Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Chase Geyser. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| You're a freedom-loving, pro-human American in the year 2022. | ||
| It should be obvious to you by now that the federal government hates you. | ||
| Over the past two years, this tyrannical institution has subjected all of us to a hellacious circus of psyops that strives ever upwards towards the peak of clown world. | ||
| However, you and I both know that there is no peak to clown world. | ||
| So how do we get off this ride? | ||
| What do we do? Let's take a moment to remind ourselves where we're currently at. | ||
| Where are we at? And then explore a solution that few people are talking about right now. | ||
| Subscribing to an ideology that rejects God and objective reality, our government is attempting to steer America towards an anti-human, transhumanist future. | ||
| To pave the way for this, definitions can be rewritten and memory-hold at their request. | ||
| The First Amendment is subject to a biased algorithm curated by limp-wristed metrosexuals in California. | ||
| A nightmare, you say? | ||
| Nay, this is democracy. | ||
| This is progress. | ||
| This is their truth. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Your sperm don't make you male. | |
| Then what does? It's a constellation. | ||
| In reality. In truth. | ||
| Okay? Whose truth are we talking about? | ||
| The establishment's idea of progress means demolishing restraint against our baser impulses and desires. | ||
| In an age where millions are atomized by social media and struggle to feel anything real, the causes of progressivism embolden the liberal masses by fueling their egos and giving them a sense of purpose. | ||
| Whether it's through the compliance of urbanite champagne clinkers or the belligerent rage of outright psychotics, the federal government is furthering their agenda by openly encouraging this standing army of moral relativist children. | ||
| The cement has hardened, and the people who remain ignorant will most likely never wake up to the evil that they are supporting. | ||
| So what do we do? Solutions to this madness appear hard to come by. | ||
| Grab the muskets? No. | ||
| The feds want nothing more than for a LARP conservative uprising to happen so they can institute full martial law. | ||
| Various alumni of the Ray Epps Drama School have attempted to provocateur this with hilarious results. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If you blow my truck up, man, hey, it's on you, Joe. | |
| I'm ready to die for calls. | ||
| I'm ready to die for calls. | ||
| Sure, Jan. They've revealed what they want most of all, and we must not give them that. | ||
| But wait, how about voting our way out of this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you serious? | |
| Again, what do we do? | ||
| I believe that the solution to this open tyranny begins by asking a single question. | ||
| Should we still be a part of this? | ||
| Should we still be a part of this corrupt, degenerate federal machine that is powered by blackmail and is actively engaged in a demonic pact with anti-human postmodernist pedophiles? | ||
| Why are we stuck playing hand after hand in this openly rigged card game? | ||
| Why are we still here? | ||
| It's time for freedom-loving Americans to begin a national conversation on the subject of peaceful divorce. | ||
| Secession. Yes, the S-word. | ||
| We have a hard time even saying the word secession because we've been gaslit into thinking that leaving a rigged card game is somehow being unreasonable or cowardly. | ||
| Or maybe it's because generations of history class programming has taught us to associate the word secession with other fun words like slavery and racism. | ||
| Let's conclude this report by examining two secessionist movements happening right now. | ||
| The Greater Idaho Movement, started by a man named Mike McCarter, is a campaign to merge the conservative state of Idaho with the eastern section of Oregon. | ||
| Eastern Oregon is predominantly rural, conservative, and can no longer tolerate the city of Portland speaking for them. | ||
| While the movement is still young, it's nonetheless gaining traction and has support from the state of Idaho as well. | ||
| However, the liberal media has wasted no time scoffing at it with pompous Marvel movie sarcasm. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, so what is Move Oregon's border? | |
| We want to adjust the border, taking Eastern Oregon, shifting to Idaho, to help maintain the conservative values that Idaho has over there. | ||
| You're like the first guy I've ever met who wants to go to Idaho. | ||
| Amazing. They still don't understand that that patronizing, I'm so much smarter than you tone, is what got Trump elected in 2016. | ||
| Ultimately, the U.S. Congress would need to approve of this border shift should the movement come to pass. | ||
| This process is outlined in the Constitution and has happened before. | ||
| Eastern Oregonians are exercising their rights to self-determination. | ||
| Welcome to the American Journal, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| What a crazy time it has been. | ||
| I am your host today, Chase Geiser, stepping in for the great Harrison Smith. | ||
| It is always an honor and a pleasure to be with you. | ||
| All sorts of crazy things going on in the world today. | ||
| The red wave that was much anticipated by all, including myself, doesn't appear to have happened with the midterm elections. | ||
| So what does that mean for America? | ||
| Well, I'm going to have more thoughts on that in the coming hour. | ||
| We've got a great guest today in the third hour. | ||
| Adam Krigler is going to join us today in the third hour. | ||
| But I want to talk a little bit right now about Trump versus DeSantis. | ||
| Who should we be voting for in the primary? | ||
| And of course, DeSantis hasn't announced that he's running for election yet, but there's great anticipation that he will make that announcement despite many trying to encourage DeSantis to wait until 2028 to give Trump the opportunity in 2024 to redeem himself, to exact revenge on the leftists who have successfully been taking ground. | ||
| In their invasion of our politics and our culture for decades, particularly in the last five, six or seven years. | ||
| Now, whenever Trump's name is on the ballot, it's going to be hard for me to vote for anybody else, to be honest with you. | ||
| The reason that I voted for Trump in 2016 is the same reason that I voted for Trump in 2020. | ||
| And that reason is because everyone that I hate hates him. | ||
| That's the primary reason. | ||
| Now, you can say, you know, he's got great economic policy. | ||
| He's got great foreign policy. | ||
| We were taken out of so many wars. | ||
| We established the embassy in Jerusalem. | ||
| There were so many reasons policy-wise to vote for Donald Trump. | ||
| And I agree with many of those reasons, despite my reluctance around his last year or his handling of the pandemic. | ||
| But really, the only reason, the main reason that I support Donald Trump is because everyone who hates America absolutely hates him. | ||
| And I think that is a testament to the fact that he actually is endeavoring to do what he claims, which is... | ||
| Clean the swamp, drain the swamp. | ||
| Now, a lot of people are critical of Donald Trump because he failed to drain the swamp. | ||
| And frankly, what we've seen from Elon Musk in the last couple of weeks has been more an example of what it looks like to drain a swamp than what we saw from Donald Trump in four years of his presidency. | ||
| That being said, if he was just one of them, if he wasn't really trying to drain the swamp, if he wasn't really trying to save America, to make America great again, then why is it that the left hates him so much? | ||
| This is evidence enough for me to be convinced that the man means what he says despite whether or not he was able to accomplish it in his four years in office. | ||
| Now, I think it's easy for us to underestimate The amount of challenge, the amount of obstacles that are in the way of that. | ||
| It's easy for us to say, in the four years that he was president, why didn't he do things like clean out the CIA, clean out the FBI, drain the swamp, surround himself with better Newer voices, newer ideas, newer faces instead of establishment political influencers like he did. | ||
| We can criticize him for these things, but I think we have to remember that being the President of the United States is a job of chasing many rabbits simultaneously. | ||
| And when we chase many rabbits simultaneously, we frequently fail to catch a single one. | ||
| Yet Trump accomplished many great things, especially in the first three years of his presidency. | ||
| So I'm reluctant to write him off as a failed president or as a failure just because I was disappointed in one to half a dozen or a dozen of the things that he did when he accomplished many dozens of things that I find very encouraging and inspiring. | ||
| Now that being said, one of my main criticisms of Joe Biden And it's really hard to pick one because there are so many that I love, is that he's old. | ||
| He's ancient. And old in and of itself isn't necessarily a problem, but he's not just old. | ||
| He is stereotypically old in that he can't remember anything. | ||
| He can't even hardly read a teleprompter. | ||
| It's very obvious that he's not really running the show. | ||
| He's the first president that we've had in the United States that actually comes off as an employee and not a CEO-type figure. | ||
| Frankly, I think you could make a badge saying that he is Employee of the Month for any number of three-letter agencies. | ||
| I'm sure the CIA feels that he's their Employee of the Month. | ||
| The FBI feels that he's their Employee of the Month, the IRS. You name any three-letter swamp agency, any corrupt organization, both domestic or international. | ||
| Joe Biden's pretty much been Employee of the Month, and I think that's really a disappointment because the President of the United States isn't supposed to be an employee. | ||
| He's supposed to be a leader, right? Now, the problem is we're looking at Joe Biden now, who by comparison with Donald Trump is totally incompetent. | ||
| Like I said, he can't complete a sentence. | ||
| He seems to be asleep frequently, rarely at the White House, constantly going to Delaware because you don't have to document visits with your doctor if you do it in Delaware versus the White House. | ||
| All sorts of reasons to believe that Joe Biden has totally lost his mind despite the corruption that we know that he is intimately associated with. | ||
| But my concern is, if we are to elect Donald Trump in 2024, that means that by the end of his term in 2028, he would be 82 years old, I believe, if I've done the math correctly. | ||
| And people say, well, Trump's stamina is just incredible. | ||
| I agree. He's a very impressive man. | ||
| He's got a lot of energy. | ||
| He gives rallies late into the evening without any sort of sign of exhaustion. | ||
| He's not a low-energy man, despite the many criticisms of his announcement speech. | ||
| But do we know what he's going to be like when he's 82? | ||
| It seems to me that the older we get, the more like a used car we become, just generally speaking. | ||
| And what I mean to say is if you have a car that you love that has been faithful, loyal, and reliable to you for a number of years, and you put 200,000 miles on that car and you've had no issues, you can sell that car or you can keep that car and you can say, look, I've never had a problem with this car. | ||
| But the older that car gets, the more things are going to go wrong with it. | ||
| And the more things are going to go wrong with it unexpectedly. | ||
| So what I'm trying to say here is, yes, Donald Trump... | ||
| Has been an incredibly impressive man for his age. | ||
| But is he getting into that stage of his life where things can start to go wrong unpredictably? | ||
| Should we elect a man president who at the end of his term will be in his early 80s and expect that man to perform with the same level of competence that he has in his youth? | ||
| I don't know. And like I said, it's going to be difficult for me not to vote for Donald Trump. | ||
| But I still have yet to make the decision as to whether or not I'm going to vote for him for the third time. | ||
| We will be taking your calls in the next hour. | ||
| Make sure that you call in 877-789-2539. | ||
| I want to hear from the audience whether or not you have made a decision as to whether you're going to vote for Donald Trump in the Republican primary. | ||
| Now, I know, like I said before, that we don't know for sure whether or not DeSantis is running, but it looks like the two leaders on any ticket in a primary are going to be DeSantis and Trump. | ||
| So would you vote for Donald Trump or would you vote for Ron DeSantis? | ||
| Famously called Ron DeSantis. | ||
|
unidentified
|
My favorite's Ron DeSatan. | |
| Ron DeSatan. The producer just said Ron DeSatan. | ||
| I thought that it should have been Condesantis. | ||
| I think that would have been a little bit easier to remember, a little bit easier to spell. | ||
| I don't think that all Americans know what the word sanctimonious means. | ||
| And I think if you're going to make a nickname for somebody, like Sleepy Joe, for example, you should probably use some vernacular that's a little bit more conducive to being understood by the entire voter base. | ||
| But I do... First, before we go to the next break, I want to talk to you about these blowout sales that we have at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Up to 60% off of our top selling items. | ||
| For just the second time in InfoWars store history, We're announcing a selling out mega blowout sale. | ||
| Even though many of our top selling items are in limited supply and won't be back in stock until next year, we're putting them all on sale for up to 60% off. | ||
| These are all limited in supply, so be sure to act fast and order today at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| We've got Brain Force. | ||
| Plus, 60% off knockout sleep support at 50% off and alpha power at 50% off so you can be smarter, sleep better, and have the alpha power that you need to take back America. | ||
| Stay tuned, guys. Make sure you call in, and I'll see you at the end of this next segment. | ||
| Go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, to the American Journal Band.video. | ||
| Make sure you share it with friends and family and leftists everywhere. | ||
| Ready for our enemies, folks. | ||
| We didn't have the red wave that we anticipated with these midterm elections. | ||
| What does that mean? Does that mean that the left is winning? | ||
| And that they cheated in the elections and there's nothing that we can do? | ||
| I don't think so. I mean, maybe they cheated. | ||
| I don't know. Who knows? Maybe they cheated in key swing areas. | ||
| But one thing is for sure. | ||
| We failed as a nation to take our country back in 2020. | ||
| And we failed again in 2022. | ||
| I thought there was going to be a sweep. | ||
| And there, frankly, just wasn't. | ||
| It was very lackluster. | ||
| And it seems to me that the problem... | ||
| Is that the Republican Party isn't actually the Republican Party anymore. | ||
| And what I mean to say is the Uniparty is very real. | ||
| I mean, we saw Mitch McConnell come out the other day and say that it's time for Republicans and Democrats to meet in the middle. | ||
| He attempted to reach across the aisle for a moderate approach of compromised progress. | ||
| And of course, we know that a compromise is when two parties lose something. | ||
| And the beauty of Donald Trump is that he doesn't compromise. | ||
| He makes deals. And a deal is when two people win something. | ||
| So we have seen a Congress of compromise established again in the swamp of Washington, D.C., Now, we have a lot of people talk about third parties after Trump lost the election in 2020, whether he actually lost or not. | ||
| We saw a slew of posts all across social media for the Patriot Party, this alleged fantastical third party with the famous lion signet. | ||
| And people laughed it off as impossible for a third party to actualize in the United States. | ||
| But if you look at history... | ||
| There are a number of examples of third parties coming in and totally changing the political dynamic. | ||
| And I think what we have seen with this most recent election cycle is that we're not actually talking about whether or not we should have a third party when we talk about a third party. | ||
| We're talking about whether or not we should have a two-party system, given that we don't have one anymore because there's actually just a uniparty in place. | ||
| And frankly, a uniparty is the same as a single-party state, is it not? | ||
| And a single-party state is a catalyst for tyranny, is it not? | ||
| So how is it that a third party could really sweep in the United States? | ||
| Now, traditionally, we've seen the strongest third party be the Libertarian Party. | ||
| And if you look across all the states, the Libertarian Party always gets a substantial number of votes. | ||
| Not substantial enough to win, but substantial enough to show that there's a national level of interest and support for this party in federal elections. | ||
| But the problem that the Libertarian Party has, The problem that I have with the Libertarian Party approach to politics is that they have really focused on these national campaigns. | ||
| And by spreading out their resources and their support nationally, they're unable to take hold in any one given geographic area of any substantial weight. | ||
| What if a third party, whether it's the Libertarian Party or a new party, committed all of its resources and attention to taking a single state? | ||
| Imagine if Jo Jorgensen, for example, in 2020, instead of running a national campaign, just did everything she could to campaign in Texas. | ||
| And what if, by doing so, she pulled enough votes away from Republicans in Texas that Republicans didn't win the electoral votes of the state of Texas? | ||
| See, a third party could veto any Republican candidate for president if that third party just focused on a single state. | ||
| So by spreading out all over all across America and not taking any single states has rendered a third party's efforts moot. | ||
| But if they focused on a single state, could they not? | ||
| Totally changed the political dynamic of the United States and frankly and inevitably changed the political dynamic of the entire world. | ||
| Now, the problem that I've had with this idea, this potential approach up until this point is, well, if we were to do that, if we were to run a third party in Texas, then we would be helping the Democrats because we would ensure that no Republican ever won the presidency ever again. | ||
| And that has been a serious concern of mine when considering a third party. | ||
| Until the midterms, when I realized that there is no Republican Party and there is no Democratic Party. | ||
| There was only the political class versus the American class. | ||
| So who would we really be betraying if we rendered the Republican establishment powerless? | ||
| Would we be betraying the interests of the American people, Republican ideals? | ||
| Would we be betraying the Constitution or the vision for our nation that our founding fathers set in place? | ||
| Because it seems to me that it's been a very long time since the establishment Republican Party has actually done anything conducive to the success of this nation, to the propagation of its culture, to the strengthening of its position on the world stage. | ||
| To the betterment of its people and their prosperity? | ||
| Would we really be compromising America itself if we had a divorce from the Republican Party? | ||
| We hear people talk about national divorce, right? | ||
| The breaking up of America so that states can choose more for themselves what they want based on what their people want and the leftists can take their leftist states and ruin them and run them into the ground however they like. | ||
| This conversation of national divorce has come up many, many times with disgruntled people who are unhappy with the current federal political dynamic. | ||
| And it's always met with criticism and accusations of racism or white supremacy. | ||
| But really, I think that we don't need to be talking about a national divorce so much as we need to be talking about a political divorce. | ||
| What would happen instead Instead of attempting to sever the states from the Union, we began to sever ties with the Republican Party to say, you know what? | ||
| You're fired. You failed and you fail over and over again. | ||
| And you compromise, and you don't do anything to stop anything, and you've had Hunter Biden's laptop for four years, and you haven't done anything up until this point, and you're going to put together this committee, and that's great. | ||
| But we all know that House investigation committees don't really accomplish anything, because if they accomplished anything, then the Democrats, when they had all the investigation committees set up and campaigning against Donald Trump, would have locked him up. | ||
| These committees are just political grandstanding. | ||
| It is the pretending to fight for something that they do. | ||
| And I hope that I'm wrong about this. | ||
| I hope that the House investigation committees on the Biden corruption actually accomplish something, actually find the Bidens guilty of something. | ||
| And that there are real political ramifications, that there are real charges being pressed, but I don't have my hopes up because I can't think of the last time any political party in the United States has actually accomplished anything substantial for any American. | ||
| So why is it that we give our undivided loyalty to the Republican Party when they fail us over and over again? | ||
| I don't know. Make sure that you get ready to call in because in the next hour I want to take your calls about what you think about the future of third parties in America. | ||
| What you think about DeSantis vs. | ||
| Trump in 2024. Next segment, we're going to talk about Elon Musk vs. | ||
| Twitter and what's going on in the social media sphere. | ||
| Make sure you stay tuned and visit InfoWarsStore.com to get those awesome deals happening now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | |
| I want to start off this segment reading through an article from the American Journal, otherwise known as CNN. This article, Oliver Darcy, criticizing Twitter here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Twitter's last gasp. | |
| It says death is in the air on Twitter on the platform Thursday evening where hashtag RIP Twitter was a top trend worldwide. | ||
| Users wrote they feared might be their last posts, offering apprehensive goodbyes and listing the other more stable social media platforms where they can still be found. | ||
| So we see this hit piece on Twitter and it's no surprise that we're seeing a hit piece because the leftists no longer have control over at Twitter and they're doing everything they can to undermine Musk's competence as a leader of Twitter and undermine any prospects of a prosperous or successful future for the platform As they now know that freedom of speech does have substantial potential to return to the platform. | ||
| Freedom of speech, of course, being something that leftists absolutely loathe because freedom of speech is conducive to truth and truth is the enemy of all lies. | ||
| And so what are we going to see happen with Twitter? | ||
| Is Musk really the hero that we hope for? | ||
| Is he the social media messiah that we need to save us from our censorship sins? | ||
| I think so. And I know that there's a lot of listeners here on band.video who have a lot of reservations about Mosk. | ||
| And we can talk about that in the next hour with calls. | ||
| I know that a lot of people are very concerned about some of the things that he's doing in terms of transhumanism and Neuralink and wiring people in as if it's, I don't know, an episode or a movie in the Matrix series. | ||
| But what incentive would... | ||
| Elon Musk have, if not the one that he claims. | ||
| Why is it that Musk has such an interest in Twitter? | ||
| We know the company, I believe, when he took his position as CEO, was losing $4 million a day, I believe is what he posted. | ||
| And we know that there's these mass layoffs. | ||
| In large, I think that Musk is participating in these mass layoffs because he wants to reduce overhead. | ||
| And mitigate costs in a company that's losing millions of dollars a day. | ||
| But I think that the main reason is a company culture reason where he's trying to weed out the enemies within. | ||
| And, of course, we're seeing this criticism from Darcy here at the American Urinal, otherwise known as CNN. We're seeing this criticism as if, oh, you know, it's not really going to be a company if there aren't any employees anymore. | ||
| If thousands of these employees protest quitting, Then what is Musk going to have left? | ||
| And there's also these criticisms of Musk saying, oh, he's got no experience in the social media space. | ||
| He doesn't know what he's doing. | ||
| He's just this, you know, billionaire guy that thinks that because he's got money, he suddenly knows everything and he didn't accomplish anything that he wants. | ||
| But you got to keep in mind that this guy made his fortune initially by sort of co-founding or having a PayPal-esque acquisition years ago. | ||
| Right? So there's a tech position right there. | ||
| That he has experience in. | ||
| And then, of course, after PayPal, you see him invest in Tesla and totally turn a car manufacturer around, which is something that he had no experience in before but seemed to be successful in. | ||
| And you've got to keep in mind that Tesla isn't just a car manufacturing company. | ||
| It's also a tech company. | ||
| It's not a social media platform, but it's a tech company, just as Twitter is a tech company. | ||
| So you can't say that he doesn't have any tech experience between PayPal and Tesla. | ||
| And then... Musk starts SpaceX, a company so controversial in the beginning that he could find no NASA engineers that would agree to work on any of the rockets that SpaceX endeavored to create because the NASA engineers didn't believe in private spaceflight. | ||
| So what did he do? | ||
| He made himself the chief engineer of the rockets and successfully designed and launched a rocket that for the first time in history could land again. | ||
| So you've got somebody who creates an internet finance company, PayPal, succeeds. | ||
| Then he totally transforms car manufacturing with the first electric car that doesn't come off like a limp-wristed California Democrat. | ||
| And succeeds. Then decides he wants to get into the space flight business and designs a rocket that had never before been created and succeeds, but you don't think that he can turn things around at Twitter because that's just out of his wheelhouse? | ||
| Come on, folks. | ||
| Don't underestimate this guy. | ||
| He knows exactly what he's doing, and he's totally happy with thousands of Twitter employees quitting in protest because that means that the enemy within is purging itself. | ||
| And since the company was losing so much money, and since Elon Musk is among the top five wealthiest people in the world, he doesn't need the money that Twitter could potentially earn. | ||
| And since it's a private company, he doesn't need to cater to a board of directors or outside investors for compromise like the previous leadership did. | ||
| So it begs the question, why does Elon Musk care so much? | ||
| Why does he want Twitter so badly, if not the principle of freedom of speech? | ||
| This is why I think that he means what he says and he says what he means. | ||
| I think that he actually believes in freedom of speech, or at least a much greater degree of it. | ||
| And he bought this platform out of frustration because Regarding the continuous lies that have been written in corporate media, legacy media. | ||
| And I think that he is trying to, for lack of a better term, democratize news. | ||
| Democratize truth. Give everybody the ability to report what they want, say what they want, espouse the beliefs that they have, and let the public court Determine what is true and what isn't. | ||
| Let everyone have access to all claims and all information and the truth will ultimately prevail. | ||
| And so these naysayers like we've seen from Darcy here at CNN and countless other major media outlets corporate media outlets legacy media outlets you have to keep in mind that these entities are Twitter's competition. | ||
| Would you ask Ford To do a write-up and an analysis of BMW and expect any sort of truth? | ||
| Why should we trust anything that Twitter's competition says about Twitter? | ||
| Why is it that we still place our faith in these legacy media outlets? | ||
| Why is it that we believe that anything that they say is true, let alone what they say about their competition? | ||
| If we look at Elon Musk's history, like I've said before, with PayPal, with Tesla, with SpaceX, we've seen a man who's been successful over and over again in new spaces. | ||
| A man who not only knows how to do things himself, but how to lead others to a common goal, a desired outcome. | ||
| So this is not going to be the end for Twitter, folks. | ||
| Frankly, the user base is up now. | ||
| The servers are being exercised to max capacity. | ||
| We're not seeing a death on Twitter. | ||
| We are seeing a resurrection of Twitter. | ||
| And with a resurrection, similar to the myth of the phoenix, there is a death. | ||
| There's an old death in order for there to be a rebirth. | ||
| And I think that Elon Musk is performing a baptism. | ||
| For lack of a better term, on Twitter. | ||
| The death of the old. Repent. | ||
| And be reborn. So I'm very excited to see what's going to happen with Twitter. | ||
| I think that free speech does have hope on the internet. | ||
| And I think that it's going to be successful. | ||
| He's going to figure out a way to monetize it. | ||
| There's going to be more users on it than any other platform because all the other platforms censor freedom of speech. | ||
| And we're going to see great things in the years to come. | ||
| But I do want to hear your thoughts in the next hour, after the next segment, on what you think the future of social media is going to be, what you think about Elon Musk, Neuralink, and Twitter itself. | ||
| Are you going back to Twitter if you've left Twitter? | ||
| Have you been banned from Twitter? | ||
| Do you think that we are going to be able to say whatever it is that we believe on this platform again in the future? | ||
| Stay tuned, folks, and make sure to check out Infowarsstore.com for more awesome deals. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Some folks are born. | |
| Make sure you call in 877-789-2539. | ||
| I will be taking calls in the next hour, which of course is right after this segment. | ||
| I want to hear what you think about a couple of things in your calls. | ||
| I want to hear what you think about Trump versus DeSantis in 2024. | ||
| I want to hear what you think about the state of the Republican Party and whether or not there's any hope for a third party. | ||
| To solve our problems in America. | ||
| And I want to hear what you think about Musk's takeover of Twitter and whether or not you believe he's the social media messiah we have been waiting for. | ||
| This segment I want to talk a little bit about Zelensky, my favorite global leader, this week famously. | ||
| Blaming Russia for bombing Poland when it was actually, accidentally, allegedly accidentally, Ukrainian missiles that struck and killed two Polish citizens. | ||
| Seems that he was blaming Russia in an effort to catalyze more international support for Ukraine in the war between Russia and Ukraine. | ||
| And it also seems that he didn't mistakenly blame Russia because after it came out and was widely reported that the missiles were actually Ukrainian, he doubled down and insisted that he believed the strike on Poland was a Russian strike. | ||
| Begs the question, what incentive would Russia have to bomb Poland? | ||
| I mean, Russia has been faced with the greatest international antagonism that it's seen since the Soviet Union over this war in Ukraine. | ||
| So why would it catalyze a greater amount of international antagonism? | ||
| Just because. | ||
| What would Russia gain from bombing Poland? | ||
| Why would Russia have any interest in bombing Poland? | ||
| I can't think of any incentive that Russia has to do that because there's really nothing to gain by doing that. | ||
| However, what could Ukraine gain by Russia bombing Poland? | ||
| Well, if Russia is perceived as bombing citizens and various NATO allies, then couldn't Ukraine get more international support for its war against Russia? | ||
| Couldn't Ukraine use this to catalyze more funding into its nation, more arms donated to its soldiers, more antagonism toward its enemy? | ||
| It seems to me that Ukraine is the only party in this dynamic that has anything to gain from Russia bombing Poland. | ||
| So it begs the question, Did Ukraine bomb Poland on purpose in order to attempt to frame Russia? | ||
| Or did it do so accidentally and thought, you know what, instead of taking the heat for accidentally killing civilians and a NATO ally, why don't we just say it was Russia so it'll cover us for our mistake and it will also simultaneously garner more support for our cause against this great enemy that is Russia. | ||
| And then, of course, since we've seen that Zelensky certainly lied about the nature of this accident or intentional bombing of Poland... | ||
| Begs the question, did he lie before? | ||
| Has he lied about this before? | ||
| We've seen reports over the past several months, countless reports, of civilians being bombed by Russia. | ||
| I think most famously there was a train station a number of months ago that was bombed, and the accusations, of course, were that Russia's bombing civilians when this train station was bombed and all these civilians died. | ||
| And now I'm wondering, well, was it Zelensky? | ||
| Did Ukraine accidentally or intentionally bomb its own people in order to frame Russia for that and We're good to go. | ||
| Just look into Metabiota. | ||
| Don't Google it, though, because Google won't show you anything. | ||
| You better use DuckDuckGo. It's not perfect, but it is better, despite its association with Google. | ||
| So the question is, why are we supporting Ukraine in this war against Russia? | ||
| Because it seems to me that We're not really in a situation where we have this underdog Ukraine being invaded by this corrupt bully Russia. | ||
| Therefore, the good guys are Ukraine and the bad guys are Russia. | ||
| It seems to me that what's really happening here is we are seeing an example of national sovereignty versus globalism. | ||
| Where Russia says, look, we're not going to let our policies, our exports, be bullied by the international community. | ||
| By NATO, formerly the League of Nations, right? | ||
| We're not going to let our policies be determined by global constituents. | ||
| So, in order to safeguard our economy, our exports, we're going to liberate the rebel factions in Ukraine that have been engaged in civil war that's resulted in countless deaths of civilians since 2014. | ||
| We're going to liberate these areas and we're going to ensure that the international community does not have jurisdiction over our pipelines going through areas formerly connected to Ukraine. | ||
| It seems to me that the reason that there's countless Examples of antagonism toward Russia regarding the war on Ukraine is because the international community wants to put a leash on Russia. | ||
| They want control over the exports that make up a vast majority of Russia's economy so they can bully Russia into submission because it seems to be one of the only nuclear powers in the world that just doesn't play ball. | ||
| And that seems to be a national security threat to these international communities. | ||
| And so they're doing everything they can to cripple and control. | ||
| And frankly, we've seen a lot of talk over the last 20 years, specifically the last few years, over climate change. | ||
| And there's been this push for the Green New Deal and green energy. | ||
| And the claim is that if we don't switch away from fossil fuels to green energy, then all of your children and grandchildren will die. | ||
| But is it really climate change that is catalyzing or incentivizing this push for green energy? | ||
| Or is it the fact that we know that Russia's economy is dependent on the export of fossil fuels? | ||
| So if we establish alternative energy, renewable energy, then we can totally cripple a nuclear power that is perceived as a threat. | ||
| Doesn't it make more sense for the international community to push for green energy because they just hate Russia than it does because they're afraid of climate change? | ||
| I think that's what's really going on here. | ||
| Now I want to make sure you guys call in because I'm going to be taking calls all the next hour. | ||
| 877-789-2539. | ||
| What do you think about Ukraine? | ||
| What do you think about Trump versus DeSantis? | ||
| What do you think about the future of the Republican Party? | ||
| And what do you think about Elon Musk's takeover of Twitter? | ||
| So what's going to happen when this war ends here in Ukraine? | ||
| Who's going to win? Russia's going to win, right? | ||
| I mean, we've seen the subtle encouragement from international parties. | ||
| It's now being reported that different nations, including the United States, have quietly encouraged Ukraine to negotiate. | ||
| Zelensky has announced that he is open to negotiations and a public forum, which really comes off sort of like a concession, like an admission of losing. | ||
| So what happens when Russia wins? | ||
| Russia will still have access to pipeline. | ||
| But what happens to all the aid that we've given Ukraine if Russia wins? | ||
| If Russia were to actually totally take over Ukraine, After we've given tens of billions of dollars in weapons and aid, wouldn't Russia wind up with that? | ||
| It seems incredibly reckless and corrupt that we've made these irrational decisions, and I think ultimately the explanation is that there's a tremendous amount of kickback for Democrats. | ||
| Everything that goes to Ukraine comes back to the big guy. | ||
| Now, before we go into the next segment, I want to talk to you about Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| For just the second time in InfoWars store history, we're announcing a selling out mega blowout sale. | ||
| Even though many of our top selling items are in limited supply and won't be back in stock until next year, we are putting them all on sale for up to 60% off. | ||
| These are all limited in supply, so be sure to order fast if you want some. | ||
| Try Vitamin Mineral Fusion for 50% off. | ||
| DNA Force Plus for 50% off. | ||
| Vitamin D3 gummies for 50% off at infowarsstore.com. | ||
| We've got Black Friday coming up after Thanksgiving. | ||
| We've got the holidays coming up next month. | ||
| These would be a great gift for any leftist who has any doubt in their heart about the war on info. | ||
| Visit infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Join us next segment, 877-789-2539. | ||
| I will be taking calls. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| We're going to be taking calls this hour. | ||
| Excited to hear what you think about the future of America. | ||
| First call I want to take is Robin from North Carolina. | ||
| How she would vote for DeSantis or Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Robin, can you hear me? Hang on, let me get you off the speaker. | |
| Okay, I'm looking forward to hearing what you think. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hi, thanks for taking my call. | |
| Absolutely. I would say that I'm reticent about my position on Trump. | ||
| How should I say this? | ||
| I'm in a quandary to the answer. | ||
| I've mixed feelings at this point. | ||
| Had Trump attacked the Dems the way he attacked the Santas, I'd be all in. | ||
| And I've been a Trump supporter for a long time. | ||
| But I have a twitch in my psyche because of Trump's alliance with Ronna McDaniel, and that's the sticking point for me. | ||
| There's a reason they call her Ronna Romney McDaniel. | ||
| She's all tied in with the rhinos. | ||
| And so I deeply support DeSantis. | ||
| I have family in Florida. | ||
| I think he's been a stellar governor. | ||
| I think he needs to learn a little bit more about how to deal with deep state issues. | ||
| I think he's going to be led by the nose, if you understand what I'm saying. | ||
| I don't believe he's ready for the traitorous press. | ||
| And my nature is more of a fireman than a journalist. | ||
| So, Trump's Name-calling is misdirected. | ||
| I think he needs to run against the deep state, not the deep state, the Dems and the rhinos, not the Republican Party. | ||
| Yeah, I think that makes a lot of sense. | ||
| But, you know, I think this antagonism that he's expressed toward DeSantis, rather than coming out of a place of genuine opposition, I think it's really a campaign strategy because he knows that there's going to be a primary race, and he's got to win the primary before he wins the general. | ||
| And so, you know, if he just attacks the deep state, is that going to be enough for To incentivize voters in a primary election. | ||
| It makes sense to me for a general election, but don't you think that if he's fearing a run against DeSantis, he's got to come out against him at some point or other, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not necessarily. | |
| What's the matter with an alliance? | ||
| Yeah. You know? Reach out. | ||
| Congratulate him for being a stellar governor. | ||
| Congratulate him for being brilliant at what he's done. | ||
| At least make it so that he looks like the good guy. | ||
| But what do you think about, if we look back in 2016, obviously the race between Ted Cruz and Trump was incredibly heated. | ||
| Do you think that if Trump had taken the approach to congratulate Ted Cruz on his accomplishments in 2016, that that would have accomplished the same outcome for Trump that he had, you know, with the antagonism? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think apples and oranges. | |
| Okay. That was like a total different thing. | ||
| It was an open, blistering primary with 16, 17 candidates. | ||
| It was a different situation. | ||
| We aren't even to a primary yet. | ||
| So I see Trump's demagoguing of DeSantis as disingenuous. | ||
| I realize he's trying to take out a competitor early. | ||
| I get it. | ||
| But DeSantis is a rising star. | ||
| And there will be a time for him to why not at least give the appearance of an alliance? | ||
| Then when you come close to the primaries, that's a little different story. | ||
| It's a little early to punch him in the face. | ||
| It makes Trump look bad. | ||
| Well, thank you so much for your call, Robin. | ||
| I think that that feedback is really important. | ||
| I think that a lot of voters feel the same way as you, Robin. | ||
| Make sure to stay tuned. We're going to take more calls in the next segment. | ||
| In the meantime, visit InfoWarsStore.com and buy something. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back to the American Journal. | |
| We're going to be taking more calls in this segment. | ||
| I'm going to talk to Shonda in Tennessee on Trump versus DeSantis. | ||
| Shonda, can you hear me? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm also trying to get... | |
| Okay. Hey, how are you? | ||
| Can you hear me? Yeah, I'm good. | ||
| Can you hear me? Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| You sound great. What are your thoughts on Trump versus DeSantis in 2024? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. I think... | |
| I don't know if it's because Trump... | ||
| I'm 42 years old. | ||
| Trump was the first person... | ||
| I'm a libertarian. | ||
| Like, I've been in the military. | ||
| So I know how the government works. | ||
| I'm sorry? Thank you for your service. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, thank you. I thought you said, did I break service? | |
| I also don't hear very well. That's okay. | ||
| So, I think a lot of, I guess, the Republicans... | ||
| And the conservatives don't think a lot about, because it doesn't get mentioned a lot, is that Trump spoke to people like he was not a politician. | ||
| And for a lot of people like me, like, he didn't speak down to us. | ||
| And I remember one of the comments that I was like, oh, this guy's different, was the day that he came out and he said, oh, you know, our military's out there guarding oil. | ||
| To people like me, I was like, oh, he's transparent, because we all have known that. | ||
| But it was awesome to see someone who was the President of the United States not BS the whole entire public and say, oh, they're out there fighting for this and fighting for that. | ||
| No, we were out there to guard oil. | ||
| And the thing with DeSantis is that I don't know if I trust him 100% yet, just because of the fact that Trump's got the F-word money to not be bought by the lobbyists and all that in D.C. And I don't know because I haven't seen it right now. | ||
| He's a big fish in a little pond. | ||
| If he has that in order to get there and just not, you know, end up bending the knee to the Uniparty, which does very much exist, you can see it. | ||
| And I think the way Trump was doing it instead of a whole different party was... | ||
| We have to remember, he's really good at working within the system to change the system from the inwards-outwards. | ||
| And I see it slowly being done, like slowly across the country. | ||
| You can watch more and more people that are the populist movement, not full-blown Republican, but kind of like just populist in general, regardless of what party they claim, because most of us don't, is changing the party. | ||
| And that's why there's so much pushback against the people he wanted to get in because they know it's going to happen. | ||
| So I don't think we need a third party per se, but I do think that we need to change the party within to into the umbrella party that it has become instead of just Republicans and conservatives. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And I'm sorry. | |
| Maybe it's just because I'm from the East Coast. | ||
| I 100% get his ball busting because that's just the way we all are out there. | ||
| And if DeSantis cannot get into a verbal ring and beat Trump at it, there's no way he's going to be able to handle D.C. No way. | ||
| Yeah, that's true. And Trump is certainly a formidable foe. | ||
| I think of, you know, campaigns are never a pleasant experience for either candidate. | ||
| They're incredibly combative. | ||
| But I think that running for office against Donald Trump is particularly painful for anyone. | ||
| And so DeSantis is definitely going to have to be able to take some punches in order to win a primary against Donald Trump. | ||
| But my concern is... | ||
| When I look back in retrospect on what happened during Trump's presidency, I'm not feeling that there was enough of... | ||
| Of a draining of the swamp for how long he was in office. | ||
| And I know that he was faced with this, you know, incredibly painful pandemic and nobody really knew how to appropriately react early on. | ||
| And, you know, he let some of the things, some things go or he probably should have done some things differently that were more difficult to perceive in the moment but seem more obvious now in retrospect. | ||
| But do we really, that taking into consideration, do we really think that Trump is able to drain the swamp in another term? | ||
|
unidentified
|
See, that's where I'm like, okay, I feel like Trump went in there and he was a lot more ignorant to the way the government works than he thought. | |
| I very much think that he trusted the wrong people and that they used that ignorance against him 100% because I don't see any reason why Bolton, come on, like, you could have talked to anybody in the military and they would have told you, get rid of that guy, like, ASAP. He's a warmonger if you want peace. | ||
| He needs to go. A lot of other people that he took in, Fauci, get rid of him. | ||
| He should have gotten rid of him when he had the chance. | ||
| The guy's been a scumbag since the AIDS pandemic. | ||
| And I think maybe if he's smart about it this time and he trusts the right people, that he could do a lot of good. | ||
| But I also think because the way I look at it, Trump is a master because I've watched him do it. | ||
| Of dragging the people within the party into the light, not for his sake, but for us to see who they are. | ||
| So either way, if it's him or if it's DeSantis, this is also showing DeSantis, hey, look at how wishy-washy these people are. | ||
| They backed me this whole entire time, but then as soon as they got a new puppy, they're like, oh, toss them aside. | ||
| We found somebody better. | ||
| because they will do that exact same thing to DeSantis. | ||
| And we have to also remember that if they get away with doing this to Trump, then the left is going to know all they have to do is run the same game on DeSantis, and DeSantis is going to have to fold easier because he doesn't have the money to make through all the lawsuits that Trump's going. | ||
| So like I said, he's either going to have to compromise and become part of the Uniparty or they're going to completely run him into the ground like they did Trump, and then they're just going to keep on doing that to any real populist leader that we ever even try to get into the right house. | ||
| But I do think that he needs to get a Libertarian VP because the Libertarian Party is growing, but they have crappy candidates because I was going to vote for Joe at first and changed my mind. | ||
| So if he gets the Libertarian VP, he's going to be able to pull those voters. | ||
| Well, thank you so much for your call, Shonda. | ||
| I appreciate it. Next, I want to hear from Greg Reese, who's on the line. | ||
| Greg, can you hear me? Yes, Chase. | ||
| How are you doing? Thanks. I'm doing well. | ||
| It's an honor and a pleasure to be speaking with you. | ||
| I am a tremendous fan. | ||
| Oh, thanks. I think you do a good job hosting. | ||
| I appreciate you coming in and covering for Harrison. | ||
| It's my pleasure. Thank you for that. | ||
| I just wanted to express some thoughts on this. | ||
| I almost wanted to do a report on it, but I try not to do opinion pieces. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I just wanted to spew my opinion on the matter. | |
| First of all, if we have two years to focus on another rigged election, then there is something else going on that none of us are aware of, and we are definitely all getting played. | ||
| That said, the COVID vaccine debacle is mass murder on a historic scale, and Trump owns it. | ||
| The sanctimonious comment was a leftist tactic of projection. | ||
| Trump's behavior can easily be described as sanctimonious, whereas DeSantis is the only elected official I know of in the USA who acted like an elected official should. | ||
| You know, he served and he did the right thing. | ||
| Those are facts. | ||
| We're not talking about words. | ||
| We're talking about facts. | ||
| The only two things you can say to defend Trump is that he's playing 5D chess or that the Democrats hate him. | ||
| But within two years, we all witnessed millions of people brainwashed into hating Trump, whereas before they had no opinion about Trump. | ||
| Within two years, they were turned into emotional weirdos with an irrational zeal of hatred towards them. | ||
| And I would argue that the majority of the people we see in government are no different. | ||
| They're brainwashed drones. | ||
| In many cases, they're the worst. | ||
| They're MKUltra drones who hate Trump simply because they're told to. | ||
| And so we're in an ugly situation, and what I see is a lot of people that are very, very disappointed, and I get it. | ||
| But it's ridiculous, I think, at this point to think. | ||
| Because here's the thing about Trump, in my opinion, if they can get Trump as our guy, then the powers that be that pull the strings, they know for a fact that they can string us along for another four years. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Greg, I want you to stay on the line. | |
| We're going to cut to break, but I want you to stay on because I want to continue this when we get back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back to the American Journal. | |
| We've got Greg Reese on the line. | ||
| Greg, are you still with us? | ||
| Yes, sir. So, I take it you have some reservations about Trump's antagonism toward DeSantis? | ||
| Well, specifically the specifics of it. | ||
| The fact that he accused DeSantis of being exactly what he's been acting like. | ||
| Trump's been making this whole thing about him. | ||
| Even his supporters have joined in on that and said things like, he deserves it, or he has an axe to grind, as if this is a movie that we're watching and it's not... | ||
|
unidentified
|
The future of our lives, you know? | |
| Yeah, absolutely. But my question then is, how is one supposed to win a primary election if they don't make it about them and don't criticize the opposition? | ||
| I share your sentiment, but I'm curious as to what a better approach would be for Trump if he wants to be re-elected. | ||
| Ultimately, how are we going to win an election? | ||
| Right. I've been saying that my whole life. | ||
| I voted when I was 18 because I was allowed to. | ||
| And I never really voted since until 2020. | ||
| I didn't vote in 2016 because I was convinced that there's no way Trump would get elected. | ||
| And even if he did, I'm not really into the two-party system. | ||
| The only way anything's ever going to change is if we change it. | ||
| And that's only going to happen in two ways. | ||
| It's going to happen Sri Lanka-style, which is not what we want. | ||
| That's what we want to try to avoid. | ||
| Or... We do it the way they did it. | ||
| We go to the local governments. | ||
| Because, you know, I love the idea of secession. | ||
| But if Texas tries to secede, they're going to quickly run into the main issue. | ||
| And the main issue is local governments. | ||
| And that's an easy thing to solve. | ||
| You don't even need muskets. | ||
| You can just hog time and throw them in jail and then start fixing the problems. | ||
| You know, it's not that hard. | ||
| But people are going to have to stop watching the movie. | ||
| And get involved because we're not going to vote ourselves out of this. | ||
| And I understand, like, if you want to, the thing is, though, that's the thing. | ||
| You don't hear many people saying that because that's the one thing that the powers that be don't want people talking about. | ||
| As long as you're talking about vote this way or vote that way, then you're going to have a strong voice in media. | ||
| Because that's the game. | ||
| Yeah, I think that's a really good point. | ||
| And if we look at the history of civil change in this country, it's usually been done by fairly drastic measures, namely civil disobedience, right? | ||
| So the civil rights movement was successful in large because there was a lot of civil disobedience. | ||
| There were sit-ins at restaurants. | ||
| There was, I'm going to sit where I want on the bus. | ||
| You know, fine, arrest me. And it seems like nothing's going to change unless we have civil disobedience. | ||
| What do you think about... Small business owners in large just refusing to pay taxes. | ||
| Do you think that that would impact the political dynamic in the country? | ||
| I think everyone should stop paying taxes. | ||
| I think that would be brilliant. | ||
| How do we get everybody to get on the same page? | ||
| The only way anything ever really changes is if it starts looking like a Ron Paul revolution. | ||
| That's what it has to be. IRS, CIA, FBI, all these things. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| But the Ron Paul revolution, as impressive as it was, and he was the man who inspired me to be interested in politics in 2012 when I was just a college student sitting behind a desk at a student job watching YouTube videos of speech highlights and debate highlights of his. | ||
| His revolution was good enough to keep him in office as a congressman, but ultimately it didn't change anything in the White House, did it? | ||
| Well, that's what I'm saying. There's no way you're going to do this through the system. | ||
| We tried and it's noble and it's great, but the sooner we realize that we're trapped, the sooner the better. | ||
| And that's how it is in every instance. | ||
| has been a series of me making stupid mistakes and ending up in traps and the sooner and what I've learned over the decades is the sooner I can figure out that I've been trapped the sooner I can figure out that I've been duped and I'm a dummy the better because then I can get my start getting out of the trap and then once I get out of the trap I'm a little stronger and smarter than I was before and that's how it goes and that's where we're at right now and the sooner We can collectively realize this. | ||
| Because the thing is, we all want to avoid the big violent bloodbath. | ||
| Well, I'm telling you, the way the violent bloodbath happens is by sitting around doing nothing and hoping some savior comes. | ||
| That's how the bloodbath comes. | ||
| That's how we get the Sri Lanka. | ||
| That's how we get all that stuff. | ||
| The way out of it is to just start acting like adults. | ||
| Stop blaming everyone else and go to your local government. | ||
| And start taking control. | ||
| Eventually, I mean, that's the only way out, in my opinion. | ||
| And like I said, it doesn't have to be violent. | ||
| Because if you look at these city council people, we see them in some video clips. | ||
| The parents, you know, the school, the parents' school meetings and stuff like that, you get a little glimpse of them. | ||
| These are just dummies that have been paid off by Soros to take jobs that normally don't pay. | ||
| That's it. You don't need muskets, you know? | ||
| You just need a bunch of local people coming and saying, like, you guys are fired. | ||
| How much worse do you think things have to get before people really wake up to that? | ||
| I'm somebody who pays quite a bit of attention to politics, but I fail in the category that you're talking about. | ||
| I couldn't name a single person that's on my city council or school board in my district. | ||
| I'm embarrassed to admit it, but it's the fact of the matter. | ||
| So how do we get to a point where people are actually paying attention? | ||
| I mean, I'm sure they probably have think tanks that have sorted this out for decades, but Unfortunately, my guess is a lot worse. | ||
| And the thing is, though, that... | ||
| See, here's the thing. What do I know? | ||
| I know one thing. I know I'm a dummy and I get into a lot of traps. | ||
| So I try to be vigilant and I try to look out and I try to smell a rat. | ||
| That's basically all I know. | ||
| But here's the thing. It also seems like they are intentionally trying to get us to react in some way. | ||
| I don't know how people feel about that, but... | ||
| Like, the transgender stuff, I mean, yeah, you can say, well, they're doing it for this reason. | ||
| No, no, no. It's crazy. | ||
| And I think there's only one explanation why. | ||
| The thing is that people have to remember is that the enemy isn't the Democrat Party. | ||
| The enemy isn't this radical left. | ||
| The enemy is the bankers or whoever controls the bankers, the ones pulling all the strings. | ||
| These idiots... Didn't just happen to get in charge. | ||
| That's the other thing you can't trust about Trump, is he's talking about Biden like he's a bumbling idiot. | ||
| That's not what's going on, you know? | ||
| We don't have some bumbling idiot that just accidentally stumbled into the presidency. | ||
| You know, that's not what's going on. | ||
| There is a massive psyop happening right now, and it seems like they want to provoke us. | ||
| So, I mean, to be honest, in a lot of ways, I kind of feel... | ||
| We're doing a pretty good job of being level-headed and surfing through this. | ||
| On a spiritual level, a lot of people would even argue that what's happening right now is their hell and their turmoil, not ours. | ||
| That's really interesting. | ||
| And, you know, I think that you bring up a good point in that traditionally we often think of hell as this afterlife punishment for a life of sin. | ||
| But hell can start before you die. | ||
| You experience the pain of spiritual weakness during your life, regardless of whether or not there's a hell outcome at the end of life. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Don't you kind of think? I mean... | |
| In my life, I've experienced heaven and hell in my life. | ||
| I have reached pits of hell in my life that have turned me towards God, and I have experienced absolute bliss and paradise on this earth that I would describe as heaven. | ||
| So yeah, I would agree with you 100%. | ||
| Well, it's been an honor and a pleasure to have you on the American Journal this morning. | ||
| Thank you so much for calling in, Greg. | ||
| After the next segment, we'll be taking more calls from listeners. | ||
| Make sure to go to infowarsstore.com and check out the massive mega blowout sales of up to 60% off our top selling items. | ||
| Get something for friends and family for this holiday season. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stay tuned more calls. | |
| Welcome back to the American Ladies and gentlemen, I'm taking more calls this hour. | ||
| We hear from Len in Wisconsin. | ||
| Are we supposed to be impressed by billionaires? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Len, are you with us? | |
| You know, I'm tired of the Ivy League. | ||
| I'm tired of the elite. | ||
| The billionaires, are we supposed to be impressed by them if we are Then are we not more impressed by those that control the billionaire? | ||
| Yeah. So who do you think is in control of the billionaires? | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're in a battle. We're in a battle, Jake. | |
| You know, it's been going on a long time. | ||
| Alan Watts explained there's a lot of clarity in his interview that's on Bandot Video. | ||
| You know, he said they released this in the roaring 20s, 1920s. | ||
| But the church stepped forward and stopped it. | ||
| Prohibition was going on. | ||
| They brought in cocaine. | ||
| The girls raised their dresses up. | ||
| Thigh high. | ||
| Jazz came in. | ||
| And there was no penicillin. | ||
| And there was no birth control. | ||
| And the churches came in there and said, Hey, we don't want this. | ||
| So what do you think the solution is? | ||
| Who do you think is controlling the billionaires, and how do we take control back of the future of our country? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, when they put them into a digital system, then they just say, you know, we don't like you giving money to the church billionaire. | |
| We don't like you building parks. | ||
| We don't like you giving and helping your employees with health care. | ||
| So guess what? | ||
| You're frozen. You know, get your fun. | ||
| They better be stocking up in these billions of gold. | ||
| You know? They better have their vault full of what was that cartoon? | ||
| The duck guy? | ||
| Daffy Duck? Donald Duck? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Scrooge McDuck? Yeah, Scrooge McDuck. | |
| You know? They better have something like that because they're going to get froze out too. | ||
| We're slaves. We're slaves. | ||
| And Alan Watt explained that. | ||
| He said, they said, we got a better solution than having slaves. | ||
| We get them tied to the money. | ||
| We don't have to feed them and take care of them, but we come back and tax them and get it all back easily. | ||
| Yeah, I tweeted the other day that the 16th Amendment is a violation of the 13th Amendment. | ||
| So an income tax is a violation of anti-slavery. | ||
| Because if one out of every four days that you work, your money goes to the government, are you not in part enslaved by the government? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, and Mitch McConnell just said, I ain't going nowhere. | |
| Okay? They're not entitled. | ||
| They're not entitled. | ||
| Yeah. Well, Len, thank you so much for your call. | ||
| I appreciate your feedback. Next up, I want to hear from Anthony in Kentucky, who says Elon Musk is a liar. | ||
| I'm interested to hear what your thoughts are. | ||
| Anthony, thank you for calling in. | ||
| Are you with us? Yes, sir. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I sure am. All right. | |
| So what do you think about Elon Musk? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, let me do a plug for you guys first. | |
| And I just shout out to all you listeners to go get that Brain Force Ultra. | ||
| It is awesome. I'm a truck driver. | ||
| And it really gives me the clarity when I'm out here on the road. | ||
| Thank you for that plug. It's 60% off, by the way, at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Make sure you check it out. And next, Elon Musk, I think he's playing possum, Cap, because nobody has been reinstated that's been out there speaking the truth like Harrison and Owen and Alex and Trump and all of them. | |
| So... And then as well as PayPal, his sister company, has just put forth a policy that they're going to penalize the users $2,500 for anybody that puts out misinformation on these other platforms. | ||
| Yeah, that's true, but Elon has not been involved with PayPal for almost 20 years, and I did see that he tweeted his opposition to that policy that PayPal has after it was announced that they were doing that. | ||
| What are your thoughts on that? Do you think he's still involved with PayPal behind the scenes? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, he still owns it, right? | |
| All right, he sold it. He sold it. | ||
| I believe. I don't think he's involved anymore. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If he sold it, okay, well, you were saying earlier that he was a sister company, but yeah, I don't know. | |
| We'll see because he's still got all them other policies of being the globalist and everything else, so I don't think a leopard can change his spot. | ||
| Yeah, well, thank you so much for your call. | ||
| I appreciate your feedback on that. | ||
| Next up, I want to hear from Stephen in Florida about the Ukraine nuclear threat that we could be facing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stephen, are you with us? Hey, good morning, Chase. | |
| Good morning. I wanted to, before I address that issue, I just wanted to address a couple other things that you've been talking about with callers. | ||
| And Greg Reese, actually. | ||
| First of all, I take the Bible as the authority on spiritual matters and all matters of life. | ||
| Heaven and hell are in eternity, not here on Earth. | ||
| We should not say that good times and bad times are heaven or hell on Earth. | ||
| That is absolutely false. | ||
| If you take the Bible as the absolute authority on that. | ||
| So I just want to throw that out. | ||
| Okay. Secondly, this issue of Trump and DeSantis. | ||
| Okay, now I'm here in Florida. | ||
| I've been here the second time around for 12 and a half years. | ||
| And there's two camps I have a problem with. | ||
| One is the never Trumpers. | ||
| We know who they are, the rhinos, etc. | ||
| But the other one are the always Trumpers. | ||
| These are people like Laura Loomer and Roger Stone And shame on them. | ||
| Laura last week railing on DeSantis and Trump can do no wrong. | ||
| And a caller called in after she was on with Owen and said it right. | ||
| It sounds like a cult. And then Roger saying, oh, Governor DeSantis, sanctimonious. | ||
| Okay, this is garbage. | ||
| Okay, I don't even think DeSantis is looking at 2024 now. | ||
| He's too concerned about what's going on here, like when he sent the 50 illegals up to Martha's Vineyard there. | ||
| We got that. And let's not forget, here's my opinion. | ||
| Forget about 2024 and the presidency. | ||
| Folks, we got a wide open border. | ||
| We got 64 million unborn whose blood is crying out to God for judgment. | ||
| We got all these children being sex trafficked. | ||
| And we're thinking about the presidential election. | ||
| And let me remind you, folks, When Hillary was in the White House, the Republicans had the Senate and the House. | ||
| What got done? Nothing. | ||
| When the Bush regime was in, W. The Republicans had the presidency and both houses of Congress. | ||
| Again, what got done? | ||
| Nothing. And now they're talking about McCarthy being the speaker, and Mitch McConnell's still there, who now it's shown he has ties to FTX, and he's got his communist Chinese wife with ties to the CCP. So give me a break, folks. The Republicans aren't going to come in and fix this, okay? | ||
| It's just there's good people within that. | ||
| Okay, now, that being said, I wanted to comment on this Russia-Ukraine situation. | ||
| There's a parallel here, and in Ecclesiastes chapter 1, Verse 9, it says, Now, if you go to band.video, | ||
| you scroll down to Infowars Films, I would recommend everybody watch Alex Jones' film, Terror Storm, which was put out in 2007, where he perfectly lays out how politics and things in life work as far as The global scheme, okay, with, you know, false flag attacks, the history of government-sponsored terror, etc. | ||
| But he also lays out in there the false right-left paradigm, okay, which it is. | ||
| It's fake. It's two factions of the same party putting on a good show for public consumption. | ||
| That's what we've got in America. | ||
| But in there he shows... | ||
| How, you know, the globalists have done things to rig things, etc. | ||
| And so here's the thing. | ||
| When you look back, how did World War II get started? | ||
| And this is what he went into. | ||
| False flag operation. | ||
| Stephen, thank you so much for calling in. | ||
| I appreciate it. Take more calls in the next segment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stay tuned, folks. Welcome back to the American Journal, ladies and gentlemen. | |
| We're taking more calls in this segment, and in the next hour, we're going to have an awesome guest, Adam Krigler, on the show. | ||
| I want to take a call from Jefferson in Virginia with a name like that. | ||
| How can you not take the call? | ||
| DeSantis will not primary against Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Jefferson, can you hear me? | |
| I hear you, Chase. Good morning. | ||
| Good morning to you. Yeah, I think the political landscape is going to change dramatically here in the next six months, and we're not really ready for it. | ||
| You know, with the fuel shortages and food shortages, and we're running out of diesel, things are going to get dramatically worse very quickly. | ||
| But I think we're all sort of missing the point that Kevin McCarthy is not going to be Speaker of the House, so we won't have a speaker on the first day of Congress. | ||
| And then there's going to be another ballot, and eventually they're going to come around to realizing that Donald Trump should be the Speaker of the House. | ||
| And that puts him two heartbeats away from the presidency, and Kamala's ineligible. | ||
| So if Biden basically keels over, Trump could be president in less than six months, maybe shorter time. | ||
| So I don't think DeSantis is going to come out of his lane and attack the incumbent president, who's Donald Trump. | ||
| He's entitled to a third term because he's only been elected to one. | ||
| He can be elected to a second. | ||
| But do you think Trump has too much pride to take a speaker position? | ||
| Do you think that he would be afraid that it was perceived as a demotion from his highest-ranking office held yet, which, of course, is presidency? | ||
| Yeah, we've got to worry about bigger things than his ego in this movement. | ||
| First off, he needs to be educated by Ivan Raiklin about all the different powers he would have as Speaker of the House. | ||
| He could control an awful lot of things that do or don't happen going forward if he's Speaker. | ||
| He only has to be Speaker for a short amount of time. | ||
| I'm pretty sure that a Secret Service agent at the White House would recognize that if Trump is the Speaker of the House, he would get an immediate pardon were he to do what he needed to do to get Do you think that if he was Speaker of the House, he would create a House investigation committee on the January 6th investigation committee? | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. Trump would be the only person that had standing as Speaker and the supposed alleged insurrectionist leader to go to court and say, I need to see all 14,000 hours of the video that Nancy is withholding under sovereign immunity. | ||
| He'd be the only one that could win the case if he's the Speaker. | ||
| You can't do it as he's the President, the ex-President, but as the Speaker, he would both have the power, supposedly, and the standing as the supposed alleged insurrectionist leader to go to court and say, well, if I'm the leader, I need to see this as exculpatory evidence. | ||
| So you have to say, I'm the only one that has standing as the Speaker. | ||
| So if he became Speaker of the House, would he be referred to as Mr. | ||
| Speaker or Mr. President? | ||
| You can say both. | ||
| You hyphenate it. Mr. | ||
| Speaker, Mr. President. I love it. | ||
| I've been saying that he should be the Speaker of the House for a long time. | ||
| I just hope that he has the capacity to accept that position and not disregard it as a blemish on his ego because, honestly, I think it would be a very creative troll and an awesome political strategy. | ||
| Yeah, I think, like I say, if he were to speak with Ivan Raiklin about this, I think we've had him as a guest many times on the show. | ||
| But Ivan's right on top of this issue. | ||
| He's a constitutional authority. | ||
| He's a good guest on any time you have him on. | ||
| And he knows that... | ||
| Trump said this was an interesting idea when it was suggested to him by Wayne Allen Root more than a year ago. | ||
| So he knows about it. | ||
| I think he's keeping it on the down low for the moment because he knows McCarthy isn't going to get enough votes to be speaker. | ||
| So he's saying he supports McCarthy right now because he knows it's not going to work out for McCarthy. | ||
| So that sort of holds the position open for him coming at the last second and say, well, why don't you just make me speaker? | ||
| Interesting take, Jefferson. Thank you so much for your call. | ||
| Next, I want to hear from Chad in Little Rock on distrust of Elon Musk and whether or not corporations can come to the rescue. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Chad, are you with us? Yeah, Chase. | |
| Hey, first of all, I hadn't seen you on here before, and I appreciate that you speak concisely and positively in framing the discussion topics. | ||
| Thank you. I appreciate that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. Okay, so the problem I see with Elon and Trump is the same, and it is a form of idol worship. | |
| It is a step backwards into our whole life is beholden to what these feudal lords do, okay? | ||
| So the problem... | ||
| With Musk and Twitter, it's like, okay, so this guy's now the savior of our free speech over on Twitter? | ||
| No, that's not a good idea. | ||
| You're taking the power away from the Constitution. | ||
| But in that problem, I see a solution. | ||
| If the truth is that America has actually been ruled as a corporation, you know, since the Federal Reserve and all this stuff, then I would say... | ||
| It doesn't matter how perfect the Constitution is. | ||
| Obviously, corporations and computers as a technology have taken the place of representative government because you basically just program these rules into both of those, corporations and computers. | ||
| It takes the place of people. | ||
| It's the will, and then it comes out, especially on Twitter where you're seeing people censored by bots, stuff, politically. | ||
| I would say that what we need to do is use InfoWars as a model. | ||
| It's a corporation. So we need to be together based on our will, like free speech, and then really that's worldwide. | ||
| So I get the whole importance of the southern border and stuff like that, but just in general, I think if we took that and go, well, this is what they're doing is using these corporations and computers, We need to have cooperative systems so that the people that are energized can take part more directly so that at the end of each day it's like a business and you go, here's our goals and here's measurably how we got closer to our goals. | ||
| And last thing I'll say, if you do want to try to work with local government, we need to have a system to make local InfoWars TV Just like the network broadcasting does for the purpose of mobilizing people to go vote or those kind of things. | ||
| That's all I have to say. | ||
| Well, thank you so much for your call, Chad. | ||
| I really appreciate that feedback. | ||
| And what Chad was saying about Corporations being unable to come to the rescue. | ||
| I agree. | ||
| I am a fan of Elon Musk. | ||
| I don't distrust him primarily because I can't think of any time that he's ever lied up until this point. | ||
| That is not to say that it won't happen in the future and I could be totally misguided and wrong about Elon Musk, but I have no reason to distrust him. | ||
| Everything that he's done has been legitimate up until this point as far as I can tell. | ||
| That being said, I think it's incredibly alarming that Freedom of speech came under such overwhelming attack the last several years that it required a rogue billionaire to come in and buy up a gigantic corporation in an effort to solve the problem, | ||
| which is yet to be solved, but I do believe, at least in part, Ground will be recovered on the side of freedom of speech. | ||
| But that being said, if it takes a rogue billionaire to solve a national problem, then there's obviously something inherently wrong with the system. | ||
| We can't rely on the Elon Musk's of the future to be able to solve our problems. | ||
| He is a once in a century thinker and businessman, the likes of Henry Ford and others who we revere in our study of history and capitalism and entrepreneurism. | ||
| And I adore Elon Musk. | ||
| I admire him. I look up to him. | ||
| I find all of his accomplishments quite inspiring. | ||
| That being said, we cannot lean We have to lean on individual Americans to save America by coming together under a common banner that is the love of America, the love of Americanism, a populist, individualist movement. | ||
| To take this country back. | ||
| And we're going to have to use civil disobedience in order to accomplish it because we can't vote our way out of this, in my opinion. | ||
| But before we go into the next segment with our awesome guest, Adam Krigler, I do want to draw your attention to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| We are doing a mega blowout sale and we are selling out fast, up to 60% off of our top sales. | ||
| Selling items. For just the second time in our history, in InfoWars store history, we are announcing a selling out mega blowout sale. | ||
| Even though many of our top selling items are in limited supply and won't be back in stock until next year, we're putting them all on sale for up to 60% off. | ||
| These are all limited in supply, so be sure to act and order today. | ||
| Check out Vitamin C with Zinc at 40% off. | ||
| Brain Force Ultra at 50% off. | ||
| And Super Male and Female Vitality at 50% off. | ||
| Check out Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Buy something for yourself. Buy something for your friends and family. | ||
| Help support the war against America at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Let's win this war against America, folks. | ||
| Stay tuned. The film Soylent Green was made in 1973 and set in a dystopian world in the year 2022, where the government is secretly feeding the people food made of people. | ||
| And the most pleasant experience one can have is state assisted suicide. | ||
| While government-run media pushes the idea of cannibalism, government-assisted suicide is officially now a thing in 2022. | ||
| Before COVID, you could always count on modern medicine to keep you alive, so long as you had the money or insurance to pay for it. | ||
| But these days, the hospitals seem more likely to liquidate you. | ||
| And in Canada, they will help you kill yourself, even if you don't really want to die. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Amir Farsud has applied for medically assisted dying, known as MAID. He lives in constant agony due to a back injury, but has started the process for end of life because his rooming house is up for sale and he can't find anywhere else to live that he can afford. | |
| He barely survives on Ontario disability support payments, which are just over $1200 a month. | ||
| He doesn't want to die, but being homeless is not an option. | ||
| I know in my present health condition I wouldn't survive it anyway. | ||
| Farsud meets the criteria for MAID, physical suffering due to disability that cannot be relieved. | ||
| His doctor, who knows Farsud's real reason for MAID is his fear of being homeless, signed off on the application in August. | ||
| Farsud needs a second to do the same. | ||
| There's a 90-day waiting period he believes he could potentially access MAID in about a month. | ||
| I don't wish to be dead, even with the pain, even with the meds. | ||
| I still want to be here. | ||
| According to the Canadian government, they are getting several requests for suicide from children, who they refer to as mature minors. | ||
| And they are seeking to amend the laws so that these children can be euthanized Without their parents' consent. | ||
| There are posts on social media that suggest this might be true, which shouldn't surprise anyone. | ||
| The quality of life for Canadians is at an all-time low. | ||
| And the motive for helping Canadians kill themselves is allegedly to save the government money. | ||
| They have saved $90 million. | ||
| So, I mean, that's like four missiles flying to Ukraine. | ||
| The government has infinite money for refugees and for, you know, foreign aid and for, you know, Democrat campaigns and for waging war in Ukraine. | ||
| But no money to keep people alive. | ||
| That's too expensive. | ||
| This is the plan how they're going to save money. | ||
| Sure, they're going to welcome in a couple million foreigners every year, put them on the free health care ticket. | ||
| Average Canadians, sorry. | ||
| Sorry, it's time to suicide. | ||
| It's time for death. After 6,465 individuals committed suicide with the help of MAID, medical assistance in dying, the Canadian government saved $86.9 million, about $13,000 per person. | ||
| That's what an individual's life is worth today in Canada. | ||
| The economists running Canada concluded that the savings from MAID are so far negligible, but the suicide program should continue. | ||
| Bullets don't cost that much. | ||
| I mean, we could really be ramping this up. | ||
| Maybe you could have people pay tickets. | ||
| Maybe this is a solution. | ||
| Maybe in Canada, you pay like 10,000 bucks and you get to kill somebody. | ||
| This is the predictable outcome of big government. | ||
| When unnecessary jobs are created and given to lazy idiots, then economists and bureaucrats inevitably sort everything out. | ||
| And they only see us as a resource, which turns civilization into a meat factory. | ||
| Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. | |
| Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | ||
| This hour, we're going to have an amazing guest, Adam Krigler, on the Journal. | ||
| Here we go live with Adam. | ||
| I want to talk a little bit about 2016 Donald Trump. | ||
| 2016, Donald Trump ran for president of the United States and famously won as perhaps the first populist president in the history of our country. | ||
| Of course, he ran as a Republican, but there wasn't a populist party alternative. | ||
| And frankly, I think that he was more of a populist president than a traditional Republican president, which I'm totally in favor of. | ||
| And I remember when he was running, I was at a Halloween party the fall before the primary election, and my close friend Ryan was wearing a Make America Great Again hat to the Halloween party. | ||
| And I asked him, I was like, man, do you really think that Donald Trump is going to win the election? | ||
| Like, I thought it was ridiculous. | ||
| I had hoped that he would win. | ||
| I was always a fan of Donald Trump. | ||
| I was never antagonistic toward him or opposed to his policies or his rhetoric or his attitude. | ||
| But I just believed it unimaginable that someone like Trump could win in such a corrupt and political and special interest-saturated environment. | ||
| And despite all of the polls, which turned out to be lies, Donald Trump pulled through and did this amazing thing, which is, as a political outsider, win the presidency of the United States. | ||
| So it begs the question, why is it that Donald Trump won? | ||
| How is it that he won? | ||
| And there's a major theme. | ||
| You can take classes online about how to win political campaigns. | ||
| My personal favorite class that's available online about politics and winning political campaigns is the class that, frankly, Karl Rove and David Axelrod did on MasterClass.com. | ||
| It was great. I'm not huge fans of either of them, but I do admire their ability to win political elections. | ||
| It's certainly proven that their leadership and campaign management styles and approaches have worked. | ||
| And when I was taking that class, there was a little bit of a subtle emphasis on this concept of a zeitgeist or a spirit of the times. | ||
| And what a zeitgeist is is a general mood. | ||
| It's almost a subconscious attitude or sentiment, position, or feeling of a culture, right? | ||
| And we see in our entertainment that every decade, every generation has a different zeitgeist based off of the economic and political climates that are faced. | ||
| We see it in our movies. We see it in our music. | ||
| It just saturates our culture. | ||
| For example, in the 80s when Top Gun came to prominence as a blockbuster movie that really broke through, that was sort of in the middle of the Cold War. | ||
| And America was gung-ho about the Air Force and American technology and American military superiority in the face of a potential nuclear war with Russia. | ||
| We see this happen in the 90s and the 70s and the 60s. | ||
| Every sort of generation, every sort of decade has its own zeitgeist. | ||
| And that zeitgeist has resonated in our culture and our entertainment, but it also has a major impact on the political outcomes of our elections. | ||
| So what was the zeitgeist that inspired the election of Donald Trump in 2016? | ||
| And the reason that I ask this question is because if we can come to some sort of a conclusion or understanding of what it is that got Donald Trump elected in 2016, then perhaps it will inform us as to whether or not he will win again in 2024. | ||
| So with that question, I do want to bring our guest Adam Krigler onto the podcast to join us now. | ||
| Adam, how are you, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Doing well. Thank you for having me, Chase. | |
| It's an honor and a pleasure to have you on the American Journal on band.video. | ||
| Adam, I want to ask you a little bit about your journey to supporting Trump in the prior election. | ||
| What is it that got you convinced that he was somebody you wanted to get behind? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I actually was very nonpolitical, and I joined a show where I talked politics all the time, so I started digging into politics. | |
| Obviously, Trump was the president, and I saw how the news media was portraying him. | ||
| Because I was researching politics and researching his policies, I saw many discrepancies that caused me to want to dig more. | ||
| And the more I dug, the more I found out he was actually a fantastic president. | ||
| He was doing a lot of things that was helping America. | ||
| And the news media was, as he kept saying, fake. | ||
| And I was like, wow, they really are fake. | ||
| So I ended up doing a deep dive on Donald Trump on my channel, and I found out all sorts of different things about his family, about his policies, and suddenly I was like, wow, I'm a big fan of Donald Trump. | ||
| And then I ended up voting for him, and it was to no avail, but we all know what happened there. | ||
| Yeah, well, the story isn't over yet. | ||
| I think it's really unfortunate that the first three years of his presidency have been sort of shadowed or shrouded by what happened with the pandemic. | ||
| If we reach back far enough, what is it about his presidency before the pandemic that sort of inspired you to think this is the right move for 2020? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the economy for one. | |
| I mean, that was huge. | ||
| The gas prices. | ||
| I mean, but one of my favorite things that he did was the right to try. | ||
| I think that was pretty incredible. | ||
| And legalizing hemp. | ||
| I know that kind of sounds kind of random, but there's so much that we can use hemp for. | ||
| And paper, Oils, gas, clothing. | ||
| It's incredible. | ||
| And the economy was fantastic. | ||
| And right to try. I like that. | ||
| If it's terminal, you can try whatever works. | ||
| And if you find something that works, it's great. | ||
| That's one thing that really, really drew me to him. | ||
| A lot of people are critical of Trump because of his involvement with the vaccine, right? | ||
| Obviously, he still brags about the vaccines, warp speed, and everything like that. | ||
| But I always point out that he was always a right-to-try candidate, right? | ||
| And, you know, the real problem with the vaccines is not whether or not they're dangerous, in my opinion. | ||
| The problem is that they were mandated and that we relied about them after Trump's presidency. | ||
| I don't really have a problem with Trump developing an experimental treatment or vaccine or medication, giving people the right to try it. | ||
| The problem was that people were forced at the threat of losing their jobs if they didn't take this drug. | ||
| What are your thoughts on Trump's involvement with the vaccine and whether or not that's actually a warranted criticism? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, let's take a look at his presidency. | |
| He surrounded himself by people that he found out he couldn't trust. | ||
| And ended up trusting a lot of the wrong people. | ||
| You know, he wasn't in politics. | ||
| He entered politics and became the president, which is in itself pretty amazing. | ||
| But he came in wanting to fix things. | ||
| And he was immediately met by the uniparty power that is ingrained in the government. | ||
| So what is he going to do? | ||
| You know, you got to find as many people as you can that seem to be on your side. | ||
| So when we get to the pandemic, or the plandemic as many refer to it as, you know, what is he trying to do? | ||
| What's his first thing? | ||
| It's like, all right, well, I want to help the American people, right? | ||
| And he's being told this is a deadly virus, which is laughable at this point. | ||
| Sure. You know, we need to open up. | ||
| We need to figure something out. | ||
| Of course, they already had the vaccine planned. | ||
| They're like, here. Look, we've got this. | ||
| And he's like, all right, let's get this out because that'll open up the American economy again. | ||
| And that's what the American people need. | ||
| Like you said, the right to try and the mandates came later, and also they came at a state level, and different cities and states were implementing different things, whereas look at Florida, DeSantis was like, we're not mandating any of that. | ||
| No. We're going to let the people decide if they want it or not, which really props to the way that DeSantis has handled that. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, go ahead. | ||
| Well, I was just going to say, I do want to talk to you more about Trump versus DeSantis in the next segment, kind of along in that vein, but we are going to cut the break in a minute. | ||
| Before we cut the break, I do want to mention the mega blowout sale of up to 60% off our top selling items. | ||
| Make sure you go to infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Check out Rainforest Plus for 60% off, Knockout Sleep Support for 50% off, and Alpha Power for 50% off. | ||
| And make yourself a superior American with these amazing supplements at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Stay tuned. More from Adam Crickler in the next segment. | ||
| Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have a very distinguished guest with us today. | |
| Adam, I want to ask you what you think, as someone who came to support Trump in 2020, about a Trump versus DeSantis run in 2024. | ||
| Do you think this is all just, you know, exaggerated, kind of whatever distraction? | ||
| Do you think it's even going to happen? | ||
| And have you already made a decision on who you would vote for in the primary? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I'll say it right away. | |
| I'll vote for Trump. | ||
| Definitely. I think that he was just getting started. | ||
| I think he was just learning how to get things done and who to trust, which, as I mentioned before, he had issues with people around him that he couldn't trust. | ||
| I think this whole DeSantis versus Trump is something that is not coming from Trump. | ||
| The Republican side. | ||
| Well, more accurately, the MAGA side. | ||
| You know, the people who are fully for America, that really want America to thrive. | ||
| Not this uniparty GOP who, you know, it's all one. | ||
| It's just maintaining control. | ||
| These people, they don't really care about bolstering DeSantis. | ||
| They want to Divide the base. | ||
| They don't want people to unite. | ||
| I mean, that is on all fronts, but more specifically, this battle between the two, obviously, frontrunners for who the GOP would pick for their frontrunner in 2024. | ||
| Yeah. So one of the things to consider, too, is... | ||
| Primaries are notoriously combative. | ||
| If you look back in 2016 when Ted Cruz and Trump were running against each other, I mean, it got pretty brutal. | ||
| I mean, they even got their wives involved. | ||
| You remember when Ted Cruz posted a picture of Melania and was like, do you really want this to be the first lady? | ||
| And Trump's response was famously just posting a picture of Ted Cruz's wife. | ||
|
unidentified
|
She was one of the hottest first ladies, let's be honest. | |
| Yeah. I mean... Yeah, she was looking good. | ||
| Barbara's my close second, you know? | ||
|
unidentified
|
And look who's the vice president. | |
| Kamala grilled Joe Biden for being racist, for bussing her, and believing Tara Reid. | ||
| It's like... And then became his running mate. | ||
| So, I mean, that... | ||
| If the people could get... | ||
| I don't know. Well, someone voted for him, whether they're alive or dead. | ||
| That's another conversation, I guess. | ||
| But I think DeSantis and Trump have talked and are talking... | ||
| And it would not surprise me if they went as a team and trump DeSantis. | ||
| Obviously, that would be incredible and unbeatable. | ||
| I know DeSantis has talked about not wanting to be in D.C. because he wants to stay in Florida while his kids grow up so he can be around them. | ||
| You know, he was in D.C. for a little while there, and he wasn't able to be around his kids when they were young. | ||
| So... I understand that as a father. | ||
| It would make sense, actually, if he were to support Trump, stay in Florida for a little longer, and then take up the reins in 2028. | ||
| Yeah, I think that makes sense, too. | ||
| But the reason I brought up how brutal the primary was in 2016 is sort of to the point that you made about Kamala and Joe, that even if this is an attempt to divide the base and weaken the Republican Party, Mm-hmm. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I do. I'll be honest though, I wasn't very political back then, so I'm not as knowledgeable about the 2016 election as I am I think that the bottom line is, I think they're on the same side. | |
| I think that this is something that the media is trying to ruin the morale of the MAGA party, the American first citizens out there that really want Trump to survive. | ||
| I mean, Trump, you know, calling Ron's sanctimonious, you know, it's like, well, you know, what is that? | ||
| And then more so, he said something about, you know, I know perhaps more than Ron's wife knows. | ||
| And it's like, well, what are you trying to say there, Trump? | ||
| You know, he said a few things over the past couple of weeks that I have questioned why he said it, you know, including his speech the other day about, well, some people agree with it. | ||
| I don't know if I agree with the death sentence for drug dealers. | ||
| Yeah. That's a conversation unto itself. | ||
| Sure. I understand where he's coming from on the death sentence for drug dealers because the idea is, all right, we got to stop screwing around because there's this opioid crisis and people are dying and the cartel is influencing it and China is obviously making the fentanyl. | ||
| I can understand taking a hard line stance, but the reason that I'm sort of against the death penalty just generally is because our justice system so frequently gets the verdict wrong. | ||
| And if you look at an example, I believe that the punishment for treason is hanging in the United States. | ||
| I'm not sure. | ||
| I think it's execution. | ||
| And if the Democrats had had their way and somehow gotten to the point where they were able to convict Trump of insurrection or treason and there was capital punishment, then you could potentially foresee a situation in which the political opposition executed the leader of their political opposition. then you could potentially foresee a situation in which the And so I'm just, you know what, like if you want to convict people and have harsher sentences and you want to have more due diligence and be more aggressive about going after drug dealers, I'm fine with that. | ||
| But I'm generally very, very reluctant to accept a death penalty. | ||
| But that being said, it's not going to be like a make it or break it issue for me because I think our problems are so much greater than any individual issue. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't want the government to have that much power. | |
| Maybe if he started out the conversation by talking about big pharma, pushing an experimental drug maybe that killed a lot of people and those people being held accountable, maybe I would have seen that statement a little differently because those people I find are much more malicious. | ||
| I mean, fentanyl obviously is a huge issue. | ||
| And the open border policy that these Democrats have, it's pouring over the border. | ||
| And China is making the ingredients, sending it down to Mexico. | ||
| The cartels are making the fentanyl. | ||
| And then it's coming up into America. | ||
| And it's like, this is done on purpose. | ||
| It's happening for a reason. | ||
| And there's people behind it. | ||
| And they're just going after the... | ||
| Drug dealers in America, which we should, right? | ||
| I'm not saying that we shouldn't go after these drug dealers, but the death penalty, you're giving the government more power, and eventually someone's going to be in power that's going to use those new abilities that they have for their own ends, and that scares me. | ||
| Yeah, and we've made this mistake before where after 9-11 we empowered the intelligence community with the Patriot Act. | ||
| Patriot Act, yeah. Right, and we saw that it has amounted to the espionage of American citizens and really culminated at its... | ||
| Peak corruption, in my opinion, in what I formally refer to as Towergate with the Trump Tower espionage and the secret FISA courts that allowed Democrats and the establishment to spy on a private citizen who was running for president of the United States. | ||
| And so we see time and time again that, you know, even if we have good intentions when we empower the government, often that empowerment results in these unintended consequences that catalyze a greater injustice than the justice they aim to establish. | ||
| But I want to talk more about Republicans versus Democrats in the next segment. | ||
| Stay tuned, everyone. | ||
| Make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| And we'll have more from Adam Crickler in the next segment. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. - Yes. | |
| Another amazing guest today, Adam Krigler. | ||
| It's an honor and a pleasure to have him with us. | ||
| I want to talk this segment about Republicans versus Democrats in terms of the two-party system. | ||
| So for a long time, I've had a dream of a third party actually working in this country, and it is sort of a pipe dream. | ||
| Or at least has been up until this point. | ||
| And my question for you is fairly broad, but what are your thoughts on the Republican and Democratic parties as they are on a national level? | ||
| Whether or not they're even really two different parties and whether or not a third party is viable in the next century. | ||
| What's your intuition about what's going on in terms of our political dynamic there? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I can't stand the parties. | |
| You get these people that don't understand politics at all, like rock the vote, get out and vote, vote, vote, vote, vote, and they have no idea who they're voting for. | ||
| They have no idea what these people's policies are. | ||
| I have no idea if they're alive or dead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And then they're like, the Democrat side is the side of good. | |
| Or Republicans are standing up against the craziness. | ||
| And then they don't even know who they're voting for, right? | ||
| Uninformed voters, I feel, are the bane of voting systems. | ||
| Besides certain obvious problems with the voting systems. | ||
| Yeah. I think that people need to vote for the person, right? | ||
| They need to know who they're voting for and why. | ||
| And if they don't know who, either one, why are you even going to vote? | ||
| What's the point? Blue, no matter who. | ||
| That's such a stupid statement. | ||
| But it rhymes. All it is is telling me that you're ignorant. | ||
| Yeah. Yeah, I agree. | ||
| My concern is that people say that America is a two-party system. | ||
| And it just seems like maybe it used to be, but both parties seem to accomplish the same thing, which is the expansion of the federal government and the non-solving of any real problems. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Making more laws to shrink our rights. | |
| That's all the government does. | ||
| Yeah. Yeah. | ||
| So spend our money. So if we were able to get a third party, some sort of momentum, let's just say in this pipe dream, just for the sake of conversation. | ||
| And, you know, whether it's a libertarian party or a new party, would we actually be adding a third party or if the uniparty is real, would it just be making a second party again? | ||
| So would it be sort of the reestablishing of a two party state? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. Yeah, I don't know. | |
| I mean, there's been certain people who have tried to reinvent the GOP. I think that the Uniparty is very blatantly obvious. | ||
| And I think people are watching it happen right now more than ever because everyone's in the conversation. | ||
| You know, one thing that didn't count on with COVID is that everyone was at home watching the news, reading, going online because that was the only way that they can connect to others. | ||
| And they're seeing what's happening. | ||
| They're like, we don't like this. | ||
| I'm being censored. | ||
| I'm being mandated to do certain things that I don't want to do to be able to provide for my family. | ||
| And they are like, enough is enough. | ||
| I'm going to start being a part of the conversation. | ||
| And you were having a conversation with... | ||
| I'm sorry, I forgot his name. | ||
| Greg Reese? Yes, Greg. | ||
| And he mentioned something that I was like, that is exactly the answer. | ||
| People need to go out and get involved in local politics. | ||
| That's the key. | ||
| People need to be a part of their communities and be a part of the conversation that is actually steering the boat as far as what laws are created or abolished. | ||
| To make your community better. | ||
| And that shouldn't have anything to do with whether you're Democrat or Republican. | ||
| It's all about the person that caters to the community. | ||
| You know, like DeSantis did, you know, in, honestly, the past couple of years, everything he's done, it really seems like he's like whatever's best for Florida. | ||
| In fact, he came out today and openly stated, we're not going to have any World Economic Forum BS in our state. | ||
| You know, I'd rather go to the... | ||
| He named a couple small cities or small towns in Florida I didn't recognize, but... | ||
| I'd rather go there and see what they need for them. | ||
| And I'm like, that's the message that we need to send. | ||
| Because I feel like the Uniparty in America and the World Economic Forum, they're all a part of that same group talking to each other. | ||
| Deciding where the plebs' money goes to best suit them. | ||
| You do nothing. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. Well, and my biggest concern about this globalism, World Economic Forum, Davos, Klaus Schwab, ESG, DEI, all these things is that... | ||
| Ultimately, what happens when you have globalization is you have your nation's policies and actions determined by a global consensus rather than the constituents who elected their leaders. | ||
| So why is it that American policy should be determined by the French people or the Polish people or the Ukrainian people? | ||
| That seems like a great injustice that we would have foreign influence over our policy to such an extent. | ||
| In fact, it seems sort of unconstitutional or like a national security threat to even entertain the idea of globalism. | ||
| Because what you're saying basically is a redistribution of influence rather than redistribution of wealth, right? | ||
| We're going to, you know, compromise and cater to this international community, you know, and not to mention the special interest in the way the money laundering is done through that. | ||
| But that seems like serious treason to me. | ||
| You call me a conspiracy theorist or not, I don't care what anybody thinks about me. | ||
| This is an incredible vulnerability to cater to this international community, I think. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have a letter that Jimmy Carter wrote. | |
| Now, I love space, and I cover a lot of space stuff on my show, and Artemis just launched the other day. | ||
| We're going back to the moon soon, which is very cool. | ||
| But I was looking into certain things, and he wrote something on Voyager 1. | ||
| You know about the Golden Record? | ||
| Have you heard of the Golden Record? Mm-mm. | ||
| So on Voyager 1, they put all these sounds of different kids saying hello in 20 different, 30 different languages, maybe more. | ||
| All sorts of the best music ever made, according to the NASA engineers at the time. | ||
| Sure. I don't know if I could find it right away. | ||
| I'll just paraphrase for it, though. | ||
| Jimmy Carter, back when Jimmy Carter was president, he wrote, you know, at the moment, the globe, you know, the human race, we're actually divided in different nations, but we're working to move towards a global government. | ||
| So this is way back in the Carter era, right? | ||
| And that was something that if an alien saw it, they'd be like, oh, they're all fractured? | ||
| Oh, but they're moving to work together. | ||
| And it's like, okay, the more I look, the more I dig, the deeper it gets and the farther back it gets. | ||
| So it's been around. These people have been moving the pieces on the board to try to take... | ||
| Yep, there it is right there. | ||
| We human beings are still divided into nation states, but these states are rapidly becoming a single global civilization. | ||
| You know, that right there, it's like, I see that, and it's like, okay, to the average person, that might not seem ominous. | ||
| But to me, with the World Economic Forum, you will own nothing and you will be happy. | ||
| It's like, no, no, no. I love my house. | ||
| I love owning my house. | ||
| I want to tell my kids... | ||
| That this house will be yours one day. | ||
| When I'm not here, you can have this place that I love. | ||
| And I want them to have their kids to have a house of their own and be sovereign and own their decisions for their lives. | ||
| It's like, you will own nothing. | ||
| Well, what does that mean? You won't own yourself when you really get to the root of it. | ||
| And I'm not having that. Yeah, well, one of the interesting things about Klaus Schwab saying, you will own nothing and be happy. | ||
| He did that in conjunction with claims that in the future we'll rent everything. | ||
| And it just occurred to me, like, if we're renting it, that means somebody owns it. | ||
| So, who owns it, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
The club. Yeah, the club. | |
| The club. So, stay with us. | ||
| We're going to talk more about Twitter and Musk in the next segment. | ||
| I'm very curious to hear Adam Kriegler's thoughts on censorship and the future of social media. | ||
| In the meantime, make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Check out our mega blowout sale. | ||
| Up to 60% off our most popular products, folks. | ||
| Stay tuned and come back for the next segment of the American Journal. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back to the American Journal, folks. | |
| Playing a little bit of music from the Golden Record. | ||
| Just on our last segment, talking about the roots of globalism extending decades back. | ||
| This segment, I want to talk a little bit about the future of censorship on social media and what Adam thinks about Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter and the potential outcome. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Adam, what are your thoughts, man? Well, I agree with you and what you were saying earlier on in the episode. | |
| You know, he has done amazing things with the companies that he's acquired in the past, you know, PayPal and Tesla. | ||
| SpaceX, I think, was an acquisition, but still, look what it has done. | ||
| You know, we've, you know, the Dragon Capsule, America's now Putting its own astronauts into space instead of paying Russia an insane amount of money for however many years that we were doing that to use the Soyuz. | ||
| But I like Elon. | ||
| He has stated some things that has made me wary of him that fall in line with the World Economic Forum, which we kind of went over a little bit. | ||
| You know, he was pro-vaccine. | ||
| He's pro-universal basic income. | ||
| And there's some other things that aren't coming to mind. | ||
| But overall, I think he's proving with Twitter that he really does care about a free speech space, which we need. | ||
| And I love that he's turned the main town square, which has been Twitter, into this spot, which is freaking out a lot of the people that have that control, that legacy media, uniparty, like the establishment essentially controlling the narrative, booting like the establishment essentially controlling the narrative, booting off the doctors that are speaking out against the vaccine, the mRNA technology, or reporters like Savannah Hernandez. | ||
| She's been on the show. She's absolutely fantastic. | ||
| She got booted off just because Donald Trump retweeted a video that she was just showing the truth about, I don't know if it was some riots that were going on But they didn't want anyone seeing it. | ||
| They don't want people having conversations that break their narrative, which is why going on Rumble is so great. | ||
| We are able to say whatever we want to say, and people are starting to come here. | ||
| Overall, I like Elon Musk. | ||
| Trust but verify has become one of my monikers. | ||
| I need to see it to believe it, and he does seem to be showing that he has meant it. | ||
| Yeah, well, I think one of the interesting things about this Twitter acquisition is how it may impact other social media platforms. | ||
| And what I mean to say, just to provide a little bit of context, is We have free speech platforms that have been created in response to Twitter's previous censorship like Gab and Getter. | ||
| And I actually really like Getter a lot. | ||
| I think that Jason Miller and the team over at Getter has done a great job. | ||
| But the challenge that these new platforms face is they were created based on freedom of speech. | ||
| And the users that they attracted were very much of... | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| They all come over and sort of protest to these new platforms. | ||
| But what Elon has done here is he's taken an existing major player that already has a critical mass of users from all different political perspectives, all different nationalities. | ||
| And then he's flipping the switch to make it a freedom of speech platform. | ||
| So he doesn't have the challenge of trying to acquire users to diversify the perspective that these new platforms do. | ||
| And my thinking is that it would be very interesting to see if, you know, video content creators, YouTubers, other voices suddenly use Twitter much more than it had previously been used because of these freedom of speech protections. | ||
| What impact is that going to have on the Instagrams and the Facebooks and the YouTubes of the world who now suddenly have a major competitor, not just a baby competitor, protecting freedom of speech? | ||
| Is that going to force them to kind of walk back some of their censorship policies? | ||
| Is it going to have a real business impact on them? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. I mean, Elon Musk has come out and said that he wants to actually bring back Vine, which is essentially a TikTok alternative or the original. | |
| He also was saying that the people that want to monetize their Twitter accounts can actually podcast on Twitter now and have full-length videos. | ||
| I don't know how he's going to implement that, but... | ||
| The implications of what that can mean. | ||
| It's like people don't even need to go to Instagram anymore. | ||
| They don't need to go to YouTube anymore. | ||
| You know, Elon did say that he wants to create X, which is the all-encompassing. | ||
| Now, instantly, people think of WeChat in China, which you think about any program, China, China, the government can just kind of take, put their fingers in and kind of manipulate everything. | ||
| So on one hand, it sounds awesome. | ||
| But on the other hand, You know, it's like we were talking about earlier, when you create a program for the government, it's like, that sounds good on paper, until the wrong person gets a hold of that power and abuses it. | ||
| So it's like, once Elon is gone, you know, in the future, and everyone's using this app to do everything, will the handlers come back in and bring back all their blue haired employees, communists, self I mean, they said that they're communists. | ||
| I don't know if you saw the Project Veritas expose on it. | ||
| It's like they didn't care about making the company money. | ||
| They cared about pushing their message and shutting down any message that went against that. | ||
| So I think this is huge for free speech. | ||
| I think YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, all these people, they're laying off employees. | ||
| They're getting really scared because people are going to revolt, not just The people that are getting banned. | ||
| Big players that aren't even banned. | ||
| Look at Russell Brand. | ||
| He moved over to Rumble. | ||
| Nick Arcata. He got booted off for dubious reasons. | ||
| YouTube gave him his account back. | ||
| And he just goes on Rumble. | ||
| He's majorly successful. | ||
| And every day, more and more people. | ||
| Andrew Tate. Everyone wants to hear from Andrew Tate. | ||
| Now I hear he's making a Rumble channel. | ||
| So all these alternative medias are getting... | ||
| I know Gab's been around for a while, but they had to jump through hurdles and make their own platform work. | ||
| Politicians are on Twitter. | ||
| A lot of the main top players of businesses are all on Twitter. | ||
| So Twitter tends, at the moment, seems to be the place. | ||
| And as you said, he acquired Twitter, and people are already there. | ||
| And over the past month, There's been a 25% increase of people signing up for Twitter, which is amazing. | ||
| That's huge. 25% more people signing back into Twitter. | ||
| I mean, you think all these people are announcing they're leaving, but in reality, Twitter's blowing up. | ||
| It's getting bigger and bigger and bigger. | ||
| So they're actually just a very loud minority of people on Twitter. | ||
| Where before, when they had the engineers and the people behind the scenes at Twitter boosting them and the algorithms, making it seem like that's what the conversation was, and that's what everybody felt, it's actually wrong. | ||
| You know, there's a lot more of us than there is of those screeching minorities. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. My concern about the YouTubes and the other major players in the social media spaces, I feel like they just don't care when they lose a major channel because they have such a massive base of content creators. | ||
| Do you think that they actually feel the pain when they lose someone that gets tens of millions of views a month? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not yet. I think that's coming. | |
| Twitch banned DrDisrespect and he had a huge gaming platform. | ||
| I love that guy. Now he's on YouTube. So funny. | ||
| And he's going after Twitch now because they wrongfully banned him and good for him. | ||
| And he's starting all of his own stuff now because of that. | ||
| At the moment, a lot of the big YouTubers, Twitch streamers and what have you are still on the platform because the money is really good. | ||
| YouTube money. I mean, I... I worked with a channel that did extraordinarily well for what it was. | ||
| So I know it's there. | ||
| And the people that have millions and millions and millions of followers are probably making a ridiculous amount. | ||
| So it's hard to take that platform and risk going to a different platform when it's a little uncertain. | ||
| So I think YouTube's comfortable right now because of that. | ||
| They still have a lot of base. | ||
| And they're trying to do shorts. | ||
| They're trying to compete with TikTok. | ||
| I feel like everyone's trying to compete with TikTok, which should just be banned because it is Chinese spyware. | ||
| But yeah, I don't know. | ||
| We'll see. It's all about those content creators, if they're going to choose to risk or stay comfortable. | ||
| And that's the problem with humans right now. | ||
| They're awfully comfortable. | ||
| We've only got about a minute left of this last segment. | ||
| I want to give you the opportunity to share with the audience where people can find you, follow you, engage with you and your brand, and watch your content. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, first, thank you for having me on. | |
| This has been great. | ||
| And thanks for having me on your show. | ||
| I think it was last week or the week before. | ||
| It was a great conversation. | ||
| So thank you for that. Everyone, if you'd like to follow me, I have a show on YouTube and Rumble. | ||
| It's called The Krigler Show. | ||
| I have a bunch of friends that join me on Monday. | ||
| We call it Base Staff Monday. | ||
| We just shoot the shit and just talk about a whole bunch of different stuff. | ||
| We laugh a lot. | ||
| It's a lot of fun. And I try to do interviews on my show Monday through Friday, 6.30 p.m. | ||
| Eastern Time. Every Friday, I do a jam session. | ||
| I'm a musician as well. | ||
| I actually play these guitars that are behind me, and I'll be going live tonight as well. | ||
| And I also have a coffee company. | ||
| It's called Krigler Coffee. | ||
| It's roasted after you order it. | ||
| It's the freshest coffee that you can get. | ||
| And yeah, thank you for having me on. | ||
| Appreciate you. It's an honor and a pleasure, Adam. | ||
| Stay tuned, folks, and visit InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| I'm pointing my finger at you. | ||
| And I'm also pointing right back at myself. | ||
| You forget to take your multivitamins. | ||
| You forget to take your vitamin D3. You forget to take your Brain Force Plus. | ||
| You forget to take DNA Force Plus. | ||
| You forget to take the X3. And you know it makes your life better. | ||
| And you know it makes you healthier. | ||
| And you constantly forget. | ||
| And when you remember to do it, you're a lot healthier. | ||
| This stuff will blow you away, plus it funds our operation. | ||
| We've got the biggest sale of the year going right now at Infowarsstore.com with promo code 1776. | ||
| Go to Infowarsstore.com and use promo code 1776 to get up to 60% off on these best-selling products. | ||
| The lowest deal is 40%. | ||
| Most of the sales are 60% or 50%. | ||
| When you use promo code 1776. | ||
| There's too many products to tell you about them all. | ||
| They're all kick-ass. They keep us on the air. |
Export Selection