I don't have courage, I don't have skin in the game, they're trying to put me in prison because I threaten them with the truth.
		And I expose their works of darkness.
		And I give people hope and I rally against them.
unidentified		And I expose them. Incredible stuff.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		So yeah, of course that was Alex Jones talking about the insanity of what the American government is doing right now.
		Dedicating untold resources on hunting, tracking, Manipulating just normal Americans that just want to live their lives.
		Just people that disagree with the utterly destructive policies of this administration and really every time leftists get into power, this is the outcome.
		Inevitably, it seems.
		So our prayers are with Owen Schroer as he faces this injustice system that we're under.
		It almost seems like the government is doing everything it can to simultaneously demonize so-called white supremacists while also doing everything they can to push people towards some sort of violent reaction as, quote JFK, those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.
		It's a very sad situation to be in.
		That video was, I believe that was edited by Declare Victory on Twitter, at VictoryDeclare.
		He is a extremely powerful repeater station for InfoWars.
		In other words, he takes stuff from InfoWars, re-edits it, uploads it to Twitter, gets it spread around.
		That is a service that we could not do without.
		So thank you very much to Declare Victory, at VictoryDeclare.
		And of course, I want to give appropriate props to Hi-Rez the Rapper for that song that we heard in the first five minutes.
		Hi-Rez the Rapper came out with that song.
		It's called Big Brother featuring TVEXT, at TVEXT, and it will be available on all streaming platforms, or it is available as of midnight yesterday.
		So if you want to support a red-pilled, freedom-loving, anti-New World Order podcast, Artist who really just makes music that is really good and fun to listen to regardless of how you feel about it.
		High res, the rapper, really incredible stuff.
		Now, when Alex Jones is talking about all of the, not even when Alex Jones is talking about it, just when you think about all of the resources that America has at its disposal and where those resources are going, Hundreds of billions of dollars to Ukraine.
		The untold, probably at this point, trillions of dollars at the southern border.
		The entire contingencies of the government dedicated to hunting and tracking down so-called disinformation and misinformation that's actually correct but is counter to what the authorities want you to think.
		For every dollar that you see them spending somewhere else, remember that it's a dollar that's been robbed from you as America collapses around us.
		We can go to clip number eight here.
		This was posted, I think, by Benny Johnson.
		Took a little trip through Philadelphia.
		What does it look like on the American streets these days while the American government prioritizes hunting down white people who think wrong and opening the borders and sending billions of dollars to Ukraine?
		What What's happening with America while this is all going on?
		Let's watch. Right.
		It used to fly.
		Here we go. These are the streets of Philadelphia.
		All the stores are shuttered.
		Trash absolutely everywhere.
		The only people you see on the streets are drugged out, zombified, miserable.
		This is what's happening to America while our government does everything it can to both exacerbate this problem Allow this to continue while robbing the people that could fix it in order to send that money overseas or send it to the southern border.
		Formerly beautiful cities gutted.
		We didn't lose a war, folks.
		This is our own government attacking us.
		Maybe it's time to fight back.
unidentified		War.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to this front-line report here in the information war. - It's Friday, so we'll open up the phone lines very, very shortly.
		Let's go ahead and begin today as we start the show off with our Daily Dispatch, shall we?
		Daily Dispatch, here it is. All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Friday, the 23rd of June, 2023.
		From the post-millennial, U.S. students' math scores plummet to lowest level in decades.
		Officials with the National Assessment of Educational Progress reported that the average math and reading test scores for 13-year-olds in the U.S. have hit the lowest level in decades.
		According to a recent long-term national trends assessment released on Thursday, the declining education levels began at least a decade before government officials and school districts closed schools in response to the COVID pandemic.
		Since the 1970s, NAEP has been monitoring students' performances in the subjects in administering the federal standardized basic skills test.
		In the 2022-2023 school year, test results from the fall showed an average of 256 out of 500 in reading scores and 271 out of 500 in math scores.
		Only three years ago, reading levels were at 260, while mathematics scores averaged approximately 280.
		Actually, if you look at graphs of this, you can see that since they started tracking over the last 40 or 50 years, there's been a very steady incline where year by year we make Steady and continuous gains, only for it to take a nosedive as soon as COVID was implemented.
		Of course, as they point out, it wasn't exactly having to do with COVID. It was also a lot to do with the lowering of standards in order to bring about some sort of mirage of equality and equity.
		In other words, let people graduate even if they don't fulfill their academic requirements because otherwise the numbers look bad.
		So, of course, diversity is our strength, so that's why we have to lower standards across the board.
		It's typical of leftist policy in this country and everywhere it gets implemented.
		That is, it's hard to bring people who are below standard up to standard.
		It's a lot easier to bring everybody down.
		And if equality and equity is your only goal, then there's no difference.
		Why not bring everybody down?
		At least then everybody's equally stupid, illiterate and miserable.
		Otherwise you'd have to actually contend with the underlying causes of failures in the academic realm.
		And that's very uncomfortable.
		It's an uncomfortable conversation.
		It's much more comfortable to just say racism and then abolish standards across the board.
		And that's what they did. And that's what they continue to do.
		and having negative impacts for absolutely everybody, most especially the people that it's ostensibly intended to help.
		Typical, isn't it?
		Meanwhile, this has got to be the biggest story of the day, and we'll, I mean, there's just like nine stories in this one story, so we'll get into it a little bit later, but this story is from Kellen McBreen at Infowars.com.
		IRS whistleblowers released new bombshell evidence against Biden's DOJ and AG Garland.
		Several bombshells dropped by two IRS whistleblowers on Thursday reveal, among other things, that Joe Biden's DOJ buried evidence of Hunter Biden's tax crimes and stopped U.S. Attorney David Weiss from bringing charges against Hunter in two different jurisdictions last year.
		According to Representative Jason Smith, Weiss sought to be appointed as a special counsel in the case last year, but was denied as well.
		What's more, the IRS sought felony charges against Hunter, sent their recommendations to the Biden DOJ, and they, quote, came out as two misdemeanors, Byron York tweets.
		According to the whistleblowers, one of whom is Gary Shipley, who came forward weeks ago to reveal his identity, the IRS was notified of potential evidence in the guesthouse of former Vice President Biden, but were rebuffed by U.S. attorney Leslie Wolf, who said there's no way as a search warrant would, quote, never get approved. who said there's no way as a search warrant would,
		Whistleblowers describe how the Biden Justice Department intervened and overstepped in a campaign to protect the son of Joe Biden by delaying, divulging, and denying an ongoing investigation into Hunter Biden's alleged tax crimes.
		Again, just like...
		Just like what happens with the Hillary Clinton email scandal, it's not so much about the tax evasion as it is what the tax evasion was disguising and hiding and why it was being used.
		Hillary Clinton's big crime wasn't destroying the information on her email server.
		It was the fact that that information told the story of weapons trafficking and fostering wars in the Middle East that would lead to millions dead.
		The bigger crime...
		Covered up by the smaller crime, but the smaller crime is all that anyone wants to pay attention to.
		We'll get into the bigger crime and all of the various IRS and DOJ and FBI whistleblowers that have been coming forward over the last several weeks to explain in no uncertain details just how thoroughly corrupt our entire executive establishment is.
		Along the same line, New York Post has this story.
		Hunter Biden deducted payments to prostitute sex club from his taxes.
		Hunter Biden illegally deducted tens of thousands of dollars in payments made to a prostitute and a sex club from his taxes, according to a bombshell IRS whistleblower testimony to Congress released on Thursday.
		In a June 1st interview with the House Ways and Means Committee, one whistleblower, an unnamed IRS criminal investigator, detailed how Hunter went to great lengths to underreport his income and avoid paying $106,000 in taxes, including by writing off his sex escapades as business expenses.
		criminal investigator detailed how Hunter went to great lengths to under-report his income and avoid paying $106,000 in taxes, including by writing off his sex excapades as business expenses.
		Just don't get any ideas.
		Don't think that this sets some sort of precedent that you're able to use yourself.
		See, the primary thing to understand here is that he's different than us.
		He's protected.
		He doesn't have to stick to the same rules that we all do.
		And this is a necessary component of the New World Order global government plan.
		Some people just simply outside of the bounds Again, we'll get into that a little bit later.
		Then again, who knows?
		Maybe this was a business expense.
		Maybe that prostitute was some sort of Chinese agent.
		Is it that far off the mark?
		I wonder that. Yeah.
		We'll get into it.
		Meanwhile, Infowars.com has this story.
		Distraction? Questions swirl over timing of sub-story as Biden bombshells hit target.
		As two IRS whistleblowers prepared to go public with more damning information, implicating the Biden administration in a scheme to bury evidence of Hunter Biden's tax crimes, as well as the revelation that Joe Biden was, quote, in the room when Hunter Biden shot a threatening message to Chinese business associate demanding payment, a story which some have called the biggest plan to...
		Biggest political scandal this country has ever seen.
		Another story captivated the nation.
		Deaths of missing submarine passengers who set off last week to see the Titanic only to lose contact shortly into the trip.
	Essentially the conspiracy theory here is that the Navy detected the implosion of the sub all the way back on Sunday and yet withheld that information only to release it and dominate headlines once all of the Hunter Biden nonsense began.
	I have my questions about that.
	I don't think that's actually what happened.
	But we were able to avoid the trap falling into talking about the submarine by simply not caring about the submarine story.
	So we're going to continue on that track.
	Although there are some... There are some pretty interesting conspiracy theories about it overall.
	Like, apparently the guy, one of the guys in the sub who died, owned the company that was shipping the ammonium nitrate that went missing that we still haven't found or heard anything about.
	That's something. Maybe we will get into it after all.
	Finally, we have this. Hispanics now outnumber whites in Texas.
	New census numbers show.
	Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
	This is Infowars.com, band.video.
	The number of whistleblowers that have come out over the last couple months, it's dizzying.
	There are so many. We almost need, like, codenames for these people just so we can keep them all in line.
	Two IRS whistleblowers in a single day?
	It's overkill, quite frankly.
	I don't know how we deal with this.
	From FBI whistleblowers, DOJ whistleblowers, IRS whistleblowers, like every week or so you get a new whistleblower with some new bombshell piece of information that just shatters the entire illusion of fairness and professionalism that our government operates under.
	The latest are, of course, about Hunter Biden, and this whole stack is just Hunter Biden stories about what's been revealed about Hunter Biden.
	Again, I don't think I need to lay out for our audience the importance of this, but obviously the willful ignorant will respond, well, it's that, leave him alone.
	He doesn't have anything to do with Joe Biden.
	Like, I don't think I need to explain that clearly Hunter Biden was a proxy for his father.
	There was money laundering involved.
	It's really not that complicated.
	Joe Biden is a corrupt piece of trash that somehow a multi-multi-multi-multi-multi-multi-millionaire, despite having had no jobs except as a public servant for his entire life, like...
unidentified		Come on.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Come on. I mean, we get it.
		This is the way that the government works, I guess.
		Doesn't work, whatever you want to say.
		It's just at this point, it's becoming comical to see the mainstream media just ignore what's going on as hard as they possibly can.
		Let's just go through some of these stories, shall we?
		Infowars.com, Kellen McBreen has this.
		IRS whistleblowers released new bombshell evidence against Biden's DOJ and AG Garland, revealing that David Weiss, the U.S. attorney, wanted to bring charges against Hunter in two different jurisdictions last year, but was stopped from doing so.
		He wanted to be appointed as special counsel in the case, but was denied that as well.
		The IRS sought felony charges against Hunter, sent their recommendations to the Biden DOJ, and they, quote, came out as two misdemeanors.
		Gee, it sure would be interesting to see how that transmorgified.
		According to the whistleblowers, one of whom is Gary Shipley, who came forward weeks ago to reveal his identity, the IRS was notified of potential evidence, quote, in the guesthouse of former Vice President Biden, but were rebuffed by U.S. Attorney Leslie Wolf, who said there is no way a search warrant would ever get approved.
		There's no way.
		There's no way because I'm not doing it.
		There's no way it'll get approved.
		Well, why not? Because I'm not going to approve it, obviously.
		It's like, yeah.
		By using that passive language, it makes it seem like you're not the one making the decision.
		Whistleblowers describe how the Biden Justice Department intervened and overstepped in a campaign to protect the son of Joe Biden by delaying, divulging, and denying an ongoing investigation into Hunter Biden's alleged tax crimes.
		Sean Davis on Twitter says, as IRS criminal investigators prepared an affidavit for a search warrant on a storage unit Hunter Biden used to hide his business records, AUSA Leslie Wolf objected.
		That's Attorney General.
		When U.S. Attorney David Weiss overruled her, she alerted Biden's legal team, giving them time to vacate the unit.
		In other words, somebody tipped him off, said, hey, the business records are kept here.
		She or he, I don't know, Leslie, said...
		It's a vague name. Said, you know, that's just never going to get approved.
		There's no way. We're not going to search that storage unit.
		Then David Weiss was like, all right, well, I'm going to overrule you.
		We are going to search it. Then Leslie Wolf contacted the Bidens and said they're on their way.
		Quick, get anything out that you don't want them to find.
		Just open criminality.
		Just a massive conspiracy.
		Pernicious, vicious conspiracy.
		Everyone who was involved should be charged in a RICO, racketeering, some sort of mass criminal proceeding where they should all go to jail.
		I mean, obviously, right?
		Obviously, that's what justice demands.
		During seven hours of testimony before the Ways and Means Committee, Shipley and the other whistleblower's testimony implicates both A.G. Merrick Garland and IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel for lying to Congress about political interference in the Biden probe.
		On September 4th, 2020, the DOJ ordered a cease and desist on any overt investigation of Hunter Biden or the Biden family's influence peddling, according to IRS whistleblower Gary Shipley.
		Whistleblower 1's story was corroborated by whistleblower 2, said Representative Kevin Hearn.
		One individual came forward to lay out the full case of what's going on.
		The second individual, through his attorney, asked ways and means to contact him and asked for testimony.
		We didn't seek these.
		They sought us, added Representative Greg Murphy.
		As Technofog notes via the reactionary, with rejection from the D.C. U.S. attorney, the team sought the approval to bring tax charges for years 2016 through 2019 in the Central District of California.
		Shapely concluded that the Central District of California declined to allow charges to be brought there.
		The rejection to bring charges in D.C. and California stands in stark contrast to the testimony of Attorney General Garland, who in March of 2023 stated that U.S. Attorney Weiss had the full authority to bring cases in other jurisdictions.
		Garland also said that he personally would ensure that Weiss could carry out his investigation and that he would be able to run it.
		But those statements now both appear to be false.
		Your humble author thinks the Republicans knew Garland was making misrepresentations at the time.
		Because again, this is not a matter of Democrat versus Republican.
		It's a matter of old school, deep state politics as usual versus not being okay with that.
		versus the people who are actually demanding some semblance of populism in our government that is formed for and by the people.
		Preferential treatment of Hunter Biden might be an understatement.
		In reality, it was sabotage.
		The affirmative effort to decline investigative steps and deny prosecutors the ability to bring charges.
		The DOJ's conduct included slow walking investigative steps, not allowing enforcement actions to be executed, limiting investigators' line of questioning for witnesses, misleading investigators on charging authority, delaying any and all actions months before elections.
		Prosecutors even wanted to remove Hunter Biden's name from electronic search warrants and document requests, even though this could cause investigators to not get certain evidence.
		Also, Joe Biden was apparently in the room when Hunter Biden can be seen in a message to Chinese business associate Henry Zhao demanding that they send money as promised, saying, quote, I'm sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled.
		Wrote Hunter via WhatsApp on July 30th, 2017, tell the director I would like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand, and that means tonight.
		Hunter then warned that, quote, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than you, Zhang or the chairman, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me, Joe Biden, and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction.
		I'm sitting here waiting for the call with my father.
unidentified		So.
unidentified		So what?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		What? So Hunter Biden is sitting there literally threatening, extorting, blackmailing a Chinese business partner while invoking the name of Joe Biden who is sitting right next to him.
		You know...
		This is just the beginning. Like, there's so much more into this.
		The details of this are really incredible.
		But I really, sincerely, from the bottom of my heart, want to ask Democrats, what the hell, you guys?
		You don't care about this?
		Is it really so important that your side...
		Seem and carry the illusion of being totally clean and upright and virtuous, that you're willing to overlook blatant extortion, blatant criminality, blatant selling out of the American people to our primary geopolitical enemy?
		Are you so one-sided?
		Are you so partisan that you can't stand up against this?
		For these people, you're willing to sacrifice essentially all of the United States to protect these outrageous, despicable scumbags?
		Really? Really?
		As much as the deep states, it's you people that are letting it happen.
		Welcome back, folks.
		I have to say one of the most annoying things about the Hunter Biden revelations that have been made recently.
		You should say a Biden revelation since it's both Hunter and Joe, obviously, partners in crime in this extortion racket that they've got going on.
		And most of what we're talking about now has to do with the Chinese, has to do with fake tax payments.
		So this is all just in addition to what's been revealed about Burisma and the $5 million bribe to Biden and the $5 million bribe to Hunter.
		All of this is just piling one on top of the other.
		It almost... It almost seems like it's like a slow drip tactic to come out with like a little bit at a time.
		You're just like overwhelmed by everything that is coming out.
		It's hard to see it in its totality.
		So let's take a step back, remind ourselves really going on here.
		Joe Biden is a career criminal.
		He is a gangster. He is the leader of a mafia.
		Anyone from Delaware power circles can tell you the whole state is essentially run by the Bidens.
		And of course it happens to be the preferred tax haven for American companies.
		That's why you have some address in Delaware.
		It's like a house, but it's where like 19 Fortune 500 companies have their headquarters listed.
		Yeah, it's just beyond corrupt.
		And so the big story, the latest, just the latest entry into the saga of Biden corruption.
		Last time on The Bidens are Criminals, Burisma taped an offer to Biden where they gave him $10 million in exchange for withholding a billion dollars of American aid until the investigator could be fired.
		Next time on Biden corruption, the IRS fails to perform their most basic duties and let Hunter Biden off the hook.
		I mean, it's just like every week we get some new update in just the sheer, blatant, unrepentant criminality of the Bidens.
		And this from people who, like, will go on TV and cry and talk about...
		Donald Trump one time met with a Russian agent that the FBI happened to let into the country by fast-tracking their visa and then actually set up the meeting so that they could frame Trump later.
		But this is the threat to democracy.
		He is controlled by the Russians.
		And then you have just...
		piles of evidence that the Bidens really are doing this thing that, hey, when it was Trump, they were very willing to weep and cry and claim it was a threat to democracy and demand that we throw out the Constitution in favor of total deep state control to fight this existential threat.
		But when it's the Bidens, when it's Joe and Hunter, well, they just don't care.
		They just couldn't care less.
		And we'll look at the way the New York Times is reporting this and see their very, very sneaky, oily, weaselly rhetorical tricks that they use to downplay all of this, because that's the role that the media plays a lot of the time.
		The government is there to destroy everything, to rob you of everything, to just eviscerate your history and heritage and inheritance and livelihood and savings.
		And then the media is there to tell you, calm down.
		This is totally fine. Everything's operating as usual.
		Inflation? It's no big deal.
		So what? You can't afford milk and eggs anymore.
		That's probably your fault.
		Like, the media is just there to...
		Make everything seem normal and calm and just stop getting so worked up about things.
		And it's pretty obvious.
		It shouldn't fall for it. So we'll explain exactly how.
		Here we go. All right.
		So let's... If we can just go over again some of just the latest...
		Just the latest revelations and then get into the way that this is covered in the New York Times and other places...
		Try to wrap our heads around the true scale, scope, depth of the corruption that we're dealing with here.
		So again, Hunter, like it's not vague.
		This isn't vague at all. This isn't uncertain.
		Nothing about this is speculative.
		These are Hunter's words.
		This is whistleblowers who were in the investigation.
		This is the IRS agent who was leading the investigation, who was stymied, who was undercut, who was subverted by people higher than him.
		And now he's blowing the whistle and revealing what he knew the entire time.
	This isn't, I don't, is he Republican?
	Is he Democrat? Who knows?
	Literally, we should all care about this.
	And again, just to compare it to Trump, they never had anything.
	And this is the frustrating part about actually focusing on the truth and relying on the truth to dictate how you feel about things, is like if in 2016 they came out and had proof that Trump was a Russian agent, you think anybody that supports Trump would overlook that?
	If they actually had proof...
	Fine. Great. Then we would know that that was the case and we'd stop supporting the guy.
	And it's just you can draw a line of continuity between that and everything with COVID, where even now, after we've been proven right about literally everything when it comes to COVID, from the lab origins, to the failure of the interventions, to the efficacy of the vaccines, to the orchestrated nature of all of it.
	We've been proven right about absolutely everything.
	And people now, they look back and they go, well, but you were still just a conspiracy theorist.
	You were still just, you know, anti-science and were just saying things like Scott Adams being like, you were right.
	Anti-vaxxers were right.
	Really, we were both right.
	We were both just guessing, and you just happened to be right.
	No, we just actually follow the facts.
	We just actually look for proof, and if there is proof, we believe it.
	If there's not, then we know that you're lying, and once we know that you're lying, then we ask why you're lying, and we try to figure out what's really going on and what you're covering up with the falsehoods that you're spreading.
	Like, it's really not that complicated.
	So, if any of you people had souls, if any of you people actually had some sort of Principled beliefs in...
	America being sovereign or our executive branch being headed by somebody who has international ties and that's a really bad thing.
	If any of you actually believe that, then you would be as, if not more, outraged at what's going on with Biden than you were with Trump.
	However, you either are willfully ignorant and willing to believe falsehoods even when you know they're false in order to get Trump because you're brainwashed or...
	No, that's it. No, that's the only option, actually.
	That's the only possible thing that this could be, because I don't believe you're stupid enough to not know what's going on here.
	You either are dishonest and immoral, or you just are literally too stupid.
	You shouldn't be allowed to vote. Like, listen to this.
	Hunter Biden says, quote, I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me, who he previously said was his father, Joe Biden, and every person he knows, like literally just without...
	Vagary. The whistleblower also revealed the IRS recommended felony charges for Hunter Biden because he failed to pay more than $2.2 million in taxes and $8.3 million of income from foreign entities in Ukraine,
	China and Romania.
	Again, just scratching the surface.
	You also have Hunter Biden illegally deducting tens of thousands of dollars in payments made to a prostitute and a sex club.
	IRS supervisory agent Gary Shapely told the committee on May 26th that he found several instances of Hunter improperly expensing flights for prostitutes.
	You can't have those low-rent local prostitutes.
	You've got to get the... Expensive foreign ones, I guess.
	Now, the New York Times covers this, and again, ostensibly they are reporting what's going on, but their little rhetorical tricks that they use are incredibly effective at, like, softening the blow.
	And again, this is just evidence of psychological manipulation that every narcissist uses textbook, very understandable when it's on a one-to-one basis.
	It's not any different when it comes to gaslighting an entire nation as it does to gaslighting your abused wife, right?
	This is just how narcissists work.
	This is how they frame things to make you seem like the crazy one, you seem like the one that's overreacting because they can explain things in a way that seems like it's not that big of a deal.
	So the New York Times reports...
	The lead IRS agent investigating whether Hunter Biden committed tax crimes told Congress his team uncovered evidence that Mr.
	Biden had invoked his father, who was then out of office, right?
	They slipped that in. Who was then out of office?
	I mean, he was out of office, though.
	So what's the big deal?
	The big deal is that he has never been out of office, as it were.
	While Trump was in office...
	Strings were still being pulled and the people in the White House and the DOJ were still taking orders from the Bidens and the Obamas.
	And they were subverting Trump quite openly and with the cooperation, participation and co-signing of the mainstream media.
	While pressing a potential Chinese business partner in 2017 to move ahead with the proposed energy deal, House Republicans said.
	No, a whistleblower from the IRS said.
	But again, they want to frame this as partisan as a signal to their Democrat readers that you don't have to pay attention to this.
	Just say it's the Republicans.
	I mean, this is what they do, right?
	They have these people primed.
	They have these people mentally wired so that if they use these little terms, well, it was the Republican.
	Well, it must be partisan then.
	Then I don't need to pay any attention to it.
	And I don't even need to, you know, debate you or counteract your statements because I can just say that they're partisan.
	Just like I can just say that your concerns are racist or sexist or transphobic.
	And then I don't have to listen to your points.
	I don't even have to provide counterpoints.
	I can just ignore everything you believe by labeling you something false and defamatory.
	We'll pick this up on the other side when we start the second hour of the American Journal.
	Stay with us. The season hour of American Journal has begun, ladies and gentlemen.
	We're going to stick for the moment with the Hunter Biden revelations, just the latest that have come up.
	We'll move on to some other topics, including RFK and the death of debate in this country.
	Really portends death of representative government as we know it.
	But continuing here with the New York Times article, again, I've said it a million times, the mainstream media's role is to tell the truth in a way that leaves you believing a lie.
	They have to use the facts.
	They have to provide the facts, but they couch the facts and speculation and like these little weasel words that imply that maybe this isn't what it seems to be.
	And, you know, if we don't have actual video footage of the thing that happened, then, you know, can we really trust it?
	And if we do have video footage, like isn't that Russian disinformation?
	And won't the intelligence agencies tell us to disregard it?
	So does any of this really matter?
	Who cares?
	By the way, Trump is a Russian agent and must be stopped.
	Like the hypocrisy here, the absolute endless deluge of lies.
	You have to be able to see through it.
	I know we see through it.
	I know in a way that this is just piling on what we've known already for a very long time in no uncertain terms, just how corrupt the Bidens are.
	So outside of our audience, I would just love to hear a Democrat try to defend this.
	I don't think they will. I think, I mean, and that's why they use these weasel words.
	There is no defense to it, and this all corresponds to what we'll talk about later, show the Tucker Carlson video about Peter Hotez and RFK Jr., There is no defense to their ideas.
	There is no argument that they can win.
	So their only tactic available to them is to discredit and ignore the accusations against them.
	So that's what the New York Times is engaged in here.
	So they again relate the text messages that we just read you.
	Tell the director, I'd like to resolve this now before it gets out of hand, and that means tonight.
	And Z, if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this other than Yu Zhang or the chairman, I will make certain that the man sitting next to me and every person he knows and my ability to forever hold a grudge that you will regret not following my direction.
	And they say, taken at face value, the messages would undercut President Biden's longstanding claims that he had nothing to do with his son's international business deals.
	So, the weasel terms here...
	We're going weasel hunting now.
	Taken at face value would undercut President Biden's long-standing claims that he had nothing to do with his son's international business deal.
	How this should read is these text messages destroy President Biden's claims.
	They reveal the lie.
	President Biden is a liar, and it is proven by these text messages.
	And there's even more proof than that, and we'll get to that in just a second.
	Coming days, they say, after Hunter Biden agreed to plead guilty to two misdemeanor charges of failing to file his taxes on time.
	That's what they're claiming that the crime that Hunter Biden is.
	They just mention it. They just throw it in.
	What it leaves you with is the impression that, wow, all of this over just like late tax filing?
	I filed my taxes late.
	Like, who cares? It happens sometimes.
	That's what this is all about? No, it's not what this is all about.
	That's a lie. That's an implicit lie in the New York Times article.
	But we'll continue. The release of the information underscored the determination of House Republicans to continue to try to tie his father to his business dealings and suggest they were corrupt.
	Remember, it's so, again, the way they frame this is it's House Republicans in this baseless crusade to try to tie...
	It's Hunter Biden's own words that tie his father to his business dealings.
	No uncertain terms. And the Republicans are the only ones who seem to care about this existential threat to the sovereignty and independence of our federal government.
	You absolute psychopaths.
	Like, and again, I just hope people can see through this.
	Like, once you can see through it, once you can see what's actually happening here, you should never fall for their lies again.
	But normal people just read through this.
	It's like the Matrix.
	It just enters into their brain, sort of the barriers down, and they're just like, those darn House Republicans, always making trouble for the righteous and upstanding Biden family.
	Won't they just leave them alone and let them do their business?
	It's all lies. All based on lies.
	All manipulation. Stop being manipulated.
	We'll continue on the other side. All right, folks, we'll try to finish up with Hunter Biden here in this segment because there's so much other stuff to move on to.
	But this really is just like so much of what we cover.
	You know, it's not just about Hunter Biden.
	Because if it was just Hunter Biden, then we wouldn't even have to cover it, right?
	If this was just about Hunter or even Joe Biden being corrupt in some way, If that was the only aspect of this story of importance, then that would mean that the mainstream media was covering it, and it would mean that the Department of Justice was investigating them, or the IRS was charging them appropriately.
	But see, what starts off as Hunter Biden and Joe Biden are corrupt becomes, and they're getting covered up?
	by the DOJ and the IRS is manipulating the law to let them off the hook, and the mainstream media is providing them cover.
	What starts off as one little instance of corruption becomes evidence of a massive system-wide conspiracy to cover this up.
	And it has implications and aspects of what's going on that relate to everything else that we talk about, such as the cover-up.
	I mean, you can relate this to what's happened previously with the Clintons.
	You can relate to what's happened previously with Trump and the inverted way that all of this is being handled and just the obvious fact that if this were the Trumps, can you only imagine New York Times writing an article, this hand-waving away all the evidence that's been provided this hand-waving away all the evidence that's been provided here?
	I mean, they wrote article after article excoriating the Trumps over just like the most minor passing a Russian person in the street or, you know, actually making business deals because they actually have a business.
	See, that's the primary difference between the Trumps and the Bidens because I see people point this out.
	They're like, well, the Trumps made even like Kushner.
	I'm not a fan of Kushner, but it's like at least the dude owns buildings.
	At least he actually has a successful business that he's built over decades.
	Like at least the Trumps actually provide something for the money that they're getting.
	The Bidens have nothing.
	Their only business is selling out America.
	Their only enterprise is corruption.
	So a bit of a difference there.
	Obviously. But apparently that's not obvious to everybody and we have to sit here and explain it.
	That's fine. So again, let's just look to the New York Times cover-up of what's going on here.
	Because they do report it. They just report it in a way that it's like, yeah, these House Republicans are trying to find something on Biden, so they got this IRS whistleblower that, like, maybe gave some vague evidence about something Hunter Biden said, but, like, who cares, right? That's the way they cover it.
	They say the release of this information underscored the determination of House Republicans to continue to try to tie his father to his business dealings and suggest they were corrupt.
	It's Hunter Biden saying, quote, my dad is sitting next to me.
	He wants to know where the money is.
	I will activate my dad and everyone he knows to destroy you if you don't call me immediately.
	Apparently, House Republicans somehow...
	Got into Hunter Biden's crack-addled brain at the time and got him to do this because they're just so determined to link Biden to his son's business dealings that Hunter Biden himself linked him to his business dealings.
	Wow, those House Republicans, they really are nefarious, aren't they?
	New York Times continues, I don't know.
	It means that... No, obviously not.
unidentified		It means that Joe Biden knew what was up.
unidentified		My dad's right here next to me means, yo, we both know what's up and where's the money?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right. But what the New York Times is implying is that Hunter Biden is lying about this and simply pretending that his father's next to him to invoke it.
unidentified		There's no evidence stating that he was actually there physically in the room next to him?
		We investigated the couch and we did not see a Biden-sized butt print on the couch, so we can't say whether or not he was actually...
		He may have been standing.
		When Hunter Biden said he's sitting next to him, Biden very well may have been on his feet at the time.
		So I guess just who cares, right?
		Hunter Biden is actually a known degenerate and liar, so you really can't take anything that he says at face value.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I don't know if you're joking or not.
		That's literally what they say next.
		We'll get to it. That's literally what they say next.
		But... They also, you know, then a private citizen, having finished his term as vice president six months earlier, right?
		Again, it's like he wasn't even in office, so who cares?
		Who cares, right?
		Yeah, okay, sure, sure.
		But they say, yeah, we don't even know if he was there, but of course...
		Ooh, unfortunately, we do know.
		We actually do know. Freebeacon.com has the story.
		Biden bombshell—or no, shoot, here it is.
		Freebeacon. Photos place Hunter Biden at father's house the day he invoked dad's name to threaten Chinese business partners.
		See, the problem with your lies, New York Times, is that Hunter Biden is, in fact, a cracked, addled idiot, and he left his phone and his laptop— To be seen by absolutely everybody.
		So we have all of the information.
		We have the photos with the time stamps showing he was in fact at his father's house on the day that he made these claims.
		So you would think the New York Times, a newspaper of record, would maybe double check this, maybe cross-reference the text and the time that they were made with photos that are available to the public, despite New York Times and the intelligence community going out of their way to try to discredit it as Russian disinformation, a known, acknowledged, Falsehood at this point?
		So there's the picture.
		Photographs on Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop place him at his father's Wilmington, Delaware residence on the day he invoked President Joe Biden's name in a text message, threatening the Chinese business partner to come on with him with their full weight if the business partner did not fulfill his, quote, commitment.
		So yeah, he was at his father's house.
		While Shat... So, hmm,
		gee. Gee, it sure seems like that's confirmation of what the IRS whistleblower said, even though the New York Times wants you to think that because we don't have, well, we do have photographic evidence, so it's kind of confusing, but because, like, you know, we don't have Joe Biden himself being like, yes, I was with my son, and yes, we did do Chinese dealing.
		Somehow we can't come to a conclusion about this, right?
		When it's the Bidens, it's like, ah, well, we don't want to jump to conclusions here, right?
		I mean, we have to protect the Bidens after all.
		Not the same courtesy that they give to literally anybody.
		And Matt, you were joking. New York Times isn't.
		Hunter Biden at the time was addicted to crack cocaine, engaging in tawdry, self-destructive behavior, and facing financial pressures.
		He had spent years pursuing ventures that raised ethical questions about their intersection with his father's career, especially during the eight years the elder Mr.
		Biden spent as vice president.
		Look, can you blame the guy for selling out America and extorting Chinese business partners?
		He used to be addicted to crack.
unidentified		He still is, but he used to be too.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		He used to also. Like, look, can you really blame him?
		The man was addicted to crack.
		Come on. His brother died at some point.
		Can you blame him for selling out the American people for millions of dollars?
		Can you blame him for using his father's presidential, vice presidential power to extort his foreign business partners?
		Yes, we can, actually.
		Oh, but he was doing crack.
		Okay, that makes it worse, you idiots.
		Just retarded. It's also retarded.
		And then, of course, just in a spit, like in a form of spitting in all of our faces, the White House invited Hunter Biden to the state dinner with Prime Minister Modi tonight.
		That was yesterday evening.
		So Hunter Biden is there.
		One of the few times you see him with his clothes on and not with a crack pipe in his mouth, he's there hobnobbing it with the most powerful people in the world.
unidentified		Look at that grin, though, okay?
unidentified		Tell me he's not high as a kite.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		The grin is utterly and completely fake, right?
		It's all his fake teeth.
		So, yeah. This is the way that the media treats us and the executive branch actually.
		No shame. There's no shame, right?
		The change will never come from them.
		They don't feel any shame. They're laughing at you.
		They're rubbing your face in this.
		So we can stand up against it, or we can let these absolute miserable scumbags succeed in their campaign of tyranny.
		All right. Ladies and gentlemen, we are moving on from Hunter Biden now.
		I'm going to go ahead and open up the phone lines for your calls.
		We'll be joined by Matt Arrett in the third hour, but we'll take your calls before that.
		The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539.
		We're going to talk a little bit about what's going on with Joe Rogan and the debate debacle.
		And we're going to talk about Hispanics outnumbering whites in Texas today and the shocking speed at which that's been accomplished.
		We're going to be talking about a lot of other stuff, including, we'll touch on old Matt Walsh's reading of trans history.
		Baffling stuff. We'll try to get to the bottom of it.
		I admit, I got a little worked up.
		Overall Hunter Biden and his nationwide support system of deceivers concealing what he's been up to.
		I think maybe we'll take a moment to have some laughs on this Friday edition.
		I give out the number. 1-877-789-2539.
		1-877-789-2539.
		We're not going to have too much time to go to calls, so call in now.
		You won't have to hold for that long.
		We'll try to get to as many as possible in the next few segments.
		But for now, I want to go to this very, very funny skit.
		I've got to find who posted this.
		It's the one I just put in, so it'll be number 16.
		It's the Portland Home Depot employee.
		So this is a hysterical sketch.
		I sort of wish I'd thought of it, but this guy's very funny, and I'll find who posted it so I can give him credit on the other side.
		But if we have that in there, let's go ahead and roll it now.
		This is working at Home Depot in Portland, Oregon.
unidentified		Let's watch. This plywood here, as you can see, we're almost completely sold out of it because a lot of small business owners have to purchase this when their businesses get vandalized.
		These sticks right here, very popular for Portland protests.
		Homeless people will by law be camping on your front yard, and homeless people prefer yards that are well-kept.
		When you steal a car, come right here to the key section.
		Every criminal is going to want one of these here.
		These earplugs here are very popular among Portland residents, perfect for anyone that doesn't want to hear banging, drilling, or the truth.
		This caution tape right here is actually very important because the police in the area have actually run out of crime tape.
		Let's say you're going through the front door of a small business.
		You go like this.
		This one is going to be one of our most popular for sale, obviously.
		If you're looking for a brick to throw through the window of a small business, that's going to be in Home and Gardening in aisle four.
		This hose right here is actually perfect, and a lot of criminals use these to siphon gas out of people's cars.
		This propane is perfect for cooking.
		You can go potatoes, hot dogs, obviously fentanyl, gaps and cracks.
		This is perfect for any Portland resident's political ideology.
		So you want to go under like this and really have a firm grip right on the top.
		This door right here is actually one of our top-selling doors.
		It's very easy to get through, as you can see.
		We call it the Joe Biden immigration policy.
		If you're looking for spray paint, for vandalism, uh, aisle nine.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I love it. Absolutely brilliant.
		That is John Crist.
		So on Twitter at John B. Crist.
		C-R-I-S-T. Very funny stuff.
		The only thing that would make it better, I think, is if the skit ended with that Home Depot employee trying to stop a shoplifter and being shot dead.
		But maybe that's a bit too on the nose.
		Maybe that wouldn't be as much funny as it would just the unfiltered reality of the situation.
		Maybe it was good how it was.
		Absolute insanity across the board.
		Folks, we're doing everything we possibly can to combat this blatant insanity going on across the country and truly across the world.
		We hope and we ask, we beg and beseech you, please support us in this mission.
		Go to Infowarsstore.com today.
		You can get a product that will help you in your personal life overcome any sort of shortcomings that you may have.
		I know I have more than enough for myself, but luckily with the help of things like Brain Force Plus, Brain Force Ultra, I can overcome my inability to get a good night's sleep through the use of that incredible nootropic power.
		Buy both of those products, Brain Force Plus and Ultra.
		And get an extra 10% off for a total of 50% off the Brain Force Duo combo.
		You're also getting 50% off Super Female Vitality, 25% off X3 Nascent Iodine, and the entire Infowars MD line is on sale.
		You've probably seen the commercials where Alex talks about it.
		I mean, this is one of the most popular brand names you buy on the shelves all over America.
		We simply can private label it and sell it to you for even cheaper than you can get it at the store.
		It's so funny to hear people insult our products at InfoWars When it's almost guaranteed that if you are a health-conscious person who cares about things like GMOs and organics, you're probably taking the same supplements that we have at our store.
		You're just probably paying a bit more for it.
		So I guess that's the cost of ignorance.
		So go to InfoWarsStore.com today to help us in this mission to bring some semblance of sanity to a world beset by lies.
		You know what? Let's just go out to the calls right now because Patty in Boston has called in.
		And again, I put out the call.
		I want to know how Democrats ignore what's going on with Hunter Biden and Joe Biden.
		Patty, you're ostensibly, theoretically, you claim to be, and your tattoos prove you are, in fact, not a conservative.
		But you agree with me on this?
		You also don't like Hunter Biden?
		Welcome to the show, Patty. Thanks for calling in.
patty in boston ▲ ● ▼		Well, thanks for having me.
		Look, I think that Hunter Biden is a scumbag, and I don't think that that's breaking news.
		I don't know how anybody could think that the son of a rich kid isn't, you know, prone to be a dirtbag.
		Like, is this really breaking news?
		Like, do you think for one second that Ivanka Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump haven't used their father's name to profit You know, off of that.
		I mean, I think that's absurd.
		Now, does that make it okay?
		Of course it doesn't. Of course it doesn't.
		Should Hunter Biden be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law?
		Absolutely. I mean, I can't stand rich kids.
unidentified		I just... Is it because he's a rich kid?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Is it because he's a rich kid, though?
		Or is it because his father is Joe Biden?
		I mean, there's a lot of rich kids out there that wouldn't get away with what he gets away with.
unidentified		And this is more about... Well, I guess it's a little bit of both, isn't it?
patty in boston ▲ ● ▼		I mean, you know, like, so yeah, of course.
		Did he try to profit off the fact that his father was vice president?
		Yeah, I guarantee you he did, right?
		But I don't know that that makes him any different than Ivanka Trump, than Donald Trump Jr.
		or Eric Trump. And I'm not excusing any of it.
		I'm just saying. I mean, you look at Ivanka Trump got, what, 18 patents in China within a month of the time that President Trump talked to Xi.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah. Patents for what?
		Fashion she designed?
		Actual things she was actually making in her actual company that actually existed before Trump was president?
		These are completely different topics.
		And you can talk about Trump's kids all you want.
		They are nothing compared to Hunter Biden.
		They grew up as rich kids.
		Why aren't they cracked out and sleeping with prostitutes and, you know, selling their father's influence?
		They've been under a microscope for the entire time that Trump has even been, you know, in the political sphere, and nothing even remotely close to Hunter Biden has come up.
		So it's a false equivalency.
		It has nothing to do with it.
		Screw Hunter Biden, but on top of that, screw Joe Biden, screw the media for covering up for him, screw the DOJ for covering up for him, screw the IRS for covering up for him, but you won't go that far.
		You just like to pretend like this is just some rich kid who's getting away with stuff.
		All right, welcome back, folks.
		We've got your phone calls again here in just a moment.
		A lot of stuff to discuss.
		Of course, you can find all of the stories that we get to and even the ones we don't on our Substack at harrisonhillsmith.substack.com.
		You can go to americanjournal.info to find links to all of our social media as well as the Substack band.video page and everything else.
		You can also go to offlimits.news.
		Lots of ways to connect with us and to do your own research by following along at home.
		You can also get access to our video vault as well, where every day, something like 20 to 40 videos get uploaded.
		Let's talk about a major...
		Well, okay, we got two things I want to get into.
		And then I also wanted to get to the Tucker Carlson video.
		So let's get into first the new numbers out of Texas.
		That show Hispanics now outnumber whites in Texas.
		New census number shows Hispanic population surpasses white population in Texas.
		Hispanic Texans are now the largest demographic group in the state outnumbering white Texans by nearly 129,000 people.
		Latinos make up the largest share of Texas' celebration.
		This is posted by Voto Latino with a little celebratory icon.
		They say Texas had a white majority since 1850.
		Latinos have been powering the state's population gains for the last 20 years, surpassing white folks in July of 2022.
		Latinos can shape the future.
		They're very happy about being the majority in Texas now.
		This is a very big deal for them, and they're celebrating it.
		Why, though? Yeah, but why?
		Why are they so happy about this?
		And conversely, am I allowed to be not happy about this?
		Is this... Something that everybody's celebrating, or is this like a racial supremacy kind of thing with Latinos being like, we're in charge.
		Our race now outnumbers yours.
		We did it.
		So this is like genocide.
		This is like white replacement.
		Like, what is this? What's going on here?
		It's not just an observation of them.
		They're not just saying the facts.
		Here's the facts. Latinos now outnumber whites.
		No opinion on that. No, they're celebrating it.
		They're happy about this.
		This is, to them, some sort of victory.
		Strange. How can you have a victory without somebody else losing?
		Are we losing? Is that what's going on?
		Upon hearing the news, Texas Democrats immediately shifted from championing minority rights to defending majority rights.
		From Texas Tribune, Hispanics officially make up the biggest share of Texas population's new numbers show.
		It seems that the long-awaited milestone was reached in 2021 when closely watched data released last year was the first to reflect the culmination of decades of transformative growth.
		That's the way that they put it.
		transformative growth so in other words they're trying to change who we are by flooding our state with hispanic people so it's genocide so it's literally genocide And again, we can point to things like articles from the LA Times that talk about Mexico City is getting worried because of the influx of white people.
		They say that their neighborhoods are losing their character with the new influx of expats from America.
		And they're very concerned and they're very...
		You know, sympathetic and empathetic with the Mexican people whose neighborhoods and cities are being changed by an influx of people of a different racial makeup.
		You know, whites don't get that courtesy.
		We don't get to want to maintain a lifestyle that's unique to us.
		That's hate at that point.
		That's bad.
	This is about manipulation of human beings.
	It's about Without permission and without even having been asked, the native population of an area being forced out by an invasion from non-natives.
	If you just put it in general terms without even designating which race is which, it's obviously an attack.
	It's obviously some form of neocolonialism that's going on here.
	And they celebrate it.
	They're excited about this.
	It is the fulfillment of a plan that they've had in operation for quite some time.
	What do you call it when a group of people makes a plan and then carries out a plan to make what was once a majority a minority to depopulate an area of one ethnicity and replace it with another?
	It's genocide and it's not that complicated.
	And it's bad, no matter who it happens to.
	In this case, it's happening to white people.
	Now, the very interesting thing about this is the trend.
	Is it a long, slow burn that's taken place?
	Or is this a rapid change that has taken place over the last 10 years as a consequence of explicit policy to bring about this occurrence?
	That changes it as well.
	Now, the way they put it, they say they've been a white majority since 1850.
	They say the state is a white majority from at least 1850 until 2004, when white people's share of the state population dropped below 50%.
	People of color, Latinos in particular, have been powering the state's population gains for at least the last 20 years.
	50% of Texans under the age of 18 are Hispanic.
	And it's been more than a decade since Hispanic students first came to make up a majority of Texas public school students.
	But if we look at the trend here, we can go to the Wikipedia page for demographics of Texas and see the race and ethnicity segment.
	And you can see that the racial composition of white since 1850 has not just been a supermajority, but has been fairly steady and consistent, growing a little bit and then shrinking a little bit over time.
	So in 1850, it was 72.5% white.
	1860 had gone down a little bit to 69.7%.
	We can fast forward to 1880, where it's back up again at 75%, and it increases even more to where 1810, it's 82% white, 84% white in 1820, and it hovers about there all the way up until 1860, or 1960 rather, when it The white share of the population was at 87%, so nearly 90%.
	Almost 9 out of 10 people in Texas were white in 1960.
	1970, it was just about the same, 86.8%.
	Only in 10 years for it to...
	Lower by nearly 10 percentage points.
	78%. By 1990, it was 75.
	2000, it was 71.
	2010, it was 70.
	Still a somewhat moderate decline, right?
	To decline from nearly 90% in 1970 to just 70% in 2010.
	That's the course of 40 years.
	Slow burn taking place.
	Still doesn't make it right, but not exactly evidence of some sort of plot to carry this out.
	But then you get to the last 10 years.
	Then you take a look at the numbers from 2010 to 2020, and in that single decade, the percentage points of white people in Texas dropped from 70% to 50%.
	20 percentage point drop in 10 years.
	That's genocide.
	That's an invasion.
	That is a usurpation.
	That is nothing anybody should be in favor of, no matter which side of the racial divide you land on.
	No hate to our fellow Texans that are of Hispanic origin.
	I love you. This isn't about racial supremacy or anything of the sort.
	It's about a population being, without permission and without ever being asked, replaced as the direct result of policies pursued to bring about that occurrence.
	From 2010, it's 70% to 2020 to 50%, and since 2020, the floodgates have been open, and we've seen Probably 10 million extra people cross the border of Texas from Mexico in this designed replacement population scheme carried out by the UN, by the Democrats, by the Soros Open Society Foundation, and by the Catholic Charities that are bringing all this about.
	I don't know. I know it's a controversial issue at this point.
	I'm against genocide. Sorry, I'm against genocide.
	Sue me. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
	This is the American Journal, Infowars.com, band.video.
	Remember to support us at Infowarsstore.com.
	It's the only way we get support.
	It's the only way we are able to continue our crusade against the lies.
	Infowarsstore.com.
	We don't take money from millionaires or billionaires.
	We don't have to Change what we say to fit the agenda of some corporate master.
	As long as you, our audience, feels as though what we're doing is right and good and worthy, then we hope that you go to Infowarsstore.com.
	Short of that, we have no bosses to satisfy, and that is a very fantastic feeling, and you can...
	See the proof of our effectiveness in the intensity of their attacks.
	Infowarsstore.com. Help us fight back.
	We will...
	We have dedicated our lives to this.
	We have put everything on the line for this.
	All that we ask is that you lend us your support at Infowarsstore.com.
	Infowar bonds. Only to be fulfilled in victory.
	Which will come. And you're seeing the way people are waking up these days.
	It is... Terrifying to the globalists and very exciting for us.
	With that, we go out to your phone calls.
	Let's go to Mike in Indiana.
	You want to talk about Hunter's $10 million?
	Go ahead, Mike. You're on the air.
unidentified		Yeah, I guess I just...
		We've been focusing a lot on this, you know, $5 million for Hunter, $5 million for Joe.
		But, I mean, this has been Greece since Trump got impeached over the phone call with Zelensky.
		So what about the whole...
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, it seems like The $10 million was the investment, right?
		That's how this corruption works is you go, well, we'll spend $10 million to co-opt this politician, but then because of what they do, we get a return on investment of billions of dollars.
		So it's all absolutely tied in together.
		And remember, the impeachment over the phone call...
		We've explained this before, and actually the video of this on our Instagram has like 1.3 million.
		It's our top viewed video, 1.3 million views on this.
		People are hungry for the truth about this.
		Hunter Biden... You know, helps to facilitate this bribe to his father, Joe Biden, who in return gets the prosecutor who was looking into Burisma fired.
		So now Burisma can open up a branch in America and can, you know, make all of that $10 million and more back from their corrupt ties.
		Donald Trump starts looking into this.
		That's when they launched the impeachment.
		And we said as soon as that impeachment was launched...
		We said, you know, Ukraine is like the nexus for a lot of the deep state stuff.
		The human trafficking that goes on in Ukraine.
		The bio labs that go on in Ukraine.
		Like, we pegged all of that as soon as that impeachment happened.
		Because we said, look, Trump was looking into this.
		And they know that if Trump digs his heels in and starts really pulling on threads and unraveling this, it's not just Joe Biden that's going down.
		It's the whole corrupt system that's going down.
		Because they're all interconnected and they all have to do with each other.
		So they impeach him as a defensive move.
		That's what we said at the time.
		The impeachment looks offensive, but it is in fact a defensive move to stop Trump from looking into this.
		And in order to basically show that Trump wasn't playing games, Trump actually sent a bevy of offensive weapons to Ukraine that even Obama hadn't given to Ukraine.
		So Trump was sort of forced into that, right?
		It was like, well, we're impeaching you for trying to undercut Ukraine.
		To prove that you're not undercutting Ukraine, you have to send them weapons that they want.
		It was those weapons being sent that really got the Ukraine war to be inevitable at that point.
		So it's all deeply tied in together.
		And it was the outcome of the bribe and Trump looking into it and the impeachment that sent the weapons to Ukraine that kicked off the buildup to what eventually became the Russian invasion of Ukraine war.
		All of it's deeply, deeply intertwined, Mike.
		I completely agree.
		And yeah, $10 million pales in comparison to the billions upon billions that are now being sent to Ukraine and also being Siphoned up here or there by unsavory elements.
		Thank you for the call, Mike. Let's go to Dave in Ohio now.
		You thought that Home Depot skit was one of the funniest things you've ever seen.
		Thanks for calling in, Dave. Yeah, hilarious stuff.
		John B. Crist on Twitter made that skit.
unidentified		Go ahead, Dave. You're on the air. John D. Crist, okay.
		Yeah, that Home Depot video was the funniest thing I've probably ever seen.
		Especially on InfoWars.
		You've got to bring more funny stuff like that online.
		I'll tell you what, I've been watching you guys for at least 20 years.
		In fact, when I started, I was on dial-up.
		So, I've been through a lot to get here, but yeah, that was funny stuff.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		It was. It was good.
		What I liked about it was that it wasn't offensive or over the top.
		His style of humor is very kind of like subtle...
		Or just not, you know, he's not a clown bouncing off the walls.
		He's just very, like, quiet.
		He's just like, and you're going to want to bash the storefront in this way with the hammer.
		Yeah, absolutely hilarious.
		John B. Crist.
		I'd never seen anything from him before.
		Obviously, I'm going to start having to check him out.
		He's pretty popular on Twitter. He's got 172,000 followers.
		So, clearly, he's out there doing this stuff.
		And... It's good to see.
		So yeah, you make it, we'll air it.
		That's the way it works. And thank you for that call.
		Thank you for your support, Dave. I love hearing people call in who have been listening.
		Both are good, right? You've got some people that have been listening to Infowars for like 20 years, and they're the old school people that have been tuned in for a long time.
		But I equally enjoy hearing people that are like, I just found you last year.
		And it's like, we're still breaking through.
		We're still having success in awakening new people.
		So whether you are an old school info warrior or a brand new convert to the truth, welcome.
		Welcome to the side of light.
		And thank you for that call, Dave. Let's go to Patriot in Texas who wants to respond to Patty, although I guess he wants to respond to me as well.
		Go ahead, Patriot, you're on the air.
unidentified		Hey, Harrison. I'm coming in okay?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yes, sir. Thanks for calling in.
unidentified		All right. Yeah, I'm just going to piggyback off of Patty in Boston about your question of how are the Democrats ignoring the Hunter Biden story.
		And I think it's the same reason while the Republicans are ignoring the Trump ties.
		So we praise Trump so much, but we also criticize the World Economic Forum when all the Trump family is connected to the World Economic Forum, including Ivanka Trump and the kids.
		So it can go both ways.
		They're literally a part of the young global leaders.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Okay. So is that at all similar to what Hunter Biden has been caught doing?
unidentified		Well, yeah, because they control that whole scheme of things.
		So, I mean, that's such a small-scale thing of Hunter Biden being...
		Tied into that, because that's just on the base level, the surface.
		That's the Fox News version of everything.
		And if you want to look farther into it, I mean, Trump's stance on Ghislaine Maxwell, when he was asked at the press briefing about the Epstein case, he said, my good friend Ghislaine Maxwell, I wish her well.
		So you're going to ignore whatever you want to ignore according to the side you're on.
		And the key to it is get off the sides and just follow Follow the Holy Spirit, follow God, and get off the Republican versus Democrat side because you're not on the side of—God's not on your side.
		You have to be on the side of God.
		There's a whole different side to these things.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		So, also the RFK debate— Hold on, before we get off into other topics— I don't know if, I mean, it's just a weird thing to say.
		You know, we criticize Republicans just as vociferously as we criticize Democrats when they do something wrong.
		And if there had been evidence that Trump was engaged in the type of pay for play activity that Biden has been engaged in, do you think we would cover that up?
		Do you think we would ignore that?
		Everything that Trump is accused of, we look into, we check the evidence, it turns out to be fake, so we report that it's fake.
		If it was something real, then we would point out something real.
		And people latch on to these little things that, out of context, might seem kind of bad, but really aren't that big of a deal.
		Trump literally speaks nicely about absolutely everybody.
		That's his tactic. He is...
		Very open about that and has been since before he was even running.
		It's why he would praise Kim Jong-un or Kim Jong-il.
		He would praise Xi Jinping.
		He would praise Ghislaine Maxwell or anybody just saying, hey, look, you know, I wish him well.
		It's called politics. It's called not, you know, alienating everybody and actually being the bringer of politics You know, peace and togetherness throughout the world.
		Do you think we needed Trump to weigh in on Ghislaine Maxwell's trial as if that wouldn't have had negative impacts, as if it wouldn't have been like, well, the president has now poisoned the well of a potential jurist by saying that Ghislaine Maxwell is guilty and needs to be put away.
		He's just like, Ghislaine Maxwell, I hear she's a nice lady.
		I wish her the best.
		People latch onto that like, see, Trump is on the side of Ghislaine Maxwell.
		Are you kidding? He also said the same thing about Hillary Clinton and, you know, Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
		You think Trump's on the side of Ruth Bader Ginsburg?
		No, he's just a politician that almost sarcastically times.
		The other thing people point to is like, they're like, Trump went to the World Economic Forum.
		Yeah, to shove in their faces that he was in charge now.
unidentified		I don't know. It's weird. We're considered essential to the practice of science.
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		All scientific discovery comes from observation, empiricism, patient watching.
		Without the willingness to put aside your pre-assumptions and assess with honesty the things you see and touch and smell, the changes taking place right in front of your face, you can't do science.
		You can't create art either, or journalism, or theology.
		You have to be willing to notice the obvious.
		And when they tell you you're not allowed to notice the obvious, you should be concerned.
		Imagine you're on a commercial airline flight.
		The plane is just leveled out at 37,000 feet.
		You're closing your eyes for a nap, and suddenly you smell smoke.
		And it's not your imagination. You can see it.
		It's starting to fill the cabin.
		All around you, people are hacking and choking.
		The guy in the next seat has a napkin pressed against his mouth, and he's mumbling what sounds like Psalm 23.
		Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death.
		So clearly, the airplane is on fire.
		But almost unbelievably, no one has said a word about it.
		Not a single person is acknowledging this is happening.
		Everyone is silent. So in panic, you yell for the flight attendant.
		There's smoke in the cabin, you say as if she hasn't noticed.
		But she stares at you with hard eyes.
		Shut up, racist, she replies.
		That's a dangerous Russian conspiracy theory.
		Stop spreading misinformation or I'll call TSA and have you arrested when we land.
		That sounds like a fever dream, but it's also pretty close to the experience of living in the United States at the moment.
		All around you, things seem to be fraying and getting worse.
		Your gut tells you there's something very bad going on, and all the evidence suggests that there is.
		But the people in charge won't acknowledge that.
		Everything's fine, they scream.
		Stop noticing! But wait!
		I don't remember this many kids having allergies or asthma or eczema or autism or for that matter body dysmorphia.
		And why so many suicides?
		What's going on here? Shut up!
		Stop asking questions! That's their answer.
		But Bobby Kennedy won't stop asking and that's why they hate him.
		As Kennedy spoke on The Rogan Show, a reporter for Vice.com called Anna Merlin was watching.
		Merlin was so enraged by what she saw that she dashed off an article attacking Joe Rogan's employer for allowing the conversation to take place.
		Spotify has stopped even sort of trying to stem Joe Rogan's vaccine misinformation, read the headline.
		The piece never even described much of what Bobby Kennedy had actually said.
		Merlin dismissed the entire interview as, quote, a detailed survey of Kennedy's most dangerously incorrect views, a far too extensive list to outline in full.
		In other words, we here at Vice don't have time to describe all of Bobby Kennedy's lies.
unidentified		But trust us, they were lies.
tucker carlson ▲ ● ▼		Then Merlin called Spotify to see if she could get the episode censored.
		Much to her profound frustration, Spotify refused to censor the episode and kept the interview on its website.
		So she spent the next several days ranting about all of this on Twitter.
		People were listening to the wrong things and Anna Merlin was mad about it.
		So is Peter Hotez.
		Hotez is a pediatrician from Texas who became moderately famous on MSNBC during the COVID lockdowns as a Biden shill and a vaccine promoter.
		Hotez read Anna Merlin's piece and then hopefully retweeted it.
		Effectively, why is Bobby Kennedy allowed to talk in public?
		And that gave Joe Rogan an idea.
		Why not have Peter Hotez debate Bobby Kennedy on his show?
		You claim he's wrong. Why don't you explain why he's wrong?
		That seemed fair. But Hotez wouldn't bite.
		So Rogan offered to give a hundred grand to Hotez's favorite charity if he agreed to come on.
		Soon others made their own pledges and the pot swelled to over a million dollars.
		But still, Peter Hotez wouldn't come.
		Instead, he scampered back to MSNBC, where one of the channel's oilier hosts assured him he was doing the right thing by dodging the debate.
		And, of course, Hotez agreed.
		Quote, All right, folks, that is just a selection from Tucker's latest, his episode 6.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And, of course, it wasn't just MSNBC that was saying those things.
		Peter Hotez, since this occurred, has been posting article after article all with the same message, don't debate.
		We shouldn't debate. Debating is wrong.
		We shouldn't ask questions.
		We shouldn't be held to a standard where we have to justify our measures.
		And that's the real danger of this, is that the people that are saying don't debate are also the ones saying obey me or the force of law will hunt you down.
		All right, welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, third hour of American Journal has begun.
		My guest is Matthew Errett.
		He's a journalist and co-founder of the Rising Tide Foundation.
		He's also the editor-in-chief of Canadian Patriot Review and a senior fellow at the American University of Moscow and BRI expert for Tactical Talk.
		He's here with us today to discuss his new article, and it is a doozy, folks.
		It's called The Roots of Modern Eco-Terrorism from MKUltra and the Unabomber to Marie Strong and Yuval Harari.
		It is an article that I guarantee our audience will find a lot of value in.
		And the website, again, is risingtidefoundation.net.
		Thank you so much for joining us, Matthew.
matthew ehret ▲ ● ▼		Thank you.
matthew ehret ▲ ● ▼		Always a pleasure to be with you, Harrison.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, the pleasure is all mine, and this article is really something else, and I want to start this discussion.
		Maybe, well, it's sort of where you started, but it's also where this discussion sort of ends, and it's the spiritual aspects of this eco-terrorism, and I just want to read from your article real quick and get you to expand on it a little bit.
		You say, I think that is just a brilliant and really disturbing thought.
		But this is sort of where the...
		This is sort of the end of all of your discovery, isn't it?
		That it's ultimately a spiritual battle in this new scientific embrace of death that we're seeing across the world.
matthew ehret ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, exactly. And I think that that's sort of the modus operandi.
		At the end of the day, there's this causal force shaping the entire contour of human history.
		And I think at the end of the day, the need to create...
		Synthetic, artificial belief structures around which the targeted slaves are going to self-manage and be satisfied with their self-management has been not a new thing, but it's obviously taken on new forms in the Fabian Society construct.
		H.G. Wells talked about it over a century ago.
		Bertrand Russell talked about it.
		Many of these leading eugenicists and social engineers were making the point that a new eugenics-driven Religious order replacing the Judeo-Christian belief structures that must be labeled as outdated must be brought online by a new scientific priesthood.
		And under the post-World War II age of, you know, M.K. I'll show you a lot of the players in that and the rise of transhumanism.
		There's essentially that very new religious order, these new great narratives, as the World Economic Forum project has outlined themselves.
		They need to create new narratives, new myths, new stories that would be controlled by the Yuval Harari senior management priests out there that would be more acceptable to an age where people would value degrowth and lose this belief in the sacredness of human life or the idea that new stories that would be controlled by the Yuval Harari senior management priests out there that would be more acceptable to an age where people would value degrowth and lose this
		That has to be stripped away because they say we're ultimately delusional for not believing that we are a cancer destroying Earth Mother Gaia and we have to be brought into an awareness of that.
		So the death cult, the embrace of nihilism, the embrace of death is sort of the form it's taken under a lot of these people who I speak about in this article.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, and you mentioned a couple people there, but one that jumps to my mind is, of course, Huxley.
		And when you look at Brave New World, it was always terrifying to me when I first read that book how...
		How real it seemed that you could have this religion of death and that people would be not just willing but happy to die as their role in this society.
		And that's what so much of Brave New World was about is the embrace of death in a very joyful way and the new religious creation.
		And I think you just used a term or...
		You know, in so many words, satisfied slaves, which of course is what Aldous Huxley talked about, the new technocratic reality bringing about, slaves that were actually happy with their servitude.
		Can you expand a little bit on that?
matthew ehret ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, the concentration camp without tears, as he called it, that would be something which would be embraced by the targeted slaves who would not think that they were slaves because they were free to have the drugs that they wanted unlimitedly.
		They could have maximum sensual feelies, you know, amplified sense perception gratification in the five sensual domains.
		That would be unbounded to the point that if anybody were to, let's say, a John Savage, who was sort of a womb-born, not test to baby in the Brave New World story construct, were to arise saying that, you know, look, you're actually enslaved by your false passions and false thoughts.
		You're being made a worse human being.
		They would attack and destroy that person, kind of like what Plato warned about in his allegory of the cave 2,000 years earlier, earlier that those who love the construct of the shadowland in the cave wall and believe that that is their whole reality and identity will attack and destroy the person who has exited the cave and tries to tell them that it is a fraud.
		So that's something that Aldous Huxley and many of his colleagues who are very closely working with British Tavistockian and MK Ultra psychiatrists were all looking at how How do they take these insights of 2,000 years earlier and tweak them for a modern 21st century doctrine, including LSD-25?
		For that matter, which Hoffman, the MKUltra innovator of that, was an expert on his studies of the Eleusian Mysteries and derived LSD-25 from plant blight, wheat blight, that was something that was part of a hallucinogenic indoctrination process, that was something that was part of a hallucinogenic indoctrination process, both for the masses but also for the elite in the Eleusian Mysteries and the cult of Delphi and the various cults of the mystery schools of the ancient period, which were always part of the Luciferian control system that they just tweaked in the 21st century which were
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And so how do you argue against this?
		Because that was another thing about, you know, you read Brave New World and you're like, well, everybody, all the characters in it seem happy.
		That's what they want to do.
		They get to gratify any of their desires immediately.
		They get to just have fun all day.
		I mean, how do you argue against that?
		They're having a great time, right?
		Who are you to come in and rain on their parade?
		Like, how do you argue against this when we sort of intrinsically understand how horrifying this is?
		How do you put that to words?
		Or how do you argue, you know, in favor of meaning and purpose over gratification and pleasure?
matthew ehret ▲ ● ▼		That's a great question, and it's something people should really chew on a little bit, because there's no easy answer as far as I can tell.
		Except to say that, you know, we were told that by stripping away Judeo-Christian values and embracing a new scientific society, that we would be happier and more free.
		And if you look at the amount of consequences over the past decades of this embrace of this false freedom...
		Most of the churches we used to have in Quebec are now condos or razed to the ground.
		They're just hollowed constructs.
		We're free to have our gender realignment surgeries.
		We're free to have prescription drugs across British Columbia and most of Canada now, including methamphetamines and whatever else.
		We're free to have as many things as we want, but yet suicides have increased.
		You can look at the rates of increase of suicides, antidepressant use, increased use of euthanasia by 400% in the past two years across Canada.
		I'm speaking to you from Canada, of course.
		So are these the signs of people who are actually authentically happier with themselves and happier with being human?
		Or were these forms of happiness merely momentary, ephemeral illusions that deprived us of our true, deeper self that we did not get to tap into when we're very unhappy deep down inside?
		Our conscience isn't good, I don't think.
		And I think the data shows that that's the case.
		So there's a bunch of ways of doing that, but I don't know if there's an easy answer.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, you know, I definitely think it is about supplying or at least enforcing an alternative narrative.
		I mean, you mentioned the great narrative or, you know, because that's what World Economic Forum and all these globalist organizations are perpetuating now.
		They're saying we have a new narrative of humanity that we're putting forward.
		And obviously it's one thing to try to tear down that narrative, but to supply it with the real narrative or a positive narrative that actually reinforces people's spiritual worth and individual value, I think is probably at least a part of the solution here.
		But we'll get more into it.
		And where eco-terrorism is today, it's beyond just annoying us.
		Yes, it's annoying that they throw paint on paintings and block the road, but...
		It's way, way, way more significant than that.
		So we'll get into it more on the other side with Matthew Errett, risingtidefoundation.net.
		Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
		My guest is Matthew Errett.
		The website is risingtidefoundation.net, and he's here to discuss his newest article called The Roots of Modern Eco-Terrorism from MKUltra and the Unabomber to Maurice Strong and Yuval Harari.
		Just give us the...
		Give us the overview of this article, because it's extremely extensive.
		I mean, it's page upon page of well-researched, well-documented history of how we got to where we are today.
		But is it possible for you to sort of summarize your thesis in a sentence or two?
		Is that even possible? Or three or four.
matthew ehret ▲ ● ▼		But yeah, I can do it, I think, quickly and efficiently as possible.
		Essentially, what caught my eye, this is already a few months ago, was, as many people have noticed, the anomalously dense derailments of trains spilling toxic waste into farmlands, various forms of sabotage, what appears to be sabotage, human-driven sabotage of infrastructure.
		Now, increasingly, we've seen in the past weeks forest fires across Canada's north There's a lot of evidence indicating arson in a coordinated fashion, but this is not being talked about.
		And, you know, the question in my mind was, well, what is out there to indicate that this is coordinated and not just natural consequences of our infrastructure having decayed and thus trains are derailing, or, you know, climate change, as Mark Carney and a lot of the eco-freaks are screaming about regarding the fireworks.
		And so I started looking into an organization called Deep Green Resistance and a founder of it named Derek Jensen, set up about 13 years ago in California with big operations in Vancouver, but also with networks of disciples all across major universities around the West and even in Europe.
		Derek Jensen, I was surprised to discover, was himself a follower, a disciple of a fellow by the name of Ted Kaczynski.
		Who I didn't realize was actually an eco-anarchist anti-technologist, and that was at the heart of the Unabomber's deployment of mail bombs all over the United States, was that the recipients of these bombs were actually people that he identified as being agents of industrial progress who were targeted for death.
		And he became a bit of a guru in this entire anti-establishment, eco-anarchist movement.
		And there's many, many people.
		He had a correspondence which was superhuman of thousands of people, writing to him, seeing him as a bit of a prophet and a savior, as another fellow named David Scribina caught my eye as well as an anti-technologist, a theoretician, a big philosopher, very influential in the network.
		And so I started looking at Deep Green Resistance's website and how they promote themselves, what they do, and I was a little surprised to see that not only do they recruit young, useful, malleable, anti-human tools from the university system who are groomed,
		deployed, and then put to work carrying out various forms of vandalism on infrastructure, which they target as being the cause of human population growth, which they see as the greatest of all evils, And write so in depth.
		But they even describe on their website how they receive support and guidance from figures from the military intelligence networks.
		You can see that on their own YouTube recruitment videos.
		And they have whole pages documenting literally hundreds and hundreds of cases of eco-terrorism that they are saying they want to normalize as part of the necessary war on civilization because they define, and Derek Jensen, the Unabomber, Again, he's taught in many universities.
		The Unabomber's theories are taught in universities' sociological departments across North America and Europe as being this great philosophical insight that technology moves like a demonic force onto itself, independent of human beings, kind of like a Marshall McLuhan retweaking of that theory that technology is a sort of organism, a superorganism, and that our freedoms as people will always be diminished in proportion to the increase of technology's growth.
		Just in the same way that nature will be destroyed in the same proportion that we allow technology to grow, unless you can unleash the John Savages to declare war on technology to save us time before the singularity that they all believe in, just like the Mark Carney, Klaus Schwabian transhumanists at Davos, they all believe in the singularity of Ray Kurzweil.
		So too do these Unabomber...
		That's actually a little graph I made to sort of illustrate their theory, which is a foolish theory because it is independent of causal agencies like oligarchs, folly, corruption.
		They don't even look at that. They just presume that technology can be seen as this demonic force whereby if you go to pre-civilization periods, you know, like the minimum, what I have there on the far left, that's like the pure state of the noble savage that they presume existed as if As if there's any evidence that there wasn't tyranny in early pre-civilized humankind.
		But they say that that was when we were maximum free, nature was maximum good, when we had minimum technology, and everything's gotten worse.
		And this is where you get a false dispute, which is, well, how do you deal with this oncoming self-awareness of machines that they all posit will happen in 2045 or 2050?
		Which is itself bunk.
		There's no evidence that this is ever going to happen.
		But they say it, and then they say, well, you have a choice to either declare war on the technology to buy us more time or integrate with machines the way Elon Musk and Bezos and other transhumanists are promoting to stay relevant a little bit longer before we're ultimately cleansed by the more efficient thinking machines of Terminator and 2001 A Space Odyssey scenarios.
		So that's effectively what I try to do in my essay to get across the parallel common Malthusian doctrines underlying both above and below ground advocates of degrowth who hate civilization and hate humankind, but think that they're enemies, but they're actually on the same page.
		And how this is all linked to MKUltra and the Timothy Leary-Aldis Huxley experimentation to create new synthetic scientific paganistic religions that was put forth by people who were managing a young Ted Kaczynski when he was a guinea pig for MKUltra at Harvard by a figure named Henry A. Murray, an OSS Rockefeller Foundation-funded psychiatrist who oversaw A massive reprogramming program.
		And he's also the guy who worked closely with Timothy Leary in bringing in the Harvard Psilocybin Project that overlapped Ted Kaczynski's period being a poor human guinea pig, which sort of changed his worldview and I believe probably continued to...
		I would imagine he probably was continuously under supervision and probably management after he left Harvard, becoming a misanthropic A mathematician and eventually some guy living in a shack planning to bomb planes, passenger jets, and agents of progress around the world.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, and actually one of the segments of your essay is titled How Kaczynski and Davos Oligarchs Are of One Mind, which I struggle with this because you read Industrial Society and its Future, the You know, magnum opus of Ted Kaczynski.
		And I gotta agree with a lot of it.
		I mean, a lot of it is right on the money as far as I'm concerned.
		But, you know, the dude was a terrorist and sort of like the definition of wasted potential in a lot of ways.
		And so it's there's a weird like overlap between like us on this side who are fighting against the technocracy and the people who are putting the technocracy forward.
		It's all kind of it's hard to get a grip on, isn't it?
		I think a lot of people feel that way.
		So we'll pick it up again on the other side with Ted Kaczynski and sort of where we land on this divide or if there even is a divide.
		It's confusing. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
		My guest is Matthew Errett.
		His new essay, The Roots of Modern Eco-Terrorism from MKUltra and the Unabomber to Maury Strong and Yuval Harari can be found at risingtidefoundation.net.
		It's extremely interesting. So here's one sort of Confusing or, I don't know, illustrative dichotomy that I've found.
		In Ted Kaczynski's manifesto, or in a lot of his writings, he talks about how so much of modern life is just a facsimile for, like, meaning and purpose and how much more, you know, meaningful and real it is to, like...
		Fashion your own weapon and go out and kill a deer and then skin it with your bare hands and cook it over a campfire.
		And that's real and satisfying.
		And a trip to the grocery store to buy a prepackaged thing, it doesn't have the same fulfillment.
		And a lot of what humans do in forms of entertainment is a facsimile for that fulfillment.
		And so his solution basically was just like tear it all down, revert to monkey, just live in the woods and abandon or reject all of the modern technological advancements.
		Then you have somebody like Yuval Noah Harari who says in the future there's going to be even less for people to do, so we have to basically invent games for them to do.
		He's all in favor of creating these facsimiles of purpose and facsimiles of meaning.
		I agree to a certain extent that we need to re-embrace what is real and natural and good and what our instincts tell us to do, but then you've got other people that are interested in creating a facsimile of that just to keep us satisfied and quiet while we go about our business.
		Maybe that's a good way to see this dichotomy.
		I I don't know. I was just thinking about that during the break.
matthew ehret ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, no, it's a good point.
		And it really is a false dichotomy.
		We're often controlled by these false controlled oppositions and oppositional thought matrices that we're supposed to, you know, side by.
		Whether it's, you know, in the French Revolution, we were told that we could either be a Jacobin or a Girondin.
		The Girondins believed in logic, logic, pure, unpolluted by emotion, governing the new regime.
		And the Jacobins were more raw emotion, these Rousseauian, noble, savage type of ideologues.
		We're like, no, the revolution doesn't need scientists and ended up cutting off the heads of everybody good and bad alike, leaving a vacuum of leadership.
		But the whole thing was being funded both sides by the same city of London oligarchical banking networks that wanted to make sure that no American revolution were replicated, that it necessitated qualified, wise leadership that was represented by people like Ben Franklin's networks in France who had to be killed, and they were killed by the mob.
		And as such a proto-fascist sort of in the figure of a new emperor, Napoleon could be introduced and again funded by the same Rothschilds.
		So I think these techniques of getting us into these false debates that are very emotionally charged, we're led to believe if you believe in technological progress or you believe in population growth or human beings made in the image of God, you must want to pave the entire earth and you must hate nature because we're led to believe if you believe in technological progress or you believe in population growth or And thus you must hate nature, which is worse than humans and thus bad.
		And if you're pure and good and scientific, you must want to go back to the purity of nature unpolluted by the fruits of human scientific progress, which is just the effect of hubris.
		human beings thinking that they're arrogant enough to discover the laws of God, or maybe there is no God.
		There's variance on the theme. But then you get people to fight over these two extremes that bring you to the same ultimate conclusion or the same direction, whereas I think that the baby is often lost with the bathwater.
		And sure, technology can be seen as bad in the sense that we've misused technology a lot throughout history.
		But if you just look at the misuses of it and ignore all of the good that came out of it as well, you fall into the trap that they want these kids going through modern university to fall into, which is to see that, well, you know, every time we try to solve a problem, making technological insight, every time we try to solve a problem, making technological insight, we cause more You know, we build a dam to solve scarcity.
		We manage water production systems.
		But then we disrupt the salmon population that has to like do a seasonal migration.
		So that's bad.
		And they'll basically try to just focus on all of the bad.
		Which is wrong. It's very wrong.
		Because did we have to clear crop Amazon rainforests under the guise of industrial progress?
		No, we didn't have to. But we didn't have to let a bunch of sociopathic corporations take control of society under the past 50 years of globalization either, to the point that they now enjoy more power than most national sovereign governments.
		That didn't have to happen.
		We didn't have to, you know, let JFK and Bobby Kennedy and all of these great anti-Malthusian leaders of the 1960s who got gunned down, killed, and there were many more in Europe as well, in Africa.
		We didn't have to let the torch fall and allow these assassins.
		And this takes you right back into the same depopulation creatures that are pushing the modern eco-fascist movements today, like Prince Philip, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands, Julian Huxley, the brother of all this, Maury Strong, the founder of the UN Environmental Protection Agency.
		All of these creatures are the founders of the Great Reset Green New Deals, and they were all part of the apparatus that killed JFK and that wanted to change the paradigm of humanity in the 60s from being safe human beings from empire, which is what it formerly was, because human beings have a sacredness, and move it towards safe nature from human because human beings have a sacredness, and move it towards safe nature from human beings, which was the new sort of moral ethos that they wanted to bring into being with the counterculture movement that they also manipulated with MKUltra and other Tavistockian social engineering experiments that
		entire baby boomer generation The whole generation was victimized by this mental abuse, which we're seeing the fruits of it now today.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, absolutely. And you point out just how far back this goes.
		I mean, at least to the Rousseauian noble savage doctrine of the French Revolution.
		And I want you to talk about Maury Strong.
		Maybe we'll save that for the other side.
		But I think you're exactly right about the false dichotomy.
		And it's especially frustrating for me as somebody who I want the earth to flourish.
		And it's like all of that energy, all of that positive, wanting to help, wanting to save things, you know, impetus that human beings have is co-opted into climate change and carbon renewal.
		And it's like... But you're still deforesting everything and you're still destroying populations of animals.
		But it's this false dichotomy that goes you either, if you are an environmentalist, then you submit to the Club of Rome and the World Economic Forum and Extinction Rebellion and you want humans to die, or you don't care if everything's paved and you just don't give a crap about...
		It's a false dichotomy that we have to break through.
		So... So how do we go about breaking through that and establishing that tertiary idea, the third option of we can actually have it all.
		We can have technology and nature.
		We can have humans and God.
matthew ehret ▲ ● ▼		How do we do that? Yeah, that is the penultimate question, and I think it comes down to a cultural fight more than anything else because if you allow your culture to become corrupted and mediocratized to the point that you lose basic...
		Sacred facts of knowledge and wisdom that held us together for thousands of years.
		If you lose the idea that human beings are sacred, that we have a soul, that there is a creator that must exist for the laws of creation to be what they are and to have a certain harmonic goodness to that, if you lose all of these concepts, then you lose justice as having any ontological reality or freedom, having an ontological reality.
		It all just becomes hyper-materialized Because we're just made of dead atoms, so says the positivist modern materialist, and at which point the consequences are we're just a box of behavior moderated by raw emotions that are shaped by desires for pleasure and avoidance of pain impulses that shape our logical constructs,
		our hyper-developed prefrontal cortexes, Which allow us to, you know, use logic, they say.
		This is all stupid, you know, modern theories about the human mind.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right. Humans are hackable now.
matthew ehret ▲ ● ▼		This is what he's talking about. That's exactly why he thinks that, because he defines us as being just this material, like computer, like we're human, machine-like animals that can thus be trained by zookeepers and programmed by computer programmers, and they don't see, they don't acknowledge the existence of, again, those fundamental metaphysical principles like soul, God, justice.
matthew ehret ▲ ● ▼		That doesn't exist for these creatures.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		they're um they're offended by it you know it seems like what's needed is a little bit of humility is a little bit of maybe we don't understand why everything works the way that it does and maybe we just need to accept that some things are this way for a reason even if we don't understand it it seems like it's this narcissism that they invents uh where they say we can solve everything we can control everything we know better than god basically and really you look at nature and hell i can't even understand how complicated one yard of grass is with all the bugs and the car guy.
		I mean, it's so infinitely complicated.
		Maybe we just step back and say it's not our role to control all of this to the minute detail.
		Well, folks, we are in our final segment with my guest Matthew Arrett.
		Never seems like we have enough time.
		Time flies when having these deep discussions, which really could go on and probably should go on for hours upon hours upon hours.
		Luckily, you can continue your education here by going to risingtidefoundation.net.
		You can also go to canadianpatriot.org where you can find Matthew Arrett's essays as well as his books.
		That he sells where he lays all of this out in really impressive detail.
		Matthew Arad again is my guest and this will be our final segment and I want to ask you if you can talk a little bit, Matthew, about Maury Strong because you laid down some pretty stunning stuff for me in the break and I think our audience needs to hear it.
		Who is Maury Strong and how does he play into what you put as the roots of modern eco-terrorism from MKUltra and the Unabomber to Maury Strong and Yuval Harari?
		I I know most of us are familiar with three out of four of those things, but Maury Strong, our audience might not be as familiar with.
		So how does he play into all of this?
matthew ehret ▲ ● ▼		Well, I drew out the parallel between Maury Strong, who was, I think, one of the most candid in his remarks about the need to reduce the world population, but also undo industrial civilization in an interview that he delivered with Westa Magazine in 1990.
		And so I cited that.
		Just to draw out the similarity in the line of—the sequencing and line of reasoning that he expresses and then acts upon throughout his entire career as an upper-level manager of the oligarchy, to do just that very same thing, you know, organizing Agenda 21 that becomes Agenda 2030, and the entire Green New Deal program.
		I mean, he was a mentor of Klaus Schwab, and Klaus Schwab even said that.
		And I just wanted to draw the parallel to the exact same line of reasoning that is embedded in the words and writings of Ted Kaczynski that I also cite several quotes in the body of that text to get across just clearly to people that if they...
		If they think that they're against the Great Reset, and they think that they're against the conspiracy by a corporate overlord class to try to control us, but they hold the same fundamental assumptions that human beings are a virus, that industrial civilization must be undone to save nature and save us.
		If they think that, which many do, unfortunately, there's a deep misanthropy and cynicism controlled and imbued in our school system over decades and decades.
		It's getting worse. You're ultimately playing right into the game.
		You're playing into your enemy's hands, and you have to sort of re-evaluate and re-question, re-examine some of your core assumptions in order to think about doing things that are actually going to protect humanity from the oligarchy.
		And Maury Strong is a good, useful case study.
		As a figure, you know, his uncle was the president of the YMCA, big, big operation throughout the Cold War.
		But He's a creature who became a privy councillor of Canada.
		He was on the selection committee in the 60s that selected Pierre Elliott Trudeau.
		He was the guy who retooled the program for foreign aid when he ran CEDA, the Canadian International Development Agency that worked closely with the U.S. aid in the 60s to provide loans to other countries, poor countries that were formerly colonized, on conditionalities that they abide by appropriate on conditionalities that they abide by appropriate technological investments.
		So if they wanted to build a hydroelectric dam or something that would be bad for nature or use oil or coal under their ground in Africa, that it would be withheld from Canada or the IMF, and it would only be granted if they went through structural changes and abided by appropriate, acceptable technologies like windmills and things like that that wouldn't impact acceptable technologies like windmills and things like that that wouldn't impact the environment, but ultimately would also not allow them to stand economically on their own two feet and become economically sovereign countries, which was always the
		So he is a figure who rose very quickly through the hierarchy, becoming an upper-level manager on, I think, a Kissinger-like level.
		Passed away in 2015, but his disgusting legacy lives on, unfortunately.
		And, yeah, there's not really anything he didn't have his hands in as far as co-founding the Club of Rome of Canada, being very close with Prince Bernhardt and founding the 1001 Nature Trust with Prince Philip as well and many other oligarchs.
		Peter Monk being another major multi-billionaire gold mining magnate who was the founder and funder of a lot of the early environmental organizations, along with Maury Strong, who became the head of many mining companies as well.
		So the fact that you have these multinational cartels nominally representing capitalism funding the growth of these anti-capitalist, anti-human grassroots agencies that are being deployed now and have been— Even when you had things like Earth First, Greenpeace, they always had sort of a smell of eco-terrorism, but they're getting more virulent.
		It's two sides of the same operation, and it always has been.
		It's not a new thing. So that's why I put Maury Strong on the spotlight on him there.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		When you mentioned that he was sort of the most upfront about his beliefs, a lot of these beliefs, and we understand it, right?
		You know, an evil person, somebody that wants to screw you over isn't going to tell you, hey, I'm about to screw you over.
		They're going to, you know, come up with something that invokes your sympathy or empathy.
		They're going to see, you know, the clockwork war.
		And it's like, oh, we just had a car crash.
		Please, can we use your phone? Like, they're going to say something that invokes your empathy, like, I mean, is that a quote from him?
matthew ehret ▲ ● ▼		And what does that even mean? That's actually a quote from Maurice Lamontagne, who is a co-founder of the Canadian Club of Rome with Maurice Strong.
		And he's the person who was in charge of reorganizing all of Canada's science policy, funding, practice, and the definition of what good or bad science was in the early 70s, Maurice Lamontagne.
		And he writes in his report to the Canadian government that becomes the sort of Bible for the reorganization of science around a cybernetics doctrine of funding.
		You know, highly compartmentalize every system you want to control so that the right hand doesn't know what the left hand is doing.
		That's cybernetics as far as its political infiltration of departments in the Cold War period and to this very day.
		And that's how only a small nervous center of executives at the top are allowed to see what the whole is doing.
		So he was overseeing that part as far as the science thing goes, and he said that, and was himself the most clear in identifying population growth as only being made possible by increased rates of scientific and technological progress And that being made possible by human creativity and a sort of faith in a loving creator that is made and that we're made in the image of that.
		And Maurice Lamontagne in his report, and I cite this in my book series on the Untold History of Canada, we have to get to the root of the problem.
		And that means, he asks, how can we destroy mankind's creativeness?
		And he acknowledges we can't fully destroy it, but what we can do at the very least is redirect it towards activities and appropriate types of science that will, in application, reduce human impact on the environment.
		So windmill technology, solar panel, photovoltaic cell technology, entertainment, pharmaceuticals, things that are more That are more usable by a dominant oligarchical system that wants to use technology, co-opt it, and then use it to kill or induce us to want to kill ourselves.
		That would be okay.
		So creative expression would be permitted in those domains only, but the other domains of science that would allow us to leap outside of the limits to growth by discovering new laws, new principles of creation, translate those principles forward.
		To allow for new resources to be created, you know, things like nuclear fusion, which we were probably closer to in the 1970s in many ways than we are today, was sabotaged many times over because it was one of the bad sciences that would have caused humankind to have more people at a higher quality of life, more consumption, more—all of these things were seen as bad because it would have ultimately made us less controllable and more inclined to see ourselves as a species of dignity that would not want to adapt to controlled, unnatural systems of a slave society that more—all of these things were seen as bad because it would have ultimately made us less controllable and more inclined to see ourselves as a species
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, and I mean, you can almost even see that in sci-fi, where if you read sci-fi from the 50s before this sort of change was made, it's like they had just unbounded hope about the miniaturization of nuclear technology.
		I I mean, they really felt like they were on the cusp of, like...
		Just expansion throughout the universe and human potential exploding and then by like the 70s and 80s all that's been inverted and all the sci-fi is about you know humanity destroying itself and robots taking over and you can see the way that this psychologically was embedded in our pop culture as well as our You know, academic and industrial circles.
		It's just, again, we could talk about this for hours and I wish we had more hours to talk about it.
		My guest is Matthew Errett.
		You can find his website at risingtidefoundation.net.
		You can also go to canadianpatriot.org.
		Go get his books.
		Find this article. Again, this was published very recently.
		It's called The Roots of Modern Eco-Terrorism from MKUltra and the Unabomber to Maury Strong and Yuval Harari.
		I just want to thank you again for coming on, Matthew.
		And once again, the time has flown because We barely scratched the surface here, but thank you so much for coming on.
		We'll have to have you on again soon. Yeah, it's always a pleasure.
		Bye. Thank you very much.
		And we'll just end. I just want to read the final paragraph of this.
		The only way to break the bind is to change one's fundamental axioms and recognize it isn't the technology which is intrinsically good or evil, or that overpopulation is a genuine problem, but rather it's our willingness to tolerate evil ideas shaping the behavior of technology and political systems that result in those systems turning fascists and collapsing into dark ages.
		That's the truth, folks. That's going to do it for us.
		Thanks for being with us.
		See you on Monday.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		You're going to want to pay attention to what I'm about to say in the next 60 seconds.
		Two new incredible products are now available exclusively at InfoWarsStore.com.
		They are both clones of national best-selling products from a major pharmaceutical slash supplement maker that are listeners and patriots that are allowing us to private label it at a lower price you'll find in stores.
		It's Joint Relief Max and Nerve Renewed.
		Both of these have known, documented natural compounds to lower pain and to also make your nerves healthier, which is one of the major reasons nerves get irritated and are more inductive to pain.
		There's major research behind this all.
		You need to get Joint Relief Max from InfoWarsMD and Nerve Renew from InfoWarsMD.
		Exclusively at InfoWarsStore.com right now.
		Introducing them both, 25% off.

▲