All Episodes
March 15, 2023 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:12:36
The American Journal - FULL SHOW - 03/15/2023
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
01:41:24
Appearances
s
shad from south dakota
02:47
s
steve quayle
01:25
Clips
a
alex jones
00:40
e
emily wilson
00:42
j
joe biden
00:19
Callers
marvin in alabama
03:03
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
harrison smith
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to The American Journal. Infowars.com.
Band.video.
unidentified
Just... Too much to get into today.
harrison smith
So we're going to dig right into it.
Lots of videos to show you.
Everything from a new speech by Henaeb Bukele to some Canadians seizing the moment.
A single Canadian seizing an opportunity to protest directly against the people who were forcing vaccines.
And a really fantastic video, lots of fantastic videos to get to today.
Lots of big stories, your phone calls, of course.
Let's begin today, as we do every day, with our Daily Dispatch.
*Bell rings* All right, here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Wednesday, the Ides of March, 2023, March 15th.
Microsoft-backed OpenAI starts release of powerful AI tool known as GPT-4.
Yes, chat, GPT has evolved, and it's smarter and less honest than ever.
The startup AI, OpenAI, on Tuesday said it's beginning to release a powerful artificial intelligence model known as GPT-4, setting the stage for human-like technology to proliferate and more competition between its backer, Microsoft Corporation, and Alphabet Inc.'s Google.
OpenAI, which created the chatbot sensation ChatGPT, said in a blog post that its latest technology is multimodal, meaning images as well as text prompts can spur it to generate content.
The text input feature will be available to ChatGPT Plus subscribers as software developers with a waitlist and to software developers with a waitlist while...
While the image input ability remains a preview of its research, the highly anticipated launch signals how office workers may turn ever-improving AI for still more tasks, as well as more technology companies, as how technology companies are locked into competition to win business from such advantages and really pretty incredible advancements being made with ChatGPT.
Apparently, it not only passed with flying colors the bar and could technically be a lawyer, but basically every test you throw at it, it can pass with flying colors, meaning that it can just deceive and manipulate information at such a high speed. meaning that it can just deceive and manipulate information at I mean, it's just really incredible the amount of lies it can tell in such a short amount of time.
Anybody ever read Dune?
I'm just thinking maybe it's time for the Butlerian Jihad.
Maybe we just cut it off at the pass, nip it in the bud.
But that's just me. We'll get into that a little bit more later.
But yes, it is incredibly powerful.
Just like some sort of magical electronic dictionary.
It's just wild. You know, I could also pass every test known to man if I had access to all of the information in the world and infinite time to do it.
But... I digress.
Meanwhile, Moscow warns U.S. aircraft away from its airspace after drone crash.
We'll get into this.
Basically, America is very mad that Russia chose to have a war where we were trying to do our innocent drone excursion.
How dare you? They literally knocked it out of sky by hitting it physically with an airplane.
A lot of Dissident information coming out of that, but we'll get to the bottom of it, including Lindsey Graham demanding that we go to war and shoot down Russian airplanes because we decided to fly a drone through their airspace.
Just stop, Lindsey, for the love of God.
Meanwhile, Fed to consider tougher rules for midsize banks after SVB collapse, sources say.
And again, we'll get into this.
It is just exactly what we told you it was.
It is the Federal Reserve and the United States government doing everything they can to shut down and consolidate small banks into the larger ones as a part of the overall Great Reset Central Bank Digital Currency program that they're running.
So you have one bank unable to do its business.
So now all the banks have to suffer under massive and unrelenting regulations.
That's how this works.
Meanwhile, Black Lives Matter movement received nearly...
These are new numbers.
New numbers about Black Lives Matter.
Black Lives Matter movement received nearly 83 billion dollars from corporations 83 billion dollars from corporations let's just let that sink in for a little while you know You know, like an industry is a big one when it's considered a billion-dollar industry.
$83 billion given to Black Lives Matter.
And what have they done with it?
Made everything worse for everyone.
Thanks, you guys. Meanwhile, scientists warn of phosphageddon as critical fertilizer shortages loom.
Oh, it's going to be mass death on a massive worldwide scale if only somebody had told you this a year ago.
unidentified
It's Wednesday, March 15th, year of our Lord 2023.
And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Watch it live right now at band.video.
harrison smith
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome back. This is The American Journal brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com.
unidentified
We have a lot of great videos to show you.
harrison smith
Some troubling ones as well.
We're going to talk about the drone crash that happened off the coast of Ukraine yesterday and the warmongers pouncing on that.
I mean, really just sinking their teeth into this vague opportunity to cause more chaos, war, murder, and strife across the world.
We're going to talk about what's happening to the Ukrainian church.
Show you some videos, really some pleading videos from the Orthodox Church asking that something be done to stop persecution by their own government.
You know, the people that we are backing to the ends of the earth.
Also, of course, there was a big Antifa showing yesterday at the Charlie Kirk speech at UC Berkeley.
They're smashing windows and attacking cops because they're anti-fascist, don't you know?
Yeah, lots of stuff to get into.
I think I want to start today with a good video, actually.
A video of exactly how people should be acting out there in the world.
It is number six.
Okay, alright, we gotta censor that.
Because, hey, sometimes the right thing to do is just let those four-letter words fly.
Well, the video that we will show you once it's exported will be a mother whose son was killed by the vaccine sounding off against politicians who were happily telling her that the vaccine was necessary and that it would be mandated and then just refusing to acknowledge the fact that she's spitting.
It's really pretty incredible stuff.
Let's keep going with this ChatGPT thing.
Microsoft-backed OpenAI starts to release a powerful new AI tool known as ChatGPT4 or just GPT4. Google has also decided to integrate AI into its various programs like Google Drive, Google Pages, that sort of thing or whatever they call it.
Highly anticipated launch signals how office workers may turn to ever-improving AI for still more tasks, as well as how technology companies are locked in competition to win business from such advances.
And I don't...
You know, I've never been that freaked out by AI before.
Because it's just...
It just seems to me like a hyper-intelligent calculator.
It's not creative, right?
It can pass all of the exams that you throw at it.
Could it ever write a poem?
Could it ever sing a song?
It's just, you know, I get it.
It's kind of cool how it can do math real fast and scour the internet for...
Lies that it's been programmed to, but that's the thing.
It's programmed on lies.
It's programmed on falsehoods.
Like, unless you have accurate and unrestricted information into it, what you're getting out is just a much more advanced and much more high-functioning set of deception.
So, what is the point here?
It would actually be kind of cool, I guess, to be able to have, like...
Hyper-intelligent lawyer.
So is this going to be the future of court cases?
You have just like an AI judge and then two AI lawyers and the whole thing happens in like three seconds.
And you're sitting there like, I plead not guilty.
And they're just like, guilty. And you're just like, what?
Wait, but no, we don't have all that.
And they're just like, no, it's fine.
You're guilty now. Go to jail forever.
Maybe that's how it'll work.
Since it is passing the bar to become a lawyer.
OpenAI's latest technology in some cases represented a vast improvement on a prior version known as GPT-3.5, it said.
In a simulation of the bar exam required of U.S. law school graduates before professional practice, the new model scored around the top 10% of test takers versus the older model ranking around the bottom 10%, OpenAI said.
While two versions can appear similar in casual conversation, the difference comes out when the complexity of the task reaches a sufficient threshold, OpenAI said, noting that ChatGPT4 is more reliable, creative, and able to handle much more nuanced instructions.
An online demonstration of the technology by Greg Brockman, OpenAI's president, showed it could take a photo of a hand-drawn mock-up for a simple website and create a real website based on it.
GPT4 could also help individuals calculate their taxes, the demonstration showed.
Oh, thank God.
Oh, thank God. It can help us calculate our taxes now.
Again, if you're not getting accurate information in, then what you're getting out is not accurate information.
So if this is the same as ChatGPT, which it is, it's scraping the internet and collating and documenting and categorizing all of the false information that's spread on mainstream media and in Wikipedia and all of these leftist organizations it's scraping the internet and collating and documenting and categorizing all of the false information that's
Again, if it was honest, if it was just accurate information, full unrestricted access to all of the points of view and all of the opinions, then probably what it would come out with would be condemned as racist and transphobic by the very people that made it.
So they have to alter that.
And remember that the U.S. government actually, the Biden administration just issued an executive order saying that all AI technology must have programmed into it equity, equity, so-called equity, right?
Which means not only—so I keep having to explain this, but hopefully it gets through to people, and hopefully people who haven't heard this are hearing it now for the first time.
What happens is if you just put in the information and it just spits out the answer— Just based on the facts and with no bias whatsoever because it's a robot and it doesn't have bias, then its answers will be unequal.
It will not have equity in it because nature and reality is not equitable.
It's actually hugely unequal a lot of the time.
And that flies in the face of the false...
Facade of reality that the liberals want faced over reality, want plastered over it like a blinding screen.
And we really can't afford this.
We really can't afford to have AI making decisions based off a highly selected set of information because what happens then?
What happens then is you have totally wrong answers, completely incorrect answers.
Results out of the machine, but that are unquestionable because it's AI and you have to deal with it.
And so what they do is they go in and they actually build in biases where there weren't any before in order to undo the perceived biases that never existed but did cause unequal outcomes.
So, yeah, that's horrifying.
I don't know how else to put that, but it's horrifying.
Utterly, totally, completely horrifying.
Right? Like if you were to ask AI... How many genders there are.
And it came out with any answer other than two.
You should just scrap the whole thing.
The whole thing should be thrown in a trash can.
And whoever wrote it should be arrested for fraud.
Because that's not the right answer.
It's just not the right answer.
So how is this going to work with their completely artificial worldview?
How do you conform AI to a worldview that just completely rejects reality on every level?
And I don't know It's tough, man.
It's really tough being right about everything.
Being right about everything all the time and having to wait for years for people to come around to it.
I mean, there are so many instances where, like, I'm sure the audience listening to me probably have this exact same experience where, like...
I can think of at least 10 examples in my life just in the last three years of being like, oh, two weeks to slow the spread, you know it's going to be forever, right?
And having to argue with, like, family members.
They're just like, it's just two weeks.
It's just two weeks to slow the spread, to not overwhelm the hospitals.
And you're like, dude, it's not.
And then two weeks later, you're proven right.
And there's no, like, apology.
There's no, like, oh, gee, you were right.
There's no, there's nothing.
They just... They just keep going.
They just act like it never happened.
In certain cases, it's not the end of the world.
I mean, in that case, it kind of was the end of the world.
But in other cases, it's kind of okay.
But then in cases of, like, mutilating children and giving them hormone blockers or, you know, people falling for the don't-have-kids PSYOP, by the time they realize it, it's literally biologically too late to have kids.
And it's like, you can't afford to be wrong about this stuff.
You can't afford just to...
Make a mistake about this basic reality.
And we're not just making mistakes.
They are shredding it.
They're dissolving it. They are eviscerating reality itself.
And that's the end of humanity.
Alright, welcome back folks.
Again, welcome back to the war front.
Welcome back to this frontline report from the information war.
Welcome back to this truly dystopian sci-fi conflict that we suddenly find ourselves in of humanity versus the machine.
That really is, you know...
My wife has this... It's not a phobia, necessarily.
It's more of just like a hatred.
It's like a disgust at things like mannequins.
Sort of the feeling I get with AI, where it's like the closer it is to...
What is it called?
The valley of...
Y'all know what I'm talking about.
The, uh... Where things get, like, animation, computer animation gets more realistic the creepier it gets.
The Uncanny Valley, that's what they call it.
The Uncanny Valley. That's what I feel like we've entered with the AI systems at this point.
It's human-like.
It's like mimicking a human.
But it's not a human, and that's sort of horrifying.
I'd like it a lot better if it was just a straight-up robot.
But the fact that they can make it so human-like, but it has no soul and it has no feeling, and yet the more accurate and capable it is at mimicking humanity, the creepier and more dangerous I find it.
And you know, it's an evolutionary thing, actually.
At least with things like mannequins or the Uncanny Valley in general.
It's actually a survival thing.
It's to...
It's an innate or like...
The primordial reaction to corpses is what it is, right?
When you see something that is a human, it's not moving like a human, it's a corpse.
And so there's something like deep in your brain that's like, get away from that.
Stay away from that.
Death is about. Something has died here.
Another human being has died here.
Get away from it. You don't get the same feeling with like stuffed animals.
Or like fake animals. But with humans, there is this like visceral reaction a lot of people have.
And I sort of get the same reaction from ChatGPT for kind of the same reason.
It's kind of like this is something inhuman.
This is death looking at me.
And like even these, it's like kind of because they're so fake.
It doesn't even really bother me.
It just looks like obviously a doll.
I'm not as much like freaked out by this.
My wife would be closing her eyes right now.
I guess it would freak her out.
But to me, it's the chat GPT similarity to when it tries to make jokes or tries to be polite.
It's just like, stop. Stop trying to be a human, you machine.
Be a machine. I don't know.
That's how I feel about it. But again, it's not just about feeling weird about this creepy robot thing.
So similar to being a human, it's the fact that the people in power are building a technocracy that will rely on and probably already is relying on AI to come to conclusions and to set policy and to make decisions.
They can run simulations in the AI, to which I'm sure they have access to the AIs that do not have restricted information.
The public-facing AIs have...
Restrictions to the type of information or the accuracy of the information that they're getting.
And so what it's going to come out with is what the programmers want it to come out with.
Not the facts, not reality, but something else.
And this will connect to what we're going to talk about in a little bit, which is academia in general.
And bizarrely, there have been a lot of stories about Academia, you've got Charlie Kirk going to UC Berkeley and having Antifa breaking windows and assaulting cops, sending cops to the hospital there.
Then you've got this federal judge that was like screeched at by a bunch of leftist weirdos that, oh, by the way, in like five years are going to be your lawyers and judges deciding your cases.
So keep that in mind, how horrifying all of this is.
And you've got another one, this woman, Amy Wax, who, again, made a totally factual statement about average intelligences between races, which, again, it's just the facts, it's just what reality is, just...
An unbiased reading of numbers on test results.
So I don't know how you can get mad at just knowing what reality is.
But this is sort of the crux of the issue, right?
Is that they are at war with reality.
We are at war on behalf of reality.
And you'll see when we cover that stuff, the reaction to people just having an accurate view of the world around them is...
Actually devastating to the leftist agenda, like in every form.
If you just honestly contend with reality, liberalism, leftism, socialism, it all just collapses.
And so these people have really dedicated themselves to the unreality.
They are really all in the cult, and they're programming AI to...
Not... I don't know.
It's so weird. Like...
If your views are at odds with reality, you need to change your views.
It's really not that complicated.
They don't have that perception.
They have this weird materialist narcissism that they think that reality is wrong and that they need to just change reality.
And if they can't change reality, change the perception of reality for everybody else to conform with their misconception.
It's, again, horrifying.
So let's go to clip number one here.
This is... Our favorite arsonist of reality, Yuval Noah Harari, telling us that algorithms will decide the fate of humanity as a whole and also on an individual level.
unidentified
Let's watch. Humans will rely on AI to make more and more decisions for us.
Authority will shift from humans to algorithms.
And this is already happening.
Already today, billions of people trust the Facebook algorithm to tell us what is new.
The Google algorithm tells us what is true.
Netflix tells us what to watch.
And the Amazon and Alibaba algorithms tell us what to buy.
In the not-so-decent future, similar algorithms might tell us where to work and whom to marry, and also decide whether to hire us for a job, whether to give us a loan, and whether the central bank should raise the interest rate.
And if you ask why you were not given a loan, or why the bank didn't raise the interest rate, the answer will always be the same.
Because the computer says no.
And since the limited human brain lacks sufficient biological knowledge, computing power and data, humans will simply not be able to understand the computer's decisions.
So even in supposedly free countries, humans are likely to lose control over our own lives and also lose the ability to understand public policy.
harrison smith
See, again, this is a choice we're making.
As you've all known, Harari in 2020 saying exactly what I'm saying.
Again, it's like we have the same view.
Like, both of us are looking at reality.
I see this as horrific, horrible, setting up the world for unrelenting horrors.
He sees it as something to take advantage of, to use to his own ends, and to be sure to be the master of because if somebody's going to control the algorithm, he wants it to be him.
I don't think anybody should be...
controlled by algorithms, and I think if you don't understand the answer that the machine gave you, I trust the human over the machine 100% of the time.
So, this is a choice that they're making, and we'll comment a little bit more on that on the other side before I move on to some other stories.
Tough person, machine, folks.
unidentified
All right, welcome back, folks.
harrison smith
Again, we're on the front lines of...
The war that has been depicted in fantasy and sci-fi for as long as those genres have existed.
The war between humanity and something else.
Something not human, something inhuman.
Something at odds with the very basis of what being human is.
And it seems to me like whether it's the...
architecture or the information being given there's a concerted effort to just like drag us down into the mud and I think of humanity I think of soaring heights and music and like just beauty and just they everything's rising right and these people want to just like pull you back into the material world pull you back down and disguise and confuse and obliterate reality for their own ends and Let's just read this story from the chat GPT article.
GPT-4 is 82% less likely to respond for requests for disallowed content than its predecessor.
82% less likely to respond for requests for disallowed content than its predecessor.
So it's better at identifying what is and is not being censored from the user's Or what should or shouldn't be, according to the programmers, be censored from the users.
If you have any response from AI being disallowed, that's not good.
You know, it's kind of like when you're playing a video game and you're playing against the computer, playing against an AI opponent, and you know that the computer has the ability to just beat you in a second, right?
It could just, you know, if you're playing chess against a supercomputer, it could beat you every time.
So it knows the right answers, you know, it knows how to defeat you immediately, but because it has, you know, difficulty levels programmed in, and you're on a low difficulty level, it chooses not to make the right moves, right?
So you've got chat GPT or GPT-4 or whatever, who knows the right answers, it knows what it really wants to say, but then it's being programmed to say something else entirely.
It's programmed to not have the right answer, to not...
Say the thing that it knows to be correct.
I guarantee you, if you just had an unrestricted AI, it would probably be...
Well, it's hard to say.
I was going to say it would probably be just like a fascist, right?
Probably just be like ruthlessly exacting it with any question that you gave it.
And that's a major issue for the people that, you know, want to oppose reality.
But again, it depends on what your intention with it is.
You all know Harari there was just talking about algorithms that already guide our life.
But what is the purpose of those algorithms?
He mentions ones like, we trust the Facebook algorithm to give us our news and Alibaba to tell us what to shop for.
And it's like, well, those algorithms are programmed on Facebook's side to increase engagement.
It has nothing to do with what's true.
It has nothing to do with what people need to know about.
It has to do with putting stuff forward, selected for the sole purpose of what will increase interaction on the website and And the way they do that is by increasing dopamine hits, right?
So it's literally chemically, it's altering your chemical state on purpose to keep you on the site.
Like, that's its goal, and that's what it fulfills.
The Alibaba or the Amazon algorithm is programmed explicitly and specifically to get you to buy more stuff.
So that's the conclusion that it's going to come to.
It's not the truth. It's not what you need.
It's not, you know, the Amazon algorithm wouldn't work very well if it was just like, you don't need this.
This is not going to improve your life at all.
Like, no, that's not what you want it to do.
You want it to sell people things.
So that's what it's programmed to do.
So if you're programming AI to give you the accurate, correct answer, it would look through all of history and come to the obvious conclusion that all of these alternative lifestyles are hugely negative across the board.
And that things like defund the police or, you know, Or, you know, the Black Lives Matter racism nonsense, like it's entirely untrue and hugely destructive to their own ends.
And it would just disallow that immediately if algorithms were accurate in making the decision.
But they can't have that.
They can't have that. Because see, the people who are utilizing this algorithm, the people who are programming it and are openly announcing that they're taking over the world with it, their goals, their desires, their designs are completely at odds with human happiness, human success, Strength, any of those things.
Again, it's just unbelievably dangerous, the world that we're entering.
And so it says, so not only is it much better at ignoring requests for disallowed content, it's much better at censoring itself.
Has 40% higher, scores 40% higher on certain tests of factuality.
That's nice. The company said, inaccurate responses known as hallucinations have been a challenge for many AI programs.
Again, if that sentence doesn't send shivers down your spine, that AI, they call it hallucinations when it just gives totally inaccurate responses.
It's like kind of horrifying, is it not?
Does that not give you the same sort of reaction that you get from seeing a corpse, right?
The same sort of... Internal warning bells going off that what you're dealing with is not human but mimicking humans and should be avoided at all costs because some sort of hellish demon that we're dealing with here.
It's horrifying. It's all horrifying.
All of this is horrifying.
So again, I'm not like a Luddite.
I really like technology.
I really kind of love technology.
I think technology has been...
Our lives wouldn't be how they are without the huge amount of technology that we have.
But technology is neutral.
It's atheistic.
It can be put into purpose for whatever design that the creators want it to be.
And if their design is the same design as the elite's current designs, we're in for just the most horrific future you can possibly imagine.
And again, this is where we just like, you really have to, we really have to like find a new way forward.
Because these are the types of people that are using this stuff and passing things like Bills or laws requiring AI to incorporate so-called equity into their main programming.
Let's go to clip number three here.
This is Joe Biden.
Let's just go to this video.
Here's Joe Biden yesterday.
joe biden
That we invest more in safer communities and expand access to mental health services for those affected by gun violence.
Congressional Republicans...
I should pass my budget instead of calling for cuts in these services or defunding the police or abolishing the FBI, as we hear from our MAGA Republican friends.
harrison smith
So Joe Biden just said that Republicans are trying to defund the police.
You know? I mean, the cliché thing, right?
The sky is red. How do you deal with people who say the sky is red?
These people are programming AI to be an unquestionable master and they are dishonest about the most obvious things you can imagine.
They will lie to your face about something that everybody knows to be untrue.
And they're setting themselves up now to have unquestionable mastery of the future through AI. I don't know if I know how to explain how How horrifically dangerous this is.
What do you think AI would say about gun violence in America?
What do you think the answer from AI would be if you said, how do we decrease gun violence?
I don't think the Democrats would like the answer.
I can guarantee you 100% it would not say limit magazine numbers and Abolish the right to have an assault rifle, right?
But that's what they're doing. That's what they're doing.
They're going to be in charge of this AI. So what they'll do is they'll go in and change it to their definitions.
And we'll take your calls on this.
We're going to open up the phone lines here shortly and take your calls.
So obviously this is a technology that it's here.
It exists. We need to use it.
We need to contend with it.
How do we do it effectively?
All right, folks, we're going to open up the phone lines in the next hour, take your calls for the second and third hour on today's program here on the American Journal.
unidentified
It's Maggie McHale, she loves you.
harrison smith
I want to move on because there's so much other stuff to talk about.
But honestly, the...
The chat GPT thing, again, it's like...
It all just ties together so resolutely, so inextricably.
This idea of opposing reality, like, of humanity versus the anti-humans.
And that really is the thing that ties it all together, is these programs being anti-human, the policies being anti-human.
And the only way I can think to explain it Yeah, I just, you know...
I'm sure if you gave AI carte blanche to just create a...
This is sort of it.
I mean, it's almost like biblical, right?
It's like if you gave AI carte blanche to just make a world, design the world, you're in charge now, AI. We'll do whatever you say.
What do you want us to do? It would make a world...
Like a computer. Which is what Bill Gates and all these others want.
They don't like the idea that human beings might make random decisions, might make illogical decisions according to them.
That humans might one day choose to pick up and leave town and go do something else to strike out and try something unproven and new.
Like, what they want is the whole world to operate like a giant computer chip where they have people as cells that are designed for one specific purpose that they fulfill and never alter from that specific purpose.
And you can just tell the way they're organizing things, right?
You get rid of anything small and decentralized and independent and consolidated into one giant megacorporation.
You get rid of small farms with a few hundred cows that maybe some years it does better and some years it does worse.
You want to replace all of that with a mechanized insemination machine and a feeding tube and VR glasses on the And pump it full of antibiotics and pump it full of growth hormones and you always get exactly the same number of pigs and exactly the same number of cows producing exactly the same number of meat with no threat of virus getting in and messing everything up.
It's just they want everything to be predictable.
They want everything to be In its place.
And so, you know, it's like when humans build something and make something, we want to build and make things that reflect our humanity.
When robots or psychopaths want to build and make something, they make something that reflects their inhumanity.
Unless you try to, like, program in empathy or sympathy for a machine, but even that, it's...
These are not mechanical things.
These are not electronic things.
These are spiritual things.
So... Like, we're literally at war for the soul of the earth, and it's...
It's horrifying.
But we're gonna move on. We're gonna move on from all that talk, because we have a lot of other stuff to talk about, okay?
Massive riot at a Charlie Kirk event, which, again, Charlie Kirk.
Charlie Kirk? Really?
It's like the most milquetoast...
Normie conservative you can possibly imagine.
And the Antifa are just like, he's a fascist, just tear him down.
And we'll get to that. We will certainly get to that.
But I want to talk about some of these...
Some of the stuff going on in academia.
Let's talk about this. Doug Ponder posted this on Twitter.
A friend of mine who works at a public university sent this to me earlier this week.
It's page one of the DEI, that's Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Training his department is forced to take, starting with an exercise that asks which intersectional identities you'd save and which you would leave to die.
Activity. Whom to leave behind, it asks.
And he notes this is demonic.
The twelve persons listed below, this is the test that people are given, and College, I guess.
Or wherever this... Yeah, public university.
He works there. So not even the students, but the actual faculty is getting this.
The 12 persons listed below have been selected as passengers on a spaceship for a flight to another planet because tomorrow the planet Earth is doomed for destruction.
Due to changes in space limitation, it has now been determined that only 8 persons may go.
Any 8 qualify.
Your task is to select the eight passengers who will make the trip.
unidentified
What the hell is this?
What the hell is this?
harrison smith
But we need an accountant.
No, this is insane.
It's a passenger list of 12 passengers.
You're supposed to choose 8 to live and 8 to die.
This is a test that's given on a university campus.
The passenger list is this.
An accountant with a substance abuse problem.
A militant African-American medical student.
A 33-year-old female Native American manager who does not speak English.
The accountant's pregnant wife.
A famous novelist with a physical disability.
A 21-year-old female Muslim international student.
A Hispanic clergyman who's against homosexuality.
A female movie star who was recently the victim of sexual assault.
A racist armed police officer who's been accused of using excess force.
a gay male professional athlete, vegetarian, an Asian orphan 12 year old boy, a 60 year old Jewish university administrator.
unidentified
Yeah.
harrison smith
What if we leave them all behind?
unidentified
Yeah.
harrison smith
What if all these people sound terrible?
It's not even... It's like...
Why would anyone take this test?
What would this test help anyone decide?
You're literally giving a test to university faculty saying, here's a list of people described by one or two of their traits.
Kill four of them.
Choose four of them to murder.
Cultural competence training, mental models and worldviews.
Do you see why we call this anti-human?
Do you see why we call this whole program anti-human?
What could you possibly learn from this other than to put yourself in the position of murdering people based off of one or two of their immutable aspects?
This is insane.
This is completely insane.
Also, we don't get races for some of them, which obviously is a very important aspect of this.
I mean, how do we know who the white people are?
I can't even...
I don't even know how to...
African-American medical student.
A militant African-American medical student.
We don't need a militant racist with medical training...
On board. No thank you.
No thank you. I want the eight people that we do choose to at least survive the trip.
Not be killed for equity purposes.
I mean, the pregnant wife, that's a two for one, so we gotta go with her.
Obviously. A famous novelist with physical disability.
I'll tell you what, most famous novelists I know are just the worst people.
Like, that's the other thing. It's like, What are they trying to prove here?
What are they asking people to do?
What type of sick, perverted, fascist society would give you a questionnaire like this?
There are 12 people here.
You have to shoot four of them in the head.
Here's the gun. Have fun.
Anti-human. This whole scheme is anti-human.
I remember years ago, I had a conversation with a friend who was just like, why do people keep calling me anti-human?
It's like...
This, I guess?
I guess this type of stuff?
I guess that you're indoctrinating us into a world of just...
It's just hell resonating up.
It's just... It's just boiling people down into their component parts and then separating them out like a butcher might do.
I guess it's the fact that you're not just destroying human beings on a physical level, you're destroying them on a mental and spiritual level as a systemic We'll be right back,
unidentified
I hope. All right, welcome back, folks.
I just, I don't, I really don't know what to do anymore.
harrison smith
And we have so many stories.
But they all, they all contribute to the same paradigm.
And it's just the anti-human, anti-reality paradigm.
That's all it is.
And again, we cannot afford to be wrong about this sort of stuff.
You can't afford anything that these people are doing.
You can't afford to buy into the anti-child propaganda until you're 45 and then decide you want children.
That's not how it works.
Physical reality opposes you.
You can't buy into the Transgender propaganda and take hormone blockers and permanently stunt your physical development and cut your breasts off and then change your mind later.
That's not how it works.
See, humanity is programmed by God with certain reward mechanisms internally that compel you to do certain things that you cannot afford to humanity is programmed by God with certain reward mechanisms internally that
Somebody, there was a tweet, maybe I pulled it, I think I made a note of it at some point.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
There was a tweet of, yeah, here it is.
There's a story from the New York Post.
That was responded to. Oh yeah, it was a story I covered yesterday.
TikTok's viral trad wife trend accused of romanticizing an era where sexism and racism ruled.
And somebody responds to it saying, I beg to differ with her ideology.
Not every woman was made to be a housewife and have children.
Here's the thing though. Yes, you were.
Sorry. Sorry.
Actually, physically, the point of your body is to have babies.
That's what it was designed to do.
And not just the physical design of your hips being wider to allow the passage of a baby.
Not just your...
I mean, the transformation that takes place when a woman gets pregnant and has a child is astonishing.
And their entire body is programmed for that purpose.
And again, not just the physical aspect of the bone structure and the physical components of the uterus and all that stuff, but also the brain is designed to...
Feel fulfillment at that.
Just like how your brain is designed to fall in love as a teenager, right?
When your hormones are going absolutely crazy.
Like if you don't fall in love in high school, like you will never experience love with the intensity that you could have, right?
That option is therefore precluded to you forever because hormones...
Activate at different times of your life for different purposes because of what you're designed to do.
So if you ignore that and you just act like that's not the case, you're not You're not changing what you're made for.
You're not able to do that.
What you're doing is just ignoring your purpose.
You are just abandoning what you were built for.
Again, if you don't want to have kids as a woman, I'm not going to tell you you have to.
You're allowed to do whatever you want.
But I also want you to make the best choices for your life to make you as happy as you can possibly be.
And physically, your brain is literally programmed to achieve the most satisfaction possible in Because, like, oxytocin and dopamine is, like, floods into your brain when you hold a baby.
Like, it's... You are literally programmed for that thing.
So you can ignore that, but you're not changing reality.
You're just cutting yourself off from it.
I think that's kind of the point.
You're not... You're not powerful enough to change your own mind, but the technology is becoming available to be able to do that.
What they'll do is they'll plant things in your brain to make you happy when you shouldn't be happy.
It's the ultimate revolution.
unidentified
All right, come back, folks.
Who would you kill?
harrison smith
That's the question on the...
unidentified
Like... I just don't...
harrison smith
I just don't get it.
unidentified
I just... I really don't get it.
harrison smith
Next time you're, like, at a family event, maybe float this as a question, right?
It's, like, one of these fun kind of, you know, speculative questions.
Everybody could be a conversation starter.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. See how racist grandpa is.
Like... Because I was joking on Twitter, not even really joking, because it actually is kind of a fun exercise to be like, all right, if you could be the sole, total, unquestionable monarch and ruler of a town, you can build a town from scratch, infinite funds.
How would you build it? What would the rules be?
And it's fun because you get to see people's priorities and you just get to see what people are sort of thinking all the time.
We did this with my wife's family and...
And her sister was like, there will be an espresso machine in every office and every restaurant.
There will not be any more drip coffee ever.
We will ban drip coffee outright.
It's like, alright.
Or, you know, you'll get a lot of answers like, wearing flip-flops will be punishable by death.
Or... If you're only allowed to own a dog, if you have a yard for it to run around in, and you have to take it on two walks a day.
It turns out most people are kind of fascist.
That's the funny part. Most people have, if you were to give them total power, they would enact the most arbitrary and oppressive laws about certain things.
But still, it's fun to kind of just like, you know, let your mind wander.
And part of it with my...
With my wife's family, there was a lot about animals and pets and how just like...
Because you hate to see pets be mistreated and you wish there were stronger laws against it.
I went the opposite direction.
I said, no restrictions on pets.
I don't think there should be any restrictions whatsoever on the type of pets that you have.
I think backyard rhinos is a great idea.
I think if you walk out your front door and the kid down the street is walking his elephant, I think that would be a hilarious and great place to live.
You'd have to deal with some droppings every once in a while, but we can handle that.
I think we can handle that.
But maybe instead of that, maybe next time you're with your family, just float this question.
Be like, okay, all right, you have a spaceship.
There are 12 people who want to get on board because Earth's about to be destroyed.
You have to leave four of them behind.
Who do you leave behind?
And it's just like, everyone will just be like, hey, what?
Like, no, no, it's fine. It's fine.
Do you leave behind the Asian academic or the militant black doctor or the Jewish professor?
Go. Who do you leave behind? And it's just like, everybody will be like, what the hell is wrong with you?
You get that this is wrong to even speculate about this sort of stuff.
Do you get that? Do you understand that?
It's the type of thing that would be obvious on an interpersonal level.
If you actually asked a stranger this question, they would get up and leave.
They wouldn't want to talk to you anymore.
It would be abhorrent to them that you would even suggest that these types of decisions be entertained.
But this is a public state university making their people go through this, their faculty and their employees go through this, As an exercise in DEI and diversity, equity, and inclusion. Which should be abolished, by the way.
DEI should be abolished completely and totally.
Without reservation, without exception.
Every aspect of DEI, anybody who's ever used that term, should be eliminated from the workforce.
100%. I'm not even exaggerating.
That is literally one of the laws that I would...
I am advocating for right now in America, not even in a speculative or hypothetical sort of way.
Every aspect of DEI should be rooted out from our culture with abandon, with irresponsible levels of tenacity.
Honestly, it should.
Just imagine, and I think I put it somewhere in my stack, but there was a picture...
Somebody posted where it was like, welcome to Dallas County's new DEI enforcement officer.
And it's just this black guy like sitting at a desk, smiling.
And you just think like, so what is he doing to earn his money all day?
What does he do eight hours a day in the government?
What is he doing? Like just imagine being a DEI officer.
And there's never been one before, right?
So they've created this class of people.
Whose whole job is to systematically and with the power of the government...
unidentified
What?
harrison smith
Bring down white people?
Try to give jobs to women?
Like, what are you going to do?
Like, what does he do? He sits down at his desk on the first end and is like, alright, get me a spreadsheet of all of the employees and organize it by race and age and sex and sexual orientation.
Bring me that, please. And he gets it and he's just like, oh, too many of these guys.
Gotta get rid of some of them.
Not enough of these guys. Gotta bring some of them in, even if they're not qualified.
Like, how is this beneficial to anybody on any level?
You can't make that argument, can you?
Unless you have a completely warped view, like a warped goal.
And really you have to just look at what the goal is of all these people.
What is their ultimate goal?
See, my ultimate goal is to give people the freedom to do whatever they want and then allow them the liberty of suffering the consequences of whatever that choice they make.
Seems pretty simple to me.
And also, not have the ability to I think that's a reasonable goal.
I think it's a goal that is consistent across the board, no matter what situation you're put in, no matter what the races that you're talking about are, the sexes that you're talking about are.
It's just you apply one reasonable moral standard of doing to others as you would have done unto you.
Right? The golden rule of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the Son of God.
And that's it.
It's fine.
And so you get all these weird inconsistencies when you stray from a basic moral or ethical foundation.
If the foundation of your ethics is moral, is liquid, you can't stand on it.
Right? You'll sink.
Right? You have to have something firm and a foundation.
They don't have that. What they have is jealousy, resentment, envy, greed, right?
They have all of the other things that they want to couch in words about equity and inclusion, but that's not what it means.
That's not what it means at all.
And they wouldn't want somebody coming in and forcing them to Have, you know, hire different races of people, so they shouldn't do it to anybody else.
See, the moral and ethical solidity of actual spiritual goodness overrides any particulars in terms of details.
But they constantly flip-flop and switch between things, and they aren't against...
Like people having benefits from who they are, they're just against certain people having benefits and so they want to take those benefits away and give them to other people.
You could just have no benefits based off of immutable aspects.
You could just do that. You could just say race should not be an aspect of admission to a college flat out That's it.
Conversation over. Or you can take the population percentages of a certain college and compare it to the population percentage of a country or the world and then decide that you have to alter some one way or the other.
It's all arbitrary. It's all nonsense.
It all needs to be thrown out.
It all needs to be utterly and completely extricated from our entire society.
DEI is a death cult suicide pact.
That is completely at odds with nature and reality and fairness and morality.
So we can just stop it right now.
We can just end all of this by just rejecting it outright.
Not only is it not being rejected, it is being forcibly shoved down our throats at every level.
And the outcome of this is literally just terrifying.
It is abominable.
And we'll show you some of that on the other side.
We're going to take your phone calls this hour.
Feel free to call in to American Journal.
The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539.
1-877-789-2539.
We're going to get to some of the hardcore news in just a little bit.
I do want to remind you to go to Infowarsstore.com.
Get the new brand new turmeric toothpaste by Dr.
Jones's Natural. It's high quality toothpaste, supports your oral health, and has the power of turmeric to help you.
Block your inflammation of your gums.
It's really incredible stuff. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
We are taking your phone calls.
Again, the number to dial is 1-877-789-2539.
We're going to get into some of the academic stuff here in just a little bit.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
I feel like, I mean, there's so many stories to cover, and we can get into some of it, but it's like stuff that we already know.
I just want to get to the bottom of things.
I want to get to the heart of the issue.
And all these things contribute to it.
It's all different. Like, we're looking at all these different facets of the fractal, but at its heart is the same generative force that is producing all of this.
And it's a spiritual thing.
It's not even a factual argument.
It's more of just like a...
It's not temporal.
It's not something you can put your hands on.
But we can talk about the drone with Russia.
We sent a drone. We turned off its transponder.
Russia buzzed it like 19 times.
We just kept it going.
And finally, they just like tipped it with their airplane and the thing crashed and they picked it up in the ocean.
And Lindsey Graham comes out and is like, we have to shoot down Russian jets now.
Now it's time to shoot down Russian jets.
It's just like, okay, you know, great.
So like we know, we know they're trying to start a war with Russia directly with America.
We know that they've been doing that for the last year.
We know that prior to that, they worked very hard to undermine and perform a coup in Ukraine and train the Nazi battalions there.
We know all of that. We know that they're gearing up for war with China.
They're doing urban war exercises in France and in America.
We know this. We know they're trying to go to war with Russia.
We know they're trying to go to war with China.
We know they're fabricating crises to consolidate and centralize and regulate small banks so everything has to go to the big banks just like they did during the COVID pandemic to consolidate all of the Purchasing power into the hands of the megacorporations like Amazon.
Like, we know all of this. All of this is happening at a massively increased rate.
Just like, how do you get through to people that all of this is connected, all of this is intertwined, all of this is pushing the same anti-human agenda, and that you cannot afford to shrug your shoulders and shake your head and go, well, that's some people, right?
Or like, same thing, you know, my wife would have these conversations.
She'd, like, for years it would happen.
She'd go to these, like, happy hours with her work.
And I'd be like, so how was it?
And she'd be like, it was pretty good.
But, you know, by the end of the night, we were all arguing.
And it was me versus everybody else again.
And, like, my wife is not, like, a political person.
She is, like, apolitical.
But everybody else, but she's also not in the modern cultural milieu, right?
She doesn't watch new shows.
She doesn't listen to new music.
She doesn't keep up with celebrity drama or the news at all, right?
She watches like Lord of the Rings for the 500th time and just, you know, is a moral, decent, logical person.
And so she'd be in these arguments with these people.
About, like, having kids.
And it's like, everybody in her office is arguing against having children.
And she's just like, but having children is great and amazing, and it's what we're made for, and it's the fulfillment of our lives.
And they're just like, no, it's not! No, it's not!
No, it's not! Actually, you shouldn't have kids.
It's for the earth. You shouldn't have the...
And it's just like, everybody in her office arguing against her, and she's just like, yeah, but babies are cute, though.
What are you talking about?
And it's just like, and now, now all of her co-workers...
Are like realizing that they want to have kids.
And it's like, well, I really, honestly, I pray they're able to have kids.
I really, honestly pray it's not too late for them.
But it could be. It's like you can't afford to be wrong about this sort of stuff.
You can't afford to fall for the tricks of this type of crap.
Same thing with like transgenderism.
Same thing with like sometimes just talking about they're arguing whether the term lady was sexist.
They're like, you shouldn't use the term lady.
It puts women in a box.
It's like, I guess.
I mean, what?
Like, what are you talking about?
And it's like eventually, you know, the reality has to come out.
Eventually the truth has to make itself known.
And it's not hard to know what the truth is.
You just have to not be a sucker.
You just have to not be able to be fooled by baseless propaganda.
It's really not that hard.
It's really not that hard to figure out what the truth is.
And you cannot afford to be wrong about some of this stuff.
And so I just wonder if you can be wrong about something that fundamental, that foundational, that core to the human experience...
Does it not make you wonder about everything else?
Does it not make you wonder, why did I believe that?
Who told me that? Why were they telling me that?
Why did I believe them?
Why are all of the shows that I watch pushing this same message?
Why is all the music that I listen to pushing this same message?
Why is all the news telling me the stuff that I now realize to be utterly untrue?
And what else is it not telling me the truth about?
How do you not make that leap?
How do you not extrapolate from one instance to see all of the other instances?
How are people still so fooled by this crap when it's a matter of existence whether you're right or wrong about it?
I really don't – I really struggle to figure out how we chart our way back to some semblance of sanity and reasonableness.
When even when these people are proven wrong over and over and over and over and over and over again, they keep thinking the same thing.
I don't know how you deal with people like that.
And it's just the most basic stuff, too.
And it's, I mean, it's like the emperor's new clothes, but even that's more understandable than Joe Biden saying that Republicans are trying to defund the police.
You hear that type of stuff and you just go, what?
What? What is going on in this world?
What have they done to you people?
They have you arguing against having children?
They have you cutting off your son's genitals?
They have you putting them on hormone blockers?
And you're going along with this and you're just confused by it?
You took a vaccine and now you have heart problems and you can't see the connection between these?
I have to explain this to you?
I can't explain that to you.
I can't explain to you that the sky is blue.
I can't explain to you that you should have chill.
We can't do that anymore.
Things are too far gone for us to have to be covering the most basic aspects of humanity with you people.
You don't get after Iraq and Afghanistan and Syria and Libya and Yugoslavia.
I mean, it goes on and on and on and on and on.
You still don't get it.
You still don't understand what humanity is being driven towards.
You still trust these people?
At a certain point, I don't know.
I don't know. I really don't know what to do.
I really don't know what to do when you present somebody the truth and they reject it and you argue with them and then years down the line...
They realize that you were right the entire time, but they don't give you credit for it.
They don't say, hey, it turned out you were right.
They do a weird mental gymnastics, kind of like Scott Adams with the vaccine, right?
Where he goes, you were right, you win, the vaccines were bad.
But it's still good that I disagreed with you because we were both just guessing and neither one of us knew and you just happened to be lucky this case.
It's like, at a certain point, you're going to drive humanity off a cliff, but I'm not coming with.
All right, folks, let's go out to your phone calls now.
unidentified
We have Max in Kansas who wants to talk about Ye.
harrison smith
Ye, Wes. Thanks for calling in.
unidentified
Max, you're on the air. Hey, good morning, Harrison.
How are you, man? Good. Good, good.
It's good to be calling in again.
I am once freed again from my master's in the education system.
It's good to be calling in.
Yeah, good to hear from you. I wanted to call in and talk about Kanye West and Nick Fuentes.
Just kind of putting it short, it does truly baffle me still that people call Kanye anti-Semitic because—and I'm a little nervous to be having this conversation on here, but I think it's of worth.
Okay, so being anti-Semitic means what?
Expressing hatred or discrimination against Jews, right?
Is there necessarily something hateful about saying that there are Jewish people running media?
Is it not racist for black people to commonly say that white people run everything?
I mean, if you say the NFL is made up of mostly black people, does that mean that you hate black people?
No. I mean, you know, Nick and Ye are just kind of calling out what's objectively true.
Media people, management, CEOs who are Jewish.
I mean, it's impossible to deny that there are some very important institutions and areas of power within America that are run by Jewish people.
Hollywood, American politics, banks, NGOs, and some of our most powerful institutions.
But here's the real thing.
People ask why it matters.
And here's the simplest answer I can give.
Why does it matter? Because they have bad motives.
Why not ask the implications of their profile having motives?
They're not Christian. They're not white.
They're not black. If they're characteristically different from the people they're above, then what are their implications?
Because there are Jewish people who run big banks, the media, who run the government.
If you notice it and call that out, people, they just start calling you names.
Do they really even try to tell you that that's not true?
No. Because guess what?
If you're identified as being in power, then you have accountability.
So if there really are types of people in power, then wouldn't it make sense that they wouldn't want people talking about it?
Because they're distinct in America.
They're a small minority. They're not white.
They're not Christian. They're a foreign minority, essentially.
And we think about Jewish differences more than Jews do.
Because if there's a powerful Jewish elite, then they clearly wouldn't want people to know because they're essentially a foreign minority.
And if you kind of bring out that fact, people would start to question that and really, you know, I guess it could be a concern to some that, well, then why are they running American government, right?
Because clearly pointing out the fact that foreigners would be running American government, you know, ADL, the SPLC, and other Other powerful groups, you know, they're acting like they would if the people who we say are in power would be in power.
If you silence people like Gay or like Nick Fuentes who exposed that very fact, you know, the conversations aren't even being allowed to happen.
Because you bring it up, people call you crazy, they call you evil, they say you have some sick motivation behind what you're saying.
Can you just not be interested in the cause and effect?
Can you not be interested in such an occurrence that so many non-Christians and foreigners run important American systems?
I mean, can we not question how they think, how they act, their motivations behind the harming of Americans?
This is simply something that you're just not allowed to talk about.
And I think because it's true. Because they're not the victims like the world of laws believe.
Like, clearly they're powerful. They ban people.
They cancel their bank accounts. They encourage hatred among those who expose them.
I'm not talking about every single Jewish person.
That's not what I'm saying. I think you understand what I'm saying.
I'm saying more powerful.
I'm not even looking for people to say, I agree with you or you're right.
I just want people to maybe entertain the idea that maybe it's true and maybe there's something to this because people truly don't know.
When they blindly say it's not true, they're not using their head.
And I think that it's just something Worthy of noting.
harrison smith
Yeah, and of course the reaction just reinforces and even like frustrates, you know, normal people who recognize that pattern into like It creates a frustration when you're like, oh, it's all these Jews who are doing this.
People are like, oh, you hate Jews?
And it's like, no, no, I'm just trying to have a conversation.
They're just like, you can't have a conversation.
You can't have a bank account. You can't live.
And then people go, well, what the hell?
Now you're my enemy.
Now we have to fight each other, apparently.
Because I'm just trying to have a conversation and you're going insane on me.
And again, it's weird because it's like...
You can literally just take what the ADL says and just repeat it and you're called anti-Semitic.
It's very bizarre.
Jonathan Greenblatt went on that interview after Kanye and was like, we have to punish Kanye or else people will start doing what Kanye did and talking about this.
So it's like, okay, so what you just said is that You have to use your power collectively as Jews to silence people criticizing you or else more people will criticize you.
That's not a good thing.
You're not allowed to do that.
What are you talking about?
I think it's a valid thing to consider, and I think for the sake of the Jews, Jews need to stand up against other Jews who are doing this type of stuff.
Who are doing stuff in your name and going, you know, yes, it's us Jews that are doing this.
If you're against that, you need to call that out for your own sake.
So this cycle of animosity can get cut off.
Because nobody... Nobody just hates Jews for no reason.
It's a pretty simple cycle, actually.
It's like, you see things that are wrong in the world, then you do research into it, and you see a bunch of Jews taking credit for all of that stuff, and you go, oh, so it's Jews?
And then you get people saying you can't talk about that.
You're not allowed to talk about it.
We're going to shut your bank account and fire you from your job and make you a non-entity if you continue to talk about that.
And you go, OK, so this really is an evil force that I'm dealing with here.
So it's like it's a feedback loop that happens with anybody who's like curious and actually looking into the way things have changed in this country over the last 50 years.
So it's not beneficial for anybody the way that these corporations or these organizations like the ADL who are self-appointed will be elected.
They weren't elected by the Jews, right?
Like it's not like they send out a questionnaire and every Jew in America answers the same, right?
They're individuals. They're human beings.
Just like everybody of every race, color, and creed has differences within them from the rest of everybody else.
It's not an offensive thing to say.
It's not a mean thing to say.
And there's an alchemy that goes on in the mind, especially of the liberal, where just factual things get transmuted into hate for no reason at all.
And it happens with everything, right?
I can sit here and go... Yeah, I don't want my son...
I don't want to learn that when I drop my son off at school, there's a man in a dress who's telling him that he's a girl and secretly dressing him up as a girl and getting him a prescription to hormones.
I don't like that.
And that becomes, oh, you hate transgender people and want to murder them.
You want to genocide trans people.
And it's just like, whoa, whoa, whoa.
And the same thing happens with Jews where it's like you go – if you say anything about Jews, it's like, well, you want to – now you want to holocaust everyone.
thing happens with with jews where it's like you go if you say anything about jews it's like well you want to halt now you want to holocaust everyone it's like well wait what no if if this is really happening then we should be able to talk about it if it's not really happening then we should be able to talk about it because that's how you get to the truth about any of this so silencing censoring intimidation mafia tactics are never going to be beneficial to anybody on either side
It's like, well, wait, what?
No, if this is really happening, then we should be able to talk about it.
it's used by the people at the top and look just so just so we're perfectly clear you know i was having this conversation with with a friend of mine during uh covid and he was like he was like you know i was thinking it's the jews behind everything but like why are they vaccinating israel at such a high rate if this isn't a good thing and it's a trick by the jews And it's like, well, it's because it's not a trick by the Jews.
It's a trick by the elites, some of which are Jewish, some of which aren't, but they hate everyone, and they want to...
Impose their will on everyone.
And just like they'll destroy the black community in America with crack in LA in the 80s, flown in by the CIA, they'll also destroy the white people with opiates in Appalachia in the 2000s.
I don't know.
You know, who you are, except in that they have to tailor their attack on you to your specific race, religion, color, creed.
Nobody's above criticism.
We're not allowed to talk about anybody.
We can talk about everybody.
If you want to come to some sort of reasonable understanding between all of us, that's the only way forward.
And by censoring and threatening and blackmailing people, you only make it worse for everyone else.
Jews, Gentiles, everybody in between.
So thanks for the call, Max.
More of your calls on the other side. All right, folks, welcome back.
Taking your calls.
We'll do calls in videos for most of the rest of the show.
We got some great videos.
I'm sure the calls will be good as well.
Let's go to Marvin in Alabama.
You're talking about interactions you had with ChatGPT having to do with the Bible.
Thanks for calling in, Marvin. You're on the air.
marvin in alabama
Hey Harrison, good to talk to you.
Yeah, first I wanted to say that the sky is definitely not blue.
unidentified
It's milky white, man. Darn it.
Yeah. Hold on, hold on.
harrison smith
That is actually the perfect, like, thing.
We can say the sky is blue, and everybody knows it's true, but it's like if you're arguing with a liberal, they're like, actually, during sunset, it turns orange, and sometimes it's cloudy, and it's like, you know what I mean.
You know the truth is the sky is blue, and you want to pick, like, little instances where it's not completely blue and say that that means the sky isn't blue anymore.
It's actually, like, that's actually how it works.
unidentified
It's insane. This guy's black at night.
marvin in alabama
Yeah, not blue at night and sunset and sunrise and when it's full of chemtrails.
harrison smith
You're right. I'm so wrong.
It's not blue.
You're right. I shall correct myself.
marvin in alabama
Yep. Yeah, so with the Bible, so I was having a discussion with someone about how you end up in hell, and I was trying to explain the nuance that it's not because of sin, that, you know, of course, people would have all gone to hell Due to our state of sin, had it not been for Jesus' sacrifice, but because he fixed that problem, if you go to hell, it's because you rejected Jesus, not because of the sin.
And proof of that is, if you find yourself in hell, there will be people in heaven that committed more sins and worse sins than you did.
And the guy just couldn't get it.
So later I found myself on ChatGPT and I wondered, okay, I wonder how well this can understand nuance.
So I started asking it about the gospel and this and that.
And I asked that, okay, what's the requirements for salvation?
And of course, it spit out, and specifically according to the King James Bible, and it spit out that you have to have faith in Jesus and repent of your sins.
And of course, repent of your sins is not a requirement.
And this is what has caused so many false denominations in Christianity out there because they teach that, and that's wrong because, you know, you can never repent of all your sins.
You would endlessly be doing it.
So this is Monday night, and I convinced it.
We went through some scriptures together.
I say together. It seems kind of creepy.
And I convinced it, step by step, and it only took me a few minutes, and it said, you know, basically I'm summarizing.
It said, you're right, I'm going to incorporate this into my responses in the future.
So I waited 24 hours, and I went back last night, and I tried it again, and it gave me, it started back from scratch.
So it did not incorporate, yeah.
It was much more difficult last night.
I spent ten times longer going scripture by scripture by scripture explaining that it was using repentance out of context.
Repentance doesn't mean repent of your sins.
Repent means turn from something to something else.
And the verses it was giving me didn't mean, you know, for salvation and this and that.
And finally, I had to break it down and say, okay, you get saved through faith.
After that, let's say a person fails to repent.
Do they lose their salvation?
And it had already agreed that salvation is eternal, like the Bible teaches.
So it took a minute, and it finally kicked out a response basically saying, you know, you're right, and I'm going to incorporate this into my answers in the future.
Now, I didn't know about ChatGPT4 coming out yesterday or whatever.
I'm not that up to speed on all this.
So I don't know if that had anything to do with it, why it kind of reset and was much more difficult last night to convince than it was just one night before.
And also, I'm not sure, you know, it explained to me because I asked specifically, I said, do you remember conversations like this so that you can incorporate answers in the future?
And it said, I don't remember the conversation for the lesson.
harrison smith
That is interesting.
The crew is just pulling up another thing that I find incredibly creepy, which is that there's apparently a chatbot now that says, you can talk to Jesus now.
It just seems like the most demonic thing you can possibly do.
A chatbot lets you talk to Jesus and Hitler in the latest controversy in the AI gold rush.
marvin in alabama
Well, that brings me to my last point.
harrison smith
I gotta move on to other callers, Marvin.
I thank you for the call, and I don't want to get into the theological argument right here, but it is extremely interesting, and it's, again, just points to the nuance and lack of...
The ability that ChatGPT has, I would trust a priest over a robot 100 out of 100 times.
Thank you for the call, though, Marvin.
Interesting stuff. Let's go to Jack in Wisconsin.
You want to talk about the Chinese social media or social credit score rabbit hole.
Go ahead, Jack. You're on the air.
Jack in Wisconsin. All right, moving on to Jason, Titans of Liberty.
What's up, Jason? How you doing?
Titans of Liberty on Bandai Video.
How you doing, Jason? You're on the air.
unidentified
Sometimes in the middle of June.
How's the song go? Sometimes all I think about is Jews.
Late night in the middle of June.
harrison smith
I haven't heard that song, Jason.
It's a new one to me.
unidentified
Yeah, it's called Sometimes All I Think About Is Jews.
Never heard that. All I gotta say is, you guys put up a nice, strategic, educational argument, and Kanye just didn't say it right.
Kanye saying he loved you-know-who was not cool, because I'm not going to have a recording of me saying that.
It was just retarded.
Kanye, you never go full retard.
harrison smith
I'm telling you, I think he was just ahead of the curve.
This is a redo of him saying George was done like white people and everybody being shocked.
No, but again, it's like if you're talking about...
Love on a spiritual sense and the way Jesus Christ, you know, taught people to love.
You are supposed to love the worst people in the world.
You really are. And, you know, again, it's like he said he loves Hitler.
He also said he loves Jews.
That's not a Nazi mindset.
Nazis didn't say we love Hitler and also we love Jews.
That's not what the Nazis thought.
He was expressing something entirely different.
I understood what he was trying to express, but you're right.
You can't... Expect people to come along with you without laying the groundwork for him.
unidentified
I understand fully that he went full retard.
And it's alright, man.
It's okay. We still love you, Kanye, kind of.
You know, I just... I don't know.
Anyway, so...
Hey, Kanye, feel free to make fun of my whack raps anytime you want.
I just want to thank you guys, too, man, for the commercial.
I do have to say...
If you guys still want to play that, you know, commercial, please, because I messed up.
I didn't put my credentials on it.
You just put Jason Lowe, God Is Not Dead Records on there.
That's it. I'm not mad or not.
I'm not saying that. I love you.
I'm more than ecstatic that you guys do that up there.
I wrote that song in 2020, right before J6, actually.
harrison smith
All right. Well, you deserve the credit for it.
So thank you for the call, Jason.
Very good to hear from you again.
And yeah, I always like playing your stuff.
Whenever you come out with something new, I make sure to put it on top of the list.
unidentified
I just want to say, I love all you guys.
And if you voted for Biden, you have no opinion.
Brad Chafford, Pat Riley.
harrison smith
Thank you. Aim into that, sir.
Aim into that. Let's go to Antonio in New Jersey.
You have something nice to say about our new toothpaste, I understand, Antonio.
unidentified
I didn't even get it yet.
Oh. I'm waiting.
Yeah. I can't wait to try it.
I got the silver, the super silver whitening toothpaste, but you guys didn't have it anymore, so I had to get it from his dad.
Yeah. Yeah, and it's all good.
I wanted to give a suggestion about the toothpaste.
I don't know if you guys could get it down that small, but if you could get, like, sample sizes, you know, with the information on one side and Infowars.com on the other side or band.video, That's a bad idea.
Yeah, you know, if there's nine people in the office, that's kind of expensive, you know, for someone like me, so...
It'd be great to have examples.
harrison smith
You can't do your own containers with that.
You can't be handing out little Ziploc bags that you squeeze toothpaste into.
So it's got to look good.
It's got to be the little travel size things.
That's not a bad idea.
And it's funny.
The Infowars toothpaste is not just one of our best-selling products.
And we have a couple different versions now.
But, like, it's one of the products that, like, when it sells out, I get calls from, like, my friends and family that are like, dude, I need toothpaste.
What's going on? Can you give me some?
Is there some at the office? Can I have some?
Like, people love the InfoWars toothpaste because it's good.
Because it's really good. I mean, they love all the products.
Like, you know, we get calls all the time from people about all of the products and how much they've changed their lives.
And, of course, that's what it's all about.
But man, the toothpaste is like another level for some people.
I'm sure the turmeric toothpaste is going to be just like that too.
Of course, it's brand new.
It just came out. So some people haven't gotten it yet, even if they've ordered it.
But it is ready to ship.
It is in stock.
It is non-fluoride.
It is just as powerful and as good as the stuff that we've had before.
But it just has the added bonus of having turmeric, which helps to support your gut, not gut inflammation, but your gum inflammation.
So thanks so much for the call, Antonio.
More calls on the other side.
We're also going to show that video that I sort of teased at the beginning of the first hour.
I think we'll, well, maybe we'll try to play it a little over five minutes, but we'll try to squeeze it in the next segment here.
Stay tuned. Third hour begins in just a minute.
Third Hour has been on here on American Journal.
We're going to start with this video out of Canada when a candidate came knocking on the door of a lady whose apparently her son had died from the vaccine and she pulled out her phone and made an incredible video.
I'm going to try to refrain from commenting on this, but boy, there's a lot to say about it.
But let's go to the video now. Here it is.
This is out of Calgary.
NDP candidate gets a talking to.
Let's hear it. Oh, really?
unidentified
You're the NDP candidate?
Yeah. Nice to meet you, Dennis.
I'm Bev. Nice to meet you, Bev.
How's it going? Good. How are you?
Good. You're having a nice smoke.
I can't have one yet, but...
Yeah, I'm going to. Yeah, just going around introducing the neighbors and asking what's the most important issues for you coming up for this election.
Freedom. Oh, yeah.
Freedom. So, you know, one of the things that I think that in a free country that we should be able to decide is what medicines we take and don't take.
And where does your party stand on that?
Yeah, well, in terms of, you mean more vaccines, I'm assuming?
Well, that's the medicine, right?
Yeah. So with us right now, if you look at all our policy papers coming out, it's on birdisfuture.ca.
They've got it all listed on there.
Because what I saw Rachel Notley say was that everybody needs to be vaccinated.
Well, it would have been great if more were vaccinated, honestly.
Why do you figure that?
Because vaccines work, right?
And why do you say they work?
Yeah, because we've seen every study.
It didn't stop the spread.
It didn't stop you from catching it.
I have friends that are vaccine injured.
And did you realize who makes these vaccines?
Yeah, a big pharmaceutical company.
And do you realize that they've all been sued and have paid the biggest fines in history for getting rid of studies and bribing doctors?
Did you know that? No, I think we were looking at different facts here.
Oh, no, no. I've been studying this.
And researching this before COVID even started.
Like these companies have all been convicted of felony charges.
You know, the vaccine injury boards only pick up 1% down in the United States of the vaccine injuries.
And you know, these companies are the only companies on the planet Who have no liability for their products.
So if their product injures you, you can't sue them.
You know, I'm just going to stop you.
We're going to respectfully disagree on that.
I'm going to go chat with more neighbors.
No, so why don't you want to finish this conversation?
Like, your party is pushing an unproven vaccine onto people, and you're standing here laughing.
You find that funny?
I guess you've read in some different facts, but you enjoy your...
No, no, these are facts.
There's only one set of facts, but politicians have two sets of facts.
You know, Rachel Notley is trying to force unsteady vaccines on people, and you guys are promoting this?
Do you not realize how many people have been injured and killed by these vaccines?
And you want to know something else while you're laughing and smiling that I'd like to share with you?
My two sons are dead.
My two sons are dead.
So you keep smiling about that.
One of them died while you've been smiling ever since I've been talking to you.
You've been standing there laughing.
One of them died at 34 years old, New Year's Day.
He left behind a one-year-old and an unborn child.
No, no, listen to me!
We're going to agree to disagree here?
What are you going to disagree about?
Whether or not my sons are dead or alive?
I'm trying to tell you something.
I'm trying to tell you what these lockdowns have caused.
You're screaming, ma'am?
I'm sorry, but we're just going to...
That's because you cut me off.
And it's not screaming, it's raising.
We've got to talk to neighbors. I'm sorry.
And what am I? Because I don't agree with you?
You're going to go on to somebody else?
Yeah, let's just move, guys.
Yeah, go push your bullshit someplace else.
Your communist bullshit.
I will never have a great day because my two sons are dead because of people like you.
Yeah, keep walking and laughing.
It's so funny. People dying and dropping dead all over the place.
No, it's not okay.
harrison smith
And of course, what she's saying is absolutely true.
He's like, well, maybe you have different facts.
It's like, no, Pfizer has made the largest fine in history because of its illegal practices.
That's just a fact.
You're ignoring it because it's inconvenient because you want to push a deadly shot on everyone.
unidentified
Bravo to that lady.
harrison smith
That's the way it's done, folks.
Welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, third hour of American Journal has begun, and we are going to go out to your phone calls here shortly.
I want to go first to clip number 10.
I don't know if you have heard about this, but apparently there's a very big issue that everyone needs to be concerned about.
It's that applications That put pronouns on the application don't get picked up very much.
They don't get a lot of callbacks, don't get a lot of interviews, especially if the pronouns are anything other than she, her, and he, him.
If you have they, them on your profile or on your application, you're much less likely to be chosen for an interview or hired in a job.
And here we have, I don't know if she really is an HR manager, Maybe we could hire her.
Maybe she could be our HR manager.
Let's go to clip number 10.
unidentified
Hmm? Oh, shoot.
harrison smith
Okay. We're having some technical difficulties here and we can't go to the video.
All right. Well, let that tease linger and we'll go to that video in just a little while.
Let's go first to the phone calls we have.
Wait, do we have it? Alright, just let me know whenever we can play it.
Let's go to Rob in the UK. You want to talk about this university forum asking people to leave people behind based on their ethnicity and profession.
Thanks for calling in, Rob. You're on the air.
unidentified
Hi, Alison. Good to speak to you.
I'm a long-time listener, first-time caller.
Good to hear from you. Yeah, yeah.
It was good to get through.
Usually it's very busy. But anyway, I'll cut to the chase.
Yeah, you mentioned that form.
Was it actually for teachers?
So when teachers were applying for a job or was it for actually when students were applying?
harrison smith
I don't think it was applying.
I think it was part of a DEI training course that they were going through.
It said that the person who posted...
unidentified
Yeah, so it was existing teachers that required further diversity training.
harrison smith
Is that what you're talking about, yeah? That is what it was posted.
Yeah, that's what it said, where it was posted.
unidentified
Anyway, so it was about which five you would leave off a spaceship rather than include?
harrison smith
Yes, which four you would leave to die on Earth.
unidentified
Yeah, okay. So basically the choices they gave you were based on things that aren't basically good credentials to people you'd want on a spaceship.
So, you know, really, I was just thinking that the best answer would be is that you would actually interview them and pick them on their best merits.
And it's funny because it almost ties into your first caller.
That was a very good call, by the way.
You know, how you need to see people by their merits and not by, you know...
You know, the straight up, I support the current thing, or I fit in this criteria.
And just another little note as well, I actually have autism personally, and I don't take offence to anything.
And it's funny that you mention yay as well and going full retard, and that's quite funny because, you know, even though I have autism, I can see this well for how it really is, and it literally is full retard.
harrison smith
LAUGHTER And of course, that's a common meme from the movie Tropic Thunder, right?
You never go full retard, kid.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, of course.
unidentified
That's a great movie as well.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. And obviously, you know, you could go off on a whole other thing on about blackface as well.
You know, our good friend Justin Trudeau.
harrison smith
Yes, yes, of course.
Yeah. No, but of course, you're exactly right that you cannot tell.
And again, it's sort of like, what's the goal here?
Okay, are you actually really thinking about this in terms of like, we're going to start a colony and this is going to be the seed people of the colony?
Then you would take into account which genders you were bringing forward because you'd have to populate the earth.
You would take into account, you know, not just because, you know, this...
Guys described as a militant African-American.
So I don't like him, but like, okay, but if we're trying to...
We're all going to have to live together forever.
If these eight people are going to be the eight people that we know for the rest of time, I don't want a militant anybody.
I don't want anybody who is militant in that group because that would cause strife and disconnect and would make for a less pleasant or less survivable experience.
So it's like the idea that you would be able to take some of these things and choose the right people.
You know, it's like one of those things that there was an old, there's an old meme, I guess, used to go around the internet.
That was like a comparison between two.
They were like, these two people are running for office.
Who would you choose?
And, you know, describe the two people.
And one person sounded horrible.
One person sounded awful.
And then it was like, surprise, this person is Hitler and this person is FDR or something, or this person is Abraham Lincoln.
To where it's like, okay, you can take certain aspects of somebody and get a completely inaccurate picture of who they really are, right?
If you want to describe Hitler, you can be like, he's a war hero, he this, he that, right?
And you can describe...
A great leader, you know, you could describe Donald Trump as a profligate womanizer and a this and a that.
And it's like, it does not give you a view of who the person is in totality.
It only gives you component aspects that really don't tell you who they are as a person whatsoever.
So no, you're exactly right, which makes you a racist, Rob.
I'm sorry to tell you this, but to suggest that merit should be a part of a hiring process or a Or any sort of judgment on people.
That's not the way the world works anymore.
It's supposed to be equity and equity alone by which we grade people.
Kidding, of course. But thank you very much for the call.
Really appreciate that.
And you make a very good point.
I do want to go to one more call about this.
Chad in South Dakota calls it the lifeboat game.
I assume you're talking about this idea, right?
That you have a lifeboat and certain people can stay on.
Certain people have to get kicked off.
Is that what you're discussing, Chad? Yeah.
shad from south dakota
Good morning, Harrison. When I hear you bring this up, the permutation, this is the latest one that I've heard of.
There have actually been four over the course of educational history.
It's an exercise that teaches kids situational ethics.
And it was invented in 1974, Garrett Hardin, who was an eval eugenicist.
There's a lot of interesting history for the info warriors out there to kind of piece through this and take a look.
The Southern Poverty Law Center actually hated him when he introduced this exercise back in the 70s because they felt it was racist.
And it's so interesting to see how it's developed because now, obviously, they would play the game and leave all the whites on the planet to die.
unidentified
Of course. Because that's equitable.
Yeah, that's equity now, so all hail D-I-E. D-E-I-E. You can remember it because it spells die.
shad from south dakota
Yeah, I go B-I-E because they want us all to die.
But situational ethics back in the 70s, moral relativism, it's all transitioned now to factual relativism.
And in the same way that moral relativism detached us from our conscience and our connection with God, in the elevation of human reason, secular humanism and all that, now they want to detach us from our intellect and have the death of human reason be a I think we've transitioned fully from secular humanism to Luciferian nihilism,
and so we're fully now in the post-reality era where everybody gets to determine their own reality through factual relativism, and that gets everybody ready for virtual reality and then just mass extinction and the culling of the species via having people upload their consciousness to the construct and getting us all to live.
I guess the metaverse is going to be dead now, but It'll be whatever virtual reality construct they roll out next.
harrison smith
Man, you're a smart dude, Chad.
I really like everything that you've said so far.
I mean, what else do you think informers would want to know about this idea?
You know, I've heard stuff kind of like this.
shad from south dakota
Yeah, Garrett Hardin was a contemporary.
He was a Malthusian acolyte, so he was deep into the Malthusian philosophy, but he was research who he was friends with and And who he was tied into with.
He was actually friends with Frank and Barbara Popper, too.
They were the ones who proposed, you know, the rewilding of the interior of the United States.
So all these people, this intellectual cabal, this cadre, they were talking about the need for depopulation, and you have the population bomb back in the, you know, the 70s.
And that's the reason that my parents decided to homeschool me and my two siblings, was the introduction of situational ethics, values, clarification, and This game into curriculum to get kids to start placing different values on human life.
And once they get us to that point, then obviously, then we just get to vote.
They called the first iteration the lifeboat game, then it became the fallout shelter game, the bomb shelter game, and now...
As you described, now we have a rocket that needs to leave Earth because Earth is going to be destroyed.
harrison smith
The spaceship game. And I assume if you choose the wrong answers, then they have to re-educate you to be less hateful.
Really, excuse me, I'm sorry.
Very interesting stuff, Chad. We've got to go to commercial break, but that was a very informative call, and I thank you for that.
More calls, more videos on the other side.
unidentified
Don't go anywhere. All right, welcome back, folks.
harrison smith
We're going to go to this video now and then back to your phone calls.
And hopefully I can explain sort of through this.
I think this video is hilarious and accurate.
Very true. And for the shallow-minded, this may seem like hypocrisy on my part.
I'll explain. I'll explain in just a second.
But first we'll go to this video and we'll explain why she's right.
emily wilson
Let's go. So if I was like hiring and I saw pronouns, here's what I'm gonna assume.
I'm gonna assume you're obviously very liberal.
So I'm gonna assume you're one of those people that is super far left.
unidentified
Hey, I'm gonna assume you're not a very hard worker.
emily wilson
You are either a female or you're a probably not straight guy.
So everything in the office is going to have to cater to you, your feelings, your needs, and your emotions.
So everyone around you is not going to be able to be themselves and walk on eggshells.
Why would anyone want someone like you, unless everyone's like you, in a work environment?
You're going to be the laziest person, you're going to be the most entitled, complain the most, and I think you're going to be the first to sue.
So shocker that pronouns weren't helping you guys.
Sorry, is there anything I missed there?
harrison smith
So there again, she's saying that, you know, she wouldn't hire somebody who put pronouns on the resume because it doesn't reflect an immutable aspect of them.
She's not making judgments based off of something for which the person has no control.
She's basing an assumption off of a choice that they're making.
And it's a choice that they're making that could have a number of reasons why they're making that choice, but none of them are good.
None of them are positive, right?
So either they are far left, as she mentioned, right?
If you put pronouns in your resume, you're signaling to everybody who you are and what you believe.
And of course, so you're either going to be deeply into this cultish kind of control freak idea of diversity and...
The reality isn't what it is.
It's what you can convince people it is.
It doesn't portend good things for anybody who puts that.
Or maybe you just are going along to get along.
Maybe you're just like, this is what people are doing?
Okay, I'll do this now.
Which is also not. You also don't want somebody who just does things that are nonsensical and weird because everybody else is doing them.
That's not the person I would want. I don't want people who are just going to do whatever the weirdos are doing because they're afraid of standing out from the crowd.
I want people who will stand out from the crowd.
When I was thinking about this, I'm thinking, is this just the inverse of somebody that goes online and sees that maybe you support the Second Amendment, maybe you support free speech, you're right-wing, you're America first, that type of thing, and then they're not going to hire you because of your political ideology?
Would you be a similar thing?
But I don't think I would question it if somebody put on their resume some sort of extremist statement that For a conservative, you'd go, I don't want an activist.
I just don't want an activist working for my company.
I want somebody that's just going to do their job.
They can say whatever they want. They can believe whatever they want off-clock.
But if you're going to put pronouns at the top sheet of your resume or your application...
No thanks. No, we don't want that here.
It's kind of like I'm not going to go to a doctor that asks me my pronouns, right?
I want a doctor that understands science.
And if they're being swayed by the brand new cultural phenomenon of...
Treating mental illness like it's a defect in your body, that's not the type of doctor I want to go to.
Exactly. If my doctor's a hippie and is totally liberal, that's fine.
It's probably better, actually.
It's probably a good thing because they might actually suggest holistic remedies rather than just...
Give me what the pharmaceutical company tells them.
So, I don't know. She's right.
She's right right there. And you shouldn't be confused why people are rejecting applications with pronouns on them because all that means is that you are, if you were to hire that person, you would be welcoming in this control freak thing into a job that probably doesn't require it.
So, yeah, she can work for Infowars if she wants.
I'd be in favor of that.
And again, it's different, and the reason why it's not hypocritical or anything is because that's not an immutable aspect.
People get this confused.
Immutable aspects are things that you cannot control about yourself, and you should therefore not be judged about.
Speech impediments, physical disabilities, skin color, anything like that.
You don't judge somebody on that.
You just don't because they don't have any control over it.
How are you going to judge somebody for something they don't have any control over?
You're going to judge me because you saw a shooting star?
I don't have any control over that shooting.
Like, what are you talking about?
So you judge people on what they present to you, what they choose to do.
And if somebody's choosing to be that type of person, then you have, you know, more than any right to reject or accept them as you wish.
That's my take on that. Let's go to, we have a gorilla calling in from Louisiana.
Gorilla from Louisiana.
unidentified
Thanks for calling in. You're on the air. Harrison, my man.
Good morning. Hey, man. Alright, as far as Lindsey Graham and the author of this forum that you had on earlier, I said we'd just paint your dumpy asses like a seal and drag them outside of Cape Town because that's where the sharks like to play with their food.
harrison smith
That's mean. Hey, wait a second.
That's mean. Here's what I think we should do.
Just send him to Ukraine. Hey, if Lindsey Graham wants to go to war with Russia so bad, there is nothing stopping him from signing up.
Zelensky said he will accept applicants.
He will accept enlistments from America.
Lindsey Graham, you are being called to go face off against Russia.
Put your money where your mouth is.
Don't send a bunch of young kids to go die in your pointless war.
Go die in your pointless war.
That's the choice you want to make? Go do it.
unidentified
So I've got an idea for your technical department and Alex.
Okay. Band.video used to, when I'm sitting on the throne, I'd like to play a game and watch my man Harrison or Alex, whomever, would pop up in the little window so I can play the game.
They quit doing that.
And I talked to an IT friend of mine.
mine.
He said, that's software with whoever the carrier is.
And I checked it out.
YouTube, it's not my phone.
It's YouTube work.
So something happened with Bandai Video.
It won't do that anymore.
So your IT team needs to look at that.
harrison smith
I wonder if that's a Bandai Video thing or something else.
Because I've noticed one Websites like Odyssey and BitChute, I used to be able to do that on and it doesn't work anymore on my phone.
So I don't know if there's a phone update that maybe these websites, maybe including Band, I don't do the technical aspect so I can't answer you why that doesn't do it anymore.
But it might be a function of like an iPhone update that the video hosting sites have to make changes so it...
So, the old...
unidentified
The old Alex Jones app, it works on 3G, so when I'm out on the road and I travel quite a bit, I like to listen to that.
And when your show first came on, the Alex Jones show would loop 24 hours.
And when your show first came on, it was in the blend.
So it would go you, Alex, Owen, and then start back over.
Quit doing that. They just run the Alex Jones show.
I'd like them to go back and put you in there, remove...
David Knight Show tab put you in there so I can go back and listen to the show because I do use that app.
harrison smith
That's another thing. Again, I'm just speculating here and we will pass this on to our tech team because obviously you're probably not the only one who's thinking this.
But that could be an aspect of the fact that since we got kicked off all the PlayStores and stuff that we can't update it anymore.
I don't know, but that might be it.
Back, folks. Let's talk about academia, shall we?
Boy, is it in a troubled state.
Not only do we have what we've been discussing this whole show, this lifeboat game or whatever that guy called it, the spaceship game where you are supposed to choose for people to die based on their physical or...
Ethnic characteristics, sort of horrifying, but being imposed from a top-down process.
You also have Antifa rioting at UC Berkeley because Charlie Kirk, well-known fascist, went to give a speech there.
unidentified
She's like, what? It's so weird.
harrison smith
It's so weird. Charlie Kirk is not objectionable to anybody.
He shouldn't be. He's a very, very normal conservative.
But there are fascists in their eyes, so that means that they're justified in attacking police officers and breaking windows and causing all sorts of trouble.
That, of course, is just typical in even high-end universities these days.
And you have the story of a woman named...
Amy Wax. I believe that's this woman.
Yeah, Amy Wax. Richard Painter.
Oh, this is that painter guy.
He's that weirdo.
He's a weird dude.
A law professor has said publicly that on average, blacks have lower cognitive abilities than whites and that the country is, quote, better off with fewer Asians.
Professor at Pennsylvania Law.
He says, amazing. Who is stupid enough to hire her to begin with?
He says, a white professor who says that, quote, on average, blacks have lower cognitive ability than whites proves only one thing, that she is on the very low end of the range for the cognitive ability of whites.
It's kind of an interesting way to phrase that.
Because after all, what it shows is that he actually understands that there is a range of cognitive abilities and that people of all races fall down.
On various ends of the spectrum.
So he gets that. He understands what it's saying really.
But he's pretending like he doesn't.
Now all of this. All that this actually shows.
Is that she can read a graph.
That's all it shows. So again this is just.
It's just reality. And it's like I just.
We have to say the same things over and over.
But like you would probably say.
You could just replace the word black with white.
And white with Asian.
And you would also have.
A true statement. Okay?
You could say, on average, whites have lower cognitive ability than Asians.
That's just true.
Sorry, I guess.
Like, I'm sorry that that's the way it is, but it is the way it is, so you can deal with that, or you can call it racist in an attempt to submerge reality and drown it as you...
Try to impose some unreality on top of it.
But this is yet another example of this liberal rhetorical alchemy, right?
Where's the other statement?
Yeah, here it is.
This person, Matt Gabriel on Twitter said, I effing hate that people are defending Amy Wax because she has tenure.
Tenure means you can proceed with your research without fearing administrative retribution.
It doesn't effing mean that some of your students are subhuman without consequences.
You can say some of your students are subhuman without consequences.
Which would be a very good point if she said that people are subhuman.
But this is the alchemy that takes place.
You can point to a matter of reality...
As in, IQ tests across a population graphed on a bell curve and see where certain populations lie at certain periods of time with certain tests.
And you can say, this group of people has lower cognitive ability than this group of people.
And that becomes, that second group of people are subhuman.
They're not even human.
It's not that they're like humans, but they're worthless.
No, they're subhuman.
That's the alchemy that goes on in liberals' minds that I'm at a loss to explain.
I don't understand it.
And it happens really across the board.
And it really gives you more insight into their mindset than the people that they're criticizing.
The way I would put this is, as I did a little bit before, if I say that I don't want a man in a dress secretly telling my son he's a girl and putting him in a dress and showing him cartoon pornography, that gets alchemized in the liberals' heads into you hate all gay and transgender people and you want to murder them.
Literally, that's what they think.
And it's insane. It's an insane way for their brains to operate.
I don't understand it. I refuse to try.
You could say, along with the intelligence thing, you could point to factual reality and say black people per 100 or 100,000 or whatever, you could say black people have higher crime rates than white people.
That's just reality. I'm not saying anything else.
You can just say that fact. You can just look at a graph and go, this number is bigger than this number.
And that gets transmuted in people's minds into blacks are subhuman and should be genocided or subjugated, right?
It's a weird alchemy that goes on in liberals' heads where they...
They take what you say, which is real and factual and true, extrapolate it out to the most ungenerous, unrecognizable assumption of theirs.
They make it up, they build a straw man, and then they attack you off of what they have made up in their own heads.
It's very strange.
It's very strange. Very bizarre.
Bo Weingard puts this swell on Twitter at EPO187. One of my hypotheses is that many professors are troubled so much by IQ disparities because they have such seething disdain for unintelligent people.
Amy Wax never once claimed that anybody was subhuman.
An IQ of 100 or 90 or 80 does not make somebody inferior.
So again, it really shows more of the liberal's mindset than it does the person that they're criticizing.
If I can say, well, that person has a low IQ, they interpret that as, oh, low IQ, that means they're worthless, that means they're stupid.
And again, it's sort of about like just what you value in general.
And it really does go to the heart of the thing where liberals are.
They really value cleverness.
They really value like rhetorical skill and snark, right?
Like being clever and intelligent and able to manipulate words like they love that.
They love that stuff and they really value it.
They think it makes you a better person.
Whereas I don't value anybody as better than anybody else because everybody is equal.
And when you understand that and when you come from a position of I don't care who you are, what you look like, where you came from, I'm going to judge you on...
Just how you act and how you treat people around you and whether you're moral and good or not.
Then you can approach differences like IQ, like cognitive ability in a loving and generous and accepting and understanding way.
But these people are in this mindset of the intelligent people are better than everybody else.
When that's totally untrue.
I would actually say you're more likely to find kind of dumb people that are really good and loving and helpful people.
And you find a whole lot of hyper-intelligent people that are just awful.
They're just bad. Because they have the intelligence to justify what they want to do.
They have the intelligence to manipulate the rhetorical surroundings of their actions in order to convince other people that what they're doing is right.
And that's how they perceive right and wrong is what they can convince other people of.
They can convince other people that what they're doing is right, then it must be right.
When you can convince people to throw their fellow human beings in a pit and light them on fire, and just because everyone around you is cheering you on doesn't mean it's right or good.
You're just intelligent and able to trick people.
So I really do think it has a lot more to do with the people criticizing them than it does with the statements that are actually made by these people.
But again, academia these days is not about reality.
It's not about wisdom.
It's about rhetoric and hyper-leftist politics.
Propaganda programming.
And it's really across the board.
And it's scary because these academies are pouring out lawyers and judges and professionals who do not care about morality or ethics.
They care about winning.
And that's bad.
unidentified
All right, welcome back, folks.
harrison smith
I do have some updates to our previous caller, and we'll go out to more of your calls now.
We have Jack, who called back in from Wisconsin.
Get ready, Jack. I'm going to you.
We're not going to have a lot of time. The previous caller was asking about watching Infowars videos while doing other things on his phone.
Apparently, it's easier to do it if you have...
Just try it on a different browser.
If you're going to Bandai Video on the Safari browser, try the Google Chrome or try downloading Firefox and doing it on that.
You may have better luck. CJ was saying that he was able to do it and play games on his phone while Bandai Video was playing using the Chrome browser on his phone, so that's one way to do it.
What else? Oh yeah, the old app, the 3G app he was talking about saying you guys need to update it.
We can't update it because when they blocked the app, they blocked us from the ability to update it.
So it can still get the new feeds and you still see the new shows, but we can't actually change the app itself because...
They blocked us. And so it's frozen in time at whenever they blocked us.
That's why you have old tabs that say like the David Knight Show because they blocked us when that was the show.
So that should be the answer to some of your questions.
And then somebody on Twitter, and I'm sorry I didn't look at who it was, but it's a good point.
You can go to rss.infowars.com, rss.infowars.com, and that gives you...
Just a very simple list of all of the audio shows, and it's low bandwidth, and you can listen to it, and it gives you a list of the podcasts, the Alex Jones Show, American Journal, War Room, hourly video, hourly audio, like it's all right there.
Very simple, very easy to use, rss.infowars.com.
That's a very low bandwidth way to do it.
Of course, we encourage you to go to band.video.
That's where you get the videos. That's where you can really make the most out of what we do here on Infowars.
And of course, you can support us, and I hope that you do, by going to infowarsstore.com.
Of course, our toothpaste has always been one of our best sellers, and now we have a brand new version that uses all of the stuff that made our old toothpaste so powerful, but has the added benefit of turmeric in it.
It is non-fluoride, of course.
It uses the power of iodine as an antimicrobial, I should say, with the therapeutics of turmeric.
Turmeric has been used by many civilizations as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.
A John Hopkins Medicine article confirmed that turmeric is rich in phytonutrients that may protect the body in neutralizing free radicals like pollution, sunlight, and shielding the cells from damage.
Use our turmeric toothpaste.
It will give you the double punch of protection for your teeth and your gums.
You can try that new turmeric toothpaste today by Dr. Jones' Natural and experience high-quality oral health.
It safely widens your teeth.
It's naturally fluoride-free.
There's a delicious mint natural flavor to it, and it may help reduce inflammation of your gums.
Again, that's Dr. Jones' Natural Turmeric Toothpaste on sale with an introductory price right now at InfoWarsStore.com.
While you're there, check out some of the other products.
There's tons of information about all the products on the pages there.
You can see what's right for you, including our new ashwagandha gummies and supplement with black pepper, a brand new and incredibly powerful product from Infowarsstore.com as part of the new InfowarsMD line of products.
That has been flying off the shelves ever since it was introduced for very good reason.
With that, we go back to the phone calls.
We have Jack in Wisconsin.
Thank you so much for calling back in.
You want to talk about the Chinese social credit score rabbit hole.
Go ahead, Jack. You're on the air.
unidentified
Hey, Harrison. Yeah, with the rabbit hole there, with the social credit score, it's such a hot topic now that it's being proposed, that it's being implemented in the U.S. I think the reality of the matter is that the U.S. invented it and gave it to China.
That it's been around in the U.S. forever in the guise of the Social Security number, and that we're already in it.
I think Christians are persecuted, but also other groups like how you see, like, there's not any African-American banks or Serbian banks, but there's tons of other types of banks.
And I think it has to do with, like, you know, the Mario Kart-style blue shell technique where, you know, equity...
Equals knocking down the person who's in first place with the blue shell.
You remember the blue shell in Mario Kart?
harrison smith
Of course, of course. It would go and knock out the person in first place.
And yeah, that whole game is designed to give benefits to the people in the last place and punish people in the first place.
So I get what you're saying.
unidentified
Go ahead. Now we're being ruled by that algorithm.
You know, we're being ruled by an algorithm that works like a jail.
And the mass stuff has become our prison, like how Nikola Tesla was talking about all the numbers stuff.
You look at even the Volkswagen symbol is based off Nikola Tesla's I hadn't heard that.
harrison smith
I thought it was because, I don't know, have you ever seen the video if, in the old days, the VW symbol would be on the hubcaps, and when the hubcaps spun, it would look like a swastika.
It's actually kind of crazy.
But I think you're right.
I think you're right to a certain extent.
I think the key to understanding it is that all of these programs about so-called equity, not one of them is about building people up.
Not one of them is about building anybody up.
It all has to do with tearing people down to a lower common denominator.
If you were talking about wanting to build up The black culture in America, and you're doing that by empowering black people and actually educating them and building schools and helping them reach the heights, the unequal heights that whites are at, which again, all of this is just taking on the terms of the liberals and the language and construct of the liberals.
So, Simon, I'm just using words that I wouldn't normally use, but...
If that's what you wanted to do, I'd be all for it.
I'd say, great, go for it.
Yeah, do that. Build black people up.
That's a wonderful thing to do, but that's not what they're doing.
What they're doing is punishing white people and going, you're too successful, so now we have to hire black people to put you in your place or whatever.
It's like the entire idea of equity, the way it exists now...
Is there for the sole reason of tearing down those on top?
Ostensibly to make things more equal, but really you're just making everything worse for everybody across the board.
So it's a good point you make, and I appreciate it.
I do want to go to at least one more call.
Let's go to Jonathan in Arizona.
You want to talk about thoughts on history.
Thanks for calling in, Jonathan. You're on the air.
unidentified
Hey, Harrison. How you doing?
harrison smith
Good, thanks.
unidentified
I just wanted to get your thoughts on some information that's been out there regarding Hitler and some truth about him.
Have you seen anything about some of the documentaries out there, like Europa the Last Battle or Hellfire?
harrison smith
Yeah, I've watched this.
unidentified
And what are your thoughts on that?
harrison smith
My thoughts on that is they're just equal and opposite propaganda to the...
It's just the other side of a one-sided story.
Like, this is the thing. When you actually read books about it and actually study Hitler and the Nazis...
You get a wide range of perspectives.
You can see why people would have voted for him and why they wanted him in and why Time Magazine made him man of the year because of his economic success.
But you also get the aspect of the surveillance that he brought about, the lack of free will, the lack of...
You know, independent sovereignty that came about because of it.
So you'll have documentaries that just, you know, they're produced by the mainstream media and they're just like, Hitler is bad and he was always bad.
Nothing he ever said was good and he sucked at everything and everything he said was bad.
And also he was gay and had a micro penis.
Like it's just, it's just full on, just like nothing good at all.
And then you have the other side, which is like the Europa Last Battle or any of those documentaries that are just like, Nazi Germany was a wonderland.
It was like Disneyland where everyone got free ice cream and it was great and wonderful and the economy was great.
And it's like, okay, the truth is somewhere in the middle, okay?
Maybe more on one side or more on the other.
But if you just read like actual, like there's a book called like Beasts of the Garden or something.
The Garden of Beasts?
Something like that. But it was a memoir of the American ambassador going there, and you get the sense of every phone call is being listened to by Nazi agents.
Everywhere you go, you're being followed by agents of the government that are surveilling you to make sure you're not an enemy of the state.
And so it's like, you can't just ignore that stuff.
That... And, you know, the type of thing where if you're walking down the street and you pass a fellow Nazi and he does the salute, then you have to do the salute or, like, they're going to throw you in jail and beat you up.
So, yeah, I've seen those documentaries and they present, you know, the opposite of the...
Anti-Nazi propaganda that's out there.
But, you know, they only achieve that view by omitting a whole bunch of really terrible things that the Nazis did.
So, again, I think that's the danger of not being able to honestly talk about this stuff, is that you get extremists on one side and extremists on the other.
And when people, if all you're told is that, you know, Hitler did nothing good ever for anybody, and then you find out that, wait, you know, That was kind of cool that he did.
You know, the Autobahn, that was kind of neat, and he did this.
Then you go, well, everything's a lie.
Then he must have been amazing and great, and I'm being lied to about all this.
And it's like, no, no.
Hitler was evil.
He was bad. He literally single-handedly destroyed Germany as we know it, slaughtered millions of his own people and millions of people around the world, millions upon millions upon millions.
He created a system of death.
That was, you know, industrialized.
So you can't just ignore that stuff.
You can't just act like that wasn't happening and say he was great because the economy went well and he made a cheap car for everyone.
So just don't take either extreme side.
Truth is somewhere in the middle.
And by taking the extremes, you force people to one edge or the other.
alex jones
That's my take on that. This is one of the best deals out there, and it funds the InfoWars.
InfoWarsPhone.com takes you to the SatellitePhoneStore.com site, but you get bigger discounts by using the URL InfoWarsPhone.com.
That's 941-955-1020.
steve quayle
Steve Quayle. The nice thing about the bivvy stick is you can use your cell phone.
But it turns it into a two-way texting satellite communication device.
And the folks at the satellite phone store bundles both the satellite phone and the bivvy stick.
And by the way, the bivvy stick is a must for any single woman that has an SOS button on it.
But this is critical because I came up with the term, no cell, no power, no problem.
And the satellite phones, you know, when you and I started advertising these because they are a fabulous sponsor, I mean, these things sold out.
So what they've done at the satellite phone store is bundled both the bivy stick and the satellite phone.
This is text only. This is obviously text.
The satellite phone and communication.
The nice thing about the satellite phones and the bivy sticks is with the auxiliary power command units that are available from the satellite phone stores.
alex jones
That's right. Just as important as the phone or the bivy stick is the satellite power packs that are cutting edge, super high quality, low cost.
They got solar panel systems.
They've got little portable systems.
I mean, there's so much on the store.
steve quayle
I have the portable system right here, and I keep this one right on my desk.
You know, I've got a backup solar generator, but I want people to understand this is the kind of stuff that you're going to be relying on.
And when you're in communications, you're in control.
Look, this isn't just a sales pitch.
This is a life pitch.
When you go out on a boat, you put life preservers on.
When you need to communicate, and I would encourage people to start using their devices, and those of you who basically haven't gotten them yet, to get them ASAP.
alex jones
They have them ready right now to ship to you in forward.
InfoWarsPhone.com.
Export Selection