Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| Let's first go back to this great Mike Adams article that came out in July of last year and it links right to the New England Medical Journal that hides it deep in the study that said 82% of pregnant women who got vaccinated for COVID during the first and second trimesters suffered miscarriages and it's still a very very large amount as well you can read in the third trimester as well that's also in the double digits. | ||
| Here's one of the studies, preliminary findings of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine safety in pregnant women, miscarriage stillbirth rates exploding worldwide as depopulation continues undabated. | ||
| You can see the graph there from the federal government's own numbers, similar numbers around the world. | ||
| Exposure to COVID vaccine spike proteins renders women infertile. | ||
| Nurse whistleblower fetal deaths have skyrocketed since pregnant women started using, being forced to get COVID-19 shots. | ||
| Australia sees 63% drop in births after introduction of COVID vaccines. | ||
| What will the government's excuse will be? | ||
| Hospital president, COVID-19 vaccines causing miscarriages is a complete myth, plain and simple. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm very happy to report that among the tens of thousands of women who have been closely studied after they chose to get the COVID-19 vaccines, the data is clear. | |
| These vaccines are safe. | ||
| The often mentioned but completely unsubstantiated concerns about COVID-19 vaccines causing either miscarriages or other problems with their pregnancy or causing problems getting pregnant is a complete myth, plain and simple. | ||
| Where's the study? The tens of thousands of women. | ||
| Where is it? They admit it's all lies. | ||
| Pfizer fake reports as well. | ||
| This guy is a lying scumbag. | ||
| So he doesn't give any facts, doesn't give any statistics, doesn't give any numbers. | ||
| He just says we have thousands of women and none of them had a problem. | ||
| No, no, no. Just no, nobody's, nobody's dying. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No children are dying. I've been actively miscarrying since the 8th. | |
| I have gone to a doctor and this is my second visit to the ER if you're wondering why women's rights. | ||
| It doesn't matter. This is my way. | ||
| Nobody actually is coming down. | ||
| They're always going to send me home. | ||
| These are the folks that tell you the two men can have a baby. | ||
| It's all upside-down world. | ||
| You know, they use DNA to prove somebody committed a murder 30 years ago, and that's all scientific. | ||
| But now the science guy, Bill Nye's new shows, tell kids that there are no X and Y chromosomes. | ||
| They're murdering the truth. | ||
| They're murdering science. | ||
| And he sits up there and says, out of tens of thousands of women, nobody's had a miscarriage. | ||
| Nobody's had a sick baby. | ||
| That's a damn lie. | ||
| I see a vast number of patients a year. | ||
| I don't know of any other maternal-fetal medicine physician in this country that sees as many patients as I do by ultrasound. | ||
| At one point in time this year, I was on track to see 9,000 high-risk OB ultrasounds. | ||
| So I know what's going on, and I've seen death and destruction like I've never seen before. | ||
| The stillbirth rate is measured in terms of live births per thousand and really it's come down in my career from about 10 to about almost 5.8 or 6. | ||
| Now let's go to 2021 and look at the stillbirth rate for Michelle's. | ||
| This is horrifying but if you take this death figure and you look at that rate at 29.3 That stigma that you're looking at It's 40 plus sigma. | ||
| Standard deviation. | ||
| Let that sink in. | ||
| And what I've seen in my clinical practice has been a substantial, massive increase, unprecedented, in menstrual abnormalities prior to pregnancy. | ||
| A substantial increase in infertility. | ||
| A substantial increase in miscarriage, fetal death, and fetal malformation. | ||
| We've published many studies this year. | ||
| Over the last two years, our latest study, which we've used from VAERS and CDC data, and we compared the COVID-19 vaccines over the last 15, 18 months with those of the influenza vaccine in pregnancy. | ||
| And what we've seen is catastrophic. | ||
| What did Alexander Soltanitsyn say about this? | ||
| He goes, we know they are lying. | ||
| They know they are lying. | ||
| They know we know they are lying. | ||
| We know they know we know they are lying. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But they are still lying. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | |
| Welcome to the American Journal. | ||
| I am your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| So glad to be here with you this morning. | ||
| We got a lot of stuff to talk about today. | ||
| Just like every day. | ||
| Like every day. There's just an infinite amount of nonsense to get through today. | ||
| And we'll get right into it. | ||
| We'll be taking your calls throughout the show today as well. | ||
| Do we have a guest today? Is Alex on today? | ||
| I believe we're going to have Alex Stringer in studio, if I'm not mistaken. | ||
| I believe that's today. | ||
| He's an activist here in Austin that makes some very funny videos. | ||
| And we'll talk about how Tariq Nasheed is targeting him and attacking him and just what you can do to take the passion that you may have for humanity and turn it into, if nothing else, at least some entertaining content for your fellow humanitarians out there. | ||
| Doing what we can to resist the technocratic, unhuman onslaught that we're all facing. | ||
| So, very big show today. | ||
| Very glad that you're with us. Remember to go to Infowarsstore.com to support everything that we do here. | ||
| Let's just get right into it. | ||
| Here it is, your daily dispatch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, here it is, folks. | |
| Your Daily Dispatch for Wednesday, the 28th of December, 2022. | ||
| This broke yesterday during the war room. | ||
| SCOTUS rules Title 42 must stay in place. | ||
| The United States Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that Title 42 border restrictions can remain in place until a February court challenge can be heard. | ||
| The Trump-era COVID deportation policy allows the government to deport illegal immigrants crossing U.S. borders without allowing them to seek asylum. | ||
| So, thank goodness. | ||
| Thank goodness we can use this obscure, nonsensical COVID pandemic rule to get permission to just police our own border. | ||
| Amazing the workarounds that you have to do to just enforce what is already the law. | ||
| Just baffling to me. Again, this is a good thing, I guess. | ||
| Ostensibly, there will be slightly less people coming in, right? | ||
| This is like your house is flooding because there's an open faucet, and Title 42 just makes it a little bit more closed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just shut the flow off. | |
| The water's still flowing. It's just flowing at a slightly less rapid rate, and you're only allowed to do this by claiming it's about COVID, right? | ||
| For some reason. For some reason, we have to pretend this is about COVID to just stop our country being actively invaded by millions of foreigners. | ||
| Okay, good. Good. | ||
| Fantastic. Great. | ||
| We'll do it because of COVID, then. | ||
| Whatever. Jeremy Bell says, Thank God Trump won in 2016 and we have the majority of the court for communist justice voted in favor of our country being invaded. | ||
| It's actually a fair point by Gorsuch, but additionally, the United States shouldn't need new laws and rules to deal with illegal immigration as the Constitution already addresses the issue and those who enter the country illegally should be deported as they are lawbreakers. | ||
| It really is as simple as that. | ||
| This article by Kellen McBreen on Infowars.com. | ||
| That whole paragraph really just explains it all. | ||
| The United States shouldn't need new laws to deal with illegal immigration. | ||
| It's already illegal. | ||
| So there's that. | ||
| It's like we were talking about yesterday in the war room. | ||
| There's a statement from Libs of TikTok about Florida going after... | ||
| Drag queen storytime strip shows being performed for children. | ||
| And they're just like, it is already illegal to perform lascivious acts in front of children, so we will be investigating this. | ||
| It's like, we don't need to have a debate about drag queens or transgenderism. | ||
| Just like, are you perverting children? | ||
| Well, that's against the law. | ||
| You're going to jail now. | ||
| But I'm a man that dresses up like a woman. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Get in the cell, please. | ||
| Doesn't matter. | ||
| We don't care. | ||
| It's already illegal. | ||
| We don't need new laws. | ||
| We just need to enforce the laws that we already have. | ||
| 90% of our problems, poof, gone away. | ||
| They're just a choice we're making or not making. | ||
| I Meanwhile, another headline. | ||
| I covered one yesterday that was about your robot vacuum spying on you, where I said, you know, sometimes you go to InfoWars, there's these headlines, and you think there's no way. | ||
| There's no way. There's no way this headline is just what it appears to be. | ||
| We have another one. NYC Mayor declares, Big Brother is protecting you. | ||
| Once again, you would think, I mean, there's got to be, he was being sarcastic, he was talking about a, it's got to be taken out of context, right? | ||
| There's no way the mayor of New York City would actually say that. | ||
| But then you read the story. | ||
| Oh, it could lead to one of those, right? Okay. | ||
| It's like standing in a house that is just thoroughly on fire, being like, yeah, I don't know if we should leave the dish towels on the stove like that. | ||
| There might be a fire. | ||
| Everything is turning into ash around them. | ||
| Yeah, it's too late for that already, but I'm sorry, let's continue with this story. | ||
| Let me get to the actual, oh, where's the actual quote? | ||
| Alright, we gotta find the actual quote here. | ||
| I think we're missing a page. | ||
| But essentially, he came out and said, you know, people are saying, this is like 1984, you know, Big Brother is watching you. | ||
| Big Brother's not watching you. | ||
| Big Brother is protecting you. | ||
| It's like, no, that's the same thing, sir. | ||
| Actually, sir, that's the same thing that you just said. | ||
| It's no diff. | ||
| It's actually kind of creepier, the way you put it. | ||
| It's like, Big Brother's not just watching you. | ||
| He's watching you to make sure you don't break the rules. | ||
| Oh, okay. Civil Liberties advocates have warned that making facial recognition technology ubiquitous could lead to a minority-report-style society where everyone, whether they have a criminal record or not, is tracked everywhere they go. | ||
| See, Democrats don't seem to care about this because, you know, you can't just present them concepts like ubiquitous face recognition, AI surveillance, pre-crime technology is a horrendous violation of our most basic human and constitutional rights. | ||
| They don't care. They don't care if you put it that way. | ||
| What you need to say is this could inadequately or rather unfairly, inequitably target minority populations. | ||
| They'll be on this like white on rice. | ||
| I mean, they will. | ||
| Is that racist? | ||
| Oh, God. | ||
| White on rice. | ||
| I can't tell if I'm insulting white people or Asian people, but I should just avoid that saying forever. | ||
| But yeah, they don't care. | ||
| They don't care that there's a technocratic control grid being slowly lowered around the world population. | ||
| But if you phrase it as if it's only going to unfairly target minority populations, they will demand a change immediately and riot until they get it. | ||
| So that's the way we need to present this. | ||
| Again from Infowars.com, gaping holes in deep sewers, no end in sight. | ||
| Thank you. No. | ||
| Weren't you paying attention? | ||
| No, it just slightly moderate. | ||
| It just moderates the gushing flow of foreigners pouring into our country continuously. | ||
| And what is seen as a victory for Republican led states on December 27th, U.S. courts blocked the Biden administration from rescinding COVID era Title 42, originally conceived by ex-president Donald Trump to justify the expulsion of over 80 percent of illegal immigrants caught trying to enter the country. | ||
| Illegal migrants are using everything from gaping holes in the border fence to dugouts in the sewer system to continue to cross into the U.S.-Mexico border. | ||
| According to reports, again, just the sheer numbers of this are staggering. | ||
| Millions of people per year from other countries coming into ours without permission, being ferried here by billionaires and their You know, organizations, non-governmental organizations, as well as the UN, paying for their way here and then providing them with the lawyers and the secret magic words they need to apply for asylum. | ||
| Of course, the people on our side of the board are also working with these same NGOs so they can check the boxes and say, yes, you've read off the correct statements. | ||
| We can't prove otherwise because we also instructed you to throw your ID away so we can't actually identify you. | ||
| So I guess we have to let you in, just circumventing the law, ruining everything for everyone, and acting like they're the good people for doing it. | ||
| Meanwhile, every social media firm censors for the U.S. government, this according to Elon Musk. | ||
| All social media platforms work with the U.S. government to censor content, Twitter CEO Elon Musk claimed on Tuesday. | ||
| Documents released by Musk following his purchase of Twitter showed that the platform colluded with the FBI, CIA, Pentagon, and other government agencies to suppress information on elections, Ukraine, and COVID-19. | ||
| And folks, that's just the beginning. | ||
| Seriously, I think Twitter was one of the lesser-controlled platforms. | ||
| I mean, do you have any idea how sophisticated the algorithms for Google have to be? | ||
| It's almost like they know what is going to be dangerous to the New World Order before anybody else does, and then the algorithm changes in real time to correct that. | ||
| It's a very sophisticated censorship operation. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| Continuing with our Daily Dispatch, just returning here to the... | ||
| Previous story, we have the full story here. | ||
| Again, it can be found at Infowars.com. | ||
| NYC mayor declares Big Brother is protecting you. | ||
| Okay. The Democrats, it says, also brazenly suggested that mass surveillance wasn't a chilling, slippery slide. | ||
| But in fact, a good thing. | ||
| Quote, it blows my mind how much we have not embraced technology. | ||
| And part of that is because many of our electeds are afraid. | ||
| Anything technology, they think, oh, it's a boogeyman. | ||
| It's Big Brother watching you, he told Politico. | ||
| No, Big Brother is protecting you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, so there's the quote there. | |
| Again, the problem isn't... | ||
| Using technology, it's that the technology is being used by biased people who despise us. | ||
| So, not exactly a good thing. | ||
| See, the problem is, I hate to be the bearer of bad news here, but if you were to start using AI to track and predict Crimes, particularly in New York City, it would have a distinct racial bias that would have to be overcome by the people writing the algorithm. | ||
| So they would have to write into the algorithm things to alter the outcome of the algorithm, making the algorithm less than useful, actually damaging to the purpose that it's being employed for. | ||
| So until we can get over statistical anomalies being automatically Portrayed as and declared bias and then actions taken to correct the perceived bias of the robot machine that doesn't think but just does what you tell it to, then we shouldn't have this type of technology employed by law enforcement. | ||
| But that's just me. | ||
| Finally, we have this story. | ||
| Buffalo Blizzard latest. | ||
| Motorists slammed 30 people, spent Christmas in a Target just to survive the ice storm. | ||
| I mean, really... Being from Texas, these pictures are actually horrifying. | ||
| You can just see these houses literally covered in ice. | ||
| It's, yeah, just absolutely crazy. | ||
| And it continues to grip all of Buffalo and New York. | ||
| Apparently there's a driving ban because of the black ice there. | ||
| The death toll across the U.S. is now at at least 65, with numbers still rising. | ||
| The New York state governor said the aftermath of the storm resembled a war zone. | ||
| It's interesting because it's... | ||
| Not because it's so snowy. | ||
| No, it's because people went out of their way to loot each other and take advantage of the natural disaster that was hitting all of them. | ||
| In fact, we have videos of that. | ||
| Don't we? Didn't I put these in here? | ||
| I must have forgotten, too. | ||
| I think you can just imagine it. | ||
| Just imagine looting, but with a layer of snow on top. | ||
| Again, this is why we can't have nice things. | ||
| Any weakness gets exploited continually in this country. | ||
| I think that really might be the big distinction between good people and evil people. | ||
| I was thinking about this on the drive-in because one of the stories that we're going to cover today is Klaus Schwab talking about education and And explain that this is not a new phenomenon. | ||
| The World Economic Forum is not unduly influencing our education system any more than an entire cacophony of non-governmental organizations all getting to have their say and train our teachers into how to teach our children. | ||
| And you just, you know, whether it's transgenderism or just the World Economic Forum, you know, globalist mindset in general, When you see little kids, little innocent children in elementary school or even younger, you can really think of it as one of two ways. | ||
| One, you can want to preserve that innocence. | ||
| You can want to prolong that blissful ignorance that kids are in for as long as possible. | ||
| Or you can see it as an opportunity to exploit. | ||
| You can see it as a vulnerable population to mold to your desire. | ||
| Whether it's little kids or people who have been subjected to a natural disaster, or just people who are living in the world and just fearful of all of the uncertainties that we have all around us, you can either see that as something to be protected, a vulnerability to be protected, and that as a strong person you have a responsibility to Mend that vulnerability, or you can see that vulnerability like a predator sees a vulnerability. | ||
| You can see that vulnerability like an injured bison running behind the herd, just waiting to be snapped up by your brutal jaws. | ||
| I mean, that really is sort of the distinction here. | ||
| And again, the... | ||
| New World Order globalist combine. | ||
| They don't just sit back and take advantage of people in vulnerable situations. | ||
| They create those situations to then exploit. | ||
| They manufacture the fear that puts people in a state of suggestion that they then take advantage of. | ||
| I think that's what you call evil. | ||
| I think that's the only word that's appropriate, though perhaps not sufficient. | ||
| So many things are evil. There's something particularly abhorrent about taking advantage of people who are in some sort of vulnerable situation, whether it's a snowstorm, a natural disaster, a state of ignorant fear, or childhood innocence. | ||
| You either take advantage of it or... | ||
| Want to protect it. And I think that is really a big division between a lot of people. | ||
| I guess we can go to that video now. | ||
| Because I do want to get into this quickly. | ||
| The World Economic Forum seeks to seize control over the educational system. | ||
| We have Klaus Schwab essentially saying exactly that. | ||
| But I want to save that for the next segment because I have a couple videos I want to show from the World Economic Forum. | ||
| But as we get into the World Economic Forum, we talk about the way that they want to use education to achieve their own ends. | ||
| I think people are sort of starting to come around to the idea that kids in school are being indoctrinated one way or the other. | ||
| It really is, in a lot of ways, impossible to have a strictly objective point of view when you're teaching things like history. | ||
| So you have to make a choice of whether you... | ||
| Take a subjective view that is beneficial and uplifting and honors history that came before or one that acts like human beings were always just evil, you know, sick, mud-dwelling creatures that only our recent technology and globalist masters have risen out of the mire and granted with godlike righteousness. | ||
| But when you look at The education system, I don't even know. | ||
| My mom was an elementary school teacher for like 20 years. | ||
| And every single year, before the school year begins, every single teacher in every single public school district is required to go to these workshops where they train the teachers on the updated version of the rules. | ||
| And slowly but surely, every single year, the bricks are being laid to build the facade of globalism. | ||
| Every single year, they get little updates that compel teachers in every single school district, all orchestrated and organized by massive NGOs, the very same ones that are censoring Twitter and, you know, betraying the FBI and doing everything else. | ||
| They come into the education system and they just inch by inch shove our entire culture off the civilizational cliff. | ||
| World Economic Forum may be a new player in this. | ||
| They may be a powerful player in this, but it's in no way a novel concept since going on for decades. | ||
| you Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Let's talk about education, shall we? | ||
| There's a video that's been going around. | ||
| It's not a particularly new video, but it does, again, just highlight just how intricately intertwined into every aspect of our society things like the World Economic Forum is or things are completely unelected completely self-appointed masters of the universe they would like to think This time taking the reins on the education system so that they don't have to deal with the pesky reality of adults with their own thoughts and own opinions having to either suppress, | ||
| oppress, or convince those people. | ||
| It's so much easier when you can just program kids from the beginning to accept your dictates unquestioningly. | ||
| But I want to start off with a video That also has been going mildly viral as a response to the Klaus Schwab video. | ||
| So the Klaus Schwab video got posted yesterday. | ||
| I think it was Wall Street Silver that first posted it. | ||
| We'll play that in just a second. | ||
| But in response to that, people were posting other stuff about the education system, one of which is this video of Frank Zappa, must be from at least the 80s, possibly the 70s, talking about the education system. | ||
| And while he's right in general, I think it's worth noting how the education system and how the So let's first go to this clip from the 70s, | ||
| clip number 12 Frank Zappa talking about what the purpose of American education was in America. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Schools train people to be ignorant with style. | |
| They give you the equipment that you need to be a functional ignoramus. | ||
| American schools do not equip you to deal with things like logic. | ||
| They don't give you the criteria by which to judge between good and bad in any medium or format. | ||
| And they prepare you to be a usable victim for a military-industrial complex that needs manpower. | ||
| As long as you're just smart enough to do a job and just dumb enough to swallow what they feed you, you're going to be all right. | ||
| But if you go beyond that, you're going to have these grave doubts that give you stomach problems, headaches, make you want to go out and do something else. | ||
| So I believe that schools mechanically and very specifically try and breed out Any hint of creative thought in the kids that are coming up. | ||
| So what's the alternative for the parent who would agree with you? | ||
| Well, remember that the school isn't the only place that a child gets educated. | ||
| If you realize that the schools are doing damage, and I believe this, I believe that schools do a lot of damage to kids, then you should do what you can at home to help give them something to counteract what's happening to them at school. | ||
| You mean encourage creativity? | ||
| Encourage them to read things other than what the school gives them. | ||
| Encourage them to watch things on television other than cartoons. | ||
| Because I don't believe that television is all bad and some things that are on are very useful. | ||
| And give them some support. | ||
| Let them feel that you as a parent want them to be smart. | ||
| Not just to be successful. | ||
| Not just to be a nice little person. | ||
| That you want them to develop their thinking apparatus. | ||
| I think he's right in general, and I think he was certainly right about schools back then. | ||
| Again, just going by the quality and the sort of style that you see in that video, I think that was in the late 70s where he talked about that, unless the crew can find otherwise. | ||
| But definitely it was long enough ago that The military-industrial complex was actually interested in building up Americans that could follow orders and could be deployed around the world. | ||
| It's not really the case anymore. | ||
| See, that was the era of Vietnam, where literally millions of young American men were sent overseas to do the fighting. | ||
| That's not really the case anymore. | ||
| In fact, the army has decided that Americans aren't We're not capable of serving in their own armed forces anymore and we increasingly fill the ranks with foreign recruits doing the work of American citizens in the armed forces. | ||
| We're also not any longer in a world where they want unthinking workers Because they don't think they need workers anymore. | ||
| How many times have we heard from the World Economic Forum that the biggest challenge of the future will be just finding stuff for people to do because work isn't necessary anymore. | ||
| They'll replace us all with robots and then come up with either chemical compounds or video games to keep us alternatively entertained and sedated so that we just pass away without too much fuss moving into the future. | ||
| It's almost like, you know, Frank Zappa sees the educational system in the 1970s as being this conformity machine creating unthinking workers for the industrial and military class. | ||
| Let's see, the crew found that. | ||
| Okay, 1981, yeah, so early 1980s is when that was made. | ||
| So still shortly after the civilizational trauma of the Vietnam War. | ||
| Which we can get into as well. So he was right back then. | ||
| You've got to wonder if you could take Frank Zappa from the 1970s or early 80s, transport him to the current education system, which doesn't bother to teach kids anything, actually. | ||
| Actually, if you look at what the standards are now, they're being eliminated and erased. | ||
| Teachers are refusing to give grades now in the name of equity. | ||
| I can't tell you how many videos I've seen of teachers going, in the name of equity, everybody in my class passes. | ||
| Every single person gets an A. It's not about what you... | ||
| And it's like, which is more damaging to children, to have them adhere to a rigorous... | ||
| Set of demands that they have to study and achieve certain goals or to tell them that nothing is real, nothing matters, there is no truth, what's your truth? | ||
| And just a complete, all-in, nothing but so-called creativity, which is really just, you know, narcissistic exploration, basically. | ||
| So let's go now to clip number six. | ||
| Because here is the video that went viral. | ||
| I think this one's also from a few years ago. | ||
| Klaus Schwab on education. | ||
| Here's how the World Economic Forum, and again, these self-appointed, unelected psychopath control freaks just openly announcing that they'll be in charge of your children's education from now on. | ||
| But don't worry, they're starting in the third world because they're such philanthropists. | ||
| Let's watch. We put emphasis on what I said before, public-private partnerships which we accompany. | ||
| So when we define a project like our global educational initiative, I just described it in a second, We have under the leadership of Cisco and many other companies, practically all the big names. | ||
| We try to revolutionize the educational system of Jordan, Egypt, and now Burundi by working together with the local authorities. | ||
| We work also together with UNESCO. Not only to equip the schools, but to retrain the teachers, to put new curricula into place. | ||
| So we work together. | ||
| We are companies. | ||
| We do not set the difference to the Clinton Initiative, which mainly, which is a good thing, which asks companies to pledge some money to make a commitment and some to come back and to report. | ||
| We are with the initiative from the beginning to the end. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's one other difference. | |
| Why does he have to have such a cartoonishly evil accent? | ||
| It really is just like insulting almost. | ||
| That not only is this guy... | ||
| A foreigner having, you know, access to these massive corporations that are dictating to our education system what their priorities should be. | ||
| But he's got to talk like this the entire time. | ||
| It's like, really? That's got to happen? | ||
| So again, they've taken the... | ||
| You know, outrage about the school system being run for the sake of corporations. | ||
| They just want drones, man, to make us work. | ||
| And they flip that to we've brought the biggest corporations in the world together to train children how to be trans and cut off their genitals. | ||
| I don't know which is worse. | ||
| I don't like either. We'll be right back. | ||
| Alright folks, welcome back. | ||
| We're talking about education and the influence that the creepy old weirdos at the World Economic Forum want to have over your children and how that's changed over time. | ||
| I don't think there's any, you know, complaints nowadays that school is too rigorous, that they're turning out homogenized You know, little worker bees. | ||
| They're not. They're not producing anything anymore. | ||
| They're producing confused, frightened children incapable of taking care of themselves, let alone the country. | ||
| And it's because the world has changed. | ||
| We're not an industrial powerhouse anymore. | ||
| We don't have any manufacturing. | ||
| We don't have people who need to be trained to be okay with and to value working at an assembly line all day. | ||
| No, we've moved on. | ||
| We've advanced. We've evolved into something horrifying and useless. | ||
| Frank Zappa did make a good point there. | ||
| He said, they teach you to be ignorant with style. | ||
| That hasn't changed. The style has changed. | ||
| The ignorance hasn't. | ||
| In fact, now it's sort of a... | ||
| Like when you think about transgenderism, right? | ||
| If you believe that There's no such thing as men and women like you're ignorant of one of the most basic biological realities of all of existence. | ||
| For all of time. Human beings, animals, everything. | ||
| Absolutely everything. Flowers, trees, just everything. | ||
| That's a male and a female. | ||
| So you're ignorant of that, but it is the style. | ||
| It is the current style. It is the current trend. | ||
| So teaching kids to be trendy, to be stylish in this strange way, but to be utterly and horrifically ignorant of the reality around them. | ||
| So that's very accurate. | ||
| He also said that it doesn't teach you to judge between good and bad, or good and evil. | ||
| Which again, that's changed as well. | ||
| It used to be a very open and explicit part of the agenda to indoctrinate. | ||
| I know that's a bad word, but it just means to introduce to the doctrine of, right? | ||
| When CIA agents get put on a case, they say they're indoctrinated into that case. | ||
| They're told what's going on in that case. | ||
| So, you know, to indoctrinate something evil is evil, but when you indoctrinate love of country, when you indoctrinate respect for the rule of law, it's not exactly a bad thing. | ||
| It can go too far, obviously, and I guess that's sort of the point of all of this, is that we're vacillating from one extreme to the other, where before the education system was very explicitly designed by the Rockefellers and Carnegies who helped to bring it about in the first place to create little thoughtless worker bees that won't challenge the status quo, | ||
| that won't have the capability of overthrowing their corporate or political masters because they're just incapable of doing it and that's what they needed at the time, just manpower or military power. | ||
| That's not the case anymore. They don't need us anymore. | ||
| And in fact, they're not shy about announcing this. | ||
| So let's go now to that first video. | ||
| You all know Harari. The one that says Klaus Schwab's sidekick. | ||
| So here he is back when he had hair and no glasses. | ||
| Explaining that, you know, as we change into this new paradigm, the old paradigm of the Industrial Revolution that brought about the education system that we're still stuck in. | ||
| So we're still stuck in this legacy program of education that's being warped and manipulated and distorted as we move into the future. | ||
| is no longer fit for purpose but it's changed its outcome to be one even more damaging than the uniformity demanded of the 1970s or 80s so let's go to you've all know harari explaining why this is happening and coinciding it with klaus schwab's favorite topic the fourth revolution let's watch | ||
| In the Industrial Revolution of the 19th century, what humanity basically learned to produce was all kinds of stuff, like textiles and shoes and weapons and vehicles. | ||
| And this was enough for very few countries that underwent the revolution fast enough to subjugate everybody else. | ||
| What we're talking about now is like a second industrial revolution, but the product this time will not be textiles or machines or vehicles or even weapons. | ||
| The product this time will be humans themselves. | ||
| We are basically learning to produce bodies and minds. | ||
| Bodies and minds are going to be, I think, the two main products of the next wave of all these changes. | ||
| And if there is a gap between those that know to produce bodies and minds and those that do not, then this is far greater than anything we saw before in history. | ||
| And this time, if you're not part of the revolution fast enough, then you probably become extinct. | ||
| Once you know how to produce bodies and brains and minds, so cheap labor in Africa or South Asia or wherever, it simply counts for nothing. | ||
| Again, I think that the biggest question maybe in economics and politics of the coming decades will be what to do with all these useless people. | ||
| I don't think we have an economic model for that. | ||
| My best guess, which is just a guess, is that food will not be a problem. | ||
| With that kind of technology you will be able to produce food to feed everybody. | ||
| The problem is more boredom and what to do with them and how will they find some sense of meaning in life when they are basically meaningless, worthless. | ||
| My best guess at present is a combination of drugs and computer games. | ||
| Again, we don't have to speculate. | ||
| Just listen to what these people are saying. | ||
| So you've got the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, his spiritual advisor. | ||
| You've all know Harari. Klaus Schwab saying, look at all these great programs that we have. | ||
| And again, he's pointing out things in cooperation with the Clinton Global Initiative that they're doing in third world countries. | ||
| You've all know Harari points out that once you have these foreign populations that'll work and do the manual labor for decades, I don't have to put words in his mouth. | ||
| He said these people are useless now. | ||
| They're preparing for that. | ||
| They're laying the groundwork for that. | ||
| They're setting the stage, and as they say, you know, we're making people. | ||
| Of course, part of that means actually physically altering people to be more malleable, more suggestible. | ||
| Maybe those things like they suggest removing parts of the brain can lessen your faith in God. | ||
| Like, maybe they're talking about physically changing or chemically altering the makeup of human beings' minds. | ||
| But they're also talking about using education to form human beings into something that doesn't seek some sort of higher purpose, doesn't have ambition to change the world and impose their views on anybody else. | ||
| But to simply be, as he put it, a useless person that can be sequestered away in some sort of digital gulag where they can play video games and be drugged into a stupor for the rest of their lives, a la Brave New World, just seeking endless, a la Brave New World, just seeking endless, pointless, temporary pleasure until you die. | ||
| Then you're gone, and you haven't had time to build anything, so nothing lasts beyond your death. | ||
| You just go away, and that's the end of that. | ||
| You were useless, and now you're gone. | ||
| And of course, that's a threat from the World Economic Forum. | ||
| When they say, you know, you're either useless or you're either useful to our new system, this new industrial revolution that we're bringing about, or you die. | ||
| You go away. That's the threat that they're suggesting to you. | ||
| We still have a couple more videos here. | ||
| We'll carry this into the... Next segment, let's go to a newer video of Yuval Noah Harari, where he gets even more in-depth into this psychopathic, again, control freak paradigm that these people are not asking our permission to do, but are simply doing because they've accrued power unto themselves. | ||
| Let's watch. It was always very difficult to be in charge of your destiny. | ||
| What is unique now is that the big danger for people is no longer exploitation, it's irrelevance. | ||
| Previously in history, if you were on the wrong side of history, if you didn't understand what was happening and you lost the competition, then you ended up as some kind of serf or manual laborer being exploited by the people who understand and have the power. | ||
| Now, if you're left behind, you're facing something far worse, which is to be completely irrelevant. | ||
| They won't even need you as a serf or as a slave. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, which is a worrying thing. | |
| And, of course, we were very concerned about how to find meaningful work and meaningful existence for folk in the future. | ||
| You've all known her. I was like, no, you misunderstood me. | ||
| We don't want people to have meaningful work. | ||
| We want to destroy people's ability to recognize meaningfulness so they don't know whether what they're doing is meaningful or not. | ||
| It's actually more sophisticated and evil and scummy than people give it credit for. | ||
| We're going to continue this on the other side. | ||
| I'll show you some examples of what the Modern education system is like. | ||
| But again, I think he lays it out there when he says, in the old days, you were worried about being exploited, now you're going to be worried about being irrelevant. | ||
| See, Frank Zappa in the early 80s was explaining how the education system is making people easy to be exploited. | ||
| And now Klaus Schwab is announcing that the education system will be used to make you okay with being irrelevant. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
| You know, you can take your kids out of education You can take your kids out of public school. | ||
| You can homeschool your kids. | ||
| You can take that burden onto yourself. | ||
| And maybe, maybe if you do it right, you can protect your kids from the influence of their peers and the wider society for the time being. | ||
| But you know, it's not just about your kids. | ||
| Your kids are going to have to grow up and be a part of a generation, which they are an extreme outlier and part of the.1% or whatever the... | ||
| I guess it's a higher population now, but they still have to grow up in a world run by and peopled and populated by the people who are subjected to this type of brainwashing. | ||
| It's not something that you can just run away from. | ||
| It's something that has to be taken on and... | ||
| Somebody is going to be in charge of education. | ||
| It can either be good people who actually care about children and want to teach them ways that they can be successful, prosperous, happy, strong, live a good life, have meaning in it, or it can be run by Klaus Schwab, who wants to train your children to be okay with being a useless vassal of a robot. | ||
| So somebody's got to do it. | ||
| And running away is really not an option when they have such complete influence when it comes to education. | ||
| Let's go to clip 14 here. | ||
| Just again to lay out the people that are now announcing their intention of thoroughly taking complete control of the education system. | ||
| We'll talk about how this works. | ||
| Let's just take a look first at what the World Economic Forum does. | ||
| There are a vast array of plans they have for humanity. | ||
| None of them good. Let's watch. | ||
| Nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. | ||
| Can you imagine that in ten years when we are sitting here... | ||
| Brain implants....we have an implant in our brains, and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants... | ||
| Just think of sensors. | ||
| Planted into our brain. | ||
| It doesn't change what you are doing. | ||
| It changes you if you take a genetic editing. | ||
| It's a fusion of the physical, the digital, and the biological world. | ||
| That's really the essence of the fourth industrial revolution. | ||
| Decarbonization of the economy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Where are they traveling? How are they traveling? | |
| What are they eating? What are they consuming on the platform? | ||
| So, individual carbon footprint tracker. | ||
| Stay tuned. We don't have it operational yet, but this is something that we're working on. | ||
| This global reset is necessary. | ||
| Yes, very necessary. | ||
| And run by corporations who despise you. | ||
| Again, these things that he's suggesting, nobody would be okay with subjecting themselves to. | ||
| If you have a population who's been raised to value things like personal liberty and sovereignty and humanity's ultimate destiny of rising up, not being continually lowered down. | ||
| So if you can take control at a very early age and squash that ember before it flames up, Then you can have people in the palm of your hand. | ||
| So everything they're doing would be utterly and completely rejected by people who had been educated in the old system. | ||
| The new system has to soften that defense to allow the mind control to work. | ||
| And of course, there's just infinite numbers of videos to go to, but let's go to this one. | ||
| Clip number 13. Words like however and therefore are hate-filled white supremacist words. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. The white supremacy runs deep. | |
| Well, let's look at how we write essays. | ||
| Start with an introduction that includes a thesis. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Always cite your sources. | |
| Use transition words like however and therefore. | ||
| These are all made up rules. | ||
| They're arbitrary. | ||
| They were created by Westerners in power. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In linguistic justice, April Baker Bell calls this the language of respectability or the language of power. | |
| There is nothing more 2022 to me than a high school English and literature teacher saying that using a thesis and words like however and therefore are white supremacist when she is in fact... | ||
| Granted, college professors have said 2 plus 2 equals 4 is racist also, so I guess everything is just racist. | ||
| Breathing is now racist, so just be aware of that in the American education system, I guess. | ||
| You honestly cannot make this crap up anymore. | ||
| Homeschool your kids. Welcome back, folks. | ||
| Second hour has begun here on American Journal. | ||
| There's so much other stuff to talk about, but I feel like so much of it intersects with this concept of The education system and you can really just go from there all over the place. | ||
| The video that we showed in that last segment, the idea of proper syntax, grammar, vocabulary is considered white supremacy, just like grades are considered white supremacy. | ||
| So what's the purpose of this? | ||
| What's the point of this? | ||
| Like, is this the end result? | ||
| Is this the slippery slide down which Frank Zappa was traveling? | ||
| Right? You start off rebelling against the conformity and robot-like insect hive mind of education, but what you end up with is just complete dislocation. | ||
| And bastardization, right? | ||
| Deracination, just unhooking humanity from anything stable and permanent and recognizable and just thrusting them into the chaotic world of their own interpretation, their own subjective, wildly different interpretation from student to student. | ||
| Again, I think it's hard to exploit people who are firmly grounded and Moral principles who are intelligent and capable of higher cognitive function, who have the vocabulary to fully express what they're thinking. | ||
| You know, that was the point of Newspeak in 1984. | ||
| Good, ungood, double plus ungood, right? | ||
| The idea wasn't just to simplify the language. | ||
| It was to simplify the language for a purpose. | ||
| The purpose was that eventually you would have a language that was incapable of expressing the requisite ideas to bring about a revolution. | ||
| If you can't explain what freedom even is... | ||
| How can you advocate for it? | ||
| And there's already, you know, attempts to bring something like this about just search BBC Pigeon, P-I-G-D-I-N, right? | ||
| This just bizarre language of just not English, just English, but for brain-damaged people, I guess. | ||
| And it just means that you're in... | ||
| Again, if all of our... | ||
| If we were... Obliged to only use one or two syllable words. | ||
| Could we ever write the Constitution? | ||
| Could you ever express the higher values? | ||
| If you're forced to use simplistic language, these things are complicated. | ||
| So, by dislocating kids from the stream of education that has come down to us from centuries of slowly but surely building on the Enlightenment, building on The Renaissance, | ||
| if you can interrupt that stream and just dislocate them from that and let them spiral helplessly into the void, you have a machine that's much easier not to be exploited, but to be distracted, taken advantage of. | ||
| That's one of the things that we try to do here is give people the information they need to Act on their impulses in a lot of ways. | ||
| A lot of people just know that things are weird. | ||
| They know things are wrong. It's hard just to do things like avoid taking the vaccine if your entire reason for not taking it is just like, yeah, it just doesn't sit right with me. | ||
| Some people can do that. Some people have the backbone just to go, yeah, it doesn't sit right with me, so I'm not doing it no matter what you say. | ||
| But it's hard for that just innate discomfort to overcome continual, constant propagandizing in the opposite direction from absolutely everybody, from your friends, from your family, from the TV, from the authorities, from your doctor. | ||
| It's just like you've got to have the information to back up your position so you can be strong in your resolve. | ||
| If they can deprive you of that information and then demonize your basic instincts, then they can make of you what they will. | ||
| And what they want of you is a suicidal person. | ||
| They would rather you not fight to make things better, but resign yourself to the weakness that they would project on you and Succumb to their anti-human agenda without complaint. | ||
| Words like however and therefore hate-filled white supremacist words. | ||
| I just, I, you know, we're just off, we're off the mark a bit. | ||
| And again, the way this goes can really be illustrated by the Loudoun County affair that we've covered so extensively here and that continues to, you know, have updates. | ||
| What happened there? You had a teacher who was trying to teach a lesson on slavery. | ||
| They had an interactive lesson for the kids to try to show kids what it would maybe be like to be a runaway slave. | ||
| It may have been a little insensitive, but I don't think you can... | ||
| Basically, they had kids acting as the slaves and other kids acting as the slave hunters. | ||
| Again, I don't know if it... | ||
| Did the thing that the teacher wanted to do, but I also don't think the teacher designed that lesson with any racist connotations. | ||
| I think they were legitimately trying to come up with an activity that would be remembered, that kids would look back on and Wouldn't just be another lesson, another day, another lecture that just goes in one ear and out the other, but something that, you know, actually sticks with them a little bit, trying to impart to them some of the reality of, you know, the words they read in history books. | ||
| You know, maybe it wasn't the most sophisticated type of lesson, but it certainly wasn't something should have caused... | ||
| Outrage, but it did cause outrage. | ||
| It caused outrage because it brought the attention of the NAACP and the ACLU and the SPLC and the ADL, and they all jumped on this opportunity. | ||
| You had a couple parents who were kind of insulted, kind of mad that this teacher would be so insensitive as to play a game surrounding slavery. | ||
| Again, I think your intentions were good, or his intentions were good, but... | ||
| The outrage was there, and so it's taken advantage of by these very, extremely powerful, extremely well-funded, extremely widespread, nationwide groups that came into this school district, and because of this one little event from one little teacher, they said, we demand that you give us a committee, an equity committee, so we can simply do research. | ||
| We can simply investigate whether there's any issues. | ||
| Of course, these people's existence depends on there being issues, so of course they find a whole litany of issues, Suggestions. | ||
| They don't, you know, make You know, they don't just, like, offer something up that then is voted on. | ||
| They make demands. They say, now that you've given us a committee, this committee is now permanent. | ||
| It's the equity committee. And we are now going to have unquestioned authority to change everything about your school district. | ||
| and if teachers so much as disagree with us in their private lives, literally, in Loudoun County, they said, if a teacher goes in their private social media off hours and says, I disagree with what the Loudoun County Equity Committee is doing, they would be fired. | ||
| And a teacher did get fired. | ||
| It was later reversed, but that actually happened. | ||
| So you've got national groups who exploit a situation to inject themselves into the school district to demand ultimate authority, unquestionable authority. | ||
| Then they make outrageous changes like putting into place libraries, specific highlighted libraries in elementary school classrooms full of the books that they choose, which are pornographic in nature, racialized, racist, critical race theories. | ||
| just all that crap gets injected by fiat, by demand, by these multinational, ideologically driven organizations into your elementary school. | ||
| And when the parents noticed this and said, what the hell is this? | ||
| Why are these... First of all, why are these books even in an elementary school? | ||
| But especially, why are they being highlighted and pushed to the kids? | ||
| Then what happened? You had the media and all of these multinational NGO groups demonize and castigate and actually call terrorists these parents who simply didn't want to be subject to this program that they were running. | ||
| They were told they were book burners. | ||
| They wanted censorship because they weren't asked... | ||
| And weren't okay with being imposed upon in this way by these non-governmental organizations. | ||
| And then, of course, it, you know, ends up with multiple girls being raped because they're trying to pass a transgender rule, and they're afraid that the optics of girls getting raped is going to stop them from passing their ridiculous laws that allows the girls to be raped, so they had to cover that up. | ||
| It's total criminality across the board, all orchestrated by these very same groups that are embedding themselves deeper in our education. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is American Journal. We're going to go ahead and open up the phone lines right now. | ||
| Give us a call. The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| That's 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Give us a call. I had a good time hosting the War Room yesterday and taking calls from that audience about what they thought the biggest story of the year was. | ||
| They had some really good suggestions. | ||
| Actually, I had a bunch of great calls yesterday. | ||
| I think we've named all of the stories at this point. | ||
| I think we have all of them from this year. | ||
| If you want to call in with your top story of 2022, we welcome that. | ||
| Or maybe what you think our goals and plans should be for 2023 as we enter the new year. | ||
| What should we be focusing on? | ||
| I mean, there's so many different things. | ||
| Again, I've spent the first hour on this talking about education. | ||
| Perhaps that should be a primary focus. | ||
| But what do people think the biggest goals for 2023 should be for we here in the liberty movement? | ||
| the Infowar conflict. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, there's still a lot of stuff to talk about today. | |
| So 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| I think I want to go to some videos here and we'll talk about what's happening in the Ukraine. | ||
| Ukraine war continues to rage unabated. | ||
| There has actually been an interview with Vladimir Putin. | ||
| I want to read from some of his responses. | ||
| It's always so confusing because the media is just so hopelessly dishonest continually. | ||
| It is actually impossible to get a grip on what exactly is going on in Ukraine right now. | ||
| Perhaps by design, perhaps just as a result of Basic misinformation, but just yesterday I saw competing headlines. | ||
| Some saying Ukraine is losing battalion upon battalion in their advance into Russia. | ||
| And you've got the Daily Mail article. | ||
| Putin's troops are cut down and continue World War I-style fighting for the town of Bakhmut. | ||
| So, you read one headline, it's Ukraine struggling, you read another headline, and Russia's on the back foot. | ||
| What the truth is, I think, is almost anybody's guess. | ||
| We'll talk a little bit about what Vladimir Putin has said in his recent interview, because unlike President Biden, he actually gives substantial statements in response to questions that are given to him. | ||
| We'll go to some of those. | ||
| But first, let's take a look at what the real purpose of the Ukraine war is in the first place. | ||
| As we know, this war is not particularly a new development. | ||
| It's just the latest escalation in a conflict that's been going on for decades. | ||
| Where you even want to start the timeline is a matter of subjective, you know, priority. | ||
| But you could at least, at the very least, start it in 2014 with the full-scale assault of the Donbass region and the separatists there who desire to be a part of Russia but were forcibly kept in Ukraine by a campaign of bombing against them. | ||
| But leave it to Flamboyant idiot Lindsey Graham to just come out and tell everybody what the real purpose of all this is. | ||
| Just constantly hear about we need to protect Ukraine. | ||
| We need to stand with Ukraine. We have to make sure Ukraine is in charge of its own destiny. | ||
| That's not what it's about. You can just ignore all of that. | ||
| We are all perfectly aware on this side of the spectrum. | ||
| You can take the claims of defending Ukraine against this unwarranted aggression with the same seriousness that you can take claims of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq during the Bush years. | ||
| It's just what they need to say to get the American people to let them do what they were going to do anyway. | ||
| It has nothing to do with protecting Ukraine. | ||
| It's a very long, slow proxy war for the ultimate goal of regime change in Russia. | ||
| That's what it's about. That's what America is engaged in. | ||
| That's what we're always engaged in. | ||
| Whether it's Saddam Hussein or Muammar Gaddafi or Bashir al-Assad or Vladimir Putin, this is the new world order. | ||
| This is the new global government system. | ||
| When the whole world is under one monopolistic control pyramid, then there would simply be just endless war against any leader that refuses to capitulate. | ||
| So let's go now to clip number seven. | ||
| Here's Lindsey Graham just coming out and saying what the real purpose of our involvement in the war in Ukraine really is. | ||
| What their goal is, what the ultimate conflict that they're willing to push to the ends of the earth. | ||
| Nuclear exchange, it's a small price to pay for their ridiculous goals. | ||
| Here's Lindsey Graham just saying it. | ||
| Somebody's going to win and somebody's going to lose. | ||
| How does this war end when Russia breaks and they take Putin out? | ||
| Anything short of that, the war is going to continue. | ||
| To ask the Ukrainians to give Russia part of their country after all this death and destruction is not going to happen. | ||
| To signal a ceasefire, Russia will take the opportunity to rearm and come at them again. | ||
| So we're in it to win it, and the only way you're going to win it is to break the Russian military and have somebody in Russia take Putin out to give the Russian people a new lease on life. | ||
| So that's the point. | ||
| That's the purpose. That's why we're in Ukraine. | ||
| That's why we started the conflict with Ukraine by imposing a puppet, placing a puppet on the In the Ukrainian Oval Office, whatever their equivalent is. | ||
| That's why Victoria Nuland and with cooperation, State Department and George Soros brought about the fabricated, manufactured Maidan revolution in 2014. | ||
| That's why they performed a coup against the actually elected pro-Russia government in Ukraine and placed our own puppet on the seat of power. | ||
| That's what it's all been about. | ||
| You really can't blame Putin for doing what he's doing. | ||
| I mean, when you have people like Lindsey Graham, powerful politicians in the United States, saying very openly, right there in no uncertain terms, that the war will not end until Putin is essentially killed, is what he said. | ||
| That's what they mean. | ||
| They're not going to offer peace. | ||
| Ukraine is a puppet of America. | ||
| Ukraine is on the American leash. | ||
| They rely entirely on American largesse, the money stolen from Americans and laundered to them. | ||
| That's where they get their power. | ||
| That's how they remain in charge. | ||
| If they don't do what the Americans say, the Americans will find somebody else who will. | ||
| That's how it works. They are a satrapy. | ||
| They are a vassal state of us. | ||
| So they're working on our behalf. | ||
| They will never go to the negotiating table. | ||
| They will never agree to any peace settlement whatsoever. | ||
| It has nothing to do with territorial integrity. | ||
| It has to do with exactly what Lindsey Graham just said. | ||
| The American military, the American political class, the American media will continue to prosecute this ridiculous, destructive war until... | ||
| It cripples Russia and we can throw out Vladimir Putin and put somebody of our choice in place. | ||
| I don't have to speculate. | ||
| Lindsey Graham himself just said it. | ||
| And he, of course, just another voice, just another mouthpiece for the deep state that actually runs things. | ||
| They're telling you what their plan is. | ||
| I want you to... Alright, welcome back, folks. | ||
| We'll go out to your phone calls here shortly. | ||
| I want to talk a little bit about the... | ||
| Ukraine war right now. | ||
| Let's start with clip number three here. | ||
| This is Claire Daly, a member of European Parliament. | ||
| One minute and 15 seconds telling the truth about the Ukraine war. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Ukraine are not free, they're loans, which Ukraine will default on, and they come with neoliberal strings attached. | |
| If you listen to The Economist, Ukraine is marked for a nightmare round of shock therapy, a sell-off of public land, deregulation of labour, sale of public assets, On it goes. | ||
| The country's future is being sold to finance a proxy war that's tearing it apart. | ||
| And of course the loans have preconditions that Ukraine must uphold democracy and rule of law. | ||
| But since the tap was turned on, Zelensky has banned most opposition parties, shuttered the media, attacked trade unions and workers' rights. | ||
| But the billions keep flowing. | ||
| This is a country our Court of Auditors have said was a country accused of grand corruption. | ||
| And on it goes while the EU policy seems designed to prevent peace and keep the war going at all costs as long as ordinary people pay. | ||
| So between Russian tanks and European banks, there'll be little left of Ukraine when this is over. | ||
| Don't forget, war is a racket and there's going to be hell to pay for this one. | ||
| Pretty incredible stuff. | ||
| Again, from MEP. Claire Daly. | ||
| You know, there's lots of reasons why the Ukraine war is very convenient for people. | ||
| Again, as we look back at this last year, already in January, the Biden administration was blaming COVID for the supply chain collapse. | ||
| And come February, that changed the route, and it was Putin's price hike. | ||
| It was Putin's inflation. | ||
| It was all those sanctions that Putin made us put on him. | ||
| So it was a convenient red herring. | ||
| A convenient excuse or something to blame for the ineptitude or purposeful manufactured collapse of the people in power. | ||
| So a lot of times we want to look for just one cause or one outcome or one reason why things are happening around the world. | ||
| There's lots of reasons why the Ukraine war is very convenient for the people in power. | ||
| In fact, I had a video about this yesterday. | ||
| If we can pull it in, it's the phone call, the Biden call about Ukraine from way back before Trump was even impeached over the Ukraine issue. | ||
| Of course, the impeachment itself was a defensive maneuver to prevent Trump from looking too deeply into what was going on in Ukraine, seeing as the establishment, the government here in America... | ||
| Everywhere from John Kerry to Nancy Pelosi to Joe Biden all have children with lucrative contracts with Ukrainian companies. | ||
| All very convenient. They were desperate to not have President Trump look into that. | ||
| If we can find that video, guys, let me know if you... | ||
| There's something about a Biden call. | ||
| I can find it here in just a second. | ||
| But I do want to read this speech from Vladimir Putin or this questioning from Vladimir Putin. | ||
| And there's a lot of it. I almost feel like I have to read, you know, huge chunks of it to get the full context. | ||
| And again, just to remind ourselves what it's like when you have a country actually run by the person at the top spot rather than the top spot being occupied by a zombified puppet of the neoliberal communists that actually run things behind the scenes. | ||
| Of course, I don't even know the last time Joe Biden actually took questions from the press. | ||
| I don't remember it. Had to have been earlier than this year. | ||
| Doesn't do this type of stuff anymore. | ||
| But Vladimir Putin does and he gives pretty thorough and well-reasoned responses to the questions that were asked him. | ||
| One person... Vladimir Putin responds, Young people are constantly being accused of being superficial, unworthy of something, that everything was better before. | ||
| It says, on the contrary, I believe the young people are always better. | ||
| Remember the hardest trials at all times in our history. | ||
| Everyone said, no, that was then. | ||
| Now they could not do it. | ||
| But what can they not do? Young people can do everything. | ||
| You know, I take this with a grain of salt, right? | ||
| How often have you heard people like Joe Biden celebrating youth, being like, we need to have the voting age down to 16 because it's the youth that will lead us into the future. | ||
| A little bit different, though, right? | ||
| What Vladimir Putin is saying is that, you know, it's not a foregone conclusion that kids are going to be just like rebellious and destructive to the Society that they're born into. | ||
| They can actually be huge benefits to the societies that they're born into when they're raised to love their family, to love their country, and to do what's right. | ||
| So, again, you wonder why they want to perform regime change, why they're willing to spend $100 billion and risk nuclear annihilation just to get this guy out of office. | ||
| And, you know, the first response, he cites... | ||
| Children and the importance of fathers in homes. | ||
| And I think you may have a good idea of the vast difference in ideology between Vladimir Putin and everybody that runs our country. | ||
| Another person asked him, Mr. | ||
| President, I would like to ask you about the agreement on supplying Patriot missile battery to Ukraine reached during Mr. | ||
| Zelensky's visit to the United States. | ||
| Is it possible to speak about full U.S. involvement in the conflict in Ukraine? | ||
| What about the consequences of this decision? | ||
| For instance, can Russia bring its system closer to the borders of NATO countries or deploy them in direct proximity to the U.S.? Again, bringsmanship. | ||
| War, bringsmanship. | ||
| And this is... | ||
| What it comes to, right? | ||
| Again, Russia didn't start this, to be honest with you. | ||
| Russia didn't start putting missile batteries on the border of America as something that we are responding to. | ||
| See, we do something like send Patriot missiles into Ukraine that have the capability of attacking deep inside Russia. | ||
| What do you expect Russia to do? | ||
| Expect them to not respond? | ||
| Of course they're going to respond. People in power right now are making these changes to the war. | ||
| They're making these escalations to the battle. | ||
| Putting all of us at risk. | ||
| Forcing the Russians' hands because their goal, as laid out by Lindsey Graham, has nothing to do with peace. | ||
| They are dedicated to prosecuting this war until they can destroy the Russian government and personally oust Putin from power. | ||
| Really what they would love would be if he dragged through the street and sodomized by a bayonet like Muammar Gaddafi. | ||
| And Hillary Clinton could cacklingly laugh, saying, we came, we saw, he died. | ||
| Anybody that opposes them will meet that fate one way or another. | ||
| It's just your life, your treasure, your country that they are using as the vessel to bring this about for their own purpose. | ||
| Greedy reasons. But in response to this, Vladimir Putin says, you've asked whether it's possible to speak about greater U.S. involvement in the conflict in Ukraine. | ||
| I think we need to look at the problem more broadly. | ||
| What do I mean specifically and why? | ||
| Because the United States has been doing this for a long time, it's long been involved in the process of taking place in Soviet and post-Soviet space. | ||
| We'll save this for the other side because, folks, it's been... | ||
| Over half the show, and I've yet to even suggest, let alone appropriately beg you to go to Infowarsstore.com, which is just silly of me. | ||
| Because without your support, we would not be on air. | ||
| So please do go to Infowarsstore.com to support us. | ||
| We make it so easy for you to do it. | ||
| Our products are incredible. | ||
| We don't tell people to plug in when they call in, but people can't help themselves. | ||
| Everybody who uses these products, it's a compulsion to spread the word about these products because people buy the supplements, they try them out, whether it's just to support us because they... | ||
| Think there's something in the product that, you know, could help them. | ||
| They try the product, they realize what a vast difference it makes in their own life, and they want other people to experience that as well. | ||
| You too can experience the difference that InfoWars products can make in your life by going to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| You're getting 50% off the Real Red Pill Plus. | ||
| It's been sold out for two years for good reason. | ||
| It's a great product, and it will sell out again. | ||
| So go now to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Get Real Red Pill Plus for 50% off. | ||
| One New Year's resolution for us here at American Journal is to make more skits. | ||
| I want to make more skits. | ||
| Here's a skit idea. Write this down in the big book. | ||
| I just want to do a skit. | ||
| Let's find a little kid actor. | ||
| Just a little kid asking why. | ||
| I feel like you can get to the bottom of basically any conspiracy just by asking why enough. | ||
| Right? What are you doing, Dad? | ||
| I'm hanging this Ukraine flag. | ||
| Why? Well, because I support Ukraine. | ||
| Why? Well, because Russia's invading them. | ||
| Why? Oh, wow. | ||
| Oh, geez. Okay, well, because there are people in Ukraine that want to be a part of Russia. | ||
| Why? Well, because the Ukraine government has been abusing them and passing laws to prevent them from... | ||
| Exercising or celebrating their cultural heritage. | ||
| Why? Well, because the people that run Ukraine aren't Ukrainian nationals they've actually put into place by America. | ||
| Why? Well, you just ask why enough and you tend to get to the bottom of things pretty quick. | ||
| It's pretty amazing the similarities between Ukraine and the Vietnam War. | ||
| I was just doing a bunch of research in the Vietnam War. | ||
| And there's stuff that I knew I knew it at one point, but you just forget how blatant the American provocation of Vietnam was. | ||
| For example, did you know that Ho Chi Minh, the communist leader, started the Vietnam War? | ||
| The Ho Chi Minh Trail, right? | ||
| Their leader that we were at war against and lost tens of thousands of American young men fighting was brought to prominence by the OSS, the precursor to the CIA. Do you know that we were the ones that went in and picked Ho Chi Minh to lead the country? | ||
| And actually when Ho Chi Minh declared independence of Vietnam, By quoting Thomas Jefferson, he was standing on a stage next to an OSS officer who was there as his handler. | ||
| Just every time you look at a war, you trace back the cause to early enough, and it's the deep state, it's the spy organizations meddling in some foreign conflict, picking somebody to lead a country, and then inevitably having to go to war with that very person decades later and cost tens of thousands of lives, all as a consequence of our pointless meddling in the first place. | ||
| Just yet another world conflict. | ||
| As a consequence of America placing its chosen leadership at the head of a foreign nation. | ||
| Pretty typical. Let's get back to some of these responses from Vladimir Putin, then we'll go out to your phone calls. | ||
| Again, Vladimir Putin has asked about America sending Patriot missiles to Ukraine in this escalation, what the response will be, whether this will... | ||
| Force Russia's hand or whether Russia will respond by, you know, equal and opposite action. | ||
| Vladimir Putin says, you asked if it's possible to speak about greater U.S. involvement in the conflict in Ukraine. | ||
| I think we need to look at the problem more broadly. | ||
| What do I mean specifically and why? | ||
| Because the United States has been doing this for a long time, it has long been involved in the process taking place in Soviet and post-Soviet space. | ||
| Back in Soviet times, whole institutions worked in Ukraine and they fully realized the background of the issue. | ||
| They have experienced deep specialists who know this professionally. | ||
| I will repeat, the ground was laid during Soviet times. | ||
| People were selected, meetings were defined, and so on. | ||
| I don't want to get into details at this point. | ||
| It's not the right format to go into a deep history of the issue. | ||
| That said, it's all very clear where this came from. | ||
| The unity of the Russian world is a very subtle issue. | ||
| Divide and rule. That slogan was used in ancient times and is still being actively used in real politics. | ||
| This is why our potential adversary, our opponents, have always been dreaming about this and have always been engaged in this. | ||
| They've been trying to divide us and then run the separate parts. | ||
| What is new here? | ||
| The idea of Ukrainian separatism was born by itself a long time ago, when we were still one country. | ||
| You know, I've always said that if someone decides that a separate ethnic group has formed and wants to live independently, for God's sake, it's impossible to ever go against the will of the people. | ||
| But if this is so, this principle must be universal, and it is impossible to ever go against the will of the people that feel like they're in a different reality, that consider themselves a part of the Russian people in the Russian world, that believe they are part of this culture, part of this language, part of this history and these traditions. | ||
| Nobody can fight them either. | ||
| But a war was unleashed on them in 2014. | ||
| I mean a war. This is what it was about. | ||
| What was it when the centers of million strong cities were struck from the air? | ||
| What was it when troops with armor were deployed against them? | ||
| It was a war. Combat operations. | ||
| We endured all of this, endured and endured, in the hope of some peace and grievance. | ||
| Now it turns out that we are simply fooled. | ||
| So a country like the United States has been involved in this for a long time. | ||
| A very long time. | ||
| We believe that, okay, the USSR ceased to exist. | ||
| But as I said at yesterday's Defense Ministry Board meeting, we thought our common historical roots, our cultural and spiritual background, would be stronger than what pulls us apart, as such forces have always existed. | ||
| We assumed that what unites us was stronger, but no, it was not so, due to the assistance of outside forces and the fact that the people with extreme nationalist views came into power basically after the collapse of the Union. | ||
| And this division was growing worse all the time with the help of these forces, and despite all our efforts. | ||
| As I once said, At first, we were pulled apart, separated, and then set against each other. | ||
| In this sense, they have achieved results, of course. | ||
| And in this sense, it has been something of a fiasco for us. | ||
| We were left with nothing else. | ||
| Maybe we were deliberately brought to this brink, but we had nowhere to retreat. | ||
| That is the problem. They were always fully involved. | ||
| They did their best. I do not remember now, but you can read up on it in history books. | ||
| One of the deputies of Tsarist State Duma said, if you want to lose Ukraine, add Galatia to it. | ||
| And this is what happened in the end. | ||
| He turned out to be a visionary. Why? | ||
| Because people from that part behaved very aggressively and actually suppressed the silent majority in the rest of the territory. | ||
| But again, we believe that the underlying foundations of our unity would be stronger than the trends that are tearing us apart. | ||
| But it turned out this was not the case. | ||
| They began to suppress Russian culture and Russian language, tried to break our spiritual unity in totally barbaric ways, and they pretended that no one noticed. | ||
| Why? Because, as I said, their strategy was to divide and rule. | ||
| And he talks again about the unification of the Russian people being the ultimate goal. | ||
| And I think he makes a fair point there. | ||
| He says, you know, if somebody's an ethnic group that wants to rule over themselves, it's really not smart to try to go against that or try to rule over those people. | ||
| You should let them have their freedom. | ||
| You should let them make their own government that fits their people. | ||
| But you also have to have that universally. | ||
| Also, if it's Russians, you say we're a part of the Russian people and we want to be a part of the Russian state, then you should respect that as well. | ||
| Instead of respecting that, the Ukrainians went to war with Russia. | ||
| The Russian separatists. As for the Patriot, he says, it's a pretty old system. | ||
| I would say it doesn't work like our S-300. | ||
| Nevertheless, those who oppose us assume that these systems are defensive weapons. | ||
| Alright? We will just keep that in mind, and there's always an antidote. | ||
| So those that are doing this are doing it in vain. | ||
| It just prolongs the conflict, and that's that. | ||
| We'll return to that in just a little bit, but let's go to the phone calls now because we're going to talk a little bit more about the source and beginning of the Ukraine war and the reasons that we continue to escalate that situation and the way that Russia is likely to respond. | ||
| But for now, let's go to Tim in California who wants to talk about crimes against children. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. Tim, you're on the air. | ||
| Well, you know, I'm very sorry to hear about the passing of Chris and Of course, the timing's awful, and we support the Infowars, you know, but for those who can, let's all try to make it to that GoFundMe page and do what we can, okay? Yeah, go to GoFundMe.com and search Christopher Andrews Memorial. | ||
| Christopher Andrews Memorial. | ||
| Can't say Chris, because that'll bring up a different page. | ||
| I'm sorry. And I know a lot of you did donate, so thank you so much for that. | ||
| I know we all really, really appreciate that. | ||
| And as far as you've been asking for the story of the year, I've been trying to call in, but just, you know, but you've hit on it today very well, and that's really what it is, is that the crimes against the children are out in the open now. | ||
| We're coming for your children! | ||
| You know, it's just... And the CRT and the 57, now 90-something styles of sexuality and openly in the schools. | ||
| And if you dare to show up as a parent, well, who are you? | ||
| You're just the parent. What say should you have in any of this? | ||
| And we're going to have the highest man in the country, the Attorney General, declare that the FBI has to go after these parents and so forth. | ||
| And then you've got, if you want to go on the Disney Cruise, the happiest place on earth, and you're only five years old, well, you have to go to the doctor and take this shot. | ||
| You're going to have to take this shot to go on the cruise, sweetheart. | ||
| And, oh, the New England Journal of Medicine on November 9th said, hey, they believe we should keep on masking, not because of the COVID, but because, well, it's going to take care of the inequities in education and so forth. | ||
| And it's just, you know... | ||
| No, this year was the year they took the mask off, wasn't it? | ||
| And no pun intended there. | ||
| But, I mean, they... | ||
| Even up until 2021, when you had... | ||
| I think that was when you had the gay choir singing, you know, we're coming for your children and that sort of stuff. | ||
| Like, even that wasn't as outrageous as what happened this year, where they just went full bore, look, we're coming after your children, we're sexualizing them, and if you stand up against us, we will destroy you. | ||
| I mean, they really... They really just went all in this year, didn't they, Tim? | ||
| Well, and it's just all the confusion. | ||
| So many things. And it's not just school. | ||
| You think about how we've allowed this border to be just porous. | ||
| You've got 107,000 people died in one year. | ||
| Yeah. Yeah, from fentanyl. | ||
| For drugs. Yeah, fentanyl, I think, may be one of the other big underreported stories. | ||
| 100,000 deaths. | ||
| I mean, can you imagine? All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| We're going to go straight to your phone calls. | ||
| We've got Joe in nearby Temple, Texas. | ||
| He wants to talk about chemtrails. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. Joe, you're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, Harrison. How are you doing? | |
| Good, thank you. Hey, just wanted to tell you about my wife and I were looking at the sun yesterday, and it was a white light instead of a yellow light. | ||
| So I'm a research chemist, so we came back home and I looked up some stuff, but basically... | ||
| What they're adding is the same thing that they add to the gas to the house, that sulfur smell when you have a gas leak. | ||
| It's dimethyl sulfide. | ||
| Well, when they add that, which is in fuel, you know, which is in oil and diesel and stuff, but they add a lot to it. | ||
| And what happens when they put it in jet fuel, it heats up into a blue, pale blue color. | ||
| Well, when it heats up, it's highly absorbable to the UV wavelengths from the sun. | ||
| Well, those are the things that kill the germs in the air. | ||
| And if we don't have these things in the air, you know, viruses and bacteria are going to proliferate in the atmosphere. | ||
| And what I was thinking is, and when this stuff happens, it gets absorbed, there's a fluorescent emission from the sun, and it turns white. | ||
| You know, the 400 nanometers to 700 nanometers. | ||
| So basically, we have a film between us and the sun, and it's sulfur dioxide. | ||
| Why are they doing that? | ||
| Are they planning to put some viruses in the air for the next pandemic? | ||
| So, essentially, it filters out the UV aspect of the ray. | ||
| Yeah, you're sort of going beyond my scientific purview here. | ||
| So, explain it like I'm five, Joe. | ||
| No, I think I get what you're saying. | ||
| But you think, is this just a consequence of jet fuel in general? | ||
| Or do you think this is being, you know, purposefully, you know, planted out there, being sprayed out for this... | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, by design. Well, I think it's by design because when my wife and I, we took a picture of the emissions from the jet fuel, and it was blue. | |
| Jet fuel's not blue. | ||
| It, you know, blows white. | ||
| And if it's blue, I mean, they're putting sulfur dioxide in there because the sun, if you look at the sun about 5 o'clock after you get off of work or at 6 o'clock, the sun's white. | ||
| It's very bright, and it hurts your eyes. | ||
| That When the sulfur dioxide absorbs these UV lights, it fluoresces into a white light between 400 nanometers and 700. | ||
| When you mix those wavelengths, it produces a white light. | ||
| Well, that's what the color of the sun is at night. | ||
| It's not yellow. And that's very dangerous because if the sun's not able to clear the pathogens in the air, that sets us up for some bad things. | ||
| Do you think that it would be enough of an effect to actually stop the germ-killing aspect of UV rays? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the sun's not yellow. | |
| The sun's white. It appears white. | ||
| So, yeah, that's what I think. | ||
| All those UV rays are being absorbed by that sulfur dioxide. | ||
| Interesting. Yeah, I was so mad yesterday because I thought, wait a minute. | ||
| Is that what I think it is? | ||
| So I did look some things up, and yeah, that's what's happening. | ||
| It's really aggravating because last night I was beside myself. | ||
| We were laying in bed about to go to sleep, and I just couldn't. | ||
| So I did some more research, and I just couldn't sleep. | ||
| I couldn't. You know, I was very aggravated because if they're able to do this, Harrison, what about the UVB light? | ||
| They can absorb the UVB light, you know, the 280 nanometers. | ||
| That helps plants produce oil and photosynthesis. | ||
| I mean, you know, what if they put another molecule in there to absorb UVA light? | ||
| You know, our plants would be done. | ||
| And if we have no germ-fighting power in the sun and we have no UVA or UVB, what's the planet going to look like? | ||
| It's going to look like mercury. | ||
| It's going to die off. | ||
| Well, that's extremely troubling. | ||
| Did you hear the story that we covered yesterday about the guy sending up the sulfur weather balloons? | ||
| I wonder if that's the same chemical that you're talking about, because they did say it was sulfur. | ||
| I don't know if it was sulfur dioxide, but that would fit in line with what you're saying. | ||
| Well, I hadn't heard of that. Thank you so much for the call, Joe. | ||
| I really appreciate it. | ||
| We'll have to look into that a little bit later. | ||
| We'll be back with more of your phone calls on the other side. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| We still have a lot to talk about today. | ||
| I want to keep going on the topic of Ukraine. | ||
| As again, I think we can learn a lot from Putin's interview that he did just a few days ago. | ||
| It's pretty amazing to hear the difference between Russian leadership and American so-called leadership. | ||
| They just have to be laughing at us, right? | ||
| I mean, I'm embarrassed. | ||
| I'm shamed. Who we've become. | ||
| You look at Vladimir Putin just being like, gee, where do I start the history on this? | ||
| So in 2014, and it's like Kamala Harris, like, big country, small country. | ||
| Okay? Big country attacked small country. | ||
| That's bad. Okay? | ||
| Okay. Guess let's all die in a nuclear holocaust because big country, bad. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. Yeah. | |
| Pretty depressing. | ||
| Sort of all comes full circle, doesn't it? | ||
| Destroy the education system. | ||
| You have a population incapable of even comprehending the complicated nuances of geopolitics. | ||
| So they're easily inspired to war. | ||
| Wild stuff. | ||
| Let's go to John in Argentina. | ||
| Argentina? Whoa. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, John. You're on the air. | ||
| What do you think was the most underreported story this year? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not only this year, but the last three years. | |
| As far as I know, no one has covered this. | ||
| Not InfoWars, not Tucker, nobody. | ||
| As we know, Bill Gates has our interest at heart. | ||
| And about three years ago, they started installing this software Doing it state by state. | ||
| I don't know how many states have it, but a lot of them do. | ||
| It's called Microsoft Election Guard. | ||
| And this was put on to keep the Russians from hacking our election. | ||
| Of course. Yeah. | ||
| Such a real threat. Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So if that gives you an idea, it's really underreported, if at all. | |
| But I'm pretty sure that's what happened in 20 is what happened this year. | ||
| Uh... Sidney Powell was on the right track. | ||
| You know, when you've got 90,000 votes being moved in a matter of seconds, that's not ballot stuffing. | ||
| That's not, you know, the normal machinations of the Democrats. | ||
| That's something going on with software. | ||
| I don't really understand the software that well, but that's where it's happening, and it has the ability to cover its tracks. | ||
| Yep. And once again, as everything gets more complicated, it becomes easier to manipulate, easier to conceal your activity. | ||
| I don't know what the psychological mechanism is that makes humans just continually complicate things, but that's not always the right answer. | ||
| Simplicity is often far more effective than... | ||
| So I don't know why we don't go back to... | ||
| I think the best way to do it would just be the die on the finger. | ||
| You just put die on your finger. | ||
| It stays there for like a full day. | ||
| You vote on election day and just on election day. | ||
| You hand count it. | ||
| I mean, it's really not that complicated. | ||
| It's like... This is really the downfall of an empire is... | ||
| When you can't do just the most simplistic things because they're continually overcomplicated by factionalism. | ||
| Tales old as time. Thank you so much for the call, John. | ||
| Election Guard, one of the most underreported stories. | ||
| Of course, Microsoft was the ones that came out with News Guard. | ||
| So it's just like, you know, start some sort of manipulation and or censorship campaign. | ||
| Call it Something Guard and Bill Gates will fund it with a billion dollars. | ||
| It's, again, it's like... | ||
| I don't know what we do here. | ||
| I talked about it a little bit on War Room yesterday, but, like, clearly these big tech companies are not being held to account, right? | ||
| They're not doing things in a way that actually comport to our societal values. | ||
| But they're doing that in cooperation with and often at the behest of our government. | ||
| So it's like, on one hand... | ||
| I'm like, you know, these corporations need to have some sort of oversight over them. | ||
| We as citizens should have a right to vote for people to then exercise authority over these big tech companies so we can be sure that they're not just completely flagrantly disregarding our basic rights. | ||
| But then the libertarian in me is like, you think given the government power over the big tech is going to make it better? | ||
| The government's behind a lot of the corruption. | ||
| So it really feels so hopeless in so many ways. | ||
| I think simplicity is the only answer. | ||
| We're going to go to Travis in Maine in just a little bit. | ||
| So stay on the line, Travis, because I know you want to talk about Putin. | ||
| We're going to get to some other calls first because I do want to talk about Putin more. | ||
| So we'll take your call and talk about that in the next segment. | ||
| But first, let's go to Shanda in Tennessee or Shanda in Tennessee. | ||
| You want to talk about culture jamming Antifa. | ||
| Go ahead, Shanda. Good morning, Harrison. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good morning. So here's my plan. | |
| We already know that they don't pay attention to anything that their side does. | ||
| Antifa doesn't exist. | ||
| Antifa's a good guy. | ||
| They're not an organization. | ||
| Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. So the question that I have is why aren't we learning from already experiencing that the only way to get them to pay attention to their problems that quote-unquote don't exist is for when we do it. | ||
| Why aren't we protesting? | ||
| Everything. When they show up to shut down speakers at colleges, we should be there, dressed in full black box, face covered, everything that they do, and protest that. | ||
| So on and so forth until they get the point where you said anybody can be Antifa. | ||
| We're actually the ones trying to fight the fascism in our country that's going on. | ||
| So why aren't we doing that instead of like having to show up completely off? | ||
| Like they don't own that. | ||
| We should be taking advantage of that until they be like, oh, now they exist. | ||
| Oh, now they're cells. | ||
| Oh, and make them, force them to pay attention to it and actually do something about it. | ||
| It's a good idea. It's an interesting idea. | ||
| I don't know if it'll work, though, because these people don't have any qualms about being inconsistent. | ||
| They don't care about applying law equally across the board. | ||
| I mean, if that was the case, they would be going after Antifa already. | ||
| So I think... | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I can see this backfiring a little bit where... | ||
| They go, you know, the right-wing conspiracy theorists that claim Antifa is a real thing are actually dressing up and being Antifa now. | ||
| Like, they would just go after you regardless and just, like, use your sort of false flagging of Antifa as... | ||
| You know, evidence that Antifa really are the good guys and it's just right-wingers that are pretending to be Antifa that are the bad guys. | ||
| I can see it backfiring. | ||
| At the same time, I completely agree that we should be counter-protesting them. | ||
| And I think the real valuable thing that people could do is just join Antifa and disrupt it from the inside. | ||
| I think that's the most valuable thing you can do. | ||
| I think if you are a young person that listens to us, I think you should... | ||
| Have either alternative social media that is not associated with your names. | ||
| People can't find out what you really believe and just, you know, you don't have to say much. | ||
| Just go join Antifa. | ||
| Get in their internal circles. | ||
| Get, you know, the passwords, their little message boards that they have. | ||
| They have all of these systems. | ||
| I mean, Antifa's extremely sophisticated in the sense that they have tons of money from donors who then pay for lawyers to get them out of prison, who pay for, you know, websites where they can... | ||
| There's, like, this whole, like, email, secret email thing they have where you have to get invited to it. | ||
| And so you have to find somebody who's in Antifa to give you... | ||
| You know, the code to get into their email server where they, you know, send out all of their plans. | ||
| So I think the most valuable thing would not necessarily to be to, like, dress up as Antifa and then go protest Antifa. | ||
| I think you should just insinuate yourself into Antifa and then start publishing everything that they talk about and do and expose their plans to, you know, patriotic Americans who can go and, you know, oppose them. | ||
| Or, you know, just document criminality and bring it to a media outlet so we can take it to the public and force law enforcement to actually do something about it. | ||
| I think the most valuable thing in that regard would be to do that, would be to infiltrate Antifa. | ||
| And if young people in our audience, you know, can stomach it. | ||
| That would be extremely strategically valuable. | ||
| We'll be back on the other side. More of your phone calls. | ||
| Talk a little bit more about Vladimir Putin's response to the Patriot missiles being sent to Ukraine. | ||
| Stay tuned. All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| We're going to go out to your phone calls again this segment. | ||
| Still more to say about what's going on in Ukraine, and we're going to take a little trip back in time to see where this all, not necessarily began, but... | ||
| There's actually a holding pattern that took place during the Trump presidency that I'd like to examine. | ||
| But I think we'll go out to some phone calls before that. | ||
| And then I also have maybe my favorite story of the year that we'll cover a little bit later. | ||
| I love this article, and we'll get to it in just a little bit. | ||
| So stay tuned for that. | ||
| Let's go to the phone calls first. | ||
| Larry in Florida called in about the proxy war. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Larry. You're on the air. | ||
| Thank you. Pleasure talking to you, Harrison. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good to hear from you. I had two things. | |
| One, and I tried to make this suggestion a few months back when I called in, and I don't think I presented it as clearly as I should or as I could have, but I think a really good way to get some good cash infusion into Infowars and also to frankly make the millions of folks like me that are longtime listeners I feel like maybe we're just we're doing something and we're part of something would be to have just basically an info warrior membership and it's it's not it's not a any kind of fee to listen or anything like that it's basically say info warrior 2023 timing is good and for that I send you $10. | ||
| I'm picking the number. And for that, I get like a little sticker, maybe like the support, the police decal for the back of my window, or maybe the decal for, you know, support the blue, or the ones like Sig Sauer have, little small ones. | ||
| And it just says, Info Warrior 2023. | ||
| And my gut says that $10, We're basically just being able to be an info warrior and be able to advertise that every time I drive. | ||
| You might get a lot of cash flow come in. | ||
| That's not an idea. It's kind of like the... | ||
| Enough to give you to buy some product. | ||
| It's not a subscription. | ||
| It's not a podcast. | ||
| I get the idea. It's a good idea. | ||
| I mean, I think just the way that we... | ||
| Yeah, there is the recurring sponsorship that you can sign up for. | ||
| But yeah, some sort of little decal. I mean, it reminds me sort of like the 100 Club when you donate to the... | ||
| To the Fund for Fallen Policemen, you get that sticker and maybe let you get out of tickets every once in a while. | ||
| Maybe something like that so you can recognize each other. | ||
| Maybe just like a symbol or something. | ||
| So it doesn't even have to be explicit, but if you're a part of the InfoWars Club, then you can recognize other people. | ||
| I don't know. That's a good idea. | ||
| But let me hear your thoughts on the proxy war, Larry. | ||
| And the proxy war is absolutely crazy. | ||
| I'm going to say this. | ||
| In my opinion, if I were... | ||
| Vladimir Putin, I would be willing to bet you that he's getting pressure daily to go ahead and do a first strike. | ||
| Because we've got idiots like Lindsey Graham and other senators talking about first strikes, sitting there publicly talking about regime change. | ||
| And the people in America have been sold this bill of goods for decades, which is mutually assured destruction. | ||
| Nobody will do this. | ||
| Well, in a scenario where, number one, a country like Russia gets backed into a corner, I sure wouldn't bet on that. | ||
| But more importantly, in terms of civil defense, that's an old term for when I was young, and they used to tell us to hide under the desk during the Cuban Missile Crisis, so I'm an old guy. | ||
| But we spend basically zero on that in terms of any kind of preparation for nuclear strikes and that. | ||
| And Russia... I don't think the jabs will get them there that quick. | ||
| Yeah, nuclear war would accelerate all of their plans exponentially, and that may be what they're agitating for. | ||
| It is interesting, you know, you've got Lindsey Graham saying that our goal in Ukraine, the war will not end until we get regime change in Russia. | ||
| Outrageous. I've never heard Vladimir Putin once suggest regime change in Ukraine. | ||
| Never once, let alone regime change in America. | ||
| Imagine Vladimir Putin going, the war in Ukraine will not stop until there's regime change in America. | ||
| I mean, it's a ridiculous thing that our politicians are doing. | ||
| Thanks so much for the call, Larry. | ||
| I do appreciate it. Let's go ahead and go to Travis in Maine now since we are on the topic of Russia and Putin. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Travis. You... | ||
| You seem to be more suspicious of Putin than myself and some of the other InfoWarriors. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. Yeah, well, I don't know. | |
| He's one of the World Economic Forum young leaders, or he's tied to them in some way, I thought. | ||
| I mean, I know Bush and Clinton were basically the ones that were in power when He took power, so I just don't trust that they're not all... | ||
| They're just all in on it together and making money, you know, dropping bombs and fighting wars. | ||
| You know, it's just same thing. | ||
| Military-industrial complex type deal. | ||
| Sure, and... It would be more useful to the people in power if Russia was still communist and they could still rely on that dichotomy to inspire the American people to have some sort of ideological opposition to Putin. | ||
| That they can play on. I mean, you know, that's the most useful thing to the people in power is having the two sides you can play off one another. | ||
| Like Putin says, you know, divide and conquer. | ||
| I mean, that is the main tactic. | ||
| I think it's more complicated than that, though, because, I mean, think back to Barack Obama's presidency and Hillary Clinton going over to Russia with the red reset button. | ||
| And going, we're going to press the button together. | ||
| And it's her and Lavrov. And Lavrov's like, okay, press the button. | ||
| Thank you. Can we talk about the war now? | ||
| I mean, I don't think that meant that the Clintons and Putin were like best buddies. | ||
| I think, you know, the powers that be are constantly playing this little back and forth game of, oh, I'm your friend. | ||
| Oh, if you're my friend, you're going to do this for me. | ||
| And oh, now you're evil and I'm going to, you know, fight against you. | ||
| But you can still be my friend. | ||
| And like there's always this constant jockeying of alliances and friendships and support and opposition. | ||
| And it is all largely a game. | ||
| But I think if you look back at the recent history, I mean, Vladimir Putin has been sort of a master of playing this game and, you know, setting up America for embarrassing situations like that, like the reset button that Hillary Clinton goes over there. | ||
| And her attempt, I mean, she wasn't about to make any concessions to Russia. | ||
| She wasn't about to actually act like a friend to Russia. | ||
| It was just a little play acting that they were doing so that when, you know, Russia talks about the aggression that America is carrying out against Russia... | ||
| American Go, no, we're friends. | ||
| We gave them that button, remember? | ||
| I mean, it's all... Kabuki theater. | ||
| It's all manipulation. But I don't think that means they're all in on it. | ||
| I don't think it means that Putin is an agent of the people that he's pretending to oppose. | ||
| I think it's just a constantly evolving, swirling, dishonest stew that they're switching sides and portraying one thing in public and another thing in private. | ||
| And I think Vladimir Putin is the type of person to recognize the The advantageous aspect of being a part of a group like the World Economic Forum, while not exactly being willing to submit himself to their rule. | ||
| If he was willing to submit himself to their rule, there wouldn't be a war in Ukraine. | ||
| There wouldn't be. In fact, he'd probably be assassinated, is what would happen if he actually gave in to them and played their little game. | ||
| More of your phone calls, more on the Ukraine war on the other side. | ||
| Don't go anywhere, folks. We'll be right back. | ||
| Alright folks, welcome back. Again, returning to this interview with Vladimir Putin. | ||
| Question is asked of him. | ||
| If I may, I have one more question about the special military operation. | ||
| As usual, you've said very little about the course of the operation, preferring not to speak about the details. | ||
| However, do you see any signs of the conflict becoming drawn out? | ||
| Vladimir Putin responds, you know, I've already spoken about this. | ||
| The situation actually started developing. | ||
| This was less perceptible here, while the West preferred not to speak or notice anything, way back in 2014, after the coup d'etat that was instigated by the United States when cookies were handed out on Maidan. | ||
| I've spoken about this many times. | ||
| But our goal is not to whip up military conflict, but to end this war. | ||
| This is what we want, and this is what we will try to do. | ||
| As for me speaking little or sparingly about it, this is logical, Ma. | ||
| On one hand, I may be sparing words, but the defense ministry holds daily briefings to report the public and the country what's going on, where this is taking place, in what manner, and so on. | ||
| In short, we will do our best to end this, the sooner the better, of course. | ||
| As for what is taking place, I've noted on numerous occasions the intensification of the conflict will lead to unjustified losses. | ||
| Many a little makes a mickle. | ||
| Whatever that means. But again, you can... | ||
| Trust Putin or not, trust Putin. | ||
| You can give whatever weight to his words that you think is appropriate, but at least he's outside, ostensibly, publicly saying that he doesn't want war, that he's trying to end this as quickly as possible, that they have certain aims that they're attempting to achieve that are reasonable, better achievable, many of which have already been achieved, and that a peace deal could be reached and the war could be over. | ||
| Compare that with Lindsey Graham. | ||
| He says the only end to this war is the Russian people taking out Vladimir Putin and putting somebody more amenable in charge, right? | ||
| Again, you can think Putin's full of crap and he's just saying this so he can have plausible deniability and continue to wage this war. | ||
| But I at least prefer a politician or a leader of the army that... | ||
| At least talks about peace that at least in some way seems to be angling for some sort of settlement rather than having your goal be the total destruction of a country that we're not even at war with. | ||
| We're not at war with Russia. | ||
| So crazy. We're not at war with Russia. | ||
| There's been no declaration of war. | ||
| They haven't even pretended that Russia is a state sponsor of terror. | ||
| The designation they've given to Russia is an aggressor state. | ||
| So they're not even saying they're sponsored terror, therefore they fall under this umbrella justification of the NDAA or whatever the hell they call it. | ||
| Or they go, well, we've decided that Syria is actually a terrorist now, so we don't have to debate it. | ||
| We just go to war with them because, you know, Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, or maybe they didn't 20 years ago. | ||
| So now we get to go to war with Syria. | ||
| At least they have that basic justification when you talk about the wars in the Middle East. | ||
| They're not even saying that with Russia. | ||
| They're calling it an aggressor state, which is interesting, considering our number one ally in the Middle East is actively disenfranchising and ousting its neighbors. | ||
| That's okay. It's not about consistency. | ||
| It's about expediency. | ||
| It's about convenience. So at least Russia is... | ||
| Making an argument for peace. | ||
| At least they're setting war aims that aren't suicidal and world-ending. | ||
| But I had this story yesterday. | ||
| It's from the Epoch Times. | ||
| And again, you know, reading mainstream media and it's like, Ukraine is ready to negotiate, but Russia won't meet them in the middle. | ||
| And it's like, here's what's actually happening. | ||
| Ukraine wants UN-backed peace deal with Russia, but on one condition. | ||
| What's that one condition? | ||
| A completely intolerable, ridiculous demand to put their own generals under UN war crime tribunals. | ||
| So, okay. So they don't want peace talks, in other words. | ||
| I mean, that is a demand that nobody would ever subject themselves to. | ||
| It is a ridiculous demand. | ||
| We want peace, but in order for us to have a peace deal, we want you to arrest your own generals and send them to us so we can try them for war crimes. | ||
| So again, they don't want a peace deal. | ||
| If they wanted a peace deal, they wouldn't make ridiculous demands like that. | ||
| You can just write this off immediately. | ||
| It's an outrageous demand. | ||
| We would never submit to this. | ||
| Why would Russia ever submit to this? | ||
| We actually probably deserve to be brought up on war crimes. | ||
| We, the American government. | ||
| Like, just imagine. Just imagine. | ||
| Like Afghanistan or Iraq or somewhere. | ||
| And they're just like, yeah, we'll sue for peace. | ||
| Just, you know, George W. Bush has to submit to a war crime tribunal. | ||
| Do you think we would even entertain that for a single second? | ||
| So they don't want peace. | ||
| The Ukrainians have rejected every offer of a peace deal continuously. | ||
| Russia has continued to offer peace deals, has continued to make concessions on their demands for, uh, A peace deal, and Ukraine has continually refused to negotiate. | ||
| Russian President Vladimir Putin has said on multiple occasions in recent months that Moscow is ready to negotiate to bring an end to this deadly conflict with its neighbors. | ||
| In an interview with state television on Christmas Day, Putin appeared to suggest that Ukraine is the one refusing to hold peace talks, saying, quote, we're ready to negotiate with everyone involved about acceptable solutions, but that's up to them. | ||
| We are not the ones refusing to negotiate. | ||
| They are. However, in a statement on Monday commenting on Cabela's proposal, that's the proposal saying submit to our war crime tribunal and we'll discuss peace, just again, ridiculous. | ||
| Criminal spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said that state RIA Novosti news agency that Russia, quote, never followed conditions set by others, only our own in common sense, obviously. | ||
| Russia said the only resolution to ending the war in Ukraine is for Russian forces to pull out of the country. | ||
| Meanwhile, CIA Director William Byrne said in an interview with PBS published on December 16th that the CIA does not believe Putin is serious about holding negotiations to end the war. | ||
| Oh, well, if the CIA says it, I mean, you can take that to the bank. | ||
| I mean, if the CIA says that Putin doesn't want to negotiate, then I guess we just have to all die in a nuclear hellfire holocaust. | ||
| I guess that's just what we have to do because the CIA is so trustworthy and honest, and they hate war. | ||
| I mean, their whole point is to protect the American people and our rights and privileges as American citizens. | ||
| The last thing they want is to create some sort of war... | ||
| Just ridiculous. And of course, this has been an ongoing process as far back as April of this year, meaning the month after, two months after the war began, Ukraine and Russia were ready for peace talks when, who came along? Oh, the West. | ||
| The West came along and said, you better not go to peace. | ||
| We're not ready to have peace yet. | ||
| We've got an economic crisis that we need to blame on this war. | ||
| We've got our own Our own ends to which this war is but a means. | ||
| Boris Johnson pressured Zelensky to ditch peace talks with Russia, this according to a pro-Western Ukrainian paper. | ||
| The British government has become an obstacle in peace to Ukraine, said Stop the War Coalition. | ||
| The conflict there is developing into a proxy war between Russia and NATO, and it is the Ukrainian people who will suffer the consequences. | ||
| They discussed that... | ||
| Russia and Ukraine were ready to come to an agreement, come to a peace deal in which they would return to the pre-invasion territory in which, you know, Luhansk and Donetsk would be allowed to be seceded to Russia, which was the result of the plebiscite they held, and the war would end. | ||
| And this could have been over two months in. | ||
| Every single death, every single dollar, All of the crimes they're getting away with are all a consequence of this scuttling of the peace talks that continues to this day, as Lindsey Graham himself has said, because our goal has nothing to do with peace, has nothing to do with ending any war. | ||
| It has to do with widening this war, accelerating this war, escalating this war with the sole intent and purpose of forcing Vladimir Putin out and Inducting Russia into our globo-homo-rainbow-flag empire. | ||
| That's what it's all about. | ||
| We're on a righteous war. | ||
| We are on a crusade at the behest of the most ungodly, despicable scumbags the world has ever seen. | ||
| We'll try to get out more of your phone calls this segment, but I got to... | ||
| I gotta let you know about this article. | ||
| Apparently it's not exactly new. | ||
| It's about a month old. It's from November 29th. | ||
| Probably my favorite article I've read this year. | ||
| And I think you'll see why. | ||
| It's a type of article... I was going through highlighting the things in the article I wanted to read. | ||
| I was just highlighting the whole damn thing. | ||
| So I'm just gonna read for you this article. | ||
| I'm coming around, folks. I'm starting to come around on trusting the science. | ||
| I actually think the science is to be trusted in this regard. | ||
| I am trusting the science like a good leftist. | ||
| Let's just get into it, shall we? | ||
| Left-wing ideology is a biological phenomenon. | ||
| That's the story. Biopolitics.substack.com is where this is from. | ||
| The leftist personality. Left-wing ideology as a biological phenomenon. | ||
| It really is amazing when you look at this set of pictures, this collage of pictures. | ||
| The dead eyes, the double chin, the weird haircuts, the face tattoos, the hair dye, the eyes set a little too close together, the beady look, the mix of anger and confusion on their faces. | ||
| There's something metaphysical going on here. | ||
| They begin this article by defining what leftism is. | ||
| They say leftism is characterized by ideas like equality, fraternity, progress, societal reform, and globalism. | ||
| This manifests practically as support for feminism, homosexuality, wealth distribution, immigration, and racial egalitarianism combined with opposition to the family, nationalism, and traditional culture. | ||
| They say the rejection or embrace of hierarchy, a.k.a. inequality, inequality, is the fundamental difference between left and right wing worldviews. | ||
| Right wingers believe that hierarchy is inherent to reality and part of the natural order, while leftists claim to believe that all men are fundamentally equal. | ||
| I sort of have some things to say about this. | ||
| You know, I think it's true there is this aspect of the hierarchy, but that's often portrayed as only a top-down sort of belief, that, like, people believe in the hierarchy because they're at the top of the hierarchy. | ||
| That's not the case. | ||
| To me, it's really about, like, thankfulness and humility. | ||
| I think that almost all of leftist politics is predicated on envy, jealousy. | ||
| Specifically, envy though. Wanting what somebody else has. | ||
| Jealousy is when you want to keep what you have. | ||
| Envy is when you want what somebody else has. | ||
| And that's like a key aspect. | ||
| And I remember learning this lesson as a little kid. | ||
| It's a religious paradigm. | ||
| It's a spiritual confidence that you have to have. | ||
| I remember my uncle, I probably have told this story before, but my uncle... | ||
| Would, like, go out of his way because he grew up in the Depression and he thought he didn't like the way that boys were being raised in the 90s. | ||
| Thought they were not being taught to be tough. | ||
| Thought that they should... Basically, boys should learn their place. | ||
| Men should learn their place, which is not the exalted, honored position of women. | ||
| It is as dirt. | ||
| And honestly, like, I sort of don't like telling the story because it almost seems like... | ||
| I don't know, it was like something like traumatizing. | ||
| It wasn't traumatizing or anything, but like literally you would go out of his way to like give my sister's gold necklaces and then would just give me like a rusty length of chain. | ||
| Be like, yeah, I got you something too. | ||
| I also got you a chain and it would just be like a rusty. | ||
| And the whole thing was like, just because your sister's got something doesn't mean you've been robbed of anything. | ||
| You have not been hurt in this exchange. | ||
| It's up to you to have the spiritual fortitude to be happy for somebody else's Gift to be happy that they're happy, to be happy that they've gotten something, and not to feel robbed that you haven't gotten something. | ||
| And honestly, I didn't necessarily like it when I was a kid, although I did have lots of cool lengths of chain. | ||
| I did like the chain that I was given, the heavy iron chain. | ||
| Yeah, it looked like that. | ||
| But honestly, you know, it was like a lesson that my uncle was trying to teach me to go, look, somebody else's reward is not your punishment. | ||
| Just because somebody else has something doesn't mean you have been deprived of anything. | ||
| You haven't. So just be happy for them. | ||
| It's like nobody has this... | ||
| It's painful. I know even in my personal life, people I used to be friends with, you would tell them something good that happened to you and they would be mad. | ||
| They wouldn't be happy for you. | ||
| They would be mad that they didn't get it. | ||
| You go, hey man, I just got a great promotion in my job. | ||
| I'm going to be doing so much better. | ||
| And they're like... Oh, okay. | ||
| Cool. Good job. | ||
| You know, it's like, you're not happy for me? | ||
| And they're not. They're not happy for people that have good things happen to them because they feel like it's somehow stealing from them. | ||
| They deserve that. I really think that's like at the basis of all of this. | ||
| So it's not even that hierarchy that we like hierarchy because we're in charge and you are under us and that's hierarchy. | ||
| Stay in your place. But literally just understanding like, look, I'm where I am. | ||
| I have my authority. | ||
| But I also am not There's somebody else above me, and I've got to respect that too. | ||
| So it's not about just being envious of the people above you and wanting to exert power over those below you. | ||
| It's about knowing that hierarchy is not about a belief. | ||
| It's about a certainty. | ||
| It's about a knowledge. It's about the reality of the situation. | ||
| There's all these memes and stuff of... | ||
| You know, it's like a hawk killing a pigeon, and it's just like, hierarchy is natural. | ||
| You know, it's just like, it's just how it is. | ||
| Some things kill other things. | ||
| Some things are higher on the food chain than other things are. | ||
| Saying that is not passing judgment on that. | ||
| It's just recognizing reality for what it is. | ||
| And human beings have that same reality as well. | ||
| There's nothing about that that is unfair or, I mean, it's unequal, I guess, but life is unfair. | ||
| I mean, it's just what it is. | ||
| Anyway, just a small tangent here. | ||
| Returning to the science. Leftism and physical biology. | ||
| Here it is. Countless studies have shown that physical characteristics closely align with political orientation. | ||
| In fact, AI, facial recognition, can accurately predict a person's political alignment 72% of the time. | ||
| Outperforming chance, which would be 50%, or human estimation, which is just a little above a 50-50 chance. | ||
| Taller and more attractive people are more likely to identify as right wing and more likely to actively support right wing parties, policies and politicians. | ||
| In America, Australia and Europe, right wing politicians are more likely to be physically attractive than their left wing counterparts. | ||
| You better believe it. That's why our audience is so handsome. | ||
| Men who are physically stronger are more likely to oppose wealth distribution and other forms of sociopolitical egalitarianism, even if they are poor themselves. | ||
| And opposition to egalitarianism grows as men spend time in the gym. | ||
| Similarly, men with more masculine facial features are more likely to support explicitly prejudiced ideas, and men who are better fighters are more likely to support warfare and hold self-favoring, that is non-leftist, political beliefs. | ||
| In summary, leftists are shorter and uglier. | ||
| Leftist men are weaker, less masculine, and less capable of fighting characteristics that are not conducive to success in any human civilization. | ||
| Of course, what you know about leftism, you realize this is a feedback loop, right? | ||
| Because The uglier, shorter, fatter, less capable you are, the more likely you are to be leftist. | ||
| The more leftist policies go into place, the shorter, fatter, uglier, and less capable the population becomes. | ||
| They strengthen themselves. | ||
| Just like you would be strengthened in the opposite way if you take right-wing beliefs and impose them on the people, you would end up with people who are stronger and more capable and more likely to support a right-wing policy. | ||
| Studies on left and right-wing psychology have consistently found that leftists are more likely to exhibit manipulative, self-serving, and generally antisocial personality traits. | ||
| For example, leftists have abnormally low disgust sensitivity. | ||
| A person's political alignment can be predicted with a 95% accuracy by observing their brain's response to one disgusting image. | ||
| Because it's natural to be disgusted. | ||
| Because it's actually imperative for the survival of the species that your disgust reaction be fine-tuned. | ||
| Because back in the cave days, if you weren't disgusted by the thing that you're seeing, then you might be poisoned by it or infected by it. | ||
| So, again, the ideology and even biological reality of leftism is one of weakness and death. | ||
| Despite leftist claims that their ideology is just being a good person, support for wealth distribution is best predicted by the psychological traits of, quote, communal fairness. | ||
| That is egalitarianism. | ||
| Malicious envy, exactly what I was talking about, spite, being self-interested, and willingness to inflict instrumental harm, that is, hurting innocent people for the greater good. | ||
| The stereotypical left-wing behavior of victimhood signaling correlates with personality traits such as narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism, amoral manipulation. | ||
| Victimhood signaling is best described as emotional manipulation technique used to obtain free resources. | ||
| If you ever watch true crime stuff, you know that the number one trait of all victimizers is to portray themselves as victims. | ||
| The number one trait of all serial killers is that they're constantly being oppressed by the law, right? | ||
| It's natural. When you're a bad person, you project that badness on other people so that your own misdeeds can be portrayed as some sort of righteous retribution against those who have harmed you. | ||
| Folks, if you are a handsome, good-looking, tall, capable, and strong human being, prove it by going to infowarsstore.com right now. | ||
| Get stronger. Get better looking. | ||
| become more right-wing. | ||
| It's a feedback loop that'll save the world. | ||
| Why does the establishment spend so much time demonizing InfoWars, attacking myself and the crew and our other hosts? | ||
| Because they know we're pro-human. | ||
| They know we're telling the truth. | ||
| They know we've got their number. | ||
| They know everything we do is about empowering humanity. | ||
| And God gave us through Mother Nature incredible compounds that will supercharge our body's stamina, libido, energy, and immune systems. | ||
| And we came out many years ago with Real Red Pill Plus that has all the documented compounds like preglanone and so much more to supercharge your body. | ||
| And to give your body the key elements and the key ingredients it needs to function at a proper level. | ||
| This is the answer to the New World Order's tyranny. | ||
| This is Real Red Pill Plus, sold out for two years, 50% off at InfowarStore.com. |
Export Selection