Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
You're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
Soap me, man. | ||
Let it say whatever it wants to say. | ||
Ha, ha, ha, | ||
ha. ha. - What does it mean to speak in tongues? | ||
Does speaking in tongues just mean babbling nonsense? | ||
One of the more contentious pieces of the New Testament, the defining of this inspired act of the apostles, has caused great confusion among the followers of Christ. | ||
In the book of Acts, during the day of Pentecost, the Holy Spirit descended upon the apostles and disciples as they were all gathered in Jerusalem, and the Spirit gave them the ability to speak in other tongues. | ||
Quote, They saw what seemed to be tongues of fire that separated and came to rest on each of them. | ||
All of them were filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in other tongues as the Spirit enables them. | ||
The crowd gathered around them, devout men from every nation under heaven, each heard the apostles speaking in their native languages. | ||
Quote, We hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues. | ||
Whatever could this mean? | ||
Clearly, it doesn't mean they babbled nonsense to one another. | ||
Otherwise, the multilinguistic crowd would have dismissed them as being false prophets without the power of the Holy Spirit. | ||
Instead, they heard the Spirit-filled followers of Christ speaking a variety of languages, languages they didn't know before the miraculous event at Pentecost. | ||
In Greek, the original language of the New Testament, the word used for tongues in this passage is the plural of glossa, which means the tongue, and by implication, a language, specifically one naturally unacquired. | ||
In 1 Corinthians, the gifts from the Holy Spirit are further elaborated on. | ||
There are different kinds of gifts, but the same Spirit distributes them. | ||
Gifts such as wisdom, knowledge, faith, healing, prophecy, distinguishing between spirits, and speaking in different kinds of tongues or interpreting different kinds of tongues. | ||
And it is said that In contrast, in Genesis of the Old Testament, at the Tower of Babel, the power of God and His Spirit confused the languages. | ||
In short, after the flood before Nimrod in Babylon, many languages formed from Noah's descendants. | ||
Then after some time, the many languages became one as the Babylon Empire arose and consolidated a new order in the world. | ||
Most likely by force. | ||
They tried to build a tower to escape God's judgment and reach heaven by the work of their own hands, rather than by the graceful hand of God. | ||
Bab-el means gate of God in Hebrew, a gate in the sky they were building. | ||
And the Hebrew word Babel is essentially a play on words, where a term meaning confusion is used to describe the tower they were forced to stop building in the kingdom because God confused their languages and the work could not continue. | ||
It is only through the Holy Spirit that the miraculous occurrence of speaking other languages with no prior experience is possible. | ||
This is what allowed the gospel to be understood as it went into Africa, Asia, and Europe. | ||
Speaking in tongues can't possibly mean incoherent babbling because the gospel would then not have spread worldwide. | ||
In my opinion, these interpretations of clear Scripture is the work of the great adversary to confuse minds of otherwise faithful followers of Christ. | ||
We cannot twist Scripture to fit tradition or our own wills. | ||
Instead, a careful study of God's Word with humility will lead to heavenly knowledge and understanding. | ||
This is Brian Wilson with Infowars.com. | ||
That is the latest from, of course, Red Pill TV. Report Tower of Babel versus Tongues at Pentecost. | ||
Share that link. | ||
Join us on the other side for the Daily Dispatch. | ||
unidentified
|
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith. | |
Watch it live right now at band.video. | ||
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Welcome to The American Journal. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Lost my video list already. | ||
We have a big show for you today. | ||
We'll be joined by Mike Shelby, intelligence expert in the third hour. | ||
I imagine we'll talk about a number of things, but primarily we'll be talking about the threat of China as it looks an awful lot like it's preparing for war in a couple different ways. | ||
Primarily cyber war against the United States. | ||
We'll be talking about cyber war against China with Mike Shelby. | ||
We'll also be probably talking to him a little bit about what's going on in Iraq. | ||
Lots of videos to go to. | ||
And of course we'll be taking your calls as well. | ||
So let's get into it. | ||
Here it is, your daily dispatch. | ||
All right, folks, here it is, your daily dispatch for Tuesday, the 30th of August, 2022. | ||
FBI special agent who opened Trump investigation reportedly escorted out of the bureau. | ||
Former FBI Washington field office assistant special agent in charge, Tim Tybalt, was reportedly escorted out of the Bureau on Friday amid whistleblower allegations that he showed political bias in his handling of politically sensitive investigations. | ||
The Washington Times reported eyewitness accounts that Mr. | ||
Tybalt was seen exiting the Bureau's elevator last Friday, escorted by two or three headquarter-looking types. | ||
The article appears to have been updated and now states that Tybalt abruptly resigned, but that he was forced to leave his post. | ||
It cites two unnamed former FBI officials. | ||
Whistleblowers alleged that Tybalt concealed the partisan nature of evidence from FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland to secure their approval to open an investigation into former President Trump in 2020 unrelated to the raid, according to information made public by Senator Charles Grassley. | ||
Those whistleblower allegations have raised questions about the bureau, as it also deals with the fallout of the raid from Trump's home earlier this month. | ||
And we will get into this much more later. | ||
including... The fact that Tybalt was apparently the FBI's expert on election security. | ||
So isn't that convenient? | ||
The person who was in charge of making sure the elections were fair within the FBI has resigned after being accused of political bias. | ||
So we'll get into that. | ||
We'll talk about that, who this guy is, and show you some interesting videos that have been dug up. | ||
Meanwhile we have this, changes to COVID vaccine guidance for pregnant and breastfeeding women causes outrage. | ||
A viral post highlighting alleged changes to COVID vaccine data for pregnant and breastfeeding women in the UK has caused outrage on social media. | ||
Essentially, after telling pregnant women that it is imperative, it is the most important thing they can possibly do. | ||
For two years, they're being told that they have to get vaccinated. | ||
You must get vaccinated. | ||
It's incumbent on you. | ||
It's for the life of your child, after all. | ||
And now that they've actually done some research into it, they've decided that actually, quote, women who are breastfeeding should not be vaccinated. | ||
And in the context of supply under Regulation 174 is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use in the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time. | ||
We read that again. Sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time. | ||
However, use in women of childbearing potential could be supported provided healthcare professionals are advised to rule out known or suspected pregnancy prior to vaccination. | ||
So they're now admitting that they cannot tell you whether it's safe or not for pregnant women to get the vaccine. | ||
And in fact, they say if you are of childbearing age, you should make sure you're not pregnant before you get the vaccine. | ||
Just a little switcheroo they did on us here. | ||
We'll talk about that a lot more today as well. | ||
We have this. This broke yesterday during the show. | ||
Violence in Iraq escalates. | ||
30 people have been killed in the Iraqi capital Baghdad after fighting between supporters and rivals of religious leader Muqtada al-Sadir. | ||
30 people have been killed in fighting in Iraq between rival Shia militias as well as the Iraqi security forces after the powerful religious leader al-Sadir claimed that he was withdrawing from politics. | ||
Again, not a lot of real in-depth information about this so far. | ||
We'll cover it and we'll see what insights Mike Shelby can lend to our understanding of what's going on exactly. | ||
But there has been major violence in the so-called green zone, which is where, of course, the American peacekeepers are. | ||
So we'll cover that a little bit more as well. | ||
Farmers say they will be forced to cull cows to meet climate change targets. | ||
Government plans to cut agriculture emissions by 25% by 2030 will drive many farms into bankruptcy, say critics. | ||
As if that's not the purpose. | ||
As if that's not the reason. | ||
You think culling cows is going to do absolutely anything to affect the earth? | ||
I don't know. You ever seen a volcano erupt? | ||
You see the images of the tire fire in Kuwait? | ||
Just acre upon acre of rubber burning endlessly forever? | ||
Do you think any of that is going to be offset by... | ||
Culling some cows? | ||
No, of course not. The only thing that you achieve by culling cows is the bankruptcy of the farmers because that's the point of all of this. | ||
It's just wild. | ||
They're actually culling their cows to meet completely arbitrary, totally vague, entirely unscientific demands of the World Economic Forum. | ||
Pretty wild. Pretty wild indeed. | ||
Under a new government plan, agriculture must reduce emissions by 25% by 2030. | ||
Other sectors face even higher targets. | ||
Transportation must reduce emissions by 50%, commercial and public buildings by 40%. | ||
But the loudest protests have come from the farmers. | ||
Yeah, well, considering the fact that we are rapidly approaching a food crisis in which the UN says they think something like a billion people are going to starve to death, And yet this is not happening naturally. | ||
This is a result of the policies being pursued by these governments. | ||
And people think it's not a conspiracy. | ||
Just insane. | ||
This story is really big today and we'll talk about it in a little bit. | ||
I think Mike Shelby will also have some things to say about this. | ||
More than 40% of Americans think civil war is likely within a decade. | ||
More than two-fifths of Americans believe civil war is at least somewhat likely in the next couple years, ten years, according to a new survey, a figure that increases to more than half among self-identified strong Republicans. | ||
Amid heated rhetoric from supporters of Donald Trump, the findings and research by YouGov and The Economist follow similar results in other polls. | ||
On Sunday night, the South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham predicted riots in the streets if Trump is indicted over his retention of classified documents after leaving the White House. | ||
Materials recovered by the FBI at Trump's home this month. | ||
Well, I mean, he was mentioning that, but I would say... | ||
If he is indicted for any of the reasons that they are fabricating, making up, manufacturing, and inventing. | ||
It doesn't have to be about the latest scandal, right? | ||
I mean, they've impeached him twice. | ||
They've launched investigation after investigation. | ||
There's a New York investigation. | ||
There's the FBI investigation. | ||
There's the special investigator investigation. | ||
There's the investigation into his taxes, investigation into his, you know... | ||
Business dealings, there's investigations into just absolutely everything, and they're going to try to come up with something to indict him. | ||
And the point is that the Republicans are the reaction force here. | ||
Republicans are not the ones out here wanting to wage civil war. | ||
Republicans are the ones who are watching our country being ripped away from us and are being targeted by the corrupt elements of the deep state. | ||
So they can just stop being tyrannical despots. | ||
They can just stop being hysterical, brutal dictators. | ||
And we can chill. | ||
And it's all good. So you can stop becoming communist dictators and then everything's fine. | ||
No need for a civil war. | ||
Or you can aggressively tear down the very foundations of our unity and just wait and see what happens. | ||
Finally, we have this. eBay is now locking accounts of users who sell over $600 worth of products until they submit their Social Security number for IRS reporting. | ||
As of January 1, 2022, the IRS now requires us to file and send a Form 1099-K to everyone who sells $600 or more. | ||
They say, since you've made $600 or more in sales this year, we need your full nine-digit social security number, your individual tax ID number, to send you your 1099K. Yeah, take that, billionaires. | ||
Take that, Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates. | ||
Take that, George Soros. | ||
The IRS is going after billionaires. | ||
If by billionaires, you mean, I don't know, some grandma selling her collectibles on eBay. | ||
If she doesn't file that 1099... | ||
Bull in the head, Grandma. | ||
Don't mess with the IRS. They're coming after you. | ||
unidentified
|
All right, folks. | |
Welcome back to the American Journal. | ||
As always, we have a ton to talk about. | ||
I'm just wondering where I should begin. | ||
We should lay the groundwork. | ||
For all these other stories to fit in or whether we should build up story by story, I think we'll start with a nice little overview. | ||
Because for those of us who have been interested in conspiracy theories for the last several decades, I guess, you know that the Great Reset is not really anything new. | ||
It's a singular plan that's been in place for... | ||
About 50 years now. | ||
And it's gone through a number of different labels or names, designations, including Agenda 21. | ||
It became Agenda 2030. | ||
It was folded into the Great Reset. | ||
It's all the same program, just with different names, different labels as they use different forces to enact it. | ||
So I want to go down to clip number one. | ||
This is an older video. | ||
Before the Great Reset, It was the newest designation. | ||
And here's a very nice explanation of Agenda 21 and how exactly it will be enforced. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Agenda 21 is kind of a code name for a master plan originated at the United Nations to change the political and economic system of the world To one of total collectivism. | |
And in order to do that, people must not be allowed to have independence. | ||
They must be dependent on the state for everything. | ||
Otherwise, they won't be easily controlled by the state. | ||
That means they can't have private property, mostly. | ||
They cannot have land of their own. | ||
They have to live in Preferably high-rise apartments that are provided to them by the state as a benefit, so to speak. | ||
Oh good, we got a free apartment. | ||
But they want, these people at the top want all humans to be dependent on the largesse of the state. | ||
That means that they don't want anybody living out in the boonies. | ||
Anybody that's got a couple of acres of land and his own water supply and can grow his own food and that kind of thing, or have some sheep or some chickens, these people are a threat to the collectivist society because they aren't going to go to the politicians and say, please feed me, please clothe me, please give me shelter. | ||
They tend to be independent. | ||
That's the secret behind Agenda 21. | ||
They want people out of the country. | ||
They want corporations out there growing all the food and that kind of thing, but they don't want anybody living out there, because that way they cannot be controlled. | ||
In order to control mankind, we have to get them all into the big cities. | ||
We have to rack them up and stack them up, get them dependent on the state for their food, their shelter, their electrical power, their water, everything. | ||
That's the dirty secret behind Agenda 21. | ||
And of course we see all of this coming to fruition now with the attack on farmers, the war being waged on farmers everywhere from Belgium to the Netherlands to here in America, Ireland of course. | ||
As the latest headline from yesterday, Irish farmers say they will be forced to cull cows to meet climate targets. | ||
And climate change is the real convenient excuse they're using to roll out These policies, which their real intention is exactly what you just heard. | ||
Agenda 21, total control through dependence. | ||
Clip number four has yet another food processing plant has caught fire yesterday. | ||
It's getting a little suspicious now. | ||
Let's roll that as B-roll. | ||
But yes, another in a long line and rash of food production plants. | ||
Pfft. I couldn't even tell you how many that is this year. | ||
Just dozens upon dozens upon dozens. | ||
Totally unique situation. | ||
You also have this. Let's go to clip number 16, because it's not just about farming and your ability to grow food. | ||
It's also about your ability to access that most basic necessity of life, water. | ||
And of course, this is an older clip. | ||
A lot of info warriors will remember it, but it's worth reminding ourselves. | ||
Once again, it's not just governments doing this. | ||
The corporations have their hand in it and plan on Making it serve them as well. | ||
So let's go now to the Nestle CEO in 2008 talking about how useful water will be in controlling the population. | ||
unidentified
|
Water is of course the most important raw material we have today in the world. | |
It is a question of whether we should privatize the normal water supply for the population. | ||
There are two different opinions on the matter. | ||
The one opinion, which I think is extreme, is represented by the NGOs. | ||
Bang on, he says, about declaring water. | ||
Public right. That means that as a human being, you should have a right to water. | ||
Yeah, I would think so. | ||
That's an extreme solution, he says. | ||
And the other view says that water is a foodstuff, like any other. | ||
And like any other foodstuffs, it should have a market value. | ||
Except that water is more like air. | ||
Because it's everywhere. Because it springs up from the ground. | ||
Because it is necessary for every human being to live that they have access to air and water and food. | ||
So again, rationing is the key here. | ||
And whether it's food, oil, water, or even air, they will restrict it from you until you bend the knee to them. | ||
Steve Bannon said, He's talking about this as well. | ||
Let's go down to clip number 18. | ||
Here's Steve Bannon decrying the total and complete destruction that we are now facing. | ||
Here's the headline from the FT. People are going to die. | ||
And you have a mother of a four-year-old who said, I make a decision every day of paying my bill or feeding my kid. | ||
Okay? You have 20, Bloomberg reports, you have 20 million households in the United States of America. | ||
Let me repeat that. I think there's only 100 million households in the country. | ||
20 million households. | ||
That would be, let me do some math here. | ||
Oh, 20% of our population. | ||
Households in the country are so far behind on their power bill that Bloomberg, who's also not a hair on fire war room type, says it's a tsunami of shutoffs. | ||
This is what your leaders have done, Biden and Mark Kelly and the guys at the World Economic Forum and these fantasy people that have led you down a path of total and complete destruction. | ||
Let me be blunt. | ||
Let me repeat that. Total and complete destruction. | ||
And I don't know why we don't have the Republican Party at the ramparts on this thing. | ||
Well, because they're a part of it. | ||
Steve, I hate to break this to you, but they're not going to do anything. | ||
But here's another little issue is they can't stop you from growing food in your backyard, can they? | ||
Of course they can. With chemtrails, let's go now to clip number five. | ||
This person says, if it's just condensation, please explain why all the plants under a canopy are thriving. | ||
While all the plants that are not covered die, including cactuses. | ||
Is something being sprayed in the air to kill the plants? | ||
The answer is yes. | ||
unidentified
|
In the southern part of Texas, in the town of San Antonio, here's a four-year-old. | |
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
This is the American Journal. | ||
Remember, you support everything we do here by going to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
DNA Force Plus is back in stock and 50% off. | ||
Ultimate Fish Oil is 40% off. | ||
No matter what you buy from InfoWars, know you can rest easy. | ||
Knowing that you get the finest products available on the market in terms of supplements, you can also get the Great Reset book or the t-shirts or any of the incredible products at InfoWarsStore.com and know that you are supporting this singular outlet for truth in an empire of lies. | ||
Of course, that's why they're trying to destroy us. | ||
Again, not that complicated. | ||
In the same way that they're not Telling Irish farmers to cull their cowherds because of climate change. | ||
They're not coming after Infowars because of disinformation or hate speech. | ||
You get that they come up with lame, pathetic, baseless excuses for doing what they were going to do anyway. | ||
Destroy dissidents and eliminate the ability of people to feed themselves. | ||
Because it's all a plan that InfoWars has revealed for the last several decades. | ||
And again, people, I just always think back to a tweet that was like, so now that Alex Jones has been proven right about everything, maybe we should let him back on? | ||
And it's like, no, don't you get it? | ||
Don't you get that they had to kick Alex Jones off right before they rolled out the plan? | ||
Don't you get that that was all part of the plan? | ||
That first you use your big tech... | ||
Partners to eliminate the people that are going to expose the truth behind your machinations. | ||
Really not that complicated. | ||
But of course it's various different organizations that are involved in this. | ||
It's big tech. | ||
It of course is big corporations like Nestle. | ||
But almost most importantly, it is the deep state spy controllers in this country. | ||
And we're seeing some interesting moves in that regard. | ||
Just the News has the story. | ||
FBI special agent who opened a Trump investigation reportedly escorted out of the bureau. | ||
His name is Tim Tybalt. | ||
And he was escorted from the building. | ||
Although the FBI says, no, it's totally normal. | ||
He wasn't fired at all. | ||
Which is a weird response because... | ||
If anything, the FBI should be saying, yep, it was all him. | ||
Right? Because initially, my immediate response is, okay, here's the fall guy. | ||
The whole system is corrupt from Merrick Garland to Christopher Wray, everybody below them, completely captured by this traitorous force. | ||
And so the typical reaction would be to take one guy that actually isn't that important and say, actually, it was all him. | ||
It was his fault. He's the problem here. | ||
We got rid of him. | ||
We're done. We're back on track. | ||
You can stop yelling at us now. | ||
But it's interesting that they apparently have fired this Timothy Tybalt and then said, actually, no, he's just retiring. | ||
Totally, perfectly normal. | ||
This happens to everybody. | ||
We escort everybody who retires off and take their guns and badges. | ||
Timothy Tybalt, a top-level FBI agent who had been under fire for his role in investigations regarding President Biden's son, Hunter Biden, resigned last week and was walked out of the FBI, two officials confirmed. | ||
But these officials also said that Tybalt had reached retirement age, and they added all who retire hand over their badge and gun or escort it out of the building. | ||
It's like they're like, no, please. | ||
You think we would actually do something when somebody brings their political bias to the job and uses the power of the FBI to try to sway an election? | ||
That's what we do. That's what we do here. | ||
That's what we're all about. | ||
We don't fire people for doing that. | ||
That's our job. Tybalt, who worked at the FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C., had recently been removed from his position as assistant special agent in charge at the FBI's Washington field office. | ||
Tybalt came under fire earlier this year from Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, who accused him of improper conduct in the Hunter Biden investigation, adding that Tybalt had tried to close the probe. | ||
Grassley said that in late July, a highly credible whistleblower had approached a senior Senate Republican and alleged a widespread effort within the FBI to downplay or discredit negative information about Hunter Biden. | ||
In October 2020, just one month before the election, an avenue of derogatory Hunter Biden reporting was ordered closed by a senior FBI agent at the Bureau's Washington field office. | ||
an earlier letter from grass that identified the agent as tibbled uh this whistleblower cited a 2020 fbi intelligence assessment that was used by an fbi headquarters team to improperly discredit negative hunter biden information as disinformation he continued based on allegations verified and verifiable derogatory information on hunter biden was falsely labeled as disinformation we know that | ||
And then, of course, that was spread to Facebook, where the FBI warned them out of courtesy. | ||
Remember, they phrased it that way when Mark Zuckerberg retold the story, and I said this last week, because it's a common tactic that they have. | ||
They're always going to be warning you. | ||
I was talking about how Elijah Schaefer, when he was here, was getting texts from people just very concerned that he was going on a show with me. | ||
We're just looking out for you. | ||
We just wanted you to know, and for your best interest, maybe you shouldn't do this thing we don't want you to do. | ||
I just care about you so much. | ||
It's the same thing the FBI did. | ||
You know, last in 2016, you got in some hot water because of Russian disinformation. | ||
We would hate for that to happen again. | ||
So we just, out of courtesy to you, want to warn you, bury the Hunter Biden laptop story. | ||
Don't let it spread. Destroy it. | ||
Call it disinformation and make sure no one can share it. | ||
You know, for your own benefit. | ||
Of course they phrase it that way. | ||
So in this little goings-on here, you've got Tybalt, who apparently tried to shut down the Hunter Biden laptop investigation. | ||
We've had lots of whistleblower information about that. | ||
But you also have him alleged to be deeply involved in the decisions to open and pursue the investigation into the Trump campaign. | ||
Whether that's the Russiagate investigation or yet another baseless interference by the FBI, sort of hard to tell. | ||
You've got shutting down the Hunter Biden investigation while simultaneously opening up baseless investigations on Donald Trump. | ||
But then you also have a very interesting video from Before any of this happened, let's go down to clip number 10. | ||
Here is Timothy Tibbold himself talking about another topic that was his concern at the FBI. Let's watch. | ||
What is the FBI doing to combat election fraud? | ||
unidentified
|
The FBI is charged with protecting the rights of all Americans, including their right to vote. | |
While the responsibility to ensure a fair election process lies primarily at the state and local level, the FBI takes allegations of election-related violations of federal law seriously. | ||
The FBI investigates federal election crimes that generally fall into three categories. | ||
Campaign finance crimes, voter ballot fraud, and civil rights violations. | ||
The FBI Washington Field Office works with our state and federal partners to engage with other law enforcement partners and provide resources about the FBI's role in elections. | ||
Learn more about election security at FBI.gov slash Protected Voices. | ||
Isn't that amazing that Tim Tivolt tried to stop the Hunter Biden investigation, launched investigations against Donald Trump, was also apparently in charge of election fraud at the FBI, which of course completely turned a blind eye to the accusations, credible as you could want, during 2020. | ||
And of course, that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the FBI corruption. | ||
We have a video we'll show you in the next segment. | ||
Tucker Carlson going on about the FBI and the Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping plot, which of course is completely manufactured to yet again. | ||
Poll from thin air. | ||
The evidence that they need to prove that right-wingers and Trump supporters are dangerous domestic terrorists that have to be stopped. | ||
Last week when Border Patrol agents were captured on video trying to patrol the border, the FBI decided they need to step in and investigate. | ||
I don't know whether the team sent to investigate the Border Patrol patrolling the border is bigger than the one they sent to investigate the noose that was actually just a garage door pulldown. | ||
But, you know, when the FBI gets gets on something, it's strictly for public consumption. | ||
It has nothing to do with what actual crimes are being committed, whether laws are being violated and preventing the abuse of American citizens. | ||
It's all entirely about public perception so they can manipulate you into enslaving yourself. | ||
Continuing on, our coverage of just the... | ||
Utter corruption of the FBI. It truly is shocking how far they've fallen in just the past few years. | ||
They used to be so good at committing crimes. | ||
You know, they used to be so good at simultaneously undermining the rule of law and being upheld as the protectors of our constitutional republic and the incorruptible federal agents. | ||
They've fallen so far. | ||
I mean, they're still doing all the things that they've always been doing, but the fact is they've lost it. | ||
They've lost the ability to continue to pull the wool over America's eyes. | ||
And whether it's desperation or arrogance, just a narcissism and self-satisfaction, knowing that they can get away with any of this stuff because they have a firm grip on the throats of The major media outlets will report only and without deviation exactly what is being told to them by the FBI without questioning it. | ||
Maybe they're in a position where they just feel totally untouchable. | ||
And maybe we're proving them right. | ||
But of course we can go back to the beginning of the Russiagate investigation where you had the FBI Actually letting in the Russian spy, the DOJ, gave her a special waiver to get in and go to the Trump Tower meeting, which, by the way, now has an entire Wikipedia page, the Trump Tower meeting. | ||
Like, it was... | ||
You know, some sort of major historical event that had a major impact on this country. | ||
Trump Tower meeting. Wikipedia entry. | ||
It occurred on the day, June 9th, 2016. | ||
And it was a meeting between Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, Paul Manafort, and Natalie Vetskanaya. | ||
And of course, she was not allowed to be in the United States until she got a waiver to come into the country given to her by the DOJ and the FBI. So they bring her in. | ||
They're in contact with her, obviously. | ||
They send her to Trump Tower and then they point and go, see, they're meeting with Russian spies. | ||
Now we have to investigate them. | ||
Of course, this was all pretty long after they'd already launched the investigation way earlier on. | ||
And remember, they thought they were going to be successful. | ||
They thought that they were going to have Hillary Clinton in office. | ||
And if they had Hillary Clinton in office as the head of the executive branch and therefore the top of the pyramid when it comes to the DOJ, they would have... | ||
Found it very easy to roll out all of this manufactured evidence, claim that Donald Trump was a Russian agent, and completely destroy him. | ||
When they're talking about an insurance plan, they never thought those texts would come to light because they thought that this insurance plan would guarantee that Hillary Clinton got into office. | ||
If you want an idea of how arrogant they were, they took a fabricated story made up by Glenn Simpson at Fusion GPS that they intended to run as a political hit piece on John McCain and used the same exact premise to incriminate Donald Trump. | ||
Like, that's how brazen they were. | ||
Yeah, yeah, yeah. No, they thought they were going to get away with it. | ||
They didn't think Trump was going to win. | ||
So, again, when you talk about the ultimate conspiracy, when you talk about this globalist superstructure that's pulling the strings all around the world, people get the idea that you think that everything is moving exactly to their plan. | ||
And they're just, they're the puppeteers, you know, controlling absolutely everyone. | ||
It's not true. They're human beings. | ||
They don't have control over your mind. | ||
They don't have control over my mind. | ||
They don't have total, incomplete control. | ||
They have something very close to it, but they have to contend with human will. | ||
Unexpectedly, Donald Trump won the election, probably by such overwhelming numbers that the cheating that they were certainly engaged in just wasn't sufficient to keep him out of office. | ||
And so they had to change tactics. | ||
So they had to launch the special investigation, Mueller investigation. | ||
Which again was an aspect of the FBI and DOJ. But all of that's old news. | ||
All of that was during the Trump administration. | ||
Since then, they've ramped it up another notch. | ||
They have launched the Gretchen Whitmer fabricated case. | ||
We have a video from Tucker Carlson discussing that. | ||
We'll go to it in just a second. That was just the prelude. | ||
In fact, this very same agent that headed that Catastrophe was then moved to head the January 6th investigation. | ||
January 6th, the FBI will not admit how many undercover agents they had in the crowd. | ||
Cassidy admitting that they did have agents, they just won't admit how many there are. | ||
If the answer was zero, they would have said zero. | ||
But they didn't. They said, we can't tell you. | ||
And of course, during the 2020 election, they were at the forefront of both Destroying the investigation into the Hunter Biden laptop, as well as going to big tech and giving them the justification they needed to stop that information from spreading. | ||
Epoch Times has the story. | ||
FBI knew a potential Hunter Biden story leak before warning Facebook. | ||
And this is about just the obvious implications that you can derive from the statements made by Mark Zuckerberg when he said that the FBI came to him before the story broke and said the story's about to break and you better be careful for it. | ||
And so FOIA fan at 15 pounds to go on Twitter has come up with a pretty convincing timeline of how this took place. | ||
He or she says, if I had to guess, the FBI, the feds knew in advance that the Hunter laptop story was going to break because they were investigating or spying on Rudy Giuliani. | ||
He was the source of the New York Post story and the FBI was pursuing Rudy at the time. | ||
Of course, they had to politicize it and lie. | ||
Within one day of the New York Post Hunter laptop story breaking, the fact of an FBI investigation into possible Russian disinformation operation was made known to the press to lend credence to election rigging lie. | ||
Your tax dollars at work. | ||
So remember, it wasn't just the FBI that was engaged in spreading the disinformation that this was disinformation, right? | ||
It's a disinformation layer cake we're dealing with here. | ||
But you also had 40 members of the intelligence community sign a paper declaring that this had all of the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign. | ||
Despite the fact that at the time, they were in possession of the laptop. | ||
Foyafan says Rudy had the laptop. | ||
The FBI was investigating Rudy. | ||
They may have learned of it through some form of spying and had to get in front of the story for improper political reasons. | ||
A laptop the FBI already had. | ||
A laptop they knew was dynamite. | ||
A laptop they knew was genuine. | ||
And in August 2020, the same month that Rudy got the laptop, but two months before New York Post broke the story, the FBI starts treating the fully verified Hunter Biden material as disinformation. | ||
The FBI was investigating Rudy at the time. | ||
Conclusion, the FBI snoopers knew what was coming. | ||
I think that's a good reading of the situation. | ||
They say even on October 19, 2020, after Ratcliffe stated that the Russian disinformation allegation was unsupported, the FBI and dim pals in Congress kept pushing that line. | ||
And again, the intercourse between the media and the intelligence community, from the FBI to the CIA, To the MSM. I mean, these are all just three-letter agencies of a singular globalist force. | ||
An MSNBC pundit who claimed Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation has been tapped for the Intelligence Advisory Board. | ||
Jeremy Bash signed a letter claiming that the laptop had the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation. | ||
And President Biden on Friday announced his intent to appoint Jeremy Bash to the President's Intelligence Advisory Board, a known and despicable liar. | ||
He's a former CIA chief of staff, in addition to his role as MSNBC pundit. | ||
He signed that letter in October 2020 that attempted to downplay the scandal before Election Day. | ||
Is it not clear yet? | ||
I mean, you've got CIA agents... | ||
Going from the CIA to MSNBC, spreading lies that benefit the Democrats, then getting hired on to the President's Intelligence Advisory Board, despite being completely wrong, but he was very useful in a partisan sense. | ||
So of course he gets rewarded for his lie by the system. | ||
You've got the FBI launching investigation after investigation, in some cases, simply to claim primacy and say, well, we're investigating the Hunter Biden laptop, so we can't talk about it because it's under investigation. | ||
We cannot state anything about an ongoing investigation, an investigation that they're scuttling and destroying and falsifying on purpose. | ||
And then they're launching other investigations based off of completely manufactured and fake evidence in order to go after political opponents, hoping in a fishing expedition that they'll find something Particular that they can use. | ||
They're raiding the former president's private home on completely spurious grounds and then redacting the entire affidavit. | ||
I mean, it's complete madness. | ||
It's complete insanity. We are completely taken over by people who are open liars using their position to ensure Their primacy at the top of the heap while depriving the American people the information they need to actually make an informed decision and fulfill the requirements of the republic that the FBI is supposed to protect. | ||
And you don't think they're coming after Infowars? | ||
You don't think we are also a threat? | ||
I mean, the truth is threat to liars. | ||
So, just know, all this stuff that's being done to you, it's being done to us, maybe even more. | ||
And all we ask is for your support. | ||
Go to Infowarsstore.com right now. | ||
Make a purchase and help us fight back. | ||
We may be the biggest threat to the FBI in a peaceful information sense that the world has ever seen. | ||
Support us in this fight. | ||
Spit in the eye of these despots. | ||
Infowarstore.com. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Second hour of American Journal has begun. | ||
I will be opening up the phone lines this hour to take your calls. | ||
We'll be joined in the third hour by Mike Shelby. | ||
We'll be talking about very suspicious and troubling activities of China as they seem to be preparing for all-out war, cyber war, and physical invasion centered around Taiwan. | ||
We'll also be talking about what's happening in Iraq and a number of other topics that he's well-versed on. | ||
I want to play a video here first of something that largely slipped through the cracks for me. | ||
It wasn't on my radar, really. | ||
And part of it, and if you've watched this show for a while, part of my frustration with the attempts to Make voting more secure is that there seems to constantly be headlines that seem like they're a big deal. | ||
And then you go and read and you're like, what is actually being said? | ||
It was all very confusing. | ||
And so, of course, it was hard if somebody said, what is your evidence of voter fraud to actually point to a big list? | ||
It's like, here it is. Here's all the big lists of voter fraud. | ||
I mean, we see it constantly. | ||
But to aggregate it all in one place was... | ||
Not happening. So I want to play this video because it's one in particular event that can be extrapolated and seen throughout the entire country. | ||
It's DeKalb County in the election that took place this year. | ||
It's a very interesting twist and turns. | ||
So let's take a look now at clip number nine. | ||
unidentified
|
Here it is. Right now, dozens of people are hand counting ballots in the race for DeKalb County Commission District 2 after a candidate discovered a problem in the electronic tower. | |
May 24th, DeKalb County, Georgia. | ||
Voters went to the polls to vote on a local county commissioner race in District 2 between Lauren Alexander, Marshall Orson, and Michelle Longspears. | ||
The end result from the Dominion machine showed Lauren Alexander received 34.67% of the vote. | ||
Marshall Orson receiving 41.35% of the vote, and Michelle Longspears receiving 23.98% of the vote. | ||
In Georgia, if one candidate doesn't get above 50% of the vote total, a runoff election is automatically held between the two top candidates, meaning Michelle Longspears was cut out of the race. | ||
But Michelle Longsteers felt a lot about the numbers, so she visited different precincts to double-check the tallies. | ||
Guess what? She noticed that in some precincts she didn't receive a single vote. | ||
But how is that possible that a candidate with 24% of the vote total finds precincts where she didn't receive a single vote? | ||
While statistically alarming, the real surprise came when she realized there was not one vote cast for her in her own precinct. | ||
The same one where she and her husband voted for herself. | ||
Spears immediately demanded a hand recount of the results and got one. | ||
On June 1st, the results were released, and the difference between the Dominion machine count and the hand count was shocking. | ||
After the hand count, Loren Alexander gained 355 votes, Orson lost 1,298 votes, And Spears actually gained 3,620 votes, making her the new runoff candidate. | ||
And here's the best part. When you add them all up, the hand count shows 2,810 votes more than the Dominion machines reported on the 24th. | ||
This is huge. On the small count of commissioners' race, with 15,500 votes total, the Dominion machine tally was short by nearly 3,000 votes. | ||
What does that say about all the other races that were conducted on these very same machines? | ||
This is proof that the machines cannot be trusted. | ||
If Spears had not sounded the alarm, no one would have ever known. | ||
Yeah, pretty incredible stuff. | ||
15,000 votes, 3,000 of them don't get counted. | ||
Were you about to say something like that? So, I mean, those are the accusations that have been laid out by this group. | ||
Apparently this is General Flynn's group, apparently, who made this video. | ||
You know, how many times you heard, there's no widespread voter fraud. | ||
There's no voter fraud enough to sway the whole election. | ||
Trying to convince you. | ||
That for the election to be stolen, everyone had to be cheating everywhere. | ||
Nope. A few different places, very few strategic areas could sway the whole election by just a couple thousand votes. | ||
And that's exactly what they did. | ||
We'll be back on the other side. | ||
Don't go anywhere. Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
It is The American Journal. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Second hour has begun. | ||
I'm just finishing up here, publishing the video dispatch on my substack here. | ||
If you want to have access to all the videos that we play and all the ones that we don't get to, There's over 30 videos in the folder today. | ||
We've already played about 10 of them, which is a pretty high number. | ||
But of course, there's a video of Tucker Carlson talking about the Gretchen Whitmer case and the video that you just saw. | ||
All of these videos can be found at the Substack, but only for paid subscriptions. | ||
It's pretty cheap. | ||
I don't even remember how much it is, like five bucks a month or something. | ||
But you get access to the Video Vault where you get all of the videos that we use every single day here. | ||
If you don't want to pay, you can just sign up for free and you get delivered to your inbox all the stories that we cover. | ||
Links to all the stories. | ||
It's harrisonhillsmith.substack.com. | ||
Or you can go to offlimits.news and sign up there on the homepage. | ||
There's a box for you to fill out with your email. | ||
And the other important thing about having a Substack or having something like this is, God forbid, Forbid if the feds kick down the door one day or we show up to the studio to find padlocks on the door from some absurd ruling from some faraway court. | ||
It would be nice to be able to reach out and connect to you guys since we're forbidden from having social media like Twitter and Facebook. | ||
Having your email is a fantastic way that we can reach out to you. | ||
So go sign up for the Substack. | ||
You get all of the links. | ||
It's totally free. Links every single day. | ||
50 or so of them. | ||
You can let me do all of the gathering of the news for you. | ||
But importantly, we'll then have on file your email. | ||
We won't ever spam you. But in case something happens and we need to get in contact with our audience, that is a fantastic way to do it. | ||
Again, harrissmillsmith.substack.com, offlimits.news. | ||
And of course, support us by going to infowarsstore.com so that we don't ever have to do that. | ||
Wouldn't it be nice if we could just continue to operate on air? | ||
Well, that's only possible by going to infowarsstore.com and purchasing DNA Force Plus, 50% off. | ||
Ultimate Fishwell, 40% off. | ||
The Great Reset Book, the... | ||
T-shirts and hats and survival accessories. | ||
All sorts of great stuff at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Make sure that we never have to use the emergency email lists that we have. | ||
Support us. Keep us on air. | ||
And we will continue to stand up against the tyrants, despots, idiots, weirdos, hateful monsters that have taken control of this country. | ||
I want to open up the phone lines for your calls. | ||
The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
That's 1-877-789-2539. | ||
Give us a call now. | ||
We'll take your calls about any and everything we're covering here. | ||
One of the great things about Infowars and this little niche we've carved out for ourselves is that we don't have to constantly be following the same script as Fox News. | ||
Or even some of our other competitors in the alt-right, you know, dissident right sphere. | ||
Because InfoWars is more than just debating the nuances of the latest story that goes nowhere and means nothing and is completely unimportant. | ||
It's more about taking that bird's eye view, the long-term view, and documenting the progress that has gotten us here and following that arc and seeing where we eventually land. | ||
And so I'm going to go back now, back in time, to when I was but a wee lad and still could see through the lies that the government was spitting in our faces. | ||
We're going to go to clip number six here. | ||
This is Joe Biden, back before he got his plastic surgery, back with his real face, I guess you could say. | ||
I mean, it's very weird. | ||
I don't know what... I don't know if it's a clone. | ||
I don't know if it's actually a robot. | ||
I don't know if it's just plastic surgery or the effects of adrenochrome. | ||
I don't know what's happened, but the dude looks very different than he did 10 or 15 years ago. | ||
And it's noticeable. It's noticeable in this video. | ||
But it's important, again, to not just document that this happened and that occurred. | ||
But read into it. Look into it. | ||
Think about what you're about to hear Joe Biden say. | ||
And understand that this is the mindset of these people. | ||
From the FBI, to the CIA, to the politicians in charge. | ||
You're about to hear Joe Biden justify the lies that got us into Iraq. | ||
And it's sort of the same thing that you heard from... | ||
What's that Sam guy? | ||
Sam Harris? Same type of thing, right? | ||
Yes, it was a conspiracy. | ||
Yes, they did have to lie to us, but it was for the greater good. | ||
It was because the people, the American people, are too stupid to make their own decision. | ||
We have to trick them for their own good, like an animal, like their dogs or cattle. | ||
We're the smart ones. We're the enlightened ones. | ||
We understand the real danger that they're in, and they're too stupid to get it, so we have to lie to them so that they understand the truth. | ||
This is the warped mindset of these people. | ||
It's the warped mindset that allows them to internally justify the activities they're engaged in. | ||
Let's go now to clip number six. | ||
Here is Joe Biden, all those many years ago, saying that lying about weapons of mass destruction was necessary to get people on board with the war. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, we know. Here it is. The ultimate reason why most people voted to go to war was the totality of the circumstances he laid out and not the notion of whether or not they had weaponized or not weaponized had nuclear or not. | |
I think to the extent that was hyped by some of the administration was for public consumption and try to get public support. | ||
Because remember, that kept fluctuating. | ||
It kept fluctuating. One day it would be 48% of the people and 54%. | ||
And I think all administrations tend to do that. | ||
I remember the first Gulf War, we heard all this about babies being killed in Kuwait and the like. | ||
That wasn't the reason we went to Kuwait, but it was sort of icing on the cake to deal with public opinion, I think. | ||
Icing on the cake to deal with public opinion. | ||
It was a lie. It was a false flag. | ||
It was a fabrication. | ||
It was a manipulation. | ||
It was a lie. | ||
That's not how they see it. They see it as icing on the cake to sway the public because we have other reasons to go to war. | ||
I mean, this is how you treat a little kid. | ||
This is how you treat a dog, right? | ||
It's not how you treat a fellow human being. | ||
If I want you to do something, if I'm like, hey, you need to go to war against this guy. | ||
If the reason is because I want his oil, hell, you're not going to go to war just because I want his oil. | ||
So I have to tell you he's killing kids in incubators to sway you to do the thing that I wanted you to do that you wouldn't do if you knew the real reasons I wanted you to do it. | ||
This is the mindset of these people and it's sick. | ||
Matt, I think you had something you wanted to chime in on this? | ||
Oh yeah, I got a real far out idea. | ||
Okay. Alright, I think what we need to do is we need to get all these Iraqi families together to file a lawsuit against Joe Biden, CNN for defaming them. | ||
Because of that, they had the U.S. military go over and harass them and say that there were weapons of mass destruction when really there were no weapons of mass destruction. | ||
Interesting. Let me think about that for one second. | ||
You're saying that a lie that caused people to be harassed and attacked and damaged could perhaps be settled in the court of law. | ||
Well, what I'm getting at is that, you know, there are a lot of people out there, everyone who is in the Infowars audience knows that Alex is fighting legal battles in court over statements that he said, right, that didn't have an effect on people's, it wasn't a life or death. | ||
There was no life or death consequence there. | ||
Yet, CNN and people like Joe Biden will never be held accountable for the hundreds of thousands of people killed and all of the people born with cancer and all of these rare... | ||
I hate to use the word exotic, but really just... | ||
Insane diseases that pop up when people are using armor-piercing rounds and depleted uranium and things like that. | ||
It's impossible to fully understand the devastation that's been caused by Iraq. | ||
It's insane. The migrant crisis would be another one. | ||
Yeah, people love to tune into CNN and hate on Alex Jones. | ||
So it's just, you know, this is where we're at. | ||
Yeah, and you can see there, I mean, they admit it, you know, Alex Jones, you know, just says what he believes. | ||
He's very upfront and forthright about it. | ||
This is Joe Biden saying, look, we know what we're telling you is not true. | ||
We know there are no weapons of mass destruction, but we need to tell you that so you will get on board. | ||
We know that babies weren't killed in incubators, but that's what we needed to tell the public to get them on board. | ||
They're open about their deception. | ||
They're open about their lying. | ||
And they're confident enough in their position. | ||
They don't think they're going to pay a price. | ||
unidentified
|
I guess that's up to us. All right, welcome back, folks. | |
And we have a lot of videos to go to. | ||
We're getting some good calls. | ||
I want to get to as well. | ||
We still have the war to talk about. | ||
Oh, all sorts of stuff. | ||
In fact, we're going to talk about COVID-19 this hour as more and more information is coming out about the vaccines. | ||
We'll take a moment here to go to a trailer for a new film that has been made. | ||
And we'll go out to your calls. | ||
We've got James, Stephen, Wynn, Robin, Judy, Pastor Sam. | ||
We'll try to get to all of you. But let's go first to clip number 23. | ||
And there's a new film being produced called Fluvid 19. | ||
Has some pretty interesting take on COVID. Let's watch. | ||
unidentified
|
Everything your government has told you about this virus is a lie. | |
Trust the experts! | ||
Trust the experts! Are you afraid of the flu? | ||
Don't bother me. I mean, that's the reality of how people perceive flu. | ||
So we really do have a problem of how the world perceives influenza and it's going to be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say, I don't care what your perception is, we're going to address the problem in a disruptive way and in an iterative way because you do need both. | ||
unidentified
|
Make sure you wear your mask at all times. | |
Do your part. It is a federal decline. | ||
If we catch you with that mask below your nose... | ||
Don't ask questions. | ||
Do what you are called. | ||
It is for your safety. | ||
unidentified
|
We have 33 confirmed positive tests. | |
COVID-19 in Thailand remains at 33. | ||
33. 33. | ||
33. 33. | ||
33. There were 33 confirmed cases in North Carolina. | ||
33. There was 33 everywhere. | ||
Yes! I think that was Red Team Go. | ||
I think 33 is like Red Team Go. | ||
Everybody goes, okay, let's do it. | ||
It's time. We're good. | ||
unidentified
|
89% until 94% of those PCR deaths are false positive. | |
It doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that. | ||
Everyone who's listed as a COVID death doesn't mean that that was the cause of the death. | ||
We didn't understand that it's a fairly low fatality rate and that it's a disease mainly of the elderly, kind of like fluism. | ||
This isn't going to be run on CNN for a week. | ||
Nicely to be found. | ||
You got lied to and fell for this shit! | ||
Keep them patient. But our patience is wearing thin. | ||
Why are we being pressured to add COVID? You're exactly right. | ||
You are correct. I should not be giving these vaccines. | ||
unidentified
|
You've been subject to propaganda and lies like people who are very well trained in how they do that. | |
Only one person in the entire state died from the flu. | ||
So when you deny this stuff... | ||
unidentified
|
When you don't want to believe this, you're going to face reality. | |
It's only hurting you. They relied on people's ignorance. | ||
unidentified
|
Everybody sees what's going on. | |
People woke up, man. | ||
unidentified
|
They're not looking for anybody to save them. | |
They're saving themselves. | ||
There's your flu last year. | ||
Here's your flu this year. | ||
Literally doesn't even exist. | ||
And they think we fell for that. | ||
Fluvid19. Fluvid-19.com is where you can go to watch that video. | ||
And, of course, they used a little bit of Owen Schroer there, Infowars. | ||
So we love to see that. | ||
Yeah, the flu just took a year off. | ||
They actually wrote headlines saying the flu just took a year off. | ||
And people bought it. | ||
I mean, no wonder they're so confident, right? | ||
No wonder they are doing ridiculous stuff that makes no sense. | ||
They got away with it. | ||
They are getting away with it as we speak. | ||
They created the virus. | ||
They released the virus. | ||
They shut down the entire economy. | ||
They enforced the social distancing. | ||
They enforced the masks. | ||
They knew none of that worked. | ||
They knew the vaccine didn't work, but they shoved it in your arm anyway. | ||
They fired you. | ||
They stopped you from going to your grandmother's funeral. | ||
They destroyed the mental health of children. | ||
They told you the flu took a year off when you had exactly the same number of deaths from COVID-19 that you typically have from flu, but you had zero deaths from flu that year. | ||
I mean, of course they're going to be confident that they can pull the wool over your eyes. | ||
Of course they're going to be confident that they can launch a globalist total world takeover. | ||
They're getting away with all of this. | ||
What did Ron DeSantis say yesterday about the lockdowns? | ||
There has to be a reckoning. | ||
That's what we need. Forget the great reset. | ||
We need the great reckoning where all of these people are held to account for all of their misdeeds. | ||
It's not a matter of anger. | ||
It's not a matter of wanting revenge. | ||
It's a matter of necessity. | ||
It's a matter of prevention for this type of stuff ever happening again. | ||
We need brutal recompense for the brutality they've inflicted on us. | ||
Let's go to your phone calls now. | ||
We've got James in Tennessee. | ||
He wants to talk about the Great Reset book, now available at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Let's watch. I mean, here you are. | ||
Thanks for calling in, James. Howdy. | ||
How you doing, Eric? Good, thanks. | ||
unidentified
|
Good. Hey, man, I just wanted to tell you, I'm excited about the songbook to come out. | |
I bought it the day of the Texas Ruling, Fort Shaw. | ||
That's a piece of history right there. | ||
And, you know, excited to see what's inside of it and share it with others. | ||
I also wanted to go ahead and say, you know, something about liberals that I think we all know, but just a reminder, you know, kind of why they're dangerous. | ||
They're cowards. It's because they're willing to kill for their beliefs, but they're not willing to die. | ||
That's because they're fearful of the God that they don't believe in, whom we seek grace from, and who is on our side of righteousness. | ||
Right. And, you know, I just think that's something that's a distinction, you know? | ||
I'm not saying, trying to, you know, say anything egregious or nothing. | ||
It's just, you know, they're cowards. | ||
They're, you know, we see what they're doing. | ||
Yeah, you're exactly right. | ||
unidentified
|
I'd also like to say Matt Tomino's doing the MSN over live. | |
I think that's class action right there. | ||
You know, Facebook, Twitter over true censorship has caused me some emotional distress and anxiety. | ||
And, you know, I think I'm entitled to compensation for my pain and suffering. | ||
I think you and every one of our listeners are too. | ||
So, that's all. Yeah, no, great call. | ||
I appreciate it. | ||
And, of course, what it makes me think of is... | ||
What was that study? | ||
What are the exact words? | ||
We talked about testosterone in monkeys, and it was saying low testosterone makes them more aggressive and more submissive. | ||
Like, that just explains liberals right there. | ||
It's low testosterone people that are both vicious and angry and hateful and spiteful and complete cowards that are perfectly willing to subjugate themselves to... | ||
The stronger being, right? | ||
They're submissive. They're weak. | ||
They just want to be a part. | ||
They want to be like the little gremlin that sits next to Jabba the Hutt or some sort of sucker fish attached to the bottom side of a great white shark. | ||
They want to be close to power. | ||
They want to feel protected by power. | ||
They want to cackle and laugh while The power is turned against their enemies, but in their heart they're weak, vicious, pathetic little fools. | ||
Sorry, liberals. I know. | ||
You think that your positions come from, well, I just care about everyone. | ||
I just want things to be good. | ||
Well, I'm sorry, but everything that you support makes everything worse. | ||
Everyone suffers more. Everything gets more miserable and more despotic and more hateful and more vicious and more divided. | ||
Everything you support destroys everything you claim to love. | ||
And as you follow the Pied Piper... | ||
Of climate change to eliminate coal? | ||
They're burning 12 million trees in Scotland. | ||
You complete idiots, you think you're supporting anything good? | ||
Your weakness is destroying everything. | ||
If you could just be strong enough to stand up for what is actually good, we could save the world. | ||
unidentified
|
You people are pathetic. Welcome back, folks. | |
We'll go out to your phone calls here. | ||
We will be joined in the third hour by Mike Shelby. | ||
We'll be talking about what's going on with China. | ||
And it looks like things are heating up. | ||
In fact, insider paper just reported 44 minutes ago Taiwan Army fired warning shots at Chinese drone for the first time. | ||
Which is pretty interesting. We'll get into what that portends with Mike Shelby. | ||
We will go to your phone calls for the next 30 minutes here. | ||
Let's see if there's anything in particular I need to cover first, but we'll let the callers guide us. | ||
We've got Steven in Florida. | ||
Let's talk about Trump and the COVID death shot. | ||
Thanks for calling in, Steven. You're on the air. | ||
Yeah, hey, good morning, Harrison. | ||
Hey, I wanted to follow up on, I called in, I think it was Friday, and if you remember, I had spoken about this subject. | ||
Sure. And I want to follow up on that. | ||
As you know, yesterday, Alex Jones announced his direct response from Donald Trump in relation to his challenge to Trump to finally come out and admit that he's wrong about this whole situation with the COVID death shot. Alex Jones announced his direct response from Donald Trump in And admit that he made a horrible error in judgment with Operation Warp Speed and Fauci, etc. | ||
And as you heard, what Trump told Alex Jones and therefore to us, the American people who supported him is, I don't care. | ||
I know what I did was right. | ||
I'm sticking to my guns. | ||
I'm not backing down on that. | ||
Now, I called Pete Santilli's show the other day and he asked me, he said, if you were able to speak to President Trump right now, face to face, what would you say to him? | ||
Well, here's what I would say to you, Mr. | ||
Trump, after you said this to Alex Jones that he announced yesterday on his show. | ||
Here's an article on Worldview Weekend from Brandon House. | ||
Official report reveals COVID-19 vaccinated children are 4,423% or 45 times more likely to die of any cause than unvaccinated children. | ||
And that's from July 29th. | ||
All right. And then also, okay, I went to the open VAERS site. | ||
Right now, as of today, They have, and this is 1%, as you know, 30,479 COVID vaccine-reported deaths. | ||
All right? So here's what I want to say to Mr. | ||
Trump. Mr. Trump And you profess to be a Christian, okay? | ||
No one appealed to you from Scripture. | ||
Proverbs 16, 18 says, Pride goeth before destruction. | ||
And everybody misquotes it. | ||
It doesn't say before a fall. It says, Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit, which is an arrogant spirit, before a fall. | ||
Mr. Trump, you are self-destructing by being on the side of We're good to go. | ||
And I'm going to say this. | ||
I got you. I got you. Hold on. I got to cut you off because we got to get to some other calls. | ||
But I appreciate your call. And I know a lot of people listening share your thoughts. | ||
But we're going to move on to Wynn in Ohio. | ||
Thanks so much for the call, Stephen. | ||
Let's go to Wynn. | ||
You're talking about using your artistic talents when you're on the air. | ||
Hey, Harrison. Great to talk with you again. | ||
Good to hear from you. Yeah, you mentioned a couple minutes ago the Great Reckoning and how it is so very much needed, and I just created a tombstone-themed InfoWars meet with Alex as Wyatt Earp, Owen as Doc Holliday, and you as Johnny Ringo. | ||
unidentified
|
It's called Seek Semper Tyrannis. | |
And it really goes to that Great Reckoning theme in that I use movie quotes from Tombstone, where Wyatt says, Hell's coming with me. | ||
And you, as Johnny, are saying, and Hell followed with him. | ||
And Owen is saying, it's not revenge he's after. | ||
It's a reckoning. | ||
Oh, wow. Yeah, yeah. | ||
That's great. And where was it? | ||
This is alwayswin.com, W-Y-N. Yes, yes. | ||
And you can also find me on Getter at always underscore win, W-Y-N. See, I'm an artist and an attorney in Ohio just trying to crank out stuff to do what I can for the cause of freedom. | ||
Awesome. Well, we'll check it out. | ||
I appreciate that. I try to spread and retweet every meme I'm featured in, so I'll spread that as well. | ||
AlwaysWYN.com and on Getter at always underscore WYN. Thank you so much for that win. | ||
And again, folks, everybody... | ||
Out there listening to me right now has some sort of talent that you can put towards human freedom and liberty and fighting against the new world order in whatever way that you can. | ||
So thank you for that win. Let's go to Robin in North Carolina. | ||
What's about control freaks running the election? | ||
unidentified
|
You're on the air. Good morning, Harrison. | |
Thanks for taking my call. | ||
Sure. I wanted to basically say that, how should I put this? | ||
I hope there's enough God-fearing, God-loving people that will stand for protection of our rights and votes and the littlest innocence and freedom to choose in our coming election. | ||
I really see a very despotic situation and When I wrote out my question, and I write it out because I tend to be a little ADD and squirrels are everywhere, so they get a little distracted. | ||
Anyway, there's not enough good pushback. | ||
There are too many people with their heads down trying to just stay under the radar, and I'm not talking about The people that are info wars, but I'm talking about the people that tend to be... | ||
Just the regular good people out there that don't realize what's going on. | ||
I get exactly what you're saying. In fact, I want to ask you a question because I was thinking about this exact topic with the drag queen story hours that are taking place in places like Dallas or just outside of Dallas in North Texas. | ||
And it's like it's such a wide disconnect between Between how we feel about what's going on, of course, we see it as grooming, as perverted, as weird and dysfunctional and abusive and creepy and all of these other things. | ||
And yet, I know if you were to ask just like a regular person, just like, whatever, 60-year-old woman who has been a teacher all her life and you go, isn't it weird that kids are being taken to drag shows? | ||
Like, I don't even know how to express it. | ||
They're just going to be like, yeah, that sounds fun. | ||
That's like a fun thing to do. | ||
Like, why do you want to stop them from doing that? | ||
Like, how do we... | ||
How do you get through to people that, like, children are being abused right here? | ||
Like, I guess you could try to go, well, would you be okay with strippers being shown to kids? | ||
And maybe they'd say, well, not really, not that much. | ||
But, like, what... What do we do to close this gap, to try to convince people? | ||
I don't even know how to express it, Robin, but do you see what I'm saying? | ||
How do we close this gap? | ||
How do we convey to people the horror of what's going on if they can't see it for themselves? | ||
unidentified
|
That's a very good question. | |
I don't really know how to answer it other than I think we're our backs are to the wall and it's time to pray because these People have bought so much into this. | ||
I mean, look what was done to Tommy Robinson over grooming in England. | ||
And that was a milder, more hidden type of grooming. | ||
This is out in the open, in our faith, evil. | ||
Such a good point. And you get the same reaction, you know, you tell people, you know, you know, 10,000 girls were raped systematically in grooming gangs. | ||
People just go, oh my gosh, that's terrible. | ||
I'm sure they're doing something about it. | ||
And it's like, don't care. Like, the house is burning around them and they're drinking tea and saying everything's fine. | ||
It's just incredible. | ||
We'll be back on the other side. | ||
I'm going to talk about the rumble chat. | ||
I see you guys. | ||
You're saying nonsense. | ||
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
We're going to go out to your phone calls again. | ||
We are using the Rumble chat. | ||
The Rumble feed has pretty good chat and of course the band.video chat is down. | ||
You can still stream us at band.video and share those links and of course comment on the videos once they're up. | ||
There's not a live chat there so Rumble is the live chat we have playing here. | ||
It's actually good today. Yesterday it was just real bad. | ||
Just full of trolls. They didn't show up today. | ||
So instead you have just one person, Liberty or Death Network, saying he lost respect for me for telling people not to take guns to face off with Antifa at the pedophile rally on Sunday. | ||
Are you stupid? | ||
Are you a stupid person? | ||
What do you think would be the greatest gift InfoWars could give our enemies? | ||
Do you not get what's going on here? | ||
Do you not get why we're called InfoWars? | ||
Do you not know that... | ||
The people in power are desperately waiting, desperately watching for us to say something that they can claim as some sort of threat to go carry out a false flag and say, Infowars told us to do it! | ||
They can claim that we're responsible for some mass murder or something. | ||
Do you not understand that the one thing that plays into their hands better than anything else is to go be the violent terrorist that they claim that we are? | ||
And sure, they're going to claim that we're terrorists even when we're completely peaceful, even when everything we do is completely in line with the law, completely in line with the First Amendment, completely in line with the foundational morals of this country. | ||
So they're lying. Let them lie. | ||
Hey, my stance on guns is anywhere you're allowed to carry them, carry them. | ||
Places that you're not allowed to carry them, carry them concealed. | ||
Kidding. I'm kidding, of course. | ||
Never take guns somewhere illegal. | ||
It's like, no wonder we always lose. | ||
There's no capability of subtlety, I guess, in our audience. | ||
What would you want to say? | ||
What would you want me to say? Liberty or Death Network, call in. | ||
Give us a call. If you can call in in the next eight minutes, we'll put you on air, and you can tell me what the problem is with me saying, don't go start an armed conflict with a bunch of Antifa morons who are protecting pedophiles. | ||
Go expose them. Go film them. | ||
Go humiliate them on camera. | ||
Go shout things at them. | ||
Go armed if you want. | ||
You're allowed to. We still have the Second Amendment, however tenuously enforced. | ||
But for the love of God, the one thing that the establishment, the FBI, and all of this stuff is missing, like the one thing that has stopped them from actually rolling out their FEMA camp program, Roundup of patriots is the fact that we have been incredibly patient with them. | ||
Now, at a certain point, the time for patience has expired and we have to actually punish the people that have broken our laws and caused mass suffering on a global scale. | ||
We do that through the courts. | ||
We do that through a global awakening of people realizing that How horrific it's gotten and no longer being tepid, lukewarm, so-called conservatives, but actually conserving the things that we appreciate. | ||
Go ahead, call in Liberty or Death Network, and we'll try to get you on. | ||
In the meantime, we'll go to Judy in Florida. | ||
I want to talk about Trump's response on truth about running a new election. | ||
Yeah, so Judy, Trump went on truth and said, you either got to make me president or run a new election because now we have obvious and readily apparent and admitted election interference by the FBI. What's your take on this, Judy? | ||
Yeah, I just don't see how... | ||
Another situation that's presented as something casual and, oh yeah, we lied. | ||
You know, oh yeah, you know, the FBI was the one that told us, you know, on Facebook that, you know, we really need to suppress this story because we just can't authenticate it yet. | ||
I mean, this is kind of huge. | ||
And I really, I don't respect Joe Rogan. | ||
That's just me. I think he's conformed to the world. | ||
He likes his little niche. | ||
And, you know, he is who he is, you know, whatever. | ||
But if this falls by the wayside, because this is seismic, this admission, if it falls by the wayside and if there's not a new election and everybody and their mother should be up in arms, not actual arms, but, you know, to be able to say, look, Everybody knows this was not a fair election except those that are lying about it, those that actually colluded in it. | ||
I never watched 2,000 Mules because, like, what's the point? | ||
Right. Okay? And if this doesn't, you know, in November, in concert with the midterms, to just, you know... | ||
Everybody who cares push for a new election with Trump and the Alzheimer's patient on the ballot to see who actually wins. | ||
You'd think two years of the Biden administration with absolutely everything collapsing into chaos and failure would be enough for people to go, yeah, I think I would have picked the other guy, actually. | ||
But do we remember how good it was under Trump? | ||
Say what you want about the vaccine. | ||
Again, we've been over this a million times. | ||
It would have been... | ||
It's just... | ||
You have to deal with reality as it stands. | ||
You can't have the President of the United States... | ||
Anyway, it doesn't matter. | ||
For the entirety of his office holding, America was just on the upward trajectory. | ||
Just lowest unemployment, massive success, lowering of illegal immigration. | ||
Just everything was better. | ||
And then Biden gets into office and just everything collapses. | ||
Yeah. I think a new election would have drastically different results. | ||
I would hope that people would realize this. | ||
I think there would be. | ||
But, you know, and all of that aside, I mean, I do not know and you do not know the actual heart of Trump. | ||
He gave us a glimpse of that in his response to Jones. | ||
Well, look, you know, you talk about what has been revealed from the FBI. Unless you think, and I think people give too much credit to our enemies. | ||
Unless you think that the FBI launched fake investigations so that then Trump could say that he was being investigated, so then we would vote for, like, unless you think that these people are operating on a, you know, extra dimension, which they're not, they're human beings trying to pull very simplistic scams on people. | ||
It's not that complicated. | ||
They're not that sophisticated. And so why would the FBI launch investigation after investigation? | ||
Why would they bury the Hunter Biden laptop? | ||
Why would they set Donald Trump up to be the Russia gay guy? | ||
Why would they go after him with everything they've got if he wasn't the real deal and actually a threat to them? | ||
I mean, like you said, we don't know his heart. | ||
He doesn't agree with me on everything. | ||
He doesn't agree with Alex Jones on everything. | ||
But at the same time, he was what he pretended to be. | ||
He was what he seems to be. | ||
He is an independently wealthy maverick and American patriot. | ||
And that alone represents an accidental threat to the highly curated and highly controlled electoral system that has for decades been not actually... | ||
Used by the American people to get who they want, but rather used by the deep state to provide the American people two choices, both of which benefit them. | ||
So just the evidence of the FBI attacking Trump is more than enough evidence to prove that Trump is the real deal because it's the entire deep state against him, from the media to the Democrats to the FBI to the CIA to the international community to the bankers to BlackRock. | ||
And Facebook and Twitter. | ||
I mean, it's... Everybody's against Trump. | ||
Unless you think they're all with a wink and a nod going, actually, we love Trump because he's on our team. | ||
We're just pretending to hate him. They're not that sophisticated, folks. | ||
These scams that they're pulling are very simple. | ||
Very simplistic. It's like... | ||
It's like treating some guy as some sort of highly sophisticated mental manipulator when it's like, no, he's just beating his wife. | ||
It's not that complicated. | ||
These are simple, abusive tactics to keep people in a state of Stockholm Syndrome. | ||
It's not complicated. | ||
They're not always playing this double game. | ||
Sometimes, especially when the information is revealed unexpectedly and without their permission, It's just what it seems. | ||
Thanks so much for the call, Judy. | ||
I really do appreciate it. Let's go to Robert in Pennsylvania quickly. | ||
We only have about a minute left, Robert, but you're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Hi, Harrison. I wanted to elaborate before what you were talking about with a lawsuit. | |
I believe that people who are injured by the vaccine did now, because of the Alice Jones case, file lawsuits in Connecticut. | ||
Against social media companies who pulled their videos away. | ||
Against certain media personalities like Rachel Maddow or Brian Seltzer. | ||
I believe it's possible because of what happened with Alex Jones. | ||
What are your thoughts? Yeah, I think suing media companies is certainly a good start. | ||
I think if I was a pregnant woman that got the vaccine, I'd be suing whoever gave it to me and whoever told me that it was good for me. | ||
Because they admit now they have removed now... | ||
The guidance on pregnancy and breastfeeding to where they now admit that they don't know if it's safe. | ||
They can't say that it's safe. | ||
In fact, they suggest that you make sure you're not pregnant before you get it because obviously it hasn't been tested and could be extremely dangerous. | ||
So if somebody told a pregnant woman, this is good, you'll be fine, you should take this. | ||
We've done the tests. | ||
They were lying, and they should be sued. | ||
We often noted on this show, because it's hard not to notice, we are living in one of those moments where so much is happening all at once, and information about it all is so tightly controlled that huge history-changing and information about it all is so tightly controlled that huge history-changing events can occur, and in fact are occurring right now, and nobody seems aware It's pretty unsettling, actually. | ||
Here's one example. Europe is descending into poverty. | ||
Did you know that? Had someone told you that? | ||
So the most advanced continent on the planet, the birthplace of Western civilization, our civilization, is getting much poorer very quickly. | ||
It's moving backward at high speed. | ||
Just a year ago, Europe was a modern place. | ||
For example, the overwhelming majority of Europeans heated their homes with natural gas, as modern people do. | ||
In Germany, the continent's richest country, only about 6% of households, most of them rural, heated with cordwood. | ||
And you'd expect that given that, again, Germany is a modern industrialized country with central heating and indoor plumbing and all the other trappings of a society that has moved beyond the medieval period. | ||
Last year, only about 6% of Germans used wood to heat their homes, but that has changed dramatically. | ||
Demand for firewood in Germany has risen so fast that there is none left to buy. | ||
You can't get it. | ||
So desperate Germans are now cutting their own wood, scouring the forest like their ancestors for sources of heat. | ||
unidentified
|
Watch. Some in Germany are taking matters into their own hands with solutions that might look like a blast from the past. | |
About two hours outside Berlin, residents of this small town have turned to wood chips for fuel. | ||
We have to be innovative, said the project's organizer. | ||
If we don't act and just rely on the government to solve the crisis, we'll never succeed. | ||
This burner will soon fuel most of this village of 60 people. | ||
So they call it biomass, but it's wood. | ||
They're burning wood, again, as they did during the feudal period. | ||
That's Germany. In Poland, families are standing in line for days to buy coal. | ||
Not in 1910, right now, tonight. | ||
Cars queued up outside coal mines hoping for fuel. | ||
Quote, this is beyond imagination, one 57-year-old Polish man told Reuters. | ||
People are sleeping in their cars. | ||
I remember the communist times, but it didn't cross my mind that we could return to something even worse. | ||
Oh, but it's come. | ||
Something even worse has arrived. | ||
The French government has announced energy rationing this winter. | ||
Just the other day, France had so much energy that it exported it to other countries. | ||
It was a net exporter of energy. | ||
Now there won't be enough heat in France for everyone in the country to stay warm. | ||
In the UK, 70% of restaurants are preparing to close, to go under. | ||
Why? Because when winter comes, they won't be able to afford to keep the heat and lights on, etc., etc. | ||
This is happening across Europe in every country. | ||
So the question is, why is it happening? | ||
And the answer is extremely simple. | ||
There's an energy shortage in Europe. | ||
Cheap energy is essential. | ||
It is the key to everything that a normal society strives for. | ||
Prosperity, safety, a longer life expectancy for its citizens, everything. | ||
It depends on cheap energy, but Europe no longer has it. | ||
And as a result, things are falling apart very quickly. | ||
Energy costs in Europe are expected to increase by hundreds of percent in coming months. | ||
Germany's year-ahead price of electricity, that's the benchmark for all of Europe, it's measured in euros per megawatt hour, that price just exceeded 1,000 euros for the first time in history. | ||
For perspective, just a week ago, last Monday, the cost was about 700 euros per megawatt hour. | ||
And that was a record. | ||
In other words, the price rise is approaching 50% in a single week. | ||
In France, electricity went up 25% in one day. | ||
That was last Friday. Imagine that happening to you. | ||
You might not have to imagine it. | ||
It might be coming sooner than you think. | ||
Yes, folks, the energy crisis, the supply chain crisis, the food crisis. | ||
We have story after story. | ||
One of the world's largest fertilizer producers called Yara in Norway is slashing its production due to skyrocketing natural gas prices. | ||
So the energy prices affect the ability to produce food, which is causing downstream effects that the UN says may kill 800 million people or more. | ||
All of this... The thing you need to know about it is it's on purpose and by design and not an accident and the result of policies made by people who despise you. | ||
And of course, you can go to Infowarsstore.com and support the most powerful force against them. | ||
We'll be back on the other side with Mike Shelby. | ||
Don't go anywhere. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
The third hour of American Journal has begun here on Infowars.com and Band.video. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
My guest this hour is Mike Shelby. | ||
He's an intelligence expert and a former intelligence NCO and contractor. | ||
He runs Forward Observer, a private threat intelligence firm that focuses on low-intensity conflict. | ||
You can catch the daily live stream on YouTube by subscribing to Forward Observer. | ||
Or by going straight to the source at forwardobserver.com. | ||
His Twitter is at grayzonewarlord. | ||
And again, that YouTube is Forward Observer or the website forwardobserver.com. | ||
Thank you so much for coming on and joining us once again, Mr. | ||
Shelby. Hey, Harrison. | ||
Good morning. Thanks for having me. | ||
I'm very glad to have you. And of course, Forward Observer implies that you're ahead of the curve on certain things. | ||
And of course, you certainly are. | ||
You texted me last Friday about preparations that China was making In terms of launching a cyber attack and what this could portend, and now this morning getting ready to conduct this interview, I simply searched China prepares in Google, and there's a dozen different stories about the way China is preparing to attack. | ||
And in fact, about an hour ago, Inside Paper reported that the Taiwan army fired warning shots at a Chinese drone for the first time. | ||
War with China seems to be right around the corner. | ||
What can you tell us about this, Mike? | ||
Well, China views Taiwan as an inseparable part of China, and Xi Jinping is serious about forced reunification now, especially since he lost face against an 80-year-old drunk woman who visited the island without Xi's permission. | ||
And so this is something that China is going to do, probably below the threshold of conventional war. | ||
I doubt China wants to get into a shooting war with the United States or with Japan or South Korea, Australia, potentially India, other global NATO allies. | ||
So they're probably going to do this through gray zone warfare. | ||
They've been conducting military exercises around Taiwan, disrupting shipping, and that's largely been seen as a way to Practice a military blockade and eventual embargo of Taiwan. | ||
And so that's what we at Forward Observer really expect the Chinese to be doing. | ||
I'm not exactly sure when that's going to happen, although we have seen a lot of indicators that in the next couple of weeks or potentially months, maybe even later this year, we feel certain it's going to happen at some point. | ||
Yeah, and I want to hear how you think this might roll out or the various ways that it could. | ||
And I've been saying for a while that if China was making moves in Taiwan, they're likely going to start with something that looks much more like Hong Kong, like with the Hong Kong protest. | ||
I mean, China essentially took over Hong Kong. | ||
That of a really firing a shot by political machinations and putting money in certain places. | ||
And of course there were riots that took place and protests that took place, but they've all been squashed by this point and China has a pretty firm hold over that island now. | ||
I think if I was China, I would want to repeat that in Taiwan, but Taiwan is much more important to America than Hong Kong is because of the production of computer chips that takes place there. | ||
I mean, what's your opinion on that? | ||
Do you think that that's just an impossibility, that something like what we saw in Hong Kong would take place in Taiwan, so China's not even going to try that tactic and will move more towards the physical war? | ||
If at all possible, China wants to do this without firing shots. | ||
One of the things that Max and I have been talking about over at Ford Observer is the concept of elite capture. | ||
China goes in, they move around a lot of money, they pay off politicians, cultural icons, people in media, in sports, in aspects of popular society, and they pay them to toe the China line, and they pay them to push back and say, oh no, you can't say that about China. | ||
Oh, you can't do this against China. | ||
China's a peaceful nation. | ||
They don't seek war. They seek peace and inclusiveness, and they want a It's a global piece, and they're not out for war. | ||
And we know exactly what China's out for. | ||
It's the same thing the United States is out for. | ||
Their best interests, no matter the cost. | ||
And so, you know, I look at Taiwan. | ||
It's going to be a key part of the Chinese economy, just with the Taiwanese industrial base there that you mentioned, semiconductors. | ||
And this is going to have follow-on effects for the United States pretty drastically. | ||
The United States is in a race right now to get its domestic semiconductor, specifically its 2 and 4 nanometer chip production up and running. | ||
That's something that the United States and also Taiwan is dumping a lot of money into to try to get that production out of Taiwan because they know eventually they're going to be surrounded, they're going to be embargoed, and eventually that semiconductor production is going to cease. | ||
Being transported to the United States. | ||
So it really is a critical piece of land there. | ||
Yeah, and of course, the story at Forward Observer from just a few days ago is China preparing major cyberattacks on U.S. as part of Taiwan reunification. | ||
You say former Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency Director Chris Krebs said last week that China is preparing to conduct major cyberattacks on U.S. infrastructure and industry as a part of its offensive military plans to force reunification of Taiwan with mainland China. | ||
So do you think that this is, I mean, what are you expecting this to look like? | ||
Cyberattacks hitting America at the same time that forces land in Taiwan? | ||
Would this be a simultaneous attack or would it be used first to soften up the United States? | ||
What do you think a Chinese cyberattack would look like? | ||
Well, in December 2020, the Army published a facilities security report that warned against foreign cyber attacks, specifically against military facilities as well as soft targets like critical infrastructure. | ||
And the play here is if you're China, you have to do what you can to prevent the U.S. military from mobilizing and deploying to the area. | ||
Now, we do have four deployed forces, and of course, we have U.S. allies, Japan, South Korea, Australia, within striking distance of the East and South China Seas. | ||
But the United States really does not have the amount of force that's going to be required to stop China from doing this. | ||
And so if China does do this militarily in a conventional setting like boots on ground, airborne insertion, amphibious assaults, then that's going to look a lot more like a war. | ||
And that's That's going to be more likely to draw a conventional response as well. | ||
If China slow rolls this and uses its brown water fleet to encircle Taiwan and create an embargo, that's beneath the threshold of conventional war. | ||
And so I think China wants to do that. | ||
They do not want to draw a conventional attack from Japan and South Korea that have missiles and artillery within striking distance and ships especially. | ||
So I would expect China to try to cut the power to attack. | ||
Food production, our electrical grids, Oil and gas, energy, to tie up the United States here at home so that the Biden administration is unable to respond in full to Taiwan. | ||
Now, that said, I think Max and I both believe that the Biden administration has chosen Ukraine over Taiwan. | ||
I don't think we're going to get into World War III over Taiwan, but nothing's impossible. | ||
Yeah, lots of different avenues to World War III at this point. | ||
I guess it's a choose-your-own-adventure game where the outcome is preordained as massive and horrific conflict. | ||
Now, another advancement or occurrence that has happened recently was the Solomon Islands have denied entry to the U.S. and U.K. Coast Guard ships. | ||
These are right off the coast of China there in the South China Sea. | ||
Under heavy Chinese influence has denied entry into its waters of two U.S. and U.K. Coast Guard ships. | ||
Both these ships are conducting patrols and yet they've been prevented from entering the Solomon Islands. | ||
Can you give us any insight as to how that plays into the Taiwan conflict? | ||
Yeah, this is a part of China's strategy to recruit the global south into the Chinese sphere of influence. | ||
Earlier this year, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said, Asia's time in global governance has come. | ||
That is non-negotiable. | ||
That's a starting point for China. | ||
And so they look at the Solomon Islands as a potential naval base. | ||
China's been doing this for Cambodia and a number of other countries as well. | ||
They want to extend their island chain out to the Solomons. | ||
Taiwan is a key part of this process. | ||
So the Solomon Islands is a strategic area that's in play, and there's a little bit more beneath the surface as well, and we can talk about that later. | ||
Okay, yeah, we'll talk about that on the other side as we talk about exactly what is going on here as... | ||
As it really does seem like the battle lines are being drawn for World War III with Russia, China, Iran on one side and America and our cohort in the West on the other. | ||
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
My guest this hour is Mike Shelby of the Forward Observer. | ||
ForwardObserver.com is where you go to stay ahead of the curve. | ||
Just like InfoWars is tomorrow's news today, I guess you could say Forward Observer is tomorrow's military intelligence today. | ||
And on Friday, the 26th of August, they published this story, China preparing for major cyber attacks on U.S. as part of Taiwan reunification. | ||
And this, of course, dovetails with stories from a number of other outlets, including Gateway Pundit, saying the People's Republic of China is preparing to go to war and it's not trying to hide its efforts. | ||
This from Chinese expert Gordon Chang. | ||
You also have... | ||
This from The Guardian. China used drills to prepare for invasion, Taiwan foreign minister says. | ||
I also would like to touch on this story. | ||
Rare earth mineral producers become target of China-backed cyber attacks. | ||
This relates to a story that we covered last week about rare earth minerals becoming increasingly important as we move towards this electrified electric cars and all this sort of stuff that require batteries and things like lithium and cobalt and massive batteries. | ||
So we want to get to all of this. | ||
But in the last segment, you sort of hinted at something deeper under the surface when it comes to the Solomon Islands. | ||
Can you tell us what is it about the Solomon Islands? | ||
What are the Solomon Islands? Why are they important? | ||
And why is America being denied access to them such a bellwether of things to come? | ||
Well, back in April or May, China and the Solomons announced a mutual defense pact. | ||
And the Solomon Islands, you know, it's a relatively small country. | ||
And they said, well, we want to strike this deal with China because we want humanitarian aid. | ||
And so China was all too happy to do that. | ||
There's a lot of speculation that China might try to use this to roll into a foreign military base in the Solomons. | ||
Australia, New Zealand, the United States, other countries saw that as absolutely unacceptable. | ||
And so the Biden State Department sorted out a bunch of officials to the Solomons, and we think they effectively carried it and sticked them and said, well, you can do this the easy way or the hard way. | ||
And so the Solomons came out a short while later and said, yeah, actually, everyone read way too much into this. | ||
We're not going to have Chinese foreign naval base here. | ||
There's not going to be any Chinese army troops here. | ||
And so the Solomon Islands just basically said, hey, look, this is not what it looks like. | ||
Well, more recently, there was news that Solomon's officials had been distributing Chinese money among members of the parliament there. | ||
And so it appears that China has come back in and bought and paid for a lot of the Solomon. | ||
So this is still up in play. | ||
But this is a lot of the gray zone warfare using soft power, money and influence to try to gain favor and bring some of these countries into the sphere of influence. | ||
And this is breaking down just like the Soviets in the United States and the West did in the Cold War. | ||
This is effectively a new Cold War. | ||
The world is again bifurcating between East and West. | ||
And Solomon Islands is just the latest indicator of that. | ||
This is going to happen to a lot of other countries. | ||
It could happen in Iraq. | ||
It could happen in a number of other Pacific Islands countries as well. | ||
And of course, the Solomon Islands are kind of like Hong Kong. | ||
They were really administered as a colony by the British until 1975. | ||
And they were a major point of action when it came to the Pacific Theater during World War II. | ||
And so I know, I can't remember who I was talking to, but, you know, they were saying, yeah, my dad or my grandfather was a World War II veteran. | ||
And he's pissed because Americans fought and died for Guadalcanal and other, you know, islands in this chain. | ||
And now we're being denied access. | ||
We never lost a war, but somehow we, you know, the victories that were claimed by American lives and American blood in the water in the 40s have now been completely undone. | ||
And we don't now don't have access to these islands that we fought and died over in Guadalcanal. | ||
I have family members who died at Guadalcanal. | ||
And yet now American ships can't go there. | ||
You know, we talk about gray zone warfare everywhere. | ||
It's like we lost a war that we never fought. | ||
I mean, it's very strange. | ||
Yeah, you know, we send a massive amount of money and actually Kamala Harris shortly after that came out and said, hey, we're going to send more millions of dollars to the Pacific Islands Forum to prevent the Chinese from doing this. | ||
And so, yeah, it's going to be a Much more of a problem is China, they're starting to use BRICS and, of course, the BRICS Plus. | ||
And next month, there's going to be the BRICS Parliamentary Forum. | ||
And China looks at these BRICS countries, the BRICS Plus countries. | ||
I think Argentina and Iran have already applied. | ||
50 countries have taken part in BRICS talks so far this year. | ||
Another 19, maybe 20 countries have said they're looking at trying to join BRICS+. And so China looks at this constellation of smaller developing and emerging market countries. | ||
As a way to extend their influence. | ||
They're using the Belt and Road Initiative. | ||
They're also trying to go into the Arctic with these icebreakers and create what they call a polar silk road. | ||
And so really what we see is forced projection of Chinese hard power and soft power. | ||
And this is a new world for the United States. | ||
It's been a long time since we've had a major competitor like this. | ||
And so, again, China does not want to fight a war with the United States. | ||
They certainly do not want to fight a war with global NATO. That's going to include Europe and Indo-Pacific countries, potentially include India. | ||
And as a matter of fact, India and U.S. forces just finished a joint military exercise. | ||
They have another one coming up in the next couple of weeks that I believe is going to focus on or at least include some U.S. and Indian special operations forces. | ||
And so China does not like that at all. | ||
You look back at the Cold War, and one reason why we didn't go nuclear, we didn't fight a conventional war, rather, is because of the risk of going nuclear. | ||
And so there was a lot of proxy warfare, a lot of insurgency and guerrilla movements that were funded by the Soviet Union and the United States and the British and the West at large. | ||
And so we are probably looking at another period of low-intensity conflict. | ||
So that includes everything from popular revolutions to... | ||
Terror campaigns, guerrilla movements, insurgencies, armed attempts to overthrow a foreign government and install a government that's pro-China or pro-United States. | ||
This is going to be the new normal for the next couple of decades until But until the United States is trying to potentially go to war, this would probably be World War III. So it's a pretty dangerous time in the world right now. | ||
Yeah, it is. And none of us are comforted by the people in charge right now. | ||
It's not exactly the type of people that you put your full faith and trust in. | ||
They can get us through this potentially world-ending conflict. | ||
Well, they can't even pull troops out of Afghanistan without it being a catastrophe. | ||
But I am almost getting deja vu of... | ||
Russia and Ukraine in the months before that, when we had an opportunity to prevent the war, when we had an opportunity to come to some sort of conclusion that was satisfactory to both sides, and yet... | ||
We ended up in a massive conflict that has killed tens of thousands and is going on to this day. | ||
I mean, it does feel a bit like that where China is menacing Taiwan and it could be nothing or they could flip that switch and it could be, you know, Ukraine 2.0 and billions more dollars going to a more or less hopeless cause. | ||
I mean, am I right in seeing the parallels here? | ||
Yeah, you are seeing the parallels. | ||
This is a regional dispute with global implications. | ||
I just saw this morning that the Biden administration is trying to push through another billion dollars in arms funding to push to Taiwan. | ||
So yeah, it looks like we're trying to take an accelerated path to giving Taiwan everything it needs to try to defend itself. | ||
Learning a lesson from Ukraine, and I say we, and I mean the U.S. establishment, not necessarily my own opinions here, but Taiwan's going to be a big deal here probably in the next, within 6 to 12 months, I think. | ||
All right, troubling stuff. We'll get more into it on the other side with Mike Shelby. | ||
We'll also talk about what's going on in Iraq. | ||
Mike spent some time in Iraq and has at least a little bit more insight than it seems like most of the journalists in this country do, so we'll talk about that as well. | ||
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
This is American Journal on Infowars.com. | ||
Remember, you go to Infowarsstore.com to support everything that we do here from the American Journal to the War Room to the Alex Jones Show and all of the great content creators we have at Band.Video. | ||
All we're doing is trying to keep our finger on the pulse of... | ||
The globalist elite and what their new plans are and how we as regular citizens can counteract them. | ||
But we can only carry out this mission if we have the support of you, the American people, by going to Infowarsstore.com and keeping us on air. | ||
DNA Force Plus is 50% off one of our best-selling and most popular products, as well as the Ultimate Fish Oil. | ||
That's 40% off as well. | ||
Please do keep us on air. | ||
Keep us in the fight. | ||
All we ask is that you go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
And in that way... | ||
You sort of metaphorically spit in the eye of the people that see you as nothing more than misbehaving slaves, I guess you could say. | ||
Spit in their eye. Go to Infowarsstore.com today. | ||
Now my guest is Mike Shelby of the Forward Observer. | ||
Forwardobserver.com is where you can go. | ||
To keep your finger on the pulse of warfare around the world, we've been talking about China and the Solomon Islands and the preparations they seem to be making to bring Taiwan, as they put it back into the fold. | ||
And then you have this story broke an hour ago. | ||
Solomon Islands suspends all naval visits. | ||
This is according to the U.S. Embassy. | ||
And so we see more things happening by the hour there in the Solomon Islands. | ||
But, Mike, I wanted to ask you about what's going on in Iraq. | ||
I know when we were talking off air, you said, well, back when I was in Iraq in 2009, I was for sure fully an expert of what was going on there. | ||
But things have changed a lot since 2009. | ||
The latest is that violence has exploded in the green zone as this religious leader, Muqtada al-Sadir. | ||
Claimed he was withdrawing from politics, and that announcement on Monday led his supporters to converging on sites in Baghdad's fortified green zone, where they stormed the Republican palace where the government is based. | ||
They also confronted supporters of their rivals, the Iran-backed Coordination Framework Alliance, leading to fighting between the two groups. | ||
These are two Shia groups fighting each other. | ||
Late on Monday, al-Sadir Declared he would start a hunger strike until violence and the use of weapons stopped, which is strange since it's his supporters who are doing the violence. | ||
I'm confused by this. | ||
Can you give us any insight into what exactly is going on here, Mike? | ||
Yeah, sure. I'd love to. So, Muqtad al-Sadr is one of the most important and powerful faction leaders in Iraq. | ||
He comes from a long line of Of Iraqi clerics. | ||
And he has this movement, which we've called the Sadrist movement. | ||
And he was one of the prime instigators. | ||
He had a militia called Jaysh al-Mati, and they had various appendages. | ||
And they targeted American forces and coalition forces in Iraq. | ||
They also targeted the government at times. | ||
And that was really to try to eject the U.S.-led government. | ||
Muqtad al-Sadr and the Sadrist movement, Jaish al-Mahdi special groups and a lot of other proxy groups were funded by Iran. | ||
Since then, Muqtad al-Sadr has said, well, I'm actually, I don't want any foreign influence in Iraq. | ||
And he's become a hardline Iraqi nationalist. | ||
He wants to eject both Iranian and American influence from Iraq. | ||
And so now he's He has a political movement, and he has not been able to do what he wants to do politically. | ||
And so recently, I think it was yesterday, he announced his retirement from politics, and that left a lot of people wondering, well, is this a prelude to more sectarian warfare? | ||
Is Iraq about to jump into another civil war? | ||
Are we about to see another new round of insurgency of these Sadrists fighting and trying to topple basically a pro-Iranian-backed government of Iraq? | ||
Since then, Iran has really come in very heavily. | ||
They've infiltrated the Iraqi military, infiltrated Iraqi politics, and Sauder is just tired of it. | ||
He's tired of a foreign power dictating what happens politically in Iraq. | ||
And so I haven't seen that he's going on a hunger strike here. | ||
I didn't see it this morning yet. | ||
But this is effectively what's happening. | ||
Saudis Iraqi nationalists and Iranian-backed proxy groups are fighting against each other. | ||
I think they killed something like a couple of dozen in street battles the other night. | ||
And the Iraqi government imposed a curfew and trying to bring an end to the violence because this certainly does look like the period heading into the 2004 insurgency in Iraq. | ||
And apparently the latest on this is that Tuesday afternoon, that's today, I guess a few hours ago, al-Sadr ordered his supporters to leave the green zone, including their protest site, and apologized for the violence. | ||
And so many of the supporters immediately started to leave. | ||
So it looks like he is at least saying what he can say to try to stop this from spiraling out of control. | ||
But just as, you know, to zoom out and to tie this all in together... | ||
We don't hear much about Iraq anymore. | ||
It's not something that's constantly on our news feed, yet we still have thousands of people there. | ||
We still have massive infrastructure investments taking place there. | ||
We still have people in Syria. | ||
We still have people all over the Middle East. | ||
I mean, that conflict that started nearly 30 years ago is still continuing and continuing to sap our resources and cause more bitter and ill-feeling against America in that part of the world. | ||
You've got the Ukraine war. | ||
We've got China's war. I mean, how does all of this play together? | ||
And is this really just drawing the fault lines of World War III and an inevitable global clash of these powers? | ||
Well, I'm not sure the extent to which the United States still has influence in Iraq. | ||
After that status of forces agreement in 2008, a lot of the kind of overt presence, American presence, left the country. | ||
And, of course, you know, we still have assets there in some form or fashion. | ||
But, you know, the big thing is the Middle East. | ||
China sees – they look at Saudi Arabia. | ||
They look at Iran. | ||
They're oil-rich countries. | ||
They look at Egypt especially. | ||
Egypt controls the Suez Canal. | ||
China wants to be able to influence what comes in and out of the Suez Canal. | ||
And so we have seen increased Chinese presence and interest throughout the Middle East. | ||
And Max and I, I tell you, I'm not really sure right now if this is... | ||
I doubt this is backed by China, but China probably is looking at this and saying, hey, how can we expand our influence into Iraq? | ||
I'm not sure that Sauder is going to go for it, but the Chinese are looking at that as a potential. | ||
Yeah, of course. And it seems like China is worming their way into all sorts of stuff that America is involved in. | ||
In fact, Zelensky has come out and said that when the fighting is over, China will help rebuild Ukraine. | ||
And Israel is making deals with China sort of against the wishes of America. | ||
I mean, China really is growing, expanding, pushing out everywhere that they can. | ||
The Belt and Road Initiative is obviously their major attempt to do this through commerce, but they're doing it militarily. | ||
They're expanding in Africa. | ||
And of course, we know that the people in charge here in America sort of love this, actually, And we have videos of Joe Biden saying, you know, next century is China's century, and that's a great thing. | ||
America's weakening and China's growing stronger, and we've had a lot to do with that, and we're proud of them. | ||
So, I mean, are the people that run America even trying to stop China, or are they the ones contributing to this? | ||
Well, the Chinese practice very heavily this tactic called elite capture, and they go into these countries, they pay off all these people, and they pay for support. | ||
The United States does the exact same thing. | ||
We just don't call it elite capture. | ||
But China, I think, has done this very effectively in the United States. | ||
And so you look at what China's doing, the same thing around the world. | ||
Do U.S. quote-unquote leaders have the political will I don't know. | ||
I'll tell you, I'm somewhat haunted by this. | ||
Biden talked about this exchange, this conversation between he and Xi Jinping, and he said, Xi told me that democracy does not work in the 21st century, or it will not work in the 21st century, because in a democratic system where people vote, you have to have Consensus. | ||
You have to reach consensus to reach an agreement. | ||
And you look at the scale and the power that technology companies have, the rate at which the pace at which the world moves, that developments happen. | ||
Xi Jinping says you have to have an essentially controlled political and economic system so that you can respond very quickly. | ||
And so I look at that and I say, well, maybe more elites in the United States are coming around to that idea that you have to centralize authority just like they tried to do for COVID, trying to do it for monkeypox, or trying to do it for this economic recession. | ||
And so I think that probably is going to be the America that we inherit. | ||
Yeah, and you sort of read my mind there. | ||
They were pretty open about sort of salivating, wishing they had the power the Chinese government did during COVID. They saw them locking everything down and said, gosh, we wish you could do that. | ||
In fact, we are going to turn our view towards the domestic situation and talk about a speech that Biden is set to give on Thursday with Mike Shelby of the Forward Observer. | ||
On the other side will be our final segment. | ||
unidentified
|
Don't go anywhere, folks. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | |
Final segment of American Journal here on Infowars.com. | ||
Mike Shelby is my guest from the Forward Observer. | ||
You can find their website at forwardobserver.com. | ||
They also have a YouTube channel where they stream daily. | ||
Just search Forward Observer on YouTube. | ||
You can follow his Twitter at grayzonewarlord, and that's G-R-A-Y, zonewarlord, is Mike's address there on Twitter. | ||
A really great follow as he... | ||
Well, you follow the facts on the ground, Mike, not the media's portrayal of them, which is what I appreciate about your feed. | ||
It's different than you'd normally get from people always just responding to the media. | ||
You really do seem to be on the forefront. | ||
And one of the things that you're talking about is the speech that Biden is set to give on Thursday in Philadelphia at Independence Hall. | ||
I mean, they love their symbolism, don't they? | ||
I'm sure he's going to talk about how much he loves the Constitution and the First Amendment and the Second Amendment. | ||
Or they're going to the place where the Constitution was written to spit and stomp all over it. | ||
What do you think is going to be announced in this speech that they say is going to be about the, quote, soul of the nation, Mike? | ||
I think this is going to be another salvo of the Biden administration. | ||
Biden specifically trying to target the Trump campaign in 2024 before it starts. | ||
You know, Biden came out last week and said, oh, The MAGA movement, the Trump Republicans, are semi-fascism. | ||
And we've seen a long list of Democrats making accusations of terrorism and fascists. | ||
And most recently, some Democratic strategist said, oh, it's a terror cell and it should be treated as such. | ||
And so I think Biden's going to try to draw a distinct line here, probably warn Americans that if Trump gets elected in 2024, then The American experiment. | ||
He's going to try to force moderates out of any position on Trump. | ||
Biden is a weak president. | ||
He's underwater on the approval rating. | ||
I think part of this, at best, this is an effort to paint Republicans as extreme, to help Democrats in the midterms, maybe help the Democrats keep on I think we're good to go. | ||
Biden looks at this, and Democrats look at this, and Biden has no clear successor. | ||
Kamala Harris is unpopular. | ||
She only, I think, got 1% or something like that of the Democratic primary. | ||
There's no clear, strong successor to Biden, and so I think Democrats really are worried that Trump is, again, going to be a very strong candidate, and I think they're This speech is probably going to try to draw a line and force Americans. | ||
Are you on America's side or are you on the terrorist side or the fascist side? | ||
The semi-fascist side. | ||
Yeah, or excuse me, the semi-fascist side. | ||
This is shaping operations. | ||
So in counterinsurgency, before you go into an area or before you conduct a large-scale operation, you... | ||
In a conventional military setting, you always try to target the adversary's command and control and communication systems, right? | ||
You try to make sure they can't communicate, try to make sure commanders can't command, they can't issue orders to subordinate units. | ||
In kind of a low-intensity conflict that we have in this country right now, it's psychological and information operations or warfare. | ||
And you're targeting the mental space of the American public. | ||
And so I think this speech is going to center on... | ||
Forcing Americans to decide, are you on the side of America, the side of the Constitution, free and fair elections, or are you going to be on the semi-fascist side? | ||
Ultimately, I think if Trump runs, that is going to be the dividing line. | ||
They're going to try to make that the dividing line of 2024, and I'm just not very optimistic that that election is going to be successful one way or the other. | ||
Yeah. Yeah, and of course, it's the most childish argument you can possibly make to say you either vote for me or you're— I mean, it's the George W. Bush line. | ||
You're either with us or you're with the terrorists. | ||
In this case, the terrorists are simply your Republican next-door neighbor, your mom and your dad, right? | ||
It's your fellow Americans. | ||
They're the terrorists now. | ||
They've really taken this to the next level. | ||
And actually, while we were on air, a mere 17 minutes ago, President Biden has filed for re-election. | ||
So, you know, while Trump is not initially or officially rather filed for, you know, to run as a candidate, Biden has. | ||
So I think you're right that they don't have a successor for President Biden. | ||
They don't have anybody waiting in the wings ready and able to pick up the torch and run as a unifier in the Democratic Party. | ||
I guess Pete Buttigieg is not done quite so well in his position as Transportation Secretary. | ||
But there, Biden has announced that he is running for re-election. | ||
And so I imagine that will tie in with the speech he's about to give. | ||
And of course, it'll probably tie into all the revelations that we have had about the FBI. I mean, let's talk about the FBI a little bit, Mike, and how they're operating in this gray zone warfare, low-intensity conflict situation. | ||
Takeover of the United States where they're launching investigations or stifling investigations. | ||
They are spreading things to the media that they want to be spread while redacting anything that might hurt them. | ||
I mean, we've heard so much in just the last few months about the corruption, deep-seated corruption at the FBI. What effect do you think this will have on the election coming up? | ||
I think there's a lot of institutional rot at not just FBI but CIA and DHS, you know, all the other, Department of Justice. | ||
And so, you know, in terms of what impact it's going to have on the election, I've been somewhat surprised to see that Attorney General Merrick Garland, a couple months ago, recirculated that the Barr memo, the Bill Barr memo that said Basically, | ||
any type of investigation into political candidates needs to be cleared directly through the Attorney General's office and to be careful of what you do and try to not allow investigations to appear political. | ||
And of course, that's what's on paper. | ||
Part of the institutional right at the FBI is that it has become politicized. | ||
It has become a tool for politics. | ||
And I think, just like at CIA, I think there's probably a lot of decent people there who are trying to go after Trying to do the right thing and go after legitimate criminals. | ||
And you see this in the military too. | ||
The problem is the higher you go, the more political your job becomes to the point where if you're appointed or you're confirmed by the Senate, that is a purely political job. | ||
And you are working for your boss in the executive branch. | ||
And so in terms of how this could play out, I mean, obviously they're gunning for Trump and Trump. | ||
It's not just the FBI and DOJ. It's in New York and some other—the Manhattan DA's office and the New York Attorney General's office. | ||
And I'm not sure of how much of that is just smoke just to cloud the Trump campaign. | ||
But look, if Trump, for some reason, were to— They could easily drag this through November 2024. | ||
I think they probably will have something like a year just to start the trial, and then who knows how long the trial is going to take. | ||
So they absolutely could use this to legally sideline Trump for 2024. | ||
And it does seem like that's what they're doing. | ||
So Trump is coming out and he's demanding that new elections be held, but he also is imploring whistleblowers within the FBI, the good people that you mentioned, to actually come forward and blow the whistle on what they're being told to do. | ||
And we've had people do stuff like that. | ||
Senator Chuck Grassley was approached by people telling the truth about what the impetus was behind a lot of the moves by the FBI. What do you think the likelihood is that Trump gets arrested and if he is, riots in the streets? | ||
Do you think Lindsey Graham's accurate on that prediction? | ||
I don't know. I'm so close to this that I probably don't have the most objective read. | ||
I think there's a feeling. | ||
I have this feeling. | ||
There is a feeling among Trump Republicans even that maybe it's time to move past Trump. | ||
You know, thank him for the service, and I know that's probably no popular thing to say here at Info Awards, but... | ||
You'd be surprised, actually. | ||
Okay. Our audience is done with Trump for a lot of cases. | ||
Okay. Well, yeah, there is that sentiment here, and so I don't necessarily know there'd be rioting in the streets, but you would poison the well. | ||
You would... If a Republican, if Trump were sidelined from the 24 election and a Democrat won in 2024, I don't think Biden's going to make it to November 2024. | ||
But whoever does, you would permanently poison the well of electoral politics, and that would probably be the death knell for, quote-unquote, free and fair elections in this country. | ||
24 to 25 to the 28 election would be even more of a disaster than we've seen in the last two years. | ||
And if I could, just briefly, if Democrats win in 2024, they have to build a moat. | ||
I don't think they're going to be in a position where they can allow another Republican to come in and turn the whole-of-government approach against Biden and Democrats. | ||
I don't think they're going to allow that to happen. | ||
They've built such a large moat. | ||
I just don't see them turning that over willingly to Republicans. | ||
Yeah, you're so right. And just like ever, everything they accuse us of, they are doing. | ||
It's the actual destruction of us as a democracy or a republic or anything, you know, resembling what America once was. | ||
was. | ||
Thank you once again, Mike Shelby, forward observer.com. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, if millions of people get this book, our funding problems will be over and it's starting to happen. | ||
That's why I said, yeah, go to infoworkstore.com, get the book, it starts shipping in a couple weeks. | ||
The Great Reset and the War for the World. | ||
But I said go to Amazon, because it's the number one book chart in the world. | ||
And if it goes to number one, not of political, not of history, not of U.S. history, it's already number one over 40 categories, like political science, you name it. | ||
40-plus categories is number one. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, drumroll please, of books in the world, The Great Reset and The War for the World is 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. | ||
We are now number nine in the world. | ||
Woo! This is major. | ||
This is political. This could fund our war chest. | ||
Just go to Amazon.com, everybody, and buy 10 copies. | ||
Send this blueprint to the Death Star and the New World Order. | ||
Because you read this, you know their whole plan how to stop them. | ||
Get the Great Reset and War of the World now. | ||
It's going to go to number one. |