Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Researchers at Boston University have created a new strain of COVID-19 that has an 80% kill rate in humanized mice. | ||
| According to the preprint, quote, We generated chimeric recombinant SARS-CoV-2 encoding the S gene of Omicron in the backbone of an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 isolate. | ||
| And compared this virus with the natural circulating Omicron variant. | ||
| Essentially, after an estimated 20 million people have died so far and 2.2 billion have been injured by the COVID vaccines, American virologists at Boston University are making chimeric SARS viruses even more deadly. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So joining us now to talk more about this, Dr. | |
| Monica Gandhi, professor of medicine and associate division chief of infectious diseases at UCSF. So they wanted to see if it was the spike protein mutations that made it less virulent by sticking the spike protein of COVID-19 Omicron onto the ancestral strain. | ||
| And then they found that whatever the ancestral strain had over here, beyond the spike protein, that was what was leading to virulence because this is a very deadly strain and it's very transmissible both. | ||
| It has all the worst things going for it in terms of causing disease. | ||
| So I have to say I'm a little bit worried that this is created and I think, point proven, let's destroy this now. | ||
| How concerned should Americans be about a possible lab leak? | ||
| The WHO has been very clear that we needed to have been more careful during this pandemic. | ||
| They actually said, we have to investigate, we have to ensure that all biosafety procedures, when people were working with coronaviruses, scientists were working with coronaviruses in labs, were followed. | ||
| And that is the right approach. | ||
| We can't keep on kind of fooling with viruses and make them more deadly. | ||
| It has to be done very, very carefully. | ||
| While mRNAs will be added to the food supply to genetically depopulate civilization, You can actually order these DNA sequences online. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's AdGene is offering them and Thermo Scientific and BioLabs. | |
| They literally will send it to you. | ||
| You order it and they send it to you via email. | ||
| They're using artificial genetic sequences, right? | ||
| And they have to delete certain genes in the human genome and then they code whatever the messenger RNA is coded with and we know all of them are coded with this green fluorescent protein. | ||
| Alright, so what is the goal? | ||
| What is the goal here? | ||
| They are changing the human species, attempting to genetically modify humans and treating humans like animals. | ||
| In particular, the green fluorescent protein, which comes from the firefly, that means they are actually turning people into hybridized humans with insect DNA. So the NIH is admitting to this cloning technology? | ||
| Yes. The Deagle forecast has predicted global depopulation of 50 to 80 percent by 2025. | ||
| Deagle's forecast is shrouded in mystery as to its use by the government, but WikiLeaks documents revealed that it was legitimately used As a reference material in a Stratfor report on the technological capabilities of the North People's Republic of Korea. | ||
| 17.1% more people dying in the first half of 2022 in Australia than we would expect. | ||
| And this is the same for other countries. | ||
|
unidentified
|
As a funeral dresser, I'm seeing a massive increase in death rate exclusively in young jab recipients. | |
| Do you know how many children I've had in that have died from COVID? Have a guess. | ||
| None. Not a single one. | ||
| Neither of any of my colleagues. | ||
| This is an agenda, and I would have never believed. | ||
| I was never into conspiracy. | ||
| Never. I left there knowing that they know. | ||
| They know, and they're going to push on. | ||
| You're committing murder. | ||
| You're being complicit in mass murder and hiding it. | ||
| Yes. The vote passed, 15 zeros. | ||
| Or 15-4, no against. | ||
| Excellent. Thank you. | ||
| And we have to make sure that we're ready because there will be another pandemic. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What we really want to educate people about here at Iron City Pest is rodents and the threat that they carry. | |
| For those with eyes to see and ears to hear, America is blatantly under attack. | ||
| John Bowne reporting. | ||
| Share that link, folks. Band.video. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| We'll do your daily dispatch on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to The American Journal. | ||
| Very big show we have for you today. | ||
| As ever, we'll be joined in the third hour by Phil Williams. | ||
| We'll be taking your calls throughout the show, of course, and we'll be watching a lot of video today from the debates last night. | ||
| It was a nationwide bloodbath. | ||
| There's more to learn from the responses than just the fact that Democrats are hopelessly outmatched as we approach the midterms. | ||
| And we'll get into some of those clips and what we can learn about our friends on the other side of the aisle. | ||
| But we'll begin today, as we do every day, with our Daily Dispatch. | ||
| All right, here it is, folks, for Daily Dispatch. | ||
| For Wednesday, the 26th of October, 2022, New York Supreme Court reinstates all employees fired for being unvaccinated and orders back pay. | ||
| The New York State Supreme Court has reinstated all employees who were fired for not being vaccinated, ordering back pay, and saying their rights have been violated. | ||
| The court found Monday that, quote, We're good to go. | ||
| You've made it through. This is, for many of the people in New York City, a finish line that you have now crossed. | ||
| You have resisted for as long as necessary. | ||
| So, congratulations. There was always light at the end of the tunnel. | ||
| Now, not only are you able to get your jobs back, which, frankly, why would you want to? | ||
| Why would you want to go back and work for a company that so unceremoniously fired you for not submitting to their ridiculous medical experiment? | ||
| I doubt many of these people will return to their jobs. | ||
| They've likely all moved on to better places. | ||
| They're now sitting on the beach in Florida somewhere going, why did I ever live in New York City? | ||
| What was I doing there in the first place? | ||
| That was silly of me. | ||
| So congratulations, everyone. | ||
| That's amazing. Not only now can you get your jobs back, but you actually will get back pay for the time that you... | ||
| Been unemployed, so congratulations. | ||
| And of course, this will relate to one of the topics that's discussed in the debate, as Kathy Hochul, as governor, claims that she would do the same thing all over again, which is a little bit troubling. | ||
| And again, it's almost like, well, I mean, with this, who's going to pay for this? | ||
| People's rights have been violated. | ||
| Who violated those rights, and how are we going to hold them to account? | ||
| We can't live in a country where rights are violated. | ||
| The Supreme Court has to come in and after months and months of suffering, reverse the decision, and then that's it. | ||
| We move on as if the rights weren't violated in the first place. | ||
| There has to be some sort of punishment for this. | ||
| There has to be somebody held to account for this. | ||
| There has to be an example made. | ||
| And I can think of quite a few people. | ||
| That should be spending time behind bars for this egregious violation of our most basic human rights. | ||
| It's just the beginning, and again, that will be a theme as you see the entire structure and apparatus of the New World Order crumbling pretty quickly, actually. | ||
| It's pretty incredible. This is a story that came out yesterday, but then was completely reversed, but we'll cover it Today, a little bit more. | ||
| House progressives float diplomatic path towards ending war in Ukraine, get annihilated, and quickly, quote, clarify. | ||
| So, yeah, 30 minutes of the Congressional Progressive Caucus in a letter to the White House that attempted to gingerly open a conversation about a potential diplomatic end to Russia's war in Ukraine. | ||
| The door was slammed shut by the evening, met with enough fury to elicit a clarification in the form of a statement from caucus chair Pramila Jayapal. | ||
| Let me be clear, Jayapal said in a statement issued just before 7 p.m. | ||
| We are united as Democrats in our unequivocal commitment to supporting Ukraine in their fight for democracy and freedom in the face of illegal and outrageous Russian invasion. | ||
| Nothing in the letter advocates for a change to that support. | ||
| So, yeah. It was like you had a flash of brilliance there. | ||
| A flash of... | ||
| Really political genius, in my opinion. | ||
| Just another one of these examples where the Republicans, again, are Mark McGuire walking up to a t-ball ready to knock it out of the park. | ||
| It's just sitting there waiting for the bat to come down. | ||
| And the Republicans instead decide to bunt, right? | ||
| Just don't do anything. And it happens over and over again in terms of big tech censorship or... | ||
| Any other crime in general. | ||
| I mean, there's a million things that Republicans could separate themselves from the Democrats and actually put forward a good path ahead. | ||
| Like, just no war. | ||
| You could clear things up in a lot of different ways. | ||
| And instead, it's the Democrats who propose this stuff. | ||
| Just where are the Republicans, I guess, is the question. | ||
| Where is a single Republican other than, like, Thomas Massey? | ||
| Who's actually talking about peace in Ukraine. | ||
| I don't see them, which is weird because I think a lot of people in America would rather have our government talk about peace than be an endless instigator of war. | ||
| But once again, the progressives show why their ideology is foundationally broken as they, for the umpteenth time, for the ten hundred thousandth time, Capitulate to the powers that be because that is the core of their ideology. | ||
| We have this story from Variety. | ||
| Should Kanye West's music be banned? | ||
| Kanye West continues to double down on his anti-Semitic comments and Adidas becomes the latest company to sever business ties with him. | ||
| Which, am I missing something? | ||
| What did he say that was anti-Semitic? | ||
| I honestly can't figure this out. | ||
| He said he's going to go death con 3 on Jews. | ||
| That's what he said. | ||
| Beyond that, the only statement that he made was that if you question Jews, Jews will cancel you. | ||
| Jews invented cancel culture was what he was insinuating. | ||
| And then everything that's happened since then has just proven that Accurate. | ||
| So what is the big outrage? | ||
| He didn't come out and go, Jews drink the blood of Gentile children. | ||
| Jews perform human sacrifice in their temples. | ||
| He didn't say anything outrageous. | ||
| And everything that he said is clearly true as they ridiculously try to cancel him to the extent of banning his music. | ||
| Banning his music, really? | ||
| Really? We just burn his albums while we're at it. | ||
| Maybe we just make him wear a badge on his chest so everybody knows not to trust him. | ||
| Maybe we can sort of keep him separated from the rest of the population in some sort of ghetto neighborhood. | ||
| Maybe we can just send him to a work camp. | ||
| Maybe Kanye deserves to be gassed. | ||
| I mean, what are we really pushing back against here? | ||
| The idea of anti-Semitism and Nazism or the actual practice of depersoning somebody for the I mean, we have a First Amendment in this country that's obviously quickly going away, | ||
| and how powerful is the First Amendment when it's not the government censoring you, but literally every corporation all at once combining their power to destroy you for speaking out against them. | ||
| I mean, it is truly wild, this... | ||
| This whole saga. And we're not going to spend too much time on it today, but we are going to spend some time on it. | ||
| We'll get back to it. We're going to spend a lot of time on this story. | ||
| PA Senate debate was over from Fetterman's first response, but Oz just trounced him with reality. | ||
| And it was funny getting on Twitter while this debate was going on because you actually had a funny dichotomy of, well, sort of a, I don't know, trichotomy? | ||
| what's the term a three-way um discussion about this you had republicans basically just like in shock just like oh my god i knew it was bad but i didn't realize how bad it was going to be then you had the actual like moderately still barely respectable left-wing media that was actually telling the truth and going yeah we knew it was going to be bad but it looks really bad for This is not a good look, like actually telling the truth about it. | ||
| And then you had that third group of people who are the progressive psychopath idiots who essentially took the stance of Oz's bullying John Fetterman, which I think is a good preview for how the Democrats are operating moving forward. | ||
| You can see it now, can't you? | ||
| The idiocracy-style campaign where they run a retarded person and go, you can't insult him, he's retarded! | ||
| It's just like, wait, what? | ||
| You can't run a mentally ill person and then say you can't debate him because he's mentally ill. | ||
| To the Greta Thunberg defense all over again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Makes no sense. Welcome back folks. | |
| I'm finishing off with our daily dispatch here. | ||
| Putin oversees successful annual nuclear drills. | ||
| Russia has hailed the success of Wednesday's scheduled annual nuclear drills after President Vladimir Putin oversaw the exercise from a command and control room. | ||
| RIA news agencies quoted the Kremlin as saying, under the leadership of Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, Vladimir Putin, a training session was held with ground, sea, and air strategic deterrence forces during which practical launches of ballistic and cruise missiles took place. | ||
| So again, just another set of nuclear drills bringing us ever closer to the reality of nuclear exchange over... | ||
| You know, whatever. Over whatever we're doing, you know, for whatever reason. | ||
| I don't know. You can't tell anymore. | ||
| At least in the 80s when all of America lived with a specter of nuclear annihilation and you had, you know, the drills where you'd have to get under your desk. | ||
| At least it was like we're fighting communism. | ||
| We're fighting for the existence of freedom on the world and to avoid being subsumed into some sort of System of absolute domination and authoritarianism. | ||
| But now it's just like, no, we're fighting for democracy. | ||
| What does that mean? | ||
| What is it? Democracy in Ukraine doesn't exist. | ||
| They've made it illegal to oppose them. | ||
| The ruling party completely disbanded their opposition and confiscated all of their stuff. | ||
| It's not a democracy there, so we're not fighting for that. | ||
| Europe's not even a democracy. | ||
| You've got millions of people taking to the streets demanding a change in leadership, and the leadership sends out their well-armed SWAT goons to take care of that little trouble. | ||
| It has nothing to do with democracy. | ||
| It has nothing to do with representing the will of the people. | ||
| So what are we fighting for again? The Biden's crime family? | ||
| What is this again? | ||
| George Soros' pet project in Ukraine? | ||
| Why are we doing this? | ||
| What are we pushing ourselves towards nuclear war for again? | ||
| I don't know. Maybe they'll tell us. | ||
| Maybe they'll tell us after the nuclear bomb goes off. | ||
| Finally, we have this story. Elon Musk pledges to finish Twitter purchase deal by court's Friday deadline. | ||
| Billionaire industrialist Elon Musk might actually seal the deal on his purchase of social media giant Twitter later this week. | ||
| He told a group of financiers working with him that the purchase would be completed by the October 28th deadline set by the judge. | ||
| In response to this, the employees of Twitter have issued a letter of demands That's the way they think the world works, and it's hilarious, and we'll get into that later in the show. | ||
| Let's get in now to the political sphere, the political landscape. | ||
| Let's take a look at some of these debate videos to see just how badly the Democrats are being stomped into the dirt across the nation. | ||
| It really is getting to a panic mode. | ||
| When it comes to the Democrats and what is really becoming apparent is that as if it wasn't already just completely obvious before, the concern that the so-called Democrats have for so-called democracy is the most cynical and arbitrary loyalty the world has ever seen. | ||
| And it's an interesting sort of tactic that they're taking. | ||
| So you've got Hillary Clinton. | ||
| They can only get away with this because people are brainwashed. | ||
| It's such an embarrassingly blatant manipulation and obfuscation and just flat-out lie that you really have to give them credit for just how confident in the brainwashing of the American people that they've achieved. | ||
| And it's one of those things that, you know, there's that classic Malcolm X quote where he's talking about the media, where he's saying, yeah, the Soviet Union was our best friend a couple years ago, and now they're our worst enemy. | ||
| And the way that, strictly by the stories that the media chooses to tell and the way they choose to frame things, they can have the same political entity as a celebrated ally or a Vile, hated enemy, and that can swing in a couple of months. | ||
| This is even more than that. | ||
| They spend four years saying that Donald Trump is an illegitimate president who cheated the election. | ||
| Then in 2020, that election was the most legitimate election of all time. | ||
| You're not allowed to question it. | ||
| Questioning it is terrorism. | ||
| And now they're back to the election is going to be stolen by right-wingers, and they just do this. | ||
| Again, you couldn't do this if the population wasn't brainwashed. | ||
| You couldn't get away with this level of lie if you didn't have a Pravda-level Soviet control of the entire media establishment and therefore the minds of the American people, which again is why they want to destroy Infowars, because we actually offer a Offer a way to destroy that facade that they have, that control system that they've erected. | ||
| Hillary's conspiracy theory, GOP already plans 24 election theft. | ||
| Right-wing extremists, she says, have a plan already in place to, quote, literally steal the next presidential election, and they're not making a secret of it, Hillary Clinton says in a video recently posted to Twitter. | ||
| Now, they've got nothing to actually back this up, unlike in 2020 when the cheat that was going to happen was being talked about by the likes of Donald Trump months before the election ever took place because of the mail-in ballots. | ||
| And because by August of that year, there had already been thousands of examples of mail-in ballots being lost, being manipulated, being sent in inappropriately. | ||
| Just we knew from the outset that this would be an opportunity for the Democrats to steal, only to see that come to fruition on election night as you had massive tranches in the middle of the night after they had apparently shut down voting for the night. | ||
| And everybody, they'd forced everybody to go home. | ||
| And then all of a sudden at 4 a.m., you got 100,000 votes for Joe Biden and zero for anybody else. | ||
| And it was confirmation of what we thought they were going to do in the first place. | ||
| They're just saying this. | ||
| The Hillary Clinton is just saying they're going to steal the election, just as a way to set it up to be sort of a Civil War Part 2. | ||
| Hillary Clinton says Biden should not concede the election under any circumstances. | ||
| Hillary Clinton said in a new interview that Joe Biden should not concede the 2020 presidential election under any circumstances, anticipating issues that could prolong knowing the final outcome. | ||
| Quote, Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances because I believe it's going to drag out. | ||
| I eventually do believe that he will win if we don't give an inch, if we're focused and relentless as the other side is. | ||
| He's focused and relentless. | ||
| That is one way to describe the Democrats, that's for sure. | ||
| But as much as the Democrats like to pontificate about the threat to democracy and how democracy is over if Republicans win, democracy is legitimately at risk with these people in power. | ||
| And we'll talk about it and we'll show you some videos on the other side during the debates. | ||
| This topic actually came up. | ||
| You had from just about every major... | ||
| Left-wing candidate last night, some sort of promise to completely, or at least in part, abolish the separation of powers. | ||
| You had them openly stating that we should not listen to the Supreme Court, that it doesn't matter what the Supreme Court decides, they're going to do it anyway. | ||
| And so you get to see this This new sort of so-called democracy where when the vote goes their way or when the Supreme Court decides in their favor, then that is an unquestionable fact. | ||
| It is law. | ||
| To oppose it is treason. | ||
| But when they go against you, then you just ignore them and you go with what the media wants instead. | ||
| It's essentially ruled by the unelected media is what we're headed towards. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| The Democrat panic is palpable. | ||
| And it's obvious why. | ||
| I mean, take a look at the candidates they're running, and you realize this is the best they have to offer. | ||
| This is what they got. This isn't like, well, you know, our first five candidates all died in a train accident, so now we're stuck with this guy. | ||
| No, this is the best they got. | ||
| Fetterman is the best they got. | ||
| Hochul is the best they got. | ||
| Christ is the best they got. | ||
| Joe Biden is the best they got. | ||
| And you sort of get to see the tactic that they're taking moving forward, sort of the democracy that they champion all the time, that they claim is at risk. | ||
| You get to see what it actually looks like in these debates and in the response to the debates. | ||
| In fact, you had one left-wing pundit saying, you know, being in the Senate, it's just saying yes or no. | ||
| It's just voting yes or no. | ||
| Fetterman doesn't have to be cogent. | ||
| He doesn't have to have a functioning brain. | ||
| He just has to be there to vote the way the party says. | ||
| It's like, oh, that's your whole tactic, isn't it? | ||
| You would love just a Senate full of mental incompetence that just do as they're directed by whatever shadowy force dictates your party's policies. | ||
| And it doesn't matter what the actual decision is in the Congress or in the Senate or in the Supreme Court. | ||
| Because if it's in favor of what you were going to do anyway, then you'll champion it as the results of our free and fair electoral system. | ||
| And it's codified by the Supreme Court. | ||
| It's unquestionable to address it in any terms other than absolute subservience and capitulation is treason. | ||
| But if they decide against you, then the media will just simply give you the out and say, well, we don't have to listen to the Supreme Court. | ||
| Well, the Supreme Court is, who are they? | ||
| They don't get to decide what's happening on the ground here. | ||
| You just get to ignore it. | ||
| So it's really an apparatus that they're building that is above the electoral politics, that controls the electoral politics as far as they can. | ||
| And when they fail in the electoral side, they just do it by fiat and by Mass mind control, essentially. | ||
| It's very disturbing. | ||
| Again, just a few headlines to illustrate just how disliked, hated even, Democrats are across the country. | ||
| Charlie Criss, former colleagues and subordinates, signed letters supporting DeSantis. | ||
| The choice in November cannot be more clear. | ||
| We unanimously endorse Governor Ron DeSantis for re-election, the signatories wrote. | ||
| So this is, of course, the Governorship of Florida that they're running for. | ||
| Do you remember how close it was? | ||
| How close Florida was to having a meth-spoken criminal as their governor? | ||
| Remember how close it was that DeSantis almost didn't get the governorship? | ||
| Can you imagine what a different world we'd be in? | ||
| So every one of these elections is important. | ||
| Now they're running Charlie Crist, whose own colleagues and staff who worked for him have all unanimously and without reservation endorsed his opponent. | ||
| That's just how deeply unlikable they are. | ||
| And it's ubiquitous. I mean, just look at the headlines that have come out about Kamala Harris' office since she became vice president. | ||
| Or just take a look at any time anybody contradicts Joe Biden. | ||
| Democrats are simply deeply, deeply unlikable people who on a personal level are abhorrent and revolting to anybody of decent character. | ||
| Biden press secretary says high turnout and voter suppression can take place at the same time. | ||
| Yes, they're claiming voter suppression despite record high turnout, voter turnout in places like Georgia. | ||
| Because again, their existence, their reading of reality does not comport to any facts on the ground ever, whatsoever. | ||
| I mean, it really is astonishing how these people operate in just a complete and total fantasy world. | ||
| And of course, they're It's not about democracy. | ||
| It's not about serving the people. | ||
| It is about doing whatever you possibly can to gain power over them. | ||
| Now an MSNBC host suggests the US needs foreign election monitors because the GOP is, quote, trying to destroy our democracy. | ||
| They're trying to destroy our democracy, so what we need are foreigners to come in and oversee our election. | ||
| Sure. Great. | ||
| MSNBC's Nicole Wallace suggested that foreign election monitors should oversee America's elections because the Republican Party is trying to destroy democracy. | ||
| By what? Getting elected? Do you think it's time to ask friends and allies to come over and help us monitor our elections? | ||
| These people are so treasonous. | ||
| It's actually astonishing. | ||
| And do you think that their response would be any different if actual civil war broke out in this country? | ||
| This is a prediction we've made for a very long time, which is if there were to actually be some sort of struggle for American supremacy between the actual patriots of this country and the globalist goons that are trying to take it over, the Democrats wouldn't hesitate a single second in inviting all sorts of foreigners. | ||
| They'll invite Chinese people, they'll probably invite Russians in to take out the patriotic Americans who stand in the way of their total control. | ||
| A mail vote time bomb in Pennsylvania is the headline from Wall Street Journal. | ||
| Divided government has prevented Pennsylvania from substantially updating its voting laws since the election mess of 2020. | ||
| Oh, was it a mess? I must have missed that. | ||
| I heard it was the most secure election of all time. | ||
| I was under the impression it was treason to suggest otherwise, but I guess things are changing now that they're about to lose. | ||
| We'll spin the roulette wheel again in November. | ||
| Imagine if control of the Senate comes down to John Fetterman and Mehmet Oz with a judge asked to decide whether to count undated mail ballots. | ||
| Well, luckily, you don't have to guess because the Supreme Court... | ||
| The story begins with a Pennsylvania judicial election from 2021. | ||
| Republican David Ritter led by 71 ballots, but there were 257 mail ballots on which voters did not handwrite a date. | ||
| The Pennsylvania judiciary has held that dating is mandatory because the law tells voter to fill out date and sign. | ||
| Yet a Third Circuit Court of Appeals held this May that refusing to count those 257 votes would breach the Civil Rights Act. | ||
| Adding to the general spirit of mayhem was the timing. | ||
| The Third Circuit rushed out its judgment amid the disputed Russian primary between Oz and McCormick if the court intentionally sought to upend how the GOP ballots were being counted at that moment. | ||
| The Supreme Court declined to stay the Third Circuit with a dissent by three conservatives. | ||
| The Third Circuit's view is likely very wrong, said Justice Samuel Alito wrote. | ||
| If left undisturbed, it would affect the outcome of the fall elections. | ||
| It would be far better for us to address that interpretation before rather than after. | ||
| It has that effect. | ||
| But you've got other people in Pennsylvania saying, you know, we're going to count them anyway. | ||
| It doesn't matter what the Supreme Court says. | ||
| We're going to do whatever the hell we want, which is what they did with the mail-in voting in the first place. | ||
| Nothing they did to bring about mail-in voting was legal. | ||
| Nothing followed the legitimate process. | ||
| They just did it by fiat. | ||
| Secretary of State just decided, didn't take a vote, didn't let it go to debate, and if you opposed it, you were castigated as, again, as someone treasonous, as conspiracy theorist, as somebody who wanted people to die waiting in line to vote because you just love COVID so much. | ||
| So again, just the way the language is used is so absurd and outrageous, and yet it continues. | ||
| But it's getting bad for Democrats all over the country, even in places that are hardcore Democrat At their base, Democrats scramble to avert shock Senate loss in Washington state. | ||
| Incumbent Patty Murray's support has slipped in recent weeks, prompting outside groups to pour in millions to prevent a sleeper victory by Republican Tiffany Smiley. | ||
| Democrats are adding millions in television spending to boost Senator Patty Murray, a sign that the party is employing a take-no-chances approach, even in solidly blue Washington state. | ||
| The 30-year veteran of the Senate is facing a challenge from Republican Tiffany Smiley, a political newcomer whose campaign is seized on quality-of-life issues from urban crime and homelessness to inflation, to tarnish Murray. | ||
| In recent public polling, Smiley has closed a sizable gap since the summer when Murray led by 18 percentage points in an 18-candidate all-party primary. | ||
| Senate Times poll released last week showed Murray slipping slightly from 51% in a July survey to 49% now, with Smiley support increasing from 33% in the summer to 41% now. | ||
| So they're moving up. | ||
| And again, it's not because Republicans are... | ||
| Have some devious tricks, not because they have total control of the mainstream media and they're, you know, just pumping out pro-Republican talking points all the time. | ||
| Quite the opposite. It's just the falsehood that the media portrays cannot break through to the reality that everything the Democrats do makes life noticeably and tangibly worse for the people under them. | ||
| And finally, we have this. | ||
| Nancy Pelosi waves off bad polling numbers for Dems, saying, I dismissed that. | ||
| Yeah, they're just dismissing it. | ||
| Because who cares about polling numbers and the will of the people when you can just cheat to win? | ||
| Oh, you can't add truckloads of mail-in ballots to polling numbers, can you? | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Final segment of this hour. | ||
| We'll go to these videos of the debates from last night. | ||
| to support everything that we do here. | ||
| The 1776 Super Sale continues. | ||
| You're getting up to 50% off plus double Patriot points to help fund the tip of the spear. | ||
| This is a crucial moment for us and we need your sponsorship and support to make it over the line now more than ever. | ||
| It's essential to keep InfoWars on the air so we can continue to defend the First Amendment. | ||
| We have sales in our top products for 40% to 50% off. | ||
| Plus, you can receive an additional 10% off any item in the store by using the promo code 1776. | ||
| Survivor Shield X3, the incredible nascent iodine, is 50% off. | ||
| Brain Force Ultra is 50% off. | ||
| Brain Force Plus 50% off. | ||
| DNA Force Plus 50% off. | ||
| Fizzy Magnesium as well as 50% off. | ||
| Of course, we've gone over the importance of magnesium and these things. | ||
| You might think you eat healthily. | ||
| You might think that you have a good diet, but the way that food is harvested and grown now, it is completely deprived of its nutritional value. | ||
| So you might not know that you need to supplement some of these things. | ||
| You might not realize that you're not getting enough magnesium, but once you supplement and once you are getting enough magnesium, you realize what it is that you've been missing. | ||
| It's like when you get a new mattress and you suddenly sleep well for the first time in a long time and you're like, that's what sleep is supposed to be? | ||
| That's how I'm supposed to feel when I wake up in the morning? | ||
| Is that good? I had no idea. | ||
| I thought it was normal to just be unrested all the time. | ||
| It's one of those things where if you don't have anything to compare it to, you think that's just the way you feel all the time. | ||
| But once you actually supplement and make up for the lack of nutrition in your daily diet, you realize what you've been missing the entire time. | ||
| So... Realize what you've been missing the entire time right now by going to infowarsstore.com and purchasing some of the supplements that are just necessary in today's world. | ||
| No matter how healthily you eat, no matter how well you take care of yourself, you should be supplementing because it's the only way to get the requisite required amount of things like magnesium, which no longer exist in our diet to the requisite degree. | ||
| Now we're going to go to some of these videos, but We almost don't even need to as the headlines tell us enough. | ||
| Red State says PA-Senate debate was over from Fetterman's first response, but Oz just trounced him with reality. | ||
| InfoWars has this report. | ||
| Oz odds of winning PA soar after historic Fetterman debate meltdown. | ||
| That was a repost from Zero Hedge there. | ||
| Yeah, Dixon and Whitmer also debated last night as well. | ||
| As Zeldin and Hochul in the state of New York. | ||
| But back to the Fetterman debate. | ||
| Political playbook. How much will John Fetterman's rocky night matter? | ||
| It was a bit of a rocky night. | ||
| Bit of a rocky night, you might say. | ||
| We'll show you just how rocky that is. | ||
| But the PA Senate debate last night moved to markets. | ||
| This is from Predict It, which is where people go to actually bet on So, you know, this is real money involved. | ||
| People who do these odds have to be sure about what they're doing because if they're wrong, they lose a ton of money. | ||
| And you can see the just massive rise of chances of odds winning and massive collapse of Fetterman winning after the debate last night. | ||
| A one-day move of huge significance. | ||
| Just the News has this report. | ||
| Oz shines. Fetterman falters in Pennsylvania debate critical to determining control of U.S. Senate. | ||
| The Philadelphia Inquirer seems to be the only publication in America that actually thought that Fetterman did a good job. | ||
| Not even that he blew it out of the water, but that he was just okay. | ||
| It was basically nothing but the Philadelphia Inquirer and then all of the, ironically, strangely, bizarrely enough, all of the social media influencers that were at the White House that fill up my Twitter feed now. | ||
| Literally, I don't follow any of them. | ||
| But they all get forced into my Twitter feed, and every single one of them was posting things like, Fetterman just destroyed Oz last night. | ||
| Wow, that was amazing. | ||
| Did he, though? Let's go to the clips, shall we? | ||
| Should we see how honest you really are? | ||
| Where should we start? Jeez, there's a lot of good places to start here. | ||
| The news is most embarrassing. | ||
| This, honestly, is just horrifically embarrassing. | ||
| Let's start with clip number nine. | ||
| This is the intro to the debate. | ||
| Clip number nine with John Fetterman and his opening remarks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Senator, you have 60 seconds. | |
| Hi. Good night, everybody. | ||
| All right. | ||
| See ya. | ||
| Thanks Frankenstein. | ||
| Good job. | ||
| Yeah, that was the, uh, that was the opening there. | ||
| Hi, everyone. Good night. I mean, literally. | ||
| And they're just like, you can't make fun of him. | ||
| He's mentally challenged. | ||
| He had a stroke four months ago. | ||
| Maybe you shouldn't be running him for the Senate. | ||
| Maybe you shouldn't be putting him in this position. | ||
| But this is it's it is like the Greta Thunberg tactic where you put out a child to make arguments and you say we have to do what this child says. | ||
| This child has all the answers. | ||
| We have to do what she says. | ||
| And then other people go, what this stupid child? | ||
| She's an idiot. | ||
| And it's just like, whoa, she is a child. | ||
| How dare you, sir? | ||
| So, yeah, they put out. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How dare you? | |
| I'm just a child. | ||
| Then why are you talking? Go away. | ||
| If you're putting yourself out here like this, then you have to contend with politics. | ||
| I mean, that's just how it is. But this is the tactic they're taking. | ||
| And it's obvious why. | ||
| Because they can't win on, like, actual argument. | ||
| So they just put out somebody who can't argue and then say, he's retarded. | ||
| You're not allowed to argue with him. | ||
| Really is bizarre. But he got cleared, apparently, for the debate. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number six. Here's Fetterman making a very cogent remark about whether he is mentally capable of even doing the debate, let alone serving as a senator. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Again, my Dr. | |
| Dr. L believes that I'm fit to be serving, and that's what I believe is where I'm standing. | ||
| That wasn't a sentence. | ||
| No, that was a good try, but that was not a sentence, no. | ||
| My doctoral believes I'm fit to be serving, and that's what I believe where I'm standing. | ||
| Okay. Good to know. | ||
| Good to know. Now, this... | ||
| This is an interesting clip. | ||
| This clip sort of throws me for a loop here. | ||
| Clip number five. Democrat John Fetterman says, I do not believe in supporting the Supreme Court, which is weird, but also I don't think that's what he meant to say. | ||
| So we're in this weird twilight zone where it's like, well, I think what he meant to say was this. | ||
| Which is something I agree with, but what he actually said is this, which is something I don't agree with. | ||
| So do we go with what he meant to say and is mentally incapable of forming, or what he actually said but doesn't believe? | ||
| If you're a Democrat, I guess it doesn't matter because you're convinced that if you don't vote for John Fetterman, then Dr. | ||
| Oz himself is going to rip your uterus out, or whatever you people believe. | ||
| I don't know. You're all stupid. | ||
| You're all... Special education. | ||
| So I guess, you know, it doesn't matter anymore what people actually say versus what they mean. | ||
| But for the sake of pretending we still live in a thinking democracy with informed human beings making decisions on topics that matter, we'll go to this clip, clip number five, as John Fetterman says something ridiculous that I don't think he meant to say. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think it's critical that we be consistent, and I do not believe in supporting the Supreme Court. | |
| Mr. Rodgers? So, again, the question, as you can read at the bottom of the screen there, was, do you believe in expanding the Supreme Court? | ||
| So I think what he meant to say is, I do not believe in expanding the Supreme Court, but what he says, I do not believe in the Supreme Court, which is actually more in line with the rest of his Democratic colleagues. | ||
| Who believe that the Supreme Court is full of insurrectionist white supremacists like Clarence Thomas that are just desperate to force women into a hands-made tale fantasy world. | ||
| So they don't actually support the Supreme Court and they think that when the Supreme Court decides against them, it is then therefore an illegitimate organization that must be filled up with four or five extra Democrat seats just to make sure they decide the right way from now on. | ||
| So, kind of confusing. If he's saying he doesn't support enlarging the Supreme Court, then that's a good thing, but that's not what he said. | ||
| Again, I don't know. What do you do with somebody who has a mental disability but wants to be a Senator of the United States? | ||
| Do you just... It's worked out pretty good for AOC. Hey, hey now. | ||
| If you think about it, it's ultimately kind of the same thing, right? | ||
| Where AOC, you know, is kind of the front, the facade to the people behind her, you know, as is Joe Biden, and Fetterman will be nothing different. | ||
| Yeah, you know, you're right. I mean, this is the Democratic ideal. | ||
| This is the Democrat democracy that they're championing. | ||
| This is what they say is a threat if Republicans get into office. | ||
| They want a bunch of morons in office who don't know crap about anything, who just vote the way that they're told. | ||
| She makes a hell of a mixed drink, though. | ||
| Does she? Does she make a hell of a mixed drink? | ||
| I don't know. I seriously doubt she was... | ||
| Compton, a bartender, as she is a congresswoman, that is to say. | ||
| I wouldn't drink anything she makes. | ||
| We're going to get into more of these videos on the other side, including the clip of the night, which was Fetterman's answer to the fracking debate as to whether or not he believes in fracking. | ||
| Again, It's impossible to tell what the truth is. | ||
| It's possible to tell whether he's saying what he means or whether he doesn't know what he's saying or whether he even believes anything at all. | ||
| The Philadelphia Inquirer tells us this was a powerful and important and good performance by Fetterman. | ||
| I'll let you decide with more clips. | ||
| Welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, second hour of American Journal has begun. | ||
| We will open up the phone lines at this hour. | ||
| But first, we'll go back to these videos of the debates. | ||
| Last night, you had Kathy Hochul debating Zeldin there in New York, Fetterman versus Oz in Pennsylvania, and Dixon versus Whitmer in Michigan. | ||
| It was a universally one-sided blowout in the terms of Republican victories. | ||
| Because, well, the Democrats are just universally stupid. | ||
| It really is kind of shocking. | ||
| Not just stupid. I shouldn't say that. | ||
| Mean-spirited, heartless, callous, and cruel. | ||
| You have to be. | ||
| You have to be the most wicked woman ever to sit there and watch your husband falter because you're so desperate to For power. | ||
| I mean, it's the Jill Biden effect all over the place. | ||
| Instead of shielding their mentally ill husbands from public embarrassment over and over again, they would rather subject them to that because of the power it gives them. | ||
| It really is vicious. But again, the Philadelphia Inquirer really gives you an insight into the mindset of these freaks. | ||
| They say, quote, look, it's clear Fetterman's post-stroke speaking abilities haven't caught up with the rapid-fire format of today's debate, and that will likely hurt him. | ||
| Yeah, it was that rapid-fire format. | ||
| It's the rapid-fire format's fault. | ||
| It was just too fast, too run and gun. | ||
| I mean, the man's supposed to be a senator, not some sort of, you know, cowboy. | ||
| He's not out there drawing and firing and quick-witted and... | ||
| You know, intelligent. He's just trying to be a senator. | ||
| Okay. All right. | ||
| All right. So let's take a look at this rapid-fire debate that he was barely keeping up with. | ||
| This, of course, was the best clip out of the entire night, to give you an example of just who's contending against each other. | ||
| Clip number seven, Fetterman's embarrassing fracking answer that... | ||
| Really probably just tanked his entire campaign right here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Mr. Oz, I do want to clarify something. | |
| You're saying tonight that you support fracking, that you've always supported fracking, but there is that 2018 interview that you said, quote, I don't support fracking at all. | ||
| So how do you square the two? | ||
| I do support fracking, and I don't—I don't— I support fracking, and I stand, and I do support fracking. | ||
| Okay, thank you, Mr. I support fracking, I don't, I don't, I do, I stand, and I support fracking. | ||
| Amazing. And it only took him about 20 seconds of silence before he actually answered that. | ||
| Of course, that's not true, and it's a complete lie, and everything they say is lies, so why should that be any different? | ||
| Let's go to clip number 18 now, as we see just how stalwart he has been a supporter of fracking in the previous days. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I've always supported fracking. | |
| I don't support fracking at all, and I never have. | ||
| Yeah, I called for a moratorium on fracking. | ||
| There's no such thing as a green fracker. | ||
| I'm not pro-fracking. | ||
| 2016 fracking moratorium pledge that Fetterman signed for an environmental watchdog group as well as a 2016 tweet he sent while running for U.S. Senate. | ||
| I don't support fracking. | ||
| I think it's something that has to eventually go away, and I would like to see it Now, in the debate, he said he does support fracking, which probably most of his supporters don't. | ||
| It's just, you know, it's just one of those things. | ||
| It's just like, how are you even supposed to respond to politicians We go from, I don't support fracking and I never have, to, I do support fracking and I always have, without the blink of an eye and without being called out by fact-checkers in the mainstream media and without being condemned for this and without it even being criticized. | ||
| In fact, the Philadelphia Inquirer calls this a few muddled answers. | ||
| He had some muddled answers there. | ||
| Yeah, it was a little bit muddled. His brain is muddled. | ||
| You deal with them the same way you deal with the changeling and the thing. | ||
| I don't know that movie. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Use of my head. Oh, good lord. | |
| Yeah, brilliant. A brilliant performance. | ||
| Well done, Fetterman. You win, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. | ||
| Just to make something clear. Welcome back, folks. | ||
| Second hour of American Journal has begun. | ||
| We'll open up the phone lines here in this segment. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| What did you think of the debates last night? | ||
| What do you think the chances are that Republicans will have a red wave this November? | ||
| And what do you think the Democrats will do to prevent it and to maintain their hold on power? | ||
| You think they wouldn't release a virus from the Boston lab? | ||
| I mean, they did it once. | ||
| You don't think they'd do it again? But let's make something very clear here. | ||
| There is nothing compassionate about the things the Democrats believe. | ||
| They cloak their beliefs and their policies in the words of compassion. | ||
| They claim to be compassionate. | ||
| But it's not compassionate to support policies that spread misery and strife and poverty and violence and hatred and conflict. | ||
| It's not compassionate to release a murderer onto the street to let him murder again. | ||
| You might feel compassion towards the murderer, but you're also subjecting a family to Murder. | ||
| It's not compassionate to free a murderer and allow them to murder again. | ||
| It's not compassionate to open up the border and give billions of dollars to human traffickers as they flood our streets with fentanyl that kills 100,000 people a year. | ||
| It's not compassionate to kill your baby in the womb. | ||
| None of this is compassionate. | ||
| Compassion has nothing to do with it. | ||
| It's manipulation. It's confusion. | ||
| It's Putting a compassionate mask on a vicious and hateful ideology. | ||
| But there's nothing compassionate about allowing chaos to reign. | ||
| There's nothing compassionate about Like, there's nothing compassionate about any of this. | ||
| But that's all they have to go on. | ||
| The only argument they have is we're nice and they're mean. | ||
| And that's what they go with. | ||
| Well, there's nothing nice about allowing your country to collapse. | ||
| There's nothing nice about a thousand extra murders a year. | ||
| There's nothing compassionate about old women getting kicked onto train tracks or smashed in the head with hammers walking down the street. | ||
| There's nothing compassionate about supporting the institutional allowance of this to take place. | ||
| There's nothing compassionate about this. | ||
| But that's the only way they can frame things because they want – they are desperate. | ||
| They need to portray Republicans as heartless, vicious monsters that just for no reason want women to be second-class citizens and minorities to suffer. | ||
| I mean, it makes no damn sense whatsoever, and yet it's the only argument they have. | ||
| They need you to believe this because if you actually look at the facts on the ground and which policy is compassionate to the people that have to live under it, It's obvious who the real compassionate party is. | ||
| And it's not the people who are firmly on the side of abortionists, criminals, sex traffickers, corrupt politicians, corporate overlords. | ||
| You people are not compassionate. | ||
| You people are vicious beyond explanation. | ||
| But according to this... | ||
| Philadelphia Inquirer, they say the directness of Fetterman's support for a living wage, unions, college debt relief, compassionate immigration policies, and ensuring reproductive rights showed this debate was between a candidate with a heart issue and an opponent who barely has one. | ||
| Fetterman doesn't have a heart issue. | ||
| He's got a brain issue. | ||
| If this was a... | ||
| If this was strange, maybe the guy's name confused them. | ||
| We are not in The Wizard of Oz. | ||
| This is not... The straw man versus the tin man. | ||
| But that's the way that they're making it. | ||
| One candidate who's in desperate need of a brain versus one candidate who's in desperate need of a heart. | ||
| Although, again, there's nothing compassionate about debt relief for people who took on a debt that they can't pay. | ||
| You're just subsidizing failure. | ||
| You're just subsidizing irresponsibility. | ||
| Again, nothing compassionate about that. | ||
| In the same way, there's nothing compassionate about letting your brother or sister live in your house and eat all your food and not get a job and waste their life away playing video games. | ||
| Sure, it's what they want. | ||
| It's not good for them, though. | ||
| Is it really compassionate to allow them to be a parasite to you while they destroy their own lives? | ||
| No. There's nothing compassionate about immigration policies of an open border. | ||
| What do they think compassion means? | ||
| What do they think any of this means? | ||
| There's nothing compassionate about allowing criminal cartels who are a full-on terrorist organization to traffic children by the thousands without their guardians or parents with them. | ||
| There's nothing compassionate about allowing that to continue. | ||
| So let's just cut that off right now. | ||
| But again, they not only want to claim that Fetterman is being compassionate by supporting things like the union. | ||
| Oh, he has so much compassion. | ||
| He wants mobsters to control the way that your company votes. | ||
| Incredible. Again, there's nothing compassionate about abortion. | ||
| The compassionate thing would be to help people get through it, not to kill a baby. | ||
| But they say, Fetterman has repeatedly said that in January he will be much better following his stroke, but Dr. | ||
| Oz is still going to be a fraud. | ||
| Well, Fetterman got better the longer the debate went on, too. | ||
| He struggled. More than many were comfortable with, I'm sure, they say. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. When you're voting for a senator, when you're voting for one of 50 people who decide the course of this nation, amongst the other branches of government. | ||
| You mean one of 100? Yeah. | ||
| What do you mean? There are 100 senators. | ||
| Oh, 100 senators, yeah, that's right. I've seen 50 states. | ||
| Yeah, one of 100 that decide the course of the nation. | ||
| You should be uncomfortable if they're like, no, trust me, in January I'll be able to talk. | ||
| No, trust me, in January the words will make sense. | ||
| In January, just trust me on this one. | ||
| This stroke's going to clear right up. | ||
| Oh, yeah. That's one thing we know about strokes, right? | ||
| It happened once and then it's just, you're in the clear from then on out. | ||
| Just incredible. But he says this, he struggled more than many were comfortable with, I'm sure, but that says more about us than him. | ||
| It's our fault. It's our fault for not wanting to vote for a mental incompetent. | ||
| It's our fault. I'm telling you folks, I don't, I know people get offended at the word. | ||
| So I won't use it, okay? | ||
| It's like they are literally running for a special needs person, a mentally disabled individual. | ||
| I don't like it. No, they are. | ||
| I'm sorry. This is not a metaphor. | ||
| This is just reality. They are running a mentally incompetent person and then saying, wow, that says more about you that you're worried about as mental incompetent. | ||
| Gee, I didn't realize you were so judgmental and heartless. | ||
| This is equity. It's equity. | ||
| This is equal outcome. | ||
| We don't have equal representation for retarded people in the Senate, and we need it with John Fetterman. | ||
| They're literally saying we are running a mentally incompetent person, but it really says more about you than him that that bothers you, okay? | ||
| It's just disturbing. All this is just weird and disturbing. | ||
| Fetterman was asked, clip number eight here, about not paying his taxes. | ||
| And his answer... | ||
| It's one thing when you're a politician and you can sort of duck and weave questions. | ||
| You can seem like you're answering the question without actually answering it. | ||
| There's a certain skill and finesse that it takes. | ||
| Some people are really advanced at it, like they're really good at it. | ||
| Other people aren't. For example, you can take like Jen Psaki and... | ||
| Jean-Pierre, right? Saki would run you around in circles. | ||
| Completely avoid the question, but at the end of the day, she would seem like authoritative and like she actually said something. | ||
| People would be sitting there going, wait, did she answer that question? | ||
| I don't know. And then you got Karine Jean-Pierre who's just like, that question confuses and scares me, and I'm moving on. | ||
| It's just like, wow, that wasn't very finessed. | ||
| That wasn't very nuanced, was it? | ||
| It was kind of just blatant. | ||
| So here we see John Fetterman kind of, I guess, trying to do the politician thing and duck and weave his way around a question, but he ends up just answering a question that wasn't asked and not even remotely breaching the question that was put to him. | ||
| So here he is asked about not paying his taxes. | ||
| His answer? About something else entirely. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. A 15-second rebuttal. | |
| He has specifically said you have not paid your taxes and that you want to raise taxes on Americans. | ||
| How do you respond? Absolutely. | ||
| The Oz rule, of course he's lying, it was helping two students 17 years ago to help them, you know, buy their own homes. | ||
| They didn't pay the bills and it got her paid and it has never been an issue in any of the campaign before. | ||
| It was all about non-profit. | ||
| All right, thank you, Mr. | ||
| Fetterman. Bam! Mic drop! | ||
| Nailed it! Nailed it! | ||
| Totally batted that one down. | ||
| What? What was that? | ||
| What was that answer? | ||
| What just happened? | ||
|
unidentified
|
The song goes out to John Fetterman. | |
| Better luck next time, fella. | ||
| You have been defeated by the Wizard of Oz. | ||
| Go home, won't you? | ||
| Just go home. You know, I think one of the things that confuses people or gives legitimacy to the lie that Republicans are somehow heartless is that there's a difference between your personal life and politics, right? I would never, ever, in my entire life, I would never mock somebody who's had a stroke. | ||
| I would never belittle them or Look down on them. | ||
| I know people in my life have had strokes, and it's a brutal and horrific thing to go through, and a lot of times their mind is just as sharp as ever, but their body can't form the words in the way that they used to, and it really is a troubling thing. | ||
| So in your personal life, you'd never mock somebody like that or claim that they were... | ||
| Unworthy of appreciation or anything of the sort. | ||
| This isn't our personal life. | ||
| This is politics. | ||
| This is deciding the fate of our nation. | ||
| This is deciding who controls the levers of power. | ||
| And when the Democrats are running a stroke victim who is incapable of forming sentences or even pronouncing words or seemingly understanding what's being put to him, that is unacceptable. | ||
| And you have to call it out. | ||
| And you have to put your foot down. | ||
| In the same way that If you were to meet somebody who's been run out of their home and is having trouble, of course you'd have compassion for that person. | ||
| You'd want to do something in your own personal life to help them. | ||
| But when it comes to the southern border of the United States, it's not about personal compassion. | ||
| It's not about what you would do in your personal life with somebody that you know is struggling. | ||
| It's about maintaining the security of a nation. | ||
| You have to put away your Instinct on a personal level and approach things on a geopolitical level, approach things on a no-nonsense, serious business level. | ||
| And I mean, it's the same in business in a lot of ways, although in business even there's a little bit more room for nuance as far as I'm concerned, where you can make decisions that might not be the best thing for your company. | ||
| But at the end of the day, you know, companies wouldn't exist if they're CEOs treated their employees in the same way that they treat their family because you can't fire your family. | ||
| You can fire your employees because what's important is that the company be profitable so everybody gets paid and everybody can live a good life and everybody can have security and stability and know that their paycheck's coming in and all that sort of thing. | ||
| That's the important thing. That's what you need to prioritize. | ||
| So in this case, what you need to prioritize is not How good you feel. | ||
| Like, I'm such a good person. | ||
| I'm so compassionate. I'm going to vote for a brain-dead idiot for senator. | ||
| That's just how compassionate I am. | ||
| There's nothing compassionate about that. It's just stupid. | ||
| It's just stupidity. In your personal life, be as compassionate as you want. | ||
| When it comes to politics, just like when it comes to business, you have to have a clearer mind. | ||
| You have to have a more straightforward and hard-line stance on things. | ||
| And it's the injecting of... | ||
| So-called compassion into this stuff that, again, it just makes everything worse because your compassion is not useful when it comes to politics. | ||
| It is to a certain degree, but you people don't have compassion where it actually matters. | ||
| You people don't actually care about things like peaceful protesters who've never heard anybody in their lives Not being able to see their child's first birthday, not being able to be there for their child's first day at school because they're sitting in a concrete box as political prisoners. | ||
| You celebrate that. | ||
| You laugh at that. You think that's deserved and good. | ||
| You don't actually have compassion where it matters. | ||
| You don't actually have compassion when it actually counts, when it's not convenient for you, when it's actually about taking your humanity and bringing it above politics. | ||
| That you don't care about. | ||
| We're going to go out to some phone calls here. | ||
| I just saw that Hobbs in Nebraska disagrees with me. | ||
| We're going to go to him first and disabuse him of that concept. | ||
| Thank you for calling in. Hobbs, you're on the air. | ||
| Hey, good morning, Harrison. | ||
| Good morning, InfoWarriors. | ||
| It is, in fact, your boy. | ||
| I just, before... | ||
| We'll get into it if you'll allow me to impose myself upon you and the Infowars audience. | ||
| If y'all are listening on Rumble, and you should be, I would kindly ask you to go over to the search bar, click on Channels, type in Rhodes, the number 2, Liberty, all one word, The only channel that'll pop up is our Rumble channel, and I would be very appreciative if everybody went and subscribed to it. | ||
| It costs nothing, and it would give me a thumbs up if we're not wasting our time over there. | ||
| I would appreciate it very much. | ||
| Is it Roads to Liberty, R-O-S-E? No. | ||
| No, Roads, like the Roads you drive on. | ||
| Oh, Roads, okay. Roads to Liberty. | ||
| Got it. Thank you. Yes, yes. | ||
| So anyways, what I disagree with you about is at the beginning of the show you were talking about how people like John Fetterman and Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden, you were saying that they're the best that the Democrats got. | ||
| And I have to say that I disagree with you there. | ||
| We know that the globalists slash deep-state slash Democrats out there, but I repeat myself, we know that they have more competent, capable people. | ||
| It's just that they prefer to be the ones in the shadows with their liver-spotted hands on the marionette strings of people like Joe Biden and John Fetterman. | ||
| And because they can exercise a lot more power that way by putting up a front man who clearly doesn't know where they're at. | ||
| And it's also because I believe, and I've been calling into your show and your predecessor, David Knight, about this concept for a while since I've been calling into the show. | ||
| And I believe that it is because we are in the midst of a full-blown demoralization of Humiliation ritual in this country. | ||
| They're putting forth these people like Betterment, Biden, and Nancy Pelosi and all these other mummified fossils that are only being kept alive by a pharmacist's cocktail of God knows what. | ||
| And they're cheating to win, both in the overt cheating by the ballot harvesting and mail-in ballots and by, I guess what you could call, in-kind donations that the media gives them. | ||
| Shaping the narrative so that people, like you were saying, believe that going out and voting for Fetterman may not be the smart thing to do, but it's the moral and righteous thing to do. | ||
| So they're putting these people up there because they are trying to erode our faith in our institution. | ||
| That's the entire point of it. | ||
| No, I think you are exactly right, Hobbs. | ||
| I think you hit the nail on the head there, and really great stuff. | ||
| I do want to go to other calls, but again, go to Rumble and type in Rhodes, the number two, Liberty, and follow Hobbs for more fantastic insight like that. | ||
| Thank you so much for that call, Hobbs. | ||
| I do appreciate it. Let's go to Marcus in Ohio now. | ||
| He always has some sort of fun game for us to play. | ||
| Marcus, thanks for calling in. | ||
| You're on the air. Marcus, are you there? | ||
| Come in, Marcus. He probably stepped away from his phone. | ||
| Let's keep him on the line, but we'll go to Tim in Ontario first. | ||
| Tim in Ontario, thank you for calling in. | ||
| You want to talk about Epic Rap Battles? | ||
| You're on the air. Hey, yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks for taking my call. | |
| I just wanted to quickly plug a YouTube channel, Epic Rap Battles History. | ||
| They do satire, and they got special effects, good actors in their music videos. | ||
| It's like the Babylon Bee of rap battles. | ||
| They got Trump versus Hillary. | ||
| Trump vs. Biden. | ||
| Yeah, they were really big a couple years ago. | ||
| I imagine they're still doing their thing. | ||
| But yeah, that's a fun channel. | ||
| What about it made you want to call in and tell us about it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I just wanted to bring some levity to the situation. | |
| I actually was trying to call in the other day when Owen was kind of in a bad mood. | ||
| Thought that might cheer him up. | ||
| All right, excellent. Well, we'll take your advice. | ||
| Epic Rap Battles of History. | ||
| We should do one of these. | ||
| Wow, this looks silly. | ||
| Maybe we'll come in on the next segment with this. | ||
| We'll see. All right, thank you for the call, Tim. | ||
| We'll go back to your calls, starting with Marcus in Ohio. | ||
| He'll actually get by his phone this time. | ||
| We'll be right back, folks. Don't go anywhere. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is the American Journal. | ||
| I feel like what we need to do What would be a really popular podcast would be profiling just recent crimes, like a true crime podcast where they actually talk about and go out and interview and discuss the way that people's lives have been destroyed. | ||
| By crime. And you could basically make a whole podcast where, you know, once a week you come out with an episode and you maybe cover five cases per week, maybe just one case a week, but there's plenty of cases to cover where every case would be a victim of a crime... | ||
| That was committed by somebody who had recently been let out of prison or been let off on bail or been, you know, excused from some latter crime or just has a long history of crime. | ||
| Because practically every one of the just horrific, random, violent, life-destroying crimes involves somebody with a rap sheet with 40, 50 different charges. | ||
| They are just a nuisance, a menace to society. | ||
| They are just a continual drain on our resources and our safety and our ability to function as a And time and time again, they get caught, they get arrested, they go through the process, they get assigned a lawyer, they go to the bail form and it's just tens of thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours going into just slapping this person on the wrist and letting them out on the street where they murder again. | ||
| But the important part of this podcast would be the individuals affected by the violent crime because so little attention is paid to these people. | ||
| One of the big things from the debates last night was Kathy Hochul, governor of New York, who was appointed governor. | ||
| I love the way actual Justice Warrior put it. | ||
| He was like, because Cuomo was so bad at flirting with women. | ||
| Andrew Cuomo was so bad at flirting with women that now we have Kathy Hochul as governor of New York. | ||
| So she was never elected in the first place. | ||
| But she, in the debate last night, said... | ||
| I don't get why you're so obsessed with putting people in prison. | ||
| And it's like, well, it's because innocent people are having their lives destroyed. | ||
| And it really is a problem that it happens so much that we're just like, this guy got let out of prison and now he murdered somebody. | ||
| And so, you know, this is why it's bad, blah, blah. | ||
| But it's like, wait, he murdered somebody? | ||
| Wait, so... Just imagine what that's like because a lot of times these people that are just shot in the back of the head while they're waiting in the Wendy's parking lot or just like you know walk into a gas station to get a can of chew and end up getting stabbed in the neck by some psychopath and end up bleeding out on the floor of a 7-Eleven like so many times you know you hear words that describe them like father to be you know and it's just There's no attention paid whatsoever to the victims of this and the idea of like a pregnant wife waking up in the morning expecting to roll over and see her husband there and instead the bed is empty knowing that You know, | ||
| this baby that's coming in three months is not going to have a father. | ||
| I mean, it's the most heartbreaking and horrific thing. | ||
| One murder is such a travesty for so... | ||
| I mean, you kill one person, there's a hundred people whose lives are inalterably changed. | ||
| And there's a dozen people who will never live a day of their life without some gut-wrenching reminder that they've lost somebody that they love. | ||
| And they just, they don't care. | ||
| Like, they literally don't care. | ||
| It's just another statistic for them as they celebrate how many fewer people they have in prison, as if that's something to celebrate. | ||
| And they're setting the stage for this to only increase. | ||
| Here's one story. Suspect in NYC knockout game subway attack held on $20,000 bail says, quote, Why am I in trouble? | ||
| Literally doesn't understand why he's in trouble. | ||
| He attacked a 62-year-old man. | ||
| From behind, completely for no reason whatsoever, this 21-year-old black dude, Deshaun Smith, charged with assault, harassment, and reckless endangerment for allegedly punching the unsuspecting victim and knocking him onto the tracks of the 149th Street Station Sunday night, according to police. | ||
| Now, luckily, this guy survived. | ||
| There's no guarantee for that. | ||
| But then this dude, this 21-year-old, Says, my thing is, he said something to me inappropriate first. | ||
| I was defending myself. | ||
| Now, for one thing, no, that didn't happen. | ||
| I don't believe you, not for a single second. | ||
| I think this guy was minding his own business when you tried to kill him. | ||
| I don't believe for a single second that he said anything inappropriate. | ||
| But even if he did, this is the type of personality that the Democrats are creating with their rhetoric, with their mindset, with their worldview. | ||
| When you have the media and the politicians and everybody saying that words are violence and then you allow for this type of thing to happen. | ||
| You encourage this type of thing to happen. | ||
| You guarantee that this type of thing happens more. | ||
| Is that somebody is convinced that something inappropriate being said, maybe a racial slur, maybe something that just simply shows disrespect is worth murdering somebody over. | ||
| Knowing that you're likely going to get out since, you know, places like Baltimore, 75% of murders go unsolved. | ||
| 75, 3 out of 4 murderers get off completely scot-free, never even get investigated. | ||
| And this is the world they're setting up and they call you not compassionate for not wanting this to continue. | ||
| These people are not compassionate. | ||
| They have no compassion whatsoever for the actual innocent victims. | ||
| The only people they have compassion for are criminals. | ||
| The only people that they want to help are the most worthless, deranged, and parasitic members of this society. | ||
| The innocent, normal people out there just living their lives and trying to maintain under this barrage They're sworn enemies. | ||
| They have no compassion for them. | ||
| They have nothing but seething hatred. | ||
| So let's go out to the phone calls once again. | ||
| Hopefully have a little fun this time. | ||
| Let's go to Marcus in Ohio, who I understand is back by the phone. | ||
| He has a Mad Lib for us. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Marcus. You're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, sir. Good morning, Mr. Harris. | |
| I'm sorry about that. I was letting the suspicion build and audience build. | ||
| That's right. All right. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Can I get a 90s pop singer girl name? | |
| Is this going to be a pop culture thing? | ||
| I don't know pop culture. Britney Spears. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's not. It's all over the place. | |
| It's my first one ever, so... | ||
| All right. And then we got... | ||
| Give me a funny car name. | ||
| Or a car name. The Gremlin. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. And a number less than 10. | |
| Four. An adverb? | ||
| Shockingly. Nice. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A guy's name? | |
| Jim. I'm trying to hurry. | ||
| Give me two numbers, please. | ||
| 45 and 2009. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, wow. That's going to be funny. | |
| One of the Infowars shows? | ||
| The American Journal with Harrison Smith. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Classic. Two crimes? | |
| Murder and public intoxication. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Alright, I'm trying to hurry, really. | |
| Three-digit number? 796. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And a number and a measure of time? | |
| Four and a year. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And then an animal? | |
| Rhino. And then I got one more and then I'll read it. | ||
| One more number, please. | ||
| 9-1-1. Okay. | ||
| On his way into American Journal, Harrison was blasting Britney Spears and his gremlin. | ||
| Unlocked every other day. | ||
| Today he took four shots of turbo force. | ||
| But he was driving a little shockingly and caught the attention of Deputy Tim. | ||
| He pulled Harrison over for doing 45 in a 2009. | ||
| During the stop, Deputy Tim noticed Harrison was listening to yesterday's American Journal broadcast. | ||
| This enraged Deputy Tim. | ||
| The routine traffic violation snowballed into DWR, driving while Republican, murder, and a third-degree public intox. | ||
| The fines totaled $796 million on top of a four-year jail time. | ||
| But the judge ruled if Harrison agreed to affirm his son's identification as a rhino, the ruling would be dropped to 911 hours of watching CNN. That is completely accurate. | ||
| That is 100% exactly what happened this morning. | ||
| How did you know? Even if you've tried other things on InfoWars Store, now is the time to try anything that you may have had your eye on before. | ||
| Remember, the more expensive the supplements are, first of all, the better they are. | ||
| And there's a reason they're more expensive because the ingredients are harder to get a hold of and harder to package in a way that's beneficial to the human body. | ||
| And so there are things that are more expensive and there's a reason they're more expensive. | ||
| Things like DNA Force Plus is up there on the scale. | ||
| But that also means that when you're getting 50% off, you're getting a massive discount. | ||
| You're saving huge amounts of money on these supplements. | ||
| So if there's ever been a time, I know DNA Force Plus is one of those, where people see it and they go, you know, people call in a lot saying it's such a good thing. | ||
| I've done research on the ingredients and it seems like it's the real deal, but it's just I don't want to take the risk because what if it doesn't do what I want it to and, you know, then I'm Then I'm out this amount of money. | ||
| Well, that amount of money is now down 50%. | ||
| Plus, you can get an additional 10% off. | ||
| Plus, you get double Patriot points that you can apply towards your next purchase. | ||
| So, really, now is the time. | ||
| Now is the time to try anything at Infowars that you may have had your eye on. | ||
| May have thought, maybe that might be something that I'd at least try it out. | ||
| See if it's good for me. | ||
| Try it out now. Now is the time to do it. | ||
| And it's the best time to do it. Because, of course, we are under the biggest attack and most sustained assault that we've ever been under. | ||
| So if you've ever wanted to support InfoWars, now's the time to do it. | ||
| If you've ever wanted to try a supplement out, now's the time to do it. | ||
| I guess the point of the story is now's the time to do it. | ||
| Go to Infowarsstore.com right now. | ||
| Get 40 to 50% off all of our top-selling products, plus an additional 10% off with the promo code 1776-1776 and receive an extra 10% off. | ||
| Plus, you're getting double Patriot points. | ||
| Plus, you're supporting this singular outlet for the truth in a sea of lies. | ||
| What more reasons do you need? | ||
| Go to Infowarsstore.com right now. | ||
| Make a purchase. Help keep us afloat. | ||
| And know you can rest easy knowing that your money is going directly into the fight against the globalists in the most effective and powerful way that's ever been devised. | ||
| So let's go back out to your phone calls now. | ||
| Daniel in Florida has called in about Howard Stern, which is hilarious. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Daniel. | ||
| Howard Stern? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Never heard of him. Yeah, I just want to point out some of the hypocrisy with Howard Stern and, you know, the target on Kanye's back and Alex Jones' back. | |
| Howard Stern had a skit about Whoopi Goldberg. | ||
| You can find it on—I tried to find it on Google. | ||
| I couldn't find it on Google. | ||
| I had to go to DuckDuckGo. | ||
| I mean, he also made comments about the school shooter saying that— I don't know why the guy doesn't at least have sex with the girls before he shoots them. | ||
| And you can find that. | ||
| And it's out of his own words. | ||
| And you can't really find anything on Google. | ||
| But you can go to DuckDuckGo and see it's coming out of his own mouth. | ||
| Oh my god. You can just watch old Howard Stern shows from the 90s and like... | ||
| I think we're sort of on the edge over here, and I'm a fan of edgy comedy. | ||
| I guess you just forget how crazy it was in the late 80s and early 90s, but... | ||
| There's compilations on YouTube that's like, the O.J. Simpson trial, all of the Howard Stern clips from the O.J. Simpson trial, and he's literally, like, he's taking calls from people that have, like, African accents, and he's just like, you belong in the bush! | ||
| What, you have a bone in your nose? | ||
| You freaking African bushman! | ||
| Like, he is so vicious. | ||
| It's like, whoa, Jesus Christ. | ||
| It's like really bad. | ||
| So yeah, for Howard Stern to be offended by anybody ever is, well, it's laughable, but it's also evidence of just how far he's fallen and how completely he has been consumed by the modern milieu and foppishness. | ||
|
unidentified
|
able to call out Alex Jones and Kanye West as being the worst human beings in the world, but he's way far worse because he did it purely for motivation, monetary gain, and to be edgy to get listeners. | |
| Kanye West is trying to open people's minds and so is Alex Jones. | ||
| What a great point, Daniel. | ||
| That is such a good point. | ||
| It's true. Howard Stern has been outraged in the past, but there was nothing justified. | ||
| There was no sort of greater goal he had other than self-promotion, self-aggrandizement, and enriching himself. | ||
| That is such a good point, and Look, it's really tragic what's happened to Howard Stern. | ||
| The man looks like a diseased pelican at this point. | ||
| The man hasn't left his basement in two years. | ||
| He still is scared to go outside because of COVID-19. | ||
| And by the way, at least while the media and the establishment rails against the likes of Alex Jones and Kanye West... | ||
| They both have people in their personal lives that love them unconditionally and really love being around them and enjoy their company and think that they're brilliant and don't have to be paid to stay around them. | ||
| Howard Stern is despised by everybody who has anything to do with him. | ||
| The only people that are still around him are there because he pays them to be there. | ||
| They aren't even shy about how much they despise Howard Stern. | ||
| All of his old compatriots have left him, and he is alone in a basement complaining about people who he's not worthy to kiss their feet. | ||
| So it's a tragic downfall. | ||
| I wish I had the clip. Because Kanye went off on Howard Stern and brutalized him. | ||
| I mean, just embarrassed him on the Lex Friedman podcast. | ||
| Was really, really vicious to Howard Stern, and it was hilarious. | ||
| Maybe we can find that clip. | ||
| It may have been in the show yesterday, maybe in the show folder yesterday, but I'll play it if we have time. | ||
| But thank you for that call, Daniel. | ||
| Very, very good points. I do want to get some other calls here. | ||
| Let's go to Andrew in New York. | ||
| He wants to talk about the systematic dismantling of the globalist system. | ||
| Thank you for calling in, Andrew. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're on the air. Andrew Aslinson, the next Pennsylvania senator. | |
| Anyway, so everything the Globus have been doing is illegitimate. | ||
| We've been building up all this information. | ||
| And the election this time, there's some safeguards they have for that. | ||
| They have the Fusion Center. | ||
| They have all these ways of checking. | ||
| They can get the cash vote ballots from the machines. | ||
| And there's so much evidence that Trump won in 2020. | ||
| All they have to do is vote Trump into the Speaker, then impeach Kamala and Joe Biden easily, and then that entire Democrat system that is working on behalf of the globalists, You're right, and this is the strategy, and this is the plan, and this is what's happening, and this is what InfoWars has helped to lead. | ||
| People like Marjorie Taylor Greene, people like Joe Kent, people like Lee Zeldin. | ||
| I mean, people getting into office now who actually are willing and able to fight on behalf of the republic and not just concede nobly to their opponents in the way that we're so used to Republicans having done for the last several decades. | ||
| People recognize now the fight that we're in. | ||
| They recognize that this is a life or death battle. | ||
| They recognize just how evil, destructive, and vicious the Democrats are. | ||
| And so the people running now and getting elected into office now who will soon replace the old rhino fossils of Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell are going to actually fight for the American people. | ||
| And really all it takes is one good freshman class of congressmen who actually understand what's going on and are willing to use the levers of power that they've been given to make corrections in our path. | ||
| And we could sweep this whole thing up in an afternoon, quite literally. | ||
| I mean, that's really how quickly all this could happen. | ||
| It's just a matter of once that happens, the power structure that controls corporations and the media, are they going to be willing to burn themselves down in an effort to stop the corrective measures being taken? | ||
| And I think from what we've seen with Kanye, they're perfectly willing to At least one company is perfectly willing to put itself at risk of existence to virtue signal against some words that Kanye said. | ||
| So, you know, their desperation and their willingness to tear everything down if they can't have it. | ||
| You know, they're like kids. They're like little babies. | ||
| They're like little babies with nuclear weapons that say, if I can't play with it, nobody can. | ||
| And they just break their toy rather than letting their friend use it. | ||
| So that's really the danger that we're facing now. | ||
| So we just need to show the Republicans that we have their back and If they work for us and if they actually fight the globalists, then they have our full support and there's nothing they can do to fail. | ||
| So let's go finally to Wayne in Texas. | ||
| Wayne, I know you called in yesterday and I didn't get to you, and I want to get to you today. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. Wayne, you're on the air. | ||
| Hey, Harrison. What I wanted to do, and it was Lex Friedman's interview with Kanye that kind of reminded me of some things. | ||
| I wanted to talk about the mark of the beast, the one in your forehead and the one in your hand. | ||
| And the mark of the beast is the love of money in your hand. | ||
| If you think about, like, the hamsa, you know, or the talisman, where you got the evil eye that's in the hand, or it was in a necklace, you know, to ward off jealousy, they've got, like, this jealousy in your hand, fueled by the love of money, the usury of the ancient Near East, like Hammurabi's Code, where they regarded inanimate matter as alive, and judged between man and material, you know, what somebody's work was worth, right? | ||
| Right. Yeah. That's where they hid their lord's money in the earth, the penny that he gave to everybody equally and sought to establish their own righteousness. | ||
| And then that's the other mark, the mark in their forehead. | ||
| It's how a man establishes their own righteousness whereby they want to get their person honored and respected. | ||
| Now, there's a couple things Kanye said. | ||
|
unidentified
|
First of all, he mentioned being jealous, and I find that disturbing. | |
| But, you know, he's a new believer, so he doesn't know what spirit he's animated by. | ||
| The prince of power of the air, the spirit of Christ sometimes when he talks. | ||
| Yeah, I think you're exactly right. | ||
| A bunch of good points there, Wayne. | ||
| Thank you for that call. We'll be right back on the other side of the third hour of American Journal. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stay with us, folks. Connect Incorporated, | |
| who built a communication platform called ChineseBrief.com for the Confucius Institute, was incorporated in 2002 in Michigan by Chinese immigrant Eugene Yu, who then went on to create a research and development subsidiary of Connect Incorporated in Communist China, registering as a foreign national under his Chinese name with U.S. dollars. | ||
| One week later, Connect in Michigan begins outsourcing to Communist China for election software coding, and they begin developing an entire product line of digital election software. | ||
| In 2014, they were focusing on developing an election backend server subsystem. | ||
| In 2015, they filed a patent for network voting of absent electorates. | ||
| This patent was then quickly transferred to a brand new company born out of the CCP's big tech division that specializes in elections. | ||
| Connect Australia was established by Eugene Yu in 2018, and during the 2020 elections in Queensland, reporting problems were caused by coding resources being locked down in China, revealing that Australia's election software was being written by coders in Wuhan, | ||
| China. According to a Chinese document entitled, International Elite Entrepreneurship, the mission of Connect Incorporated is to become one of the top 50 e-commerce service providers for schools and government in the United States. | ||
| A communist Chinese company quietly running election software systems out of Michigan. | ||
| One would normally expect this to be a much bigger story. | ||
| In November of last year, Connect received a $300,000 grant from Governor Gretchen Whitmer's team. | ||
| On October 3rd, the New York Times published an article defending Connect, entitled, How a Tiny Elections Company Became a Conspiracy Theory Target. | ||
| The next day, Eugene Yu is arrested for suspicion of stealing poll data. | ||
| He is extradited to Los Angeles, where Connect had a five-year contract with LA County Elections. | ||
| Prosecutors in Los Angeles claimed that Connect was illegally giving sensitive data to their partners in Communist China. | ||
| George Soros-appointed District Attorney Gascon said the investigation only involved personal information of election workers and would not impact election results. | ||
| And now, Chinese spy and Connect CEO Eugene Yu's case has been sealed. | ||
| The corrupt FBI has reportedly vouched for him. | ||
| He was released from custody, given an electronic tracking bracelet, and scheduled to report back for arraignment on November 17, well after the U.S. elections. | ||
| Meanwhile, Connect provides the software for the U.S. military's mail-in ballots. | ||
| They manage polling campaigns for elections in Australia, Canada, and several areas of the United States. | ||
| Reporting for Infowars, this is Greg Reese. | ||
| Transcription by CastingWords Find and share that video at band.video. | ||
| Communist China rigging elections with Konak Incorporated. | ||
| That is the latest from Greg Reese. | ||
| Remember, you support everything we do here, including the great content at band.video, by going to infowarsstore.com. | ||
| You can also go to saveinfowars.com. | ||
| You can also go to 1776coin.com. | ||
| But if you go to infowarsstore.com, be sure to use the promo code 1776 to get an additional 10% off and know that everything is That you spend at Infowars store is a war bond in the Infowar. | ||
| It is a guarantee that we will be able to continue to operate that much longer and that with your support, we will make it through this rough time and come out ahead. | ||
| Hopefully, as Winston Churchill put it, see ourselves in the sunny uplands of the future once we get through this tyrannical flip in the radar of human existence. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | |
| The hour of American Journal has begun. | ||
| Let's talk a little bit about the wider view of what's happening. | ||
| In particular, how the Great Reset is still being implemented at a pace and has not been derailed from its In fact, | ||
| it seems to be increasing its attempts to bring about a global system of total corporate control based on surveillance and monitoring everything you do, everything you buy, | ||
| everywhere you go, everyone you know, everything you say, and then assigning you a score that is not determined on any legitimate scale, which I would consider I don't think there's any scale that you could legitimately grade people on, | ||
| but let's be honest, if the people that run the media and run politics in this country are the ones deciding what is good and what is bad, the scale looks nothing like what our personal morality scale might look like. | ||
| I might want to reward people for Being self-sufficient, reward people for going to church, reward people for volunteer time and helping people out, reward people for I don't know, traveling and not sitting at home watching TV all day. | ||
| Unfortunately, the people that are actually implementing this program seem to think that being a bug is the highest goal of humanity. | ||
| Living an existence of impermanence where nothing you do makes any effective and permanent change to anything ever that you not deserve. | ||
| Create life, that you not build, that you not take risks. | ||
| They would rather you just be a serf, a subservient moron, a useful tool in an assembly line, and then to die willingly at 75 without having reproduced at all, without having contributed anything of any importance to anybody ever. | ||
| And of course they're predicating this all on saving the earth because they're heroes, because they're so compassionate after all. | ||
| Let's take a look at some of the few headlines that we have here. | ||
| Commonwealth Bank now is tracking your carbon footprint based on how you spend money. | ||
| Commonwealth Bank in Australia has a new carbon footprint feature on internet banking. | ||
| The app shows how many trees a customer has destroyed based on spending. | ||
| Again, it's just completely absurd. | ||
| Partnered with EcoStartup to encourage sustainability from Australians. | ||
| So they're already doing it. | ||
| They're already... Breaking down the carbon footprint of individuals for doing things like driving, eating groceries or eating out, and they have options to offset your footprint, which I guess means pay them money. | ||
| I don't know what else that could possibly mean. | ||
| How to reduce your footprint, which essentially means live less. | ||
| Live less. Stop going places. | ||
| Stop eating things. | ||
| Just stop it. Stop buying things. | ||
| Stop owning things. | ||
| It's all hurting the earth, you guys. | ||
| Of course. This is just the excuse that they're using. | ||
| It doesn't mean it's real. | ||
| It doesn't mean it's actually making any positive difference. | ||
| In fact, it's only making a negative difference. | ||
| Especially when you have things like the Drax power plant. | ||
| Where they'll claim, we've offset our carbon footprint by burning trees. | ||
| And then they'll tell you how many trees that you've saved by burning trees. | ||
| This is really what they're doing. | ||
| This is how backwards and retarded all of their crap is. | ||
| Daily Mail also has the story, outrage over a new Commonwealth Bank feature. | ||
| Commonwealth Bank is now tracking your carbon footprint based on how you spend money. | ||
| Amazing. Italy now has laws for heating. | ||
| Where they tell you the maximum temperature that you can keep your house at is 19 or 20 degrees Celsius and heating will be off from 11 o'clock p.m. | ||
| to 5 o'clock a.m. | ||
| The Italian Ecological Transition Ministry has announced a new decree that limits indoor temperatures in your home. | ||
| But it's not just Italy. Spain is also limiting indoor heating to 19 degrees Celsius and limiting air conditioning cooling to 27 degrees Celsius. | ||
| These rules will be in fact until November 1, 2023, over a year, to, quote, promote self-reliance in renewable energy production. | ||
| That absolutely does nothing to promote self-reliance or renewable energy production, but these are just the words that they say. | ||
| It doesn't matter. None of it has any... | ||
| Bearing on anything. They just do what they want, and then they tack on random positive-sounding words to make it seem like what they're doing isn't indoctrinating you into a slave camp. | ||
| France is doing this as well. | ||
| Temperatures limited to 19 degrees Celsius, but they're also banning hot water in public buildings and reducing temperatures in swimming pools and gyms. | ||
| But things could get even worse in Switzerland if there's a gas shortage this winter, which is probably likely, again, because of the decisions that they make, because of the wars that they're starting... | ||
| Switzerland is talking about a proposal to limit indoor temperatures to 19 degrees Celsius, just like Italy and Spain. | ||
| And if people violate the rule, they could face a 3,000 fine per day, or people could be sent up to three years in prison. | ||
| Three years in jail for the crime of heating your home. | ||
| And they're just doing this. | ||
| They're just doing this. Nobody wants it. | ||
| Nobody's advocating for it. | ||
| Doesn't actually help anything. Doesn't do anything at all. | ||
| They're just doing this. Because it's a democracy after all. | ||
| The people don't want it. | ||
| Nobody wants it. You put this to a vote, it would get thrashed down immediately. | ||
| But we have to save our democracy. | ||
| See, we're at war to save our democracy. | ||
| And because we're at war, there's no gas. | ||
| So now, in a completely undemocratic move, they are restricting and limiting your energy production in complete order. | ||
| Reversal of what democracy would actually have you do. | ||
| So it's all very confusing. | ||
| When you're run by psychopath liars with hidden agendas... | ||
| Of your extermination. | ||
| Things get a little confusing, I guess. | ||
| Deutsche Bank unveils new target in cutting carbon footprint. | ||
| Deutsche Bank AG will say it will cut emissions tied to its oil and gas financing as it refreshes targets for lessening its carbon footprint. | ||
| The Frankfurt-based lender on Friday said it cut financed emissions, a type of accounting associated with investments linked to a company's carbon footprint, to upstream oil and gas by 23 percent by 2030 or 90 percent by 2050. | ||
| And this is where it's really coming from. | ||
| It's not that these things are being voted on and being implemented by the national government. | ||
| These things are being decided on by cabals and coalitions of banking elite who then dictate to the national government what their policy will be. | ||
| And the national government then imposes that on the people regardless of what the people believe or want or desire. | ||
| And of course, with this... | ||
| You'll get surveillance. | ||
| You'll get full and total surveillance. | ||
| All of this is coming from the banks. | ||
| All of this is part and parcel with each other. | ||
| They all go hand-in-hand with one another. | ||
| We'll go now to clip number four, as once again we play this video that we've seen before that tells you how this In fact, first we'll go to 19 because this is about the consumer carbon footprint and how this will be used by banks to, of course, track everything you do and everywhere you go and everyone you interact with. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number 19 where we see the World Economic Forum. | ||
| Just telling you this, just explaining this to everybody who cares to listen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're developing through technology an ability for consumers to measure their own carbon footprint. | |
| What does that mean? That's... | ||
| Where are they traveling? | ||
| How are they traveling? | ||
| What are they eating? What are they consuming on the platform? | ||
| So, individual carbon footprint tracker. | ||
| Stay tuned. We don't have it operational yet, but this is something that we're working on. | ||
| So it's just evil. | ||
| It's just... These are the Bond villains of our time. | ||
| This is what it looks like. | ||
| I don't know how people don't recognize this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Soon the Death Star will be fully operational. | |
| Yeah, exactly. Exactly. | ||
| So let's go now to the central bank, or the CEO, I believe, of the International Investment Bank, talking again about digital currency and how it will be programmed not just to track everything that you do, But it'll actually be controlled by the central bank itself. | ||
| Let's watch clip number four. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A key difference with the CBDC is that the central bank will have absolute control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability. | |
| And also, we will have the technology to enforce that. | ||
| Those two issues are extremely important, and that makes a huge difference with respect to what cash is. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| This is American Journal. Just came across two articles I want to share to you since it really illustrates what we're up against here. | ||
| I'm having a little bit of trouble bringing them up here. | ||
| All right. From the Financial Times, It's from October 20th, so a little less than a week ago. | ||
| My guide to deglobalizing the world. | ||
| He says this. This is from Rana Furuhar. | ||
| He says, I'll never forget an interview I did years ago with the late Richard Trumpka, the then president of the AFL-CIO, America's largest labor union. | ||
| Trumpka, a tough-talking former Pennsylvania coal miner-turned-lawyer, told me about a conversation he had in the 90s with a Clinton administration official about the fallout of NAFTA, which had been ratified in 1993, and the potential impact of China coming into the global trading system. | ||
| Trumpka was concerned about a flood of A sudden flood of cheap labor into the global marketplace and the effect it would have on Americans' workers' incomes and lives. | ||
| Quote, I told the official that the deals would kill us, and he agreed. | ||
| But the official said that after a while, wages would start to go up again and things would even out around the world. | ||
| When Trumka asked him how long this process of leveling out might take, he answered, about three to five generations. | ||
| These are the way they make decisions. | ||
| These are the way that the people in charge determine whether to ratify an agreement or not. | ||
| They're like, yeah, it'll destroy the lives of millions of people. | ||
| Sure, it'll gut industry in this country. | ||
| Yes, it will eliminate our manufacturing base and destroy our economic powerhouse position. | ||
| But we think we've done the models and it'll even out in about 100 years. | ||
| Well, great then. It'll even out. | ||
| It'll even out. This is globalism incarnate. | ||
| This is what it's all about. | ||
| This is the mindset of these people, and this is the way that they manipulate to achieve their ends. | ||
| No concern about the people they're actually supposed to be serving. | ||
| Their only concern is how do we pitch this to the people that we claim to be serving in a way that makes them go along with it, makes them not make too much of a fuss while we gut their entire nation wholesale like it's a deer we've just hunted. | ||
| Three to five generations. That's a century in the lives of the communities and the people in question. | ||
| Is it any wonder, then, that the average American worker, just as those many rich countries, have begun to question globalization or that nationalism and populism are on the rise? | ||
| As Harvard professor Danny Roderick, one of the few mainstream economists to challenge the perceived wisdom of his profession in recent years, argued in 2011, democracy, national sovereignty, and global economic integration are mutually incompatible. | ||
| We can combine two of the three, but we'll never have all three simultaneously And in full. | ||
| Again, you can have democracy and national sovereignty, but you can have global economic integration along with that. | ||
| And so you can combine the others as well. | ||
| He goes on to talk about how all of this has really been targeted directly at the American people. | ||
| And That there's so much contempt and hatred for the average American in the minds of the elite that actually are making decisions that affect the lives of the average American. | ||
| It's no wonder that their decisions constantly put them at the bottom. | ||
| It's not an accident. And as our guest Phil Williams will tell us coming up, because he says it really well in his article, that this is all just horrifically immoral. | ||
| This is all just hateful people who are actively going out and destroying lives of others that they don't deem as worthy of respect or consideration. | ||
| This article in the Financial Times goes on to say, A few years ago, I interviewed a top aide to a senior Democrat senator who told me with amazement about the sense of certainty that there used to be within the party that rural areas in low-density locations simply weren't worth considering politically. | ||
| It says, quote, I remember back in 2016 talking to a friend in the White House who had been traveling and seeing a lot of rural poverty in places like Iowa and Virginia. | ||
| said the aide, quote, he told me, don't worry, we've got this figured out. | ||
| We've done the models, and it turns out it's cheaper to pay people to move to the top 50 cities than to try to create jobs where they are. | ||
| The contempt inherent in that statement, which assumed that the concept of place and home don't matter, was not only insulting but politically wrong. | ||
| Rural areas got Trump elected, and people are no longer migrating around the U.S. as much as they once did. | ||
| But both parties now appreciate that place matters. | ||
| After decades of winner-take-all trend in which the majority of prosperity has been located in a handful of cities and companies, look for business and policymakers to be focused on ensuring that wealth and place are re-moored. | ||
| Well, that obviously hasn't happened, and they're still demonizing and... | ||
| Running roughshod over any care or consideration for the people who live in rural areas in this country. | ||
| There's been no recalibration in terms of national politics for America. | ||
| They still hold rural Americans in just as much disdain as they always have. | ||
| This is the world they're creating, and so they recognize that what they're doing is bad for you. | ||
| They recognize that how they're treating you is objectionable and horrific, and that you wouldn't stand for it if you knew what they really said about you behind your backs. | ||
| If you knew, they're just like, no, they're doing the best they can. | ||
| No, they're not. They're running scientific models that go, well, in a hundred years, the lives that we've destroyed, your lives that we've destroyed, it'll be fine because we'll replace you with foreigners. | ||
| Like, that's the way that they think, that's the way that they feel, that's the way that they make decisions on a national level. | ||
| It's just up to you to see through their lives. | ||
| It's entirely on you. | ||
| It's entirely up to the average American to just have a semblance of skepticism, just a modicum of doubt when it comes to the Democrats in particular, but Republicans as well, politicians as a whole, and just know that their goals and their ambitions are Not only don't take your life into account, | ||
| it sees your life and your existence as impediment and something to be manipulated out of existence. | ||
| But if they can't do that, if they can't outright get rid of you, what they will do is lull you into acceptance. | ||
| They will drug you into a state of unthinking adherence to their dictates. | ||
| And how this works is they have things like antidepressants that aren't antidepressants, don't work, never have, never been tested, and yet are given to tens of millions of people in this country. | ||
| Something like a quarter of all young women in this nation. | ||
| Actually, I think it may be upwards of around a half now. | ||
| Whatever the number is, it's Way, way, way too many people are on antidepressants and the primary takers here are white liberal women. | ||
| A five-minute chat with her doctor is how Adele Framer's 11-year ordeal began. | ||
| She complained about work-related stress. | ||
| For that, she was prescribed paroxetine, a common antidepressant. | ||
| There was no conversation about alternatives, such as psychotherapy. | ||
| I would add or working out or getting a hobby or getting a new job. | ||
| But no, no, no. This is the globalist frame now. | ||
| There's no such thing as bettering yourself through health and connecting your soul to nature and community. | ||
| No, it's keep doing what makes you miserable. | ||
| Just take a drug to make you happy while you're doing it. | ||
| There's also no discussion of the drug's side effects or when to stop taking it. | ||
| Quote, I had a very typical patient experience and a very typical patient attitude at the time, says Ms. | ||
| Framer. I was a believer that it would be a great idea to just solve my problem with an antidepressant. | ||
| Her libido vanished when she started taking the drug. | ||
| Then, after years of taking the medication, she became extremely apathetic and lethargic, a common effect of antidepressants that deepened over time. | ||
| So now, no longer in the stressful job she once held down, she saw little reason to persevere. | ||
| But trying to stop was a disaster. | ||
| She became hyperactive and agitated. | ||
| She had brain zaps, electric shock-like sensations. | ||
| Her sexual dysfunction became worse, and those were just some of her withdrawal symptoms. | ||
| It doesn't even help you being depressed. | ||
| It just makes you a lethargic, apathetic tool for the progress of their destructive ideas. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| You are watching American Journal. | ||
| I am your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| My guest is Phil Williams, former Alabama state senator, attorney, and talk show host. | ||
| Phil Williams is a former two-term Alabama state senator, API chief policy officer. | ||
| He's an attorney and the host of Right Side Radio. | ||
| His program goes beyond covering news and addresses the concepts of free markets, limited government, strong families, and values of personal liberty. | ||
| You can listen live weekdays from 2 to 5 p.m. | ||
| Central on rightsideradio.org. | ||
| That, again, is rightsideradio.org. | ||
| And just to be clear... It might have been confusing how I said that. | ||
| He's a former Alabama state senator and a current talk show host, not a former talk show host, just to make that perfectly clear. | ||
| So it's Right Side Radio. His Twitter is at S-E-N Phil Williams, and RightSideRadio.org is where you can go to find his podcast and his radio show and everything that he does. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us, Mr. | ||
| Williams. Hey, glad to be here. | ||
| Thanks for having me. Well, I'm very glad to have you. | ||
| And the topic of discussion today is this article. | ||
| You can find it at 1819news.com. | ||
| No such thing as a free lunch. | ||
| And you lay out a very powerful argument, several very powerful arguments, I should say, against the Biden student loan forgiveness plan. | ||
| You make not only the, I guess you could say... | ||
| Just monetary argument against it, but also you get into the ethical and moral hazards that this type of, not legislation, but fiat dictate from the government has. | ||
| Tell us, what are the ethical or moral problems you have with forgiving student loan? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, Harrison, thanks for having me on. | |
| So, I mean, the reality is you can dissect this Fail-out program from a variety of different capacities, and I outlined a legal, an ethical, a moral, and a mental problem with every bit of it. | ||
| Ethically speaking, I think one of the biggest things that people have to look at is, why is it okay for the government to pick winners and losers? | ||
| I mean, when did it become okay for the government to say, we like you, but we don't like you, so we're going to make sure that we pay off a student loan over here at the same time You know, that guy who worked at night and got his certificate to be a journeyman electrician and he went out and borrowed $50,000 to start his own business, he didn't get a bailout. | ||
| In fact, if anything, he's paying off the bailout for the guy who got the underwater basket weaving degree or a liberal arts degree. | ||
| So I think that, ethically speaking, the government should never be in the position of picking winners and losers and deciding that tax dollars go to one favoritism over another. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. And you say, and again, I encourage people to go out and read this article, and I'm really tempted just to read the whole dang thing myself on the show because each part of it is such a powerful argument against what the Democrats are doing, not just with student loans, but with a whole host of other topics that they discuss. | ||
| We tend to have this same mindset on, but you say this, quote, I mean, | ||
| this really is sort of at the crux of what we believe as a nation, whether we believe that people have to be allowed to go out and pursue their dreams and then suffer the consequences of failing, or whether we're all just going to live, you know, as, what's his name, Roosevelt said, Teddy Roosevelt said, you know, live in this vague sort of non-existence, the grayness that knows neither success nor defeat. | ||
| You're really making sort of a man-in-the-arena argument here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. And that's what it is. | |
| I mean, America was birthed on the idea of the individual citizen having rights and having a say in their governance and having the ability to exceed and go beyond the norms of what a government says they can or cannot do. | ||
| I mean, that's the American dream, is the idea that if you work hard, you can succeed. | ||
| In this case, the government is saying, you don't have to work hard. | ||
| In fact, don't work at all. | ||
| We'll take care of that for you. | ||
| And all they're doing is getting into my moral argument that they're establishing more and more of a welfare mentality that disenfranchises people from the value of hard work. | ||
| And you talk about that, the welfare mentality, and I think that's an important thing to consider, especially when you see the way young people are being brought up now to quite literally have no notion of consequences for their actions or consequences for the decisions that they make. | ||
| They're just they're insulted if their decision turns out wrong. | ||
| They think they've been wronged and that this makes them a victim and somebody else has to come in and fix it for them. | ||
| I'm not interested in living in a society occupied by a bunch of crybaby weirdo idiots that don't know how to take care of themselves. | ||
| I want my neighbors to be strong. | ||
| I want my fellow Americans to be strong. | ||
| But the Democrats seem to thrive on weakness. | ||
| Is it just about the Democrat electoral victories, that they need weak people so that they can give them things? | ||
| I mean, is it really as simple as that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I think there's certainly some of that in there. | |
| I mean, I did a segment on my show the other day, talked about what I call buying friends and voters. | ||
| And this is certainly, the timing of this is certainly suspect with regards to the midterms that are upon us. | ||
| But I look at it too, and you know, I think I quoted Pastor Adrian Rogers in that piece that you're talking about there, the no free lunch. | ||
| He said specifically, you cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. | ||
| You do not grow an economy By deciding to distribute things across some form of an equitable distribution. | ||
| There's no such thing as equitable, especially when you've got government deciding what is equitable. | ||
| All said and done, when the Israelites went across the Jordan, God could have just cleared the land. | ||
| He could have just destroyed the enemy before they got there. | ||
| He didn't. It was worth fighting for. | ||
| He wanted them to have a stake in it. | ||
| And so I believe that we've got to have the ability to see a next generation of Americans believe that what we have as a nation is worth working hard for, what it is worth fighting for, it is worth putting your neck on the line for. | ||
| But if we continue to just bail them out over every bad decision they make, well, I mean, we're building a society that is going to wind up being the downfall or the ruin of our nation. | ||
| Absolutely. And the problem I see with this is... | ||
| Your moral argument is very strong, and I agree with it, and I think it is immoral for this to happen. | ||
| The problem is, does that argument even work with these people anymore? | ||
| I mean, if you tell a Democrat it's immoral to do this, do they even care? | ||
| I mean, it seems like first we have to get people to actually care about morals and ethics in the first place instead of seeing everything as a zero-sum game where we just have to get ours no matter how we do that. | ||
| Like, do people even care about the moral argument anymore, or is this just go right over their heads? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Well, I think some, it definitely goes over their heads. | ||
| I mean, you can look at some of the decision makers in D.C. and figure that out pretty quick. | ||
| The other side of this, though, I will say there's a lot of people who took out a student loan who never asked to be bailed out. | ||
| They never sought this, and granted, I understand there's an application process now, but the truth be told, there was not a crisis upon us. | ||
| The nation was not coming down to its knees because of the student loan programs. | ||
| Are there reforms that could be made? | ||
| Absolutely. But this was not something that you were hearing a clarion call from all of the members of society. | ||
| My wife and I paid off her student loan. | ||
| I know any number of people who paid theirs off. | ||
| Is there going to be a retroactive repayment of those who paid it off because they had a contractual obligation? | ||
| I doubt it. No, you're just the sucker now. | ||
| You were stupid for paying it off, right? | ||
| I mean, that's how they're setting it up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, dadgummit, I should have gone ahead and defaulted and I would have gotten a bailout. | |
| Yeah, if only you had been a piece of crap, if only you had been irresponsible, then you'd be rewarded by this country. | ||
| Then you'd be celebrated and upheld by this country. | ||
| But you, like a fool, actually did what you said you were going to do and paid off the debts that you had accrued. | ||
| And gosh, you must feel silly now. | ||
| I mean, that really is how backwards things are getting at this point. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It really is. And, you know, Harrison, I tell you, one of the things that's so awkward in all of this is the mental argument that I make for it, because the Biden administration allegedly does this on the basis that times are hard and the pandemic has authorized the president to take certain measures. | |
| At the same time, the same president has said, our economy is strong as hell and the pandemic is over. | ||
| So how do you mentally come to the decision that you can authorize $400 billion in payments on the one hand for things that you just said on the other are not even there anymore? | ||
| It requires one of two decisions. | ||
| Either he's lying when he made the decision or he's delusional when he made the decision because he has already openly expressed that the grounds upon which his decision rests are invalid. | ||
| It's kind of like if I were in court and had him on the stand as a witness, I would look at the judge and say, Your Honor, he's just impeached his own testimony. | ||
| It's a level of cognitive dissonance that I personally am not prepared to try to bridge the gap between. | ||
| It makes no sense at all. | ||
| We'll be back with more on the other side with Mr. | ||
| Phil Williams. Again, you can find his website, rightsideradio.org, and we'll talk about the fact that this is, at the end of the day, just an open bribe to people. | ||
| Vote for me and I'll pay you $10,000. | ||
| That's what this amounts to, in my opinion. | ||
| We'll be right back. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Harrison Smith here. You're watching American Journal. | ||
| My guest is Phil Williams. | ||
| You can find his website at rightsideradio.org. | ||
| Right Side Radio can also be found anywhere good podcasts are hosted, including Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Google Podcasts. | ||
| You can also find them on all the social medias, everywhere from Twitter, YouTube, Rumble, Facebook, Instagram, and Getter. | ||
| Just go to rightsideradio.org and you can find links to the others. | ||
| His personal Twitter is at S-E-N Phil Williams. | ||
| And we're talking about the fact that there's no such thing as a free lunch and the bailout program for student debt loans. | ||
| And I mentioned at the end of the last segment the idea that this is just an open bribe. | ||
| And this type of... This talk and this type of argument, I guess, has been going on since the Roman Republic and the corn dole where they were saying, you're bribing people with my corn, essentially. | ||
| You're saying, vote for me and I'll give you that guy's corn. | ||
| That's not okay. These types of arguments have been going on forever. | ||
| In this case, I can't see it not working. | ||
| I know so many people my age who have student debt and they go, look... | ||
| You know, everything's going to crap anyway. | ||
| I'll vote for Joe Biden. If he wins, I get $10,000 off my student loan. | ||
| That will be the decision that decides who they vote for. | ||
| And it doesn't matter that it's immoral of them to do so. | ||
| It's $10,000 and they're going to do it, you know, whether it's a good thing to do or not. | ||
| What's your take on that, this being an open bribe to a huge number of American citizens? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh man, this is like the Obama phone on steroids. | |
| I mean, this is literally saying, hey, you there, I'm going to give you something and you're going to love me for it. | ||
| I mean, it reminds me of that scene from the movie Gladiator where the two senators are talking and he said he will give them games and they will love him for it. | ||
| That's what it feels like. And the very idea that they're going to have this $400 billion payout with sort of a hassle-free guarantee, just tell us it's hard. | ||
| We'll pay you. And then next thing you know, they're also, by the way, pandering. | ||
| Just the other day in studio during my show, I had multiple screens up on the wall. | ||
| CNN was running a piece that said Biden's speaking to student groups in order to encourage Right. | ||
| It's all right there. Right. | ||
| There it is. I mean, and they're pretty much open about it at this point. | ||
| You know, they're just saying, hey, you vote for me and I'll give you $10,000. | ||
| Vote for the other guy and you'll be left with nothing. | ||
| Of course, there's no way to run a country. | ||
| And again, it's like a bribe, but it's not even a bribe with your own money. | ||
| A bribe with your own money is one thing. | ||
| This is a bribe with my money and with your money, with people who work. | ||
| Our money is going to pay for people who don't make money to pay off the debts they should have never accrued in the first place. | ||
| And it would have never been as high as it was without the government guarantee of Of the loan in the first place. | ||
| And we can talk about that. But let's talk about some of the ways that they're justifying this. | ||
| Because you mentioned during the break that the arguments that they're making about PPP loans and the GI Bill, I mean, the fact is they just want money and they're greedy and they're making up excuses for it. | ||
| But talk a little bit about some of the excuses and parallels that they're drawing to try to justify this open bribe. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, man, thank you. So the military is a huge part of my background, 30 years of service, tours of duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. | |
| And so the GI Bill is out there, and I get it. | ||
| And they want to say that if you have signed up for the student loan bailout, it's no different than the GI Bill because we pay off an education for veterans. | ||
| I got news. Those veterans had to go do some hard stuff to get there. | ||
| Not necessarily all wartime. | ||
| At the very least, they had to enlist for a period of time and serve our country in whatever capacity. | ||
| And so the idea that they can equate that somehow to a student loan bailout because you just didn't want to pay your debts or you said times were hard, totally different concept, apples and oranges. | ||
| The other one they're talking about so often is this PPP loan that we had during the pandemic. | ||
| Well, first of all, the PPP loan was congressionally authorized because the power of the purse rests in the legislative branch. | ||
| But then at the same time, the PPP loan was also there if you could keep your employees on staff and on payroll during the pandemic when they shut you down, by the way, they would try to help you through that timeframe. | ||
| And it was forgivable only if you applied for forgiveness and met certain criteria. | ||
| In other words, if you didn't meet the criteria, you were going to pay it back. | ||
| Well, so keeping people paid and the economy somewhat afloat because they shut you down equates to a student loan bailout ain't no way. | ||
| Totally different. Totally different facts and patterns. | ||
| Right. Absolutely, yeah. | ||
| And we've talked about that on this show where, you know, if it's the government that's forcing you to shut your doors, if the government, you know, if you try to open your business during the pandemic, they sent tanks to your... | ||
| I mean, we went and visited and... | ||
| Out in West Texas, you know, bars where the sheriff had gone and pointed AR-15s in the faces of the people who opened their bar and said, shut it down or you're going to be arrested. | ||
| So when they forcibly shut you down, yeah, it's kind of their responsibility to make sure that you don't go hungry for that. | ||
| I oppose all of it. | ||
| I wish it never happened in the first place. | ||
| But if you're going to shut it down... | ||
| It is your responsibility slightly to make sure that their lives aren't destroyed from that. | ||
| And the GI Bill, I think we should have a reverse GI Bill. | ||
| If they pay off your student loan debt, you are then signed up for whatever new adventure they have for you overseas. | ||
| I think that's a great idea. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That beats the draft, right? | |
| Hey, man, you got something from us. | ||
| We got something for you. | ||
| But I'm pretty sure that that would go over like a lead balloon. | ||
| Yeah, I don't think that would go over. | ||
| I think that would actually severely weaken our armed forces if we got a bunch of, as you say, underwater basket weaving majors out in the field. | ||
| I'm not sure that would actually help our... | ||
| It's the legal, ethical, and mental arguments that you make. | ||
| And to me, the ethical one is of such importance. | ||
| And it really does show how far we've fallen as a country that people don't even want to be responsible. | ||
| They think responsibility is foolishness. | ||
| If you're being responsible, you're being an idiot, what you should be doing is just trying to get by however you can and trying to get what's yours however you can. | ||
| There's no sense of moral... | ||
| Like force behind anything that we do anymore. | ||
| It's all immoral and to me that really is signaled by this whole bailout is they don't even care about the morality anymore. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, they don't. And so often today, we wind up seeing the idea of helping someone being used as a bludgeon to justify progressive ideologies. | |
| I got news. | ||
| There are any number of ways that someone could pay off a student loan. | ||
| If you can't find a job within the context of your degree pattern, well, I got news. | ||
| Early on in our life, my wife and I, we were committed to raising our kids and her being at home. | ||
| I delivered pizza. I did early morning janitorial work. | ||
| I was in the National Guard. | ||
| I spent time doing whatever it took to make sure the bills got paid, which included her student loan. | ||
| And that's just what it takes. | ||
| There is work out there if you want it. | ||
| It may not be the work you went to school for, but by God, you've got a contract with a loan. | ||
| Go work, pay it off, be done. | ||
| But the idea that we should all pay it off because it's just hard for you... | ||
| There's the underwater basket weaving. | ||
| Love the imagery there. That's great. | ||
| The crew pulls up stuff you don't even think would exist, but it's out there. | ||
| They can found it. Yeah, future Navy SEAL right there. | ||
| But, you know... It also—you know, the student loan issue is a big issue. | ||
| I would like to see students in America be able to go to school and not leave saddled with this insane debt. | ||
| I think that's a problem, but this is not a solution to that. | ||
| It only furthers this problem, right? | ||
| I mean, this is not a solution to the issue of how expensive schools are. | ||
| This is a Band-Aid over a blister that's actually just the— apparent symptoms of a cancer that's really rotting us out from the inside. | ||
| Would you agree with that sort of characterization? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, I would. I think you're absolutely right. | |
| Now, are there reforms that can be made to the overall system? | ||
| Possibly. I think that you ought to look at universities perhaps having to validate that the career track that the person wants to be on substantiates the ability to get the loan. | ||
| Or perhaps there are certain majors that don't qualify, period, because they're just known to be nonproductive. | ||
| But the reality is that The true benefactor of the loan is the person who signed the papers, and they're the ones also getting the bailout. | ||
| And so in the end, they signed up for a contract. | ||
| And as an attorney, I can just tell you, there has to be what's known as a meeting of the minds. | ||
| And there was a meeting of the minds. | ||
| And if you can prove that there was coercion or undue influence in some way, and it defeats the meeting of the minds argument, okay. | ||
| But if they gave you the money, then consideration passed between the parties. | ||
| You're in a contract, and you need to follow through on your obligations. | ||
| Yeah, and you know, I think it's incumbent on the banks or whoever's giving out these loans also to make sure the loans they're giving out can actually be paid. | ||
| But it doesn't seem like they would care about that anymore. | ||
| I mean, they're going to get paid by the government regardless. | ||
| So, you know, give out those underwater basket-weaving loans, even though you know it's never going to get paid back because the government will just take it from taxpayers. | ||
| Anyway, well, like I said, this article is absolutely fantastic. | ||
| It's by Phil Williams. | ||
| No such thing as a free lunch. | ||
| It can be found on 1819news.com. | ||
| And the whole thing is just brilliant. | ||
| It really lays into... | ||
| What's happening in this country, really, and how it's accelerating and how every problem they create creates another set of problems, which happened with the PPP loans, too. | ||
| Now they've launched an entire FBI sector to just deal with the theft of the PPP loans. | ||
| So maybe after this, we'll have to launch another investigation into all of the cheating that people did to get these loans, even though they don't qualify for them. | ||
| It's just problem after problem, Phil. | ||
| We've got to do something to extricate ourselves from this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I mean, at some point we have to stop spending money, right? | |
| I mean, there's not an endless pot, and the printing presses can only run so long. | ||
| So I agree. | ||
| Let's get back to the nation of hard work and the American dream and just keep getting government out of people's way and watch them succeed. | ||
| Could not agree more. Thank you so much for being with us. | ||
| RightSideRadio.org is where you find the Right Side Radio broadcast as well as anywhere podcasts are hosted. | ||
| The press is reporting on a major run on iodine. | ||
| Iodine of any type, the medical potassium iodine, deep earth crystal iodine, atomic iodine, you name it, people are buying it off the shelves all over the world because of the threat of nuclear war with Russia and the Ukraine situation with NATO and the United States in a proxy war with Vladimir Putin. | ||
| I'm not promoting X3 as some panacea that protects you from nuclear war. | ||
| In fact, if there is a hydrogen bomb attack or an atomic bomb attack, it only protects you from some of the fallout and a few of the isotopes. | ||
| The answer to stopping nuclear war is peace and speaking out. | ||
| That's what we need. | ||
| And former President Trump's been talking a lot about that. | ||
| The reason I promote high-quality iodine is what it does to your immune system, what it does to your cells, what it does to your energy, your stamina, your libido. | ||
| We have the very best iodine out there with all three types of the very best in tri-iodine X3. And despite the fact there's a run on iodine happening right now, We're offering it at 50% off until it sells out. | ||
| It's been sold out for many months. | ||
| It's finally back in stock. | ||
| X3 exclusively available at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| And it takes about two weeks to kick in. | ||
| Look, it's not just that I&I can block some radioactive isotopes. | ||
| That's not what we sell them. What it does block is the bad halogens, chlorine, fluoride, bromine, romine, and a bunch of other bad halogens. | ||
| It's the good halogen associated with higher IQ, mental clarity, against stamina, libido, you name it. | ||
| And X3 is back in stock at 50% off at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| It's a true 360 win. | ||
| Fund the InfoWars at this critical time. | ||
| Keep us on air and experience the power of X3. Now look, an aspirin kicks in in 30 minutes. | ||
| Coffee kicks in in 30 minutes. | ||
| This takes two weeks to kick in. |
Export Selection