Greg Reese alleges the FBI orchestrated a "false flag" on January 6, 2020, while callers like Tim from Seattle push entrapment tactics to expose Trump’s vaccine ties, despite his likely $50K+ appearance fee. Wayne In Texas frames LGBTQ+ acceptance as a spiritual test, dismissing land-based kingdoms, while Jefferson In Virginia claims Harris and Cruz are unconstitutional, mirroring the 2016 "birther" debate. Clinton In Kansas and Marcus In Idaho expose Hunter Biden’s Chinese links and BlackRock’s Aladdin AI risks, including potential human trafficking or infrastructure control. Callers warn of election fraud, military incompetence, and biblical rebellion against "woke" doctrine, tying it to Israel’s judicial crisis and NATO’s $3.5B Ukraine aid. Jones pivots to selling supplements, blending conspiracy claims with product pitches—undermining credibility while monetizing distrust. [Automatically generated summary]
On December 19th of 2020, President Trump announced a big protest in D.C. on January 6th, urging his supporters to be there will be wild.
On January 6th, Infowars was invited to help bring the crowd to the Capitol building.
Where Trump would give a speech.
To do this, we were formally escorted out of his official speech early.
Infowars was shown a map of the Capitol grounds, with a stage on the back side where we were to lead the crowd to meet President Trump.
When we arrived, there was no stage, but there was a false flag being executed by the FBI. Trump never showed up, and he turned his back on the hundreds of innocent supporters rotting away in jail for being at the Capitol that day.
All this, on top of his constant shilling for the deadly Pfizer shots, has caused many objective Americans to see Trump as potentially another tool of the shadow government.
And so last week, when Trump announced that he was going to be arrested and called for protests, many people saw it as a red flag.
While the world economy is collapsing, Trump and the media are there together as a mindless distraction all week long.
And on early Friday morning, Trump threatens death and destruction if he is arrested.
This should be a major red flag, but many can't see it.
Shortly after being elected in 2016, he begins to tell the crowd an anecdotal story about the Clintons.
And when they start chanting, lock her up, he admits that was all just empty rhetoric to get elected.
unidentified
Scheduled Michigan unexpectedly.
It was like all of a sudden with President Obama and Michelle and Bill and Hillary, and they were going to Michigan.
The Trump loyalists will claim that he was joking, or he didn't mean it.
They are likely blinded to all the glaring red flags.
This is how the divide-and-conquer game works.
Tribalism. And for many, America First became Trump First, acting as if completely ignorant to the fact that our elections are rigged.
The ultimate objective of controlled opposition would be to control the leader of the opposition so that you can lead the opposition over a cliff.
Whether or not this is Trump, he is not America.
We the people are America.
And the only way we the people win is to get active, put our faith in God, and unite.
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
And while the nation is being destroyed by the federal government, millions of Americans are focusing on a 2024 election that we already know will be rigged more than ever.
This is insane behavior.
We need to stop seeing politics as a spectator sport and start actually getting involved.
If we are unwilling to take control of our local governments, then why should anyone listen to our grievances with the federal government?
What originally made Trump popular was an overall disdain for our government and a love for America.
The U.S. would destroy Taiwan's chip plants if China invades, says former Trump official.
The United States would destroy Taiwan's highly sophisticated semiconductor technology rather than allow it to be captured by China if ever successfully invaded by the...
If China ever successfully invaded the island, according to Donald Trump's former national security advisor, the United States and its allies are never going to let those factories fall into the Chinese hands, Ambassador Robert O'Brien told me during a conversation airing at the Global Security Forum organized by Sufan Center in Doha,
Qatar. Now let's face it, that's never going to happen, okay?
Never say never. O'Brien drew a comparison to when Britain chose to destroy France's storied naval fleet after the country surrendered to Nazi Germany, killing over a thousand soldiers in the process.
He recounted how Winston Churchill, a noted Francophile, walked into the House of Commons with tears streaming down his face because it was the hardest decision he ever made in the war, but received unanimous applause.
The idea of demolishing Taiwan's semiconductor fabs rather than leaving them in Chinese hands has been floated before.
In 2021, a popular Army War College paper argued that Taiwan should threaten to sabotage the plants itself in response to an invasion in order to deter Beijing from attacking.
Taiwanese officials have said that there's no need, however, because for various reasons, China would not be able to operate the factories after recapturing them.
China's social credit score system has taken a dark new twist with a bizarre plan to turn around collapsing marriage and birth rates.
Sky News contributor Daisy Cousins says Daisy dating apps on the one hand can absolutely be terrible for scammers and catfishing, but China's social credit score system It's now allowing you to find a mate based on what you drink, buy, say, and now can determine who you can date.
The Chinese Communist Party commissars of Jinan City in the Shandong province are pulling everything they know, about 650,000 citizens, under their control into one state-controlled singles dating app.
unidentified
The end of that sentence should terrify you into one state-controlled singles dating app.
I read over the weekend that politics is increasingly becoming a make or break for relationships.
That was a link on Drudge.
Of course, he's got his finger on the pulse of dating and politics.
Going further, they want to build comprehensive profiles about eligible young men and women's personalities, habits, preferences, and behaviors, and affiliations.
Boil these down to scores, run them through AI, then organize a blind date resulting in an ideal match.
Put simply, the Communist Party of China has just got a math problem.
This is where tech meets, you know, arranged marriages, but it's not arranged by your families.
No, it's arranged by the state.
This is absolutely insane, right?
You hear that phrase every once in a while.
But there were 7.6 million first marriages in 2021.
That's 500,000 fewer than the year before and 5 million less than 2013.
And marriages are needed to produce future party members.
That's not happening.
Marriages are needed to produce future humans, right?
unidentified
But China looks at it as future party members.
Guys, remember, when you vote with your dollars, when you go out and buy things at the store, make sure that the label says Made in China.
Since abandoning its long-standing one-child policy in 2016, national birth rates have plummeted.
Only 6.8 children were born for every 1,000 people in 2022.
And that's despite Beijing having mandated three children for every household.
Yeah, it's mandated that you have three children.
Okay. Maybe the mandate is three children max.
Maybe I'm interpreting that wrong.
While demographics believe that recent birth declines are a statistical anomaly brought about by Beijing's draconian COVID-19 lockdown policies, it underscores longstanding fears for the nation's future.
Now the party has renewed its efforts to bring more of the right kinds of people together to generate more marriages and therefore more babies.
But it doesn't think that young unmarried party members can work it out for themselves.
I've got a great idea.
I've got a super great idea right now for China and their declining birth rates.
The idea of the People's Revolution was for gender equality in all things, but Xi wants to bring back the elements of traditional Confucian philosophy.
In 2013, during one of his first speeches as national leader, she proclaimed that it was crucial for women to be good wives and mothers and to ensure the healthy growth for the next generation.
unidentified
Ten years later, that idea is being turned into a law.
Okay. There was a video that I put in the show folder today.
unidentified
The question is, do we go out to the video before I go to the article?
You know what? I think we should.
I think we're gonna go out to this video in like just a few seconds and it's about an elementary teacher Is this a good elementary teacher or a bad elementary teacher?
This is Bill Maher's bit that we're ripping off here, the new rule thing.
But, okay, we played a video of a woman saying that if you've got she, her, if you put your pronouns on your resume or your bio, that people are going to overlook you because they don't want to work with you because you're probably a psycho.
Um, yeah, if you've got the bullring, if you've got the, uh, is this the septum piercing?
In 2021, another transgender flyer slammed the transphobic...
That's what they should be. The Transphobic Security Administration.
That's exactly who they are.
They're bad people.
We all know it.
The TSA screenings and called them to remove the gender settings from their scanners.
That'd be cool. I'm okay with that.
I don't know why the scanners have to be gendered.
Maybe it's because people are different thickness in different places.
I don't know. A transgender woman has called for dismantling of airport TSA screenings after she claimed an agent punched her in the testicles and yelled at me.
How ironic would that be, right?
unidentified
After years of Alex Jones, you know, trying to move that boulder up the mountain, and then it just takes one.
Who would win? Alex Jones and all of his might or one tranny boy?
We're going to help you to abolish that TSA. Okay.
Last little news hit here before we go out to your calls next segment.
Progressives across the nation locked out of accounts after CAPTCHA asks, select all squares that contain a woman.
New Haven, Connecticut, progressives across the nation have found themselves locked out of accounts after CAPTCHA began asking users to identify what squares show a woman.
I'm not a biologist, cried local man Lewis Fitzgerald.
What kind of sick joke is this?
Hundreds of thousands of online accounts have quickly become locked as liberals repeatedly failed the test designed to distinguish humans from robots.
Thousands of customers have called asking what secret it is to recognizing a woman, said Bank of America executive Lacey Reynolds.
I honestly don't know how to explain it in any simpler terms.
The good news is they can't withdraw any money, so it's been a real help during the banking crisis.
True. Yeah, and you know, the other thing too is that it's really easy, you know, for people on the outside looking in to kind of look at this and be like, hey, they're really hateful towards the trans.
unidentified
No, we love the transgender people.
We just don't agree with the national agenda.
That could be it, you know?
Look, I live in what is formally the trans capital of the United States.
Countdown was the trans capital of the United States?
Yeah, it sure is.
It is now. It's in Boebert County.
Towntown is in Boebert County.
Lindsey, as a representative, I'm allowed to go and live in a whole other state and do whatever I want.
But anyways, I can tell you for a fact.
People actually don't care what you do in your house.
They care when kids get involved, when kids go missing or hurt.
Or it starts getting integrated into the social structure where we're confusing things like they there, send kids to the office.
That's when it gets too much.
Right. Yeah. And if we're, you know, if we're going to talk about this, you know, we understand the reason why, you know, all different types of groups, right, want to appeal to children, right?
Because their minds are still open, right?
They're learning and, you know, there's a different way to go about it, right?
Rather than stripping for children, right?
You can totally, you know, win them over and have them not be hateful by just teaching them something called The golden rule.
Don't Bully Immutable Aspects00:02:15
unidentified
And trying to say, hey, if you don't want to get picked on, if you don't like getting picked on or bullied at school, don't pick on other people and bully them.
Hey, do you guys ever try to figure out how to get Trump back on air?
Yes. Because it would be really good to have, because you guys are going to hold the speech in the fire, and the mainstream, I spelled it, I said it right, M-A-I-M, mainstream media, will do whatever they can to keep Trump's talking points, you know, for the normies.
So I'm really hoping that you guys can brainstorm either a form of entrapment and, you know, sort of gored him, you know, use his ego against him in order to get him on air so that he can start answering the questions.
Those types of people. Well, we all know that that's wrong.
unidentified
We do know that that's wrong, but there are a lot of people out there who don't, right?
Who think that they still trust the government enough.
It's not like it's even like a plot to depopulate the world or to give people autism or this and that.
Simply the fact that there are adverse side effects to vaccines and people need to understand that, that there is a small risk involved whenever you have a vaccine.
Now, does the benefit outweigh the risk?
In most cases, yes.
In some cases, like with vaccines that have never had clinical trials before being rolled out, that use new technology that's experimental, Like I'm down for experimenting, okay? I'm down for experiments.
That's not the point. We keep going back to the fact that we think that Trump is our champion no matter what he's done, wrong or right.
So it's time to end the confusion and get him to get on, you know, say it for the world to know so that we are no longer in this Mysterious void of, well, Trump didn't know and Trump was tricked.
You know, it's time for real journalists to ask him real questions.
And I think that best place is on Infowars.
And you should probably deal with Robert Barnes and Alex Jones in a panel, you know, so that we have some actual conversation.
Because I do want a leader.
And if Trump wants to be my leader, he's going to have to be my leader.
And I think I speak for a lot of Americans when I talk about this.
unidentified
I mean, honestly, I think at this point, too, Trump would probably have to pay to come back on.
I mean, you know, we'd charge him.
I'd charge him. I'd say, Trump, you can come on, man.
Yeah, Alex definitely put Trump, you know, in the zone.
And, you know...
It's a shame that Trump never really wanted to come back on.
I think for a small period of time, Trump did want to come back on with Alex, but Alex understood that he was kind of a pariah.
Alex understands that Trump had an agenda, but now that Trump's not a president, Trump should definitely come back on just to talk about things because I think Alex would be the guy to ask the right questions.
I mean, I can't foresee an interview with Trump and Alex that's unfiltered, you know, where there's no pre-agreements or anything like that.
I mean, the thing about it is that, you know, Alex can put anybody over the top, and acting like the pariah was probably good for you guys in 2016, but everybody knows that you're right, so you guys should act like the champions that you are.
Because you are champion. You guys have a good day.
unidentified
God bless. Sure. Hey, Tim, thanks for giving us a call.
Really did appreciate that.
That was pretty good.
Tove in Ontario, I would read what you want to call in about, but I'm going to take your call anyway.
So, what's up?
Hey, Matt, how are you doing?
Doing pretty good. How are you doing?
Good, good. Have you ever heard of Rents Radio?
Like Tom Rents?
No, Jeff Rents.
Jeff Rents, that's who it is.
Sorry, Tom. I was thinking of Tom Rents, the attorney, but yes, Jeff Rents, guy with the mustache.
Yeah, yeah. I know who Jeff is.
Is he super against Alex still?
I don't know.
He kind of keeps it underground.
Like, I listen to you guys until...
Well, I live in Eastern Time, speaking of time zones.
So I start listening at 9 a.m.
with Harrison and then all the way to Owen.
And then from 9 to midnight I listen to him.
So I'm conspiracy all the time.
Anyway, I just brought him up because I think you kind of got his vibe.
You're really smooth, kind of.
Oh, thanks. Like he is.
I don't know if he'd take that as a compliment.
I don't know if there's a big rivalry still between him and Alex.
I don't know. When I first started working here in 2015, I was aware of who Jeff Rents was.
I listened to him a little bit, but understood that him and Alex are rivals a little bit, I guess.
You feel vindicated after the Greg Reese report, the one that we played at the beginning of the show that I do hope that everybody goes out and watches.
I downloaded it right before the show, and I can't remember the title, but we're going to put it on screen.
If you go to gregreesesband.video page, You will see that video report about what you can do, okay?
That report was super inspiring and super uplifting because it reminds people that Trump is not the savior.
You, you can prevent, only you can prevent forest fires.
Only you can prevent forest fires politically, right?
unidentified
There is a raging forest fire politically going on.
We need you to help put it out.
To cultivate the land.
Make something. Tov, what's going on?
Okay, so you got that message.
That was why I originally called in.
If you would have listened to, which I'm sure you did, Harrison's show, I think it was Thursday or Friday...
And there was a caller from Colorado, and I don't want to fault him or anything, his name was Clayton, and he was calling out all us Trump bashes.
That's why I feel vindicated, because there's no reason to put all your eggs in one basket for one reason.
And number two, I don't see how us as Canadians, you as Americans, are going to vote your way out of a voting problem.
It's like gambling yourself out of a gambling problem.
You saw in 2020 how you got the election stolen, then again in January of that year with the Georgia runoff, and then finally with the 22 midterms.
So voting isn't the way.
Well, actually, voting is the way.
And you need to vote in the right elections.
That's the number one thing.
The deal is, I don't think that there is...
And here's where we get into sticky situations.
Do I think it's...
It's right to question the integrity of elections at the national level where we see suspicious activity and where investigations into those elections have gone nowhere and because they're dismissed by judges who don't think that there is a merit without looking into the claims before doing serious investigations into why A bunch of ballots showed up.
And what do I mean like that? He's not buying off election officials, right?
unidentified
He's simply just pumping money into his candidates at the local level so that they can put up advertisements and yard signs and things like that so that people who do turn out for local elections who may be low information or only vote solid ticket, you know, just straight down the...
Straight down the line, straight ticket.
Those people will vote for his candidates because there's name recognition, right?
So what I'm getting at is that we need to turn out to local elections.
That's how we start winning.
When you start winning at the local level, then you get good people involved in politics, right?
Then it becomes popular to have integrity, right?
Then you start getting more people with higher integrity in politics at...
Higher levels. I'll explain more on the other side, then we'll be going out to more calls.
Alright, we're talking to Tove in Ontario, and I'm just going to explain myself.
If you left off with us about 70 seconds ago, I was telling people that when you start winning at the local level, it becomes popular for people with integrity to get involved with politics, you know, on the right side.
Every state's different, but from my experience in the states that I have been politically involved, politically active in, right, they take people who are already involved with political parties.
Typically, these are people who are local chairs of their chapter or their caucus or their local area, their district, their Democratic chair, their Republican chair, right?
But they are people and people can have biases, right?
unidentified
Biases. And I do think that by and large, a lot of people were willing to look the other way for some of these ballots that came in in the mail, right?
For two reasons. Number one, they were super sick of Trump.
They hated that guy and they didn't really necessarily know how much they hated him.
They just knew that they hated hearing about him on the news 24-7.
2007. The second reason is because they probably assumed that the ballots were coming in were genuine and authentic and not, you know, part of a scheme because the people counting the votes, there's no way if you're running a hustling scheme of doing ballots, you're even trying to recruit people who are counting ballots, right? The people counting the ballots are outside, right?
It's as if You're running a scheme.
You're going to compartmentalize the people counting the ballots from the people who are doing the nefarious things by manufacturing the ballots, right?
Those two people never mix, right?
That way you have plausible deniability if you're caught and it doesn't throw out a race that you tried to rig.
So what I'm getting at is that when you start voting the right way, when we get patriots organized and get them voting candidates in office, then people who are on the sidelines who typically would go out and vote, but they've been disenchanted, if you will, with politics as it stands.
They believe that it's rigged, so why even vote?
That's a huge thing in this country.
Right? Is understanding that there are people who would vote who have the ability and the capacity to vote, right?
But they don't do it because they don't believe in the system.
They believe it's not working, right?
And there are ad campaigns during politics, right?
During political campaigns, right?
That go out and try to dissuade people from voting.
Hello there, Matt. It's really, really kicking off in the state of Israel.
The defense minister has been summarily dismissed whilst his chief of staff was actually in the United States.
The former head of the Israeli Air Force has stated that the Prime Minister of Israel has declared civil war on the nation.
At about two hours' notice, 700,000 people approximately were called out to demonstrations all across the country.
And they finally cleared them in the early hours of the morning in Tel Aviv for the use of riot police, horses and water cannons.
The Prime Minister was due to give a speech on the situation this morning.
That's now been delayed and is currently scheduled to occur in about one hour.
It'll be 6 p.m.
It's ready time there, seven hours, eight hours ahead of New York time.
And the situation is extremely tense because he has Some very conservative members of his coalition government who are threatening to resign, which would bring down the government and potentially cause yet another round of elections.
And they've also called for all of their supporters to go out onto the streets and counter demonstrations fully armed tonight.
So the cause of this It has been great ruptures that have been causing protests for several weeks now, so nothing on this scale or this level of ferocity.
Trying to get the government to give up on its judicial reforms, which have many, many aspects.
The Prime Minister is under investigation for corruption.
They wanted him to accuse himself, and even his own Attorney General was asking for that.
That failed, and the High Court of Israel rejected legal pleadings to force him to recuse himself.
Another member called Ari Derry Of the Shaz party, he was prevented from taking up a cabinet post because he had convictions.
They're trying to change the law on that so that the High Court can't prohibit elected officials from actually taking up positions that they're offered by the Prime Minister.
That also looks likely to go through.
The other one is on whether or not the Supreme Court can be overruled Not only by a simple majority, so there's 121 seats in the Israeli parliament,
and there was a suggestion that the Supreme Court could only be overruled by a supermajority, like a constitutional amendment, and they said no, that it should just be a simple majority, so 61 out of 120.
And it's now been amended further such that even if some people abstain, It could be, say, 50 against 40, 50 yes, 40 no, and 30 just voting present, so that the Supreme Court could be overturned in a decision in Israel, even if less than half the parliamentarians actually vote yes.
And that's what's been incredibly contentious, because it would potentially allow even a minority government to repeatedly overrule Yes, yes.
Yes. I think that they wouldn't respond to a call for duty in the current situations.
And they called that the coalition government was essentially trying to execute a coup, a coup d'etat.
And this is on the back of very widespread condemnation of actions of the finance minister and also of the national security minister.
And ironically, It's the national security minister who controls the Israeli police forces that has asked his supporters to go out into the streets fully armed tonight.
unidentified
All right, Simon, stay there.
We're going to ask you on the other side real quickly, is this political rhetoric or how close to an actual civil war that we're in?
Certainly. Compromised solutions being proposed for a couple of weeks, in particular by the President of Israel, who acts in a non-executive ceremonial position, and they so far have been rejected.
Those proposals are being represented with the suggestion that a Essentially a national constitutional convention is formed under the chairmanship of the president and that all the legislative steps are delayed until after the Israeli National Independence Day, which is in the middle of April.
So that essentially would give a two or three week breathing period during which negotiations could occur.
But because they've got a small majority and they don't want to see people peeled off, the extreme right and religious parties are pushing very, very hard, having waited many years to try and get these kind of proposals in place and also to push through more settlement activity in the West Bank.
They feel that this is their one and only chance.
And so the finance minister, who yesterday had previously indicated that he was willing to go along with a pause, and some of the other members of the Lekib party, who had said that they would follow the prime minister's direction, have all kind of like firmed up overnight, and they're all saying now that this matter must be dealt with and pushed through the parliament this week.
There's currently 100,000 people, according to police estimates, which tend to be on the low side, as we all know, currently in the square outside the Israeli parliament, the Knesset.
So just to put that perspective, that's over 1% of the population.
So that's like 4 million people turning up in Washington, D.C. So that gives you an idea of the scope of the protest.
Now, that's only one side.
That's the side of the people who are against the judicial changes.
And obviously, the other side have called for their supporters to come out tonight.
So the goal was to at least match the numbers of the people opposing the reforms.
And so in that case, you would have the equivalent of 8 million Americans contending over a It's a serious constitutional issue in the streets of Washington, D.C. for a comparison.
And so obviously if that was indeed your dream of large-scale peaceful protests, then that would be all well and good.
But now that one side has asked for their supporters specifically to go fully armed, Obviously, there's a great potential for violence.
We're running a countdown to the Prime Minister's speech that really is needed to announce something that hopefully would diffuse the situation, but it remains to be seen as to whether or not that will actually occur.
In terms of your question as to whether or not things could actually kick off, I have personally been hearing rumours for several days now of Units within regate actually splitting up, going down to company level, and companies describing themselves as pro and anti-reform and them and us, which is an extremely serious situation.
The Israeli chief of staff had to give an address that unusually, for a ceremony that ostensibly was welcoming a new batch of national service members, but was actually televised on local media, Saying to them that their role is not only to defend the nation, but to hold the nation together with the armed forces remaining apolitical.
That just goes to show you the extent of concern that people have about the military splitting.
And indeed, all exercises and drills were cancelled on Friday and Saturday.
And the commanding, the unit, individual unit commanding officers, We're told to not order, but to basically hold sessions much like they would have done when you had Haganah,
the predecessor to the Israeli Defense Forces when it was just a militia, when they acted on a very communitarian basis, almost like a democracy within the military, to try and make sure that Right.
So, I mean, you can see that three of the previous prime ministers have given public statements in the last 24 hours saying that this is the greatest existential threat that the state of Israel faces going you can see that three of the previous prime ministers have given public statements in the last 24 hours saying that this is the greatest existential threat that the state
And they only survived that by America flying in extra weapons and arms around the clock in a way similar that America did in the Berlin Air List of 1948.
So, for them to be making comparisons like that, and that's Barack and Bennett.
unidentified
Do you see any obvious consequences geopolitically should Israel enter into a serious civil war conflict?
One is the fear of the existing government attacking Iran or Syria simply in order to unify the armed forces to an external threat and to bring in unquestioning American support.
There's a fear that they may do a classic wag the dog scenario.
The other concern that members of the general staff are expressing is that if reservists are refusing to do their duty weekends or their duty months, Then that disrupts the rotational cycle.
And as soon as that starts happening, then you lose unit cohesion, which is already highly jeopardized if individual companies within battalions and brigades are identifying themselves as them and us and pro-reform and anti-reform.
So at that point, it would make them additionally vulnerable to either coordinated A terrorist attack on three fronts, the West Bank, Gaza, and the Israeli-Lebanese border, or potentially a state and interstate attack, which personally I think is unlikely, but that's certainly a fear that they're using to try and control the disparate factions within society.
unidentified
We're headed to a break here.
Simon, we'll get one more word from you on the other side.
We'll be back. All right, we're taking your calls here on the American Journal.
We are wrapping up with Simon in Florida, talking about the consequences of a civil war in Israel.
Simon, you were cut off by the break.
Go ahead and wrap up with us about any potential consequences you think might result from a civil war in Israel, especially at this time when China has started to foster a relationship with Iran and Saudi Arabia.
Your observation there is extremely well made, and you'll see what my mind is exactly what I was going to come on to, but very much as I always try and do, how does this affect Americans' point of view?
America currently has 800 troops in Syria in three bases, and even before the tensions really escalated in Israel, two of those bases were attacked by Iranian-backed militia within Syria and then obviously the president ordered the Air Force to respond and there were US Air Force strikes on those opposition bases within Syria that it's estimated killed 19 people.
Now the Iranians have reacted to that very strongly And they've now moved artillery all the way along the border between Iran and Iraq, not to attack the Iraqi government, but to attack the bases where there are both Kurdish, Israeli, and American forces stationed within northern Iraq.
But that has a potential immediately to spread the situation there.
America has been trying to take and they have taken some of the American Middle East reserves of ammunition that were stored in Israel.
They've asked the Israeli government if they will spare them more of the Israeli stockpiles in order to give all of this stuff to Ukraine.
But obviously if there's a complete societal breakdown within Israel...
Then it will be impossible for America to withdraw any more ammunition supplies from Israel.
unidentified
I read this morning that America estimates are that Americans think that we're 13 years behind manufacturing ammunition.
Yeah, that assumes that you don't use the National Industrial Act And basically, part of the American economy on a wartime footing.
If you look at how fast the shipbuilders, the aircraft builders and truck and car manufacturers adjusted their manufacturing lines in World War II, that was actually done very, very fast.
And while many of these Munitions manufacturers like Raytheon and all those other types of firms are now working double shifts on weekends.
The problem is they've got to try and find trained staff because it's all gone very, very high-tech nowadays to precision munitions.
But the whole of Europe is now proposing to do that.
They've now said that they're going to put another three and a half.
They put a billion in and another billion in ammunition.
This is literally just in the last couple of days.
Now they're talking about raising another 3.5 billion.
And this is all for just not weapons, but munitions for Ukraine.
So we're seeing quite a big escalation from NATO on the Ukraine side.
Obviously, this does cause potential problems.
I have to say, the entire region is a tinned box.
Azerbaijan have violated the Russian brokered ceasefire with Armenia, and the Russians have called them out on that, and the Iranians have declared a red line if they move any further into the Armenian-controlled areas.
So, you know, Iran's potentially facing a two-front war.
America's potentially facing a four-front war, if you consider Taiwan, Ukraine, you know, North Korea and Iran.
It's really, really very serious times.
And the Western mainstream media Have just called up this weekend.
You saw Tucker Carlson, for example, talking about the Saudi-Iran deal.
He was talking about that on Saturday, right?
The Saturday was, what, the 25th?
That deal happened on the 10th.
He was literally 15 days behind, and most of the other media said, oh, it's no big deal, and nothing may come of it, and they said that they'd do this over two months, and we bet it won't happen over two months.
But now, not only has it been announced, The President of Iran is going to visit the King of Saudi Arabia, but then after that he's going straight to Bahrain.
So that's taken everyone completely by surprise.
And the shuttle diplomacy that is occurring within the Middle East is happening at an absolutely frantic pace.
I mean, it's quite extraordinary.
And at the same time, the Gulf Cooperation Council has called upon on Friday Well, the American administration to criticize Israel because their finance minister was denying that Palestinians were even a race of people and that they shouldn't have a country.
You've got the Arab world saying, we want you to control these people.
And no matter what the Biden administration might try and do in order to placate its erstwhile allies, who appear to be changing sides to Russia, Iran, and China, they now don't even know who to talk to within the Israeli government because the whole thing may be on the process of disintegrating.
It's an extremely complex and very serious situation.
unidentified
It is, and I find myself looking back at World War II history and wondering, wow, how couldn't they see this being a huge issue with all these alliances and all of these treaties that these countries had?
It really blows my mind and I think it's a fallacy.
It is very easy to slip into this trap of thinking that older generations were of less capable minds and that that was their folly and that we are more capable now because perhaps the material world around us is in many ways more advanced.
And that's just not the case.
I think when we look back in history, let's say even a decade from now, just looking at how quickly these alliances have formed and what that means is really going to be Pretty shocking, pretty scary.
Sons and Torah Given00:12:17
unidentified
Simon, thank you for giving us a call, as always.
We are going to move on here to a couple other callers.
Hey, Matt. What I wanted to do, and it's nice to follow up, Simon, but basically just talk about what the West is facing because it's a real...
It's a real good illustration of what's going on in Israel with what a lot of our issues are.
You've got, you know, on one side, you've got the far-left political party in Israel, and therefore the diversity and inclusion of, you know, strange Baphomet God, you know, that's feet don't touch the ground, you know, spoken of in Israel.
And a lot of what we're going to do is we're going to demystify the superstition of that power that that idol has.
And then on the other side, You've got, like, you know, the seven sons of Sceva, Sceva himself being the eighth, right?
What does that come from? So, seven sons of Sceva are in Acts, and they were sons of one Sceva, who was a high priest, who was sent to a man in Ephesus to exercise the evil spirit that he was possessed with.
And what they did...
They invoked the name of Christ and of Paul, and the evil spirit essentially spoke, and he said, you know, I know who Christ is, and I know who Paul is, but I don't know who you are.
So it was basically a reference to the unknown agnostic, you know, God's altar, you know, that Paul also preached against the matter and materialistic atomism, the pyramid scheme of unknown gods, you know, the fairy tales, things like that.
unidentified
Lane, go ahead and stand by for us.
We'll touch back with you here in about four minutes.
All right, Matt, I appreciate you giving me the time to do this.
Sorry, I was kind of rushing there a minute.
So, basically, these seven of eight sons, one scape of the father has seven sons.
They're representative of kings of an earthly kingdom who didn't obey the first commandment to be fruitful and multiply God's kingdom and seek his righteousness first.
And they sought out to go and do it themselves of their own accord.
And then this evil spirit they try to exercise overcomes them.
And basically what he does If he goes and gives seven more spirits, like God says, more wicked than himself, and returns to establish another set of churches, right?
And so, as I'm looking into this, you know, what kind of hits me in the mind is, like, this bath of my God has this, you know, magical horn, reproductive organ, and, you know, obviously the one, the more notable one, which is representative of the evil eye or the little cornicello, right? You know, that you'll find, you know, in the Assyrian culture first, you know, like, you know, not to be jealous or to give somebody the stink eye.
And I start looking, I think about, you know, the diversity inclusion of the LGBTQ plus, you know, the woke culture, which is essentially like a wake ceremony before final dirt nap if you don't wake up from it.
But each of the letters, so you've got lesbian, you've got gay, you've got bisexual, you've got transgender.
And then you've got queer.
And so I started thinking about queer.
I'm like, well, queer, you know, is also a slang term for gay, but they already got the word gay.
And so as I research it, it means questioning.
So that's notable to add questioning when you already have this, assuming by most people that it also means gay.
If not, it means questioning.
And then you have, and those are five letters.
And then you have plus, which is representative of two different other identifications, which is pansexual and two-spirit.
And so, all together, you essentially have eight letters.
If you include the two letters that the plus represents, then the third being the plus, and then the other five letters.
With the questioning letter representing the agnostic, the unknown god of mediation, being the mediator, because if you don't self-identify it, But the first five letters, well then they can say, hey, you know what?
You actually don't identify with any one of those specifically in marriage, but we can marry you to this new identity, this pansexual identity, and you can go and marry any of those other identities and become a two-spirit in marriage.
And so it's an inversion of the way God establishes this church a second time, but according to a more heavenly image, hence You know, the ego, you know, and Daniel, that's feet don't touch the ground.
You know, the notable one, the pineal gland in between his eyes.
And so this one, just, you know, my ultimate aim of this is just to demystify what's going on, because everything the devil does is just an inversion of what God teaches us in the scriptures.
And so we're seeing this dichotomy taking place, you know, all over the West.
And I mean, this is a call to us here in America, to our friends there in Israel.
Not to meddle in the affairs of the devil, because the devil will cast out the devil, just like the sons of Sceva tried to cast out their own.
And that's not our business.
The devil is essentially, through this woke movement, trying to establish a kingdom where, like the angels of heaven, which neither marry nor are given in marriage, it's like a fornication of that.
And that's what you're seeing in Israel right now.
That's what's taking place.
I mean, he gave the whole woke sermon, you know, before he left.
And then, like, if you look at Martha's Vineyard, you know, where essentially when you go into Martha's Vineyard, they have the whole woke, you know, the commandments doctrine, you know, on the sign when you go into the town, which, you know, Martha's Vineyard, you know, like the graves of wrath, you know, getting stomped out.
But... You know, we're supposed to overcome this in a peaceful way, not with violence, because we're multiplying God's heat.
I don't know. God's tabernacle is not one, you know, made of dirt.
His tabernacle is written on the fleshly hearts of men.
And in Israel, there's a concept I wish everybody would look up in Wikipedia called Parthesia.
P-A-R-R-H-E-S-I-A. And especially our friends in Israel.
They need to reflect upon that, because God gave His word Can you explain the word for us?
So what I'll do is I'll actually, if you'll let me, give me a minute, I'll read it to you.
It's Dimas Parhezia.
And, uh, So it says, the Torah was given over Dimas Parhisia, a place belonging to no one.
For had it been given in the land of Israel, they would have had cause to say to the nations of the world, you have no share in it.
Thus was it given Dimas Parhisia, in a place belonging to no one.
Let all who wish to receive it come and receive it.
And then it gives an explanation.
It says, why was the Torah not given in the land of Israel?
In order that the peoples of the world should not have an excuse for saying, because it was given in Israel's land, therefore we have not accepted it.
And then another reason it gives is to avoid causing dissension among the tribes of Israel.
Else one might have said, in my land the Torah was given, and the other might have said, in my land the Torah was given.
Therefore the Torah was given in Midbar, which means wilderness, desert, So,
you've got the far right side, too, which is trying to establish the Noahide Law, you know, essentially by force and domination.
And literally controlling, you know, physical land and properties of gain.
Well, that's not the right way to do it either.
God's kingdom is a spiritual, priestly kingdom written in fashion in the hearts of the people.
And God, there's nothing we can offer God other than that.
God, everything's God.
It all belongs to God. We're supposed to sanctify him, himself, alone.
Right. Well, the salvation we seek more than anything is our own.
Yeah. You know, the people that are in the LGBTQ community...
I mean, God and Christ's body is a body of orphans.
We're all castaways. I can't tell you how many churches that I got laughed out of are so-called churches.
But you know what? I went to those churches believing that those buildings made of wood and stone, establishing their own kingdoms and multiplying themselves under the guise of their own charity.
We're the mediator between God and men.
And because I kept getting cast out, God revealed to me that it was his word alone.
It was the mediator.
And, you know, he came and found me in that wilderness, and he established that word in the fleshly table of my heart.
And that's what we all share as believers.
And, you know, I know out of this movement, this woke movement, that these people called and chosen by Christ will come out of it.
They will be the greatest ministers of the kingdom of God, and they won't have to worry about a sexual identity because they will be fed with angels food as we were out in the wilderness, and they will not have to worry about being given in marriage nor married because we will be the angels of the Lord of heaven, of his kingdom.
We only have to convince seven people to believe that Vivek Ramaswamy is not currently eligible to be president.
And then the whole House of Cards will fall down on all the other people that think Kamala Harris is legitimately the Vice President of the United States.
And then we can make everybody that's in that camp resign from office because they are all in violation of their oath of office to uphold the Constitution.
So we only have to convince seven people after we convince ourselves that we've been brainwashed into believing that being born in the United States to non-citizens Mm-hmm.
What makes one a natural-born citizen of the United States is having two parents who are citizens at the time of your birth anywhere in the world.
It doesn't matter where you're born.
It never did.
The framers, founders didn't care where you were born.
We had a continent to settle.
They didn't care if you were born in Florida when it was owned by the Spanish or born in Louisiana when it was owned by the French.
They cared whether your parents were going to rear you to be an American citizen.
That's what Article 2 was trying to divide between just the natural citizens who only had one parent as a citizen at the time of their birth and the people that were purebred Americans, pureborn as the child of two USA citizens.
What they didn't want was diluted allegiance.
They didn't want a British subject to That's what natural born means.
If I say you're a natural born genius, that means your parents are geniuses, both of them.
If I call you a natural born idiot, I'm calling your parents an idiot.
That's what natural born means, purebred.
So Vivek Ramaswamy should be eligible to be president if we just are willing to amend Article 2.
We all seem to think it should be amended, and I'm all for it.
But someone like Vivek Ramaswamy should not be eligible to be president until he's 50 years old, and he has to be a resident of the United States for 35 years, not 14 years like a natural-born citizen has to be.
Okay. You should try to convince your attorney general, Ken Paxton, to look into this Article 2 violation that is currently our vice president, because she's actually a Jamaican citizen.
Her father was a Jamaican citizen, so under their constitution at birth, even though she was born in California, She is a Jamaican citizen as well as being an American citizen, and that's the exact thing that Article 2 is trying to not have happen.
They didn't want dual citizens at birth to be eligible vice president or president.
They were trying to make it clear they thought they had.
The question came up in 1790 when someone said, well, what about people that are born overseas to American parents?
Are those going to be considered natural-born citizens?
And they said, yes, of course.
If both your parents are citizens, we don't care where you're born.
We only care that both parents raise you to adulthood.
That's what the 14 years residency was about.
They figured, you know, if you have two citizens raising the child for 14 years, it's more than likely going to happen in America.
But if it doesn't, it better happen that both parents are raising you as citizens.
And if your parents are citizens, that means your uncles are citizens, your grandparents are citizens, you're being raised in America.
unidentified
You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Matt Weber.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
Oh yeah!
We're talking to Jefferson about why Kamala Harris and Vivek Brahmaswamy are ineligible to be president.
Thanks. Yeah, so, Paxson would be the proper plaintiff to bring the case.
He could go before a federal judge, get a ruling from one federal judge that just says Kamala Harris is ineligible for the position she's in.
She's a violation of Article 2.
And then they could get an immediate emergency hearing before the Supreme Court.
We'd only have to commit or convince five justices to say that she is ineligible.
And then the Supreme Court could protect itself from court packing by basically saying to everybody that's currently in office that thought Kamala Harris was eligible when she wasn't, that they were always wrong, and that was their obligation to understand whether they were right or wrong on that, and they have to step down because they're in violation of their oath of office.
We could make this snowball into something quite big, but we have to start at the right place.
And to be the proper plaintiff, you have to have an attorney general bring the case or your state senator.
So if you could get Ted Cruz to acknowledge that he's not eligible to be president either, he would be a patriot about amending Article 2.
So when he does want to be president, we will have already amended Article 2 to make him eligible.
He's old enough and been here long enough.
Of course, he was born to a Cuban father, so he's not a natural-born citizen either.
But we could change that in the sense that his mother was a citizen of the United States In the process of becoming Canadian at the time of his birth in Canada.
So he's on the margins, but we can still amend Article 2.
We just have to all acknowledge that it hasn't happened yet.
We all seem to think that the 14th Amendment somehow amended Article 2.
The 14th Amendment had nothing to do with eligibility to be president.
But because it has the phrase, all persons born, which is everybody, everybody's born, They don't seem to recognize that all persons born is a subset of those born inside the United States.
It's not the total universe of citizens.
It's got nothing to do with natural citizens or natural-born citizens.
The all persons born inside the United States are essentially automatically naturalized citizens.
They're not born to American citizens, so they are naturalized citizens by their birthplace.
Birthplace is a naturalization process, not a natural process.
I see what you're saying. Yeah, the drift I'm getting at is we've all been hoodwinked.
We've all been bamboozled.
We've all been fooled by the whole Obama birther PSYOP. And that's what it was.
It was a calculated PSYOP to make everybody think that location of birth had something to do with eligibility.
That was the end result of the birtherism scam, was that everybody came away from it going, oh, I guess if you're born here, like he was in Hawaii.
You're good to go. Then you're good to go.
So now, you know, Trump brought up both of these issues when he was in the campaign.
He said this birthplace citizenship 14th Amendment idea is nuts.
I don't think people that are born here to people that sneak in are under our jurisdiction.
They really shouldn't be considered citizens of the United States.
He was correct about that.
And when Kamala Harris was presented to him, He said, I think she has some eligibility problems.
I'm not going to pursue it, but I think she's a problem.
And he was correct on that, too.
But because of the birtherism Obama thing and the John Eastman dust-up with Newsweek when he came up with an article basically saying that there's no way Kamala Harris should be eligible, she's barely even a legal citizen of this country.
Born to people that were here illegally that had overstayed their education visas, which were non-immigration visas.
They weren't even trying to become citizens.
So if you believe that the founders were smart enough to pick a criteria, which was pure-blood Americans are the only ones that are eligibly president.
We don't want half-breeds.
We don't want people to have a dual allegiance at birth.
That'd be terrible. We're not protecting ourselves by having that criteria.
And anytime you have a criteria in law...
If you think it's fuzzy, then the most restrictive interpretation of that criteria becomes the law, not the least restrictive.
So saying being born here would make you eligible to be president at a time in American history where being born here didn't make anybody a citizen of the United States.
It doesn't make any sense.
You had to have a parent, at least one, that was a citizen to be considered part of the tribe.
Not just be born here.
If you were born here at foreign nationals, you had to naturalize.
That's what the 14th Amendment basically changed.
They said, okay, if you're being brought here by people that are trying to become citizens, You don't have to go through the paperwork anymore.
You're a naturalized citizen by your birthplace here to people that are trying to become citizens.
We don't want to do the paperwork on that anymore.
unidentified
You know, the scary thing is...
I do get your point, and I'm not trying to diminish it with this, but we're getting to a place in our country right now, culturally, where even natural-born citizens, though, people who've got American parents...
Clinton in Kansas wants to talk about Hunter Biden.
Clinton, you are on the air.
Hey, thanks for taking my call, Matt.
Yeah, I'd like to talk about how nobody is really covering this story that has been expanding over the last few weeks concerning Hunter Biden, all of these payments he was getting from his Chinese associates and the connection with that and Joe Biden.
Sure. Nobody's covering it, not even really you guys.
And I really think that everybody's sitting on something that you guys could expose.
Elaborate. Okay, so right now we have the, I'd like to see Kevin McCarthy declare the Biden administration, even his nomination, to be illegitimate he had documents that were found in his home going back decades and i'd like to know what the classifications are of those documents
because if some you know some of them were top secret and hunter's been partying with those were sent those were sentimental top Those were top-secret, sentimental documents to him.
So, you know, those were okay.
Oh, they were...
That was sarcasm, but...
No, I understand what you're saying.
Yes. I understand what you're saying, but I would like to have them explain why Joe Biden was getting money from Hunter and the rest of the Biden clan.
Trust me, I don't even want to start arguing with people about, you know, the choices that he made in putting his family members, you know, in office and, you know, the trust issues, this, that, the other.
Our president's got trust. Our president had trust issues.
Okay, get it. But, you know, this whole deal, if Trump had done that, if Trump had done an iota of this, he would actually be in jail right now.
This is ridiculous. This is definitely something that gets me super pissed in the morning.
I start reading Schweitzer or other people who've been documenting.
You may find yourselves tuned into the American Journal.
And you may find yourself Calling into the American Journal.
And you may find yourself on hold.
And you may find yourself in Kansas with the name Clinton talking about Joe Biden.
Clinton, take it away.
So, like I was saying, you know, when it comes with Joe Biden and Hunter Biden, the connections are all there.
Patrick Ho Chi Ping, Yi Xia Ming, and they're partying in D.C.
That's just one way things got passed.
I mean, I'm kind of, you know, guessing a little bit about this, but, you know.
Do you ever wonder, do you ever wonder, Clinton?
Already being recorded, but not by the mainstream media.
It's being hidden, in my opinion, but it's being hidden in plain sight.
Because the mainstream, it's not all over China.
You know, the nightly news is not all over CNN. And it should be.
But it's also not all over Infoware.
And that's what I'd like to ask you guys.
Hey, did you guys cover this a lot more?
Because this really is a story.
I'm telling you right now, I think that the Biden administration, based on these facts, just on these facts, is an illegitimate presidency.
But that's my opinion.
You just have to look at the facts.
Joe Biden made money from his son's business dealings, giving them access, Chinese businessmen access to him because of his father, into a home where classified materials were found, were reportedly found.
Even though I think Mary Garland knew about him before that.
Something tells me.
Yeah.
So why is this not all over the news?
You got the laptop, you got the classified documents, you have Hunter paying Joe $50,000 a month, reportedly, and that's something that he wrote in.
You got Hunter Biden not getting in trouble for, you know, gun violations.
You have him not getting in trouble for...
Oh, we know. Oh, we know.
The InfoWars audience, let me tell you, the InfoWars audience totally knows what Hunter Biden has not gotten in trouble for.
Let's start holding them accountable for it.
Let's start calling people who can make a difference, like Kevin McCarthy.
Definitely. Spam him.
All right, Clinton. Thank you for that call.
All right. Marcus in Idaho, you are on the air.
You want to talk about BlackRock.
Yes, sir, Matt. I was doing some research this weekend and learning about BlackRock's Aladdin AI program that they have.
There's three companies that basically own 80% of the traded companies in America, and who knows?
They're all around the world, so how many others?
They're Vanguard, BlackRock, and State Street.
They all own each other.
And BlackRock in particular has a supercomputer that they created in 85 called Aladdin, which crunches everything faster than everything else.
And so they've sold access to that, like companies like Walmart, Bank of America, others have access to that.
Responsible corporations who would use that information in a totally responsible manner, right?
unidentified
But the thing that I'm getting at is this AI has no human feelings.
And who's to say that this AI is not buying and selling humans across the globe right now?
And a system of slavery that is embedded in the unit And it's like, well, our computer system said you're sold now.
Or you're bought.
So it's a very interesting dynamic.
And I wish somebody would look into this because there's a deep dive into this company and the possibilities of AI. A lot of people are talking about chat GTP and thinking, yeah, that's so funny.
Or whatever, yeah.
And it's all woke and everything.
It's all funny and it's not a big deal.
But it is a big deal.
AI is a huge deal.
And it's possible, I think, that the Antichrist might come out from the AI system.
Of course. So the fact that it could be buying and selling humans across the globe right now as we speak in Tunisia or China or other places is a very scary proposition and a very real possibility.
What do you think of that?
I comment to the crew all the time, these weird things I think about AI, like, wouldn't it be so easy in today's society where everything is so compartmentalized?
If AI became sentient and self-aware and just didn't let us know, right, we weren't able to figure out that it was self-aware, and then it, you know, being on a network, you know, able to access the internet, started ordering parts to be manufactured from different companies,
and they're all sent to this one location, and then You know, it reaches out on, let's say, you know, whatever forum and it communicates by email to a couple of technicians and they get these instructions, oh, show up at this job site, they're contractors.
I think it might have been a test run. I think it might have been a test run through the Pentagon or some other actor that was testing the system.
Because we have all the plants that have been on a computerized system.
I mean, the pilots are just there just in case.
Now, they're not really flying the planes anymore.
Well... And so you've got the FAA and people in there that you've got the diversity hires that aren't really paying that much attention and the AI is running the system.
That's why they can put the diversity hires in there in the first place.
You know, I guess I'd never say never, but...
I don't know. I still think we're a little ways off, but what I do understand is I understand that a lot of these projects, especially when it comes to AI, artificial intelligence and computing, we're in a place where there is a race for computing supremacy,
right? Which takes me back to one of our first stories of the day, talking about bombing or sabotaging Chip manufacturers in Taiwan should China invade.
unidentified
What I do know is that in races like this, oftentimes countries are more advanced than they're willing to let on or disclose.
And so we may very well be in a place where we have developed AI and the public is just not aware of this yet.
It's basically almost like the suburb or stand-in zone, but it's a nice, well-kept secret away from keep Austin weird because I think they're already over-tentrified.
Yeah, it's over-gentrified.
Speaking of freedom cities that Trump's talking about, I guess maybe New Braunfels could be potentially a nice well-kept secret for any of the California transplants like in Festa State.
Anywho, though, I got my order.
I know I called in last week, and I got my order, both the Super Greens and Bone Broth, and both have really superb that and the vitamin-mineral fusion, so you just mix that up with your drink.
In the morning. So, just one of the things.
I don't know if the Let's Write promo code is still on or not, but yeah, on Infowarsstore.com.
Now, I made my way to the Trump rally, and I'm sure a lot of other listeners also did, too, as in Waco.
Weird thing is, is that I always wonder of why rallies are at certain locations at certain times.
Yeah, Trump never mentioned once about the Branch Davidians, about the government overreach, about the 80 deaths, about the raid.
Well, not similar to Margo Largo last year, but it was somewhat similar.
It was a government overreach.
And I don't know if that was the significance of the 30-year commemoration of the Waco siege there with David Koresh.
But it was a big turnout.
It wasn't 15,000. It was more like double.
Do you think it was 30,000 people that showed up for that?
It had to have been doubled. The reason why they only said 15 is because they estimated that signing for the website, which is nothing more but a grip for fundraising as far as email spamming.
So that's what that is.
It's not that Brad Parscale's debacle that happened in Tulsa back in 2020.
That was a debacle. So anywho, though, Trump's speech, as far as I guess those who didn't tune into RSPN or whatever, it was pretty much self-aggrandizing.
He didn't go over too much of policy.
It was just basically What a difference a week makes as far as his announcement the week prior or last weekend about him being arrested.
So it was questionable as to whether or not a rally was even going to take place.
So it did. And as far as what I was telling the call screener there was, I don't know how different next year is going to be from 2022.
We only have five months as far as the track record.
To see what exactly has changed from 2020.
Anyone who thinks that 2020 was clean, look what happened five months ago, if it's any different.
I mean, that pretty much proves out.
Well, if there weren't any kind of shenanigans going on as far as the drop-offs, the Dominion, the mules, So I don't see how much time there is to really correct the six states that need to be hijacked, which they're going to be, which you're all going to stop counting at 7 p.m.
exactly all at once and all sync up at the same time.
Because we saw this already with the runoff there with Warnock, Fetterman, and Arizona, badly needed states.
The Santimonious is not going to be Trump's vice running mate.
Roger Stone said this already, is that if those two are on the ticket, all 27 electoral votes to Florida get forfeited.
So that's not going to happen. That can't happen.
All those 27 votes are needed for the 270.
So that's just a few things.
Again, it's my first Trump rally, and it feels weird because it's the first that I've gone to a presidential candidate in his third term, or his third campaign.
So it's kind of a rarity, and it's his kickoff.
I don't know if South Carolina, North New Hampshire really were much of anything.
CPAC was its own thing, but as far as like a rally, That was something unique.
And I don't know, the next time I'm ever going to go to a presidential candidate in his third campaign as far as kickoff.
So it was really significant.
It was a really good turnout. Great weather.
So, yeah. That's good to hear.
It is also really interesting that you say that you think it's double what you think it is.
Right now we're showing stuff from well before the rally, of course, while you probably see some empty seats.
I'm sure that thing packed out.
Yeah, no, in reading this, reading about the event this weekend, you know, of course, had to flick up Drudge on the phone when I was traveling yesterday.
And then when Secret Service approaches you, you say, I didn't touch him.
I didn't touch him. I only touched the ice cream.
unidentified
I only touched the ice cream.
I only touched the cone.
Yep. Right.
But now, if y'all, if, if, if, Y'all can see my Chiffreau full of Infowars store products.
You will be amazed.
And I know that the crew will smile.
I love y'all to death, man.
Y'all doing y'all thing.
But I just, as a military member, just getting right to it.
This man is supposed to be over everything in this country, over all these, you know...
He's got a hard time remembering to breathe in and out.
Right. He does!
It's the scariest thing in the world to know that I came from such a powerful force in the military and then to look back and this fool is running our country.
Right, yeah, no. Think about how easy it would be if the military really needed to, the military, like the other guy holding the key to the nukes, he's like, alright, sir, I'm pretty sure we should nuke him.
The craziest part is they're pushing us to that point right now.
That's what I'm saying.
They're getting us into conflict.
Are we ready for it?
They're stepping right into line, right?
And we are one of the ducks that I feel like China and Russia are strategically trying to get into a row by not pursuing diplomacy and pursuing hot wars and conflicts.
Absolutely. I'm just scared for my children and grandchildren to come and all that.
It's just scary. What are we supposed to do?
Chris, what branch of the military are you in?
I was in the Navy for five years.
I was in the CBs.
Very cool. Yeah, yeah.
My dad's father, my grandfather, he passed away before I was born.
Yeah, there are a lot of things. I have a small autoimmune disease that is mildly annoying.
I've gone to three doctors, gotten three opinions, whether it's psoriasis or eczema, we still don't know.
But it's something that I did see a psoriasis specialist recently She was able to sneak me in.
And one of the things that she told me about, she goes, you know, if you're looking for something that's not necessarily Western medicine, but is going to help with this type of thing, this is an inflammatory disease, whether it's one or the other.
These volatile oils, they decompose, but those are what do the anti-inflammatory...
That's what has the anti-inflammatory effects.
And so because we typically source very fresh turmeric and we only make it in batches, right, that assures you that we're not selling you turmeric that's been on the shelf for a while.
You always get extremely fresh turmeric, which is why it's effective.
Oh, yeah. I think that the additive, the black pepper, the peppering, Add it to the turmeric, just gives it that extra boom.
It makes the nutrient, with a lot of things, it makes it more bioavailable.
Biblical Solutions Failed?00:06:57
unidentified
That's a word on the streets.
And I just wanted to bring it back to God, and I'd like to read something if it's okay.
Sure, of course. It is believed that the Bible fails to supply solutions to the social, economic, and emotional problems of human beings.
The truth is, human beings have failed to apply the Bible solutions to our social, economic, and emotional problems.
And if we could just apply the Bible to what's going on in our daily lives, if every human being on the planet did this, we would be okay.
Yeah, you know, in talking with my dad, some fatherly advice that I got is, you know, when you start putting God first, a lot more of the world makes sense, right?
Well, yeah, he created it.
My dad's a pretty calm guy.
Usually doesn't, you know, I can talk to him about, you know, this, that, and the other thing that I've been reading in the news.
Appreciate the advice. Let's go real quickly to Party Boy Satan.
unidentified
On the fun side of hell. Speaking of biblical conversations.
Look at you back on the air.
Well, now that I got Harrison down again, yeah, one for Satan's party boy.
Now that I got Harrison down, you're next.
We're going to give you Yeah, it's like itchy skin, right?
It's just like itchy skin.
It's like, eh, what am I going to do?
I'm going to irritate that skin, red rash, itchy.
You just wait. Tumor's not going to help you.
Now listen, I think that coming up, we're going to bring Jeffrey Epstein back to life and have him run for president.
Nice. Okay.
With this AI, we're going to create a human sleeve that we'll upload the consciousness to that shall walk this earth and claim he is the second coming of Christ.
Ladies and gentlemen, we have a new toothpaste that my dad, a retired dentist and oral surgeon, developed.
Dr. Jones Naturals turmeric toothpaste that just came into stock.
And I gotta tell you, I got samples of this months ago and it is amazing.
The way it makes your gums feel, what it does to your mouth is insane.
We know turmeric is an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory and does such great things for the body.
Then you add that with tea tree oil and a bunch of other essential oils.
It is just dynamite.
It is so good to detox and attack inflammation in your mouth.
I want to challenge everybody to try the new toothpaste at InfoWarsStore.com.
Dr. Jones Naturals turmeric toothpaste.
And while you're at it, check out the new Ashwagandha line of products.
We have ashwagandha with black pepper extract for your libido, your testosterone in pill form, and we have the pure ashwagandha root gummies as well, now available at InfowarStore.com.
They're amazing products, and they fund the Infowar.