Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to The American Journal. I am your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| We have a very, very big show for you today. | ||
| We'll be joined by Bryson Gray in the third hour. | ||
| We're going to spend part of the second hour airing a classic interview of Aldous Huxley. | ||
| There's so much stuff that I'm like, we've covered this. | ||
| You know, we've shown clips from this interview so many times. | ||
| I mean, is it really worth showing it in? | ||
| But then you, like, go on Twitter or something and you see some famous person quote that interview and somebody else respond like, oh my gosh, this is so amazing. | ||
| It's like, I guess people haven't heard this. | ||
| I guess we still have to lay the groundwork for a lot of people. | ||
| So that's what we're going to do. I'm going to show you a classic interview from Mike Waldus and Aldus Huxley where Aldus Huxley lays out exactly what is going to happen in the future that we're now living through. | ||
| The pharmaceutical ultimate revolution beyond which all further revolution is impossible. | ||
| And it really gives you an idea of just how long these plans have been in motion now that they come to near their fruition. | ||
| I want to start with a video I think it's pretty amazing. | ||
| Clip number four here. I want to go to clip number four because one of the big changes recently is that Twitter is no longer... | ||
| Checking COVID misinformation, which means the truth about COVID-19, the vaccines and all of it, can finally be spoken on Twitter. | ||
| I think this is a good example of the way that when they're caught out in their lies, the powers that be just sort of shift the goalposts a little bit. | ||
| I don't think I need to remind you that all through 2020, 2021, and for the first half of 2022, the idea of the COVID-19 virus coming from a lab was deemed horrific misinformation. | ||
| It was silenced, censored, and demonized. | ||
| Of course, that put a little bit of a roadblock in the way of actually figuring out what this disease was, how severe it was, and what we should do about it. | ||
| You can't find solutions for things if you can't get accurate information about it. | ||
| But now that the Republicans are in charge of the Oversight Committee, the truth is starting to trickle out. | ||
| Anthony Fauci is trying already to desperately weasel his way out of it. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number four. | ||
| Republicans are taking over the House of Representatives, which means there's going to be a lot of oversight hearings earlier in the program. | ||
| We heard from the soon-to-be chairman of the Oversight Committee, and obviously they're going to hold hearings on the origins of COVID. You have said that you think that it is likely that it was a natural development from animal to human, but that your mind is open about it possibly being from a lab leak. | ||
| And the investigation is going to be about specifically whether there's any connection If there was a lab leak, to U.S. investments in virus research at the Wuhan lab. | ||
| It's possible, right? | ||
| Well, it's possible that there's a lab leak, but if you look at the viruses that the NIH funded, and it was a very small grant, $120,000, $130,000 a year, Granting to study bat viruses in a surveillance way to see what's out there. | ||
| If you look at those viruses and you look at what was done with the viruses, It would be essentially molecularly impossible for those viruses to turn into SARS-CoV-2 because they were so evolutionarily distant that I can't tell you what's going on in all of China and in other things, | ||
| but I can tell you for sure that if you look at the viruses that the NIH Grant funded to study in a surveillance way. | ||
| Anybody who even has a peripheral understanding of evolutionary virology will tell you these viruses could not possibly turn into SARS-CoV-2. | ||
| So when you talk about a leak, maybe there's a lab leak, but it's not with the viruses that the NIH was funding. | ||
| That's almost certain that that's the case. | ||
| Almost certain. We're almost certain that we didn't actually create the virus that destroyed the world. | ||
| We're almost certain on that. | ||
| Oh, really? Really? | ||
| Isn't that interesting how it works? | ||
| Isn't that interesting how it goes? Just like the vaccine efficacy from 100% to it doesn't stop transmission to it doesn't protect you to most people are dying and have been fully vaccinated. | ||
| Isn't that interesting how it always just... | ||
| This slips down a little bit. | ||
| They've known the whole time. These people are inveterate liars and, uh... | ||
| Well, they should all be in prison for a start, for a very timid start. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to The American Journal. | ||
| I am your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| We'll be joined in the third hour by rapper Bryson Gray... | ||
| He's been making a pretty big splash recently with his music, the way Apple is censoring him. | ||
| He also has a protest song out about Balenciaga. | ||
| Very excited to talk to him in the third hour. | ||
| We'll be showing you during the second hour an extended... | ||
| Original interview from Aldous Huxley from the 1950s, where again he gives really detailed insight into exactly what the plan was moving forward. | ||
| And you can watch that with the knowledge of how it all turned out, how exactly right he was. | ||
| Was back then. | ||
| Really amazing stuff. | ||
| We're going to, of course, talk about more continuing fallout from Kanye and Nick Fuentes, which is dominating the headlines still continually, more so than like the mass murders recently or anything else for that matter. | ||
| This is the most important thing we have to talk about. | ||
| Obviously not, but there's also the increasing crackdown of protesters in China. | ||
| We'll show you those videos. We'll get into all of it. | ||
| We begin today with our daily dispatch and a very sad story. | ||
| So here it is, your daily dispatch. | ||
| Here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for, what is it, Wednesday, 30th of November, 2022. | ||
| too. | ||
| Our first story, a truly heartbreaking one. | ||
| Oath Keepers Stuart Rhodes found guilty of seditious conspiracy. | ||
| Oathkeeper founder Stuart Rhodes was convicted Tuesday of seditious conspiracy for a violent plot to overturn President Biden's election, handing the Justice Department a major victory in its massive prosecution of the January 6, 2021 insurrection. | ||
| That's right, folks, the violent insurrection that wasn't violent and wasn't an insurrection. | ||
| The violent overthrow of the United States government in which the primary movers and shakers had no plan to overthrow the government, committed no violence, were not carrying weapons, didn't even enter into the Capitol that is the center point of the so-called insurrection. | ||
| Words cannot describe how absurd this finding is, This finding is, especially when you consider the fact that there were no less than and probably much more than eight FBI agents embedded within the Oath Keepers who could have blown the whistle and pulled the rug on any sort of violent activity if there ever was any. | ||
| But there wasn't, of course. | ||
| Stuart Rhodes has been held in prison for over a year, I believe, pre-trial to this. | ||
| Of course, there was at least a year and a half in which he could have fled the country, could have run away, could have staged another insurrection. | ||
| Of course, that was never the intent in the first place. | ||
| There were never any claims for that. | ||
| The entire proof that the government relied on as they changed their prosecutorial theory throughout the trial started with this was a violent insurrection and it sort of transmorgified into, well, they intended to actually what they really wanted. | ||
| We're mind readers and we can tell that if things had been different, they would have done something bad. | ||
| I mean, it's just... Really sort of the most outrageous and ridiculous thing you can possibly imagine, especially when you consider that there are multiple defendants. | ||
| The charge was conspiracy. | ||
| Some of the defendants were found innocent of the conspiracy, but other ones were found guilty. | ||
| So essentially you have two people, Stuart Rhodes and Kelly Meggs, were convicted of seditious conspiracy, I guess, with each other. | ||
| It was two people. Two people were going to overthrow the United States government, and they did that by... | ||
| Not going into the Capitol, not having any weapons, and actually actively telling their subordinates to not engage in violence at the Capitol and to leave as peacefully as possible. | ||
| It's, again, impossible to describe how ridiculous this is. | ||
| Obviously, our heartfelt prayers go out to Stuart Rhodes. | ||
| He faces up to 20 years in prison having been the first person ever convicted of seditious conspiracy in the United States. | ||
| And again, we can... We'll all look back at this in decades and see it for exactly what it is. | ||
| The beginning of total, absolute tyranny in this country where the Justice Department criminalizes any activity against them. | ||
| Peaceful protest in the First Amendment be damned. | ||
| Truly incredible. We'll cover more of that in just a little bit. | ||
| But hey... All I can say is everyone listening to this with a Twitter account should probably go ask Darren J. Beattie what he thinks about all this. | ||
| Pretty tragic that at the moment where he was being unfairly prosecuted by the United States government, practically everybody who was friends or supporters of Stuart Rhodes threw him under the bus and abandoned him at the behest of baseless accusations from Darren J. Beattie. | ||
| I wonder how he feels about that. | ||
| I really do. Meanwhile, Christians are now a minority in England and Wales. | ||
| Fewer than half the people in England and Wales identify as Christians, according to a census data released on Tuesday, underlining a landmark shift towards secularism in multicultural Britain. | ||
| That's one way to put it. | ||
| The findings from the 10 yearly census carried out in 2021 came just over a month after Rishi Sunak became Britain's first Hindu prime minister. | ||
| So yes, after... | ||
| Something like over a thousand years of Christian rule in the UK, Christianity has fallen. | ||
| And that's just one of the many problems that the UK is facing right now, and we'll get more into that a little bit later. | ||
| But yeah, something like 46% of England and Wales describe themselves as Christians, down 13.1 percentage points from just 10 years ago. | ||
| So practically... Dropping more than a percentage point a year over the last 10 years as the concerted effort to destroy spiritual reality or organized religion in the Western world has massive success. | ||
| Zelensky, meanwhile, says that rebuilding Ukraine will cost more than $1 trillion. | ||
| Get working, Americans. | ||
| Get working. The Ukrainians need your money, and they're going to take it, whether you like it or not. | ||
| Rebuilding Ukraine will cost more than $1 trillion, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said during a video address to the General Assembly and the International Bureau of Expositions on Tuesday. | ||
| The International Bureau of Expositions. | ||
| That's another highly needed international conglomeration. | ||
| According to Zelensky, Ukraine is developing a system that will allow partner countries to become patrons of Ukrainian regions, cities, or businesses. | ||
| Okay. All right. | ||
| We're already seeing interest in the program from France. | ||
| So what, they're colonizing themselves? | ||
| They're going to divide their country into colonies to be occupied by European nations? | ||
| Thank God, since we know this is all about keeping Ukrainian sovereignty in place. | ||
| They say so far, repairing the damage from the war is at $750 million, but let's multiply that by $1,000 and then we're somewhere closer to the estimate that they want. | ||
| $1 trillion to rebuild Ukraine after they broke it in the first place. | ||
| Pretty incredible stuff. | ||
| I think the solution is just give Ukraine to Russia and that'll cripple them economically. | ||
| I'm a strategist. | ||
| A trillion dollars is your money. There it is. | ||
| Look, Ukrainians can only sell so many children. | ||
| They can't make up a trillion dollars just in illegal organ harvesting money. | ||
| I mean, maybe a couple billion, but, I mean, beyond that, they're going to need, you know, the farm workers and factory workers and storekeepers here in America to make up the difference for that. | ||
| It's all your fault. You have to pay the price now. | ||
| Pretty incredible. Meanwhile, from InsidePaper.com, at least 20 tornadoes hit southern U.S. At least 20 tornadoes hit the southern United States on Wednesday, cutting power and damaging homes, the National Weather Service said, urging residents to seek shelter. | ||
| Tornado struck the states of Mississippi, Louisiana, and Alabama, damaging roads, downing trees, and blowing roofs off of houses, NWS said. | ||
| NWS described one tornado ripping through Alabama as life-threatening in an advisory issued at 8.45 a.m. | ||
| Our prayers go out to the people who are affected by this. | ||
| Obviously, it's our fault for not submitting to the New World Order. | ||
| Obviously, all weather now is climate change, so unless you start eating bugs and living in a pod, the tornadoes will continue. | ||
| Meanwhile, in government news, Senate passes vote to make same-sex marriage a federal law. | ||
| We'll get into that. It's more about punishing people that don't go along with it. | ||
| About punishing the bakers and dressmakers that don't want to participate in gay weddings. | ||
| That's what it's really about. | ||
| We'll get into more on the other side. | ||
| Don't go anywhere, folks. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal Infowars.com and Band.video. | ||
| It's where you go to support us. | ||
| Free gift thing's over, right? | ||
| I mean, Infowarsstore.com, yesterday was the last day to get your free gift, but you may be able to take advantage of a... | ||
| ...of a lapse in the InfoWars store updating. | ||
| Since that's extra free gift, we'll be going away probably within hours. | ||
| You can go down to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| You can still get 60% off Brain Force Plus, 50% off DNA Force Plus, one of our best-selling and actually one of our pricier products. | ||
| So you're getting a massive discount when you get 50% off that DNA Force Plus. | ||
| You also get 50% off... | ||
| Bod-E's my personal favorite, or one of my favorites. | ||
| Knockout's probably my favorite. | ||
| If I could only have one, I'd choose Knockout. | ||
| But I don't have to only have one. | ||
| You can take all of the supplements. You can combine them and get even better effects than if you take them individually. | ||
| All available at InfoWarsStore.com right now. | ||
| 50% to 60% off, plus double Patriot points in our mega blowout sale. | ||
| A lot of these products are selling out. | ||
| So go quickly to get them before it's too late. | ||
| We have a lot of stories to cover, a lot of videos to show you still. | ||
| Some pretty mind-blowing stuff. | ||
| I do just want to start with the really devastating news. | ||
| I don't know why. I don't know why I held out hope. | ||
| I don't know why I still have this sort of ignorant faith in the American judicial system, thinking that 12 random jurors would be able to see through the lies and manipulation of the Department of Justice. | ||
| But you always want to hold out hope until it's really too late. | ||
| And that's what happened yesterday as the Oath Keepers, Stuart Rhodes, Someone I'm very proud to call personal friend has been found guilty of seditious conspiracy for his activity in January 6th. | ||
| He's the first person in America to be charged and convicted for seditious conspiracy. | ||
| Done so on the basis of nothing more than text messages and statements that Stewart publicly made about the danger of allowing America to fall into the hands of a tyrannical, unaccountable elite. | ||
| Essentially, they took statements where you'd say things like, we have to stop this now or, you know, things are going to get really bad in the future and said, see, he's calling for civil war. | ||
| No, he's predicting exactly what has come to fruition. | ||
| He was right about what he was saying. | ||
| You're not calling for war by saying if we allow tyrannical warmongers to take control, there will be war. | ||
| But that's what they convicted him of. | ||
| A Washington, D.C. jury found Rhodes guilty of sedition after three days of deliberation in the nearly two-month-long trial that showcased the, as the AP News puts it, far-right extremist group's effort to keep Republican Donald Trump in the White House at all costs. | ||
| At all costs. Yeah, they showed up unarmed to a protest. | ||
| Convict them now. Sentence them now. | ||
| They didn't do anything bad, but people who talked to them did, so throw them in prison for two decades. | ||
| Pretty incredible. Rhodes was acquitted of two other conspiracy charges. | ||
| A co-defendant, Kelly Meggs, who led the anti-government group's Florida chapter, was also convicted of seditious conspiracy, while three other associates were cleared of that charge. | ||
| Isn't that interesting? Isn't that interesting that you have a conspiracy where most of the conspirators are not convicted of that conspiracy, but the conspiracy still exists? | ||
| Isn't that weird how that happens? | ||
| So two people have been convicted. | ||
| It was a two-person conspiracy to overthrow the United States government. | ||
| They didn't have any political backing. | ||
| They had no ability to form a government of any sort. | ||
| They didn't bring weapons to the peaceful protests. | ||
| They didn't encourage their members to do anything dangerous. | ||
| In fact, they encouraged them to not go into the Capitol and were mad at their subordinates when they learned that they had gone into the Capitol. | ||
| None of that matters, though, apparently, because it's their thoughts that are being convicted right now. | ||
| Pretty wild. | ||
| Jurors found all five defendants guilty of obstruction of an official proceeding, Congress's certification of Biden's electoral victory, which, of course, was obstructed not by the protests that overwhelmed the purposefully small vote. | ||
| Capitol defenses that day, but actually stopped when the bombs were discovered outside of the Capitol building. | ||
| The placer of those bombs, of course, has never been identified, despite the fact that Washington, D.C. is a total surveillance state, and the FBI likely knows exactly who this person is because they probably sent them, if I had to guess. | ||
| But of course, if you simply search Stuart Rhodes' name on Twitter, you get an idea of what this is really all about. | ||
| You get a pretty good view of what's actually happening as basically every single person Immediately says, yeah, now we can go after Trump. | ||
| Now that we have Stuart Rhodes, we know who the real ringleader was. | ||
| It was Donald Trump. | ||
| So we can use this as a springboard. | ||
| Sure, it's a human being with a life that we're destroying, but that's just a small price to pay in pursuit of our political goals. | ||
| Everybody who's anybody is absolutely celebrating this on the left. | ||
| Stuart Rhodes, guilty of seditious conspiracy. | ||
| Doug Jones says the conviction of the Oath Keepers founder sends a powerful and unambiguous message regarding January 6th and how it should be viewed. | ||
| It also demonstrates the resolve of the Department of Justice to hold those who instigated and participated in it accountable. | ||
| It was a peaceful protest, I remind you. | ||
| It was a 99.9% peaceful protest in which the only violence that broke out only broke out when the police started firing flashbangs and tear gas into a crowd that was not attacking anybody. | ||
| Pretty wild stuff. But of course, they recognize that this is just one more stepping stone, one more domino to fall in their pursuit of absolute control and their destitution and elimination of the First Amendment and the ability of people to actually protest against the United States government. | ||
| Sure. | ||
| There was a year or more of violent insurrection that took place in every city in America with tens of thousands of people being highly coordinated by activists crossing state lines and coordinating riots that destroyed billions of dollars worth of damage in the year preceding to that. | ||
| But that wasn't the big issue. | ||
| The big issue was that Congress had to evacuate the Capitol for a couple of hours while people peacefully wandered through the halls and took selfies with each other. | ||
| So, I mean, let's put things in perspective, of course. | ||
| This could embolden investigators, they say, whose work has expanded beyond those who attacked the Capitol to focus on others linked to Trump's effort to overturn the 2020 election. | ||
| U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland recently named a veteran prosecutor, Jack Smith, to serve as special counsel to oversee a key aspect of a probe into efforts to subvert the election, as well as a separate investigation into the retention of classified documents at Trump's Florida estate, Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| Of course, the argument that... | ||
| Stewart made, and that is obviously true, is that the 2020 election was, by all definition and without speculation, unconstitutional. | ||
| The changes that were made on behalf of the COVID lockdown were not passed through the proper channels. | ||
| They were initiated by fiat, by people like the Secretary of State of Pennsylvania and others, who simply changed the law on a whim without putting it to a vote, without securing the election in any meaningful way, and allowed for potential Welcome back, | ||
| folks. If you're the religious type, you might want to dedicate a couple minutes today to praying for Stuart Rhodes. | ||
| For the last year or so, he's been sitting behind bars in solitary confinement, awaiting his chance to actually clear the air about what happened on January 6th. | ||
| We all know what happened on January 6th, a peaceful protest encouraging Republican members of Congress to exercise their constitutional right to demand a 10-day pause in the certification of the election in which they could investigate claims of voter fraud, which were testified to under a peaceful protest encouraging Republican members of Congress to exercise their constitutional right to demand a 10-day pause in the certification of the election in which they could investigate claims of voter fraud, which were testified to under oath, that were testified to and signed which were testified to under | ||
| testified to under oath that were testified to and signed and legally binding affidavits by people who themselves were either actively involved or saw firsthand the way that the election process was manipulated. | ||
| Or investigate or bring charges between states such as the Texas or Texas versus Pennsylvania case in which Texas claimed that it was being denied its rights. | ||
| You know, fair say in an election because places like Pennsylvania and others instituted mass mail-in ballot changes to the election without any constitutional authority to do so. | ||
| The actual insurrection that took place, of course, the actual coup that took place was, you know, Nancy Pelosi and General Milley conspiring together to deny Donald Trump his rights as president of the United States, duly elected in 2020. | ||
| None of that got brought up, though. | ||
| But it's just worth sort of reminding everybody or putting into perspective how the powers that be in this country feel about people that actually understand and wish to uphold the original constitutional purpose of this nation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Stuart Rhodes never hurt anybody. | ||
| He's not even accused of it. | ||
| He never gave orders for anybody to hurt anybody. | ||
| He was unarmed and made sure that his subordinates in the Oath Keepers organization were also unarmed during the January 6th event, as it was a peaceful protest in which the only people who died during the event were those murdered by the police, the protesters unarmed who were shot point blank in the chest or beaten to death on the steps of the Capitol. | ||
| Again, just how this could even possibly have happened is a real indictment of our entire system. | ||
| Over the seven weeks of testimony, jurors heard how Rhodes rallied his followers to fight to defend Trump and discussed the prospect of a bloody civil war. | ||
| My God. My God, he was predicting a bloody civil war because... | ||
| We no longer have the ability to elect people that we want in this country because the entire system is utterly corrupt and tyrants can get into power and then stay there through corrupt manipulation. | ||
| Gosh, you shouldn't warn anybody about trouble ahead. | ||
| That means that you want it, apparently, even though everything that you're doing is attempting to prevent what you're predicting. | ||
| Apparently that's enough. Just discussing the prospect of something means that you are responsible for that thing happening even when it doesn't happen. | ||
| It's confusing because it's all lies. | ||
| Defense attorneys accused prosecutors of twisting their clients' words and insisted that the Oath Keepers came to Washington only to provide security for figures such as Roger Stone, a longtime Trump ally. | ||
| And those claims from the defense were, of course, backed up by the reality of what actually happened. | ||
| So, you know, there's that. | ||
| The defense focused heavily on seeking to show that Rhodes' rhetoric was just bluster and that the Oath Keepers had no plan before January 6th to attack the Capitol. | ||
| There was no evidence presented of a plan to attack the Capitol because there wasn't a plan to attack the Capitol. | ||
| Everybody saw it in real time. | ||
| It's a massive protest, and once scuffles with the police started, the police were massively understaffed. | ||
| Meaning that you had a million people in Washington, D.C. and about 15 police officers standing in front of the Capitol building with little ropes to block it off. | ||
| And again, this was after a year of violence. | ||
| And you kind of can't blame the people on January 6th of thinking, of actually believing the media, actually believing the rhetoric that they'd heard for the last year. | ||
| Over and over and over, we were told, this is fine. | ||
| This is good. This is what democracy looks like. | ||
| That was the chant they chanted while they burned down federal buildings and attacked police officers in places like Chicago. | ||
| You kind of can't blame the January 6th protesters. | ||
| for thinking this is how things are now because everybody keeps telling us this is how it is but of course even despite You know, being told by the media over and over for an entire year that property is just property, man. | ||
| It can be replaced. Who cares? | ||
| This is what democracy looks like. | ||
| This is what free speech looks like. | ||
| Rioting is the voice of the unheard. | ||
| Well, that's just for one side. | ||
| That's just for one side. If you do it, you're a domestic terrorist. | ||
| You will be hunted down by the FBI. You will be put in a jail cell in solitary confinement in a bright concrete cube for years on end to mentally destroy you because you deserve it. | ||
| And that's sort of the point, isn't it? | ||
| Stuart Rhodes never hurt anybody. | ||
| He never attempted to overthrow the government. | ||
| He never told anybody under him to do anything that caused anybody any pain at all, whatsoever. | ||
| The greatest outcome of this was that the vote was delayed a couple hours, which it wasn't even right in the first place. | ||
| It was the bombs that were placed. | ||
| We went over that. But it doesn't matter. | ||
| These people want you dead. They're celebrating and... | ||
| Excited about the fact that Stuart Rhodes will now be in prison. | ||
| They're mocking and making a big joke out of the fact that this guy's life has been destroyed even though he hasn't done anything wrong. | ||
| You gotta understand, this is the world that we're in now. | ||
| Doesn't matter if you've done anything wrong. | ||
| It really doesn't. Of course, they're not done. | ||
| Jury selection for a second group of Oath Keepers facing seditious conspiracy charges is scheduled to begin next week. | ||
| Several members of the Proud Boys, including former National Chairman Enrique Tarrio, are also scheduled to go on trial on the sedition charge in December. | ||
| An extraordinary move Rhodes took to the stand to tell jurors there was no plan to attack the Capitol and insist that his followers who went inside the building went rogue. | ||
| All of that, of course. | ||
| Absolutely true, and the evidence bears it out. | ||
| And of course, there's evidence also that the FBI was deeply embedded in the Oath Keepers for the entire time and could have put a stop to any plan had there been one. | ||
| There wasn't one, so they didn't put a stop to anything. | ||
| Rhodes testified that he had no idea that his followers were going to join the mob and storm the Capitol and said he was upset after he found out some did. | ||
| Of course, this also is borne out in the messages shared between them. | ||
| Where he said they were acting stupid and outside of their mission and to stop doing what they were doing. | ||
| Doesn't matter. It doesn't matter anymore. | ||
| This is a political move and they'll destroy your life just as rapidly as they'll destroy Stuart Rhodes'. | ||
| Prosecutors said the Oath Keeper saw an opportunity to advance their plot to stop the transfer of power. | ||
| Another way to put that would be to... | ||
| Advance their constitutional right to oppose the unconstitutional changes that were made to the electoral process in the run up to the 2020 election that was then taken advantage of, never investigated, never litigated in court, and allowed to absolutely continue. | ||
| Matthew Sabian on Twitter, Sablin on Twitter, says, I'm still confused about the weird mixture of verdicts. | ||
| Some people are guilty of doing the thing, and the lead guy is guilty of having conspired with him to do the thing, but they were not guilty of a conspiracy with him if you read the jury verdicts as a collective. | ||
| That doesn't make any sense whatsoever. | ||
| This is in response to Julie Kelly, who has some of the best coverage. | ||
| The case against the Oath Keeper, she says, is one of the most absurd political prosecutions in DOJ history. | ||
| Case relied mostly on comms between members, but today's mixed bag outcomes and overall defeat for the DOJ. Let's hope this overly confident, smug prosecutors lose lots of sleep over this. | ||
| Again, it's just... | ||
| Every time I think that things are turning around in this country, that people are starting to see just how dishonest and manipulative the media in coordination with the politicians are, you just get this cold slap in the face. | ||
| Of course, Ray Epps, who is on video encouraging people specifically to go into the Capitol the day before and the day of the Capitol riot. | ||
| He's not... Even arrested at this point, not under investigation, not facing trial. | ||
| It's called in unequal application of law, and it's worse than no law at all. | ||
| We have an out-of-control judiciary at the behest of their political... | ||
| ...appointers who are now systematically engaged in the dismantling of any opposition and any dissident forces opposing their tyrannical rule. | ||
| It's real folks It's the collapse of the republic And we're living it real time Alright welcome back ladies and gentlemen This is American Journal. A lot of stuff to cover today. | ||
| We'll sort of take what's happening to Stuart Rhodes as a jumping off point. | ||
| Talk about how else this type of atmosphere is affecting the liberty of American citizens. | ||
| It's just really crazy. | ||
| It really is. I mean, when you look at the way that they are treating Stuart Rhodes in the January 6th event, where police murdered a couple of peaceful protesters and Congress was forced because of a bomb threat to take a couple hours before certifying an election that would have never been allowed to take place in the first place. | ||
| They act like that is the biggest threat to democracy that the world has ever seen. | ||
| Meanwhile, what do you think is worse? | ||
| What do you think is worse? A couple people high-fiving police as they walk through an open door of the Capitol? | ||
| Is that more damaging to our democracy? | ||
| Or is letting in populations the size of the city of Houston cross the border illegally in a single year? | ||
| I mean, what do you think is a little bit more damaging to the fabric of American society? | ||
| One of those things is being ruthlessly prosecuted by the U.S. government. | ||
| The other one is being carried out and facilitated by the U.S. government. | ||
| It's almost, it's, it's just, it's inexplicable, all of this. | ||
| Of course, on top of this, you've got DOJ appointing Jack Smith as special counsel. | ||
| Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene took to Twitter to discuss counsel Jack Smith. | ||
| She says the neutral, fair, can't be influenced. | ||
| Special counsel Jack Smith is another DOJ Democrat operative. | ||
| His Democrat activist wife, Kathy Chevron G. Smith, makes documentaries, finance and backed by leftist globalist George Soros and is a Biden donor. | ||
| She also works closely with Barack Obama's wife, Michelle Obama. | ||
| Jack Smith's mother-in-law was a George Soros senior fellow at the Open Society Foundation. | ||
| Jack Smith's psychotherapist sister-in-law compared Trump-winning POTUS as the same as 9-11 and urged her patients to resist and is also a Biden donor. | ||
| Special counsel Jack Smith worked with Lois Lerner to target conservative Americans. | ||
| Jack Smith is not neutral, will not be fair, and is purely political. | ||
| Democrats always take care of their own, she says, a... | ||
| $8 million in taxpayer money was in the budget last year for Lois Lerner's legal defenses. | ||
| For targeting conservative Americans, so taxpayers should pay for Trump's legal expenses too, right? | ||
| Fair is fair. Special counsel is just another taxpayer-funded Democrat political campaign that will be used to create more lying headlines, be used to produce Democrat campaign ads in 2024. | ||
| We're going to defund and stop the special counsel, and Merrick Garland should go ahead and resign, she says. | ||
| I'm sure he will. I'm sure he'll take that advice. | ||
| It's like, how many special counsels do we need? | ||
| Do we not all remember Robert Mueller? | ||
| Do we not remember that he had Over two years and tens of millions of dollars to sift through every communication from Donald Trump with a fine-tooth comb. | ||
| People still say Trump is a Russian agent. | ||
| Still, after all of that. | ||
| It just doesn't matter to them. | ||
| Reality doesn't matter. The results of the investigation don't matter. | ||
| It's just whatever needs to be said to expedite your political opportunism at that particular moment. | ||
| It's absolutely wild. | ||
| This is a good article from Red State that lays it down... | ||
| In the first paragraph here, federal public defender sounds alarm over unconstitutionally overbroad warrants against January 6th defendants. | ||
| They say one of the most troubling things about the Biden regime has been the unequal application of law we've ever seen. | ||
| What has always made the U.S. special in the history of the world was not only its freedom, but its rule of law, which of course are one in the same. | ||
| This is the basis of liberty. | ||
| The entire concept of liberty came about during the time of the Roman Republic and it meant that you were under the protection of the Roman state. | ||
| It meant that you had rights to make your argument in the Roman courts. | ||
| That's what justice is. | ||
| That's what the rule of law is. | ||
| That's what freedom is in the modern world or the ancient world. | ||
| It's all the same. They say that's why people came to us from troubled places all over the world fleeing banana republics. | ||
| In other words, fleeing places where you didn't have the rule of law, you had the rule of men. | ||
| You had not an unchanging set of laws that... | ||
| You know, set of rules like a game you're playing that everybody had to adhere to to assure fair play. | ||
| But you had people applying a law where they want, not applying it where they don't want. | ||
| If you're a friend of someone powerful, you're not subject to laws. | ||
| But if you're an enemy of the ruling powers, whether you've committed a law violation or not, you'll be charged with something and put out of the way. | ||
| This is the chaos of tyranny, and it's exactly what is being inflicted on the American people right now. | ||
| Say the Biden team seems to be intent on turning us into the banana republics that people have fled from. | ||
| We've seen the stark difference in the way the January 6th defendants have been treated versus BLM or other leftist rioters. | ||
| And just to illustrate that, one of the Black Lives Matter rioters who threw a Molotov cocktail at a cop car, burning it down, received a couple months in prison, far less than the QAnon shaman Jake Angeli received when he peacefully walked through the open door of the Capitol, | ||
| shaking hands with police, coordinating with police, and then when Donald Trump sent out the message to evacuate, encouraged all of his fellow protesters to peacefully abandon the Capitol. | ||
| So according to our new law system, throwing a Molotov cocktail at police officers, less damaging, less threatening, less punishment than walking around the Capitol with the permission of the Capitol Police, at the side of Capitol Police, and in coordination with the Capitol Police. | ||
| I mean, this is how utterly absurd this is. | ||
| And of course we know from whistleblowers recently that the FBI has been Essentially fabricating domestic terrorism cases, taking agents off of actual human trafficking cases and putting them on totally nonsensical domestic terrorism cases in order to pump up the numbers in order to justify their prosecution of dissidents in this country. | ||
| So you've got the DOJ ruthlessly... | ||
| Attacking abortion protesters or election fraud protesters. | ||
| Coordinating with big tech directly to surveil the private messages of people who do things like question the 2020 election. | ||
| Meanwhile, California releases thousands of convicted pedophiles within a year of conviction. | ||
| California has released thousands of convicted pedophiles after only spending a few months in prison. | ||
| Such pedophiles have been convicted of a range of horrific acts, including raping children under 14. | ||
| More than 7,000 persons convicted of lewd or lascivious acts with children under the age of 14 have been released in the very same year they were convicted. | ||
| Convicts who committed even more heinous crimes, such as sodomy and rape of children, also served short sentences. | ||
| So this is the priority of our current government. | ||
| These are the priorities. | ||
| Ruin a child's life, steal someone's innocence, violate and abuse a child, you get a couple months in prison, walk through the open doors of a Capitol, you're going away for decades, my friend. | ||
| This is the priority of these people. | ||
| This is what our current Department of Justice is engaged in. | ||
| And of course the problems with the election haven't gone away. | ||
| Pennsylvania County that ran out of paper ballots fails to certify election results. | ||
| Of course this continues to be a fallout from the utter destruction of our legitimate electoral system in this country. | ||
| And all it would really take would be a couple of stalwart Republicans actually standing up against this instead of contributing to the narrative by calling January 6th protesters, terrorists, and allowing the DOJ to run roughshod over our every right. | ||
| As if this isn't coming for you. | ||
| As if liberals or blue-blooded Republicans are somehow immune to the tyrannical actions of out-of-control prosecutors at the Department of Justice. | ||
| Let's come down on all of our heads. | ||
| We can stand up now, or we can subject ourselves to the horror that awaits us if we do nothing. | ||
| Of course, even saying that, I guess, will now be used as evidence of my treason trial, where they say he threatened a bloody civil war. | ||
| No, I'm telling you, that's what's going to happen if we don't stop things now. | ||
| Sorry, that's just the way that it's going to go. | ||
| We'll be back in the next hour. | ||
| We're going to talk about Project Veritas revealing another just horrific thing being done by our own government, an absolute abandonment of our laws and the safety of our people in favor of political reorganization of the population. | ||
| It's pretty wild stuff. Stay tuned. | ||
| In the meantime, go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Take advantage of the mega blowout sale. | ||
| Still up on the internet. You get a free gift with every order. | ||
| It's supposed to end today, so it can't go on much longer. | ||
| You're getting 60% off, 50% off, or 40% off our top-selling products like Bodies, DNA Force Plus, and Brain Force Plus. | ||
| But get them now while you still can. | ||
| They're selling out rapidly. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Keep us on the air and keep us in the fight. | ||
| We're not giving up no matter how tyrannical these scumbags get. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Second hour of American Journal has begun. | ||
| The story, we found a post-millennial 16-year-old migrant pimped out by a sponsor under Biden HHS, Project Veritas Reveals. | ||
| Project Veritas released a report on Tuesday that featured a whistleblower that worked with the federal government's Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency. | ||
| The report features whistleblower Tara Lee Rodas who volunteered to assist the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services which aimed to help process unaccompanied migrant children. | ||
| What she found out they were doing instead horrified her beyond description. | ||
| She went to Project Veritas to tell the story. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here is the video. The tax dollars of people who are listening are paying to put children in the hands of criminals. | |
| They said, I need to make you aware. | ||
| And they said, Tara, we don't get sued by traffickers. | ||
| A government whistleblower has stepped forward to Project Veritas to detail her harrowing experience at the Department of Health and Human Services. | ||
| In 2021, this whistleblower volunteered to assist HHS with the placement of unaccompanied minors and was deployed to the Migrant Emergency Intake Site in Pomona, California. | ||
| There, she witnessed the agency failing these children, as she puts it, doing the work of the cartels on your tax dollars. | ||
|
unidentified
|
These vulnerable children, we care for them, we clothe them, we feed them. | |
| With your dollars and my dollars, we fly. | ||
| That product directly to the trafficker. | ||
| God forbid it's sex trafficking. | ||
| Project Veritas embarked on a nine-month investigation across the country to corroborate our whistleblower's claims. | ||
| So he attempted to traffic children and he's still at Address in Texas. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, we have 44 unaccompanied children at that address. | |
| We have 25 unaccompanied children at that address. | ||
| Project Veritas put boots on the ground, visiting scores of addresses the whistleblower shared from case files she worked on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What we found was shocking. - There was a girl saying that they pimped, this woman pimped me out. | |
| How many men did she force you to be with? | ||
| How many men? Well, many. | ||
| I don't remember, the 16-year-old says. | ||
| I didn't like what she was doing to me. | ||
| She forced on me. | ||
| Is she really your aunt or is she... | ||
| She said that she knew me since I was a young child, but I didn't know her. | ||
|
unidentified
|
...hold up that order of deportation to that child and say, if you do not do what I say, I'm going to call ICE on you myself. | |
| The 16-year-old says, I escaped one night. | ||
| Later on, she called immigration. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That this is something that HHS wants people to know. | |
| If you're a case manager and you know this information, if you really care about the children being safe, you need to come forward. | ||
| So that's a video by Project Veritas. | ||
| This, of course, comes after the whistleblower came out to Savannah Hernandez. | ||
| She did that great interview with the guy saying, look, I was helping to traffic children. | ||
| They were putting children by the hundreds onto planes, flying them to far-off cities and handing them to men who didn't recognize the children and whom the children didn't recognize themselves. | ||
| Like, they... Didn't know who this guy was that they were handing them off to. | ||
| The guy had no identification. | ||
| In fact, the people being handed children then used the children's card for their own identification in order to get on planes and stuff like that. | ||
| I mean, all of this is well known. | ||
| None of it's being prosecuted. None of it's being actually looked at by the DOJ or the Border Patrol or anybody else. | ||
| They're actively engaged in human trafficking in addition to simply opening the border to millions of people We're good to go. | ||
| Who don't qualify. So they come across. | ||
| They say, I'm here to apply for asylum. | ||
| They say, great, well, we're super backed up because we've let a million people in this year. | ||
| So why don't you come back in October? | ||
| And then they never see the people again after they give them a wad full of cash and plane tickets to Philadelphia. | ||
| That's how it goes. This is what our government is engaged in. | ||
| This is what our democracy is about, apparently. | ||
| If you oppose it, you're a domestic terrorist. | ||
| Don't try to do anything about it. Don't speak up about it. | ||
| Don't try to change it. | ||
| Oh, no, it's too good. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Supposedly, Elon Musk is freeing tens of thousands of previously suspended Twitter accounts. | ||
| None of mine are apparently on that list. | ||
| I haven't gotten any of mine back yet, unfortunately, but some people have. | ||
| Such as Carl Benjamin, a.k.a. | ||
| Sargon of Akkad. He's returned to Twitter. | ||
| And yesterday he posted this image that I have been looking for for years. | ||
| It's a 4chan post that I saw probably five years ago and has been stuck in my head ever since, but I was never able to find the image from when I first saw it. | ||
| I've actually talked about this concept before sort of paraphrasing this idea, but I think the way that this post puts it is really unparalleled. | ||
| It has to do with Well, it has to do with the undermining of the very basis of our country and the reorganization of our civilization from a positive force to a negative one. | ||
| I'll just read it here. | ||
| It says, foundation myth. | ||
| How do you recognize a foundation myth? | ||
| It fulfills three functions. | ||
| One, it explains the origin and structure of the world and society. | ||
| Two, it defines ultimate good and ultimate evil. | ||
| And from those definitions are derived the values that are used to justify the holding of power. | ||
| Three, it determines what is held sacred in that society. | ||
| For modern Westerners, the story of World War II has become their foundation myth. | ||
| It fulfills all three functions. | ||
| We live in the post-war world. | ||
| The lines on the map, the institutions, the sense of what era we live in all arise from the starting point of World War II. Two, the ultimate evil is Nazis. | ||
| The ultimate good is opposing Nazis. | ||
| The values derived from these definitions are anti-racism, equality, diversity, anti-nationalism, and so on. | ||
| Three, the only thing that is held sacred that cannot be denied or mocked in the contemporary West is the Holocaust. | ||
| The problem is that all three functions are backwards or negative. | ||
| Instead of the origin event being one of fertility and new life, it was a conflagration of death and destruction. | ||
| Instead of the ultimate good taking the central position in the story, that slot is occupied by the ultimate evil. | ||
| Everyone knows that Adolf Hitler, the personification of evil, holds the center point of the World War II story. | ||
| And that instead of being held sacred, instead of that which is held sacred being something mysterious and sublime, it, the Holocaust, is an obscenity. | ||
| Having a negative foundation myth means the tree of life for Westerners is poisoned. | ||
| Having a negative foundation myth means that the tree of life for Westerners is poisoned. | ||
| And of course you can look at not just the foundation myth of World War II, not claiming World War II is a myth, but you get the phrase, and we compare that to the foundation myth that was before. | ||
| Because we had a foundation myth, but that's changed in the last century. | ||
| 60 or so years. | ||
| The original foundation myth was the American Revolution. | ||
| Its central figure was George Washington, a man of unparalleled goodness. | ||
| And so you sort of have a binary attack going on here, where the original foundation myth, which was the American Revolution, in which to go by these The origin and structure of the world and society, | ||
| in other words, the origin or structure of America, was predicated on individuals, independent men, standing up against tyranny and demanding and gaining for themselves personal liberty of speech, of thought, of religion, of conscience. | ||
| And defending that, Not imposing it on anybody else, but defending their own against a tyrannical figure. | ||
| The tyrannical figure doesn't hold the central position. | ||
| We hardly talk about King George, right? | ||
| Most Americans couldn't even say who the king was that we were rebelling against, but everybody knows George Washington because the key figure, the central figure in this, was celebrated for... | ||
| Bravery and goodness and willingness to abandon his claims, which he could have exploited to become king of America, to impose some sort of tyrannical monarchy on America. | ||
| He had all of the political power to do so, but instead he stepped aside and went back to his farm like Cincinnatus or any of the other, you know, honorable Romans that they modeled themselves after. | ||
| The second point of this is it defines ultimate good and ultimate evil. | ||
| And from those definitions are derived the values we use to justify the holding of power. | ||
| So, of course, you look at the American Revolution, the ultimate evil would be tyranny. | ||
| The ultimate good would be freedom and liberty. | ||
| These are wonderful things, right? | ||
| These are things that it doesn't matter who you are, you want liberty for yourself. | ||
| And to want to impose or strip liberty from... | ||
| Other people is seen as the ultimate evil. | ||
| And they say it justifies the holding of power in that our government is supposed to be there to guarantee and ensure our expression of liberty. | ||
| But that's not the case anymore. | ||
| Three, it says it determines what is held sacred in that society. | ||
| Again, the sacred central point of America would be liberty itself, self-determination, and the ability to not be held down by your condition of birth. | ||
| So these are the things that are being stripped and destroyed while establishing a new culture based on the foundation myth that is contrary to those in a lot of ways. | ||
| Nationalism would also be a central point of America. | ||
| If you look at the, well, my favorite sweater from Infowarsstore.com, join or die, right? | ||
| The join or die flag. | ||
| Saying we can't afford to be, you know, separate individuals in this. | ||
| We all have to come together together. We'll have to hang together or we'll all hang separately, right? | ||
| So that's a nationalistic idea. | ||
| It's an idea that we as a nation, as a people with different particularities in our religion or our way of life still are unified by a common culture, a common overarching religion, and a common religion. | ||
| We need to defend ourselves against the tyranny of others. | ||
| That's a nationalistic idea. | ||
| And so now you look at the Founding Fathers, you ask people on the street what they know about Thomas Jefferson or George Washington. | ||
| What they'll say is mostly negative, right? | ||
| They were slave owners and rapists. | ||
| They were old white men who were imposing You know, their control on everybody else. | ||
| Despite the fact that you can read their writings, every one of them abhorred slavery, was desperate to end the practice, but was stuck in a culture that relied on slavery and didn't have an easy way to extricate themselves from it. | ||
| But of course, it was Western culture, in particular the Brits, that ended the worldwide slave trade that had been going on for the last 10,000 years or so. | ||
| Something to be celebrated, but now they bear the cost of that. | ||
| In the same way that America and American men who were sent by the hundreds of thousands into Europe to free Europe from the grip of the Nazis are now themselves called Nazis for believing the same thing that those veterans and heroes of the Second World War believed themselves. | ||
| Everything's inverted. Everything's backwards. | ||
| They've torn down our original founding myth, which was one of positivity, liberty, freedom, justice, rule of law, nationalism. | ||
| And they're replacing it with the inverse of that. | ||
| They're reigniting the tyranny, and it's all based on this founding myth of World War II. And of course, it extends, right? | ||
| You can talk about the founding myth of Texas, which is Sort of a sequel to the American Revolution. | ||
| A lot of people in the Texas Revolution were the sons or grandsons of people that had participated in the American Revolution. | ||
| They sort of wanted a taste of that action. | ||
| So you have the founding myth of things like the Alamo, San Jacinto, and the stand of Texas patriots against Mexican tyranny. | ||
| You have a different but still well-formed foundation myth that It decides and informs the purpose and the reason that you even have such a thing as government. | ||
| That also is under concerted attack right now, from all angles. | ||
| All you have to do is search the Alamo on Google, and your top results will be, we should forget the Alamo. | ||
| And actually, the Alamo was white supremacy, despite the fact that a lot of people there were Mexican themselves, and just like Texas, several other provinces of the state of Mexico rebelled at the same time against the despicable tyranny of Santa Ana. | ||
| So we're getting rid of those founding myths, getting rid of the positive, life-affirming, freedom-oriented founding myths, and replacing them with a founding myth that demonizes the very people that defeated Hitler as now being agents of Hitler, as he has replaced Satan in our new religious organization in this country. | ||
| I think it goes to explain a lot. | ||
| I'm glad we finally found this image again. | ||
| I've been looking for it for years. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Still a lot to talk about in today's program. | ||
| We'll be joined by Bryson Gray in the third hour to talk about some of his latest music that's been banned from Apple Music, as well as a protest he has been putting on against Balenciaga. | ||
| There's a really good Babylon Bee article. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know... Did I not put it in here? | |
| It doesn't matter. It was just a parody article anyway, but... | ||
| Essentially it was saying, you know, finally, thousands of... | ||
| Dozens of... | ||
| Celebrities abandoned Balenciaga, you know, claimed they'll never work for Balenciaga again after a MyPillow was spotted in one of the shots. | ||
| Celebrities cut ties with Balenciaga after MyPillow spotted in photoshoot. | ||
| It's a fake headline, but is it though? | ||
| Is it really? Does it not illustrate something undeniably true? | ||
| Which is that the coordinated way that the media and the powers that be and the Government activists and the celebrities themselves all studiously ignore these insane, horrific stories that you just don't hear about and people just don't know they're going on while causing massive outrage and creating huge earth-ending scandals about the most normal stuff like selling pillows. | ||
| Or Nick Fuentes eating dinner with Donald Trump. | ||
| These are major things. | ||
| They deserve hours and hours of television coverage. | ||
| But, you know, Health and Human Services operating a human trafficking ring. | ||
| Nah, it's not that big of a deal. | ||
| Millions of people crossing the border. | ||
| We won't mention that very much. | ||
| Unless we can blame it on Donald Trump. | ||
| It is really... | ||
| It really makes you think, doesn't it? | ||
| Doesn't it just really make you think about all this? | ||
| The way that... Outrage is managed in only one direction, and things that are absolutely outrageous from the very depth of your heart, you should feel this reverberating terror at the way our government is acting right now, and the things some people are allowed to get away with. | ||
| I have multiple stories. I already covered one, but you've got California releasing thousands of convicted pedophiles within just a year of their incarceration. | ||
| Meanwhile, you have New York City Democrat DA under fire for downgrading over half of all felony cases to misdemeanors. | ||
| 52% of felony cases, you know, felonies. | ||
| Real, real big, big deal crimes, murders, assaults, kidnappings, arsons. | ||
| Over half of them, they downgrade to misdemeanors to get a plea deal because the courts are so backed up, because the crime rate is so high, because of the activist DAs. | ||
| And this is encouraged, celebrated, treated as good. | ||
| How many thousands of people have had their lives destroyed? | ||
| How many tens of thousands of people now live in fear on a daily basis, traumatized by some criminal activity by somebody that was released from prison the day before because they got their charges downgraded? | ||
| They don't care. They couldn't care less. | ||
| It's not about that. It's about what's useful politically. | ||
| And I guess punishing crime is just not that popular anymore in our lovely democracy. | ||
| New York County Democrat District Attorney Alvin Bragg is in hot water following recent reports that he downgraded 52% of felony cases to misdemeanors in 2022, while New Yorkers continue to face surging crime rates. | ||
| Fox News Digital reported. | ||
| 39% of felony charges were downgraded to misdemeanors in 2019. | ||
| From 2013 to 2020, under District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr., the percentage downgraded cases never exceeded 40%. | ||
| But since taking office, Bragg's office has won only 51% of prosecuted felony charges compared to Vance's 68% in 2019. | ||
| Bragg has declined to prosecute 35% more felony cases this year compared to 2019. | ||
| Yeah, just declined to prosecute. | ||
| Yeah, you got the guy on camera. | ||
| You know, he's got a rap sheet, you know, 40 items long. | ||
| Just a life of blatant criminality. | ||
| And they just go unpunished. | ||
| It's not important. It's not outrageous. | ||
| Couldn't be mad at it. Or else you're a racist, okay? | ||
| Glad we understand. But all of this, of course, is... | ||
| Cultural... No, here's the... | ||
| Yeah, here's the actual story. Celebrities cut ties with Balenciaga after MyPillow spotted in photoshoot. | ||
| Like, this is the crazy thing. | ||
| Again, it's a joke, but is it, though? | ||
| Like, if... Balenciaga teamed up with MyPillow. | ||
| Balenciaga would be probably removed. | ||
| Their app would be removed from the App Store. | ||
| They would be banned from advertising on any mainstream media platforms. | ||
| They would be treated like a pariah. | ||
| Why? Because some jolly man with a mustache and a cross necklace is trying to sell pillows. | ||
| It's unacceptable. Can't have it. | ||
| Yeah, but put a child in a ball gag and have them play with a BDSM teddy bear, that's totally fine. | ||
| Now they'll think about maybe considering lessening their cooperation with Balenciaga a little bit. | ||
| A little bit. That's more important to them. | ||
| More outrageous to them that a conservative sell pillows than a child be photographed with BDSM accoutrement. | ||
| Alright. I mean, this is the culture that we live in now. | ||
| LA Times is diving headfirst into this cesspit. | ||
| They say TikTok's vibe check analyst helps queer youth feel comfortable in their own skin. | ||
| Picture of a muscular man in a dress. | ||
| Who wants to help your children feel more comfortable with his sexuality. | ||
| And they love this! And they're writing a glowing article about what a great thing this is. | ||
| This is our culture. This is our culture, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| A two-bedroom LA apartment is bustling with the chaotic but choreographed action of a music video set. | ||
| Streams of purple light intermingle with the translucent clouds of a fog machine. | ||
| Oh, it's like a poem. | ||
| It's like poetry. It's like Xanadu. | ||
| It's beautiful. An outfit handmade from hundreds of sparkling gems is getting a final touch-up at a sewing table, all while Beyonce's recent ode to celestial excellence, alien superstars booming on a pair of speakers. | ||
| Behind the production is a team of one, Tyrus Winter. | ||
| Full-on groomer, folks. | ||
| I mean, it's just... There's like, we're not groomers, but we are infiltrating your children's media to make them feel comfortable with our sexuality. | ||
| We want them to feel comfortable and joyous as a half-naked man seduces them. | ||
| Our culture, folks, here it is. | ||
| It's so much our culture, it's actually, at this point, it is the Western government religion. | ||
| That's what it is now. Now, do you think these were actually hateful? | ||
| Or do you think they simply opposed the religion? | ||
| Were they hateful or were they blasphemous to your state religion? | ||
|
unidentified
|
LGBT temple. | |
| This is an attack on the Canadian values of acceptance and tolerance. | ||
| So just picture Iran summoning a U.S. ambassador to account for his anti-Islamic tweets. | ||
| It's the same thing. | ||
| We have a new state religion. | ||
| It's the LGBTQ religion. | ||
| And our government is performing all of the things you would expect of a Theocracy in regard to this. | ||
| How dare you question our new theocracy, the LGBTQ agenda. | ||
| Wild stuff. Folks, we're going to play on the other side an extended interview from the 1950s of Aldous Huxley. | ||
| Stay tuned. It's extremely informative. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is Aldous Huxley, a man haunted by a vision of hell on earth. | |
| A searing social critic, Mr. | ||
| Huxley, 27 years ago, wrote Brave New World, a novel that predicted that someday the entire world would live under a frightful dictatorship. | ||
| Today, Mr. Huxley says that his fictional world of horror is probably just around the corner for all of us. | ||
| We'll find out why in a moment. | ||
| The Mike Wallace Interview, presented by the American Broadcasting Company, in association with the Fund for the Republic, brings you a special television series discussing the problems of survival and freedom in America. | ||
| Good evening. I'm Mike Wallace. | ||
| Tonight's guest, Aldous Huxley, is a man of letters as disturbing as he is distinguished. | ||
| Born in England, now a resident of California, Mr. | ||
| Huxley has written some of the most electric novels and social criticism of this century. | ||
| He's just finished a series of essays called Enemies of Freedom, in which he outlines and defines some of the threats to our freedom in the United States. | ||
| And Mr. Huxley, right off the bat, let me ask you this. | ||
| As you see it, who and what are the enemies of freedom here in the United States? | ||
| Well, I don't think you can say who in the United States. | ||
| I don't think there are any sinister persons deliberately trying to rob people of their freedom. | ||
| But I do think, first of all, that there are a number of impersonal forces which are pushing in the direction of less and less freedom. | ||
| And I also think that there are a number of technological devices which anybody who wishes to use can use to accelerate this process of going away from freedom, of imposing control. | ||
| What are these forces and these devices, Mr. | ||
| Hudson? I should say that there are two main impersonal forces. | ||
| The first of them is not exceedingly important in the United States at the present time, though very important in other countries. | ||
| This is the force which in general terms can be called overpopulation. | ||
| The mounting pressure of population pressing upon existing resources. | ||
| This of course is an extraordinary thing. | ||
| Something is happening which has never happened in the world's history before. | ||
| I mean, let's just take a simple fact that between the time of the birth of Christ and the landing of the Mayflower, The population of the Earth doubled. | ||
| It rose from 250 million to probably 500 million. | ||
| Today, the population of the Earth is rising at such a rate that it will double in half a century. | ||
| Well, why should overpopulation work to diminish our freedoms? | ||
| Well, in a number of ways. | ||
| I mean, the experts in the field, like Harrison Brown, for example, pointed out that in the underdeveloped countries, actually the standard of living is at present falling, that people have less to eat and less goods per capita than they had 50 years ago. | ||
| And as the position of these countries, the economic position, becomes more and more precarious, obviously the central government has to Take over more and more responsibility for keeping the ship of state on an even keel. | ||
| And then, of course, you're likely to get social unrest under such conditions, with again an intervention of the central government. | ||
| So I think one sees here a pattern which seems to be pushing very strongly towards A totalitarian regime. | ||
| And unfortunately, as in all these underdeveloped countries, the only highly organized political party is the Communist Party. | ||
| It looks rather as though they will be the heirs to this The unfortunate process, that they will step into the power, the position of power. | ||
| Well then, ironically enough, one of the greatest forces against communism in the world, the Catholic Church, according to your thesis, would seem to be pushing us directly into the hands of the communists because they are against birth control. | ||
| Well, I think this strange paradox probably is true. | ||
| There is a It's an extraordinary situation, actually. | ||
| I mean, one has to look at it, of course, from a biological point of view. | ||
| The whole essence of biological life on Earth is a question of balance, and what we have done is to practice death control in a most intensive manner without balancing this with the birth control at the other end. | ||
| Consequently, the Birth rates remain as high as they were, and death rates have fallen substantially. | ||
| All right then, so much for the time being anyway for overpopulation. | ||
| Another force that is diminishing our freedoms. | ||
| Well, another force which I think is very strongly operative in this country is the force of what may be called over-organization. | ||
| As technology becomes more and more complicated, it becomes necessary to have more and more elaborate organizations, more hierarchical organizations. | ||
| And incidentally, the advance of technology has been accompanied by an advance in the science of organization. | ||
| It's now possible to make organizations on a larger scale than it was ever possible before. | ||
| And so that you have more and more people living their lives out as subordinates in these hierarchical systems controlled by bureaucracies, either the bureaucracies of big business or the bureaucracies of big government. | ||
| Now the devices that you were talking about, are there specific devices or Are there any methods of communication which diminish our freedoms in addition to overpopulation and overorganization? | ||
| Well, there are certainly devices which can be used in this way. | ||
| I mean, let us take a piece of very recent and very painful history Propaganda used by Hitler, which was incredibly effective. | ||
| I mean, what were Hitler's methods? | ||
| Hitler used terror on the one kind, brute force on the one hand, but he also used a very efficient form of propaganda. | ||
| Which he was using every modern device at that time. | ||
| He didn't have TV, but he had the radio, which he used to the fullest extent, and was able to impose his will on an immense mass of people. | ||
| I mean, the Germans were a highly educated people. | ||
| Well, we're aware of all this, but how do you equate Hitler's use of propaganda with the way that propaganda, if you will, is used, let us say, here in the United States? | ||
| Are you suggesting that there is a parallel? | ||
| Needless to say, it's not being used in this way now, but the point is, it seems to me, that there are methods At present available methods superior in some respects to Hitler's methods, which could be used in a bad situation. | ||
| I mean, what I feel very strongly is that we mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology. | ||
| This has happened again and again in history. | ||
| Technology has advanced and this changes social conditions. | ||
| And suddenly people have found themselves in a situation which they didn't foresee and doing all sorts of things they didn't really want to do. | ||
| Well, now, what do you mean? | ||
| Do you mean that we develop our television but we don't know how to use it correctly? | ||
| Is that the point that you're making? | ||
| Well, at present, the television, I think, is being used quite harmlessly. | ||
| It's being used, I think, I would feel it's being used too much to distract everybody all the time. | ||
| But I mean, imagine, which must be the situation in all communist countries, where the television, where it exists, is always saying the same thing the whole time. | ||
| It's always driving along. | ||
| It's not creating a wide front of distraction. | ||
| It's creating a one-pointed drumming in of a single idea all the time. | ||
| It's obviously an immensely powerful instrument. | ||
| So you're talking about the potential misuse of the instrument? | ||
| Exactly. We have, of course, all technology is in itself morally neutral. | ||
| These are just powers which can either be used well or ill. | ||
| It's the same thing with atomic energy. | ||
| We can either use it to blow ourselves up or we can use it As a substitute for the coal and the oil, which are running out. | ||
| You've even written about the use of drugs in this light. | ||
| Well, now, this is a very interesting subject. | ||
| I mean, in this book that you mentioned, this book of mine, Brave New World, I postulated a substance called soma, which was a very versatile drug. | ||
| It would make people feel happy in small doses. | ||
| It would It would make them see visions in medium doses, and it would send them to sleep in large doses. | ||
| Well, I don't think such a drug exists now, nor do I think it will ever exist, but we do have drugs which will do some of these things, and I think it's quite on the cards that we may have drugs which will profoundly change our mental state. | ||
| Without doing us any harm. | ||
| I mean, this is the pharmacological revolution which has taken place, that we have now powerful mind-changing drugs which, physiologically speaking, are almost costly. | ||
| I mean, they are not like opium or like poker. | ||
| Mr. Huxley, in your new essays, you state that these various enemies of freedom are pushing us toward a real-life, brave new world, and you say that it's awaiting us just around the corner. | ||
| First of all, can you detail for us what life in this brave new world which you fear so much, what life might be like? | ||
| Well, to start with, I think this kind of the dictatorship of the future, I think will be very unlike the dictatorships which we've been familiar with in the immediate past. | ||
| I mean, take another book prophesying the future, which was a very remarkable book, George Orwell's 1984. | ||
| Well, this book was written at the height of the Stalinist regime and just after the Hitler regime, and there he foresaw A dictatorship using entirely the methods of terror, the methods of physical violence. | ||
| Now, I think what is going to happen in the future is the dictators will find, as the old saying goes, that you can do everything with bayonets except sit on them. | ||
| But if you want to preserve your power indefinitely, you have to get the consent of the ruled. | ||
| And this they will do, partly by drugs, as I foresaw in Brave New World, partly by these new techniques of propaganda. | ||
| They will do it by bypassing the sort of rational side of man and appealing to his subconscious and his deeper emotions, and his physiology even, and so making him actually love his slavery. | ||
| I mean, I think this is the danger, that actually people may be In some ways, happy under the new regime, but they will be happy in a situation where they oughtn't to be happy. | ||
| But let me ask you this. | ||
| You're talking about a world that could take place within the confines of a totalitarian state. | ||
| Let's become more immediate, more urgent about it. | ||
| We believe, anyway, that we live in democracy here in the United States. | ||
| Do you believe that this brave new world that you talk about Could, let's say, in the next quarter century, the next century, could come here to our shores? | ||
| I think it could. | ||
| I mean, that's why I feel it's so extremely important here and now to start thinking about these problems, not to let ourselves be taken by surprise by the new advances in technology. | ||
| I mean, for example, in regard to the use of the drugs, we know there's enough evidence now For us to be able, on the basis of this evidence, and using a certain amount of creative imagination, to foresee the kind of uses which could be made by people of bad will with these things, and to attempt to forestall this. | ||
| And in the same way, I think with these other methods of propaganda, we can foresee and we can do a good deal to forestall. | ||
| I mean, after all, the price of freedom is eternal vigilance. | ||
| You write in Enemies of Freedom, you write specifically about the United States. | ||
| You say this, writing about American political campaigns. | ||
| You say, all that is needed is money and a candidate who can be coached to look sincere. | ||
| Political principles and plans for specific action have come to lose most of their importance. | ||
| The personality of the candidate, the way he is projected by the advertising experts, are the things that really matter. | ||
| Well, during the last campaign there was a great deal of this kind of statement by the advertising managers of the campaign parties, this idea that the candidates had to be merchandised as though they were soap or toothpaste, and that you had to depend entirely on the personality. | ||
| I mean, the personality is important, but there are certainly people with an extremely amiable personality, particularly on TV, who might not necessarily be very good in positions of political trust. | ||
| Well, do you feel that men like Eisenhower, Stevenson, Nixon, with knowledge of forethought, were trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the American public? | ||
| No, but they were being advised by powerful advertising agencies who were Making campaigns of a quite different kind from what had been made before. | ||
| And I think we shall see, probably, all kinds of new devices coming into the picture. | ||
| I mean, for example, this thing which got a good deal of publicity last autumn, a subliminal projection. | ||
| I mean, as it stands, this thing, I think, is of no menace to us at the moment. | ||
| But I was talking the other day to One of the people who has done most experimental work in the psychological laboratory with this, was saying precisely this, that it is not at the moment a danger, but once you've established a principle that something works, you can be absolutely sure that the technology of it is going to improve steadily. | ||
| And his view of the subject was that Well, maybe they will use it to some extent in the 1960 campaign, but they will probably use it a good deal and much more effectively in the 1964 campaign, because this is the kind of rate at which technology advances. | ||
| And we'll be persuaded to vote for a candidate that we do not know that we are being persuaded to vote for. | ||
| Exactly. I mean, this is the rather alarming feature, that you're being persuaded below the level of choice and reason. | ||
| In regard to advertising, which you mentioned just a little ago, in your writing, particularly in Enemies of Freedom, you attack Madison Avenue, which controls most of our television and radio, advertising, newspaper advertising, and so forth. | ||
| Why do you consistently attack the advertising agency? | ||
| Well, no, I think that advertisement plays a very necessary role, but the danger, it seems to me, in a democracy is this. | ||
| I mean, what does a democracy depend on? | ||
| A democracy depends On the individual voter making an intelligent and rational choice for what he regards as his enlightened self-interest in any given circumstance. | ||
| But what these people are doing, I mean, what both for their particular purposes, the selling goods and the dictatorial propagandists are doing, is to try to bypass the rational side of man and to appeal directly to these unconscious forces below the surface, so that you are in a way Making nonsense of the whole democratic procedure, which is based on conscious choice on rational grounds. | ||
| Of course, well, maybe you have just answered this next question, because in your essay, you write about television commercials, not just political commercials, but television commercials as such, and how, as you put it, today's children walk around singing beer commercials and toothpaste commercials, and then you link this phenomenon in some way with the dangers of a dictatorship. | ||
| Now, could you spell out the connection, or how do you feel that you have done so sufficiently? | ||
| Well, I mean, this whole question of children, I think, is a terribly important one, because children are quite clearly much more suggestible than the average grown-up. | ||
| And, again, suppose that for one reason or another all the propaganda was in the hands of one or very few agencies You would have an extraordinarily powerful force playing on these children who, after all, are going to grow up and be adults quite soon. | ||
| I do think that this is not an immediate threat, but it remains a possible threat. | ||
| You said something to the effect in your essay that the children of Europe used to be called cannon fodder, and here in the United States they are television and radio fodder. | ||
| Well, after all, you can read in the In the trade journals, the most lyrical accounts of how necessary it is to get hold of the children, because then they will be loyal brand buyers later on. | ||
| But, I mean, again, you just translate this into political terms, the dictator says they will be loyal ideology buyers when they're grown up. | ||
| We hear so much about brainwashing as used by the communists. | ||
| Do you see any brainwashing other than that, which we've just been talking about, that is used here in the United States? | ||
| Other forms of brainwashing? | ||
| Not in the form that has been used in China and in Russia, because this is essentially the application of propaganda methods, the most violent kind, to individuals. | ||
| It's not a shotgun method like the advertising method. | ||
| It's a way of getting hold of the person and playing both on his physiology and his psychology till he really breaks down and then you can implant a new idea in his head I mean the descriptions of the methods are really blood-curdling when you you read them and not only methods applied to political prisoners but the methods applied for example to the training of the young communist administrators and missionaries they receive an incredibly tough kind of training which It may cause about 25% of them to break down or commit suicide, | ||
| but produces 75% of completely one-pointed fanatics. | ||
| The question, of course, that keeps coming back to my mind is this. | ||
| Obviously, politics in themselves are not evil. | ||
| Television is not in itself evil. | ||
| Atomic energy is not evil. | ||
| And yet, you seem to fear that it will be used in an evil way. | ||
| Why is it that the right people will not, in your estimation, use them Why is it that the wrong people will use these various devices and for the wrong motives? | ||
| Well, I think one of the reasons is that these are all instruments for obtaining power and obviously the passion for power is one of the most moving passions that exist in man and after all, all democracies are based on the proposition that power is very dangerous and that it's Extremely important not to let any one man or any one small group have too much power for too long a time after what are the British and American constitutions except devices for limiting power. | ||
| And all these new devices are extremely efficient instruments for the imposition of power by small groups over larger masses. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| I hope you were as informed and entertained as I am every time I watch that video. | ||
| How television has changed in the last 50 years. | ||
| Can you imagine seeing something like that on national television today? | ||
| We're not the same country we were. | ||
| Later this hour, we will be joined by Bryson Gray. | ||
| We're going to talk a little bit more about the fallout from Nick Fuentes and Kanye West. | ||
| In the next couple segments, we're also going to talk about the changeover that Disney is seeing as they bring in a new CEO to try to temper some of the, well, bloodletting that's going on because of their political activism. | ||
| But first, we go to this video by Greg Reese. | ||
| Canadian Psychiatric Association targets anti-vaxxers. | ||
| Here it is. The Canadian government in British Columbia is trying to pass legislation that will recreate how oversight bodies regulate healthcare and alternative medicine. | ||
| Certain details of this legislation are undisclosed and will remain so until the government passes it into law. | ||
| But what we do know about Bill C-36 is bad enough. | ||
| This bill gives the government of British Columbia the power to mandate vaccines for any illness the government so chooses. | ||
| It gives the government the power to censor anyone who challenges their narrative on anything, allowing the government power to seize an individual's property, fine them for up to $200,000, and throw them in jail. | ||
| It creates a system of classification wherein the government decides who has good character and who doesn't. | ||
| It redefines the meaning of informed consent. | ||
| And while it has not been made official yet, the Canadian Psychiatric Association is now targeting everyone who refuses the dangerous mystery vaccines, labeling them as mentally insane. | ||
| An age-old tactic of tyrants. | ||
| Throw the dissidents into mental asylums and medicate them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And you've talked about how even they recommend, you know, perhaps psychiatric medication or something for people that don't want to take a vaccine. | |
| So this has come out recently out of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. | ||
| The college sent out a letter or a memo to all the doctors in Ontario suggesting to them, now so far they're not mandating it, they're just suggesting it, that any of their unvaccinated patients, that they should consider that they have a mental problem and that they should be put on psychiatric medication. | ||
| So far it's just a suggestion. | ||
| But the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario should not be making these kinds of suggestions. | ||
| This is extremely unethical and this is a very, very slippery slope. | ||
| If they're suggesting that people who wish to have bodily autonomy and don't want an experimental vaccine, that there may be something mentally wrong with them, that is a very, very dangerous slippery slope that we're on. | ||
| This is what the website of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario says. | ||
| It says, quote, It is also important that physicians work with their patients to manage anxieties related to the vaccine and not enable avoidance behavior. | ||
| In cases of serious concern, responsible use of prescription medications and or referral to psychotherapy are available options. | ||
| Overall, physicians have a responsibility to allow their patients to be properly informed about vaccines and not have those anxieties empowered by an exemption. | ||
| So my verdict is, wow, yes, this is in fact a true claim. | ||
| This is what the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario is telling doctors, that if a patient has declined the COVID-19 vaccine, they are not to quote-unquote empower patients. | ||
| That patient with an exemption that the declining of the vaccine is automatically labeled as an irrational anxiety. | ||
| And the recourse for that in the eyes of this medical organization is prescription medications and or psychotherapy. | ||
| They want to drug you to trick you into taking the COVID vaccine. | ||
| reporting for InfoWars this is Greg Reese all right folks that's the latest from Greg Reese it's Aldous Huxley's most horrifying prediction come to life Canadian Psychiatric Association targets anti-vaxxers horrifying stuff but it's just a recommendation for now welcome back ladies and gentlemen this is the This is The American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| The third hour has begun. | ||
| We'll be joined by Bryson Gray in just a little bit to talk about his latest songs, latest censorship campaigns against him and his protests against Balenciaga. | ||
| We'll talk about that in just a second. | ||
| You know, again, just like the Stuart Rhodes conviction, it's like, I guess I shouldn't be surprised. | ||
| I guess I shouldn't have that little bit of hope that I still hold in not just the American people, but specifically right-wing conservative activists and content creators. | ||
| There's a simple solution to The inability of people to just see the world for what it is. | ||
| And that solution is just ignore the labels. | ||
| Ignore the labels and look at what's actually happening. | ||
| If the left is good at one thing, it's branding and changing definitions of words. | ||
| Disinformation, misinformation. | ||
| Sure, it might be true. Sure, it might... | ||
| Actually reflect reality, but you can't talk about it because that's disinformation or misinformation. | ||
| You can just ignore those labels. | ||
| You can ignore the labels racism and feminism. | ||
| Racism or misogynist or whatever. | ||
| And the right wing largely has learned to ignore or think of those labels with contempt. | ||
| Because we know it's not true. | ||
| Because we know that you actually... | ||
| They care about the black population and want to talk about what's going on in the black population. | ||
| It doesn't make you a racist, but that's what they'll call you for even discussing it. | ||
| Somehow they can't make the leap from that to anti-Semitism. | ||
| The anti-Semitism label is still extremely dangerous. | ||
| It's fire. You can't touch it. | ||
| Denounce anybody who's been accused of it, even if there's no proof of it. | ||
| Even if they can't actually point to a statement that reflects the claims they're making. | ||
| And honestly, it's just disappointing. | ||
| Jordan B. Peterson retweeted somebody else's post. | ||
| Let's see if I can find it here. | ||
| He tweets a lot, doesn't he? | ||
| Essentially, the person posted an image of Two of his videos, one that was criticizing Christians and one that was criticizing Muslims. | ||
| Essentially, this is in response to his hyperventilating about so-called anti-Semitism these days. | ||
| Basically pointing out his hypocrisy, his double standards, certain religions he can criticize with abandon. | ||
| And you see that with people like Sam Harris or people like any of the other people that sort of came up prior to 2016. | ||
| A lot of them are very, very open about their hatred of certain religions. | ||
| But when it comes to even minutely criticizing A Jewish group or a Jewish advocacy organization. | ||
| It's absolutely unacceptable. | ||
| Maybe he deleted that tweet. | ||
| I should have saved it. I should have screenshotted it. | ||
| The only screenshot I have of it is not good enough to show. | ||
| Maybe the crew can find it. | ||
| But essentially, Jordan Peter's response to this was, you are an evil rat. | ||
| That was the quote that he responded to this with. | ||
| So, you know, one person says, hey, look, here's a video of you criticizing Christianity. | ||
| Here's a video of you criticizing Muslims. | ||
| But you won't criticize Judaism. | ||
| And his response to that is, you are an evil rat, right? | ||
| Is this a productive conversation? | ||
| Is that how you have productive conversations? | ||
| Is this an unbiased view of reality? | ||
| It reflects a certain knee-jerk defensiveness with certain people on the right who, again, I'm just confused because they can see through the false claims of racism. | ||
| They can see through the false claims of misogyny. | ||
| They know that talking about countering feminist arguments doesn't make you a woman hater. | ||
| Here it is. Yeah, thank you. Oh, the guy's name is Evil Rat. | ||
| Oh, I think he changed it to Evil Rat in reflection of this. | ||
| Yeah, this first one is a message to Christian churches. | ||
| The second one is a message to Muslim. | ||
| He says, I couldn't help but notice a religion missing from your message to videos. | ||
| The response to this, you're an evil rat. | ||
| Just a free speech champion here. | ||
| Merely questioning... | ||
| The hypocrisy makes you an evil rat. | ||
| Seriously. What type of response to this? | ||
| And of course, you know, it's the same people, people like Dave Rubin, people like Steven Crowder, like you would think after they've been called such horrible things by the left, after they've been labeled racist, they've been labeled misogynist, they've been labeled anti-trans and homophobic and all these other things, you think they would be able to recognize this is just a tactic that people use. | ||
| You label someone something, you don't even point to anything they've said. | ||
| You just label them that, and you discredit them that way, and yet every one of them has thrown their hat in the ring on the side of, you know, Nick Fuentes is unacceptable, Kanye West is unacceptable. | ||
| And it's a little bit confusing. | ||
| It's a little bit bizarre. | ||
| It's especially bizarre when you know that it's not going to work. | ||
| You know these people don't actually care whether or not you denounce anybody or not. | ||
| They'll still call you the same things over and over. | ||
| It doesn't matter. It's different for the leftist. | ||
| And the main tactic or the main response from a lot of the people on the right, including people like Marjorie Taylor Greene, Stephen Crowder, Jordan Peterson, Dave Rubin, they all, or a lot of them, Marjorie Taylor Greene in particular, points to Ilhan Omar, where they're like, of course I denounce Nick Fuentes. | ||
| What has he said? You can't even point to anything. | ||
| But they denounce him anyway because the media is calling him names, so denounce him. | ||
| And then they say, but, you know, but it's hypocritical because Ilhan Omar. | ||
| You have anti-Semite Ilhan Omar in the Democratic Party. | ||
| If you look at the response to Ilhan Omar, I mean, again, the comments that Ilhan Omar made were not... | ||
| Antisemitic in the slightest. | ||
| It was questioning Israel's influence on America, a foreign nation with, like, the number one most powerful PAC in America. | ||
| You know, 95% of the candidates endorsed by AIPAC won their election in 2022. | ||
| It's a pretty incredible track record for them. | ||
| So, you know, maybe a sovereign nation might want to look into that, a foreign nation. | ||
| Essentially deciding 95% of their representatives. | ||
| Okay, that's okay. | ||
| I'm fine with that. I'm not an anti-Semite. | ||
| I'm fine with the foreign nation running ours. | ||
| What? All right. It's weird. | ||
| But then you look at the way Ilhan Omar is treated by the Democrats, and what happens is Ilhan Omar will say something, like a tweet, saying it's all about the Benjamin's baby. | ||
| Accurate, but still, they denounce it. | ||
| They denounce that one tweet. | ||
| They say, this tweet... It's not a good tweet. | ||
| She says, I apologize for the tweet. | ||
| They say, you're forgiven. Back to business as normal. | ||
| Like, they don't care. They don't care about these labels. | ||
| You can bring a bill on Omar all you want. | ||
| They don't care. They couldn't care less. | ||
| They'll put her on committee assignments. | ||
| They'll take pictures with her and cooperate with her. | ||
| They don't care what you call her. | ||
| Can we take a lesson from that? Like, you can just ignore the labels these people have? | ||
| But again, the real point of this is They don't care about what they're saying. | ||
| Let's go to clip number nine here. | ||
| This is MSNBC's Joy Reid. | ||
| Despite everybody who's anybody coming out, going out of their way to denounce and disavow Nick Fuentes, she's like, yeah, but all of you are still Nick Fuentes. | ||
| Let's watch. You know, some people come out and say, well, that's horrible, you know, and say he's a terrible person. | ||
| They don't want to talk about Trump. | ||
| They say, but Trump's not an anti-Semite. | ||
| They carve out of that. | ||
| Trump's not a bad guy. | ||
| He shouldn't have had him at the table. | ||
| But the problem is the rest of what Fuentes just said. | ||
| To me, that doesn't sound any different than fundamentally what the party platform is. | ||
| They don't believe in elections. | ||
| They don't necessarily like the idea of democracy. | ||
| Mike Lee said democracy is a bad idea. | ||
| They don't like the idea of women controlling their bodies. | ||
| They clearly wouldn't mind having a dictator because they don't think that elections matter. | ||
| They think they should just decide who the President of the United States is. | ||
| They hate the culture. | ||
| They're angry that the culture is too friendly to LGBTQ people. | ||
| I just, I see a very small degree of difference between what he believes and what they believe. | ||
| I just, I don't see it. | ||
| And I think this is the reason why you've seen for days now, Republicans kind of tripping over themselves to announce it. | ||
| Yeah, they still think you're Nazis, everyone. | ||
| Congratulations. You've disavowed a very important, whether you like it or not, a very important political figure in Nick Fuentes. | ||
| You've, you know... | ||
| Cause all of this chaos and drama in the Trump camp. | ||
| And they still call you Nazis. | ||
| So, what are you doing? | ||
| Alright, you're calling your supporters evil rats. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal. Infowarsstore.com is where you go to support us. | ||
| We rely on you and no one else. | ||
| This is brought to you by viewers like you. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com is where you go, and we make it so easy for you to support us. | ||
| We don't just ask for your money and give you information in return. | ||
| The information's free. Ah, gratis. | ||
| It is yours to do with what you will. | ||
| We simply ask that you go and purchase a high-quality supplement or do your Christmas shopping at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| I've said it before, but they don't need to know where you got the air filter. | ||
| Your aunt and your uncle, they don't need to know where their new showerhead came from. | ||
| All they need to know is that they love it and that it's helping them avoid the toxins that are in their water supply. | ||
| You don't have to tell them about InfoWarsStore.com where you purchased it. | ||
| That can be between you and I. But go now to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Get yourself a high-quality supplement. | ||
| Make sure that you are getting all the vitamins and minerals you need for your immune system and really your every bodily function to be performing the way it's supposed to, to counteract the toxins and the lack of nutrition in our everyday diet. | ||
| And also do your Christmas shopping there while you're at it. | ||
| You can get incredible gifts, hoodies, t-shirts, hats, flags, survival gear, sunglasses, all sorts of wonderful stuff at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| And you can shop and rest easy knowing that you're supporting a patriotic company that is fighting for the rights of all Americans. | ||
| As enshrined in the Constitution, instead of giving your money over to globalist corporations that have used various disasters that they themselves have cooked up and exacerbated to enslave the entire world. | ||
| Who would you rather shop with? | ||
| The slave master or the freedom fighter? | ||
| I guess the choice is up to yours. | ||
| I know I prefer Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Now, of course, we know the absolutely tyrannical way that The government is acting, but of course they're not doing it alone. | ||
| They're in close cooperation. | ||
| We've said many times the Great Reset is in fact the great cooperation, the great merging of business and governmental interest into one singular unified world technocratic government. | ||
| And we see evidence of this taking on new forms. | ||
| From the post-millennial Google executive, we need to move from defensive to offensive fighting misinformation. | ||
| Far-left, old far-left tweets resurface. | ||
| In the latest attempt to fight so-called misinformation online, Google has showcased info interventions, a multifaceted approach to control the kinds of ideas that people can share on the Internet. | ||
| An executive with a Google subsidiary company said that the companies must go on the offensive to fight such misinformation. | ||
| Yasmin Green, chief executive of the Google subsidiary Jigsaw, said on Tuesday during the Fighting Misinformation Online conference that, quote, we need to move from defense to offense in regard to fighting misinformation online. | ||
| This should horrify you if you appreciate being able to speak your mind or being able to actually tell the truth in public. | ||
| In past tweets uncovered by Human Events Jack Posobiec, Green was seen talking about online censorship and propaganda, saying, quote, with regards to online censorship, there's a symmetry between freedom to publish and freedom to consume. | ||
| One can't exist without the other. | ||
| A 2013 tweet read, citing assistant professor at UC San Diego's Department of Communications, Green wrote in a 2017 tweet, one person's activism or education or journalism, for that matter, is another person's propaganda. | ||
| And essentially what they're saying is, Somebody needs to decide what the public is allowed to see, and that should be me. | ||
| That's what they're saying. They're taking that power unto themselves. | ||
| They are deeming themselves the thought police, and they're doing it with the approval and cooperation of the world's largest and most powerful companies, and governments for that matter. | ||
| According to Jigsaw's website, Jigsaw is a unit within Google that explores threats to open societies and builds technology to inspire scalable solutions. | ||
| The Google division states it's looking for high-impact interventions. | ||
| We're focusing on helping a specific group of people makes the Internet and society stronger and safer for everyone. | ||
| Unless you're certain types of people. | ||
| Unless you're certain types of people, in which case you need to be shut down and silenced. | ||
| We'll get into that a little bit more. | ||
| I want to talk to Bryson Gray about that quote that I just read. | ||
| But I think there's a different, there's a very illuminating video that was posted by Chris Ruffo that I think illustrates how they get away with this. | ||
| And we'll go to it in just a second. | ||
| It's the CEO Bob Iger. | ||
| I don't have my list here, but we'll play that in a second. | ||
| Chris Ruffo wrote, I've obtained exclusive video of Iger's first town hall meeting with Disney employees in which he retreats from the company's most controversial political positions and moves towards neutrality in the culture war, | ||
| which I utterly disagree with. | ||
| That is not what he's saying. | ||
| He's, in fact, doubling down. | ||
| And I think it's very, again, illuminating or illustrating how he phrases this and how all of these people justify in their own minds and to the public their censorship and or grooming activities. | ||
| Let's go to that video now. Here's a virtual question. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Many cast members had wished that Disney stayed out of politics. | |
| Will Disney stay out of making political statements? | ||
| You know, I think there's a misperception here about what politics is. | ||
| And I think that some of the subjects that have proven to be controversial as it relates to Disney have been branded political, and I don't necessarily believe they are. | ||
| I don't think when you are telling stories and attempting to be a good citizen of the world that that's political. | ||
| See, that's it right there. | ||
| We can pause it right there. We can go back to it. | ||
| But that's it right there. | ||
| This is the scheme, right? | ||
| This is the manipulation. Of course it's political. | ||
| Of course it's political that you are embedding political and ideological messages in your programming. | ||
| You're open about that. You know perfectly well how political it is. | ||
| But they justify it by saying, that's not political. | ||
| I'm just being a good person. | ||
| I'm just supporting an open society. | ||
| No, you're supporting a specific ideology. | ||
| You're supporting a specific ideology while denigrating or making fun of or ignoring another ideology. | ||
| And it's not just political. | ||
| It's spiritual. It's religious as well. | ||
| Right? You don't see a lot of Disney cartoons where they're saying the Lord's Prayer. | ||
| Because it would be obvious that that is explicitly political. | ||
| It's explicitly religious. | ||
| But when you can strip... | ||
| So, you know, he might be saying, well, we're going to move away from that. | ||
| But they're not. They're not. They're just claiming that they are by ignoring the very political aspect of what they're talking about. | ||
| Obviously, it's political. Obviously, it is spiritual, religious, ideological in nature. | ||
| They just claim it's not. They say, no, it's not. | ||
| So when Google says, you know, we're going to control your speech, they're saying, but it's not political. | ||
| We're not controlling political speech, but we will be silencing certain political viewpoints because we're just citizens of the world. | ||
| Because we're just trying to be citizens of the world here. | ||
| They know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| They're, of course, acting politically. | ||
| Google, Disney, the United States government, the Department of Justice. | ||
| They're extremely politicized, but they don't see it that way. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Celebrities are controlled. | |
| You don't see no celebrities talking about the Balenciaga situation, right? | ||
| So that just shows you all of these celebrities out here, don't let them influence you in any way because they're controlled by the people who really influenced you. | ||
| They're not serving God. | ||
| They keep trying to cancel me. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't care nada. I see they exploiting kids just to run up commas. | |
| Brands keep going woke. | ||
| They gonna lose dollars. Threw away Nike. | ||
| And now I burn Balenciaga. | ||
| Now I burn Balenciaga. | ||
| They keep coming for our kids. | ||
| Now we need a father. Designer brands and they high. | ||
| I know hell is hotter. Threw away Nike. | ||
| And now I burn Balenciaga. | ||
| If you in Christ, you on my team. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know what I mean. They pushing LGBT on children movie screens. | |
| They pushing pedophilia. | ||
| They sneaking in the scenes. | ||
| And all these golden brands be doing the same thing. | ||
| But let's see, I got caught. | ||
| Now that they fall. | ||
| I can't support wickedness. | ||
| I walk a high talk. | ||
| I don't say you want me to run, but I ain't my fault. | ||
| I don't care about getting canceled. | ||
| Don't know who you thought. | ||
| They tried promoting cuties. | ||
| I deleted Netflix. | ||
| Nike pushes sexuality, so I exit. | ||
| We hit them in their pockets. | ||
| They gonna get the message. | ||
| It's time to build a home up like it's Tetris. | ||
| Epstein Island, can I see the guest list? | ||
| We gotta protect the children because they precious. | ||
| If we don't fight now, what they gonna be left with? | ||
| Cause it's gonna get worse. | ||
| Just wait for their next trick. | ||
| They keep trying to cancel me. | ||
| I don't care, nada. | ||
| I see they exploiting kids just to run up commas. | ||
| Brands keep going woke. | ||
| They gonna lose dollars through a weight night. | ||
| All right, folks, that is the latest from Bryson Gray, Christian Rappery. | ||
| He's a 30-time Billboard charting Christian conservative rapper whose music you must have heard many times on this show. | ||
| You can find his music on BrysonGrayMusic.com. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us today, Bryson. | ||
| Yes, sir. What's up, man? | ||
| What's up? Well, what's up with you, man? | ||
| I mean, you got a lot of stuff going on right now. | ||
| I went to Gateway Pundit this morning as some of my news gathering, and you're, like, all over that front page. | ||
| You're being banned by Apple. | ||
| You got this protest song against Balenciaga. | ||
| You're a very busy man right now. | ||
| Oh, yeah. I mean, I'm literally, like, right now having breakfast with my girlfriend and Colby Covington, and we're just... | ||
| And I'm literally at the table doing this interview, but... | ||
| Yeah, I mean, the most interesting thing about the Apple is the only reason Bern Balenciaga is on the Apple store is because I didn't upload it. | ||
| I got Portiano to upload it for me since he's on its own, and they pit it up quickly. | ||
| If I tried to upload it, it still wouldn't be out. | ||
| Yeah, so just from this article, it's on Gateway Pundit. | ||
| They say, despite Apple withholding MAGA Rapper's latest album, Bryson Gray continues to fight for free speech. | ||
| You've been shut out of iTunes. | ||
| I mean, how's that going? How are you able to succeed without the approval of big tech, Bryson? | ||
| You're supposed to be banned, sir. | ||
| You gotta find ways around it. | ||
| They keep giving me the runaround about why my latest album isn't actually on iTunes yet. | ||
| But I just rode with the punches, man. | ||
| I'm used to it. | ||
| You're not being persecuted. | ||
| You're doing something wrong. Yeah, there is something to that. | ||
| Of course, it's incredibly frustrating just trying to do what you do, like just make music, just like entertain people. | ||
| You have a huge audience out there, but just trying to get it to the audience, you've got these roadblocks in the way. | ||
| I mean, what, you know, obviously we got some of what you think from that song there about Balenciaga, but like what's going on in a wider picture here? | ||
| Like why is Balenciaga being treated with such kid gloves? | ||
| They literally have pictures of kids with BDSM, you know, stuff around them. | ||
| I mean, and nobody really cares in the mainstream media. | ||
| I mean, just what's going on here on a spiritual level, Bryson? | ||
| Well, what I will say, I will give respect to some liberals I've seen on the internet that actually, at least they have a line. | ||
| I saw some liberals talk about canceling Valenciaga online. | ||
| And, you know, at least they have some line. | ||
| But what's interesting is, you know, we just witnessed for a month straight or a few weeks straight of Kanye West or Ye and Kyrie Irving get canceled simply for their words. | ||
| Like, other than real life canceled. | ||
| Banned from these banks closed. | ||
| What's going to happen to these people that are doing this with Balenciaga? | ||
| That bank's going to get closed? Why all the other designer brands ain't coming out to condemn what they did? | ||
| Why isn't nobody giving the same treatment to Balenciaga as they gave to Kanye West or other people? | ||
| That's the part I don't understand. Yeah, I don't understand it either. | ||
| And it goes beyond liberals. | ||
| You know, on the topic of Kanye West and Nick Fuentes, this whole scandal that's been going on. | ||
| Oh, we lost your video there, but I think we still have your audio. | ||
| We might have lost him, yeah. | ||
| But Bryson Gray is... He's hopping from airport to airport and was kind enough to squeeze us in when he could. | ||
| They're sitting and eating breakfast. | ||
| We're going to try to reconnect with him. | ||
| Let me know whenever that happens since he can't hear me here. | ||
| But I want to read another tweet from Bryson Gray, which I think is an interesting point that once he's back, I'll get his comment on. | ||
| All right, Bryson, can you hear me now? | ||
| Alright, alright, that's fine. So I wanted to ask you about this tweet. | ||
| You say, separation of church and state was said by Thomas Jefferson in a letter to the Danbury Baptist. | ||
| What people never read is the letter from the Danbury Baptist that he was responding to. | ||
| Everything makes sense in context. | ||
| What does this mean? | ||
| Because I wasn't able to... | ||
| I didn't try very hard, but I wasn't able to find the letter that you were actually referencing. | ||
| I just wanted you to kind of explain what this tweet was hinting at. | ||
| Because when people think of the phrase separation of church and state, But they view it in a way as separation from—separation of religion and state, right? | ||
| That's not what it is. | ||
| People got to understand the context of how this country was ran. | ||
| Each state had an established church, which is why he wasn't a part of that specific nomination if he kicked out of a country. | ||
| So if you look at the thing, he was just making sure that there would be no laws going against You know what I'm saying? | ||
| Going against that specific denomination of Christianity. | ||
| So the laws were to make sure you can profess your version of Christianity versus there being one overarching version of Christianity. | ||
| If you read both letters and context, you'll understand that there's no negativity towards Christianity in either one of the letters about polymers to Christianity, especially if you read the letter from Danbury Baptist Church to Thomas Jefferson. | ||
| And, you know, one thing that I've sort of been talking about on this show is the idea that, like, right now you have this. | ||
| You have Canada to summon Russian envoy over hateful LGBTQ tweets. | ||
| When I read this, I see it as, like, you know, Qatar or Yemen or Iran summons... | ||
| American ambassador about their hateful tweets about Islam. | ||
| I mean it seems like now we do have a state religion. | ||
| It just doesn't call itself religion so they get away with it. | ||
| Do you see that happening as well? | ||
| Oh, yeah. I mean, obviously, that's why only one side in this country have true free speech, like, to the court that can really say whatever they want. | ||
| They can really profess their beliefs out loud, while people that are, like, stern Christians or Christian conservatives or conservatives alone, we can't really profess ourselves out loud or get persecuted, fired from a job, banned from social media companies. | ||
| Because there is an established state religion that just has nothing to do with, you know, God. | ||
| Right, right. They strip it of its spirituality, and then they impose it on everybody, just going, no, it's just being a good person. | ||
| But there's a very obvious spiritual aspect to this. | ||
| And I want to get your comment. When we got cut off there, we were kind of talking about Kanye and what's happening with Nick Fuentes. | ||
| What's your whole read on this whole situation? | ||
| I know you can't sum it up that quickly, but just, you know, what's happening here with all of the chaos and drama around Kanye West? | ||
| I mean, here's my thing, right? | ||
| After I saw Kanye West on Tim Kass, he said that he told Trump that we can have dinner alone or you can bring to France. | ||
| So at that point, I feel like Trump can't then say there was unaligned against him. | ||
| He did extend to him an invitation. | ||
| Now, some people might say, well, he don't want to be rude, and that's understandable also. | ||
| But here's my thing about the whole situation. | ||
| Why are people apologizing for Trump? | ||
| Why are people calling for Trump to apologize? | ||
| And better yet, why do people care so much about who he has dinner with? | ||
| The left has dinner with Farrakhan. | ||
| I mean, having it with themselves is enough, right? | ||
| Right. I'm Johan Omar, Joe Biden, AOC, all these very radical people that want to extremely change our country. | ||
| Why are people, and why are conservatives playing defense on this issue? | ||
| We should all be defending Trump. | ||
| Like, who cares? Y'all had with this. | ||
| But instead of doing that, everybody's like, oh, Nick Quintez is a racist. | ||
| Ye is an anti-Semite, and we're literally doing a left job for them and helping them out. | ||
| Instead of at a time where I've been, Donald Trump himself is a part of this. | ||
| He's overly defending himself, too. | ||
| But he should have came out and said, so what? | ||
| I have dinner with whoever I want to have dinner with. | ||
| And that would have been the most base response ever. | ||
| And that would have been it. Like, you know, you give them power by submitting to their demands. | ||
| I completely agree, which is why I think you're so popular and why people like following you, because you're so unapologetic about what you believe and what you think that, you know, how you think the world should go and your belief in God and your Christianity and your conservative politics. | ||
| I don't think anybody is more, like, upfront about it, especially in public. | ||
| You're sitting there right now wearing the MAGA hat that a lot of A lot of very conservative Trump supporters wouldn't dare go out in that type of shirt. | ||
| Yeah, his shirt says promise, not pride. | ||
| Beautiful stuff. We'll be back on the other side. | ||
| We may have to cut it short because he's got a plane to catch. | ||
| We'll be back with Bryson Gray. | ||
| BrysonGrayMusic.com is where you find his music at Bryson Gray Music on YouTube. | ||
| We'll be right back. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the American Journal. I'm your host, Harrison Smith, joined now by Bryson Gray, Christian rapper. | ||
| His latest album is called Lion Music. | ||
| It touches on everything from the FBI raid on President Trump's Mar-a-Lago home to Joe Biden's drug-addled son, Hunter. | ||
| It even includes a song about Alex Jones, who's one of the most banned and censored people on the Internet. | ||
| And I appreciate his music because we can play it on this show without having to censor it because the man doesn't curse. | ||
| He makes a rap album without cursing. | ||
| That in and of itself is an accomplishment, I think, Bryson. | ||
| But really, it's great stuff. | ||
| What I love about what you're doing is you are creating culture. | ||
| So much of the culture war battles are people like myself just sort of arguing about what's going on in the culture. | ||
| You're actually creating music, creating a culture or an aspect of culture that I think we need more of. | ||
| I want to see more conservative movies, more conservative music. | ||
| Why have you decided that this is the way that you can contribute to our culture by actually making something that people can enjoy? | ||
| Why is that such an effective policy for you? | ||
| Because music is one of the main aspects of culture, and rap is the most popular genre currently. | ||
| And I've been making rap music all my life. | ||
| When I made secular music, I had songs on the radio where I'm from. | ||
| I was real popular in North Carolina where I was from. | ||
| I had songs in movies. | ||
| I was on one of those things in the park when I was growing up in high school. | ||
| You know what I'm saying? So I've had independent success in music when I was doing more secular music. | ||
| But then when I fully gave my life to God and started professing my political beliefs, I mean, I mean, you make music. | ||
| I like the whole one of... | ||
| Art, as far as music, is to make music that represents you. | ||
| So, if this is what I believe in, this is all I talk about, like, in real life politics, I'm really all I talk about. | ||
| Then, of course, it's going to end up showing up in the music. | ||
| And you have to change culture. | ||
| You're right. Movies, music, Art, fashion, especially fashion. | ||
| I just went to a fashion show last night. | ||
| It's purely liberal. I was the only person that, one of the guys said I was the first person he ever seen in a fashion show with a MAGA hat on. | ||
| So, you know, we got to change culture. | ||
| Yeah, and I wonder, it seems like you have the same sort of inclination that I do. | ||
| Like, when you started making more conservative music, did you expect the backlash that you were going to get? | ||
| Was that a surprise? And it seems like you have, again, the same inclination I do, where when somebody tells you they're going to censor you for doing something, you're just like, you know what, I'm going to double down, I'm going to do it even more. | ||
| And it's like, I just want to bring people on this show that exemplify that spirit, because I feel like that's what America's missing right now. | ||
| Is that sort of just like, oh, you're going to tell me to do something? | ||
| F you, I'm going to do it anyway and even harder now that you're saying that. | ||
| I mean, do you do that consciously or is it just something that comes natural? | ||
| Well, I've just been the type of person to stand on what I believe in. | ||
| One thing in my life, for better or for worse, I gotta say that. | ||
| But I refuse to be fake. | ||
| That's like fake people. That's when we end up on drugs. | ||
| They live characters every dang on day. | ||
| I can't wake up and do that. | ||
| So my parents, they warned me that I would lose all my connections in the music industry when I started doing this before I ever went viral. | ||
| My parents were confused that I was risking my music career for something that wasn't making me anybody at the time, which was making music about politics. | ||
| They were so confused. | ||
| Everybody was around me, but I was throwing my career away. | ||
| And yes, it definitely made me do it even more. | ||
| Yeah. And I think that's the correct response. | ||
| Now I sort of want to touch back on something we were talking a little bit about before, but before you came on, I showed a video of Bob Iger, the former and now new CEO from Disney, and he was saying, actually there's a quote from him, about all these issues that they push in their movies, the ideological overlay that informs so much of the content that they create. | ||
| He says,"...a lot of these issues are not necessarily political. | ||
| It's about right and wrong." Right, so they just sort of reject the idea that this is political. | ||
| They just sort of claim that it's right and wrong, it's not political, just to deny any ability to argue against it. | ||
| I mean, the stuff they push is clearly political, it's clearly ideological. | ||
| How do you respond to this when they just claim, nope, it's right and wrong and there is no argument? | ||
| He is right that he's not right and wrong. | ||
| He's just wrong about what he said being political. | ||
| But people that support certain ideologies as being currently pushed right now, they are the ones in the wrong. | ||
|
unidentified
|
At least that's what God says. | |
| Now, they're God saying. | ||
| He may say different. But I know God says they're on the wrong side. | ||
| So he is right, but he's just the wrong person saying it. | ||
| Interesting. Yeah, he's got a little bit inverted, I guess. | ||
| Yes. Right. | ||
| Now, again, your song about Balenciaga, I mean, you came out with this in just a couple days. | ||
| Is it just like an inspiration that hits you and you just, you know, blast out a song in a couple days? | ||
| How are you able to, you know, stay on top of the speed at which, you know, topics change in the news cycle? | ||
| So I had... | ||
| So I fell in love back with producing beats. | ||
| I used to be, like, just as known for producing beats as a world of making music. | ||
| And I made this beat with another producer, Don... | ||
| And we thought the beat was so different and so fire, but I couldn't think of nothing to go with it. | ||
| Because it's like, how can you say something political, like, on this, or religious on this? | ||
| And really, you really could. | ||
| But then when the Melissa Jaco Band started happening, it just came like this, and it's everything pretty much mixed in one. | ||
| But I think for Melissa Jaco, I think that song transcends just basic politics and religious music. | ||
| It talks about God in it. | ||
| We touched on a little bit of politics, but it's really just about culture and fighting against evil pedophiles. | ||
| It really is like that simple. | ||
| It's like, no, we're fighting a war against pedophiles here. | ||
| It's pretty obvious where the right and the wrong actually lie. | ||
| That's so funny. I know you've got to go to catch a plane, so I don't want to keep you too much longer, but let me ask you, what's the likelihood that there's a Kanye West-Brice and Gray matchup at some point? | ||
| Is that happening in the future? | ||
| Any hint? I don't know. | ||
| I feel like I'm like, what's the saying? | ||
| One step removed or one place removed? | ||
| Yeah, yeah. One degree of separation. | ||
| Yeah. Yeah, one degree of separation is like Ye is meeting with all the people I'm friends with. | ||
| Even when I met him at the Candace Owens event, I thought it was weird. | ||
| Like, dang, it's like crazy how close I am to Ye, but we're not a business to collab. | ||
| And it's like now he hanging with Nick, you know, Nick, my friend. | ||
| And then he, with Milo, I'm cool with Milo. | ||
| It's like, right, it's so interesting. | ||
| I don't know. I don't get my hopes up about stuff like that, nor do I think about it. | ||
| No, but it's weird for me, too, especially, like, growing up listening to Kanye and, like, seeing him as this massive celebrity, and I'm the same way. | ||
| I'm like, I'm one degree of separation from Kanye now. | ||
| What? Even if I've never met him, even if I know who I am, it still feels kind of weird to be in this position. | ||
| What do you think is—what advice would you have for Kanye? | ||
| Because, I mean, obviously, you know, he's getting attacked from all sides here. | ||
| Do you have any advice that you would give him as to how to, like, what to do from this point on? | ||
| Yeah, literally, if I could talk to Ye, I have the most simplest advice. | ||
| Just, it's actually got to match them words. | ||
| You know what I'm saying? When he says things like it's a Christian nation, when he says things like God first, when he says things like that, all that is true, because that's what I say every day. | ||
| So, of course, I'm going to agree with somebody like that, say it. | ||
| But, I just hope That he is, like, living that. | ||
| You gotta practice what you preach, or else you're a hypocrite. | ||
| So, if he's preaching, if I was around him, I'm like, bro, make sure you live in it, because what you're saying sounds amazing. | ||
| But we want that action to match, too. | ||
| So if the action matches, it's beautiful. | ||
| Well, that's a wonderful thing. Again, the new album is called Lion Music. | ||
| Is that right? Lion Music? | ||
| Yes, sir. And it can be found at bryceandgraymusic.com. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us. I know you're a busy man, so thank you for squeezing us in. | ||
| We will keep looking forward to your latest releases, and hopefully you can sneak back onto iTunes at some point. | ||
| That'd be great. Oh, yeah. | ||
| Also, whenever you want me back on, man, it'd be amazing. | ||
| Especially when I'm in my real equipment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I feel so ghetto doing this at a breakfast place, right? | |
| That's right. We appreciate it. | ||
| It's the future. I mean, this is better quality than some of the interviews I've seen on CNN, so you don't have to worry about that at all. | ||
| All right, but thank you very much again. | ||
| That's Bryson Gray, Christian conservative rapper. | ||
| BrysonGrayMusic.com is where you can find all of his stuff, all of his merch and everything, and it really is good stuff. | ||
| I know a lot of... Our audience is always looking for music like that, and Bryce Gray is a font of material, as he always is. | ||
| Folks, that's going to about bring us to the end of our show. | ||
| I do want to remind you, go to Infowarsstore.com right now. | ||
| You can take advantage of our mega blowout sale. | ||
| It is continuing on Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| You're getting up to 60% off our top-selling products, and it's just the second time in Infowarsstore history that we're having this type of sale, a sellout mega blowout sale, where everything is on sale until they sell out. | ||
| Including our top-selling products, some of which have already left the shelves, so don't wait. | ||
| They're not going to get back in stock until next year, but we're still putting them all on sale for up to 60% off. | ||
| Very limited supply. | ||
| You get things like Brain Force Plus for 60% off. | ||
| Knockout Sleep Support, my favorite product, 50% off. | ||
| Alpha Power is 50% off. | ||
| VazoBeats Complete is 50% off. | ||
| Bodies, Vitamin Mineral Fusion, DNA Force Plus, Vitamin D3 gummies, all of these are 50% off. | ||
| And as we move into the winter weather, As we get into December here, it's more important than ever that you take your vitamin D and I think the best way to do it is to get the vitamin D3 gummies. | ||
| They're delicious, lemon flavored. | ||
| Your kids will not balk at taking them and they have just a massive supply of all of the vitamin D3 that you need. | ||
| Of course, combine that with vitamin mineral fusion and you're like super overloaded with all of the vitamins and minerals that you need. | ||
| And by the way, we're giving out now free shipping with all orders over $50. | ||
| So stock up, do your Christmas shopping on InfoWarsStore.com, and you get free shipping with all orders over $50, plus two times Patriot points, plus 60% off. | ||
| Have there ever been this many reasons to go to InfoWarsStore.com? | ||
| On top of the main reason, which is you keep us on the air, you keep Band.Video on the web, you keep all of these content creators, the show hosts, the great interviews that we get, all of it is thanks to you going to InfoWarsStore.com. We cannot thank you enough, and we'll see you back tomorrow for the next episode of American Journal. | ||
| Stay tuned. The Alex Jones Show begins in just one minute. | ||
| Don't go anywhere, folks. Free shipping at InfowarStore.com is now back. | ||
| For more than six months, we've not had free shipping. | ||
| But free shipping is back at InfowarStore.com for all orders, $50 or greater. | ||
| We had to get rid of it for a while because of financial issues, but now we've signed a deal with one of the top shipping companies in the nation, And so we can do free shipping on orders of $50 or more, and all of the regular orders below that are up to half the cost shipping was previously. | ||
| So we've got extremely competitive shipping now, which is going to lower the price across the board of all the products at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| And on top of that, the biggest sale of the year, the Mega Blowout Sale going right through Christmas is running right now up to 60% off with promo code 1776 and double Patriot points on your next order. | ||
| That's an additional 10% off that you save each time you order at InfoWarsTore.com. | ||
| So, it's finally back. | ||
| Free shipping on orders of $50 or more and the regular orders, you're going to see the shipping dramatically, massively cut. | ||
| We worked hard to get this done. | ||
| I want to thank you all for your past support. | ||
| I want to encourage you now, while you still can, to get things like Body's Ultimate Turmeric Formula, Vitamin Mineral Fusion, DNA Force Plus, Vaso Beats, Ultra 12, the list goes on and on. | ||
| And all these products are going to stay at a huge discount right through Christmas. | ||
| The issue is X2, X3, BioTrue Selenium, Wake of America Coffee. | ||
| So many of the products have already sold out. | ||
| And so, we'll keep the sale going, but In a week or so, a bunch of the best-selling products will be gone, like DNA Force Plus, Vitamineral Fusion, Bodies and others. | ||
| So take advantage of this sale. | ||
| Get free shipping right now at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Enrich your immune system, empower your body, make your life richer, and keep us on air. | ||
| Please take action. InfoWarsStore.com. |
Export Selection