Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
You're listening to the American Journal with your host Harrison Smith. | |
| Watch it live right now at Banned.video. | ||
| Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to The American Journal. | ||
| Big, big show we have for you today. | ||
| We'll be joined by Nick Fuentes in the 9 o'clock hour to talk about the new movie that he's releasing, the documentary that has been rejected, banned, forbidden. | ||
| ...by numerous outlets, but the show must go on, and they'll be doing a massive premiere in Las Vegas, so he'll be coming on to tell us all about that event in the third hour. | ||
| We'll be joined by Robert Owens of the National Council of the John Birch Society to talk about a number of different topics, and we're also going to have a follow-up today from Simon. | ||
| There was a web-exclusive posted yesterday at band.video talking all about the high drama... | ||
| Welcome to my show! | ||
| The left's biggest nightmare is running for Arizona governor. | ||
| Find and share this video at band.video. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. What do you think the most important issue for your state is? | |
| We've got a couple of important issues. | ||
| We have a wide open border. | ||
| We have fentanyl pouring in. | ||
| We have the cartels with operational control. | ||
| But that wouldn't be happening if we would have fair, honest elections. | ||
| We had a fraudulent election, a corrupt election, and we have an illegitimate president sitting in the White House. | ||
| And because of that, our border is wide open. | ||
| Five and a half tons of fentanyl was confiscated last year, enough to kill over two billion people. | ||
| It's a weapon of mass destruction. | ||
| And that's why we're going to secure that border starting on day one, after I take my hand off Without the Bible, we are going to issue a declaration of invasion. | ||
| We're going to finish President Trump's wall. | ||
| And we're going to send our armed National Guard to the border and stop people from coming across. | ||
| Just to circle back, you say that it's an illegitimate president. | ||
| You say that the election was stolen. | ||
| You speak a lot about this on the campaign trail, talking about the 2020 election. | ||
| This is the Arizona House Speaker, Rusty Bowers, testifying in front of Congress last week. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Anywhere, anyone, anytime has said that I said the election was rigged, that would not be true. | |
| There was no evidence being presented of any strength. | ||
| He's a Republican, he's a Trump supporter, and that's what he said. | ||
| He's a rhino. Here's what we have. | ||
| 740,000 ballots that have no chain of custody. | ||
| They cannot be authenticated and they should not have been counted. | ||
| 34,000 ballots that were counted two, three, and four times. | ||
| People who moved who still voted in our election. | ||
| There's a mountain of evidence and I wish that the corporate media would start covering it instead of putting their head in the sand and acting like it didn't happen. | ||
| I understand what you're saying, but there have been, as you know, more than 70 court cases where there was not evidence and there was not any state legislature or governor that failed to certify an election, including your own Republican, Doug Ducey. | ||
| We did not have any court cases where the evidence was presented. | ||
| We now have evidence that is admissible in a court of law, and I believe the day will come where we have that court case. | ||
| We have an AG, Mark Bernadette, who has sat on a mountain of evidence and done nothing, including video evidence. | ||
| We have the true the vote evidence. | ||
| We have people who do not want to uncover the truth about our election. | ||
| When I'm governor, we're going to get to the bottom of it. | ||
| We thank you, and we'll cover the primary. | ||
| Thank you. Please send reporters out to cover this corrupt election. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We would appreciate it. Thank you. | |
| Absolutely incredible. | ||
| That again is the latest from Darren McBreen. | ||
| Game changer. The left's biggest nightmare is running for Arizona governor. | ||
| Nothing terrifies the establishment like an outspoken patriot, especially a woman. | ||
| Oh no, they can't use half of their attacks anymore. | ||
| Carrie Lake really does represent a danger to this entire corrupt, fetid, rotted out establishment. | ||
| And wouldn't it be nice to see 50 of her running 50 states? | ||
| Wouldn't we be back on track if only we could elect people like that? | ||
| We'll be back on the other side with your Daily Dispatch. | ||
| Don't go anywhere, folks. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to the America Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| As I said previously, just a gargantuan show we have for you today. | ||
| We'll be joined by Nick Fuentes. | ||
| A little bit later, we'll be joined by Robert Owens of the John Birch Society, talking about a number of different topics. | ||
| Lots of guests today. | ||
| We're also going to be expecting a call from Simon... | ||
| If you went to band.video yesterday or infowars.com, you may have seen that we put up a web exclusive shortly after the show yesterday. | ||
| We decided to stay late and film a little bit extra because while I covered it on the show, it may have come through that I'm not the most well-versed in the intricacies of British parliamentary nonsense. | ||
| I'm sorry, politics nonsense. | ||
| So we covered what was happening with all the resignations, but I couldn't give you too much detail, so we decided to stay late and film an extra segment with Simon, who was extremely well-versed in what was going on. | ||
| And so if you want to know all of the behind-the-scenes machinations that brought us to this point... | ||
| Then you can go check out that video, but Simon should be calling in a little bit later to update us as to what the latest is. | ||
| So we'll be opening up the phone lines nice and early this morning. | ||
| That video on band.video, waves of resignations threatened to destroy UK government. | ||
| Go check that out. I think that was the one from the show yesterday. | ||
| I think that was different than the web exclusive. | ||
| We had a different web exclusive up there. | ||
| What was the web exclusive called? | ||
| Tomorrow's news today. We're good to go. | ||
| That's right. Boris Johnson has announced his resignation today, Thursday. | ||
| Johnson said he would stay until a conservative party picks a new leader, despite multiple people, including his latest two cabinet appointments, calling on him to step down immediately amid an ethics scandal. | ||
| Dozens of ministers and officials in his conservative government have resigned this week. | ||
| British Treasury Chief Nodham Zahawi... | ||
| I'm going to call him... | ||
| Simon Jones, one of Johnson's closest allies, told him to resign on Thursday for the good of the country just two days after he was appointed by the Prime Minister. | ||
| He says, Prime Minister, this is not sustainable and will only get worse for you, for the Conservative Party, and most importantly for all of the country. | ||
| Johnson said in a letter to Johnson, you must do the right thing and go now. | ||
| Education Secretary Michelle Donilon, who was also appointed on Tuesday following the resignation of her predecessor, announced her resignation Thursday morning. | ||
| Resignation upon resignation causing the entire parliamentary facade to collapse, leaving UK in an uncertain state at this time where certainty sure would be appreciated. | ||
| So we'll get into that a little bit later today. | ||
| As I said before, go to band.video to see our very thorough explanation of the goings-on yesterday. | ||
| Meanwhile, folks, the Georgia Guidestone Monument has been completely destroyed after an explosion. | ||
| A Georgia monument that drew curious visitors and was derided by a gubernatorial candidate as satanic was destroyed Wednesday after authorities said someone detonated an explosive device at the site. | ||
| Here you can see the video of the glorious collapses. | ||
| The explosion left the entire monument behind. | ||
| In a dangerous state, so they decided just to take the whole thing down with a backhoe. | ||
| And isn't it nice to see a monument that actually deserves being destroyed for once? | ||
| Isn't that nice? | ||
| Of course, the authorities are on it, 110%. | ||
| Of course, we know that over the last two years, innumerable numbers of historic monuments Beautiful, brilliant monuments have been torn down, whether by angry mobs or at the behest of angry mobs. | ||
| And these actions were not only encouraged, supported, and carried out by the authorities, but now that one of their satanic monuments to the New World Order has gone down, they've launched full investigations and they're asking for your help to identify the Terrorists that would do such a horrible thing. | ||
| Of course, there is security footage of the cars actually driving up to the monument. | ||
| But we're not snitches here, so we're not going to be showing you that. | ||
| Keep your mouth shut, folks. | ||
| Whoever did this is a hero. | ||
| And I want them to call in a little bit later. | ||
| I'm kidding, of course. | ||
| We don't support violence here. | ||
| We don't support destruction. We don't support demolition. | ||
| We want to destroy the globalists entirely in a metaphysical way. | ||
| And intellectual way, the monuments are just icing on the cake, I guess. | ||
| So it's gone. It's over. | ||
| The Georgia Guidestones have been destroyed. | ||
| No doubt they were highly insured and will be put up a little bit later this year. | ||
| Uvalde police officer missed an opportunity to fire at the gunman while waiting for supervisor's permission, report finds. | ||
| A police officer armed with a rifle watched the gunman in the Uvalde Elementary School massacre walk towards the campus but did not fire while waiting for permission from a supervisor to shoot, according to a sweeping critique released Wednesday on the tactical response to the May massacre. | ||
| Some of the 21 victims at Robb Elementary School, including 19 children, likely could have been saved on May 24th if they'd received medical attention sooner, while police waited more than an hour before breaching the 4th grade classroom, a review by a training center at Texas State University for active shooter situations found. | ||
| The report is yet another damning assessment of how police failed to act on opportunities that may have saved lives in what has become the deadliest school shooting in the U.S. since the slaughter at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012. | ||
| Quote, a reasonable officer would have considered this an active situation to devise a plan to address the suspect, read the report published by the University's Advanced Law Enforcement Rapid Response Training Program. | ||
| Authors of the 26-page report say their findings were based off video taken from the school, police body cameras, testimony from officers on the scene, and statements from investigators. | ||
| And we'll get a little bit more into this later, but it was funny. | ||
| I was walking through the office earlier today, and there was a replay of yesterday's war room on the On televisions, and of course, Owen Schroer came to the immediate conclusion that I also came to, which is, this is what you get when you demonize police officers for carrying out their duty. | ||
| When you have a crisis situation in which decisions must be made in split-second intervals, That can be the matter of life and death if a police officer has to think through his mind, do I really want to go to jail for the rest of my life for trying to stop this? | ||
| If I make a mistake here, will I be lynched by the mob or can I act on my own intuition? | ||
| And that hesitation fomented, brought about, implanted in the minds of police officers by the hysterical and stupid response of To police brutality from the Democrats is pretty much directly responsible for the death of those 21 kids. | ||
| So devastating, upsetting, horrific, mind-blowing that this actually happened in this day and age. | ||
| But then again, that's what you get when you have police officers who are hunted down by lynch mobs, encouraged by the media and weaponized by the judiciary. | ||
| So there you go. | ||
| Army cuts off more than 60,000 unvaccinated guard and reserve soldiers from pay and benefits. | ||
| Some 40,000 National Guards and 22,000 reserve soldiers who refuse to be vaccinated against COVID-19 are no longer allowed to participate in their military duties, also effectively cutting them off from some of their military benefits, Army officials said Friday. | ||
| Soldiers who refuse the vaccination order without an approved or pending exemption, which, of course, there are no approved exemptions whatsoever. | ||
| We've had many, many callers call in talking about the various ways they've tried to get exemptions and how they were all rejected out of hand without the slightest consideration. | ||
| So, of course, this is all on purpose now, I guess, that you've kicked out these 40,000 National Guard members and 22,000 Reserve soldiers. | ||
| What you're left with are soldiers who will follow orders without questioning them and without thinking about them for themselves. | ||
| So, it should make it easier to... | ||
| Well, kill the American citizens that are in the crosshairs. | ||
| Meanwhile, we're going to cover this story quite a bit later. | ||
| World hunger rising as UN agencies warn of, quote, looming catastrophe. | ||
| Now, folks, it's a global starvation campaign, a global holodomor, a purposefully organized and orchestrated starvation campaign of depopulation. | ||
| cover up. | ||
| They're going to start launching World War III. | ||
| It's the Crucible, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, folks. | |
| We have just so much to talk about today, but I'm going to open up the phone lines real early, like, you know, right now. | ||
| I'm going to go ahead and open up the phone lines right now. | ||
| The number to dial is 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Give us a call now. | ||
| I'm cracking. And we'll be taking your calls throughout the show before we welcome Nick Fuentes and Robert Owens. | ||
| We'll also be calling in, talk to Simon about what exactly is happening in the UK and what the disruption portends for so many global catastrophes that we are now facing. | ||
| We're going to be covering, of course, the latest updates with the Dutch farmers. | ||
| We also have some of this new really horrific... | ||
| Updates about the Uvalde shooting, but I want to cover pretty interesting development in the ongoing effort by the globalists to starve the entire world. | ||
| Al Jazeera has this story. | ||
| World hunger rising as UN agencies warn of looming catastrophe. | ||
| World hunger levels rose again last year after soaring in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. | ||
| I don't know if you guys know this, but the COVID-19 pandemic, the flu, it actually destroyed crops. | ||
| It destroyed huge amounts of crops. | ||
| It killed all of the farmers. | ||
| Does anybody else feel insulted, I guess, is my question. | ||
| Anybody else feel insulted when you hear the things that the government has done blamed on COVID-19? | ||
| It's like if a mosquito lands on your friend's head, and so you try to kill the mosquito with a baseball bat. | ||
| He's like, God, my head hurts. | ||
| You're like, yeah, well, there was a mosquito. | ||
| There was a mosquito there, and I saved you from it. | ||
| Can't believe that mosquito made your head hurt so much. | ||
| It wasn't a mosquito. | ||
| That wasn't the cause of the pain. | ||
| The pain was the reaction to the mosquito. | ||
| Pain was the reaction to COVID-19. | ||
| All of this horrific, deadly disasters being caused by COVID-19, not caused by COVID-19, they were caused by the reaction to COVID-19. | ||
| Of course, this gets even more convoluted when you realize COVID-19 was caused by the people who supervised and organized the reaction to COVID-19. | ||
| So it really all goes back to them, the globalists. | ||
| Oh, right. Also the Ukraine war. | ||
| Sorry, it was the COVID-19 pandemic and the Ukraine war. | ||
| Oh, and climate change. | ||
| Yeah, okay. | ||
| I mean, it's just, it's really incredible. | ||
| Like three things... That they're blaming on mass starvation across the entire world. | ||
| All three things directly the consequence of the actions of those in charge. | ||
| Again, climate change is not stopping the Dutch farmers from raising their cows. | ||
| Climate change is not the thing preventing people from growing food. | ||
| The reaction to so-called climate change. | ||
| The measures imposed on people with the excuse of climate change. | ||
| Same with the Ukraine war. Ukraine war didn't just sprout out of nowhere. | ||
| Vladimir Putin didn't just wake up one day and said, you know what? | ||
| I want to go bully some innocent country for no particular reason. | ||
| All of this was brought about because of the machinations and the schemes of the people in charge. | ||
| But they say that climate change now threatens starvation and mass migration on an unprecedented scale this year, according to UN agencies. | ||
| And if there's one thing we know about the UN, they hate mass migration. | ||
| They're so scared of mass migration. | ||
| Of course, they're also funding, facilitating, and coordinating mass migration, so... | ||
| Gee, it seems like all of this just plays directly into their hands, doesn't it? | ||
| It's not a conspiracy, though. It's not a conspiracy. | ||
| It's not planned. No, it just happens to always work out in exactly the same way over and over again, as if it's all completely organized. | ||
| Up to 828 million people, or nearly 10% of the world's population, were affected by hunger last year, 46 million more than 2020, and 150 million more than 2019. | ||
| Agencies including the Food and Agriculture Organization, World Food Program, and World Health Organization said on Wednesday in the 2022 edition of the UN Food Security and Nutrition Report, world hunger levels had remained relatively unchanged between 2015 and 2019. | ||
| Which is really interesting because the UN happened to post this article before hastily deleting it. | ||
| It was called, quote, The Benefits of World Hunger. | ||
| And it was written by George Kent, who you may remember as the bowtie-wearing traitor who tried to impeach Donald Trump over Ukraine. | ||
| We sometimes talk about hunger in the world as if it were a scourge that all of us want to see abolished, viewing it as comparable with the plague or AIDS. But that naive view prevents us from coming to grips with what causes and sustains hunger. | ||
| Hunger has great positive value to many people. | ||
| Indeed, it is fundamental to the working of the world's economy. | ||
| Hungry people are the most productive people, especially where there is a need for manual labor. | ||
| Yeah, they wrote this, folks. | ||
| George Kent wrote this for the UN. They published it on their website before somebody apparently made a phone call and was like, what the hell are you guys doing? | ||
| Take that down. You're blowing the cover. | ||
| You're saying the quiet part out loud. | ||
| You shouldn't do that. These types of discussions are for us, behind closed doors, secretly, outside of the vision of the media and the wider public. | ||
| We know that we are in favor of hunger. | ||
| We know that we use and create catastrophes in order to consolidate power amongst ourselves. | ||
| But you don't tell that to the masses. | ||
| Come on, George! So they've taken it down now. | ||
| They've deleted it. | ||
| And fact checkers, I'm sure, are going to tell us that it never existed. | ||
| But luckily, people took screenshots. | ||
| This one was posted by Ramsey Paul. | ||
| But you can find it everywhere. | ||
| Yeah, they literally are saying, quote, hunger has great positive value to many people. | ||
| Especially in a place where they need manual labor. | ||
| Especially at a time when you're trying to encourage mass migration to overwhelm the systems of developed countries to cause a cascading collapse scenario in which you benefit by taking control to prevent the chaos that you yourself have sown. | ||
| It's just so simple. | ||
| It's just so predictable and simple and easy when you let these people get away with it. | ||
| It really must be nice. | ||
| It really must be nice to be a globalist. | ||
| And just know that you can quite literally starve hundreds of millions of people and launch entire wars and just confiscate billions of dollars from taxpayers and then just print billions or trillions of dollars more with the click of a button on a keyboard. | ||
| And just know that... | ||
| Nobody's ever going to do anything about it because the media is in your pocket and the wider American people are kept in a state of hazy delusion, incapable of organization to oppose you. | ||
| It must be nice. | ||
| It must be nice to have this brief moment in time where your every despicable aim is reached. | ||
| Enjoy it while you can, folks. | ||
| People are waking up. It's becoming a little bit too much to ignore. | ||
| And this state of untouchability is not going to last too much longer. | ||
| Just incredible. The United Nations, the benefits of world hunger. | ||
| As they say, it's necessary for cheap labor. | ||
| They know the next food crisis is coming. | ||
| It's not a prediction. It's a promise. | ||
| they're the ones doing it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
For now. | |
| For now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | |
| Remember, you can support everything we do here by going to InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| The July 4th Super Sale is still on. | ||
| You're getting up to 75% off, plus double Patriot points at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| 40% off Knockout Sleep Support Formula. | ||
| 40% off Alpha Power, Living Defense Plus, Whole Food Multivitamin, Pollen Block, Just a huge number of incredible supplements, including Survival Shield X2. We're also getting 50% off Brain Force Plus, Ultra 12, Vitamin D3 gummies, Ultimate Coral Oil, Lung Cleanse Plus, Fizzy Magnesium, Prostagard, Ultimate Fish Oil, VasoBeats Complete. | ||
| For whatever ails you in your daily life, there is something that can help you fight back at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| And of course, everything that we do here at Infowars is brought to you by Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| We're going to go out to your phone calls. | ||
| Momentarily, I do want to cover this. | ||
| According to Disclose.tv, Venovia, Germany's largest housing group, begins to throttle its tenants heating at night to save gas, a spokeswoman said. | ||
| Hundreds of thousands are affected, Berlinger Zeitung reports. | ||
| So yes, the rationing has begun. | ||
| And it won't stop until you're all dead. | ||
| It's pretty much as simple as that. | ||
| It really is a little bit unbelievable that they're actually getting away with this. | ||
| I like the way the Gateway Pundit puts it. | ||
| Mounting evidence continues to emerge, proving the food shortages and supply chain disruptions are being manufactured by the United Nations World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization in an effort to institute a new world order, global government, and destroy the United States. | ||
| A 2009 op-ed published by the United Nations, which is now removed from its website, heralds hunger as, quote, the foundations of wealth and a means to bolster the world economy. | ||
| Hunger must be sustained to exploit manual labor, contends George Kent, professor at the University of Hawaii's Political Science Department, who authored the November 2021 UN document. | ||
| That was the one I showed you before. | ||
| Hunger is such a good thing. | ||
| It motivates people. | ||
| See, it's a good thing because it will motivate hundreds of millions of third-worlders to flock to first-world countries and overwhelm those systems and cause a cascading domino effect that will spread hunger, suffering and strife to even very, very well-founded and previously hugely productive countries. | ||
| If you can't get that this is all purposeful and organized and coordinated, then I don't know what to tell you. | ||
| Because it could not be more obvious. | ||
| I mean, you know, it's like I'd say, it's like they're jumping up and down telling you what they're doing. | ||
| But it's not like that. It is that they are doing that. | ||
| They are literally writing articles where they're telling you what they're doing. | ||
| So it's not up to me to try to convince you. | ||
| It just is the reality and it's up to you to either come to terms with that fact and understand the true scale and scope and implications of what's happening. | ||
| Or maybe that's too overwhelming for you and you can just take your pills and keep watching Netflix. | ||
| Maybe just do that instead. | ||
| It really is incredible. And it's incredible the way they do it step by step, right? | ||
| They knew there would be pushback for climate lockdowns, so they had to get you used to it, turn up that temperature on the pot holding the frog just a little bit with COVID, get you used to lockdowns, get you used to arbitrary rule changes. | ||
| And surrendering your own personal sovereignty for the dictates of some trillion dollar pharmaceutical company. | ||
| Much in the same way, they've had to work for years to fully establish and really grease the gears of the immigration system to perfectly and very expediently bring in millions and millions of So now all those systems are in place. | ||
| All the lockdown systems are in place. | ||
| All the command and control systems are in place. | ||
| They literally already built the camps under the guise of COVID. Those camps are still out there. | ||
| You know that, right? You know they built COVID camps that they didn't send COVID patients to in this country, but they didn't tear them down either. | ||
| So the camps are ready for those dissidents who refuse to give up their food for the benefit of The global economy or whatever excuse they'll use. | ||
| They've laid all of the groundwork. | ||
| They've done a very thorough job of establishing the infrastructure for the collapse of the entire world and the creation of a one-world government. | ||
| So now they're just making use of that infrastructure they've laid. | ||
| Now the trains are rolling down the tracks that they laid over the last two years. | ||
| And it's incredible to see. | ||
| It's incredible that more people don't see it. | ||
| Let's go to your phone calls now. | ||
| We have Devin. So you sent a video about the Supreme Court decertifying the 2020 election. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What's this about, Devin? Hey, yeah, so my parents have been, like, I don't know, they say they're really plugged in and stuff. | |
| They just watch Telegram all the time and shit like that, and they're saying this guy, Phil Godloose. | ||
| Watch your language, Devin. | ||
| Sorry, we're on terrestrial radio here, so no four-letter words. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Gotcha. My dad sent me a video from Phil Godloose, this guy who's kind of like a QAnon conspiracy theorist type guy. | |
| That's what at least, like, the Daily Beast is schmearing him as, and he was saying that Right before the recess, the Supreme Court made the decision to overturn the 2020 election, and they're now spreading apart the justices before the decision is announced. | ||
| And so, I don't know, I wanted to ask you guys if you've ever heard of this guy Phil Godluski, because I've never heard of him. | ||
| And, I don't know, it's kind of weird. | ||
| I've never heard of him. | ||
| And just off my initial response, I don't believe it. | ||
| But I have no evidence one way or the other. | ||
| But I'm going to just say that is not happening. | ||
| I mean, I don't know. | ||
| Guys, we can find some sort of article that confirms that, but I'm going to say no on that one. | ||
| I'm just going to say no. I don't think that actually happened. | ||
| I would love to see that happen, but no, I don't think that's the case. | ||
| I think that's a little bit too good to be true. | ||
| And again, you just have to ask yourself, like, how would this one guy have this scoop and be able to report it and it be completely ignored by everybody else? | ||
| Like, You know, there used to be a time where the mainstream media would just completely ignore things that they didn't like because they had sort of a monopoly on the spread of information. | ||
| But now that information can be spread so rapidly in alternative You know, forms, then the mainstream media doesn't really ignore things like that anymore. | ||
| They have to address it and try to skew it in the way that they want. | ||
| So if something like that were to happen, we would see mainstream media articles about it. | ||
| Even if they don't want you to know about it, they have to tell you about it because they want to frame it in their view rather than otherwise. | ||
| So my instinct is to say that whatever that guy's telling you is... | ||
| Either he's lying or mistaken, but I would stop listening to him. | ||
| Thanks for the call, Devin. Let's go to Travis in Georgia. | ||
| He wants to talk about the Georgia Guidestones. | ||
| Travis, was it you? | ||
| Was it you, Travis? You're in Georgia. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, good morning, Harrison. | |
| No, it was not me. | ||
| I can't, you know, I can't fess up to something like that. | ||
| Interesting. That was an interesting way to phrase that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I wanted to bring up something I found a little interesting. | |
| There is a band out there called Angels and Airwaves, which if you kind of think about it, Fallen Angel, King of the Airwaves, they released an album called We Don't Need to Whisper back in 2006. | ||
| Very interesting album cover, by the way. | ||
| But on that album, they have two separate songs. | ||
| That I think talk about the Guidestones. | ||
| The first song is called Distraction. | ||
| And it says in the very first verse, it's saying, there's a field nearby with words written in stone. | ||
| My love will not die. | ||
| Please let it be known. And I thought that was pretty weird. | ||
| So the very last song called Start the Machine in the second verse, They talk and say, I left some words quite far from here to be a short reminder. | ||
| I laid them out in stone in case they need to last forever. | ||
| Oh, no. They didn't last forever, did they, Travis? | ||
|
unidentified
|
How you get so much favor on your side. | |
| Accept the measure. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's your love, that neighbor, not the bad. | |
| I'm a ride. | ||
| That's on God. | ||
| It's really hard to put into words what's happening to the world right now. | ||
| Because it's like... | ||
| It should be enough just to say the facts, but it's like it doesn't get it across somehow. | ||
| I mean... | ||
| They have launched a depopulation... | ||
| They have launched a plan to kill billions of people, and they're doing it. | ||
| Millions have already died. | ||
| Billions more are on the chopping block. | ||
| This is all purposeful. | ||
| This is mass murder on a scale the world has never seen, and it's happening right before our eyes, and nobody can seem to recognize it. | ||
| It really is Worst thing you can possibly imagine. | ||
| And the numbers are finally starting to come out. | ||
| And the experiences are finally starting to be heard. | ||
| People are finally starting to sort of come to grips with just the far fringe edge of what's actually happening. | ||
| They're just starting to notice the tip of the tail of the dragon that is devouring them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's Sort of depressing. | |
| It's sort of depressing. | ||
| It's one thing to be under attack. | ||
| That's not depressing. There's nothing depressing or upsetting about being under attack. | ||
| You know the world is a vicious place. | ||
| And when you're under attack, you can confront it and deal with it. | ||
| There's something else entirely when the people who are being attacked are blind to it. | ||
| And not just blind to it, but willfully blind to it. | ||
| Willfully ignorant of what's going on. | ||
| And I don't know if they just can't handle the truth. | ||
| I mean, it's that classic phrase, you can't handle the truth. | ||
| Like, maybe they literally just can't handle the truth of what's happening. | ||
| But I think they're in for a very, very rude awakening very soon. | ||
| Just some of the stories coming out now. | ||
| From Gateway Pundit, England. | ||
| Excess deaths on the rise, but not because of COVID. Experts call for an investigation. | ||
| Yes, we should have an investigation. | ||
| What could it be, folks? | ||
| Gosh, we just don't know. | ||
| We just can't tell. Director General of the Danish Health Authority admits vaccinating kids was a, quote, mistake. | ||
| From Infowars, twice as many vaccine deaths as COVID deaths in U.S. households, poll finds. | ||
| More than twice as many Americans have lost a household member to a COVID vaccine injury, then have lost one to COVID. That's the shocking finding of a new poll of 1,500 Americans carried out by the polling company Polefish. | ||
| The people polled were a randomly selected representative sample of the U.S. public, of whom 74.3% were vaccinated, so the sample was not inherently biased towards or against the reporting of vaccine problems, though, as in all opinion polls, there may be an issue of self-selection bias. | ||
| That being said, you had twice as many people say, yes, somebody in my household, somebody in my family died from a COVID vaccine, twice as many as saying people in my household died of COVID. Just absolutely incredible. | ||
| And more and more people are speaking up about this as it is happening to them and their families. | ||
| We'll go out to your phone calls in just a second, but first I want to go to this video. | ||
| It's clip number seven. A devastating call from a father whose child was killed by the vaccine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's listen. You can begin when you're ready. | |
| Hello, good morning. Good morning. | ||
| My son played hockey. | ||
| His name is Sean Hartman, since he was eight years old. | ||
| And he took a year off for COVID. And he got extremely bored sitting in his bedroom. | ||
| He decided to go back to hockey this year. | ||
| And to do that, he had to have a vaccination to play hockey. | ||
| He got his first shot of Pfizer on August 25th. | ||
| Went to the hospital on August 29th with a bad reaction. | ||
| He got sent home with only a prescription for Advil. | ||
| He had a rash all over his neck and face and brown circles around his eyes. | ||
| And on the morning of September 27th, his mother found him dead on the floor beside his bed. | ||
| And all he wanted to do was play hockey. | ||
| So I'm just wondering really how safe this is. | ||
| And why no deaths are being reported. | ||
| You're talking about numbers and ICUs, but nobody ever talks about deaths. | ||
| And it is happening more than anyone knows. | ||
| And it's just being denied and silenced. | ||
| And I have a Twitter page called Answers for Sean, which has 7,500 followers who are all wondering the same thing as me. | ||
| What happened to my son? | ||
| He had an autopsy done. | ||
| In Toronto, that came back cause of death unascertained, which only 2% of deaths have that conclusion. | ||
| The only thing they found was a slightly enlarged heart. | ||
| So I questioned the coroner, well, is that not caused from the vaccine causing myocarditis? | ||
| They're saying there was no myocarditis. | ||
| I sent his autopsy report to a second well-known pathologist in Canada who wants to remain anonymous for fear of losing his job. | ||
| He told me the vaccine did kill my son. | ||
| I don't know who I can believe anymore. | ||
| I have to go the rest of my life either thinking there's no cause of death. | ||
| He knows exactly what the cause of death was. | ||
| So did the doctor. So did the person that performed the autopsy that told him they couldn't figure it out. | ||
| They know exactly what's behind it. | ||
| And they're willing to lie to a grieving parent. | ||
| Yeah, well, they don't want to get sued by Pfizer, and they also have a cultish devotion to this religion of pharmaceuticals. | ||
| I mean, it really is shocking. | ||
| It really is devastating. | ||
| And it really is becoming something bigger than you can even really explain. | ||
| I mean, that dad right there just said 2% Only 2% of deaths have an indeterminate cause behind it. | ||
| And yet, from CTV Calgary, official government outlet in Canada, says Alberta is reporting an unprecedented increase in ill-defined and unknown causes of death in 2021. | ||
| Alberta. So much so, it is now the number one cause of death in Alberta in 2021. | ||
| The majority of Alberta deaths in 2021 attributed to unknown causes. | ||
| Here you can see the various causes. | ||
| Number one is ill-defined and unknown cause with 3,362 unexplained deaths. | ||
| That's 3,362 deaths from the COVID vaccine that they refuse to acknowledge. | ||
| So again, it is getting too much to ignore anymore. | ||
| And people's lives have not just been ended, they've been destroyed. | ||
| Let's go down to clip number 11. | ||
| This is a Florida model, Claire Bridges, who had to have both of her legs amputated due to the vaccine. | ||
| Let's watch. Actually, we can just play this as B-roll, not much audio here. | ||
| But again, just imagine, right, a healthy, happy girl goes in for a vaccine, loses both of her legs, now spends most of her time strapped to a hospital bed, tubes feeding her. | ||
| Because she got a vaccine that does not prevent the virus it's designed to prevent. | ||
| Again, just the amount of human suffering, the amount of death, unimaginable. | ||
| And finally, we'll go to this, clip number nine. | ||
| The EU is actually issuing warnings about the booster. | ||
| If only they'd done that before they injected 100 million people with it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. EU regulators are warning that frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune system and may not be feasible. | |
| The European Medicines Agency says repeat doses every four months could eventually weaken people's immune systems. | ||
| They want more time between booster programs tied to the onset of cold weather. | ||
| Israel has already begun a fourth dose program with about 400,000 people getting the jab. | ||
| Yes, EU regulators warning about the destruction of the immune system. | ||
| Kind of like InfoWars has for the past few years. | ||
| Tell you what, folks. If you had some questions about the vaccine and weren't quite sure about it and came to InfoWars, And we're told in no uncertain terms, no waffling, not, well, if it's right for you and you should be careful, but do not take the vaccine. | ||
| Do not take the vaccine. | ||
| It is a death shot. It is a mass kill, slow kill program. | ||
| Don't take it. They're trying to murder you. | ||
| And if you heard that and decided not to take the vaccine and now still have both your legs and your children alive, do us a favor and go to InfoWarsStore.com because we'd love to be able to save millions of lives in the future by spreading this information. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. Second hour of the American Journal has begun. | ||
| We'll be joined by Nick Fuentes. We'll be getting an update from Simon a little bit later. | ||
| In the third hour, we'll be joined by Robert Owens of the John Birch Society. | ||
| But for now, we go out to your phone calls. | ||
| Let's go to 416 Bitcoin in Toronto. | ||
| We'll talk about the Guidestones being destroyed. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. Bitcoin, you're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks for taking my call. I want to send out my condolences to your previous father, that Really struck a nerve. | |
| We hope that he can find closure. | ||
| I just wanted to mention quickly about the guidestones and AI and data collection. | ||
| I am quite concerned about people reacting to these sort of events on social media and the data being collected for Just to list us as dissidents. | ||
| It might not be us directly, but our generations, like our offsprings, our kids and our grandkids. | ||
| Because of what we are saying now, all of this information can be stored and possibly used against us later. | ||
| So my thoughts are, is we can combat that through art and sarcasm. | ||
| I was going to say, yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, because I don't think the AI can recognize sarcasm yet. | |
| Right. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So that's what I wanted to call it. | ||
| Yeah, it's just because I was seeing everyone saying all these things and mentioning, hey, yeah, it's a good thing what happened. | ||
| But my concern is the people that are watching this might be making a list of all those people that are in agreeance with what happened yesterday. | ||
| That is interesting. | ||
| I would not be surprised if that was the case. | ||
| I mean, obviously... That's how you test things like that, right? | ||
| You change a variable and then you test the reaction. | ||
| From the group that you're monitoring. | ||
| So I wouldn't be surprised, yeah. | ||
| But I think sarcasm is a very powerful tool in this fight. | ||
| Oh no, the Georgia Guidestones were bombed. | ||
| What a terrible tragedy this is. | ||
| What a horrific display of anti-social behavior. | ||
| I'm so upset by this. | ||
| The AI just sees that as words and it's like, beep boop, a good world citizen. | ||
| Affirmed. It's so weird. | ||
| We are literally in a sci-fi rise of the machines dystopian future where we actually have to consider this stuff because it's not fantasy anymore. | ||
| It's reality. And I think you're exactly right to be concerned about that. | ||
| However, you know, the only way they win is by us actually censoring ourselves and not saying what we believe because of... | ||
| Fear of how we'll be treated. | ||
| I wouldn't have a show on InfoWars if I thought that what I say on here is somehow being stored in catalogs. | ||
| I mean, it is. I know that it is, but I don't care because screw those people. | ||
| So I don't know. That's my attitude on it. | ||
| And yeah, sarcasm can be useful. | ||
| But at the end of the day... | ||
| You know, these systems exist, and the only way we'll prevent them from being used against us is to take control of them and use them ourselves. | ||
| So that's got to be the goal. Let's go now to Sean in California. | ||
| Thanks so much for the call, Bitcoin. | ||
| I do appreciate that. Sean in California has a comment about the Georgia Guidestones as well. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Sean. We've got one minute left. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're on the air. I'm going to try to be faster than Harrison. | |
| I was going to say, we always can use these opportunities to learn, so it would be pretty interesting to find out who contracted that backhoe to wreck Georgia Guidestones, because I know that wasn't Kamala Harris that knocked him over, but I was thinking maybe, you know, Alex, you know, he got his Godzilla powers, they activated CERN, he teleported that weasel there, and he just shot right across. | ||
| I'm kidding about that. The fact of the matter is, is what we all saw, folks, was something that you would consider illegal, but it's not necessarily a lawful. | ||
| So I had a similar idea of, you know, hey, get a community together in Georgia, they'll get their assembly together, and they'll pull them down lawfully. | ||
| But the fact of the matter is, we're all Spartacus in this situation, so if you're afraid of the AI monitoring you, too bad, because it already knows you listened to InfoWars. | ||
| So, Harrison, I'll call you back on another day when you've got more time. | ||
| Have a great one. All right, thank you so much. | ||
| Yeah, well, you know, the backhoe was probably just the state. | ||
| I mean, the state probably went out, surveyed the damage, saw that the structural integrity had been compromised, so they took it down with the backhoe. | ||
| Who planted the bomb? | ||
| That's a question that... | ||
| I don't think anybody wants answered. | ||
| Nobody cares. We don't care who bombed the Georgia Guidestones. | ||
| I don't think anybody did. I think it was spontaneous. | ||
| spontaneous combustion. | ||
| That's what happened. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You want to talk about an emergency? | |
| Emergency. | ||
| One in every 30 kids in the U.S. now has autism. | ||
| a 50% jump from 2017. | ||
| Maybe we could look into that sort of thing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
*music* It's so crazy. | |
| Everything's so crazy. Let's go back out to your phone calls. | ||
| We have Bo in Arizona. | ||
| I always want to read your name as Boaz. | ||
| Bo-A-Z. Let's go to Bo. | ||
| Bo, you're on the air about Carrie Lake. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, Harrison. You got me? | |
| I got you. Good. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, so I've lived in Arizona almost all my life. | |
| I'm 31 years old. | ||
| Carrie Lake hit Fox 10 News and was working there by the time I was like five years old. | ||
| My first concern is that's not far off from a lifelong politician. | ||
| My second concern is I can't find any information about her husband and how he made his millions of dollars. | ||
| He's a photographer and videographer, but his website looks like it was put together by a four-year-old. | ||
| I just, I have so many scary questions about Carrie Lake and like watching her. | ||
| Oh, and my third one is she loves both terms of George Bush and she donated to Obama at least the first term. | ||
| I can't remember if it was both or not. | ||
| So her track record is terrible. | ||
| So she's doing great things, saying great things right now. | ||
| I'm just very concerned about the fox in the hen house situation. | ||
| It looks like a very viable thing for someone that's been in Phoenix their whole life. | ||
| And I don't know. | ||
| I just kind of want your opinion. | ||
| Like, how much do we judge the fruits of the labor over a historic tracker? | ||
| Yeah, that's a good question. | ||
| I mean, I don't know one way or the other. | ||
| I think it's smart to be a little bit suspicious of these people. | ||
| And again, it's almost like this... | ||
| It's almost like this PTSD that conservatives have where, like, the better you are, the more you seem to be in line with reality and in line with, you know, our ideology, the more suspicious we are of you. | ||
| You know, it's like she's saying all the right things. | ||
| Who is she really? | ||
| What's she really up to? | ||
| And so, you know, that's a self-defeating process at a certain point. | ||
| But on the other hand, you know, things have happened... | ||
| In the last couple years that a lot of people who previously thought that things were going one way have realized they're going another and have started to stand up against it. | ||
| I mean, I'm not shy on this show about saying that I got tricked by Obama when I was 18. | ||
| I voted for Obama. | ||
| I thought I believed the things that he said. | ||
| But when it was shown that he was a complete fraud and a likely CIA plant, and I actually did research and realized what was going on, I completely disavow that now and would hate to think that, you know, that somehow made people suspicious of my positions when I make them Perfectly clear on this show. | ||
| So, you know, my instinct is to give the benefit of the doubt to Carrie Lake because she seems to be a trustworthy person. | ||
| She seems to be a combative person that's not shy about... | ||
| You know, explaining what she believes. | ||
| I mean, there was other stuff about Carrie Lake, like, posing with, like, drag queens and then coming out against drag queens later. | ||
| But she, you know, explained that saying, you know, this is about kids and being, you know, kids being introduced to drag queens, not adults, you know, doing whatever they want. | ||
| So, I mean, I think people that... | ||
| Before, had the sort of naive, rhino, conservative position. | ||
| Sort of realized, oh, we can't do this anymore. | ||
| You know, the things that I believed before. | ||
| Yeah, there's Carrie Lake posing with a drag queen. | ||
| So, you know, I don't know. | ||
| So I'm not going to put myself out on the line and say that no Carrie Lake is for sure the real deal. | ||
| Because she very well could not be the real deal. | ||
| At the same time, she's better than anybody else I've seen. | ||
| And if she... You know, doesn't hold her word. | ||
| If she gets elected and goes back on all these promises, then we'll know and you'll have to kick her out of office after that. | ||
| And I think that's the only option we really have. | ||
| So, you know, I don't have any insight into her background or whether, you know, her change in mindset is legitimate or play acting. | ||
| I really couldn't tell you. | ||
| I think only she knows that. | ||
| All I can say is that she seems to be a fiery warrior for the truth. | ||
| So she's got my support. | ||
| But I thank you for that, Bo. | ||
| And again, I guess it's about treading the line between suspicion and making sure that people are the real deal, but also not letting that prevent us from supporting good people and shooting ourselves in the foot in that regard. | ||
| Let's go now to Hangman Immortal in Detroit. | ||
| Hangman, you're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, good morning, Harrison. | |
| Everybody listening. I greet you in the peace of Christ and I thank you for your time. | ||
| I have a few points to bring up, and for the sake of brevity, I will try to blow through them as to not take too much time away from everyone else. | ||
| So, I'll move forward. | ||
| About the Georgia Guidestones, to bookend and dovetail into what you said about the way You know, these people kind of put out the information out there and then they go to, you know, years later, they go to, like, removing it and taking it down and all of that. | ||
| And I want people to apply that concept to these Georgia Guidestones and as much to not be fooled. | ||
| Like, keep an open mind to it because it could be... | ||
| You know, we know this mass culling is going on. | ||
| It could be they destroyed them themselves, you know, so it doesn't say keep the population under, you know, 500 million. | ||
| Like I said, there's that. | ||
| Also, I reached out to Mike Adam via naturalnews.com, his website, about these biostructures. | ||
| That seemed to be growing and popping up and vaccinated. | ||
| Okay, when he was on the air and they were showing that bio structure that came out of that cadaver that was about the size of a pinky finger. | ||
| I cannot viably see a human being living more than five or ten minutes with something of that size in their carotid artery. | ||
| So it seems to me that these structures are continuing to grow post-mortem. | ||
| So that is what I put forward to Mike Adams. | ||
| And also, tying into that, it seems to me that these boosters, they come, you know, you get the first shot and they say you have to get these boosters. | ||
| It looks a little bit to me like these boosters might be food for whatever it is that is growing in these people. | ||
| Because I have a friend that his wife is a pediatric nurse at Children's Hospital here in Michigan. | ||
| And his wife made him take the jab because she had to take the jab. | ||
| But he only took the first jab. | ||
| And he's completely fine. | ||
| His wife was having problems. | ||
| She's had boosters and all of that. | ||
| So that's what I'm using as a gauge for that. | ||
| It just seems odd that The more these people get the boosters, these things are growing faster and faster, and like I said, I can't. | ||
| Someone couldn't live more than five to ten minutes with something that size in them. | ||
| I don't care what anybody says. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. But the thing about them, while they were big, they were like stringy and kind of, you know, thin. | ||
| So I don't think they exist in the vein in this clump. | ||
| They're more like strung out along the vein. | ||
| So, you know... As they grow, the heart has to work harder and harder, and eventually it becomes so much that it gets clogged and the whole system breaks down. | ||
| But while the volume of it is big, you can see they're stringy, so they could be all along the veins without necessarily clogging them up right away. | ||
| And yeah, I mean, look, it's a soft kill weapon. | ||
| It would be too obvious to just be injecting everybody with cyanide and have them collapse over dead the next day, right? | ||
| And of course, we know that different batches have different amounts of different things. | ||
| And maybe we'll figure this out when Uruguay, I don't know if people have heard about this, Uruguay has demanded that Pfizer produce information about exactly what is in the vaccine, including, and they say in their order, nanoparticles and other things like that. | ||
| So, you know, maybe they'll come out with something showing what's actually behind this. | ||
| But, yeah, it's a soft kill weapon. | ||
| And the booster shots, I don't know if you could say, are feeding the things in them. | ||
| But, you know, it's like anything that's a poison, you know. | ||
| Alcohol is a poison, but it's not that bad. | ||
| But if you drink alcohol to an excessive amount every single day, then slowly but surely you'll kill yourself from it. | ||
| That's all it is. It's a poison. | ||
| It's just at a very low dose. | ||
| But still, it's killing millions. | ||
| We'll be back on the other side with more of your phone calls. | ||
| Stay tuned. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| We have on the line Simon. | ||
| Now if you go to band.video, you'll see in the scroll bar at the top a web exclusive. | ||
| Yesterday we stayed a little bit late after the show to talk to Simon about what was going on in the UK and the high drama taking place there. | ||
| And he gave us a quite thorough breakdown of it. | ||
| So please go to band.video to take a look at that, watch it, be informed, and share that information. | ||
| but also go to InfoWarsStore.com to support us as we are not only producing three hours of content every day here, but obviously three hours on The War Room, four hours on The Alex Jones Show, plus all of the great content creators at Bandit Video and the web exclusives. | ||
| All of that is free. | ||
| We just ask you to go to InfoWarsStore.com and buy some of the products that will improve your life. | ||
| They're now 40% to 75% off, plus double Patriot points with the Independence Day sale that has been extended through the week. | ||
| InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| With that, we welcome back Simon. | ||
| Simon, I hear Boris Johnson has resigned as PM or rather announced his intention to resign as PM. | ||
| What exactly is happening here? | ||
| That's exactly right, Harrison. | ||
| So, the controversy continues. | ||
| He, after a total of something like 52 ministers, so remember yesterday we were at a count of about 34 and we were speaking and did the special. | ||
| Resignations continued up until midnight Britain time, and then an additional seven people resigned this morning. | ||
| And finally, with a great deal of ill grace, he finally did not actually resign, as you put it, and now that he will be leaving as prime minister. | ||
| So he's gone as the leader of the Conservative Party of the United Kingdom with immediate effect, but he's trying to remain as the interim prime minister all the way through until the middle of October. | ||
| And as you can imagine, many of his ex-colleagues and a great majority of the country are particularly disgusted with the prospect of that outcome. | ||
| And indeed, they haven't even announced the exact timetable And the exact day in October that the entire replacement mechanism would be completed. | ||
| So the former Prime Minister, Mr John Major, who still sits in Parliament, is reported to have written to the equivalent of the RNC, the 1922 Committee, To request that the Deputy Prime Minister, Mr. Rabb, should be, or somebody like him, should be the interim Prime Minister for the next three months. | ||
| And all the press are clamouring that Boris Johnson does actually depart today and not hang about like a bad smell for three months, because obviously the position is very, very powerful. | ||
| And he could direct a lot of financial resources and also a lot, frankly, of military resources. | ||
| And people just don't think that it's appropriate that he should stay there. | ||
| But frankly, the entire machinery of government ground to a halt. | ||
| Most of the business today was cancelled because they simply didn't have enough elected government ministers in the necessary positions of power. | ||
| So the entire country didn't kind of like collapse. | ||
| But in terms of the administrative machinery, it really did undergo quite a blow. | ||
| So there's still a lot to save for, and the press and foreign leaders are taking great relish in the downfall of Mr. | ||
| Johnson. The Kremlin has issued a couple of statements. | ||
| Dmitry Peskov, Mr. | ||
| Putin's A personal spokesman said that Boris Johnson doesn't like Russia and we don't like him. | ||
| We're glad that he's going and hopefully somebody more rational will replace him. | ||
| And Maria Zakharova, the spokesperson for the foreign ministry, said that Mr. | ||
| Johnson had launched a boomerang and now it has come back and hit him. | ||
| Yeah, I've seen a lot of taunting from people in the Russian camp talking about the Dutch in full revolt and the collapse of the UK parliament and all this stuff. | ||
| And they're saying, gee, Russia sure is having trouble these days. | ||
| Well, it looks like Western Europe is having a great deal more trouble. | ||
| And there's also this story from Newsweek. | ||
| Russia's Lavrov meets with China at G20, will not sit down with the U.S., and Liz Truss of the U.K. is skipping the G20 meeting. | ||
| So what's the fallout when it comes to G20 from all of this chaos and drama in the U.K.? | ||
| Well, once again, our attention is being diverted both by the Georgia Guidestone event and also this political machination from the United Kingdom. | ||
| But other world events are actually occurring in the meantime. | ||
| So the G20 is the pre-meeting. | ||
| This is the get-together of the foreign ministers Not of the president and prime minister, which will happen in November this year. | ||
| So this is one of those kind of like pre-conference meetings. | ||
| But there seem to be a great number of side deals occurring. | ||
| China and Russia are really working very strongly with Senegal because their country's president is currently head of the African Union. | ||
| And there's all kinds of issues going on with China and Japan and South Korea. | ||
| So that event, the G20 foreign ministers meeting, which is happening in Indonesia today and tomorrow, does seem to be very, very busy. | ||
| But what actually occurred is the British foreign minister Elizabeth Truss Who is likely to stand for the new position of British Prime Minister. | ||
| There will be a two-stage election. | ||
| Normally there'll be a series of votes of the elected Conservative Members of Parliament. | ||
| And then there will also be a vote of all the regular card-carrying members of the Conservative Party, just as if you're a regular individual member of the Democrats or the Republicans or the Greens or something like that. | ||
| And so she flew all the way from London, far Dubai, to Indonesia, literally refueled, had the plane refueled, after a very, very long journey, and then immediately flew back. | ||
| Because obviously she wants to be there to be in the running. | ||
| Now, there's a couple of interesting anecdotes. | ||
| The Attorney General, which is just the same as Mr. | ||
| Garland, the Attorney General of the United States, she went public and said that she wanted to resign last night. | ||
| But that she couldn't because the solicitor general, which is like the solicitor general in the United States, and the justice minister had already resigned and there had to be a senior legal officer left in the government to sign all the legal paperwork that needs to be signed every day. | ||
| So that's how incredible the situation got. | ||
| She was like the last official lawyer left in the building. | ||
| So she couldn't quit. | ||
| And then, as we discussed in the specials, The Cabinet members who were going to give advice to the Prime Minister, one or two of them continuing to support him, but most of them recommending that he step down yesterday and he refused to see them as a group because he didn't want five people attacking them. | ||
| He forced them to see him one at a time. | ||
| Whilst that process was going on, like resident Biden had a couple of dogs that like to establish the Secret Service agents at the White House. | ||
| There's a resident cat at number 10 Downing Street, and he's called Larry the cat. | ||
| He's very popular with the general public. | ||
| So the cat, we've this way through all the hundreds of press and journalists and TV cameras and stuff, went and sat outside the door waiting for somebody to go in or out so that he could get into his house. | ||
| Because that's where he lives permanently, even when the prime minister goes, the cat will remain. | ||
| Right. Right. Right. Right. Good Lord. | ||
| I'm surprised the cat didn't resign. | ||
| I mean, everybody else is resigning. | ||
| I'm surprised the cat didn't hand in his resignation as well. | ||
| Thank you so much, Simon. As always, very informative, very brilliant. | ||
| Thank you. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is The American Journal. I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| My guest is Nicholas J. Fuentes. | ||
| Nick Fuentes is an American political commentator and podcaster. | ||
| He's been censored on numerous social media platforms, I think almost all of them, for supporting the America First agenda. | ||
| His website can be found at nicholasjfuentes.com. | ||
| You can also find him at cozy.tv. | ||
| And also, AmericaFirstFoundation.org is where you find information about the new film, The Most Cancelled Man in America. | ||
| That is Nick Fuentes. | ||
| And not only is he the most cancelled man in America, the film about him being cancelled has been cancelled, but that hasn't stopped him from launching his own screening. | ||
| Thanks so much for coming on, Nick. | ||
| Hold on. We're missing your audio here. | ||
| There you go. All right, we got you now. | ||
| Thanks for coming on, Nick. Hey, thank you for having me. | ||
| Good morning. Good morning. | ||
| So, this film, tell us about this film, The Most Cancelled Man in America, that is playing this weekend, the 14th of July, in Las Vegas. | ||
| What's it all about? Yeah, so we put together this documentary last year, and it's been filmed over the course of the last year. | ||
| And it talks about some of the fallout from January 6th that I've experienced specifically. | ||
| It goes into a lot of detail about how I was, as you know, put on the federal no-fly list last year because of my involvement in the January 6th protests, as well as the seizure of my cash and my funds by the FBI for the same reason. | ||
| So the documentary is a little bit under an hour. | ||
| And it goes into all the different things that have happened to me as a result of my activism, particularly in Stop the Steal, but broadly because of America First. | ||
| So we brought together a couple of professional directors. | ||
| We shot interviews. | ||
| We shot some footage at our conference, AFPAC-3, a few months ago as well. | ||
| And so we put it all together in, I think, a really nice package that cleanly explains, for a lot of people that just don't really know how bad it is, the state of free speech in America for political dissidents like me. | ||
| Yeah, the most canceled man in America. | ||
| I mean, that's an appropriate moniker for... | ||
| I don't know. I guess you and Alex Jones are competing for that dubious honor. | ||
| But the amazing thing about it is you made this documentary explaining what it is actually to be oppressed in this country these days. | ||
| We hear a lot about oppression, but usually it's not, you know, a lot of concern for people like yourself or people like Alex Jones who are actually under the thumb of the establishment in so many different ways. | ||
| And yet... This film itself was canceled where it was originally supposed to be screened. | ||
| Can you tell us about what happened there? | ||
| Yeah, so it just goes to show, and like you said, I know you guys have your fair share of it as well. | ||
| Like you said, it's a little bit dubious how lucky we are to be in this position competing for, you know, who's more canceled, who's having sort of the worst quality of life under this totalitarian regime. | ||
| But so we put this film together, like you said, to explore the state of Cancellation, censorship in America. | ||
| And so we submitted the film, which is, again, it's about me, a victim of cancel culture, regime censorship. | ||
| We submitted the film to a libertarian film festival called Freedom Fest. | ||
| A Freedom Festival, which is this annual libertarian film festival they hold in Vegas. | ||
| A very popular libertarian event. | ||
| There's a lot of mainstream politicians going. | ||
| I think Justin Amash will be there, Andrew Yang, some others. | ||
| And so we submitted the film to be screened there, and I was supposed to be a part of a panel with the directors of the film talking about it and talking about what goes on in the movie and our experience putting this together. | ||
| And so this was all on the schedule. | ||
| This was all on the books. We were set to screen the film. | ||
| I was going to fly out there. | ||
| I was going to join the panel, explain the movie, and then they canceled us. | ||
| They canceled the film about the most canceled man from the Freedom Festival because, in their own words, they said that it didn't provide enough context. | ||
| In other words, we didn't explain the reason that I was banned, apparently to rationalize it or justify it or something. | ||
| You had to make the other argument for them, and you didn't do that, I guess. | ||
| That's right. Yeah, we had to play devil's advocate and say, well, hey, in fairness, these were the things he said that got him put on the no-fly list. | ||
| So judge for yourself. Libertarian Film Festival, by the way. | ||
| So we're put in the position now where we've got to put together our own screening right alongside their event. | ||
| Same city, same weekend. | ||
| This is what we have to do with everything, I guess, right? | ||
| Well, that's why I'm laughing because even as you're saying that, I'm like, well, they cancel him from this. | ||
| So then he's like, all right, well, we're going to have our own film festival. | ||
| That'll be bigger and better. And I'm laughing because I'm realizing that's exactly how AFPAC got started in the first place. | ||
| They kicked you out of CPAC. And so you said, all right, we're going to come back next year and do it ourselves. | ||
| So I guess this is just what you have to do is create this parallel system that, you know, is actually, in my opinion, bigger and more fun than the official events that Because they don't let you participate in the official events, and yet there's still that massive hunger for what you provide and your content and to support you and, you know, be involved in the America First movement. | ||
| And so you just have to create your own, and that's what you've done. | ||
| That's right. That's the story of my life. | ||
| That's the story of what you guys do at InfoWars, you know? | ||
| And that's really the broader project is we are clearly being... | ||
| Kicked out from the table here or kicked away from the table. | ||
| We can't have a seat at the table and share our political views. | ||
| They're controversial or dissenting or something like that. | ||
| And so every kind of activity that we do, we've got to build our own websites, our own stores, our own conferences. | ||
| You know, I'd like to just be able to participate in the society, but when the regime is controlled by these control freaks, these liberals and New World Order types, this is what you have to do. | ||
| You've got to build it yourself. | ||
| So that's what we've done here with the film festival. | ||
| And I think you're saying something there which is important. | ||
| There is an appetite for it. | ||
| That's the most frustrating part, is people want to watch this stuff. | ||
| This is the sort of ascendant political view in America, and we've got to fight just for basic things, like the ability to hold a conference, take payments on the internet, sell a live stream, or things like that. | ||
| It's very frustrating, but ultimately, it feels good knowing that there's that appetite for it. | ||
| There's a sort of inevitable feeling that And they can do whatever they want. | ||
| We're more fun. We're more energetic. | ||
| It's better content. It's what the people want. | ||
| So we're going to give it to them. | ||
| Well, I'll tell you, I go out of my way to try to attend every America First event that I can, whether it's the AFPAC or during the White Boy Summer Tour. | ||
| I got to meet up with you at CPAC there in Dallas. | ||
| And it always is incredibly refreshing. | ||
| I always say it makes sense why they fear Nick Fuentes, why they fear America First, because you go to these events and it's like a sea of mostly very well-dressed and respectable and intelligent young men who are very tuned in and very active and very aggressive in their desire to see America return to some semblance of normality that we grew up with. | ||
| To me, it's incredibly uplifting, but I can see through the eyes of our enemies why it would be terrifying that they can't stop you. | ||
| They can't put the brakes on this train. | ||
| And so I love it because you strike fear into the hearts of these people. | ||
| But the events are always extremely fun and extremely uplifting for me. | ||
| Sort of a spiritual refresher going, okay, it's not hopeless. | ||
| All right, there are young people out there that get what's going on and are fighting back against it. | ||
| So along with the film screening that you're doing in Las Vegas this weekend, are there any other events planned? | ||
| Yes, so we'd actually like to go to the Freedom Fest that we're banned from. | ||
| That's sort of the other plan. | ||
| We have this sold-out screening. | ||
| This is next Thursday. | ||
| But then we're also going to be at the actual Freedom Fest, which is being held at the Mirage Hotel and Casino there on the Vegas Strip. | ||
| And I would like to go there. | ||
| And legally, of course, I'll follow all the rules and so on. | ||
| But I'd like to buy a ticket, go into the Freedom Fest. | ||
| I'd like to talk to the so-called libertarians and say, hey man, what gives? | ||
| What kind of freedom fest is this? | ||
| That I'm an actual political dissident that's banned from, like you said earlier, everything, and I'm not allowed to participate in the event? | ||
| What kind of libertarians are you? | ||
| What kind of freedom festival is this? | ||
| How could you go out there and say we're protesting cancel culture by participating in it? | ||
| So we'll be showing up there, I think, at least on Thursday and maybe Friday, too, at the Mirage, at the Freedom Fest. | ||
| And I think we're going to bring maybe 50, 100 people. | ||
| And if we can't get in, we'll protest outside. | ||
| But the important thing, and this gets to what you just said a moment ago, why they fear us. | ||
| We were online causing a lot of trouble. | ||
| As you know, in the 2016 election and before spreading the message, and they banned us all from social media. | ||
| It's important for us to show up there in person to show that just because you ban us on the internet doesn't mean that we stop existing. | ||
| We're still out there, we still disagree, and you just made us more angry because of the fact that we've now been silent. | ||
| So that's why it's more important than ever that if they kick us offline, you've got to show up in real life. | ||
| And not violently, not with any kind of bad intention, but go out there and make your message heard. | ||
| Absolutely. And have fun. | ||
| It's always fun. NicholasJFuentes.com. | ||
| We'll be right back. | ||
| Don't go anywhere, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| My guest is Nick Fuentes. | ||
| You can find his website at nicholasjfuentes.com. | ||
| You can also watch his show on Cozy.tv as well as a bunch of other fantastic shows with great creators like Ethan Ralph, one of my favorites. | ||
| Just a ton of great stuff. | ||
| Of course, Info Awards streams there as well because, well, this is what we have to do, create parallel systems when we get kicked off of the controlled big tech platforms. | ||
| So go to Nicolas J. Fuentes or Cozy.tv. | ||
| You can also go to AmericaFirstFoundation.org slash Vegas to learn about the film that will be premiering one week from today in Las Vegas, The Most Cancelled Man in America. | ||
| Nick, I want to talk a little bit more about you being cancelled and the reaction to that and how you're able to fight back against it. | ||
| But I also want to get your opinion on some of the other stuff going on in the world. | ||
| So we still have a lot to talk about. | ||
| But I have to ask, don't you feel a sense of... | ||
| I don't know how to put it. | ||
| What you're doing is so effective and it's almost like a badge of honor to be cancelled in the way that you are. | ||
| I mean, wouldn't you feel a little bit insecure if you were saying all the things you were saying and the media was propping you up and going, oh, what a great guy this is. | ||
| Oh, you should watch him. YouTube was putting you on trending. | ||
| The fact that you're cancelled, isn't that a badge of legitimacy in today's world? | ||
| Absolutely. Yeah, it's certainly frustrating. | ||
| I'll tell you that over the years, being deplatformed just makes life a lot more difficult, personally and professionally. | ||
| So I would prefer not to be. | ||
| I certainly would prefer not to be. | ||
| But you are right that We're in an information war. | ||
| And it's so funny. I always say on my show, you guys have the perfect brand because that's what it is. | ||
| It's an information war. | ||
| Alex, you know, he saw the future decades ago and he came up with the name because that's what it is. | ||
| It's a war. And the means that the war is being fought is with information. | ||
| And so... You know, though I prefer to be able to use the mainstream services, I recognize that the mainstream services are run by the enemy. | ||
| They're run by the propagandists, the liars, the New World Order, and so on. | ||
| And so if we were not a threat, if we were not fighting effectively in the information war, of course the regime would not allow us to use their tools to fight effectively against them. | ||
| And so I'm sure you see this too. | ||
| There are lots of people that are completely left alone on Twitter or YouTube or any of the other major platforms and begs the question, so if we're in this information war, a clear battle between two defined sides with two different objectives and two different kinds of MO, | ||
| two different kinds of strategies, Why is it that somebody presenting as a friend, presenting as a patriot or a freedom fighter or a free thinker, why would they be allowed on a platform which is weaponizing We're good to go. | ||
| And there is something very vindicating about that that does give me the sense of legitimacy that it sucks, I don't like it, but it's proof that what we're doing is working. | ||
| They wouldn't be censoring us if they didn't care. | ||
| They wouldn't be censoring us if what we're doing wasn't effective. | ||
| So it's a little bit of incentive to keep fighting, even though it is difficult. | ||
| Yeah, it's like a solace. | ||
| It really does suck. | ||
| I mean, I've been canceled not to the extent that you have or that Alex has. | ||
| When my Twitter account gets deleted, it's a couple thousand people. | ||
| It's gone. But it really hurts. | ||
| It really is like a pain in the butt to know that you've worked so hard to build an audience. | ||
| There's so many people that want to hear what you have to say. | ||
| And just to have some faceless goon in a big tech office somewhere click a button and erase that, it is really... | ||
| Awful. It's a really awful feeling and it really, you know, it makes you feel powerless and so you get that solace of like, yeah, but they're fighting me and they hate me and I hate them so I'm going to keep fighting. | ||
| I'm not going to give up. But do you think that's part of why they don't want to show your documentary is because... | ||
| If people actually understood what it was like to go through this, they would have sympathy for you. | ||
| And even if they didn't agree with your views, it's about that empathy or that sympathy for you that a documentary can help to get through to people because in a way that only art can get through to people, a documentary could show people what it's like and make them have sympathy for you. | ||
| And really, that's what they don't want you to have. | ||
| They want you as sort of a bad guy, just a faceless monster that they can demonize. | ||
| But once people have sympathy for you, their whole ballgame sort of falls apart I mean, how much do you think that has to do with why you get cancelled? | ||
| I think that's a huge part of it because it humanizes us. | ||
| So much of the political censorship regime is based on villainizing the political dissent. | ||
| And so they'll take a guy like Tucker or Alex or Trump or me or whoever, and they'll say, well, we're not censoring this guy because he disagrees with us. | ||
| Well, we're censoring him because he's quite rude. | ||
| He's impolite, he's boorish, controversial, something like that. | ||
| Because he's dangerous, because he's inhuman, he's a villain. | ||
| And I think that makes the censorship... | ||
| A much easier pill to swallow for your average person. | ||
| If you go to your average normie, your average person out there in the world who doesn't really know what's going on, and they'll look at the sitting president banned on Twitter, or they'll look at the mass censorship going on on YouTube and elsewhere, and they'll say, hmm, how does that really work with free speech, First Amendment, an open society? | ||
| And the regime will reassure the people by saying, Well, not to worry, they didn't get banned for their opinion. | ||
| They got banned because, well, that opinion was dangerous or they're some kind of a bad person. | ||
| And so once you bring to light the personal experience of one of these political dissidents that's subject to this oppression and to the cancellation and censorship, It changes the dynamic and it says, okay, well, this is a human being, you know, flawed maybe or controversial, but a human being like the rest of us with the same rights, dignity, and entitled to the same, at the minimum, justice under the law. | ||
| And I think that changes the entire framing of the conversation around platforming and communication and technological elements of the debate. | ||
| So I think that's a huge part of why the film was banned. | ||
| And that's a big part of why they don't like to cover people like us in the mainstream media. | ||
| I know that's why they hate, I'm sure, Alex Jones going on Joe Rogan, because people watch that and they go, oh, he's a funny, hilarious entertainer who I'd like to watch. | ||
| And that actually makes a lot of sense, makes some good points. | ||
| They need to make sure that people like that are considered the devil, you know, are horrible people that nobody should bother listening to. | ||
| That's half the battle. | ||
| That's 90% of the battle. | ||
| So that's why things like this really go a long way in fighting the information war. | ||
| Yeah, and it's why the information war is also like a spiritual, I don't even know how to put it, but like a consideration war. | ||
| Like who they want you to care about versus not care about. | ||
| And they use information to dictate that. | ||
| And I think that's exactly right. | ||
| Now, Cozy.TV, I have found to be a really incredible resource. | ||
| I mean, it runs incredibly well. | ||
| It streams incredibly smoothly. | ||
| It's high quality. It's really great. | ||
| Can you tell us about like what was the impetus behind Cozy.TV and what people can find if they go there today? | ||
| Well, thank you so much. | ||
| First of all, I'm glad that you're enjoying the platform. | ||
| So Cozy.TV is a website that I run, and this idea came to me a few years ago. | ||
| It's sort of a self-evident idea. | ||
| You know, I started my show on YouTube five years ago, and I always knew from the day I started my show, the day that I started doing live streaming, That was never going to last. | ||
| I knew that YouTube censorship was coming, and so I had a backup. | ||
| There were a few alternative platforms like Twitch, DLive, a few others, and so I always thought, well, if YouTube ever goes, I'll have a fallback on some other website. | ||
| And then I did get banned on YouTube back in 2020. | ||
| And so I fell back on another website. | ||
| And it was at that time I realized, well, if this falls through, I don't have a backup. | ||
| And then I literally cannot live stream on the internet, which is kind of crazy to think about. | ||
| Because we have this idea that there's competition. | ||
| It's a free market. | ||
| If you don't like it, go somewhere else. | ||
| There is, at some point, nowhere else to go. | ||
| I said, we'll just have to build it. | ||
| So we set out to make a... | ||
| Free speech platform, live streaming platform, and the concept was simple. | ||
| Make it look good, make it work really well, and then platform really good content creators that are banned from everywhere else. | ||
| And that's really the important philosophy because, unfortunately, with a lot of alt tech, it doesn't really look good. | ||
| It doesn't work very well a lot of the time. | ||
| It's sometimes a chore to use, which is why adoption is sometimes slow. | ||
| And so the idea was to build a truly great product, give people great content on a great website, and that was the vision which started in 2020. | ||
| It took us close to two years to build, and we launched it back in October of 2021. | ||
| Since then, our traffic has just been exploding. | ||
| We've surpassed some of the other alt-tech platforms like Getter. | ||
| I know we'd be TrueSocial for a few months, and it's friendly competition. | ||
| I'm on TrueSocial. | ||
| I like them, but it's always great to see something succeed like that. | ||
| We've been having a lot of fun, and knock on wood, so far, so good. | ||
| We've been able to platform a lot of people without a lot of trouble. | ||
| No, and it's been great, and a lot of my friends are over there, like Ethan Ralph I mentioned earlier, Dalton Claudefelter. | ||
| I mean, a lot of people, a lot of great content, incredible stuff. | ||
| I know all of us here at InfoWars are watching your career and applauding the successes that you've had, the latest of which is, of course, the documentary AmericaFirstFoundation.org slash Vegas is where you find information about The Most Canceled Man in America, the new documentary premiering one week from today, NicolasJayFuentes.com. | ||
| Thank you so much for being with us, Nick. | ||
| Thanks for having me. | ||
| Alright, God bless. | ||
| We'll be back on the other side of the third album of American Journal. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. CERN is an acronym that translates to European Council for Nuclear Research, but has since moved on to studying particle physics. | ||
| And even though they invented the internet in 1989, they are most famous for their 666 logo, a video of a woman being ritually sacrificed on CERN grounds at the altar of Shiva, the Hindu god of destruction, and for potentially destroying the universe. | ||
| Multiple lawsuits have been filed to stop CERN's particle collider in fear that it could destroy the Earth. | ||
| Which revealed to the public that CERN is a sovereign entity outside the jurisdiction of the courts so they can do whatever they want. | ||
| What is it that they're doing? | ||
| It has to do with high-velocity counter-rotational spin, which was first documented in Nazi Germany's most secret program, Die Glock, the Bell. | ||
| According to surviving documents, the bell was somehow affecting time and space. | ||
| The most distinctive aspect of the bell was high-velocity counter-rotational spin, also known as torsion physics. | ||
| Many are concerned that CERN is attempting to open a portal into another dimension that will allow demonic entities to enter ours. | ||
| This was blatantly portrayed six years ago in a pagan ritual to celebrate the opening of the Gothard Tunnel, just east of CERN. The dimension they would be attempting to open is already somewhat accessible. | ||
| Do you hear voices in your head? | ||
| If you do, then you likely know it's best to keep that to yourself. | ||
| Because a doctor will tell you that you're a schizophrenic. | ||
| Modern psychiatry calls these voices auditory hallucinations. | ||
| And even though a whopping 1% of the world's population suffers from schizophrenia, there isn't much research. | ||
| But after 30 years of working closely with the criminally insane, Jerry Marzinski has noticed that the voices talking to these schizophrenics are all saying the same things. | ||
| There is a distinct, predictable pattern. | ||
| The voices are exclusively generating negative emotion, leaving the patient physically and emotionally drained. | ||
| The voices are always pulling a person away from God or anything positive. | ||
| The voices are always a call to action, instructing the person to either hurt themselves or hurt someone else, which is probably why the voices always rebel against the drugs that are prescribed for schizophrenia. | ||
| These drugs make a person comatose and the voices want you to do things. | ||
| Marzynski believes that schizophrenics are being attacked by non-physical entities that he calls energy parasites because they feed off of negative energy. | ||
| And in practically every case, the victim has experienced severe trauma, usually sexual trauma, which explains why the voices tell people to traumatize others. | ||
| These demons want more victims. | ||
| According to the ancient Gnostics, who referred to these entities as Archons, they are destructive, sadistic beings who control the Earth via the thoughts of humans. | ||
| Voices in the head. | ||
| This explains the rampant pedophilia we are seeing today and the incestuous inbreeding of royal bloodlines. | ||
| These energy parasites need traumatized people to feed upon. | ||
| Perhaps some of the thoughts in our own mind are not our own. | ||
| Most schizophrenics claim that this is the case, but are told by doctors that they are crazy. | ||
| Doctors who only give them lobotomies, electroshock, and drugs. | ||
| And Marzinski has only seen schizophrenics recover once they start seeing these voices as an external entity. | ||
| They then realize that they can actually resist them, and the voices go away. | ||
| And so, while CERN is a great mystery and a concern, the demons from another dimension may already be here, in our thoughts. | ||
| So it's a good thing we all have free will. | ||
| Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| The third hour of American Journal has begun, and I'm happy to welcome my guest, Robert Owens, a National Council member of the John Birch Society. | ||
| In fact, he's the Midwest Regional Field Director and a National Council member of the John Birch Society, a writer for the New American Magazine. | ||
| And host of the weekly video series Constitution Corner at JBS.org. | ||
| Prior to joining the field staff, Robert was a trial lawyer and practiced law for over two decades. | ||
| He's here with us today to lend his expertise in discussing what your options are regarding vaccine... | ||
| Man, oh, I think we used an old copy for this. | ||
| He's actually here to talk about the recent Supreme Court cases. | ||
| That have been decided recently and what their fallout and implications are. | ||
| The website is thenewamerican.com and the constitution corner on jbs.org can be found at that website jbs.org slash video slash constitution dash corner if you want to enter in the URL. Thanks so much for joining us, Robert. Hey, thanks so much for having me back. | ||
| And, you know, that last piece that we did about what Americans can do to protect themselves against vaccine mandates, I was thrilled to see that that was viewed and shared hundreds of thousands of times. | ||
| We got tremendous feedback of people that were able to keep their jobs and refuse to jab. | ||
| And, man, are they glad they did that now. | ||
| We've had a few callers tell us exactly that thing. | ||
| I mean, it really is amazing what, you know, the little conversation that we have here on this platform spreads like wildfire and actually makes a tangible positive difference in people's lives. | ||
| I mean, if that's not what it's all about, then I don't know what we're doing here. | ||
| So we actually are achieving really lofty goals here. | ||
| So thank you for helping us with that. | ||
| Hey, my pleasure. That is literally in my job description with the John Birch Society. | ||
| Well, that's absolutely fantastic. | ||
| So, the Supreme Court has issued a number of rulings. | ||
| Basically, the only one that's gotten real attention on it is the Roe versus Wade ruling, but the gun control, there's been a little bit of talk about that. | ||
| The EPA ruling, there's been a little bit of discussion, but really nothing. | ||
| But really, you know, some of these other decisions, other than the Roe vs. | ||
| Wade decision, have a lot more impact on people's daily lives. | ||
| I know I've heard you say so. | ||
| Tell us, what do you think about just the recent slate of Supreme Court decisions that have come out? | ||
| Well, I'll tell you what, it has been delicious. | ||
| I can remember going through law school and, you know, briefing all these horrific cases—Roe v. | ||
| Wade and the Chevron case that was just really eviscerated by the EPA decision this year—the religious liberty cases and thinking, What the hell are these people thinking? | ||
| This is nuts! | ||
| But I'll tell you what, as I've had an opportunity to review these new cases coming through, and I mean, there's been hundreds of pages of reviewing, for which I will say I've been enjoying my Black Rifle coffee as I've been going through it, my favorite coffee. As we're going through this process, right, it has been so refreshing to see reason and common sense be reinstilled in the law. | ||
| And this is, you know, a critical concept because as Frederick Bastiat, author of a book called, incidentally called, The Law, talks about is that if people have a disconnect between morality and the law, they start having disrespect for civil law. | ||
| And that's how civilizations really erode and collapse from the inside. | ||
| And the thing is that these globalist bankers that are driving this stuff, they know that, and that is part of this process. | ||
| So, to answer your question directly, though, The Roe v. | ||
| Wade decision is huge, and that can't be underestimated. | ||
| However, the EPA decision could very well, in terms of giving our republic life support to keep going through these really dark days of the Biden administration, probably has the biggest impact of keeping us on life support. | ||
| Going forward for our industries and such. | ||
| And then, of course, the religious liberties cases, the gun case, this has all been huge. | ||
| But if I were to rate it, I would say the EPA case is probably the most significant. | ||
| Then the Roe case, and then, boy, those religious liberty cases and the gun case, only to the extent that they've been somewhat limited in their scope, makes them maybe a little bit less significant than the other two. | ||
| No, but the success really has given a certain buoyancy to people on the right who actually want respect and rule of law. | ||
| And I think that's really important what you said, that when morality and law are at conflict, that's not a good thing. | ||
| And, you know, I was talking about this on the show and I'd like to sort of delve down into it, maybe not the details of the cases, but more of the sort of spiritual overlay of this and what any of this means. | ||
| Because to me, the concept of liberty really means a rule of law that you can trust and understand and isn't oppressing people. | ||
| Can you talk a little bit about just the importance of having law that reflects people's innate morality? | ||
| Just that you mentioned that, I think that's a very profound statement actually to really consider. | ||
| Yeah, so Frédéric Bastiat, well, I'll tell you what, if your listeners are not familiar with this, you can get this online. | ||
| You can buy it cheaply. | ||
| You can even read it for free online. | ||
| It's called The Law, and Frédéric Bastiat is the French philosopher. | ||
| The book is brilliant, and it's very short. | ||
| So if you're looking for a summer read that is tremendous, The Law by Frédéric Bastiat is definitely the way to go. | ||
| And really, so the concept is this, that when you look at what made America truly great, It's not just the function of freedom, right? | ||
| Because liberty with licenses is just a mess. | ||
| The Founding Fathers talked about that our government is only for a moral and just people, and it just isn't going to work in any other way. | ||
| But the special sauce that made America great Is that on one hand you had liberty, you had freedom, but on the other hand you had moral restraint that came together with that. | ||
| And the connection of the two is like an unbelievable special sauce that your grandma couldn't even imagine that made the most prosperous civilization that benefited more people than at any point ever in civilization. | ||
| Yeah, and I think people, you know, I always use the cookie jar analogy, right? | ||
| Liberty is an unguarded cookie jar. | ||
| Because you could steal it, you could probably get away with it, but you have to have the moral foundation to say, I'm not going to do that, because if I start doing it, everybody's going to start doing it. | ||
| So, you know, liberty... Requires sort of an ecology of virtue. | ||
| Everybody has to recognize, all right, we all have to act virtuous, and even though I could take advantage right here, I'm going to resist it myself for the betterment of all of us. | ||
| And I think, you know, nowadays you hear people talk about freedom and liberty. | ||
| They just mean the freedom and liberty to do whatever they want, whenever they want, completely missing the moral requirement that is the prerequisite to any of this. | ||
| Well, and that's exactly right. | ||
| And I'll tell you, in terms of the two major religious liberty cases that came out of this last session, they really drive directly at providing solutions for that. | ||
| So on the one hand, the court made it clear that parents can get their kids out of the government schools, and if the legislature is going to pass laws, That allow the money to follow the child, then those parents can get their kids out of the government schools and put them into a really solid, you know, religious-based program that's going to inculcate these kinds of values into our future generation. | ||
| Because we know for sure that the teacher unions are not going to allow that to happen. | ||
| So, on one hand, Huge movement to get kids out of government schools. | ||
| Now, for those that are left in the government schools, the other religious liberty case, the 50-yard line case, is tremendous, because there are good Christian teachers in the government school systems. | ||
| That want to ensure and sort of have their faith be part of the process for them. | ||
| And so this really loosens the noose around them to bring faith back into the school environment, even in the government school system. | ||
| So that's tremendous as well. | ||
| And so this has been sort of a double-sided attack that has really loosened up religious liberties for American And boy, that's a huge concept going forward. | ||
| It really is. It absolutely is. | ||
| And we'll talk more about all of that on the other side. | ||
| Robert can enjoy his Black Rifle coffee. | ||
| I'll be enjoying my Patriot Blend Wake Up America coffee from Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| We'll both be appreciating our particular brew here as we continue this conversation. | ||
| Just slightly jacked up on caffeine, but the finest quality available. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com is where you get the Wake Up America Patriot blood. | ||
| We'll be back on the other side with Mr. | ||
| Robert Owens of the John Bird Society. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Stay tuned, folks. Alright folks, welcome back. | |
| It is the American Journal. My guest is Robert Owens, National Councilmember of the John Birch Society. | ||
| Extremely, extremely well-read and knowledgeable about, well, law in general and especially the Supreme Court cases that have recently been decided. | ||
| And one that we started to talk about a little bit in the last segment, but again, I think has not gotten enough attention. | ||
| I know I myself really haven't heard too much about it. | ||
| I looked into it a little, but I haven't heard of all of the implications or how exactly it even got to this point. | ||
| It was the EPA case, and that was recently decided sort of in a positive direction. | ||
| Can you tell us, just give us the breakdown of what exactly the EPA case was about and what the decision means? | ||
| Certainly. Just very broadly, the case itself dealt with the EPA's ability to regulate carbon emissions, and so that was the gist of the case. | ||
| But the more broad implications deal with regulatory powers of sort of the bureaucracy state of the executive department. | ||
| And, you know, when I look at the Constitution, when I read the Constitution, Article 1, Section 1, Sentence 1 says that all legislative powers are vested in the Congress. | ||
| Now, if all are vested in Congress, I don't know how much is left over for the Executive Department. | ||
| Colleges left over for the judicial branch. | ||
| I chose a college based on no math requirements, so I'll say that up front, but I'm thinking that that one is clear. | ||
| So what this case did was really reaffirm that principle that, look, if there's going to be legislative policy decisions They have to be explicitly enacted by Congress, that Congress can't just delegate this wide breadth of authority to a legislative agency and then they can just make up basically whatever they want, | ||
| so long as it has Basically some possible concept of an idea relating to the nature of the action. | ||
| And that was the old standard under what's called the Chevron rule. | ||
| But this case really took a whole new direction to that. | ||
| And it actually built off of a case that I reported on last year in Constitution Corner that dealt with bump stocks. | ||
| And in that case, the court said that the ATF couldn't sort of change the rule on what you call a bump stock to now make it illegal, where it was previously illegal, that that required an explicit action of Congress. | ||
| So this really— It enforces the language of the Constitution in a way that hasn't been seen in decades and decades and is a major reversal in the right direction that's going to impact not just, | ||
| you know, The sort of green agenda of the Democrats, but a whole swath of deep state rulemaking authority that's going to have potentially huge impact going forward. | ||
| This could potentially be the most significant case of this term, even with the Dobbs case considered. | ||
| You know, I sort of find myself in a tough situation because, you know, obviously we here at Infowars, like part of what we speak out against is not just the government overreach, but also corporations who are able to use the government and have this sort of regulatory capture but also corporations who are able to use the government and have this sort of regulatory capture to destroy the environment in a lot of ways, atrazine in the water, I mean, chemical imbalances caused by just pollution from | ||
| So, you know, I like the idea that the government should be able to have the power to stop corporations from doing this type of stuff. | ||
| As an individual, I don't have the power to stop them. | ||
| I think that's an appropriate use of the government's powers. | ||
| And yet you see time and time again they take this power that you grant them to ostensibly protect the American people, and they're using it to aggrandize their own power, actually benefit the very corporations that they're supposed to be regulating. | ||
| So what's going to be the implication of this EPA ruling? | ||
| I mean, is it going to give Is corporations more power to pollute and to cause trouble? | ||
| And how do we strike that balance? | ||
| Because, you know, I'm an environmentalist at the end of the day. | ||
| I don't buy into the green new scam or the climate change complete nonsense. | ||
| But I care about the natural world and I don't want corporations to have free license to destroy it. | ||
| So, I mean, how do we make this balancing act and is kicking it to the legislature the appropriate move here? | ||
| Yeah, so, and I agree with you 100%, and I would say that really conservatives are the best conservationists of the planet that I've ever met. | ||
| When you look at the biggest ecological disasters ever in history, they're always in communist nations. | ||
| Oh, right. To this day, yeah. | ||
| It's horrific. Now, what I would say, though, is that there is a process to deal with those types of things that don't require federal legislation. | ||
| So you certainly have the ability at the state level to deal with things, and their government is far more responsive to the people, and so you don't have the types of overreach problems that you get when you centralize Power in the federal government. | ||
| So I would say that to the extent that government needs to be involved, it should really be involved more at the state level or at the local level, and really not at the federal level, except for, you know, maybe certain significant problems that need to be dealt with, the complexity of which is too much for our discussion today. | ||
| But what I would say is this. | ||
| There's also a very significant private sector process as well called nuisance law. | ||
| Which means that, hey, if you are adjacent or close to a property that is polluting in such a way that it's now impacting the use of your rights, of your property, you can bring that action in court and seek redress. | ||
| And nuisance law has been part of American jurisprudence since the beginning. | ||
| It really helps deal with a lot of the issues where government doesn't need to be involved, because you're right. | ||
| Government itself can really run amok once you start getting into the process. | ||
| So to address the issue of You know, of conservation directly. | ||
| What I would say is this. | ||
| Private property owners usually have a vested interest in making sure that their property is maintained because it preserves the value. | ||
| Now, there are certain bad actors, but there you can use nuisance law and you can use state and local government to deal with it, such that at the federal level, they really shouldn't be involved but for very limited purposes. | ||
| Yeah, and you make a couple very good points, and of course that's how I always picture it, is in the libertarian sort of mindset, is if my river is being polluted by the mine upstream, well that's infringing on my rights to enjoy my property, and so it really all does go back to that basic foundational understanding of what it means to be an American, why private property is an important thing, and the non-aggression principle sort of in its In a vague but very important form. | ||
| And of course, the story I always think of when talking about the EPA is, you know, the story from 2015. | ||
| EPA says it released 3 million gallons of contaminated water into a river. | ||
| Gee, thanks, EPA. You know, what would we do without you? | ||
| Yeah, there's no constitutional authority for that organization. | ||
| There's no constitutional authority for the Department of Education or the Department of Energy. | ||
| Quite honestly, the sooner we get rid of all of those crazy departments, the better off we're going to be because these are not federal issues. | ||
| They should not be dealt with at the federal government level. | ||
| Yeah, it really just gunks up the works and makes them so much less efficient and more easily corruptible when they're so centralized like that. | ||
| It couldn't be more obvious from my point of view and I think from yours as well. | ||
| And I want to touch again on sort of the foundational aspect of what you're talking about on the other side, the idea of the separation of powers and how that's been destroyed recently. | ||
| I know you've written about that when it came to January 6th in the Congressional Committee, so we'll get into that on the other side. | ||
| Robert Owens is with me. We'll be back in just a minute. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| My guest is Robert Owens, Midwest Regional Field Director and National Council member of the John Birch Society, and he's a writer for the New American magazine, which can be found at thenewamerican.com. | ||
| He also hosts the Constitution Corner on JBS.org, where every week he puts out a video about current events and relates them to the Constitution, something that seems like our politicians increasingly forget to do, actually acknowledge what the Constitution something that seems like our politicians increasingly forget to do, actually acknowledge what the Constitution | ||
| And isn't it ironic, Robert, that we have something like the January 6th Committee who invoke the image of the Constitution continuously, invoke the image of our founding fathers over and over again to try to justify their existence. | ||
| And yet what they're involved in is in complete contradiction to the structure of government as laid out in the Constitution. | ||
| And you brought this up in the last segment, talking about the way that duties that have very explicitly been given to the legislature are being sort of put off to the side or being usurped, however you want to think of it. | ||
| It's not the power is no longer lying where it is supposed to, according to the Constitution. | ||
| And I see the January 6th committee as sort of a glaring example of this. | ||
| But from the January 6th committee to environmentalism, it seems like everything's just sort of getting shuffled around and mixed up in the wash. | ||
| And that's the source of a lot of issues in the country today. | ||
| I mean, do you see this as an existential crisis like I do? | ||
| Or do you think things are just sort of... | ||
| Eh, the Constitution's kind of getting tossed to the side. | ||
| I mean, I think that's kind of a big deal. | ||
| I imagine you do, too. But what do you think is really going on here? | ||
| Yeah, so I had an opportunity. | ||
| Before I got into law, I was a military historian, specifically focused on the Royal Navy. | ||
| And so the Royal Navy had a saying, once is happenstance, twice is circumstance, three times is enemy action. | ||
| Well, Harrison, we have enemy action going on here. | ||
| There's no question about it. | ||
| We've got people that are not stupid, they're not good Americans trying their best, but aw shucks, it keeps going wrong for them. | ||
| No, $5 a gallon gasoline is a purposeful attack on the United States. | ||
| Crashing our economy with a bioweapon, right? | ||
| And making a vaccine that's an even bigger bioweapon. | ||
| These are purposeful attacks on our country. | ||
| So we need to understand that this is enemy action and nothing less than that. | ||
| So- With that in mind, we can then go forward because as Sun Tzu would say in The Art of War, know yourself, know your enemy. | ||
| You need not fear the result of 100 battles. | ||
| Right, right. No, I think you're exactly right. | ||
| And it's so funny because I say exactly what you just said on the show all the time. | ||
| And I always say the division these days is not between conservative and liberal or Republican Democrat. | ||
| It's just people who get it. | ||
| I think that's a key part of getting it is understanding this is not on accident. | ||
| We are under attack and our system is under attack. | ||
| When you have congressional committees acting as the judiciary, that's an attack on the very structure of our government and needs to be recognized as such. | ||
| And yet it seems like they're able to get away with this partly because the media is complicit in their actions. | ||
| I mean, you actually brought it up, I think, during the break, the fact that Congress has the power to declare war. | ||
| Congress is supposed to declare war, and they have not done so since World War II. I mean, this is not a small thing. | ||
| The fact that we are essentially, in all intents and purposes, at war with Russia right now, and yet there's been no discussion, no debate, no discussion of what is our war aim here, and what are we trying to achieve? | ||
| I mean, that's why what we're facing now is an absolute quagmire. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, no doubt about it. | |
| Building off this EPA case that said, look, it's Congress that has to do things the right and appropriate way. | ||
| They can't just delegate authority generally. | ||
| So on the War Powers Act in particular, this could potentially be a huge doctrine change Where because we haven't had any undeclared wars, because we've had Congress just sort of ceding nebulous authority to the executive department to do all kinds of different war, we could see a real change where Congress is now going to be forced to do their job again. | ||
| And that could be huge, because the warfare state Is perhaps the biggest way by which the technocratic oligarchs that are truly behind the scenes running our country drive the dollar into absolute dust. | ||
| And certainly we're seeing that here today with the gas and the inflation and everything else. | ||
| Again, this is purposeful attack. | ||
| And do you think it's just that the Congress, like the actual Congress members, don't want that responsibility? | ||
| Because, you know, I've noticed Thomas Massey, he'll retweet Joe Biden when Joe Biden says, in a war economy, or we are at war, and Thomas Massey will retweet it and go, despite the declarations of the executive branch, we are not at war right now. | ||
| So he's sort of demanding, you know, in certain ways that this power be relegated back to where it belongs in the Congress. | ||
| But do you think that the Congress members just go... | ||
| I'd rather not have to justify my warmongering, so we'll just let the executive do it and we'll just keep quiet about it. | ||
| I mean, is that what it is? Just an abdication of their responsibility? | ||
| Oh, absolutely. Spot on. | ||
| And I love Dr. | ||
| Ron Paul in Congress for 20 years. | ||
| He would constantly point this out. | ||
| And with regard to the various undeclared wars that we had throughout his 20 years, he would sponsor bills to have a declaration of war. | ||
| And he'd say, I plan to vote against it. | ||
| But if we're going to do this, it has to be done the right way. | ||
| And of course, they always brushed that aside because they were permitted to. | ||
| There was sort of an easy escape valve that they were looking at using the sort of Chevron rule concept to be able to delegate authorities out. | ||
| This case could have huge, sweeping concepts going forward. | ||
| Now, not necessarily all of the justices are on board with the expansive view of that. | ||
| And so throughout all of the decisions that we've been talking about, Harrison, several of the judges that—or justices that voted with the majority then wrote concurring opinions saying, don't get too excited yet. | ||
| We're not sure that it's going to expand beyond that. | ||
| Doesn't necessarily mean they're right that it won't, but maybe, maybe not to actually have support for that expansion as we go on forward. | ||
| So what would that mean? Would that mean that somebody would have to bring a case to the Supreme Court to say, hey, you know, suing the government to say you're not allowed to declare war and yet you are? | ||
| And would that then be decided? | ||
| I mean, in terms of war powers, is there a case that could be brought? | ||
| How would that happen? Well, so the first part is you'd have to find a proper party to bring the action. | ||
| So quite honestly, a member of Congress would be an ideal proper party to bring or those types of things. | ||
| We see those kinds of cases being brought. | ||
| A great example would be the issue of Kamala Harris and her ability to serve as vice president, the fact that she's not a natural-born citizen. | ||
| Well, the big issue is, well, who's a proper party? | ||
| Well, I'll tell you what, a U.S. senator could certainly bring that case, because one of her offices is president of the Senate. | ||
| But those cases are never decided on their merits. | ||
| They're always decided on just cases of who's a proper plaintiff to bring the case. | ||
| So the key to enforcing those decisions is finding what's called a proper plaintiff that the court will recognize to bring the action. | ||
| That's going to be the key to it. | ||
| I don't have that answer offhand right now, Harrison. | ||
| One of our regular callers, Jefferson, I can hear him from here screaming in exultation. | ||
| In fact, a phone line just lit up. | ||
| I wouldn't be surprised it was him because he's called in regularly since Kamala Harris was elected to make that exact argument. | ||
| And so I know he'll be happy to know that there are people like yourself that agree with him. | ||
| Just quickly here, I mean, is that possible? | ||
| Is it possible if a senator wanted to bring that case against Kamala Harris to say she's not legally allowed to occupy the space she now resides in? | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. But I mean, who's going to do it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ted Cruz? He's shooting himself in the foot in the process. | |
| So, you know, that becomes sort of the concept is, well, which senator is actually going to step up and do it? | ||
| I mean, you'd hope somebody like Rand Paul or one of these guys would do it. | ||
| But, you know, that's just not a step they're willing to take. | ||
| So it's a political decision. | ||
| You hear that, Jefferson? Start calling your senators. | ||
| They're the ones that could do it. | ||
| I'm telling you, he brings it up all the time, and it's a good argument, but that's the question is, where do you go from there? | ||
| All right, folks, welcome back. | ||
| Final segment of American Journal. | ||
| My guest is Robert Owens, and now that I've learned he is a scholar on British Royal Navy history, I'm going to resist the temptation to just talk about My favorite book series of all time, the Aubrey Matron series. | ||
| But we're going to resist that temptation. | ||
| We're going to stick to topics that affect you and your daily life. | ||
| You can find Mr. Owen's writings at thenewamerican.com. | ||
| Really brilliant work there. | ||
| And, of course, the Constitution Corner on jbs.org, where he does weekly uploads and discussions about the Constitution and how it relates to the modern day. | ||
| Now, there's a couple of Supreme Court cases that have been decided that we haven't talked too much about yet. | ||
| This is the gun control case and the religious liberty case. | ||
| We've touched on them a little bit, but what's the expansive or the narrow scope of these, and how will these affect people in their daily lives? | ||
| Certainly, Harrison. | ||
| So first, let me address the gun case. | ||
| And really the most significant case that has been decided on the Second Amendment since the Heller case in 2008. | ||
| And this was a focus on not just an individual's right to own a gun in their home. | ||
| That was the 2008 Heller case. | ||
| This was whether or not you can then bring that gun out of your home. | ||
| And I think to myself, hmm, let's see, did the Minutemen that mustered on Lexington Green, did they, like, before they left to muster, did they check to see if they had permission from the king to exit their home? | ||
| Right. Right? | ||
| Come on! That's nonsense! | ||
| And the bottom line is, anytime you need a license or permission from the government to exercise a God-given right, Harrison, that is not a good thing. | ||
| Now, here's the good to bad of this case. | ||
| The good is that No longer can states have paradigms on concealed carry where you've got to essentially prove that you have some sort of good reason to be able to carry a gun. | ||
| And then the government's in a position of determining whether that's a good enough or not good enough reason with really no accountability on that decision. | ||
| And in essence, it becomes, who do you know? | ||
| And how good are your connections to whether or not you can get a gun? | ||
| Because that's really what that came out to be, which is a very elitist, discriminatory sort of law, especially impacting lower-income families that have more of a need. | ||
| To protect themselves when they go out to the grocery store to prevent getting mugged or whatever the case may be. | ||
| So what this case said is that, all right, states can still be in a position to issue licenses for things like make sure that you don't have felony background, perhaps that you've had some training so you're not going to shoot your neighbor in the process. | ||
| Those types of things, they can have those types of requirements to issue a license, but Upon an objective showing that you've met those standards, they have to issue that license. | ||
| They can't withhold it on any sort of subjective criteria. | ||
| So the good news is that in a lot of states where this was previously really out of the realm of possibility, Now you can get a license. | ||
| The bad news is we're still talking about a God-given right, and the Supreme Court has especially said, yeah, you can require a license for that. | ||
| Now, in many states, in fact, my home state of Ohio, we just passed something called constitutional carry so that in Ohio, at least, you don't need any license at all. | ||
| You don't have to bend the knee, kiss the ring to have the right, God-given right, of self-defense. | ||
| Right, absolutely. And, you know, one of the things that I've noticed uniquely, I think in my experience, at least my, you know, conscious knowledge of it, is the way that not just the executive branch now, but you see even states sort of announcing their intention to either ignore or in some way subvert the rulings of the Supreme Court. | ||
| And, of course, you know, they made this ruling on gun rights, and like the next day, New York State said, well, we're going to We're going to have to require three years of social media information in order to give you a gun license. | ||
| I mean, is this as unprecedented as it seems, the attacks against the Supreme Court? | ||
| Well, you know, it's interesting to see. | ||
| I mean, when we had, you know, really the assault that came from the court in the 1960s with the Warren Court, there was a lot of conservative, you know, pushback. | ||
| And there were a lot of states that said, geez, no, we're not going to— Well, you know, the federal government started sending in soldiers to enforce these Supreme Court cases. | ||
| So I'm guessing that the Biden administration is not going to be sending in anybody to Right. | ||
| Or this Buren decision either. | ||
| But really what it comes down to is this. | ||
| There has been, I think, a series of cases this past term that have really been pro-Constitution. | ||
| And we're seeing for the first time really the weight of the Trump appointees really swinging this court to a proper direction of original intent. | ||
| I don't think Justice Roberts It doesn't necessarily count as a conservative, | ||
| but I think that we're going to see as we go forward an outgrowth of these cases that enhances and furthers the cause of liberty in America. | ||
| It's kind of like Return of the Jedi time. | ||
| It's an exciting time to be an American. | ||
| And it at least seems to be changing sort of the mindset of people because I can think of, you know, the religious liberty ruling, you know, whether or not it changes the way laws are enforced. | ||
| I can imagine now that coaches who maybe previously had seen, hey, that coach got fired for praying. | ||
| Now they go, hey, maybe I will pray after, you know, after the game because I'm not scared to do that anymore. | ||
| So at least in the mindset of the American people, it's probably having a pretty significant shift. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. That's a huge aspect. | ||
| And here's the thing we need to understand. | ||
| Government schools right now are so hopelessly Corrupt and horrific. | ||
| They are not educating your children for anything. | ||
| They are indoctrinating them to live as slaves. | ||
| And so parents need to understand, get your kids out. | ||
| Get them out. Get them out now. | ||
| Don't pass go. Don't collect 200. | ||
| Don't even go back to clean out the locker. | ||
| Just get them out. | ||
| And so these cases have given an opportunity for citizens then to go to their state legislatures and do what we call in Ohio a backpack bill, where the money that would go to a child for their education can instead be redirected by the parents To use in a religious-based education that is far better. | ||
| So I would hope that this would be a major aspect of empowering parents to get their kids the heck out of government schools, with the added bonus that the few that remain in that system, unfortunately, hopefully Christian teachers will be able to finally be able to express themselves in a way that will even reach them as well. | ||
| And that's a huge change in American law on that concept and a return to the original intent of the Constitution to begin with. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. And of course we know that it sort of depends on how you define religion or morality, but they have no problem with certain ideologies being pushed on kids. | ||
| They just don't want that Christian one because that one has a church. | ||
| And so maybe this will at least level the playing field where people can— Positively influence kids rather than just the horrific nonsense that you pointed out. | ||
| Quickly, as we finish up here, what do we expect next from the Supreme Court? | ||
| Are we eagerly waiting with our popcorn to find out what new decisions are being made, or is that it for the foreseeable future? | ||
| No, I think that—so first of all, this term is done, so we're not going to see any further major decisions going forward. | ||
| So nothing in sort of the next few months. | ||
| Probably what we're going to see is not really until the end of the next month. | ||
| Term where we get, you know, next June where we get sort of the next round of decisions. | ||
| But there's talk of another gun case that's going to be before. | ||
| There's talk of other regulatory cases that could expand upon this. | ||
| And, of course, we're going to see other cases that even build on this Dobbs decision going forward, too. | ||
| What I'm really hoping to see, and what Thomas—Justice Thomas talked about in his concurring opinion, is that things like same-sex marriage Will also be addressed because the substantive due process aspect of the 14th Amendment that really was the basis for all of those sort of woke agenda decisions was completely gutted in the Dobbs decision, | ||
| and that's going to create a whole new concept to re-look at those cases and hopefully reverse Obergefell and so many of these other bad decisions as well. | ||
| Well, the tide really is turning in America, I believe, and it doesn't happen fast. | ||
| The tide turns slowly, but it turns inevitably and irreversibly, at least for the time being. | ||
| Well, we'll have to have you on before then, for sure, but especially then when these decisions come out to explain to our audience exactly what they mean for them in their lives. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us. | ||
| Again, it's Robert Owens, thenewamerican.com, the Constitution Corner on JBS.org. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us today. | ||
| Hey, thanks so much, Harrison. | ||
| We'll talk to you soon. Well, yeah, we'll have you on again soon as more developments occur, folks. | ||
| That's going to do it for us. Stay tuned for The Alex Jones Show. | ||
| It begins in two minutes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Don't go anywhere. PrepareToday.com. | |
| PrepareToday.com. | ||
| Or simply follow the URL that is a hyperlink to PrepareToday.com from PrepareWithAlex.com. | ||
| High quality storable food is now back in stock, ready to ship to you and your family. | ||
| We've not sold food for three months because there was a wait. | ||
| Now there is not a Almost every other storable food distributor is completely out and will not have more food for months, if ever. | ||
| And the prices are exploding. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, now is the time to protect yourself and your family and not be dependent on the system. | ||
| The time to be self-sufficient is now. | ||
| We have the best deals on high-quality storable food and a whole spectrum of other preparedness and survival items right now. |
Export Selection