Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Well, the Pentagon has publicly greenlit the cruise missile attacks inside Russia. | |
| that have been going on for a week and a half. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We can see a Russian tank. | |
| We can see a Russian APC. We can see a Russian missile get launched. | ||
| And that information gets fed to the Ukrainians, and they could actually act on it almost immediately, which is something I think the Russians never contemplated. | ||
| Well, if Putin didn't contemplate that, his intelligence services didn't contemplate that, they're idiots. | ||
| Because I knew it and I told you that. | ||
| Oh, the spin is, when the Russians fire a missile, we give them a lifetime. | ||
| Like when Ukraine fire those missiles into Poland to blame it on Putin and try to get a nuclear war going? | ||
|
unidentified
|
A month ago? This is a very dramatic potential escalation, obviously, because Poland is a NATO country. | |
| There were ongoing cruise missile attacks being carried out in the west of Ukraine, close to Poland's border, at the time that these projectiles landed on Polish territory. | ||
| It is conceivable that they are Russian missiles. | ||
| I'm not pro-Russia. | ||
| I'm pro non-nuclear war. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Shall we play a game? | |
| How about global thermonuclear? | ||
| And Russia's got its problems and has committed its crimes. | ||
| But compared to the New World Order, they are amateurs, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| But they've got a giant nuclear weapons arsenal. | ||
| They're being pushed into a corner, and now Putin's threatening nuclear war. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Russia might as well be fighting Martians right now. | |
| The technology's 30, 40 years in advance. | ||
| Can Russia deploy tens of thousands of one-man team launched? | ||
| One guy can put two switchblades on his back, and those switchblades can go out and take out multiple Russian vehicles. | ||
| Over-the-top dangerous. | ||
| The Pentagon has greenlit what you've been seeing for two weeks, or 12 days, almost two weeks. | ||
| Daily cruise missile attacks into Russia. | ||
| Blowing up military bases. | ||
| So Putin goes, OK, I may do a first strike with nukes. | ||
| I said I wouldn't, but now I may. | ||
| I mean, this is just huge. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And now we have strikes at at least three bases inside of Russia. | |
| Exactly. And for him, that is very worrying because now he knows that Ukraine could hit. | ||
| I mean, we're talking about very close to Moscow, right? | ||
| This is the center of the Kremlin and the center of Russian economy and power. | ||
| Here we are, ladies and gentlemen, in the year 2022. | ||
| And everything else, quite frankly, pales in significance. | ||
| Now, why is war already started and why is more war coming? | ||
| Because they're at the end of a currency bubble. | ||
| They need a big global emergency to be able to basically make us forget that this is a giant Ponzi scheme that makes Bernie Madoff and FTX and the tulip mania that, you know, happened hundreds of years ago pale insignificant. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you hate America? No. | |
| You know, in fact, I'm knowing many inmates. | ||
| I figured out we're sharing way more common. | ||
| Maybe America is very much similar. | ||
| Look, it's the same size. | ||
| It's the same kind of this. | ||
| And when you talk to them, there is nothing there even to beef about. | ||
| We are naturally, you know, born not to be enemies. | ||
| And whenever there's conflict, it's elites. | ||
| You know, every, you know, American I met in a prison who is from rural area was very easy to deal with. | ||
| He has no problem with Russia, and he was curious about Russia, despite all propaganda. | ||
| They're losing their Christian values. | ||
| They're losing their families. | ||
| They're losing, literally, their countries. | ||
| You'll be laying in your bed one night, we're gonna be driving down the highway after work, and there'll be big flashes You see, and then 10 seconds later, your car's gonna be overturned, probably on fire, and then life as you know it's over. | ||
| You won't get back to your family, there'll be mass starvation and death, and there'll be a new literal dark age with enough dust in the atmosphere to cause a mini ice age, and they estimate 7 billion people will die in a nuclear war. | ||
| There'll be maybe 500 million left, which is what these death cult people fetish all day long. | ||
| Welcome to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| I am your guest host today, Chase Geiser, in for the great Harrison Smith. | ||
| Really excited to talk to you today. | ||
| We have so much to talk about. | ||
| Great guest coming up in the third hour. | ||
| I want to start by talking about the recent news from Citizens Free Press about Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine being linked to blood clotting. | ||
| Checking out this article here, Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine has been linked to blood clotting in older individuals, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. | ||
| FDA researchers crunched data, and they found three outcomes of interest, a lack of oxygen to the heart, a blood platelet disorder called immune thrombocytopenia, and another type of clotting called intravascular coagulation. | ||
| Welcome to my show! | ||
| It came to the realization that there were irregular blood clots found in the bodies of the deceased that are disproportionate to what was found before these vaccines were administered on a wide scale. | ||
| So it appears that these vaccines have indeed began to cause weird clotting and side effects in particularly older individuals who have gotten these vaccines. | ||
| We always knew that there was something sketchy about these vaccines. | ||
| There was always a lot of skepticism about why the government was pushing the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines so hard over the J&J vaccines. | ||
| And there was always a lack of trust in this space. | ||
| But to see the FDA come out and just slowly start to inch us toward being comfortable with some of these side effects, which now, of course, they're saying are very rare, uncommon. | ||
| We're going to see more and more of these folks come out. | ||
| And the reason that I was skeptical of these vaccines to begin with is because I have type A severe hemophilia, which is a bleeding disorder you may or may not have heard of. | ||
| It's very rare. I believe there's only about 10,000, 10 to 20,000 people in the United States who actually suffer from hemophilia. | ||
| And basically, it's a bleeding disorder in which my blood doesn't produce the protein that causes normal person's blood to clot, whether it's external cuts or internal bleeding. | ||
| Many people with hemophilia suffer from joint bleeding and arthritis as a result of that and require knee replacements, things like that, at a very young age. | ||
| My older brother has had both his knees replaced. | ||
| He's 17 years older than I am. | ||
| And he had both of his knees replaced while he was in his 30s, I believe. | ||
| And the interesting thing about the story of hemophilia is that there was groundbreaking progress made in terms of treating hemophilia in the 80s. | ||
| You may remember vaguely the Ryan White story. | ||
| They made a movie based off of it called The Ryan White Story. | ||
| Elton John actually performed at Ryan White's funeral. | ||
| What happened was the original treatment for hemophilia was if you were having internal bleeding whether it was in a joint or excessive bruising or you were actually injured and bleeding too much they would take you to the emergency room and they would give you a blood transfusion of normal blood and that blood would clot and cure the bleed, | ||
| the injury. And what happened was during the 70s and 80s, the pharmaceutical companies developed a synthetic form of treatment that could be injected proactively in order to prevent these bleeds from occurring. | ||
| So they made a synthetic version of the protein using human blood donors And three times a week, I did a grown-up Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. | ||
| You could inject this drug intravenously at home. | ||
| And whenever there was an issue, like you twist your ankle playing basketball with your friends at recess or anything like that, this drug would then automatically sort of proactively work to prevent the bleed from becoming more severe to the point of limping or having to ice it and wrap it. | ||
| And what they found was... | ||
| This drug was contaminated with hepatitis and HIV from the blood donors. | ||
| Now, I'm fortunate enough that I was born in 1990, so I was born after they were able to identify this problem and correct it. | ||
| But the crazy thing about it is if you look at the history of the contaminated blood product that they were using, they knew for years, even while Fauci was involved in health administration, they knew for years that the drug was causing children. | ||
| Even to be infected with hepatitis and HIV and they kept it a secret. | ||
| They tried to cover it up in any way that they could and parents were unwittingly injecting their hemophiliac sons because it only affects males with HIV and hepatitis resulting in the death of thousands of hemophiliacs in the United States alone and tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands worldwide. | ||
| And even more pervasive than that is once they were caught And told that they could no longer ship the product in the United States because of its contamination with HIV and hepatitis. | ||
| They simply took their remaining stock and continued to ship it to foreign markets overseas so they wouldn't lose money on the product they already developed knowing that it would infect patients with hepatitis and HIV, which of course becomes AIDS, which of course becomes death. | ||
| So anytime a pharmaceutical company comes out with a new experimental medication, there's always good reason to be highly skeptical as to how safe that drug really is, especially in light of the fact that these vaccines have so many protections against litigation, against liability, or any adverse effects that may occur. | ||
| So, just from my personal experience as a hemophiliac and a member of the hemophilia community, I was very skeptical at this new technology coming out in these vaccines. | ||
| I didn't want to take anything that was mRNA associated because, frankly, I just don't trust the pharmaceutical companies. | ||
| And now we're seeing that we're having these blood clotting issues among an older generation of those who take the drug. | ||
| Obviously, there have been countless examples of myocarditis, soccer players just collapsing in the field, the sudden death of teenagers, including, I believe, a daughter of one of our congressmen. | ||
| And so what are we to do moving forward? | ||
| How are we going to hold these drug companies accountable? | ||
| And why is it that so much of our population still remains intentionally ignorant of the fact or unwilling to admit the fact that these drug companies are not our friend? | ||
| Since when did the left in the United States become the greatest defender of big pharma? | ||
| How is it that we've gotten to this point where we've allowed these drug companies to take so much power, to make so much money without any accountability for the adverse effects of their drugs? | ||
| You know, one of the things that's fascinating to me is when looking at the different vaccine options, of course, there was the J&J option in the beginning. | ||
| And that particular option was... | ||
| dismissed by many of the experts as a less effective option. | ||
| Of course, the J&J vaccine is the only vaccine, I believe, that didn't use the mRNA technology. | ||
| It was a traditional vaccine that had a small portion of the virus in it in order to develop immunity. | ||
| But that one was the one that came out and everyone was like, oh, it's causing blood clots. | ||
| Nine women have blood clots, so we better take this one off the market and force everyone to take either Pfizer or Moderna. | ||
| And I haven't looked at the numbers myself specifically, but it seems to me that there were some bad actors in place that were catalyzing that decision making. | ||
| It seems to me likely that our politicians, our leaders, Big Pharma, the political industrial complex, were invested in Pfizer and Moderna disproportionately. | ||
| They were not invested in J&J for whatever reason. | ||
| And they shot down the competition without any regard for the safety of the medication. | ||
| And proceeded to push this drug on an entire population despite the fact that its efficacy is incredibly questionable and its safety more and more so every day. | ||
| So if you haven't had the opportunity yet, I highly recommend going to rumble.com at some point after this show and checking out the documentary Died Suddenly. | ||
| I believe it's on Stu Peter's Rumble channel. | ||
| And you can see for yourself some of the impacts and effects that these drugs seem to be having on our entire population. | ||
| First, I'd like to introduce you to our new Infowars MD product line, which sets a new standard for supplements across the board. | ||
| Many of these products can be used not only to relieve the aches and pains of everyday life, but to optimize your body's true potential. | ||
| The best part is that we're offering these great products with an introductory sale of 25% off across the board because we know if you try them, you will love them, in turn creating a 360 win. | ||
| Make sure that you go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Check out products like Ageless Vitality Collagen, Mushroom Max Nootropic, Turmeric 95, Better Mood Plus, Nitric Boost, Libido RX, Superfood Greens, CBD Full Spectrum 10mg Gummies, CBD Full Spectrum 25mg Gummies, and... | ||
| CBD full spectrum, 1,000 mg. | ||
| Check out InfoWarsStore.com and stay with us. | ||
| We'll be back after the break. Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| Santa Claus came early this year with the gift of Elon Musk as CEO of Twitter and a slew of Twitter file releases. | ||
| Part 6 came out at 3 p.m. | ||
| on the 16th, a couple of days ago. | ||
| And the interesting thing about this approach to the Twitter files is, of course, they started out with the more vanilla releases, really highlighting the bias at Twitter and some of the decisions that the employees made in terms of censorship that were obviously unfair and not actually in alignment with Twitter's policies on account suspension and censorship, but executed anyway out of a bias or hate for right-leaning accounts. | ||
| Namely, the account of at real Donald Trump. | ||
| And the funny thing about starting that way is that so much attention from the opposition was focused on talking about how vanilla these posts really were. | ||
| So what? Twitter's a private company. | ||
| So what if they decide to censor accounts? | ||
| They can do that if they want. | ||
| It wasn't like Joe Biden was president at the time that his campaign was pressuring Twitter. | ||
| It wasn't like Joe Biden was president at the time. | ||
| When XYZ account was suspended? | ||
| Or it wasn't like the government itself was pressuring this organization to do censorship? | ||
| Because if that were the case, that would be serious. | ||
| But with Twitter Files Release 1 or Twitter Files Part 2, that wasn't really the case. | ||
| And so all these criticisms come in from the left-leaning media saying that, oh, this isn't a violation of your First Amendment right if it's a private organization. | ||
| And of course that was a bait, because now we're at the Twitter Files Part 6 from a few days ago, and it's becoming more and more obvious that the FBI was directly involved in encouraging the censorship of American citizens. | ||
| If you take a look at this, Taibbi posted thread, the Twitter Files Part 6, Twitter, the FBI subsidiary. | ||
| Twitter files are revealing more every day about how the government collects, analyzes, and flags your social media content. | ||
| Twitter's contact with the FBI was constant and pervasive, as if it were a subsidiary. | ||
| Between January of 2020 and November of 2022, there were over 150 emails between the FBI and former Twitter Trust and Safety Chief Yoel Roth. | ||
| Some are mundane, but others are more serious. | ||
| A surprisingly high number are requests by the FBI for Twitter to take action on election misinformation, even tweets that were just obviously jokes. | ||
| The FBI's social media-focused task force, known as FTIF, created in the wake of the 2016 election, the scandal surrounding Cambridge Analytica, swelled to 80 agents and corresponded with Twitter to identify alleged forward influence and election tampering of all kinds. | ||
| They go on to talk about how the government analyzes this data. | ||
| But even more pervasive than this is the communication between the FBI and leadership at Twitter. | ||
| For example, this message from the FBI San Francisco office. | ||
| Hello, Twitter contacts. | ||
| The master canine quality of the FBI's relationship to Twitter comes through in this November 2022 email in which FBI San Francisco is notifying you. | ||
| It wants action on four accounts. | ||
| So here we have an example of the FBI reaching out to a private business and encouraging censorship action on four accounts of private citizens listed here specifically in this email. | ||
| Now, I'm not an attorney, but I am an American citizen who has read the Constitution and does appreciate particularly the Bill of Rights. | ||
| It seems to me that it's a direct violation of our First Amendment right to freedom of speech for any federal agency or elected official or federal department or government entity to encourage the censorship of any individual American citizen. | ||
| It goes on. | ||
| Twitter personnel in that case went on to look for reasons to suspend all four accounts, including at FromMA, whose tweets are almost all jokes. | ||
| And the funny thing about this is, if you see the response, thanks Patrick, I've escalated. | ||
| Email two FBI folks here. | ||
| I've reviewed this already from the TD perspective and suspended three of the accounts for multi-account abuse and ban evasion violations. | ||
| So you have an instance in which the FBI is requesting action to be taken on specific accounts of American citizens in order to censor them or silence them or suspend them. | ||
| And Twitter looks into it obediently. | ||
| How is this not government censorship of freedom of speech? | ||
| How is it not the case that people are up in arms? | ||
| You know, I tweeted a couple of weeks ago, the problem with America today is that a tea tax would not lead to a tea party. | ||
| And, you know, we talk about revolution a lot in this political climate. | ||
| There's rumors of revolution. | ||
| What if we're going to have a national divorce? | ||
| What if we're going to have a political divorce? I've talked about it on this show and my podcast a number of times. | ||
| And... There's a part of me that's hopeful that it'll happen when things get bad enough, but then I see how bad things are now compared to how bad they were when the last revolution occurred in this country. | ||
| And it seems like everyone is very, very complacent. | ||
| Why is this not the number one story on CNN, New York Times, any of the legacy media mainstream outlets? | ||
| Why are people not enraged by the fact that we have proof here in the documents, we have receipts That the federal government is encouraging the censorship of private citizens on our social media platforms. | ||
| And it's no big deal? | ||
| This is absolutely embarrassing. | ||
| I mean, they locked us down. | ||
| They ruined our currency. | ||
| They forced us to wear masks and they forced us to put masks on our children. | ||
| They're performing transition surgery and hormone blockers on minors in some states, particularly in the nation of Canada, without parental consent. | ||
| They forced us to get vaccinated. | ||
| They called us domestic terrorists. | ||
| They intervened in our elections. | ||
| They laundered our money through Ukraine and funded literal Nazis. | ||
| And now they're pressuring private businesses to enact censorship. | ||
| But everything's fine, folks. | ||
| Everything's okay. At what point in time... | ||
| Would it be appropriate for a revolution? | ||
| And I'm not calling for violence. | ||
| A revolution doesn't have to be violent. | ||
| There are different ways to have revolutions. | ||
| There are cultural revolutions. There are other ways to enact political change. | ||
| The civil rights movement is a great example of a nonviolent movement that totally changed the political climate in this country. | ||
| But my question for you, and I'll be taking calls in the next hour, is at what point is it time to say enough? | ||
| You know, I think our founding fathers were intentionally ambiguous when they We're good to go. | ||
| We're giving billions upon billions of dollars to Ukraine. | ||
| Money is being laundered through things like FTX and just other entities in Ukraine, other NGOs. | ||
| None of our rights are protected. | ||
| We're being silenced constantly. | ||
| We've got people that are political prisoners right now for years now since January 6th. | ||
| At what point in time do we say enough is enough? | ||
| What do we need to do to take this country back? | ||
| And how do we inspire courage in the masses to reclaim America from those who seek to subvert it? | ||
| Stay tuned, folks. | ||
| We will be back in the next segment after this break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're watching The American Journal with your host, Chase Geiser. | |
| Watch live right now at band.video. | ||
| Welcome back to The American Journal, folks. Thank you. | ||
| We've got more from Matt Taibbi just from 15 hours ago. | ||
| With this thread, Twitter files supplemental. | ||
| So he added some additional notes to some of the previous official releases. | ||
| He writes, in July of 2020, San Francisco FBI agent Elvis Chan tells Twitter executive Yoel Roth to expect written questions from the Foreign Influence Task Force, the interagency group that deals with cyber threats. | ||
| Now, this may seem fairly normal or fine or whatever on the surface, but I'd like for the small business owners in the audience To consider how you would feel if the FBI were to reach out to you formally, | ||
| to your business, one of your employees, perhaps in HR or to you as the owner, and ask for you to expect questions from a certain department of the FBI or a certain professional within the FBI, and to request that those questions be answered with written responses. | ||
| Would you feel a little threatened by that? | ||
| Am I a suspect in a crime? | ||
| Am I under investigation? | ||
| Should I expect an increase in regulation? | ||
| These sorts of actions are the reason that the federal government is not supposed to be able to threaten or interfere with the actions of private businesses, particularly when it comes to freedom of speech or any of our rights as delineated in the Bill of Rights. | ||
| Here's the email. Hi, Yole. I believe FITF would like a response ahead of our meeting this week of August 10th. | ||
| It could be a written response, or we can set up a phone call, whatever is easiest for you. | ||
| I think you can tell from the nature of the questions that there was quite a bit of discussion within the USIC to get clarification from your company. | ||
| Let me know how you would like to proceed. | ||
| Thanks, Elvis. I'll tell you what, Elvis ain't nothing but a hound dog. | ||
| The questionnaire authors seem displeased with Twitter for implying in the July 20th DHS, ODNI, FBI, industry briefing that, quote, you indicated you had not observed much recent activity from official propaganda actors on your platform, end quote. Here's some of the questions that they ask. | ||
| In what ways and by what measures do you see official propaganda actors as less active than other groups on your platform? | ||
| What groups are you comparing to official propaganda actors? | ||
| And they go through and these are just very interrogatory, for lack of a better term, I don't even know if that's a word. | ||
| It is now. In a very interrogatory tone, Send these questions. | ||
| And how is it that you can claim that Twitter wasn't coerced or manipulated or influenced by the federal government when they're receiving requests for responses to questions like this? | ||
| Matt Tybee writes, one would think that it would be good news. | ||
| The agencies seem to feel otherwise. | ||
| Chan underscored this. | ||
| There was quite a bit of discussion with the USIC to get clarifications from your company, he wrote, referring to the United States intelligence community. | ||
| The task force demanded to know how Twitter came to its unpopular conclusion, the conclusion that propaganda actors were not interfering to as much of an extent as perhaps otherwise thought. | ||
| Oddly included a bibliography of public sources, including a Wall Street Journal article attesting to the prevalence of foreign threats as if to show Twitter they got it wrong. | ||
| Which I find quite funny because what's to say that the Wall Street Journal isn't itself a subsidiary of the FBI? | ||
| I mean, we know that the FBI has inched its way into operating Twitter, or at least had while Twitter was a publicly traded company. | ||
| And I'm sure that Twitter, given the fact that it was among the least popular of the major big tech social networking platforms, is not the only company that the FBI was involved with. | ||
| with it's almost certain that similar discourse has been happening with the likes of facebook instagram snapchat even uh google youtube for sure right and we know that for decades past the fbi has been influencing major media outlets outlets including major tv networks like cnn or the new york times and the wall street journal for that matter right | ||
| the fbi as part of its counterintelligence measures has been involved in the disbursement of information in this country since after world war ii since during world war ii for that matter and so when they're citing a source like the wall street journal in order to argue that twitter got it wrong in terms of its analysis of propaganda on its platform from foreign bad actors what they're really saying is this news outlet that we are you know influencing infield | ||
| which we have infiltrated, disagrees with you. | ||
| We disagree with you. | ||
| It's not even a third source. | ||
| They're not even citing another source. | ||
| It's really just a branch of the FBI known as the Wall Street Journal, in my opinion. | ||
| Roth, receiving the questions, circulated them with other company executives and complained that he was frankly perplexed by the requests here, which seem more like something we get from a congressional committee than the Bureau. | ||
| In other words, they seem more like an investigation than a list of friendly questions. | ||
| He says, hi, team. | ||
| The questions we received are attached. | ||
| I'm frankly perplexed by the requests here, which seem more like something we get from a congressional committee than the Bureau. | ||
| There's a big discussion to be had about state-controlled media, which will be impacted by the label launch later this month. | ||
| But I'm not particularly comfortable with the Bureau, and by extension, the intelligence community, demanding written answers here. | ||
| What's your perspective on how best to navigate? | ||
| So we even have the case here where we have internal employees at Twitter expressing that they're uncomfortable with these questions. | ||
| And this isn't just some miscellaneous employee either. | ||
| This is Yoel Roth. I mean, this person was fundamentally involved in the censorship of President Donald Trump on the platform. | ||
| He's not exactly a right-leaning person or a conspiratorial-minded person. | ||
| This is someone who's basically cool with playing ball with the left-wing narrative At least personally. | ||
| And he's expressing discomfort here with the questions that the FBI is asking. | ||
| He then sent another note internally saying the premise of the questions was flawed because we've been clear that official state propaganda is definitely a thing on Twitter. | ||
| Of course, if you go to the RT Twitter account, for example, it will say Russian state-affiliated media. | ||
| I don't know why if you go to NPR on Twitter, it doesn't say United States state-affiliated media. | ||
| But Ross suggested they get on the phone with Elvis ASAP and try to straighten this out to disabuse the agencies of any notion that state propaganda is not a thing on Twitter. | ||
| The FBI responded to Friday's report by saying it regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors, subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities. | ||
| And that may be true, as Taibbi writes, but we haven't seen that in the documents to date. | ||
| Instead, we've mostly seen requests for moderation involving low-follower accounts belonging to ordinary Americans and Billy Baldwin. | ||
| So, we have a situation here in which it's well documented that the FBI is pressuring businesses To increase behavior, answer questions relating to content on their platforms, and explicitly encouraging the specific censorship of individual Americans on these platforms, which to me is a clear violation of our First Amendment right as Americans to the freedom of speech and expression. | ||
| Where are the lawsuits? | ||
| Who gets sued here in this situation? | ||
| How can we allow these communities to get away with this? | ||
| And if the FBI is doing things like encouraging censorship regarding election misinformation and encouraging the censorship of a President of the United States, doesn't that undermine the integrity of the power of the executive branch or the White House? | ||
| Doesn't that undermine Weaken the representation that Americans have in our own government. | ||
| How can we say that we have a government of the people, by the people, representing the people when we have unelected officials and bureaucrats in the intelligence community with seemingly unilateral power to influence and coerce businesses to violate our rights as citizens? | ||
| It's not like we elected Elvis Chan here to follow up with Twitter to undermine misinformation on the platform. | ||
| This is some person that we never had heard of, that we never should have heard of, who's influencing the outcome of elections. | ||
| Make sure to call in 877-789-2539. | ||
| Again, that's 877-789-2539. | ||
| I'll be taking calls in the next hour. | ||
| I want to hear what your thoughts are on the FBI and where we need to go to solve this problem in America. | ||
| Stay tuned. Go to Infowarsstore.com and join us after the break. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| Last time that I was on air with you, amazing audience members, we talked about Trump versus DeSantis in 2024, and I mentioned that it would be very hard for me to vote for anyone other than Trump any time that I saw his name on the ballot. | ||
| And I specifically mentioned that one of the reasons, the main reasons that I love Trump so much is because everyone I hate, and for that matter, everyone who hates America, hates him so much. | ||
| And I think that's a very good indicator that he's actually on our side. | ||
| But I gotta share with you my disappointment in Trump recently on Truth Social. | ||
| And I recently tweeted about this on my Twitter account at RealChaseGeyser. | ||
| Knowing that I would catch a lot of flack for it because this is the first time I believe that I've posted any sort of serious criticism about President Trump. | ||
| I voted for him in the primary in 2016, in the general in 2016, and again in 2020. | ||
| And I'm undecided about what I'm going to do in 2024 because I don't know who the candidates will be, what they will say, and whether I can trust them. | ||
| But when I saw this Truth Social post, it really shocked me, frankly. | ||
| Trump wrote, and this was a couple of weeks ago at this point. | ||
| So, with the revelation of massive and widespread fraud and deception and working closely with big tech companies, the DNC and the Democratic Party, do you throw the presidential election results of 2020 out and declare the rightful winner? | ||
| Or do you have a new election? | ||
| A massive fraud of this type and magnitude allows for determination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. | ||
| Our great founders did not want and would not condone false and fraudulent elections. | ||
| Now, Trump received a lot of negative press over this particular post that he made on True Social, and particularly for this sentence here. | ||
| I'll mark it here just so it's easier for you to see. | ||
| A massive fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. | ||
| So the way that reads to me is that we have President Trump arguing for at least the temporary suspension of the Constitution in order to correct the error that was the fraudulent election of Joe Biden in 2020. | ||
| Now, I'm all for getting to the bottom of voter fraud, for holding those accountable for cheating in elections. | ||
| I have very serious doubts as to the integrity of the outcome of the election in 2020, and I think that there are many pieces of evidence and points that should have been explored through our legal system that were not explored through our legal system. | ||
| Regarding 2020, but it seems to me that there's a reason that the founders didn't put any details as to how to deal with a fraudulent election after an inauguration in the Constitution. | ||
| It seems to me that the thinking was, all right, if we figure out that an election was stolen after the president has been inaugurated, then the people can simply impeach the standing president and correct it at that point. | ||
| What I don't think the founders anticipated was that the political climate would be such that there would not be any consensus around an impeachment, right? | ||
| And so we've got this situation in which Trump is calling for the temporary suspension of the Constitution. | ||
| Now, he walked this back after he got so much negative press. | ||
| He walked it back on his own true social and basically implied that what he meant was by having a fraudulent election, the Constitution is thrown out. | ||
| But honestly, I just don't buy it. | ||
| Based on my interpretation of this text, I think that he was advocating for the temporary suspension. | ||
| And the reason I think that is because if you look at the last sentence of this post where he says, our great founders did not want and would not condone false and fraudulent elections. | ||
| This sentence only makes sense in conjunction with the prior sentence. | ||
| If it is used as a justification for a temporary suspension of the Constitution, right? | ||
| So he's saying, look, our founders were great, they wrote the Constitution, it's perfect, but they wouldn't have wanted fraudulent elections, and that justifies a temporary suspension of the rules because I need to be reinstated as the President of the United States. | ||
| I agree that the election was probably stolen from Donald Trump. | ||
| I find it very hard to believe that Joe Biden had the highest number of votes of any president in the history of the United States. | ||
| I find it very hard to believe that the Democrats didn't cheat in this election, given that we know they cheated in the primary election of 2016 when they stole the election from Bernie in favor of Hillary. | ||
| So they've got a history of cheating. We know it's to be true. | ||
| And I think there was cheating. | ||
| At least there wasn't any sort of serious investigation into whether or not the election was legitimate. | ||
| Basically, everything was dismissed that the Trump team brought to the courts, to the judges. | ||
| Nothing was really seriously looked at aside from documentaries like, what was it, 2,000 Mules? | ||
| And so, this is what makes me uncomfortable. | ||
| We have a president of the United States who swore to protect and defend the Constitution, who is apparently here advocating for the temporary suspension of the rules in the Constitution in order to be reinstated. | ||
| I am someone who has defended Trump every decision that he's made, even the ones I disagree with. | ||
| Look, I understand why he made this decision, even if I don't agree with it. | ||
| But to see him explicitly advocate for the suspension of the Constitution of the United States, having taken the oath to defend and protect it, was incredibly alarming to me and grounds for me to welcome any sort of opposition was incredibly alarming to me and grounds for me to welcome any sort of Now, I'm not saying that I'm not going to vote for him in 2024. | ||
| I absolutely will vote for him in the general election if he's running against a leftist. | ||
| But I am shopping for alternatives as a result of this because, to me, it looks like 2020 broke Trump. | ||
| This reads like he snapped and he's lost it. | ||
| And he's so upset and bitter and disgruntled about the results of the 2020 election, legitimate or not, that he's willing to throw out principle in order to regain power here in the United States. | ||
| And he did walk it back. There are different interpretations of this message here. | ||
| But I am not comfortable with anyone, no matter how much I agree with them on policy, no matter how much I would fight for them, no matter how much I adore them and the movement in which they resonate with, I'm not comfortable with any leader explicitly willing to suspend the Constitution. | ||
| If we are willing to suspend the Constitution in this country from the right, then what makes us different from the leftists? | ||
| The criticism of the left, the primary criticism of the left is they are so self-righteous that they believe their own judgment on a case-by-case basis on any given issue is more just, fair, and correct than the principles laid out in our Constitution. | ||
| Right? The Constitution says the right to bear arms shall not be infringed. | ||
| And we constantly have situations in which the left is like, yeah, we know it says that in the Constitution, but our judgment is better than that of the Founding Fathers. | ||
| We are wiser, smarter, more educated than the Founding Fathers. | ||
| And we believe that America would be a safer place if people couldn't have high-capacity magazines. | ||
| And we from the right criticize them time and time again for disregarding the Constitution, for disregarding the oaths they have all taken, where they have sworn to protect and defend the Constitution and therefore the rights of the American citizens. | ||
| We criticize them time and time again for this. | ||
| And then when our guy does it, We defend them? | ||
| When our guy says, yes, I know that the Constitution doesn't have a framework or a system in place for dealing with correcting an illegitimate election after an inauguration, but we should suspend it because our founding fathers wouldn't have wanted it like this? | ||
| We should suspend the Constitution and correct a fraudulent election? | ||
| Tell me this. How would we not be more vulnerable with the temporary suspension of the Constitution? | ||
| What's to say that it would ever be reinstated if it were to be suspended? | ||
| I want to hear your thoughts, guys. | ||
| Call 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| I'll be taking calls all the next hour. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Before we go to the break and before we go to the next hour and start taking calls, I want to introduce you to our new InfoWars MD product line, which sets a new standard for supplements across the board. | ||
| Many of these products can be used not only to relieve the aches and pains of everyday life, but to optimize your body's true potential. | ||
| Now, the best part is that we're offering these great products with an introductory sale of 25% off across the board. | ||
| Because we know if you try them, you will love them. | ||
| In turn, creating a 360 win. | ||
| So make sure you guys go to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Check out our new InfoWars MD product line. | ||
| Pick up something like Ageless Vitality Collagen, Superfood Greens, Mushroom Max, Better Mood Plus, Libido RX, and stay with us. | ||
| Through the break, we'll be taking calls all next hour. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Merry Christmas. You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Chase Geiser. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
| We're going to be taking more calls throughout the hour. | ||
| I'd like to start this segment with James from Indiana. | ||
| James, how are you, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you with us, James? Oh, this is James. | |
| I was listening this morning. | ||
| I said, oh, Harrison isn't there. | ||
| I'm going to turn this off, and then I'll give Chase five minutes. | ||
| You caught my attention. I think Joan should give you your own show from 7 to 10. | ||
| You're awesome. Thank you. | ||
| I appreciate that. On to my point, the medical field is completely unreliable from wrong diagnosis to wrong records. | ||
| It's one of the leading causes of death in this country. | ||
| The DOJ is completely corrupt. | ||
| There is no Bill of Rights. | ||
| We have political prisoners while the merchant of death is free. | ||
| There should be protests in the streets to dissolve the DOJ. I'm calling on Congress to empower the IG to remove any federal employee that violates any constitutional rights. | ||
| Not the next day, not a week from there, not 10 years from there, but on the spot. | ||
| Can someone explain to me why the IEG puts out all types of reports on government corruption from the U.S. Attorney's crimes, the Phoenix scandal that killed 40 veterans, the director of Minnesota that stole $250,000, didn't lose her job, didn't pay it back, while the IEG allows the VA to break federal prescribing laws, turn veterans into drug addicts, and manufacture cases against veterans, while the real crimes of the government get a free pass. | ||
| Most people won't protest or speak out because Congress Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| So the question is, how do you actually revamp, restructure, destroy, and replace the DOJ when it seems like in order to do something like that, you would need a DOJ? Like I said, it's disgusting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You have an IG that's basically worthless. | |
| They put out all these reports on actual crimes of the government. | ||
| They do absolutely nothing, but then they manufacture cases against the disabled after they highly drug them. | ||
| It's a completely disgusting system. | ||
| You're absolutely right. Congress needs to completely defund these agencies. | ||
| It will not happen. But they need to do something to empower the IG. These free passes on violating people's rights is a national disgrace. | ||
| Like I said, people are afraid to speak out because they will just sit there and make up all kinds of fake evidence. | ||
| Congressman not too long ago was on the news saying he can't talk about the Yeah, you know, it's funny because I was sitting with a close friend last night, | ||
| and we were talking politics, as is often the case in my house, and I asked a question, which I'm not going to state here, but I asked a question, and my friend wanted to make sure that the phones were outside of the room before responding to the question. | ||
| And I can never imagine growing up in an America in which American citizens, and I know I'm not the only one who's had this experience, have wanted to remove the phones from the room in order to continue a conversation. | ||
| A conversation that violated no laws, by the way. | ||
| But there was just concern over constant surveillance. | ||
| What are your thoughts on that? Have you ever been in a conversation where someone's like, oh, is Alexa in here? | ||
| Or, oh, you better turn your phone off, right? | ||
| Like, have you ever experienced that, or am I the only one? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Me personally, I don't have my own email account. | |
| I don't have a cell phone. | ||
| I've had too many problems with people playing in my accounts because they're unreliable. | ||
| And now it's also come out, you know, these companies can actually just go in your account, passwords are worthless, and they just change whatever they want anyways. | ||
| But I know an actual congressman who stated, he said something one time, and then all of a sudden those ads just started appearing on his phone. | ||
| It's well known that these devices and stuff do listen to you. | ||
| It's not some type of conspiracy. | ||
| It's completely out there. | ||
| Absolutely. Thanks for calling in, James. | ||
| I appreciate your feedback. I do want to take a call from Jefferson in Virginia. | ||
| Jefferson, how are you today? | ||
| I'm annoyed as usual, Chase. | ||
| How are you? I'm annoyed as usual, too. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I hope you're not annoyed with me. No, you're doing a great job. | |
| Thank you. Announce he's going to renew in March 13th. | ||
| He has to send a notification to the registry of Congress that he's intending to renew the National Emergency Act, which means he gets to remain a dictator until 2024. | ||
| So basically when people say there's no law that I have to follow under these mask mandates and things like that, that's all a trickle-down effect from his Renewing the National Emergency Act, which is unconstitutional. | ||
| It's right up there with the Model States Public Health Emergency Act, which is also unconstitutional. | ||
| But we can't get SCOTUS, the Supreme Court, to make a ruling on that because they won't hear the cases when people want to challenge the constitutionality of things like the National Emergency Act or the Public Health Emergency Act. | ||
| So we're stuck in this case where the judiciary, our judges, We're good to go. | ||
| And we're being lured or pushed into a revolution that's going to get violent. | ||
| And I don't like that. | ||
| Our only real escape valve right now is the Brunson case that's about to come up before the Supreme Court on January 6th that basically makes it possible for us to say that all the people in Congress violated their oath of office, so they have to step down because they didn't vote for the 10-day investigation of the It blows my mind that we have something like a national emergency act in the United States, | ||
| given what we know happened to Rome by having an avenue for It always leads to tyranny whenever you just empower one person. | ||
| Why would we provide an incentive for a power-hungry president to declare an emergency in order to expand those executive powers indefinitely? | ||
| What were we thinking? | ||
| Well, it was back in 1976. | ||
| Gerald Ford signed into the law our only unelected president ever was the one that signed the National Emergency Act into existence. | ||
| And now it's just metastasized into this administrative state where everybody in the technocracy thinks that they're smarter than everybody else and what they believe should dominate. | ||
| So all the experts lie to us about what the truth is about whether it's global warming or pandemics. | ||
| It's all just – we're being corralled into a situation where what we think doesn't matter to the technocracy. | ||
| So they basically want to manipulate what the masses think the masses think. | ||
| So the polling and elections are all about manipulating our thought, believe, oh, it's close. | ||
| But the leftists have taken over and they've done it properly when in reality they've rigged the game from very early on and we're just late to the party. | ||
| We haven't figured out that – Now talking about harvesting votes in the next election is just part of the game where we're going to cheat just as hard as they cheat, and they're going to win anyway because they know how to cheat on the next level. | ||
| We're stuck. We're really in a bad, bad spot. | ||
| If we can't get the Supreme Court to get us out of this mess and finally say, Everything's illegitimate. | ||
| We need to start over. Do we have to do it through a bloody revolution, or can we just all agree that we need to reform the Constitution? | ||
| We need to make things more specific about what the rules are and are not. | ||
| Because right now, we're relying on laws that were always unconstitutional, and as a principle, if you rely on laws long enough that are unconstitutional, that makes them legitimate. | ||
| The Reliance Clause argument is where we're stuck. | ||
| Absolutely. Yeah. | ||
| Well, thank you so much for your call, Jefferson. | ||
| I really appreciate it. Next segment, we're going to be taking more calls. | ||
| Make sure you call in 877-789-2539. | ||
| But before the break, I want to introduce you to our new Infowars MD product line, which sets a new standard for supplements across the board. | ||
| Many of these products can be used not only to relieve the aches and pains of everyday life, but to optimize your body's true potential. | ||
| Best part is that we are offering these great products with an introductory sale of 25% off across the board because we know if you try them, you will love them, in turn creating a 360 win. | ||
| Make sure you check out Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Pick up some of our new products for yourself. | ||
| Get them as stocking stuffers for your friends and family this Christmas. | ||
| Make sure to call in 877-789-2539. | ||
| We'll be taking calls in the next several segments. | ||
| And stay with us through the break. | ||
| We will be back in just a few minutes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's go ahead and take another. | |
| Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| We're going to be taking calls this segment and for the rest of the hour before our outstanding guest, Matthew Colkin, joins us in the third hour. | ||
| First call I want to take this segment is Jeremy in Austin. | ||
| Jeremy, how are you today, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, sir. I'm here. How are you? | |
| I'm doing okay, I guess. | ||
| What's going on? Well, I have a couple issues. | ||
| There's one, and I'm not sure what the theme of the show is today because it's very difficult to get Alex on anymore. | ||
| But my main issue is the ecological disaster that's going on in Austin with the garbage. | ||
| And it's everywhere. | ||
| And I've tried... | ||
| I'm a homeless man, and I have tried to call the city. | ||
| They blew me off. I've tried to call waste management, and they have essentially blown me off. | ||
| They haven't called me back. | ||
| But if you go... | ||
| If you go under the west... | ||
| 12th Street Bridge, 12th Street and Lamar, I guess. | ||
| And if you go on the walking path down there, there is a bottle of refrigerant in Shoal Creek. | ||
| And I don't know how long it's been there. | ||
| I don't know if it's leaking or not. | ||
| There's garbage everywhere. | ||
| We, as hobos, Don't treat the land this way. | ||
| We don't treat our environment this way. | ||
| We have our own camps. | ||
| And we tidy up. | ||
| We take our garbage with us. | ||
| We dispose of it naturally or respectively where it's supposed to go. | ||
| If you go and I walk out to the end of West 5th Street under the Spaghetti Conjunction out there yesterday, it's deplorable. | ||
| It'll take an army of people and dump trucks and bulldozers to clean that up. | ||
| And they outlaw grocery bags. | ||
| And now I gotta pay an extra 30 cents if I need a grocery bag. | ||
| Where is that money going? | ||
| You know, because it's certainly not going to clean up the mess that's out here. | ||
| So, I mean, you know, help me help you, Austin, get this done. | ||
| And help, you know, I can't do it. | ||
| Nobody seems to care. | ||
| And then also, too, the Starbucks on North Lamar and 5th. | ||
| Told me I was too homeless to buy their coffee anymore and drink it out front. | ||
| And they kicked me and my friends out, and we're no longer allowed to be there without getting trespassed. | ||
| And that was the other side issue. | ||
| And I'm really sorry to hear that you had the experience, and I'm sorry to hear that you're experiencing homelessness. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And I work. I'm not a bum. | |
| I work, dude. | ||
| I mean, I have a job at, you know, I have a job. | ||
| I'm not going to tell you where, but I have a job, I have a camp, and we are clean people. | ||
| We don't do this. | ||
| And that is part of the dichotomy that I want to change is that you automatically think that you're homeless. | ||
| Oh, well, then you're just a blob or a piece of excrement. | ||
| That's not the case. | ||
| And I know this might not be fitting in with your team today, but I just had to get this out here. | ||
| I'm glad that you called. Yeah, I really appreciate that you called, and I live in Austin myself. | ||
| What were your thoughts on the changes in the camping policy in the city? | ||
|
unidentified
|
How did that impact your life? Well, I mean, I've been kind of lucky because we made a deal with some people, but... | |
| As far, you know, I don't like to see it either, any more than anybody else does. | ||
| I think it should be... | ||
| There should be a consolidated area where people are allowed to be, but they have to be clean. | ||
| You can't just be out there and, you know, and just making a mess. | ||
| But, like, we're on Red River. | ||
| There's the Red River building where they allow us to have storage. | ||
| That is awesome. | ||
| That is a great thing, but everything is so spread out, you can't really get to anything. | ||
| It needs to be more... | ||
| It takes a whole day to get to one thing. | ||
| So you need to have a more consolidated situation to where you can go and take care of two or three different things that you need, like laundry, food, or storage, or showers, or whatever. | ||
| And there's different agencies that offer these things, but they seem to always offer them at the same time on the same day. | ||
| So you have to let go of one to get the other. | ||
| You can't do both at the same time. | ||
| And then my Medicaid, I can't get my Medicaid switched over from Wisconsin. | ||
| And I've been having a real problem with my inhaler because I have COPD, and I keep going through the emergency room because Anyway, the thing is that there needs to be, as far as camping is concerned, there's plenty of land that can be utilized for that. | ||
| And it can be controlled. | ||
| But it's just not being done. | ||
| And if you walk down with me to the end of 5th Street and you see this mess just down there, it made me cry yesterday, man. | ||
| I mean, you know, and I was angry. | ||
| You know, I mean, you know, we as homeless people don't do that. | ||
| I don't like it any more than anybody else does. | ||
| But on the bike path, You know, these rich people are walking by and walking through this stuff every day just like I do. | ||
| And they're not doing anything about it. | ||
| And they have the resources to do so. | ||
| And now I'm calling all these national people, you know, all these places, as a homeless man with no resources, trying to get somebody to care. | ||
| And it's your city too. | ||
| Why don't you care? | ||
| It's your neighborhood. | ||
| You know what I'm saying? Yeah, absolutely. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, and, you know, I mean, you know, and it just... | |
| I'm sorry I'm getting emotional and upset, man, but I'm incensed by this. | ||
| And then I go to a grocery store and I can't even get a bag. | ||
| Where is that extra money that they're charging? | ||
| It's a racket. Everybody knows it's a racket. | ||
| Where is the extra money going? | ||
| Yeah, they force the businesses to charge for the plastic bags, but then the businesses keep the profit for the plastic bags that they charge for. | ||
| It doesn't go to any sort of initiative to actually help the environment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A long time ago. Which was already working to the price of the food years ago. | |
| You know, so, I mean, they took it. | ||
| It's just a racket, man. | ||
| And they're not doing anything positive with that extra money. | ||
| Because the garbage is still out here, bro. | ||
| And, you know, I mean, and I've got a couple of friends You know, and I'm sure that they'd be willing to donate their time and my time to help clean this up if anybody that had the wherewithal to do anything about it gave a damn. | ||
| You know? Yeah. | ||
| So, I mean, and this is Austin. | ||
| This is our city. You know, I mean, you know, and, I mean, why does it look like? | ||
| Why is it in this condition? | ||
| And that's all I'm asking all the other Austinians. | ||
| Regardless of your wealth or your status, Why is this this way? | ||
| Who else cares? | ||
| Well, thank you so much for your call, Jeremy. | ||
| I really appreciate you dialing in. | ||
| I think Jeremy makes a great point. | ||
| We have these cities that are run by leftist leaders, and they constantly advocate for issues like climate change, the environment, Serving the homeless community or the unhoused, as they politically correctly like to call it. | ||
| And yet, when you see the reality of leadership in these cities and the policy outcomes of these leftist policies, we have trashed cities and rampant homelessness and, frankly, unjust suffering. | ||
| Stay with us. We're going to be taking more calls in the next segment. | ||
| Visit Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
| For the rest of the hour, we will be taking more of your calls at 877-789-2539. | ||
| Start off this segment, I'd like to hear from Sauce in FEMA Region 9. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Sauce, how are you? Good, how about you? | |
| I'm doing well. Thanks for calling in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What's on your mind? Yeah, so recently I got into the Trump NFT card and I made money off him, but I'm sitting here asking myself why. | |
| Why did he drop fees? | ||
| Is it relevant? I don't know. | ||
| I don't get it. I mean, I've been involved with crypto and NFTs since 2000. | ||
| Well, NFTs since 2019 and crypto since 2017. | ||
| So I've been around in this space. | ||
| I've seen rug pulls. I've seen scams. | ||
| And it's at the point now where if you don't understand Bitcoin was made by the NSA, I don't know what to tell these people. | ||
| I think Trump is part of the cabal. | ||
| He's hardened people like Kodak Black instead of Julian Assange. | ||
| He hasn't, you know, went against vaccines. | ||
| And now he's pushing the crypto, the crypto stuff. | ||
| When we, as you mentioned, we can easily impeach Biden, right? | ||
| No, he wants to go about another way. | ||
| He wants to subvert that and potentially create some kind of new digital, you know, constitution, which I'm highly against. | ||
| And I'm also highly against blockchain voting, because once you enable blockchain voting, you're opening up the door for other avenues that crypto is going to offer, DAOs and other things like that. | ||
| And it's going to create a socialist America that we don't want. | ||
| And that's just from my understanding of crypto. | ||
| I know it sounds sexy to have blockchain voting, but that's not going to be... | ||
| I mean, it sounds good. | ||
| It really does. Trust me, it does. | ||
| But we can still do the old-fashioned way and take away mail-in ballots. | ||
| There's no reason why we have it anyway. | ||
| We just accept things because we're so soft as Americans. | ||
| You know, like, we don't have any struggles. | ||
| You know, maybe if the supply chain shortage, maybe if you didn't get the milk or the eggs or maybe the... | ||
| That's our struggle, right? | ||
| It's not a real struggle. | ||
| I mean, don't get me wrong. | ||
| I understand people need to feed their families and their bills need to be paid. | ||
| But at the end of the day, you know, we're still hot water. | ||
| Like, we're not Jeremy, right? | ||
| Like, we're going to be Jeremy. | ||
| Our society is going to become homeless because we're going to get to banks and we're going to usher in the crypto and we're going to let them control us. | ||
| Because at first it sounds good, it sounds sexy, and hey, we might get rich. | ||
| What makes you think that Bitcoin was created by the NSA? Okay, so basically, just look at the encryption. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I've talked to Bitcoin, Max, about this, and they say, well, everything is SHA. Your VPN is the whole point, right? | |
| SHA-256, that's the encryption. | ||
| That's what Bitcoin was made out of. | ||
| And if you just think about it, like, okay, so you're telling me this phantom coder, right, this phantom menace, right, had the foresight to create a digital currency that the U.S. government, never mind the less, let They exist in the economy, but if you pay attention to the SEC lawsuit, they're attacking everything right now. | ||
| Everything. LibraryCoin got shut down. | ||
| XRP is in the SEC lawsuit. | ||
| So they're going after each other. | ||
| Wait, what? They let Bitcoin stay? | ||
| They let Ethereum stay? What? | ||
| Isn't that a threat to our national security? | ||
| We went to war and shed blood for our dollars. | ||
| Right, that's our dollar. Yeah, this phantom menace can create some digital currency. | ||
| Nobody knows who he is. I mean, come on. | ||
| Do you really buy that? | ||
| I've often thought that it was likely that Elon Musk was at least in part Satoshi Nakamoto, the founder of Bitcoin, just because of his background with digital finance, right, with PayPal and the company that he sold to PayPal early in this century. | ||
| What do you think about that theory that Elon Musk might have been involved in the creation of Bitcoin? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't buy that. | |
| I think if he was involved in it, then he's... | ||
| I don't think he was. I think David Schwartz and the Ripple guys were involved in the creation of Bitcoin because of how the connection... | ||
| So people think Elon Musk and his X.com is going to incorporate XRP into a global payment system with a cross-border payment, XRP offers or whatever. | ||
| I don't think Elon Musk has anything to do with Bitcoin. | ||
| I think Bitcoin is its own separate thing, as a lot of Bitcoin maxis say, which is they do get some things right. | ||
| But I think Elon Musk has no connection with Bitcoin. | ||
| And that could, I mean, obviously, I mean, I could be wrong, but I don't see any connections with Elon Musk and Bitcoin at all whatsoever. | ||
| Well, thanks for your feedback. | ||
| I appreciate your call. Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. And next I want to hear from Matt in New Hampshire, who says the Constitution is already gone. | ||
| Matt, what are your thoughts on the state of our republic today and what the outcome is going to be? | ||
| Are you there, Matt, in New Hampshire? Looks like we're having a problem connecting with Matt in New Hampshire. | ||
| Bye, Matt. Are you here? | ||
| Yep, I can hear you now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, sorry about that. Good morning. | |
| I was commenting about the Constitution and President Trump wanting to suspend it, and I think he's just honest to a fault at times. | ||
| Mm-hmm. It certainly does need a re-ratification. | ||
| Just like you said, the UN was obsolete. | ||
| Turns out he was right. | ||
| It's not politically correct, but he's correct. | ||
| Yeah, but don't you think there's a way to... | ||
| Isn't there an avenue to legitimately make changes to the Constitution without just forcing sort of an unconstitutional suspension of it? | ||
| I mean, we can make changes to the Constitution if we get the right number of states to vote and support an amendment, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I believe that's the story, but I mean, they've just added amendment after amendment, basically nullifying the original Constitution. | |
| Sure. Yeah, we can redraw it. | ||
| I mean, almost... I want to hear from JR in New York as well on this. | ||
| What are some other options for undoing a fraudulent election? | ||
| JR in New York, are you with me? | ||
| Yeah, can you hear me okay? Yeah, you sound great. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What's up, man? Hey, I don't know. | |
| I was actually just wondering, because I don't trust Trump at all. | ||
| I call in a bunch, and I kind of gave Harrison a hard time last time, which I apologize. | ||
| I love him, and all you guys, but I think Trump cannot be trusted, and I think he's owned by this cult, and what's his name, Leo Zagami? | ||
| Kind of broke it down. | ||
| It really comes down to the Sabbatean, Frankist cult that runs everything. | ||
| These guys... are not going to stop because they're literally a death cult and their objective is depopulation. | ||
| So the other question was when is revolution needed necessary? | ||
| I think it's every single day but you know we can't be violent and we shouldn't be violent but they're certainly violent with us and this is a war apparently so I always ask myself when is a citizen's arrest appropriate and you know a peaceful citizen's arrest and like Because they're not going to do anything. | ||
| And Trump, like, Trump did some good stuff for the borders and all this stuff, but when he got out, he undid his drain, the swamp bill. | ||
| I think there's a lot of division going on here with DeSantis. | ||
| I think DeSantis is the obvious choice, and I just can't believe that people still support Trump because I feel like he's certainly owned by this Sabbatee and Frankis cult, and the guys should really dig into that. | ||
| And another thing I wanted to bring up was The Noahide laws, because when the Noahide laws can be brought forth is when they basically suspend the Constitution, and there's like a state of emergency. | ||
| So if there's a state of emergency, or the Constitution is suspended, they can enact the Noahide laws. | ||
| I'm not saying Trump is going to do that right away, and Alec said that it's the Seventh-day Adventists. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's not. They're like, they're Hasidic Jews. | |
| They basically are part, in my opinion, they're members of this cult. | ||
| And in 1991, they signed in with George W. Bush Sr. | ||
| at the Education Day, which every single president, including Trump, has honored since then. | ||
| And so they all are on with the Noahide laws, which are openly about killing Christians and decapitating everyone. | ||
| Like, Alex just blew over the topic the other day when a caller called in, but I feel like this is a huge thing. | ||
| If they get these laws in, they're already in, but if they actually enact them on us, they legally can decapitate everyone for worshiping God in any form they see, which I think people should have freedom of religion. | ||
| Right, of course. | ||
| Whether you believe Jehovah is the one true God or not. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I personally think we should have freedom of religion. | |
| Do not have to worry about decapitation. | ||
| Please look into the Noahide laws, guys. | ||
| This is like serious. We should get these things repealed. | ||
| Well, thank you for calling in. I appreciate it. | ||
| Make sure that you guys check out our new InfoWars MD product line on InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| We're offering 25% across the board because we know if you try them, you'll love them, in turn creating a 360 win. | ||
| Visit InfoWarsStore.com now and stick with us. | ||
| More calls next segment. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
| We'll be taking more calls this segment before our guest, Matthew Culkin, joins us in the next hour. | ||
| First, I want to start with Chad in North Little Rock. | ||
| Chad, what's on your mind? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, it's good to talk with you this second time. | |
| You too. Yeah, what is on my mind is that I want to see us Meaning the truth seekers, the people trying to do good, the fans of Infowars, etc., to just stop. | ||
| Please, stop blaming other people, the left, the Rothschilds, whomever. | ||
| And I would like to see Infowars do what it's already doing a better job of in recent years, which is allowing different points of view On their platform. | ||
| And specifically, start with somebody like Brendan O'Connell, who focuses on the Talpiot program, which is Israel's control of the whole cybersecurity thing. | ||
| And, you know, I just don't look at anywhere where I see that any of us are really acting any better than each other. | ||
| And then the last thing I'll say that annoys me is that my understanding is that if we have a private Federal Reserve, which America has fought with that, its whole existence, then it doesn't matter what the laws are. | ||
| And I think that we know that we all get caught up in the day-to-day news cycle, but we have got to have some kind of things that we agree on, like it just doesn't matter what we talk about. | ||
| All of that is a distraction from the fact that the governments of the world have to borrow money, and that's just on the face of it. | ||
| You know, it's just irritating. | ||
| Yeah, I know what you mean. | ||
| You know, I respectfully receive and understand... | ||
| The perspective that Infowars needs to bring on more people perhaps critical of Infowars or not necessarily blaming others but talking about things that we can do without blame on an enemy to save America. | ||
| But where I push back a little bit on that is if you want to see content that's critical of Infowars, Watch a little bit of Infowars and then watch CNN. Or if you want to see content that's critical of Infowars, just follow people on Twitter who hate the Constitution. | ||
| I mean, there's plenty of places to get the opposite sort of narrative to Infowars. | ||
| And if we don't identify the enemies of America, whether it's the leftists, whether it's the globalists, whether it's the fractional reserve bankers at the Federal Reserve, if we don't identify the enemies, then how is it that we can combat the policies that are negatively then how is it that we can combat the policies that are negatively What do you think, Chad? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Last thing I'll say on that is that I think that there is a very thin line of. | |
| Between anything, right? | ||
| So let's focus on a character like Roger Stone, okay? | ||
| So, Brendan talked about him and all of these people at Infowars and alleging their connections to various intelligence apparatus. | ||
| But my point is, is that I think we would accept, hey, you know, you have to have somebody like Roger Stone We're good to go. | ||
| Okay, good and evil and these opposites. | ||
| You know what I mean? | ||
| And then it's like another way you hear about it is communitarianism, which is this big UN thing. | ||
| And evidently, Tucker Carlson has said, I saw a clip that showed that that was his point of view. | ||
| And that's another one of those things. | ||
| We can have honest debate about this because I can see that it is manipulative to combine the opposite of everything. | ||
| One of them is that, okay, Trump's wife is the daughter of a communist leader, and then we're all on the alt-right connected with Russia, right? | ||
| So I'll just the last thing I'll say is that there is like genuine politics, meaning like it's hard to tell the difference between these two things to make a decision. | ||
| And then, of course, people manipulating that. | ||
| And I just wish that we would distinguish that and just give each other a break. | ||
| Well, thank you so much for your call, Chad. | ||
| I appreciate it. Next, I want to hear from Sean in Commie, New Jersey. | ||
| Sean, how are you today, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm blessed by the best brother, despite my growing mountain of mess, and I gotta tell you, that pile of pebbles gets bigger by the day. | |
| That's good to hear, man. | ||
| What's on your mind? I have a note here that says you're interested in Americans buying into the partisan fight. | ||
| Are you thinking that we're just in a uniparty situation? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What are your thoughts? No. | |
| It's not so much the uniparty. | ||
| Where I'm at, Is where Alex is at, right? | ||
| Everyone is buying into Democrat, Republican, Liberal, Tea Party, you know what I mean? | ||
| It's not... | ||
| People need to remember that it's not what makes us different, right? | ||
| It's the commonality that we all share. | ||
| The love of freedom. | ||
| The love of liberty. | ||
| Right? Right. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now, there's a reason why my personal Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, spoke out most harshly against the bankers. | |
| Okay? Because the worship of money is truly the root of all evil. | ||
| Right, right. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We need to remember that coveting and all the falseness of everything is just another paradigm to keep us divided. | |
| So you look at the attack on carbon as an example. | ||
| The attack on carbon Really ramped up when NASA and the ISS discovered that the increased carbon in the atmosphere was regreating the Earth. | ||
| Now, I'm going to quote Mike Adams, the health brain. | ||
| What's so bad with regreating the Earth? | ||
| Right. Will that bring plentiful food? | ||
| Now, I have twins that just turned two. | ||
| Congratulations. My daughter's turning two next month. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey! Outstanding! | |
| Thank you. So my twin girls, congratulations, by the way. | ||
| My apologies. Thank you. | ||
| So my twins just turned two. | ||
| So they were born in the beginning of COVID. Mm-hmm. | ||
| Fair enough. Yep. | ||
| Now the hospital where they were born literally tried to keep me out of the room. | ||
| Yeah, me too. Now the doctors kept me from going to all the appointments. | ||
| Like all her ultrasounds and everything. | ||
| Sure, me too. So when they tried to keep me out of the room from my daughters being born, I said to them, I said, your mandate and your CDC, whatever you're abiding by, does not override Right. | ||
| If you stop me from bonding with my offspring when they're born, i.e. my daughters, I will fucking— Sorry, guys. | ||
| I apologize. | ||
| But I told them I will sue you into oblivion. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| Well, Sean, thank you for your call. | ||
| I appreciate that feedback. It's funny because in our culture these days, we all want to be in the room when our children are born. | ||
| I really enjoyed that experience. | ||
| I was fortunate enough to be in the room when my daughter was born. | ||
| However... We're good to go. | ||
| With that, I want to introduce you guys to the new InfoWars MD product line, which sets a new standard for supplements across the board. | ||
| Many of these products can be used not only to relieve the aches and pains of everyday life, but to optimize your body's true potential. | ||
| Now the best part of this new product line is that we are offering these great products with an introductory sale of 25% off across the board. | ||
| Because we know if you try them, you will love them, in turn creating a 360 win. | ||
| So make sure you go to Infowarsstore.com today. | ||
| Check out our new product line. | ||
| Get some for yourself. Buy some for friends and family for this Christmas. | ||
| And stick with us through the break. | ||
| We'll have our great guest on the next segment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Until... | |
| In case you missed it, at DC Homecoming on Twitter sums up the latest horror story of our time. | ||
| A newborn baby boy named Alex was born in Washington State with a 95% survivable congenital heart defect. | ||
| He was also anemic and he needed a blood transfusion. | ||
| In 2021, little Alex's parents had a close friend die of a heart attack shortly after she received her COVID-19 vaccine. | ||
| By all accounts, their friend was healthy, and her death caused alarm bells to go off about the safety of the mRNA vaccine. | ||
| Because of this experience, they wanted to make sure that young baby Alex had unvaccinated blood for his transfusion. | ||
| So they found a match through a member at their church, and they paid to have the proper protocol take place for Alex to receive that donor's blood. | ||
| However, when it came time for the hospital to initiate the transfusion, the doctors and nurses claimed they were unable to locate the unvaccinated donor's blood the parents had procured. | ||
| So without the parents' consent, they took blood from the hospital's general stockpile. | ||
| The doctors and nurses assured the parents that baby Alex would be fine. | ||
| And told them babies rarely, if ever, get blood clots. | ||
| Shortly after the transfusion, baby Alex developed a large blood clot. | ||
| The blood clot ran from his knee all the way up to his heart. | ||
| The hospital changed their tune, saying babies get blood clots all the time, and this was normal. | ||
| Baby Alex was put on the highest dose of blood thinners possible for his age and size. | ||
| But the blood clot didn't dissipate at all. | ||
| Just 12 days later, Alex sadly passed away as a result of a blood clot. | ||
| And now the Sacred Heart Children's Hospital that killed him claims there's no record of baby Alex being at the hospital, despite ample evidence, including photographs, medical bills, and his death certificate. | ||
| What is going on here? | ||
| Just days ago, Cole Reeves and Samantha Savage had their infant child, Will, taken by the New Zealand government to explicitly be given vaccinated blood. | ||
| Will is still healthy, and his father suggests the possibility that hospital workers may have disobeyed the government and used clean, unvaccinated blood for Will's surgery. | ||
| One can only hope that eventually people will start standing up against this mass murder. | ||
| And the sooner, the better. | ||
| Because young, innocent children like Alex are being murdered in hospitals all over the world. | ||
| And these monsters are still pushing to inject every single child with this deadly poison. | ||
| Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome to the American Journal. | |
| We are getting connected with our distinguished guest, Matthew Culkin. | ||
| And in the meantime, we will take a call or two. | ||
| But first, before I take more calls, I do want to read Matthew Culkin's bio. | ||
| He is a trial lawyer with experience in all aspects of U.S. immigration law. | ||
| And the former elected director of the AILA National Board of Governors. | ||
| Before we get connected with Mr. | ||
| Culkin, I do want to take more calls. | ||
| So, let's hear from Geronimo in Arizona. | ||
| Geronimo, how are you? Good morning. | ||
| Good morning. Thank you for calling. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Everybody's always talking about looking for a solution to have all these problems, you know, with privacy and problems. | |
| Mm-hmm. Our founders gave it to us in the preamble of the Declaration of Independence. | ||
| Yeah, but what specifically? | ||
| I mean, our founding fathers talk about how it is the right of the people to take power back from the government when... | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're watching The American Journal with your host, Chase Geyser. | |
| Watch live right now at band.video. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
| Thanks for sticking with us through that short break. | ||
| Geronimo called in and I'd like to hear more of his thoughts on the Constitution and when it's appropriate for the people to take power back from the government. | ||
| So Geronimo, I'm not sure if you were able to hear everything that I said pushing back on your comments and thoughts, but the Constitution seems to give the right to the people to take the power back from the government when our rights are violated. | ||
| But it's not super specific as to when those violations have reached an extent that justifies any sort of action like that. | ||
| What are your thoughts on how we as Americans can know when it's actually constitutionally appropriate for us to take power back from our government? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, when you have elections that don't work anymore, and you have your congresspeople that everyone you elected into office Don't respond how they should appropriately to the abuses that's upon us. | |
| And just, what's that? | ||
| Yeah, complete tyranny is happening. | ||
| We have all three branches of government that are completely corrupt. | ||
| Like, for example, we have Carrie Lake here in Arizona. | ||
| She's going to court. | ||
| I guarantee you nothing. | ||
| This lady that's God stole the election here. | ||
| She's going to stay in. She's going to stay in. | ||
| Just like Joe Biden did. | ||
| And just like Gavin Newsom in California. | ||
| We had a recall. | ||
| They had a recall over there. | ||
| And all throughout that recall, I said, he's going to stay in. | ||
| And sure enough, he's still there. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. Well, thanks for your call, Geronimo. | ||
| I think you make a great point. | ||
| I think our government is totally corrupt, and it's time for us to do something. | ||
| The question is what and how. | ||
| Next, I want to hear from Robert in North Dakota. | ||
| Robert, thank you for staying on hold so long. | ||
| I see here that you say all of our problems are coming together. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What are your thoughts? Yeah, well, it looks to me like what's happening is that We've got about 95% of the federal government being totally unconstitutional, because if you read the Constitution, the federal government was supposed to be small. | |
| What is it? The military, Customs and Border Protection, tariffs, post-rows. | ||
| I guess that would be U.S. highways and interstate highways nowadays, and that's about it. | ||
| But the state government can grow as big a bureaucracy as they want. | ||
| So if California and New York want big bureaucracies at the state level, they can go knock themselves out. | ||
| But in a state like Wyoming that's screaming, fire engine, cherry red, Republican, maybe not so much. | ||
| But, I mean, we have a perfect reason to reduce the federal government. | ||
| We were talking about the FBI at the beginning of the show. | ||
| Well, the FBI is just part of that. | ||
| And this hasn't stuck up on us. | ||
| They've been like that since the beginning. | ||
| And the more you look at their track record. | ||
| And then all these troops, we got troops in, what, 150 countries or more? | ||
| I mean, that's ridiculous. | ||
| That's nothing but a bunch of colonialism. | ||
| And it's interesting that the left, being status, is really very colonial, you know? | ||
| And you can tell because they always accuse us of being stuff like that. | ||
| Anything they accuse us of, they're guilty of themselves. | ||
| But to reduce the government by 95%, we could just say, like, to the world that we're backing up the military, we could just say, sorry, we can't afford it anymore. | ||
| Bye. Bring them back and put them on the border and just reduce the federal government by 95%. | ||
| Any state that wants to fill in the bureaucratic gap, they can go ahead and do it. | ||
| They can go make their own little hell. | ||
| But why are the people so stuck? | ||
| I would submit to you that the reason the people are stuck is because of several things. | ||
| I think that it's possible. | ||
| I'm going to Talk about stuff that I don't like to talk about that people don't like to hear, but truth is like that. | ||
| I don't know if you've noticed that, but truth is like that. | ||
| First of all, we've had a lot of idolatry in this nation. | ||
| As a result, what's connected at the hip with idolatry is immorality. | ||
| What's connected at the hip with immorality is genocide. | ||
| What's connected at the hip with genocide is damnation. | ||
| And so, how deep is How deep is the idolatry? | ||
| Well, first of all, you know, the idea... | ||
| Okay, how about... | ||
| Okay, you know, I hate to do this. | ||
| How about Freemasonry? | ||
| How about Zionism? How about Mariolatry? | ||
| We've got a nation full of that. | ||
| So we've got a pantheon of idols, you know, and we just have to face the facts that this hasn't been working. | ||
| So we're stuck so that generally that can boil down to the spiritual. | ||
| Okay, and then how about the immorality? | ||
| I think... The Satanists, who've been in power a long time, knew in the 1960s that they were going to be able to do anything they wanted to us with the birth control pill. | ||
| And I'll tell you something else. | ||
| I'm old enough to remember that in 1963 or 64, when Life magazine, this is a decade darn near before Roe vs. | ||
| Wade, they had a special issue that became a collector's item about the development of humans in the embryo. | ||
| They had beautiful color pictures of every trimester and really every month. | ||
| So we all knew. | ||
| It was sitting there every time we went to the grocery store. | ||
| That issue was there because it wasn't a monthly issue. | ||
| It was like for posterity. | ||
| Let me ask you this, Robert. | ||
| I'm a Freemason. | ||
| Tell me what you think about that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. Okay. | |
| Well, you know what I would ask you? | ||
| Sure. What level are you? | ||
| 32nd degree. 32nd degree. | ||
| Well, that's pretty high. I would encourage you to repent. | ||
| You would encourage me to... | ||
| So what makes you so sure that Freemasonry is idol worship, Satanism, that sort of thing? | ||
| And I'm not trying to be combative with you or anything. | ||
| I totally respect you. | ||
| But I want to have this conversation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm glad you're talking. | |
| 32nd degree, that's Scottish Rite. | ||
| Am I correct? That's right. I did the Scottish Rite and the York Rite. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And you're right, okay, okay, so here's the thing. | |
| You know, you take a look at the Knights Templar, you know, that's where it kind of came down from, and they became kind of too big for their britches, what the Vatican looked at, when they were doing all that banking stuff for the... | ||
| Yeah, that's why Friday the 13th is considered unlucky, because that was the day that the Templar were disbanded and slaughtered. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, the demole and all that, yeah. | |
| Yeah, and so then they ran away to what, in those days, was like, if we were to run away to Alaska nowadays, that's what running away to Scotland was back in that day, to Europe, you know? | ||
| Sure. And then they, you know, they established there, and they hid out, and, you know, they talk about that they went over to Newfoundland or someplace to hide the treasure or whatever, you know, and they... | ||
| You're really talking against foundational stuff in the United States when you say things like that about Freemasonry. | ||
| I'm glad you're being upfront about that. | ||
| Sure. And the reason I joined Freemasonry, just to be clear, is because I read Benjamin Franklin's autobiography and I thought, man, I want to be more like this guy. | ||
| And it was sort of something I did out of a desire to be as American as possible. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's hard to argue with. | |
| But, okay, I would say If it's so American, how come the city of London is so Masonic? | ||
| Sure. That would be another thing that would trip me up. | ||
| I would just say that I, for one, am a Christian. | ||
| I'm a conservative Lutheran, because some of the liberal Lutherans are really in bad shape. | ||
| They really are. It's really quite shocking. | ||
| A lot of the Protestant denominations are like that. | ||
| And I'm not on a high horse with any of this. | ||
| This is like one sick person telling me, This is kind of a salvation message. | ||
| To me, I feel like this is one sick person me telling another sick person where the hospital is. | ||
| It's the throne of Christ. | ||
| The idea that I have been on a high horse morally in my life is such a joke. | ||
| We can confess and repent of this stuff. | ||
| I would just say... | ||
| It really does get very foundational when you're in America talking, you know, in opposition to Freemasonry. | ||
| Sure. The founding fathers, somebody of them, yeah. | ||
| And the founding fathers, okay, Jefferson, Thomas Paine, Benjamin Franklin, they also wrote some pretty dark stuff. | ||
| Sure, sure. And Thomas Jefferson was basically, you know, More than questioning the veracity of Scripture. | ||
| Sure. Well, Thomas Jefferson, of course, was sort of a deist, and he famously wrote the Jefferson Bible. | ||
| I don't have much more time to talk to you, Robert, so I appreciate your call. | ||
| But make sure, everybody, that you stick with us. | ||
| We have Matthew Culkin coming on to be our guest for the rest of the hour in the next segment. | ||
| Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com and check out our new products. | ||
| Stick with us through this segment, and we'll be with our guest next. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
| This Christmas, Santa has brought us a very special guest, Mr. | ||
| Matthew Culkin. He's joined us before on the show, and he's with us again. | ||
| Matthew, it is an honor and a pleasure to have you with us. | ||
| How are you today, sir? Great. | ||
| Bill's Victory Monday. | ||
| Absolutely. So this segment this morning, we've been talking a lot about the Twitter files and the FBI's influence and coercion in terms of censorship online. | ||
| We've also been talking about Trump's recent comments on Truth Social regarding temporarily suspending the Constitution in order to get reinstated. | ||
| And I actually see here on the screen that just eight minutes ago, Michael Schellenberger released the Part 7 of the Twitter files, which I haven't had a chance to read yet, of course. | ||
| But what are your thoughts as an attorney about the FBI's role and influence in Twitter? | ||
| I'm just a layman, but I thought that was a violation of the First Amendment when the federal government used a private entity to censor American citizens. | ||
| It's a clear violation. | ||
| And it appears that it goes a lot deeper than this, and I think you actually tweeted about it over the weekend. | ||
| If you think that what the FBI is doing with social media is the only thing that they're doing to influence and suppress speech, you're really not paying attention. | ||
| It's probably—it's more likely than not that our intelligence community has been directing— Legacy media with regards to the dissemination of information to the United States, and what we basically have is a propaganda wing of the DNC and the deep state. | ||
| So what's the legal recourse? | ||
| Can the individuals who were censored as a result of specific FBI requests file suit against the FBI? I mean, it seems like up until this point, there hasn't been any accountability for any violation or breaking of law in any department of our intelligence community. | ||
| Well, this is a little outside of my wheelhouse. | ||
| Harvey Dillon, who's running for DNC chairperson, and Ron Coleman are really the experts on this. | ||
| But realistically speaking, there would be a long road. | ||
| Yes, you can file suit, and potentially there would be recourse through the courts, but it's going to be costly, and it's going to be time-consuming. | ||
| I wouldn't want to, if I was an individual whose rights had been challenged, There are many obstacles that would be in front of me to be able to get any type of recourse. | ||
| So what are your thoughts in terms of the new chairman race for the RNC? Are you a Harmeet supporter? | ||
| 100%. She's been fantastic over the last couple of years. | ||
| She's regularly on Fox News, which obviously is It doesn't speak to her credentials. | ||
| But in my opinion, from my interactions with her, I feel as though she's a person of character, of integrity, and has the ability to bring the ball across the goal line. | ||
| She's been at the tip of the spear fighting all of the things that have prevented the free exercise of our constitutional freedoms. | ||
| I made a video last summer, and by last summer I mean summer of 2021, where I was looking at the open positions at the RNC versus the DNC, and the DNC was hiring upwards of 50 different roles, fundraisers, social media influencers, all sorts of different marketing, advertising, human resources, recruitment, any sort of role that you can imagine that an entity that wants to win massively in election cycles would be hiring for. | ||
| And then at the RNC site at the time, they had, I think, seven open positions, maybe six open positions. | ||
| One of them was an intern. | ||
| And my point is, I don't see how this most recent disaster with these midterm elections and just the general weak performance of the Republican Party as a whole on behalf of those it claims to represent. | ||
| I don't see how Ronna McDaniel has an angle here. | ||
| I mean, it seems like she's basically just totally dropped the ball in every way possible. | ||
| Without a doubt. And it's also difficult to fill positions when you're spending a half of Half a million dollars a year on private planes. | ||
| I think that was the number that I saw. | ||
| It seems like there was a lot of waste going on and there was a lot of taking advantage of the funding of that organization. | ||
| Obviously, I don't know definitively what happened, but all I know is that with the amount of loss That the Republicans have faced since she got into that position. | ||
| She just doesn't merit a continuing role. | ||
| Yeah, I think you're absolutely right. | ||
| So do you think that a new RNC chairperson is enough to sort of catalyze the changes that are needed in order to save the party? | ||
| Because it seems to me that the party is sort of on its last gasps in terms of actually being able to survive and be a sustainable force of representation moving forward. | ||
| I tend to disagree. | ||
| And I wouldn't have disagreed until Not only the House popular vote, but the makeup of the Congress going into January. | ||
| And if you look at the map, the map right now is a sea of red, and it generally is. | ||
| But even in traditional blue states, such as New York, its majority, from a geographic standpoint, And this goes for almost every state. | ||
| California, you look at the coast, it's all blue. | ||
| The interior of the country, other than a couple of smatterings, is red. | ||
| Arizona flipped one congressional seat. | ||
| The whole northern part of Nebraska, South Dakota, North Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, West Eastern Washington, that's all red. | ||
| And then you go to Kansas, it's mostly red, and same with Oklahoma, and obviously Texas, other than the southern portion of the state. | ||
| A little tiny bit here and there. | ||
| So to answer your question... | ||
| I don't believe that this is a center-right country still. | ||
| According to the House popular vote, it was 54 million votes for Republicans versus 51 million for the Democrats. | ||
| And I believe that what you're saying is that... | ||
| The majority of this country, by about 3 million, a slight majority of this country, are centrists who are fiscally conservative and socially moderate. | ||
| Yeah, and I agree with you in terms of culturally. | ||
| I think there's no question that the American people are a center-right people, Bill, despite what the... | ||
| Changing demographics might actualize in the long term, but my concern is that despite the fact that the American people are center-right, it seems like no matter who we elect to actually represent us, there's immediately a compromise of principle and policy that takes place once those people go to the swamp. | ||
| With few exceptions. | ||
| Thomas Massey is obviously one of them. | ||
| He's fantastic. I don't know if you see what he does on Twitter, but Well, I experienced this firsthand. | ||
| My own congressman, who's a personal friend and a client who I care very deeply for, who just resigned his position after the redistricting in New York State, he introduced I'm not sure if he introduced, but he signed on to a sweeping anti-Second Amendment bill. | ||
| It's another example of a Republican just sort of switching on policy after getting in the cycle. | ||
| More from Matthew Culkin with us after this break. | ||
| Make sure you check out Infowarsstore.com and come and stay with us on the American Journal. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Chase Geyser. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Welcome back to The American Journal with our distinguished guest, Matthew Kolkin. | ||
| Matthew, I want to talk a little bit this segment, and I know that your specialties in immigration law specifically, but just as someone who has studied law, I want to talk to you a little bit about the Constitution and the justification for any sort of revolution. | ||
| And I use the word revolution very loosely because I'm not in any way advocating for violence, but our Constitution is pretty clear that the people have a right to take power back from the federal government in the event that it fails to perform its duties or transgresses against the rights but our Constitution is pretty clear that the people have a right to And, you know, I wrote down a list before going live this morning of everything that's happened in the past couple of years with, you know, they locked us down. | ||
| They ruined our currency. | ||
| They forced us to wear masks. | ||
| They forced our children to wear masks. | ||
| In some states, they're forcing children to have surgery to help them transition from one gender to the other or puberty blockers in terms of hormone therapy, forcing us to get vaccinated. | ||
| They call us domestic terrorists. | ||
| They have involved themselves in mass censorship. | ||
| in a number of ways. | ||
| At one point, would the Founding Fathers have flipped out? | ||
| A long time ago. | ||
| I think that the only solution that we have is for there to be more governors like Ron DeSantis. | ||
| Yeah. And that's the first line of defense. | ||
| The federal government has exceeded its initial and intended structure. | ||
| The federal government shouldn't be dealing with anything other than national defense. | ||
| There's taxation, obviously, and interstate commerce. | ||
| But The only way to really take care of it would be to defund it on a mass scale. | ||
| And then there will be mass economic ramifications to that because of the amount of people that the federal government employs. | ||
| In Buffalo, New York even, just government in general, between federal and state employees, that's the largest employer in the city of Buffalo, New York. | ||
| So they've ingrained themselves In the fabric of our economies and have made any sort of divestiture very difficult because they've indoctrinated so many people who are dependent upon their livelihoods from the federal government or the state governments. | ||
| But that being said, I see more than I have ever seen in my lifetime counties within this country who are wanting to separate from the—and most of these are rural counties—that are wanting to separate I see more than I have ever seen in my lifetime counties within this country who are wanting to separate from the—and | ||
| And I think that if we are going to have a sweeping return to federalism, which is how this country was created, where each state was supposed to be its own little country, and that each state would work with other countries together as a way to defend against all enemies, and that each state would work with other countries together as a way to defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that to do so, there's going to have to be recognition that the people in the cities | ||
| And I think that the people in the city are going to be governed in a vastly different way than the people that are living outside of the cities. | ||
| And if there is any way—and I'm not a proponent of national divorce or civil war, certainly not by the taking of arms— What I would love to see... | ||
| Is the rural areas of the country redraw, have a vast redrawing of the state lines and have counties secede into other states. | ||
| I know this is happening in eastern Oregon and Idaho. | ||
| They were very desirous of eastern Oregon moving into Idaho, becoming part of that state. | ||
| And as that happens... I believe that we will have the ability to have the locations where the voters live run the way they want them to be run. | ||
| If the cities want to have socialism, they can have it. | ||
| That's part of federalism as long as they're not engaging in constitutional violations. | ||
| But it's not fair. For the city centers to dictate policy throughout an entire state when the majority of the geography is Republican, and we're dealing with razor-thin minorities. | ||
| It would be nice to have an electoral college system within the states. | ||
| Sure, absolutely. I was talking to a close friend about this last night for several hours, and one of the concerns is just the amount of complacency in our culture, the amount of Neglect and abuse that the American people are willing to tolerate in terms of their rights being violated. | ||
| It seems like no one cares that the FBI has been coercing Twitter. | ||
| It seems like even if the CIA or the FBI were to come out and admit that they assassinated JFK, half the country wouldn't even care, right? | ||
| We talk a lot on Infowars about 1984. | ||
| Alex Jones has famously said that the cure for 1984 is 1776, but it seems to me that we're dealing with more of a brave new world outcome than a 1984 outcome where those who seek to subjugate us have found a way to keep complacency but it seems to me that we're dealing with more of a brave new world outcome than a 1984 outcome where those who seek to subjugate us have found a way to keep complacency growing in line with subjugation to the point where we're sort of | ||
| So my question for you is how do you think this plays out long term? | ||
| Do you think that the powers that be are going to be able to keep the people complacent as they subjugate them more and more over the years to come? | ||
| Or do you think there will be some sort of an awakening? | ||
| Do you think things will get bad enough that people will stand up for themselves? | ||
| Well, there already has been an awakening. | ||
| I mean, in certain areas of the country. | ||
| And once again, I point to Ron DeSantis. | ||
| Ron DeSantis has specifically insulated his state from the ridiculousness that we saw during the pandemic. | ||
| He stayed open. And it worked, and he was right. | ||
| And politicians, it's monkey see, monkey do. | ||
| When these other Republican governors see how popular Ron DeSantis has become by asserting himself and insulating the citizens of his state from the ridiculousness, hopefully we're going to have 24, 25 governors who Who are going to stand up and say, | ||
| enough's enough. We're going to enter into a pact which basically prevents the federal government from enforcing any laws that's a violation of a state or the federal constitution and gut the federal government of their enforcement mechanisms in the interior of the country. | ||
| And they can do so by passing state laws, which say that if you violate the state law, if a federal law enforcement agency violates state law, you're going to be prosecuted. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And the majority of the people that are working for the federal government within the states are residents of those states. | ||
| They live there. | ||
| They work there. | ||
| And they're going to have to decide whether or not they're going to continue to carry out. | ||
| And I have no reason to believe that they will go against their self-interest and they will follow orders. | ||
| But they will have to follow unconstitutional orders and continue to do so and violate state law and risk being incarcerated as a result. | ||
| Yeah, I think that's a really reasonable outcome. | ||
| We're about ready to go into a quick break, but during the next segment I want to ask you a little bit about state dependency on federal government in terms of federal funding and how that might compromise those types of initiatives. | ||
| Before we go into the break, I do want to introduce the audience to our new InfoWars MD product line, which sets a new standard for supplements across the board. | ||
| Many of these products can be used not only to relieve the aches and pains of everyday life, but to optimize your body's true potential. | ||
| The best part is that we are offering these great products with an introductory sale of 25% off across the board, because we know if you try them, you will love them individually. | ||
| In turn, creating a 360 win. | ||
| So make sure you check out Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Get something for yourself. Get something for your friends and family for Christmas. | ||
| They are excellent stocking stuffers, and we know that once you try this great line of products, you'll keep coming back. | ||
| Stick with us through this break. | ||
| We'll be back in just a few minutes with Matthew Kolkin. | ||
| In the meantime, check out Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
| With us for this segment of the hour, we have the great Matthew Culkin. | ||
| We've been talking about how the states can reclaim sovereignty relative to the federal government. | ||
| And the question I have for you, Matthew, is I know that In the case of one example, we've seen how the federal government has leveraged policy at universities across the United States. | ||
| Title IX is a great example of this. | ||
| Any university that receives federal funding in any form is subject to losing that funding if certain federal policies aren't followed. | ||
| And so we've seen instances with Title IX, for example, where Students have been falsely accused of sexual assault, and they're not able to face their accusers in these sort of mock trials that happen. | ||
| And it's sort of up to the discretion or determination of the university to decide whether someone's guilty or not, whether to suspend somebody from university or not. | ||
| And all of these policies sort of come under this threat that... | ||
| These universities could potentially lose their federal funding if they don't abide by the rules and regulations of Title IX. And so if we take that principle and we apply it to the states, many of which receive a tremendous amount of federal funding for different programs, whether it's entitlement programs or highway upkeep or what have you, Is there a problem there for states who seek to reclaim their own state sovereignty? | ||
| Is there a risk then for them to lose federal resources that they depend on to execute their basic functioning? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What do you think? That's how they get you. | |
| What would be nice is to see an abolishment of the federal income tax altogether. | ||
| Have each state have income tax or a flat tax implemented by the state governments and have each state We're good to go. | ||
| Just like the states are required to operate within a budget. | ||
| And the continuing printing of money is just... | ||
| The deficit and the debt are above my pay grade. | ||
| But I can tell you one thing. | ||
| It's not sustainable. | ||
| And there's no one that's going to be bailing us out again. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| Do you think that there... | ||
| There's enough leeway with our problem of this fractional reserve banking system that we set up for us to correct the problem? | ||
| Or is it inherently unsustainable regardless of whether the federal government figures out a way to balance its own budget? | ||
| Once again, above my pay grade, but my gut instinct is that the United States is circling the drain. | ||
| The world economy is literally... | ||
| They've pressed the plunger. | ||
| It's going down. Yeah, it feels that way to me too. | ||
| What do you think ultimately happens then when this Ponzi scheme that is the U.S. dollar comes to a head? | ||
| Is there just going to be total economic collapse worldwide like the Great Depression? | ||
| Would your intuition suggest or is there going to be some way to bail this out? | ||
| They don't call it the Great Reset for nothing. | ||
| I think on a previous podcast we were talking about billionaires buying bunkers in New Zealand and other places like that. | ||
| That's right. The people that are in power, they don't care. | ||
| They've got private planes and second homes on islands. | ||
| This doesn't impact them. | ||
| They've got theirs. Some of the decisions that are made are so incompetent on the surface that it seems almost like this is all intentional. | ||
| Do you think that they're trying to sort of catalyze this collapse in order to usher in a new system that's more sort of coercive and subjugating? | ||
| Or do you think that they're trying to actually save what there is and they're just terribly incompetent at it? | ||
| Or both? Well, you were the one that brought up Brave New World. | ||
| Yeah. Those people were smart. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Give me one of those pills. Yeah, absolutely. | |
| So what do you think the incentive is, though, for this for this globalism? | ||
| We talk a lot on Infowars and I talk a lot on my podcast about globalism and how it's sort of morally, philosophically, inherently wrong. | ||
| But one of the questions that I haven't been able to understand an answer for or find an answer for is what is the incentive? | ||
| Why do these different world leaders want globalization? | ||
| How is that actually a perk for them? | ||
| Well, ask the big guy and his 10%. | ||
| Yeah. I mean, people are getting rich off of globalization. | ||
| And when I say people, I mean the people at the very top of the pyramid. | ||
| The rest of us are just in the scheme. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| Do you think that this... | ||
| I guess my point is, obviously, this getting rich is a product of people working, earning, paying taxes, and then that tax money being laundered through whatever programs, initiatives, or wars back into the pockets of what I call the political class, right? These elite political leaders, whether domestic or foreign or both. | ||
| With the advent of AI, there's a lot of concern about the reduction in middle-class jobs. | ||
| And doesn't it present a problem for this political class if the middle class of America goes away? | ||
| Because that's less money that they can launder and generate tax revenue into their own pockets. | ||
| Well, I think we've spoken about this before as well. | ||
| You have to keep the middle class just full enough that they don't riot. | ||
| I mean, we've already seen what happens on Black Friday or whatever the day, the big shopping day is where people riot over a 40 percent markdown on a flat screen TV. | ||
| There's a thing which I know we've spoken about in the past called Nine Meals Till Anarchy. | ||
| Historically speaking, they've done the modeling and after three days of no food, the mobs revolt. | ||
| And that starts in the cities? | ||
| That would happen here very quickly. | ||
| And that would start in the cities and then kind of work its way out? | ||
| I don't think the rural portions of the country are more equipped to be able to deal with it. | ||
| Especially in places like Utah, where the Mormons proliferate. | ||
| A very large part of their religious doctrine based on self-preparedness. | ||
| They're supposed to have a year's worth of food stored in their pantries at all times. | ||
| I think they might have backed down off of that, but The cities aren't equipped. | ||
| I mean, we're talking about, well, heck, we just had a big snowstorm in Buffalo, New York about two weeks ago. | ||
| They had to move a football game. | ||
| You walked into the grocery store here, and there were, I mean, yes, there were shortages during the pandemic, but the entire bread aisle and every grocery store I walked into, and I go into a certain amount of them in the area that I live just out of curiosity to see what's going on, The bread aisles are all empty within an hour or two. | ||
| Certainly in Buffalo, New York, if there's a football game, the beer aisles are empty. | ||
| But we have a just-in-time delivery component. | ||
| We have... A trucking system that is very much on the brink of collapse because of the unavailability of new trucks and parts for the trucks that remain on the road. | ||
| I just had a conversation with somebody in the industry. | ||
| They were saying that they don't believe that the supply chain issues that they're having with will alleviate until sometime in 2023. | ||
| These trucks can last for about a million miles, and some of these trucks We're good to go. | ||
| I hate to be one of these conspiracy theorists, because I'm not, and which we've talked about in the past. | ||
| But the thing that scares me the most is that we have a system where there are far too many people that are takers than producers. | ||
| And it's not sustainable. | ||
| And this country doesn't build anything anymore. | ||
| Well, it's been an honor and a pleasure to have you on the American Journal, Matthew. | ||
| I hope you'll come back and join us again in the future here on Infowars at band.video. | ||
| Everybody needs to check out Matthew Culkin at Twitter as soon as you can. | ||
| check me out as well on twitter at real chase geyser or one american podcast.com it's been an honor and a pleasure to be with the audience this morning here on info wars and to sit in for the great harrison smith make sure you stay tuned and keep streaming band.video today and check out info wars store.com for a great new product line and get some stocking stuffers for the family this christmas thanks | ||
| again and take care you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you It's been said many times that trials and tribulations, if you don't give up, will only make you stronger, will make you more versatile, will make you more competitive. | ||
| And that has certainly happened in the last couple of years with supply chain breakdowns and other issues. | ||
| So, after a year plus of contacting organizations and traveling around the nation and going to top trade shows, we have made connections with two of the very top quality suppliers of nutraceutical grade supplements in the nation. | ||
| And so many of the best selling, top rated, top brands in the United States and around the world are supplied by these two companies. | ||
| And the first big line we're rolling out is InfoWars MD. Every one of these 10 new products is the highest grade in the United States. | ||
| The cleanest, the best, the freshest. | ||
| It's insane. Take the new turmeric formula. | ||
| It's called Turmeric 95. | ||
| Just like bodies. It's the same turmeric 95% cuminoid extract that was in bodies from the very same producer of it. | ||
| We've just cut out the middleman, so we can lower the price some. | ||
| Think about that, ladies and gentlemen, and it's the same for all of these products. | ||
| But many of these products are things never before available at infoworkstore.com, like The full spectrum CBD oil. | ||
| Doesn't have THC in it, doesn't get you high, but has all the good parts of the oils in the hemp plant that are so well documented for your brain, your cardiovascular, your joints, everything. | ||
| I went to a doctor two years ago, had a checkup, had a full physical done, and they prescribed me CBD oil. | ||
| Not that it was a prescription, they just prescribed that I go out and get CBD oil. | ||
| And guess what? I discovered the CBD oil that they told me to get came from this company. | ||
| So ladies and gentlemen, InfoWarsMD has 10 new products. |
Export Selection