Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
By opening the floodgates to unfettered free speech, Elon Musk has allowed hate to spread far and fast on Twitter. | |
| While the left whines out another distraction about Matt Taibbi catering to the richest man in the world. | ||
| What do the Twitter files reveal about the inner workings of, as Taibbi described, a Frankensteinian tale of a human-built mechanism grown out of the control of its designer? | ||
| By 2020, requests from the New World Order disciples to delete tweets were routine. | ||
| One executive would write to another... | ||
| More to review from the Biden team. | ||
| The reply would come back, handle. | ||
| Twitter was acting as a wrecking ball of political tech censorship, catering to the corrupt Washington establishment, directly impacting and propagandizing a digital town square which affected the general welfare of the United States, whose lifeblood is protected by the power and freedom of the First Amendment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And if it turns out there are a lot of us on this list where the DNC targeted us, and I will quote the immortal words of Joseph Welch when he attacked Joe McCarthy for the enemy's list he had, at long last, sir, have you no shame. | |
| Yes. President Biden, all of your... | ||
| I see little operatives in the DNC who have targeted American citizens. | ||
| Have you, Mr. | ||
| President, have all of you at last. | ||
| No shame. Taibbi points out that both parties had access to these tools. | ||
| For instance, in 2020, requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were received and honored. | ||
| But the overwhelming amount of leftist Marxist cucks staffed at Twitter ensured that Democrat Party requests took the front burner, a fact backed up by the overall donations by Twitter to the Democrat Party reaching 99.73%, or $165,969 to Democrats, while $451 went to Republicans in 2022. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you worried about these Twitter files coming out? | |
| What was that experience like having Kellyanne, who's always in control of herself, sticking this mega trolls on you? | ||
| It's terrifying. | ||
| When you get targeted in some of these ways, it's hard to differentiate between what is somebody just online trying to rattle you and what's a real threat. | ||
| You see in things like Pizzagate that online conspiracies can mobilize very real and very direct offline violence. | ||
| I saw those harms, I experienced those harms, and now it was those harms through a mainstream news outlet being held up in the Oval Office by the former President of the United States, and that is What does appear to be illegal to the point of treason is that a false narrative of possible foreign hacks supposedly behind the Biden laptop debacle was manufactured by Silicon Valley, | ||
| the media, and the DNC. Well, we know that this whole smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin. | ||
| That's been clear for well over a year now that they've been pushing this false narrative about the vice president and his son According to internal emails, there was zero evidence of foreign interference occurring. | ||
| What did occur was a meltdown of internal Twitter censorship spearheaded by top Twitter management, with the result of ultimately burying a critical story under false pretenses in order to sway popular opinion and alter the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. | ||
| In retrospect, we now know that as the New York Post reported, nearly four of five Americans who've been following the Hunter Biden laptop scandal believe that truthful coverage would have changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. | ||
| And an even higher number, 81%, said U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland should investigate the laptop. | ||
| Not only have Twitter employees like Head of Legal Policy and Trust Vijaya Gadi and Trust and Safety Chief Yoel Roth proven that they willingly altered the 2020 U.S. presidential election, but they have demonstrated that Silicon Valley, the Mockingbird Media, and the corruption in Washington is an occupying force and a direct threat to the stability and the future of the United States of America. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This cyber insurrection is what I'm calling it. | |
| It's an assault on this country, and it's borderline treason if you think about what the executives did at Twitter. | ||
| John Bowne. You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to the American Journal. | ||
| Lots of stuff to talk about today. | ||
| We'll be taking your phone calls throughout the show. | ||
| Of course, our biggest topic will probably be the Twitter files. | ||
| We'll go through and determine what exactly we learned from this, if anything. | ||
| It's just another one of these examples, one of these times when It's almost like we didn't need this. | ||
| We didn't need the Twitter files. | ||
| You can just see from your own observation how things are coordinated behind the scenes. | ||
| But I guess it's nice to have a little bit of proof of what we all know to be true from the very beginning. | ||
| So we'll get into that. | ||
| We'll show you lots of videos, some advertisements from Elon Musk as to what's coming up next. | ||
| But a lot of stuff is happening. | ||
| Really across the board, and we'll get into it all, and of course take your phone calls throughout the show as well. | ||
| But we'll begin today, as we do every day, with our Daily Dispatch. | ||
| All right, here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Monday, the 5th of December, 2022. | ||
| Her baby needs heart surgery, but she is demanding unvaccinated blood. | ||
| A New Zealand couple is refusing to allow their infant to undergo life-saving heart surgery using blood from people vaccinated against COVID-19, showing how vaccine misinformation continues to manifest in unexpected ways two years into the global inoculation campaigns. | ||
| Well, that's an interesting way to put it. | ||
| New York Times, I would phrase it a different way. | ||
| The way that I would phrase it would be parents of a baby who requires surgery are requesting unvaccinated blood Since vaccinated blood is tainted with the mRNA gene-altering technology that they don't want in their child, and the New Zealand government is blocking them from being able to do that. | ||
| Sort of a little bit different than where New York Times places the blame here. | ||
| It's not COVID misinformation that's putting this baby in danger. | ||
| It is the ineptitude and immovability of the ridiculous and, at this point, highly unscientific COVID restrictions and vaccine mandates. | ||
| The four-month-old is critically ill with a severe case of pulmonary valve stenosis, a heart valve disorder. | ||
| The boy's mother says she wants her son's operation to take place without delay, but she's demanded that safe blood be used, with her lawyer saying that the family was concerned about blood containing traces of vaccines using the new mRNA technology. | ||
| You see, when you take these new vaccines, these new so-called, not-at-all, even-a-little-bit vaccines, it gets in your blood and it taints your blood. | ||
| And if that blood is transfused to another person, the toxin comes with it. | ||
| They don't want that. | ||
| But the New Zealand Health Service has denied the family's request to use blood from unvaccinated volunteers and says that the vaccines pose no risk to donor supplies. | ||
| On Tuesday, the high court in Auckland will decide whether to grant the health service, Tiwata Ora, a temporary guardianship of the baby so it can remove the child from the family and perform the surgery. | ||
| Paul White, the agency's lawyers, described the boy as getting sicker with every heartbeat, but they won't let him get the operation because the parents want... | ||
| Untainted blood, and they're not allowing that to happen. | ||
| Again, we'll get into this a little bit later. | ||
| We'll show you a video of the parents actually explaining their reasoning behind this decision. | ||
| But it's just got to be baffling listening to the mainstream media, believing the mainstream, even having the mindset that would allow this type of story to just enter unfiltered into your mind without the slightest ability to just cognitively Dissect what's going on here. | ||
| Again, they're trying to claim as if these parents are placing their baby in danger by refusing vaccinated blood, but they have literally thousands of people volunteering to supply and donate unvaccinated blood. | ||
| It's not an issue that they want unvaccinated blood. | ||
| That's easy. | ||
| That's simple. | ||
| That's a condition that could easily be fulfilled. | ||
| No problem whatsoever. | ||
| Literally thousands of people going, I've got the right blood type. | ||
| I'm a healthy person. | ||
| I haven't been vaccinated. | ||
| Here is my blood. | ||
| You can have it. | ||
| Go do the surgery. | ||
| And the New Zealand government is saying, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| If we do this surgery with unvaccinated blood, it means that we are somehow capitulating to the demand for unvaccinated blood. | ||
| So, See, that's going to mess up our whole program of demanding that absolutely everybody get vaccinated. | ||
| So out of a political move, we are denying your baby the surgery. | ||
| They aren't denying their own baby surgery on some political grounds. | ||
| It's... Health grounds on their part. | ||
| And again, we'll show you the video of this where they explain it perfectly clearly. | ||
| So the New Zealand government, instead of just allowing this family to do the surgery with the unvaccinated blood, they're working instead to take the baby away from the parents and force it to have a transfusion of mRNA-tainted blood. | ||
| I guess horrific would be one way of describing that. | ||
| Meanwhile, more just... | ||
| Utter horror. We've been covering this developing story for the last couple weeks, but it's reaching new and just ridiculous heights. | ||
| Paralympian claims Canada offered to euthanize her when she asked for a stair lift. | ||
| A Paralympic Army veteran who stunned lawmakers in Canada when she claimed that a government official had offered to give her euthanasia equipment while fighting to have a wheelchair lift installed in her home. | ||
| Retired Corporal Christine Gauthier, who competed at the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Paralympics, testified on Thursday that the unnamed Veterans Affairs caseworker had offered in writing to provide her with medically assisted dying device, the CBC reported. | ||
| In other words, she's disabled. | ||
| She has trouble going up and down stairs. | ||
| She applies since, you know, everything medical related in Canada is controlled by the government. | ||
| You have to go to the government and ask, will you please install a stair lift so I can get up and down the stairs in my house despite being in a wheelchair? | ||
| And they said, yeah, we could do that, but it might take a while to install. | ||
| In the meantime, have you considered suicide? | ||
| Have you thought about just killing yourself? | ||
| I understand it's... Trouble going up and down stairs. | ||
| I mean, sure, seven years ago you competed in the Paralympics, meaning you're not exactly, you know, not living your life. | ||
| You're not exactly completely incapable of being a human being. | ||
| You clearly have drive and you're healthy and fit and all this other stuff. | ||
| But if you want to wait for the stair lift, that's going to be a couple months. | ||
| So why don't you just kill yourself instead? | ||
| Why don't we just euthanize you instead? | ||
| So again, we got a video of this too. | ||
| We'll go to that a little bit later. | ||
| As the Canadian government just is diving headfirst into this futuristic death cult of scientific murder. | ||
| It's really incredible. Speaking of, your third story here from thesun.co.uk. | ||
| I worked with the Wuhan lab. | ||
| I tried to warn them, and I know COVID was a lab leak. | ||
| A scientist who works closely with the Wuhan lab has claimed COVID was genetically engineered and leaked from the facility. | ||
| What? What? | ||
| Why I'm so shocked. | ||
| Dr. Andrew Huff, former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, claims to have had a ringside seat to what he brands as one of the biggest coverups in history and the biggest U.S. intelligence failure since 9-11. | ||
| Again, if you think this was a failure, you misunderstand the designs of the people in charge. | ||
| This has been going incredibly well for them. | ||
| The release went great. | ||
| The lockdown went spectacularly. | ||
| The vaccine rollout, a little bit of a hiccup, but it's moving along at pace. | ||
| They're doing incredibly well with exactly what their plans are. | ||
| This is not an accident. But again, we'll get into that. | ||
| How much time do we have here? | ||
| Again, the New York Times covers a story that we are going to get into and tell the truth about. | ||
| But again, they discuss it in the most obtuse and dishonest way. | ||
| Their headline is Elon Musk, Matt Taibbi, and a very modern maelstrom. | ||
| They say it was on the surface a typical example of reporting the news. | ||
| A journalist obtains internal documents from a major corporation, shedding light on a political dispute that flared in the waning days of the 2020 presidential race. | ||
| But when it comes to Elon Musk and Twitter, nothing is typical. | ||
| The so-called Twitter files, released Friday evening by the independent journalist Matt Taibbi, set off a firestorm among pundits, media ethicists, and lawmakers in both parties. | ||
| It also offered a window into the fractured modern landscape of news, where a story's reception is often shaped by readers' assumptions about the motivation of both reporters and subjects. | ||
| So you... | ||
| You can't say they ignored the story. | ||
| New York Times, no, we covered that story. | ||
| They're just not actually covering the story. | ||
| They're not actually discussing what is obtained and revealed in the Twitter files. | ||
| Instead, they're writing a story about how it's so confusing. | ||
| It's such a scandal. | ||
| They're writing about the scandal. | ||
| They're writing about the release of the Twitter files, not the Twitter files themselves. | ||
| It's just, and people are okay with this. | ||
| People still trust the mainstream media for their news. | ||
| It's wild. | ||
| We'll finish up with the Daily Dispatch on the other side. | ||
| Stay tuned. Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| The battle for free speech is on. | ||
| And I want to discuss sort of the way this is being covered first. | ||
| We'll get into the actual details of what's included in the battle. | ||
| Twitter files that are being released by Elon Musk is a major news story. | ||
| It's a major event. It's a major revelation showing the internal secretive documents and communications of Twitter employees with the people requesting censorship on behalf of their political party, their political candidate, their ideology. | ||
| Or whatever. Just whatever they wanted to censor. | ||
| They had direct communication with Twitter who would dutifully carry out the censorship. | ||
| It's not that complicated to figure out. | ||
| You would think that when the newspaper of record, the New York Times, wrote an article about this, you would actually hear things like what's in the files, what's contained in them, what the documents actually show. | ||
| That's not what you get from the New York Times. | ||
| So I'm going to help you guys out. | ||
| I'm going to help out the gray lady. | ||
| I'm going to help out the New York Times. I've done a little bit of editing here. | ||
| What I'm going to do here is take an article and remove about half of it, because about half of the article is actually telling you things about the story, and the other half are weasel words added in to obscure, obfuscate, and confuse what's actually going on. | ||
| So let's go through some of these. | ||
| So for example, the first paragraph says, The so-called Twitter files, released Friday evening by the independent journalist Matt Taibbi, set off a firestorm among pundits, media ethicists, and lawmakers on both parties. | ||
| It also offered a window into the fractured modern landscape of news, where a story's reception is often shaped by a reader's assumption. | ||
| So this is all stuff not about the Twitter files. | ||
| This is all stuff about the reception of the Twitter files, about the media perception in the wake of the Twitter... | ||
| No, no, no. All right, so we're going to just... | ||
| Cross out about half of these lines and actually see where the truth lies, like finding a needle in a haystack. | ||
| What they're actually saying is it was a typical example of news reporting. | ||
| A journalist obtains internal documents and releases it. | ||
| The Twitter files, released Friday evening by independent journalist Matt Taibbi, offered a window into the fractured modern landscape of news. | ||
| You can just ignore all the other stuff. | ||
| This is the actual facts that are embedded within the story. | ||
| But it's like... It's like going to a New York deli and you get about two slices of meat and then bread about four inches thick. | ||
| It's a lot of waste, a lot of nonsense going on. | ||
| We really want to get to the meat of the story. | ||
| They say the Tempest began when Mr. | ||
| Musk teased the internal documents that Now, what it says here is, he said. | ||
| He said would reveal. | ||
| So let's just take out that little phrase there, he said, and see what it really says. | ||
| The Tempest began when Mr. | ||
| Musk teased the release of internal documents that would reveal the story behind 2020's decision to restrict posts linking to a report in the New York Times about Joseph R. Biden Jr.'s son, Hunter. | ||
| Mr. Musk, and see they add in here, who has accused tech companies of censorship... | ||
| So let's just cut that part out and just read what it actually says. | ||
| Mr. Musk then pointed readers to the account of Mr. | ||
| Taibbi, a journalist who shares some of Mr. | ||
| Musk's disdain for the mainstream media. | ||
| That's not actually part of the story. | ||
| That's just there to poison the well, to make you think that you can't trust this person when really they're not offering any evidence as to why you can't trust them. | ||
| Having a preconceived notion of government or corporate malfeasance doesn't mean that you don't have evidence of that malfeasance. | ||
| So it actually doesn't discredit anything that they're saying, but they're including it in an attempt to, in the minds of their readers, discredit the reality that they're saying. | ||
| So again, the way they put it, Mr. | ||
| Musk, who accused tech companies of censorship, shared this with Matt Taibbi, an iconoclast journalist who shares some of Mr. | ||
| Musk's disdain for the mainstream media. | ||
| What they're actually telling you is Mr. | ||
| Musk then pointed readers to the account of Mr. | ||
| Taibbi, a journalist. That's... | ||
| That's without all of the editorializing. | ||
| I want to try to teach people how to read the fake news and glean the reality from within crap. | ||
| To find the diamond in the cesspool. | ||
| Also, Matt Taibbi is not really much of an iconoclast. | ||
| He's kind of an establishment guy. | ||
| An iconoclast is someone who goes up against the status quo and challenges the status quo. | ||
| Well, an iconoclast is a Byzantine who has problems with the Nicene Creed, actually. | ||
| If you want to get back to the basics here. | ||
| But no, yeah, these are just words that, you know, make people think that the journalists and CEOs involved in this somehow have a political agenda that they're upholding above the truth. | ||
| Which is what the New York Times does, which is what regular mainstream media journalists are constantly doing. | ||
| They're projecting that onto the people in this story in an attempt to sway the opinion of the people reading it. | ||
| Published in the form of a lengthy media thread, Mr. | ||
| Taibbi's report included messages of email exchanges among Twitter officials deliberating how to handle dissemination of the post story on their platform. | ||
| So I went ahead and scratched out handle and wrote censor just to give you a more accurate view of what's going on here. | ||
| See, there were Twitter officials deliberating how to censor disinformation of a post story on their platform. | ||
| Because it's not up to them to handle the dissemination. | ||
| You don't have to do anything. | ||
| It will be disseminated. | ||
| If you just have a hands-off approach, the dissemination takes place. | ||
| You're not handling dissemination. | ||
| The only way that you can have an effect on dissemination is you can increase it because it's a story that you like, or you can censor it and decrease dissemination, which is what they did. | ||
| So, censor is the accurate word there. | ||
| They go on to say things like, Mr. | ||
| Musk and Mr. Taibbi framed the exchanges as evidence of rank censorship and pernicious influences by liberals. | ||
| You didn't need Mr. Musk and Mr. | ||
| Taibbi to frame that. | ||
| It was there in the exchanges. | ||
| So what they should say is, the exchanges show evidence of rank censorship and pernicious influence by liberals. | ||
| I'm going to say a bunch of other stuff. | ||
| Again, we just scratched all this out. | ||
| None of this is actual news. | ||
| None of this is actually telling you anything. | ||
| So let's just continue on here. | ||
| The exchanges show evidence of rank censorship and pernicious influence by liberals. | ||
| The Fox News host, Tucker Carlson, go ahead and scratch out the editorial comment about him. | ||
| Made the claim that the documents show systemic violation of the First Amendment, the largest example in modern history. | ||
| House Republicans, who have called for an investigation into the business dealings of Hunter Biden, asserted that the report showed systemic collusion between Twitter and aides to Joe Biden, who was then the Democratic nominee. | ||
| And again, they add in more stuff. | ||
| Hopefully you can read this well enough. | ||
| You can see what I've scratched down and what I haven't. | ||
| The type of things they add will be like, Jack Dorsey, Twitter's chief executive at the time, later reversed the decision to block the post story and told Congress it had been a mistake. | ||
| It doesn't matter. They blocked it. | ||
| They blocked it at the behest of Joe Biden and his aides. | ||
| They did that. All this other stuff doesn't matter. | ||
| You can claim that Tucker Carlson has made claims of liberal censorship before. | ||
| But all that means is he was probably right, because what you're reporting on, New York Times, is the release of evidence of liberal censorship. | ||
| What you're releasing in this article, what you're supposed to be talking about, is the evidence that Elon Musk presented that showed unequivocally that there has been censorship and collusion between The government, and specifically Democratic operatives, and Twitter to silence, censor, and bury stories that don't reflect on them positively. | ||
| That's what you're supposed to be reporting here. | ||
| I know it can be confusing with all this other stuff about Musk and Tucker Carlson and Matt Taibbi as if somehow their personalities disprove the evidence that they're laying forward, but they don't. | ||
| The evidence is still there. | ||
| So let's see what else we can cut out here. | ||
| Former Twitter executives who have lamented Mr. | ||
| Musk's chaotic stewardship of the company. | ||
| See, we can just cut out the word chaotic there. | ||
| So it reads a little bit better. | ||
| And we'll finish this up on the other side and tell you what's actually there. | ||
| We'll do the New York Times job and actually report the news. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. We will get into actually what is in the Twitter files in just a moment. | ||
| Again, we're just trying to do a little, trying to help out the New York Times. | ||
| I seem confused as to what the point of this story is. | ||
| I'm trying to think of, like, what, you know, other times in history, what the stories would look like. | ||
| You know, if you were reading an article, the first major New York Times article about Watergate was this convoluted and distorted. | ||
| What would that look like? | ||
| How would they tell the story in that case? | ||
| Other times when bombshell information has been revealed from inside sources. | ||
| Is the discussion about, well, who are these sources? | ||
| And, you know, sure, there are journalists who are pretty unimpeachable on their facts and activity. | ||
| But, you know, is that—should we really trust them? | ||
| And let's talk about the confusion this is causing and all of the conflict that's breaking out as a consequence of these files. | ||
| Was it even a good idea to release these files in the first place? | ||
| You just don't get any actual information about what the actual files say. | ||
| So we'll make up for them in that regard. | ||
| But again, they just... | ||
| They act like this is somehow dangerous. | ||
| The thing they're trying to get across to you, and the thing I always say about the mainstream media, the point of them is to tell the truth, believe you believing a lie. | ||
| So the truth is in here. | ||
| We're illustrating it. | ||
| It's sandwiched by an overabundance of Confusion. | ||
| But, you know, sprinkled in here, there are facts. | ||
| They have to actually tell you the facts. | ||
| They just have to leave you believing alive. | ||
| So you read this. What it is is a story about Elon Musk revealing the inside workings of Twitter, showing how Twitter was in active communication with political activists, targeting and censoring those people that the political activists asked them to target and censor. | ||
| That's what the actual story is. | ||
| What they leave you thinking as you read this article is that Elon Musk has somehow caused some sort of dangerous situation by, you know, recklessly and irresponsibly releasing personal information about good people who were just doing their best at Twitter to keep their heads above water in an uncertain time. | ||
| Like, that's not what was happening. | ||
| They were censoring damaging material on behalf of their political leaders. | ||
| Opponents. It's not that confusing. | ||
| New York Times wants to make it confusing because if they can't lie about it, then they just have to confuse their readers. | ||
| And again, I guess it's just not even worth continuing down this, but not anywhere in this entire article. | ||
| This is the New York Times article about The Twitter release, and if you just scroll over this, the whole thing is just like the central role of Mr. | ||
| Taibbi. Mr. Taibbi rose to prominence. | ||
| Donald J. Trump on Friday. | ||
| Mr. Taibbi. Mr. Musk. | ||
| Mr. Taibbi. | ||
| Mr. Taibbi. Mr. | ||
| Musk. What is the actual information? | ||
| What did they actually share? | ||
| What did they actually show in the Twitter files? | ||
| And what does that mean for the First Amendment? | ||
| None of these questions are answered. | ||
| They turn it into, A bunch of nonsense. | ||
| Just really incredible. So let's get into what the actual Twitter files say. | ||
| Thanks for nothing, New York Times. | ||
| Thank you. Thank you. | ||
| I know less than I did before after reading your article. | ||
| Thank you, Mainstream Media. What would we do without you? | ||
| By the way, this is some of the people that, by the way, they do celebrate in the New York Times article. | ||
| In the New York Times article, they're like, Mr. | ||
| Musk is a fan of Mr. | ||
| Taibbi, who left Rolling Stone to start a newsletter on Substack. | ||
| It's no big surprise. | ||
| Mr. Musk often hails the virtues of citizen journalism. | ||
| On Saturday, in a live audio session on Twitter, Mr. | ||
| Musk said he was disappointed that more mainstream outlets had not picked up Mr. | ||
| Taibbi's reporting. Of course, they mentioned the Rolling Stone. | ||
| Maybe this is why Matt Taibbi left the Rolling Stone. | ||
| You had stories like this. | ||
| This is from their official Twitter. It's still up, by the way. | ||
| This is how shameless they are. | ||
| From October 21, 2020. | ||
| Vile, baseless conspiracy theories are spreading about Hunter Biden. | ||
| And despite pledges to curb misinformation in the lead-up to the election, social media sites aren't stopping them. | ||
| They aren't stopping these vile, baseless conspiracy theories that are actually 100% true and proven in no uncertain terms. | ||
| Like, it's just, they're absolutely true. | ||
| But this is where all of the articles go, by the way. | ||
| Stories from Axios and Wall Street Journal that both have very similar methods to the New York Times article. | ||
| Musk's Twitter files spotlights Hunter Story ban. | ||
| Elon Musk's Twitter took aim at the firm's previous management on Friday evening with Twitter files presentation intended to demonstrate free speech suppression. | ||
| Again, did it actually do that? | ||
| I mean, I don't know. | ||
| It's one of those things. You either get it or you don't get it. | ||
| You can either read these and just understand what's happening or you just can't, I guess. | ||
| I really don't know if I can explain it. | ||
| Any more than I already do. We'll get to that Infowars article in just a second. | ||
| But here's the actual Twitter files from Matt Taibbi. | ||
| Thread Twitter files. He says, Twitter, in its conception, was a brilliant tool for enabling instant mass communication, making a true, real-time, global conversation possible for the first time. | ||
| In an early conception, Twitter was more than lived up to its mission statement, giving people, quote, the power to create and share ideas and information instantly without barriers. | ||
| As time progressed, however, the company was forced... | ||
| Slowly to add those barriers. | ||
| Some of the first tools for controlling speech were designed to combat the likes of spam and financial fraudsters. | ||
| Slowly over time, Twitter staff and executives began to find more and more uses for these tools. | ||
| Outsiders began petitioning the company to manipulate search as well, first a little, then more often, then constantly. | ||
| By 2020, requests from connected actors to delete tweets were routine. | ||
| One executive would write to another, more to review from the Biden team. | ||
| The reply would come back, And then you have a screenshot of exactly what this looks like. | ||
| More to review from the Biden team sent with a series of links to Twitter accounts from all sorts of people responded by somebody at Twitter saying, handled these, handled them, they have been handled. | ||
| How do you think they got handled? | ||
| They've been deleted. They've been censored. | ||
| That's all that's happening. | ||
| That's all this is. It's not complicated. | ||
| It's not confusing. It's not clandestine. | ||
| It's the very simple and, at this point, open practice of the United States government to have agents or friends in big tech that they can simply reach out to, provide them with a list of information or accounts they want censored, and the big tech media censors it on their behalf. | ||
| It's just the violation of the First Amendment. | ||
| It's just the complete destruction of the First Amendment entirely. | ||
| It is... It's nothing other than that. | ||
| Like, it's very simple. Celebrities and unknowns alike could be removed or reviewed at the behest of a political party. | ||
| And they have another example, this one from the DNC, targeting people like Real James Woods. | ||
| Both parties had access to these tools. | ||
| For instance, in 2020, requests from both the Trump White House and the Biden campaign were received and honored. | ||
| However, this system wasn't balanced. | ||
| It was based on contacts. | ||
| Because Twitter was and is overwhelmingly staffed by people of one political orientation, there were more channels, more ways to complain, open to the left, well, Democrats, than the right. | ||
| And then they have a list of the contributions to party recipients showing that over 99.5% of donations from Twitter went directly to the Democrats, while only.27. | ||
| A quarter of a percent of their donations actually went to Republicans. | ||
| The resulting slant in content moderation decisions is visible in the documents you're about to read. | ||
| However, it's also an assessment of multiple current and former high-level executives. | ||
| Jumping forward, the Twitter Files Part 1, how and why Twitter blocked the Hunter Biden story. | ||
| On October 14, 2020, the New York Post published Biden's secret emails and expose based on the contents of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop. | ||
| Twitter took extraordinary steps to suppress the story, removing links and posting warnings that it may be unsafe. | ||
| They even blocked its transmission via direct message, a tool hitherto reserved for extreme cases, e.g. | ||
| child pornography. We've just barely dipped our toe in the water of the Twitter files. | ||
| We'll continue to expand on them. | ||
| Again, it's kind of a strange position to be in because if you were alive and awake during the 2020 election, none of this was confusing. | ||
| Right? You had a bombshell story that exposed corruption at the highest levels of the Biden administration, family, etc. | ||
| Communication between Joe Biden and his son and foreign agents making millions of dollars. | ||
| And then that story was disappeared from the internet. | ||
| Alright folks, welcome back. | ||
| We're going through the Twitter files right now. | ||
| The massive tranche of information that was revealed Late on Friday by Elon Musk, Matt Taibbi was a journalist chosen to disseminate this information. | ||
| We're going through his thread on Twitter, exposing exactly what was going on here with the Hunter Biden laptop story. | ||
| Again, none of this is like particularly groundbreaking. | ||
| It shows the intricacies, the actual conversations going on behind the scenes. | ||
| But this is the thing about observing reality. | ||
| I didn't need any of this to know what was going on. | ||
| Sure, okay, now we have the names of the people, but we sort of knew who they were anyway. | ||
| And all you had to do was just pay attention to the process of the story as it came out. | ||
| You had Hunter Biden's laptop. | ||
| It was given to the New York Post via Rudy Giuliani. | ||
| It was given to the FBI first, but they didn't do anything with it, didn't want it. | ||
| Didn't want to investigate it, despite the fact that it had evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors and, by the way, a little bit of treason thrown in the mix there by the Biden family. | ||
| This came out shortly before the election. | ||
| Would have had a devastating impact on the Biden campaign if it had been actually discussed in the mainstream media in any appropriate way. | ||
| Instead, it was censored off of Twitter for no particular reason. | ||
| Even the excuses they gave at the time were utterly nonsensical. | ||
| So now we get to see the discussions behind the scenes at Twitter where people in Twitter were saying, this seems nonsensical, what we're doing here, which is fine. | ||
| Okay, good to know. But we didn't need any of this. | ||
| We knew what happened already. | ||
| You just have to observe... I think we're good to go. | ||
| I think we're good to go. | ||
| It's obvious that there had to be some sort of communication going on between those sectors. | ||
| Now we have the evidence of the conversations, but the evidence of the conversation was also back then when they were all doing things exactly the same at exactly the same time. | ||
| That in and of itself is evidence of the conversations. | ||
| Now we just have the actual conversations themselves. | ||
| Matt Taibbi goes on to say, Strom's note returned the answer that the laptop story had been removed for violation of the company's hacked material policy. | ||
| And of course, that doesn't make any sense. | ||
| Not only are they... | ||
| Oh yeah, so I sort of skipped forward a little bit. | ||
| We'll go back and we'll talk about that. | ||
| But this is in response to the fact that White House spokeswoman Kayla McEnany was locked out of her account for tweeting about the story, prompting a furious letter from the Trump campaign staffer Mike Hahn, who... | ||
| We actually have the discussion here. | ||
| Kayla McKinney has been locked out of her account for simply talking about the New York Post story. | ||
| All she did was cite the story and firsthand reporting that had been reported by other outlets and not disputed by the Biden campaign. | ||
| I need an answer immediately on when or how she will be unlocked. | ||
| Also, I don't appreciate how nobody on this team called me regarding the news that you'll be censoring news articles. | ||
| Like I said, at least pretend to care for the next 20 days. | ||
| That's how close we were to the election when all of this malfeasance and censorship took place. | ||
| This led public policy executive Caroline Strom to send out a polite WTF query. | ||
| Several employees noted that there was tension between the comms and policy teams who had little slash less control over moderation than the safety and trust teams. | ||
| Hi team, are you able to take a closer look here? | ||
| Thanks! Go ahead and take a closer look here into all the censorship that we're doing. | ||
| We need a really good excuse for this, you guys. | ||
| Come up with something clever. Everybody just knows that internally, whether openly discussed or not, they all just knew. | ||
| They knew this story is true, but if it gets out, it will hurt our attempt to oust Trump from office. | ||
| So we have to bury this story. | ||
| And now all the discussion is, how do we justify this? | ||
| How do we weather the storm that will come about because we're doing this? | ||
| It has nothing to do with whether what they're doing is right or not. | ||
| Of course they know that what they're doing is wrong. | ||
| Obviously. Let's not forget that this underscores, you know, deep state government actors directing the hidden hand, right, of a private company. | ||
| Well, not a publicly traded company, I should say. | ||
| But, yeah, I mean, and it wasn't even Trump's officials, right? | ||
| It was people who were in the government who obviously wanted an establishment candidate in Joe Biden to get in. | ||
| And that's what we, you know, refer to as the deep state. | ||
| Right, the permanent state, the bureaucratic state, the intelligence agencies that were behind all of this. | ||
| So, Strom's note returned the answer that the laptop story had been removed in violation of the country's, of the company's, hacked material policy. | ||
| And of course, we've pointed out the hypocrisy of this, not even hypocrisy, just the lie of this, because... | ||
| Over and over again, there have been openly hacked... | ||
| They'll literally just dump hacked material. | ||
| It'll be like Occupy Democrats being like, some brave hackers just hacked the Oath Keeper's website. | ||
| Here's all of their information, all of their home addresses. | ||
| Have a look, are brave warriors out there? | ||
| And it's just like, Twitter's fine with that. | ||
| It has nothing to do with hack policy. | ||
| It's just, they had to come up with an excuse that... | ||
| Would put the attention off of them being obviously political actors obviously censoring something for political gain. | ||
| Although several sources recalled hearing about a general warning from federal law enforcement that summer about possible foreign hacks, there's no evidence that I've seen of any government involvement in the laptop story. | ||
| In fact, that might have been the problem. | ||
| The decision was made at the highest levels of the company, but without the knowledge of CEO Jack Dorsey, with former head of legal policy and trust Vijaya Gade playing a role. | ||
| Quote, they just freelanced it is how one former executive employee rather characterized the decision. | ||
| Hacking was the excuse, but within a few hours, pretty much everyone realized that wasn't going to hold, but no one had the guts to reverse it. | ||
| No one had the guts to reverse it. | ||
| They have all the guts in the world when they're censoring material. | ||
| When they're working on behalf of the leftists, there's no shortage of guts. | ||
| There's no shortage of disregarding The law or decency or anything of the sort, right? | ||
| There's no hesitation. Should we censor? | ||
| No. When it's time to work on behalf of the leftist, it's consequences be damned. | ||
| Do what you want to do whenever you want to do it. | ||
| With complete disregard to the consequences. | ||
| Just censor the story. | ||
| Boom. Censored. It's gone. | ||
| And then we'll make up stuff. | ||
| But then when people go, oh, I think this is wrong, suddenly they're very cowardly. | ||
| Suddenly nobody can stand up for free speech. | ||
| Suddenly everybody's a little bit scared to speak their mind. | ||
| It always works that way, doesn't it? | ||
| 25, he says, you can see the confusion in the following lengthy exchanges, which ends up including Gade and former trust and safety chief Yoel Roth. | ||
| Comms official Trenton Kennedy writes, I'm struggling to understand the policy basis for marking this as unsafe. | ||
| That's like leftist weasel talk of saying, yeah, you're lying here. | ||
| We're censoring this politically and then claiming it's because of the hacked material, which everybody knows is false, and you're making us all look like idiots. | ||
| But the way you say that, if you're a weasel little snitch, is I'm struggling to understand the policy basis here. | ||
| Struggling to understand this. | ||
| You're lying. What you mean to say is you are lying about this. | ||
| But, you know, nobody's scared. | ||
| You keep people in a state of fear, keep people constantly wondering if speaking out too much will get you sacked, then you get little comments like that. | ||
| I'm struggling to understand the policy basis for making this unsafe. | ||
| And I think the best explainability argument for this externally would be we're waiting to understand if this story is the result of hacked materials. | ||
| We'll face hard questions on this if we don't have some solid reasoning for marking the link unsafe. | ||
| Again, they know that it's not unsafe. | ||
| They know that it wasn't hacked material. | ||
| They know all of that. They're not discussing whether it is hacked material or not. | ||
| They're discussing how we portray, as they put it, quote, externally. | ||
| In other words, how do we lie to the public to claim that what we're doing is something other than what we know we're all doing. | ||
| Utter, blatantly dishonest. | ||
| Katie Roseborough says, will we also mark other similar stories as unsafe? | ||
| Well, you don't, so obviously not. | ||
| It's just, they're like, to cover ourselves, should we start marking other stories to give some semblance of credibility to this claim we're making? | ||
| No? Okay, never mind. By this point, everyone knew this was F'd, said one former employee, but the response was essentially to err on the side of, well, continuing to err. | ||
| Yoel Roth says, the policy basis is hacked material, though, as discussed, this is an emerging situation where the facts remain unclear. | ||
| Given the severe risks here and lessons of 2016, we're erring on the side of including a warning and preventing this content from being amplified. | ||
| Gade asks, what is the warning that will come up? | ||
| Yoel Roth says it's new. | ||
| When you click the link, you'll see a generic unsafe URL message referencing spam, malware, and violations of the Twitter rules. | ||
| Not ideal, but it's the only thing we have. | ||
| So again, they are just discussing how to silence a very important story that illustrates and illuminates the decades-long malfeasance and corruption that the Biden family was engaged in. | ||
| Even the way you hear people talk about this, they're like, who cares about Hunter Biden? | ||
| I don't know. How about the first sentence of the actual New York Post story? | ||
| That says Hunter Biden introduced his father, then Vice President Joe Biden, to a top executive at a Ukrainian energy firm less than one year before the elder Biden pressured government officials in Ukraine into firing a prosecutor who was investigating the company, according to emails obtained by The Post. | ||
| How about the first sentence of The Post story reveals that this has nothing to do with Hunter Biden. | ||
| This is evidence of Joe Biden's corruption, for which he used Hunter Biden as an agent. | ||
| So again, we'll get more into this. | ||
| This is the absolute death of the First Amendment. | ||
| The mainstream media is only covering this in the frame of, what is Elon Musk causing too much confusion at Twitter by revealing how they cooperate and correspond with the FBI, DOJ, and high government officials to censor material that they don't want the American people to know? | ||
| Just utterly insane. | ||
| We'll continue on with this and take your phone calls in the second hour. | ||
| Stay tuned. It's American Journal, Infowars.com. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. We're continuing to cover the Twitter files. | ||
| There's more stuff to talk about, but I'm going to actually tell you what's in these files as you're not getting it from most mainstream places, any mainstream places, really. | ||
| Maybe Tucker Carlson will cover it, maybe a few other people on Fox News. | ||
| We've got some videos here to show you as well. | ||
| Let's just finish up with this first thread from Matt Taibbi. | ||
| Because there's an interesting exchange between a congresswoman and Twitter authorities. | ||
| Of course, they're... | ||
| Again, just sort of the overwhelming thing that you get from reading these exchanges is that it has nothing to do with determining whether or not what they're doing is right or good. | ||
| They know what they're doing is bad. | ||
| They know what they're doing is in violation of the First Amendment. | ||
| They know what they're doing is... | ||
| Manipulating an election, silencing their political opponents. | ||
| It's really not confusing. | ||
| It really is like listening to a secretly taped conversation between two people who had murdered somebody. | ||
| They're not discussing whether or not it's right or wrong that this person is. | ||
| They're talking about covering up their activities. | ||
| How can they lie and make it seem convincing? | ||
| It's people who are in the act of committing a crime discussing ways to mitigate the consequences of their criminality. | ||
| It's nothing more complicated or anything than that. | ||
| One humorous exchange on day one, Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna reached out to Gadd to gently suggest she hop on the phone to talk about the, quote, backlash re-speech. | ||
| Khanna was the only Democratic official I could find in the files who expressed concern. | ||
| And she essentially says, this is generating a lot of backlash on the Hill re-speech. | ||
| Happy to chat if you have time. | ||
| In response to this, Gadd quickly replies... | ||
| Immediately diving into the weeds of Twitter policy, unaware Kana is more worried about, you know, the Bill of Rights. | ||
| Hi, Congressman Kana. | ||
| Thank you for reaching out. We appreciate the heads up. | ||
| We put out a clarifying thread of tweets earlier this evening to explain our policy around the posting of private information and linking to hacked materials. | ||
| The press secretary's account was not permanently suspended. | ||
| We requested that she delete the tweet containing material. | ||
| It's in violation of the... Again, it's just... | ||
| It's just bureaucratic doublespeak. | ||
| They know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| Yes, they censored the material. | ||
| Yes, they knew it was not hacked ever. | ||
| It was not in violation of their policy. | ||
| Even in the internal discussions, they recognize that. | ||
| And their own people are saying, this doesn't hold any water. | ||
| This doesn't make any sense. We're going to do this with other hacked material? | ||
| No? Then why are we doing it for this one? | ||
| Just none of this matters, right? | ||
| A fundamental... | ||
| I'm sorry, they go on. | ||
| Say Khanna tried to reroute the conversation to the First Amendment, a mention of which is generally hard to find in the files. | ||
| She says, hope you're well, Vijaya. | ||
| But this seems a violation of the First Amendment principles. | ||
| If there is a hack of classified information or other information that could expose a serious war crime and the New York Times was to publish it, I think the New York Times should have that right. | ||
| A journalist should not be held accountable for the illegal actions of their source unless they actively aided the hack. | ||
| So to restrict the distribution of that material, especially regarding a presidential candidate, seems not in the keeping of the principles of New York Times versus Solskjaer. | ||
| Sullivan. Sullivan, I say this as a total Biden partisan and convinced he didn't do anything wrong, but the story now has become more about censorship and the relative innocuous emails, and it's become a bigger deal than it would have been. | ||
| Again, they also don't care about this information being true or false. | ||
| They don't care about the information revealed in this. | ||
| They're worried about the PR blitz. | ||
| They're worried about public perception. | ||
| They're worried about their social engineering program going wrong. | ||
| If you censor this too blatantly, then people are going to be talking about all the censorship that we're doing, and that's inconvenient for us. | ||
| So can you handle this a better way? | ||
| Again, they're framing it in the terms of New York Times versus Sullivan and journalistic practices, but that's not what they really care about. | ||
| She says the story now has become more about censorship than relatively innocuous. | ||
| See, what they're saying is if you would just let this go, then we could have covered this up with the mainstream media. | ||
| The mainstream media could have spun this As if it wasn't a big story, as if it was no big deal, but because it obviously is a big deal and obviously is a big story, so much so that Twitter had to step in, violate its own rules to censor it, now it's becoming a bigger problem. | ||
| Again, it's not about what the truth is. | ||
| It's not about a principled opposition to corrupt actors in the highest levels of government. | ||
| They're fine with that. They're a partisan in that regard, but they're worried about the backlash and this being known to the American people. | ||
| Hi folks, welcome back. Congressman Ro Khanna was discussing with Vijaya Gade, the trust and safety policy manager at Twitter, how to handle the censorship of the Hunter Biden laptop. | ||
| Again, not concerned about the fact that the Biden laptop contained hard proof evidence, conclusive evidence. | ||
| Evidence of the Biden family and its corrupt activity while in the office of Vice President of the United States this just a month before the presidential election. | ||
| No discussion as to whether the story is true, whether the content in it is true. | ||
| It's all about how do we mitigate the pushback to this? | ||
| How do we destroy the First Amendment without riling everybody up too much about the fact that we're destroying the First Amendment? | ||
| In fact, Ro Khanna actually encourages and celebrates Twitter for their censorship policies, saying, I believe Twitter itself should curtail what it recommends or puts in trending news, and your policy against QAnon groups is all good. | ||
| It's a hard balance. | ||
| It's a hard balance. | ||
| How do you censor your opponents without pissing them off too much? | ||
| That's the balance that they're trying to strike here. | ||
| In the heat of the presidential campaign, restricting dissemination of newspaper articles, even if New York Post is far right, seems like it will invite more backlash than it will do good. | ||
| And they're not contending. | ||
| They're not arguing against the fact that it's good. | ||
| They say it is good. It's good that you're censoring our opponents. | ||
| But the question is whether it's more good to censor our opponents or whether the backlash will be bad. | ||
| Just keep this communication between us and Jack. | ||
| No need to CC the team or forward it to him. | ||
| No need to tell anybody we're talking about this. | ||
| No need at all. Now let's keep this secret, shall we? | ||
| Just wanted to offer my two cents. | ||
| Well, I'm afraid at two cents for your thoughts. | ||
| You have vastly overpaid. | ||
| You got scammed, my friend. | ||
| That's way too much money for what you just said. | ||
| But these are the discussions that are going on in the background of Twitter between congressmen and Twitter themselves. | ||
| Just coordinating, discussing how to both censor your political opponents and weather the political storm that will come from the revelation that you're censoring your political opponents. | ||
| But Zabo, who's Zabo again? | ||
| They just say here on the last one. | ||
| He's of the research firm NetChoice that was in contact with members of Congress, Carl Sabo. | ||
| Sabo's letter contains the chilling message relaying Democratic lawmakers' attitudes, saying they want more moderation. | ||
| And as for the Bill of Rights, well, it's not absolute. | ||
| It's not absolute. | ||
| So he went and talked to a bunch of Even though he's just an innocent little flower. | ||
| He's just a wonderful little bunny rabbit. | ||
| The water's being muddied by publishing first-hand accounts of his activities. | ||
| The water's being muddied by allowing newspapers to publish his own words in context. | ||
| The water is being muddied by showing evidence of his crimes. | ||
| Just incredible. | ||
| No, he's an innocent little lamb, right? | ||
| They link this to Hillary Clinton's email scandal. | ||
| She did nothing wrong, but because the press wouldn't let go of the story, it became a scandal far out of proportion. | ||
| In their mind, social media is doing the same thing. | ||
| It doesn't moderate it. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Which was more baseless, the Hillary Clinton email scandal or the Trump-Russia collusion, which became a bigger scandal far out of proportion because the press wouldn't let go of the story? | ||
| One of them was right. | ||
| One of them, you literally had the head of the FBI come out, list off Hillary Clinton's crimes, and then say, but we're not charging her because we don't think she meant to. | ||
| And that's what you had with Hillary Clinton in the email scandal. | ||
| You had her destroying entire servers, bleach-bidding hard drives, smashing phones with hammers after she was requested to preserve them as evidence for an investigation. | ||
| And then being let off the hook and actually given a free pass by the FBI despite all of the crimes. | ||
| I mean, just again, folks, it's not just like so much other stuff that we cover. | ||
| It's not like both sides are doing the same thing. | ||
| One side gets held accountable and the other side doesn't. | ||
| One side is doing all of the corruption. | ||
| One side is just a rat nest of corruption. | ||
| Just as far down as you can possibly go. | ||
| They, their families, their friends, they're all involved in just the wholesale fire sale of the American fortune. | ||
| They get positions of power. | ||
| They sell off that power. | ||
| They sell off the American people's will, our tax money, our blood, sweat, and tears, our time, our future. | ||
| They just sell it for the highest bidder. | ||
| One side's doing that and completely covered and completely It goes to bat for by the mainstream media. | ||
| And then the other side is not involved in any of all that stuff. | ||
| There's not evidence, laptops full of evidence showing their corruption. | ||
| There's not email scandals where they completely violate the law and then get covered up for by the FBI. And these people are the ones that are called corrupt and get continuously lambasted by the mainstream media. | ||
| So, again, it's not like apples and oranges. | ||
| It's not like, well, they do this and don't get caught, and we do this and do get caught. | ||
| It's that they do this and get away with it. | ||
| We don't do it and still get called all the terrible things. | ||
| Still get all the investigations. | ||
| It's just wild. In their mind, social media is doing the same thing. | ||
| It doesn't moderate enough harmful content. | ||
| It doesn't moderate enough harmful content. | ||
| That was their takeaway from the Hunter Biden story. | ||
| So when it does, like it did yesterday, it becomes a story. | ||
| See, if the American people had just been used to them censoring, if for months ahead of time they had made it a practice to silence and censor and prevent the spread of stories just so we can cover it, then the American people would be lulled into a sense that this was somehow normal and okay and good then the American people would be lulled into a sense so when they do it for Hunter Biden, it's not out of the ordinary. | ||
| This is the way the globalist mind works. | ||
| This is the way the scheme, the conspiracy takes place. | ||
| If you're going to do something like eliminate the First Amendment, you can't just come out eliminating this major bombshell story a month before the election. | ||
| That pisses people off. | ||
| You've got to start censoring small. | ||
| You've got to start turning up the heat in the boiling, you know, frog water way earlier. | ||
| Otherwise, the frog's going to jump out. | ||
| That's what they're mad about here. That's what the Democrats are concerned about. | ||
| That's their number one concern is the fact that this censorship was good and it should have happened and they're happy it happened, but they just wish that Twitter had censored more beforehand so it wasn't so out of the ordinary when they do it like this. | ||
| This is what they're concerned about. This is what they are talking about. | ||
| I'm not putting any words in their mouths. | ||
| I'm not speculating on what might be... | ||
| We did that for two years because we knew that this was the case from the very beginning. | ||
| From the instant New York Post was censored. | ||
| From the instant the Facebook... | ||
| You know, moderator went on Twitter to say, well, we just, we weren't sure, so we went ahead and censored. | ||
| Like, this was all obvious. But now we're just seeing, you know, what the real discussions were behind the scenes. | ||
| So this is a message from Democratic congressmen telling Twitter, you just don't censor enough. | ||
| You just don't censor enough. | ||
| And so now when you do censor, it becomes a story. | ||
| We would much rather have you be able to quietly censor our political opponents. | ||
| If companies moderated more, conservatives wouldn't even think to use social media for disinformation, misinformation, or otherwise. | ||
| So if you just censor the conservatives more, then they won't spread information on your... | ||
| platforms anymore. | ||
| This is what the Democratic Congress people are encouraging. | ||
| The Democrats were in agreement social media needs to moderate more because they're corrupting democracy and making all truth relative. | ||
| When pushed on how government might insist that consistent with the First Amendment, they demurred saying the First Amendment is not absolute. | ||
| So again, just internal documents, internal discussions from Democrats and big tech discussing how the First Amendment is not absolute, how they must censor more, and how the only problem with them censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story was that they made it too obvious, and that caused a bit of turbulence in the Democrat and that caused a bit of turbulence in the Democrat Party's manipulation of the political process. | ||
| Just wild stuff. | ||
| Matt Taibbi finishes by saying, Even after Dorsey jumped in. | ||
| Another thing that is not confusing, it's not news. | ||
| We've known for a very long time that just like the presidency of the United States, these corporate offices are not governed by the people they claim to govern. | ||
| They're governed by highly connected, extremely powerful activists and cooperation networks, you could say. | ||
| Networks of people, unaccountable. | ||
| working in the shadows to destroy your rights and then collaborating with politicians and corporate movers and shakers to make sure that that destruction of your rights, your most basic human rights, as guaranteed by the Constitution, happens very quietly. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Still a lot to cover on today's edition of American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host Harrison Smith. | ||
| We got some great reset nonsense to cover. | ||
| We've got more, you know, malfeasance in the FBI and the DOJ that's related to Twitter. | ||
| But also some odd goings on with this power outage in North Carolina that we should probably discuss a little bit. | ||
| So we're going to finish up here with the... | ||
| There's just so much to get into. All right, but we'll try to finish up here with the coverage of the Twitter files, open up the phone lines for your calls, and then move on to some other topics. | ||
| But I do want to know what your opinion is with the Twitter files, if there's anything you think we're missing. | ||
| Again, you can get into the weeds when you actually listen to these people. | ||
| You don't actually need to listen to them. | ||
| You can just see their actions, and you can judge their statements on a scale as if you're judging... | ||
| You know, some sort of manipulative serial killer, you know, making a statement in court. | ||
| You know what his intentions are. | ||
| You know what they're trying to, you know what their goals are, what they're trying to convince you of. | ||
| But you also know that they're liars who have been caught in the act and they're saying whatever they think they can to get out of responsibility. | ||
| So, you know, you can more or less ignore them and just look at the actions that they take and see what their intentions are from the results of these actions. | ||
| We'll go to some videos here as we finish up. | ||
| Story from Infowars.com. | ||
| Belongs in prison. Calls for ex-Twitter exec Vijaya Gade's arrest explode after Elon Musk releases censorship files. | ||
| Twitter's former legal and policy head Vijaya Gaddy. | ||
| I don't know. I'm just going to call her Vijay Jay. | ||
| Well, Vijay Jay is under fire after Twitter communications released by Elon Musk revealed she played a central role in censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story in 2020. | ||
| Liz Churchill saying this is the criminal that censored the Hunter Biden laptop, Vijaya Gad. | ||
| She should be in prison. | ||
| Avi Yemeni says Vijaya belongs in jail for election meddling. | ||
| Benny Johnson, Vijaya needs to go to jail. | ||
| Team USA, who thinks Vijaya Gad belongs in prison? | ||
| I mean, she certainly did manipulate the entire election. | ||
| And, you know, obviously, the most typical response to this would be, you know, just imagine if it was the other way around. | ||
| Just imagine if Elon Musk had bought Twitter in 2020 and then used his power to censor damaging material about Donald Trump. | ||
| What if... Donald Trump Jr.'s laptop was found and had communications discussing foreign executives and how he was a facilitator that allowed them to cooperate and get billions of dollars from President Trump while he was president. | ||
| And then Elon Musk took over Twitter and censored I think? | ||
| So if you just look at this in an unbiased way, it couldn't be more obvious what's actually going on here. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number three, where Elon Musk is teasing what is to come next. | ||
| He says he's going to release all of the Twitter files, including requests from the Biden campaign and DNC, to censor individual users, something that we've known has been going on for a while. | ||
| But apparently we're about to see the internal documents showing proof of these claims. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Yeah, I was just wondering if all accounts that were requested to have things taken down by the DNC and by the Biden campaign, even ones that have nothing to do with the Hunter Biden laptop, if they will also be released? | |
| Yes. The intent is to release all the files. | ||
| So it's not like anything that's hidden or anything I mean, I think this is, you know, this is like whatever Stasi files or, you know, truth and reconciliation, like Nelson Mandela would say, you know, if you want reconciliation, there must be truth. | ||
| That's the intent here, is to just make it clear what was happening and provide transparency about the past, and in doing so, to build trust about the future. | ||
| Awesome. So, do you think that Twitter could also, like, have an automatic notification if anyone was, say, if their account was requested content taken down? | ||
| Do you think there could be something like that implemented? | ||
| Yeah, I mean, you mean it's like if a government has a takedown request or something like that? | ||
| Yeah, yeah. If a government says, hey, we want you censored. | ||
| I mean, I think, like, even Germany would let you know, right? | ||
| So why doesn't America? | ||
| Or with James Woods, for example, how his content was—they requested his content be removed, say, if that happened from, like, the Biden campaign. | ||
| Yeah, I— I think both past and future requests should be made public. | ||
| And Sunshine is a great disinfectant. | ||
| If they request content takedowns that are embarrassing, then they'll be less likely to request those content takedowns. | ||
| At the end of the day, Twitter doesn't have a choice but to abide by the laws. | ||
| So that was Elon Musk on Twitter Spaces, again, saying that they plan to release all of the Twitter files. | ||
| They're not excluding any. | ||
| They're not releasing things that look bad in one regard, but disguising other things. | ||
| He's releasing all of it, and so we should get answers as to the communication between places like the DNC or the FBI and Twitter. | ||
| And also, I think that's a great idea. | ||
| Make it publicly known. | ||
| If somebody is reaching out to Twitter saying, will you take this person's tweet account or tweet down, then that person should be identified and say, hey, do you know that this government official is trying to take this tweet down? | ||
| That'd be a little bit embarrassing. | ||
| And it would certainly have the, you know... | ||
| Opposite of the desired effect, which would be to actually increase attention on that tweet so then the people in power might think twice about issuing these requests. | ||
| We're just going to have to continue this into the next segment as well. | ||
| I'm going to go ahead and give out the phone number. The number dial, if you want to call in, is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Give us a call here at American Journal. | ||
| We'll take your calls throughout the second half of this program. | ||
| We're going to come back and show you a video of Yoel Roth talking about censoring Babylon Bee because it's not funny and satire isn't an excuse. | ||
| We'll also show you an example of satire that disproves his entire... | ||
| It'll be fun. We'll do that in just a second. | ||
| I do have to remind you to go to Infowarsstore.com to keep us on the air. | ||
| If you can't find a reason to support Infowars now, you're not paying attention to the news because Infowars has talked about all of the stuff that's going on right now years before COVID. It actually happened. | ||
| We have been predicting this and just figuring out what's going on by observing tangible reality and then reporting on it. | ||
| I mean, if you watch the mainstream media in 2020, I guess you think that the Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation and that Twitter was protecting and fortifying the election by removing it. | ||
| If you're watching InfoWars, you know everything that we're seeing laid out in black and white in no uncertain terms now. | ||
| So, even if you, you know, didn't support Infowars back then, can't you see we were right now? | ||
| Don't you want to go to Infowarsstore.com right now and make sure that we're on the air to tell you about what's coming up in the next couple years? | ||
| We'll project into the future later in this show. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. I don't know how exactly to express this, but, you know, the biggest problem that we have in this country is not just dishonesty, it's that People are like, it's like they're afraid to call out dishonesty. | ||
| Fear has to be the biggest issue. | ||
| People are just scared. They know what's right. | ||
| They know what's truthful. They know what's actually going on. | ||
| They're just scared. | ||
| They're frightened. They're frightened and scared to actually do anything positive or anything about the situation that's happening. | ||
| They're just too scared. Too scared to point out the dishonesty. | ||
| And the reason for that, one of many reasons... | ||
| The primary one, I guess, would be the institutional control that the dishonest people have. | ||
| So, you know, you're going to get fired if you point out the dishonesty of your boss, I guess. | ||
| That's one of the things that happens. | ||
| But the liars in this country have a very sophisticated... | ||
| I don't know if that's the right word. | ||
| Because it's not... It's blunt, but effective. | ||
| It's not sophisticated, but effective strategy of framing all of their most ruthless, destructive, and evil activities as being good. | ||
| And that's what provides the fear that people have, right? | ||
| So if you're going to censor people that you don't like, you're evil, right? | ||
| If you're going to use the power that you have, you've been entrusted with as part of the trust and safety team to make Twitter safe for all users. | ||
| If you're going to abuse that in order to censor your political opponents who make you look like an idiot, you can't just say, I'm going to censor my opponents who make me look like an idiot. | ||
| You have to say, I'm doing this to protect trans people. | ||
| So then anybody that would be there pointing out that the emperor has no clothes, that your lie is as obvious as the nose on your face, they won't do it because then they'll be accused of attacking trans people. | ||
| You're transphobic. You want trans people to feel unsafe on our platform. | ||
| How dare you point out my dishonesty? | ||
| And they do it with climate change and they do it with racism and, you know, any other program that they want to enact. | ||
| COVID-19, right? | ||
| It wasn't that you are suspicious of, you know, some of the most evil companies in the world forcing you to take their untested inoculation. | ||
| You know, it's that you're a science denier and you want grandma to die. | ||
| It's all emotional manipulation. | ||
| It's all just social engineering. | ||
| That's all this is. Yoel Roth was the head of Twitter and he puts on a master class of this here when he's asked about justifying Babylon Bee. | ||
| Babylon Bee, a satire account which made jokes at the expense of leftists, was removed from Twitter. | ||
| And of course, that's because they made leftists look ridiculous. | ||
| It's because it was a funny, positive, completely could not ever be deemed as hateful example of conservative messaging being very widespread, effective, good, you know, couched in humor, so it went down easy. | ||
| That's why they... | ||
| Kick them off the internet. But no, if you listen to Yoel Roth, it's because their existence was a danger to the poor, beleaguered trans people of this nation. | ||
| Couldn't be more obvious what their tactics are, and it's really an indictment of the United States that this obvious, unsubtle practice actually works on the wider population. | ||
| Let's go down to clip number 11. | ||
| Former Twitter censor Yoel Roth justifies banning the Babylon Bee. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's roll clip 11. Babylon Bee, which is what got him to buy the thing, I think. | |
| That's the one which was not particularly funny. | ||
| The Babylon Bee's man of the year is Rachel Levine. | ||
| Not funny. Yeah. | ||
| And you can ask— I didn't agree they should have taken that down, but go ahead. | ||
| You know, it's interesting to think about what the competing tensions around that are. | ||
| And I want to start by acknowledging that the targeting and the victimization of the trans community on Twitter is very real, very life-threatening, and extraordinarily serious. | ||
| We have seen from a number of Twitter accounts, including libs of TikTok, notably, that there are orchestrated campaigns that particularly are singling out a group that is already particularly vulnerable within Publishing their own words. | ||
| Yeah, not only is it not funny, but it is. | ||
| Just, first of all, these frickin' people. | ||
| I mean, the most annoying Dolores Umbridge snitches you've ever seen. | ||
| Just like, not funny. | ||
| I don't think that's funny. | ||
| It's pretty funny. It's pretty funny. | ||
| Man of the year. I mean... | ||
| Not breaking any new ground, but it's pretty funny. | ||
| Who the hell are you, by the way? | ||
| So I'm sorry, we've put in humorless gadflies in charge, and if they don't think something's funny, you're not allowed to say it. | ||
| This is what liberals are into these days. | ||
| First of all, it's not funny. | ||
| And Libs of TikTok has targeted harassment campaigns where they take things that transgender people have published themselves and they publish them without context or without comment, right? | ||
| They just take things that leftists themselves do, that liberals themselves. | ||
| It's called Libs of TikTok. | ||
| They take videos and images of people doing things and they post them and say, here's this person doing this thing. | ||
| They publish this. | ||
| Here it is. This is unacceptable, apparently. | ||
| Unacceptable. It's a targeted harassment campaign that Yoel Roth asserts, without evidence, without even being asked to provide any, that this type of content is dangerous and deadly, actually. | ||
| It will kill people. It's stochastic terrorism showing people in public what other people in public are saying in public. | ||
| I mean, it doesn't have to make sense because these people are just lying. | ||
| But let's go back to this... This video, poor Yoel Roth, who's just trying to be a hero and stand up for all these poor, innocent people. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch....dangerous, and it does contribute to an environment that makes people unsafe in the world. | |
| So let's start from a premise that it's f***ed up. | ||
| But then, again, let's look at what Twitter's written policies are. | ||
| Twitter's written policies prohibit misgendering. | ||
| Full stop. And the Babylon Bee, in the name of satire, misgendered Admiral Rachel Levine. | ||
| Satire. Nominally, but it's still misgendering. | ||
| And, you know, there can be a very long and academic discussion of satire and sort of the lines there. | ||
| Interestingly, Apple tried to tease out this question of satire and political commentary in their own guidelines, which I think are also fraught. | ||
| But, you know, we landed on the side of enforcing our rules as written. | ||
| And that's how it got bought by Elon Musk, just in case you're interested. | ||
| He was mad about that, I remember that. | ||
| And you screwed everything up, you censorious woman. | ||
| You're a woman, Eli Roth, whatever your name is, Yoel Roth. | ||
| Yoel Roth is a woman. | ||
| I'm misgendering him to point out how stupid it is that you get your Twitter account... | ||
| Again, it's not, you know, I don't know. | ||
| It's just, again, I guess you just got to see it or not see it. | ||
| Like, if you can sit here and think that that's a serious person actually concerned about the line between satire and blah, blah, blah, we can have a big, long academic discussion about what satire... | ||
| No, you're just censoring people that you don't like, and then you're rambling about it like a woman. | ||
| So, there it is. | ||
| They don't think it was funny. | ||
| It was, in fact, dangerous to point out that Rachel Levine is, in fact, a man. | ||
| To point out the reality, the facts on the ground, that that's a man right there. | ||
| You can't do that, even if you say it's satire. | ||
| We'll go out to your phone calls in a second. | ||
| But first, let's go to clip number one here. | ||
| It's a liberal person demanding that the Austin City Council do something about Twitter. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ever since that right-wing Elon Musk bought Twitter, our democracy has been literally hanging on by a thread. | |
| You know, Twitter used to be a safe space for marginalized community, and now it's become a haven for maggot... | ||
| Just look who they're letting back onto Twitter, okay? | ||
| Andrew Tate, Kanye West, and that... | ||
| Savannah Hernandez. | ||
| Just look at them. They are the physical embodiment of white... | ||
| And Donald Trump, he doesn't even need to tweet, because his presence is literal... | ||
| And that's why we need to cancel Twitter, because a free and open internet is textbook white ****. | ||
| It's worse than the ****. | ||
| It's even worse than January 6th. | ||
| My favorite website has become a cesspool for conspiracy theories. | ||
| Just look at the way these MAG and QAnons talk about Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| Oh, Jeffrey Epstein didn't ****. | ||
| His friends want you to wear a mask and get vaccinated. | ||
| Well, yeah, because Jeffrey Epstein's friends, they believe in science. | ||
| Alex Stringer, everybody. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's Alex Stringer. Brilliant guy. | |
| All right, folks, I could literally spend the entire show today just getting into the intricacies of what's going on at Twitter. | ||
| Infowars has a story. FBI held weekly meetings with big tech ahead of 2020 elections, sent a list of URLs and accounts to be censored. | ||
| This was revealed Tuesday under oath by an FBI agent. | ||
| The meetings were initially quarterly, then monthly, then weekly, heading into the presidential election between Donald Trump and President Biden. | ||
| According to a source, Chan, Elvis Chan is the agent's name, testified that in those multiple separate meetings, the FBI warned the social media companies there could be a potential Russian hack and dump or hack and leak operations. | ||
| Of course, laying there groundwork for the Hunter Biden censorship. | ||
| Remember, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg stated that the FBI came to Facebook and put them on high alert just days before the release of the New York Post, which allowed them to pretend like they were concerned about Russian disinformation when they know perfectly well what it was, | ||
| just like we all did. The Attorney General of Louisiana is getting into this, saying on Tuesday's deposition, FBI agent Elvis Chan revealed the FBI played a big role in working with social media companies to censor speech from weekly meetings with social media companies ahead of the 2020 election to asking for account takedowns. | ||
| Linking to a story on Fox News that says exactly that. | ||
| Katie Hobbs' office contacted Twitter to censor host. | ||
| James Wood was directly censored by the DNC in cooperation with Twitter. | ||
| The FBI began covertly surveilling Rudy Giuliani one month after he was hired as President Trump's personal attorney. | ||
| Because what we're dealing with here is the concerted combined effort of the deep state and big tech to silence the people of the United States and guarantee that they're Rule continues, unabated, long into the future. | ||
| Last year, Twitter disclosed to the FEC they're warned of a hack and leak operation involving Hunter Biden by federal law enforcement that led them to censor the New York Post story. | ||
| This disclosure was signed by Yoel Roth. | ||
| Jack Posobiec posted this with a comment, it was an intelligence operation. | ||
| Yes, so much of this is. | ||
| Here's that story from 2020 by Rolling Stone, dutifully doing the work of the intelligence agencies. | ||
| In saying that Twitter and Facebook allowed a Pizzagate-esque conspiracy theories to spread about Hunter Biden. | ||
| Isn't that interesting, though? | ||
| So much similarity between the Pizzagate conspiracy theory and what was found on Hunter Biden's laptop and what was discovered to be happening on Jeffrey Epstein's island. | ||
| It's so weird. So weird that the Rolling Stone is still using Pizzagate as a term to denote a wild-eyed, nonsensical conspiracy theory. | ||
| While also admitting that... | ||
| Well, maybe they aren't admitting it, but showing what is true about the Hunter Biden laptop that had all that Pizzagate-esque conspiracy theory content. | ||
| Wow, so strange. Let's go to your phone calls now. | ||
| Marvin in Alabama wants to talk about the angle that the tech companies are really up to. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Marvin. You're on the air. | ||
| Hey, Harrison. Good to talk to you again. | ||
| Yeah, so I got censored big time in January of 2021 like everyone else, and what I kind of figured out at the time was That they were really trying to, they meaning the big tech companies, Facebook, Twitter, etc., they were trying to establish their authority to do so at all. | ||
| And they really don't have that authority, and we could get really deep in the weeds with 230 and all of that kind of stuff, but I'll try not to do that. | ||
| But what they prefer is, if they're going to take a loss on this, We're good to go. | ||
| Marsh v. Alabama kind of supports that, and Supreme Court justices have said in the past that these platforms serve as the new public town square already and other arguments like Peckingham, for example. | ||
| And if that's the case, then if they exercise policing authority over people's speech in the public town square or the new public town square, then they are violating the First Amendment right out of the gate. | ||
| And, you know, the Section 230, really, people say it's to protect the tech companies from being liable for people's speech on their platforms, but really it's to protect the people to have the speech because, you know, and so what they're doing is they're trying to have their cake and eat it too, and they're saying, we're going to have the protection with no liability so that people can say whatever they want on our platform, and we're going to censor them. | ||
| And then when we get caught, we're going to say it's all under the state actor, you know, part of the law. | ||
| 100%. I couldn't agree with you more. | ||
| I think you've hit the nail on the head. | ||
| Again, it's not about what's right and wrong for these people. | ||
| It's about what they can get away with and, you know, how they can convince the American people to just turn a blind eye to what's going on by paying lift service to the First Amendment. | ||
| Great read on that, Marvin. | ||
| Let's go to a different call, though. | ||
| Let's go to Tim in Seattle. | ||
| Tim, you think this warrants a whole new election? | ||
| Is this because of the Twitter files, you mean? | ||
| Yeah, I believe it. | ||
| Yeah, we should definitely have a new election. | ||
| Do you think that Biden... | ||
| Well, this basically just uncovers the entire apparatus that's working against us. | ||
| The elections are gone. The medical establishment's gone. | ||
| The political establishment's gone. | ||
| This is just an army of trolls ran by the West, the World Economic Forum, aimed against us. | ||
| I definitely think if the American population was to get pissed at us, and they rightfully should, we should get new elections. | ||
| We should demand new elections. | ||
| Because the war in Ukraine, none of this stuff would be happening right now if Trump was in office. | ||
| So we deserve it. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, I have to agree with you. | ||
| I don't know if even new elections are the right thing. | ||
| I mean, the funniest thing in the world is that right now, hashtag arrest Trump is trending. | ||
| Like, for what? These people are just completely insane. | ||
| And there's all of this concern that people have about a statement Trump made about suspending the Constitution. | ||
| And it's just like, we can get into that statement later, but for these people to even act like They're offended at this idea when we've heard for the last two years that whether it's COVID-19 or Russian disinformation or AR-15s, whatever it is, they'll take any excuse they can to destroy the Constitution of the United States. | ||
| But when... When Trump suggests a similar activity, saying, you know, extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures, it is an outrage. | ||
| How dare they? I'd love to ask him, like, what exactly part of the Constitution are you in favor of at this point? | ||
| They're all openly destructive of the Constitution. | ||
| There is no legitimacy to this government, whether the election was even held or not. | ||
| It's really what's becoming clear is the manipulation behind the scenes by deep state, Unmitigated control of the information flow in this country. | ||
| So, yeah, I don't think a new election is that far out of the question, Tim. | ||
| Let's go to JR in New York. | ||
| You have some thoughts on Kanye and you don't trust Elon. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, JR. What's your comments on Elon first? | ||
| Well, good morning. | ||
| Obviously, we can't trust Elon if he's not going to Put Alex back on and everybody else that he's denying. | ||
| And I even saw a comment where he said, you know, somebody with renown was like, oh, what about Alex? | ||
| And he's like, too bad. And then... | ||
| I mean, the guy obviously can't be trusted, right? | ||
| So he's giving out information, but it's that what he says is going to get released. | ||
| So is he going to release absolutely everything? | ||
| I'm not sure. I really don't think we could... | ||
| Depend on Elon Musk at all, honestly. | ||
| And another comment I wanted to make about Elon is I remember once I heard him say, maybe you guys heard it also, he referred to himself as a Trojan horse. | ||
| So that makes me think that he is a Trojan horse against the people he's referring or against them. | ||
| He's embedding something in the AI technology that just in case it gets out of control, he could shut it down. | ||
| That's one thought I had. Now, if you want to react to that, I can make a comment about it. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. Well, we're about to go to break in about a minute, so I think we'll have to end it there, but I appreciate your thoughts. | ||
| And there was even something that Elon said recently. | ||
| I should try to pull. | ||
| I'll try to pull up the tweet during the break here, but he essentially said that an AI algorithm told him to buy Twitter. | ||
| And again, it's one of the things that I've said on this show over and over. | ||
| I have no proof for it. I have no evidence for this. | ||
| I can just tell you that the people in power are already designating or delegating their decision-making process to AI. | ||
| We are already being ruled by AI because the people in power are using their algorithms to make decisions for the rest of us. | ||
| So Elon Musk basically admitted that. | ||
| It's just another thing that's like we told you so. | ||
| Info Wars Tomorrow's News Today. | ||
| Because you just look around at what's going on and you go, they have these incredibly powerful quantum AI computers with all of the real-time information of everybody in America or in the world. | ||
| And they can judge input versus output. | ||
| They can judge if we do this one thing, what's the reaction? | ||
| They're already making decisions at the behest of AI. | ||
| They are delegating their decision-making to AI algorithms and then acting on the decisions that the AI comes to. | ||
| I'll find that tweet from Elon Musk in the break, but I don't know if we trust Elon either. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
| Back to your phone calls shortly. | ||
| I want to cover this pretty horrifying story. | ||
| We'll go to clip number six here. | ||
| The New Zealand government is trying to take custody of a baby, a four-month-old child, because his parents don't want to use vaccinated blood during surgery. | ||
| We covered this in the... | ||
| Daily Dispatch with the New York Times article, her baby needs heart surgeries, but she is demanding unvaccinated blood as if putting the burden of this crisis on the parents for simply not wanting their four-month-old child to be vaccinated. | ||
| To have a blood transfusion with blood that has been tainted with the mRNA vaccine, which continues to produce the spike proteins that are causing the massive wave of unexplained deaths around the world. | ||
| Perfectly reasonable request, in my opinion. | ||
| Just read it a different way. | ||
| Her baby needs heart surgery, but she is demanding blood not tainted with the HIV virus, right? | ||
| Would you tell the parent that they're the wrong ones for that? | ||
| They're like, no, I want my baby to have the surgery. | ||
| I just want untainted blood with it. | ||
| The blood is there. It's perfectly available. | ||
| At any time, the New Zealand government could just give the seal of approval and go, okay, she wants unvaccinated blood, here's the unvaccinated blood, go ahead, do the surgery. | ||
| They're the ones stopping this, but to hear the New York Times or any mainstream media outlet talk about this, it's this woman's fault for daring to question the experts who have been proven wrong over and over again continuously forever. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number six. | ||
|
unidentified
|
To have safe blood, that is our right as a mother and as my voice for my baby. | |
| The baby is not scheduled for his operation. | ||
| He's in a stable condition. | ||
| We're not playing with our baby's life to get a political or any movement going. | ||
| We're wanting our baby to have the surgery and we're wanting him to have the very best that's available for his surgery and his future and his recovery. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We have a government and a blood bank that are not prepared to make available services that they can offer and that they offer in other situations. | |
| They're not willing to make those services available to this baby. | ||
| We got our say about what we wanted and then it was, you know, your say is not a scientific say, it's your concern, but it's not our concern. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're saying, we know big sports are good for your baby and we want you to do it our way and we are not even going to talk to you. | |
| We're going to go into the court and we're going to try and get somebody from the court to gang up with us effectively and make you do what we want to do because we're going to show you we're the boss. | ||
| There will be no harm. | ||
| They've got blood ready. The operation can go ahead. | ||
| In the interest of the parents and the child, this can go ahead. | ||
| You've organised the donors? | ||
| Sam has. Sam, you've organised them. | ||
| We've been screening. | ||
| We've done everything that we need to do. | ||
| They're all ready. I'm getting texts all the time. | ||
| Am I going to book my appointment at the transfusion centre to give blood? | ||
| There are thousands and thousands sticking into the world. | ||
| He gave me another smile. | ||
| I just fall in love with him every time he smiles. | ||
| He's beautiful. And we found last night there were so many people overseas coming on board and wanting to support. | ||
| This is becoming a real world thing, a real world story. | ||
| This case is about Will's life, and he is a very special little boy, but it's about the lives of your children and grandchildren. | ||
| If one day we find that our blood bank is utterly polluted, we don't know yet, we pray it won't be, You will be so grateful to have this case where all your journalists have stood up and said, we must have the option of unjabbed blood in New Zealand. | ||
| We need to all write to the Prime Minister and say, free up this unjabbed blood. | ||
| All these people want is this baby to have the operation tomorrow. | ||
| Free up the unjabbed blood. | ||
| Free up the unjabbed blood. | ||
| So again, they're trying to frame this as if this is parents putting their baby's life at risk for some political or, you know, conspiracy claim. | ||
| Now, it's the New Zealand government that's willing to let a baby die, then give up their completely unscientifically founded claim that vaccinated blood is perfectly safe and totally normal and exactly like the unvaccinated blood. | ||
| In fact, the way the New York Times puts it, this case and the family's flawed scientific arguments highlight the continued dangers of online misinformation and conspiracist narratives. | ||
| Pretty incredible, isn't it? | ||
| That's what they have identified as the danger of this, not the overreach of the government denying a baby life-saving blood that it needs to make a point in the world that we're in. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. Out to your phone calls now. | ||
| A lot of people calling in about a number of different topics, but we'll go to first the people who called in about the Elon Musk Twitter file expose. | ||
| Let's go to Wild in Wisconsin. | ||
| You want to talk about Elon Musk and Ye. | ||
| Got a couple people calling in about Ye as well. | ||
| Wild in Wisconsin, thank you so much for calling in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're on the air. Hi, Harrison. | |
| I think Elon Musk is more like... | ||
| Westinghouse and a Tesla Edison where he's kind of like a hybrid inventor and businessman and it's kind of up to like the populace to sway which way he goes especially in light of what happened to his kids that he's been like bitten by you know the progressivism where one of his kids is now going trans and then there was also that rumor when he took LSD with crimes That he was acting very weird and strange. | ||
| I don't know if you heard about that one. | ||
| No, I hadn't heard that one. | ||
| Basically, he was just acting abnormal, which for someone on the spectrum could just be just another thing. | ||
| And then with Yee and the whole stuff with what he was saying about with the Nazis, I'm kind of upset that he explicitly said in the interview when he was on the air with you guys, That he was being called the N-word, and women were being called the B-word, and that if they're just going to call him now an anti-Semite, he'll be an anti-Semite. | ||
| So it's kind of like in the vein of, you know, whatever you want to call me, or whatever name you want to give me, as long as you listen to me, and still people aren't listening to him as he's, you know, being technologically lynched right now. | ||
| Yeah. And, you know, I just think it's kind of unfortunate that there seems to be like a Holocaust monopoly where... | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's a terrible game. | |
| Yeah. It seems like not very fun, but you've got to concentrate a lot. | ||
| You know, it seems like, you know, that something that happened 100 years ago is being just focused with one group where, you know, me, myself, you know, I'm Serbian. | ||
| There was 300,000 Serbs killed in the Holocaust and a lot of gypsies killed in the Holocaust. | ||
| And that's not really ever discussed by when the Holocaust is brought up. | ||
| And, you know, nowadays it's amazing to see the same people who are crying about ye being a Nazi and anti-Semite make no reference to the significantly more treacherous tyranny that's occurring with the COVID vaccine, COVID lockdowns nowadays it's amazing to see the same people who are crying about ye being Yeah. | ||
| You know, there is just since we're on the topic, there was an event this weekend where Nick Fuentes was caught on video throwing a Sprite at somebody who had thrown food at him. | ||
| It was a food fight at the In-N-Out Burger. | ||
| And... Honestly, it's a hilarious video. | ||
| It's like almost unreal. | ||
| It's very strange. | ||
| But I just bring this up because I went to the Reddit post where somebody had posted this in a Reddit forum called Public Freakout. | ||
| Apolitical, right? It's an apolitical, not apolitical subreddit. | ||
| But every comment on it was like so disturbing. | ||
| Here's the video of him throwing the drink. | ||
| So apparently people came up to him, I guess it was either him and him and Kanye. | ||
| They were sitting in In-N-Out Burger and people just came up and started throwing food at him. | ||
| I haven't really gotten the full story of it, but the video of him throwing the drink has gone totally viral. | ||
| Pretty hilarious. He just throws the drink and just stands there. | ||
| Is that guy in the white hoodie? | ||
| Nick's buddy? Yeah. | ||
| Okay, good. Oh, no, I don't know. | ||
| I don't know who's his buddy. | ||
| If I was the guy in the white sweatshirt. | ||
| Yeah, I know. That's the crazy thing. | ||
| He throws the drink and he just like stands there. | ||
| So I don't know. I don't know who he is. | ||
| I don't know. I don't know the details. It doesn't matter. | ||
| It doesn't matter. The point is that I went on the subreddit and every single comment underneath was just like, Nick's lucky I wasn't there. | ||
| I would have slammed his face into the table. | ||
| I would have curb stomped his ass. | ||
| And like, just literally like, every comment is just like, since when are Nazis, since when do Nazis feel like they can just walk around the streets of America? | ||
| They should feel unsafe. | ||
| They should be attacked everywhere that they go. | ||
| And I just, I really got the overarching sense that I was listening to like, Little Nazis in elementary school talking about Jews, right? | ||
| Since when do Jews think that they have the right to walk around German streets? | ||
| When I grow up, I'm going to beat up every Jew I see. | ||
| He's lucky I wasn't there. | ||
| I don't allow Jews in my neighborhood. | ||
| I would have beaten them up. It's like, first of all, you're a child. | ||
| You don't know what the hell you're talking about. | ||
| Shut up. But also... | ||
| That's why I started the whole coverage of the Kanye interview with the question, like, why are the Nazis bad? | ||
| What is it about the Nazis? | ||
| And the answer to that question is that the Nazis, using very sophisticated technology at the time, cutting-edge social engineering programs and... | ||
| You know, theories that they were putting into practice for the first time ever that we experience on a daily basis now. | ||
| They were able to create a population that utterly devalued and dehumanized their fellow human beings, which is the necessary prerequisite to death camps, right? | ||
| You can't have death camps. | ||
| You can't have the... | ||
| The meat grinder of war killing millions without first totally dehumanizing and justifying any action no matter how egregious against certain people, whether those people are defined by their race, their ideology, their religion. | ||
| The first thing that you do is dehumanize them to an extent that the wider public sees nothing wrong with threatening violence against them, threatening to kill them, just in the open saying, well, this person has been labeled this, therefore they deserve death, and if I was there, I would kill them and feel good about it. | ||
| And that's what's being done now. | ||
| Ironically, it's being done to people who the media claims are Nazis. | ||
| And it's just sort of all inverted and weird and ridiculous and backwards. | ||
| But I really did get the sense of just a bunch of... | ||
| A bunch of little Hitler youth guys sitting around the campfire, a bunch of little eight-year-olds talking about how they couldn't wait to go out and just beat up the first Jew that they see. | ||
| That's what the Reddit comments sounded like to me. | ||
| It's just like, you people are sick and evil. | ||
| You think you're justified because you think you've identified a group of people that deserve this sort of treatment, but really all you are are victims of We're good to go. | ||
| Where ire is pointed and what population that this action is being justified against, it still is the prerequisite to the things that we abhor about Hitler, which are the death and the murder and the camps and all the things that the left is seemingly eager to bring about in this country. | ||
| So that was just sort of the latest update with the EA saga. | ||
| There's also stuff about Milo. | ||
| Leaving the campaign and some other news on that as well, but it's not that important and kind of a foregone conclusion as far as I'm concerned. | ||
| Let's go to Sauce in FEMA Region 9 since you seem to have a different take on Elon than a lot of our other callers. | ||
| Sauce in FEMA Region 9, you're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, thanks for having me on, Harrison. | |
| How are you doing today? Good, thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, so, well, I don't trust Elon Musk. | |
| The thing is, is that he seems to be the last bastion of the good in humanity, but it's a false sense. | ||
| I talked to my brother about this quite some time, and he would bring about the whole World War II, the World Wars, when there was still some good in men, there was still some morale, people actually still wanted to uphold the sense of patriotic duty with their country. | ||
| When COVID started, that got thrown out the drain. | ||
| All these countries, they all assimilated and they all performed the same ritual, basically. | ||
| Now, Elon's coming into the picture, and he's seemingly trying to undo all that stuff. | ||
| While he's covering the EV sector, he's cool with the crypto guys. | ||
| You know, he's covering every sector. | ||
| He's almost like the perfect person almost, right? | ||
| So I think essentially he's going to bring in the trans, the transhuman movement, essentially, or he's going to endorse it because his own kids trans. | ||
| But not only that, it's not going to be just trans. | ||
| It's going to be biometrics. | ||
| That's going to be the cool thing. | ||
| We'll see kids on TikTok with their with their quantum dots and all these digital AR augmented reality things and AI, all this stuff that he says he's against. | ||
| He's still pushing it on the back end. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Remember, he's trying to put the chips in our brains here. | ||
| Yeah, he said six months I'll be doing human testing of Neuralink. | ||
| No, I know. That's why I'm sort of, you know, What an agnostic when it comes to Elon Musk. | ||
| Like, I don't know. I have no feeling that he is either totally good or totally a schemer and bad. | ||
| Sort of the same way I feel about Donald Trump. | ||
| I feel like, and this might be a groundbreaking take on this, they're human beings with complicated belief systems, but they are doing some pretty heroic things. | ||
| We can't deny that. | ||
| I finally found the quote I was referencing here. | ||
| Hans Machney on Twitter says, Elon was just asked why he bought Twitter. | ||
| This was his answer. | ||
| Quote, I don't know if that's true or not. | ||
| I tend to believe it's not entirely true. | ||
| But he says that his biological neural net concluded it's important to buy Twitter. | ||
| Which I assume means, you know, like a biological neural net, that just means a computer made up of the brains of human beings. | ||
| Which is what Twitter could potentially be. | ||
| Sounds like a low-key plug for Neuralink. | ||
| Yeah, it could just be a plug for Neuralink. | ||
| But, you know, he says on Twitter, the intelligence of this hive mind will improve significantly as signal slash noise, effective cross-linking of tweets, and speed of tweets all improve. | ||
| So he's treating Twitter as this hive mind. | ||
| That's what he's calling this hive mind. | ||
| Hive mind is just another term for biological neural net. | ||
| So is Elon Musk, does he have a grand plan of combining Twitter with something like Neuralink? | ||
| To have access to the computing power of humans' brains interconnected. | ||
| Cliff Hyde talks about this. | ||
| He used to have a platform that could predict world events by looking at certain words that Twitter users use. | ||
| And basically he claimed that he couldn't do that anymore because of all the censorship in Twitter. | ||
| You weren't getting an unfiltered insight into people's minds, which is what you get when you're able to Sort of identify certain words that people use. | ||
| You can sort of read into what their underlying thoughts are in a lot of cases. | ||
| And you can make predictions based on that. | ||
| But once Twitter started censoring a lot, then you had not a free and unfiltered view of what people were thinking, but one that was swayed in one certain way. | ||
| But again, all of this is just to illustrate that people in power are already... | ||
| Taking orders from or making decisions informed by AI neural network data-sweeping programs, which is horrifying because they control those programs. | ||
| Let's go back out to your phone calls now. | ||
| Let's go to Kyle in Florida. | ||
| You have experience with COVID tyranny. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Kyle. You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hi, Harrison. How are you? | |
| Good, thank you. I wrote down some stuff. | ||
| If you just will let me go off for about 60 seconds, I'm going to try and condense my whole experience into about one minute. | ||
| Go ahead. So thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Long story short, I'm a law student at a Florida law school. | |
| There's been a lot of COVID tyranny. | ||
| They made me wear a mask like up to four hours a day. | ||
| I was getting shortness of breath. | ||
| They said if you want to take the mask off, you have to go through Student Disability Services. | ||
| So I had to go see a doctor of the lungs. | ||
| And, you know, he had to write a note saying, gotta let this kid take his mask off, basically. | ||
| It's really harming him. | ||
| And, you know, the worst part wasn't even that. | ||
| The worst part, they tried to kick out all the non-vaccinated kids in one fell swoop on April 1st. | ||
| Ron DeSantis stopped them. | ||
| I know for a fact Andrew Gillum wouldn't have stopped them, you know? | ||
| So I just want to tie in one thing. | ||
| It might seem unrelated, but it's not. | ||
| To get a law degree in Florida and in most states, You basically have to be a sitting duck for a couple years. | ||
| You cannot bring a weapon on campus. | ||
| You have to be unarmed. | ||
| Now, I think school shooters are a real threat. | ||
| I think COVID's not a real threat. | ||
| When we all took the masks off, eventually they let us, right? | ||
| No one started getting sick. | ||
| COVID's not a real threat to me, school shooters are, but they get to decide what threats are real. | ||
| And already, you have to be a sitting duck for three years to get a law degree and enter the legal profession in America. | ||
| I don't think it's right, but they want to make it even worse. | ||
| They want to make it so. You have to get whatever vaccine they say. | ||
| They can take away your oxygen. | ||
| It's just not right. So, you know, I'm not happy. | ||
| And I hope it gets better. | ||
| Well, it's like, you know, I was talking to a friend over the weekend about... | ||
| I can't remember what we were talking about. | ||
| Something about the military, you know, operating against Americans. | ||
| And I just pointed out, like, yeah, but they... | ||
| He was like, you really think the army would follow orders to attack Americans? | ||
| American citizens, and it's like, first of all, like half of our army are not even American citizens. | ||
| They have no loyalty to us whatsoever. | ||
| They're in our army. Just late, late Republic type of stuff. | ||
| Just look at Rome. But the real thing is they've already gotten rid of everybody who would stand up against them. | ||
| They've already gotten rid of all the people who refuse to take the vaccine and refuse to be bullied into it. | ||
| So this might be the most extreme example of not wanting to follow orders, but I think that's what you're pointing out as well, is that if you want to become a lawyer in this country, you have to, for three years, show the people who give you your diploma, show that you're willing to not question orders, show that you're willing to binge your own morals. | ||
| For the sake of power. | ||
| Like, you have to participate in this years-long ceremony of subjugating yourself before you're, you know, allowed to go out there and be licensed by them to be an authority of any sort. | ||
| I don't know. Am I sort of along the same line of what you're talking about, Kyle? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, 100%. All I want to do is throw one more thing in, which is, you know, I just think it adds some detail that needs to be added. | |
| Anthony Ladappa, the Florida Surgeon General, puts out this updated mRNA guidance advising that, you know, this causes a big increase in cardiac-related death for men 18 to 49. | ||
| My school doesn't even acknowledge it. | ||
| It's like it doesn't happen. They're not listening to the Florida Surgeon General. | ||
| And now if you post about that guidance on Instagram, it's getting fact-checked. | ||
| Yeah, oh my god, that's such a good point. | ||
| And it sort of ties into everything that we're talking about here, especially the things about like AI making decisions that I was just talking about this. | ||
| Because I think about this all the time. | ||
| And I don't know how they do it in their own minds. | ||
| I don't know the contortionary activity that goes on in their own thought process that allows this type of thing to take place. | ||
| But they predicate their actions on, we're trusting the science. | ||
| We're doing it because the science said. | ||
| We can be brutal. We can be inhuman. | ||
| We can deny your basic human rights because the science says so. | ||
| It's the science. It's undeniable. | ||
| Trust the science. And they do it. | ||
| And the new science comes out that contradicts that. | ||
| If they were at all honest, if they were at all actually doing the thing that they claim they're doing, then once that new evidence came out, they would have to reverse their position and be just as dogmatic and just as forthright and just as upfront about all this stuff. | ||
| So, right, when that new, you know, Surgeon General comes out with new science saying, hey, this damages people 18 and 25, the correct reaction would be to then take on that position with the same vociferousness, right, with the same fury that they took on everything else. | ||
| Where they go, well, now the science has changed. | ||
| It's saying 18 to 25-year-olds should not get the shot. | ||
| You should not be getting the shot. You should not be wearing the mask. | ||
| But it doesn't work like that. | ||
| It doesn't work like that. Some science is unquestionable and you have to follow it. | ||
| But other science, they just know to ignore it completely and just don't take into account. | ||
| When you take that into the A.I., You know, sector, you realize that they're setting up a world in which computers are making decisions, AI and algorithms are making decisions, which means there's no one to appeal to, which means it's not a human decision. | ||
| It's science. You have to trust it. | ||
| There's no arguing with the computer. | ||
| The computer is just spitting out facts as it knows it. | ||
| And so what they do is they are now programming into the algorithms themselves these types of biases, where they'll say, well, we just fed information into the algorithm, and here's the result it came out with. | ||
| It's unquestionable. It's science. | ||
| But then you have to look at what the information is they're feeding in. | ||
| Some they'll choose to feed in. | ||
| Some they won't choose to feed in. | ||
| They'll tweak it a little bit so that the outcome is more aligned with what they think, but it'll still be unquestionable because it's an algorithm making this decision. | ||
| It's all just... It's all just a scam. | ||
| It's all just a lie. All of the claims of trusting science, that's not the case when the science goes against them. | ||
| And this is obvious. | ||
| Everybody knows this. But it's a philosophy almost that's leaking into the biggest discussions and the biggest decisions that are being made in our society. | ||
| And it doesn't portend a future you could exactly call pro-humanity. | ||
| It's actually the exact opposite. | ||
| They're stripping us of our humanity, replacing us, body and mind, with a robotic, useful tool. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| We have a couple major stories that I really have only touched on during the Daily Dispatch here. | ||
| Let's get into it. | ||
| We cut this out as a separate segment. | ||
| I think it's worth its own investigation into this. | ||
| The Sun has the story, quote, I worked with the Wuhan lab. | ||
| I tried to warn them, and I know COVID was a lab leak. | ||
| Dr. Andrew Huff is a scientist who worked closely with the Wuhan lab and claimed COVID was genetically engineered and leaked from the facility. | ||
| Dr. Andrew Huff, former vice president of EcoHealth Alliance, claims to have had a ringside seat to what he brands, quote, one of the greatest cover-ups in history and the, quote, biggest U.S. intelligence failure since 9-11. | ||
| This revelation on top of all of the other evidence that is being revealed about the origin of this coronavirus, which is no... | ||
| Small thing, right? | ||
| It's kind of the biggest thing in the world. | ||
| It shut down the entire world. | ||
| It allowed a total reorganization of our entire society forcibly from the top down. | ||
| It killed ostensibly millions of people. | ||
| If you listen to the official reports, of course, the flu was in disguise that year. | ||
| It wasn't the flu. It was the flu with one of those glasses with nose and a mustache. | ||
| It was just the flu, but it was obviously covered up as something else. | ||
| But regardless, if you believe the official stories, essentially what he's admitting is his first-hand knowledge of the mass murder of millions of people. | ||
| Even if you don't believe COVID even exists, even just the lockdowns themselves and the lack of pre-screening for cancers and that sort of thing, or the Literally hundreds of thousands of severe injuries and or death caused by the vaccines. | ||
| This entire event has killed no less than hundreds of thousands of people. | ||
| At the very least, it's done that. | ||
| And this was on purpose. | ||
| And this was done by human beings. | ||
| And the reality of this has been concealed. | ||
| Not very well. I mean, we knew about it from the very beginning, but for the rest of The wider public, it's been concealed for the last two and a half years. | ||
| So again, I'll say that this is only one of two things. | ||
| This can only be one of two options with this information being revealed. | ||
| It is either, as he puts it, the biggest U.S. intelligence failure since 9-11, or, and this is where I land on it, this has been the greatest success of the U.S. intelligence apparatus since 9-11. | ||
| This is either... It's one of two things. | ||
| Either the U.S. intelligence agencies, the entire landscape of deep state actors, either they utterly failed in their one mission, all of these millions of dollars that we pour into these innumerable NGOs whose entire purpose of existing is to detect and help guard against emerging diseases. | ||
| Either they all utterly, totally failed, which is... | ||
| an indictment of their existence means that they probably shouldn't exist in the first place since they don't do the one thing that they're supposed to do or they did it on purpose and they are actually complicit in this action they are actually the ones guilty of bringing all of this about in the first place It doesn't look good, because those are the only options. | ||
| Those are the only options that exist. | ||
| Most of America still exists in a hazy dream world of intangible lies. | ||
| They think that this just came out of a bat somewhere. | ||
| So it's nobody's fault. Nobody could have seen this coming. | ||
| We did everything right in trying to protect against it. | ||
| That's the one option that is not actually an option. | ||
| That's the one belief that is unsupported by any of the evidence. | ||
| That this has just happened and there's nothing anybody can do. | ||
| Either they failed or they succeeded. | ||
| Either they meant to cause this to happen, which all of the evidence points to that, or this was just a failure and oops, they just didn't do their job. | ||
| Whoops. Either way, it's their fault. | ||
| Wuhan Institute of Virology, a high-security lab specializing in coronaviruses, has been in the eye of the storm as questions raised over whether COVID could have escaped from its lab. | ||
| These are the way these people think. | ||
| It's just incredible. The way I would have put this is the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a high-security lab specializing in coronaviruses, was obviously the initial output of the coronavirus. | ||
| And this has been obvious to everybody who's paid attention the entire time. | ||
| Literally made a video about this in January of 2020. | ||
| So, you know, we knew. InfoWars knew. | ||
| But it's fine. Everybody else is now just finally admitting what we've known the whole time. | ||
| Again, it's like, thanks for coming out with this two years later, Andrew. | ||
| Thanks, Dr. Andrew Huff, two years later, coming out with this in your book that you're trying to sell. | ||
| Could have saved God knows how many lives. | ||
| Could have prevented God knows how much tyranny. | ||
| But instead, you're selling a book now. | ||
| Great. Both China and the lab have furiously denied any allegations. | ||
| Duh. But evidence of a lab leak has been piling up over the last two years. | ||
| Scientists, researchers, and governments hunt for answers and step forward with evidence. | ||
| Dozens of experts have suggested COVID could have escaped from the Wuhan lab. | ||
| Again, just duh. We can just put duh after every one of these paragraphs and it actually makes the article more informative somehow. | ||
| Even the head of the World Health Organization reportedly believes COVID did leak from a lab after some sort of catastrophic accident. | ||
| Or on purpose, that's fine too. | ||
| It's one of the primary strategies that interrogators use in police interrogations. | ||
| in the method that they use, they always downplay the events. | ||
| They always start with, look, I know something just got out of hand. | ||
| Did something get out of hand? | ||
| Was somebody else involved? | ||
| Did the person do this to themselves? | ||
| Are you just trying to cover up from someone? | ||
| We understand, right? | ||
| They're talking to a murderer, right? | ||
| They're talking to somebody who like murdered their children and they're like, was it your wife? | ||
| Did your wife do it? | ||
| And you tried to step in to stop it. | ||
| They try to give them some sort of excuse that allows them to admit that they were involved, but it's not a total admission first. | ||
| We're sort of working in the opposite direction somehow here. | ||
| But it's typical, right? | ||
| I wasn't the murderer, but I was actually there. | ||
| I was actually there. | ||
| I did actually see it happen, right? | ||
| You open them up with little steps, and eventually you get to the actual confession that they were the murderers. | ||
| So I guess that's what we're going through here. | ||
| In his new book, The Truth About Wuhan, whistleblower Dr. | ||
| Huff claims the pandemic was the result of U.S. government's funding of dangerous genetic engineering of coronaviruses in China. | ||
| The epidemiologist said China's gain-of-function experiments carried out with shoddy biosecurity led to a lab leak at the U.S.-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology, saying, quote, He said in a book, | ||
| an exclusive pre-release copy of which was provided to The Sun Online, EcoHealth Alliance has been studying different coronaviruses and bats for more than 10 years with funding from the National Institutes of Health and developed close working ties with the Wuhan lab. | ||
| Dr. Huff, who worked at EcoHealth Alliance from 2014 to 2016 and served as Vice President from 2015, We're good to go. | ||
| Speaking to The Sun Online, Dr. | ||
| Huff added, I was terrified by what I saw. | ||
| We were just handing them bioweapon technology. | ||
| So what is this? Treason? | ||
| Mass murder? Just evil scientists losing control of their experiments? | ||
| That's the only thing we have to decide at this point. | ||
| Was it murder in the first degree or murder in the second degree? | ||
| Was this you actually were holding the gun and firing the bullet, or were you just the driver that helped to conceal the evidence afterwards? | ||
| We have all of the evidence, all of the evidence we could possibly need now to prosecute this as the mass murder crime against humanity that COVID truly was. | ||
| Every aspect of it, from the initial outbreak, didn't even exist before it was created by actors and In the American intelligence agencies, the American scientific community, and funding from the American government in cooperation with the communist Chinese. | ||
| So the very creation, the literal creation of this virus to the leak of this virus and then the subsequent cover-up of the origin, which prevented any factual-based methods to combat the virus as we were seeing it, obviously hampered the creation of any sort of You know, mitigating process to prevent the spread of this virus, to the lockdowns, to the mask mandates, to the vaccine program and the vaccine mandates. | ||
| All of this has been one giant conspiracy. | ||
| It is a mass murder program that is still going on and the people involved are still free and still leading it. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. We will go out to your phone calls again this segment. | ||
| I just got to cover this story also in our Daily Dispatch, but I got a video to show you along with it. | ||
| Paralympian claims Canada offered to euthanize her when she asked for a stair lift. | ||
| A Paralympic Army veteran told stunned lawmakers in Canada that when she claimed that a government official had offered to give her euthanasia equipment while fighting to have a wheelchair lift installed in her home. | ||
| These are the priorities of the Canadian government. | ||
| Tell you what, we're all backed up on the whole stair lift thing, making it easy for you to get up and down stairs as a disabled person. | ||
| That's going to take a while. We do have plenty of readily available euthanasian kits. | ||
| If you want suicide kits, very cheap, very plentiful. | ||
| We have plenty of those. We can get that out to you tomorrow. | ||
| If you want the chair lift, it's going to be months of misery on your behalf. | ||
| But if you're looking to kill yourself, we can get that out to you tomorrow. | ||
| We can ship that out to you right away. | ||
| It's a death cult, folks. The entire world is run by a giant death cult. | ||
| They're not hiding it anymore. | ||
| Retired Corporal Christine Gauthier, who competed in the 2016 Rio de Janeiro Paralympics, testified on Thursday that an unnamed veteran affairs caseworker had offered in writing to provide her with medically assisted dying device, the CBC recorded, saying, quote, I have a letter saying that if you're so desperate, madam, we can offer you made medical assistance in dying. | ||
| Ms. Gauthier, 52, told the House of Commons Veteran Affairs Committee, according to the CBC, three other disabled veterans are believed to have been offered the same equipment, according to Global News. | ||
| Testifying in French, Ms. | ||
| Gauthier said she'd written to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to express her concern. | ||
| Mr. Trudeau said on Friday the incident was absolutely unacceptable. | ||
| Absolutely unacceptable and 100% in line with the rest of what we're doing. | ||
| Incredible. We're following up with investigations and we're changing protocol to ensure that what should seem obvious to all of us, this is not the place of the Veterans Affairs Canada who are supposed to be there to support these people who stepped up to serve their country. | ||
| Wait, what? To offer them medical assistance in dying, was reported as saying. | ||
| Wait. That is not the place of Veterans Affairs who are there to offer them. | ||
| Alright, that's not the place he's saying. | ||
| It was a little bit confusing. It's a little bit confusing because this is what your government is doing. | ||
| You're making ads about it. | ||
| And it seems to be a major push that your government is championing medically assisted suicide. | ||
| So I'm confused at why you're so outraged that the thing that you're doing is being done. | ||
| But there you go. The law was expanded in 2022 to people living with debilitating disabilities or pain even if their lives are not immediately at risk. | ||
| They say they're driven by compassion to end suffering, to an end to suffering and discrimination and desire for personal autonomy. | ||
| Just wild, wild stuff. | ||
| We have a video news report about this. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number 12. | ||
| Canada offers disabled veteran aid to die when she asked for a stair lift for her home. | ||
|
unidentified
|
For Christine Gauthier, the fight to get a wheelchair lift in her home has been an uphill battle. | |
| I have to crawl down the stairs on my butt with the wheelchair in front of me to be able to access my house. | ||
| While pleading her case to a Veterans Affairs case manager over the phone in 2019, she was told something that would leave her feeling shocked. | ||
| If things are so hard at this point and you just can't keep going on, then you know we can assist you with egg to die. | ||
| And she's not the only one. | ||
| Yeah, I say at least five veterans have complained about this being offered euthanasia equipment. | ||
| One of the craziest things about this is that this person lost the use of her legs after suffering an injury during military training in 1989. | ||
| In other words, you sign up to fight for the Canadian government. | ||
| They maim you, paralyze you from the waist down when you simply ask for A device that makes it easier for you to go up and down stairs. | ||
| They say, why don't we kill you instead? | ||
| Now that we've ruined your life by paralyzing you, we think suicide is the right answer. | ||
| These people aren't just... | ||
| Employees aren't just doing this. | ||
| They aren't just flying off the cuff. | ||
| They aren't just like deciding on their own initiative to suggest this. | ||
| This is the program. They were told that this was an option and that they should make people aware that this option was available. | ||
| I'd love to hear from the employee because they got fired apparently. | ||
| Suspended for this. Not fired. | ||
| Suspended for this. I'd love to hear from them. | ||
| Whether they're just like, I just love suicide and just want everybody else to kill themselves. | ||
| Or if they say, this is unfair, I was suspended for doing what I was told to do. | ||
| They told me to offer this stuff. | ||
| I did. And now I got suspended for it? | ||
| What the hell? I'd love to hear what the outcome of that is. | ||
| But there you go. Canada continues down its... | ||
| Rollercoaster of death. | ||
| Euthanasia. Assisted suicide. | ||
| For armed veterans. For people who fought for their country. | ||
| Yeah, of course. Who were injured. | ||
| Fighting for their country. Who were injured. | ||
| Who signed up for their country. Were injured. | ||
| And are now told, because you're injured, maybe you should just kill yourself. | ||
| Sounds reasonable. Totally reasonable. | ||
| Those lovely Canadians to our north. | ||
| What the hell is happening to you people? | ||
| Folks, all of these stories, I mean, it's just, it's like InfoWars come to life. | ||
| It's like everything that we've predicted is all coming true and is totally undeniable at this point. | ||
| Maybe that's a good reason to support us here at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Go there now. Take advantage of the mega blowout sale. | ||
| You're getting free shipping on all orders over $50. | ||
| The shipping can add up, especially if you're buying some of those big ticket items like the air filters or water filters. | ||
| Make sure to go now and take advantage of that free shipping. | ||
| You're going to have to order soon if you want it in time for Christmas. | ||
| You can also treat yourself with stuff like Knockout Sleep Support, Alpha Power, Vaso Beads Complete, Bodies, Vitamin Mineral Fusion, DNA Force Plus, and Vitamin D3 gummies, all for 50% off right now with the mega blowout sale. | ||
| It'll be on discount until they're sold out. | ||
| Things like Survival Shield X3, Patriot Blend Coffee, and Immune Support Coffee have all already sold out, so these things are flying off. | ||
| Go now to InfoWarsStore.com to take advantage of this massive sale. | ||
| Get your free shipping and support the one outlet that told you all of this was coming back when we had time to prevent it. | ||
| Let's go out to your phone calls now. | ||
| Let's go to Thomas in Pennsylvania. | ||
| You say both Elon and Kanye are together, are just looking for attention. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. Thomas, you're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks so much, Harrison. You're a rock star, man. | |
| Hey, I think Kanye just has nothing else to run on right now. | ||
| So he's doing things like trolling President Trump by going to the Mar-a-Lago dinner and bringing Nicolas Fuentes and that situation there. | ||
| And then, of course, the other day talking about the things he said about Hitler. | ||
| I think he's just looking for, you know, obviously attention. | ||
| But wait, wait, wait. | ||
| I want to ask about this because... | ||
| Why? Why would he want attention like this? | ||
| He could get attention a million other... | ||
| He already has all the attention in the world. | ||
| He's the richest black man to have ever existed. | ||
| And he's like one of the biggest celebrities in the entire world. | ||
| Why would he do this for attention? | ||
| You don't think he's the real deal? Say what you want about what he believes. | ||
| I think he's very much the real deal and he's very much just reacting to the situation in his own personal life. | ||
| But you think he's putting something on here? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I do. Listen, I have Kanye West music in my Spotify. | |
| My point is, right now, the fact that he's going through something, right, he's just spouting off all this stuff about running for president. | ||
| And, you know, he's got to let Trump know if he's going to go have dinner with him and say, hey, I'm bringing this guy Nicholas with me, who he's got to know, you know, he did that on purpose, I believe. | ||
| And then he's just spouting off all this stuff. | ||
| Just to grab something for himself while he's swimming out there and things happening against him. | ||
| Hopefully it's okay with you. | ||
| I just want to get to Elon real quick, too. | ||
| Elon is also getting a lot of attention doing his things on Twitter with all his free speech and everybody's kind of championing him. | ||
| I think he's all about Neuralink and transhumanism and getting out to outer space, and that's his main thing. | ||
| That's his hardcore, like, his purpose in life. | ||
| That's his religion is for that stuff, not Twitter, not freedom of speech. | ||
| He might care about that stuff, but he's also intention grabbing by doing that for his true purposes, true cause of what he's trying to do, which is transhumanism. | ||
| If you don't know what it is, look it up. | ||
| I've been researching it. | ||
| And one other point real quick, too. | ||
| I do want to move on to another call here, but I appreciate your input. | ||
| I disagree with you, but I think a lot of our audience probably disagrees with me. | ||
| I think you can see from the fruits of their labors, these guys are the real deal. | ||
| I mean, they don't have to do this sort of stuff. | ||
| Kanye West has had his entire life destroyed. | ||
| Like, that's not fake. | ||
| The same way that, you know, I don't know. | ||
| Everybody's so suspicious of everybody. | ||
| And it's like even when there's undeniable proof that they're the real deal, people are still suspicious of it. | ||
| It's like people still probably, if you ask him about Stuart Rhodes, will say he's a fed plant because of the Darren J. Beattie article. | ||
| The dude is in prison. | ||
| He's been in prison for a year and he'll be there for years later. | ||
| That doesn't happen with people who are protected by the FBI. | ||
| People like Alex Jones don't get sued into an oblivion and get charged billions of dollars and have their entire life destroyed, their reputation destroyed, and their every waking moment filled up with trying to defend themselves from lawsuits when they're not the real deal. | ||
| Kanye West, like somebody doesn't lose billions of dollars in a single day because they're not the real deal, because they're putting on some sort of act. | ||
| You know, Elon Musk is the only, like, mildly suspicious person because I agree with you that I think his real goals are something other than what he pretends they are. | ||
| But look at the Twitter files. | ||
| The guy's actually releasing stuff. | ||
| He's actually letting people back onto Twitter. | ||
| That's tangible, real evidence that what he's doing is not a performance of some sort. | ||
| You can talk about the fact that he's not letting Kanye, not letting Alex Jones, not letting your boy Harrison Smith back on. | ||
| You can be angry about that. | ||
| Again, it's like at a certain point, you gotta just look at what's actually happening on the ground, the hits these people are taking, and realize that this isn't a game. | ||
| These people are not faking it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
it. | |
| They're the real deal. | ||
| Even if you don't agree with them, they're telling the truth. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's hard to believe sometimes that we are still live on air, broadcasting free worldwide. | |
| And it seems quite real that things can change in an instant. | ||
| Things are getting very weird, and it's definitely more difficult than ever to even know what's going on. | ||
| But we'll keep doing our best so long as you keep us on the air. | ||
| And you can do that now at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Help us clear out our stock of body's turmeric, vitamin C with zinc, and alpha power. | ||
| Turn those shady Federal Reserve notes into the highest quality supplements available while they still last. |
Export Selection