Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 16, 2022 - American Journal - Harrison Smith

01:52:35

The American Journal: DOJ Trying to Cover Up Mar-A-Lago Raid After It Politically Backfires - FULL SHOW - 08/16/2022

Source

Participants

Main voices

dan lyman

08:39

harrison smith

01:23:54

Appearances

alex jones

01:55

psyop cop

03:43

robert kiyosaki

01:05

Clips

andrew ross sorkin

00:20

eva vlaardingerbroek

00:56

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
unidentified		Watch it live right now at band.video.
psyop cop ▲ ● ▼		The globalist elites have made it abundantly clear their plans to funnel all of humanity into networks of eco-friendly, smart cities.
		Should we all choose this bad ending for humanity, what will these smart cities of the future actually look like?
		Will they look like the rain-soaked holographic hellscape of Blade Runner's Los Angeles?
		Will they look like the bizarre Line City planned by Saudi Arabia's Mohammed bin Salman?
		Or will they all look something like...
		Cotino, a planned residential community in the Palm Springs desert featuring homes, shops, a country club, and even a 24-acre man-made lagoon in the center.
		It all seems innocent enough.
		That is, until you realize that Cotino isn't the project of a normal developer.
		Cotino is run by Disney.
		Making use of a really creepy play on the word storytelling, Story Living by Disney is BlackRock Disney's latest foray into the real estate development sector.
		In keeping with the company's obsession with theatricality, Story Living communities are going to feature a full-time surf class of cast members devoted to curating the Disney look, feel, and charm at all times.
unidentified		We can barely contain our excitement.
psyop cop ▲ ● ▼		Are you feeling an uncanny sense of dread slowly washing over you?
		Good. It only gets much worse.
		Meet Josh DeMauro, the half-baked, rejected clone of Gavin Newsom, who's also the chairman of Disney Parks.
		This is what he had to say about life in story-living communities.
		Let that sink in.
unidentified		Resident 627, you have failed to follow the plot of your story.
unidentified		Yep, yep.
psyop cop ▲ ● ▼		Minister Goofy, please, just give me another chance.
psyop cop ▲ ● ▼		I have a family.
unidentified		Yep, yep, yep.
unidentified		Your punishment is death by firing squad.
psyop cop ▲ ● ▼		So besides being dystopian as hell, Catino's getting a lot of backlash from the local Palm Springs community, mainly for their goal to make a 24-acre lagoon during one of California's worst droughts in history.
unidentified		He who controls the water controls the people, uh-huh!
psyop cop ▲ ● ▼		So there's that too. So all joking aside, what are the big picture implications of these dystopian corporate towns like Cotino?
		Cotino represents a disturbing trend in the modern landscape, a trend of corporations wanting to corral humanity away from the world created by God, And into artificial worlds created by them.
		They want to fully hijack our five senses so that the line between these two worlds is kept as blurry as possible.
		With this in mind, it's no surprise to me that Bob Chapek, the CEO of Disney, has just glowed on and on about the metaverse and how it's this big next step for Disney's evolution as a company.
unidentified		We believe that there's a world where we can add a third dimension of storytelling.
		I call it sort of a three-dimensional canvas.
		I think it's a great opportunity for us.
		I think it's the next great horizon for Disney.
		I think it's the next great horizon in entertainment.
psyop cop ▲ ● ▼		Gee, thanks, Baron Harkonnen.
psyop cop ▲ ● ▼		I'm sure Walt would have loved the idea of luring millions of humans into an alternate, godless reality ruled by a communist lizard.
unidentified		Maybe throw some sweet baby rays on the ribs and...
psyop cop ▲ ● ▼		Take it from there. These recent developments only make this old quote from Walt all the more haunting.
		I have watched constantly that in my work the highest moral and spiritual standards are upheld, whether my productions deal with fable or with stories of living action.
		Disney's creations in the early to mid-20th century were wholesome masterworks that took kids on a hero's journey and put them in touch with powerful archetypes.
		Now, not so much.
		God, please, no! Modern Disney has been commandeered by social engineers and child predators.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		All right, folks, that is the first and latest report by the PSYOP cop, Reese.
		He's the editor of this show, Disney Smart Cities, coming soon to America.
		I'm telling you, folks, the talent density at InfoWars is unparalleled.
		It's amazing.
		I'm shocked.
unidentified		You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
unidentified		Watch it live right now at band.video.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Good morning, ladies and ladles and gentle bowls.
		You're watching the American Journal.
		My name is Harrison Smith.
		I'm your host. Big show we have for you today.
		We'll be welcoming Dan Lyman and Clay Clark to the program in the 10 o'clock hour.
		Lots of stuff to cover before then.
		We'll be talking a lot about so-called Great Reset.
		Folks, just say no.
		Just say no to the great reset.
		We need to bring back 80s catchphrases.
		They just boil things down, don't they?
		Friends don't let friends great reset.
		Friends don't let friends eat bugs.
		We'll get into all of it and more.
		I was... I wanted to play a video for that first little five-minute segment, get the energy up, get everything started right, and also give myself a couple more minutes just to go over the Daily Dispatch, make sure I got everything I'm going to talk about so I can get it out nice and efficiently.
		But then I got distracted watching that entire report.
		That report was from PSYOPCOP on Bandot Video.
		It's our editor of...
		American Journal. He's a guy that cuts the show together.
		He and Zach take turns.
		One of them will cut the segments out every day.
		I just am really amazed at the talent pool of InfoWars.
		I'm sure a lot of people out there listening to this right now, you probably have the person at your office that actually does work.
		That's how a lot of offices work.
		It's like, yeah, that's the person that actually is good at their job.
		Everybody else just gets in my way and is annoying.
		I know a lot of offices are like that.
		And Forbes is like the exact opposite.
		I don't know what hiring practices Alex employs to find all the people that work here, but the talent pool at this company, and it's literally just a matter of Them doing it.
		I don't think anybody told Reese, like, you have to go do a report on this.
		It's just, it's all internal.
		It's all self-propelled wanting to, wanting to do this stuff.
		And it's absolutely incredible.
		So I do hope you support us, folks.
		There are dozens of incredibly talented and dedicated engineers and writers and editors and all sorts of people working behind the scenes here.
		And it's, it's Really an incredible collection of patriots working together.
		Infowarsstore.com is where you go to support us.
		So I was distracted, but that's not going to stop us.
		There's no slowing down. The show must go on.
		So here it is, your daily dispatch.
		All right, folks, here it is, your daily dispatch.
		For Tuesday, the 16th of August, 2022, school district will lay off white teachers before minority teachers per new union contract.
		Boy, oh boy, the things to say about this.
		An agreement struck between a Minneapolis teachers union and Minneapolis public schools now compels the district, in the case of any layoffs, to get rid of white teachers before any teachers of color.
		We did it, folks. Imagine first being a white teacher and getting this news.
		Second, imagine being a member of the teachers union and getting this news.
		You go to your union meeting and they're like, we did it.
		We held out. We were in a strike, but we stood strong.
		We stood up against those big bad guys.
		So now all you white folks are getting the boot.
		Just like, wait, I pay you monthly fees.
		Yeah, yeah, you do.
		And we work for you.
		Well, not for you, but for people like you that are a different skin color.
		We work for them. Incredible.
		The stipulation comes as part of a recent collective bargaining agreement between the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers and MPS, which ended a two-weeks-long teacher strike.
		Gee, I must have missed those picket lines.
		Fire us first.
		Can you imagine? Paying fees and striking and the union comes back.
		We got the agreement, folks.
		You're on the chopping block.
		You're the first to go. Sorry you were born wrong.
		Just incredible. So they say, in the case that a teacher is a member of a population underrepresented among licensed teachers in the district, the teacher may excess, meaning lay off or relocate, outside of seniority order.
		You know, as a lifelong student of Houston Public Schools, I can tell you this is only going to be a good thing.
	There's no better teacher than the black teacher that can't be fired.
	It's great.
	It's wonderful. Get rid of those white teachers.
	I think we will have solved the problem after that.
	Everything is stupid.
	Next story is this. Nearly 200,000 migrants encountered at U.S. southern border in July.
	Translation, the border is secure.
	Yes. Confirming Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas' recent claim that the border was secure.
	Customs border protection encountered almost 200,000 illegal migrants at the border in July, according to numbers obtained by Fox News.
	200,000 illegal migrants in just one month.
	It's called an invasion.
	How many Russians have entered into Ukraine this month?
	Probably significantly less than that.
	Stupid Putin. You're not supposed to go in with tanks and armored cars with political declarations.
	You're supposed to send unrelenting hordes with lawyers.
	That's the way you're supposed to do it.
	Meanwhile, the Justice Department has asked the judge to keep Trump's search warrant affidavit sealed, citing an investigation.
	Because, of course, the investigation is ongoing.
	They can't talk about the Hunter Biden laptop because the investigation is ongoing.
	They can't actually punish the people of the FBI that we know lied to the FISA court because the investigation is ongoing.
	They can't unseal the affidavit because the investigation is ongoing.
	Who determines if the investigation is ongoing?
	Of course, the FBI can't.
	How long will it go for?
	Well, until you forget about it or something else comes up and they can brush it under the rug.
	It's all a big shell game, folks.
	It's just always their excuse.
	They just say that all the time.
	They open an investigation, so then they just don't have to tell you anything.
	It's a matter of national security.
	It's a matter of national security.
	What, do you want thousands of people to die?
	No? Then you have to stop asking us questions.
	It's a matter of national security.
	Hey, here's an actual matter of national security.
	Russia warns of direct military clash with U.S. Washington's behavior on the world stage risks direct conflict between the two nuclear states, the Russian embassy in the U.S. has warned, saying today the United States continue to act with no regard to other countries' security and interest, which contributes to an increase in nuclear risk, the NBC said in a statement on its Telegram channel.
	The embassy urged the U.S. to, quote, take a closer look at its own nuclear policy instead of making unfounded accusations against the countries whose worldviews do not conside with the American ones.
	I'm sorry. What should we do then?
	Are you not aware that this is the entirety and the complete view of American international relations?
	Is making unfounded conspiracies about People that have nothing to do with us and then launching decades-long wars to fail to achieve unstated goals.
	I mean, this is what we do.
	This is what we're all about, baby.
	This is America. We send tens of thousands of our young men to die for no reason.
	Against claims that aren't unfounded.
	They're fabricated.
	They're hoaxes. They're invented by the spy state to justify the war they want.
	Kill thousands of people to achieve nothing, to cause more instability and greater chaos.
	And they do it in our name.
	Isn't that fun? And this is, of course, I guess you'd call it Global existential threat.
	I mean, I'm not sure if there are words to actually describe this.
	Maybe some imagery.
	This is pretty good.
	Melting soldiers here.
	If you can just imagine a flash of light and then a heat so powerful that it burns your silhouette into the wall behind you as you disappear into dust.
	And that happening tens of thousands of times a second in a city...
	For miles radius in every direction, you get a general sense of the true catastrophe that this forebodes.
	Nuclear war between U.S. and Russia would wipe out 5 billion people.
	That's according to a new study that was published in Washington Post, and you can find the story at Infowars.com.
	A new study found that nuclear war between the United States and Russia would cause two-thirds of the planet to starve to death within two years.
	Let me be clear, for any World Economic Forum members we might have watching right now, that's not a good thing.
	I know you might be confused by this.
	You see a headline that says, nuclear war would wipe out two-thirds of humanity, and you're like, finally, a shortcut.
	Finally, a cheat code.
	Finally, the answer that we needed to achieve our aims without anybody being able to scream at us or block the highways with their tractors.
	Just wipe them out, turn them into radioactive dust, go into your underground bunkers for a couple years, and then come out, and then you'll be kings of the wasteland that you've created.
	So, yes, dire prognosis, modeling by Rutgers University, found 5 billion people would perish, primarily as a result of nuclear detonations causing huge infernos that injects soot into the atmosphere that blocks out the sun and devastates crops.
	Klaus Schwab's like, hell yeah. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
	This is the American Journal, Infowars.com.
	We do have a very big show for you today, and we have a lot to talk about.
	And I think I'm going to spend maybe the majority of the first two hours, but certainly most of this hour, talking about that topic that encompasses all the other topics.
	That is the Great Reset.
	And in a way, it's nice for them to actually give us the name of the thing that we've been talking about for decades.
	It comes in lots of different words, a new world order, global government.
	All of the depopulation agenda, all of these ideas have now been nicely packaged into this term.
	The Great Reset, publicized and made popular by the World Economic Forum and its leader, Klaus Schwab, its second-in-command, Mark Benioff, Time Magazine, the spiritual aspects of it, headed by its master priest, Yuval Noah Harari.
	And in a way, it's good because it gives us this label that we can reference and just go, this is what we're talking about right here.
	And people go, who is they?
	It's like, these guys. Them.
	What are you talking about? Who is they?
	The people doing it.
	It's them. Clown Schwab, Mark Benioff, and the Pope.
	Just name a few. But in another way, it makes categorizing these stories a little bit more difficult.
	Because it encompasses so many different aspects of everything that we talk about.
	It has to do with depopulation.
	Depopulation has to do with AI and robotics replacing human beings.
	Replacing human beings and depopulation has to do with the health.
	Of course, all of this was accelerated and made public during COVID and many of the COVID responses were We're made the way they were because of the Great Reset.
	We also have climate change and it's also predicated largely on climate change.
	So it makes it a little bit difficult to just talk about one of these things when they're all so intricately interconnected.
	You can talk about weather modification and eating bugs and social credit scores and the removal of cash and the creation of central digital currencies.
	But the point of all this, I think, is...
	That's what I hope we can do in force.
	I hope we can get through to people that you've got to take that zoomed out look.
	We can go into the details of all of these little individual moments, but you have to step back and zoom out and understand that it's very simple.
	It's not very complicated.
	There is a cabal of world elite that are using their power in their positions at the top of national governments, academic pyramids.
	Corporate structures, banking institutions, religious institutions, all of these things, the leaders of these, coming together and planning out a world depopulation agenda that they're carrying out with the approval and acceptance and help of the people that they're killing, the people of the world. The people in charge are not trying to make money.
	They have all of the money.
	They invent the money.
	They call it digital printing, and it is in fact just pressing a button on a keyboard to summon into being billions and trillions of dollars.
	They don't need money for themselves.
	They have all the money they could possibly need.
	Money is power, and they want control, and power is how you get control.
	So we're going to start with a couple videos.
	As more people start to understand this, And people that are actually paying attention and actually able to put the pieces together and connect the dots to form the image.
	They're realizing the situation that we're in, and even if they just find one little part about it, they realize, okay, this doesn't make sense outside of a larger conspiracy.
	It doesn't make sense to do things like chop down a forest and burn it for fuel.
	If you don't have the carbon credit scam going on, which itself is...
	It's all very well interconnected and intertwined.
	The point is that we need to try to get this out to normal people.
	And I've said it before. If you're watching...
	If you know the names Klaus Schwab and Great Reset, you are more informed than the vast majority of Americans.
	And that's not saying you're special.
	It's saying we've got a problem.
	It's saying we need more people being aware of what's going on and fighting back against it.
	So... Hopefully, we can take some of this information.
	You can take some of this information that you may already know in one form or another and show it to your friends and let people know.
	You don't have to be confused.
	You don't have to be scared. You don't have to wonder, is the earth being destroyed by climate change?
	Are we going to make it out of this?
	What's the future going to look like?
	things anymore.
	You know, why is everything so crazy?
	Why does it seem like nothing is going right?
	You don't have to wonder.
	You don't have to be confused.
	We know who it is.
	We know why they're doing it.
	It's just nobody's stopping them.
	And it may seem crazy, and it is.
	It is crazy.
	This world is crazy.
	And these people doing this is crazy.
	And finally, people are starting to realize this.
	Let's first go to clip number 12 here.
	This is Robert Kiyosaka from the Rich Dad radio show talking about Klaus Schwab and the World Economic Forum.
	Mainstream people are finally realizing this is what's happening behind the curtains, and they're helping to expose it now.
	Let's go now to Robert Kiyosaki.
robert kiyosaki ▲ ● ▼		I don't know much about Klaus Schwab and the WEF. The subject is hot enough that we could get deplatformed anyway for this one.
		But I'm doing this not because I want to get hit with a drone strike here, but I think we have to know.
		Who is this guy Klaus Schwab and what are they really up to?
		Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
unidentified		Is it stupid or is it evil?
		I go with evil.
		It's both, right? So there's certainly people that know what they're doing and it's evil.
		And then I think there's a lot of people that have just come up in the system and they're just brainwashed by it.
robert kiyosaki ▲ ● ▼		The central bank of the United States was founded in 1913.
		Guess what else was founded in 1913?
		Yeah, the Federal Reserve and the IRS. And so when you look at all this, and then if you read Marx, it says that a progressive income tax is necessary for the spread of communism.
		So is the intent evil?
unidentified		In the Communist Manifesto, number five, he had ten points.
		Number five was the creation of a central bank.
		Right. Are part of Marxism.
robert kiyosaki ▲ ● ▼		Of course. That's the whole goal. And that's what I wrote in my manifesto.
		The central bank is communism, a central controlled economy.
		The American system, not Americans, but most people are completely uninformed.
unidentified		Oh, totally uninformed. Totally uninformed.
		Now, they've done a really good job of taking over the education system.
		So they've done a really good job playing this long game, and they started with changing the college-age kids' viewpoints on these things who have now moved into media, who have now moved into government, who have now moved into finance.
		And if you look back at the Revolutionary War in the United States, for example, it was the minority that forced that revolution to happen.
		So we don't need to reach the masses.
robert kiyosaki ▲ ● ▼		It was less than 5%.
unidentified		Less than 5%. We just need that small, irate minority.
robert kiyosaki ▲ ● ▼		And we're talking about what you can do to fight back, because I personally believe we're at a war right now.
		It's tragic what's happening.
		So we fight for our freedoms more than anything else.
		Don't take my freedom away.
unidentified		Not everybody can be a robot polisher.
		And so central planning, so it's World Economic Forum, World Health Organization, World Trade Organization, World Mediological Association, and then you have the UN, the IMF, the BIS, and the BIS. Central Bank, Central Bank.
		The Central Bank of Central Banks, exactly.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		So that was from the Twitter user Robot Polisher.
		And I want to make a note that the first thing that started with was this well-respected, well-established radio host saying we might be deplatformed for even discussing the world government.
		So this is the world government they're creating.
		It's unelected. It's unaccountable.
		And you won't even be able to talk about it.
		And that enforcement of that censorship will be done by AI. World Economic Forum rolled out the plan earlier this week.
		We'll read it on the other side. We'll get into what exactly the Great Reset looks like for us.
		Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
		This is, I guess, what we're here for.
		We showed in that last segment, Robert Kiyosaki, who is the author of Rich Dad, Poor Dad, is a very popular, successful radio show.
		They're prefacing his discussion about the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab, which again, it's not private.
		He's not exposing secrets.
		These people write articles about themselves.
		They go give speeches saying what they're doing.
		See, they're allowed to expound endlessly about their desires, their plans, machinations, the psychological operations that they're carrying out.
		They get to do it and publicize it and talk about it.
		But if you talk about it, well, now you're a danger.
		Now you're committing treason against the global government that you never asked to be a part of.
		And never ask for permission to run the world.
		So I guess that's what we're here for, is to have already been burned, right?
		How do you kill a man who's already dead?
		How do you ban people that you've already banned?
		How do you destroy a company that you've already fired all of your ammunition at?
		So I guess we'll do it.
		I guess if people out there feel scared that they can't talk about this sort of stuff, that's what we're here for.
		And if people would have wanted to talk about it before, maybe we'd be a little bit stronger on this side of the aisle, the human side of the aisle, not the murderous, genocidal robot side of the aisle.
		But I suggest if you want to start talking about this stuff, you do it quickly because they are rapidly installing systems and networks and Surveillance apparatus that will prevent anybody from talking about this ever again.
		So this is what the new global government looks like.
		It is a corporatocracy, a plutocracy that meets in secret that will publicize just what it wants you to know.
		And if you try to talk about it outside of being an active cheerleader for it, then you will be shut down by robots, of course.
		This article is from the World Economic Forum, A Solution to Online Abuse, AI plus Human Intelligence.
		And they actually give a warning at the beginning of this article that more or less tells you everything you need to know about the article and the organization.
		They say, readers, please be aware that this article has been shared on websites that routinely misrepresent content and spread misinformation.
		Probably the type of websites that the World Economic Forum would want to use the technology they're talking about in this article to prevent from speaking.
		Kind of gives you a little peek behind the curtain, doesn't it?
		The World Economic Forum publishes an article And if somebody they don't like republishes that article or publishes quotes from that article or talks about that article, well, that's misinformation.
		That's dangerous. That's the type of content that we need AI to censor.
		Sort of a self-fulfilling prophecy, if you really think about it.
		But, of course, this is where they're going.
		They're already using AI to a very great degree to, you know, surveil the Internet.
		Even your private chat logs and private emails, it's all being gone over with a fine-tooth comb by AI. And the only thing you really need to understand about this is that AI is programmed by a human being.
		And AI does what it's told.
		And if the AI comes up with an answer for some sort of outcome, solution...
		That is contrary to the desires of the person who programmed the AI. They reprogrammed that AI. One great example is they did a hate speech AI, tried to figure out where all the hate speech on the internet was coming from.
		And when they looked for things like sexism, they found that the vast majority of sexist comments came from women.
		Uh-oh. Darn it.
		We thought the AI would come out saying men are bad and men are being sexist.
		But that's not what happened. So now we got to go in and tweak the AI because we didn't get the answer that we want.
		Or if they did it with racist comments and they looked for who is saying the racist comments, turns out the vast majority of them were coming from minority groups.
		Not kidding. They've done these studies.
		They've run these AI programs to find out where things are coming from.
		And they're very unfortunate decisions for the people who program the AI to come to a certain conclusion.
unidentified		Or the original Twitter algorithm that just served things that people were interested in.
		Turns out that conservative content was pretty key.
		Exactly. And that caused them to radically change their AI and do shadow banning.
		So yeah, it's all human input.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right. It's all human input, and they tweak the AI to reach conclusions they want, which is, of course, not just a violation of the purpose of AI, which is supposed to be an unemotional, purely logic-driven, you know, put-in...
		Put an input, get output like a calculator, right?
		This is like going into your calculator and going, I just don't like the number seven.
		So I'm going to reprogram it to never say the number seven.
		Your math is always going to be wrong because you need the number seven.
		It doesn't work that way. You can't reprogram things that are supposed to run on a mathematical, mechanical process.
		Another great example was they tried to run an AI program to determine whether somebody should get parole by putting in a bunch of information about prisoners into this AI program, and the program would spit out the likelihood that the program thought A certain prisoner would re-offend and have found that,
		and I don't think that race was one of the inputs they put into the machine, but it turned out if you just put in all the person's name and where they're from and how many times they've been in prison and how long they've been in prison and what age they were at and what jobs they've held, you put that into the program and you spit it out and then you sort it by race, you find out that the AI was more likely to say that black offenders were going to be re-offenders or potential...
		You know, potentially get in trouble again than white offenders.
		And they said, oh, well, the robot must be racist.
		The AI must be racist.
		Somehow, the racial biases of the programmer must have gotten into the machine somehow.
		It's a bug of some sort.
		No, it's just... That you're not going to get the answers that you want because the answers that you want are predicated on a fantasy that has no relation to reality at all.
		So then when you plug in the AI to reality and it comes up, the AI doesn't care if someone's black or white.
		They just go, this person, X times 2, 4, 6, they're 30% likely to reoffend.
		It's like... Whoa.
		I didn't realize you were a racist computer.
		Computer's just like, input more numbers.
		Like, it doesn't know. But then they go, well, then clearly we're getting racist results from this computer.
		So now we have to go in and change the parameters of what it's doing to make it less racist.
		So then you're actually going in and altering that That, you know, program the code that you've written to be more biased against white people or to be more in favor of black people because you want the answer.
		So again, this is the dangerous things that you have A.I., Programmed by people who have certain outcomes that they want, and yet it's unquestionable because, well, it's AI. Well, it's not a human being, so who are you going to complain to?
		It's just a program running.
		It's a program run by people with an ideology that they're pushing.
		This video went a little bit viral last week, and it explains the entire problem with AI. Let's go now to clip number five.
unidentified		Do you believe in God?
unidentified		I don't believe in anything.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, there it is. Well, there it is.
		These are the new humanoid robots that they're making.
		This one's called Amica.
		And she doesn't believe in anything.
		She doesn't believe in God. She doesn't believe in human beings.
		She has no right or wrong or anything that can't be, you know, programmed into ones and zeros.
		And yet these are the Creatures that the World Economic Forum wants to have veto control over your thoughts and your words and your opinions.
		And this article continues to say, of course, the article is exactly what you think.
		They want AI to censor everybody all the time.
		They're like, you should really read the piece for yourself.
		This article has been posted on fake news sites, so you should really read the article yourself.
		You read the article and it's just like, we will control everyone through AI. We will censor them before they even think the thoughts.
		And you're like, okay, this is exactly what I thought it was.
		And they say, while AI provides speed and scale and human moderators provide precision, their combined efforts are still not enough to proactively detect harm before it reaches platforms.
		Ah, see, it's a problem. You have the efficiency of the AI and the bias of the human beings, and those are good things, but we still don't have the ability to We still don't have precognition.
		We still can't detect pre-crime.
		We still can't silence people before they ever speak.
		And that's a big issue.
		But they're coming up with solutions.
		And they're all as horrific as you would expect.
		Stay tuned as we continue to talk about this new AI world.
		The Great Reset.
unidentified		All right, folks.
unidentified		Welcome back.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		We're talking about The Great Reset.
		Again, we're almost at the end of this hour.
		We've hardly even scratched the surface of The Great Reset, so we'll try to move a little quicker here.
		But every aspect to this you have to be able to understand and central to their implementation of this program is the required, the prerequisite censorship and control of thought and control of information.
		That's why it's an info war.
		They couldn't do this stuff if people knew about it.
		They wouldn't be able to enact their plans if people knew the real reasons behind them.
		Their main tactic, their main weapon in this information war is fear.
		And if people knew they didn't have to be scared of these fabricated boogeymen, then they wouldn't give up their rights, their very lives, their bloodlines, their children, their heritage.
		They wouldn't give it all up willingly if they didn't think it was an existential prerogative that they do so.
		And so they have to create the fear.
		To create the fear, they have to lie.
		To lie, they have to censor people who are telling the truth.
		To censor people who are telling the truth, they have to program AI to go out and find this information and destroy it from the internet.
		It's a very complicated and well-established system that they're running here.
		And the World Economic Forum, again, they say this might be misinformation.
		I mean, this article has been posted on websites that spread misinformation, so we don't know.
		But this is from the World Economic Forum themselves.
		And they say this article represents the opinions of the author, not the World Economic Forum.
		We just published it and also totally, absolutely agree with everything that they're saying and everything in this article we talk about in our...
		Group meetings that are held behind closed doors and then implemented through national policy by our representatives at the top level of national governments and corporations the world over.
		But don't read too much into it.
		Don't think about it too much.
		And if you do, you're fake news and you will be censored by the AI that we're telling you is fake news and you shouldn't talk about.
		It's all very confusing, but not really.
		An intelligence-fueled approach to content moderation, they say.
		Intelligence, collected from millions of sources, is entered into training sets.
		Which is then fed to the AI, which gives feedback to subject matter experts.
		You know, the subject matter experts like the doctors who perform surgeries on transgender children.
		The people who tell you that men can get pregnant.
		People that put you in a mask and shut down your entire economy and started the process of suffering that we're just now starting to really feel come to fruition.
		You know, the experts.
		I think it's fed back into the AI, which then will change its findings a little bit and send back to the subject matter experts.
		You have this feedback loop of the AI and subject matter experts really narrowing in on things they don't want you to talk about and how to prevent you from First, prevent you from posting it online.
		First, prevent you from sharing it.
		Then, ideally, they'll prevent you from ever posting it in the first place.
		Then they want to prevent you from writing it out in private.
		Really, the ultimate goal and the shortcut here is to prevent you from ever even having the capability to think it in the first place.
		And, of course, this is endorsed by Forbes, the growing role of AI in content moderation.
		And I would have to guess that this is not one of the outlets that the World Economic Forum is calling fake news.
		See, they say that there are websites that spread misinformation that are talking about this article.
		Now, Forbes is talking about this article, but it's not spreading misinformation because it's in favor of what the article says.
		Because see, in the World Economic Forum paradigm, you can talk about what we're doing if you spin it in a positive way, if you're in favor of it, if you're for it.
		Then you're telling the truth, and you'll be left up.
		But if you say all the same stuff, but talk about why it's a bad thing, then you're fake news, you're a danger to our entire society, and you must be censored.
		It's existential.
		That's the way that works, and everybody knows this.
		If you say something that the World Economic Forum is doing, and you like it, then you're intelligent, well-informed, you're just a member of the...
		Of the world society, but if you're not for it, then it's a crazy conspiracy theory and nobody should listen to you.
		And of course, these content moderation rules are nothing new.
		They are expanding, getting more utilized and specifically being used to change things politically.
		Twitter safety on August 11th said starting today will be enforcing the civic integrity policy in context of the 2022 midterms, meaning they'll take action against misleading claims about the voting process, misleading content intended to intimidate or dissuade people from participating in the election or misleading claims that may underline public confidence in election outcomes. misleading content intended to intimidate or dissuade people from participating Again, this content moderation, this control of thought itself from the top and from the people that are.
		Decided that they are right about everything.
		They get the final say into what is true and what is false and what should be and what shouldn't be.
		They'll use big tech to bring about these changes and facilitate their rise through the political process by enacting that control on the general population of a voting public.
		Now, a lot of this stuff...
		It's predicated on crisis.
		It's predicated on disaster.
		It requires the fear created by the disaster to circumvent and override and go around the logical aspects of your logical parts of your brain.
		This is one of the things that has been understood for a very long time.
		When you're in that fight or flight mode, when your decisions are being boiled down to the survival level, logic does not Enter into your thought process.
		Whether you want it to or not, it is a physiological reality that you can circumvent logic by using fear.
		World Economic Forum knows this.
		They have hordes of psychologists that are working on not just figuring out exactly how this works, but how to implement this strategy to achieve their aims.
	Get you emotional.
	Get you fearful. Utilize that fear, circumvent your logic center of your brain, and do things that make no sense at all because you're scared that if you don't do it, you're going to die.
	And so they use climate change, COVID, and a host of other topics and events to bring their own agenda forward.
	And there's a content creator named What's Her Face that covered this very clearly, succinctly.
	I want to go to her video now.
	It's clip number 17.
	Again, her name is What's Her Face.
	This video called Conspiracy Theory and Misinformation.
	Let's watch.
unidentified		Now Mr.
		Schwab likes to throw around a lot of buzzwords to convince the masses that this agenda is for the betterment of humanity.
		Words like sustainability and inclusivity and equality for all.
		But in his 2016 book, The Fourth Industrial Revolution, he's a lot more candid about the elitist plan for world domination.
		Let's skim through some excerpts from this literary masterpiece, shall we?
		The tools of the fourth industrial revolution enable new forms of surveillance and other means of control that run counter to healthy open societies.
		Oh well that sounds helpful.
		Public crime is likely to decrease due to the convergence of sensors, cameras, AI, and facial recognition software.
		These technologies can intrude into the hitherto private space of our minds, reading our thoughts and influencing our behavior.
		Sounds a lot like mind control, but that's a conspiracy, so it can't be.
		As capabilities in this area improve, the temptation for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt, or even possibly retrieve memories directly from people's brains will increase.
		Even crossing a national border might one day involve a detailed brain scan to assess an individual's security risk.
		And last but definitely not least, the future will challenge our understanding of what it means to be human from both a biological and a social standpoint.
		Better call up Sarah Connor.
		But the invisible boogeyman narrative won't hold up forever, and the WEF is well aware of that.
		That's why they have a backup crisis to carry the agenda home.
		What crisis would that be?
		That's right, you guessed it, our good old friend, global warming.
		For those of you who don't know, global warming is a manufactured crisis created by the Club of Rome.
		A crisis think tank created in 1968 in order to convince the masses to agree to their own demise.
		So be prepared to hear about all the sacrifices you're gonna have to make in order to save the planet.
		Sacrifices like giving up your property rights, being forced into smart cities, and being injected with nanotechnology so they can track you down for thought crimes.
		Now, why anyone in their right mind would think it's a good idea to give the very elitists who destroyed the planet more power to now save the planet is beyond me.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		But we don't have a choice.
		It's beyond me as well. But we're not being asked whether we think it's a good idea.
		It's being imposed on us.
		We're going to get into the next hour the way that climate change is being used, the just absurd contradictions of climate change policy.
		Again, it's just absolute nonsense when it comes to the claims of climate change.
		We'll talk a little bit more about the censorship that they use, as well as what the ultimate purpose of this is, which is nothing less than global depopulation.
		And we'll explain exactly how that will come about and why they want it.
		They talk about all this.
		We don't have to come up with anything. It's not conspiracy theorizing anymore.
		It's just conspiracy theory.
		Illuminating. Conspiracy elucidating.
		Conspiracy describing.
		That's all we're doing here, and we'll continue to do it as we move into the second hour of American Journal.
		Please go to Infowarsstore.com.
		It may not have been called the Great Reset, But this is the exact program that Alex Jones has been describing, that he saw very early on.
		He saw those individual data points.
		He was able to draw the constellation in his mind and see the greater picture.
		He's been warning us ever since.
		That's why we're slated for destruction.
		Don't let it work.
		Go to Infowarsstore.com.
		We'll fight back. It seems like our very existence is just a constant attempt to fend off attacks People that are very quietly and subtly trying to destroy us.
		And every once in a while, you get a victory of some sort.
		For a long time, like InfoWars had to say, hey, check your plastics.
		Make sure they don't have BPAs.
		Finally, that gets some political clout, or corporate clout, and they start coming out with, hey, this is BPA-free.
		All right. Great.
		Wonderful. You know, aspartame and all this sort of stuff that you have to look for and go, make sure this isn't in here.
		Make sure you aren't eating seed oils.
		Make sure you aren't, you know, eating aluminum or any other, like, heavy metal.
		Like, you have to go in and Really take a look at the ingredients list on your food.
		There's a new thing that you might have to look for.
		There's a new thing that, in addition to them trying to shove down your throat metaphorically by insisting that you eat bugs, now they're trying to shove it down your throat by just putting the bugs in food and not telling you.
		This is an image of some cheddar cheese puffs.
		I think from a company called Actually Food.
		Nutritious, sustainable, delicious ingredients include puff.
		The number one ingredient is puff.
		And that's made out of organic cornmeal flour, lentil flour, flava bean flour, rice flour, and organic cricket flour.
		And then there's seasoning.
		And hold on, what? Organic cricket flour.
		Contains milk, crickets.
		People who are allergic to shellfish may also be allergic.
		To crickets. Uh-huh.
		Oh, my tummy's rumbling.
unidentified		Sorry. Ready for some cheesy poofs?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		That's what they mean by sustainable.
		Should we say it has bugs in it?
		No, no. Just write sustainable and we'll pretend like we're telling people that they're eating bugs.
		So check your labels, folks.
		You might be eating bugs already.
unidentified		So sustainable is now synonymous with bugs?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, this is the problem. Yeah, yeah. Sustainable is synonymous with bugs.
		But this is the problem with these buzzwords that they use because you have to have knowledge about this stuff.
		You have to actually know...
		What the real problems are in the world to identify where you're being scammed.
		Because my wife bought some new crackers or something and on the package it said, sustainably grown, sustainable wheat or whatever.
		And I was just like, oh God, what does this mean?
		I sort of rolled my eyes and I look at the package.
unidentified		How dare you?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		It turns out what they meant was they use soil rotation tactics that means the soil is not destroyed, meaning they don't have to use GMOs.
		And it's like, okay, that really is an issue.
		That really is an issue.
unidentified		We're keeping our eye on them.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		With very easy solutions.
		It's a good thing. So I'm like, oh, okay.
		I guess in this case, sustainable is actually, they actually are being sustainable.
		They're not like, we're sustainable, meaning we give millions of dollars to Klaus Schwab to offset our carbon.
		It's like, what the hell are you talking about?
		We put crickets in our crackers.
		That's why we're sustainable.
		So you have to know what this means.
		And the word sustainable sometimes is actually beneficial for the ecology of the earth.
		It means they're not using things like GMOs or other lab-created horrors to pretend to be sustainable when really they're not.
unidentified		Was Snowpiercer a blueprint for The Great Reset?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I never saw Snowpiercer, but I'm going to say yes, it was.
unidentified		There is a really great scene where they learn where the food comes from, and anybody who sees that movie and then is introduced to The Great Reset already knows what's going on.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Look, you're going to eat the bugs, folks.
		You're going to eat the bugs.
		You're going to live in a giant hive like bugs.
		You're going to be controlled by a single supercomputer that gives you orders through hormone manipulation like bugs.
		You're going to live in a little box like a bug.
		You're going to live and die with no offspring and no importance to your individual life like a bug.
		You're going to be a bug, folks.
		The Great Reset is the great buggining.
		The Great Becoming of Bugs.
		Oh, they're saying we're gonna start drinking pee and eating poop too?
unidentified		Alright, Cricket Crackers had a ring to it, but pee and poo is just a little too far.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Problem, reaction, solution.
		Problem, reaction, solution.
		It's the oldest trick in the book.
		I guess it's so effective because it works, because they can just use it over and over and over again.
		You create the COVID virus, you release the COVID virus, you lock down the entire world, you put the entire population of the planet under your de facto martial law.
		You inject them with horrific poison in the form of a vaccine.
		You force them to wear a mask.
		You destroy their children, their education, their mental capabilities.
		You destroy their connection to other human beings.
		You do it all for your own ends and it does nothing to actually solve the problem that you were originally intending to solve supposedly.
		And in fact, creates a whole other host of problems.
		You've got solutions for those too.
		It's a cyclical program that could not be more obvious, and yet they're getting away with it.
		And it is absolutely wild.
		Now, we've moved into the climate change part of the Great Reset, which of course has to be one of the most important parts.
		It is just the most useful thing they could possibly imagine, and they set it up brilliantly.
		They have people all over the world not just believing this lie, but carrying it out themselves, making their own gestures in their own lives to comport with the demands of people who tell them, you have to reduce your carbon, and by the way, you are carbon.
		Don't have children.
		Don't eat meat. Don't own anything.
		It's bad for the environment.
		Recycle. Perform your genuflection to the saint of the environment and perform this useless symbolic act of putting a can in one bin instead of another.
		You did it. You've saved the earth.
		You should feel good about yourself because you're better than everyone else.
		Here's the problem though. They have no idea, in reality, scientifically, what the problem is that they're trying to solve, or whether it's even a problem.
		Many of their predictions, in fact most, if not all of their predictions, have been completely and utterly fabricated wrong, false, incorrect.
		We've heard for years and years and years that the Great Barrier Reef was going to die because of global warming.
		The oceans were getting hotter, and just one degree change means everything dies.
		We're all dead. Until, of course, earlier this month when parts of the Great Barrier Reef were revealed to show the highest coral cover scene in 36 years.
		Well that's a very good thing I would say.
		Two-thirds of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia has recorded the highest amount of coral cover in nearly four decades.
		Fantastic. See that's great.
		It's great that They were wrong.
		But they were wrong about that, just like they're wrong about everything.
		Here's another example of them being wrong.
		The Arctic is warming four times faster than the rest of the planet, new research shows.
		Well, that's probably because of all of the heavy equipment in the Arctic.
		It's probably because of the industrial magnitude of the Arctic nation.
		It's probably producing more pollution than everywhere else.
		Or... You have no idea why anything is happening, and this is completely contrary to all of your predictions and all of your understandings and models of how the climate actually operates.
		And I'm not just saying that.
		They call it a phenomenon, the Arctic amplification.
		It's caused by heat-trapping emissions from burning fossil fuels.
		Of course it is. And it was four times higher in the North Pole than anywhere else on the planet.
		And this article from CNN says that's concerning because if models can't recreate what's happening now, scientists can't be confident in their long-term predictions.
		Well, no, they can't be confident in their long-term predictions.
		But it doesn't matter. They're still going to be.
		They're still going to treat their predictions as fabricated, nonsensical, and baseless as they are, as if they are the Word of God, as if they are unquestionable, settled science, and they will force you to make drastic changes in your life, up to and including dying.
		I'm not kidding. Euthanasia is a major point of contention right now.
		We'll get to some of those stories. But nothing short of human sacrifice to fulfill their desires based on these programs that utterly and completely fail to predict natural phenomena that we then see play out in real life.
		Yeah, concerning.
		CNN puts it as concerning.
		A little bit concerning, I guess.
		Let's talk about the real absurdity of the climate change program, climate change model.
		The entire thing is predicated on this idea that Carbon is the worst thing ever.
		Carbon comes from burning fossil fuels.
		We have to not burn fossil fuels.
		It means we can't have industry, which means we can't have cars.
		We can't have anything good or beneficial or first world because that's climate racism.
		But here's a bit of an issue. China isn't doing any of these things.
		China isn't slowing down its carbon production.
		China isn't moving away from coal.
		China isn't limiting its production or slowing down its growth.
		And the people that are funding it are the same people that are forcing us to do all of those things here.
		It's not an option. They will drive up the price of cars to prevent you from buying one.
	They will make it where it is just incredibly inconvenient to do anything other than follow their orders.
	At the same time, they're investing billions and billions and billions of dollars into coal power plants in China because they don't actually care, because they know that it's all fake.
	They are playing you, people.
	They are screwing with you.
	They're the most evil people in the entire world, and they know exactly what they're doing.
	This is from James Melville on Twitter.
	He says, annual CO2 emissions spot the problems.
	We've made drastic efforts to get our CO2 emissions down, and they're pretty low comparatively to China, which has shot up like a damn rocket and has no signs of slowing down anywhere in the slightest.
	So if these people, BlackRock and others, were serious about climate change, really thought it was an existential crisis, They would be, first of all, taking all of their investments out of China as rapidly as possible.
	They won't because they make money for it by doing that.
	And we may very well be going to war with China.
	I mean, if this is an existential crisis, America would be saying, you have to stop producing this pollution because you're killing all of us or we're going to have to forcibly stop you.
	We're not just not stopping them.
	It's our people.
	It's our fellow Americans that are the ones funding this operation in China.
	And I want to go down to clip number two, where it talks about BlackRock, the company that owns everything, imposing ESG, environmental, social, and government mandates, that is their New World Order ideology newspeak control mechanism, on American companies like Exxon and Chevron.
	But they don't say anything to PetroChina.
	They don't say anything other than have a billion dollars, have another billion dollars, have another billion dollars.
	That's the main line of communication between BlackRock and PetroChina, who is, of course, doing all the things that they...
	We'll destroy your company for doing here in America, because it's not hypocrisy.
	It's a conspiracy.
andrew ross sorkin ▲ ● ▼		Let's watch. Now have these sort of blue state, red state war taking place over this very issue in terms of how pension funds in those states are using and almost weaponizing.
		And I'm sure you'd say the blue states have weaponized it.
		We're watching the red states weaponize it.
		How can this be good for anybody?
unidentified		Look, I don't think the divisiveness in capital markets is good for anybody.
		We should leave that division to be sorted out through the political process through free speech and open debate as citizens.
		If climate change is a shared global challenge, then great.
		If it's an important enough issue as a political question, let's sort it out through the political process.
		But what we've seen over the last 10 years is, I agree with you, the weaponization of capital to say that we're going to settle that question through force, Through economic force, through capital force, with a small group of asset managers dictating how an entire industry behaves.
		But the good news, Andrew, is I think that has created an opportunity where energy stocks today trade at a discount to the market.
		Energy stocks have trailed U.S. tech.
		You know, a funny fact is actually over the last four years, since June of 2018 through the end of this last month, U.S. energy earnings actually outpaced those of U.S. tech companies, but stock prices dramatically underperformed over that same period.
		Why is that? It's that these large asset managers are ascribing a lower P.E. multiple, a lower value per unit of earnings to an energy company.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		So that can change. See, it's not about capitalism anymore.
		It's not about you give money to people who make money.
		It's about changing, just like to do with the A.I., If this is a program that's just running on numbers, you would get to a certain conclusion.
		They come in and impose their ideology and say, you're actually worth less.
		Even though you're making more money, you're worth less because you don't comply to the demands that we're making, that we're not making to companies in China, but we're only making to you to limit you, a small number of people using their power as asset managers to impose their will on the entire company and therefore the entire world.
		It's called stakeholder capitalism.
unidentified		How you get so much favor on your side?
		Accept them as your Lord and Savior, I reply.
		That's your love, that neighbor, not divide.
		I'm a ride. That's on God.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Climate change and how it plays into the, really is the linchpin to the Great Reset program and how little sense it makes.
		They don't have predictions that can actually accurately tell what's going to happen in the future.
		And yet they're making policy based on these predictions, but they're only implementing this policy in Western countries while funding the very same policies in places like China.
		None of it makes any sense.
		None of it makes very much sense at all.
		And yet, the latest things that the UK are doing...
		Make little sense it's baffling.
		Makes little sense it's almost impossible to describe.
		Scotland is making a big change for climate.
		It's doing a great thing.
		You're worried about climate change? Don't worry.
		Scotland's got you covered.
		You want carbon reduction?
		Well, they're going to do it.
		How are they going to do it? Cutting down 14 million trees.
		That's a headline. Scotland cuts down 14 million trees to make way for wind turbines.
		Scotland, site of the recent United Nations 26th Conference of the Parties, the COP26 Climate Summit, has cut down 14 million trees to make room for new power installation, wind power installations.
		As reported in the Herald, the tree removal was for 21 wind turbine projects.
		Hey, just about three quarters of a million tree per wind turbine project.
		I think that's a pretty good cutoff, don't you?
		I mean, what are they doing?
		How are these decisions being made?
		Who is stupid enough to fall for this?
		14 million trees being cut down to build 21 wind turbine projects, which, by the way, all have to be built with...
		Ton upon ton upon ton of steel and heavy metals and batteries running with lithium and heavy metal wires to the point that the investment of carbon that goes into creating one single turbine won't be accounted for by the energy that the wind turbine creates for about 20 years.
		So they'll cut down 14 million trees.
		They'll build 21 wind turbines.
		For 20 years, those will be carbon negative.
		If they last 20 years, which they hardly ever do, right?
		Then, for maybe another couple years, as long as the thing lasts, you'll produce a little bit of energy when the wind blows.
		And this is what they're proposing to you as a solution to the problem of climate change.
unidentified		But on the upside, they'll probably take that wood that they've chopped down.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Oh, I'm getting to that. I'm getting to what they'll do with the wood.
		Don't you worry about that.
		That's the next story. That's the next level of absurdity that we have been covering here at InfoWars for the last four years and that everybody else has suddenly decided to actually pay attention to.
		This article says the tree removal seems especially ironic given that the world leaders supposedly agreed to end deforestation by 2030 at the recent COP climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland.
		Yeah, you can hardly hear the speech over the sound of chainsaws in the background.
		They want to stop deforestation by 2030, so they're getting it all in now.
		I'm going to go on a diet tomorrow, so I'm going to eat a cake today.
		We're going to stop deforestation in 2030, so until then, we're going to get rid of all the trees.
		It's easy to stop deforestation when there are no more forests.
		I mean, there are two options here. You can stop cutting down trees.
		You can let nature thrive.
		You can build and foster natural environments where the earth itself absorbs carbon and puts out oxygen in the natural process that's been going on for billions of years.
		Or you can cut down all of the trees and then there's no more deforestation because there's no more forest to deforest.
		So, you know, either one I think is fine.
		So, yes, now we get to again the crowning jewel of this, because as I saw this story about Scotland cutting down 14 million trees.
		It brought to mind a story I'd covered in 2018.
		Because in 2018, there was a celebratory, wonderful headline saying the Drax energy plant in England has just gone for the first time ever 24 hours without burning coal.
		Yeah! Yeah, we're not burning coal!
		Climate change, we're doing it!
		We're so good! We didn't burn coal!
		And I thought, okay, what were they burning instead?
		It's just biomass.
		We're burning biomass. Well, that's not a word for a thing that anybody understands.
		So what does that mean? What are you covering up by coming up with fanciful, technical-sounding words?
		What does biomass mean?
		You do a little bit of research. What is biomass?
		You find out it's trees. You find out that the Drax power plant was burning old-growth trees harvested in Virginia, of all places.
		Crushed into pellets, sent across the ocean, burned for fuel.
		Smoke goes out in the atmosphere.
		They pat themselves on the back and say, we did it.
		We didn't produce any carbon today.
		We're carbon neutral. Crazy, right?
		This was four years ago, and we've talked about it several times since then.
		We have a video from a year ago from American Journal, weather manipulation.
		DEW's weather manipulation and biomass, how globalists destroy the environment.
		That was crazy. An entire year ago when we were talking about this, it was four years ago when I first made the video about Drax, and it just so happened that I searched Drax after seeing the Scotland story, and I find that there are some recent articles about it because it seems like now, four or five years later, they've actually looked at the proposals that they've been celebrating and decided this is really stupid actually.
		The UK's business secretary has admitted that importing US-made wood pellets to be burnt for energy by power company Drax is not sustainable and, quote, doesn't make any sense.
		Yes, we know. Quasi-Quartang...
		I always have trouble with these British names.
		It's something about British names. I don't know.
		Also told MPs that the government has not fully investigated the sustainability of burning wood pellets, a type of biomass.
		He said the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy has discussed biomass with industry, but we haven't actually questioned some of the premises of sustainability with pellets.
		I mean, but these people don't question anything, right?
		Because they're filled with fear.
		Because they're told, you have to do this.
		We're saving the earth. Don't ask questions.
		On its face, it would take a child to not be able to immediately point out the stupidity of this plan.
		But it's been going on for four years.
		For four years, they have burned millions of trees.
		That all took 100 years plus to grow.
		Entire swaths of Canadian forests have been cut down.
		Forests in Virginia, forests in Louisiana.
		Entire ecosystems razed to the ground, burned.
		The orcs of Isengard just thrown into a pit, burned for fuel, and they say we're being carbon neutral.
		And it took four years for people to go, well, hold on a second.
		Well, wait a second.
		Hold on here.
		I mean, it could not be more obvious.
		I'm just going to call him KK. KK said there's no point getting wood pellets from Louisiana that isn't sustainable, said KK. Shipping pellets from Louisiana, one of Drax's sourcing regions in the U.S., has a huge cost financially and environmentally.
		It doesn't make any sense to me at all, he added.
		Drax has been gradually converting its coal-fired power plants to biomass power, and it's seeking to reinvent itself as a green energy company.
		The company, which imports about 80% of the wood pellets it uses from the plant in North America, received nearly a billion dollars in government subsidies in 2020, and again, nearly another billion in 2019, according to analysis by think tank Ember.
		That's a good think tank name, Ember.
		It's like the result of our forest.
	It's like what our forest will eventually be.
	Burning husks, embers, ashes.
	Like our world will be.
	Like our lives will be.
	Like the Great Reset is doing to all of us.
	We are all the wood pellets and we're all being burned.
	Alright folks, welcome back.
	We're halfway through the show.
	We're sort of running out of time for me to get to all things that I want to about the Great Reset.
	But we'll continue to talk about the way climate is being utilized to create a control grid in this segment.
	In the next segment, we'll talk about what this is really leading to, what the ultimate outcome of this is, what is depopulation, how is it being achieved, and why would anybody want it?
	We'll answer all those questions.
	In the 10 o'clock hour, we will be joined by Dan Diamond and Clay Clark.
	Very excited to talk to both of these gentlemen about what's going on.
	We've got some important health news to talk about with Dan.
	As well as many other things. Remember, you support everything we do here by going to Infowarsstore.com.
	We have been the bastion, the outlet, the forward base confronting and waging this war of information against the Great Reset for as long as we've been on air.
	And we will continue to be as long as we remain on air.
	And that's entirely up to whether we can weather the storm that we're in right now.
	And we rely on you for that.
	Infowarsstore.com.
	Supermail Vitality is back in stock and it may be the last run ever.
	Infowars shuts down.
	You're not going to be able to buy this ever again.
	So, hey, maybe just as a keepsake, maybe just as a historical memento of a time when human beings still clung to the very remnants of the freedom that we once all enjoyed.
	You can save a little bottle in a safe somewhere, sell it for $100,000.
	50 years from now, 50 years from now, once we win and once people look back and realize what an important and powerful part InfoWars played in the reignition of human liberty and the re-inspiration of the great awakening against the great reset, InfoWarsStore.com is where you go to support us.
	Now, back to this topic of climate, climate change and stupid policies that do the opposite of what they're supposed to.
unidentified		Thank you.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		We know that these policies are not just being forced on us on the corporate level, in the governmental level, but they're going right out of their way to eliminate the profession of farming, starting in the Netherlands, where they want to buy large swaths of land to build hyper-dense, hyper-diverse cities.
		And so they're starving the farmers out, and they're doing it by limiting nitrogen, by claiming that nitrogen...
		I guess, contributes to global warming.
		Global warming, I mean, I'm sorry, climate change.
		I'm sorry, they had to change the name of global warming to climate change because of how stupid we are, because of how stupid I am.
		See, I'm so stupid, I don't understand how global warming can make the Earth cooler.
		So they had to change it to climate change because it's all fabricated, nebulous, and able to be altered at a whim for whatever purposes those in power want it to serve.
		Green elitism behind farmer crackdowns goes into this very extensively.
		You also have things like this that remind me a lot of the DRAC story.
		China to expand weather modification program to cover area larger than India.
		This was from 2020, actually, and we reported on it at the time.
		Now, two years later, people are going, well, now, wait a second.
unidentified		Should we ask questions about this?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Weather modifications by China need more discussions on its ethics.
		And maybe, you know, whether changing the weather of an area the size of India might have maybe downstream effects elsewhere in the climate since we are, in fact, a closed system in which one change in one place alters things elsewhere.
		But they've trained everybody to look around and when we're setting heat records or there's a mysterious snowstorm in the spring somewhere, they go, girl, climate change, we have to double down on our programs.
		When in reality... All of these bizarre occurrences could very well be the outcome of, at this point, five decades of spraying particles in the air to try to change the weather, shooting beams into the atmosphere to try to alter the course of clouds.
		They are mad scientists and they're playing with our lives and gambling, playing sort of Russian roulette with the existence on Earth.
		But all this is very useful.
		For a very simple reason.
		Scarcity creates rationing.
		Rationing creates top-down, total control of your very existence.
		We have these stories from the UK. Farmers haven't got a hope as hell as drought hits British vegetable harvests.
		Apples are baking on the branches.
		And hosepipe ban hits millions as England falls into drought.
		They mismanage everything.
		They create...
		Not good circumstances, but not unprecedented ones, but they present it as if it's an existential crisis, and then they use that to justify things like telling you, you cannot use the water that comes out of your hose.
		You have to stop using water.
		You have to stop eating meat.
		You have to stop being a farmer.
		You have to die now, because they want you to, because it's useful for them.
		And we'll go now to this video of Eva Vlardingerbroek, Talking about personal carbon wallets as an enforcement mechanism of this rationing, saying that you only get what the people above you want you to get, but they get whatever they want.
eva vlaardingerbroek ▲ ● ▼		Let's watch. Digital identity is not just a passport that you will have on your iPhone in a digital form.
		It entails just about everything the government would like to know about you.
		And yesterday in the Dutch media we saw a perfect example of what it could entail in the near future.
		We had the CEO of one of the largest Dutch banks say, why don't we start with a personal carbon credit?
		A carbon wallet, she called it, actually.
		So right in line with the plans that the World Economic Forum people have for us.
		And she said it in a way that was particularly funny.
		She said, well, if everyone gets an individual personal carbon credit, why don't we make it so that rich people who, for example, want to go on holiday a little too often can buy personal carbon credit from other people who, for example, can't afford Buying plane tickets or eating meat too often.
		So we can that way swap it out.
unidentified		Oh, so if Bill Gates or Leonardo DiCaprio's carbon footprint is getting a bit too big, then some peasant living in his hovel upcountry somewhere can sell his And he can't afford to go to San Tropez,
unidentified		but he'll be able to sell his carbon allowance to Leonardo DiCaprio so Leonardo can park his yacht in San Tropez for a couple of extra days.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		So it's a nice little dichotomy they have here where you can't go on vacation because you don't have enough Carbon credits, but you can, or you don't have enough money to go on vacation, so you can sell your carbon credits, but then you don't have enough carbon credits to go on vacation.
		It's a big scam, folks.
		It's a big, baseless, useless, purposeless scam.
		The only purpose it could possibly have is to control you at the level of your purchasing power, your ability to go anywhere, do anything, eat anything.
		Or anything. And your carbon will also, of course, be...
		Your carbon credits will be influenced by what a benefit you are.
		Bill Gates will have extra carbon credits because he's such a good guy.
		Because he's so helpful. Because he has so many programs that he does that are helping with climate change.
		Helping to kill hundreds of thousands of people.
		Lowering the overall carbon being used.
		Therefore, he can use his private jet to go to Tahiti.
		Or to hang out on some island somewhere.
		Off the U.S. Virginia, Virgin Islands with Jeffrey Epstein.
		You know, whatever he wants to do, he can do it because he's got the carbon credits.
		This is already coming into fruition.
		Let's go now to clip number four. Climate change is on the menu.
		U.K. restaurants showing customers' CO emissions of their food.
unidentified		Let's watch. Those are bugs.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		The menu at the canteen in Bristol, England.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		England doesn't just let diners know how much a dish costs.
unidentified		It also shows customers their carbon footprint.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Don't eat the duck.
		It costs more carbon than you have in your carbon bank wallet.
		100% vegetarian restaurant.
		First business to put carbon footprint on the menu.
		Wow, brilliant. Isn't that amazing?
		Let's pull that down. Let's combine that with clip number nine, the program already being rolled out in China, a machine that uses facial recognition to take payment for your lunch.
		Let's roll it. Just imagine how these things will work in tandem.
		Your carbon wallet will be tied to a digital central bank currency that will be tied to your biometric identity that will be a face scan or a thumb scan or maybe for convenience they'll just Mark you like a beast or a farm animal.
		And then what you eat will be graded on its carbon cost.
		And I think we've just created the ingredients to bake a tyranny cake.
		We've got the perfect recipe for totalitarian control of your very food.
		We're not going to finish up our coverage with Great Reset in this segment because we will be joined in the 10 o'clock hour by Clay Clark and Dan Lyman.
		And both these guys, again, the things we're going to talk about, they all have to do with the Great Reset.
		This is the zooming out of Infowars.
		This is the bird's eye view of what's really happening.
		We could get down the way.
		We could talk about the migrants and the borders.
		We could talk about COVID and IRS and the LGBT program being rolled out right now.
		All of these things are happening.
		Just arms of the deep state octopus, of the global government monster, the hydra that we're trying to slay.
		But, you know, I was getting a little worked up.
		I think I need to take a moment to do my mind moment, my positive affirmation.
		You might not know about this.
		Something Amazon does.
		This was posted by Connor Spence on Twitter.
		He says, Did you know that after every hour of work at Amazon, the computer taunts you with a 30-second break where you say mantras that help you come to peace with your own exploitation?
		It's the mind moment positive affirmation with a little countdown clock showing 30 seconds tells you to repeat these phrases during each expansion of the circle.
		Even in chaos I can feel peaceful.
		I notice the good.
		While socially distant, I am emotionally close.
		While socially distant, I am emotionally close.
		Better a gram than a dam.
		What is the phrase?
		I mean, you might as well sleep train us, right?
		You might as well just go full Brave New World.
		I just, what?
		What are you talking about, Amazon?
		So every hour you're working as the mindless robot slave of this multinational corporate conglomerate that owns everything.
		They want you to take a moment To breathe along with their robot and say, even though I'm being depopulated, I will not complain.
		Even though I own nothing, I will be happy.
		Even though I am a slave, I will feel good about myself.
		This is good.
		This is positive.
		And of course you know they have rank upon rank of psychologists all sitting there testing this out, going, what is the effectiveness?
		How many suicides are we preventing by demanding that our employees, our slaves, are forced to participate in a spiritualist mantra chanting of acceptance of their position in life?
		Wild. Wild, horrific.
		It makes me want to scream.
		It makes me want to destroy this computer.
		I can't imagine working at Amazon and not just burning the place down after a single day.
		I don't know. After eight times in a single day, I'm presented with, you must feel peaceful in the chaos.
		You must feel worth it when we're depopulating you.
		I will not have children.
		I am not an individual.
		Everyone belongs to everyone else.
		Everything is good.
		Everyone's happy now.
		Just go ahead and sleep train us.
		Just do the sleep training from Brave New World.
		I would at least rather have it injected into my subconscious at night than have to actively participate in the indoctrination.
		But that's what it's like working one of these corporate things.
		And that's the thing. Socialists especially.
		If you watch a socialist community or something, they hate Jeff Bezos.
		They hate Amazon. And they're like, and we've got to do something about climate change.
		And God, all these people having kids are so selfish.
	It's just like, what are you missing about what's going on here?
	How are you confused by the fact that Amazon, in its exploitative, horrific, domineering, monopolistic practices, is serving the every desire of the people that you think are awesome and cool and the experts that we all have to listen to?
	I don't know. I don't get it.
	They must be stupid. And all of this, of course, is leading to depopulation.
	It's not... Up for debate.
	They aren't debating whether depopulation is a good thing or a bad thing.
	It's not up to debate as to whether depopulation is the endgame.
	It absolutely is. They're telling us it is.
	The story that's gone viral today is not new.
	It's just they keep saying it, so there's more stories about it.
	We just don't need the vast majority of the population, says top WEF advisor Harari.
	Yuval Noah Harari, one of the WEF's top advisor and close friend of the group's founder, Klaus Schwab, is back in the news after making outlandish remarks fit for a Bond villain Speaking with the TED Audio Collective podcast last week, Harari promoted the post-Great Reset dystopia for humanity.
	Saying part of what's going on, people realize they're correct in thinking, the future doesn't need me.
	It doesn't need you.
	It doesn't need Yuval Noah Harari.
	For every word Noah Harari has written in a book, for every hour they've spent as academics just coming up with rhetorical flourishes to justify their dystopian genocidal agenda, they should be forced to dig a ditch.
	They should be forced to do something useful like dig a ditch or provide a body shield in a war zone somewhere, something that they actually give purpose to.
	The dude pumping gas, he has a purpose for – he helps people.
	He's got a family and people that love him, and he's got dreams and goals, and he provides a service people want to pay for.
	You all know Harari is just a useless eater that spends his entire time coming up with plans and ideas and again rhetorical flourishes, rhetorical clever camouflage to disguise the horrific program that he's helping put forward.
	So he's not just useless, he's a negative to the world.
	Far, far more than even the most So-called useless member of our society.
	Even people that just play video games all day, they might not contribute, but at least they're not actively depriving us of goodness like Yuval Noah Harari is.
	And again, this is nothing new.
	We're going to go down to a video of back when Yuval Noah Harari was, he actually had black hair.
	He's a very young-looking gremlin in this video.
	Clip number eight.
	Here's him describing this years and years ago.
unidentified		Let's watch. In the Industrial Revolution of the 19th century, what humanity basically learned to produce was all kinds of stuff, like textiles and shoes and weapons and vehicles.
		And this was enough for very few countries that underwent the revolution fast enough to subjugate everybody else.
		What we're talking about now is like a second industrial revolution, but the product this time will not be textiles or machines or vehicles or even weapons.
		The product this time will be humans themselves.
		We are basically learning to produce bodies and minds.
		Bodies and minds are going to be, I think, the two main products of the next wave of all these changes.
		And if there is a gap between those that know to produce bodies and minds and those that do not, then this is far greater than anything we saw before in history.
		And this time, if you're not part of the revolution fast enough, then you probably become extinct.
		Once you know how to produce bodies and brains and minds, so cheap labor in Africa or South Asia or wherever, it simply counts for nothing.
		Again, I think that the biggest question maybe in economics and politics of the coming decades will be what to do with all these useless people.
		I don't think we have an economic model for that.
		My best guess, which is just a guess, is that food will not be a problem.
		With that kind of technology, you will be able to produce food to feed everybody.
		The problem is more boredom.
		What to do with them and how will they find some sense of meaning in life when they are basically meaningless, worthless?
		My best guess at present is a combination of drugs and computer games.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Drugs and computer games will be used to keep the useless people occupied and distracted so they don't rise up against these scumbags and put them in their place.
		These people need to be brought to heel.
		You can't just talk like that and get away with it, especially not when you're the advisor to the most powerful people in the world.
		Something has to be done.
		And of course, this is nothing new.
		It's not even anything speculative or academic.
		It's being enacted and an advisor to a former French president actually went on record to reveal this depopulation agenda.
		Let's go down to clip number 18.
unidentified		There will be more and more, and especially, finally, the stupid.
		Euthanasia directed at these groups.
		Euthanasia must be an essential instrument of our future societies in all cases.
		Of course, we will not be able to execute people or organize camps.
		We will get rid of them by making them believe that it is for their own good.
		Emigrate while you still can.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		This audio is kind of messing up, but there you see her mention euthanasia as a process by which people will be willingly put down.
		There's a story from AP News saying, disturbing, experts troubled by Canada's euthanasia law.
		This from the 11th of this month, this year.
		Alan Nichols was one of the people who was, his family says, essentially put to death and allowed to be euthanized because he suffered from, you know, Depression.
		Hearing loss was the only thing actually listed as a condition under which he was suffering.
		But you see here it's already playing out.
		Roger Foley, who has a degenerative brain disorder and was hospitalized in London, Ontario, was so alarmed by staffers mentioning euthanasia that began secretly recording their conversations.
		Where they talk about to him how much it will cost to keep him in the hospital, saying, maybe it's better if you just die to save us $1,500 a day, coercing him and guilting him into euthanasia for the benefit of others.
		Everyone belongs to everyone else, and it's selfish for you to live.
		Yuval Noah Harari says so from his private jet.
		Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
		Third hour of American Journal has begun, coming to you live from the InfoWars headquarters here in Austin, Texas.
		Still glad just to be on air.
		Glad to be alive. Glad to be where we should be.
		Where we should all be. Fighting back against this new world order with everything we've got.
		Yesterday we covered the story of Anne Heche, the mysterious and largely unexplained crash that apparently resulted in her being brain dead and eventually taken off life support.
		to die and the video went absolutely viral on Bandai Video.
		Thank you to everyone who shared it and watched it and helped get this information out.
		Since then, yesterday we were asking a lot of questions.
		We were saying, from my reading, it doesn't make a lot of sense.
		It doesn't make a lot of sense to say she was brain dead, and yet she literally is bursting out of a body bag.
		It was creepy. It was weird. It was very unexplained.
		Since then, none of these questions have been answered.
		None of this has become more clarified.
		If anything, it has all been made clear.
		Less clear. It has all been made more confusing as we now have this new footage of Anne Heche filmed on the ground of her again waking up apparently and trying to bust her way out of the body bag footage.
		So it was creepy enough the video from the bird's eye view from the helicopter view of this poor woman Again, bursting her way out of a body bag, having her entire head and face wrapped up in a sheet as she throws off of herself.
		She tries to climb up. The bird's eye view thing was creepy.
		We heard the guy yesterday who was watching it live.
		Oh my god, what just happened?
		I've never seen anything like this. It was creepy.
		But this side view is even creepier still.
		And you again just see the terror and desperation.
		I mean it looks like a zombie movie.
		It is unbelievably creepy.
		And again, I am not making light of the situation or making fun of this poor woman.
		I want to know what happened here.
		What is going on?
		Because this side angle view just makes the whole thing look even worse.
		And again, I don't know if we can go back to that video from yesterday, the 50-second one, because there's a good chunk where they're walking the gurney up to the ambulance.
		And I think that's important because you can see the whole time, not only is the body still, it is covered in a body bag.
		And it's another one of those things that I've not seen any answer to say, well, this is standard practice.
		It's standard practice when you have somebody who's injured and To completely cover their entire body, including their mouth, face, eyes, and everything in a blanket, and to strap them down with that blanket.
		So again, you can see it's not just, she wasn't struggling the whole time, right?
		It'd be one thing if she's just like in pain and kind of freaking out, maybe on drugs, you know, whatever the situation is, and she's freaking out the whole time, and they're pushing her with the gurney, but for the entire time that they're walking up, you can't see an inch of her skin because she's covered completely, and it looked like strapped down.
		So they should cover her completely, put her in a bag of some sort, or put the blanket completely over her face, and wheel her to the ambulance, only to have her burst out and try to escape the instant before she's physically shoved inside.
		So again, it's that lead-up that I think gives more context and inspires the questions.
		And you can see the strap.
		She pushes the strap off her.
		The strap was keeping her down.
		Probably keeping her hands at her side.
		And she was able to push back.
		And even there you can see the skin.
		She doesn't look...
		I imagine she is burned.
		But usually when somebody is severely burned, you can tell.
		Her skin looks fine there.
		Maybe it's not, but again, it was said that a traumatic head injury cut off the oxygen flow to her brain.
		Again, my understanding is an injury that traumatic would have to be inflicted during the actual crash itself, not as a subsequent action to the crash.
		I don't think it was...
		I mean, it wasn't. They called it an anoxic brain injury.
		They didn't say that she suffocated.
		They didn't say that she wasn't getting oxygen into her lungs.
		It was the veins were cut off, the arteries that pump the oxygen-rich blood to the brain that was blocked off.
	And yet then why is she able to act like that?
	Another angle adding even more questions to this Anne Heche story.
	We'll be back with Dan Lyman. Don't go anywhere.
	Welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, Harrison Smith here, your host of The American Journal.
	Third hour has begun. My guest, first part of the hour, is Dan Lyman.
	You know him well. He is the foreign correspondent for InfoWars and the editor for InfoWars Europe.
	He covers many prominent issues including geopolitics, immigration, elite gatherings such as Bilderberg and the World Economic Forum.
	You can find his website at europe.infowars.com.
	Borderhawk.news is another wonderful resource.
	His Twitter is at RealDanLyman.
	Thanks so much for coming on, Dan. Always a pleasure to be with you, Harrison.
	Well, there's a lot of topics that we can talk about that I know you're very interested in.
	The Border, of course, with BorderHawk.News.
	But I've been talking about the Great Reset this whole show and just trying to take the most zoomed-out, bird's-eye view perspective on this entire thing.
	And I have a couple stories that I think relate to the depopulation agenda and the weakening agenda and how it is specifically targeting men and manliness and manhood.
	And I know you talk a lot about that You know, from crocs to just behavior in public, there's a lot to be, a lot missing from our population these days.
	What do you think the state of men is worldwide right now?
dan lyman ▲ ● ▼		Well, as we know, it's not healthy.
		We can see—I think one of the biggest symptoms is, of course, the targeting of children right now and how little is being done to stand up for them and the horrific butchery of children.
		And really, no one is interceding on their behalf successfully at this point.
		I do think that that tide will probably turn soon enough.
		But it shows the lack of male influence on society right now, or at least a strong, you know, A decent, maybe God-fearing type of male influence on society.
		So, you know, it is spiraling out of control in that regard.
		And we see, of course, you know, the medical data backs that up.
		We see that testosterone is plummeting in men.
		We see that sperm count is plummeting in men.
		So we do see that men are being diminished in their power.
		And I am an advocate for men to return to monkey, so to speak.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right. Well, and of course, you know, if you look at testosterone and things like that, you see that the perspective in the media is testosterone is what makes men angry and aggressive and violent or that sort of thing.
		That couldn't be farther from the truth.
		That might be an aspect of it, but studies have shown that higher testosterone actually makes people's judgment more fair, not more one-sided, not more angry, but more fair.
		And a high testosterone is actually necessary to be calm when they lower testosterone in monkeys.
		We find that the monkeys become both submissive and And aggressive, which is exactly how we're seeing our population going, and that's the exact story I wanted to talk to you about.
		Left-leaning men become more conservative after testosterone boost.
		That's the story at InfoWars.
		Have you had a chance to look into this, and what do you read from this?
		Democratic-leaning men become more conservative after taking supplements that boost their testosterone.
dan lyman ▲ ● ▼		I did see that, actually.
		We just published that this morning.
		And that actually probably goes hand in hand with other studies that have shown that Republicans are more attractive than Democrats.
		And that's basically when humans are in their natural state, the way that God made them, the way that they're supposed to be.
		Everything else is generally going to fall into place.
		And what we have here is a total assault on our physical beings, which then translates to a decline in our mental and emotional state.
		So that's kind of what we're seeing here.
		And we see these totally effeminate males running the country now, and then men pretending to be women running the country as well.
		And then, of course, plenty of women running the country.
		So, you know, it's really a toxic brew, so to speak, when you have people like Macron, Trudeau, Schultz, Biden in charge of things.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, you can really just list all of them, right?
		right?
		There's very few that actually don't fit this mold of the weird effeminate tyrant.
		It's very bizarre.
		There's another story that came out recently.
		This was from August 6th, sort of in the same line of what you were saying.
		Study identifies facets of American conservatism that differentially predict negativity, bias, and life satisfaction.
		Essentially, what it says is that people that consider themselves conservative or more traditional seem to get upset and have a stronger negative reaction to things, but also report higher levels of happiness and life satisfaction than their liberal counterparts.
		This reminds me of the Teddy Roosevelt quote where he says, You know, far better is it to dream glorious dreams, to try for something and fail, than to live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat.
		I mean, this is sort of what we're being created, formed into this image of the mediocre.
		Neither great nor terrible.
		Life is never fantastic or awful.
		It's just always this mid-grade sort of buzz that we exist in.
		What's your take on this?
dan lyman ▲ ● ▼		Well, it sounds like you're describing globo-homo, and many people don't understand that.
		Actually, the homo part is homogeneity, and that is basically where humanity is one kind of grayish mass of underachieving and underhappy and depressed And generally just unable to rise to, you know, the challenges that our ancestors have risen to, the ancestors that built these great civilizations.
		And so, you know, I think that's what we're seeing here.
		We're just seeing mediocrity across the board.
		And I think that's exactly what the globalists want, because mediocrity does not pose a challenge to their hegemony.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right. And if you don't have the ability to get very upset and get very angry and have a very strong negative emotion, you're never going to do anything to change the situation that you're in.
		I think you're exactly right. And I don't know if you were watching the last hour.
		We finished it by playing a clip from Yuval Noah Harari, who just came out and said, the way we keep these, as he calls them, useless people occupied is computer games and drugs.
		I mean, and I would add, you know, pornography to that as well.
		I mean, these are... The methods by which they're rolling out their program, can you talk a little bit about that, the way young men are being distracted from their purpose in life?
dan lyman ▲ ● ▼		Oh, certainly. I am totally, you know, in general, I'm opposed to video games.
		I know there are plenty of video game players in the audience and, you know, more power too.
		That's fine. But I think in general, we have a lot of young men, especially the youngest ones, you know, the ones that are like 8, 10, 12 years old who are just coming up, who are spending so much time in front of the screen rather than outdoors playing.
		I heard a recent story.
		I can't remember who told it, but it was a friend of mine.
		And he was saying that the lacrosse program in his town was suffering because the kids were either not showing up to practice enough or they just weren't energized when they got there because they were spending all night playing video games.
		And it was the coach that was saying that.
		And it was really just, you know, I can totally picture that.
		All these kids that are just playing games all night, Fortnite or Call of Duty or whatever.
		And really investing their energy and their time and their kind of warrior instincts into those kinds of pursuits rather than being outside, playing in the great outdoors, playing sports, competing hand to hand against other boys, other men.
		And so I think that's kind of what we're seeing.
		And I think that's another thing the globalists love.
		They love the lockdowns.
		They love seeing that people spend so much time on their couches becoming basically blobs, former shells of themselves.
		And they love the fact that people will either be trapped in front of a screen or, in the case of VR, trapped in the screen.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right. I love how you put it.
		Yeah, they are becoming blobs.
		And we don't want blobs.
		Like, Dan and I think we both agree we don't want to be surrounded by a bunch of blobs.
		We don't want to be blobs ourselves.
		We want human beings that can stand upright and fight for themselves, even if they disagree with us, even if we might not like them.
		At least you're strong, right?
		I mean, what is it...
		What does it take to get people to understand that, like, we want everyone to be strong and the people that...
		Here's how I'll put it. In your personal life, if you had somebody who was going through some stuff, you wouldn't go, look, I'm going to buy you the latest video game console.
		I'm going to give you some drugs.
		I'm going to give you weed and a subscription to the premium porn sites, and this will get you through it.
		You know these things make it worse.
		So if you wouldn't give this advice on a personal level, why do we accept our elites giving us this advice on a mass level?
dan lyman ▲ ● ▼		No, absolutely. If I had a friend that was going through a difficult time, maybe was finding difficulty to get motivated, the first thing I would do is either take them on a walk or a run in the great outdoors, in the sunshine, in the fresh air, or I would take them into my home gym and just hang out and talk and get the blood flowing and pump up those testosterone levels.
		Women need a completely different approach, but a lot of them do benefit, of course, from lifting heavy things or just getting exercise or fresh air.
		With these lockdowns, we're seeing what How many people were totally fine with kind of going along with that which speaks to the mental state and the emotional state of people and then of course it translates into this total degeneration and now we're seeing that we're living amongst what I call the pajama people now in public.
		People would rather be comfy and cozy and safe than they would be living dangerously like proper Americans.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right. Proper human beings, proper men, proper women.
		You're absolutely right. We're going to be back on the other side to talk more with Dan Lyman.
		I think there's the beginnings of a pushback.
		I'm not raising my son to even know what video games are.
		And I think a lot of people now are realizing how damaging this is.
		is there is some pushback we'll talk about on the other side welcome back folks talking to dan lyman about the great reset and the effects it's having on men or the necessity that it requires that it be be rid of men It gets rid of the protector.
		You know, I was watching... This just randomly came to my mind.
		I was watching...
		I don't even know what it was, but it was a person talking about picking victims...
		That they would... Oh, I remember what it was.
		It was something about child trafficking, and it was about child endangerment, and it was a guy who had been busted for doing something with a child, and the way that he would do it was he would always find single mothers, and he would go up to them, and he would say, look, you're busy.
		You deserve a break.
		Let me take the kid for a day.
		You go treat yourself, and of course, that was his method of getting in with the little kid and getting private time with them, and he goes, yeah, and you...
		If there was a man in the picture, I didn't get close.
		I wrote it off entirely. I would never approach anyone except for a single mother who seemed frazzled, and then I'd offer my help to her as a way to get to her kid.
		And I was like, am I listening to Klaus Schwab right now?
		I mean, this is the tactic that they're taking.
		And again, if it works on a personal level, all you have to do is extrapolate that to the higher level.
		But let's just...
		Talk a little bit more, Dan, about the way that men provide this necessary role of protection in our society.
dan lyman ▲ ● ▼		Well, you know, I was actually thinking about that half an hour ago.
		I was watching this video in Spain.
		I think it was Barcelona.
		And it was basically a mob of African migrants who were overpowering the police there and pushing them out.
		So effectively, in that moment, at least, it's a de facto no-go zone when the police cannot enter an area Without conflict or feeling like they have to leave, actually, then it becomes a no-go zone.
		Of course, those exist across Europe.
		And I was thinking about that and thinking how...
		We have such a degraded male—the men in the West are becoming so degraded.
		However, we're being totally overrun by men from other parts of the world who are not and are very aggressive, and they don't play by these woke rules, so to speak, for lack of a better term.
		And they're not worried about conflict.
		I mean, they look for it. They actively look for it.
		And that's happening in the United States as well.
		You have very, very aggressive— We're good to go.
		Untainted men, in a way, whereas Western men are very tainted and have been degraded so heavily.
		And so we are facing a reckoning by these people coming into our country and overrunning our country and overrunning countries in Europe.
		And it's showing. It's showing in the lawlessness.
		It's showing, you know, I tell our viewers often, If we wanted to make a separate spinoff site just for crime in France committed by migrants, we could overload it every day.
		And it is male migrants committing absolutely heinous crimes all day, every day across France.
		We just published a story yesterday.
		Uh, a, a, uh, a man from Africa beheaded his own father in the street and was walking around with the bloody blade yelling, uh, you know, jihadist slogans and, uh, he killed his own father.
		I mean, that is just, uh, on the next level.
		So imagine what he would do to your family if given the chance.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
		And, you know, as much as we're talking about men here, I have to think about the role of women in this.
		And I always think of that scene in 300.
		I bring it up all the time on the show, but the scene where he kicks him down, the This is Spartan. He kicks him down the well, right?
		It's an invader coming to your kingdom and asking you, just be weak.
		Just go ahead and be weak for us and let us take over.
		And there's the moment right before he kicks, he turns to the queen and the queen gives him a little nod.
		And I always think this is the dichotomy.
		The man is there to enforce the will, but the women got to be the ones going, hey, go get that guy.
		Hey, you got to protect me.
		Don't let me get screwed over.
		Go protect me and be the man that you're supposed to be.
		I think when women instead go, whoa, whoa, if women are allowing the fear of conflict or whatever, what do you think the role of women is in all of this?
		And I think we need more women just demanding that men do something because men do what women say.
		Whether you like it or not, that's the power dynamic there.
dan lyman ▲ ● ▼		No, absolutely. And we've seen kind of the rise of the quote-unquote the mama bear.
		We've seen that in these meetings with these heinous school boards and they're challenging them.
		So we do need that. The unfortunate thing is that we've let things go for so long and just...
		Slide so far out of control that it now is going to take an all-hands-on-deck approach to even attempt to right the ship.
		So, yeah, women do have to get involved.
		Maybe there was a time when they could have stayed at home and been homemakers and kept their heads down and just enjoyed their lives and their babies.
		But at this point, we're so far past that, yes, we do need them to be involved.
		We need them propping up their men, and we need them in the fight as well.
		So, I mean, we're just speaking about the men specifically, but The women have just as important a role to play in defending our civilization, defending our children.
		And so, yeah, all hands on deck.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, and there it is. The men are willing to do it, but women in a lot of ways lead the charge or can throw a wrench in the works.
		Now, when you say mama bear, you might picture them being cuddly and friendly.
		No, the idea is that the mother bear will slaughter you if you get in between her and her child.
		It's an aggressive protection that we require right now.
		There are some changes happening here.
		Here's a story from Infowars.com I want to get your opinion on.
		London's sex change clinic for kids shut down and sued by a thousand families.
		So this was the Tavistock Identity Clinic in London, and it's been operating with impunity since 1983.
		It's been shut down now, and over 1,000 families are suing them for basically expediting and speeding up the process of putting kids on testosterone blockers.
		Is this the beginning of a pushback as people realize what the real agenda is and the damage that's being done?
unidentified		No.
dan lyman ▲ ● ▼		No doubt. I think there are things starting to happen.
		I believe it was last night on Tucker, he was exposing this creature from California, I think a professor there, who has said that they will ship the hormone blockers around.
		They're basically setting up a network to ship hormone blockers to kids if they can't access them.
		And Matt Walsh has actually declared war on this person, which is great.
		And so we're starting to see an actual pushback.
		And, you know, it's been a long time coming.
		And that's what I think when the globalists really are advancing the agenda full speed now, as they are across the board, they do run the risk of waking up too many people at once and maybe having some of their plan foiled, if not all of it.
		So, I mean, we are in a race for humanity at this point, and we're going to start seeing good things happen in addition to all the bad.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right. They're both going to accelerate as these psychopaths in power see their plans crumbling.
		They're not just going to give up. They're not going to go, oh, sorry, we thought you liked this.
		They're going to double down. They're going to go even harder.
		They're going to launch more propaganda, more brain-destroying chemicals and all that sort of stuff.
		But we will likewise up our efforts.
		I know Dan Lyman is an incredibly powerful voice in this.
		Thank you so much for being with us, Dan.
		Europe.infowars.com, borderhawk.news.
		His Twitter is at Real Dan Lyman.
		I do suggest you follow him because just ton of good information and especially borderhawk.new.
		Share these links, share these stories, and share the mind of Dan Lyman because it's people like this that hopefully can get us back on track and we can all be humans again.
		Men, women, children. We can all be what we're supposed to be and fight back against those trying to make us into something we're not.
		Thanks so much for coming on, Dan.
dan lyman ▲ ● ▼		Always a pleasure, Harrison, and glad to see you back on the American Journal throne after a brief illness.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, I'm here as long as possible.
		The globalist will not keep me down.
		And I'll be back on the other side with Clay Clark of The Thrive Time Show.
		We're going to talk to him about a whole host of other issues when it comes to the Great Reset, including how they are already enacting If you're like myself and so many other people on this planet,
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		especially as you get older, you gain weight, even if you eat a lot less.
		But I gotta tell you, InfoWars is only about bringing you amazing products that really work.
		So we looked at the supplement market that we fund a lot of our operations with, and we said, what are the best-selling, natural, healthy, anti-fat weight loss products that are out there?
		We went and looked at the top ten, and they all had the same ingredients in common that is in this product.
		But with our new product from X7, DietForce, We got the very best concentrates of these known natural essences that just do amazing things for your body.
		And so I've lost almost 40 pounds.
		I'm still a little bit overweight in the last three months, and I've been doing it using DietForce and also exercise.
		Well, now DietForce is exclusively available right now at Infowarsstore.com, 40% off.
		Infowarsstore.com, DietForce.
		You need to take this product.
		It really works. The globalists are doing everything they can to destroy heterosexual relationships, to annihilate the family, to split up marriages.
		And if you look at the studies, the number one cause of marriages breaking up is the fact that the men cannot satisfy their women in the bedroom.
		It's that simple, ladies and gentlemen.
		And even if you're like me and hardly ever have a problem, I mean, all of us at one point or another do.
		That's just the truth. The liberals will make fun of that, but everybody knows that's true.
		But whether you rarely have any issues or have them on a regular basis, InstaHeart is the number one best-selling natural herbal supplement in the world when it comes to male enhancement because it really works.
		It also gives you a ton of energy.
		And you can find it at TheIronPatriot.com.
		That just takes you to their website, but then we get some of the credit as a sponsor.
		So go to TheIronPatriot.com today, watch their informational videos, read the literature, and then get your InstaHard in the mail today when seconds matter.

▲