Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The message that this conveys is that unless things change, unless the arms race is reversed, we're heading toward this midnight from which there can be no obligation. | |
| The doomsday clock has been set to 90 seconds to midnight, the closest it has ever been to global annihilation of the planet. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Members of the Science and Security Board move the hands of the Doomsday Clock forward, largely, though not exclusively, because of the mounting dangers in the war in Ukraine. | |
| We move the clock forward, the closest it has ever been to midnight. | ||
| It is now 90 seconds to midnight. | ||
| Hundreds of thank you are not hundreds of thanks. | ||
| All of us can use thousands of wars in discussions about It is in your power to guarantee such artillery and any aircraft that will crush terror. | ||
| It is in your power to make the victory. | ||
| So, may your decisions hit accurately. | ||
| Germany to provide Poland approval this week to send thousands of heavy battle tanks into Ukraine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will also deliver battle tanks to Ukraine. | |
| Leopard 2 tanks, that is the result of a very close and intense discussions with our partners, with our allies, our allies. | ||
| We have battalions together with our allies. | ||
| There are many countries that want to join in. | ||
| We will coordinate it and include these countries. | ||
| We will train Ukrainian crews here. | ||
| We will make logistics available, replenishment and we will also allow partner countries to deliver these tanks. | ||
| There are many citizens in this country that are worried because of this decision and the dimensions that this type of arm brings about. | ||
| Please trust us. | ||
| Trust the government. | ||
| We are fighting a war against Russia and not against each other. | ||
| Thank you. American lawmakers urge U.S. to ship Abrams' frontline battle tanks to Ukraine. | ||
| Reuters reports breaking. | ||
| The Biden administration is leaning towards sending a significant number of Abrams' M1 tanks to Ukraine. | ||
| The announcement of deliveries could start this week, U.S. officials says. | ||
| Today I'm announcing that the United States will be sending 31 Abrams tanks to Ukraine. | ||
| The equivalent of one Ukrainian battalion. | ||
| Secretary Austin has recommended this step because it will enhance the Ukraine's capacity to defend its territory and achieve its strategic objectives. | ||
| The Abrams tanks are the most capable tanks in the world. | ||
| They're also extremely complex to operate and maintain. | ||
| So we're also giving Ukraine the parts and equipment necessary to effectively sustain these tanks on the battlefield. | ||
| Got a shocking video of scores of F-16s spinning around in the air in Denmark in an attack exercise on the Russians. | ||
| Spoiling for nuclear war. | ||
| And George Soros has crawled out from under his rock or climbed up out of hell. | ||
| Stories up on Infowars.com. | ||
| George Soros urged use of Eastern European soldiers to reduce the risk of body bags for NATO countries in a New World Order article. | ||
| They say New World Order. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm afraid to ask, but what nuclear options does Russia have? | |
| Well, Russia has a lot of nuclear options, and so does NATO. And I don't think that either side would deliberately initiate the use of nuclear weapons. | ||
| But the concern is that when you have a war, things get out of control sometimes. | ||
| And there are many different ways in which this conflict spirals. | ||
| Yeah, sometimes things get out of hand with war. | ||
| Yeah, just look back at literally every war we've ever been involved in and the utter catastrophe of it. | ||
| NWO pushes global catastrophe closer to the edge of midnight. | ||
| That's the latest from band.videoinfowars.com. | ||
| Stay tuned. Daily Dispatch in one minute. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Thursday, January 26, year of our Lord 2023. | |
| And you're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Watch it live right now at Band.Video. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to The American Journal. | ||
| I am your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Band.Video, InfoWars.com. | ||
| Please do share those links and get the word out there. | ||
| Download the videos, re-upload them yourself. | ||
| We rely on you getting this information out, and that's what it's all about, after all. | ||
| We have a pretty big show for you today. | ||
| We'll be joined by Eden Bieber in the third hour. | ||
| Talk about some new revelations. | ||
| He, of course, was the one who discovered the secret contracts between Pfizer and other pharmaceutical companies and the countries that they were selling their poison shot in. | ||
| And... You know, he uncovered the actual language of the contract that exposed the indemnity that Pfizer would enjoy. | ||
| So he's got some new revelations for us. | ||
| Revelations abound, folks. | ||
| We also have Project Veritas coming out with an absolute bombshell undercover video showing Pfizer involved in potentially what sounds an awful lot like but may be legally distinct from gain-of-function research to create more viruses akin to... | ||
| So just lots of revelations these days. | ||
| Another hate crime hoax on the docket. | ||
| It's hilarious because the Fox News article about this in particular one happened in a school in Idaho. | ||
| You know, the first words in the article are hate crime hoax, semicolon, you know, white power spray paint was actually a Hispanic gang or something. | ||
| And so I went this morning to search for hate crime hoax, just thinking, well, it's in the title. | ||
| It's the first words in this article. | ||
| It's a Fox News article, so it'll be at the top of the results in Google. | ||
| Hit the news tab. And just searching hate crime hoax, you just get dozens of hate crime hoaxes. | ||
| It's like impossible to find the one you're looking for because there have been so many over the recent years. | ||
| It's a pretty hilarious phenomenon that we're dealing with, and the latest is perhaps more ridiculous than all of the others combined. | ||
| Well, typical these days. | ||
| So lots to get into, lots of videos to show you. | ||
| We'll play that Project Veritas. | ||
| I'm just going to play the full thing if I can. | ||
| It's about a 10-minute long video, but it's worth every second, so we'll watch that and, of course, talk about the inexorable march towards nuclear annihilation that our so-called leadership has set us upon. | ||
| all of that and more coming up today. | ||
| But let's begin as we do every day with our daily dispatch. | ||
| All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Thursday, January 26th, 2023. | ||
| Yes, your daily dispatch, your daily delve into the demonic possession of America. | ||
| Move over, Moses and Zoroaster. | ||
| Manhattan has a new female lawgiver. | ||
| It's a new statue crowning the courthouse of the Appalachian Division of the New York State Supreme Court at 27 Madison Avenue. | ||
| It's not the first time the court has changed the lineup of figures presiding over its rooftop, but it may be the first time that they've crowned this particular courthouse with such an utterly demonic-looking crime against art. | ||
| Just incredible stuff. | ||
| Frenzied commuters in New York's Flatiron District have been stopped in their tracks in recent days by an unlikely apparition near Moses, Confucius, and Zoroaster. | ||
| Standing atop the grandiose state courthouse is a shimmering, golden, eight-foot female sculpture emerging from a pink lotus flower and wearing Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's signature lace collar. | ||
| Also, the devil horns and the creepy tentacles you might want to mention as well. | ||
| Literally just repulsive. | ||
| I don't know how anybody can look at this. | ||
| But this is... You know what? | ||
| You get rid of the statues of, you know... | ||
| Teddy Roosevelt marching on a horse and you replace it with this abomination. | ||
| Just, I mean, what other words could you use to describe this creepy, transhuman, tentacle monster, demon goat-headed justice of the Supreme Court? | ||
| What? We've got, like, Moses, right? | ||
| Led the Jews from Egypt. | ||
| Founded the religion of Judaism. | ||
| Lawgiver. Man of God. | ||
| Spoke one-on-one with God himself. | ||
| Like, long beard. You know the guy. | ||
| Beautiful statue. Confucius. | ||
| Lawgiver of the Chinese people whose dictates still guide their lives to this day. | ||
| A wise and, you know, studied man. | ||
| Zoroaster, one of the oldest monotheistic religions in the world, a prophet of ancient repute. | ||
| And then you have some sort of half-octopus, half-goat demon woman, but she's the golden one, so she stands out. | ||
| And of course, it's to honor Ruth Bader Ginsburg's contribution to the slaughtering of innocent babies inside their mother's wombs. | ||
| Just demonic possession on an open frame at this point. | ||
| Stirring regally a head with her hair braided like spiraling horns, the sculpture, installed as part of an exhibition that opened last week, is the first female to adorn the courthouse's tin plinths. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ugh! Ugh! | |
| Ugh, ladies. Ugh. | ||
| Come on. What is wrong with you people? | ||
| It's just one of those things, man. | ||
| I don't know what it is. | ||
| I don't know what it is about... | ||
| Like, the first, it's just, you know, the first, they celebrate it, and then it's just like, but why is it all awful? | ||
| But why is every time you're celebrating some first, it turns out that that first of whatever you're celebrating has to, like, resign in disgrace, or it's the first statue, like, you know, it just makes you think of the little girl in front of the bowl statue, right? | ||
| It's just like, what a narcissistic, grandiose, Abomination. | ||
| It's just disgusting. | ||
| And I guess that's all there is to say about it. | ||
| But no, I think it's appropriate. | ||
| I think it's an appropriate monument to women's reproductive rights. | ||
| I think it's a very appropriate monument to women's reproductive rights. | ||
| Yes, very appropriate. | ||
| You people are gross. | ||
| Moving on. Earth's core appears to have stopped spinning, liars say. | ||
| I'm sorry, scientists say. | ||
| Yeah, I don't believe this. | ||
| According to an study, the Earth's inner core appears to have stopped spinning. | ||
| Yeah, press X for doubt. | ||
| While that may sound bad, as Vice reports, scientists say it's actually not a big deal. | ||
| Yeah, no big deal. | ||
| The inner core of our planet stops spinning, but it's probably fine. | ||
| There's one of two things. | ||
| Either... This is the end of the world because the magnetic poles will no longer operate. | ||
| The magnetic poles come from the energy created by the spinning of the Earth's molten core. | ||
| It's called a dynamo. | ||
| Yeah, the dynamo, which creates the... | ||
| The shield that Earth is protected from solar rays and radiation from the sun, protected by the energy output of the magnetic poles, which is added. | ||
| So either this is the end of the world or the scientists are full of it. | ||
| But they seem to be thinking literally the opposite. | ||
| They're like, it is happening, but it's not a big deal. | ||
| Okay, my reading of this is it's not happening, but if it was, it would be the end of the world. | ||
| So just a little switcheroo there. | ||
| Measuring seismic waves from quakes deep beneath the surface, the researchers found the Earth's inner core may be experiencing a turning back in a multi-decadal oscillation, suggesting that there was another turning point in the early 1970s. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, scientists. | |
| Sure. Okay, yeah, right. | ||
| People believe this, but you say COVID came from a lab, and they're like, what?! | ||
| I don't believe it. | ||
| I'm sorry. Do you have any concept of the amount of energy you're talking about and it just decided to reverse one day? | ||
| So is the Earth conscious? | ||
| Did it make this decision? | ||
| Or is this just something you think happens when a body in space is spinning, it just every once in a while stops and turns around? | ||
| It's like something you'd read in Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy or something. | ||
| Moving on, UK becomes the latest country to ban COVID boosters for under 50s. | ||
| COVID booster doses will no longer be available to healthy people under 50 from next month, the government said. | ||
| I honestly want to know this question. | ||
| Has there ever been a time in history where something has gone so quickly from being mandated to being banned? | ||
| Mandated to banned. No intermediary. | ||
| It went from you have to get the jab or you're fired and you'll go to jail and you'll be quarantined and et cetera, et cetera, to actually you're not allowed to get it because it's super deadly. | ||
| It's banned. Step away, sir. | ||
| You're not allowed to get this anymore. | ||
| It's only for the old people. | ||
| Has anything ever in the history of All right, folks, welcome back. | ||
| Continuing with our daily dispatch here, yes, the UK has become the latest country to ban COVID boosters for under 50s. | ||
| The reason given by the GCVI, the government's vaccine advisory body, is because the transition continues away from a pandemic emergency response towards pandemic recovery. | ||
| A number of countries have imposed similar bans on boosters for healthy under 50s, a trend that's been linked by observers to safety concerns, though public authorities have not confirmed this. | ||
| The UK will continue to offer the first two doses to over 16s. | ||
| Just no boosters. | ||
| Just incredible. Incredible. | ||
| Can you believe people are still getting the vaccine? | ||
| I mean, my God, you deserve it at this point. | ||
| Record lows and deadly snows sweep Japan. | ||
| Iceland's coldest December for 50 years, plus cold Arctic skies produce a rare polar stratospheric clouds. | ||
| Pretty incredible Weather in the east these days. | ||
| Asia's cold spell is intensifying, particularly in the east where records are continuing to fall across the likes of China, the Koreas, and Japan. | ||
| I believe China recently recorded their lowest temperature ever at negative 63 degrees. | ||
| Something like that. | ||
| Pretty incredible stuff. Massive snowstorms in Japan. | ||
| You also have Iceland recording their coldest December of all time. | ||
| Because of global warming, obviously. | ||
| Obviously, it's because of global warming that everything's getting colder. | ||
| Stop asking questions. | ||
| Men can get pregnant. The vaccine makes you more likely to get the disease. | ||
| Everything is backwards and stupid. | ||
| Get used to it already. | ||
| It's pretty wild. I mean, obviously, my... | ||
| First instinct would be point to the massive and unrestricted multi-billion dollar program by the Chinese to literally change their own weather through cloud seeding and atmospheric heating and ionospheric expansion that they're engaged in and are quite open about and are using to... | ||
| You know, actively alter the natural progress of this enclosed weather system we call the environment. | ||
| So, that might have something to do with it, or it could be because you don't eat bugs. | ||
| I don't know. I guess we'll have to go to the experts on this one. | ||
| Finally, we have this, and this is the story I was mentioning at the beginning of the show. | ||
| I want to pull up a little... | ||
| Summary of what's going on by Vincent James, because he phrased it really well. | ||
| So I'll find that in just a second. | ||
| The headline is, I should have pulled it up beforehand. | ||
| I knew it. I knew I was going to use this. | ||
| I'll find it later, but Vincent James laid it out perfectly, because basically what happened was a Hispanic kid was wearing a t-shirt that said, Brown Power. | ||
| He was... Or she was punished for dress code or just told, hey, you can't wear that shirt at school. | ||
| Then all of the brown children in the school, the Hispanic children in the school, staged a walkout and did a protest. | ||
| And it became a giant thing as they demanded the right to say brown power and to wear brown power on their shirts. | ||
| And then during all of this chaos, somebody sprayed white power in graffiti on a local high school. | ||
| And that, of course, was then... | ||
| Investigated as a hate crime by the police, who then figured out it was the Hispanic rival gangs that were the ones doing it. | ||
| It's just... And they say it's a hoax. | ||
| I don't know, though. I don't know. | ||
| I mean, are you saying that just because someone's Hispanic means they can't believe in white power, that they can't be a white supremacist? | ||
| I don't know. That flies in the face with everything else you say all the time. | ||
| Maybe it was one of those Hispanic white supremacists that we hear so much about. | ||
| An Idaho police department determined that white power graffiti found at a local high school was not an act of hate, but an act of intimidation between two rival Hispanic criminal street gangs. | ||
| An act of intimidation between two rival Hispanic criminal street gangs. | ||
| Okay, so you've got two gangs of Hispanics, one of which intimidates the other by saying white power. | ||
| Eh? What? | ||
| What? At this time, detectives no longer believe the incident would be motivated by hate, but rather as an act of intimidation between two rival Hispanic criminal street gangs from Caldwell, the Caldwell Police Department said on Facebook. | ||
| Detectives are basing this off evidence, video, and other factors discovered in the course of the investigation. | ||
| School officials reportedly compared the phrase to a white pride shirt. | ||
| According to the students who was told to remove the shirt, Brenda Hernandez... | ||
| Wait, what? No, it was not. | ||
| It was a brown power. | ||
| Brown pride. I'm confused here. | ||
| Caldwell High School Principal Anita Wilson said at the time the school had a strict dress code compared to other school districts because Caldwell has a gang problem before and brown pride is associated with gangs. | ||
| Well, you can't say that. | ||
| Brown pride associated with gangs? | ||
| How dare you? | ||
| After the graffiti was found Thursday, the police chief denounced what at the time appeared to be an act of hate, saying we will not tolerate hate in our city. | ||
| We will tolerate gangs. | ||
| We will tolerate ethnically separated criminal gangs warring with each other, but not hate. | ||
| But we will not accept white people hating. | ||
| No. No. | ||
| And we'll ensure that whoever is responsible for this will be held accountable for their actions. | ||
| It's just, you know... | ||
| Are we sure they just didn't misspell white powder? | ||
| Maybe they were advertising their cocaine. | ||
| That's a good question. Very well could have been. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey man, I sprayed an advertisement on the wall. | |
| You spelled powder wrong, man. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What are you doing? You are hateful now! | |
| They provide an update on the graffiti vandalism believed to be a diversion tactic used by one of the Hispanic gangs in the area to avoid being caught by police and was possibly done to exploit the recent protest at Caldwell High School. | ||
| Yes, yes. Criminals are not stupid. | ||
| They understand how to manipulate the, you know, cultural... | ||
| law enforcement at this point they understand that like the police don't care about mexican gangs like killing each other on the street but if you say white power then it's all hands on deck full force investigation we have to get to the bottom of this it's common for gang members to vandalize property in their attempts to create fear and intimidation within the community the department said in its facebook update for the case uh friday But it's not hateful, so it's fine. | ||
| It's not hateful, though, so it's fine, right? | ||
| Criminal gangs roaming the streets, tagging places to create intimidation and fear and remind people that they're constantly surrounded by a group of violent psychopaths that live outside of the law. | ||
| But at least they don't hate, so it's fine. | ||
| So it's good. It's good, actually. | ||
| Police posted screenshots of surveillance footage from the night the school was vandalized showing individuals wearing black masks and hoodies standing near a wall. | ||
| Again, it's just one of those things where it's like, all right, so if it was a white person that did it, it would be a hate crime. | ||
| They'd probably go to jail. | ||
| You'd have to have a big lockdown. | ||
| Probably the entire school administration would be, you know, fired unless they agreed to implement some, you know, white supremacy combating classes where every teacher has to go through some training to inform them about how hate is wrong and white people are evil and bad and should be destroyed. | ||
| Hate is wrong and white people are uniquely evil and must be eradicated from the planet. | ||
| And you just see like all these, it's like, they're so, they were so terrified of this idea that somebody sprayed white power. | ||
| Meanwhile, while they're investigating that, there are literal mobs of high school students waving brown power signs, wearing brown power shirts, waving the Mexican flag, and protesting against their inability to wear brown power shirts. | ||
| Just, supremacy is everything but white, I guess. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal. We're going to open up the phone lines for calls next hour, for sure. | ||
| We'll be joined in the third hour by Eden Bieber, Eden Biber, with some pretty major revelations about COVID-19. | ||
| In fact, I think in the next segment, I'm going to go ahead and dedicate the whole segment to playing the latest from Project Veritas. | ||
| Where they have an employee of Pfizer talking very coyly about the way that they're breeding viruses to kill the whole world. | ||
| Now everything they do is bad for everyone except for themselves. | ||
| Isn't that so funny? They're like, yeah, we'll watch. | ||
| We'll watch. It's pretty great. | ||
| He's just like, yeah, the revolving door of politicians and Pfizer and they're in these positions of power and then You know, they immediately leave and come straight to Pfizer and get great jobs. | ||
| So, you know, they're not going to say anything bad about us. | ||
| It's bad for America. It's bad for everyone except for us. | ||
| They're like, it's so funny. | ||
| It's so funny being the henchman of evil people. | ||
| Really wild. Pretty crazy stuff. | ||
| I do have some good news here, covering a story that we are one of the only outlets to actually dedicate energy and attention to, but is probably one of the most egregious violations of the First Amendment to occur in my lifetime. | ||
| That is AB 2098, the Californian law dictating that doctors have to say whatever the official experts from the government say, or else they might lose their license to practice medicine. | ||
| Just... Nazi-level, Soviet-level thought and speech control of doctors. | ||
| So it's our health that they're risking with this. | ||
| But the good news is this. Aaron Chiardi on MD on Twitter says, Judge just granted our request for a preliminary injunction against AB 2098, the gag order on physicians in California in our Hague v. | ||
| Newsom lawsuit. This effectively halts the implementation of this terrible law while our case is being tried. | ||
| The ruling bodes well for our case. | ||
| It indicates that our arguments at this law is unconstitutional, have strong pretrial facial... | ||
| Facial plausibility. Not to get ahead of ourselves, of course, or to try to predict the final outcome of this case, but this is a very positive development. | ||
| So grateful to be a part of this superb and courageous team of doctors and lawyers fighting for medical freedom and informed consent in California. | ||
| One more detail here. | ||
| The preliminary injunction ruling also establishes that we five physicians have standing to challenge the law. | ||
| This is important because a similar challenge filed against AB 2098 was dismissed based on a ruling that the plaintiffs lacked standing. | ||
| So I guess they... Say they, uh, outstanding. | ||
| So again, you know, you just keep asking the question, and I really don't know the answer to this. | ||
| I really don't know what mechanism needs to be in place to prevent, like, yeah, I don't know. | ||
| It's, you know, I just don't know if our system is capable of handling the current level of infiltration that we're dealing with, right? | ||
| Yeah. This bill, AB 2098, is just a blatant violation of the Constitution. | ||
| A horrifying intervention into healthcare by the government threatening doctors with losing their license, which, again, if you... | ||
| You know, doctors may be one of the only professions left that still has... | ||
| It still requires the level of schooling and dedication. | ||
| You know, it's like Starship Troopers. | ||
| You know, like to be a citizen in Starship Troopers, you had to go through a military. | ||
| You had to join the military and go through. | ||
| And they talk about how, like, in order to make citizenship valuable, their experience in the military has to be terrible, right? | ||
| You have to like really sacrifice a lot in order to gain citizenship because then once you have it, you're going to value it because you're going to think like I suffered and almost died for this. | ||
| I'm not just going to treat it lightly. | ||
| And like that's really – like doctors still go through that. | ||
| The money that they spend going to school, the amount that they are just crushed by the workload all throughout school. | ||
| I mean you dedicate a decade of your life to becoming a doctor. | ||
| You're going to do pretty much anything to not let that be stripped away. | ||
| That's like stripping away 10 years of your life, right? | ||
| To be disbarred or have your license taken and not be able to practice as a doctor anymore. | ||
| It's like actually... | ||
| It's a major threat. | ||
| So, you know, they're weaponizing that, I guess, and just going, yeah, you dedicated, you know, 10 years of your life. | ||
| You worked harder than anybody's ever worked. | ||
| You sacrificed your pleasure and your comfort and your, you know, relaxation times. | ||
| You've probably sacrificed relationships and, you know, you missed out on really fun things you could have been doing to dedicate your life to medicine. | ||
| But if you... Say something that contradicts what we non-doctors and the government say, we're going to just strip that away from you and destroy it and make all of that time and effort that you put into it a complete and utter waste. | ||
| So better just to make sure you stick to the rules here. | ||
| Just horrific, right? | ||
| So the fact that this gets passed, the fact that we're having to get preliminary injunctions against this I don't know if there's any coming back from this. | ||
| I don't know if you can implement such a law because you had to have the people who wrote the law. | ||
| You had to have experts weigh in on it. | ||
| You had to have everybody in the assembly vote for it. | ||
| And not one of these people had an issue. | ||
| Not one of these stopping points. | ||
| Because this is the thing. | ||
| Our governmental system is orchestrated to or designed to delay the ability of tyrannical measures to be put in. | ||
| People are like, oh, things are getting hung up in the Senate. | ||
| That's what it's there for. | ||
| That's the purpose of it. | ||
| So with the checks and balances, it's all about not letting the tyranny get put into place In the first place. | ||
| But once it's there, I don't know. | ||
| I mean, I guess you can repeal a law, but then they'll just come back with a slightly differently worded or they'll come up with a different justification for it. | ||
| So again, I don't know what the mechanism is for attempted tyranny. | ||
| But who would you punish here? | ||
| I mean, you've got the entire state senate of California or state government of California in favor of this. | ||
| So like... You know, what do you do about that? | ||
| What do you do about the fact that not one of them was concerned at the fact that the government is demanding veto power over your personal doctor? | ||
| It's wild. Just wild destruction of our most basic fundamental rights, like our very healthcare. | ||
| They are willing to let you die. | ||
| They are willing to let tens of thousands of people die so that they can have this control. | ||
| Like, what do you do about that? | ||
| What do you do about that? If it was just a king issuing these orders and it was just one guy going, from now on, if you disagree with me as a doctor, you're going to have your license taken away. | ||
| Then I'd go, well, this guy sucks. | ||
| And they would just kill that guy. | ||
| But what happens when it's hundreds and hundreds of people from every county in California all getting together in a big Congress and they're all saying, if you disagree with us, then you lose your license as a doctor? | ||
| What do you do when it's the entire government engaged in this tyranny? | ||
| And what do you do when it passes and then you have to get a preliminary injunction and have to reverse a decision and then next year it's just the same bill is on the floor and they approve it again and you have to go through the whole thing again? | ||
| Like how do you, like how do we do, what do we do? | ||
| What do we do here about this? | ||
| I think, you know, things might work themselves out because if this is a California state law, Wouldn't medical professionals who took their job seriously not operate in California, driving the cost of healthcare even higher in California, and then it would lead them to repeal this, or you don't think that that would be the case? | ||
| I don't think the failure of programs has ever once caused liberals to reverse their case. | ||
| I mean, California is sort of the perfect example where they're like, oh, we kind of have a homeless problem. | ||
| Let's spend $10 billion on fixing homeless, and by the end of the 10 years and the $10 billion, you have five times as many homeless, and it's destroying your state. | ||
| So, like, everything they implement backfires. | ||
| Everything they implement makes things worse. | ||
| They never reverse it. | ||
| They never... Realize their mistake and reverse it. | ||
| If that happens, what they'll do is they'll make a law to prevent doctors from leaving California. | ||
| Remember they did that? Remember they were trying to collect California taxes from people that had already left the state? | ||
| That's what they'll do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They suck. Alright, welcome back folks. | |
| I just saw this from our boy, Robot Polisher on Twitter. | ||
| The left's attempt to meme. | ||
| It's not a good one. | ||
| They say anti-vaxxers keep saying dumb things like vaccines aren't 100% effective, so they're useless. | ||
| Parachutes aren't 100% effective either, but wearing one is a damn good idea. | ||
| Don't you love how they just make things up that you've never said and then say that you say them in order to disagree with them? | ||
| I've never said the vaccine isn't 100% effective. | ||
| I said it actively makes you more likely to get the disease, more likely to die from the disease, more likely to be hospitalized from the disease. | ||
| If we're using the parachute metaphor here... | ||
| This is people jumping out of an airplane with a giant metal ball collared around their neck. | ||
| Or a parachute. It's called a parachute. | ||
| Or a parachute that hasn't been folded, hasn't been tested, right, to see if it was folded. | ||
| Nobody made the checks to make sure that the parachute was strung up correctly in the backpack. | ||
| But even in that case, you know, the parachute still might work. | ||
| Like, this is... The vaccine just... | ||
| It doesn't just not work. | ||
| It doesn't just not work 100% of the time. | ||
| It actively makes it worse, right? | ||
| So it's got to be something that... | ||
| When you jump out of an airplane makes you less likely to survive, right? | ||
| It's not just a malfunctioning parachute. | ||
| It's like, yeah, we're all going to jump out of this airplane and you're going to have your hands cuffed behind your back and, you know, dynamite taped around your head. | ||
| What, you don't trust the science? | ||
| It's just like, all right, okay, that's fine. | ||
| Of course, it gets even worse. | ||
| Project Veritas yesterday released an absolute... | ||
| I know we use this word a lot, but it's a real bombshell. | ||
| This is a nuclear bombshell. | ||
| This was an absolutely huge undercover get by Project Veritas. | ||
| Dr. Eli David on Twitter says, Project Veritas exposed what's probably the most important story on Pfizer and COVID, but if you Google it... | ||
| What do you get? You get Google thinking about it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, gee, it looks like these results are changing pretty quickly. | |
| We're just not really sure what you're talking—oh, you mean the video that's gotten millions of views since it was posted late last night exposing Pfizer and Project Veritas? | ||
| Gee, I just, you know, just give me a minute. | ||
| Just give me a minute. Let me search for it. | ||
| Tell you what, check back in tomorrow or a week, and I'll see if I can find it. | ||
| Our culture is just replete with it. | ||
| Again, I don't know how we solve this short of just hellfire, right? | ||
| Literally everything is backwards. | ||
| Literally everyone is in on it. | ||
| Big corporations, the pharmaceutical companies, the governmental... | ||
| Oversight boards, the government itself, they're voting on laws that make everything worse. | ||
| They're being implemented by NGOs that make everything worse. | ||
| They're supported and lied about by the media, just making everything worse. | ||
| It's just everything, just everything, everywhere, everything. | ||
| It's a war against humanity, and it's from every different angle. | ||
| So... Google doing their part to try to suppress this video. | ||
| We're going to go ahead and play as much of it as possible. | ||
| The whole video is about 10 minutes. | ||
| It can be found on the Project Veritas site. | ||
| YouTube, Twitter, assuming it hasn't been taken down yet. | ||
| Again, we're going to play as much of this as possible. | ||
| I do want to remind you, before we go to it, to go to Infowarsstore.com to support everything that we do here. | ||
| Which is mostly just be right about everything. | ||
| Support the people that have been right about literally everything the entire time. | ||
| I don't even say that as a brag. | ||
| It's just support the people that have the ever so rare ability to simply see reality and then figure out what's going on. | ||
| Like it's so simple. | ||
| It's so easy, but nobody else is doing it. | ||
| So please support the one outlet that still has its head on straight and still actually has some sort of principle that we stand on that is human freedom and liberty, peace and justice in the American way. | ||
| Please, for the love of God, we are surrounded and they're closing in. | ||
| Support InfoWars now or never. | ||
| That's really what it is. Now or you'll never be able to. | ||
| Get your ultimate bone broth. | ||
| Ultimate bone broth is back. | ||
| It's been improved. | ||
| It's been added to a whole bunch of different ingredients that make the absorption better, that give you sustained energy and really let you maximize your workout. | ||
| Ultimate bone broth plus And again, just like everything else, we didn't have to invent some new thing here. | ||
| We aren't fabricating new molecules in some lab somewhere. | ||
| We are using the power that nature gave us and that... | ||
| Wives and grandmothers have known for all of time. | ||
| Bone broth, right? | ||
| Jam-packed full of healthy nutrition is one of the best and healthiest things you could ever eat. | ||
| And all we're doing is going back to the basics, going back to tradition, and weaponizing it for... | ||
| The needs of the modern world. | ||
| Ultimate Bone Broth Plus is, was it 25% off right now at InfoWarsStore.com, which is a pretty big discount, and it's been out for years, and it's back now. | ||
| It'll probably sell out pretty dang quick if I had to guess. | ||
| Ultimate Bone Broth Plus, now available at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Without any further ado, here is the latest from Project Veritas, where they have an employee of Pfizer bragging and laughing about how they are in cahoots with the federal government to bring a... | ||
| About misery and suffering in the American people. | ||
| and they laugh about it. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Pfizer ultimately is thinking about mutating COVID. | |
| Well, that is not what we say to the public. | ||
| No. | ||
| Don't tell anyone that's COVID. | ||
| You got to publish your own time. | ||
| You got to publish your own time. | ||
| I know. | ||
| We're scoring like not, you know how the virus keeps mutating? | ||
| Yeah. Well, one of the things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just mutate it ourselves so we can create unsupply developed new back chains, right? | ||
| So we have to do that. | ||
| If we're going to do that, though, there's a risk of, like, as you could imagine, no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f***ing viruses. | ||
| It's got to be, like, very controlled to make sure that this virus that you mutate doesn't create something that, like, you know, goes everywhere. | ||
| Something crazy. | ||
| But it's the way that the virus started to get moving on. | ||
| To be honest, like, it makes no sense if this virus would pop out of nowhere. | ||
| Yeah, I know. | ||
| Meet Jordan Tristan Walker, a director of research and development strategic operations and mRNA scientific planning at Pfizer. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It sounds like gain-of-function to me. | |
| I don't know. It's a little bit different. I think it's different. | ||
| It's definitely not gain-of-function. | ||
| It sounds like it is. I mean, it's okay. | ||
| No, no, no, no. | ||
| Directed evolution is very different. | ||
| Well, you're not supposed to do gain-of-function research of the viruses. | ||
| Yeah. But you do, like, these, like, selected directional mutations to try to see if you can be more potent. | ||
| Yeah. So there is research I'm talking about that. | ||
| I don't know how that's going to work. | ||
| There might not be any more outbreaks, because, like, Jesus Christ. | ||
| The gentleman seems to have absolutely no moral compass at all. | ||
| It's a revolving door for all government officials. | ||
| It's pretty good for the industry, to be honest. | ||
| Yeah. It's bad for everyone else in America. | ||
| Why is it bad for everybody else? | ||
| Because if the regulators are to approve our drugs, know that once they stop being regulated, they want to go work for the company, they're not going to be as hard for the company. | ||
| If this is the quality of individuals within Pfizer that are making these huge decisions that risk global public health, it's profoundly corrupt. | ||
| What is Pfizer doing, I guess, to optimize, you know, the vaccines now? | ||
| Oh, we actually had a meeting about that today, so there's a lot. | ||
| I don't know if I should say this. | ||
| Our undercover journalist asked Walker how Pfizer is handling the fact that their COVID vaccines are ineffective against virus variants. | ||
| What he said is disturbing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Listen to this. We're exploring, like, you know how the virus keeps mutating? | |
| Yeah. Well, one of the things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just mutate it ourselves so we can create uniquely developed new vaccines, right? | ||
| So we have to do that. If we're going to do that, though, there's a risk of, like, as you could imagine, no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f***ing viruses. | ||
| So we're like, do we want to do this? | ||
| So that's one of the things we're considering. | ||
| In the future, maybe we can create new versions of the vaccines and things like that. | ||
| Okay, so Pfizer ultimately is thinking about mutating COVID? Well, that is not what we say to the public. | ||
| No. It was a thought that came up at a meeting and we were like, why do we not? | ||
| It was like, we're going to consider that. | ||
| There'll be more discussions. | ||
| We're like, wait a minute. People won't like that. | ||
| That's right, it appears that Pfizer is internally discussing the possibility of mutating the COVID virus themselves in order to tailor a vaccine to sell to the public. | ||
| Listen to Walker describe in detail just how they would conduct such a scientific experiment. | ||
| first in living animals. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So the way that we're thinking about it, don't tell anyone this. | |
| You got to publish your own time. | ||
| You got to publish your own time. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Okay, right. | ||
| So the way it would work is like, we put them in the virus in these monkeys. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And then we successively like, cause them to keep infecting each other. | ||
| I would collect serial samples from them, and then the ones that are more infectious, like the virus, we'll put them in another monkey and just constantly actively mutate it. | ||
| that's one way or you can do like directed like simulation which is like we can turn off so far and then you just sample what the different like um like proteins on the surface of the virus look like over time so then you can see the mutation you cannot of course it can mutate in a certain way you want okay you have to be like very controlled to make sure that this virus that you mutate which doesn't create something like you know it smells everywhere something crazy but is the way that the virus started it moved out to be honest like it's it makes no sense if this virus pop out of nowhere like | ||
| Yeah, I know. COVID virus experimentation on live monkeys? | ||
| This is unethical, to say the least, and Walker describes those experiments as if they are ongoing and not simply a hypothetical discussion. | ||
| Total moral black hole operating at the highest levels of our country in every different facet of our existence. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. We still have a lot to talk about in today's show and a lot of videos to show you as well. | ||
| We'll take your phone calls this hour and be joined by Edin Beiber in the third hour with some more revelations about the true scale of deception that was involved in the rollout of the vaccines. | ||
| Lots of big news still coming up. | ||
| Let's talk a second about fact checks, shall we? | ||
| I was going to bring this up because of the Antifa riots that occurred in Atlanta and Boston and several other major American cities just this last week. | ||
| With, again, hilarious, like, the media. | ||
| I mean, again, even after all this time, they are still literally saying they're in front of a burning police car, being like, this protest was totally peaceful and non-violent. | ||
| And there's just, like, people being shot in the background. | ||
| So much so that the mayor of Atlanta had to come out and be like, these are domestic terrorists that are destroying our city. | ||
| Stop covering for them. | ||
| Of course, they didn't, and they continued to... | ||
| You know, lie about it. | ||
| And I mean, the whole thing was predicated on a hoax in the first place with the police shooting of a guy who shot at them first. | ||
| Anyway, it's all nonsense and stupidity as it always is. | ||
| But it reminded me of the story that we broke way, way back before Black Lives Matter 2020. | ||
| You know, before any of that, it was like 2018 or something that we discovered the Friends of Democracy documents that showed that It's either Alexander or Jonathan Soros. | ||
| George Soros' son has this group called Friends of Democracy. | ||
| And it was the organization and tactics and pre-planning for a riot in Baltimore where they said explicitly that their number one goal is to create a feedback loop in which... | ||
| Violence from the protesters brings in more police, and more police brings more violence from the protesters. | ||
| A feedback loop eventually requiring intervention from federal forces. | ||
| That was their stated goal of the people organizing it, and it was basically how Antifa is organized, how they run their operations to create the most amount of chaos and havoc in order to bring about the state of uncertainty and, again, chaos that they can then take advantage of. | ||
| Nobody ever said it was fake. | ||
| Nobody ever came out to say, hey, that's my name on there, and I never wrote that because it had people's signatures. | ||
| It named them. | ||
| I mean, it was everything, right? Friends of Democracy was the name of the document. | ||
| So I was looking up this document again last week as Antifa was up to their old tricks, and I came across this fact check from Reuters. | ||
| It's a very good example of... | ||
| The manipulation that they are engaged in. | ||
| Fact check. This is from June 3rd, 2020. | ||
| Protesters were not issued instructions from Friends of Democracy PAC. Images circulating on social media appear to show instruction manuals for George Floyd protesters accidentally dropped during the demonstrations. | ||
| This claim is false. | ||
| What's false about it? | ||
| Can you guess? | ||
| Do you have... The supervision? | ||
| Can you see through? | ||
| Like Superman's x-ray vision? | ||
| Can you see the truth for what it is? | ||
| What was wrong about it, and they say this, is that it wasn't George Floyd protesters because these documents were out before George Floyd. | ||
| And they weren't dropped during a demonstration. | ||
| They were found in the bedroom of an Antifa member by his brother who then posted them to 4chan. | ||
| So again, it's like the documents are real. | ||
| The things that the documents show being planned actually happened, and it was the Freddie Gray riots back in 2012 or 2014 or something. | ||
| So all of that's true. | ||
| Then they do a fact check saying it's false because they asserted that the claims were that it was George Floyd protesters in 2020 and it wasn't. | ||
| So this is the way fact checks works these days. | ||
| And of course they mention us here. | ||
| It was part of a larger instruction manual posted online at least as far back as 2018 by outlets like Infowars in which it alleged a funding conspiracy related to protests after the death of Freddie Gray in April 2015. | ||
| One version of the claim featured a longer document that can be seen in this Twitter post. | ||
| The longer document entitled BWI 04-118-15 in reference to Baltimore, the place of Gray's death and subsequent protest. | ||
| So again, they have the planning. | ||
| Then you can see the protest. It actually did happen exactly as it was planned. | ||
| And then they come out and say, actually, this is false. | ||
| Fact check, not true. | ||
| Pants on fire because we put George Floyd in there. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. Second hour of American Journal has begun. | ||
| We'll open up the phone lines for your calls this hour. | ||
| The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Give us a call now at American Journal. | ||
| Support us by going to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| And I look forward to hearing from our audience. | ||
| We'll be joined by Eden Biber in the third hour. | ||
| You know, I was really just bringing up the fact check thing from Reuters because it segued into a different story I wanted to cover, but I realized we really haven't covered this since we first broke the story in 2018. | ||
| And it may be worth it to remind our audience that isn't aware of how these things are orchestrated, just how illuminating this document series is. | ||
| So again, this was... | ||
| I think I'm the first one to bring this to the public. | ||
| This was in 2018, just a year after I started working here. | ||
| It was one of the first things that I went on air to do. | ||
| And basically, I happened to catch the original post on 4chan of this guy. | ||
| You know, my brother is really high up in Antifa. | ||
| He thinks he's a badass. He thinks he's like some secret agent that's like working to overthrow a fascist regime. | ||
| And he's like, so I broke into his room. | ||
| And I think he said he broke into like a safe of his and found these documents that showed the orchestration and organization of the Freddie Gray riots. | ||
| And so again... Reuters says, literally as a fact check, false. | ||
| These documents were not provided to George Floyd protesters, which is hilarious because we made this claim in 2018, which is before anybody had ever heard of George Floyd at all, two years before that. | ||
| St. George Floyd. I'm sorry, St. | ||
| George Floyd, blessed be his name. | ||
| Peace be upon him. So, like, it's, you know, we make these claims about the Freddie Gray riots in 2015. | ||
| They come out and say, absolutely false, not true. | ||
| These were not provided to George Floyd protesters. | ||
| It's like, well, we didn't say that, so who are you fact-checking exactly? | ||
| But it's just the way they do it. | ||
| Because the reality is, what you can understand from them fact-checking the idea that these were given to George Floyd protesters— And saying they weren't given to George Floyd protesters is that they were, by implication or by leaving this out, they were given to Freddie Gray protesters. | ||
| These are legitimate documents. | ||
| They have nothing to say that they aren't, so they tack on an extra claim that we never made, and then they debunk that because they can't debunk the original claim because the original claim is true. | ||
| The Action Oversight Executive Committee, so Friends of Democracy there at the top, confidential level 7AB-G, swift transition from AOC playing to implementation by friendly operators in BWI, is in part to seize as much momentum as possible from the current civil unrest in the BWI area. | ||
| Friendly officials in various administrative agencies for BWI have told us to expect large law enforcement response to our operations. | ||
| Please refer to Action BWI 041315 documentation on recommended practices when encountering LE and hostile forces. | ||
| Operators in Ox Ops must be in constant contact via 328 BG comms provided by the agency. | ||
| A-O-E-C. So again, you can see why somebody that would get this would have the feeling that they're involved in some sort of military operation because of the words that they use, because they use these terms like OPSEC, AGITORGS, right? | ||
| All of these... These phrases that are meant to convey that this is a serious and military operation, but there's so much here to dig into, right? | ||
| Friendly officials in various administrative agencies for VWI have told us to expect a large law enforcement response. | ||
| So, again, if our Federal government or any aspect of our government was actually interested in digging down and figuring out who the people and organizations are that are causing domestic terror, that are causing strife, that are causing death and chaos across this country. | ||
| They wouldn't be chasing down 60-year-old farmers who wandered through the Capitol one day. | ||
| They would be figuring out I mean... | ||
| This is the frustrating part. | ||
| This document alone would give any investigative body just everything they need. | ||
| The names are on it. The people are on it. | ||
| And again, it's almost impossible to even imagine how this could be fabricated. | ||
| Because you've got signatures that are all very clearly from different hands. | ||
| Different people sign these. So unless this was like an organized false flag from a bunch of different people working on this. | ||
| But why you would go through all this work. | ||
| And also again you can see this plan. | ||
| And then you can go back to the actual riots and see how this plan was actually carried out. | ||
| So they literally have, like, staging areas, Alpha 2, Gamma Prime, Delta 8, Alpha 4, demonstration. | ||
| They have, like, where they're going to go. | ||
| They basically have, and again, you know, it's like a pyramid, right? | ||
| So you've got organizers at the top who then issue orders to their, like, commanders who then manipulate the people on the ground that don't even know they're a part of this movement and a part of this group. | ||
| So basically you've got, like, a bunch of You know, college students and, you know, loser 28-year-old white guys, like, orchestrating a bunch of, like, black high schoolers to go attack the cops. | ||
| And it's all organized by this. | ||
| Right? Right. | ||
| Agit orgs, right? Agitation organizers. | ||
| That's what agit org means. | ||
| We are expecting possible injuries, if not from today's action, then very likely from action. | ||
| Then they give a different date, right? | ||
| 2015, the 25th of April. | ||
| Agit orgs have designated operators to serve as ad hoc medics when necessary. | ||
| Consult page 14, blah, blah, blah. | ||
| Here are their post-action objectives. | ||
| Their primary objectives are agitation of local civilian population, right? | ||
| Piss people off. Escalation of civil unrest in BWI area. | ||
| Cause chaos, cause violence, right? | ||
| I mean, this alone, anybody who is in possession of these documents or can be traced back to these documents, if you were to unleash the full investigative powers of the federal government, you could identify and dismantle this Entire network in an afternoon. | ||
| They could all be in jail, and then we could have peace, and we wouldn't have thousands of extra dead black people because of the defund the police movement. | ||
| You wouldn't have entire cities burned. | ||
| You also wouldn't have January 6th because you wouldn't have set the precedent over that year of it's okay to go destroy buildings. | ||
| So, I mean, all of this could have been prevented. | ||
| All of this is easily prevented. | ||
| It's reconcilable if the government was actually interested in investigating the actually well-organized, orchestrated sowers of chaos as revealed in this document. | ||
| But continuing, one of their other primary objectives is the provocation of hostile law enforcement and BWI officials, right? | ||
| Provocation. They're poking you in the eye. | ||
| they're crying out in pain as they strike you, right? | ||
| They are doing things on purpose to get law enforcement to be violent against the little unknowing black foot soldiers that they have unwittingly, you know, working for George Soros, you know. | ||
| Who are wound up and on drugs and carrying weapons. | ||
| Of course. | ||
| And, I mean, we even saw this on video in the George Floyd protest where you had, like, guys just, like, handing bundles of cash to little, like, black kids that are, like, 12 years old and then those black kids run off and, like, light stuff on fire. | ||
| Remember all those videos that we saw? | ||
| This is still going on. | ||
| It's still happening at a really high level. | ||
| And it's not just people in the government and the administration that is feeding them information about how the response to the riots is going to how it's going to look so they can maximize the chaos that they're selling. | ||
| You also have people in the media that are in communication to go, hey, we're going to have chaos here. | ||
| So make sure no cameramen are there to see it right then. | ||
| Well, while we're doing this, maybe you should be over here filming this peaceful part that we've organized. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So and again, this was another thing that on Hot Mike, you had agitators from Chicago going to Michigan and then like they don't realize that the camera's on and they're talking to MS, you know, NBC producers. | ||
| And they're like, hey, I'm friends with your other producer lady. | ||
| And yeah, we're organizing to do all of this. | ||
| I'm from out of state, actually. | ||
| Like all this is breaking the law. | ||
| All this is coordination and organization between the media, the administration, the billionaire NGO activists and the unwitting foot soldiers of the psychopath pedophiles. | ||
| So their secondary post-action objectives would be escalation of law enforcement deployment in the BWI area. | ||
| Escalation. They want more cops to respond. | ||
| They want to create violence so more cops have to show up. | ||
| Galvanization of friendly and useful allied organizations. | ||
| Creation of an environment where organic conflict can grow. | ||
| These are the people that say they're loving and love democracy. | ||
| They want organic conflict. | ||
| It's, you know... It's not as efficient if you have to fabricate the conflict. | ||
| They want it to grow organically. | ||
| Their tertiary goals would be recruitment up to the discretion of agit orgs, seeding of other organic actions in other locations in the US, but they're ideal. | ||
| Their number one goal of this is for civil unrest To lead to the deployment of martial law-like policies for BWI, creating a feedback loop. | ||
| They want to create violence to bring in more cops, to cause more violence, to bring in more cops. | ||
| This has been the plan the whole time, and Reuters tried to fact-check it and couldn't disprove it. | ||
| All right, folks, we'll go out to your phone calls here momentarily. | ||
| Again, in case people don't realize how orchestrated all of this is, Again, this purports to be the scanned and stolen documents from A group that calls itself Friends of Democracy, | ||
| describing that their ideal outcome in orchestrating the Baltimore riots after Freddie Gray is that civil unrest leads to the deployment of martial law-like policies for BWI, creating a feedback loop, additional action opportunities, easy identification of enemies and allies, sympathy from media outlets, emphasis on television media. | ||
| So it's all a big game they play. | ||
| Point of contact to DA Donnelly. | ||
| Do not name this individual in any comms or in person. | ||
| This does not leave this document. | ||
| They have rules about the behavior. | ||
| Closed fists may be used only below the neck and above the belt. | ||
| Open hands may be used wherever. | ||
| Kicking is not permitted unless provoked with no other recourse. | ||
| Do not reach for law enforcement weapons or make any moves that could be misconstrued as reaching for their weapon. | ||
| General behavior. | ||
| Do not congregate with other ops or ox ops in groups of more than two. | ||
| Do not make prolonged eye contact or speak with more than two other ops or ox ops. | ||
| If you must speak with other ops or ox ops directly, please do so via 328BGcoms, which I imagine are just like radio communications. | ||
| When not in crowds, keep hands out of pockets. | ||
| Keep them visible. Avoid being caught in open spaces. | ||
| Stick close to other locals participating in the demonstration. | ||
| These are the agents that are working to create the chaos and the atmosphere for violence, but they want to blend in with the rest of the people that were actually there to legitimately protest. | ||
| Do not spend too much time on your radio communications. | ||
| Use it sparingly. We're trusting you to act independently as much as possible. | ||
| Navigate only the protected corridors. | ||
| Stick to your personality profile assignment. | ||
| uh as a props do not bring anything to the demonstration you may only engage in the use of props if other local demonstrators have already done so bottles rock sticks and other small blunt objects are permissible as long as the use of props has already occurred amongst other demonstrators aggressiveness agit orbs will update you before mobilization on signs and codes used to identify friendly law enforcement and bwi officials | ||
| so they literally i don't know if they're wearing ribbons of some sort or if they have some sort of code word that they share that was all done on the you know personal levels that They don't even have that in the document. | ||
| That's the next level of secrecy up. | ||
| But clearly they have law enforcement who's aware of this and is helping to coordinate it. | ||
| So literally you've got law enforcement and administration officials in the city cooperating with the violent rioters to orchestrate the violent riots that then bring about martial law. | ||
| That's what they say is their ideal outcome of this, the feedback loop. | ||
| So again, this is all just like You want to talk about orchestration, you want to talk about what's happening on the streets being a big show for everybody, like this is the script we're reading. | ||
| Agit orgs will relay orders from nearby AOEC representatives when it comes appropriate to escalate. | ||
| Remember, timing and assignment of escalations is determined by conditions on the ground and intelligence from LEs channeled through AOEC. So again, they are in active communication with law enforcement going, okay, now's the time, ramp it up. | ||
| Ignite the violence. If the determination has been made to escalate, specific instructions will be relayed via the 328BG. Only escalate per those instructions if and when they come. | ||
| And then of course they have the disbursement of funds. | ||
| Initial disbursement of funds prior to action. | ||
| If you have not already received this disbursement, please reach out to the designated point of contact. | ||
| Final disbursement of funds will come at some point in the future. | ||
| Do not report this income to anybody. | ||
| We've coordinated with relevant tax authorities and accounting firms to assure that funding is distributed through appropriate channels to preserve OPSEC. Operational security, that is. | ||
| Failure to properly abide by the terms of funding will result in your expulsion from future actions. | ||
| And they make a point to bold that, underline it, capitalize it right. | ||
| Very important that these people not, like, put on their taxes, oh, I was paid to orchestrate a riot, because then the government can't pretend not to know what's going on. | ||
| Incentives are offered during demonstrations. | ||
| Deplays of leadership or bravery can earn you bonuses based on your merit. | ||
| As with previous Friends of Democracy actions, incentives are limitless. | ||
| We encourage exploration. | ||
| So again, this document alone could bring down the city of Baltimore, bring down the NGOs that are orchestrating and organizing all of this. | ||
| And again, I've seen no evidence that this is fake at all. | ||
| You have one or two people denying it. | ||
| You have people from other organizations also called Friends of Democracy being like, we never made this. | ||
| And it's like, well, no, you're a different organization than the one that made this. | ||
| But the only fact check that they can claim is they claim that it's false that this was given to George Floyd protesters. | ||
| No, it was given to Freddie Gray protesters. | ||
| This was all in the build-up to The George Floyd riots, which I'm sure also had this exact same thing, but maybe they got a little spooked that we found out about it and decided to change it up a little bit. | ||
| Change up the way they do things from now on. | ||
| Just so everybody knows, the conspiracy is real. | ||
| The riots are orchestrated. | ||
| The violence is purposeful. | ||
| The feedback loop is already having its desired effect. | ||
| And the people who participate in these riots and So-called protests. | ||
| Are the actual, you know, insurrectionists actually engaged in a violent coup against the United States with the participation of the authorities in charge, cooperating with the domestic terrorists? | ||
| Pretty incredible stuff, but there it is. | ||
| Let's go to your phone calls now. Sean from California. | ||
| You want to talk about the current Project Veritas bust? | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Sean. You're on the air. | ||
| Hey, Harrison. Good morning to you once again. | ||
| Good morning. I wanted to kind of touch on something, but you guys have hit so many points. | ||
| I almost want to go off the rails with all the other points. | ||
| So I'll keep it really simple here. | ||
| Yesterday, when I got cut off, I was going to give you the props for walking the walk, you know, having your own chickens and all that. | ||
| And this is the thing about Infowars. | ||
| You guys do walk the walk. | ||
| And I'm going to bring up something here. | ||
| Project Veritas' great work that you guys have all witnessed would not have been possible had back when all this lawfare gets them started, had Alex Jones giving them $10,000 to get them up and going. | ||
| So when people are hating on Infowars, you know, Alex Jones and you guys put your money where your mouth is. | ||
| And that's kind of one of the things you've got to look at with that agitprop you were just covering in all those documents. | ||
| Those folks are getting paid out. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What they believe in versus paying to do good. | |
| What they believe in is causing trouble and causing the organic violence or confrontations, however you phrase that. | ||
| They're looking to pick fights. | ||
| You guys are looking to expose these people before those fights, those riots, etc. | ||
| can happen. | ||
| And so for those of you who are listening, you know, go into Infowarsstore.com or, you know, put in a donation in, buying a coin, whatever. | ||
| You're helping Infowars actually get the effort and get the work done. | ||
| Because again, back when they started going after O'Keefe in the courts, without that $10,000 and help from Alex, I don't think James O'Keefe would have been able to get that far. | ||
| And that's something I distinctly remember is when some of these conservatives are being targeted, Alex is one of the first on the front line to say, hey, Here's some money from our coffers. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's not much, but let's use it to get you going. | |
| 100%. And, Sean, that's not the only time that he's done that. | ||
| You know, there's a lot of stuff. And he's mentioned it every once in a while. | ||
| But, I mean, there, you know, especially, like, after 2016 when Infowars was really killing it and, like, we're still online and just, like, making tons of money. | ||
| Alex was just, you know... | ||
| He was helping a lot of these organizations that are still going on and are still operating in the same way that Project Veritas is, like funding them money and really creating this ecosphere. | ||
| So we've had more influence than you can possibly imagine, but I really appreciate it, Sean, and I can't help but agree with you. | ||
| Thank you so much for the call, sir. | ||
| More of your phone calls on the other side, folks. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. See American Journal on Infowars.com. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com is how you and you alone support us. | ||
| Alright folks, welcome back. We're going to go out to your phone calls here, but just quickly, the reason I was bringing up fact checks in the first place and went down the trail of talking about Friends of Democracy again is because they're... | ||
| Basically, I'm confused. | ||
| I'm very confused. | ||
| My reality is bifurcating and separating and becoming unstable, and I don't know what's real and what's not anymore about certain things. | ||
| So, let me find the... | ||
| There's a Reuters fact check about this article. | ||
| It was a fake headline about blaming anti-vaxxers for the vaccine problem. | ||
| And I've lost the page now, but Reuters had a fact-checked fake headline from The Conversation asks why the unvaccinated didn't warn the unvaccinated. | ||
| A screenshot purporting to show a future headline for an article published by The Conversation asks, quote, why the unvaccinated did not do more to warn people who were inoculated with the COVID-19 vaccine, but it is fabricated. | ||
| They say it was not on The Conversation. | ||
| Here's like a picture of the fake headline, right? | ||
| They say it's a fake headline. | ||
| It's not real. No such article has been produced. | ||
| The conversation came out and said we never published this. | ||
| But then what is this? | ||
| Then what's this I have on my desk? | ||
| What is this? This is the article. | ||
| So is this real? | ||
| Am I imagining this? | ||
| Can everybody else see this? Crew, am I looking at a document right now? | ||
| Okay, Reese says it's a satire article. | ||
| Here's the problem. I don't think it is. | ||
| I mean the publication that it was published in is not a satire publication. | ||
| Where would be the evidence it was satire? | ||
| I mean one of the reasons I think it might be satire is... | ||
| These people are kind of so stupid. | ||
| So it's from a website called IQfy or IQfy.com. | ||
| And like, it's kind of funny because they say, sorry, commenting has been disabled. | ||
| While 85% of you are wonderful people, the other 25% of recent commenters have tended to be the results of targeted troll storms. | ||
| So they can't add up to 100. | ||
| But again, I don't know if this is a joke or not. | ||
| Maybe it is a joke. | ||
| Maybe it is sarcastic. | ||
| But I don't see any evidence of that. | ||
| So I don't know. It's not a, you know, this isn't a Babylon Bee article. | ||
| I mean, is this stuff supposed to be funny? | ||
| Like, I don't get it. | ||
| Like, this is the thing. | ||
| Is this real or not? I don't even know. | ||
| It sounds ridiculous, but so does everything else in the mainstream media. | ||
| They knew. Why didn't the unvaccinated do more to warn us? | ||
| The unvaccinated knew what we didn't. | ||
| Some of them said too little. | ||
| Most said nothing at all. A lot of blood is now on their hands. | ||
| I mean, if it's satire, it's not funny, though. | ||
| So, Reese, you think this is satire? | ||
| He's running to the mic. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, I mean, if you explore the rest of that site, all of the articles they have seem like generic content mill stuff. | |
| Just the most boring milquetoast stuff you can find on the internet. | ||
| The whole site, if you explore it, just seems really suspect. | ||
| You can't really... | ||
| Discern any, like, personality from any of the writers. | ||
| It seems just like this weird Chinese content farm of some sort. | ||
| Like, it's weird. A quick site. Right. | ||
| And that's what's so weird about it, right? | ||
| Like, nine reasons wine is better than a boyfriend. | ||
| It's like... I wouldn't blink if I saw that headline on BuzzFeed. | ||
| The articles are bad. | ||
| And they do kind of seem like they're written by AI. So maybe it's an AI thing. | ||
| Is cuddling a form of cheating? | ||
| 35 ways to be healthier this year. | ||
| Like, this isn't overt sarcasm, right? | ||
| It's not overt parody of anything. | ||
| It's like, I don't get it. This is how much water to drink to boost metabolism. | ||
| Is that a joke? It's not funny. | ||
| So, like, what? It's so weird. | ||
| It is just a very weird sight. | ||
| So maybe there is something I'm missing about this. | ||
| Fake woke website dupes conservatives desperate to prove the left has lost it. | ||
| These aren't outrageous. | ||
| It's just... These are just normal things. | ||
| Cruel and unusual. History's most disturbing medical treatments. | ||
| Mercury. Yeah, they use... | ||
| Yeah, it looks like the tapeworm diet. | ||
| Like, these are real. Like, this is a real article. | ||
| There's nothing funny about this. | ||
| Right. Right. From IQ5 or whatever. | ||
| But that's the thing. It's not... | ||
| I don't believe that. | ||
| I don't think it's a parody. | ||
| I really don't. I don't get it. | ||
| And if it is, it's like... | ||
| The joke's on you because... | ||
| This just looks like BuzzFeed. | ||
| It's really not... | ||
| It's weird, man. | ||
| The line between parody and... | ||
| In reality, it's becoming very blurred. | ||
| But again, the fact check says the article doesn't exist. | ||
| They say, altered, an article penned by an academic at the University of Portsmouth on potential discrimination faced by unvaccinated people is altered to include a fake headline text and date. | ||
| So they claim that this doesn't exist, but the article is right here. | ||
| What? What's happening? | ||
| We don't know. Honestly, I really can't wrap my mind around it. | ||
| I think just... | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I don't know what to say. We'll go out to your phone calls. | ||
| Joe in the USA. I want to talk about Ruth Bader Ginsburg. | ||
| Not just the statue, but the lady herself. | ||
| Go ahead, Joe. Hey, give a shout-out to Texas, man, first. | ||
| Go, Texas. But, um... | ||
| Yeah, I heard somebody say on air one time that Ruth Bader Ginsburg, she could have resigned during Obama's presidency, and they would have been guaranteed to have control of her seat, but she didn't. | ||
| And she was a pretty smart woman. | ||
| I think when she first got into being a staunch, I guess, person for liberals, you know, things were a lot different. | ||
| She was definitely ill and at the end of her life, and she could see how out of control liberals had become and how out of control that they are. | ||
| And if you ask me, I think she held on to that seat on purpose to at least put it up for grabs to the Republican Party or Donald Trump. | ||
| And guess what? That's exactly what happened. | ||
| She was a very intelligent woman. | ||
| She knew she was dying. | ||
| She knew she was... | ||
| Well, here's the... | ||
| They coddled her to the point to where they just, like, they just allowed her to just basically stay in there for her whole life. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, here's the issue, though. | ||
| She never resigned. | ||
| She died, right? So, you know, if that was the case, then she could have resigned under Donald Trump. | ||
| No, I think that's an interesting interpretation. | ||
| I think you're being a little bit too generous to her. | ||
| I think she was completely in favor of everything that's being done now. | ||
| Really? Yeah, I mean, she never came out and was like, stop worshipping me. | ||
| They were doing it while she was still alive. | ||
| Well, that's what it was. | ||
| They totally worshipped her, but trust me, She had to know that if she died during Obama's presidency that her seat would have been up for grabs for the Republicans and Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And the fact of the matter is, she made sure she stayed there until the very end. | |
| Isn't the decision that Ruth Bader Ginsburg made the exact same decision that the intelligence agencies made, that the FBI made, that all these people made, trusting and really, truly believing that Hillary Clinton was going to be the winner? | ||
| Like, don't you think that she really thought Hillary Clinton was going to win? | ||
| Because you're looking at this from now, going back in the past, knowing that Trump won. | ||
| They all thought Hillary was going to win. | ||
| So her withholding her seat while Obama was in office to get a couple more years out, she did that under the understanding or belief that Hillary Clinton would be in office and it would be her that got to appoint the new Supreme Court. | ||
| So in the same way that, like, you look at the FBI's actions and they were just flagrant and just completely violating the law and totally, you know, not covering their tracks because they thought Hillary Clinton was going to be in office and she was going to help them cover it up. | ||
| And that's how they all got caught with it. | ||
| So I think Ruth Bader Ginsburg was the same, where she wasn't withholding her seat so Trump could get it. | ||
| She was withholding her seat so Hillary Clinton would get it. | ||
| And that just didn't work out. | ||
| And so she tried to hang on for as long as possible, ended up not making it the four years. | ||
| And so it was assigned by Trump. | ||
| So I think it was another hubristic mistake by the Part of the old guard in believing that they would have Hillary Clinton in office to carry out all of their despicable plans. | ||
| And the election of Trump upended all of that, including the Supreme Court. | ||
| So we'll be back. Nothing but your phone calls when we get back, I promise. | ||
| Straight out to your phone calls the whole time. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| Let's go directly out to your phone calls once again. | ||
| Go to some names I don't recognize. | ||
| I want to go to Mike in Delaware. | ||
| I'm kind of confused by your question, Mike. | ||
| Mike's called in asking for evidence that Ashley Babbitt was shot. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Mike. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What's your question? Yes, amen, amen. | |
| Thank you, Harrison, for taking my call. | ||
| I was interested in what evidence do you have to believe that Ashley Babbitt was shot and that Taylor Hansen is telling you the truth? | ||
| We have videos. Is there an open casket? | ||
| Exactly what makes you think she was shot. | ||
| This is a very odd question. | ||
| I feel like I'm being tricked here. | ||
| I guess the evidence would be the video of the event from multiple angles. | ||
| I guess it would be that, yeah, I personally know Taylor Hansen who was there and also Sam Montoya who was there in the room who saw it happen. | ||
| And also the first time I saw it was her body having been stripped to the waist and bloody being hauled out of I mean, is there something I'm missing here? | ||
| The fact that, like, the... | ||
| The media acknowledges that this happened, that even the mainstream media and the establishment that this looks very bad for can't deny it because it clearly did happen. | ||
| I mean, what am I missing here? | ||
| What more proof would you want to have, Mike? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, can you specifically tell me in the videos what makes you think she was shot? | |
| I guess that when she gets shot, I guess, is the time in the video. | ||
| I guess it's when the trigger gets pulled, the gun goes off, the bullet flies, she falls back, and there's a bullet hole in her chest. | ||
| I think it's that part of the video. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. Can you post the link where you see a bullet hole in her chest? | |
| We're watching it right now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't... Well, I'm asking you to post the link because a bullet hole in her chest is exactly what you said happened. | |
| Uh-huh. Right? Yeah, in her neck, yeah. | ||
| Okay. In her neck? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Is it her chest or is it her neck? | |
| Or is it her stomach? Yeah, it's like... | ||
| Because Taylor Hansen said it was in her stomach, and he was right there apparently. | ||
| And you're saying the chest. | ||
| I really don't even like watching this footage very much, so we're going to go ahead and move on and not even entertain what you're saying. | ||
| Thanks for the call, I guess, but... | ||
| What? | ||
| I mean, it's... | ||
| Yeah. There's a line, you know... | ||
| At a certain point, you've got to believe what you see with your own eyes. | ||
| Okay? There's such a thing as... | ||
| Going too far off the deep end, folks, and it's not helpful for anybody. | ||
| I'm not even picking on you, Mike, but we see this a lot in a lot of people, even people that generally know what's going on, some people that have big followings. | ||
| It's like to them, literally everyone is compromised. | ||
| Literally every single person is working on behalf of some shadowy group. | ||
| It's like at a certain point, You can't distrust literally every single thing all of the time, okay? | ||
| Just some things are real. | ||
| InfoWars is controlled opposition. | ||
| The crew is writing me notes. | ||
| Are we? Are we controlled opposition? | ||
| This is new to me. | ||
| Oh, my God. Yeah, people say stuff all the time about me or Alex or whatever, and it's just like, okay, how much more do we have to go through for you to know we're the real deal? | ||
| How much does Donald Trump have to go through? | ||
| Honestly, just at a certain point, please. | ||
| Please, for the love of God. | ||
| You cannot be that, you know, not literally everything is fake. | ||
| Please, folks. Let's go out to another phone call here. | ||
| Scott in California, you say we're living in a dystopian movie. | ||
| Am I the star, Scott? | ||
| Am I starring in this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just that previous call, I mean, it came from Delaware, so maybe he was calling from the Biden compound. | |
| Could be. I don't think Delaware exists, so that's why I should have asked him. | ||
| He should have had to provide me proof that Delaware was a place. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I've worked in Delaware for a year, so... | |
| Yeah, right. All right, Scott. | ||
| So you're in on the scheme, too, huh? | ||
| Trying to spread the lie of Delaware existing. | ||
| We're on to you. I'm sorry, Scott. | ||
| Go ahead. Go ahead, please. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's fine. You know, it's like you said, we're watching this dystopian movie, and if the people that are buying into the propaganda were watching this on screen, knowing it was a dystopian movie, they would be saying, how can these people be falling for this? | |
| And yet, you know, I'm active on Twitter, and I see at least half of the people are falling for everything. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, that's one of the things I talk about. | ||
| I mean, that's why I talk about, like, Harry Potter and stuff all the time. | ||
| Because it's like, the things that are happening in the real world today, the basically exact same thing happens in all these movies that the left loves. | ||
| And it's like they can't see it for themselves. | ||
| They can't realize that they're involved in it. | ||
| Even though they take these fantasy things more seriously than anybody else does, it's... | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Do you got any explanation for me, Scott, or you're just noticing the same phenomenon I am and just scratching your head like me? | ||
|
unidentified
|
To me, the greater principle at work here is that destruction, whether it's legislative, bureaucratic, or taken to the street level, it's easy. | |
| You know, you can take a neighborhood that took decades to build and it's a community and people have businesses, and it can all be destroyed in one day. | ||
| Yep, you're exactly right. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The organization you were talking about, about the Freddie Gray, I mean, you know, on one level, it almost sounds impressive, but when you boil it down, it's very, again, destruction is very easy. | |
| And even though I live in California, I come from Baltimore, and one thing I noted with the George Floyd protest, I waited for something to break out in Baltimore, and nothing did. | ||
| And to me that says that Baltimore was not targeted. | ||
| They already had their thing with Freddie Gray and the Baltimore was not targeted for this latest. | ||
| They got what they wanted out of Baltimore, right? | ||
| They probably had already largely defunded the police and collapsed that city, so it was not worth the expense. | ||
| Very interesting stuff, Scott. | ||
| Isaac in Florida has also called in about the Baltimore riots, so I want to go to him. | ||
| Thank you so much for the call, Scott. | ||
| Isaac in Florida, what are your comments on the Baltimore riots? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey guys, first I want to joke about Mike back there. | |
| That guy could have seen Ashley Babbitt's dead body and still said, My favorite is Bill Hicks is actually Alex Jones. | ||
| But the thing about these riots, they don't want to stop them. | ||
| A high IQ is really isolating, but when you have large numbers of double-digit IQ people, they turn into a mob fast and they're very easily controlled. | ||
| When it was military police in the Corps, I found out the better I used my voice, the less I had to use my hands. | ||
| Interesting. What do you mean by that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
If I could direct somebody with my mouth, the words coming out of it, and the cadence, the speech pattern, large groups of people just by talking to them like they're humans. | |
| These cops don't think they're humans either. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, that is very interesting. | ||
| And of course, that's the way the New World Order operates. | ||
| I mean, that's what... | ||
| You know, the idea of America is sort of... | ||
| Obviously, it came from Rome, and the whole idea of Rome was that the entire system was... | ||
| It's designed to exploit and maximize ambition and personal glory, right? | ||
| So you were supposed to just be honest and upfront because it was, you know, I'm the one that's doing this. | ||
| I'm the one in charge. I'm going to get all the glory when this succeeds or I'm the one that pays for a price when it all collapses. | ||
| And so America was sort of designed in that way as well. | ||
| But now we have this shadowy force of people that they don't want accolades. | ||
| They don't want You know, to be celebrated, they don't want anybody to know they're pulling the strings. | ||
| They actually find it more fulfilling to know I'm the one that did this, even though nobody knows my name, right? | ||
| I'm the one that orchestrated this, and they'll never know it was me, but I'm really the one that did it. | ||
| And me and my group know that we're the ones that really carried this out, so we'll operate from the shadows. | ||
| So, you know, we have this public-facing, actually... | ||
| Responsible to and you have to listen to the public because you're out there making decisions and you have to explain them or you're going to get ousted if your ideas aren't good enough. | ||
| And that's incompatible with a shadow group of operators behind the scenes manipulating things, not needing or wanting the accolades or... | ||
| You know, hatred if they fail. | ||
| So yeah, I think you're right. | ||
| And you know, this Baltimore riot just points to the way really everything works in the United States. | ||
| And That's largely why our government is so utterly corrupt, because the people that we think are the government are literally nothing more than frontmen for the people actually pulling the strings behind the scenes. | ||
| And just like the little black kids that's throwing a rock at a cop, he doesn't know he's working for George Soros. | ||
| I think a lot of the Congress people don't know that they're working for George Soros. | ||
| They're just the foot soldiers of the real power behind the scenes. | ||
| It's called conspiracy. Ed and Biber will be my guest this hour, but before we welcome him to the show, I do want to play a couple videos here. | ||
| The first one I'll play is from Donald Trump. | ||
| I'm telling you, maybe I need to do a whole special report about Trump and the vaccines, because that seems to be the sticking point a lot of people have, even though they don't seem to be understanding the wider game that's being played here. | ||
| Fear and division are the real viruses that are going to destroy this country. | ||
| Anyway, I don't even want to get into that right now because the point is that for the last month or so, Trump has occasionally issued videos And statements that show he is so far ahead of the curve in terms of identifying and putting focus on the right things. | ||
| He's talking about going to war with the cartels. | ||
| He's talking about completely demolishing the FBI and their collusion with big tech and an internet bill of rights. | ||
| I mean, he's talking, you know, he's actually pushing for peace and negotiation in Ukraine rather than conflagration and nuclear holocaust. | ||
| So it's like you could go down the list, especially of the recent updates to Trump's policy platform. | ||
| Go down the list. | ||
| I'd love to hear what people disagree with, because every single thing that I want from our government, Donald Trump is coming out and making video about how he supports that situation. | ||
| So I think if somebody checks off every single one of your lists and your policy is exactly the same as his, maybe he's the right candidate for you. | ||
| I don't know. Just a suggestion. | ||
| But here's the latest one where, again, he shows that he is completely on top of and in the forefront of the Dissident reactionary right politics that are needed to save this country. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 14. Trump issues a video today outlining the marching orders for his House Committee on Weaponization of Government. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. The new House Committee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government is a rare chance to expose the breathtaking corruption of the security state, the media, and the Washington swamp. | |
| Here are just a few of the questions the committee hopefully will be asking. | ||
| Who in the Mueller team was in charge of leaking secret information and fake news stories to dishonest journalists, of which here are many, to perpetrate the Russia hoax? | ||
| And that's what it was. Turned out it was a total hoax. | ||
| It was all misinformation. | ||
| It was all a horrible thing that was given to the people of our country. | ||
| Illegally, by a fake press and a corrupt press and by corrupt politicians. | ||
| The day the fake Steele dossier was first published, because they knew it was fake, and they knew that sometime there'd be a guy like Trump that wants to go after them. | ||
| Have any fake news journalists been paid or compensated by U.S. government agencies, directly or indirectly, for their role in spreading domestic disinformation, like the FBI did with Twitter? | ||
| Who orchestrated the FBI's repeated operations to interfere in domestic politics in the final weeks of multiple U.S. election seasons? | ||
| And specifically, and most importantly, in the presidential election of 2020, what the FBI did was suppress anything bad about Biden and go all out, put it all out there, if there was anything at all bad about Trump. | ||
| And if there wasn't anything bad, we'll make it up. | ||
| What that was is a rigged election just by itself. | ||
| For all the federal agents and informants and pressing the crowd toward the Capitol, On January 6th. | ||
| And who is Ray Epps? | ||
| Tell me about Ray Epps. | ||
| Where does he come from? I think we know. | ||
| In addition, the committee needs to do a full review of Pfizer warrants and any abuse. | ||
| We should also get a full report on any domestic surveillance of MAGA supporters that has taken place under Biden or Obama and the radical left. | ||
| And the deep state is very, in fact, deep-seated It's the greatest threat American freedom in generations has seen, and their collusion with the fake news media is absolutely... | ||
| Trump for emperor. We'll be right back. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Bad news is, Edin Beiber is having a little bit of trouble connecting. | ||
| We are going to connect with him in the next segment, but the good news is we have time to take more of your phone calls, so we'll go out to those for this segment. | ||
| Before we do, I wanted to cover this story. | ||
| Mike Hart, M.D., Dr. | ||
| Mike Hart on Twitter says... | ||
| debate over whether or not vitamin D is protective against COVID is over. | ||
| A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis has concluded that there is indisputable evidence that vitamin D supplementation reduced ICU admissions in COVID patients. | ||
| In conclusion, they say, quote, the positive results highlighted again and now validated by TSAS suggested that an indisputable association between vitamin D supplementation and the protective effects on ICU admission can be considered definitive evidence. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Does the phrase too little too late strike anybody? | ||
| You realize if the American government had just... | ||
| We could have avoided the lockdowns and the masks and the social distancing and the contact tracing and the vaccine and all of the ensuing mental illness and health effects and destruction of society and shattering of families and everything else that they're dealing with. | ||
| And of course, this is exactly what we suggested from the very beginning. | ||
| It's just incredible, folks. | ||
| How we have the solution to all of these problems within our grasp, and we have a litany, a whole parade of psychopaths stopping us from taking it, right? | ||
| This is just, it's just like, it's like there's a murderer breaking into your house with an axe to kill you. | ||
| You have a shotgun right there, and every time you reach out for it, Your brother hits you in the face with a baseball bat. | ||
| You're just like, just grab the gun. | ||
| I can save all of us. | ||
| And he's just like, trust the science. | ||
| Vitamin D is evil. | ||
| Wear your mask. All the problems, everything we deal with, literally a month. | ||
| Literally, you could take one month under the right leadership. | ||
| Ukraine war would be over. | ||
| The border would be secure. | ||
| Children would be children again. | ||
| Transgenders would have to just stay by themselves and not indoctrinate anybody else. | ||
| The economy could be roaring back. | ||
| It's all so simple. | ||
| It's as simple as pulling a trigger. | ||
| But unfortunately... | ||
| We are being run and controlled and interfered with continuously by people that just pull every hook and crook and trick in the book to stop us from doing what is obvious and readily apparent and in your face all the time, every time. | ||
| Really incredible. On a completely different and totally separate note, did you know that Infowarsstore.com has vitamin D3 gummies for 50% off? | ||
| Incredibly delicious, and they get you all the vitamin D you could ever possibly need. | ||
| Just throwing that out there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just wild. I mean, the numbers. | |
| The numbers are incredible. Literally, it's just like 90% of, you know, severe COVID patients or COVID deaths had a lack of vitamin D. And people who supplemented vitamin D not just had an adequate amount, but actually had an overabundance of vitamin D. I'll just say it does what vitamin D does and has positive effects on your immune system. | ||
| It's all so simple. | ||
| It's all so simple, folks. | ||
| Also back at InfoWarsStore.com is the ultimate bone broth. | ||
| It's back and better than ever. 25% off. | ||
| It still has all the great stuff that made it such a bombshell product in the first place, like chicken bone broth, turmeric root, chocolate mushrooms, bee pollen, goji berry, alfalfa, herb power. | ||
| But in addition to these, it's now been fortified with 5 grams of organic soluble acacia fiber for the digestive health, sunflower lecithin, Organic acai berries for antioxidant effects, added electrolytes to help you recover from exercise such as magnesium, potassium, and sodium. | ||
| Real organic cocoa bean powder with natural chocolate flavor and a touch of sea salt, as well as cutting-edge chicken bone broth protein isolate powder for better flavor and dissolvability. | ||
| It's the ultimate bone broth plus, back and better than ever at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| With that, we go out to your phone calls. | ||
| We have... | ||
| Marvin in Alabama. | ||
| Marvin in Alabama, thanks so much for calling in. | ||
| You're on the air. Hey, Harrison. | ||
| Good to talk to you. Before I forget, I just want to remind you that if we allow New Prussia to be established, Bismarck will remain the same, and we can't allow that to happen. | ||
| It's unacceptable, sir. | ||
| We have to go to war, and I'll die, or else the Kaiser will reign. | ||
| Right. So I think you were asking for solutions earlier, and really it kind of boils down to paradigm warfare. | ||
| And if we take that, extrapolate that out of the Bible, I think we would call that spiritual warfare, but a more modern term might be paradigm warfare. | ||
| And so the only way that we can really solve this problem, it's not going to happen through the court, Supreme Court, politicians, Trump, nobody. | ||
| The only way it gets solved at this point is if we just don't comply anymore. | ||
| And if people wonder, well, don't comply with what? | ||
| Well, Christians need to do what Christians are supposed to do, which is do Christian things. | ||
| And faith without works is dead. | ||
| So if you understand, you know, Jesus Christ is the truth, Well, how can we do things that we know not to be true? | ||
| How can we comply with things that we know not to be true? | ||
| So, for example, and I'll try to make this quick, if they put out a mandate at a hospital and the nurse says, I'm not taking the shot, and she gets fired, well, you know, if a million Christians stand up and say, hey, bank, you know, if you try to take her home, you know, you're going to have a problem. | ||
| We're not going to allow that to happen. | ||
| And that needs to happen, and that's why I say it won't happen, because too many people are just too complacent. | ||
| They're too stuck in a strong delusion, which I heard Alex ask somebody yesterday what birth that was. | ||
| I think it's 2 Thessalonians, and that ties into the doctors as well. | ||
| The doctors in California, most of them, unfortunately, sad to say, don't have a problem with this new law. | ||
| If they did, they would quit, and those same doctors are giving shots. | ||
| So, of course, they don't have a problem with it. | ||
| And the reason they don't is because their paradigm, they spent 10 years of their lives having a paradigm built for them that now has them stuck in this delusion. | ||
| A lot of them truly believe they're saving people, just like Trump believes it. | ||
| He truly believes. I believe he does. | ||
| He believes he saved 100,000 lives. | ||
| Unfortunately, that's not a good excuse for me because people may not believe this, but I've never been the most powerful man in the world And somehow I was able to figure it out back in spring of 2020 that they were going to start mandating shots and that I would not be taking one. | ||
| So I don't really see how he wiggles out of that, but I know that's a whole other topic. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, well, here's my question. | ||
| Why did Trump say to be anti-vaxxers playing into their hands? | ||
| He's stuck in a legal problem now because now... | ||
| If he did come out and say, you know, oh my gosh, I made a big mistake, you know, how does he get out of that legally speaking? | ||
| Not morally speaking, not even politically, like with his base, what we might think about it, and all of that, but legally speaking, you know, I mean, he's even gone a little too far, in my opinion, and said, I push the FDA. To, you know, okay this faster than they ever would have. | ||
| He has said that himself. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, he did. That's not a good legal thing to do. | |
| You know what I mean? Yeah, but he did it because they were purposely withholding it until Biden got into office. | ||
| Again, you got to have a bird's eye view on this sort of stuff. | ||
| Again, I got to just do a whole thing about Trump because, again, They're trying to destroy America. | ||
| Donald Trump is trying to save America. | ||
| There are multiple ways to destroy us. | ||
| One of the ways they destroy us is through irreconcilable differences that they implant in us. | ||
| One of those is the vaccine. | ||
| He is counteracting their civilizational division that they're sowing. | ||
| He is working against the division. | ||
| He's working against the fear. Do you remember... | ||
| When the FBI stepped in, when Jim Baker stepped in to silence Donald Trump and personally demand that Twitter take down Trump's tweet in the beginning of COVID, it was when Trump was saying not to be fearful. | ||
| We don't need to be fearful of this virus. | ||
| Now, people at the time maybe were saying, like, Trump is—he's letting the—he wants people to get the virus. | ||
| No, he's fighting against the fear, just like now he's fighting against the division that is also a weapon in the arsenal of our enemies. | ||
| Our enemies— Donald Trump is opposing that and he's trying to bring people together and he's giving you signals and you're missing them. | ||
| When he says you're anti-vax, you're playing into their hands. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal. I am your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Very, very happy to be joined once again by my guest, Edin Biber. | ||
| He's a professional information security and privacy expert who joins us now to discuss a series... | ||
| Oh, no, I'm sorry. Yes, he did join us. | ||
| It seems like it must have been... | ||
| Feels like decades ago, Edin, that you joined us to expose Pfizer's manufacturing and supply agreements with other countries. | ||
| He's with us today to discuss a couple of articles from his Substack that you really do need to find and share. | ||
| Revelations about the lack of testing, the failure to test by Pfizer of the COVID vaccine. | ||
| You can follow him on Twitter at EH underscore DEN. His Substack is Edin, E-H-D-E-N dot Substack dot com. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us, Edin. | ||
| Thank you very much for having me. | ||
| It's a pleasure to have you back. | ||
| Like I said, so much has happened since you were last on. | ||
| It feels like we're an entirely different century at this point. | ||
| But you have some new revelations. | ||
| I was really enjoying your thorough breakdown of the testing failure of Pfizer. | ||
| But tell people what you've uncovered throughout your research. | ||
| So, a little bit of background. | ||
| One of the reasons that Pfizer and BioNTech, which they delivered together, managed to get an emergency use authorization was their promise that their product would be safe and effective, right? | ||
| And they managed to skip tons of tests that they were supposed to be doing. | ||
| They were supposed to be doing some sorticity tests and a lot of tests, but then they managed to skip most of them. | ||
| And finally they had tests on animals. | ||
| So before, actually it was happening in parallel while they were injecting it to human beings, which has usually never happened before. | ||
| And so what happened is that Pfizer and BioNTech or the people or the researchers have ended up publishing one paper that was published in the academic literature in Nature magazine. | ||
| And that paper was about their quality of their product and how great it is and how effective it is. | ||
| And they claimed in it, for example, that it is eight times more effective than natural immunity. | ||
| And that paper was published on the 1st of February, 2021. | ||
| Now, that is the background. | ||
| I was struggling with trying to figure out what was the regulatory approval process, and I decided to try to look at the document itself. | ||
| What were they actually claiming? | ||
| And what I found was astonishing. | ||
| First of all, let's start with the safety. | ||
| You know, one of the things that they claim is that we tested it on animals. | ||
| They did what they call And what I found out was that since 2004, scientists have known that you cannot do tests on rats to test SARS viruses, because rats simply does not seem to get infected with it. | ||
| The way that they describe it is that if you try to compare human beings and then mice and then rats and then control, the rats, the level of infection you get with rats are almost close to background noise. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's all very, very close to the control group rather than to represent anything human. | |
| So that is from 2004. | ||
| So that's a long time. | ||
| And the problem with that when it comes to check for the ecotoxicity is that what happens is that if this thing actually works, you inject this injection to the rats, and it would go inside the cells and create a spike protein, The spike protein would not go and cause damage to the rats themselves. | ||
| It would just stay in the bloodstream because it doesn't know how to infect it. | ||
| The reason for that is because the way that the virus works, it attaches itself to something called ACE2 receptors. | ||
| The ACE2 receptors of the rats are very, very different when it comes to SARS viruses. | ||
| It simply doesn't get infected. | ||
| So what happened is that all the immune response that they have shown in rats were just because the rats have all those crazy spike proteins that's running around the bloodstream. | ||
| The problem with that is that when you take that, since it didn't really went into the cells, they did an assumption based on the fact that they were assuming that that would happen the same in humans. | ||
| But in our case, the response is much different because all those spike proteins would start to attach themselves and to attack ACE receptors in the heart, ACE receptors in different body parts, ACE receptors in the brain. | ||
| All the time that you have heart attacks was a result of that, or the times that you would have all the people who just die out of nowhere, all the people that would spin around, and that could be a result of the spike protein for that. | ||
| And that has a huge impact on this. | ||
| Toxicity test was wrong. | ||
| That's a huge thing. It means that the dosages that they were assuming that they would give to us is correct is wrong. | ||
| So that's one part. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's for the safety part. | |
| And let's look at the effectiveness. They claim that this thing is eight times more effective than natural immunity. | ||
| But then if you look at the research paper itself, and that It's probably the most insane thing that I've ever seen in my life. | ||
| The papers were submitted to Nature magazine, which is supposed to be one of the two greatest magazines out there, the British Journal of Medicine, BMJ, and Nature. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If you are a researcher, you want to be published there. | |
| And you look at the data that was published in there, and there's a table, which is the first one which you showed on the screen before, about the list of monkeys that were involved in that trial. | ||
| In the test, what they claim, if you look at the tables that they have, they give results, for example, of the previous candidate of the Pfizer shot, which was called BNT161B1. And they mention in it that it's a beginning, it's a green one. | ||
| The thing which is interesting, if you look at the results that they published, they mention BMT162b1, 30 micrograms. | ||
| There is no monkey over there that received that dosage. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You can compare it to what they claim that was there. | |
| There's not even one monkey that received it, and yet they published it in a magazine that was supposed to be their most prestige magazine and most accurate. | ||
| There are so many violations over there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They claim results that they had results that came from six monkeys. | |
| If you scroll down for the dosage that ended up by us, there's a BNT B2, which is the one that he ended up, and you can see it's red. | ||
| If you scroll up, you can see if you scroll up a little bit more, down to the end, there's a group which they created called sentinels, and there's only three monkeys in it, and yet they have claimed that they have results from six monkeys. | ||
| You can look at it by yourself. It's in the paper itself, and that it for itself should have... | ||
| This is a fraud. | ||
| That should have been thrown out of any publication. | ||
| You don't need to be a scientist. | ||
| You just need to look at the data. | ||
| But then what was even worse was the part of the claim of the effectiveness. | ||
| So if you try to understand what they claim in the effectiveness, they claim that they measured the level of what they call neutralizing antibodies. | ||
| Now, the body can generate a lot of antibodies. | ||
| But some of them do not really work on the virus. | ||
| So you are actually trying to find out which of the antibodies that your body has created would actually stop the virus, would bind to it and stop it from doing the harm. | ||
| And they have claimed that their product has given up more than 800 units of that. | ||
| It's called the NT50 technical term. | ||
| But let's say the units. It's about more than 800 units per microliter. | ||
| And they say, we compare it to the human samples that we had, and the human samples had only 94. | ||
| Okay, hold that thought, Ed, and we're going to dive back into this. | ||
| I love this, because I'm usually a big-picture guy, and I'm not a big detail guy, but you're such a detail guy, so we're going to dive in and really get into the detailed fraud that was perpetrated for these vaccines. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is Harrison Smith. I am your host. | ||
| You're watching American Journal. | ||
| My guest is Edin Bieber. | ||
| You can find his Substack at edin.substack.com. | ||
| That's E-H-D-E-N.substack.com. | ||
| And we're focusing mostly on his two most recent articles that sort of, they reference one another. | ||
| So you sort of have to take both of them at the same time. | ||
| Monkey Business is his most recent one. | ||
| And it says, Monkey Business, how BioNTech and Pfizer faked their pre- And like I said before, I tend to be a big-picture guy, sort of get lost in the details, which is why I really appreciate researchers such as yourself that can just focus and dig down and get into the nitty-gritty details to really expose the greater lie that we're all recognizing and dealing with. | ||
| So I just wanted you to continue and pick up where you left off, talking about the... | ||
| Just complete failure, not just to test the toxicity of the vaccines, but the effectiveness of the vaccines. | ||
| From every step all the way down, it's fraud upon fraud upon fraud. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ed and Bieber. So, let me just do a small recap. | |
| So, when Pfizer and BioNTech was trying to... | ||
| To prove the quality of their shot. | ||
| They were trying to show that this shot generates what is called neutralizing antibodies. | ||
| Now, they had a problem. Usually in the past, if you want to work with a virus, you want to prove it, you work with your lab, you generate the virus, you try to do the response, and you try to show that it works. | ||
| But they were working with this New thing, deadly pathogen, almost deadly pathogen, which was this coronavirus number two. | ||
| And so they couldn't really do that. | ||
| Usually you have to do it in a secure lab. | ||
| It's called BSL, high security, highly controlled lab. | ||
| So that's where they were supposed to be doing it. | ||
| So they couldn't do it. So with the mice, they came up and invented this. | ||
| They created what they called a pseudovirus. | ||
| They took a virus. With the spike protein, and they tried to prove that it works. | ||
| But I think the regulator was trying to say to them, look, this probably doesn't really work. | ||
| So they were probably being requested to show real protection. | ||
| And then for that, they went to monkeys. | ||
| Now, the problem that they had is that The normal test that is being done, there's what is called the gold standard for doing that. | ||
| It's called PRPN. There's a standard. | ||
| That's how you test the level of neutralizing antibodies. | ||
| It takes a little bit of time. | ||
| It's complicated, but that is considered to be the way that the regulators always have looked with it. | ||
| But then they came up with, in this paper, and they came up and said, we're going to use a new method. | ||
| That new method was invented just a few months ago before that, or a few weeks before that, we can't really tell the exact date, by a group of researchers from Texas University of Texas Medical Branch. | ||
| And they came up with this new method that was supposed to provide a faster for mass testing. | ||
| So they came up with that, they had a patent for it. | ||
| And two of the people from the original research, one of the lead authors and another person, were the ones that were actually participating in the Pfizer trial. | ||
| They were the ones providing the measurement. | ||
| Now, as I said at the beginning, when Pfizer presented the results to the regulators, and it was part of the dossier, this was part of everything that they delivered, they practically said, our product gives eight times more immunity versus natural immunity. | ||
| And they used a sample, which they called the huge human sample of 38 People who got positive PCR results, and they compare it to the levels of neutralizing antibodies that were receiving in the monkeys. | ||
| And in the human samples, the 38, the average of it was about 94. | ||
| And if you look at the monkeys, they claim that in, I think, day 28 or day 21, they had about something like... | ||
| 860, something like that. | ||
| So they claim, look at us, we have eight times more protection than what you would find in nature. | ||
| Now there's one really, really big problem with that. | ||
| In the paper that was published by those researchers, those two researchers were part of it, in the paper that was published by them, before that, the paper that was describing the method, they had 57 samples. | ||
| And if you remove elements of it, and you would look only on the relevant ones, the average level of protection was not 94, it was about 1000. | ||
| And so, how can the researchers that did this test on using and doing those references and develop this method, which again, never was validated, never was proven before by anybody, the FDA didn't approve it at that point of time, they just came up with a new method. | ||
| How can they, who were part of the original research, decide that from more than a thousand The units of protection, it goes down to 94. | ||
| That just doesn't make any sense. | ||
| And it was actually higher than the results that they got in the monkeys. | ||
| Now, if you look at what happens at that point of time, if you actually read the two people that were involved in it, One of them, who is the lead, one of the lead researchers in that university, is an ex-Chinese trained, | ||
| CCP trained person, who has patents on some of, I think with the Chinese army, if I remember correctly, with regards to some development Sorry, Edan, you dropped out there a little bit. | ||
| Your connection got a little bit wobbly there, but you were telling me during the break that the CCP had some participation in this. | ||
| So, sorry, we heard you say that he had been trained under the CCP and may have some trademarks or copyright stuff with the Chinese army, if you could pick it up there. | ||
| Yeah, so that person who is right now lead of a very big, prestigious program has been involved in the past with the Chinese. | ||
| He was trained in China. | ||
| He was trained by the Chinese army, and he moved to the U.S. And the thing which is fascinating, let's assume that this is all, like you can claim, just a conspiracy theory. | ||
| The more interesting part for us is the fact that The two researchers, GATT or the university, has received. | ||
| The university in 2019 received from Pfizer about $250,000. | ||
| And in 2020, they received $1.8 million. | ||
| And out of the $1.8 million that they received, $420,000 went to those two researchers. | ||
| And in 2021, the number from Pfizer jumped up to 3.7, and $1.3 million went to these researchers. | ||
| And it's mentioned in the paper that they got this compensation for it. | ||
| And the reason they chose this person is because that person is an editor on multiple publications. | ||
| He is considered to be a senior guy. | ||
| And what Pfizer practically did with them is that they chose this place, perhaps also because this is one of the only two collaborating centers of the World Health Organization. | ||
| So we are talking about a collusion from everywhere possible. | ||
| Those people are interacting with each other, they are funding each other, and they are creating this very guilt in which truth is not part of it. | ||
| And it's fascinating because, again, This was published in Nature magazine. | ||
| There are things, as I said at the beginning, that should have made this thing be removed, redacted. | ||
| I am not a biologist. | ||
| I only looked at it because it was interesting to me to try to figure out what was happening. | ||
| There's a lot of people who work in the scientific community. | ||
| No one said anything. | ||
| I tried to post yesterday a comment on this article Yeah, no, I'm not surprised at all. | ||
| I mean, it almost reminds me of like, you know, before the Reformation and the Catholic Church would have all of their, you know, everything was in Latin, so the normal people couldn't understand it. | ||
| They used this language to... | ||
| Keep everybody else from discovering what is obviously true. | ||
| We'll be back with more from Edin Bieber. | ||
| Edin.substack.com is where you go to find these very thorough researched documents and articles. | ||
| We'll be right back. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| My guest is Edin Bieber. | ||
| Edin.substack.com is where you go to find his articles, which are just so, so thoroughly investigated. | ||
| I mean, he's got every reference there. | ||
| You can actually just tell from the thickness of the wads of paper that we have just printing them out, just how thoroughly... | ||
| Research all of this is, and it's utterly fascinating. | ||
| And, you know, the whole time that you're talking, all I'm thinking is of that response that was given to the EU when the EU demanded to know why Pfizer didn't test whether the vaccine stopped transmissibility, and they said, we're moving at the speed of science. | ||
| And that was their excuse for it. | ||
| I just keep hearing that phrase where they're changing the way they do things. | ||
| And, you know, you talk about the different way that you test the VNT versus, what is it, the PRNT, which was the gold standard. | ||
| But they said, oh, it's too slow. It's too slow. | ||
| The gold standard's too slow. | ||
| We've got to come up with this other way to do it that's faster. | ||
| And it might not even work, but it's faster because we're working at the speed of science. | ||
| I mean, they were—I mean, was it just— Your takeaway, was it just incompetence and the fact they were trying to move so quickly that they cut corners? | ||
| Or is all of that sort of smokescreen to disguise the fraud they were pulling off and they were doing this knowingly deceiving people? | ||
| What's your impression coming out of your research? | ||
| My impression is, and that also relates to something that I worked on and discovered and published in 2021, after I discovered the Pfizer contracts, I looked a little bit into the technology that they were using called codon optimization. | ||
| And the regulator at that point, and what I found out that they use a technology in order to try to make more spike proteins. | ||
| They wanted to make it as much as possible because they wanted to show that their product is great. | ||
| But this usage of this, they use a technology which has been known for years, for more than 10 years, that it causes what is called disease prions, which means that the protein itself falls badly and it causes heart attacks. | ||
| And neurological damage. | ||
| And you read it and you think to yourself, where were the regulators? | ||
| And I remember when I looked at it, I found videos of people from the FDA talking about this thing, talking about how much it's dangerous, and admitting that they don't have a framework to check it, and that they don't even ask the pharmaceutical companies to provide any assurances about it. | ||
| They go like, we just assume that they do their work, practically. | ||
| And practically, it means that the way that I look at it is that this is just a facade. | ||
| This is just something that is a smokescreen. | ||
| At the end of the day, they just show you what it is. | ||
| For me, it is pseudoscience. | ||
| Look, I work in information security. | ||
| I work, and most of my life, I've been protecting information assets. | ||
| And if you work, for example, in a bank, I was a head of security of a bank. | ||
| You don't trust anybody. | ||
| You are making sure that your systems are secure. | ||
| I would try to explain it to people. | ||
| What happened here is very much like this thing is if your body is... | ||
| Look at an iPhone or you have app stores and those apps are supposed to give you some features. | ||
| Some give you some options that gives you capabilities to your phone. | ||
| Try to imagine a company that only generated very, very niche applications. | ||
| And then they come up to Apple one day and they go like, we're gonna write, we have a new application that's not gonna be written by your language, we're gonna write it in the code of the iPhone, which usually nobody's supposed to be allowed to do that. | ||
| And it's going to do a lot of things. | ||
| And we're just going to distribute it to all the iPhone users around the world. | ||
| Apple would never allow that to happen. | ||
| Apple would go for tests and you cannot just submit. | ||
| Just because you had an application in the past doesn't mean that this application can be trusted. | ||
| And what you have here, if you think of Apple, Apple is the gatekeeper. | ||
| The regulators were supposed to be the gatekeepers in our case. | ||
| They did not do anything. | ||
| They just allowed this thing to pass through. | ||
| And that just represents the way that the pharmaceutical... | ||
| What industry and big pharma is working with, this is not an outlier. | ||
| This is the normal, practically. | ||
| And you can see that the regulator doesn't do anything by the fact that you can look at the British regulator, who was the first one to approve this thing, simply did copy-paste of what Pfizer wrote into their assessment. | ||
| And this is... | ||
| If you cannot trust the regulators, you cannot trust the big pharma, you cannot trust the scientific community, you cannot trust the publications. | ||
| All those people who we are supposed to follow the science are just... | ||
| This is pseudoscience. | ||
| This is not science. | ||
| And real scientists, by the way, I had conversations with scientists, In Israel, and they are frustrated. | ||
| There are some scientists, brave scientists, who are just frustrated. | ||
| Their lives have been threatened as a result of them standing up. | ||
| And I'm talking about professors of biology who try to suit up and go, like, this is not science. | ||
| And he has been threatened. | ||
| And this is what we have. | ||
| We are living in an age where That the people who are—the systems that are supposed to safeguard us are not working at all. | ||
| And it's a sad thing. | ||
| I'm being honest. | ||
| For years, I used to say to people when they come up with conspiracy theories, I go, yeah, yeah, you've been listening to Alex Jones way too much. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. And now I'm part of the crazy bunch. | |
| The only thing I do was critically thinking. | ||
| That's the only thing I did. | ||
| And I ask people, try to look at the data. | ||
| Try to look at what is there. | ||
| I have both on Getter and on Twitter is my... | ||
| My account is E-H underscore D-N. On Substack, it's E-D-N. Try to look at it and decide for yourself. | ||
| I could make mistakes for sure. | ||
| I'm not claiming to know the truth. | ||
| I think one of the things that I recognize is that this journey has taught me that I don't know the truth. | ||
| What I can do is serve the truth. | ||
| But with whatever is there, whatever my mind thinks that is true, well, two years ago, a few years ago, I thought the truth was very different. | ||
| So instead of us thinking that we know the truth, don't trust people, don't trust anybody just Try to figure out things by examining them and recognize there is something much bigger that is happening right now. | ||
| And this thing would not have been happening. | ||
| If you look at Pfizer, by the way, they got a contract. | ||
| They managed to force countries to give full indemnity to everybody who are involved. | ||
| The indemnity that Pfizer in the contracts gave also give indemnity for Nature magazine who published it. | ||
| Really? It's insane. | ||
| Yeah, because it's written there that anybody who's doing the marketing, anybody doing the publication, anybody who's, like, the whole supply chain from researchers through the people who deliver it, through the people who are promoting it, have been receiving full indemnity through those contracts. | ||
| It's just outrageous. | ||
| It is outrageous. And, of course, Most people don't have the technical capabilities, or even me, seeing all this data, it's just like, whoa, it's overblown. | ||
| So all you have to work with is these final statements that they come out with where they say it's eight times as much protection as natural immunity. | ||
| But if you don't know how they got to that conclusion, you can't combat it. | ||
| So you don't know that they changed this over here, manipulated this over here, and they used this instead of this over here. | ||
| And so in the background, there's so much stuff that went on to come to that conclusion that We're good to go. | ||
| What's your final takeaway from this? | ||
| Again, Edin Bieber is my guest. | ||
| His Twitter is at EH underscore D-E-N. His substack is Edin, E-H-D-E-N dot substack dot com, where you can go and find all this stuff. | ||
| But just, what's your final takeaway from this? | ||
| What do people need to know when they walk away from your substack? | ||
| What's the idea you want in their head? | ||
| I think that we need to understand that this was a psychological, in its ways, it was a psychological warfare. | ||
| People are, they just follow whatever, it's like monkeys, you follow the person with the wise suit. | ||
| Somebody says to you, it's 8x0 secure, and they just followed it. | ||
| So there's a reason that this fake number came over there, because they wanted to make sure that everybody who would be following and would be running all this vaccination We just have something to hold on to. | ||
| And they used lies and manipulation to make people think that this is important, this is good. | ||
| Because people need to have something in their head that says, I'm doing this thing, even though it looks to me maybe bad, but I'm doing it for society and doing it for saving people. | ||
| Look, it gives more protection. | ||
| And I think this was one of the things you need to understand. | ||
| This was not only faking of data. | ||
| This faking of data ended up with so many lives being taken away, so many innocent lives that have been forced into that, and all those lockdowns were justified by, if If you're not going to have this vaccine, obviously you're a bad person because look how great this immunity is and you just resist it, which was a lie. You are exactly right. | ||
| All of this is just aspects of a wider psychological attack against humanity. | ||
| Incredible stuff, as always. | ||
| Ed and Bieber at EH underscore DEN, his substack, EHDEN.substack.com. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I just want to say about diet force. | |
| Diet Force? I'm 45 and I have bits. | ||
| I go to the gym and I have bits that won't move. | ||
| And Diet Force has helped me move those bits. | ||
| Like, under my pecs, my belly, I'm just taking Diet Force two tablets a day. | ||
| Man, if you're, like, struggling to get... | ||
| Like, chip shape for the ladies. | ||
| Mate, Diet Force is the go. | ||
| You have to get to Diet Force and have two a day and just keep active. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com. X7 Diet Force. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Infowarsstore.com, baby! | |
| Now on sale. We're cutting that call into an ad. | ||
| I can guarantee you that. Thank you so much for the call, Grant. | ||
| God bless Australia. | ||
| We'll be right back, folks. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. Infowarsstore.com. |
Export Selection