All Episodes
Nov. 10, 2022 - American Journal - Harrison Smith
02:11:43
The American Journal - FULL SHOW - 11/10/2022
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
01:10:35
m
mike lindell
16:10
Appearances
g
greg reese
03:16
p
pete santilli
02:03
t
tucker carlson
02:17
Clips
a
alex jones
00:55
j
joe biden
00:44
Callers
stephen in florida
00:34
steven in florida
01:40
tim in seattle
00:54
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
you're tuned in to the american journal with your host harrison smith Watch it live right now at band.video.
harrison smith
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to The American Journal.
I am your host, Harrison Smith.
Big show for you today.
We're going to actually take up most of the first hour with a special presentation by Mike Lindell about some of the Some of the interesting questions about voting that happened over the last couple days.
So we'll go to that here very quickly.
We won't waste any time. We'll get right to it.
Here it is, your daily dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Tuesday, the 10th of November 2022.
Hurricane Nicole makes landfall in Florida.
Hurricane Nicole made landfall on the Atlantic coast in the U.S. state of Florida, meteorologist said Thursday, sparking mandatory evacuation orders.
The Category 1 hurricane, a rare occurrence this late in the year, comes just weeks after Florida was battered by Hurricane Ian, one of the most powerful storms to hit the United States.
Nicole was packing sustained maximum winds of up to 75 miles per hour and made landfall along the east coast of Florida, just south of Vero Beach.
And apparently Donald Trump refused to leave Mar-a-Lago, even though it was a mandatory evacuation order.
But the hurricane has since been downgraded to a tropical storm.
And, of course, I think Florida will be fine, considering that...
Well, they just seem to do everything a little bit better than everybody else these days.
I think they'll be all right.
And we have this story breaking from Gateway Pundit.
They did it again. Two massive unexplained ballot drops gave Gretchen Whitmer the lead in Michigan.
They ran a drop and roll in Michigan last night.
Yes, it did happen again.
Last night in the 2022 midterms, the infamous drop and roll occurred in the Michigan governor race, just like it happened in the 2020 presidential election.
The crooks and criminals stealing U.S. elections are using different tactics.
One of the major ways in which the 2020 election for president was stolen...
was the method gateway pun and identified and labeled the drop and roll drop and roll incidents identified in the 2020 election they found that 90 percent of the expected ballots were returned large batches large batches of ballots were dropped with nearly every ballot for joe biden these batches were as large as 330 000 ballots for biden in virginia in one single drop and of course that same tactic was carried out
uh this year 2022 to put whitmer over the top and you see once again the massive very recognizable upticks in votes for the democrats while no similar rise for republicans A statistical anomaly that represents proof of fraud.
Meanwhile, some good news out of the election.
Victorious Rand Paul vows to subpoena every last document of Dr.
Fauci, saying the COVID cover-up will end after winning a decisive victory to secure his third term as Kentucky Senator.
Rand Paul promised to end the COVID cover-up by forcing Anthony Fauci into court.
Paul told supporters he intends to focus on uncovering the evidence for COVID emerging from a lab and whether it was manipulated with funding from Fauci's NIH. He said, thanks for coming out to Dr.
Fauci's retirement party, Paul joked, saying, I promise you this, the COVID cover-up will end, the senator urged, adding, I will not only hold Dr.
Fauci accountable, we will finally investigate why your tax dollars were sent to fund dangerous research in Wuhan.
Very, very good news on that front, and we eagerly await the outcome of those investigations.
Meanwhile, Biden has said that Musk's Twitter acquisition worth being looked at for national security risk.
Again, it's just an incredible abuse of power from the federal government.
Essentially, what they're saying is, if you run your big tech company in cooperation with us, you're fine.
But if you sell to somebody who doesn't do our bidding, well, then maybe you're a national security threat then.
Maybe you need to be dealt with.
Like a terrorist. We'll get into that a little bit more later in the show.
Finally, we have this story also from Infowars.com via The Daily Skeptic.
Striking correlation between autumn vaccine boosters and excess deaths in England as total non-COVID excess deaths tops 23,000.
And this again is a worldwide trend that we will explore later in this show as well as taking your calls.
But when we get back, a special extended report by the one and only Mike Lindell looking into...
Strange goings-on in the electoral process.
Stay tuned, folks. We'll be right back.
Back to AmericanJournalInfoWars.com, fan.video.
unidentified
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Watch it live right now at Band.Video.
harrison smith
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the American Journal.
Infowars.com. Banned.video is where you go to find us.
We're going to spend this first hour of today's program watching together a video by Mike Lindell.
It's called Crime Spikes.
Mike Lindell shows real evidence of election fraud.
It can be found at Banned.video.
It already has 135,000 views.
We figured we'd give it a...
A couple tens of thousands more here and watch it along as we investigate the fraud that was carried out just a few days ago.
It can be found again on band.video under the channel The Illegitimate Presidency of Joe Biden.
Here is Mike Lindell and his group of researchers showing massive spikes up and down in votes, in vote counts coming out of many different races in the 2022 midterm elections.
You can share this link at band.video.
mike lindell
Here it is. That's something everybody can enjoy, real-time crime.
It's right there in front of you.
Everybody can enjoy this.
How do you hide this? I want one journalist in the world to write, there is no evidence.
There is no evidence.
There is no evidence of any crime.
This is real-time crime.
unidentified
You can't deny it. The answer to 1984 tyranny is 1776.
alex jones
And our biggest set of the year is now live.
Black Friday comes early. Get up to 60% off at InfoWarsStore.com at checkout with promo code 1776.
pete santilli
Jeff O'Donnell actually just captured it.
As a matter of fact, we're going to go to Jeff capturing a very clear spike.
Let's take a look at it.
Jeff, let's go to you.
We've got the ability to show it on screen.
Here we go. Okay. Oh, wow.
mike lindell
Look at this, everybody.
This is real-time crime, our first one of the night.
Our first one of the night.
This is exciting. They are caught.
Look at this, everybody.
This is exciting for the whole country and world.
I want a screenshot of that.
This will go down in history.
Here it is, a frank speech on the real-time crime desk.
Look at that spike, everybody.
And, Jeff, I want you to explain it, whose race this is, and then when it took over.
And then they were overriding the algorithms, it looked like.
And then what happened? Give us your analysis here.
unidentified
Well, what happened is what we're seeing in a lot of places, whereas the Democrat breaks out to an early lead.
But we see that probably because that's where most of the cheating is taking place right there at the beginning.
I don't like what happened with Carrie Lake again.
I bring that up again. So you see that in red, Hershel Walker kept coming back, coming back, coming back, closing the gap as we started to get real Election Day votes in.
At the moment, nearly the moment, when they were even.
They were essentially even.
There's two dots here. You can't tell the difference.
Suddenly, there is an update that has 117,000 votes for Ornock.
And... 6,000 votes for Herschel Walker.
So about 117,000 to 600.
There you go.
That's what happened.
mike lindell
We want this. I want you to, if you can, send me this screenshot.
We're going to send it out all over social media right now.
And this is the first real-time crime.
We've caught them. They're trying to steal Herschel Walker's race.
This isn't coming from us here.
This is coming from the Edison Report.
This is real-time crime going on here.
And, wow, good catch, Shep.
And if you could take a screenshot, send it over to me.
I got my social media gal here sitting here waiting for the first one to be put out, and she is excited.
She is very excited.
unidentified
I have some negative boat drops for you in Pennsylvania as well when you want to hear about those.
mike lindell
No way! Two in a row!
She's ecstatic here, but let's do another one.
unidentified
Let's do another one. Let's take a look here.
I want to look at the Pennsylvania Senate race with Dr.
Oz versus Fetterman.
One moment, let's bring that up.
mike lindell
Welcome to the real-time crime desk, everybody in the country and around the world.
Here we go. What do we got here?
unidentified
So we've got the blue is John Fetterman, and we've got the red is Oz, and you can see things at this point anyway are not looking good, but you never know what's going to happen.
But note we have here, we have the votes going up.
I'm putting my cursor over it.
Votes going, you know, staying the same, staying the same.
And then we have, we go from 326,000 votes down to 288,000 votes.
So where'd they go?
mike lindell
They're gone. Okay.
I want to explain this one, everybody.
Now, I want everybody to look at this.
And I can explain this and go, well, gee, why would they do that to a Democrat?
They lower—you can't go and reverse everybody.
These are the order—these votes are coming in through the Edison Report, which is one of the biggest monopolies in this country.
Every single vote goes through New Jersey, and then it comes out to us.
Well, when you start counting, I want everybody to count.
One, two, let's count by 10.
10, 20, 30, 40.
Let's count by hundreds. 100, 200, 300.
You can't go in reverse when you're counting pizza ballots.
One, two. Oh, wait a minute.
I'm going to throw a bunch off the pile.
So the reason is, here's what I think, Jeff.
I think that they lower that number...
They lowered that number with that drop because the cheat was too big there.
They're making this steal.
The algorithm is too big, and they've got to correct it so it doesn't look like a big anomaly or a huge deviation where the whole country knows they stole the election from him.
What's your opinion on that?
Am I spot on? I think you are.
unidentified
That's certainly a good—I mean, there's no rational explanation because they don't— We see so many of these in an election that it's impossible that it's that many human error mistakes.
Right, right. And here you see, I switched over while you were talking to the governor race in Pennsylvania, and you'll see it happened there, too.
mike lindell
Now, wait a minute. Hold it.
Is this the governor's race right now going on?
unidentified
That's correct. That's Mastriano and Shapiro.
mike lindell
Okay, now let me tell you.
So here's reality, everybody.
When they set these algorithms, you still got to kind of guess, don't you, Jeff?
You got to make an estimated guess at what the score is going to be, because if you cheat too big, it's like I said before, everybody, I'm going to give everybody another example.
If I said the state of Pennsylvania went 6 million for Donald Trump and 2,000 votes for Biden, everyone in the world would say, no, that's a computer error.
Something's wrong.
And then as you go and go, okay, how about 5 million for Trump and 500 for Biden or 5,000 for Biden or 500,000?
They have to make it within a reason of the whole world to go, oh, I guess that could happen.
And this is what they're doing here.
They put the algorithms, thinking how many votes maybe that Mastriano was going to get, and they set them too high, everybody.
Look at that big—look at the beginning when they stole them there.
It went straight up, or almost straight up.
And then you go over a little bit and another uptick, and now they overcorrect it.
Look at the difference between the two.
So they had to correct it and take away votes.
You guys, machines, people don't go, hey, 20,000 people or 150,000 people don't go in and say, I want to take my vote back.
I don't want to vote.
Jeff, what was that drop right there?
How many votes was that drop we're seeing at the real-time crime desk here?
How many votes dropped there?
unidentified
About 90,000. 90,000 votes.
mike lindell
You guys, if you're tuning in, that's a Democrat.
They took 90,000 votes off of a Democrat.
Why did they do that?
Because the cheat was set so big in the beginning.
Look at the beginning, Jeff. Point to the two spikes that you can't explain.
Okay? The one in the beginning, and then you go over a little bit, and there's another one.
How many votes spike is that right there?
unidentified
About 90,000? Well, 90,000.
mike lindell
How about let's go to the next spike?
Let's move over to the next Democrat spike.
This is the governor's race, by the way, if you tune in, of Pennsylvania.
What's that crime spike?
We're going to call them crime spikes.
That's my new name. Okay, go to the next crime spike.
unidentified
That's about 63,000.
mike lindell
So we have a 63,000.
We have a 90,000 crime spike, another 90,000 crime spike, a 63,000 crime spike.
harrison smith
We will continue with this video on the other side.
Stay with us. Crime Spikes, you can share that link at band.video.
Mike Lindell's presentation continues on the other side.
mike lindell
Go to the next crime spike.
unidentified
That's about 63. 63,000.
mike lindell
So we have a 63,000.
We have a 90,000 crime spike, another 90,000 crime spike, a 63,000 crime spike.
And then they go, uh-oh, the whole world's gonna know that Mastriano's getting, you know, we're cheating by too much.
So what do they do, everybody? Write their point to the cursor?
They took away 90,000 votes from the Democrat.
unidentified
Yeah, if you look, it took the vote total back to where it had been way back here.
Basically, that erased all of the vote total increases from that time.
mike lindell
You guys, look at that.
In that time span, everybody, this is the order these votes are caught in.
This is real-time crime, everybody.
This is what I've been telling you about.
This is what, and cast vote records show this same type of thing, don't they, Jeff?
unidentified
Yes, well, they don't show negatives, but they show the patterns that aren't natural.
mike lindell
They show the algorithm patterns, you guys.
Now, there is not anyone in the world that can deny, they can't deny that this is real-time crime.
Those are crime spikes and crimes, these are real-time crime spikes, Machine manipulation?
Looking at this, do we have a poll that's out there right now?
What do they say this race is at?
Or what do they say the governor's race?
This Pennsylvania crime, can you give us an update of where they say that the election's at right now?
unidentified
Do we have a report? Well, if I back it up to the Senate race, I know that the last I saw, it did have Oz up by two or three points.
mike lindell
Two or three points.
Yeah. But now look at that race.
So he's up by two or three points.
Okay. Now what about the governor's race, Sriano?
unidentified
I believe it was about the same difference the other way.
I think it was two or three points, Shapiro.
mike lindell
So does everybody understand that it's like a fixed football game?
I want everyone to understand when we say override the algorithms.
Now, I'm going to use this for a while.
I used to be a compulsive gambler.
I used to bet on football and have come to my door and go, hey, pay up today.
Well, I'm going to tell everybody, when there's a fixed game, let's say there's a fixed football game or any game out there, And you fix a game and maybe a couple players are paid off or, you know, Jay missed a couple holding calls or the referees, you know, pay this off, make a couple holding calls.
Maybe this was all just conspiracy back in the day, but that's been proven at these games that there were games out there that were fixed.
Now, when you fix the game, it doesn't mean that it's 100% that you're going to win that fixed game, because the other team, in spite of even fixing it and having paid off players on the one team, the other ones could just play out of their mind and just overrun the fix.
Or overrun the point spread or whatever it may be.
Here, I believe that this is how we're going to override these algorithms.
But Jeff, the only thing is, is early on there when they adjusted that and took 90,000 votes away, now do you think that those were early voting that were being counted there?
Because I want to make another point.
unidentified
I'm making that assumption based on the pattern, yeah.
mike lindell
Right. So let's say everybody, when you see that blue go down there, that spike that goes down, that took votes away from that Democrat.
But now here's the deal.
In the early voting, this is where I told everyone you have to vote same day.
So they're stealing it with these algorithms.
Stealing it, stealing it, stealing it.
And now when those real stay-of-votes come in, I'm hoping, and this is what we're praying for, that they override these algorithms that were preset, pulling names from the voter rolls illegally, criminally, and that's why we have this.
This is a dream come true, Jeff.
You're exactly right what's going to happen.
This is real-time crime.
It was worth the wait.
You see what they did, everybody?
Look at this. These are the order that are coming in.
They couldn't change the Edison report and hide the crime in time.
They couldn't hide the crime in time, everybody.
Okay, and all the terrible journalists that usually watch my program on their favorite show, all of you guys pay attention here.
Look at that. You see that Democrat going ding, up 150,000 votes because Herschel was taking the lead.
So they just dumped a bunch of votes by computer in there.
Everybody can understand that.
That's something everybody can enjoy, real-time crime.
It's right there in front of you.
Everybody can enjoy this.
How do you hide this? I want one journalist in the world to write, there is no evidence.
There is no evidence.
There is no evidence of any crime.
This is real-time crime.
You can't deny it. So I would like any of the journalists, the horrible, terrible journalists out there, please call my phone right now and tell me what you're seeing and explain this.
Okay? That's your—Cheryl, would you like to call me?
Emma Brown? Jim Akowska?
Any of you guys out there would like to call?
There it is right there.
We're from the real-time Crime Desk, and this is just one of many we're going to find tonight.
So if—I guess—and here—and, Jeff, let me see if I can explain this in Garland.
When you're seeing this, my guess is these are still the mail-in ballots that are coming in and the early voting that's coming through.
And when you see that, as they're stealing and they're adjusting and adjusting— And see where Herschel's catching up again there.
So they're over—pretty soon they'll run on a railroad track, won't they?
And then if they have no more names to steal from the voter rolls, if it's the day of voting coming in, that's where we overrun the algorithms.
Is that correct in theory, or is that fact?
unidentified
I think that you see, it came out, when you look at this right here, Warnock came out to the fairly large lead, relatively speaking, and then they began to run out of railroad, as you said.
And then the, I think, day of election day voting began as what responsible for bringing Hersha Walker back up.
And that spike up there is pretty inexplicable.
That one looks to be just a reactionary dump of ballots or something.
Absolutely. There is no technical explanation for that spike, and there's no explanation from an election integrity perspective for that kind of a spike.
That's 100,000 votes that comes out of nowhere.
That's just not real.
mike lindell
Right, right. And this is what we've been telling everybody.
Everyone that's watching in this country, you need to share this with all your friends.
We just put it out on social media.
And this needs to be shared everywhere.
This is the perfect example.
You can see in the beginning where the Democrat takes the big lead because they set the algorithms.
Heck, they probably preloaded ballots.
Here you go. Have a nice ride.
Get ready for the race, because we already know the winner.
They're racing, racing.
Well, then the real-time votes come in, the real votes, and Herschel's passing the opponent up, and then they go, you ain't getting ahead of us.
Bam! Up goes the spike.
And, Jeff, I want to ask you this.
When the votes are reported, once it goes through Edison in New Jersey— If they would report—if they didn't put that spike in where it was, and things kept going at that pattern, and now, look, if you were to take those 150,000 votes out of there right now and put them over there, Herschel would have the lead by—it looks to me on the chart here—by about 200,000 votes.
unidentified
Is that correct? It would be a big—it would be a big lead.
I mean, we say that's— Yeah.
One hundred. And now, at this point, it's only a, holy moly, it's only like a 3,000 or 30,000 vote difference right now.
So, yeah, it may be 100.
mike lindell
So, it would be up by 100, you guys.
So, if you took that cheat out, if you took that real-time crime spike out, If you took that real spike out, that crime spike, Herschel would be up by 150,000 votes.
Now, if you did it at the end, if he had a big lead, and then all of a sudden, Edison reported, Herschel's ahead by 150,000 votes, and the race is running out, they wouldn't be able to stick that spike in at that time, because it would be too obvious.
You know what I mean, everybody?
So they had to do it then, going, oh, dang it, he's catching up again.
We better get this spike in soon enough.
And I'm going to tell everybody that's exactly what happened in Arizona in Cary Lake's primary.
Cary Lake was, they were stealing it, stealing it.
Then the real-day boats came in, and she ended up at 2 in the morning getting ahead by 12,000 boats.
And what did they do?
They shut her down.
There was only 90,000 boats left to count.
But the whole world knows she was winning 70, 30, 70, 30.
unidentified
This is the Michigan governor race, or we have Tudor Dixon against Gresham Whitmer.
The very, very even race.
Again, if you're looking for spikes— There was a spike here, which is, in relation to everything else that happened, pretty big.
There are, I believe, still some votes left.
I don't think this one's been called yet.
I would not, but it's interesting.
There was another huge dump of votes right here, actually pretty much equal for both candidates.
But it'd be interesting to see where that one's going.
It's about 859,000 to 755,000.
So there's quite a gap there.
So Jeff, let's take a look at those spikes right there that you're showing in the middle of the screen for Widmer, which don't really make any sense.
Let's zoom in a little bit.
I'm seeing about 100,000.
Yeah, it looks like about 100,000 votes spike there, if I'm reading that correctly.
Out of nowhere, yes, that one.
For Gretchen Widmer, that has all the indications of a vote dump.
Of likely counterfeit ballots.
Both of these look really, really strange, but in particular...
Yeah, this one. Yeah, that one...
Because there was almost hardly any increase in the...
Yeah. That's 22-23, so it's 10-23 p.m.
Eastern Time, if I'm reading that correctly.
Correct. And so that is almost beyond belief.
We see this in Georgia.
This is exactly the kind of vote spike that turned...
The Georgia election for Joe Biden after Brad Raffensperger should have stopped counting and should have actually recorded and certified all the results.
So we're seeing the same kind of boat spike here in Michigan.
So I just wanted to take a minute to point that out.
This is not something that you would normally see, and Jeff can tell you a little more about this, but But you don't see a massive boat spike for one candidate in any state, county, or precinct.
It just doesn't happen.
It looks extremely suspicious.
You now have a fairly small, very tiny, percentage-wise, very tiny difference now with a slight lead for Fetterman.
But that lead is being chipped away with every update.
Five out of the last seven updates have been pro-Oz.
In other words, Oz has had more votes than Fetterman in five out of the last seven updates, and they've all been fairly uniform size.
So the momentum is definitely in Oz's side and might just be able to do it.
Again, I'm not all that certain Why there is such a difference, given how highly politicized things are, between that and the governor race, which is not getting close at all.
And I'm sure, you know, people can come up with reasons and that, but still, this is a very, very different graph than that.
pete santilli
Just from honest observations, if you don't mind me asking, does that look natural to you?
It looks natural to me, does it not, compared to the other...
unidentified
Yes, it does.
Right? Yeah, it looks fairly natural.
And it actually looks what we expect, given what we're seeing these days, in that, once again, it appears that you've got the absentee, which are going to be pro-Democrat and also are going to contain most of whatever fraud that there is in there.
And then followed by, as you start getting the mix of Election Day votes in, you see it starting to tighten up.
So I've seen many, many tonight that follow that pattern.
And the one thing, Jeff, excuse me if you're interrupting, but the one thing that is not natural, even though, as you said, Pete, that looks like a very natural graph, but at the very, very beginning, and we see this over and over again, there is a, in this case, it appears to be about 50,000-plus initial vote injection for Fetterman at the very beginning of the race.
Oh, wow. We have seen this over and over again, race after race after race across different states and even in different counties when there's a county race.
Or a different district.
Suddenly, there's always the establishment candidate ends up with a $50,000, $100,000 vote lead right out of the starting blocks.
And from that point on, as you said, the graph looks very, very normal.
But if you look here, this very first update had 130,000 votes for Fetterman and 22,000 plus for Oz.
I'll tell you, I'll say that again.
130,000.
pete santilli
At moment, zero.
unidentified
At the first update after 8 o'clock.
pete santilli
Right.
unidentified
Yeah.
And Oz had 22,500.
Mm-hmm.
So there's your problem, as they say.
And you can see that that difference right there, 130 to 22, that's about a, what, 108,000, say 100,000 difference.
Well, guess what? Now that we're up here, we got 196 to 191.
We have a 50,000 vote difference now.
So in other words, this made a huge difference.
This created the lead.
50 or 5? That was 5,000, right?
1,962,000.
So 1 million 916.
pete santilli
No, Jeff, without making it too complex, while at the same time not dumbing it down, I have a question about that.
Pre-loading it algorithmically as they start to get the same-day voters, they can pretty much establish based on certain polling data or certain data how much they need to front load the ballots.
And then The only variable would be how many people actually show up and vote and they make the adjustment thereafter, correct?
Correct. So their initial, their algorithm with that initial front loading of those ballots, they always stay ahead of that curve if they need to make the adjustment, correct?
unidentified
Correct. I mean, think about how our parents' generation cheated elections.
You waited until the end, you saw how many votes you needed, and you found them.
And stuffed them into the ballot box.
And we're now very good at detecting that.
We look for that, for those late ballot dumps.
Right. If you're going to give an award to the people who stole the 2020 election for anything that they did, it would be the decision to, like, we'll dump them at the beginning because nobody looks at the beginning for a big dump.
And then we'll also have the machine smooth it out so you can't even see that there's a big dump unless you're really looking hard.
And apparently they have kept to that same formula here in the midterms.
pete santilli
And we're watching it.
I mean, this stuff is absolutely fascinating as we're watching this real-time here at the real-time crime.
Because these are crimes, ultimately.
I mean, everyone's now, since 2020, Jeff and Garland, I want you to comment on this before we throw back to the main studio.
harrison smith
All right, ladies and gentlemen, what you're watching right now is available on Banned.video.
It's called Crime Spikes.
Mike Lindell shows real evidence of election fraud.
There's their monitoring it as it was happening.
We'll finish up with this video on the other side.
Your phone calls and more.
It's American Journal. Share that video, folks.
Banned.video, Infowars.com.
They both have them. Share them now.
Hit the share button. It gives you that disguised URL. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
You are watching American Journal.
We're spending the first hour of today's program watching this fantastic live presentation that was occurring during the election on Tuesday.
You can find this video under the illegitimate presidency of Joe Biden channel on band.video.
It's Mike Lindell. The name of the video is Crime Spikes.
Mike Lindell shows real evidence of election fraud.
Let's continue this presentation.
pete santilli
You know, over two years, we've certainly learned a whole heck of a lot.
And the way I'm feeling right now, having watched the anomalies on election night in November 2020, not really knowing what was happening, now as we've learned our way through this, tonight...
As we watch it unravel real-time, we're pretty much catching them.
All Americans should be very familiar and, of course, very, very upset about what's happening in this system.
They will not stop, will they, Garland?
unidentified
Right. And, Pete, what they should be upset about— Is the reason that we're sitting here right now.
The reason that we're sitting here right now is because ballots are counted in secret without public oversight or public view.
And if the ballots were counted in public, you could verify the voting system results.
You could then also detect any counterfeits that were Interinjected.
And in fact, if you did that, you wouldn't even need the machines to begin with.
So that's a whole other reason.
But they don't want to get to public counting of ballots because once you get there, they're going to realize you don't need the machines anyway.
And we can't have legitimate elections with secret counted ballots.
So that's just, it's insane.
This is like the Wizard of Oz voting.
Just look over there.
We'll tell you who won.
Mike, you're gonna love this.
You're gonna love this. This is the Illinois Senate race.
This is Tammy Duckworth's race.
It not only has several, uh, impossible, uh, what do we call them?
The dives up. Real-time crime spikes.
mike lindell
We call them crime spikes.
unidentified
That was it. Crime spikes.
Crime spikes. And it has a, uh, a back down as well.
A loss of votes like nothing else yet tonight.
mike lindell
There we go. Wow! Look at this, everybody!
unidentified
That's a million votes up and a million votes down.
You know, a million votes here and a million votes there, and eventually it adds up to real, you know, real elections.
mike lindell
Right. Okay, I really want, um, I want this pitch, I want a screenshot.
Jeff, if you could send me some screenshots.
I got my social media, we're getting, we're getting hundreds of thousands all across social media.
They're sharing this. Herschel Walker went crazy.
I want you to send me this one, send me others, but can you explain this one?
Can you explain this?
unidentified
Well, I can't really explain it.
I mean, I can't. There is no explanation.
There is no explanation, but you see that I'm actually surprised that this was as close as it is.
And what happened here, though, was you had an update at Eastern Time, what is that, 1042, of about a million votes for— Duckworth, and pretty much none for the other person.
And then you see, it wasn't like it was something that came right back.
It's like we kept on having a little more updates, a little more updates, and then suddenly there goes the million votes back down again.
So it almost hides the fact that you have these very, very big spikes.
mike lindell
Take us through each real-time crime spike.
unidentified
About 291 to 396 so that was about a hundred thousand votes right there compared to About a couple thousand for the other one.
Right, right. Then this one...
mike lindell
That one's a big one, everybody.
unidentified
Yeah, this one goes from $569,000 to $817,000.
So that's about $200,000 and let's call it $250,000.
And the other person got...
385, you know, maybe 100,000.
So it was a two to one or so.
mike lindell
So if I was looking at this, Jeff, when they wanted that Democrat to take that big lead, and now you go over there to that big huge spike where a million votes up, would that be a—let me explain to everyone.
Everything goes through at this Edison report, which is a monopoly out in New Jersey.
Is that correct, right?
Yes. Okay, so everything goes through this report.
Now, that million-person spike there, million-vote spike could only be done with computers, obviously, right?
unidentified
One would imagine it would be difficult to come up with a way that someone could have accidentally keyed in an extra million votes.
So we don't know at what point, because of the confusing and mystifying way that the vote counts get from the counties to Edison and the media, we don't know at what point that this might have happened.
You know, this number.
And that's, you know, part of the problem in that there's no accountability.
And we're talking about all these black box systems.
mike lindell
There's another one. Well, the one thing we do know is that a million votes cannot go the other way.
Not even one vote can go in the negative, everybody.
Here, we're counting ballots as they come in.
One, two, three.
All of a sudden, am I up to three?
No, I'm at negative two.
I mean, it doesn't happen, everybody.
It's impossible. So this is something else.
unidentified
It's stuff like this, Mike, that points out that You just can't trust the system at all.
Right, right. Because, you know, even if you say, okay, this wasn't done in an attempt for fraud, let's give that supposition.
What kind of system that's used in our elections, something as important as our elections, allows this to happen?
mike lindell
Every vote in the United States goes through Edison, right?
unidentified
It's pretty much the only place you can say that, yes.
mike lindell
Well, pretty much, or it is the only place?
unidentified
It is the only place. I mean, the only other would be, you know, the newspapers, you know, the newspapers that print everything.
mike lindell
That's got to be one of the biggest monopolies that ever there ever was when every vote goes through this Edison research in New Jersey, right?
unidentified
They're in New Jersey? They are in New Jersey.
mike lindell
Yeah, and I don't know the significance of that, but it's just, so these are reports coming right out of what?
Right out of the machines, correct?
It's what the machines are telling you.
unidentified
Ultimately, ultimately they came from the machines and probably passed between two to four different portals on the way to the newspapers.
Mike, you made an important point, Mike.
Unmute, Garland. Mike?
You made an important point that I just want to make sure everybody understood, because we've talked about it very quickly.
But you said that this has to be some type of electronic type of fraud, because you can't load this many Ballots in that short of a time frame.
It's just not possible.
So even if you take one of the smaller spikes there, Jeff, the one I think was at 2323, which is before the big one.
Even that one, the smaller one, I'm going to get the cursor on that one.
Yeah, so let's just take the smaller one.
That's not possible.
I don't see any way that that is possible.
Without some type of electronic manipulation of the results, because you can't process that many ballots that fast in a given state.
So there's something wrong there, and I just wanted to point that out again, because I thought you made a really quick point—good point, but we glossed over it really fast.
pete santilli
You know, Jeff, I'm going to go to you because I really want you to speak to, if you did not already.
mike lindell
Yeah, Jeff, can you pull up the odds?
Pull up the Edison report on that, the graphs.
They've had to just pump votes into Fetterman.
I guarantee it.
unidentified
It's impossible. Yeah, it's about $2,235,000 to $2,185,000.
So... Percentage-wise, that's not much.
mike lindell
So if you look at this, if I'm looking at this, I'm going, okay, in the beginning it looks like there was one little pump of votes right in the beginning there to give them that little edge.
What was that? How many votes was that that were dropped in right there?
unidentified
About 80, between 80 and 90,000 votes.
mike lindell
So 80,000, 90,000 votes, everybody.
You know what? That's a lot of votes.
That's a lot of votes.
And they couldn't have come in that fast.
Like Garland said, you're going to just drop these.
harrison smith
All right, ladies and gentlemen, that again is a video called Crime Spikes.
Mike Lindell shows real evidence of election fraud where you can see these unaccountable, unexplainable spikes in Democrat voting counts.
As they watch live on election night, you can share that video at band.video and infowars.com.
Go to infowarsstore.com to support everything that we do.
The Black Friday comes early.
Mega blowout sale is on with top products up to 60% off.
Plus, you're getting double Patriot points.
Plus, an additional 10% off with the promo code 1776.
Everything from the whole food multivitamin to X3 to the ultimate krill oil.
It's all powerful. It's all available for massive discount at infowarsstore.com.
Go there today. Welcome back.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is The American Journal.
unidentified
We're going to get into quite a bit of stuff today.
harrison smith
We're going to get into your phone calls.
Of course, we're going to talk a little bit about what's been going on at the Stuart Rhodes trial, the Oath Keepers trial taking place right now.
We'll get into some of that.
We have some inside information on that front.
We'll also, of course, talk about the fallout from the election on Tuesday a little bit more.
But there's also big tech, transgender, COVID, all sorts of fantastic news coming up.
But first, I wanted to go to this video.
It is the latest by Greg Reese.
It's about a thread. A tweet thread from Kim.com, who himself has a very interesting story of being persecuted by the American government.
It's called A Thread of Important Questions That Every American Should Be Asking.
It can be shared at ban.video and infowars.com.
Please do share these links. We rely on you to get this information out there.
Here is the latest Greg Reese report.
greg reese
On the eve of the U.S. elections, Kim.com published a thread of important questions that every American should be asking.
He wrote, The U.S. proxy war in Ukraine is not going well.
Let's ask some important questions and see if you have the answers.
Feel free to reply.
One, how long will people in the West accept sending billions to Ukraine while they have a major cost-of-living crisis?
Two, now that large parts of Ukraine are without power, how many millions of additional Ukrainian refugees can Europe support?
Winter is coming.
Three, Russia prepares a major offensive this winter with up to 500,000 fresh troops.
How will Ukraine stop them with their depleted army?
Four, the Russian economy is fine despite Western sanctions.
Russia now sells oil and gas to China and India, with Turkey becoming the new energy hub to Europe, meaning Russia can afford this war for as long as it wants.
Are Western taxpayers prepared to spend a trillion in Ukraine?
Five, Russia is now mass-producing $30,000 kamikaze drones.
They destroy NATO weapon systems that cost millions.
While Russia is fighting a low-budget war, it preserves high-end arms for a confrontation with NATO. How long until NATO is running out of high-end arms to defend itself?
6. Russia is winning because it has the clear strategic advantage.
Time is on its side.
The longer this conflict takes, the more likely the defeat of the West becomes, no matter how much money and arms they send to Ukraine.
What then? NATO troops in Ukraine?
Nuclear war?
unidentified
Or peace? 7.
greg reese
The U.S.-EU propaganda is failing.
Most people can see the reality of this U.S. proxy war.
It's all over the internet.
Ukraine flags on social media have disappeared.
And as with past U.S. wars built on lies, this one is also running out of steam.
Who still supports this nonsense?
8. Now ask yourself the most important question.
The U.S. proxy war in Ukraine only serves U.S. interests to prevent BRICS from ending USD dominance.
U.S. empire is bankrupt.
Time to accept that.
Let's go multipolar.
This is not the issue for which humanity must end in a nuclear war.
Kim.com is correct.
President Vladimir Putin's suggestion for a multipolar world is the only reasonable solution.
1776 worldwide.
Reporting for Infowars, this is Greg Reese.
harrison smith
Share that video, fan.video, Infowars.com, a thread of important questions that every American should be asking.
Remember to go to Infowarsstore.com to support us.
It's not just the shows that we do here live on the Infowars network, but also it's fan.video and the incredible researchers, content creators, spokespeople, just all of the wonderful stuff that we do on a daily basis is all brought to you entirely by Infowarsstore.com.
Go there now to support us in this mission to free the world.
unidentified
A brand new way of life.
harrison smith
Alright, welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, second hour of American Journal has begun here on Infowars.com and Band.video.
So glad you're here with us today.
Still have a lot to talk about.
Spent the first hour watching that very important live broadcast that you can now find archived at Band.video.
Which again illustrates one of the important parts of having something like ban to dot video.
Since you can talk about things like voter fraud, elections being stolen right in front of you, in front of your very eyes.
And not have it deleted by the big tech masters who would rather cover up the crimes of their globalist compatriots.
So ban dot video is where you can find and share that.
Still have lots to talk about today, although I gotta say, it's a little bit of a slow news day today.
It's like everybody's still reeling from the elections, and even the elections haven't changed too much.
There's been a few decisions here, a few decisions there, but largely and importantly, some of the more contentious races have not yet been decided, are still up in the air, are still too close to call.
That's the case in Arizona and elsewhere.
But again, I think the real takeaway from all of this is, does anybody even trust the voting system at all anymore?
I mean, is there any evidence that we should trust it even in the slightest?
Or is the overwhelming sense that they could be cheating, they could not be cheating, there'd be no way to tell, there'd be no way to know, no one would care even if it was proven.
Democrats are so... Power-hungry and deceptive, they'd be fine.
If it turned out that they had to cheat to win, they would think, well, you know, whatever it takes, we're the good guys after all, so whatever we do is good.
You know, whatever we do is good because we're the good guys, so if we have to cheat to win, that's just what the good guys have to do.
Completely self-defeating process taking place here, but that's how it goes.
I guess we'll stick on the election for a second.
We'll move into more cultural...
Topics here in just a moment.
Let's go to clip number nine here.
This is Tucker Carlson talking about the lesson we can take away from the midterms of 2022 and what should be done about the Republicans who utterly failed to capitalize on the situation that we find ourselves in, which is, of course, everything the Democrats have done have been an abysmal failure, and yet... Republicans can't win elections when you have these people running things.
It's pretty incredible.
Let's go now to Tucker Carlson.
tucker carlson
Republicans swore they were going to sweep a red tsunami.
That's what they told us. And we, to be honest, cautiously believe them.
But they did not sweep, not even close to sweeping.
The Republican Party in the end may take control of the House and the Senate, but only by a tiny margin at best.
That's great, but it was not the plan.
The plan was really simple.
It seemed easy a week ago.
An unpopular president, a faltering economy, an open border, the looming risk of nuclear war, how about that?
Put all those together, how could there not be a massive Republican win nationally?
Wins everywhere. Well, there weren't.
Some exceptions, but overall, there weren't.
Joe Biden was not punished.
In fact, he was out there bragging about himself today.
Pretty frustrating. He wanted Republicans to win, not simply because they're so great, but because Democrats are so very bad.
And that's not an overstatement. So what happened?
Well, before we give you our theories as to what happened, one obvious point.
The people whose job it was to win but did not win should go do something else now.
We're speaking specifically of the Republican leadership of the House and the Senate and of the RNC. It's nothing personal.
Some of them are no doubt nice people.
But they took hundreds of millions of dollars to paint the map red, and they didn't.
It doesn't mean they're evil. It doesn't mean they should be jailed.
It does mean they shouldn't be promoted.
No one should ever be rewarded for failure.
If there's a truly conservative principle in life, it's the principle of the meritocracy.
You reward excellence.
You do not reward mediocrity.
And when you do, things fall apart.
Democrats kept promoting Tony Fauci despite his obvious ineptitude.
What is that? That's corruption.
Republicans should never do anything like that.
And if they do, what's the point of voting for them?
They're no different. So the question is, why did Republicans underperform last night?
You're hearing a lot of people saying it was about abortion.
Suburban ladies were mad about Roe.
That's certainly plausible in some places, probably true.
On the other hand, a number of resolutely pro-life Republicans thrived statewide.
That would include Ron Johnson in Wisconsin, Brian Kemp in Georgia, Ted Budd in North Carolina, pro-lifers all.
So abortion may have been a factor, but it's not the whole answer.
Many others are saying that Donald Trump is the reason Republicans didn't do as well as they thought they would.
That's a more complicated question.
The truth is we can't really see the entire picture.
harrison smith
Yeah, and we'll talk a little bit more about the abortion topic in a little while.
Tucker Carlson also, you can find the article at Infowars.com, also said the Democrats have conditioned Americans to passively accept election theft, which I think is absolutely true.
He points out that electronic voting machines, Politico told us, are in fact easily hacked and manipulated, said Carlson, which is why real countries like France have banned them and used paper ballots instead.
That's just the way it is, corporate media tells the American people.
If we don't eliminate freedom of speech in this country and impose more censorship to fight disinformation, voters might try to opt out of the current utopia, Carlson said in a segment, citing a recent Guardian report that claimed if Americans don't accept Democrats' will in their shady election practices, we'll have civil war.
Yeah. And this is the strategy that we always talk about the globalists using.
If you just willingly step into their cage, if you willingly give yourself over to slavery, then it's fine.
Then you're fine. They're perfectly willing to accept you and put a chain around your neck and keep you there for life.
But if you fight, if you refuse to come willingly, then you get trouble.
Then they have to really bring out the big guns.
It's not so much that you're making a choice as to whether to surrender to them or not.
It's whether you come easily or whether it's a struggle.
But either way, they're going to try to force you.
Of course, the whole night was plagued with very strange things going on, not just pointed out by Republicans, but by people like Diane Sayre for U.S. Senate.
Who says, last night I had over 55,000 votes and by this morning I have less than 30,000.
Well, isn't that interesting?
She was running against Chuck Schumer and she somehow lost 20,000 votes overnight.
That's kind of interesting, isn't it?
Well, too bad it's the most secure election of all time, so shut up, Diane.
I mean, it's just, you know...
What, suspicious that you lost nearly half your vote count overnight for no reason at all?
Well, too bad. You can't question it.
That's the media landscape that we live in now.
Meanwhile, dead candidates win U.S. elections.
Pennsylvania State Representative Tony DeLuca won his race for state Congress in a landslide victory on Tuesday.
The only problem? He died last month, leading officials in an odd position as they prepare another election to fill the vacant seat.
DeLuca is just one of multiple deceased politicians to score wins this week.
You've got dead politicians.
You've got undead politicians.
You've got semi-living politicians being controlled by machines.
It's just a full-on who's who horror show in the Democratic Party.
And I think it's indicative of what a lot of people are calling late-stage empire.
It's a late-stage empire.
Remember when—who was it?
Was it Nero or Caligula that made his horse a senator?
How long will it be until we have horses for senators?
I think within 10 years we will have—it'll start as a joke, but then it'll actually happen—a cartoon character running for Congress.
I think we'll have some digital or cartoon character— Who does not exist, is not real, and yet gets tens of thousands, if not millions of votes if they don't actually win a seat in the U.S. Senate or Congress.
You'll see headlines that are like, you know, Flicky McDougal isn't real, but he just won his election in Pennsylvania.
How is the American government going to deal with this?
And it's just like some cartoon rabbit that gets elected to the Congress, and it's just like...
Okay, I guess, you know, you people chose this, so there we go.
Oh, dog mayors.
Yeah, they're like dog mayors and like cat mayors in like small towns.
They just, like, they don't even need a mayor, so they just put an animal in that position.
But I think like U.S. Senator, I think if people are willing to vote for John Fetterman, who literally cannot have a conversation, he literally has a teleprompter feeding him words to say, and he can't even read those out...
Effectively or, like, reasonably.
I mean, that...
You might as well, at that point, just put, like...
What's the teddy bear that you put a tape in that tells you a story?
You might as well have one of those.
Yeah, Teddy Ruxpin. Teddy Ruxpin, whatever his name is.
You might as well have Senator Teddy Ruxpin, the honking teddy bear, running for Senate.
Why not? Couldn't be any worse.
Alright, welcome back ladies and gentlemen.
Still people are asking the question, what happened on Tuesday?
What is going on in this country?
I wonder if some of it's maybe just like normalization hangover that we're dealing with where people are just still living in the world of reasonable expectations that doesn't exist anymore.
It's perfectly reasonable to expect that when you have one political party that has absolute power, controls the Senate, controls the Congress, controls the executive branch, total domination in the federal realm of government, and yet, for the last two years, absolutely everything has been worse, from crime to the economy to the political unity of the country as a whole to international conflicts.
I mean, How many times has Joe Biden's administration been openly disrespected by our Political so-called allies like Saudi Arabia, France, all these other people just laughing in Joe Biden's face, refusing to take his calls.
I mean, it's really just been embarrassment and humiliation on every front.
So people expect, they're like, well, then we're going to sweep the board.
Republicans are going to sweep the board because clearly everybody, it's not even like a you have to pay attention to politics sort of thing.
It's like a everybody's life is tangibly worse because of the Democrat policies.
Everybody knows the crime rate is spiking.
Everybody sees that they're paying twice as much for food at the grocery store.
Everybody knows that the border is wide open and it's costing us billions of dollars.
Just massive crime.
Everybody knows about the hundreds of thousands of people on fentanyl.
It's just like the natural consequence of this would be that the people who brought all of this suffering about are ousted from office and people who promise to fix things are put in.
But that's not really the case anymore.
We don't live in a world like that.
And we have some explanations as to why that might be.
I want to get into them here.
On Twitter, Sean Fucht says this, Gen Z overwhelmingly, that is by 28 points, voted for abortion on demand, mutilation of children's bodies, weed, LGBTQ +, student loan forgiveness, lockdowns, crushing society, open borders, casinos, strip clubs being essential over the church.
The left hijacked their minds, he says.
We need revival.
And I don't even think it's necessarily hijacking of their minds.
I think it's more of just destroying their minds.
It's kind of hard to explain, but it's a subtle difference that I think is an important one.
That's not necessarily that they have actually convinced these people of anything.
It's just that they have destroyed the ability for...
Gen Z to even be able to cognitively rationalize what they're seeing in their lives.
I don't think it's unexpected.
I think it's insane and criminal that's been done to an entire generation.
I mean, there's been stories since forever of kids who are victims of abuse because their parents just lock them in a basement for their whole lives.
And they just, you know, they come out and they just...
They're not human, right?
They're just, like, destroyed mentally.
They don't know how to interact with people.
They don't know what's right or wrong.
They don't know what they should do in public for as much as they do in public.
They've been totally disconnected.
Like, you know, the classic story of, like, the kid raised in the woods.
Like, that's an entire generation now.
An entire generation of Gen Z... Has, by the authorities, by the government, been locked in their room, kept away from their friends and family, and only allowed to communicate with the outside world through the most destructive psychological weapons the world has ever seen in the form of social media.
TikTok and Instagram and Facebook and Twitter, who we know use their algorithmic You know, design of content to funnel to people what gives them dopamine rushes but is not good or healthy or anything of the sort.
So it's just an entire, it's basically an entire generation of feral children.
It's really what I think it is.
You know, for example, and it extends up to the other generations as well, not just Gen Z. I think millennials are stuck in this pretty heavily in addition to Gen Z. Seth Dillon writes this on Twitter.
Nearly a quarter of a million people have voted not to require medical care for infants born alive.
So this is something, you know, again, it's not that people have been convinced that this is somehow a good thing.
It's that Their minds have been utterly gutted of humanity.
Montana referendum number 131 requires medical care for infants born alive.
So you go up to somebody and you go, hey, here's a question.
If there's a baby that was just born, should the doctors who delivered it be required to give it medical care?
Should they be required to try to keep it alive and healthy?
Who would say no to that?
How could you possibly say no to that?
I mean, it's like I would be insulted if you even asked me.
You know, it's like going up and going, hey, if I drop this pin, will it fall and hit the ground?
It's like, what are you talking? Yes, obviously.
What? What are you talking?
Why are you asking me such a stupid question?
But apparently it's not a stupid question.
Apparently more people said no than yes.
More people said no. Doctors should not be required to keep a newborn and baby alive.
They should let it die.
You should put it on a metal tray, cold metal food service tray, and just let it expire, and then toss the body in the dumpster.
I mean, you know, is this something beyond just, you know, tricking people into voting for Democrats because they're bribing them.
Because that's a part of it too, right?
You have the student loan issue where there are billions of people out there with student loans and you tell them, hey, vote for me, I'll give you $10,000.
They're like, alright, sounds good to me.
It's just a vote. Whatever, it doesn't cost me anything, but if you'll give me $10,000 for it, sure, I'll do it.
Or weed or, you know, whatever.
Those are just sort of like bribe things, I guess you could say.
Student loan forgiveness. All that sort of stuff.
But that doesn't explain this.
That doesn't explain what's going on here.
There's something way deeper and more sickening and disturbing.
There's no trick to this, right?
It's not like, well, do you think women should have a choice over their body?
And then you say yes. And they're like, great, we're going to kill babies when they're born.
It's like... Wait, what?
I didn't know that was in the law.
Like, this isn't buried in a law somewhere.
This isn't like a, well, I like the idea of abortion.
And so I say yes, but then I didn't realize that the details were actually kind of horrific.
No, no, it's just straight up ask the question.
It's just straight up ask the question, should doctors be required to provide medical care to infants who are born alive, including after an attempted abortion?
52.1%.
Of the respondents in Montana said no.
Nearly a quarter million people said no.
You should not be required to provide medical care to newborn babies after they're born.
You should be allowed to kill them.
You should be allowed to let them die.
It's one and the same. Those aren't different things.
You want to talk about feeling black-pilled.
We want to talk about having no hope.
I don't know how a country comes back from over half your population.
This is in Montana, folks.
This isn't New York. This isn't California.
This is the state of Montana.
Quarter million people in Montana have said they do not want to require medical professionals to render aid to children born alive after an abortion or not.
How do we get back from this?
I honestly want to know. I'll open up the phone lines on the other side, but like...
unidentified
I don't know how you do this anymore.
Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
harrison smith
Let's talk a little bit more about what it may have been that caused the election results we saw on Tuesday.
Peter on Twitter, at Niggledom, that's his name, wrote this thread that is actually extremely accurate, in my opinion.
I'll just go ahead and read it here.
He says, this is my view of the U.S. elections, why Republicans lose and what they could do about it.
He says, I'm not American, but visit often.
We have similar issues in the U.K. Obviously, leadership matters, but if someone like Fetterman can win, something else is going on here.
Democrats realized a long time ago that most voters do not pay attention to issues or facts but are driven mainly by fear.
Republicans try to appeal to logic.
That is absolutely a losing strategy.
Democrats use short, easily digestible sound bites repeated over and over.
It doesn't matter how puerile or stupid the assertions are either.
They can flat out lie. No one cares.
Some of the lies they use. Democracy is on the ballot.
Fear. Republicans will take your rights.
Loss or fear. Republicans only care for the rich and will take from you.
Loss and fear. We're good to go.
Every Democrat repeats these talking points endlessly.
Their talking heads on the news and channel repeat them over and over again.
They also get in first.
Clinton immediately framed the Pelosi affair as an assassination attempt driven by MAGA and Republicans.
January 6th was immediately framed as an insurrection driven by Trump.
Russia interfered in the 2016 election.
Complaining about the 2020 election is election-denying.
It doesn't matter how ridiculous, it sticks.
The hypocrisy accusation carries no weight as there's no associated fear or loss.
Framing abortion as, quote, reproductive health was a stroke of genius.
When they yell Republicans will take your rights over your own body, there's no defense except by intellectual explanation, which means you've already lost.
This is true of all of the above.
So how do you fight it? He says you have to get down to their level.
You have to have a consistent, short, fear-driven set of short, easily repeatable affirmations.
A few positive messages also, but playing on loss and fear is easily the most effective.
And then every single candidate must repeat these over and over and over again.
Proceed every single statement with Democrats lie every time.
Some examples. Democrats will take your house.
Democrats let in terrorists.
Democrats let fentanyl kill your children.
Democrats are owned by China.
Socialism kills. Social Democrats will destroy your freedom.
And so on. I'm sure someone can come up with a better list.
Once you have the list, just ignore everything Dems say and simply repeat these ad nauseum.
Lastly, get better candidates.
Never apologize. Never get defensive in interview.
Interviewer asks about abortion.
Respond with, my opponent wants to mutilate children.
That's it. Do what they do, but do it better.
Half of persuasion is fear.
The other half is repetition.
And of course, what he's illustrating is the sort of Goebbels-style Nazi propaganda tactics where I just repeat the same thing over and over.
And he's right for the most part.
But it's like... It's a little bit different though, right?
It's a little bit different because what Republicans are talking about in general is real and Democrats actually want to do these things.
I mean look at some of the claims that he comes up that Democrats say and it's just they are just flat-out lies.
They have no basis in reality or fact whatsoever.
At all, even in the slightest, right?
Democracy's on the ballot.
Just like, what does that even, what does that possibly mean?
It means literally nothing.
It is worse than saying nothing.
It is a slogan with no purpose.
It's like an advertisement when there's no product.
It's just nothing.
Democracy is on the ballot.
What? What does that even mean?
Literally nothing. If you're voting, that's democracy.
Like, what? Okay, fine.
Republicans will take your rights.
And that's one of the ones. They just make these claims.
It doesn't mean anything. They don't offer to explain why, like what rights are being taken away.
It doesn't matter. If they even feel the need to justify it, what they'll say is, well, what the Republicans want to do will impact certain minority groups more than others.
So therefore, the whole purpose of the law is to target minority groups.
Therefore, it's a racist law to take your rights.
It's ridiculous, right? If you say, well, I want there to be punishment for crimes, and they go, oh, well, black people commit more crimes, so now that law will affect black people more.
So really, you're just trying to keep down minorities.
No, we're trying to keep down crime.
But it doesn't matter. None of that matters.
They're just blatant, ridiculous, baseless lies.
Republicans are terrorists. Republicans want to put you in camps.
They're literally like building the camps, being like, Republicans want to put you in these, like the ones they're building, the quarantine camps and the crap that we stood up against.
It's insane. Republicans are Nazis, white supremacists.
And then Republicans feel the need to, like, defend themselves because they're not.
And these are ridiculous claims.
They just make them over and over. Whereas, if you look at the things that Republicans talk about, Democrats are mutilating children.
It's not even up for debate.
It's completely insane that anybody claims that this isn't happening.
They give seminars about it.
It's happening all over the place.
So it's like it's insane that Republicans are complaining about things Democrats actually do, legitimate concerns they have.
Democrats just come up with nonsense.
So it's not like you need to come up with a list like the Democrats do of just like making these claims and whatever.
It's that the media landscape in America is so overwhelmingly Democrat that it doesn't even matter if Republicans come up with good talking points that everybody repeats.
It It doesn't matter because the field that you're playing on has been set, has been decided and established by the Democrats themselves.
So, you know, it's like Democrats will take your house, Democrats let in terrorists, Democrats let fentanyl kill your children.
These aren't lies. These are true.
This is what's happening, right?
The open borders are letting in terrorists.
The open borders are contributing to the fentanyl crisis that is killing hundreds of thousands of people.
None of this is even up for debate.
It's all undeniably true.
But they don't care, and they have so controlled people's minds.
Again, it's almost hard to explain.
I was trying to think of a good metaphor, maybe a popular movie where this type of thing happens.
The only one I can think of is...
It's like Pirates of the Caribbean, and nobody even realizes this happens in Pirates of the Caribbean, but the first Pirates of the Caribbean, everything bad that happens is because everyone thinks that Captain Jack is a liar.
So everybody has this perception of Captain Jack.
Oh, he's a liar. He's a pirate.
You can't trust him. So Captain Jack tells the truth about something.
He's like, this is what's happening, and here's what we need to do.
And everybody else assumes he's lying, so they all act as if he's lying.
They all take their actions as if...
What he said is a lie and then it screws everything up because it turns out he was telling the truth in the first place and if they would have just listened to him it would have worked out.
Like... I know this is totally vague and out there and probably doesn't make any sense, but that's how it feels to be a Republican, where you're like, hey, there's fentanyl coming across the border and it's killing hundreds of thousands of people.
That's true. It's because we care about the people that are being killed.
It's because it's a poison that could easily be stopped and there's no reason to allow this to happen.
But the perception of Republicans as spread by the mainstream media is really...
Republicans are just racist and Republicans just don't like brown people crossing the border.
So when they talk about fentanyl, you can just ignore that claim because really they're just racist and they're coming up with an excuse for their racism.
And so it's like, we're just here telling the truth.
We're just trying to do what's right.
But the well has been poisoned.
The... I don't know what to tell you, man. I don't know how you think that's homophobic, but that's what's actually happening, and I care about that.
I'm sorry, your mind has been so poisoned against me that you can't see reality for what it is.
But we're getting desperate at this point.
But no matter what it is, no matter any of these issues that this guy brings up, like, you know, if they're true and there are things that Republicans should be unified on and our messaging should be simple, like these soundbites that are just put this across, they don't care.
The Democrats do not care.
The mainstream media does not care.
So therefore, the people that listen to mainstream media do not care about these issues.
So yes, they're letting in fentanyl.
They don't care. They think you're racist.
Yes, they're mutilating children.
They don't care. They think you're a homophobe.
So it's like, it's far beyond talking points at this point.
Honestly, I'm black-pilled today.
That's it. Ladies and gentlemen, I think one of the reasons why Democrats do so well is I think a lot of people underestimate how many one Topic voters there are.
Like, I think a lot of voters, if you ask them, like, why'd you vote for one person over another, they'll have one thing that they know about or are concerned about.
A lot of times that's abortion, and that's a big, you know, talking point now.
That, again, just sort of came out of nowhere.
I mean, I guess that had to do with the Roe vs.
Wade being rolled back, but even that is not...
It's not like a bad thing if you're in favor of abortion.
It just means it goes back to the states.
It wasn't an anti-abortion thing.
Or like student loan forgiveness.
Or marijuana legalization.
I think there's tens of millions of people in the country that they don't care about politics.
They don't think politics affects their everyday life.
They have no concern about the relation between politics and inflation.
Or The war in Ukraine, that's all far away and it doesn't matter to them.
But they're just like, but I want legal weed, so I'll vote for the person that gives me legal weed.
Or I have a student loan debt, and so I'll vote for the people that will pay it for me.
It really is just as simple as that.
In the last segment, we showed that thread where They're talking about the way that Democrats just all unify their message on single, soundbite talking points that push fear of Republicans as something dangerous or anti-democratic or whatever.
But I think a lot more of it has to do with sort of the open bribing of Democrats in a lot of ways.
So I think this thread from Twitter actually is more accurate, but they're both true.
You know, both these things are not mutually exclusive.
They're both true at the same time.
This one is by...
I don't even know how to say this name.
Apokokurumanane? A-P-O-K-E-K-R-U-M-M-E-N-A-I-N. So, however you pronounce that.
But this thread's pretty brilliant.
He says, So, what do I mean by this?
Well, let's look at things Democrats do well.
First off, they reward their voters on issues important to them.
For example, Dems say, if you vote for us, we'll make sure you can get abortions.
Dems, if you vote for us, we'll make sure your student loan debt is forgiven.
Dems, if you vote for us, we'll protect the environment.
Secondly, the Dems are quite comfortable punishing their enemies.
They're all for cancel culture, queering the schools, mass immigration, globalism.
They're willing to go to racial politics to reward minority voters with quotas and punish Republican voters, i.e.
whites.
Third, Dems also understand that political loyalty is built not through ideological conformity, but rather through patronage networks, including tax dollars to reward their friends.
Fourth, Dems understand that politics is one on the ground, activism, voter registration, busing in voters, controlling election offices.
It also means controlling the rules so that the system always is tilted in their favor.
The Republicans, on the other hand, other than tax cuts, which strangely enough likely benefit Democrat voters more because there are more high-income voters on the left, really don't have a plan to benefit their voters.
What do Republican voters get from voting Republican?
I would argue other than SCOTUS judges, and that can be a dicey thing long-term, the Republicans do nothing to benefit their voters, and they're not going to Nothing. Their biggest message is, vote for us to stop the Democrats.
But tell me, does anyone have an answer what are the Republicans doing to stop Dems?
The honest answer, not a whole hell of a lot.
Most Republicans have as their goal merely to get elected.
Honestly, the whole Trump thing is a red herring as far as I'm concerned, a sideshow that distracts us from the real issues.
The problem with Republicans is that they focus on ideas and policy, often the wrong ideas, over organizing and building on the ground patronage networks within the bureaucracies and over political machines down to the community level.
But the big reason Republicans don't win is that they want to win elections without doing actual politics.
Republican leaders do not want to reward their voters for their votes.
Republican leaders have no will for punishing people for voting Democrat.
I think that one's actually important here.
Republican voters need to know that their Republican vote will directly benefit them.
Stop with the tax cuts already.
They likely benefit Dems more than Republican voters anyway.
How are we being rewarded for voting Republicans?
Stopping the Dems is not enough.
What does that even mean anyway? How do they plan to punish Democrats and their supporters?
Dems know the answers to these questions.
Do you as a Republican voter know the answer?
Reward your friends and punish your enemies.
Dems understand this.
Republican politicians do not, and they think their ideas, which are bad, will win the day.
Republicans give no one reasons to vote for them.
Dems do.
It's that simple.
For those who think that the whole analysis of politics of punish your enemies and reward your friends is an after-the-fact thing, I've advocated this before, and I think one quote, tweet, or reply called this type of politics repugnant.
Well, it's why the GOP loses.
No stones. For good measure, a reminder of what was and what might be once again the flag of the Sons of Liberty.
Again, whether it's good or not, it is true.
Democrats get into power and then they use that power to further their agenda.
I mean, we pointed this out as far back as the 2020 elections when it came to people like Lena Hidalgo in Harris County, running for Harris County judge.
She didn't run on, I'll be the best judge.
She didn't run on, I have experience and qualifications to actually occupy this position.
She ran on the idea that if she was in office, she would then use that power and the resources that she has control of in that office to further socialism.
Like her entire campaign pitch was like, hey, if you vote for me, we'll start programs in schools to teach kids the importance of government and social policy.
We'll, you know, have carnival days that the government will sponsor to where people can come to the government and learn how what a good thing it is to have democratic rule in our government.
Like she didn't even suggest that she would be good at the job or that she would be fair or balanced or anything.
She actively made the the argument, put me in office and I will use my position to further our political agenda.
Now, Ron DeSantis has actually done that.
And if you look at Florida and why Florida did so well is because he did put in place things to punish the Democrats and reward Republicans.
And not in a corrupt sort of way, just in a we are working for you sort of way.
Things like stopping Disney from, you know, bankrupting the state in order to get Homosexuality taught in elementary schools.
It's just bizarre.
They actually went and made it illegal to do transgender surgeries on children.
They just did that. And it worked.
And Republicans went, okay, this is what a robust Republican Party looks like.
This is what an aggressive Republican Party looks like.
You vote for them, then they put laws into place that actually reflect your agenda.
So it's a very important lesson to be learned there.
I don't know if Republicans even have the capability of learning that lesson.
But all you have to do is look at what the Democrats are doing.
And I guess it's kind of like a self-defeating thing, right?
I guess it's like if you vote for...
If you've got one group of people that's like, yeah, you put us into positions of power and we'll use that power to benefit you.
We'll reward you. I'll pay your loan.
You know? I'll give you something.
I'll reward you with something. Look at Beto's campaign promises from, again, back in 2016 or 2018 or 2020 even.
I mean, his entire list of policies was just a list of giveaways.
He's like, we'll give you free internet, free healthcare, free childcare, free preschool, free telephones.
It was all just free giveaway stuff.
So I think a lot of people out there don't know anything about politics and are like, hey, if I vote for that guy, I'm getting free crap, so I'll vote for that guy.
I mean, it really is as simple as that.
It's depressing. It's sad.
It's why democracy is evil.
It's because people can do that with democracy.
This isn't anything new. This goes back to Rome, ancient Rome, and the fall of the Republic and the collapse of that system.
The corn dole. This was an issue, and people understood it back then.
They go, you are bribing your constituents with money from the public coffers.
You're just telling them, hey, vote for me, and I'll take that guy's money and give it to you.
And it's the same thing that's happening here with the Democrats.
So it sucks.
It wouldn't work if you had a moral population.
If you had a population that rejected things out of morality rather than accepted it out of convenience, then this wouldn't be an issue.
That's not the case anymore.
And it's increasingly not the case.
And it has a lot to do with the fact that Democrats have so abandoned any semblance of morality in their pursuit of power.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
And so people recognize that and they go, well, if everybody else is doing it, I better do it too.
Is there a moral person out there that goes, well, I signed up for this student loan.
I promised to pay it back.
That's on me. It's my honor.
It's my honor. You know, soul at risk here, so I'm going to pay this off myself.
I'm not going to take your blood money.
Are any of them willing to do that?
Or are they going, well, they're all getting money, then I want money too.
So it's a death of morality that's really allowing the Democrats to succeed, and the Republicans in sort of an untenable position where they're trying to compete with immoral people using morality.
And it's not going to work. Either Republicans need to get more robust and aggressive and in your face, or just say goodbye to any semblance of morality at all.
I'm going to go ahead and open up the phone lines right now.
We'll be taking your calls throughout the entirety of the third hour.
The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539.
That's 1-877-789-2539.
Give us a call now. We'll be taking your calls throughout the rest of the show today.
I have a video that sort of illustrates what we've been talking about for the last two segments.
That is the The willingness of Democrats to simply use the power that they have to oppress their enemies with the thinnest of justifications.
Let's go now to clip number eight, where President Joe Biden is asked, do you think Elon Musk is a threat to national security?
Let's watch. Mr.
unidentified
President, do you think Elon Musk is a threat to U.S. national security?
And should the U.S. and with the tools you have investigate his joint acquisition of Twitter with foreign governments, which include the Saudis?
joe biden
I think that Elon Musk's cooperation and or technical relationships with other countries is worthy of being looked at.
Whether or not he is doing anything inappropriate, I'm not suggesting that.
I'm suggesting that it's worth being looked at.
But that's all I'll say.
There's a lot of ways.
harrison smith
A lot of ways to look at him, that is.
A lot of ways to justify the investigation into him.
Here's a question. Who did Elon Musk buy Twitter from?
Anybody know? Anybody care?
Have the Saudis not owned a large chunk of Twitter for years?
Why would it be a problem now?
Aren't the Saudis our allies?
Did something happen with our relationship recently?
I don't know. It has nothing to do with any legitimate national security threat.
It's just that he's not one of them.
I mean, again, it's like...
I honestly don't know what to say at this point because obviously there's no way to...
To combat this without doing the evil thing that these people do.
Right? There's no way to...
It's just like...
It's like the classic example we always use where it's like you've got...
You're playing Monopoly, except it's Monopoly where you've all bet your lives on the outcome of the...
Of the game. And one of the people playing with you is just reaching in and taking money out of the bank whenever they want.
And you go, well, that's not fair.
And they're like, yeah, well, too bad.
I can do it. I'm the banker.
So I have access to the money.
I'm going to give myself money. And I just do it because I have the power to do that.
Go, well, all right. Then I guess I need to start stealing too because...
It doesn't make any sense to sit there and keep playing the game and go, hey, you keep cheating.
And so you're winning by a ton.
And they're just like, yeah, oh, well, too bad.
I'm in charge. Just like, all right, I guess we just have to lose now.
I guess we just lose and die because we have to just let them cheat or we have to start cheating.
I guess we have to start cheating.
I guess it's the way it is. I guess it's just from now on, we'll just vote for people that promise that as soon as they get into office, they will investigate all of your political enemies and You know, instead of Donald Trump and Elon Musk and Kanye West being investigated, we'll just have to elect people who will investigate the Clintons and Joe Biden himself and all these other people.
Of course, it is different because the Clintons and the Bidens actually run corrupt crime families.
Trump and Musk don't.
It's a little bit different. But, I mean, this is just what Democrats do.
They just get into power, and they just go, yeah, Elon Musk, he's a national security threat now.
No reason, no justification for it.
He's just not a Democrat, so they're going to use their power to crush him.
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
We're going to take your calls this hour.
We'll be talking about the Stuart Rhodes trial as well as the topic of abortion, since that seemed to be a...
A big influence on Tuesday's election results.
Surprisingly big influence, I should say.
You know what? I want to go first to clip number five here.
This came out a few days ago, but because of the election, I never got to get to it.
And I think it's pretty illustrative of some of the other stuff we've been talking about in the show today.
We talked about Gen Z and the way that they are essentially feral children.
That is, children that have been raised...
In the woods, raised with no positive influence of humanity, and instead are just completely dislocated, bastardized, deracinated, you could say, right? Torn away from everything that's come before them, and just left to explore their own You know, base desires.
It's just, it's really bad.
It's real bad. And we have an example of just how bad it gets.
There's a mentally ill climate activist who I guess is on a bridge, like tied herself to a bridge.
She shut down traffic in both directions.
I believe this is in the UK. Video from a few days ago, so you may have seen it, but we'll try to break it down and read into what she's actually saying here.
But again, it's like, I feel sorry for these people to a certain extent.
But I more am angry and infuriated at the people who have done this.
Young people, because you'll see this woman, she clearly is empathetic.
She thinks what she's doing is right.
And she's just being used.
And she knows she's being used in a weird way.
You'll see. We'll pause the video and talk about exactly what she's saying.
But here's this climate activist who shut down a highway in UK a few days ago.
Let's watch. Do you see the highway just completely shut down in one direction?
Emergency vehicles coming up.
unidentified
It's completely blocked off.
Hello, my name is Louise.
I'm 24 years old.
And I'm here.
I'm here because I don't have a future.
And you might hate me for doing this, and you're entitled to hate me.
But I wish you would direct all that anger and hatred at our government.
harrison smith
Let's pause it real quick.
Let's just pause it. Like, clearly...
Not playing with the full deck here.
It's literally a mentally ill child acting out.
It's like it's not good for them.
It's not good for society to just like allow them to do this to themselves.
But again, it's like she literally like breaks down and starts weeping 10 seconds into her video.
Why? Why? Why?
Because she's mentally ill. Because she has been mentally tortured for a long time.
And she says there, you might hate me for this.
No, I mean, I feel sorry for you.
I hate the people that have done this to you.
She says, you know, you should...
I wish you would take all that energy and direct it towards the government...
Well, the government's not the one stopping the highway.
That's you, darling.
So you're the one who's doing things that are hurting people.
So you're the one that they're mad at, obviously.
It should be easy to understand.
But it's ironic, isn't it?
Because clearly she's got a lot of stuff going on.
I don't know. I mean, I'll just go out and guess here.
Probably doesn't have a great future personally, right?
And she projects that onto the earth.
It's like, no, we don't have a future.
No, you don't have a future probably.
You probably have nothing that you believe in or care about and no prospects of like a husband and a family, like something you can look forward to, right?
You have just nothing but pointless exercise of Vanity, moving forward, and that makes your life meaningless.
So you're desperately searching for meaning.
And so you have taken your own personal frustration with your own life or your own inadequacies, and now you're projecting that onto the government and ruining a bunch of people's days.
And now you're saying, but don't hate me, hate the government.
It's projection upon projection.
Do you know what I mean? It's her having her own issues, projecting that onto some climate change agenda, saying, no, really, it's the earth getting warmer that is making me miserable.
You're making everybody else miserable.
And you want them to project that energy at the government.
Listen to, as she continues, the list of people that she knows Are already doing the things that she wants to be done.
I mean, this is the weird part. When we say that these people are unwitting puppets of the most powerful institutions in the world, they're not unwitting.
They're perfectly witting.
They know perfectly well that they're serving the most powerful interests in the world.
unidentified
Let's hear her say that. I wouldn't have to be there if they did their lawful duty to their own citizens.
I'm part of the Just Stop Oil Coalition demanding an end to all new oil and gas licences in the UK. What we're asking for is what all the scientists are asking for, what the United Nations are asking for, the International Energy, the IPCC. How many more people have to say we don't have a livable future if you continue licensing oil and gas for you to listen?
Why does it take young people like me up on a fucking gantry on the M25 for you to listen?
All right, we can take a test.
Over a thousand people.
harrison smith
We can take it down.
I forgot it needs to be a...
It needs to be censored. But she goes on to, like, list all the other people that are on her side.
She's like, it's what the UN wants.
It's what the IPCC wants.
It's what the WEF wants.
unidentified
It's what the EU wants.
harrison smith
It's like, yeah, we know. We know.
You are a puppet for the most powerful organizations in the entire world.
So what are you doing? What are you doing?
Why is it taking young people like me?
Because you are the obnoxious ones.
You are the annoying ones.
You are the easily tricked ones.
You are the ones that have no life experience, no knowledge, no wisdom, who can be tricked into doing this sort of stuff.
You're a fool. You're demanding things that are literally impossible.
You might as well demand that we stop...
You know, having wells to get water.
It's just not possible.
It's just not possible this day and age that you not use oil.
You have literally no idea how many millions people would die if they just had a magic wand and could get rid of oil today.
It would just be... Everybody would die.
Every single person in the world would die if they got what they wanted.
And that, I guess, is what they want.
But this... This poor girl is just the perfect example of I don't know the Greta Thunberg effect of just filling young people's minds with propaganda to inspire fear to inspire panic to override their logical faculties and appeal directly to their emotions which are of course disturbed by hormonal influences also And just putting these people in a state of vulnerability and then you take advantage of that and tell them that they're righteous and good and they're saving the world by serving the very people that are destroying the entire world.
It's honestly just pathetic.
It's sad. Like, for their own good, these kids need to be shut the hell up.
Honestly. They have this overblown sense of self-importance that is completely unearned, completely out of whack with what they're actually doing, who they're actually serving, and what's actually going on in the world.
Young lady, you want to make a difference?
Go do this in China.
China knows how to deal with people like you.
Also, they're the ones destroying the entire world, not the Western European countries.
unidentified
It's just annoying at this point.
It's just annoying. And these people need to just be stopped.
harrison smith
I'm done with it.
unidentified
Alright folks, welcome back.
harrison smith
I've hardly plugged this episode, which is really stupid of me.
I mean honestly, in the situation that we're in, I should be plugging every single segment.
Hopefully you already know to go to Infowarsstore.com.
Hopefully, if you see the stuff that we're covering and actually like the fact that people are talking about what's really going on and actually exposing the Democrats for their true intentions, you already know to go to Infowarsstore.com.
But in case you don't, here's a reminder.
Go to Infowarsstore.com.
Take advantage of the Black Friday Comes Early mega sale, biggest sale of the entire year.
If you've ever wanted to purchase anything from Infowarsstore, now is the time to do it.
We have sales on our top products up to 60% off.
Plus, you can receive an additional 10% off with the promo code 1776.
Whole food multivitamin, vitamin D3 gummies, and vitamin C plus zinc.
That trifecta is all 40% off and in limited supply.
DNA Force Plus, Fizzy Magnesium, Brain Force Ultra are all 50% off.
And those are probably some of our best-selling and most successful products.
DNA Force Plus is in very limited supply, so if you want to try that with that massive discount of 50% off plus the additional 10% for 1776, you've got to go there now.
Brain Force Plus is 60% off if you prefer the capsule form.
Ultra is 50% off.
Organics Green Fiber Caps is 50% off.
Super Male and Super Female Vitality are both 50% off.
Ultimate Krill Oil is finally back in stock, and that's 40% off.
It's the badass older brother of fish oil.
It does everything fish oil does, but even more so.
Knockout Sleep Support is 40% off.
That's in very limited supply, as is Alpha Power, also at 40% off.
Immune Support is also 40% off, and you might want to get that before the winter flu season hits.
Vaso Beats Complete is also 40% off and in very limited supply, so we'll be running out of that soon.
Do not wait to get your Vaso Beats Complete at 40% off.
Ultimate Fish Oil, also 40% off, plus even more available at InfoWarsStore.com.
Your purchase of these products is, of course, a 360 win.
Not only do you get high-quality items, but you also help launch InfoWars to the next level, and it is more important now than ever.
That we get your support. Do not miss out on the biggest sale of the entire year.
Go to Infowarsstore.com right now and take advantage of the Black Friday Comes Early Mega Super Blowout Sale.
And while you're there, do some Christmas shopping.
There's something for everyone at Infowarsstore.com.
Why give your money to people who despise you and are working to tear down this country from the roots?
Why not support the people that are actually trying to build it up?
Infowarsstore.com. With that, we go to your phone calls.
We have Spam in Wisconsin wants to talk about ye olde rabbit holes.
Thanks for calling in. Spam, you're on the air.
You okay? Yep, you're coming in.
unidentified
Yeah, I wanted to talk about some ye Kanye rabbit holes.
Do you remember when he got in that car accident and they had his jaw wired shut?
harrison smith
Vaguely. I very vaguely remember that, yeah.
unidentified
Yeah, who do you think did that?
Who do you think did that? I don't know.
It's a good question. Because now looking at what happened, it's like, I don't know, some time travelers, like, going back, are they, like, predicting it with Stern, who's going to be a troublemaker, and, like, taking him out of the equation beforehand?
And then somehow he survives, you know?
The car accident. It's like, Diana...
harrison smith
Right. No, I mean, clearly he's got powerful enemies that are not willing to stop at anything to destroy him.
He's sort of gone quiet over the last week or so.
We haven't heard too much from Ye or even about Ye.
Yeah, I hope he's okay. I do too.
unidentified
I hope he can disappear or something.
harrison smith
What's the latest on him?
I do have a story...
About him or about what's going on, apparently Adidas is just continuing to sell his products, but just under a different name.
Adidas to sell Yeezy products with a different name after Kanye-Yay West fallout.
Adidas terminated the partnership with West after his recent anti-Semitic comments, but they've just rebranded his products and are continuing to sell them.
Which seems to me like, I don't know, theft?
I mean, how do you do that?
You take somebody's designs, you take somebody's promotion, you take somebody's name and brand recognition, and then you just cut them out of the deal but continue to sell their stuff?
I can't imagine that's legal in any sort of way.
He actually said in June, I'm not saying for this blatant copying no more, But apparently they're just doing that.
So I don't know. That's the only thing I've heard about Ye recently.
Do you have anything else for us, Sam?
unidentified
I think maybe the same people who are canceling them maybe did it.
Worried about that, you know?
And then also, since you're a wordsmith, Harrison Smith, the wordsmith, I was wondering, what's the Americana, patriotic, or Christian version of Zionism?
harrison smith
Americanism, I guess.
unidentified
Americanism? Sure.
harrison smith
I don't know. I mean, I don't think...
unidentified
There needs to be a word for that, no?
Like, the promotion of...
Like, you know how, like, Zionism is for, like, the greater Israel and promoting Israel and everything, you know?
harrison smith
Yeah, I've got it. It's called...
What about for... Yeah, no, I know.
Yeah, it's called Nazism.
It's called... Oh, yeah. It's called white nationalism or white supremacy when we do it, yeah.
unidentified
Oh, okay. All right, thank you.
Bye now. Have a nice day. No problem.
harrison smith
Yeah, when you say, you know, you say we have a right as a race to have uncontested control in this part of the world, that's good and it's Zionism and it's honorable and, you know, necessary and you can't talk against it when it's...
Zionism, but if you do the same thing in Western Europe or America, it's called white supremacy and Nazism, and it's the worst evil you can imagine.
Kind of ironic, but there it is.
Let's go to Lynn in Indianapolis.
I want to talk about a speech by Alan Watt.
Thanks for calling in. Lynn, you're on the air.
unidentified
Yes, sir. Y'all highlighted that speech this weekend, and it's two hours long, and it's my context now that I judge things.
It's really awful.
It's time to let the hounds loose and run these elites to the ground, dig them out, and let's throw them on trial.
harrison smith
Amen. How do we do that?
unidentified
I think we're in for war.
We've got to be aware that we are being played from point to point.
The entire time for hundreds of years.
And they're just playing us.
And you see it.
You see it.
And you're speaking just what Alan Watts spoke about.
You know? It's either wait on the wrath of God and rapture out of here before the tribulation.
Or we have to take a move.
We gotta make a move.
And they...
When he says, they give us our heroes, when he said in the Revolutionary War with England, oh, they gave us democracy, so we feel like we had a choice in things.
harrison smith
Yeah, well, that's what you can do when you, you know, control the entire media landscape.
I mean, luckily, what they did give us during the Revolution was the First Amendment, so we can still be up here and contradict and counteract their policies and their lies that they tell, so...
That's good stuff. We all put up that page again in case people want to find the speech that you're talking about.
It is available online at infowars.com and band.video.
You can just search Alan Watt, but it's Alan Watt.
Think outside your programming.
Alan Watt spelled A-L-A-N-W-A-T-T. Think outside your programming.
Share that link now.
I'm going to have to go back and watch that.
I haven't watched it Since it got put up.
unidentified
You're saying verbatim what he is saying.
harrison smith
Great minds think alike.
Lynn, I'll have to check it out just to reaffirm my pre-established beliefs, I guess.
But thank you so much for that call.
We'll go back to your calls on the other side.
Marcus, Mark, Stephen, Jeremy in Ohio, Steve.
We'll get to all of you on the other side.
Don't go anywhere, folks. Infowars.com.
Bandai Video. Share these links.
Welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, going back out to your phone calls now.
We've got Marcus in Ohio's called in to comment about the fallout from Tuesday's election.
Thanks for calling in. Marcus, you are on the air.
unidentified
Yes, sir. Good morning. How are you, Harrison?
harrison smith
Good morning. Good, thank you. Good.
unidentified
Well, real quick first, do you ever listen to Marty Robbins outside of the intro music?
I do, yeah. I like my own native land, too.
That's a pretty good one for the times we're in.
harrison smith
You should look it up. Yeah, I have a bright red Marty Robbins record that we play pretty regularly.
unidentified
Gun ballads are fired.
Okay, anyway. Yeah, here in Ohio, I thought it was kind of crazy because I live kind of close to Dayton, which is a really rough area, and the former mayor ran for governor with Mike DeWine, or against Mike DeWine, and Dayton actually went red.
I don't know how that happened.
And another question for you, if I asked you to send me $200 in the mail.
Would you just send me the $200 cash?
harrison smith
No, probably not.
Marcus, I see where you're going with this.
unidentified
Yeah, no. But they'll send their vote.
Goofy. And then one more point I'd like to make, and then I got a couple shout-outs, if you don't mind.
Go ahead. I was reading this reported like last Wednesday, before the election.
There were like 129,000 more early votes or absentee votes in Ohio, but there was a 5% less.
I just thought that was kind of weird.
harrison smith
All right. That makes about as much sense as anything else we see from this election, yeah.
unidentified
Right. And then my shout-out, first off to the Rumble Chat, especially TimC123.
Thank you, sir. And there's a guy I see near my work in Lebanon, Ohio, wearing Alex Jones' bright shirt.
I'm the guy in the truck that honked at you looking like a crazy guy.
And if everybody could, I just started TikToking.
My account is TikTok Institute of Technology.
harrison smith
A little acronym.
A little acronym.
unidentified
Yes, sir. And then I got a quote.
I got a quote to leave us all with, if you don't mind.
Good. Treason doth never prosper.
What's the reason? Or if it prospereth, none dare call it treason.
That's from Sir John Harrington.
Out of a book called None Dare Call It Treason, John Stormer, 1964.
harrison smith
Very good stuff, as always.
Thanks for that call, Marcus.
unidentified
Thank you. Have a good one.
harrison smith
We await your next call eagerly.
Let's go now to Mark in Detroit, who wants to talk about Gen Z voters.
What is wrong with Gen Z voters, Mark?
unidentified
Harrison, how's it going? Good, thanks.
Yeah, you know, I'm just pretty sad and disappointing how awful my generation votes.
I mean, You look at the stuff they vote on.
I mean, it's the same people that put, you know, like, Happy Earth Day in their Instagram post.
Like, the same people that have the black square on their Instagram post.
Like, it's honestly disgusting.
And, like, I mean, I just graduated college, and, I mean, I was a political science major, and I had to get out of that because, like, you could be neutral on the Second Amendment, or you could be neutral on any topic in automatic speed.
And, like, you see all these radical women going into these, like, You know, these liberal arts, like, political science, or, like, any of these writers, these writing majors, and, like, it's a grip.
Like, all you gotta do is just trash Trump, like, trash the right, like, talk about how bad the American flag is.
Like, it's honestly, it is terrible, and, like, you know, and it's a consequence to the American people.
Like, you look at Michigan, you look at the three proposals that just passed, like, they are so radical.
Like, proposal three is abortion up until birth, and, like, 60% of the people voted for that.
Like, You're out of your mind.
Something's got to change. I don't know what it is.
But yeah, I'm just disappointed in my generation.
harrison smith
Me too, Mark. I'm also disappointed in your generation.
I'm disappointed in my generation as well.
It seems to be only getting worse.
And yeah, I think people sort of underestimate how pervasive the brainwashing really is.
And it's so obvious if you just look out for it.
But I remember even before, when I was in high school, Like, my older sister going off to college and coming back and saying feminist talking points and, like, getting in arguments with my dad about, like, the patriarchy.
And this was, what, 10-plus years ago?
So, I mean, and it's, like, it's wild.
It's wild to see girls go just like they're perfectly normal and happy as a high school senior, and they go to one...
Semester of college, and they come back, and their hair's cut short, and they got a bunch of piercings, and yeah, the transformation that takes place.
I mean, they literally just become ugly inside and out.
Luckily, my sister got over it.
A lot of people get over it.
But man, their brainwashing tactics are so thorough and successful in a lot of cases.
And then, like when my wife was going through architecture school, I remember like the...
The essay she would have to write about architecture would be laden with political overtones.
And if you took the wrong political position in your essay...
I remember her teachers leaving her notes where it's like, well, you would have gotten an A because the essay was good and the points she made was good.
But you chose the wrong topic.
You chose the wrong position to take on this topic.
So it wasn't even about the grade.
They're literally letting people know, look...
You can write a perfect essay.
You're still not going to get a good grade because you believe the wrong thing.
It's about what you believe. That one in particular, literally, it was like two different positions you could take.
It was clear from the beginning the school wanted you to take the liberal position.
They encouraged you to take the liberal position.
If you take the liberal position, it was just a matter of like...
You know, sort of rewording their prompt and you'd get an A, but if you took the other position, you were going to get a lower grade because they didn't want you to take this.
So it's just like giving you both options, but letting you know it'll be easier and you'll get a better grade if you take the option we want you to take.
And so then you have to express their beliefs in your essay in order to get a good grade.
And so it's, and that's for our, you know, this is a, this is an engineering degree, right?
This is a technical degree that you're getting.
getting and yet there's brainwashing political brainwashing in that curriculum so it's uh hey it's taken them decades to get this to get this level of brainwashing into place it's going to take a while to get it out but it's not going anywhere anytime soon it's only getting worse because it's a self-perpetuating sort of feedback loop that we're operating in here Thanks so much for the call, Mark. Let's get one more before we have to go here.
We've got Stephen in Florida who wants to respond to the trashing of DeSantis by Laura Loomer.
Thanks for calling in. Stephen, you're on the air.
steven in florida
Hey, good morning, Harrison.
First of all, I wanted to say, you were mentioning earlier about the Democrats with their dead candidates and dead voters.
I wouldn't be a bit surprised if they end up coming up with the Disney party with the rainbow rat as their symbol.
I wouldn't put it past them at all to do that.
harrison smith
President Mickey Mouse.
Do you think we make it to 50 presidents before we get somebody like Mickey Mouse in office?
The drones are coming.
It'll be great. It'll be wonderful.
steven in florida
Yes, sir. Yeah, I wanted to respond.
Laura Loomer was on with Owen last night, and she was really trashing DeSantis and basically saying that if it wasn't for Trump, He wouldn't have got to where he is now.
Well, yes, Trump did support him in his campaign for governor here in 2018, but I got to remind everybody, you look at DeSantis and his record here, as far as I'm concerned, and you'll hear this if you would poll people here in Florida, that DeSantis is the best governor in the whole of the United States, hands down. This man has stood up for our children with the parental rights bill that they mischaracterized as the don't stay gay bill.
He took the stand against Disney that you pointed out.
He stood up against this whole LGBTQ agenda and the critical race theory agenda.
He came out against the mask mandates with the schools, et cetera.
And I was looking up some information on him.
stephen in florida
A lot of people may not know this, but in 2011, he wrote a book called Dreams from Our Founding Fathers, First Principles in the Age of Obama.
steven in florida
And so what I'm saying is that DeSantis is the real deal.
stephen in florida
This guy, I don't see him as a politician.
steven in florida
He is a statesman.
stephen in florida
That's what the Founding Fathers loved.
steven in florida
They hated politicians.
And look at—here's the other thing.
People are talking about DeSantis and Iran in 24.
stephen in florida
I don't even see that as being in his mind right now, because remember— He wanted to point out the hypocrisy of the Biden regime with sending those 50 illegals up to Martha's Vineyard.
I think he's more concerned about the fact that our borders are still wide open and they're bringing in all these illegals and they're sending them to places like here in Florida.
harrison smith
We've got to go to commercial break here, but I completely agree with you, Stephen.
given a lot of great points.
You missed the most important part, though, and that is, of course, how hot his life is, which we discussed yesterday.
More of your phone calls still coming up in today's episode of American Journal, but first I want to go to this video by Bishop Richard Williamson Talking about the globalist coup.
So this is Bishop in the Catholic Church discussing how the globalist coup is arraigned almost universally against the Son of God, Jesus Christ.
And it's one of the things that even if you weren't particularly religious when you get into this sphere, by the time that you've spent a little while in the milieu of Politics and media and perception,
that sort of thing, you realize that all the most evil people, the people that will viciously attack you and lie about you and hate you, they really hate Jesus more than anything else.
And that's something I think we saw with Trump in a lot of ways.
Trump was not religious when he started his political campaign.
But I think he was genuinely religious by the end of it because you come in contact with evil and you realize that there's something metaphysical going on here, something spiritual happening, and you realize what unifies all these people is a real, real hatred of Christianity.
And the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
So the thing that they hate must be good.
Let's go to Bishop Richard Williamson talking about the globalist coup.
unidentified
What we've just seen in England is a globalist coup d'etat.
The globalists, that's to say the New World Order, the Frankensteins and Leuvensteins, have operated a skillful manoeuvre by which they got their puppets into power, the puppets they want in power.
Mrs. Truss would have been a puppet, but she was showing too much independence.
She was wanting to cut back taxation, whereas taxation is a key part of the program of the globalists to arrive at the worldwide tyranny which they dream of.
And she was wanting to cut taxes.
They immediately operated by their power over the world and by their power of money.
They operated a collapse, a serious shock of the stock exchange.
All the materialists, all the little materialists began panicking, and therefore that was the end of Mrs.
Truss's. The globalists are behind it.
The globalists, these godless men, are in control of England.
They're in control of the Western nations, as they're called.
They're in control of virtual control of all the nations of the world.
They've been working at it for hundreds of years.
They've been allowed to do it by people who, by Catholics who did not have enough faith to realize what was going on, or they did not have enough strength in numbers to stop what was going on.
There was a loss of faith, and as the faith declined, so the power of the enemies of God rose.
And as of today, that point has been reached, where the power of the enemies of God against Christ the King has reached almost its culmination.
harrison smith
Pretty incredible stuff and And of course, this is how the world works.
That's how the world works. I mean, faith and belief and faith, it really does create a sort of psychological network that impacts the world around you.
And so it's like having a chain with links dropping off every once in a while.
Every time somebody abandons their faith, the overall signal becomes that much weaker, and eventually it becomes ineffective.
And it was that way when Jesus came the first time.
I know we've talked about it here before, but the final prophecy by the oracle of Delphi, the most respected and revered oracle in the ancient world, essentially were like, look, the Christians are, there's too many of them.
They're too powerful now. Our signal is getting disturbed.
Basically, they were asked, like, why can't you predict things anymore?
And they're like, well, our network of Metaphysical connection has been disrupted by the influence of Christianity.
And so now the metaphysical network of Christianity is being disrupted by something else.
And as we lose faith, we lose actual earthly power.
It's pretty wild stuff.
That's what's happening. And again, a very powerful statement from Bishop Richard Williamson.
On the globalist coup. With that, we go out to your phone calls.
Tim in Seattle says we are in an open-air concentration camp.
What to do? What do we do, Tim?
unidentified
You're on the air. Well, Harrison, it was a great show again.
tim in seattle
I apologize that America is under this cognitive dissidence for everybody.
We have to be loud.
We have to take on the left.
Their model is perfect.
You know, show up in mass numbers.
Into where they're overwhelmed until we can actually gather the podium and actually speak.
Because people, they want to go over the horizon.
Nobody wants to be in this concentration camp anymore, do they?
I don't think they do, but we're helpless.
We don't have any leaders.
But if you don't have a leader, then you must become the leader.
You have to find it in yourself.
You've got to go out and in the streets, be loud, get signed.
Do what you can and make this a culture.
Make resisting the West Hand Path a culture in America, and we will win.
We will bring God back into our lives, and we will have a future for our children.
If we don't do what I'm talking about, we are an official open-air concentration camp.
harrison smith
Yep, 100%. And it's one of the things that is sort of frustrating sometimes is you get a lot of people going, oh, I want to do something.
What can I do? And it's like they're waiting for instruction.
It's like we can't instruct you, man.
You've got to be able to go out and do stuff on your own and figure out your own way to contribute to this.
Tim does it super well.
And if you go help Tim, do what he's doing.
Or go find somebody that's already doing something and help them do it.
But you can't wait around.
You know, just wait for instruction.
You have to be forward acting on all of this.
Thank you so much for the call, Tim. I do want to get to some more calls here, so we'll go a little bit quicker than normal.
Jeremy in Ohio wants to talk about the election chaos, saying the deep state is in ultimate control.
Thanks for calling in, Jeremy. You're on the air.
unidentified
Nothing but love for you, brother.
Thank you. The election chaos that we're seeing going on right now, it's not by accident.
It's on purpose.
And the reason they're trying to do this is to cause an uproar across the nation.
And everybody would call for a national election process instead of statewide.
They want to take the power out of the state's hands.
They're already trying to take the power out of the people's hands.
That's going to be the narrative after all the dust settles from this disastrous election is they're going to start pushing.
We need to nationalize it.
We need to nationalize it. Look at all the problems we're having.
We need to put it in the government's hands.
They'll take care of it. They run everything so great.
Look at the Postal Service.
It's a wonderful thing. That's my prediction.
harrison smith
They've already started to push for that.
I think you're exactly right, Jeremy.
unidentified
That's all I've got to say. Thank you for playing all the fentanyl Chinese dragon videos.
My little addict loved it.
harrison smith
Thank you so much. Yeah, our pleasure.
Thank you for the call, Jeremy. Let's get to one more call before we have to go.
Steve in Arizona wants to talk about organic brainwashing.
What does that mean, Steve? Steve in Arizona.
unidentified
Hey, Harrison.
So, organic brainwashing.
I'm a farmer in Arizona.
I grow all my own crops.
Me and my family were trying to provide a living.
I grew probably 4,000 pounds of produce this year just for my little family.
And you can give away the food and people will take it, right?
Right. And it's fine.
But what bridges the gap between a regular person and Greta Thunberg or that environmental extremism that you showed earlier?
You want to know what it is?
What? The organic label on our food.
You can give them organic food.
And they still question, is it organic or not?
And then, I'm trying.
I'm producing food for my family, man.
And they come into my house, and I have a thing of oats right there.
So what do they do?
Oh, is that organic oats?
My God! Listen, I'm trying.
I've produced more food for my family than anybody that these people know.
And they're conservative people.
But what bridges their gap Is the label on the food.
And who labels that food?
The government, the FDA, the man.
They're the ones that steam what is organic and what is not.
We innately know, don't eat pesticides, herbicides, and stuff.
And we innately know that these people are trying to kill us.
But, they're organic brainwashing, man.
It's the label. So what you have to do is, I've labeled all my food not organic.
Never use herbicides.
Never use pesticides. Never use...
Miracle growth. You see what I'm saying?
Yeah, yeah. This is what bridges the gap of extremism.
harrison smith
Yeah, and the organic label is really meaningless in a lot of cases.
I mean, you should look up what it takes to be labeled organic, and it's a lot of times not what you think it is.
Yeah, you're exactly right. Thank you so much for the call, Steve.
Well... I'll tell you something that is organic, that is all-natural, that is incredibly powerful.
It's the supplements at InfoWarsStore.com.
Go there today, and we do put a label on it.
We do tell you how powerful and good and natural it all is, and it helps you to combat all of the poison that you're getting from the non-organic food that you're eating.
So go to InfoWarsStore.com today.
Take advantage of the Black Friday Comes Early Super Sale.
Use the promo code 1776 to get an additional 10% off, and stay tuned.
unidentified
Alex Jones is about to begin. The globalists are in an absolute panic right now.
alex jones
They are attacking and suing and censoring and spying on and engaging in bullying and physical attacks against populist conservatives and Christians, not just in America, but worldwide.
And their number one most hated enemy in the media is Infowars because we know the globalist number, we know their operation, we know their modus operandi, and we know how to take them down peacefully.
We've got great products that fund the operation that also are incredibly powerful and the highest quality for your immune system and more.
We have the biggest sale of the year going right now.
Black Friday comes early. Use promo code 1776 and get up to 60% off on these best-selling products at infowarstore.com.
Biggest sale of the year, promo code 1776, up to 60% off.
Export Selection