Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to the American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live from the InfoWars studios. | ||
| Yes, we've taken over the War Room studio again today. | ||
| We'll be taking your calls throughout the show. | ||
| We'll be joined by Mary Bowden in the third hour. | ||
| Dr. Mary Bowden, who is coming after everything she's ever built because she refused to go along with the COVID narrative. | ||
| Lots of stuff to talk about today, of course. | ||
| The... The ongoing outrage about Tucker Carlson actually showing what happened on January 6th. | ||
| We'll get to that and so much more news as well. | ||
| Just a lot to cover today. So let's get right into it. | ||
| it. | ||
| Here it is, your daily dispatch. | ||
| All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Wednesday, the 8th of March, 2023. | ||
| Haig mayor threatens to use military gear to keep rival climate farmer protests in check. | ||
| Mayor van der Zanen of The Haig said he could indeed authorize the use of military equipment to remove blockades or tractors in his city on March 11th. | ||
| On that date, the upcoming Saturday, both climate activists and farmers are set to demonstrate in the Zwied, Holland city. | ||
| He says, quote, I'm not going to rule out the possibility that defense equipment will be deployed. | ||
| That is available if necessary, he said in an interview with DeTelegraph. | ||
| He also asked police forces elsewhere in the country to provide officers to assist, saying we cannot handle this alone and to ensure the demonstrations are safe. | ||
| Yes, he's very concerned about how safe they are. | ||
| Once again, just more evidence that... | ||
| The so-called democracies that we have to go to World War III to defend are nothing of the sort, and they'll do whatever the hell they want, and if you want to protest it, they'll send the military after you, just like they did against the Netherlands farmers earlier last year. | ||
| Meanwhile, huge victory here, and we'll expand on this later in the show. | ||
| Can the Lone Star State go it alone? | ||
| That's the headline from Just the News. | ||
| State lawmakers introduce Tegxit bill for secession. | ||
| A Texas lawmaker has introduced a so-called Tegxit bill that would put secession from the union on the ballot. | ||
| Representative Brian Slayton of Houston introduced the Texas Independence Referendum Act, which would facilitate a statewide vote on whether Texas should reassert its status as an independent nation. | ||
| The New York Post Reported, of course, major success for one of our favorite guests, Dan Miller and the Texas Nationalist Movement Organization. | ||
| Again, we'll expand on that and hear from Mr. | ||
| Miller a little bit later. Meanwhile, the cover-up is, as Ridiculous, as you can imagine. | ||
| Again, we're sort of presented with the undeniable fact that The mainstream media's goal or role that they play and that seemingly think it's their purpose for existing is to simply regurgitate whatever the intelligence services tell them. | ||
| It's kind of hilarious. | ||
| I mean, the obvious joke is that, yeah, the pro-Ukrainian group in this case is the United States government. | ||
| But... The cover-up's ridiculous. | ||
| Nobody's buying it. Russia's come out to essentially laugh in the face of these people as they point out that Simon Hirsch already said who did it, where they did it, how they did it. | ||
| I mean, the clue game is over. | ||
| We have the answer. But they're still desperately trying to cover it up. | ||
| Speaking of desperately trying to cover things up, House GOP faces new January 6th headache courtesy of Tucker Carlson. | ||
| That's the headline from Politico. | ||
| The Capitol Police Chief and Republican senators slammed the Fox News host for falsely characterizing the violent riot using footage Speaker Kevin McCarthy provided him. | ||
| We're going to cover this in the next segment and get into what all of the responses were. | ||
| Suffice it to say that you saw how much pressure was being exerted in public. | ||
| You can only imagine what the private behind-the-scenes pressure is like. | ||
| And a lot of people were pretty disappointed with the follow-up yesterday with Tucker Carlson as he exposed a little few things. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There was a little bit of stuff that he exposed, and we'll talk about that. | |
| But, no, they got the call, and the real juicy bits were... | ||
| Have not been presented yet. | ||
| Finally, protests in France. | ||
| We'll get into those a little bit later as well. | ||
| Violence erupting thousands through the streets in France. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Wednesday, March 8th, Year of Our Lord, 2023. | |
| And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| I think it's time to blow this thing and get it Alright, good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
| We have a lot of stuff to cover. | ||
| First and foremost is, of course, the January 6th tapes. | ||
| The revelations made by Tucker Carlson. | ||
| Now, the first day was pretty bombshell. | ||
| About five myths and lies about January 6th. | ||
| Completely devastated by video evidence. | ||
| This is the strange part. | ||
| We've had two years of selective editing, picking and choosing only the most out of context clips to present to the American people in order to portray January 6th as what it was not, an armed insurrection, a coup against the legitimate government. | ||
| And now Tucker Carlson's done the opposite. | ||
| He's showing clips that prove that it was nothing of the sort, that even people that have been sentenced two years in prison, their biggest crime was being escorted around the Capitol by the police officers who were in charge. | ||
| This has absolutely infuriated the Uniparty at the top, and we'll show you clips of what they said yesterday. | ||
| But again, I want to remind you that whatever you're seeing in public is just a shadow of what is going on behind the scenes. | ||
| So yesterday, Tucker Carlson did another January 6th show. | ||
| At least the first half of his program was dedicated to January 6th. | ||
| He had Julie Kelly on, talked about the prisoners. | ||
| He also had an extensive interview with one of the Capitol Police officers. | ||
| The whole thing was a little bit disjointed, though, and you could tell that It wasn't what was originally planned to be aired. | ||
| It was kind of confusing, actually. | ||
| It was like, wait, is this the same interview? | ||
| We're going back to it now? | ||
| Typically, and you would think that they'd had several weeks to go through all of this footage and then plan out their presentation over a week or so that they were going to roll out. | ||
| I'm sure they did that. And then the second day comes. | ||
| No new footage from the January 6th tapes is presented. | ||
| But you do have an interview with one of the Capitol Police officers, the guy who was in the red MAGA hat. | ||
| And what he came out with was... | ||
| It was pretty interesting. I mean, it wasn't a dud. | ||
| This wasn't a nothing burger. | ||
| I mean, it did show that when they called for backup, when he was trying to get the Senators out of danger and evacuate them, there was no response whatsoever. | ||
| And the person that failed to respond and failed to evacuate the Senators was promoted while he, the guy who was actually trying to do his job and protect the Senators, was fired, basically. | ||
| basically he was you know put on leave and then eventually quit because he was taking so much abuse from them so I mean it was a pretty big deal in the first place but even the way it was presented it was like Doug Carlson threw to the interview and they showed clips from it and then went back to Doug Carlson and then he threw back to the interview like it was all very disjointed and kind of strange and it seemed like they were scrambling behind the scenes to come up with something new to present because what they were going to present | ||
| got scuttled got shut down somehow And of course, we know, we can see in public, the pressure that the likes of Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell, the Washington, D.C. Uniparty, were trying to pressure Fox News to take Tucker Carlson off the air. | ||
| That alone is a ridiculous violation of the First Amendment, the Constitution, in both its spirit and its letter. | ||
| I don't know why Chuck Schumer has not been censured by the Congress so far, by his fellow senators, to get up and demand that a news corporation take down one of their anchors because he's presenting facts, he's presenting reality, he's presenting video. | ||
| You can watch and come to your own conclusions. | ||
| I mean, that just flies in the face of everything that we believe about free speech and the First Amendment. | ||
| But, of course, it's a cover-up. | ||
| It's desperation. It's panic on behalf of the Uniparty. | ||
| And I just have to guess that, yeah, they got the call and Fox News shut it down. | ||
| Fox News got very worried because, remember, even outside of the legal avenues that the government could use to shut down This presentation are just the sort of behind-the-scenes pressures that are wielded. | ||
| So if Chuck Schumer gets all of his Democrat colleagues, and even Mitch McConnell gets a lot of his Republican colleagues, and they all come together and go, if you keep talking about January 6th, we're never giving an interview to Fox News again, and then the Fox News controllers Decide, well, this is just not worth it. | ||
| We're going to be cut off from all of our sources if we keep doing this. | ||
| They have different methods of applying pressure to Fox News to get them to drop a subject that they find uncomfortable to deal with. | ||
| Let's go to some of these. Here is clip number 13. | ||
| Chuck Schumer appealing directly to Rupert Murdoch, telling him to stop Tucker Carlson from... | ||
| Going on air. Stop him. | ||
| You have to stop him. I mean, he's lying, but stop him. | ||
| Shut him up. Shut him up right now. | ||
| Shut it down. Let's go to clip 13. | ||
| These lies continue tonight. | ||
| Rupert Murdoch, who has admitted they were lies and said he regretted it, has a special obligation to stop Tucker Carlson from going on tonight now that he's seen how he has perverted and slimed the truth. | ||
| And from letting them go on again and again and again. | ||
| Not because their views deserve such a program, but because our democracy depends on it. | ||
| Our democracy depends. Save our democracy. | ||
| Shut down free speech. | ||
| Save our democracy. | ||
| It's about our democracy depends on it. | ||
| Tucker Carlson is allowed to show footage of January 6th without the approval and careful editing overseen by the January 6th committee, who, by the way, has had control of all these tapes the whole time. | ||
| Democracy is over, folks. | ||
| You don't believe that, do you? | ||
| Come on, you're not that easy to fool, are you? | ||
| They just say democracy's at stake and you're just like, okay, kill the babies. | ||
| Yes, okay, do whatever you want. | ||
| Go to any lengths. | ||
| You said save democracy, so I'll do anything that you say. | ||
| I mean, this is how they expect the American people to act. | ||
| Your outrage is only confirming what we know. | ||
| Your hysterical nonsense is only confirming that This is the truth, and you're desperate not to have it out. | ||
| You're desperate to carefully control the narrative, carefully control the messaging, which is only a thing you really have to do if what you're pushing is a lie. | ||
| If what you're telling is the truth, you wouldn't care no matter how much footage was put out there. | ||
| You wouldn't care what access was granted to who because you know that you're on the side of truth, and you Any evidence presented, if it's real evidence, will bear out your conclusion. | ||
| But that's not the case because they're lying. | ||
| Again, it's just sort of exhausting having to go through this. | ||
| It's easier just to ignore and castigate these people. | ||
| But we'll finish out this segment with Mitch McConnell and then we'll come back with Kevin McCarthy's defense as well as Kash Patel saying what else he knows Tucker Carlson has on footage. | ||
| Let's go now to Mitch McConnell saying there was a mistake. | ||
| There was a mistake for Fox News to do this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch....with the Capitol Police's very serious concerns about the release of this footage. | |
| Was it a mistake by Speaker McCarthy to give access to Tucker Carlson of this security footage? | ||
| My concern is how it was depicted, which is a different issue. | ||
| Clearly, the Chief of the Capitol Police, in my view, correctly describes what most of us witnessed firsthand on January 6th. | ||
| So that's my reaction to it. | ||
| It was a mistake, in my view, for Fox News to depict this in a way that's completely at variance with what our chief law enforcement official here at the Capitol thinks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mr. Leader, if that's the case, following up on what you said, Tucker Clemson has already teased another round of videos that are going to be released today. | |
| I understand that you're accepting the way that Fox is depicting it, but he's been forecasting this for months, asking for this access to this footage to have a presentation just like this. | ||
| It wasn't a mistake for the Speaker to hand that. | ||
| You guys know I have many faults, but one of them is not answering the question in a way that I don't want to answer it. | ||
| I've given you the answer. Showing themselves for who they are. | ||
| And again, we'll show Kevin McCarthy's response to this on the other side. | ||
| Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Yes, we're talking about Tucker Carlson's very strange episode yesterday. | ||
| Actually, who was it on... | ||
| Twitter put it really well. Cheryl Atkinson put it well on Twitter, and she says, I don't have inside info, but Tucker's program looks as if they dropped the January 6th videos they'd planned and promised, moved up the reaction segments they were going to do later in the program, and then dropped the topic of January 6th entirely. | ||
| What do you think? Yeah, I think that's pretty accurate, and I think it has to do with not just the pressure that was exerted in public by the likes of Mitch McConnell and Chuck Schumer, But also, that would be a shadow of what was going on behind the scenes, as you know, when these people decide that they want something done. | ||
| It doesn't matter, you know, how much power is opposing them. | ||
| They tend to get it done. | ||
| I mean, just look at the way that they took out literally billions of dollars of profit from Adidas just because Kanye West hinted that he might say something about the Jews, right? | ||
| It's like, You've got to understand the pressure these people can bring to bear if they want something silenced or want something taken away. | ||
| God only knows what they have against Tucker Carlson and others. | ||
| So that was my takeaway, watching Tucker Carlson last night. | ||
| I was watching the live broadcast here on InfoWars, and I agreed with Alex Noen, who were both sort of sitting there going, okay, he's not doing it. | ||
| They've... They're not doing what they planned on doing. | ||
| Again, you don't roll out a video like they did on Monday without having Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday planned. | ||
| If this is what they planned, that just doesn't make any sense. | ||
| It just doesn't make any sense. | ||
| No, what happened was calls got made. | ||
| Calls got made and Fox News bent to the pressure. | ||
| That's my reading of this situation. | ||
| Of course, Kevin McCarthy was questioned about this. | ||
| I thought he had a pretty good answer. Let's go to clip number eight here. | ||
| Kevin McCarthy defends the Tucker's release of the January 6th tapes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because of the footage that you gave Tucker Carlson, last night he went on and said this was a mostly peaceful chaos, as he said. | |
| He downplayed Brian Sicknick's death, said it was not related to January 6th, said this was not an insurrection. | ||
| Do you regret giving him this footage so he could whitewash the events of that day? | ||
| No, I said at the very beginning, transparency. | ||
| And so what I want to produce for everybody is exactly what I said, that people could actually look at it and see what's gone on that day. | ||
| But why, Mr. | ||
| Speaker? Did you read this portrayal of what happened that day? | ||
| Look, each person come up with their own conclusion, but what I just wanted to make sure is I had transparency. | ||
| Because I know in CNN, I mean, I had here... | ||
| Where you guys actually broke where we were. | ||
| This was a secret location, Fort McClare. | ||
| I don't know if you got concerned by that. | ||
| I don't even know from the point of view of security if we could ever be taken there again. | ||
| But when you broke that at CNN, that was a real concern to a lot of people. | ||
| I had a real concern also when I want to make sure transparency. | ||
| Look, the officer's death is tragic. | ||
| Anytime an officer is passed in this situation, I want to make sure they're protected. | ||
| I want to make sure the transparency goes forward. | ||
| Is this in any way part of the deal that you made to win the Speakership? | ||
| No, no. To specifically give the content a talk? | ||
| No, the answer is no. | ||
| If you follow, I'm not sure if you were there the times before, I got asked a question in a press. | ||
| What I would do in the process. | ||
| I've watched on January 6th committee how it was only politically committed. | ||
| On the January 6th committee, you couldn't have been most, the minority side wasn't allowed to put people on. | ||
| And I just thought it was fair if someone asked me a question. | ||
| Just transparency. So what I tried to do is be able to release the information, which we'll do to everybody. | ||
| I worked with the Capitol Police. | ||
| I asked them for any clips on the way that they had concern with the security level. | ||
| Only one of the clips did, and we were able to change that. | ||
| An interesting thing the Capitol Police told us when we went through this is that January 6th never asked them about that, the security. | ||
| So that's why they showed, unfortunately, Vice President Pence when he was being escorted out. | ||
| They used my office on the escorted where we went out. | ||
| They never asked the Capitol Police if that's showing security clearance that they shouldn't, which they didn't. | ||
| They didn't ask me as well. | ||
| I didn't. | ||
| So, again, there he is, you know, explaining why – And again, it's worth taking ourselves back. | ||
| It's great that that clip starts off with the reporter going, Tucker Carlson claimed this was a mostly peaceful protest. | ||
| Yes, hilarious that that's the word that he used because, of course, that was popularized from the meme and the reality and the continuing – the multiple examples of people standing in front of a burning building or showing clips of protesters beating the crap out of random people they run into and overlaid it is the that was popularized from the meme and the reality and the continuing – It's a mostly peaceful protest. | ||
| So going by those standards, January 6th was significantly more peaceful than anything Black Lives Matter ever did. | ||
| But then you have to remind yourself that the January 6th committee was a Soviet-style show trial. | ||
| It was a complete fabrication. | ||
| They presented only the video evidence that they thought bolstered their case and hid and made impossible to access any evidence that may have gone against them. | ||
| They didn't have hearings in public. | ||
| They had hearings behind closed doors and then cherry-picked only the responses they thought served their purpose. | ||
| It was only the prosecution that was allowed to bring witnesses or present evidence in the first place, which, I mean, this is... | ||
| This is a complete violation of everything that we know to be, you know, how you get to the truth, how you convict people. | ||
| It was just through all of that out the window to hold a publicity stunt in order to frame January 6th only in the way that they wanted it to be framed. | ||
| So for them to be complaining about this is just like they can just shut up. | ||
| They can just shut up. Like, what? | ||
| You know, at least this is just a single... | ||
| Cable news anchor doing this. | ||
| They did the same thing in the opposite direction, but they had every news station all at once broadcasted all at the same time. | ||
| And they had all of the trappings of the Congress and the Senate in an official proceeding to give it the air of legitimacy that made people believe that what they were getting were the facts and really what they're being presented was a carefully orchestrated lie when it came to January 6th. | ||
| So hilarious to see how much they flip out. | ||
| It's sort of emblematic of the information war, right? | ||
| They require full submission, total censorship. | ||
| They require brainwashing and careful orchestration between the media outlets and the Congress and the law enforcement and everybody, the judges and everybody else when all we need is just to present the truth. | ||
| All we need is just one person to go, oh, here's a video. | ||
| You should watch it. | ||
| And then their entire facade crumbles and collapses. | ||
| That's because it's fake. | ||
| It's false. It's an illusion that disintegrates as soon as the light of truth is shined on it. | ||
| It's actually very emblematic, very typical of everything that That we see happen with their deceptions being undone by the truth. | ||
| Truth is like a wrecking ball. | ||
| I mean, it just comes in and shatters everything they've carefully built up because everything they've carefully built up can't withstand the truth because it's not built from the truth. | ||
| Ali Alexander says this, Did I know that Tucker wasn't going to air more Yes, unfortunately. | ||
| His team was unable to go through it all, among other challenges I won't mention here. | ||
| They showed Jacob, which I loved, but didn't show anything yesterday. | ||
| That was their Plan C story. | ||
| He says McCarthy and Marjorie Taylor Greene are deceiving you. | ||
| The January 6th families are furious that everyone's falling for the bait. | ||
| Ask yourself, why show footage of somebody already convicted when there are others who, if spotlighted, would be exonerated or it would at least pause the proceedings? | ||
| Pray for them. Yeah, a lot of January 6th defendants are saying, look, there could be exonerating evidence out there that's being withheld from us. | ||
| That's a violation. All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| I was thinking I was going to move on from January 6th, but there's still just a few more things I want to cover in this segment. | ||
| I'm going to open up phone lines in the next segment and move on to some other big stories here. | ||
| But first, I want to... | ||
| I'd like to encourage Republican lawmakers out there to just have a pair of balls, won't you? | ||
| Won't you just stand up for this country on the cusp of our total and utter destruction, our submersion into the cesspit of totalitarianism? | ||
| Won't you stand up for your constituents and the truth and reality? | ||
| Kevin McCarthy gave a tentative defense of his release of these things. | ||
| Marjorie Taylor Greene has... | ||
| I published a video on Twitter that I think does a good job of illustrating the differences between how left-wing and right-wing terrorists are covered, activists are discussed in mainstream media. | ||
| But Politico has this article. | ||
| House GOP faces new January 6th headache courtesy of Tucker Carlson. | ||
| See, they're trying to put this on you. | ||
| They're trying to claim that because Tucker Carlson is exposing the truth about what happened on January 6th, somehow it's your obligation now to shut him down or else the liberals are going to think badly about you. | ||
| The liberals would throw you in a pit and light you on fire if they could. | ||
| That's how they feel about you, and they will feel that about you no matter what you do. | ||
| There's a funny headline. | ||
| I don't think I printed it out today. | ||
| But it was like, despite kicking out Nick Fuentes from CPAC, the conference was still rife with anti-Semitism and bigotry. | ||
| And it's like, see, you've got to stop kneeling to your enemies. | ||
| You've got to stop bowing to the demands of people who despise you no matter what you do. | ||
| When someone despises you when you're kneeling, let them despise you when you're standing up and choking them out, metaphorically. | ||
| Okay? Just give them something to despise you for. | ||
| Stand up for your constituents. | ||
| You don't have to do what the left does, which is lie and deceive and wield this mafia-like power. | ||
| All you have to do is ignore their little jabs and their intellectual judo that they try to pull where they go, oh, see, it's the Republicans now. | ||
| They're going to get heat from this, so they better come out and tell off Tucker Carlson and demand that he stop showing these things. | ||
| Just, they're your enemies, so they're going to say things to you to try to trick you into taking their position. | ||
| You can ignore them, and you can stand up against them. | ||
| I really haven't seen any Republicans stand up for this, except for Kevin McCarthy, and he was directly asked because he was the one that gave Tucker Carlson the footage, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, because of course she's, you know, enmeshed in this as well. | ||
| But every single Republican should have been on the Senate floor and Giving an equal and opposite vehement rejection of everything Chuck Schumer said. | ||
| Every single one of them should be up there mocking the left and going, oh, you think you can have a committee where you keep all of us off and you carefully orchestrate exactly what evidence is being presented and now you're freaking out because we're actually giving the defense time? | ||
| That's the proper procedure in any case? | ||
| And again, there shouldn't really be that big of a difference between the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. | ||
| That's what these people do. | ||
| That's what Chuck Schumer – the Chuck Schumers of the world – that's the area they thrive in is when it's inside the letter of the law but outside the spirit of the law. | ||
| So everybody who knows what the spirit of the law represents is outraged and is going, this is a violation of the First Amendment. | ||
| You're trying to exert pressure to silence a journalist. | ||
| This is wrong. And then Chuck Schumer can go, oh, but I didn't break the law, though. | ||
| Oh, but I didn't break the law, so you can't be mad at me. | ||
| It's like you can just tell them to shut up. | ||
| You tell them to shut up and go away and continue pushing and, you know, come out. | ||
| And, I mean, Chuck Schumer should be censured for trying to exert pressure to silence a journalist. | ||
| That's just wrong in every possible way you can imagine. | ||
| And every Republican should be out there demanding that the January 6th prisoners be released, that the entire committee, the entire January 6th committee be removed from their assignments in the Congress. | ||
| I mean, this is unacceptable that these people would carry out this show trial in total violation of everything that we believe as Americans, letter of the law or the spirit of the law. | ||
| It's a total violation and they have to be held to account. | ||
| This is a toss-up for the This is like an underhand pitch. | ||
| Knock it out of the park. | ||
| Instead, you've got the Democrats whispering in their ear, don't swing. | ||
| Don't swing. If you swing, I'm going to call you names. | ||
| Just knock it out of the park. Just take what Tucker Carlson has given you. | ||
| Use it as a hammer to utterly devastate your enemies. | ||
| It's the only thing that you should be doing right now. | ||
| If you aren't doing that, you're not just failing yourself and your constituents. | ||
| you're failing the entire country and handing over control of all of our systems of power to people who treat the American people with utter and total disdain and condemnation. | ||
| So stand up for us, please. | ||
| Like, won't you just do that once? | ||
| Like I get Mitch McConnell is just the worst. | ||
| I get that he's just never been right about anything as far as I can possibly remember. | ||
| I'm sort of used to him doing that. | ||
| Just what, has he got your hand? | ||
| Is he controlling you like a puppet? | ||
| Are you living in his jowls? | ||
| Like, why would you continue to operate as if he has any legitimacy whatsoever? | ||
| We all have the evidence. | ||
| We can all see with our own eyes. | ||
| everybody in America, even before the tapes came out, the vast majority, something like 67%, according to some polls, believe that January 6th was an inside job and it was helped orchestrated by members within the federal government. | ||
| So you have the people on your side, you have the truth on your side, you have the facts and the evidence on your side. | ||
| Why are you not standing up to a Shipwrecked Crew on Twitter says this in reference to Tucker Carlson in the videos. | ||
| One important clarification. Yes, the DOJ made a database of videos available to defense attorneys in filed cases, but the DOJ could only put into the database what Congress gave the DOJ. If Congress and Pelosi held back video, then DOJ would not have to put it in the database. | ||
| All videos from body-worn camera of the Capital Police and CCTV are property of Congress, not the DOJ. That is a separation of powers issue. | ||
| Whether the DOJ was obligated by Brady, the Brady statute is what requires prosecution to give the defense evidence that would exonerate their client. | ||
| So that's what's being withheld here. | ||
| This guy's saying that it's not the DOJ withholding this Brady evidence, it's that the Congress never gave it to the DOJ so they can't present it. | ||
| So instead it's like if you have a murder case and the real murderer, It's not the prosecution necessarily withholding evidence, but they're also not asking for the evidence and the evidence exists. | ||
| It's being withheld by our own Congress because they're enemies of the people and trying to criminalize being a conservative. | ||
| Whether DOJ was obligated by Brady to get videos from Congress was litigated, and judges held the DOJ didn't have any way to force Congress to produce videos. | ||
| And this also ties into why they use the Capitol Police and why they've expanded the Capitol Police powers and now have Capitol Police offices in places like Florida and California because they're under a different jurisdiction and operate under different rules than normal police. | ||
| So they can avoid things like FOIA requests or Brady violations. | ||
| So, again, this is just the wholesale destruction of our entire judicial system, which is the bedrock and foundation of our freedoms as Americans. | ||
| So maybe you should stand up for this, you absolute cowards. | ||
| David Marcus has this story on Daily Mail. | ||
| The January 6th committee was destroyed by a single cable news segment. | ||
| The $3 million two-year January 6th committee was destroyed by a single devastating cable news segment because the left was never interested in truth. | ||
| They just wanted revenge. | ||
| Over the course of two years, hundreds of witness interviews and 10 highly choreographed public hearings, Democrats in Congress sought to create a carefully constructed story of January 6th Capitol Hill riots. | ||
| How fitting that such an extravagant outlay of government resources would be thrown on the trash heap by a single cable news segment. | ||
| And that's exactly what happened. | ||
| You have, again, three years, millions of dollars, just the combined effort of the entire media and Democrat establishment coming together to try to portray what happened on January 6th as an existential threat to democracy. | ||
| Just the worst thing ever, and it was the worst since the Civil War, and it was worse than 9-11, and then you have the actual footage of it that shows that it was nothing of the sort and destroys their entire... | ||
| Just everything. Because that's the truth. | ||
| Because the truth will destroy your lies in a very simple and easy to understand method. | ||
| And they're freaking out about this and they're trying desperately to cover it up. | ||
| And we can't let them. | ||
| We won't let them. And if Tucker Carlson can't get it across on his show, I just hope he gives the footage that he has to somebody who can. | ||
| Just give it to us. | ||
| Give it to Infowars. Give it to Alex Jones. | ||
| We'll air it. We'll air it over and over on repeat. | ||
| These people don't have any pressure on us. | ||
| There's nothing they can wield against us. | ||
| They've already tried and we've survived. | ||
| Hard to even really encompass holistically the number of problems that we're dealing with right now. | ||
| Welcome back. It's The American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. I'm going to go ahead and open up the phone lines right now. | ||
| We'll take your calls throughout the second hour. | ||
| We're joined in the third hour by Dr. | ||
| Mary Bowden as she is under attack for treating people for COVID-19. | ||
| Which again, we're just being attacked at every different level. | ||
| It really is something else. | ||
| So we're going to open up the phone lines now. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Lots of videos to show you. | ||
| Lots of stories to get to still in today's program. | ||
| Let's start with, again, just one of the issues that As we're running around trying to stop the house from collapsing, trying to stop the attack that we're under as people are breaking in the back door and other people are throwing Molotov cocktails at the front door, this whole time there's a faucet that's just on and just flooding the basement slowly but surely. | ||
| It just keeps running. It's just every second of the day more and more spills in and this is of course the open border. | ||
| It's like We could spend every day all day talking about just the open border because of the crazy horrific deaths, the fentanyl overdoses, the innumerable problems that come from this just continuous source of strife for the American people. | ||
| But it's like we have so much other stuff to deal with. | ||
| You've got the digital ID coming in and the CBDC is coming in and apparently the Federal Reserve is going to shut down and merge with the United States Treasury. | ||
| These are rumors that I've heard that I just don't even have time to get into because of all this other stuff. | ||
| You've got Antifa. Carrying out coordinated attacks with guys in ammo emerging from the woods and throwing bombs at police officers and then they're let out the next day. | ||
| Also in those ranks are SBLC lawyers who have now been let out on bail for $5,000 and are probably back to their job of telling the FBI who the terrorists are. | ||
| I mean this is how insane our entire world is becoming. | ||
| And throughout all of this continuously there is a steady surge at the border of people who are... | ||
| Not asylum seekers. | ||
| And this is like not a small thing. | ||
| There are no wars south of us. | ||
| There is no major conflict. | ||
| There is no government hunting a particular type of people. | ||
| There's no ethnicity that's being purged from anything south of America. | ||
| What does exist is the now, unfortunately... | ||
| Come to be expected violence from cartels and others. | ||
| There's just continuous criminality destroying lives south of our border. | ||
| Of course, those are the people being empowered and enriched by our open border policy. | ||
| But at the same time, there are just literally millions and millions and millions of people surging towards our border at any moment and continually crossing. | ||
| And of course, the solution from the Democrats is to Just say they're not illegal because they're asylum seekers, but they're not actually seeking asylum. | ||
| It's a lie. It's a scam. | ||
| It's just these people, man. | ||
| I swear. I should always go back to the idea of whether it's the COVID relief funds, hundreds of billions of dollars stolen, just completely taking advantage of an emergency situation and Or the thing at the south of the border where you've got these rules in place that are for extreme circumstances, | ||
| for unique situations where the rule of law and the laws on the books would impede the humanitarian efforts that you have to have. | ||
| All this came about because of World War II and the Jews fleeing the Nazis, and it was like, oh, look, we don't have time to... | ||
| Go through the normal process. | ||
| We've got to get them out of there. We'll get them out of there and we'll handle things on the other side. | ||
| It's an emergency situation. | ||
| It's a rare occurrence. | ||
| We have to just temporarily, we've got to suspend these rules because they're just slowing us down and we'll put them back later. | ||
| And it's this charitable activity. | ||
| It's this kind, decent, like, you know, suspension of laws that It's just taken advantage of. | ||
| So, you know, it's always... | ||
| It's like it makes you want to not be charitable anymore, right? | ||
| It's like you love giving to charities and you find out that the charities are just spending your money on yachts. | ||
| You're like, well, what the hell am I going to give to those anymore? | ||
| It's like giving to a cancer fund and then discovering that the person running the cancer fund isn't giving the money to the cancer patient. | ||
| They're using it to pay off their bad loans for a Ferrari that they bought, right? | ||
| It's not just that they're taking money. | ||
| It's not just that they're violating the law. | ||
| It's that they're using an ostensibly good thing to do it, ruining the good thing, ruining everything. | ||
| It's just evil. It's just a persistent bubbling up of evil that we're having to deal with. | ||
| So we're going to go to this video here. | ||
| Clip number three. Tom Homan, who was in charge of the border under President Trump, He's right when he calls this open border policy treasonous. | ||
| Bordering on treasonous, but I'd say it's treason and everybody involved should be subjected to the punishment that you give to people who commit treason. | ||
| You hang them or inject them with poison. | ||
| It's capital offense. | ||
| So let's go now to Tom Homan pointing out that what's being done at our border is open and obvious treason. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. It is time to stand up for the American people. | |
| That time is now. | ||
| Joe Biden's the first president in history of the nation who came into office and unsecured a border. | ||
| That is unequivocally false. | ||
| So what him and Secretary Mayorkas has done is borderline treasonous. | ||
| A mom, a poor mother who lost two kids to fentanyl. | ||
| That fentanyl they took came during the last administration. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They say our policies were inhumane. | |
| Well, let me tell you something. Under President Trump, illegal immigration was down 83%, a 45-year loan. | ||
| So when President Trump had illegal immigration down to 83%, how many women weren't being raped? | ||
| How many children didn't drown in the river? | ||
| How many women and children weren't sex trafficking to the United States? | ||
| How many Americans didn't die of fentanyl overdoses? | ||
| How many non-suspected terrorists didn't come across that border? | ||
| This administration is the most inhumane administration I've ever seen. | ||
| President Trump saved lives. | ||
| What this administration has done, since Joe Biden's been in office, we've got over 1,700 migrants dead on U.S. soil, a record. | ||
| We've got over 106,000 Americans dying from drug overdoses. | ||
| A record. We got a record of women and children being sex trapped across the border. | ||
| The cartels are making bans. | ||
| They've already arrested 156 known as suspected terrorists across the border. | ||
| We got 1.2 million gotaways from 170 different countries. | ||
| Many of those countries sponsored terrorism. | ||
| If you don't think a single one of that 1.2 million didn't come across that border to try to destroy this nation, then you're wrong. | ||
| This administration's killing people with their policies. | ||
| Mayorkas needs to be impeached, and we're right after him. | ||
| Biden needs to be next. | ||
| You make the promises this administration has made that you can cross the border. | ||
| You won't be detained. We'll give you a work authorization. | ||
| And guess what? I can't arrest you because you sit here illegally. | ||
| When you make those type of promises, the most vulnerable people in the world are going to put themselves in Henson's cartels to be small across the border. | ||
| This administration's policies are dumb. | ||
| They're killing record number of Americans. | ||
| They've killed a record number of migrants. | ||
| And God help us. | ||
| Thousands of these children are in very bad situations right now. | ||
| We need to hold these people responsible. | ||
| Do you think you've done anything wrong? | ||
| No, I don't. I think it is used for political purposes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What does the future hold? The future? | |
| I'll tell you anything I told President Trump. | ||
| If he comes back, I come back and fix this. | ||
| No one did more. | ||
| No one did more to secure this border than President Trump. | ||
| If you don't like him, then you don't like me. | ||
| I made a commitment. I even told him I'd come back for free. | ||
| I'm so pissed off. Again, the thing that stands out to me is Alejandro Mayorkas just being like, no, it's being used for political purposes. | ||
| It's like, yeah, well, you're the Democrats. | ||
| You want an open border. | ||
| Republicans don't want an open border. | ||
| That's a political difference you have. | ||
| Your policies result in death and murder and fentanyl overdoses and crime and billions of dollars being spent. | ||
| People on the border being made miserable and being subject to crime from the cartels and the cartel influence on small towns along the border or even 100 miles away from the border. | ||
| Your policies politically are devastating to the people that are subjected to them. | ||
| You can't just say, well, it's political, so therefore I don't have to answer, I don't have to account for the effect of my policies. | ||
| It's... It's unacceptable. | ||
| That's all. Folks, we're going to come back on the other side with your phone calls, many more stories and videos to get to, including what's happening in Idaho, where the New York Times has collaborated with the Democrats to... | ||
| Take over when democracy goes against them. | ||
| You can support everything we do here by going to infowarsstore.com. | ||
| New on the site is turmeric toothpaste by Dr. | ||
| Jones Natural. It's the brand new turmeric toothpaste by Dr. | ||
| Jones' Naturals. Welcome back, folks. We will go out to your phone calls this hour, joined by Dr. | ||
| Mary Bowden in the third hour. | ||
| Here in this first short segment of the second hour, I want to offer a hearty congratulations to our allies at the Texas Nationalist Movement. | ||
| One step closer to extricating ourselves from the control of the federal government once and for all. | ||
| Just the News has the story. | ||
| State lawmaker introduces Tegxit bill for secession. | ||
| Texas lawmaker has introduced a so-called Tegxit bill that would put secession from the union on the ballot. | ||
| We'll cover it. We'll tell you a little bit more about it in just a second. | ||
| But first, let me go to a video from American Journal guest Daniel Miller. | ||
| Clip number 16, the Texas bill has been filed. | ||
| Here's the Texas nationalist movement telling you about the success that they've had. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Okay folks, we've got a bit of an announcement to make. | |
| As you know, we have been working very hard this session to get House Bill 1359 from last session filed, or as it is known, the Texas Independence Referendum Act. | ||
| Well, I'm proud to announce that this morning, State Representative Brian Slayton has filed the Texas Independence Referendum Act. | ||
| So while this is great news for us, it means that the work is just beginning. | ||
| So what we're going to ask everyone to do is immediately get out right now, contact your state representative and let them know to support House Bill 3596. | ||
| House Bill 3596 or the Texas Independence Referendum Act. | ||
| With your help, Talking to these legislators with all of your work, not only did we get this filed, but we could as Texans have a vote on Texit in November of this year. | ||
| So friends, let's go win. | ||
| So there you go, a little announcement from Daniel Miller. | ||
| Could be as soon as this November at least a vote asking the people of Texas whether... | ||
| We want to be a part of the criminal cabal they call the federal government or whether we can get out of it and just start doing things our own way. | ||
| We are the size of France by landmass. | ||
| We do have an economy equal or even greater than the country of Russia. | ||
| We have enough oil in our West Texas oil fields to power the entire United States for 200 years. | ||
| There's absolutely no reason why we should be under the thumb of the people in Washington, D.C. who clearly despise us, clearly do not represent us, and are doing everything they can to destroy everything we've built over the last 200, 250 years. | ||
| And I know it's a pipe dream. | ||
| I know I don't have a magic wand. | ||
| But, you know, Texas was founded in the first place because of a mass movement of people across geography. | ||
| It was not uncommon at the time to see abandoned houses in places like Missouri and Tennessee with simply the letters GTT scrawled on the front to let their neighbors know they've gone to Texas. | ||
| They picked up their stuff, moved to Texas knowing that there was a better life there and an opportunity to create something great. | ||
| There was a post I was talking about the other day from, I think it was DC Drano on Twitter, where he was just doing the math and saying that if... | ||
| If the 5.3 million Republicans in California left the state and went to other various sort of purple states, those states would become Republican overwhelmingly, and the rest of the country could have a Republican president for the next 100 years. | ||
| And I get it. You don't want to leave California. | ||
| But why not? Why not come to show? | ||
| Like, if I had a magic wand, if I had an ability to just, like, really entreat everybody around the country, every conservative, every Republican, it would be like, we're spread too thin, our numbers are overwhelmed in all these various places, if we could all just consolidate, if we could all just uproot and move To Texas. | ||
| We could have this as a starting point. | ||
| We could have this as a base of operations from which we could expand outwards. | ||
| But first you have to secure your base. | ||
| Texas could be that base. | ||
| We could separate from the federal government. | ||
| We could create our own country. | ||
| We could rule it the way we want to. | ||
| Won't you join us in this mission? | ||
| Alright, welcome back folks. | ||
| Still a lot to cover in today's program. | ||
| We go out to your phone calls now. | ||
| Let's go to Victor in South Dakota. | ||
| You want to talk about DeSantis and Trump. | ||
| Victor from South Dakota, you're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. So the Infowars vote is very important. | |
| We are a very learned, very activist. | ||
| We are a group of patriots, and we shouldn't be taken for granted. | ||
| So we shouldn't just, like, throw our vote out there. | ||
| As a matter of fact, I think we should draft Alex Jones To be president. | ||
| You know what? Because he's been right more than the politicians. | ||
| And I think he should be radically honest about it. | ||
| Let me just say this. If Texas can secede, Alex Jones for president of Texas. | ||
| Okay? I'll be vice president. | ||
| Maybe I'll be secretary of whatever. | ||
| But wouldn't that be something? | ||
| Alex Jones is president. | ||
| So what do you think M4 should do when it comes to DeSantis and Trump? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, so if Alex Jones doesn't want to run for president, and I think he should be honest about it, just say, you know what? | |
| Like, he's not going to win, but he can make money. | ||
| I mean, Bernie Sanders made money. | ||
| True. He ran for president twice and made money from it, and we've got to save info wars. | ||
| But if he doesn't want to do that, I think he should reach out to Trump and DeSantis and say, hey, you know what? | ||
| I think y'all gotta do some exclusive Infowars debate, you know, and you gotta, like, sell it. | ||
| Like, obviously, Trump should be in office right now. | ||
| He had the election stolen from him. | ||
| But he's been wrong about the vaccines. | ||
| Alex Jones has been right about it. | ||
| And it's unfortunate that we got these reports by Greg Reese talking about how the vaccines might have affected red states. | ||
| So I think he's got some explaining to do about that and just be honest with Alex Jones and just say, hey, like, what's going on? | ||
| Like, you know, we need to talk about this. | ||
| Well, I do like the I like the idea of and the reason why, you know, I'm said it's not a terrible thing for DeSantis to be running up against Trump would be if they were sort of out trying to outdo one another in order to capture the InfoWars audience. | ||
| I swear I need to I keep talking about it. | ||
| I need just to find the video of during the trial during the Sandy Hook trial. | ||
| They had an expert come up who literally she was like, I spent four years studying the effect of InfoWars. | ||
| And it was like the way she described InfoWars is influence on the American media land. | ||
| It was like he was bigger than Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh and Steven Crowder combined by a magnitude of 10. | ||
| It's like the influence that Infowars, especially Alex Jones, had over the election in 2016. | ||
| I mean, that's the reason they took us out. | ||
| That's the reason why they took us off all the platforms and tried to destroy us. | ||
| We're still here, thanks to God and to you going to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Right. You know, everybody knows that everything we've said is true. | ||
| Everything we said about the vaccine has come to fruition. | ||
| Everything we said about January 6th is absolutely true. | ||
| Everybody knows that our view of the world is the accurate one. | ||
| It's about getting the politicians to reflect that, and they'll get the votes at the end of the day. | ||
| So, yeah, I'd love to see that. | ||
| Infowars debates, Ron DeSantis versus Donald Trump. | ||
| That'd be a beautiful thing. | ||
| Maybe we could get that to work, Victor. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, because y'all been deplatformed the most. | |
| Y'all were making money off of YouTube. | ||
| Y'all were making money off of Instagram. | ||
| Alex Jones, he's always been empowering. | ||
| He's always been telling his listeners, hey, start your own broadcast. | ||
| Just get the word out. | ||
| He's been the most free with the information. | ||
| He's been the most giving. So I think it's time that DeSantis and Trump give back. | ||
| That would be nice. That would be nice. | ||
| I like that idea, Victor. Thank you so much for that good stuff. | ||
| Let's go to Albert here in Austin, actually. | ||
| You want to talk about how people behind the scenes are stopping Tucker. | ||
| Do you have inside information, Albert, or is this your speculation? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. Well, you know, what I see here is, like, with the most recent Dominion lawsuit filing, we see that, you know, behind the scenes, Tucker is texting saying that he passionately hates Trump and that he can't wait to not have to talk about Trump all the time. | |
| And that all of the Dominion stuff that Sidney Powell and everybody were bringing up was all lies and yet somebody behind the scenes is making him have to go against his actual feelings and push those lies and push the fact that the love for Trump when he hates Trump and he can't stand Trump and so If Tucker is telling somebody, | ||
| he's texting people saying that he has a passionate hate for Trump, how do we know what is real? | ||
| And how can we even listen to you if you're going off of what he's saying on air, but what he's saying in private text messages is the complete opposite? | ||
| It sounds like everything is screwed up. | ||
| So what do you think? | ||
| Did you say he passionately hates Trump? | ||
| He said he was sick of talking about Trump, which I sort of get that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He has a passionate hatred for Trump. | |
| That's a quote from the text messages that just came out in the Dominion lawsuit filing. | ||
| These are things that came out in Discovery. | ||
| These are Tucker Carlson's text messages, just like Alex Jones' text messages to Tucker. | ||
| Alex is text messaging Tucker. | ||
| Are these the same sort of things that Tucker is text messaging Alex? | ||
| Does Alex know that Tucker hates Trump? | ||
| Does Alex hate Trump? | ||
| Do all of you fucking hate Trump? | ||
| Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. | ||
| Alright, alright, alright. Well, now we gotta take you off air. | ||
| I was letting you say things... | ||
| You don't hear on this show, but then you had to go and curse. | ||
| So, all right. Thanks for that call, Albert. | ||
| Wait, can the crew bring up that text message again? | ||
| Because I'd seen some of that. | ||
| We were very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. | ||
| I truly can't wait. I want nothing more. | ||
| It does feel very close. | ||
| I imagine things will get nice starting around mid-February. | ||
| I hate him passionately. I blew up at Peter Navarro today in frustration. | ||
| I actually like Peter, but I can't handle much more of this. | ||
| Tucker Carlson to an unknown Fox employee. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, I don't know. | ||
| It seems like I'd have to see what Todd Carlson was saying on his show that night if he's texting that sort of thing. | ||
| But, I mean, I don't hate Trump, but I also get how it's annoying having to talk about, especially the scandals they come up with for Trump all the time. | ||
| Yeah. I've sort of, in a lot of ways, ignored a lot of the Dominion lawsuit for a lot of this. | ||
| It's very confusing because it's like the people at the top of Fox didn't buy the election fraud stuff. | ||
| But we're trying to stop their reporters from doing it. | ||
| I don't know. I mean, I guess I just can't speak for Fox News. | ||
| All I know is that you'll not find text messages from us saying the opposite of what we believe on air. | ||
| You won't find text messages from me saying anything that I don't say on air because I have no script and I'm just saying what I feel about things in the moment. | ||
| So sure, don't trust Fox News, trust Infowars. | ||
| That's my takeaway from it. | ||
| Let's go to – oh, well, Jefferson in Virginia might have a different idea. | ||
| You say we put up disinformation. | ||
| Go ahead, Jefferson. | ||
| You're on the air. Hey, good morning. | ||
| Harrison, how are you? Good. | ||
| Good. Sunday night I got to talk to Owen briefly about Kamala Harris and eligibility and that whole issue, and I watched it afterwards in the post-posting of the episode, and your crew put up the disinformation that keeps getting put up by academia and Google and the Internet about whether being born here makes someone eligible to be president. | ||
| It's not helpful, but I'm trying to make my point, and it took Owen much longer than it should have to grasp this. | ||
| That being born here doesn't make you eligible. | ||
| That is the end result of the birtherism controversy that was created around Obama. | ||
| That was intentional to get people that aren't paying attention to think that, oh, if you're born here, that's all that's necessary. | ||
| And that's basically been solidified by mainstream media that now the eligibility standard has been changed from Having to have a parent that was a citizen or two parents that was a citizen, not mattering where you were born, ever. It never mattered where you were born. | ||
| So now that's the only thing that seems to matter. | ||
| So now we have Vivek Ramaswamy, who's a 14th Amendment citizen. | ||
| We have Nikki Haley running for president, who's a 14th Amendment citizen. | ||
| These are birthplace citizens. | ||
| They are not juvenile citizens. | ||
| Yeah, no, it's an interesting point. | ||
| We'll be right back on the other side of more of your calls. | ||
| Alright, welcome back folks. | ||
| We've got callers calling in to argue with other callers. | ||
| We're going to make this show a one big conversation. | ||
| Let's go to line number 10. | ||
| We'll go to Oklahoma Pilot. | ||
| You are on the ground in Oklahoma. | ||
| You have a response to the Tucker Carlson text message call. | ||
| Go ahead, Oklahoma Pilot. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're on the air. Hey, good morning, Harrison. | |
| I just wanted to say I listen to you every single morning when I'm in the air, flying, doing my job, Pipeline Patrol. | ||
| I've called in before where we kind of had not the best connection, but just really enjoy your show every single day. | ||
| Just wanted to kind of remind all the info warriors out there that what we're seeing is scripted and pre-programmed garbage, you know, a circus show before our eyes anyways. | ||
| If people remember, Tucker Carlson and Hunter Biden were roommates in Washington, D.C. for like the longest time. | ||
| And the caller was just so upset because these text messages prove that we can't trust Tucker now. | ||
| Well, come on, guys. | ||
| I mean, he's juiced in anyways. | ||
| You guys got to remember this is this is scripted. | ||
| So, you know, we need to appreciate that. | ||
| Yes, the information is coming out. | ||
| But we also need to remember that whenever it's coming out from the enemy, it's always going to have a spin on it. | ||
| It's not always going to be the full truth. | ||
| And there's going to be a purpose for it. | ||
| So we always need to be looking at the whys behind everything. | ||
| Tucker's getting pushback now from releasing some of this footage. | ||
| Well, it's all scripted anyway, so why are they making it appear for him to have the pushback? | ||
| That's what we need to be looking at. | ||
| So that was just kind of the point I wanted to make is, It's all scripted. | ||
| So don't act like, you know, oh, this side's winning, that side's winning, and oh, there's some pushbacks here or there. | ||
| It's a circus show. So look at the whys behind it and try and figure that out. | ||
| I don't have any great insights or answers, but I wish I did. | ||
| You know, in Tucker's defense, maybe I'll say, I don't know if the... | ||
| Like, reaction is to go, well, you know, what they say in text messages is the more honest thing and what they say on TV is the lie. | ||
| But I also, like, I'll say things on text message to friends either that know I'm joking or just, like, venting about something and saying, I hate all these people. | ||
| And it's just like, I don't really mean that, but, you know, it's just a text message between friends. | ||
| I don't know if a text message necessarily means that that's what he really thinks and what he says on air is... | ||
| I can see him being frustrated with Trump and going, God, I hate this guy, to his friend. | ||
| And that doesn't mean, like, I hate this guy and I'm going to work to undermine him. | ||
| And also, I'll say, you know, you'll notice that we at Infowars never really gave much credence to Sidney Powell or the... | ||
| Yeah. I do think that the focus on the Sidney Powell version of election fraud, | ||
| even the Rudy Giuliani version of election fraud, was a distraction from the real election fraud. | ||
| So that may be the big game that's being played, is that you have Fox News pushing election fraud. | ||
| They know election fraud did happen. | ||
| They don't push the real claims. | ||
| They push the fake claims so that they can then get debunked, as you're pointing out, in a very scripted way. | ||
| They're playing their part of we're talking about voter fraud, but really they're talking about the voter fraud that they know not to be the main point of contention. | ||
| I mean the voter fraud happened with mail-in ballots and the ballot harvesting and the – in Georgia and Detroit where they hid from the election observers and just fed the same thing over and over again. | ||
| So yeah, no, I think you're right. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that's why I spend so many hours of my day listening to Infowars, because I'm actually getting tomorrow's news today, and I'm not getting fed the circus show. | |
| Yeah. It's really vicious. | ||
| It is all a circus show. | ||
| I just, you know, I think... | ||
| I tend to trust Tucker Carlson, and I tend to take more weight of what he does and the evidence of the stuff he presents that nobody else will present, the stuff that we cover on our show that he covers that night. | ||
| You know, there have been a few times where I'm like, OK, Todd Carlson is definitely a viewer, at least some of his his people are because we cover something. | ||
| And then that night he covers it in exactly the same way. | ||
| And it's not something that like everybody's covering. | ||
| It's something that we only like only us covered. | ||
| So, you know, the the tangible effects of his coverage, the things that he exposes that nobody else does. | ||
| That you can't deny that he did that. | ||
| You can't deny that he's been hugely effective. | ||
| And I don't read too much into him venting on text message to some friend of his. | ||
| I don't know, but that's just me. | ||
| Thank you for the call, Oklahoma Pilot. | ||
| Very good stuff. Let's go now to J.D. in Indiana. | ||
| Two people in Indiana. J.D. first. | ||
| Response to Albert's call. | ||
| The right in media integrity. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead, J.D. Hey, I'd like to just kind of Not only that, but remind, you know, all the info warriors out there, you know, like, people are allowed to have their own personal opinion. | |
| At the end of the day, I didn't really like Trump. | ||
| I still voted for him because I thought he did a good job. | ||
| And so, you know, Tucker, you know, if you don't like Trump, then okay. | ||
| At least he goes on television. | ||
| And, yeah, he can't go full out like InfoWars does because everyone's got to understand people's minds are like a tiny little cup. | ||
| And if you're trying to put a million dollars in that tiny little cup, It's not going to go in an hour's span for him to cover all the truth. | ||
| So he's got to trickle it out in some cases And that's, yeah, we call that the QAnon effect. | ||
| We call that the overdosing on red pills effect. | ||
| I think you're right. | ||
| And even thinking about it myself, again, we don't have the context of that Tucker Carlson text where he's like, I freaking hate Trump, but it's like, I don't know. | ||
| There have been times where I've said stuff like that, not because I hate Trump, but because you're frustrated at Trump. | ||
| You're like, ah, come on, dude. | ||
| Why are you doing it like this? | ||
| This is so frustrating. | ||
| It doesn't mean you don't support him. You walked right into it. | ||
| Yeah, 100%. | ||
| Yeah, good stuff. I want to get to one more call this segment. | ||
| Thank you for that call, J.D. Let's go to Matt in Indiana. | ||
| You want to chime in on Jefferson's call about the birtherism stuff. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead, Matt. Oh, yeah, but in regards to that last caller, how are you doing, Harrison? | |
| Good, thanks. Oh, man. | ||
| Well, the natural-born citizenship, you know, same thing with Bernie Sanders. | ||
| They shove Bernie Sanders down liberals' throats, and he gets the vote every time he gets the votes, but the guy can't be president because he's not a natural-born citizen. | ||
| It's like, you know, the same thing with Trump or anybody else that they put in front of us to vote for. | ||
| It's the illusion of choice. | ||
| So what would your response to Jefferson be? | ||
|
unidentified
|
In regards to his comment on the natural-born citizen, I mean, he's accurate. | |
| It probably should be something that's looked into, you know, on why they're having all of these quote-unquote politicians being put up in front of us for us to vote on, and most of them aren't even eligible for the role that they're applying for. | ||
| Smoke and mirrors, right? | ||
| Smoke and mirrors. Yeah, so this is, the crew just pulled this up from the Harvard Law Review. | ||
| The Supreme Court has long recognized that two particularly useful sources in understanding constitutional terms are British common law and enactments of the First Congress both confirm that the original meaning of the phrase natural-born citizen includes persons born abroad who are citizens from birth based on the citizenship of a parent. | ||
| So that would be the opposite of what Jefferson said, I guess. | ||
| I don't know. It's all very confusing. | ||
| Both parents have to be citizens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, yeah. All right, welcome back, folks. | |
| Out to more of your phone calls. | ||
| Full phone lines today. | ||
| You know, we don't have... | ||
| I really don't have any way of, like, judging... | ||
| going on except for the calls that we get, in particular the number of calls that we get. | ||
| And I remember times when we first started this show, I guess it was 2021, when – do we start in 2021 or 2022? | ||
| I think 2021. And we put out the phone number and nobody would call. | ||
| We'd get like three calls. | ||
| And it was like a gut punch. | ||
| It's like, oh man, now it's like we open up the phone calls. | ||
| We open up the lines and the calls just come pouring in. | ||
| And hopefully that's some standard of success. | ||
| And we really appreciate all of the input from all of our callers. | ||
| We've broken major stories because of some of the Tips that we've gotten from callers. | ||
| Thank you so much for everybody for calling in and thank you for keeping us on air, keeping us in the fight, and keeping us, I think, just getting better and better. | ||
| We're going to be back in our old studio just as soon as we get some equipment replaced, which I know is one of the things about InfoWars. | ||
| You know, when I started here, this was the only studio. | ||
| We had this studio and then there was like a podcast studio that sometimes got used. | ||
| That was the Alex Jones studio. But just, you know, I've worked here for seven years at this point. | ||
| Eight, maybe? Six. | ||
| I joined in 2017. | ||
| I'm not good at math. | ||
| Give me a break. But I joined in February of 2017. | ||
| So, yeah, six years. | ||
| And, man, the growth that InfoWars has had, the influence that we continue to wield, it's all thanks to you. | ||
| When you go to InfoWarsStore.com, I mean, that's the only way that we are supported. | ||
| It's the only way It's the only way that we are able to stay on air and it means that we can tell you the truth. | ||
| We can tell you how we feel. | ||
| We can tell you what we think about things and we don't have to for a single moment consider how it would affect shareholders or stakeholders or People who are sponsoring us or corporate interests. | ||
| Just none of that matters to us. | ||
| All that matters to us is giving our audience what they've come to expect from InfoWars, which is hard-hitting, important news that you're not finding anywhere else. | ||
| And all that we ask in return is that you go to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| We make it so easy for you to do so. | ||
| Not only are our supplements just off the chart incredible, you know, and it's funny because people like to claim, you sell supplements that don't work, and then it's like you look in there and In their kitchen cabinet and it's all of our supplements, they're just under a different name and they don't realize it. | ||
| We take the best supplements in the world. | ||
| Some of our supplements are designed by us and exclusive to us, but most of them are just relabeled incredibly popular supplements that everybody who hates us loves. | ||
| They all love the stuff, but because they're poisoned against us, because their ideas of us is so incorrect, they don't understand that facts that we're telling them are the truth and the supplements that we sell are the real deal. | ||
| We just get really good deals because the owners of these companies are patriots, and so we're actually able to sell the same supplements that they buy from Whole Foods or Amazon or whatever. | ||
| We sell it for even less, but it's the same product in a lot of cases because they're good products. | ||
| If they're not good products, we don't sell them. | ||
| But we also have exclusive things. | ||
| We have stuff that only we sell, only we came up with and develop was... | ||
| One of the newest is Tumeric Toothpaste by Dr. | ||
| Dr. Jones's Naturals, and we are introducing this new toothpaste where you can experience high-quality toothpaste and help support your oral health today. | ||
| It does more than just protect your teeth. | ||
| It actually has incredibly good anti-inflammatory effects for your gums. | ||
| Dr. Jones's Natural is helping you step up your oral hygiene with the new non-fluoride turmeric toothpaste. | ||
| Turmeric has long been used in ancient times to help support your health and help soothe Dr. Jones has added it to their toothpaste formula to help support inflammation of the gums. | ||
| Try the new turmeric toothpaste today by Dr. | ||
| Jones' Natural and experience high quality oral health as it safely whitens teeth, naturally fluoride free. | ||
| There's a mint natural flavor and of course it helps support that gum inflammation. | ||
| Try it for yourself now with a special introductory price at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Keep us on the air. Keep us in the fight. | ||
| Keep your smile beaming at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| With that, we go back out to the phone calls. | ||
| I'm going to go to John in Houston. | ||
| You want to talk about Trump. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, John. | ||
| You are on the air. Hi, how's it going? | ||
| Good. So, this guy Cash Patel, apparently he worked for Trump. | ||
| He was on Tim Pool last night. | ||
| Usually Tim Pool, you know, kind of sucks. | ||
| But lately Tim Pool's been looking like he's doing a lot better. | ||
| And this guy Kash Patel, this guest who worked under Trump, he revealed a bunch of really interesting stuff. | ||
| He addressed the issue of all of Trump's cabinet working against Trump's agenda. | ||
| He explained, you know, he worked with Trump directly, like first-name basis, like all the time, you know, dealing with Trump on national security issues and stuff like that. | ||
| And he was saying that at this point, what you're going to see in the future is Trump revealing specific detailed policy plans, not just, you know, generic kind of hand wavy platitudes, but like actual policy in specific plans. | ||
| And I just want to point out to everybody, you know, can you can you point out any other candidate that has more than like three, four ideas put out? | ||
| Trump has like maybe 30 minutes of him talking about detailed plans about how he's going to defund universities that engage in censorship retroactively, how he's going to cut off Medicaid, the people who do transgender stuff. | ||
| A huge list of stuff. | ||
| And this guy Cash Patel is saying that the thing about Trump is that he figured out that these people who suggested people in the cabinet who ended up being against the America First agenda, they basically have figured out who is America First and who's not. | ||
| And so I know a lot of people were really disappointed with certain aspects of Trump's first term. | ||
| But, you know, I just want to remind people that Trump being a pragmatist, thinking that he could, you know, work across the aisle or, you know, trust career politicians or career D.C. people, that mistake is not going to happen again. | ||
| And you're going to see he's going to publicly point out who he's going to put in charge of the CIA and et cetera, et cetera. | ||
| He's going to publicly start naming people. | ||
| And I just, as much as people complain about Trump, I just want to point out that You know, people's first term is usually, politically, the way it works. | ||
| They're gonna try to not rock the boat, not be too divisive, not be too radical one way or another. | ||
| And then the second term, just like what happened with Obama, the second term, they just go, you know, their actual agenda. | ||
| And so, you know, for us not to support Trump after he's literally the only candidate in our lives to ever actually do anything for us, you know, I just find that ridiculous. | ||
| Also, the thing about Tucker Carlson, we are the power. | ||
| Tucker Carlson literally reads off a teleprompter, right? | ||
| So he could hate Trump all he wants. | ||
| He still has to read what that teleprompter says. | ||
| And Infowars is the grassroots. | ||
| And so Infowars represents, you know, the finger on the pulse of the grassroots. | ||
| So what we, the public, and, you know, the America First MAGA movement represents, our pressure that we're applying, whether Tucker Carlson hates Trump or not, is irrelevant. | ||
| Because if he doesn't, if he comes out against Trump, we'll just say he's no longer, you know, the forefront talking head late night show guy anymore. | ||
| You know, he will lose his position. | ||
| And again, he just reads off a teleprompter. | ||
| So, I mean, even if he ad-libs a little bit here and there, The guy is not a source of power. | ||
| He's kind of like a gatekeeper or kind of riding the wave. | ||
| But the wave itself is the actual meaningful object here. | ||
| And that's the Infowars crowd. | ||
| And they did a study in 2016. | ||
| Like, it was the vast majority of viral memes on the whole Internet come from the Donald, a subreddit dedicated to Donald Trump. | ||
| And, you know, 4chan kind of fed into that. | ||
| And what you were saying about how Infowars was so influential in the beginning, yes, so was It's the whole MAGA movement, America First movement, that is the real viral, influential movement. | ||
| Yeah, 100%. And I totally agree with Trump's proposals that he's come out with. | ||
| I mean, everything from going to war with the cartels to pardoning all the J6 prisoners to being able to sue prosecutors who release criminals that then victimize you. | ||
| He's basically saying that if you let out a criminal... | ||
| And that criminal goes on to commit a crime. | ||
| You are going to be held responsible for that. | ||
| I mean, these are huge things that nobody else is covering. | ||
| Nobody else is talking about. | ||
| But it's like every week he comes out with a new one of these, like, bombshell proposals that we need as a country. | ||
| I completely agree. Very good call. | ||
| Thank you for that, John. We'll go back to your calls on the other side for our final segment of the second hour. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. Final segment of the second hour here. | ||
| In the third hour, we will be joined by Mary Bowden, Dr. | ||
| Mary Bowden, to talk about the way she is being used as an example to try to get other doctors to not question things. | ||
| I'm very excited to talk to her. We'll go out to your phone calls here in just a moment, but there's one story that I haven't covered today that I feel like I need to. | ||
| And we'll show a video here in just a second. | ||
| But everybody knows the classic cliche is that the government, the technology that they have is something like 10 to 20 years ahead of what we know publicly. | ||
| And when you apply that standard to AI, it's sort of terrifying, right? | ||
| When ChatGPT is open to everybody and free to use and incredibly powerful and hyper-capable, you can only imagine the type of AI they have behind the scenes using it to predict Outcomes of certain stimuli or input that's put into the world. | ||
| I mean you can see how they can manipulate the entire world through these machines. | ||
| And one of the things that I've been pretty sure of for a while, and I've said on this show quite a few times, is I'm fairly positive that they are already taking orders from AI, right? | ||
| They don't see it that way. They see it as they're using AI to make decisions or, you know, help their decision-making process. | ||
| But in reality, what they're doing is the AI is telling them what to do, and then they're doing it. | ||
| We're being ruled by AI already. | ||
| And of course, we know that DARPA and big tech are basically one in the same. | ||
| They One comes from the other, vice versa, right? | ||
| It's all one big cooperation. | ||
| And so I guarantee you that AI is being used to make decisions today in the halls of power. | ||
| But that's not really even speculation anymore because a Romanian – the Romanian prime minister has now hired the first – the world's first AI government advisor. | ||
| And world's first, Romania's prime minister unveiled a new honorary government advisor that will be joining his team run entirely on AI. | ||
| The AI is called ION and consists of mirror-like services that display text as well as at times a male or female voice that responds – a female face that responds in a calm voice. | ||
| The AI-powered advisor was developed by researchers to quickly analyze the opinions of Romanian citizens on key issues and policies. | ||
| People will be able to chat with ION on the project's website. | ||
| Again, this could ostensibly be a good thing if you're getting full and accurate information. | ||
| But if your information is cherry-picked, if large swaths of your population are silenced and censored and so you're not getting their input, then you're making decisions on faulty information. | ||
| Faulty standards, faulty input. | ||
| If you put in junk, you're going to get out junk. | ||
| So this is sort of terrifying, but leave it to Romania. | ||
| I'm sure all of the other leaders of the Western countries are going, yeah, we've had AI assistance for a while now, but we don't tell anybody. | ||
| You're not supposed to just go out there and announce it. | ||
| You're supposed to do this secretly. | ||
| Come on, dude. | ||
| Romania just doesn't care. | ||
| And they're just like, yeah, we've got an AI advisor now. | ||
| Isn't that cool? Honestly, I think that's what's going on here. | ||
| So let's go to this video. | ||
| Clip number 12, Romania's Prime Minister has hired the first AI government advisor. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Romania's Prime Minister has unveiled a new honorary assistant, completely powered by artificial intelligence or AI. Salut! | |
| Mi-ați dat viață. | ||
| Eu sunt Ion. Acum rolul meu este să vă reprezint. | ||
| This computer screen you're seeing is called Eon. | ||
| This artificial intelligence has been developed by researchers to quickly analyze the opinions of Romanians. | ||
| People will be able to chat with Eon on the project's website. | ||
| The AI will also search social media to figure out what the topics are that people are talking about and to carry out what's called sentiment analysis. | ||
| And that means it will analyze whether there is a positive or A negative reaction to a certain event, for example. | ||
| So how exactly is this Eon AI assistant going to help the Romanian government? | ||
| Well, we asked the question to Nico Sebed, the coordinator of the research team. | ||
| I don't expect that the Prime Minister will always do what Eon will say. | ||
| But it's more like a suggestion. | ||
| It's more like, you know, getting the pulse in real time of the population. | ||
| With this type of system, we hope to reach out a large segment of the Romanian population. | ||
| While this technology is the first of its kind in the world, experts tell us that there may be downsides to it. | ||
| They used the term public space, and it seemed like they were equating social media as the public space, which of course in itself is problematic because not everyone is represented there. | ||
| Certain voices would be amplified, especially if you post regularly, and that is also the reason why I said that the public definitely needs to know Indeed, certain experts are concerned that, for example, bots could start spamming social media platforms to make it seem like a topic is trending when it's really not. | ||
| The Cube has already covered a bot-spamming campaign in Poland a few months ago, and here Fake social media accounts amplified anti-Ukraine hashtags on Twitter, making it look like there was a massive opposition in the country against Ukrainian refugees. | ||
| And for Chris Shrishak, what's important is that this tool is not used to decide future policies due to these sorts of risks. | ||
| It should ideally not be used as an input to influence what future policies are going to be developed. | ||
| Rather, it could potentially be used in a way where You get feedback on policies that have already been implemented. | ||
| The researchers working on Ion told the Cube that they will be closely monitoring the situation and they'll implement changes if things don't go as planned. | ||
| So there you go. World's first AI advisor advising the Prime Minister of Romania. | ||
| Of course, it's not really the first AI advisor. | ||
| In fact, one of the videos that we played quite a bit from the World Government Summit And we should really just play every day. | ||
| Honestly, we should just like come into every show with it. | ||
| Just to remind ourselves what we're up against here. | ||
| And it was Alex Karp, CEO of the Palantir Technologies, saying that their Gotham program single-handedly stopped the rise of the far right in Europe. | ||
| In other words, they and their AI program altered the political trajectory of an entire continent to benefit them. | ||
| But against the will of the people that were actually in the country. | ||
| Now how they did this exactly, they don't get into details, but they're bragging about the fact that they single-handedly stopped the rise of the far right. | ||
| So in other words, they, because they didn't want the right wing to be successful in Europe, implemented these tactics to subvert and destroy them. | ||
| Just the utter obliteration of democracy as we know it when these types of things are implemented. | ||
| And that reminded me of this story from DefenseNews.com all the way back in June of last year. | ||
| Palantir's carp was the first Western CEO to visit Zelensky amid the invasion. | ||
| Well, he's probably the most important one. | ||
| So again, where that report is saying, well, there was this anti-Ukrainian hashtag that was being spread that may have influenced the way AI would perceive things. | ||
| Well, this is what they're explicitly doing with things like Palantir. | ||
| The chief executive officer of Palantir Technologies, Inc. quietly visited Ukraine in June, meeting with the country's president and other leaders in Kiev to discuss defense cooperation. | ||
| And opening an office for the data analytics company in the war-torn country. | ||
| CEO Alex Karp's trip to Eastern Europe in the subsequent exchange with Ukrainian President Zelensky was disclosed June 2nd. | ||
| Photos and summary of the trip were shared by Zelensky's office and posted on social media. | ||
| The visit to the capital was the first made by an executive of a major Western country since Russia launched its bloody invasion in February. | ||
| Government officials had visited, but not any Western CEOs like this. | ||
| He said he's delighted that Palantir is ready to invest in Ukraine and help us fight against Russia on the digital front line. | ||
| The talks addressed Russian cyber attacks which preceded the invasion and continue to jumble networks as well as enhancing Ukraine's military's digital portfolio. | ||
| The US has reinforced Ukrainian defenses including in cyberspace. | ||
| So again you see the way that the public is being swayed towards war against Russia. | ||
| You know, they've been able to do this for a while, but now that they have AI, now that they have the cooperation of big tech, they're doing it at a level that is both larger than ever before and more invisible than ever before. | ||
| So you have to ask yourself, is my opinion being swayed by some high-level psychological operation being carried out by super intelligent AI? | ||
| The answer is probably yes, unless, of course, you list InfoWars and we explain who it is employing this AI, what they want your thought process to be, and how they implement stimuli to persuade you that way. | ||
| Say, we are actively working not only on the digital blockade of the Russian Federation but also to attract top international companies to Ukraine. | ||
| This is one of our priorities today. | ||
| The Palo Alto-based company, Palantir, is known for its data analytics and software development capability. | ||
| It launched using seed money from the CIA. | ||
| So there that is. | ||
| It's just The CIA, as we've said a million times before, the CIA is the – well, the intelligence community, specifically the CIA in America, is the central organizing and like a – They're the ones that manifest the desires of the globalists at the top. | ||
| We'll be back on the other side with the third hour, folks. | ||
| Here's a question in the last 10 seconds. | ||
| Do you brush your teeth? You do? | ||
| Oh, well, thank God. | ||
| Go to InfoWarsStore.com and get the best toothpaste you've ever had, the new tuberculosis toothpaste. | ||
| I did talk to the team, and we have a couple of things that I just want to lay out for all of you on what the DC bill does. | ||
| It reduces maximum penalties for offenses like murders and other homicides, armed home invasion burglaries, armed carjackings, as I mentioned, armed robberies, unlawful gun possession, and some sexual assault offenses. | ||
| And together we're saying loud and clearly that in America Hate and extremism will not prevail, although they are rearing their ugly head in significance now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Although they are rearing their ugly head in significance now. | |
| The issue that I don't cover enough because I know at one level it's just going to create division and that's not what we need. | ||
| We need to all love each other. But you can't address a problem if the corporate media continues to cover it up and censor those that expose it. | ||
| But every time I hear about a mass shooting or some big death, and I notice that they have the suspect in custody, they won't ever show the picture. | ||
| I go, well, I know why. | ||
| I know why this story's going to go away real quick, because it's not a white person. | ||
| So it isn't about demonizing the black people that a small minority of them are committing the disproportionate majority of these type of violent crimes. | ||
| It's about not letting the Justice Department, since Biden got in two years ago, joining the whole Hollywood ADL narrative that white people are the most vicious, out-of-control criminals everywhere. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Officials say that Peyton Gendron, a white 18-year-old man... | |
| This hateful act and other similar hateful acts across the country... | ||
| Motivated by white supremacy. | ||
| A white supremacist who has engaged in an act of terrorism. | ||
| It's not fair to lie about white people as a group and say, we're bad terrorists, and then cover up young black males committing the majority, the majority of violent crime. | ||
| And most black males don't do that, and they're hardworking good people, and they don't deserve it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If you could talk to any of the people who walked into your business and set that place on fire, what would you tell them? | |
| Put yourself in our shoes. | ||
| This could be one of your family members. | ||
| This could be your mom, your dad, your uncle, your brother or sister. | ||
| This could be one of your family members that had their own business that was burned down to the ground. | ||
| Just like white people don't deserve to be blamed for what some other white person does. | ||
| But when a white person goes out and commits a mass shooting, you don't ever stop hearing about it forever. | ||
| And how all white people and how all gun owners are collectively to blame. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why is America 30% white guys and 70% of the shootings in the last many decades have been at the hands of white guys? | |
| I'm not saying we should racially profile white guys, but I do think it's interesting to note that Had the shooters, had 70% of mass shooters been, let's say, Arabs or African-American men, I think the conversation right now would be a very different conversation. | ||
| That's preposterous. | ||
| Three killed, a mother, a nine-year-old, and a news camera person. | ||
| And as soon as it didn't say what the person's race was, I knew it was not a white person. | ||
| Sure enough, I put the shooter's name in. | ||
| It's a young black man. | ||
| So in less than two years, 18 and 19, he's 19 and a half, he's got a big old giant armed robbery crime rap sheet, and he's on the streets because of these Soros prosecutors, and then he goes and kills... | ||
| People who are totally innocent, including a nine-year-old girl and a camera person who responded to another shooting in the area. | ||
| Hell, he'll probably be out in five years. | ||
| All because he's, quote, black. | ||
| By the way, the shooter in Florida a few years ago that shot all those people at that public school, because his last name was Cruz, he was adopted, he was white. | ||
| Because his last name was Cruz, despite a rap sheet, again, about two inches thick, Of violence and robbery and death threats. | ||
| He was released with no time served, because his last name was Cruz, by the minority quote, reform program in Florida and carried out in Broward County so he could go kill all those people. | ||
| And the left knows exactly what they're doing. | ||
| They always accuse you of the very things they're doing themselves. | ||
| If there's one rule you can keep on your fridge, write it down, put it in your wallet to evaluate the behavior of the people in... | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| We are currently connecting with and should soon be joined by Dr. | ||
| Mary Bowden. Dr. | ||
| Mary Bowden completed her residency at Stanford University and is board-certified in both Lord, I can't even pronounce this word. | ||
| Otolaryngology. I'm going to have her explain it too. | ||
| It's an ear, nose, and throat speciality. | ||
| She also specialized in sleep medicine. | ||
| She specializes in sinuses, sleep, and allergy disorders and treats both children and adults. | ||
| Dr. Bowden is known nationally for standing up for medical freedom and has successfully treated over 5,000 patients for COVID-19. | ||
| She can be found on Twitter at mdbreathe or the website breathemd.org. | ||
| And just to give you another little rundown of this, Texas Lindsey on Twitter, at TexasLindy underscore, has a thread introducing everyone to Dr. | ||
| Mary Talley-Boden. | ||
| Dr. Bowden is a board-certified Stanford-educated doctor from Houston who's treated more than 5,500 patient lives, including my mom when she had COVID. The Texas Medical Board is trying to take her license away. | ||
| And I understand we have Dr. | ||
| Bowden on the line now. | ||
| Welcome to the show, Dr. Bowden. | ||
| Thanks so much for having me. | ||
| Very happy to have you. | ||
| Very interested in where your case is now, what's happening to you. | ||
| Can you just give us a breakdown? | ||
| Because obviously we've covered your story. | ||
| You've been an outspoken person promoting I don't even want to say alternative medicine because it's just alternative to what is being pushed, which is the vaccine and remdesivir and nothing else. | ||
| So you actually just promote treating COVID and have had a lot of success in that, and we've covered your work for a while. | ||
| But tell us what's going on now with the Texas Medical Board. | ||
| So... A while ago, maybe over a year ago, I had three complaints submitted to the board against me. | ||
| Two by major hospitals in Texas, and one by the step, well, the mother of a minor who I prescribed ivermectin to, but I consulted with the father and stepmother not knowing that the mother was not involved. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The son actually never took the ivermectin and there was no harm. | |
| But the meat of the complaints are from the two major hospitals, one being Houston Methodist and the other being Texas Hughley in Dallas. | ||
| And basically in November of 2021, I started speaking out about vaccine mandates. | ||
| I sent out 25 tweets in one day saying vaccine mandates were wrong and I posted patient testimonials. | ||
| Shortly thereafter, Houston Methodists went after me publicly. | ||
| They went to the Houston Chronicle, and they went to Twitter and announced that I was spreading dangerous misinformation, and they suspended my privileges in a very public manner. | ||
| Subsequent to that, I immediately resigned because I did not feel that that was the sort of institution I wanted to have anything to do with. | ||
| So they, in turn, submitted a complaint to the medical board because I resigned under investigation, which is a no-no. | ||
| So that's the gist of the Houston Methodist complaint, and then the Texas Hughley was regarding a patient that was trying to help, Jason Jones. | ||
| There's been a lot of media about him, and he was in the hospital for over a month on a ventilator. | ||
| It told his wife that he was probably going to die, and she wanted to try some other measures. | ||
| So I was contacted. | ||
| I was on a list of doctors that might be willing to help because I was known to be using ivermectin, and they reached out to me. | ||
| And they needed a prescription for ivermectin to submit with their court filing, and that's what I did. | ||
| And because I tried to do that, they're going after me. | ||
| They're saying I didn't get informed consent, but, of course, I did get it from the legal surrogate, his wife. | ||
| The patient was actually in a coma, and the patient actually had tried to get ivermectin prior to being hospitalized and couldn't. | ||
| They said that I violated HIPAA. Well, I was very careful not to disclose his name until his wife asked me to because we wanted the media to get involved to apply pressure because the hospital was not complying with court order So that's the meat of the arguments from that hospital. | ||
| And then I had a hearing about a week and a half ago, and they showed no compassion or leniency basically through everything they could at me. | ||
| A $5,000 fine, a CME, they want me to retake the jurisprudence exam, which is a legal exam doctors have to take to get a Texas license. | ||
| And I just refused. | ||
| I'm not going to... | ||
| Yeah, admit to some wrongdoings that I didn't do. | ||
| I was really just acting on the best behalf of the patient and I was sticking up for myself with Houston Methodist. | ||
| And of course, this is what they do. | ||
| They're coming up with a whole bunch of different reasons for why they claim they want to take you out. | ||
| But we know the reality is because you're disobedient, because you're actually following your oath and not following instructions from somebody that doesn't know what they're talking about up in Washington, D.C. I mean, that seems obvious to me, but I don't want to put words in your mouth or anything. | ||
| But that is essentially what's happening, right? | ||
| Because you were actually trying as a doctor to serve your patients, you're there on the ground seeing the reaction, seeing the effectiveness of medicines. | ||
| They think that your view and your expertise should be overruled by bureaucrats who have never seen a patient in their life. | ||
| Do I have that more or less right? | ||
| Yes. I mean, I caused no harm. | ||
| I was fighting for my patient. | ||
| I was fighting for my reputation when I resigned from Methodist. | ||
| And Methodist coming after me had nothing to do—and none of these complaints have anything to do with patient safety, right? | ||
| That's the job of the medical board, is to protect the patients from harmful doctors. | ||
| And I haven't harmed anybody. | ||
| I've kept over 5,500 patients out of the hospitals using multi-drug early treatment. | ||
| And, you know, this is just a witch hunt. | ||
| This is a political circus. | ||
| This has nothing to do with actually protecting the public. | ||
| You look at other complaints, the majority of complaints to the Texas Medical Board are for fairly egregious things like, you know, being under the influence while at work or having inappropriate sexual relations with patients. | ||
| Things along those lines, nothing like this. | ||
| This is a first from what I can tell from the Texas Medical Board. | ||
| It's totally absurd. And of course, it seems like what they're doing to you, they're trying to make it easier to do this to doctors. | ||
| We know that a law passed in California essentially saying that if doctors went against the advice of the government, that they would lose their license. | ||
| And for anybody who knows anybody that's gone through medical school, that's not like a small thing. | ||
| That essentially is saying that they're going to make 10 years of your life or more and really The amount of work that you've had to put in and dedicate yourself to this practice, they're going to take all of that away if you refuse to submit to their instructions, even if they don't know what the heck they're talking about. | ||
| It's completely absurd, and I'm shocked they can even do this. | ||
| But do you think, I mean, you're sort of a bellwether, right? | ||
| You should be a warning sign to all doctors that this is coming to affect them if they don't stand up right now. | ||
| Exactly. It sets a very dangerous precedent. | ||
| If they can come after me for this, then no one is really safe from using off-label medications, trying to fight for their patients, not complying with the government narrative when it's not of the best interest of your patient. | ||
| The doctor's job is to protect the patient, to do everything they can for the patient, and if that gets the Doctor in trouble with the government, so be it. | ||
| But this is an important case because it really disregards patient autonomy and medical freedom. | ||
| Jason Jones is very grateful that I tried to help him. | ||
| His wife is very grateful. | ||
| They understand I was fighting for him, and I did what they asked him to do, and I would not have done it if I thought it was going to hurt him whatsoever. | ||
| I mean, I'd had plenty of experience at that point using ivermectin, and I was very comfortable that it was safe. | ||
| It's a Nobel Prize winning medication and the lies that they told about it, calling it horse dewormers, if that was the only thing it was used for, all contributed to people's perspective on this and misinterpretation of what it actually was. | ||
| We'll get back into this more with Dr. | ||
| Mary Bowden. You can follow her on Twitter at mdbreathe or her website breathemd.org. | ||
| We'll be back on the other side to talk about this true David and Goliath story. | ||
| We're talking with David over here. | ||
| Goliath is, of course, the hospital system and the media establishment. | ||
| Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal. I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| My guest is Dr. | ||
| Mary Bowden. She is... | ||
| Really coming under attack. | ||
| It truly is a David and Goliath story. | ||
| They're trying to take her license for the crime of treating her patients, of actually trying to do something for her patients. | ||
| And with everything that we now know about the inefficacy, or really inverse efficacy of the vaccine, and just what a failure that is, and the success of ivermectin, it's just insane that they're still coming after people like Dr. | ||
| Bowden. You can follow her on Twitter at mdbreathe. | ||
| And the website is breathemd.org. | ||
| What do you think the likelihood is that these hospitals are successful in taking away your license or the board is successful? | ||
| And what do you think, even if they're unsuccessful, what do you think is the precedent they're setting and the signal that they're sending to other doctors that may want to, you know, do everything they can for patients? | ||
| I mean, they have certainly upended my life with this, not just the medical board complaints, but just the public manner in which Methodists went after me just changed my life, right? | ||
| I'll never go back to being a private citizen again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And it... | |
| I think that's just a warning to other physicians. | ||
| Don't speak out. | ||
| If you see something, don't buck the system. | ||
| Don't question the narrative. | ||
| I didn't start off being this alternative doctor. | ||
| I started off doing simple things like breathing treatments. | ||
| And then when monoclonal antibodies came around, I started using those. | ||
| And then the government started rationing those. | ||
| And so I couldn't get them for my patients. | ||
| And that's when I started looking into ivermectin. | ||
| And I did enough research to know that even if what they're saying that it doesn't work, I knew it wasn't going to hurt anybody. | ||
| And then the more I used it, the more I realized it was working. | ||
| So I'm not some... | ||
| And I was never political before COVID. I really didn't care for politics. | ||
| And I was just a little solo practitioner in a small part of Houston. | ||
| I really wasn't a threat. | ||
| But they made me out. | ||
| They made an example of me. | ||
| And I'm just not backing down at this point because I know I'm right. | ||
| And I've just sort of Even if they want to take my license, they can just take the license. | ||
| I am not going to admit to wrongdoing. | ||
| I'm not going to pay a fine. | ||
| They're just going to have to take it as far as they can take it, and we'll see what happens. | ||
| But they've put me through so much already. | ||
| There's not really much more they can do to me at this point, and I'm just not going to back down. | ||
| No, it's totally tragic, and kudos to you for simply standing up to this. | ||
| And it shows how scared they are of just one person standing up against their, in my opinion, criminal activity, forcing doctors to not treat patients. | ||
| It's so bad. Flagrantly against everything that you take an oath for and that you train for. | ||
| It really is mind-boggling how backwards everything is these days. | ||
| And yeah, I'm reading a story here. | ||
| Bowden said the board offered to give you a settlement. | ||
| She would have to admit guilt and pay a $5,000 fine, take eight hours of continuing medical education and a jurisprudence exam. | ||
| And you just said, no, I'm not going to admit to something that I didn't do, which is... | ||
| Which is just incredible, and not a lot of people would have the ability to do that. | ||
| So obviously, you know, we need a thousand people like you. | ||
| It's a shame that you're alone in this. | ||
| I can't believe other doctors aren't with you. | ||
| But I also want to talk, because we don't have too much time here, I want to talk about a lawsuit that you have actually filed. | ||
| The story here at iHeart.com, a local Houston doctor filed a lawsuit against the FDA. You have actually filed a lawsuit against the FDA. What is this about? | ||
| The FDA, their role is to approve medications, and that's where it stops. | ||
| They're not supposed to go out to the public and tell the people what they can take, how they should take it, and how doctors should prescribe it. | ||
| Well, we're all familiar with that PR campaign they launched against ivermectin. | ||
| Remember, the healthcare worker nuzzling the horse. | ||
| You don't even need to see the reaction. | ||
| You know exactly what that is, right? | ||
| That was the FDA. And that tweet went viral. | ||
| And Because of that, because of their PR campaign, and it's misleading and it's false, it's caused a lot of people to have trouble getting ivermectin. | ||
| It makes my job a lot harder. | ||
| I have to go to—only certain pharmacies will dispense it. | ||
| I have to really over-educate patients that it is not a forced medication. | ||
| It's caused me, you know, professional consequences with the medical board complaints. | ||
| And it's not just me, two other physicians, like myself, who've been using ivermectin during the pandemic. | ||
| Dr. Paul Merrick, he's one of the founders of FLCCC. He's one of the plaintiffs. | ||
| And also Dr. Robert Apter. | ||
| Who is a physician in Nevada who's also suffered a lot of adverse consequences because of the FDA going after ivermectin in such a public and, you know, they've never done anything like this with any other medication, right? | ||
| This is unprecedented and we're basically just trying to put them, you know, put the stops on that. | ||
| They really overstepped their role. | ||
| Absolutely. And there's sort of another wrinkle to this, right, in that they wanted to prevent people from getting ivermectin. | ||
| So then people who wanted ivermectin went, well, if I can't get it from the human source, I'm going to go to the vet and I can get it from there. | ||
| And then they go, oh, well, that's a horse medicine. | ||
| You know, stop. You're not a horse. | ||
| Stop it. So people were only getting the horse version, which is more or less the same, just different dosages. | ||
| But they were forced to go to the To get the horse medicine, and then the FDA says you shouldn't do that, you're not a horse. | ||
| I mean, it's sort of deceit upon deceit, isn't it? | ||
| No, it's absurd. | ||
| And I've seen so many patients that have just resorted to getting the horse version, and they can basically thank the FDA for that because it's gotten so hard to get the human version. | ||
| Yeah, and when I had COVID, I used ivermectin and could tell the difference immediately. | ||
| I mean, you know, maybe that's just a placebo effect, but all I know is it worked for me, and it was great, and luckily I didn't have to use the horse version. | ||
| And of course, you know, you're still a practicing doctor, and we know how hard doctors work, so for you to actually take this on in addition to everything that you're doing, it really is heroic. | ||
| I know I described it as a David and Goliath story, and that's really what it is. | ||
| I mean, you're dealing with The one hospital, Houston Methodist, $12 billion a year they make. | ||
| I mean, it is inconceivable how powerful these institutions are, but you're standing up against them in such a heroic way. | ||
| We only have about a minute left in this segment. | ||
| What do you want people to know other than, of course, they can go to breathemd.org or follow you on Twitter at mdbreathe. | ||
| What else do you want people to know? | ||
| The floor is yours, Dr. Bowden. Well, the most common question I get asked is, who can I trust? | ||
| Who else can I go to? And I do have a list of those doctors in Texas on my website. | ||
| But, you know, don't lose hope. | ||
| There's a parallel system growing. | ||
| I'm actually... Talking to another doctor about trying to start a small hospital. | ||
| But stand up for yourself. | ||
| You have rights. | ||
| Be prepared. There's a great website called protocolkills.com where it tells you exactly what you can do to get prepared if you ever need to go to the hospital. | ||
| But don't lose hope and just keep speaking out. | ||
| We need the army of people behind me just speaking out as much as we can. | ||
| Absolutely. Well, we support you fully and we hope that you can be a positive example for doctors in the future. | ||
| Dr. Mary Bowden, thank you so much for being with us today. | ||
| Thanks so much for having me. We'll be right back, folks. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| We're going to finish the show strong today with a couple major stories that we need to get to, as well as a I'm going to try to reframe the conflict that we're in in a way that I think everybody will understand. | ||
| We'll do that in just a second. But first, I want to go out to two calls. | ||
| We've got Joel and John. | ||
| Both of these guys have held on through the interview, so I want to go to them. | ||
| Thanks so much for holding Joel in Indianapolis. | ||
| You want to talk about your brother's vaccine reaction. | ||
| Thanks for holding. You're on the air. Hey, Harrison. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How you doing, man? Good. | |
| Thank you. Yeah, I wanted to tell a quick story also and give a shout out to that caller, John. | ||
| That was some pretty awesome stuff. | ||
| It was really good. | ||
| But anyway, my brother got the vax. | ||
| I've been listening to InfoWars for a while, so I also got the tip on the effects and everything and tried to warn, but he's not very political. | ||
| Long story short, he got the vax. | ||
| I believe he's 21, and he got the booster, the second booster. | ||
| I think he said he got the Pfizer one. | ||
| And my dad came into town, and my dad called me and said, hey, I had to take him to the emergency room because he was having chest pains. | ||
| And my first thought immediately was, okay, well, Vax, because he's healthy, goes to the gym, drinks very rarely, you know, doesn't do drugs or anything. | ||
| So that was my first thought immediately. | ||
| And he goes to the doctor. | ||
| They send him home the first time with muscle relaxers and told him that it's just stress. | ||
| And... They did like an EKG when he went to the ER. He went back, said his heart's fine, but he had some inflammation in the tissue around the breast area. | ||
| So, you know, it's scary stuff. | ||
| So then he went back to his primary doctor and she told him, yeah, it's probably stress from your work schedule and I put him on Zola. | ||
| Whoa. So, yeah, he was on it for about a week. | ||
| Total zombie. | ||
| And, you know, our whole family, you know, I think kind of at that moment, everyone realized, like, yeah, this is, you know, something's going on here. | ||
| But, you know, he quit taking that, and I took him over some Vesa Bee Complete, some turmeric, Um, and, uh, just told him and some, um, some other medication and I just told him, I was like, Hey, you know, I know you're not political or anything, but, you know, go, I gave them, uh, Dr. | ||
| Michael, go check him out. | ||
| Um, you know, and some, some other doctors that you guys have had on that, you know, we're heading the curve and we're also in very prominent positions that people who aren't political, um, You know, no, okay, well, this guy worked at Pfizer, so, you know, he's obviously legit, or, you know, a guy, oh, yeah, you know, he worked at EcoHealth Alliance, the people that were... | ||
| No, I mean, that matters, man. | ||
| You know, people, they don't know who to trust, and, you know, if they're a part of a big institution, it really matters. | ||
| That's... That's totally crazy to hear. | ||
| He went in with chest pains and they gave him an SSRI, like they gave him an antidepressant serotonin reuptake inhibitor. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's wild. Well, yeah, and, you know, my girlfriend, and shout out, it's her birthday. | |
| She won't be listening to this, but, you know, she's got a master's degree in mental health, and, you know, I told her about it, and her first thing was, okay, why are they prescribing an antidepressant for stress? | ||
| Seriously. Oof. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, so, yeah, so long story short, that doctor's out, you know, They're no longer going to be seen. | |
| And, you know, I had similar stuff with my kids and stuff with the vaccines and having questions and them looking at me funny. | ||
| But, you know, that's a whole other story. | ||
| But anyway, yeah, I wanted to share that, man. | ||
| You know, and I thank you guys for having, you know, and just thank God for being awake, man, because, you know, a lot of people haven't been and have lost family members and stuff due to the Well, I'm glad if we could be of some assistance in that regard, and I think it sounds like he did it the right way. | ||
| Maybe it would have been better if... | ||
| You know, you could have convinced him earlier, but, you know, that's not always the right tactic, and you don't want to cause a rift between you and your brother, but just being there as a resource and going, hey, if you're interested, here's the information you can read into it. | ||
| I mean, that's the way you really break through to people and could potentially save lives. | ||
| Happy birthday to your girlfriend, and hopefully your brother's okay, and we'll keep him in our prayers just like we keep everybody, you know, affected by this and injured by the... | ||
| Depopulation campaign in our prayers. | ||
| Thank you for that, Joel. Let's go now to John in Tallahassee. | ||
| Might be a troll call. | ||
| We'll figure this out. Thanks for calling in, John. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're on the air. Harrison, I just wanted to say that Abraham had faith, undeniable. | |
| It's a proven fact, if you believe. | ||
| And I'm praying for infant wars, Alex Jones, Harrison Smith, Owen Troyer, to have the faith of Abraham. | ||
| And I want to give you a scripture that helped me years ago, Proverbs 3, 5, and 6. | ||
| Memorize that scripture and say it every day, and God will enlighten your stress factor and build you up. | ||
| And God be with you, Harrison. | ||
| They gave my uncle a booster, and it put him—it killed him. | ||
| Eventually, it killed him. | ||
| He was in good health, never smoked, never drank. | ||
| A diesel mechanic for trailways and for the city of Tallahassee was in good health. | ||
| One booster, and it eradicated his life. | ||
| I'm very sorry to hear that. | ||
| And I'm sorry to call you a troll when you came on. | ||
| It's just you called in wanting to say you appreciated our show. | ||
| And now, the last time somebody called in saying that, they called me a beta. | ||
| So I'm on defense now. | ||
| But that was very nice and very thankful for that call, John. | ||
| Thank you very much. And I want to ask you one other question, Harrison. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. Did you get my letter with the record that I sent you? | |
| I don't think I did. I never got a record. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm sorry. I sent you a record and I sent a little gift. | |
| I sent you one of my records. | ||
| That might have gotten lost in the mail. | ||
| I'll have to go to the mailroom and make sure they didn't give that to somebody else. | ||
| I'll check. I think I usually get the letters and packages people send to us, so I'll have to check that out. | ||
| Thank you for the call, though, John, and if I find the record, I'll let you know. | ||
| I'll announce it on air. Thank you very much for that, John. | ||
| I really appreciate it. Folks, there's still so many stories that I want to cover today, and I just don't have time to do it, so... | ||
| We're going to come back on the other side for the final segment and I will cover a few of these major topics. | ||
| We're going to have to have some people on to explain some of this stuff to me, but here's a pretty big story. | ||
| Matt Hancock should be arrested for willful misconduct in a public office. | ||
| This is not an Infowars headline. | ||
| This is not a Gateway Pundit headline. | ||
| This is not a Justice Report headline. | ||
| This is a headline from The Telegraph. | ||
| So I believe, unless I'm mistaken, this is... | ||
| This marks, hopefully it's the first of many, it marks the first time a major media outlet has called for the arrest of a public official because of their activities pushing the lockdown and the COVID scandemic. | ||
| So this is pretty incredible stuff. | ||
| They say the Prime Minister's made it clear he's not happy, and today Downing Street issued a rebuke. | ||
| Now, we covered this story. This was Matt Hancock, who was caught with his text messages saying, when do we deploy the new variant? | ||
| Saying we have to use the fear. | ||
| The other story from him is Hancock's been accused of weaponizing disabled children with a threat to block center if MP didn't back COVID curbs. | ||
| So basically they were worried that this member of parliament would not be on board. | ||
| And they said, well, if you aren't on board, then maybe that, you know, home for disabled kids doesn't get opened. | ||
| Maybe we'll make the disabled kids suffer if you don't submit to our demands. | ||
| And it's because of activity like that that you now have a major, one of the biggest mainstream newspapers in the UK calling for his arrest. | ||
| Let it be the first of many as we tear down this facade. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Final segment of the American Journal. | ||
| We're going to talk about crime and terrorism, domestic terrorism. | ||
| Here in this final segment, I'm going to play a video here that just sort of struck me almost in a revelatory fashion. | ||
| Going, okay, this is what's happening to us. | ||
| Sort of understanding... | ||
| The proper label to put on what is going on in America. | ||
| Because we see the way that it's not just that two people might do the same thing and one person's punished and one person's not. | ||
| Oftentimes it's significantly worse than that. | ||
| It's that one group of people will actually commit violence or acts of terror and they aren't punished While Trump supporters wander around the Capitol and get thrown in jail for four years and called domestic terrorists and lose their jobs, etc., etc. So it's not even like, oh, they're both doing the same thing, but only one side is punished. | ||
| It's just fairness, equality under the law is just completely out the window as arbitrary application of the law becomes the rule that we live under. | ||
| And so this video just came up, and I'm not even going to talk about specifically what the topic of the discussion was. | ||
| In particular, this has to do with Israel. | ||
| It's not about Israel and Palestine, except that, of course, I feel for the Palestinian people because we are basically the Palestinians here. | ||
| But it's more about this concept of apartheid. | ||
| I think we're coming under an apartheid rule. | ||
| And that's actually a pretty good way of putting it and a pretty fair way of perceiving what's going on around the country. | ||
| So I want to go to this video now. | ||
| This is an Israeli, apparently an ex-Israeli soldier, describing apartheid in that country and how it manifests and just what it's like to live in a country with two sets of rules depending on who you are. | ||
| Let's go to clip number two. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But under two different legal systems, with two different set of rights. | |
| Israeli settlers, like me, are citizens of Israel, live under Israeli civilian law, with all the rights that Israeli civilian law gives us. | ||
| Palestinians live under military law, with a bit less rights, not too much, a bit less. | ||
| Just to give you an example. | ||
| So, let's say I'm an Israeli or a Palestinian. | ||
| We both throw stones at each other. | ||
| Let's assume we both get arrested, yeah, because usually the Israeli will not get arrested, but let's assume we both. | ||
| As an Israeli throwing stones, I committed a criminal offense. | ||
| As a Palestinian throwing stones, you committed a security offense, yeah, a terrorist offense. | ||
| I can demand to speak to a lawyer before my first interrogation. | ||
| You, we can keep up 30 days without a lawyer. | ||
| We don't even need a judge for that. | ||
| It's enough that a military officer signs the warrants. | ||
| If they want to keep me in custody, within 24 hours they need to bring me in front of a judge. | ||
| You we can keep between four to eight days we don't need before we bring you to a judge. | ||
| The judge that I will be brought in front will be an Israeli civilian judge in a civilian court in Israel. | ||
| Your judge will be an Israeli military judge in a military court in the occupied territories, yeah? | ||
| And goes on, yeah? | ||
| So the discrimination is across the board, yeah? | ||
| All the story. Up to over 99% conviction rate in Israeli military courts. | ||
| Yeah? Because they're very efficient. | ||
| And the level of evidence is very strong. | ||
| Yeah? Being cynical out of them. | ||
| Yes? Do they get a lawyer? | ||
| If you're... | ||
| Yes, you can get a lawyer ultimately. | ||
| You will have a lawyer ultimately. | ||
| But it doesn't really change things. | ||
| In courts? Yeah. | ||
| In courts, the conviction rate is about... | ||
| If I'm not mistaking, 99.8 or something. | ||
| So that's apartheid. | ||
| And that's essentially what we're living under right now. | ||
| And just watching that, just going, okay, yeah, this is what it's like. | ||
| If you are a Trump supporter, or let's say if you're a Black Lives Matter supporter and you firebomb a police station, maybe you'll be arrested. | ||
| Maybe. If you are, you'll have... | ||
| You'll be let out the next day. | ||
| You'll have a low bond, low bail. | ||
| Won't really matter. And you'll have a GoFundMe there set up or some lawyers guild ready to bail you out and cover for you. | ||
| But if you wander through the Capitol as a Trump supporter, you get thrown into prison waiting two years just to go to trial. | ||
| And when you go to trial, it's not treated like the offense that it actually is. | ||
| It's treated like an act of war. | ||
| And that's sort of where we're going. | ||
| That's what the domestic terror program is all about. | ||
| Is by saying certain people doing certain things will now be considered without any evidence in a completely arbitrary metric domestic terrorism. | ||
| So you won't be afforded the same liberties that a normal criminal conviction or normal criminal charge would entail. | ||
| They can suspend your constitutional rights. | ||
| They can deny you A lawyer or due process or a speedy trial, all the things that are guaranteed an American citizen, you'll be denied because you have the wrong thought. | ||
| So, you know, typically apartheid is a racial thing. | ||
| That's how it's understood in South Africa or in Israel now. | ||
| So this isn't a racial thing necessarily, but also we do have the racial thing coming into account as well, right? | ||
| If a black guy attacks a white guy, even if he's, like, saying, like... | ||
| We're attacking white guy like he's on video going, hey, a white guy, let's attack him because his race, because under any reasonable, equitable hate crime laws, it would be considered a hate crime. | ||
| But because certain races are considered protected and others not, then it won't be fairly adjudicated. | ||
| It won't be treated like a hate crime. | ||
| It'll be treated like just a random attack. | ||
| But if the races were reversed, then you have the political implication and the apartheid rules take effect. | ||
| For now, it's a hate crime. | ||
| Now you're going to jail for significantly longer. | ||
| You'll, you know, be denied all sorts of rights that you would get otherwise. | ||
| I mean, that's what they're really trying to implement right now. | ||
| And seeing that video sort of made me realize. | ||
| And there's plenty of examples. | ||
| Of course, Cruz is just showing the videos of the Antifa attack with dozens of Antifa attacks. | ||
| Activists, some in the SPLC, by the way, staging a coordinated attack on police officers, throwing explosives, all of them practically from out of state, by the way, some of them not even from this country, coordinating together to attack police officers, and yet the SPLC lawyer that was arrested, he's already out. | ||
| $5,000 bail. He's out on the street. | ||
| He's probably going back and working at the SPLC and being some sort of advisor to the FBI and telling them that white people are terrorists now. | ||
| Telling them the Trump supporters are the terrorists, right? | ||
| The terrorist is out on bail advising the FBI as to who are terrorists. | ||
| And here you see the attacks where they're literally throwing explosives at police officers. | ||
| Less than 24 hours in jail. | ||
| Out with a $5,000 bond. | ||
| Meanwhile, you've got people who, like Jacob Chansey, did absolutely nothing, was escorted through the Capitol by police officers, actually went around telling people to leave the Capitol once Trump's statement came out. | ||
| He's disencouraging and trying to stop people from committing violence. | ||
| And he's in jail for four years, went to trial without being able to see all of the evidence that would exonerate him. | ||
| So we're living in a world now of apartheid. | ||
| And it doesn't have to do with race. | ||
| It has to do with ideology. | ||
| It has to do with submission to or dissidence from the state. | ||
| And we really are... | ||
| Seeing that on full display, and we need to understand it in that way. | ||
| And we need to have laws against it, but we do. | ||
| So we're in this weird situation where we do have laws against this type of unequal treatment. | ||
| But the people in charge are just doing it anyway. | ||
| So we really need to think about that and take it into consideration as we move forward. | ||
| And then, of course, you just see the effects of this. | ||
| Crime is not just treated as crime. | ||
| It's not just the classic portrayal of justice as a blind lady with a scale and a sword. | ||
| She's blind because it doesn't matter to her who it is. | ||
| What matters is what was done and what the truth is. | ||
| But as that's changed, as that goes away, and instead we're dealing with a justice system that takes very much into account who you are and what color your skin is and determines whether or not to charge you based on whether you're You're poor and therefore can't be blamed for it or if you're white and therefore privileged and, you know, for equity, we're going to punish you more than we would otherwise. | ||
| You're going to see just the further collapse of the criminal justice system or of just life in general. | ||
| Just a few headlines for you. | ||
| New Orleans residents warned, don't sit in your car and play as carjackings skyrocketed 165%. | ||
| Don't sit in your car anymore. | ||
| You might die. Democrat lawmakers in Maryland introduced a bill preventing anyone under 25 from being charged with felony murder. | ||
| Well, that'll solve things, right? | ||
| They're just doing it. | ||
| They're just doing it. Career Criminal 30 is nabbed for a raping woman 21 and threatening to kill her. | ||
| This man had 14 previous arrests and was led out to victimize more people. | ||
| We can stop all this. | ||
| Easily. I do want to ask you to go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| As you know, we have led the way in the charge against the New World Order and their biotechnocratic enslavement that they're bringing about the whole planet. | ||
| We have redefined the discussion. | ||
| When you go to somewhere like TPUSA now, they talk about defeating the New World Order and the globalists and the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab. | ||
| That's the discussion on the conservative side of things, especially the younger side. | ||
| That's because of Infowars, and that's because of you. | ||
| Going to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| And we make it easy for you to do because we give you fantastic products such as the prebiotic fiber. | ||
| It's our most advanced formula yet. | ||
| 40% off organic acacia fiber, organic flaxseed, organic blueberry fruit fiber, organic cranberry fruit fiber. | ||
| I mean, this is getting all of the good stuff in one delicious powder that you can add to water or your smoothie and get all the fiber you need. |
Export Selection