Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Welcome to The American Journal. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
The show we have for you today, lots of videos to show you. | ||
unidentified
|
We'll be taking your calls throughout the show as well. | |
Let's not waste any time. | ||
time. | ||
Let's get right into it. | ||
Here it is, your daily dispatch. | ||
All right, here it is, folks, your daily dispatch for Tuesday, September 27th, 2022. | ||
Edward Snowden has been granted Russian citizenship. | ||
President Vladimir Putin on Monday granted Russian citizenship to Edward J. Snowden, the former U.S. intelligence contractor who became one of the world's most high-profile fugitives after he disclosed mass surveillance techniques to news organizations. | ||
Mr. Snowden said in 2020 that he was applying for Russian citizenship, describing his The request is a practical measure to give his family greater freedom crossing borders. | ||
His request was granted by Mr. | ||
Putin in a decree dated Monday and published by the Kremlin. | ||
Mr. Stodden, 39, was among dozens of foreigners granted citizenship in the decree. | ||
Good. Good for him. Good for him. | ||
Remember, the Obama administration trapped Edward Snowden in Russia in the first place. | ||
He was trying to go through Russia to get to somewhere else with his family, and then the Obama administration used whatever powers they could to keep him in Russia. | ||
And so he said, all right, fine. | ||
I'll stay here then. | ||
So good for him. | ||
He has been reunited with his family, and that's wonderful to see. | ||
You know what also would be wonderful to see? | ||
Any sort of consequences to the revelations that he made. | ||
Wouldn't that also have been nice to see when Edward Soden revealed that the NSA and spy state of this country was vastly exceeding its constitutional prerogatives, that something was actually done to reverse that? | ||
That would have been nice, wouldn't it have been? | ||
But it didn't, so here we are. | ||
This week, the Oath Keepers will be on trial, including Leader Stuart Rhodes. | ||
From Gateway Pundit, Oath Keepers forced to go on trial on bogus sedition conspiracy charges five weeks before midterms. | ||
Governor denies them discovery, arrests their key witnesses, jury bias and unethical judges, plagues the kangaroo court, Democrats desperate to retain power. | ||
I think that's all fairly accurate. | ||
Fact check, true. A group of oath-keepers, including leader Stuart Rhodes, will be forced to go on trial prematurely this week after numerous attempts by their attorneys to push the trial until January and outside of Washington, D.C. The presiding judge, Amit Mehta, denied their motions for change of venue and continuance. | ||
This is what they've been waiting for, a seditious conspiracy conviction to prove January 6th was in fact an insurrection and to tie it all to Trump to prevent him from running again and even possibly to use to arrest him. | ||
We'll be covering this extensively in today's program, show you some videos of Stuart Rhodes from yesterday. | ||
The trial should begin today, I believe. | ||
Also, of course, it's been revealed as part of the trial that the FBI did in fact have Clandestine forces inside the Oath Keepers, meaning the whole thing is, in fact, a dog and pony show. | ||
U.S. Congress negotiators set nearly $12 billion in new Ukraine aid. | ||
That's right. Just tack it on top. | ||
Just another $12 billion between friends, right? | ||
Again, we'll cover that later in the show. | ||
NASA's vending machine-sized spacecrafts Spacecraft crashes into football stadium-sized asteroid in the world's first planetary defense test. | ||
This is only a test of planetary defense. | ||
Today, our DART mission is set to crash into a non-hazardous asteroid to test deflection technology should we ever discover a threat. | ||
And here you can see the video of the actual crash taking place if you believe in things like space. | ||
Still debatable. I don't know. | ||
That's kind of cool, actually. Kind of cool. | ||
Kind of the type of thing that we should have been doing since the 70s if we hadn't gotten a little bit off track here in America, you might say. | ||
Incredible. German government thinks Russian gas pipelines could have been deliberately sabotaged. | ||
What? By who? The newspaper Tagaspiegel reports that a sudden loss of pressure in the three natural gas pipelines between Russia and Germany is likely to have been a targeted attack carried out by either Russia or Ukraine. | ||
Hmm. Who has a vested interest in destroying Russian property? | ||
Hmm. Let me think about that. | ||
We're going to have a good think about that. | ||
You come back on the other side. | ||
We'll continue the show. | ||
unidentified
|
Stay tuned. | |
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
I think it's time to blow this thing. | ||
Get everybody in this stuff together. | ||
Okay. All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
I forgot today was an extra-large, super-special Daily Dispatch. | ||
There's another story I forgot to get to, and It's a doozy, all right. | ||
Detection of messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccines in human breast milk. | ||
It's been discovered. | ||
Just incredible. | ||
I just... Okay. All right. | ||
Well, we'll just read this, okay? | ||
We'll just read this verbatim. | ||
Vaccination is a cornerstone in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. | ||
However, the initial messenger RNA vaccine clinical trials excluded several vulnerable groups, including young children and lactating individuals. | ||
Woo, boy! Just that one sentence, huh? | ||
Or just those two sentences, I guess. | ||
Just... Yeah, vaccination is a cornerstone in fighting the COVID-19 pandemic. | ||
Kind of in the same way gasoline is a cornerstone of fighting a house fire. | ||
However, the initial messenger RNA vaccine trials excluded several vulnerable groups, including young children and lactating individuals. | ||
Lactating individuals. | ||
Not breastfeeding mothers. | ||
Yeah. Not breastfeeding women, lactating it like they're cows. | ||
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration deferred the decision to authorize COVID-19 mRNA vaccines for infants younger than six months until more data are available because of the potential priming of the children's immune responses that may alter their immunity. | ||
The Center for Disease Control Prevention recommends offering COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to breastfeeding individuals, although the possible passage of vaccine mRNAs in breast milk resulting in infants' exposure at younger than six months was not investigated. | ||
The study investigated whether COVID-19 Vaccine mRNA can be detected in the expressed breast milk of lactating individuals receiving the vaccine within six months after delivery and of course it Yes, of 11 lactating individuals enrolled, trace amounts of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were detected in seven samples from five different participants at various times up to 45 hours post-vaccination. | ||
This means the yield of EVs isolated from EMB is something, something, something. | ||
The point is the vaccine travels through your breast milk and they lied to you. | ||
So, just so we're clear... | ||
Recently revealed about the vaccine is it doesn't work. | ||
It's more dangerous and more likely to cause massive side effects than COVID is to be a severe case. | ||
These all from Harvard studies and various other studies. | ||
Ivermectin is extremely successful at preventing serious cases and can actually cure patients. | ||
It's not safe for pregnant women, actually. | ||
Oops, sorry about that. | ||
We forced it on you before we knew whether it was safe or not. | ||
Now we know it's not, so sorry about that. | ||
And, of course, now it can be found in breast milk and get into kids under the age of six months and screw up their entire immune system. | ||
So... I guess it's kind of like a crime against humanity. | ||
I guess when you take it all into account, everything that the vaccine pushers did amounts to Nuremberg trial levels, crimes against humanity and children, and will have effects for years that we can't even imagine. | ||
So that's the update. | ||
That's the update. There it is. | ||
Of course, none of this is new to us here at Infowars because we've been covering all of this with the eye of an actual scientist, not a trademark scientist, not a scientist TM, not a science exclamation point, but science period. | ||
Science, the way that you look at things. | ||
with an open mind and determine what the facts are and then pursue those facts regardless of how it makes you feel or whether it affects the bottom line of some giant pharmaceutical company so it wasn't that hard to figure out that all of this stuff was either a possibility or a certainty it's just we were silenced and ignored and now this is all coming out we're told that there was no way we could have known that we're just being told it now Strange, | ||
because we were saying this a year and a half ago, or at least saying, why are they not testing these things? | ||
Why are they not doing the tests for these vulnerable groups before giving it to these vulnerable groups? | ||
Maybe it's because they knew the entire time that the outcome would be negative, and so first they had to roll it out, and then they can slow leak out the revelations that... | ||
All of what we were saying was true, but do it in a way that doesn't cause mass blowback. | ||
Well, there should be mass blowback. | ||
There should be massive, unrelenting blowback until these criminals that have poisoned entire generations are brought to justice. | ||
But hey, that's just my opinion. | ||
Who am I? Just an American citizen, that's all. | ||
Just trying to express my first movement right. | ||
We'll see how long that goes. | ||
Now, we have a big case this week. | ||
It is the Oath Keepers and Stuart Rhodes. | ||
Again, I love the way that Gateway Pundit puts it. | ||
Oath Keepers forced to go on trial on bogus, seditious conspiracy charges five weeks before midterms. | ||
The government denies them discovery, arrests their key witnesses, jury bias, and unethical judges plague the kangaroo courts. | ||
Democrats are desperate to retain power. | ||
Yes, this is in all... | ||
The ways you can imagine it, a show trial, and yet it's very real for the people involved who may very well be spending years behind prison for these falsified charges that make absolutely no sense. | ||
Stuart Rhodes at least never actually even went into the Capitol building. | ||
He was just nearby. And of course, if you read the charging documents, they try to phrase things like the stack, the military stack that the Oath Keepers used to penetrate the congressional building. | ||
And then you see what it is, and it's a bunch of dudes with their hands on the shoulder of the person in front of them so that they can more easily move through the crowd. | ||
I guess, yeah, throw them in jail for years for that. | ||
I mean, that's what we do here in America, right? | ||
After all, one thing that the First Movement does not do is allow you to express disagreement with the American government. | ||
Trust me, I'm a liberal. | ||
Let's go to video 21 here. | ||
This is Oath Keepers leader Stuart Rhodes talking yesterday about what it's like to be sitting in prison in solitary confinement for months knowing that you have done absolutely nothing wrong. | ||
unidentified
|
What other descendants in the past have gone through. | |
You know, the founding generation, they were in horrible conditions as prisoners of war in British prisonships in New York Harbor. | ||
You know, it's horrible conditions. | ||
This is nothing like that. | ||
This is nothing like what Nelson Mandela went through in the Soviet Union. | ||
This is nothing like what Nelson Mandela went through in South Africa for 20 years. | ||
And of course, this was posted by our good friend Ron Filipowski, in some way trying to mock Stuart Rhodes for comparing himself to Solzhenitsyn and Nelson Mandela. | ||
Of course, if you actually listen to the clip we just heard, he was saying this is nothing compared to what other dissidents in the past have gone through. | ||
He's keeping a cheerful and upbeat demeanor, which again is just testament to the I don't know, force of will these guys have. | ||
I mean, it really is admirable the way these guys who are sitting in prison rotting are able to keep a perspective that I'm not sure I could handle. | ||
I think I would be freaking out. | ||
These guys, they understand. | ||
This is what happens when you have a totalitarian government. | ||
It is, in a perverse way, Justification for everything that they believe, right? | ||
In some weird reverse action, it is confirmation of everything that the Oath Keepers have been saying and have been fighting against the entire time. | ||
Absolutely incredible. Of course, we have a lot of updates to this. | ||
We're going to show you some videos from January 6th of Oath Keepers doing the unthinkable on January 6th. | ||
Helping the Capitol Police, but don't let a little bit of eyewitness evidence convince you. | ||
They're seditionists. | ||
They're treasonists. They are enemies of the state that they swore an oath to serve and joined a group to continue to uphold that oath. | ||
Defense attorneys and Oath Keepers case file a motion to reveal the identities of the federal informants inside the Oath Keepers organization. | ||
We'll get into that and show you some more videos on the other side as we continue our coverage of the war against patriots happening on all fronts. | ||
One of the great battles is about to begin. | ||
Will the trial of Stuart Rhodes lead to the arrest of Donald Trump? | ||
That's what they're hoping for. | ||
How will they scheme to get it? | ||
Stay tuned. Find out. | ||
Folks, welcome back. This is the American Journal. | ||
So much to talk about today. | ||
unidentified
|
Just, yeah, as always, right? | |
Just the collapse is ongoing. | ||
The takeover is underway. | ||
And the show trials are set to take place this week against Stuart Rhodes, leader of the Oath Keepers militia. | ||
New York Times reports sedition trial of Oath Keepers to get underway when Stuart Rhodes, the leader of the Oath Keepers militia, And four other members of the far-right group go on trial on Tuesday for a seditious conspiracy in the attack on the Capitol last year. | ||
They will join a list of defendants who have faced sedition charges, one that includes Islamic terrorists, Puerto Rican nationalists, and radical left-wing unionists. | ||
Yes, unlike all of those people, however, the Oath Keepers are utterly and totally innocent in all of this, but put that off to the side. | ||
Mr. Rhodes and his subordinates intend to offer a novel and risky defense in seeking to rebut the accusations that they plotted to use force against the government. | ||
They plan to tell the jury that when armed teams of Oath Keepers prepared to rush into Washington from Virginia on January 6, 2021, they believe they would be following legal orders from the president himself. | ||
And of course, when those legal orders, which are a part and parcel of the Constitution and the actual privileges of the executive branch, didn't come, they didn't go to Washington, D.C. See, if you can sort of read through the lines here, you can understand that what they're being charged with is being in a different state with legal guns while in Washington, D.C., A spontaneous riot was taking place. | ||
This is sedition, according to these people. | ||
Getting guns, waiting in Virginia for an order that never comes, and so they never go to Washington, D.C. with the guns that they have. | ||
Seditious conspiracy. | ||
Okay. That's what that is. | ||
Lawyers for the five defendants are set to argue with the trial, which will begin Tuesday with jury selection, that the Oath Keepers were waiting on January 6 for President Donald J. Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act, a revolutionary-era law that grants the president wide powers to deploy the military to quell unrest in emergencies. | ||
In addition, that they don't mention in the New York Times, is that it allows the executive branch to deputize local militias to act on behalf of the government in order to put down unrest. | ||
Something that everybody on the right wing had been calling for Trump to do since... | ||
I don't know, June of that year. | ||
I don't know. I mean, after a couple months of endless violent riots burning down entire city blocks, dozens dead, right? | ||
A literal full-on nationwide insurrection that was taking place because of the Black Lives Matter movement. | ||
People were saying, why don't you invoke the Insurrection Act? | ||
This whole issue could be cleared up in an afternoon, basically. | ||
So, this is all perfectly legal. | ||
None of that is illegal. | ||
And when the order never came, they stayed in Virginia with their guns. | ||
So... I wonder if he would have done anything different. | ||
I wonder if Trump would have done anything different this time. | ||
Can you just imagine? | ||
Can you imagine if Donald Trump was still president? | ||
Can you imagine if the stock market hadn't lost $7 trillion? | ||
Can you imagine if the pipelines that we rely on for oil hadn't been shut down by the executive branch? | ||
Can you imagine if the war in Ukraine had been prevented, at least delayed, for another four years while Donald Trump Can you imagine not being on the cusp of World War III with Europe on its knees awaiting a winter with no heat? | ||
Can you imagine how good things would have been if Donald Trump had just done that? | ||
We can only dream. | ||
We dream to imagine here. | ||
Exclusive from Gateway Pundit, DOJ drops a bomb, admits federal government ran informants inside the Oath Keepers on January 6th, and they spring this on the January 6th attorneys less than one week before the trials. | ||
Next week, this is from September 23rd. | ||
So next week, the government is holding trials of several Oathkeeper members who attended protests in Washington, D.C. on January 5th and January 6th. | ||
The DOJ is hoping to convince a jury that the Oathkeepers were planning an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6th. | ||
Oathkeeper members were working security that day at the Ellipse, where Donald Trump Spoke to a million supporters. | ||
Several Oath Keepers then walked to the U.S. Capitol where at least two more protests were planned. | ||
Stuart Rhodes, the Oath Keeper founder and president, told all of the members to leave their firearms in their hotels outside of the city. | ||
A handful of Oath Keeper members entered the U.S. Capitol that day where they stood around, picked up trash, spoke with police and left when they were told to. | ||
Insurrection! Sedition! | ||
Throw them in the gulag! | ||
Torture them for their information! | ||
Again, all of this totally above board. | ||
All of this was discussed quite openly in public before the event ever happened. | ||
None of this was secret. None of this was hidden. | ||
None of this was illegal. | ||
In fact, we have a video here that I'd like to show you of the... | ||
The title is Those Darn Oath Keepers. | ||
Those gosh darn Oath Keepers caught on video from January 6th doing the unthinkable and actually helping the police and trying their darndest to keep the peace. | ||
Let's go now to clip number 29. | ||
I'll narrate. Here you see Oath Keepers rescue a helpless woman from police assault. | ||
That is actually Jeremy Brown, who is also sitting and rotting in prison. | ||
Here they are talking to a member of the Capitol Police. | ||
unidentified
|
How can we help you? | |
Police officers up there, can you help me get them down? | ||
I appreciate it. You're not going to leave. | ||
Do you want them to leave? No, they can stay there. | ||
I just need to get the other officers out. | ||
They need to go to the side. | ||
They can get out and go down the stairs. | ||
Just like we did. | ||
There's stairs on the side that can go out. | ||
Now watch this. | ||
Now watch. | ||
You're about to see a military stack. | ||
There it is. | ||
This is it. | ||
This is the military stack. | ||
Ironically, has a Capitol Police officer in the military stack wearing a MAGA hat. | ||
That's it. | ||
That's the military stack. | ||
See the way they're holding each other's hands as they walk through the crowd? | ||
That's what the filing documents call a military stack. | ||
And they use as proof that this is a military operation to bring about insurrection in this country. | ||
Amazing. | ||
Here is another part where Oath Keepers are de-escalating. | ||
And you hear indistinct shouting and somebody shouts, "Kill everyone, right?" Although, it was formed in a question that may have been a cop saying that. | ||
We don't want to kill anybody, we want answers. | ||
You can see people starting to yell at the cops, an Oathkeeper standing in between them. | ||
Here, Oathkeeper's actually escorting the riot police away from the building. | ||
Because again, this is what Oath Keepers always do. | ||
This is what they always do in any situation. | ||
They use their military and police training to try to prevent riots from getting out of control. | ||
Oath Keepers escort riot police away from the conflict. | ||
And these are the people that are charged with seditious conspiracy and have already spent months in prison. | ||
unidentified
|
About the death? | |
No. About the shooting? Yes. | ||
This guy talking about he was there when Ashley Babbitt was shot. | ||
unidentified
|
He said, Speaker's office, after they breached the windows, I heard a blast. | |
Somebody said it was a buckshot. It sounded like it. | ||
And then this girl went down. | ||
Both keepers carry an injured man out of the building. | ||
Keepers carry another injured man down the steps. | ||
unidentified
|
How's it going? | |
This video is from StopHate.com, by the way. | ||
Go to see that. We're back on the other side. | ||
We'll continue to talk a little bit more about what can be expected in the trial this week. | ||
We'll show you some more videos. We'll move on to some other troubling information. | ||
Another battlefront on the war against patriotism here and around the world. | ||
Stay tuned and for store.com to support us. | ||
All right, welcome back, folks. - So last week, the Oath Keepers trial begins today with jury selections this Tuesday. | ||
Last week, it was revealed that by the government that they actually had confidential human sources, in other words, government informants inside the Oath Keepers on January 6th, meaning again, if this had been a pre-planned seditious activity, If this had been some sort of designed conspiracy to overthrow the United States government, it could have and would have been stopped before it ever got started. | ||
But, of course, it wasn't, so they didn't, which is very interesting. | ||
Now, they're not saying who these confidential human sources are. | ||
They say at trial, the government or defense may call to testify certain CHSs, that is confidential human sources, who were either involved in the investigation that led to the prosecution of the defendant or who become CHSs subsequent to the initiation of the instant investigation. | ||
By this motion, the government seeks to preclude defendants from eliciting either on cross-examination or on direct information regarding any other investigations the CHSs may be involved in. | ||
Details regarding other investigations are not relevant and could undermine the operational integrity of those investigations. | ||
So again, they're just the classic FBI move. | ||
That is an open investigation, so we cannot tell you that information. | ||
It's an ongoing investigation, and they just keep investigations ongoing for years, and they never come to anything, but it does allow them to prevent you from asking questions. | ||
It'll be similar to what we see with the Alex Jones trial where certain things are just off limits, certain things you just can't talk about. | ||
And so while the defense is trying to question, like when the government is questioning these defendants, they'll already have sort of a preplanned back and forth where they say exactly, they elicit exactly the information that they want. | ||
And then when it's defendants' times to cross-examine, they'll constantly be interrupted with government saying, actually, actually, that delves into things that we'd rather not have aired out in a public courtroom. | ||
and they'll be prevented from actually providing a thorough defense. | ||
Despite the fact. So, I mean, to me, if you're going to put somebody on the stand who can't be questioned about certain things, then you shouldn't be able to put them on the stand. | ||
You can either ask them all the questions that you want about anything, or nobody can ask them questions at all. | ||
But hey, that's not the way things work, not when you're dealing with the FBI and a corrupt government. | ||
On Wednesday, Gateway Pundit spoke with Stuart Rhodes, and he told Gateway Pundit that the DOJ has indicted two of his top witnesses in the past three months, and so therefore he will not be able to call them as witnesses in the case, including Kelly Sorrell, his former attorney who traveled with him that week to Washington, | ||
D.C. See, that's just not a little hook and crook by the criminals that run our Justice Department and that are engaged in a You know, federal effort to disembowel any patriotic opposition to government overreach and unconstitutionality. | ||
Say, well, we're going to call Kelly Sorrell to... | ||
The stand to defend Stuart Rhodes since she was there the whole time and has inside knowledge and can tell you exactly what was going on and who said what to who. | ||
And they're like, oh, okay, well, then in that case, she's under arrest. | ||
Well, in that case, she is now in prison and you can't call her. | ||
Sorry about that. Oops. Ongoing investigation. | ||
Better find somebody else to talk to. | ||
So completely stacking the deck against them. | ||
Now, the defense attorneys in the Oath Keepers case... | ||
Have filed a motion to reveal the identities of the federal informants. | ||
Biden's Department of Justice admitted on Friday via a motion for a protective order, the one that I just read, that there were federal informants with the FBI working within the Oath Keepers organization. | ||
Members of that group have been charged with seditious conspiracy stemming from the Capitol riot on January 6th. | ||
And of course we know what this looks like because Jeremy Brown was one of the people approached to be a confidential human source and informant within the Oath Keepers. | ||
And he, instead of working with the FBI, filmed the FBI asking him this and trying to pressure him into becoming an informant and exposed it. | ||
He too has now been arrested because, well, you just can't go around revealing the devious ways that the FBI is working to undermine patriotic Americans and keepers of their oaths from Speaking out, exercising their First Amendment. | ||
Now, as the trial of Oath Keeper Stuart Rhodes and four co-conspirators is set to begin on Tuesday, attorneys for the defendants have filed a counter motion saying that, quote, none of the confidential human sources provided evidence of guilt on part of the Oath Keepers as an organization or the individual defendants in this case. | ||
The defendants are before this court with their liberty interests at stake, the filing reads. | ||
The government has paid individuals to gather information and evidence about the Oath Keepers and defendants. | ||
Some of the material has been used to build a case against the defendants. | ||
Although the government has disclosed to the defense, only after being ordered to do so by this court, the activities of five confidential human sources, it has communicated to defense counsel that only one will be called to testify as a witness at trial. | ||
So, in other words, five confidential human sources provided so-called evidence for the investigation to justify the arrest of Stuart Rhodes, but now they won't be called at trial, so the government won't be Giving out their identity to the defense. | ||
The defense can also not call them to witness and ask them questions about the evidence they provided to the FBI. It's just completely stacked. | ||
It's just completely stacked. It's just... | ||
We're so screwed. | ||
All of America is so screwed with this type of stuff happening and the media not just not calling it out, but actually favoring it and... | ||
Telling people it's a good thing. | ||
With the motion for a protective order, the filing continues. | ||
The government has now lifted the veil on its use of CHSs in this face, a fact... | ||
In this face, a fact that has been concealed from public knowledge. | ||
While the motion states that the government had good cause to keep the identity of the confidential human sources protected, the filing states it was only recently disclosed to defendants that none of the CHS's provided evidence of guilt on part of the Oath Keepers as an organization or the individual defendants in this case. | ||
However, the indictment against Rhodes references the quote Rhodes Plan, which is what the government is calling the method by which the Oath Keepers allegedly organized themselves into a conspiracy to use force to prevent the lawful transfer of...of presidential power in January 2021 or corruptly interfere with the electoral vote certification by Congress or both. | ||
This despite the fact that none of the federal informants, quote, reported the existence of any such roads plan, and they've all denied having known any information about a roads plan when questioned by their FBI handlers after January 6, 2021. | ||
The motion notes that either the supposed roads plan was so secret that the Oathkeeper leadership didn't even know about it, But, of course, they're not going to be allowed to see all of that information. | ||
Again, it's just selective enforcement of the law, selective allowing of... | ||
Legal avenues to investigate the investigators to actually see how did you get this information? | ||
Who told you this? | ||
How did you come about this? | ||
Well, the FBI says, don't worry about it. | ||
Somebody said this, so we're treating it as absolutely true. | ||
We can't tell you who said it or when they said it or why they said it or even who they are, where they are now. | ||
But you have to trust us, and it's an ongoing investigation, so... | ||
There it is. An absolute kangaroo court. | ||
We'll keep you updated on the developments in that case. | ||
And of course, it's worth reminding everybody right now that several months ago, many people on the right wing threw Stuart Rhodes under the bus for no particular reason. | ||
Just worth reminding everybody that at the time of his greatest need, The people that Stuart Rhodes was fighting with and for threw him under the bus and called him a federal informant and claimed that the only explanation for why he hadn't been arrested and tried was that he must have been the inside FBI agent who was directing this so that all of his underlings would get caught. | ||
Now he is facing trial. | ||
Now the FBI is admitting it did have confidential human sources but Stuart Rhodes was not one of them and they're Putting the full force and weight of the federal government into destroying his life. | ||
And I can only imagine what it was like to, at that moment of being in the lowest of the low, to have the people that you thought were on your side throw you under the bus with no evidence at all. | ||
Of course, if you're watching this program... | ||
You knew that we disproved that idea from the very beginning and stood by Stuart Rhodes the entire time, as we will continue to. | ||
And that's why, despite the fact that there are so many other outlets doing kind of like what InfoWars does, nobody gets it right as much as InfoWars. | ||
And that's just because we look at the facts and support the patriots, even when others don't. | ||
Support us, won't you, at fullwarstore.com. | ||
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
I'm going to finish up this hour by continuing to discuss the ongoing war against American patriots that's being waged by, well, everybody that's not an American patriot, I guess you could say. | ||
It's being waged by the media, it's being waged by big tech, it's being waged by the FBI primarily. | ||
And of course all of these are not separate entities, they are all various facets of the same globalist cabal that is driving us towards absolute destitution, ruin, hopelessness, famine, and everything else bad under the sun. | ||
And we'll talk a little bit more about that as we continue through the day. | ||
We're also going to talk about some new revelations when it comes to COVID-19. | ||
We have a pretty thick stack of war articles to talk about. | ||
Crime as well. | ||
But the war on patriots is our number one topic. | ||
And a bunch of revelations have been made about this recently. | ||
You have the FBI... Being exposed as whistleblowers come out and say that, first of all, the threat of domestic terror and white supremacy is not real. | ||
The quote from the whistleblower was there are essentially more FBI agents looking for white supremacists than there are white supremacists in the country, and so now they're doing everything they can to try to Just turn certain things into domestic terror in order to drive up the numbers in order to justify this witch hunt this wild goose chase that they're on including taking Agents off of investigations about child sex trafficking to go after the manufactured crisis of white supremacist domestic terrorists. | ||
You also had revelations that Big Tech was working intimately with the FBI accessing users of things like Facebook, their private messages, people who privately in their private messages questioned the 2020 election then had their private messages forwarded in a pack to the FBI. Without a warrant, without even being asked for it, actually. | ||
There's also story after story about people going directly from the FBI to the big tech companies. | ||
Did they quit the FBI? Are they not working for the FBI anymore? | ||
Or are they just filling a different position now? | ||
One that's not entirely legal, one that's not entirely legal. | ||
You know, codified and licensed within the U.S. government, but is rather just sort of a friendly thing, right? | ||
Yeah, just go work at Facebook. | ||
I know you're not an FBI agent anymore, but if you see anything suspicious, why don't you just give us a call? | ||
You know, yesterday I was doing some research, and I swear, the only thing you really need to... | ||
B, a conspiracy theorist is Wikipedia. | ||
Wikipedia has most of it. | ||
I mean, it's still one of the most censored and controlled sources of information out there, but they can't bury everything, right? | ||
And there's a game we play. | ||
Maybe we should play it on air. | ||
Something like Six Degrees of Separation, where you see if you can get from one globalist to another by just clicking a few links on Wikipedia. | ||
Yeah. Things like you want to find out about what's going on in Ukraine war. | ||
You start off with Victoria Nuland. | ||
You start clicking on things like the Center for New American Security. | ||
Suddenly, within a click or two, it's possible to get from the author of the lockstep document on the Rockefeller Foundation to Mark Benioff of Salesforce, who runs Time Magazine and is Champion of stakeholder capitalism in the understudy of Klaus Schwab to Victoria Newland to Anthony Blinken and all this. | ||
I mean, it's fascinating what you can find out on Wikipedia. | ||
So I was checking out old Anthony Blinken's Wikipedia the other day and looking at something that we've covered here, but probably not enough, which is the organization called WestExec. | ||
Now this, if you go to Anthony Blinken's Wikipedia page, you find West Exec Advisors under private sector. | ||
In 2017, Blinken co-founded West Exec Advisors, a political strategy advising firm with Michelle Flournoy, Sergio Aguera, and Nitlin Chata, as well as, of course, basically everybody from the Biden administration. | ||
Essentially what happened was when Donald Trump won, the entirety of the Obama administration just moved into a building across the street from the White House and continued to operate as if they were the ones in charge, including everybody from Jen Psaki to Anthony Blinken himself. | ||
But I was just struck by what West Exec claimed that they did, what their purpose for existence was. | ||
West Exec's clients have included Google's Jigsaw, Israeli artificial intelligence company Windward, a surveillance drone manufacturer Shield AI, which signed a $7.2 million contract with the Air Force. | ||
and Fortune 100 types. | ||
According to foreign policy, the firm's collective clientele includes the defense industry, private equity firms, and hedge funds. | ||
Blinken received almost $1.2 million in compensation from WestExec. | ||
In an interview with The Intercept, Flournoy described West Exec's role as facilitating relationships between Silicon Valley and the Department of Defense and law enforcement. | ||
Flournoy and others compared West Exec to the Kissinger Associates. | ||
So, it's just a nest of evil, just a nest of villainy, just a hive of corruption and military expansion and, of course, big tech... | ||
Intertwining, right? To intertwine the Defense Department and the Police Departments with Big Tech. | ||
That was the purpose of West Exec, the corporation owned and run by our current Secretary of State. | ||
Long been an official proceeding where they are merging Big Tech and the Defense Department or the Department of Justice to be one monolithic, unaccountable, extrajudicial spy apparatus. | ||
And, of course, the people that carried this out were in line with Mark Zuckerberg and his Zuckbucks to get them back into office. | ||
It's all one big corrupt cabal. | ||
And then you have Mark Benioff and Time Magazine explaining how they did this in a way that portrays it as something good and loving because they like you. | ||
It's not, though. It's obvious that it's not, but there it is. | ||
Story after story these days about FBI whistleblower Steve Friend, FBI hero paying the price for exposing the unjust persecution of conservative Americans. | ||
FBI whistleblower, nobody I know, signed up to investigate parents who vented at school board meetings. | ||
Oh, but that's what you're doing, isn't it? | ||
And of course, combined with this, you have things like PayPal attempting to silence anybody going against their agenda and their narrative. | ||
You also have this, another example of the way that the Actual democratic process in this country is undermined continuously. | ||
As people who have done nothing wrong are subjected to essentially struggle sessions and kangaroo courts we saw earlier this year. | ||
How again, I mean, and again, they just do this stuff. | ||
It's amazing how they get away with this. | ||
I don't get it. | ||
I don't understand why Republicans don't make bigger deals out of this. | ||
But it's like almost crazy to... | ||
To just remember this happened, right? | ||
That Marjorie Taylor Greene, Congresswoman, who has served her constituency extremely effectively, they're very happy with what she does. | ||
As she gets ready to run for reelection, she is subjected to an interrogation in public broadcast on national TV where they are questioning her as if she is a seditious conspirator, a treasonous actor. | ||
And she is forced to justify every decision or she makes even up to and including likes she made on Facebook. | ||
You liked this person on Facebook. | ||
Why did you do that? | ||
Explain that in a way that comports with our view of reality. | ||
I mean, it is insane what they're doing. | ||
Now, but it goes even farther. | ||
Judge rules Alaska GOP-er is likely barred from office for being an oath keeper. | ||
See, the oath keepers were never a terrorist organization. | ||
They were never a violent, illegal organization. | ||
It was always out in the open. | ||
It was always up front. | ||
It was always completely public. | ||
It wasn't some secret society that so many of these people are actually members of. | ||
This was a open confederation of like-minded individuals who were all or mostly ex-military and police who understood that when they stood there and took an oath of office to uphold the Constitution with their very lives, that that didn't end when their employment ended. | ||
When you take an oath, it's not I swear to do this until I stop getting paid and then all bets are off, right? | ||
It was an oath that they took and they understand just because I'm not in office. | ||
Just because I'm not being paid by the state to be a police officer, that doesn't mean I then cast off this oath I took. | ||
I still am responsible for upholding the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. | ||
So you're totally open, totally good, totally in line with the Constitution and of patriotic nature. | ||
And yet now a judge has decided because this guy was a member of this open patriotic group, he can't be in office anymore. | ||
He can't run. An Alaskan judge ruled on Thursday that Alaska State Representative David Eastman will likely be found ineligible for office in a lawsuit seeking to oust the Republican over his lifetime membership with the Oath Keepers, a far-right militia group. | ||
See, so first they claim this militia group that's totally peaceful, never been implicated in any sort of terrorist activity or intimidation, anything of the sort. | ||
They say, well, now that group's illegal and you're a member of that group. | ||
So, retroactively, now you're a terrorist, so now you can't be in office anymore. | ||
You are hereby disqualified and ineligible to run. | ||
Open corruption, open manipulation of the democratic system. | ||
Folks, we'll be back on the other side of the second hour to take your phone calls. | ||
Go to Infowarsstore.com right now to support us while you can. | ||
We're in a fight for our lives, and we depend entirely on you to arm us in this information war. | ||
Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Go there now. | ||
With our government guilty of pushing a deadly experimental vaccine, robbing the nation of its wealth, and starting a war with Russia, who has a superior nuclear weapons arsenal, One has to ask, be it angry mobs or atom bombs. | ||
where do these crooks plan on escaping the fallout? | ||
unidentified
|
Denver is now handing out free bug-out bags to help you just in case you run into emergency. | |
Lisa, all right, I asked you last time, I need to know the checklist of everything I gotta put in my bug-out bag. | ||
Toilet paper, paper towels, toilet paper, paper towels, we've got cotton balls. | ||
Two opportunities to get these free emergency preparedness bags, so really an important effort, especially when we're talking about severe weather. | ||
Yeah, and I know a lot of people People are going to go and get those bags, but for people who maybe can't make it out there, is there anything in there that's, you know, too tough that you couldn't just put one of those together yourself? | ||
Yeah, there's a lot of stuff you could easily put together yourself. | ||
I mean, if you got any extra cotton balls, you know, paper towels, toilet paper. | ||
The city of Denver is letting the locals know they should be prepared for an unexpected order to get out of town in a hurry. | ||
And many people are connecting dots between this and the Denver International Airport. | ||
The Denver International Airport has long been rumored to be sitting atop an underground military base built deep beneath the surface and connected to several other underground bases. | ||
These rumors are the result of several interesting facts. | ||
From 1995 until he was found dead a year later, Phil Schneider gave dozens of lectures claiming to be a geological engineer hired to build deep underground military bases known as DUMs for the U.S. government. | ||
His father was Captain Oskar Schneider, a former Nazi stationed in Florida working black operations for naval intelligence. | ||
Phil Schneider was showing samples of what he claimed were unknown exotic metals. | ||
He provided maps of the underground dumbs and showed off dramatic scars that he claimed were from a violent skirmish with a non-human species deep underground. | ||
In January of 1996, Schneider was found dead in his home, days after he mysteriously died of strangulation. | ||
Investigations were never completed, and it was ruled a suicide. | ||
His evidence went missing. | ||
Before he died, Phil Schneider used his clearance to take investigative author Alex Christopher into the top underground levels of the Denver airport, where they took pictures of a long road heading off to multiple destinations. | ||
Built upon 53 square miles of land, 25 miles from downtown, the Denver airport was billions of dollars over budget. | ||
Different contractors were hired for each section, some of whom have come forward and claimed it would take days to show you what's down there. | ||
Inside the otherwise unimpressive airport, there is a capstone with cryptic Illuminati and Masonic imagery, marking a time capsule buried beneath to be opened in 2094. | ||
The airport opened with a famous four-piece mural depicting biological warfare, death and destruction, the surrender of all national sovereignty, and the emergence of a new religion. | ||
On the floor, for no apparent reason, is what appears to be the symbol for gold and silver in a mining cart, AUAG, which is also the abbreviation for a deadly strain of hepatitis discovered in 1965. | ||
Outside on the surface, the runways form the shape of a swastika, and passengers are greeted by what has become known as Blucifer, a 32-foot horse with glowing red eyes that reportedly killed its creator when a piece of the sculpture came loose and severed an artery in his leg. | ||
This is why many people are talking about Denver's Bug Out Bag program, which is good, because now that we know who the people committing these historic crimes against humanity are, we can't just let them slip away into some hole somewhere. | ||
Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. | ||
He kills a teen for his political beliefs, admits it, and is now already out on bail, according to LifeZet. | ||
Court docs say Shannon Brandt told 911 dispatchers he intentionally used his SUV to kill the victim, Kaler Ellingson, because he was a Republican extremist. | ||
Is it any coincidence Brandt seems to feel justified soon after President Biden's inflammatory speech, pitting half the country against his opposition? | ||
And Biden is doubling down. | ||
I'm here at a Democratic rally. | ||
We're making real progress. | ||
We passed the Inflation Reduction Act to bring down costs, the bipartisan infrastructure law to rebuild America, the American Rescue Plan to bring our economy back, and so much more. | ||
But the extreme MAGA Republicans want to take it all back. | ||
This mess is just days after a politically motivated murder of a Republican teen. | ||
You'd think in today's politically charged environment, the targeting and killing of a young man based solely on his beliefs would be big news. | ||
But that would disrupt the MSM narrative that it's the right who are the violent ones. | ||
Newsbusters, a review of news coverage on left-wing broadcasts ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and MSNBC revealed that none of these networks have given the attack even one second of airtime. | ||
And here's Comfortably Smug on Twitter. | ||
Over 20 New York Times stories over the past month mentioned political violence. | ||
Zero mentions of Kaler Ellingson, the only American who has been murdered in an act of political violence in that time. | ||
Bringing you what's ignored, sensationalized, misleading, or just plain false, here's your media malfeasance for the week. | ||
A former Fox producer is blowing the whistle on conflicts of interest at the network. | ||
WND shares Brianna Morello says she left Fox when the corporation forced employees to receive the needle and claims the network was paid by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to promote the jabs on the air. | ||
Isn't true journalism supposed to be examining conflicts of interest and motivations, investigating, holding big corporations accountable? | ||
Instead, the whistleblower says Fox was taking money and acting more like a public relations firm. | ||
Also this week, MSN propaganda puppets still seem to care more about 50 migrants flown to Martha's Vineyard than about immigrants dying from crossing the border under the current federal policies. | ||
Daily Caller, the Eagle Pass Fire Department is requesting refrigerators for bodies as morgues are overwhelmed. | ||
Authorities say they're collecting about 30 bodies a month from drowned immigrants. | ||
Politico notes Dems pushed DOJ to probe DeSantis over migrants. | ||
But why were they silent when President Joe Biden was flying illegal immigrants overnight across the country? | ||
Someone who has not been silent about what's going on at the border is Fox's Bill Malugin. | ||
Politico. As Malujan has become an increasingly visible figure on the network, his coverage has caught the attention of the White House, which has become increasingly irritated by his reporting. | ||
But now they have a Democrat Texas sheriff who says he's investigating DeSantis for the crime of... | ||
unidentified
|
I don't know. Hmm. | |
Well, it turns out this sheriff that seems to care an awful lot about immigrants transported to an area that has claimed to be welcoming to migrants didn't care enough about immigrants' lives. | ||
He's the same sheriff that allowed 53 migrants to die in a semi-truck, according to 100% FedUp. | ||
Governor DeSantis responds. | ||
I saw somebody on CNN try to say, sending 50 illegal aliens to wealthy Martha's Vineyard is reminiscent of the Holocaust. | ||
And I just thought to myself, has the world gone totally mad? | ||
I mean, these are voluntary transportation that they're signing up for. | ||
However, Sheriff Salazar must have had a moment of clarity because he rejects the VP's assertion that the border is secure. | ||
unidentified
|
I would beg to differ. | |
I don't think the border is as secure as what folks are maybe telling them. | ||
With that being said, I think there's some solutions to be had, but it's gonna start with somebody from D.C. making the trip down here and talking to us. | ||
So what's the motivation here? | ||
Well, we find out this week that Judiciary Democrats voted to support non-citizens voting in our elections. | ||
Huh. Another thing to ponder, who is leading our country right now? | ||
The White House had to walk back at least a couple things President Biden said in an interview with 60 Minutes. | ||
If, in fact, there was an unprecedented attack... | ||
unidentified
|
After our interview, a White House official told us U.S. policy has not changed. | |
Officially, the U.S. will not say whether American forces would defend Taiwan. | ||
But the Commander-in-Chief had a view of his own. | ||
So, unlike Ukraine, to be clear, sir, U.S. forces, U.S. men and women, would defend Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion? | ||
Yes. An obvious follow-up question was skipped when Biden said this. | ||
The pandemic is over. | ||
We still have a problem with COVID. We're still doing a lot of work on it. | ||
But the pandemic is over. | ||
So if the pandemic is over, why haven't emergency powers been halted? | ||
Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massey addressed what the reporter would not. | ||
If the pandemic is over, as Biden says, then all of the president's emergency powers predicated on a pandemic, all COVID vax mandates, the emergency powers of every governor, emergency use authorizations, and the PrEP Act should all be voided tomorrow. | ||
Despite CNN acting like it's making efforts to be less biased, Don Lemon tries to weasel identity politics into an interview with a royal commentator. | ||
And this happens. | ||
And so on. And then you have those who are asking for reparations, for colonialism, and they're wondering, you know, $100 billion, $24 billion here and there, $500 million there. | ||
Some people want to be paid back, and members of the public are wondering, why are we suffering when you have all of this vast wealth? | ||
Those are legitimate concerns. | ||
Well, I think you're right about reparations in terms of if people want it, though, what they need to do is you always need to go back to the beginning of a supply chain. | ||
Where was the beginning of the supply chain? | ||
That was in Africa. | ||
And when across the entire world, when slavery was taking place, which was the first nation in the world that abolished slavery? | ||
The first nation in the world to abolish it. | ||
It was started by William Wilberforce, was the British. | ||
In Great Britain, they abolished slavery. | ||
Naval men died on the high seas trying to stop slavery. | ||
Why? Because the African kings were rounding up their own people. | ||
They had them on cages waiting in the beaches. | ||
No one was running into Africa to get them. | ||
And I think you're totally right. | ||
If reparations need to be paid, we need to go right back to the beginning of that supply chain and say who was rounding up their own people and having them handcuffing cages. | ||
Absolutely, that's where they should start. | ||
And maybe, I don't know, the descendants of those families where they died in the high seas trying to stop the slavery, that those families should receive something too, I think, at the same time. | ||
It's an interesting discussion, Hilary. | ||
Thank you very much. I appreciate it. | ||
We'll continue to discuss in the future. | ||
unidentified
|
Hello, darkness, my old friend. | |
But CNN shouldn't even try to be fair, according to Tom Jones from the Poynter Institute, which laughably still claims to teach journalism ethics and leadership. | ||
He penned CNN, hewing toward the center is not necessarily good for our democracy. | ||
Pushing for fairness and completeness in journalism is never a bad idea. | ||
But presenting both sides sometimes can be. | ||
Jones, first of all, the U.S. is most accurately defined as a constitutional republic. | ||
And second, how dare you claim to know anything about journalism ethics and then demand a news network stick with giving only one side? | ||
Helping to bring balance back to journalism by exposing the scales tipped heavily in favor of the propaganda puppet mainstream. | ||
I'm Christy Lee. | ||
unidentified
|
Follow me at FreeNews.News and join my locals community at ChristyLeeTV.Locals.com. But I wanted to spend just a few minutes with the listeners who are the best people on earth. I | |
I think the listeners and viewers of this broadcast objectively have supported and have amplified and who have prayed for this broadcast that you are the most effective best people in the world. | ||
The point is is that we're not funded by the globalists. | ||
We're funded by listeners and viewers like you and we're doing More important work than we have ever done on air at this point. | ||
And the world is listening and the world is watching and we're taking on the corrupt power structure and we're in their face. | ||
So when I say I admire this audience of activists, when I say you're the best people, it's not some fake globalists worshiping each other. | ||
Because all that's just talk with you and I, I really mean, I mean, You folks are awesome. | ||
And I appreciate your support because you're supporting yourself while you do that. | ||
And I just want to stay in this fight. | ||
And the fact that you keep me in this fight, I love you only second to God and my children. | ||
You're right there. It's like God's right here. | ||
My children are right there. | ||
Family. That's when you walk up and thank me in the street. | ||
I just go, okay, stop, stop. | ||
Because we're It's like me looking in the mirror thinking, myself, we are in this together. | ||
So I want to encourage all the viewers, all the listeners, to be part of history and to get t-shirts and books and films and amazing supplements and products at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
This is the American Journal. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Thanks so much for being here with us. | ||
We're going to go ahead and open up the phone lines right now. | ||
Give us a call here at American Journal. | ||
Infowars.com, by the way, is where you go to share all of what we cover on a daily basis. | ||
Band.video as well. | ||
Give us a call. The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
1-877-789-2539. | ||
And we'll be taking your calls for the rest of the show. | ||
Again, I'm confronted with the ever-present problem, the ever-present issue I have. | ||
It's not that we don't have any news. | ||
It's where do we even begin? | ||
I guess we'll talk about crime since... | ||
The full-on collapse is taking place. | ||
The entire civilization is being burned down around us. | ||
And one place where this can be seen more readily than elsewhere is the skyrocketing crime rates. | ||
Let's just take a look at a few stories from just today. | ||
From Cassandra Fairbanks for Gateway Pundit, understaffed New Orleans PD is hiring civilians and organizing patrol shifts. | ||
The New Orleans Police Department is hiring civilians and organizing patrol shifts amid a staffing shortage. | ||
While facing the shortage, the city has also been struggling with surging violent crime, especially murder. | ||
The city has become so dangerous that it's on track to surpass Baltimore in homicides this year. | ||
I just can't imagine... | ||
I mean, can... It's just unbelievable where America has been cratered to. | ||
How far down we have fallen. | ||
We were once a shining light on the world stage. | ||
A thriving example of how giving people freedom and liberty and just having a just and responsible administration Of the smallest possible size, | ||
people could flourish and communities could be safe and people could be left to their own devices and the morality of the people would keep them in check and the families of these people would support them and slowly but surely all of this stuff has been chipped away to the point where they don't say New Orleans is on the track to You know, become as dangerous as Mogadishu. | ||
No, Mogadishu is probably safer than Baltimore, if I had to guess. | ||
American cities are now far more dangerous with more murders than most third world countries as we increasingly become a third world country. | ||
They say the city is so dangerous that it's on track to suppress Baltimore and homicides this year. | ||
According to data from AH DataLytics compiled using the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Program, New Orleans has a per capita year to date homicide rate of 72 per 100,000 residents. | ||
The next three U.S. cities behind New Orleans are Birmingham with a per capita homicide rate of 59 per 100,000 residents and Baltimore and St. Louis. | ||
Louis each with a per capita homicide rate of 58 per 100,000 residents. | ||
Local station Fox 8 reported over the summer. | ||
New Orleans currently has fewer than 1,000 officers down from 1,300 before the 2020 Before 2020, when Black Lives Matter movement rioted in cities nationwide and pushed to demonize and defund police departments. | ||
According to a report from The Hill, NOPD Superintendent Sean Ferguson said in a statement that the current police response time is about 11 minutes, but they can lower that by hiring civilians to help out. | ||
Isn't that just what we need? | ||
I mean, isn't this the inevitable result we've been saying on this program since the... | ||
Bizarre, unprecedented, unjustifiable program of defund the police came about that defund the police meant two things. | ||
It meant privatize the police. | ||
In other words, the police will not protect the average citizen. | ||
They won't be patrolling your neighborhood to make sure there's nothing shady going on. | ||
They aren't there. They'll come in later to make a note of what has happened and then put it on the gigantic and ever-growing pile of crimes that will forever go unsolved. | ||
Sure, they'll do that. They'll give you a slip of paper to give you your insurance company to try to regain whatever physical possessions were taken from you. | ||
But other than that... | ||
Not going to be a lot of help to the average person. | ||
However, if you can pay for police, if you can hire a private police force, then you'll be protected. | ||
So the rich, those that can afford it, they'll have police protection from private forces, but the average American citizen, the police will be nothing more than a hall monitor service that will come up and document the crimes that have been done to you in a less than efficient way. | ||
The other thing that would happen would be, of course, federalizing the police. | ||
And we've seen this. There was actually a speech from Matt Gaetz recently on the floor of the Congress when he was saying, this doesn't make any sense. | ||
We're defunding local police but demanding more federal police. | ||
This is contradictory. | ||
No, it's not contradictory. It's... | ||
Directly in line with one another. | ||
You defund the local police and then you empower the federal police. | ||
You centralize control at a faraway place so that the people who are carrying out the orders, like the FBI, are doing things that they would never do in their local jurisdiction. | ||
But when they're simply the highly paid and well-respected federal police, they'll do whatever the hell they want whenever the hell they want. | ||
So this is the way that New Orleans is dealing with this. | ||
Instead of having... Well-trained and efficient police who are there to prevent crimes and punish the criminals. | ||
Now you'll have, I guess, untrained civilians? | ||
Will the civilians be armed? | ||
I mean, that could be a pretty big issue, I think. | ||
But we'll see. They say we're looking to hire 25 civilians so we can have around-the-clock staffing. | ||
Isn't that an awful idea? | ||
Here in the 21st century to have 24-hour staffing at the police department. | ||
Okay, I guess. | ||
I mean, if you want to get extravagant with it, just incredible. | ||
Detectives will also be participating in DART District Assist Response Team program to patrol on rotation starting the Sunday... | ||
As many as 75 more officers will be on patrol. | ||
That will consist of officers assigned to administrative districts and district investigative units. | ||
Ferguson continued their mission is to attack the backlog of the very district they're serving. | ||
To hire more officers, the department will no longer reject people for bad credit scores or using marijuana. | ||
Isn't that amazing? | ||
Isn't that just perfect? | ||
Because, see, there was a problem with police officers. | ||
They were untrained. | ||
They would be violent. | ||
They didn't know how to de-escalate or anything of the sort. | ||
So then we fired all the police, and now we're hiring police that aren't qualified and maybe don't have the best reputation or responsibility. | ||
You know, people that are more likely to cause problems in the police force. | ||
This is what socialism is, folks. | ||
This is the Democrats. | ||
This is the playbook. | ||
Everything they do makes everything worse. | ||
Every single time, without exception, you cannot find me an exception to this. | ||
You can find exception on an individual basis. | ||
Sure, a family that gets welfare, I guess, is better off than not having welfare, although even that is debatable, right? | ||
Give a man a fish, feed him for a day, teach him to fish, and he'll feed himself forever. | ||
I mean, even that, it's not necessarily better. | ||
But then on a societal level, it is absolutely 100% without deviation worse for everyone involved. | ||
Murderopolis. Ground zero for defund the police movement now suffering a horrendous crime wave. | ||
Gee, who could have seen that coming? | ||
Oh, I know us. We did all the time. | ||
We kept saying it, but now it's here. | ||
Now, more than two years after the Democrat stronghold turned into ground zero for the defund the police movement after the murder of George Floyd, Murderopolis is back. | ||
In 2020, murders jumped from 46 to nearly 80. | ||
In 2021, 93 people were killed in the city. | ||
This year, homicides are on track to surpass 2020. | ||
The criminals are celebrating. | ||
They were getting rich. | ||
And this is the thing you really have to understand. | ||
Example of crime. For every one murder you deal with, you have dozens of petty crimes. | ||
Dozens of crimes that shatter people's sense of security, that destroy people's lives, that may leave people in the hospital or, you know, uncomfortable and having to flee the city. | ||
The murder is just the most extreme example of this wave of discomfort. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
We're going to cover a pretty shocking story here in just a moment. | ||
We'll go out to your phone calls. | ||
We've got a couple of good calls, including Roberto in Texas, who was actually in the video of the Oath Keepers that we played earlier today. | ||
We're excited to talk to him. | ||
I just want to talk for a moment about a false dichotomy, one that is pretty pervasive. | ||
I guess you could say there's a number of false dichotomies and They all sort of align in the same ways. | ||
One that I've seen recently when it comes to the Iran protests is you have on one hand women who are forced to stay inside or forced to cover their Like every inch of their body except for their eyes with a black cloth, right, are kept as essentially property. | ||
Just the complete and total mistreatment and degradation of women that happens in the extreme religious Muslim countries. | ||
And then on the other hand, you have the sexually liberated people Proto hooker with her pink hair and covered in tattoos and piercings. | ||
They're both screaming at each other, you know, your culture degrades women. | ||
And it's like, these are not our options. | ||
This is a false imposition of two extremes that both degrade and destroy womanhood itself. | ||
There is a third option. | ||
It's the American option. | ||
It's the way that America used to be. | ||
It's women who are cared for and respected and appreciated and given the liberty to live their lives as they want. | ||
This has been the American way for generations. | ||
Everybody I know, all of our grandmothers all went to college. | ||
They all have degrees. | ||
They all could have gotten jobs. | ||
They all could have been in the corporate system. | ||
We're not Iran. | ||
We're not on the cusp of becoming a theocracy. | ||
Handmaid's Tale is a bizarre fantasy that the Democrats have to keep pushing to justify their actions. | ||
There is that third way. It is the American way. | ||
In the same way, with the Justice Department in this country, the entire system of the courts, it is not a decision between total anarchy where nobody's punished for anything and criminals are released from prison by the tens of thousands to go run roughshod over the innocent people of this country, | ||
or we're a fascist dictatorship where police are kicking down the door and there's a camera on every corner surveilling everything that you do and your every purchase must be logged in the central bank data system. | ||
These are, again, not the options. | ||
There is that third option. | ||
There is the way it used to be. | ||
There is make America great again. | ||
There is the America that we know works, that we know is not just good and effective, but the best possible system for humanity found anywhere on Earth, anywhere throughout history. | ||
It's the American way. | ||
It's a system that enforces the law, in some cases brutally, In some cases, or in all cases, efficiently. | ||
And you do your best to provide all of the resources that defendants need so they aren't Convicted on something they didn't do. | ||
We have the Fifth Amendment. | ||
We have Miranda rights. | ||
We have rights of accused people that don't exist in other places around the world, especially not the First Amendment aspect. | ||
I mean, even in Canada, they can compel you to sit down and answer. | ||
You get to call a lawyer first, but you don't get to refuse to answer. | ||
When you say, I want a lawyer, that doesn't mean they stop questioning you in Canada. | ||
We have that in America because we had a wonderful system at once, at one point. | ||
That's going away. That's being destroyed. | ||
That's being disintegrated in favor of a bizarre mix of ultimate tyranny where you have 30 FBI agents kicking down the door of a father of seven because he got into a shoving match with a man on a public sidewalk. | ||
But at the same time, people who murder people, if you run over an 18-year-old because he's a Republican, you're out the next day and Don't worry about showing up next time, right? | ||
Selective enforcement of laws and completely arbitrary execution of tyranny. | ||
It's all being destroyed. And again, we're always confronted with this false dichotomy of two extremes where in the middle lies the American way, the way that has always worked until people came in and started messing with it. | ||
They start messing with it. | ||
It starts collapsing. Then there's a backlash and there's a pushback saying we need to get back to how we were. | ||
Then that's portrayed as fascism. | ||
And so it pisses people off and then it collapses the system even more. | ||
It's this feedback loop that is horrifically damaging. | ||
And you can see it in things like this Murderopolis article. | ||
Talking about Minneapolis. | ||
And as it collapses, and you can see things like people... | ||
Brian Bogan said he moved from North Minneapolis to a relatively safer St. | ||
Paul because he did not want his kids growing up in an area where you didn't know if it's fireworks or gunshots, right? | ||
So as the city collapses into crime, good and decent people flee the city, and then your tax base goes down, then you can't afford the police, and then the crime increases, then more people flee. | ||
It's a feedback loop of total and utter destruction that we are currently trapped in on purpose, by design, by people who do not have our best interests in mind and care only about creating a Situation in which they can seize power using for justification the very conditions that they themselves brought about. | ||
It's sick. It's horrific. | ||
It's ongoing. And it has to be stopped. | ||
But any attempt to reverse it is treated as fascism. | ||
You want us to be Nazis. | ||
And then it just gets worse. | ||
So there we are. It's just worth reminding everybody that there is that third way, the American way, with respect for all individuals and a rule of law. | ||
It's the way that the world is supposed to work. | ||
With that, we go out to your phone calls. | ||
Roberto in Texas, you were in the video that we played earlier of the Oath Keepers helping and assisting the Capitol Police and trying to calm the chaos on January 6th. | ||
Thank you so much for calling in. You're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Hi, Harrison. Thank you for this platform. | |
It's an honor. So, I'm part of what is alleged to be Stack 2. | ||
So, there's only... | ||
I'm the only person left remaining of Stack 2, so it's pretty important that I stick around so I can have a real viewpoint, you know? | ||
So, in that video... | ||
You mean everybody else in that stack has been arrested? | ||
unidentified
|
No, they've pled out. | |
Oh, they've pled out. Okay. So... | ||
unidentified
|
So I was heading up the stairs in that video following the Capitol Police into the Columbus doors where we were told that they wanted to get their guys out. | |
On two separate occasions, there was the one Capitol Police officer wearing the MAGA hat that solicited the Hill Keepers to assist him. | ||
And then there was a second officer still trying to identify that told us, you can have this area. | ||
We want to get our guys out. | ||
That was told to myself and other members. | ||
Everything I'm speaking about is publicly available. | ||
I'm not going to talk about things that are going to get you guys or myself in any trouble because I do have trial pending as well. | ||
I'm the second group. | ||
It's just unbelievable what's going on. | ||
We have this situation where Stewart and Oath Keepers was given a massive platform, and that's Infowars, to launch themselves higher. | ||
And it's amazing what they've done with integrating with law enforcement and making sure that the premise of their organization is that people actually uphold the oath. | ||
So when I got involved, that's what I saw, is that this great group of people that helps in many ways, including disaster relief and all types of assistance. | ||
But I've been security for Roger Stone, I've been security for General Flynn, and I've been security for your whole team there. | ||
And if your crew wants to look me up, my name is Roberto Minuta, M-I-N-U-T-A. There will be a plethora of photos available to confirm what I'm saying. | ||
I'm pleading that Mr. | ||
Jones, Alex Jones, you have shunned us, sir. | ||
We've stuck our necks out for you. | ||
You have shunned DeWitt Rhodes. | ||
You have shunned the Oath Keepers. | ||
It would be fantastic if you could show us some support, because we've stood for you for free, and you have shunned us, sir. | ||
Well, I wouldn't agree with that. | ||
Obviously, this organization has not shunned the Oath Keepers. | ||
We report on the Oath Keepers in the same way that we report on everybody. | ||
I mean, we're all in this together and causing conflict between groups like Infowars and Oath Keepers is not a positive development. | ||
We're going to hold Roberto over. | ||
I'd like to talk to him more about this, but we've had Stuart Rhodes on calling in from jail multiple times since then to tell his story. | ||
I have always very stalwartly defended the Oath Keepers and Stuart in particular, and we'll get more into it on the other side. | ||
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
On the phone with us is Roberto, an Oathkeeper who was in that second military stack, a.k.a. | ||
people with their hands on the shoulder of the person in front of them to get through a crowd of people. | ||
And I was excited to hear from you, Roberto. | ||
You're making some good points. | ||
And then you made the claim that Alex Jones has somehow thrown the Oath Keepers under the bus. | ||
I mean, if you watch just this show, if you watched last week, we had on multiple January 6th defendants, or we had at least one on from jail, calling in from jail to promote, of course, the podcast that they're doing with Gateway Pundit, Jeremy Brown. There's new video up on band.video today promoting his podcast, another one done by Greg Reese. | ||
We've had Stuart Rhodes call in from prison multiple times since he has been arrested and, of course, many, many times before that. | ||
So, again, I got to push back on you claiming that InfoWars has not been in support of the Oath Keepers. | ||
I mean, we are not the Oath Keepers. | ||
They are a great organization as far as I'm concerned. | ||
And I've never received any notes from Alex or anybody saying, oh, let's not talk about this, actually. | ||
Actually, let's throw these guys. | ||
It's never happened. We've been very forthright and upfront in our support for the people who the government claims are domestic terrorists. | ||
In many cases, at odds with the rest of the right wing who are writing articles calling Stuart Rhodes a federal informant. | ||
We never fell for that. | ||
I never fell for that. So what exactly is your point there, Roberta? | ||
unidentified
|
I concur with everything that you just said, but I would say the most essential point that you made is that you have covered everything, and you've done a fantastic job, and I respect and honor that. | |
So Alex, in my opinion, he read part of our indictment when Stuart Rhodes was indicted. | ||
And he said that this sounds really bad. | ||
This sounds really dangerous as far as the alleged actions of the Oath Keepers. | ||
And no one was given an opportunity. | ||
You know, it's a very extremely one-sided piece of the indictment. | ||
It's extremely one-sided. | ||
And I understand that Infowars has permitted Oath Keepers to speak more than probably any other platform. | ||
And I greatly appreciate that. | ||
And I'm just referring... | ||
I'm not trying to, you know... | ||
Give Alex a hard time. | ||
However, I know he's going through a lot of civil stuff, but he's not facing any criminal charges. | ||
And all we're trying to do is convey the truth. | ||
And it seems he's trying to avoid any criminal charges, which I completely understand. | ||
It's horrific what myself and my two children and wife are going through and everyone else involved. | ||
But at the same time, We're trying to keep Infowars alive here, but if we're not going to allow the truth on specifically his platform to be spoken about, then what's the point? | ||
If we're worried about civil lawsuits and we're compromising what we're talking about because we're afraid of indictment possibly, then I don't see what the point is. | ||
I get your point, but I think you're grading him on an unfair curve, to be honest with you. | ||
Now, see, I'm in a special position because I, against my will, but thank God, was not in Washington, D.C. on January 6th. | ||
I may have made some bad decisions on that day. | ||
I was literally like God. | ||
I was just like, you stay in Austin for this. | ||
You don't need to be there making bad decisions and ruining your life. | ||
So I was here, so I get to talk about all this stuff Knowing that I was literally live on television reacting in real time to what was going on in January 6th. | ||
Unless I'm the best actor in the world, I think it's kind of impossible to act as if I knew anything that was going on. | ||
Alex is in that position. Owen's not in that position. | ||
So I don't begrudge them for taking a slightly more timid approach to this topic. | ||
I have the ability to be really upfront about this because I was there live in studio while all of it was going on. | ||
They were on the ground. | ||
We know from the media, and it's not just the media, right? | ||
The media is operating off of leaks from things within the FBI where they are doing everything they can to try to conflate Alex Jones leading a protest to the claims of seditious conspiracy that are going on. | ||
So, again, I think you've got to be a little bit more fair to Alex. | ||
And at the end of the day, we are under direct attack at this point. | ||
and it's not a matter of just convenience going, well, we don't want to deal with this, so we're just not going to talk about it. | ||
It's a matter of survival at this point that all of our focus and all of our action is going towards simply surviving the attack against us while at the same time doing everything we can to support the people that are getting an even rougher time with criminal charges. | ||
So I appreciate your point, Roberto, but I disagree. | ||
So there it is, and hopefully you can understand that. | ||
But hopefully your... | ||
Can I speak again, please? | ||
Well, I do want to get to other callers, but if you want to say a final word, go ahead. | ||
unidentified
|
Yes. So we had a rally that was held in Washington, D.C. a few days ago, and there was a handful of people there, maybe a few dozen. | |
My last point is that we really need help. | ||
We are facing incredible financial burdens, life in prison. | ||
Everything's been deleted, destroyed, taken from us and our families. | ||
My specific Give, Send, Go is givesendgo.com backslash J6. | ||
And my lawyer is representing 26 defendants. | ||
So any assistance he gets will be tremendously helpful. | ||
Anything I receive goes directly to him. | ||
So I do have trial coming up after Thanksgiving. | ||
And if anyone could help, that would be absolutely a godsend. | ||
God bless you guys. I'm not here to throw Alex under the bus, just to raise awareness that this needs to be brought to the light, the truth. | ||
And I appreciate you for doing that all the time. | ||
Well, thank you, Roberto. | ||
And again, I would just say, Take it easy on the guy, man. | ||
Alex Jones is under so much pressure, and people expect so much of him. | ||
But he's just one man, and it's frankly amazing that he is continuing to go on with this operation in the face of all of the opposition and threats of being thrown in jail that he's facing. | ||
So thank you for that, Roberto. | ||
And of course, we will continue to do everything we can to support the January 6th political prisoners in their battle against unjust charges and political persecution against them. | ||
And of course, we were very happy to promote the event last weekend and tell our audience to go and join and support the January 6th political prisoners as we always do. | ||
Let's go to another phone call here. | ||
We'll go to Bernie in Illinois because you're also on the topic of Ray Epps and the Rhodes trial. | ||
Thanks for calling in. Bernie, you're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Harrison, what's up, my brother? | |
Good morning. So, you know, I'm just, you know, banned from Facebook, from Twitter, from a lot of things, but I still have an Instagram. | ||
So I'm at PlanetBernieWood on Instagram, and I usually try to post, like, three or four pictures with a story and my thoughts on what's going on. | ||
So anyway, I posted a meme the other day, which I know is probably not true. | ||
It was about who said, like, Nancy Pelosi talked to Ray Epps. | ||
On the phone. And I was like, yeah, really? | ||
I don't know. And so I posted it. | ||
And I was like, I don't know if it's true. | ||
Someone liked it. | ||
And I went and looked to see who this person was. | ||
And I'm a nondescript woman. | ||
So I just hit follow because her profile was private. | ||
So I was like, well, maybe she'll accept. | ||
And then she accepted. | ||
Maybe a day later. | ||
And then she starts messaging me saying, Ray Epps is my dad. | ||
And I was like, uh, what? | ||
And she keeps going on and on, and she's like, he's basically like Al Bundy trying to live his glory days of, you know, Polk High, four touchdowns in one game. | ||
And he looks just like this kind of a, you know, deadbeat kind of a douchebag. | ||
Anyway, I was like, well, when was the last time you talked to him? | ||
Every question I asked her seemed like, well, it could well be her dad. | ||
I don't know. She kind of looks like him. | ||
I don't know. And then she goes on to say that he's a child molester and she doesn't want to talk to him ever again. | ||
And that her mom's just as bad and that he's in hiding. | ||
Which I also believe that he is in hiding. | ||
I don't know if he's a child. I don't know about all that. | ||
Anyway, why would someone follow me back and say this stuff? | ||
If it wasn't really her dad, you know what I mean? | ||
And then I looked at her profile, like, nothing's political. | ||
Nothing's political on her post at all. | ||
So, I mean, it's just kind of weird to me. | ||
I didn't know what to think about that. | ||
And also, this guy in the prison in D.C. that got his eyeball knocked out has cancerous growth and blood clots, and apparently they're refusing a medical treatment now. | ||
So, you know, this just all goes to show that they're seriously covering up something bad. | ||
Like, this guy that got his eyeball knocked out, he was the guy that Ray Epps told, was, like, huddling about to say, go into the Capitol, uh, uh, I'm Ray Epps, right? | ||
Like, this guy's a total jerk. | ||
I'll tell you, the most suspicious thing about Ray Epps is the way the Democrats are defending him. | ||
I mean, it is truly bizarre. | ||
These are the Democrats who, out of one side of their mouth, they're saying everybody involved in January 6th is a domestic terrorist, a seditionist, who should be, and in many cases are, being Thrown into prison. | ||
And then here you have a guy who's on tape, the only person on tape, saying let's storm the Capitol, organizing to bust down a barricade. | ||
And yet when it comes to him, they're like, leave the man alone. | ||
It's like, that doesn't make any sense. What, leave the domestic terrorist alone? | ||
Why are you defending this guy? | ||
If there's one most suspicious thing about Ray Epps, it's the way the Democrats are defending him out of everybody that they're demonizing. | ||
unidentified
|
You're watching the American Journal. | |
Watch live right now at band.video. | ||
Welcome back, folks. | ||
Again, so much to cover here in the third hour. | ||
We'll be taking your phone calls throughout as well. | ||
There has been some interesting, I guess you could say, developments in the realm of COVID. This story hit the internet yesterday and made a giant splash. | ||
Detection of messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccines in human breast milk. | ||
Yes, it turns out that if you get the vaccine while breastfeeding, the mRNA messenger RNA actually can be delivered to your child through your breast milk. | ||
Something that, of course, we were quite worried about. | ||
From the very beginning, they didn't test it, and yet, for some reason, told us that it wasn't the case, right? | ||
They don't test it, they don't know, but they call you a conspiracy theorist and you're spreading dangerous information for merely asking the question or pointing out, hey, they haven't tested for this yet, this could be the case, and you're banned from big tech, and if you're a doctor, you lose your license. | ||
This is the control that they have. | ||
And of course we've also learned it's not safe for pregnant women. | ||
Now they're admitting just all sorts of things we've been saying the entire time. | ||
Is it too little too late though? | ||
This is a shocking statistic. | ||
From expose-news.com, you can find the story at Infowars, Europe suffers horrifying 755% increase in excess deaths among children since EMA-approved COVID vaccine for kids. | ||
At the end of August, we exclusively revealed that the official mortality figures for Europe showed a shocking... | ||
Nearly 700% increase in excess deaths amongst children up to week 33 of 2022 since the European Medicines Agency extended the emergency use authorization of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for use in children 12 to 15 in May of 2021. | ||
Now, some European countries such as Denmark have actually banned the vaccine for anybody under the age of 18 without an explicit doctor's note. | ||
I want to play now a video. | ||
This is a VAERS whistleblower nurse speaking out on the growing number of pediatric myocarditis cases. | ||
Let's go now to clip number 32, please. | ||
unidentified
|
Tony Bittner, I came before you guys a year ago. | |
I'm a nurse, or at least I was, at Rady Children's in the cardiovascular intensive care unit until Nathan and his misinformation pandemic caused me to lose my job. | ||
I took care of those children who came in with myocarditis after the vaccine. | ||
And I talked to the doctors because I was a charge nurse, saying, why aren't we reporting these to VAERS? Who is going to report these to VAERS? It was an unspoken thing that we were not allowed to talk about openly on the unit. | ||
I've worked for 13 years in this community, taking care of some of the sickest patients. | ||
The day before I was taken away from my position, I was actively giving compressions to a child, pushing epi, pushing calcium into his veins to keep him alive. | ||
And we did. | ||
And he went home. | ||
And yet, I was ridiculed by those who were supposed to be my colleagues and my friends. | ||
I am the face of your misinformation campaign, Nathan. | ||
I am the one who lost my career in pediatric cardiovascular ICU care. | ||
I took care of children who had COVID. I never got COVID in the hospital. | ||
I tested twice a week. | ||
I wore my PPE because I left my job. | ||
And I love this community. | ||
Thank you. Absolutely heartbreaking stuff there. | ||
Fired for merely asking, are we reporting this to VAERS? It's a full-on psychological war against people. | ||
You cannot go along with this or you are complicit in mass murder. | ||
Horrific. Real and happening as we speak. | ||
unidentified
|
Watch it live right now at band.video. | |
Alright, welcome back folks. We will go out to your phone calls momentarily and throughout this hour. | ||
I do want to take a moment to discuss one of the most infuriating stories you can possibly imagine. | ||
But before we get to that... I want to ask you, as I need to do and as I should probably do more, please go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
I don't need to spend too much time elaborating on just how much of a threat that Infowars is under right now. | ||
Just know the only reason we've been able to make it this far is because people have gone to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
We cannot thank you enough for your continued patronage and your continued support. | ||
In this ever more dangerous time, not just for Infowars, but for the world as a whole. | ||
As Alex always points out, what's happening in Infowars is no different than what's happening to small businesses around the entire world. | ||
This is... The New World Order that Alex and all of us have warned about for years coming to fruition in the manufactured purposeful collapse of any ability for individuals, small groups, or small businesses to operate without the approval or without partnering with established technocratic monoliths like Big Tech or other massive corporations. | ||
It's Fascism, in the most literal sense, as the federal government openly merges with big tech, the media, and just industry in general, to bring about a world of absolute and total control, | ||
guided by AI that is programmed explicitly to disadvantage people who actually cling to what makes us human. | ||
Things like family, God, responsibility, freedom, liberty, free will. | ||
These things are going away very rapidly. | ||
But they're not gone yet. | ||
And there's still a fighting chance. | ||
And just like the 300 Spartans at the hot gates of Thermopylae or the 180 Texians that held off Santa Ana. | ||
There is no force too overwhelming for a group of dedicated and faithful defenders of our civilization. | ||
We can still win. | ||
We can still not just Withstand this attack, we can actually overcome it. | ||
We just need your help. | ||
We need your support. | ||
We need you to go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Go there today. | ||
Not only will you support this mission, this program, this modern day, Battle of the Alamo, but you'll support yourself as well when you fortify your body's natural defenses ahead of fall and winter. | ||
Try our Mega Immune Support Supplements for up to 50% off. | ||
That's the Infowars Life Vitamin D3 gummies, which are delicious, by the way, but don't eat too many of them because they're pretty powerful. | ||
Just take them as directed. Those are 40% off. | ||
Vitamin C plus zinc is 40% off as well. | ||
But if you get those two with DNA Force Plus, you get all of them for 50% off. | ||
These are the deals that we offer to encourage you to support us. | ||
It's a 360 win in every possible way. | ||
You know how it works. We've been up front the entire time. | ||
This is the way that we've been able to operate by using the last dying gasp of a free capitalistic society to maintain our crusade against the tyrants, despots, and morons who facilitate their actions. | ||
So we'll go out to phone calls in just a second. | ||
I do want to just cover this story because it will only take me a minute. | ||
Because how much is there really to say about this? | ||
From TimCast.com. | ||
California man with over a thousand DVDs of children being raped is sentenced to just 180 days in prison by a Democratic judge. | ||
Fresno resident Michael Wayne Martin, 57, was arrested in May of 2021 by Central Valley Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force. | ||
When the task force searched his home, they found more than 1,000 DVDs containing videos of children being raped, as well as electronic devices and books containing explicit photos and videos, according to the Fresno County Sheriff's Department. | ||
And you can actually see the photos of these DVDs stacked to the ceiling. | ||
It is a veritable library of this disgusting and abusive material. | ||
And yet, despite him being caught red-handed with all of this material, he received less information. | ||
Then half a year in jail. | ||
On Tuesday, Fresno County Superior Court Judge Leanne Lamont, 46, sentenced Martin to 180 days in jail, two years of formal probation, and ordered him to register as a sex offender upon his release. | ||
Democrat Judge Lamont was appointed to Superior Court by Governor Gavin Newsom in 2021. | ||
She previously served as Deputy Attorney General for the California Department of Justice. | ||
Is this justice? | ||
Is this... | ||
Or maybe should there be maybe a little bit more extreme punishment for people who are engaged in the wholesale trafficking of child abuse material. | ||
Just incredible. | ||
He is going to spend less time in prison as a sentence for having thousands of videos of children being raped. | ||
He will spend less time in prison Then most January 6th defendants have spent in prison before they've even gone to trial. | ||
That is so-called justice in this country these days. | ||
Martin, by the way, has been free since one day after his arrest because he posted the $40,000 bond. | ||
His attorney told the B that he will receive one day of time served for that. | ||
So there you go, 179 days, not even 180 days. | ||
This is what they call justice. | ||
And again, it just reminds you of nothing more than the Gulag Archipelago, where if you were an actual criminal, the Soviet System would basically reward you. | ||
They might punish you, kind of, but you were given actually a superior position. | ||
You would then be in charge of prisoners at the Gulag if you were an actual criminal. | ||
A thief, a murderer, a rapist, something like that. | ||
That's okay. It was crimes against the state that were most severely punished. | ||
It was questioning the state or protesting against the Communist Party that you'd really get the hammer brought down and the book thrown at you. | ||
This is the world that they're creating. | ||
This is the Subjective application of the law to apply primarily to those who threaten the fabricated system that we're being forced into. | ||
With that, we go out to your phone calls. | ||
We've got Tim in California who wants to talk about water shortages in the western U.S. Thanks for calling in. | ||
unidentified
|
Tim, you're on the air. Just quickly let me respond, Harrison. | |
If you haven't seen it, Stu Peters, you can see it on Rumble. | ||
He has this documentary, it's about an hour long, called These Little Ones. | ||
Extremely disturbing. | ||
Do not let any children in the room hear it or see it. | ||
And it's a lot about what you're talking about. | ||
It's just so demonic and so bad with children. | ||
Anyways, yes, the Los Angeles Times, September 21st, had an article about California's water usage was built on a historic lie, and that bill is now coming due. | ||
And it has a picture there that shows the water intakes at the Hoover Dam on Lake Mead and the bathtub ring behind them. | ||
It shows just how far below this historic level this reservoir has fallen. | ||
And, you know... | ||
We have these anniversaries. | ||
It's the 100th anniversary on November 24th, 1922, of the Colorado River Compact, a seven-state agreement, and of course, California was going to have the lion's share of the usage, and this was thought out by Hoover, who was working for President Harding. | ||
Anyways, and it was signed in the Ben-Hur room at the Santa Fe Palace of the Governors on the lapboard on which General Lew Wallace had written the biblical epic Ben-Hur 40 years earlier while he was New York's territorial governor. | ||
There's a lot of history. | ||
It was signed by the gold pen and so forth. | ||
But 100 years later, and we now – it's very clear we're down close to the Deadpool stage because we're at 1,044 feet right now, 1,044. | ||
If it gets to 950, there won't be any ability for the Hoover Dam to create any electricity. | ||
And if it goes down to 895, it won't even be able to release water over the gate to continue the flow downstream. | ||
And by the way, a lot of this nonsense is created by California and the Delta Smelt. | ||
This tiny little fish that looks like a minnow that we would use as fish bait, and they throw just all this... | ||
Here, set the line, Tim. We're going to come back to Tim to get the full story here. | ||
Alright folks, our caller Tim in California is detailing a problem that I cannot really fathom an answer to. | ||
And that is the unbelievable drought that's taking place in California right now. | ||
Now of course if I was a liberal, I fell for the scam. | ||
I can tell you right now it's because you're not eating bugs and because you're having children. | ||
It's because climate change and carbon. | ||
How is carbon making the water in Lake Mead lower than it should be? | ||
There's no rhyme or reason to it. | ||
It's a cultish adherence to certain dictates. | ||
That you have to believe unquestioningly. | ||
It makes no sense. What is likely having a very detrimental effect to weather systems around the world are the competing weather modification programs that are going on everywhere from America to China with tens of thousands of people doing everything from... | ||
Spraying particles of heavy metals into the air to blasting the ionosphere with radiation in order to alter its temperature. | ||
Massively changing weather patterns and even things like UAE celebrating using drones to make it rain in 120 degree heat Fahrenheit and acting like that's not going to have an effect on the closed weather system that is the atmosphere of Earth. | ||
Massive, dangerous experiments are being carried out On everybody, on the world's population, and I think this may just be an effect of that. | ||
But Tim, I'm reading this article from CBS News, Lake Mead water level at a historic low, talking about the massive drought that they call unprecedented in human history. | ||
Is there anything that can be done about this, Tim? | ||
That's not really what it is. | ||
I mean, that does contribute some, but part of it is, is in the beginning, as the article points out, they overestimated the capacity. | ||
So that was one problem. | ||
Another problem is this seven-state area that is served by that has grown by 52 million residents. | ||
That also creates another issue. | ||
But the biggest issue, which has been going on for decades, any resident of California will attest to this, is they're diverting the water straight to the ocean. | ||
Just pouring it straight into the ocean. | ||
Why on earth would you do that? | ||
It's to preserve the delta smelt. | ||
And the delta smelt looks like a minnow when you hold it in your hand. | ||
It's like what you and I would go fishing with. | ||
But they're willing. | ||
To divert millions of gallons just each and every day into the ocean of fresh water. | ||
There's been some conversation through the years we should put it in train cars and save it or just somehow do something with it. | ||
We shouldn't just pour it in the ocean. | ||
But that's why it never makes it any further downstream is, you know, between what usage we have with the 52 million extra people, you know, in large part it's because we're diverting it to the ocean to preserve the delta smelt. | ||
A little fish. | ||
Hmm. Incredible. | ||
This has been going on for decades. | ||
This has been going on for decades. | ||
The farmers, you'll be driving up and down Interstate 5 where all the farmland is, and it'll just say, you know, you'll see these lush green fields, just beautiful, and then you'll see ones that are just bare in dirt desert, and it'll be signs of saying, hey, this is brought to you by these following politicians that voted for this. | ||
Right. My God, yeah. | ||
But we are running out of water. | ||
That's no joke. And if it gets to Deadpool, you really do have a problem. | ||
Because, you know, you think you've got an electricity shortage now. | ||
I mean, the turbines can't really be generating a whole lot if you're not turning a whole lot of water through there. | ||
Anyways, you get the idea. | ||
No, yeah, it is a perfect storm of problems dealing with here. | ||
This is from the same article, CBS News. | ||
California avoided federal reductions in water use The state receives the largest annual allocation from the Colorado River, which provides between a quarter and a third of the total water supply to its southern region. | ||
Water diverted from the river through two massive canals that feed into Southern California provide irrigation and hydroelectric power to the 600,000 acres of farmland across the region. | ||
Even without federal cuts, California's agricultural sector is facing huge losses because there is even less water. | ||
Man, really a gigantic issue. | ||
And one of the issues is that they're growing things that don't belong there. | ||
You know, things like almonds that require just huge, huge amounts of water and yet They're being grown in places where the water doesn't exist to fulfill it. | ||
It is a dangerous situation. | ||
And thank you, Tim, for calling in and talking about that. | ||
Just another aspect of the collapse, I guess you could say. | ||
Let's go to another call now. | ||
Let's go to Ronell in New York. | ||
Thanks for calling in, Ronell. You are on the air. | ||
Hi. Hey, Patterson. | ||
How are you? Good, thank you. | ||
Now, I'm going to be a little bit long here, but first I have to plug two products, Fizzy Magnesium and Vitamin Mineral Fusion, in the InfoWars store. | ||
Thank you very much. Yeah, two really fantastic products. | ||
I'm telling you folks, do your own research on magnesium. | ||
Just search magnesium and go to the news tab. | ||
See what a disaster it is, the lack of magnesium in the soil or in the food that we eat. | ||
It is a... Very important mineral to have, and you can get it with Fizzy Magnesium Drink Mix, and the Vitamin Mineral Drink Mix is also another favorite of InfoWarriors across the globe. | ||
Infowarsstore.com is where you go to get those, and a glass of the stuff. | ||
I mean, it tastes amazing. | ||
It tastes like orange soda, but it gives you all the magnesium you need, and it's on sale right now for $19.98. | ||
That's Is it really 50% off? | ||
So yeah, alright. It's 50% off right now. | ||
Ionic Fizzy Magnesium Drink Mix. | ||
Get it for 50% off right now at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Thank you for that plug, Ronell. We've got two minutes left in the break. | ||
The floor is yours. I have a multiple choice question for you regarding Democrat Party and policies, but I'm going to talk about something that nobody is really talking about, not even in Alternative media. | ||
Nobody is talking about this. | ||
Now, I myself and other disabled people were always taught to vote blue because if you vote red, you're going to lose your welfare status. | ||
Now, Harrison, here comes the multiple choice. | ||
Let's say if you or Owen Stroyer or Christy Lee or anybody who works there were to get into some kind of like accident where you're paralyzed from the waist down. | ||
Now, best scenario, number one, Alex would allow you to return to work as soon as you felt you were ready or be ready. | ||
The worst case scenario would be where Alex would do something, the same thing, like David, like he did to David Knight. | ||
He would fire you and then bam, Harrison, your whole career is ruined. | ||
You're forced to go on welfare for perhaps the rest of your life. | ||
unidentified
|
Which one do you think Alex would do? | |
I guarantee you Alex would welcome me back with open arms. | ||
I mean, when I had my kid, Alex was like, take as much time as you need. | ||
It's really important for dads to be at the home. | ||
Like, if you want to take a couple months for parental leave, like, you're more than welcome. | ||
Alex is very generous on those types of policies. | ||
So I'm not sure we're going with that. | ||
I guess we'll go back to Ronell, and he'll finish up his question on the other side. | ||
But support us at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
Fizzy Magnesium, on sale now. | ||
Welcome back, folks. We are taking your phone calls in today's episode of American Journal. | ||
I'm more contentious than I'm used to. | ||
That's all right. We take all comers here. | ||
Rennell in New York. | ||
What was the multiple choice? | ||
The multiple choice was if I was paralyzed, would Alex Jones fire me? | ||
I think my answer to that was a resounding no, he wouldn't. | ||
And I can tell you, it was not just me with the birth of my son. | ||
I know many, many employees at InfoWars who have had some sort of personal disaster. | ||
And... Alex has continued to pay them while they take all the time that they need to deal with whatever the situation is. | ||
Does that answer your question, Ronell? | ||
Yes. Because many, myself and other disabled people, even before the whole COVID thing happened with the fake pandemic, we had always been taught Vote blue, because if you vote red, you're going to lose all your free government goodies, as I like to call it. | ||
Right. Like, I would hope he wouldn't fire you or Christie or Owen if something like that happened to them. | ||
Yeah, I don't think you would. | ||
Hopefully we'll never have to find out, but I don't think that's the case. | ||
I'm not sure what would make you think that would be the case, considering the fact that Infowars is not your typical corporate entity. | ||
There's not a lot of... | ||
unidentified
|
That type of stuff here where it's just like, sorry, you're fired. | |
I mean, people don't really get fired here that often. | ||
When it does happen, you usually, let's say you don't get the full story from the people involved. | ||
And I'll leave it at that. | ||
But, you know, it's one of those things where Republicans need to be better at making the case. | ||
There's other topics like this as well, like abortion, things like that. | ||
There is a purpose for welfare. | ||
I think it's better to have charities that are private, churches that help people out, families that take up the I don't want to say burden because that sounds insulting to people, but when somebody has a disaster in their life or they get paralyzed or something, you would hope that there is family and friends around them to help carry them through that. | ||
You don't need to resort to the government, but it's fine. | ||
You have welfare. Anybody that lives in America should be able to continue to live a decent, respectable life. | ||
Even if they're incapable of working like that, I agree with that. | ||
The problem is that that's not what's happening. | ||
The problem is that you have people who have subsisted their entire lives and for generations on welfare and that actively avoid getting jobs when they're perfectly capable of working, but they don't do it because they would rather have government subsidies and that ruins it for everybody. | ||
And then there's people that actually would like to work, but they're paralyzed or they're hurt in some way or they're even mentally not capable of maintaining a job. | ||
Now, those people actually need help, but the stuff that's there, the good charitable actions of the government that's there to help the people actually in need is often much more often going towards the people that are just taking advantage of that system. | ||
Same thing like asylum laws, right? | ||
Like there are people that maybe are being hunted by their government that are... | ||
Dissidents and speak out for freedom of speech and their government is hunting them down to destroy them. | ||
Yes, come into America. We will welcome you. | ||
We are here as your refuge. | ||
We'll protect you from the evil government you're fleeing. | ||
And instead of that, you get millions upon millions of people who just want to come here to get a better job because they think it's nicer than where they live. | ||
And so it's not that you hate people that are actually trying to achieve asylum. | ||
It's that all of these things are taken advantage of by bad actors. | ||
It really is sort of ubiquitous across any topic that we discuss. | ||
I'm just thinking like transgenderism or abortion, any of these things where it's like, look, if the mother is going to die unless an abortion is performed, I don't know of a situation where that's the case. | ||
But if that's the case, then, you know, it's a medical decision that you have to make. | ||
And I personally would prefer that the mother do what she has to to live if the other option is Both people die. | ||
You know, it's tough, but these are the types of things that you have to deal with. | ||
And if you don't have some subtlety in the application of the law in those cases, then you're punishing people who don't deserve it. | ||
But at the same time, we can't just allow people to take advantage of laws continuously like that. | ||
Anyway, let's move on. Let's go to Jordan in New Jersey. | ||
He wants to talk about Biden's executive order on crypto and biosecurity. | ||
That's ominous. Thanks for calling in. | ||
Jordan, you're on the air. Thank you, Harrison. | ||
How are you today? Good, thank you. | ||
Good. So, I just wanted to point out here, and I called Alex a couple weeks back as to He had a whole topic on what's next and what they're going to try to do in conjunction with obviously not allowing a referendum on the so-called Democrats who are currently in power. | ||
And it's quite clear to me, and I want to support it with some evidence here and point things out to folks so they can do their own research and be aware of this. | ||
And not be distracted. | ||
He issued an executive order recently on biotech development. | ||
Now, he also issued a big order on cryptocurrency. | ||
I believe they're linked, and I'll tell you why. | ||
On March 9th of this year, he did an executive order on ensuring responsible development of digital assets. | ||
Right. And then on September 12, 2022, he did an executive order on advancing biotechnology and biomanufacturing innovation for a sustainable, safe, and secure America bioeconomy. | ||
Kind of sounds like Emperor Palpatine speaking almost. | ||
But nonetheless, they're connected because of basically who is overseeing all this, who are the same people. | ||
And if you go in and look at both of them, you pull them up on the White House site, you go to the section on coordination, and each of them is put in coordination, and then you go to look at who's responsible for it. | ||
It's all the same people. | ||
And I'll tell you who those people are and how those people were delegated. | ||
The second executive or the second national security memorandum issued by the White House on February 4th, 2021, which was the second one, the first one was on cybersecurity, but the second one was on basically what he called, | ||
what Biden's national security memorandum said, renewing We're good to go. | ||
There's an article on this on the Lawfare, called Lawfare, a blog by a guy named John B. Bellinger III, who is a Washington, D.C., you know, Beltway insider, and it talks about the differences in there. | ||
Most strikingly, the people that are on the NSC now and the people that have control was all rearranged. | ||
Gerald Salente talked about this gentleman yesterday, Jake Sullivan. | ||
If you go into the two executive orders we talked about, the one on cryptocurrency and biotech, Him, along with a couple other people, really are at the head of this. | ||
The other person to be aware of is Brian Deese, right, who we've seen, interviewed, who we've, you know, with almost a joke, what he talks about and how he speaks to people, who used to be head of sustainable investing at BlackRock, who is now the director of the National Economic Council. | ||
So, him, These are the people all going to be running this that all these other agencies are supposed to basically report to. | ||
Him, Jake Sullivan, and a woman named Alondra Nelson, who is now currently White House Office of Science and Technology Policy head, director. | ||
Excuse me. So we only have 30 seconds left. | ||
They're folding in the biosecurity and cryptocurrency I mean, it is happening, folks, and I fully believe it. | ||
Thank you so much for that call, Jordan. | ||
We'll cover this a little bit more on the other side in our final segment. | ||
Stay tuned, folks. | ||
It's American Journal, Infowars.com. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
We're going to finish out the show with your phone calls. | ||
unidentified
|
THE FAMILY IS THE FAMILY. | |
One last time, I want to remind you, beg you, implore you, plead with you. | ||
Please go to InfowarStore.com. | ||
I don't know about you. I would like to continue to do this on into the future. | ||
I would like to defeat the globalist. | ||
I would like to reclaim what is rightfully ours. | ||
I would like to oust these various networks and cabals that manipulate American foreign policy and domestic policy to serve their own ends. | ||
And again, I'm just playing a little game of... | ||
Six degrees of separation of... | ||
I don't know. We've got to come up with a name for it. | ||
Wikipedia bingo. I don't know what you want to call it. | ||
But it is amazing. | ||
You go to... Our last caller was talking about this guy, John Bellinger. | ||
John Bellinger. | ||
Bellinger III... So nice, they bellinger him twice. | ||
He's an American lawyer, legal advisor for the U.S. Department of State and National Security Council during the George W. Bush administration. | ||
He's now a partner to Washington, D.C. law firm Arnold& Porter, adjunct senior fellow at the Council of Foreign Relations. | ||
You know, the good guys. | ||
And it's just amazing. | ||
All of these guys, you just got to go to, typically they have a section of some sort that's like post-government service, and that's when they really get down to business, you might say. | ||
Council on Foreign Relations, you have, he was the 50 GOP officials, he was one of the 50 GOP officials warning Donald Trump would put nation security at risk. | ||
They wrote a letter saying don't vote for Donald Trump in 2016 and then doubled down in August 2020 when he was one of 70 former security officials who took out a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal saying they would vote for Joe Biden as president. | ||
Bellinger is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the American Law Institute, the American Council on Germany, the British American Project. | ||
He also served as Secretary of State's Advisory Committee on International Law. | ||
In 2012, he was appointed to the Defense Legal Policy Board. | ||
In October 2012, the American Law Institute named him... | ||
Counselor for the reinstatement fourth of the foreign relations law of the United States. | ||
It's just every one of these guys. | ||
Blinken's the same way. You go to his thing and it's like there's all of these organizations that all have unchecked incredible power. | ||
None of them have been elected. None of them have been approved by the American people. | ||
They're all appointed by their friends to sit on these positions and dictate the policy and Direction that the entire nation is going to go, and they all have intricate ties to the most corrupt corporate and political institutions the world has ever seen. | ||
It just goes on and on and on and on and on, and many, if not most of them, were groomed for this position from the top. | ||
Anthony Blinken is one of these great examples where his Whereas I was looking at it yesterday. | ||
It's like his dad, his dad was U.S. or I'm sorry, his uncle was U.S. ambassador to Belgium. | ||
His dad was U.S. ambassador to Hungary. | ||
It just goes on and on, right? | ||
It's like they have these positions. | ||
They groom their children to be in these positions. | ||
They are an unofficial but firmly rooted country. | ||
Class of pseudo-nobility in this country. | ||
They grow up knowing that one day they will be appointed positions of incredible power, and all they have to do is keep a clean slate, you know, check off the boxes. | ||
Okay, went to Harvard, check. | ||
Went to Yale, check. | ||
Join the Secret Society's check, and now they're put into these positions where they dictate the path that America goes, and their buddies and friends that they were raised with are all in positions of prominence as well. | ||
They're a collective conspiracy. | ||
It's not conspiracies. | ||
It's conspiracy. There's one, and they're all in on it. | ||
I'm going to cover this before we go back out to phone calls. | ||
Salesforce CEO goes ultra-woke, essentially turning his company into a political organization. | ||
While technically true, it really reveals that they don't know what's going on here. | ||
Salesforce is not turning into an ultra-woke company. | ||
Salesforce is run by Mark Benioff, who's Klaus Schwab's understudy, who is a very prominent proponent of stakeholder capitalism that forcibly, through the control of financial speculation and banking largesse, Turning all corporations into ultra-woke corporations. | ||
In other words, through access of the money supply and being able to dictate and control the money supply, they are forcing all companies to participate, not just tacitly but openly and actively participate in their programs for the remaking of the entire world, or else they won't get investments from corporations or banks like BlackRock. | ||
So Salesforce is threatening to pull his software company's operations out of Republican-run states if their policies do not align with his liberal worldview, specifically in regard to abortion policy. | ||
And we've discussed this exact thing that he did in Idaho. | ||
I believe it was Idaho, a Midwest state where Salesforce was located. | ||
A billion, multiple billion-dollar company employed thousands, if not tens of thousands of people in this state. | ||
The state went through the proper channels of how you decide what the... | ||
Legislation should be what the laws in your state are. | ||
The people vote on representatives who debate and discuss bills and then pass it through... | ||
The normal and appropriate channels, and then it gets signed by the government. | ||
I mean, that's the way the laws are supposed to be passed. | ||
That's the way that the will of the people is to be expressed in a republic. | ||
But somewhere in that line, here comes Mark. | ||
Here comes Mr. Benioff. | ||
Here comes the philanthropist, this disgusting ogre of a human who says, actually, all of the people who voted for all of the representatives who discussed all of these bills and came to a conclusion— We're good to go. | ||
That works in this company. | ||
I'm going to move to a different state, rehire them or hire other people. | ||
I'm going to do irrevocable damage to your state and your financial situation, having set up here and taken advantage of whatever perks the state wanted to offer us to make the headquarters. | ||
Now that you did that, I have power over you. | ||
And so me, Mark Benioff, disgusting ogre, I get to decide what the laws are. | ||
Not you, not the process, not the legislature or even the government. | ||
Governor. I get to decide. | ||
And it worked. Last time it worked. He got away with it, right? | ||
They passed it. It went to the governor's desk to be signed, and the governor, on behalf of Mark Benioff, Arch Ogre, vetoed it. | ||
Said, nope, nope, sorry. | ||
I know that millions of people in this state all express their will through the voting process, and this is what they want. | ||
But on one side, you have millions of the people of Idaho, and on the other side, you have An ogre. | ||
So I'm going to go with the ogre on this. | ||
I'm going to go with the ogre because he's threatening us. | ||
He's blackmailing us with corporate manipulation to do what we say, not what the people of the state want to say. | ||
So he got away with it. He succeeded. | ||
He got what he wanted, and now he's doing it again. | ||
So now he's threatening to Do very severe economic damage to the people of states that choose something that he doesn't like. | ||
He's the one in charge, not you. | ||
And he's gonna run a Time Magazine article, the magazine that he owns, saying what a great thing it was, how he fortified the state against the anti-abortion program. | ||
This is stakeholder capitalism. | ||
This is not some change. | ||
This is an acceleration. | ||
This is not new. | ||
It has been long discussed. | ||
It is the entire purpose of the World Economic Forum. | ||
Klaus Schwab and Mark Benioff, of course, was one of the three people that combined, the other two being Lynn Rothschild and Pope Francis, to impose stakeholder capitalism on the entire world. | ||
AKA global governance under a corporatocracy. | ||
That's all this is, and they're doing it, and they're getting away with it. | ||
It's times like this that you just have to look with a little bit of envy at places like China. | ||
You know what I mean? You know what I mean? | ||
It's like, again, it's a false dichotomy because the choice is not between being a You know, useful idiot for some communist pedophile that owns a company and a literal hardcore communist stooge of the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
Like, this is not the dichotomy. | ||
But you think any Chinese billionaire would dare to do this? | ||
You think if the Chinese government was going to pass a law and a Chinese billionaire said, actually, I'll bankrupt this state if you pass that, you think they'd let them get away with that? | ||
Or do you think they do what we should do, which is go, no, no, no. | ||
We're going to stop this right now. | ||
We're going to prevent this from ever even being considered again. | ||
Mark Benioff, hope you enjoyed your times on your yachts and in your mini mansions and in your private jet because you're going to jail now for a very long time for daring to attempt to use your power and position as a media mogul and a corporate psychopath to try to overwhelm, hope you enjoyed your times on your yachts and in your mini mansions and in your private jet because You have to go to jail now for a very long time. | ||
That's what China does. | ||
Sometimes you just think, you know, we could just not let this happen to us. | ||
We could just defend ourselves. | ||
We could just defend our system and defend ourselves against the attacks from the World Economic Forum. | ||
First, you have to know about it, and they own the media, so. | ||
On April 23rd, 1910, the iconic American president who busted up the Rockefeller Trust in America gave his incredibly historic speech, Citizen in a Republic. the iconic American president who busted up the Rockefeller Trust Citizen in a Republic. | ||
It was the man in the arena speech that sent shockwaves throughout the world. | ||
And I live by this creed. | ||
I'm about to read to you just a short excerpt of the 30 plus minute speech he gave to over 5 million attendees in Paris, France. | ||
We have released a coin that has Teddy Roosevelt on the front and a gladiator on the back. | ||
Discusses a citizen of the Republic and the man in the arena. | ||
And InfoWars and everything we do is about the man and the woman in the arena fighting tyranny. | ||
It's the fourth coin in the series we've offered at PatriotCollectibles.com or 1776Coin.com. | ||
There are only 10,000 of this coin available. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, this coin is funding our operations as men and women in the arena. | ||
Let me read to you part of his famous speech. | ||
It's not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man has stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. | ||
The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs, who comes short again and again, We're good to go. | ||
This is the man in the arena coin. | ||
Only 10,000 in the world. |