Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
During World War II, the Nazis' most classified project was known as D-Glock, the bell. the Nazis' most classified project was known as D-Glock, the Secret documents found years later reveal that the bell was a new kind of exotic energy technology that could affect time and defy gravity. | ||
In 1939, the Nazis set up a secret base in Antarctica. | ||
...known as New Schwabia. | ||
Starting in 1945, Operation Paperclip secretly brought hundreds of Nazi scientists into America, where they were hired by the military-industrial complex. | ||
In 1946, Admiral Richard Byrd led a military expedition known as Operation High Jump to seek out Nazi base New Schwabia and other Antarctica bases. | ||
On his way back to the U.S., Admiral Byrd told Chilean newspaper El Mercurio that in the event of a new war, the U.S. would be facing military craft that can fly from one pole to the other with incredible speed. | ||
In 1959, a dozen nations signed the Antarctic Treaty, making it illegal for anyone to travel south of the 60th parallel without government permission. | ||
Since then, curious videos have circulated that show what appear to be Nazi UFOs. | ||
And just last Monday, Dr. | ||
unidentified
|
Stephen Greer introduced Antarctica whistleblower Eric Hecker, In 2010, I was selected to go down to the South Pole Station in Antarctica for an entire year by Raytheon Polar Services as an employee of a third-party contractor for the National Science Foundation. | |
I function in a dual-role capacity as a tradesman and a firefighter. | ||
My responsibilities required me to be more informed than most of my crew and offered me complete access to the facilities. | ||
What I learned from this unique experience needs to be shared with the entire world. | ||
The technology at the South Pole Station certainly can do what it is presented as its primary purposes, and unfortunately, much more. | ||
The IceCube Neutrino Detector is presented as a passive listening device for the purposes of the science as presented. | ||
But I'm going to skip right through the chase, folks. | ||
I have provided documentation that proves that the 5,160, what they call DOMS, that are embedded in the ice can actually transmit at 2,047 volts each. | ||
That gives us a long list of things to consider. | ||
It is effectively a multi-faceted directed energy weapons platform that I will list rapidly a few things that it can do. | ||
Vehicle detection. | ||
We're learning that these off-world craft, on-world craft, ours or other nations are also emitting neutrinos. | ||
So this makes the South Pole Station effectively an air traffic control station for this new level of equipment that nobody's discussing. | ||
In addition to the ability to detect neutrinos and the exotic vehicles, I have provided documentation that shows that this is also a system for faster than light communications. | ||
In the past, Gary McKinnon has hacked NASA, found the off-world fleet, the list of captains, and it's apparent that if we have faster than light vehicles moving throughout the system, we're going to need faster than light communications. | ||
This is that facility. | ||
Unfortunately, I have other bad news. | ||
The season that I was there, 2010 to 2011, we converted from construction to operations and maintenance in both the elevated station and the detector array. | ||
Unfortunately, when they first fired it up, that was when we had the earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand. | ||
There was two incidental shots before they were able to target it correctly. | ||
This is an earthquake-generating device as well. | ||
This is the weapons of war that we have to deal with now and what Raytheon's hiding. | ||
There's an ELF system at the South Pole Station that when I arrived, I was told it was off, dismantled, and completely defunct. | ||
In my work, I will rapidly just tell you, I had to figure out the circuitry for certain other repairs, and I found that this system is, in fact, completely energized, up and running, and being utilized with the other systems for nefarious purposes as well. | ||
The Atmospheric Research Observatory is in what we call the clean air sector. | ||
I witnessed myself a very powerful green laser shooting out of the top of this facility into the cosmos. | ||
This, I believe, is a secondary form of long-range communications and or a defense system. | ||
Folks, you can find and share that video, as always, at band.video. | ||
It's the latest Reese Report. | ||
Whistleblower claims advanced technology in Antarctica can cause earthquakes. | ||
Am I not surprised? | ||
We'll be back on the other side with your Daily Dispatch. | ||
Stay tuned. It's the American Journal, InfoWars.com. | ||
unidentified
|
It's Thursday, June 15th, here by Lorne 2023. | |
And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Welcome to The American Journal. I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Infowars.com, band.video. | ||
unidentified
|
We have a lot to talk about today. | |
Including a lot of videos from debates in the California Senate. | ||
And I guess we have to go over this. | ||
I think part of the globalist strategy is just to... | ||
Keep us talking about things that we should never have to talk about in the first place, like the fact that there's a difference between men and women. | ||
It's so odd. | ||
I mean, I guess this is where we are now, that we're having to explain to people that men are not women and women are not men. | ||
Is this an argument we need to have? | ||
Is this the... Constructive way to spend our time? | ||
I guess it is because, well, everyone is stupid now. | ||
So I guess we just have to start at the beginning. | ||
Work our way up to the more complicated issues. | ||
More complicated than men, not women, women, not men. | ||
But we'll get into it. | ||
We will get into it. | ||
I mean, it is absolutely crazy. | ||
And we'll show you arguments on both sides of the California transgender bill that threatens to take your child away. | ||
If you don't allow them to be first propagandized and then mutilated by public school teachers. | ||
Really incredible stuff. | ||
It's like videos get posted on Twitter and stuff that's like, bombshell, this doctor totally, you know, slams gender identity. | ||
And it's literally a doctor being like, when a person is born, they are either a girl or a boy. | ||
It's just like, boom! | ||
Bam! Okay, alright, yeah, great. | ||
It's crazy. It's absolutely crazy. | ||
So we're going to spend some time talking about that today. | ||
Happy Pride Month. We'll get into all of that. | ||
Show you a lot of videos from that, but a lot of other videos as well. | ||
Lots of political goings on these days. | ||
So let's just get into it, shall we? | ||
Here it is, your daily dispatch. | ||
All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Thursday, the 15th of June, 2023. | ||
Former Philly Starbucks manager wins $25.6 million after being fired for being white. | ||
It's official, folks. | ||
We are, in fact, in the very beginning of white girl summer. | ||
A former regional manager for Starbucks was awarded $25.6 million on Monday after a federal jury in New Jersey unanimously found that she had been fired because of her race. | ||
Shannon Phillips, who is white, received $25 million in punitive damages and $600,000 in compensatory damages. | ||
She is reportedly seeking further compensation for lost wages. | ||
That's right. | ||
Never be satisfied. | ||
Always seek more. | ||
Phillips was terminated in 2018 in response to backlash against Starbucks after two black men, Rashawn Nelson and Dante Robinson, were arrested while waiting for a business associate at one of many Philadelphia locations that she oversaw. | ||
Employees at the Center City Philadelphia Cafe called the police on the pair after they asked to use the washroom but hadn't ordered anything. | ||
It really is the most insane story ever, right? | ||
You've got these guys just sitting at Starbucks having not ordered anything. | ||
In other words, trespassing. | ||
And then asking and then demanding to use the bathroom. | ||
Again, not willing to pay a dollar for a coffee. | ||
But no, they'd rather make a scene. | ||
So they had to call the cops. | ||
People got hauled away and taken away. | ||
But the craziest thing is that this woman that got fired wasn't even there, apparently. | ||
And in fact, the person who was the manager supervising the employee that called the cops was a black guy. | ||
So instead of firing the black guy that was the supervisor of the employee who called the cops because this was all a PR thing by Starbucks to try to stop the psychopaths from calling them racist. | ||
Completely insane. They didn't fire the black guy that was in charge at the time. | ||
They fired his boss who wasn't even on scene for this because she was a white woman. | ||
Couldn't be more obvious. | ||
So Phillips claimed in 2020 lawsuit that her firing had been racially motivated. | ||
She said she was targeted despite not having any direct influence on the decision to call the police. | ||
Her allegations were backed up by the testimony of Paul Sykes, the black supervisor of the employee who made the 911 call that day. | ||
Sykes argued that... The fact he did not face any disciplinary action while Phillips was let go showed that Starbucks had acted in a manner that exhibited racial bias. | ||
The coffee giant tried to claim that Phillips had been fired for being an ineffective regional manager, but they failed to convince even a single member of the jury. | ||
Just absolutely hilarious. | ||
Good for her. I don't think she should stop pursuing this $25 million. | ||
It's a chump change. Bankrupt the company. | ||
That's what I say. Make sure they can never sell another cup of coffee again. | ||
That's the way we do things, right? | ||
Here in America these days? Pretty sure. | ||
Moving on. The United States' only Muslim-majority town, Hamtrak, Michigan, Hamtrak, Michigan, bans pride plagues on public property. | ||
Inshallah. I have to say, asalo leikum, or whatever, to all you fine folks there in Hamtranc. | ||
Hamtranc. I saw Ham in the name. | ||
I can't be popular. | ||
On Tuesday, Hamtrak, Michigan City Council, unanimously voted to ban pride flags from being displayed on public property located just outside Detroit. | ||
Hamtrak is the only Muslim-majority town in the United States. | ||
The ruling was celebrated with cheers and applause inside City Hall, where dozens of concerned residents, Muslim and Christian, had shown to express their thoughts on the matter. | ||
According to Detroit Free Press, the resolution was introduced by Councilman and Mayor Pro Tem Mohammed Hassan and applies not only to pride flags, but also those promoting any religious, ethnic, racial, political, or sexual orientation group. | ||
Only the American flag and the nation's flag that represent the international character of our city shall be flown. | ||
It's also kind of funny. | ||
Only the American flag and also the flags of the countries that we're loyal to. | ||
All right, that's interesting, but that's fine. | ||
The flag does not want to open the door for radical or racist groups to ask for their flags to be flown. | ||
Did you know it's that easy? | ||
Did you know you can just do that? | ||
And it's not just this Ham Tramp place. | ||
Is that how it's pronounced? | ||
Ham Tramp? I don't know. | ||
I don't know. | ||
But it was also a place in California. | ||
Just... Passed the same ordinance. | ||
We'll cover that story a little bit later. | ||
But yeah, it turns out you can just do that. | ||
You can just pass that law. | ||
And then they'll screech. | ||
They'll be mad and they'll screech and they'll be angry. | ||
And then you just go about your business because you passed the law. | ||
It really is as simple as that. | ||
Almost everything is. Almost everything we're dealing with It's literally as simple as just not letting the whiny psychopaths have their way. | ||
Just saying no. We want to hang a rainbow flag, get also transgender and black supremacy flag up, please. | ||
No, you can't. | ||
Wow, that's it, that's it. | ||
The problem was solved. I just did it. | ||
Really is that simple. | ||
Incredible. It's just revolutionary political thinking here. | ||
Just ban the things you don't like. | ||
Meanwhile, mRNA vaccines fast-tracked for Australian agriculture. | ||
After the spectacular failure of the mRNA vaccine in human trials, the agricultural industry is pushing ahead with mRNA vaccines for livestock engaged in the food industry. | ||
Whispers of stock, quote, dying suddenly will no doubt become a complaint of farmers in the future, summarily ignored by the government the same way officials refuse to listen to serious concerns about dam building restrictions, price hikes on ag products, products, ridiculous fees and charges. | ||
So this is basically out of Western Australia. | ||
The Meat and Livestock Australia announced... | ||
That they were funding a project to test mRNA vaccines that could be rapidly mass-produced in Australia in the event of a lumpy skin disease or other exotic disease outbreak. | ||
So they are fast-tracking an mRNA vaccine pipeline because You know, when you're talking about injecting something that alters the building blocks of life, that permanently changes the genetic makeup of the food that we eat, it's best to fast-track that sort of stuff. | ||
It's best to not worry too much, not do too much testing. | ||
Just get it done. Just fast-track it. | ||
Just permanently alter the DNA of living beings the world over. | ||
Just attack nature on every level with no concern for the future. | ||
unidentified
|
Learning how to pronounce things. . | |
Welcome back. Continuing on with our Daily Dispatch here. | ||
Daniel Horowitz writes this for a conservative review. | ||
Confidential Pfizer document shows the company observed 1.6 million adverse events covering nearly every organ system. | ||
Over 10,000 categories of nearly 1.6 million adverse events, many of them serious and debilitating, brought to you by Pfizer. | ||
You might not have heard in the news, but in recent months, Pfizer's pharmacovigilance documents requested by the European Union's drug regulator, the European Medicines Agency, have been released. | ||
They show that Pfizer knew about a sickening level of injury early on. | ||
An August 2022 document shows the company already had observed the following scope of vaccine injury. | ||
Over 500,000 individual cases of adverse events containing 1.6 million events. | ||
One third of the adverse events were classified as serious, well above the standard for safety signals, usually pegged at about 15%. | ||
Women reported adverse events at three times the rate of men. | ||
60% of cases were reported with either outcome unknown or, quote, not recovered. | ||
So many of the injuries were not transient. | ||
And they were, in fact, persistent. | ||
So we'll dig into this a little bit later. | ||
But in case you needed another set of proof that you should never have gotten the vaccine or that you are right to not get the vaccine, you can add this to the already overwhelming pile. | ||
The infinitely stretched pile of evidence just continues to grow. | ||
It's really... Finally, we have this. | ||
Grand jury indicts Daniel Penny in chokehold death of Jordan Neely. | ||
Neely's death was ruled a homicide according to the medical examiner. | ||
A grand jury has indicted former U.S. Marine Daniel Penny in connection with the chokehold death of Jordan Neely aboard a subway train. | ||
The exact charges will not be unsealed until Penny appears in court at a later date. | ||
Penny was initially arrested on a second-degree manslaughter charge. | ||
Video showed Penny, 24, putting Neely in a chokehold on May 1st. | ||
Several witnesses observed Neely making threats. | ||
Assistant District Attorney Joshua Steinglass told the judge during Penny's initial appearance in court on May 12th. | ||
I don't think we played the video. | ||
Daniel Penny's given a statement where he actually discusses what happened. | ||
He actually did an interview where he... | ||
You know, went through everything that went on. | ||
Maybe we should show that interview because he's like literally a hero. | ||
He's actually a heroic person that is now being charged with something, second degree, manslaughter, first degree manslaughter, murder, premeditated murder. | ||
I mean, each is as ridiculous as the last. | ||
This crazy dude was literally threatening women and children on the train. | ||
Nobody on the train. | ||
Has condemned Daniel Penny. | ||
Every single person that has spoken out, that witnessed the event, that Daniel Penny did exactly the right thing. | ||
Thank God he was there to stop Neely from hurting somebody. | ||
Also, there were two black guys that were helping Daniel Penny that don't even know their names. | ||
Certainly never been charged or arrested. | ||
So maybe Daniel Penny will be getting that big payout very soon. | ||
But, you know... | ||
What are you going to do? | ||
What are you going to do? I know what you're probably not going to do, help your fellow American now. | ||
Especially if you're white. | ||
I mean, you just know. You just know that self-defense or even defense of others is a punishable crime in this new, very diverse America. | ||
It's called equity. | ||
When you putting your life on the line to do the right thing and save others is treated as a crime and you are... | ||
Potentially sentenced to 15 years in prison for the crime of your skin color. | ||
It really is that serious. | ||
It really is that insane and it's really across the board. | ||
I mean you can't exactly deny it. | ||
You can't exactly say that this isn't happening. | ||
I mean the only defense I guess is that because white people are the majority of I guess there's no special protections. | ||
So it's like everybody sort of acknowledges that white people are discriminated against in this country. | ||
Crazy, I know. But they are. | ||
It's just okay because equity. | ||
Because equity, after all. | ||
Again, it just, I mean, the headlines today are just absolutely bonkers. | ||
I'll say bonkers. Since I can't say the words I'm thinking of. | ||
In the first month in office, crime jumps 38% under new Chicago Mayor Johnson. | ||
When Chicagoans voted out Lori Lightfoot and put Mayor Brandon Johnson in charge, they doubled down on the progressive soft-on-crime approach and went full commie. | ||
Now they're getting exactly what they voted for. | ||
The latest data reveals in almost all major crimes, with total crime growing 38% over the same time last year, Oh, yeah, it reveals increases in almost all major crimes, with total crime growing 38% over the same time last year. | ||
Just... Just wild. | ||
Just absolutely wild. Now, murder is apparently down 5%, which is nice. | ||
Which is nice to see. | ||
Although... Okay, yeah. | ||
So 56 murders instead of 59. | ||
So well done. | ||
Well done there. Motor vehicle theft is up 153%, which... | ||
Sort of throws the whole thing off. | ||
I mean, you get what you vote for. | ||
I mean, the dude ran on not prosecuting criminals, so what do you think is going to happen? | ||
This is the crazy thing. | ||
This is just our crime stack, I guess. | ||
Pregnant woman killed in daytime shooting in downtown Seattle. | ||
A pregnant woman has died and a man was wounded after being shot Tuesday morning in Seattle's Belltown neighborhood, police say. | ||
More than 20 officers flooded Fourth Avenue and Lenora Street around 11 a.m. after receiving calls about shots fired at an occupied car, according to Seattle Police Department. | ||
Officers found the 34-year-old woman suffering from life-threatening injuries. | ||
She succumbed to her wounds at Harborview Medical Center. | ||
Her unborn child did not survive. | ||
A 37-year-old man was less seriously hurt in the shooting. | ||
Police say they arrested a suspect nearby and recovered a gun. | ||
A white Tesla could be seen with bullet holes through the front driver's side window. | ||
They did not give further details about the circumstances of the shooting, which caused significant transit delays. | ||
The SPD has recorded 194 shootings or reports of shots fired so far this year, according to its online crime dashboard, which is current through April. | ||
There are more than 700 such incidents citywide last year, according to the agency. | ||
Of course, they're not giving any further information, probably because the shooter's black and the victim was an Asian woman. | ||
And I believe Seattle is one of the cities that banned Things like publishing mugshots or publishing crimes by stats because it would reinforce racist ideas. | ||
In other words, hate speech is when reality matches the stereotype. | ||
You would think that if you actually had concern for the safety and well-being of the people in your city, you might want to make them aware of the situation and circumstances surrounding the A brutal murder of an eight-month pregnant woman. | ||
What happened right before, who was involved, how they can avoid becoming victims of a similar crime, or you can just cover it all up so it doesn't fracture your completely contrived worldview. | ||
San Francisco's got better ideas. | ||
All right. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. Let's start talking about crime. | |
Sorry. Sorry. | ||
I know it's early. I know. | ||
But this is just what's going on in the world. | ||
I have to tell you about it. | ||
So from our Daily Dispatch, grand jury indicts Daniel Penny in a chokehold death of Jordan Neely. | ||
A grand jury has indicted former U.S. Marine Daniel Penny in connection with the chokehold death of Jordan Neely aboard a subway train. | ||
The exact charges will not be unsealed until Penny appears in court at a later date. | ||
Penny was initially arrested on second-degree manslaughter charges. | ||
Starting to think this whole grand jury thing is like a scam. | ||
Basically, every completely unjustified and baseless charge brought recently has come out of a grand jury. | ||
Which, I mean, the whole idea behind a grand jury is that it's like secret and only one side presents evidence. | ||
Maybe we need to do some whole rethinking about the entire grand jury system because they keep coming up with things like this, which are absurd. | ||
The whole thing is completely absurd. | ||
We'll go to the video, the only statement so far that Daniel Penny has made about the occurrence with Neely. | ||
Now the only reason this is even a thing is because Daniel Penny is white and Neely is black. | ||
It's a man-bite-dog sort of situation. | ||
The mainstream media, of course, in their desperate attempts to perpetuate a false narrative about dangerous white people killing black people, they'll latch onto any Time that anything remotely like that occurs, no matter how false it is. | ||
I mean, they're so disconnected from reality. | ||
They were convinced that a pregnant nurse after a nine-month or 12-hour shift tried to steal a bike from some young black teenagers and were just completely embarrassed when all of the evidence came out and proved beyond any shadow of a doubt who was on the right side of that conflict. | ||
But Like, it doesn't matter. | ||
They're pushing a narrative. They're not going after facts. | ||
They're pursuing a predetermined outcome. | ||
So we'll go to this video of Daniel Penny now and hear him describe it. | ||
It's really the only thing you need to hear, after all. | ||
You can just see it for yourself. | ||
This guy is conscientious. | ||
Clearly thoughtful. It's honestly shameful that he feels the need to say I'm not racist as if it could possibly have anything to do with what happened here. | ||
It's like, for one thing, the other two guys holding down Neely were black, right? | ||
But they only charged the one white guy. | ||
He was the one with the arm around the neck. | ||
I get it, but it's a little bit telling. | ||
But also as if, like, which is what? | ||
I mean, this is a situation, Daniel Pena didn't put himself in this situation. | ||
He didn't force Neely to start threatening people in the subway car and acting insane. | ||
Like, how, like, just what? | ||
What? It just makes no sense. | ||
But, I mean, I don't know why I'm shocked at that. | ||
I mean, literally nothing that we're going to talk about today makes any sense at all. | ||
As we talked about, we're going to have to spend a very long time today explaining to certain people that men are men and women are women. | ||
So, I guess, you know, this is just where we are at this point. | ||
When you have a sudden and unexpected event where you're trapped on a subway car with an insane person who's threatening women and children, I guess you're racist if the guy is black. | ||
I mean, it just makes no sense whatsoever. | ||
And, you know, hopefully people are seeing all of this happen from, like, some woman that wasn't even at Starbucks getting fired because of something a black guy did at Starbucks. | ||
Like, it just makes no sense. | ||
You know, hopefully this is maybe breaking through to some people. | ||
Specifically white people being like, huh, maybe we are under attack. | ||
Maybe I don't deserve this. | ||
Maybe I didn't do anything wrong. | ||
Maybe nobody deserves to be hated like this. | ||
I don't know. Maybe. | ||
Maybe that's going to happen. We'll see. | ||
So let's go now to Daniel Penny. | ||
This is the hero, the subway hero, that saved the women and children from the violence Of an insane street person, Neely. | ||
So, let's... Neely. | ||
Kneeling down. | ||
Kneeling for the flag. | ||
Kneeling on George Floyd's neck. | ||
There's a connection here. That's troubling. | ||
We'll look into it. Here's Daniel Penny, the subway hero. | ||
unidentified
|
East Village in Manhattan, so I take the subway multiple times a day. | |
In this instance, I was coming from school. | ||
I got out of class around 2.15, and I took the... | ||
I was at J Street Metro Tech, took the uptown F train. | ||
At 2nd Avenue, a man came on, stumbled on. | ||
He appeared to be on drugs. | ||
The doors closed, and he ripped his jacket off and threw it at the people sitting down to my left. | ||
I was listening to music at the time, and he was yelling, so I took my headphones out to hear what he was yelling. | ||
And the three main threats that he repeated over and over was, I'm going to kill you, I'm prepared to go to jail for life, and I'm willing to die. | ||
You know, this was a scary situation. | ||
And Mr. Neely came on. | ||
He was threatening. | ||
I'm 6'2", and he was taller than me. | ||
And there's a common misconception that Marines don't get scared. | ||
We're actually taught one of our core values is courage. | ||
And courage is not the absence of fear, but how you handle fear. | ||
You know, I was scared for myself, but I looked around. | ||
I saw women and children. He was yelling in their faces, saying these threats. | ||
I couldn't just sit still. | ||
Some people say that I was holding on to Mr. | ||
Neely for 15 minutes. | ||
This is not true. I mean, between stops is only a couple minutes. | ||
So the whole interaction lasted less than five minutes. | ||
Some people say I was trying to choke him to death, which is also not true. | ||
I was trying to restrain him. | ||
You can see in the video, there's a clear rise and fall of his chest, indicating that he's breathing. | ||
I'm trying to restrain him from him being able to carry out the threats. | ||
And then some people say that this is about race, which is absolutely ridiculous. | ||
I didn't see a black man threatening passengers. | ||
I saw a man threatening passengers. | ||
A lot of whom were people of color. | ||
A man who helped restrain Mr. | ||
Neely was a person of color. | ||
A few days after the incident, I read in the papers that a woman of color came out and called me a hero. | ||
I don't believe that I'm a hero, but she was one of those people that I was trying to protect. | ||
We were all scared. Mr. | ||
Neely was yelling in these passengers' faces, and they looked terrified. | ||
The reason why there was no video at the start of the altercation was because people were too afraid getting away from him, and the videos didn't start until they saw that situation was under control. | ||
I knew I had to act, and I acted in a way that would protect the other passengers, protect myself, and protect Mr. | ||
Neely. I used this hole to restrain him, and I did this by... | ||
I'm leaving my hand on top of his head to control his body. | ||
You can see in the video there's a clear rise and fall of his chest, indicating that he was still breathing. | ||
And I'm calibrating my grip based on the force that he's exerting. | ||
I was trying to keep him on the ground until the police came. | ||
I was praying that the police would come and take this situation over. | ||
I didn't want to be put in that situation, but I couldn't just sit still and let him carry out these threats. | ||
What an illustrative series of events that we have here. | ||
It's very telling as to what our civilization stands for, who we champion, when you have Guy Neely threatening women and children to kill them on the subway. | ||
After a life of crime, by the way, he's been arrested like dozens of times for crimes on the subway, just always let out, never, apparently never convicted for anything or even charged for anything. | ||
Just a menace, just a continual menace, and then he gets like a golden casket, and Al Sharpton is eulogizing him and celebrating him. | ||
And meanwhile, this like stand up guy, this Marine putting his own life in danger to help other people is now being ruthlessly prosecuted by the New York district attorney. | ||
unidentified
|
All right, coach, welcome back. | |
This is American Journal. | ||
We're going to keep talking a little bit about crime here, but we have a lot of videos to show you about the new great debate going on. | ||
unidentified
|
The great debate. | |
It's the greatest minds In our nation, much like Athens around the time of Socrates, these philosophers come together and debate these pressing questions like, is it healthy and good to cut off the genitals of children because they like trucks instead of Barbie? | ||
Is it real to say that men and women are distinct sexes? | ||
That each have their own characteristics? | ||
These are the types of real deep questions that the greatest minds in our nation are debating, coming to vague and nonsensical answers about. | ||
I mean, I kind of can't help but see a bit of a thread of continuity with all of this. | ||
So we'll get to it in the next hour, these debates. | ||
I'm serious. There really is a debate going on right now because California is trying to pass a law where they will take your children away if you don't affirm their gender identity. | ||
You don't contribute and participate in this mass delusion that... | ||
Your kid is only thinking about or even knows about because of the directed overt propaganda that they're being fed by their school teachers and also their cartoons and also department stores and also social media. | ||
Just ubiquitous constant never-ending stream of propaganda. | ||
And I think the threat of continuity here is just lay down. | ||
Just lay down and accept it. | ||
That's the purpose of all of this. | ||
So I guess when it comes to Daniel Penny, we can do a little scenario planning. | ||
We can do what the globalists do and just play this out like a role-playing game of some sort. | ||
What do you do? What do you do if there is an insane homeless person in the subway car with you, trapped, you're traveling underground, I mean you can't exactly leave, can't get out of there, so that's not an option. | ||
What do you do if there's a guy saying, I will kill you, as he's making threatening gestures and acting like a psychopath? | ||
What are your options? | ||
Do you... Fight back? | ||
Do you try to restrain him? No, obviously not. | ||
You might go to jail for 15 years. | ||
You might become the object of national scorn as people claim that you are a racist, a Nazi, a murderer. | ||
You'll have your life destroyed at the very minimum. | ||
You'll be fired from your job and everything else. | ||
I mean, do you cry? | ||
Obviously not. You can't cry. | ||
You can't show emotion. You can't show negative emotion. | ||
After all, that was the crime of the city bite Karen. | ||
She weaponized her tears, was fired from her job, doxed by the Young Turks and others, demanding that she lose the job that she needs to care for her unborn baby. | ||
So, okay, you can't fight back. | ||
You can't cry or show emotion, obviously. | ||
You certainly can't call for help. | ||
If you're big enough, you can maybe fight back. | ||
But what if the guy's a lot bigger than you? | ||
You can't fight back against him. | ||
Well, you also can't call for help. | ||
You yell out help. | ||
I mean, again, look at City Bike, Karen. | ||
Life destroyed, smeared, doxxed, harassed. | ||
No calling for help. | ||
Certainly can't call the cops. | ||
I mean, look at the... The bird-watching lady who called the cops on a black guy who was menacing her. | ||
She also lost her job. | ||
And I believe was charged with something. | ||
Okay, so you can't call the cops. | ||
You can't yell out for help. Certainly you can't cry your white tears. | ||
You racist. You cannot fight back. | ||
Certainly not. If you, you know, if you do fight back, no, you better just not fight back. | ||
No, you better just not fight back. | ||
You better not call out for help. | ||
And you can't get away, so your option is just take it. | ||
Just sit there and take it. That City Bike Karen lady, I mean, she checked out the bike. | ||
It was her bike, but when those young black thugs came up to steal it from her, she should have politely stepped aside and let them take advantage of her. | ||
That's the only right thing to do in today's America. | ||
When you have a... Crazy homeless person threatening the lives of children and women right in front of you and you're a 24-year-old 6'2 Marine. | ||
You just put your headphones back in and ignore it. | ||
You be silent and you accept your fate. | ||
When your child is told that they're actually a little girl, when they're really a little boy and their teacher wants to put them in a dress, Show them cartoon pornography to illustrate how fun it is to be gay. | ||
As a parent, you accept that. | ||
You sit down, you lie down, and you accept their attack on you or else you're the bad guy at that point. | ||
If you dare to do anything else, the state's going to take your children away. | ||
And I don't mean, you know, burn the school down or do some crazy anti-gay martyrdom nonsense. | ||
No, just if you say to your child, actually, sweetie, you're actually not a little girl. | ||
You're a little boy. | ||
That's how God made you. | ||
Well, no, can't do that. | ||
So no speaking out, no fighting back, no calling for help, no talking about any of this stuff. | ||
That's hate speech after all. | ||
I think that's sort of the thread of continuity here. | ||
I think that's why it's important to illustrate these certain cases. | ||
They all contribute to this narrative, this storyline, this new lesson that the powers that be are trying to teach us. | ||
That you accept what they're doing to you or you get punished. | ||
Now to me, Maybe you learn a different lesson. | ||
Maybe you learn the lesson that this system is not yours anymore. | ||
It doesn't belong to the citizens. | ||
It's not there for your protection or comfort. | ||
The system despises you. | ||
And whether it's Bending the rule of law or just fabricating things from whole cloth, just smearing you endlessly. | ||
It doesn't matter what they have to do. | ||
They are religiously inclined to think that they are the good guys no matter what they're doing. | ||
So maybe next time there's a Daniel Penny-type character, either they just won't do anything to stop it, let the guy do whatever he wants, let the crazy guy attack the women and children, And then like the police will show up like 30 minutes later and he'll get away and whatever. | ||
And even if they do arrest him, he won't be charged because the courts are overcrowded and there's a new Soros-funded, you know, anti-law enforcement DA who's, you know, not going to want to charge him. | ||
So that's the lesson they're trying to teach you. | ||
Don't do anything. Just lay down. | ||
Sit down and shut up. But maybe next time, if there's a Daniel Penny that still has that heroic impulse, still has that feeling of obligation as being somebody who is able to stand up against injustice or abuse. | ||
It's like Daniel Penny was living in this world where Where we should be living, where he would be celebrated for doing what he did. | ||
Putting himself out there. | ||
Every single person in the subway car who has spoken up has called him a hero. | ||
Every single person who said, thank God he was there, we were terrified until he stepped in. | ||
That might be how the people feel, but the system doesn't feel that way. | ||
Maybe next time, if something like this does happen and you're foolish or heroic enough to step in, you'll make sure to cover your face first. | ||
And once you're done with the heroic action, just get the hell out of there and hope that they don't find out who you are to come punish you. | ||
This is the world that we live in now. | ||
I mean, you think that... | ||
Not breaking the law, being a hero, and doing what all of humanity for all of time would say is the right thing to do. | ||
You'd think that would be some level of protection against a system that despises and wants to destroy you, but that's not the case anymore. | ||
So maybe we all need to start acting like we are what we are, a persecuted class because we... | ||
Don't want to roll over, don't want to give in, don't want to just surrender our children, our lives, our cities, our public transportation to the just criminal scum that run things now. | ||
Maybe that's a lesson that they're trying to teach all of us. | ||
I think we should learn the opposite lesson, but I also think we should take into account the reality of the situation. | ||
Which is you can't rely on the justice system. | ||
You can't rely on those in authority to protect good people. | ||
They will do everything they can to protect the evil in this country and disabuse you of that impulse that says to stand up against it. | ||
We'll try to foster that impulse. | ||
unidentified
|
Stay with us. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | |
The second hour of American Journal has begun. | ||
We'll move on to some other stories here. | ||
There's just a lot of crime to talk about, to be honest with you. | ||
Incredibly creepy stuff. | ||
Some good news here. | ||
Austin relocates people from homeless encampments to shelters after a resident exposes environmental damage. | ||
This, of course, is the outcome of the activities of our friend Jamie Hammonds of Dash. | ||
So not only is he receiving international accolades and attention for his coverage of the homeless problem here in Austin, but he's actually making a tangible difference. | ||
As he's brought attention to this issue and caused so much outrage about it that the Austin government has been forced to No longer pretend like they don't know what's going on and actually deal with it. | ||
So they're now cleaning out these encampments. | ||
Of course, the encampments will be back and it'll continue. | ||
Not to be too black-filled, but it's actually great. | ||
And congratulations to Dash and Jamie for making a positive difference in our fair city. | ||
I don't know if this is a joke or not. | ||
Pretty funny. From the smatteringnews.com. | ||
Sounds like a joke, right? | ||
Progressives launch campaign to buy back, to buy every black man an AR-15 to scare Republicans into supporting gun control. | ||
So I think this is like a parody article. | ||
They're trying to do a left-wing version of Babylon B, where they're making a left-wing point, calling Republicans racist, I guess. | ||
Progressive activists concerned about gun violence are launching a campaign to draw support they need to pass more restrictive gun laws. | ||
The group plans to purchase an AR-15 for every eligible black American to scare Republicans into backing stricter regulations on firearms. | ||
And this would actually work. | ||
I hate to break it to you, this would actually work, not for the reason that they think. | ||
Dubbed the Scare the Racist Straight initiative, the controversial proposal is intended to get Republican politicians and their conservative constituents on board with the effort to limit gun ownership as much as possible. | ||
The underlying belief is that the mere thought of black people exercising their Second Amendment rights will cause conservatives to abandon their principles faster than you can say, look out for that black dude with a Glock. | ||
It's pretty interesting, though. | ||
It's pretty interesting because it would work. | ||
It would work. What would happen would be they would give AR-15s to every black person in America. | ||
That would naturally cause a spike in gun crime, murders with these guns. | ||
And then those statistics would be taken from the criminal black element, gangbangers, and whoever else. | ||
Pump up those gun death numbers and they take those numbers and use those statistics to justify removing guns from the hands of law-abiding gun owners everywhere, which is what they already do. | ||
So I don't know if this is a parody or not, but I'm sure it is. | ||
But it's also, like, what already happens, and it's not because Republicans are like, black people with guns? | ||
Oh, no. Yeah, black people have guns. | ||
Like, this is one of those things where it's like, do you love guns now? | ||
And they'll post a picture of, like, a black dude with a gun. | ||
It's like, yeah, that's cool. | ||
It's so crazy when they, like, project a false image onto you and then, like, condescend to you as if that image is real. | ||
And it's just like, what are you even talking about? | ||
So no, it wouldn't bring about gun control because Republicans go, wait, black people get guns too? | ||
This isn't right. Nobody should have guns. | ||
No, it's because the gun crime rate that's constantly cited is, like, the majority of it is young black men in gangs killing each other. | ||
So what that has to do with me and my family owning guns, or... | ||
A black family having a gun for home protection? | ||
Nothing. But they're the ones who will be punished for it. | ||
We're the ones who will be punished for it. | ||
Those would actually work. | ||
You know, unregistered guns to every black person. | ||
Pump up those gun rates. | ||
Use those gun rates to justify taking guns from law-abiding American citizens. | ||
And that's what you've been doing for years. | ||
Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Second hour of American Journal has begun. | ||
Remember to support us by going to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Right now, Brain Force Plus and Brain Force Ultra are both on sale for 40% off. | ||
Buy them together and get a full 50% off with the Brain Force Duo. | ||
If you've never tried these nootropics, you are missing out. | ||
They really are incredible. | ||
I think the tincture one tastes good, too. | ||
I especially like Brain Force Ultra, the liquid version, because you can sort of tailor it to exactly how much you need with the dropper. | ||
But, of course, Brain Force Plus is the bombshell, the original, the OG, a beloved product for a very good reason. | ||
Find out for yourself by going to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Keep us on the air. Keep us... | ||
Not just fighting back, but trying to encourage other people to fight back against this just absolute, purposeful, managed breakdown of everything in this country. | ||
Speaking of, let's go to some of these videos now. | ||
We are... Dealing with an issue in this country that is so far beyond the pale, so wildly outside of the bounds of logic, common sense, or decency. | ||
I mean, honestly, if we... | ||
Like, there's two options. | ||
Either this stuff is so crazy... | ||
That we should be able to dominate in electoral politics for the next decade because every thinking, conscionable, decent human being should reject the left with everything they've got. | ||
No, I mean, like, it doesn't matter. | ||
It doesn't matter what your position on, like... | ||
Whatever, we're building trains or any of these other topics. | ||
The Democrats are the party that despises the nation. | ||
They despise America. | ||
They despise the founders. They despise white people. | ||
They despise straight people. | ||
They are just this seething cauldron of hate that just despises everything you are. | ||
So how you can vote for them, I don't get it. | ||
It doesn't make any sense. Not only do they not know the difference between men and women, they will take your children from you if you insist that a boy is a boy and a girl is a girl. | ||
Again, I don't know how any conscionable person votes for this. | ||
So either the American people still have Something in them that is human, and they will reject the left with everything they've got. | ||
We can actually fix things by getting hardcore, ultra-right, far-right people into office to set things straight, not just tap the brakes, not just make it a little harder for the left to destroy everything, but actually reverse all of these policies, undo all of the damage that's been done, | ||
deport all of the criminals that have crossed the border, actually undo all the stuff that's happened, or the other option here, Is that America really is just lost and, like, the majority of the people are so brainwashed. | ||
I don't think for a single second they actually believe this stuff, right? | ||
They don't actually think that there's no difference between men and women. | ||
They don't actually think that transgenderism is real, right? | ||
I mean, they don't actually believe that you're now a woman because you... | ||
Guillotine to your junk. | ||
They don't actually believe that, but they are so ideologically and spiritually indoctrinated and brainwashed and cowed and maybe just terrified that they're willing to go along with it. | ||
So these are the two options. Either they've gone so far that America's going to reject them and we can actually save this country, or the American people are so far gone at this point that there's nothing worth saving and these people are just going to have their way. | ||
So let's go to clip number four here. | ||
This is California debate about AB 957. | ||
And let's just hear what this is about from the author of the bill. | ||
unidentified
|
Many TGI children are not safe in their own homes because of a non-informing or abusive caretaker. | |
This leaves many TGI youth to run away from home, leaving them vulnerable to housing, instability, expectation and abuse. | ||
Research demonstrates that family acceptance of LGBTQ plus youth is a crucial protective factor. | ||
A crucial protective factor in combating depression and substance abuse. | ||
Well-rounded social support from friends and family members is strongly associated with the positive mental development, physical health, and overall well-being. | ||
AB 957 would center the health and welfare of TGI youth by acknowledging that affirmation of their gender identity is in their best interest. | ||
Yeah, a bit of a stretch if you ask me. | ||
A bit of a stretch. I mean, and these are the people, so you've got people that run entire organizations or just make social media posts where they're like, we're your family now. | ||
You don't need your family. | ||
Your family's evil because they don't support you. | ||
I mean, again, how do you even argue this stuff? | ||
How do you even combat this level of just blatant rhetorical nonsense that they're spewing? | ||
Will you be less depressed if your family is supportive of you? | ||
Yeah, I guess. I guess that's vaguely true in like the most general sense. | ||
But see, what they're actually saying is that if you don't put your child on puberty blockers, then the state will take your child away. | ||
See, you can just kind of cut through all the rhetorical nonsense, tell people what is actually being said, but of course they're evil. | ||
They can't just say, We want to indoctrinate your child into deviant sexuality and then mutilate them for life and sterilize them. | ||
That doesn't sound very good. | ||
So they have to say that family care is crucial to the development of a sense of self-esteem. | ||
It's just like, please tell me you're not stupid enough to just fall for this language. | ||
Like, tell me you're not so gullible that I could It doesn't make any sense. | ||
No sense whatsoever. | ||
Let's go now to clip number 11, where the same woman, again, uses some rhetorical handiwork to disguise the obvious implication of what she's saying. | ||
Here she is talking about what she calls judicial discretion. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Affirmation. | |
Of a child's gender identity is a good thing. | ||
To create a safe place for them is a good thing. | ||
And it doesn't leave for judicial discretion to say otherwise. | ||
Because that's what's happening. | ||
That is what is currently allowed by law. | ||
Does not allow for judicial discretion to say otherwise. | ||
So what this bill will do is it will say that affirming your child's gender identity, just separate from their sex, is the only way that you can express love. | ||
And if you don't affirm your child's gender identity, in other words, if you don't encourage and support your little boy from saying he's a little girl, you therefore don't love your child, and they take away the judicial discretion. | ||
In other words, judges who are presiding over cases of alleged child abuse can no longer say, well, these parents clearly love and are caring for their child in the best way that they can. | ||
They're capable of caring for them. | ||
They meet all of the child's needs and physical and mental necessity. | ||
And sure, they might not agree with their kid wanting to change gender, but that doesn't mean they don't love them. | ||
It doesn't mean that they're, you know, a fit parent for this child. | ||
They can't do that anymore. | ||
So now the law will be that if you don't affirm your child's gender identity, that of course has been indoctrinated into them by the media and the schools and all the other propaganda. | ||
If you don't affirm that gender identity, you therefore are not providing the best care for your child. | ||
You therefore don't love your child. | ||
The state can therefore take your child away because apparently Growing up in a foster home or being raised by social workers that will let you be gay and take puberty blockers and mutilate and sterilize yourself is better for the child than being raised by their parents who love them and care for them and want them to remain the gender they were born as. | ||
This is now being debated in California. | ||
We'll show you some more pro and some more... | ||
against statements and debates on the floor of the California Senate on the other side. | ||
All right, folks, so in California, I guess you could call this a debate. | ||
They're debating this bill, AB 957. | ||
They are removing judicial discretion by saying that, flat out, point blank, if you do not affirm your child's gender identity, which I imagine would include things like gender-affirming care, aka sterilization, mutilation, puberty blockers, chemical castration. | ||
I mean, are you just affirming it, really, if you just agree to... | ||
Use the right pronouns. Is that really being affirmative? | ||
I don't know. I don't know if that's dedicated enough to the cause. | ||
So let's hear another, you know, pro argument in this. | ||
Another person arguing in favor of this. | ||
Now, you'll notice a trend here is that the people arguing against this are the people with skin in the game, people with experience and wisdom, And that this bill will actually affect. | ||
See, everybody who's against it are the people who actually know what they're talking about and will be affected by it. | ||
The people that are for it are themselves sterilized, childless children. | ||
So, maybe democracy was a mistake. | ||
Let's go to clip number two here, where this... | ||
Androgynous Little Twink says, Affirming a child's gender identity is the only acceptable approach, including surgery if the child wants it. | ||
The only acceptable approach. | ||
unidentified
|
My pronouns are they, them. I'm an attorney and a Solis Policy Institute State Fellow. | |
Attorney, you're a bobblehead. The Women's Foundation of California is a proud co-sponsor of AB957, the Trans, Gender Diverse and Intersex, or TGI, Youth Empowerment Act. | ||
Nearly one in five trans and non-binary youth attempted suicide last year. | ||
Yeah, because they're mentally ill. LGBTQ plus youth who felt a high rate of social support from their families attempted suicide at less than half the rate of those who felt less social support. | ||
We could cut suicide attempts by TGI children in half simply by empowering parents to support their children. | ||
Empowering parents to support their children. | ||
Taking their children away if they don't support this. | ||
unidentified
|
Letting them wear gender-affirming clothing or even seeking gender-affirming care. | |
Family courts center the best interests of the child in all decisions about visitation and custody. | ||
As articulated in this committee's analysis, these decisions are extremely fact-specific. | ||
Family Code 3011 lists several factors to consider, including the health, safety and welfare of the child. | ||
Current law, however, does not address the unique needs of TGI kids, particularly in the really difficult situations where only one parent affirms their child's gender identity. | ||
AB 957 would clarify what has already been confirmed by the American Academy of Pediatrics and World Professional Association for Transgender Health, that affirming a child's gender identity... | ||
The transgender activist group said it's good to affirm your child's gender? | ||
unidentified
|
Wow. This would mean that parents who accept their children for who they are would be recognized by the courts for what they are already doing, looking out for their children's best interest. | |
Last year, fewer than one in three trans and non-binary kids found their home to be gender-affirming. | ||
Oh my god. This year, we can change that. | ||
By law, by taking your children away if you don't. | ||
unidentified
|
By empowering parents to affirm their TGI children. | |
I respectfully urge her. So again, this childless twink, like I don't know what else to call him. | ||
I don't know. I'm done qualifying my remarks. | ||
That creepy little bobblehead is trying to take people's children away from them. | ||
I'm going to call them whatever the hell I want. | ||
They're evil. And I don't know. | ||
I guess if you're dumb and someone sounds smart, maybe they sound like they're right. | ||
That person, like, very confidently bobbling her head, its head, whatever, they's head. | ||
What's he over-under on whether that thing has children? | ||
Think that thing has children? | ||
Think he, she, it should have anything to do with your children or my children? | ||
And again, this whole thing is predicated on the idea that Trans people commit suicide at like 50%. | ||
It's a rate of like 50%. | ||
All the studies I've ever seen have shown that social acceptance doesn't affect that. | ||
And the interventions don't affect that. | ||
After surgery, suicide rate, same as prior to surgery. | ||
Everything I've seen so far. | ||
All the studies I've ever seen, and there have been a lot of these. | ||
And yet the claim is that if you don't, like it's your fault. | ||
It's your fault. If some teacher entices your little kid, just these like impressionable children, little innocent babies that don't know anything about the world or told by an authority figure, actually it's really cool and awesome and fun and exciting to be a different gender. | ||
And you're not special and you're not, you know, unique and There's nothing really to celebrate about you. | ||
You're white and a boy, so actually kind of everybody hates you, but if you pretend to be a little girl, if you say that you're actually a girl, not only do little girls get treated so much better in this society, you're going to be trans, which means you're a true hero. | ||
You're a hero, and you're amazing. | ||
So maybe you want to be trans. | ||
So if you've got a teacher whispering that in your child's ear, your child, impressionable, innocent child, believes that, Apparently you have to then conform to that belief of your innocent child. | ||
Or they'll take your children away. | ||
I mean, I know I'm spending a lot of time on this, but we're going to keep spending time on it because they're trying to take your children away. | ||
And somebody should oppose this. | ||
Obviously, when we talk about this, maybe we're a little bit too polite. | ||
Let's go now to clip number 15. | ||
This is Senator Wilk from California having a bit of a revelation. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. I'm now in year 11 in the state legislature, and all the time we're proposing policies to protect children. | |
Well, after 11 years, I've come to a conclusion that we need to start protecting parents. | ||
That's just not happening. | ||
I've been here We've witnessed a full frontal assault on charter schools, taking away parents' choice in how their children are going to be educated, to the detriment particularly of children of color. | ||
In recent years, we have put government bureaucrats between parents, children and doctors when it comes to medical care. | ||
And now we have this, where if a parent does not support the ideology of the government, they're going to be taken away from the home. | ||
Now, I agree with both Senator Wiener and Senator Laird that today it only involves divorce proceedings. | ||
And frankly, a judge can already factor this in. | ||
But I can assure you it's not going to end with divorce proceedings. | ||
In the past when we've had these discussions and I've seen parental rights atrophied, I've encouraged people to keep fighting. | ||
I've changed my mind on that. | ||
If you love your children, you need to flee California. | ||
You need to flee. | ||
We are moving towards the pathway of the hands-made tale. | ||
California is becoming the new Gilead. | ||
And it just breaks my heart. | ||
I'm born and raised in this state. | ||
I love this state. I'm not going to stay in this state because it's just too oppressive. | ||
And I believe in freedom. | ||
And so I'm going to move to America when I leave the legislature. | ||
We'll be California. That's what the California state senator says. | ||
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. Scott Wiener. | |
Yep. That's me. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm a child welfare expert. | |
I'm into BDSM. And if you have the desire to chop off your son's penis, well, I'm your guy. | ||
Help me pass AB 957. | ||
Tinnator wiener. | ||
So, wherefore art thou, wiener? | ||
A wiener by any other name. | ||
He's the same guy that passed the bill that now allows people in California to knowingly pass HIV onto their sexual partners without telling them. | ||
Just a brilliant landmark piece of legislation for the gay community. | ||
He also helped to pass the other recent bill, Senate Bill 147, I believe, 145. | ||
Which the supporters are very quick to tell us. | ||
It doesn't actually totally make legal statutory rape, but it does mean that if you commit a sex crime with a 14-year-old, you will not be put on the sex offender registry. | ||
So thank God Senator Weiner is here to perpetuate all the stereotypes. | ||
Just insane. So now his latest contribution to the corpus of American law is this bill that will... | ||
Take your children away if you don't affirm the gender identity that they've been indoctrinated into through social media and elementary school. | ||
What would we do without people like Senator Wiener? | ||
Flourish and be able to focus on the real problems? | ||
Yeah, that would be one thing we'd be able to do. | ||
But unfortunately for all of us, people keep voting for him. | ||
He keeps getting in somehow. | ||
It's all so insane. | ||
So on one side, you have guys like Senator Weiner, gay, childless, sex fetishists whose entire identity revolves around their carnal pleasure. | ||
And they are setting policy against the other side, which is the people with families and actual beliefs and identities beyond their genitalia. | ||
Who will come out on top in this ultimate struggle for humanity? | ||
Will it be the people getting the game or actually perpetuating the human race? | ||
Or will it be the perverted deviants of apparently all the time and money in the world to dedicate to enforcing their beliefs through the power of law? | ||
I guess we'll wait and see. | ||
Of course, we are in an age of science after all. | ||
We should probably trust the science. | ||
I know I've heard that over and over recently. | ||
What does science actually say about transgenderism? | ||
Well, nothing that the transgender activists say. | ||
It's actually the exact opposite. | ||
Another one of these interesting little peculiarities of modernity. | ||
Where some science, unquestionable, will be kicked off the internet. | ||
You dare to deviate from the scientific consensus that they made up in a boardroom somewhere. | ||
In other cases, the undeniable science is completely ignored and called hate. | ||
You know that woman, man, I don't know, the thing with the haircut and the bow tie we saw earlier? | ||
Talking about the positive outcomes or negative outcomes. | ||
Presenting this as, as he put it, empowering parents to help the kids have the best outcomes in life. | ||
By which, of course, they mean removing children from their parents and giving them to the state for sterilization and mutilation. | ||
But if you actually look at the science... | ||
If you're actually going to be making policy based on what your perceived best outcome is, you can make the argument for criminalizing fatherless homes, all sorts of other things, criminalizing video games, criminalizing obesity. | ||
I mean, if your argument is, well, you have a better life outcome if this, therefore we get to take your kids away if you deviate from this, Then how about single mothers? | ||
Your kids, you're gone. | ||
It's not healthy for a kid to have a single mother. | ||
I know it happens sometimes, and it's not judging the kid or the mother for that, you know, and all of this. | ||
We have love for everybody and want everybody to do the best. | ||
But if we're going to be setting policy as to what's the best outcome possible, sorry, single mothers. | ||
They're not your kids anymore. | ||
Let's talk about the science. | ||
Senator Nilo, Sitting next to the wiener himself and sort of breaks down the state of science when it comes to gender-affirming care. | ||
Let's watch. Oh, I'm sorry, 14. | ||
unidentified
|
The issue is, though... | |
Other countries around the world are beginning to question this. | ||
The UK, in fact, did a comprehensive review of gender affirming care. | ||
And they described the social transition as an active intervention with significant effects on child or young persons in terms of their psychological functioning and emphasized that it is not a neutral act and better information is needed about outcomes. | ||
The systemic review found the evidence on managing gender incongruence inconclusive due to lack of long-term data. | ||
Similarly, Sweden, Finland, and Norway have since rejected gender affirmative care for children. | ||
Now, I don't know which side of it is correct. | ||
I'm just saying I'm new to the issue. | ||
I understand what Senator Laird said in clarifying what this bill does, but the elevation of the issue accepts gender affirmation care as an accomplished science and accepts gender affirmation as the appropriate approach by a parent. | ||
And my concern is, given the The conclusions of the UK and those three Scandinavian countries, not exactly restrictive-type societies, I have concerns about making the conclusion that this bill does, bringing it into a custody dispute. | ||
You know, I get it. | ||
I get why, you know, you're talking in this sort of way. | ||
They're trying to take children away from parents if the parents don't cut their genitals off. | ||
Like, there's no time to like, oh, I don't know which side of this I stand on. | ||
I mean, I don't think the science is settled full. | ||
It's nonsense. | ||
It's absurdity. | ||
You shouldn't be giving this any consideration whatsoever. | ||
The fact it's even been brought to a bill should be criminalized. | ||
Like, it makes no sense. | ||
It's completely insane. | ||
We're going to continue talking about this because I'm going to show you another video on the other side that should really settle the entire issue once and for all. | ||
I know there's other stuff to talk about, but I mean, what could be more illustrative? | ||
What could be more... Iconic. | ||
This is what we're dealing with. | ||
This is the entire conflict that we're dealing with right now. | ||
Not just that things are short off. | ||
Not just that there's a lot of problems that we can't quite get a handle on. | ||
That the people that run our country are inventing and fabricating these non-existent issues and then warping everything not just that it's wrong but that it's the inverse of everything that's right. | ||
The criminals aren't punished. | ||
But the heroes are. | ||
Men are women. Women are men. | ||
Vaccines make you more likely to get sick. | ||
Like, everything is completely backwards at this point. | ||
And if you can't muster up some opposition to this, if you feel like you have to give equal weight to both sides of this argument, you're not helping anybody. | ||
You're a detriment. There's no being polite to these people. | ||
They're trying to take your kids away. | ||
There's no being reasonable with these people. | ||
They don't think that gender exists or sex exists. | ||
They think the highest calling and achievement of a human being is who and what they have sex with. | ||
These people are degenerate scumbags, and you can't softly push back against them. | ||
We have to crush these people. | ||
All right, folks, we will move on, but... | ||
I don't know how you even get to the point where a thing like... | ||
This bill, AB 957. | ||
The amount of, like, civilizational corruption and subversion you have to deal with even to get to this point, it's almost hard to fathom. | ||
The amount of indoctrination and propaganda. | ||
You know, our belief system doesn't require propaganda. | ||
It doesn't require censorship to prop it up. | ||
It doesn't even require us to say it. | ||
It is just... | ||
It's just reality. | ||
Any tribe in the woods, uncontacted group of people, can tell you that a man's a man's a woman and a woman is a woman. | ||
Like, it's not hard at all to figure out. | ||
It's not something we need to even tell anybody. | ||
So to get to the point where they're passing bills, threatening to take kids away from their parents for not affirming their gender identity, like you have to lay the groundwork for decades. | ||
You have to not just poison people's minds with propaganda, but poison them literally with fluoride and atrazine and just all hormonal disruptions that are like the physical aspect of this spiritual process. | ||
Corruption that's taking place. | ||
So those will be our final... | ||
Well, maybe we'll play two videos here. | ||
Maybe we'll play two videos. But the first one we're going to go to should really be the only person that should even be able to talk about these policies being proposed. | ||
Again, I think, you know, if you don't have kids, I really don't think you should get a say in this sort of stuff. | ||
I think if you explicitly choose to not have kids because of the lifestyle that you live, you really don't get... | ||
You really don't... | ||
You shouldn't have the right to not only tell other people how to raise their kids, but use the state to enforce it. | ||
I mean, my God. So let's go to clip number one here. | ||
There's a woman named Abigail Martinez. | ||
Here is her telling her and her family's story about dealing with this transgender cult weaponized by the government to attack decent, normal families just trying to make their way in the world. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. My name is Abigail Martinez. | |
It has been three years and 164 days since I lost my daughter, Jaylee. | ||
I miss her every single day. | ||
Let me tell you how she died. | ||
My daughter was murdered by a gender ideology. | ||
CPS took my daughter when she was 16 years old. | ||
It was helped by her public school counselor and LGBTQ group rise and another trans identified girl. | ||
My daughter was taken from her loving home because the state of California claimed I was abusive. | ||
For not affirming her trans identity. | ||
I lost my daughter over a name and a pronouns. | ||
Even after I promised to call her a male name, it wasn't enough. | ||
My daughter was not a boy trapped in a girl's body. | ||
She had mental health issues. | ||
Against my consent, my daughter was given testosterone instead of therapy. | ||
The LGBTQ group used her to raise money for them. | ||
Look at the poor reject trans boy, they said. | ||
Why are there so many transgender in foster care? | ||
Because this state take them from their families, tell them to run, then steal them. | ||
Parents are given one option to treat their distressed child, affirm, drug, and remove their healthy body part or else lose your child. | ||
The abuse claim against me was finally dropped, but it was too late. | ||
The damage was done. | ||
By then, my daughter was in a horrible mental and physical pain. | ||
My daughter knelt down in front of a train. | ||
She was murdered by gender ideology. | ||
I beg you, stop pushing gender ideology. | ||
I don't want any parent to feel what I feel every day. | ||
Affirmation is not good for the health, safety, and welfare of any child. | ||
Again, I mean, Where do you place the weight in the scales of justice? | ||
Is it with Scott Wiener, BDSM-loving, childless gay man, and his androgynous twink lawyer, or a mother who has lived through this and has lost her daughter because of this? or a mother who has lived through this and has | ||
And like what type of person can listen to that and still just say, yeah, you know, well, maybe shouldn't have been a transphobe, right? | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
Like, what type of person is so cut off from humanity that they can watch that video and still push for transgenderism in schools? | ||
It is heartbreaking. And it is everywhere. | ||
Let's go ahead and go down to clip number 10. | ||
Because this is, again, I guess what we have to do now. | ||
Explain to people that there's such a thing as men and women. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. We live in a state that has the usual lineup of bills. | |
Okay, wait, this is a different video. But this is funny. | ||
Hold on. I want to watch this. | ||
I want to watch it. This is a different video than I thought. | ||
But this is actually funny. | ||
Let's watch what she says about these bills. | ||
unidentified
|
We live in a state that has the usual lineup of bills. | |
Let's see what these bills are, shall we? | ||
unidentified
|
The sports bill, parental rights bill, the gender-affirming care bill. | |
We can pause it right there. | ||
Just to translate it from the doublespeak, the sports bill means that men can't compete against women. | ||
They can't steal women's position at the top of their sport. | ||
They can't deny women the ability to compete Actually train hard and be the best in their sport by outdoing them out of sheer natural competitive advantage because of the way they were born. | ||
That's what she means by the sports bill. | ||
The sports bill protecting women's sports from male interlopers cross-dressing in order to get a gold medal when they would be 400th place when competing against fellow men. | ||
That's what she means by sports bill. | ||
What was the next? Oh, the parental rights bill. | ||
That's exactly what it sounds like. | ||
Parental rights. These are the bills that they're just decrying and claiming are just the worst things ever. | ||
This is what they're talking about. | ||
And then the gender-affirming care bill, aka the puberty blocker, chemical castration, physical castration, and mutilation of children, is banned now. | ||
Sorry, you psychopaths. | ||
Yes, these bills are being passed. | ||
Why we have to pass them is because Satan has infiltrated us and hell is rising up from underneath us and swallowing us whole. | ||
So, yeah, I guess we have to pass these now. | ||
I mean, there already are... | ||
Laws saying this. | ||
We just have to do it again. We just constantly have to, like, double down, you psychopaths. | ||
You absolute freaks. | ||
So these are the bills that they're talking about. | ||
Let's see what else this, I don't know, civilizational parasite has to say. | ||
unidentified
|
You know, the Department of Education, you know, with curriculum bans and all kinds of things. | |
Yeah, curriculum bans where they ban pornography. | ||
unidentified
|
And so we have to develop a backup plan. | |
So, you know, because our child gets, you know, gender-affirming care, including the medically necessary evidence-based hormones. | ||
Yeah, if that was true, you wouldn't have to say it, would you? | ||
unidentified
|
We had to talk with families who live out of state and say, you know, here's our plan in the event that this all gets shut down in our state. | |
We're refugees from our state. | ||
All right, I'm done listening to this idiot. | ||
Again, everything is backwards. | ||
Everything is bad. I think if you're a parent that puts your kids on puberty blocker, you should go to jail and have your kid taken away. | ||
Not the other way around. | ||
This is how inverted everything is. | ||
Parents that refuse to mutilate, abuse, chemically castrate, and experiment with hormone manipulation on their children, the ones who don't do that are the ones being punished. | ||
Obviously, any sane society would say that if you use your child as a guinea pig in your medical experiment or you mutilate them for no reason or inject them with hormones that are medically necessary, as if the child's going to die if you don't do it, they should all be arrested. | ||
They should all be arrested. They should all be thrown in jail. | ||
They should all be fed to the lions. | ||
Whatever is, you know, judicially appropriate. | ||
unidentified
|
The power of conversation into the caller's hands. | |
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Actress Megan Fox had a bizarre meltdown after a conservative commentator questioned why she had three sons who all identified as transgender. | ||
Robbie Starbuck said he used to live in the same gated community as Fox before sensationally claiming he saw two of her sons have a mental breakdown after being told by their mother to wear girls' clothes. | ||
Starbuck accused Fox of engaging in child abuse by imposing transgenderism on them. | ||
Now, maybe you would have expected Fox to react with a threat of legal action in the form of a libel charge. | ||
That's not how she reacted. | ||
Instead, proving that her mental stability is totally beyond scrutiny, the Transformers star reacted by suggesting she'd get revenge. | ||
By conducting an occult ritual outside his house. | ||
You f***ed with the wrong witch, she said. | ||
Going on to post a misandry-ridden diatribe about how she'd been burned at the stake before by impotent little men. | ||
Then following it up by posting an image that recently went viral showing a naked woman caught on a wildlife camera at night feasting on a deer carcass. | ||
She captioned the post, Okay, love, really proving you're the reasonable one in this debate, aren't you? | ||
Lest we forget, In an interview, Fox admitted that while one of her sons was still in the womb, she decided not to subscribe to gender stereotypes and raise them as gender neutral. | ||
A statistical analysis was performed showing that the mathematical probability of the actress's three sons all becoming transgender independently, and let's just say that without outside influence, it's more than somewhat unlikely. | ||
Fox previously admitted that she had BPD, Borderline Personality Disorder. | ||
A study on mothers of boys with gender dysphoria found that 53% 3% met the criteria for BPD, or clinical depression, which is just a coincidence, I'm sure. | ||
Given that Megan Fox appears to have a chip on her shoulder about men in general, and given the identities she's seemingly imposed on her three sons, combined with her previous admission that she's engaged in blood-drinking rituals and is a self-described witch, her reaction to Starbucks' original post only seems to have done just about everything to prove he was right. | ||
Remember this time last year when London was festooned with so many progress pride flags that it looked like some kind of aggressive occupation had taken place? | ||
Well, the occupation flag is back. | ||
A viral video on Twitter shows Union Jacks, which had been in place for the King's coronation, being clumsily pulled down and replaced with the colours of tolerance and diversity. | ||
unidentified
|
You're taking the wrong f***ing flag down, mate. | |
I don't know that. | ||
At least you know that. | ||
A lot can be gleaned from that brief exchange, can't it? | ||
But this flag basically no longer has any connection with gay rights, whatever that means now, and is basically a Babylonian emblem representing the new religion of the metropolitan elite, and has actually come to represent a symbol of resentment, social engineering and control to ordinary working class people. | ||
Mate, make sure you don't drop the rainbow flag on the ground like that. | ||
Probably be up on hate crime charges. | ||
Old Union Jack, though, man, who cares? | ||
And chew on this one for a minute. | ||
The flag's to commemorate the coronation of a new monarch, something that hadn't happened in the UK for 70 years. | ||
Only lasted a few days longer than the occupation flag will stay up to commemorate wholesome family-friendly entertainment month. | ||
And if, as I suspect, the pride flag stay up well into the summer, past the end of June, the celebration of gay pride will actually end up lasting longer than the celebration of a new king. | ||
Yeah, kind of feels like there's a new all-encompassing de facto divine presence. | ||
Something that demands total fealty and respect under threat of punishment. | ||
Something that demands loyalty oaths and pledges of obedience to be performed in its honour. | ||
A force that rules over us all. | ||
But it isn't the institution of the monarchy or King Charles. | ||
All right, folks, that's the latest from Paul Joseph Watson. | ||
Find and share those on band.video. | ||
Support us at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
We're going to move on now. We are going to move on. | ||
There's political stuff to talk about. | ||
There's crimes against nature taking place on an industrial scale that we should probably get into. | ||
There's also a new whistleblower out of Bohemian Grove, of all places. | ||
So we'll get into that as well. | ||
Massive corruption in Washington, D.C. Don't worry, folks. | ||
There's plenty of man-made horrors beyond comprehension still to come on today's episode of American Journal. | ||
We'll open up the phone lines for your calls as well. | ||
Stay with us. Don't go anywhere. | ||
Infowarsstore.com, Brain Force Plus, on sale, 40% off. | ||
Brain Force Ultra, 40% off. | ||
Together, 50% off. Alright folks, welcome back. | ||
Third hour of American Journal has begun. | ||
We're going to cover all sorts of different topics, most of which have to do with the Great Reset, New World Order, you know, whatever you want to call it. | ||
This anti-human agenda to basically re... | ||
not recreate nature, but essentially abolish nature in favor of human-made systems where... | ||
Just all things natural and good are inverted. | ||
It's just really across the board. | ||
It is dangerous, let's just say. | ||
We're going to open up the phone lines for your calls this hour. | ||
The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
That's 1-877-789-2539. | ||
Give us a call here at American Journal about any and all topics. | ||
1-877-789-2539. | ||
Let's start with this story from today at metro.co.uk. | ||
Digital IDs for all under latest proposal from former PM Sir Tony Blair. | ||
Tony Blair, a name that inspires love and devotion across the world. | ||
Don't you love how they just choose the most disgraced, despised people in the world to push this stuff? | ||
It really shows you how much control they still have. | ||
That this Tony Blair guy has been laughed out of existence. | ||
A single digital ID on your smartphone will help streamline access to public services, Sir Tony Blair has said. | ||
The former Prime Minister's Institute for Global Change has released a report calling for wholesale reform to end the era of slow and cumbersome government services. | ||
Ah yes, bye. Being incapable of delivering any services in a reasonable or concise fashion, they're solving the problem they created by implementing a biometric control system, social credit score, Panopticon. | ||
The idea is a simple identifier on your phone accessed using biometrics, said Sir Tony, speaking to Metro.co.uk. | ||
It's unique to you and enables you to interact with government systems through one portal. | ||
It allows you to get all the data you need about yourself in one place. | ||
Those without a smartphone will be able to use a physical card alternative, but, Mr. | ||
Blair adds, the vast majority of people will use it through a phone, and that's the best way to do it. | ||
Examples of how the system would function would include a digital driving's license, access to medical history in one place, personalized assistance for accessing public services, including benefits, and a single record of education. | ||
Wow. So convenient. | ||
I mean, right now, all of that is taken care of by having a driver's license and just having different databases for different sets of information. | ||
I don't really get what they're overcoming here, but essentially their argument is to make it potentially moderately easier to collect welfare. | ||
Now every single person has to have a biometric tracking app on their phone at all times in order to participate in public life. | ||
Basically, the problem is government incompetence. | ||
The government solution is the mark of the beast. | ||
Incredible stuff. This is already being implemented in addition to the social credit score for which it is inevitably designed. | ||
And again, this is just the crazy thing that's happening is that they are open about their plans. | ||
They're open about their designs. | ||
Their designs are Objectionable to everybody who knows about them except for Tony Blair and his ilk. | ||
And it doesn't matter because they're going to do it anyway. | ||
You don't like the 15-minute exclusion zone in Oxford where 90-plus percent of people said, no, we don't want this? | ||
They're getting it anyway. It's our democracy after all. | ||
I mean, I guess they're still sticking with just the vaguest, most liminal disguise to this. | ||
Like, you might as well, Tony, just come out and say, like, we're going to track you constantly. | ||
We're going to... Decide whether you can participate in public life depending on whether you support us or not. | ||
Whether you are in favor of our agenda or not will determine whether or not you get food. | ||
Like, you could just come out and say that since that's clearly what you're saying. | ||
I guess they're still sticking with this like, oh, but it's for your convenience though. | ||
It's for your convenience. Just put on the slave collar. | ||
Just lock the chain around it. | ||
Just burn your eyes out. | ||
Rip your tongue out. You don't need to see or say anything anymore. | ||
We're in charge for your own good. | ||
It's just transparent what they're setting everything up for. | ||
It couldn't be more obvious. | ||
And again, they're already doing it in certain places. | ||
We're going out of clip number five. | ||
This is in Bologna in Italy. | ||
Here comes the government-trialed smart citizen wallet, a.k.a. | ||
social credit score control system, courtesy of our technocratic overlords. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. The Italian city of Bologna is piloting a social credit system, the first of its kind in Europe. | |
The municipal government is introducing a smart citizen wallet, rewarding digital points for citizens who demonstrate virtuous behavior. | ||
Disturbingly, actions related to one's carbon footprint are central to what's considered rewardable virtuous behavior. | ||
Because use is still voluntary, this social credit system isn't yet as all-encompassing as the one that exists in China. | ||
Rather than penalizing citizens for not behaving virtuously, as defined by the government, citizens will only be rewarded. | ||
The government hopes that this distinction, treating the social credit score more like a reward card, will increase the adoption among Italian citizens. | ||
While usage remains voluntary, it is definitely a slippery slope. | ||
Overall, the success, failure, and rate of acceptance of Polonia's soft social credit system could have profound consequences for the rest of Italy and maybe look back on as the moment Europe began crossing the Rubicon. | ||
Our power is our resistance. | ||
If you like this video, please subscribe. | ||
There's just absolutely no reason to implement any of this. | ||
That's the other sort of crazy part about this, is it's not like there's a problem... | ||
That they're suggesting a solution, but we have to come up with a different solution that's better to combat. | ||
No, no. They're just making this up. | ||
They're just doing this. There's no justification for it. | ||
There's no valid reason for it. | ||
They're just doing it. | ||
So we just have to stop them. | ||
It's as simple as that. So it's already being implemented basically everywhere. | ||
But they say only a handful of other governments worldwide have begun issuing digital ID cards, including Vietnam, Brazil, and China. | ||
Places that we want to emulate, apparently. | ||
However, a working group of eight nations has drafted a set of principles for mutually recognized digital ID systems. | ||
Australia, Canada, Finland, Israel, New Zealand, Singapore, the Netherlands, and the UK. What does that mean? | ||
A mutually recognized digital ID system? | ||
It means you're not going to be a citizen of your nation anymore. | ||
You'll be a... | ||
Subject of this world system that spans all nations and is a singular one world governmental system. | ||
That's what they mean. So, not speculation. | ||
This isn't Alex Jones 15 years ago warning about what's to come. | ||
I'm just now reporting to you that it's here, it's being implemented, it's being designed, it's being rolled out in an international fashion, in the same design as the Chinese social credit score, in a way that once it's implemented, it will be impossible to undo. | ||
You understand? That once the social credit system is in place, you think you're going to get a higher or lower score for speaking out against the social credit system. | ||
When they go around China and ask people about what they feel about the social credit system, every single one of those people says, I love it. | ||
It's really good. And their social credit score goes up. | ||
Because if they were to say otherwise, their social credit score would go down. | ||
Then their friends wouldn't be able to associate with them or else their score will go down. | ||
So once this is in place, it's in place forever. | ||
Once they shut this jail cell, it's locked. | ||
So if we let them implement a digital ID social credit score on a global basis... | ||
That's it. It's over for humanity. | ||
Never again will people be able to break out of the system or gather the necessary amount of, you know, popular will to undo what they're putting in place. | ||
Once it's in place, plus AI, plus the vaccine passports, that's it for humanity. | ||
So we stop them now, or we surrender forever. | ||
All right, ladies and gentlemen, welcome back. | ||
Welcome back to the show. | ||
This is American Journal, Infowars.com, band.video. | ||
We got to your phone calls here momentarily. | ||
I was talking to somebody yesterday who's not particularly political. | ||
She was kind of like, well, I don't get why... | ||
Everything that the left seems to promote is anti-family and anti-children. | ||
Aren't they kind of sowing the seeds for their own destruction? | ||
They aren't going to be around if none of them have kids and none of them can procreate. | ||
What's the deal? How are they expecting to continue into the future if their primary policy that they support is abortion, And sterilization of children. | ||
Like, I don't get it. | ||
And, you know, obviously, why they're so intent on recruitment, right? | ||
Conversion in a religious sense. | ||
Procreate. You got to boost those numbers somehow. | ||
So you gather other people's children. | ||
You steal the children from the decent religious people. | ||
In order to boost your numbers, that's one way. | ||
But, you know, I didn't want to... | ||
I didn't even want to say the other ways. | ||
They're so creepy. | ||
They're so just transparently anti-human. | ||
Like when you're talking to somebody who's kind of innocent of what's going on in the world, you don't want to... | ||
I want to introduce these concepts to them. | ||
So, for example, one of the ways that we learned this week that the anti-human side is trying to make up for their massive shortfall, the shortcoming they have of not reproducing, well, California wants to force insurance companies to provide human surrogates for gay people. | ||
Just think about that for a second. | ||
I know we're in this milieu constantly. | ||
We're in this, like, Constant storm of absurdity. | ||
So for us, it's just like, oh, another new... | ||
Oh, a new horror to catalog in our index of just absurdity. | ||
But just maybe go, like, talk to somebody who doesn't pay attention to any of this stuff. | ||
Just see what their initial, immediate reaction is when you tell them that soon California... | ||
We'll be forcing women to carry babies for gay men who will then take the babies home. | ||
Like, the idea that insurance companies will be coerced and forced into paying for and providing, again, probably for... | ||
Down and out women who are struggling to keep things together and suddenly they're being dangled by this insurance company. | ||
Like $100,000 to use your body as a test tube to grow someone else's baby. | ||
It's so creepy. | ||
So inhuman. | ||
Don't even want to describe it. | ||
But that's what's happening. | ||
Forcing insurance companies to pay for surrogates For people who have chosen a lifestyle that precludes them from reproducing. | ||
That's one way they're doing it. | ||
Here's another way they're doing it. Synthetic human embryos created in groundbreaking advance. | ||
That's one way to put it. | ||
An advance. A downfall. | ||
A slide towards some sort of sci-fi... | ||
Nightmare would be another way to put that. | ||
Scientists have created synthetic human embryos using stem cells in a groundbreaking advance that sidesteps the need for eggs and sperm. | ||
It's not that big of a deal that all of these lifestyles preclude you from being able to reproduce. | ||
We'll just create monstrosities in jars like Brave New World. | ||
We'll just tailor-make inhuman... | ||
Beasts in some sort of capsule. | ||
That's what they're doing. Now, even this, they didn't create synthetic human embryos. | ||
I mean, that's one way to put it, but we don't have the ability to create life. | ||
Only God can create life. We have never even gotten close to unlocking the secret of creating life. | ||
They have to take stem cells, which are like the unprogrammed cells of the human body, and then manipulate that and warp it. | ||
So nothing that our scientists do when they claim to be creating life, it's never creating life. | ||
They are taking, transmuting, mutilating, warping life, but they always have to start... | ||
It's like if you can't start fire, if you don't know how to start a fire, but you can take a burning thing and go start a different fire. | ||
The fire of life is still completely outside of our kin, let alone our ability. | ||
But scientists say these model embryos, which resemble those in the earliest stages of human development, could provide a crucial window on the impact of genetic disorders and the biological causes of recurrent miscarriage. | ||
Yeah, maybe. | ||
But it also raises serious ethical and legal issues with the lab grown entities, entities, not humans, entities, the entities they're creating. | ||
Are they human? | ||
Do they have rights? | ||
Is it illegal to kill them? | ||
Is it abortion if they're never in a human body but instead in a tube of some sort? | ||
These are the types of questions that we shouldn't have to ask because this type of research should never be done. | ||
But it is. They're doing it. | ||
They're excited about it. | ||
They have now created embryos without sperm or an egg. | ||
Just the latest. Just the latest in our relentless march towards an inhuman future. | ||
With that, we got to your phone calls. | ||
Let's go to Lofton in DeSantis land. | ||
Thanks for calling in. Lofton, you're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Good morning, Harrison. | |
I was about to pour coffee. | ||
I have to run back to my notes. | ||
Okay. I have a question for you. | ||
I would like to have... | ||
If you would allow me about 30 to 45 seconds to pre... | ||
We got two minutes left in the segment, and it's all yours. | ||
unidentified
|
All right. Zelensky is a literal clown. | |
These people are so blatant about what they do. | ||
How do we let that go? Vivek Ramaswamy, if he's the true patriot he claims to be, needs to drop out of the race, start showing up to the president's events and offering his assistance, and donate $10 million to the Infowar. | ||
Yesterday's flag thing at the White House... | ||
And in the United Kingdom. | ||
That's not a signal to all of you people. | ||
And then I would add... | ||
Greg Abbott yesterday signing the... | ||
I'm breathless. | ||
I'm so nervous. That's alright. | ||
Greg Abbott. Signing the hair bill. | ||
Natural hair. Thank God, finally, natural hair will no longer be illegal. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank goodness. And we know exactly what that will be used for. | |
Suing every white-owned business out of existence. | ||
So my question... | ||
Can you please provide me, sir, with an example from history when a tyrannical government was ousted from power with only ink, paper, and words? | ||
Why are we going to rely on Kevin McCarthy, our savior? | ||
Are we going to wait until CNN tells us Gavin Newsom's the president until we get off our ass? | ||
You know... | ||
There have been some times. | ||
I mean, you could make the argument that the USSR collapsed under its own weight. | ||
You could... | ||
I would never. | ||
I would never. | ||
But one could make the argument that the Weimar Republic was transformed beyond recognition through the electoral process. | ||
There'll be a couple of examples. | ||
It's happened before, Lofton. | ||
Don't lose hope. We'll be right back, folks. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm going to read it. Okay, folks, your phone calls here momentarily. | |
But first, pretty interesting article from the Daily Mail. | ||
Secretive summer camp for the elite, Bohemian Grove, is sued by former valets in a disturbing lawsuit. | ||
Secretive all-male summer camp for the elite, whose members are Fortune 500 owners and powerful government figures, is sued by three valets claiming they were forced to endure horrific working conditions. | ||
They've been hosting retreats of the Bohemian Club for over 150 years on the California coast. | ||
Its closed-door camps are shrouded in secrecy, but a new lawsuit from former staff has shed light on the mysterious haunt. | ||
Three former valets allege a series of labor violations, including working nonstop 16-hour shifts without so much as a bathroom or lunch break. | ||
Yeah, these people. | ||
Can you imagine? Can you imagine having a club whose only members are the richest people in the world? | ||
Billionaires with wealth just beyond comprehension. | ||
And they just treat their staff like dirt. | ||
Probably don't pay them well. | ||
These people, man. I swear. | ||
Private Society Bohemian Club has hosted billionaires, industry titans, and government heavyweights on its two campuses for over 150 years, one in San Francisco and a retreat in Sonoma County called Bohemian Grove. | ||
Three valets who claimed to work at the Bohemian Grove estate during its infamous summer camps now claims they were forced to work nonstop 16-hour shifts during which they were allegedly not given bathroom or lunch breaks. | ||
And despite its lucrative membership, the club also failed to pay its staff minimum wage and overtime, according to the lawsuit first reported by SFGate. | ||
However, the Bohemian Club blasted the lawsuit, saying the people involved were never employed at the club, and the suit is a transparent attempt to drag the club into their individual circumstances. | ||
Honestly, the spokesperson for Bohemian Grove is just like... | ||
Some dude in a black hood with blood coming out of his mouth. | ||
He's just like, this lawsuit is a complete fabrication. | ||
I think you have some baby in your teeth, sir. | ||
The club's practices are shrouded in secrecy and allegedly include bizarre rituals. | ||
When they say allegedly, what they mean is captured on video by Alex Jones. | ||
The creepiest rituals you can ever possibly imagine where they pretend to sacrifice a human being to a Babylonian god. | ||
In the shape of a giant owl. | ||
The court filing claims the club hosts three events a year. | ||
The spring jinx, the spring picnic, and the summer encampment. | ||
With high society watching on, the summer conference is rumored to conclude with a bizarre ceremony involving a human effigy and the burning of a giant sacrificial owl. | ||
No, the owl is the god that they're sacrificing to. | ||
They gotta keep it vague, I guess. | ||
For those distinguished enough to be invited into the Sonoma County Estate, attendees are divided into 100 separate clubs with names including the Camels Camp, the Last Chance Camps, and the Monastery Camp. | ||
And all of them are gay sex orgies. | ||
They have different names, but they're all sort of the same. | ||
Attendees include Fortune 500 companies and prominent government officials. | ||
Government joining fees are reported atop $25,000. | ||
And new recruits must be recommended by multiple current insiders before they're accepted into the ultra-exclusive club. | ||
The complaint finally, you know, it's one of those things that's like, just knowing that this exists, doesn't that beg some questions? | ||
This is what our elites find fun, like entertaining. | ||
I wouldn't do this. | ||
There's only so much time that we have on Earth. | ||
I'm not about to spend a week of summer, two weeks of summer, dressing up in robes and pretending to sacrifice people so I can hobnob with a bunch of You know, gay billionaires, but that's what they're into I guess. | ||
Bohemian Club Treasurer Bill Dawson is reportedly singled out in the lawsuit, which accuses him of directing the valets to falsify payroll records and work off the clock. | ||
The document claims attendees would all be aware valets would work almost nonstop while they were on the grounds, taking little or no break. | ||
During the spring Jinx Burgundy lunch, it's alleged four valets worked nonstop for approximately 18 hours, providing a two-course lunch and dinner to 90 guests. | ||
The inner workings of the club have remained a mystery since its founding in 1872, but many historical moments are rumored to have ties to the society. | ||
Just everybody. | ||
Everybody who's anybody goes there, apparently. | ||
Their motto is, Weaving spiders come not here, a Shakespeare quote implying outside business is not encouraged. | ||
The club's membership has routinely been a who's who of power and wealth. | ||
One former Bohemian Grove resident told all that's interesting, quote, it's honestly just a place where wealthy guys from San Francisco go to be drunk knuckleheads. | ||
Yeah, just knuckleheads. | ||
Just being knuckleheads. | ||
Look at those goofballs burning that effigy. | ||
Look at those silly billies just performing a human sacrifice ritual and taking it very seriously. | ||
Just a bunch of knuckleheads. | ||
That's all it is. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, God. | |
It's kind of appropriate, isn't it? | ||
I mean, after all, you've got the worst people in the world, the most evil, scumbag, billionaire tyrants you can possibly imagine coming together to perform occult rituals in the woods and have sex with each other. | ||
It only makes sense that they treat the help like servants and slaves. | ||
Employees were intimidated or coerced into waiving meal periods, the suit alleges, adding that workers were also not allowed to make phone calls over 30 minutes long, and not between 9am and 9pm. | ||
In telling detail over the camp's highly secretive nature, the valets reportedly are not able to name all those that they are accusing, with some referred to as John Doe. | ||
They're like, yeah, my boss was just a floating mask. | ||
They're like, yeah, I don't actually know his name. | ||
We just referred to him as the master and he always wore a gimp mask and had a whip. | ||
Call him John Doe, I guess. | ||
I guess call him John Doe in the lawsuit because I don't know his name. | ||
Incredible. So there you go. | ||
I don't know. If I was these, I mean, I can kind of see it, right? | ||
You don't want your valets with a whole bunch of free time to go wandering around and seeing what you're up to and maybe thinking for themselves. | ||
Just keep them working constantly, constantly on the clock, never taking a break, never having mealtime, never having a spare moment, constantly in fear of getting caught, not doing their job. | ||
Just keep them busy. Keep them with their head down. | ||
I mean, it really, you know, it's the way they run society. | ||
It's the way they run everything. | ||
So, you know, it's a smart move by them. | ||
Keep the people ignorant of who they're even working for. | ||
They're bosses they don't even know the names of. | ||
They don't have a spare moment to think about for a single second. | ||
Wait, what the hell did I just see in the woods? | ||
What are these guys doing? | ||
Nope, just do your work. | ||
Do your job. Back to work. | ||
No thinking. No looking around. | ||
Just do as we say. Obey. | ||
Obey. Yeah, it all makes a lot of sense to me. | ||
With that, we go out to your phone calls now. | ||
We've got... | ||
Let's go to Robert in Brooklyn. | ||
Let's go to Robert in Brooklyn. | ||
You say it's hard to support Trump. | ||
Okay, go ahead. Robert, you're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, no. Actually, the first thing I wanted to mention was about January 6th, the video. | |
I want to press... | ||
You guys, why aren't you pressing, like, the Speaker of the House or Marjorie Teller Green about why they're refusing to release the video? | ||
I mean, you know, you have all these protesters, and it seems like they're also being denied justice, and yet they're refusing to release the video, and it could be exculpatory evidence in there, and I don't see you or Alice Jones pressing Marjorie Taylor Greene or Yeah, I don't know. | ||
I don't know what the latest with that is. | ||
The latest I heard was that they were releasing the video to... | ||
Was it like Julie Kelly? | ||
I mean, they say they are releasing the video to certain people. | ||
You know, one thing to consider with January 6th and everything is that, you know, Jack Smith... | ||
Prosecutor on the Trump case is also the prosecutor on the January 6th case, which is not going to be against Trump. | ||
It's going to be against a lot of the people that are currently now in Congress. | ||
And so I wonder if some of the people in Congress are worried about sharing jail cells with the January 6th people and are maybe covering for themselves in order to get some good grace with Jack Smith. | ||
There's a lot of speculation about that. | ||
I'll take the rest of your comment on the other side, Roberts. | ||
I know you had more to say. | ||
We'll go out to more phone calls in the final segment coming up. | ||
Infowarsstore.com. Go there. | ||
Support us. | ||
Keep us on the air and in the fight against these cabalist weirdos. | ||
unidentified
|
All right, folks. | |
Welcome back. | ||
Final segment of American Journal. | ||
Taking your phone calls, but since we're on the topic of January 6th, there's been some pretty interesting information coming out from the FBI agent who's been tasked with investigating the pipe bombs on January 6th. | ||
Revolver.News has the story. | ||
Former head of FBI J6 pipe bomb investigation comes clean with stunning admission. | ||
I don't want any conspiracy theories, right? | ||
Basically, Thomas Massey Asked him questions about this investigation. | ||
He got some pretty interesting answers. | ||
According to Jim Jordan's letter, Congressman Thomas Massey asked Dan Torno, which is the guy's name, something like that, is the investigator, whether they attempted to identify the pipe bomber via geofencing, and they received the following shocking answer. | ||
The data was corrupted. | ||
The telecom company, by sheer coincidence, happened to lose the data for that particular time and place. | ||
Oh, darn. Oh, shoot. | ||
Oh, whoopsies. What a quote for the ages. | ||
The dog ate the geofencing data. | ||
That just happened to be critical to identifying the mysterious pipe bomber. | ||
It's in unusual circumstances, and he doesn't want any conspiracy theories. | ||
Look, let's not have any conspiracy theories about the fact that I lost the data that would be able to identify this guy. | ||
Mr. Don Tuerno, whatever, also asked whether the pipe bombs had live explosives or whether they were decoys. | ||
He acknowledged that despite reports that the bombs were viable, in his estimation, they were not set to go off as the kitchen timer attached to the devices could not have detonated them. | ||
In a critical concession, Don Tuerno, whatever, admitted that the timer used on the pipe bomb could not have detonated the pipe bombs on January 6th, given that the time elapsed between the placement and the discovery. | ||
This led him to join a speculation that perhaps the pipe bombs weren't intended to go off, saying maybe they weren't supposed to go off. | ||
We don't know. It appears that the only way the diversion theory of this bomb makes sense is if the pipe bomber knew that someone would specifically discover and report the devices to authorities shortly before 1 p.m., and that's where things start to get weird. | ||
As mentioned in the summary above, not only was the first pipe bomb discovered near the RNC building at 1240, it was discovered with the mechanical timer actually stuck on the 20-minute dial, as confirmed in this Madison Magazine article piece entitled, A Madison Woman Found the RNC Bomb in D.C. Perhaps not to encourage any conspiracy theories, | ||
Dentorno demurs on saying whether he subscribes to the diversion thesis, and if he does, how one could account for the remarkable coincidence of a random pedestrian discovering the RNC pipe bomb in such a time and in such a manner. | ||
According to Jordan's letter, Dentorno acknowledged that it would be Investigation 101 to interview the individuals who discovered the bomb, yet he was unable to confirm whether the FBI had taken this basic investigative step. | ||
Remarkable evidence. Indeed. | ||
So yet another little wrinkle to the January 6th saga and the very mysterious inability of the FBI to identify one of the main perpetrators of all of January 6th, the person that placed the pipe bomb that actually started and initiated the evacuation of the Capitol. | ||
It wasn't the riot. It was the pipe bombs. | ||
And of course it was the The man who would later murder Ashley Babbitt, who was the one to go into the chamber and announce that there was a pipe bomb and that they would be evacuating. | ||
Just coincidence after coincidence. | ||
Isn't that something else? So we'll go to your phone calls now, but just don't be expecting to find any actual answers as to who planted the pipe bomb or why anytime soon, as that... | ||
It may reveal something the FBI would rather remain hidden. | ||
So, Robert, I know you're asking questions about January 6th and something else. | ||
unidentified
|
Go ahead. Well, I recently heard Marjorie Kelly Greene apparently claiming that there's security concerns about releasing all the video. | |
But anyway, in terms of the election, the presidential election, the only two candidates who I'm seriously thinking about is Donald Trump and Robert Kennedy. | ||
Both of them seem to have suffered greatly from the establishment. | ||
Now, but the thing about Trump... | ||
You know, the vaccines, it's a concern. | ||
And not just the COVID situation, but even if you go back, I'm looking at tweets from Donald Trump in 2012, 2014, a New York Times article in the beginning of 2017, condemning information. | ||
It seems like Trump has concerns about the connection between autism and vaccines going all the way back. | ||
But yet, when he became president, he was thinking about appointing, let's say, Robert Kennedy to some sort of a vaccine safety committee commission or something, but he never went through it. | ||
Apparently, Bill Gates discouraged him or something. | ||
So, you know, I don't know. | ||
It's a concern. And, you know, recently Trump came out with a video about, you know... | ||
You know, about the chronic illnesses, investigating it, but he went out of the words, the connection, possible connection between the vaccine and the, you know, chronic illness. | ||
Now, this is something that Trump has held beliefs going back more than 10 years. | ||
Yeah, I don't know what sort of things he was weighing in terms of risk versus benefit coming up with that. | ||
But yeah, he's been tweeting about vaccines causing autism for a long time. | ||
We're seeing a lot more people comment on that recently. | ||
I understand your concern. | ||
Thank you for the call. I mean, I don't really have a response if you don't want to support him. | ||
That is your right. | ||
I just think... | ||
Trump not being strong enough on that is not enough for me to abandon him. | ||
But I appreciate your thought, and I know I'm sure a lot of our audience feels the same way. | ||
Let's go now to Peter in Florida. | ||
You want to talk about transgender affirming care, Peter? | ||
I think that's the right word for it. | ||
Go ahead. You're on the air. Hey, Harrison. | ||
unidentified
|
Can you hear me? Yes, sir. So, you know, I want to talk about the importance of words. | |
You know, you obviously, as a prominent info warrior, understand the importance of words. | ||
And our communist overlords, you know, obviously understand the importance of words with their censorship efforts. | ||
And, you know, people need to start saying it like it is, right? | ||
These people are not transgenders. | ||
They're eunuchs, mutilists, castratists, Satanists, whatever you want to call them, right? | ||
It's not health care. | ||
It's murdering babies and general mutilation. | ||
And the Soros DAs are not progressive. | ||
You know, they're civilization arsonists. | ||
And the migrants are invaders and colonizers. | ||
And so, you know, people need to stop beating around the bush and tiptoeing. | ||
And they need to get angry because ultimately these people do want to kill you and they think it's funny. | ||
And then the last thing I want to talk about is the definition of wealth. | ||
Most people define wealth as material goods and income, but it's not. | ||
Your wealth is your children and your community and your values, and people need to really understand what's at stake and why people manipulate minds with words and why it's important to say it and say it proudly, what's going on. | ||
100%. Could not agree with you more, Peter. | ||
I don't even have anything to add. | ||
I think you put it perfectly. | ||
I do remember when I was a little kid, one of my friend's moms would say that. | ||
I never understood it. She was always like, don't say that they're wealthy. | ||
Say they're rich. Rich is money. | ||
Wealth is something else. | ||
And I never understood what she meant. | ||
She was like, we are wealthy because we have a great family and our health. | ||
Those people are just rich. | ||
They just have money. I never understood that when I was a kid. | ||
I certainly understand it more now. | ||
Thank you for that call, Peter. | ||
Very well put. Let's go to Tim in California now. | ||
Thank you for calling in, Tim. | ||
Chinese drones. What's this about? | ||
Yes, I read this in Forbes this week. | ||
The United States are flying thousands of Chinese drones across the East Coast, and Marco Rubio is furious. | ||
This even extends to the Capitol Police. | ||
Some FOIA records of state government drone registrations that the Federal Aviation Administration show That the United States Capitol Police has four models manufactured by China's Autel Robotics. | ||
And these companies, Autel and DJI, are the world's biggest drone maker, valued at $16 billion. | ||
And these two companies have 70% market share in the local government across Florida, New Jersey, New York, and Washington, D.C., and dominance amongst major police departments in Maryland and Virginia. | ||
And as Senator Marco Rubio smartly said, quote, We should expect that every image, video, and data set is accessible by Beijing. | ||
Here's another story for you today. | ||
Kansas is the wheat state. | ||
You know, we feed much of the world and wheat is definitely a staple. | ||
This year, Kansas wheat harvest is shaping up to be the smallest since 1957 when the Eisenhower administration intentionally suppressed wheat production. | ||
What's causing that? How about this? | ||
unidentified
|
Any ideas? Well, they had not enough water at the right time and so forth. | |
But, you know, just anyway. | ||
Climate change, Tim. | ||
It's because you don't eat bugs. That's why. | ||
Thank you. Yeah. | ||
But we have a cancer drug shortage. | ||
And this is no joke. | ||
They're rationing it and so forth. | ||
And the FDA has said, indeed, we have over 130 drugs that are in short supply, 14 of which are cancer treatments. | ||
So they're rationing, they're delaying treatments, they're substituting, and so forth. | ||
But not to worry. NBC News has reported the answer is FDA will allow imports from China. | ||
Oh, imports from China. Well, what do you know? | ||
China to the rescue. I thought you were going to say the mRNA vaccine against cancer that they've been pushing. | ||
Thank you for that, Tim. Good stuff. | ||
I'd miss those stories, so that's what we rely on you for. | ||
We also rely on you to go to Infowarsstore.com and keep us on the air. | ||
Brain Force Plus and Brain Force Ultra, both on sale right now for 40% off. | ||
Get them together. Get them 50% off. | ||
Superpower your mind with Brain Force Plus and Brain Force Ultra. | ||
Infowarstore.com Infowarstore.com is like a grocery store or like a vitamin shop. | ||
We want to have all the best brands for you. | ||
We want to have a bunch of different choices for you. | ||
So I get constant questions online and in person. | ||
Hey, what's better? Knockout. | ||
What's better? Down and out. | ||
What's better? Why do you sell two or three different sleep aids? | ||
And the answer is different herbal formulas, different compounds are better for different people. | ||
So, one person might like this coffee, another person likes that coffee. | ||
That's how our bodies work. | ||
They're all very diverse. But we've been able to private label a national bestseller that's been sold for many years, that people love, and sold for a lower price under the name InfoWarsMD, Good Night Sleep. | ||
This is a great formula full of amazing safe compounds, give you deeper, cleaner, restful sleep, and it's in stock available right now of 25% off out of the gates. |