Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| Pop culture has touted Elon Musk as some sort of eccentric heavyweight genius with humble beginnings. | ||
| But this is demonstrably false. | ||
| Elon Musk was born in South Africa, where he claims he grew up extremely poor. | ||
| But his family owned an emerald mine. | ||
| As a teenager, Elon would trade emeralds for cash in New York City. | ||
| And his father bragged how they had so much money we couldn't even close our safe. | ||
| Musk claims to have had about $100,000 of student loan debt, but he received a full scholarship to the University of Pennsylvania, where he bought a 10-bedroom frat house with his friend Adeo Resi and ran an illegal nightclub. | ||
| The pop culture claim is that Elon has an IQ of 155. | ||
| But this has never been tested, and after being accepted into Stanford for PhD studies, he dropped out after two days. | ||
| After dropping out, Elon began his first business venture with his brother Kimball, Zip2, which was essentially a digital version of the Yellow Pages. | ||
| The brothers received tens of thousands of dollars from their parents, and yet Elon denies this. | ||
| An associate of Elon's father, Greg Curry, got involved to bring in investors. | ||
| But Elon's code was no good, so they had to hire on professional coders to rewrite everything. | ||
| Zip2 was then sold for $307 million to Compaq, who later shut it down without ever earning a profit. | ||
| Elon made $22 million, bought a $1 million McLaren F1 supercar, which made mainstream news, before he totaled the uninsured vehicle. | ||
| Musk then went on to create an online bank, X.com. | ||
| He partnered with banking expert Harris Fricker, Edward Ho, and Christopher Payne. | ||
| All three ended up leaving the company after accusing Elon of lying to the media about the quality of their product. | ||
| Elon claims he founded PayPal. | ||
| Before the company was named PayPal, it was known as Confinity. | ||
| It was founded in 1998 by Peter Thiel and Max Levchin. | ||
| After losing millions of dollars, Elon's X.com was bought by Confinity in a merger in 2000. | ||
| All Musk contributed at Confinity was his own power struggle. | ||
| He made himself CEO and pushed to change the name to X.com. | ||
| The executive team successfully petitioned to fire Musk while he was away on vacation. | ||
| Part of Musk's resignation agreement stipulated that all references to founders of the company will be removed from their website, allowing Elon to claim credit, which so far is all he has ever achieved. | ||
| Peter Thiel then rebranded the company as PayPal, went public, and sold to eBay for $1.5 billion. | ||
| Elon made $180 million from the deal, which he then invested into Tesla, SpaceX, and failed company SolarCity. | ||
| Elon falsely claims to be the founder of Tesla. | ||
| Tesla was founded in 2003 by Mark Tarpening and Martin Eberhard, who developed the Tesla Roadster. | ||
| When Tesla Motors began looking for venture capital, they approached Elon Musk, who had the fake credibility as PayPal's co-founder. | ||
| Musk joined with the condition that he be named chairman of the board. | ||
| In emails, Musk was upset that the media was not giving him credit for Tesla Motors and went after Martin Eberhard, replacing him as CEO. He then forced Eberhard out of the company and rewrote the company's history to have himself listed as an original co-founder. | ||
| Martin Eberhard, the man behind the Tesla Roadster, was promised the first Roadster off the assembly line. | ||
| But Musk screwed him over on that as well and sent that car into space. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You can tell it's real because it looks so fake, honestly. | |
| So who is Elon Musk? | ||
| Elon describes his father as being an evil, abusive man. | ||
| His father, Errol Musk, has been accused of being a pedophile and fathered a child with his stepdaughter, who is 42 years younger than him. | ||
| This spoiled, narcissistic failure... | ||
| All right, folks, this video is from about a year ago, June 2021. | ||
| You can still find and share it at banded.video. | ||
| It is a Reese report. | ||
| Showing maybe you shouldn't be so enamored with elite Elon Musk. | ||
| Maybe we need to have a little bit of skepticism in this. | ||
| That being said, we're still going to laugh at the liberals melting down over his purchases on Twitter. | ||
| Stay tuned. Daily Dispatch on the other side. | ||
| Been a bunch of clips. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to the American Journal. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| You're watching us on band.video and infowars.com. | ||
| Very glad you're here this morning. | ||
| I was worried because the big news of today broke yesterday, basically as soon as our show was over. | ||
| Like the minute our show is over, the big news about Elon Musk buying Twitter broke. | ||
| And so I was worried that it would be old news here nearly 24 hours later. | ||
| But nope, it's the only thing anybody is talking about. | ||
| So we'll talk about it as well. | ||
| And yes, we will be mocking the leftist meltdown. | ||
| But more importantly, we'll be pointing out how this leftist meltdown isn't really them worried about not being able to express themselves anymore. | ||
| but it's about them acknowledging tacitly, quietly, the fact that they have been manipulating Twitter for the last five years and they understand exactly how powerful their control over that platform was in turning their ideas into political will. | ||
| So we'll get into all of that and more, but let's begin today as we do every day with our Daily Dispatch. | ||
| All right, here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Tuesday, the 26th of April, 2022. | ||
| From the Post Millennial, it's official. | ||
| Elon Musk buys Twitter. | ||
| Twitter has reached a deal with the Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk to buy out the platform for $44 billion. | ||
| After the deal was announced, Twitter stock stopped trading. | ||
| According to the Wall Street Journal, Twitter and Musk have reached a deal which gives Musk total control of the company. | ||
| Musk released a statement saying free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated. | ||
| I want to make Twitter better than ever by enhancing the product with new features, making the algorithm open source to increase trust, defeating the spam bots and authenticating all humans. | ||
| Well, this is obviously an existential threat to free speech. | ||
| Clearly, this is... | ||
| This is just awful. | ||
| How dare he say such things? | ||
| No, it's definitely a positive move. | ||
| And like Tucker Carlson said yesterday, we'll play a clip from him. | ||
| He said, Musk's purchase of Twitter is the single biggest political development since Donald Trump's election in 2016. | ||
| And that is a little bit how it feels, isn't it? | ||
| Like the feeling when Trump won the election in 2016. | ||
| That feeling of, oh my God, it actually happened. | ||
| Things are actually turning around. | ||
| Remember how that solved everything? | ||
| Remember how when Donald Trump got elected, everything got so much better, and we didn't have to worry about anything anymore, and that all of our dreams were fulfilled, and that the leftists understood, okay, we've been beaten here. | ||
| You know, better just to quietly and respectively concede Remember how that happened? | ||
| Remember how they totally didn't go absolutely insane and double down on all of their madness? | ||
| No, we're about to see a full-on madness onslaught from everybody from the mainstream media to the political operatives, and we'll cover all that a little bit later. | ||
| But moving on for now to our next story. | ||
| Biden administration temporarily blocked from lifting Title 42. | ||
| Another victory. Folks, this might be a record two pieces of good news in a daily dispatch. | ||
| This is unprecedented. The lawsuit was first filed by Missouri, Louisiana, Arizona in the U.S. District Court in Louisiana. | ||
| And they have now obtained a temporary restraining order Monday that blocks the Biden administration from lifting Title 42, a public health order that has expedited the expulsion of immigrants since March 2020. | ||
| So yes, we have obtained a... | ||
| Temporary hold on the absolute collapse of the border. | ||
| The border is collapsed, but this is just like a dam. | ||
| The water is spilling over and around the dam, and the dam is cracked and crumbling. | ||
| But we have, at least for the time being, placed a young child in front of the dam to try to hold it up for just a little bit longer. | ||
| We'll see how that goes. Meanwhile, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has signed an election integrity bill dedicated to voter fraud prevention. | ||
| It makes ballast harvesting a felony, which, thank God, why is Florida the only state ever doing stuff like this? | ||
| It's almost like every week there's one or two new things that Ron DeSantis does that, while it's amazing that he's doing it, it also illustrates how utterly worthless the rest of the state's governments are. | ||
| Whether it's the don't say gay child grooming bill or this bill about election integrity. | ||
| It's just common sense, normal things that any functioning first world society should have in place. | ||
| But for some reason, Ron DeSantis is the only American governor capable of pulling this stuff off. | ||
| So as a Texan, I feel jealous. | ||
| Moving on to the war in Ukraine, Russia's Lavrov warns a real danger of World War III. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Monday that peace talks with Ukraine would continue while warning there was a real danger of World War III. Speaking to Russian news agencies, he criticized Kiev's approach in the talks, adding, goodwill has its limits, but if this isn't reciprocal, that doesn't help the negotiation process. | ||
| But we are continuing to engage in negotiations with the team delegated by Zelensky, and these contacts will go on. | ||
| But Lavrov accused former actor Zelensky of pretending to negotiate. | ||
| He's a good actor, he said. | ||
| But if you watch attentively and read attentively what he says, you'll find a thousand contradictions. | ||
| Given the current tensions, Lavrov said the danger of World War III was real, saying the danger is serious. | ||
| it's real you cannot underestimate it Lavrov told the Interfax News Agency of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine he said he was confident everything will of course finish with the signing of an accord but the parameters of this accord will be defined by the state fighting and that will have taken place the moment the accord becomes reality and again we'll get more into that a little bit later as yes the threat of World War 3 and the conflict open war between NATO and Russia may have already begun and we'll tell you about that later and | ||
| And finally, finishing our daily dispatch in China, Beijing COVID-19 spike prompts mass testing and panic buying. | ||
| China is already trying to contain a wave of infections in its largest city, Shanghai, which has been almost entirely locked down for weeks and reported 51 new COVID-19 deaths on Monday. | ||
| Shanghai has struggled to provide fresh food to those confined at home, while patients have reported trouble accessing non-COVID medical care, and the rising cases of the capital triggered fears of a similar lockdown. | ||
| Downtown Beijing's biggest district, Chaoyang, home to about 3.5 million people, ordered mass testing from Monday for residents and those coming to work there. | ||
| The area hosts embassies and headquarters of many multinational forms. | ||
| Queues snaked around malls and outside office complexes on Monday as people waited to be swabbed for samples by healthcare workers in protective gear. | ||
| Kind of like exactly what happened at the beginning of Shanghai. | ||
| If you want to head off a pandemic sweeping through a city center, this is just me speculating here. | ||
| Maybe getting everybody in the city to go cluster close together to get a test is completely counterproductive and moronic and actually contributing to the spread of COVID. I'm no doctor. | ||
| But, you know, just on my basic layman understanding of diseases, if you want people to not get the disease, you don't force them all to gather in exactly the same place for extended periods of time, waiting in line with one another for hours on end, waiting to get a test. | ||
| Are these people stupid or is this on purpose? | ||
| It's a question that runs through my head continuously as I read the news and... | ||
| It's just ridiculous. And we'll get into more of that a little bit later as well. | ||
| That's it for our Daily Dispatch. | ||
| Coming up on today's show we have a lot of political news. | ||
| We have a lot of videos to show you in the next segment. | ||
| We'll be showing you the absolute meltdowns that are happening over Elon Musk buying Twitter and how it reveals how the leftists really feel about free speech. | ||
| Control of the public square, if you will. | ||
| We have a bunch of other videos as well. | ||
| We'll be talking about the Neuralink implant that Elon Musk is, of course, a champion of. | ||
| And Klaus Schwab is extremely excited about having wireless connection to your brain. | ||
| And he's quite open about this, talking about it with Sergey whatever from Google. | ||
| We'll show you that video from the World Economic Forum. | ||
| We'll also show you how this type of technology is put into action already as scientists use remote control, things like the Wii Remote. | ||
| From Nintendo Wii to wirelessly control the actions of living beings. | ||
| It's horrific and insane, unless you're Klaus Schwab, in which case it's just the inevitable progress of human beings. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We will have a chip in your brain through which we can control you, and your wrong thoughts will be eliminated by our algorithm. | |
| It's horrific, creepy, satanic, and the end of humanity. | ||
| And it's coming unless we stand up and stop it right now. | ||
| Stay with us. Infowars.com, ban.video. | ||
| Support us at Infowarsstore.com in this fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Roll it. | |
| In a lot of ways, it's kind of like a Fitbit in your skull with tiny wires. | ||
| Hey Eli, I see that you becoming a phenom. | ||
| People putting faith in you like you someone to lean on. | ||
| Know you were hoping this is one of those happy theme songs, but it's not. | ||
| It's not something could seem right, but be wrong. | ||
| But hey, I fight for free speech, too. | ||
| I paid everything on the line for it. | ||
| How about you? You playing about Twitter? | ||
| Okay. I hope that goes through, because then there's no more memes. | ||
| It's about what you could do. Will you restore everyone's accounts? | ||
| I want to show you Alex Jones, all of the people that believe in Cuba, now they gone. | ||
| People bad for saying things that Fat Checker said was wrong, but ended up mainstream news. | ||
| It was true all along. | ||
| Hey, Eli. | ||
| Got a few questions and that's it. | ||
| Can be for free speech and half hate speech rules. | ||
| You got to pick. | ||
| Are you still on the team of the elites or have you switched? | ||
| When you being first, the people of AI, you got to pick, hey, Eli. | ||
| The people of AI, you got to pick, hey, Eli. | ||
| Got a few questions and that's it. | ||
| Hey, Eli. | ||
| Eli. | ||
| It's in the God of the world that you're going to pick, Eli. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Hey, hey, hey, Eli, I got some questions. | ||
| Something ain't right. It's the way it is to have you giving yourself over to Christ. | ||
| You still socialists just trying to gain fans on the right. | ||
| Cause in the end, we gon' be the ones that's paying the price. | ||
| Hey, Eli, what's up with NerdLink? | ||
| Has anything changed? Are you still trying to pick chips up in everyone's brains? | ||
| I know that health benefits that you soak away to claim. | ||
| But I heard you say it's the information we can obtain. | ||
| Hey, Eli, that sound like great wonders to me. | ||
| I righteously criticize you when people coming for me. | ||
| I know you can change and that's what I wanted to be. | ||
| But I'm not the type to agree with somebody just to agree. | ||
| That sound like Antichrist. | ||
| Sound like Revelation 13. | ||
| Who's explaining to me how it's not exactly what it seemed. | ||
| And I'm willing to listen to Elon. | ||
| I ain't trying to be mean. | ||
| But it sounds like you trying to play like you the king of kings. | ||
| You said that we should stop fighting AI and mix with it. | ||
| And you said it on Joe Rogan's podcast. | ||
| It was explicit. | ||
| I know. | ||
| You think if we can beat them, they just get with it. | ||
| I picked the people of America first. | ||
| I might nick with it. | ||
| These are my concerns. | ||
| I hope you understand. | ||
| I've seen Christians leave God just to put they faith in man. | ||
| They're going to say that God can use anybody for his plan. | ||
| To justify why you so desperate to get the upper hand. | ||
| A-line. | ||
| Nothing personal. | ||
| I just care about the people. | ||
| A-line. | ||
| Either a hero or a villain. | ||
| You good or you evil. | ||
| As Bryson Gray, Elon Musk, released the same day as Mogul buys Twitter. | ||
| Absolutely genius stuff from Bryson Gray. | ||
| You can find that video at Infowars.com. | ||
| He makes a lot of good points. | ||
| And I think we've all just been burned a few too many times to just have full faith and trust in somebody that seems to at least be somewhat on our side. | ||
| But it's kind of like, I guess we take what we can get. | ||
| These days, and if nothing else, it causes absolute madness in our opponents. | ||
| To me, the real thing is, Elon Musk is not the only rich dude, right? | ||
| He's not the only billionaire. | ||
| I wonder if the other billionaires see the way that Elon Musk is revered by people on the right, and if they don't have just a slight twinge of jealousy, And if they don't understand, like, wow, all I have to do is just be moderately pro-free speech. | ||
| All I have to do is just occasionally express my support for basic American values, and I will have the undying loyalty of these desperate people who just want to be left alone, who just want the people in power not to actively and openly despise them. | ||
| And... There's none of them, right? | ||
| Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates. | ||
| We don't hate these people because they're rich. | ||
| We don't hate these people because they're successful. | ||
| Because they are just living their lives. | ||
| We hate them because they are constantly engaged in actions whose entire purpose is to depopulate the planet and destroy our freedoms. | ||
| If they would just stop doing that, we would have no problem with them. | ||
| And if they would instead actually spend their wealth in positive ways that actually benefit and uplift humanity, what couldn't we achieve together? | ||
| And Elon Musk seems to be the only billionaire other than Donald Trump to actually recognize and support the American people in our desperation for somebody with power not to be actively trying to destroy us. | ||
| So it's interesting. | ||
| I wonder why other billionaires don't realize, even if it's just out of sheer greed, how they could We're good to go. | ||
| Apparently he's the only one willing to do it, and so we have to take what we can get. | ||
| Beggars, I guess you can say, can't be choosers. | ||
| But yes, it is official. | ||
| Twitter has reached a deal with Elon Musk. | ||
| He has bought the platform for $44 billion, and he gives Musk, what they say, total control of the company. | ||
| And of course... Postmillennial reports, Twitter employees, quote, go absolutely insane after Elon Musk buys the company. | ||
| Fact check here, no, Twitter employees did not go insane after Elon Musk buys the company. | ||
| They were already insane. | ||
| They were already completely and absolutely insane. | ||
| This is just another excuse for them to vent their madness. | ||
| A Twitter employee source reached out to the New York Times reporter Talman Smith to express how unsure they were about the future of the company and their role in it, saying, I feel like he's this petulant little boy and he's doing this troll. | ||
| He doesn't know anything about our policies and what we do. | ||
| His statement about our algorithm was effing insane, and we're just going to let everyone run amok? | ||
| Nobody knows. | ||
| Well, then what are you freaking out about? | ||
| The person added they work for the platform's toxicity and health department. | ||
| Oh, good. Tell you what, Elon, your first move should be destroy that department entirely. | ||
| Just wipe it out. | ||
| I'm sure you can save a lot of money instead of paying $100,000 plus salaries to people whose entire job is to police free speech on your platform. | ||
| Save money. Free the speech. | ||
| Get rid of these people one way or another. | ||
| But again, the thing that we're dealing with is not anything real. | ||
| The entire controversy here is simply the projected madness of insane people that we have to act like has some sort of justification or reality behind it. | ||
| No, no, it doesn't. | ||
| Just like if you see a homeless person yelling at your trash can, you don't have to go, what did that trash can do to him? | ||
| This trash can is... | ||
| We have to get rid of the trash can. | ||
| It's insulting that homeless... | ||
| No, no. No, he's an insane person. | ||
| He's an insane person. | ||
| He needs help. | ||
| These people need help. Andy Ngo says, from my sources, vocal Twitter employees on internal chats indicate their biggest fear is Donald Trump being unbanned. | ||
| Yes, it's their fear we have to be dictated by. | ||
| It is their fear which dictates our policies. | ||
| It's their fear which decides... | ||
| What our country does and what our nation does and what our corporations do, all of their baseless fears are what dictate our current reality. | ||
| And that's why everything is so screwed up and mad. | ||
| These people are scared of nothing. | ||
| They are scared of the boogeyman. | ||
| It's like white supremacy. | ||
| I equate it to Sasquatch or the danger of Elon Musk. | ||
| It's a boogeyman. And our entire civilization is being held hostage by a bunch of children that think the boogeyman is real and are furious that you're not protecting them from him. | ||
| It's incredible. Many express strong hatred towards Elon Musk and say they're sick of hearing about free speech. | ||
| They're concerned about their mental health. | ||
| Well, there we have something to agree on. | ||
| I, too, am concerned about your mental health. | ||
| You are all insane. | ||
| You all need... Just huge amounts of help. | ||
| It's not a mental chemical imbalance. | ||
| It is a spiritual bankruptcy that you are dealing with. | ||
| And if you're tired of hearing about free speech, then I suggest you move to China or go jump in a lake somewhere with a large rock tied around your neck. | ||
| That's my free speech. | ||
| And I'm sorry that you had to hear that. | ||
| I really am. But not really. | ||
| It's free speech. I don't have to be sorry. | ||
| Typical leftist behavior. | ||
| Yeah, white flight is on. | ||
| One African-American owner and suddenly all the white people start to run away. | ||
| It's just sad. | ||
| White guys like Sean King have already deleted their Twitter account. | ||
| And just as I predicted, we can pull up the clips, there is already an alternative Twitter account that leftists are flocking to, or Twitter platform rather, called... | ||
| What's it called? Counter Social. | ||
| Counter.Social is where they're all fleeing to. | ||
| So many, in fact, that the entire site has crashed already once. | ||
| This alternative site, Counter Social, created by a deep state operative named The Jester. | ||
| An unidentified computer vigilante who it just so happens to work within the United States military. | ||
| So just a big coincidence there. | ||
| Former defense operative claimed it's a guy named The Jester. | ||
| The Jester was a former military contractor involved in U.S. Special Operations Command. | ||
| So yes, folks, the Twitterati are sick of being on a platform that's owned by a billionaire. | ||
| They were very happy to be on Twitter when it was owned by Saudi Arabians and other billionaires. | ||
| But now that's owned by this billionaire, they wanted their jumping ship and they're going directly to a website created and run by a member of the U.S. Forces Special Operations Center. | ||
| So just straight to the deep state platform. | ||
| Big coincidence. And of course, like I said, I... I told you this was exactly what would happen. | ||
| That's the thing. These people are sheep. | ||
| You know why humans can hunt animals? | ||
| Because animals always do the same thing. | ||
| They have no creative impulse. | ||
| They have no ability to be unpredictable. | ||
| These people are so predictable, it's almost hilarious. | ||
| And so it's not that hard to figure out. | ||
| What are they going to do when Elon Musk buys Twitter? | ||
| They're all going to jump to a different site. | ||
| They all are just going to be told, here's the site you go to, and they all just go to it. | ||
| Like... When you have sheep and you open up the pen, they all just go in the pen. | ||
| They don't know why. They don't know what they're doing. | ||
| They just do what everybody else is doing. | ||
| And so if you can sort of see the overview and recognize crowd dynamics and recognize that none of these people think for themselves, it's not that difficult to figure out what they're all going to do at exactly the same time. | ||
| And really, somebody should have just taken my suggestion, what I said, and made their own platform. | ||
| One of them should have... | ||
| One of the info warriors out there should have created one in a fake Twitter account and said, I've created a new Twitter where we're going to have no hate speech ever. | ||
| And then they all would have flocked there. | ||
| But unfortunately, the... Deep state operative fake hacker got there first. | ||
| So they're all going to the platform run directly and solely by the deep state. | ||
| Well done, folks. You total morons. | ||
| But of course, they are freaking out. | ||
| They are leaving. And they are launching the attacks already. | ||
| FX and New York Times announced Elon Musk expose documentary. | ||
| Right on the heels of news that Elon Musk is nearing a deal to buy Twitter, a television documentary about the polarizing businessman has been announced to premiere this May. | ||
| Remember, nothing they do is about profit. | ||
| Nothing they do is about serving people, doing what they want. | ||
| It's all about using the media power that they have to destroy their enemies and consolidate their power. | ||
| That is all they care about. | ||
| TheVerge.com has retweeted this story from January. | ||
| How to deactivate your Twitter account. | ||
| Since there's just so many QAnon white supremacists on there, it's time for you to leave, to run away. | ||
| And the way they're talking about this and the things they're saying is really illuminating, really illustrative of what they really think about free speech and how they see their particular control over these platforms. | ||
| Let's go now to clip number seven. | ||
| Here's MSNBC host Ari Melber suddenly worried about censorship and the silencing of political figures on Twitter impacting U.S. elections. | ||
| Oh, he's very concerned, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. You don't have to explain yourself. | |
| You don't even have to be transparent. | ||
| You could secretly ban one party's candidate or all of its candidates, all of its nominees, or you could just secretly turn down the reach of their stuff and turn up the reach of something else, and the rest of us might not even find out about it until after the election. | ||
| Elon Musk says this is all to help people because he is just a free speech, philosophically clear, open-minded helper. | ||
| Have you ever heard the leftist way of using Twitter explained more coherently and cohesively? | ||
| Like, this is the funny thing. | ||
| I mean, it's not funny. | ||
| This is the horrific thing. | ||
| This is the upsetting and infuriating thing. | ||
| Is that for years, we have said that this is exactly what Twitter is doing. | ||
| We've been... We've experienced this. | ||
| We've experienced this in ship. You can just delete... | ||
| One party's candidate. | ||
| Oh, really? Oh, really? | ||
| Oh, that's what can happen? | ||
| Oh, I didn't know that. What if they're the sitting president of the United States? | ||
| What if they're the elected, duly elected representative of the people, the president of the United States? | ||
| What about them getting their account deleted? | ||
| Like, they get it. They understand it perfectly. | ||
| So just know, as we complain about this, in perfectly Cogent, understandable rhetoric, right? | ||
| Here's how they do it. They delete this party's candidates. | ||
| They silence them. As he says, they turn down the access that they have or the reach that they have in some way subtly influencing political power. | ||
| And they're just like, you conspiracy theorists! | ||
| It's about hate speech! It's about censorship! | ||
| And they just completely ignore you. | ||
| But, like, they know. In their minds, they understand perfectly that they're like, yes, that is what's happening. | ||
| Yes, that is what we're doing. But it's good because it's us. | ||
| We're doing it so it's good. | ||
| These people have no morals. | ||
| These people have no ethics. | ||
| These people have nothing they actually believe. | ||
| It is all about raw power to them. | ||
| And when they're using it, they cover it up with all of these weasel words, hate speech. | ||
| Well, it's about safety. | ||
| It's about having a safe platform and spreading misinformation. | ||
| And his language is actually violence. | ||
| But they know in their minds, they're just like, yeah, we're destroying you politically. | ||
| We're using our power as a platform to turn down your access to your audience, to silence your... | ||
| Candidates and your public figures and the powerful people on your side of the aisle, they know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| These people deserve nothing but everything they get. | ||
| Absolutely infuriating the way these people suddenly wake up to the power that Twitter has as if they didn't know the entire time. | ||
| They are Guilty of this, right? | ||
| They're absolutely guilty of doing what they're now claiming that they're afraid Elon Musk might do. | ||
| They don't deserve to be kicked off of Twitter. | ||
| They deserve to be silenced from speaking out ever again. | ||
| Okay? That's what they deserve. | ||
| It really is. These people are civilizational arsonists. | ||
| They are societal abusers, rapists, right? | ||
| They are just Their entire existence is just there to destroy and manipulate and lie and deceive and control. | ||
| And they have had a free reign for years. | ||
| And now that that is even looking like it might just go away, they are flipping out about it. | ||
| You have to understand that this is war. | ||
| That's why I tweeted out yesterday, even though I don't have a Twitter. | ||
| But it's like, oh, you need to free Alex Jones. | ||
| You need to free... Donald Trump. | ||
| It's like, no, Elon. I don't care if you free anybody. | ||
| Silence the opposition. | ||
| Silence them. Delete all of their accounts. | ||
| I think you should do it. I think you should absolutely do it. | ||
| I'm sick of just like, well, you know, when they had Twitter, they used it unfairly to silence us. | ||
| And now that we have it, we will give them their free speech because, you know, we understand the... | ||
| The truth about what's going on. | ||
| And we want everybody to have free speech. | ||
| It's like, do you not understand that we're in a wrestling match with an alligator right now? | ||
| Like, you don't just... | ||
| You know, just, well, now that I've beaten the alligator, I'll let him go because, you know, he understands now that if I wanted, I could. | ||
| It's just like, and you've been swallowed by an alligator. | ||
| Now you've been killed by that alligator. | ||
| They're only going to double down. | ||
| They're only going to go even harder now. | ||
| They're going to try to destroy Elon Musk financially, reputationally, and eventually... | ||
| Physically. I mean, if you don't think right now the people at BlackRock and Vanguard and every other big tech platform aren't meeting at this very moment and frantically scheming as to how to destroy this man and regain their power, then you don't understand who these people are. | ||
| You have them on the ropes. | ||
| Finish them, Elon. | ||
| Tell all of their Teslas to drive them to prison. | ||
| That's the way you should do it. | ||
| I'm serious. We have a live view of the Twitter headquarters. | ||
| Here comes Officer Elon Musk. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Quick! Delete! Delete! | |
| Shred the papers! Uh-oh. | ||
| Officer Donald Trump is there. | ||
| Bring them all back. | ||
| Brilliant edit by, I think his name is Finwit on Twitter. | ||
| This, actually not so far from the truth. | ||
| Disclosed.tv reports, just in, Twitter's source code has been locked down to make it harder for employees to make unauthorized changes to the platform, Bloomberg reports. | ||
| Twitter employees, these petulant little... | ||
| So Nats, before Elon has a chance to get in here, I'm going to change the source code. | ||
| Just like lock it down. No, you're not going to cause any vandalism here. | ||
| You little insane dirtbags. | ||
| Oh man, it is fun to see the meltdowns happening. | ||
| And it is, once again, fun to see these leftists reveal their feelings about control over the ability for us to speak to each other. | ||
| Jason Miller on Getter says, this is my whole point. | ||
| Twitter employees are crazy. | ||
| Their culture cannot be fixed. | ||
| Twitter fears sabotage by left-wing staff after Musk takeover. | ||
| Developers are blocked from app after rebellious employees call deal dangerous for democracy and hysterical liberal media social media personalities threaten to quit social media giant. | ||
| Elon Musk's Twitter revolution staff claims new boss is dangerous. | ||
| See, they're so scared. They're very scared. | ||
| Yes, the boogeyman is very dangerous. | ||
| And so we have to light ourselves on fire. | ||
| No, they're just insane, and we have to be subject to their false reality. | ||
| Let's go now to, is clip 8 the same guy, MSNBC on Musk? | ||
| Oh, it's Rachel Maddow. Okay, let's see Rachel Maddow, what she had to say about, and her guests have to say about Elon Musk here. | ||
| I'm sure they have a very reasonable and logical response to what's happening here. | ||
| Here's Rachel Maddow's show yesterday talking about this. | ||
| Ben, one last question for you. | ||
| In business terms, is there anything that we know about the terms of this deal that would restrict Elon Musk from any particular kinds of changes? | ||
| Or once he owns it and it's his private entity, can he do literally anything he wants? | ||
|
unidentified
|
We don't fully know that yet, but it is his private entity. | |
| There are a lot of people at this company who are afraid. | ||
| I've talked to people inside the company in the last few days, and they are afraid, not just for their jobs, but for the product they built and the town square they built. | ||
| They put a lot of work into this thing, and they are afraid of what's going to happen to a guy who has never done content moderation before taking over this platform. | ||
| Ben Collins, a reporter covering disinformation, extremism, and the internet for NBC News, just an invaluable resource in our company. | ||
| Ben, I'm grateful for you. | ||
| Every single time you post anything or write anything for this company, your reporting is about to get even more important in days ahead. | ||
| Thank you so much for being here tonight. | ||
| They're afraid. Yes, they're all very afraid. | ||
| What are they afraid of? | ||
| People speaking their minds. | ||
| They're afraid for their platform. | ||
| They're afraid. Rachel, they're very afraid. | ||
| Okay? And who cares? | ||
| Go be afraid somewhere. | ||
| Do you get why I say this so much? | ||
| This is their only argument, is we're scared. | ||
| Has there ever been a country in the history of the world that has operated this way? | ||
| Where it's just like, well, we have a lot of real problems, but unfortunately, a bunch of insane people are scared of something that doesn't exist, so we're going to dedicate all of our time and all of our resources and all of our concern towards dealing with their own particular schizophrenic imaginings. | ||
| They're very afraid. You have to understand how afraid they are. | ||
| They're afraid. Have I told you they're afraid yet? | ||
| Okay, so what? | ||
| It's just no compassion for these people. | ||
| There can be no... Even-handedness with these people. | ||
| They're out for your blood. | ||
| Treat these people like a rabid dog. | ||
| Put them down. Metaphorically, obviously. | ||
| Obviously, all of this is metaphor and jokes. | ||
| Clearly, I don't mean any of this, except for the parts I do mean, which hopefully you can pick out the subtleties there. | ||
| Of course, it wasn't just MSNBC, CNN also just very scared. | ||
| They're all very scared, folks, and this is the main story is how scared they are and how we need to just stop having free speech because they're scared of free speech. | ||
| We need to stop having guns. | ||
| Do you know how scared guns make them? | ||
| We need to stop, you know, having white people, white people, scare them, okay? | ||
| So they're scared. They're afraid. | ||
| So stop having a country. | ||
| Stop having a race. | ||
| Stop having a religion. | ||
| They're scared of Christianity. | ||
| So stop it. | ||
| Stop obeying God. | ||
| Stop having free speech. | ||
| Stop speaking your mind. | ||
| Because when it comes between... | ||
| Your basic human rights and their ability to be comfortable all the time, their comfort wins, okay? | ||
| They need to just not be scared anymore, and it's your fault they're scared, so you have to go away now. | ||
| That's their entire ideology. | ||
| That's what they believe. | ||
| That's what all of these policies have been put into place for. | ||
| Not because... What people say is wrong. | ||
| See, when they say misinformation, just understand it's information that scares them. | ||
| That's what it really means. | ||
| It's Russian disinformation. | ||
| No, it's information that's true that scares you. | ||
| And I understand that it's hard for you to deal with information that doesn't 100% comply with your fabricated false reality that you project on everything. | ||
| But that's not our fault. | ||
| It's your fault for being insane. | ||
| Stop being scared. | ||
| Start just dealing with the world like adults. | ||
| But this is just infantilization and madness. | ||
| This sets us on all sides. | ||
| And here's Brian Stelter, Humpty Dumpty himself, talking about what Twitter's going to be like now that Elon Musk is in charge. | ||
| Let's watch. Look, who knows? | ||
| I think that's an example of a broader question for Twitter, which is, if you get invited to something where there are no rules, where there is total freedom for everybody, do you actually want to go to that party? | ||
| Or are you going to decide to stay home? | ||
| And that's a question for Twitter users. | ||
| Some Twitter users might love the idea that there's going to be absolutely no moderation and no rules at all. | ||
| Others might not want to be anywhere near that. | ||
| Am I crazy, Matt? No, no, you're right. | ||
| And what happens to the advertising? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, if there's no moderation, little moderation to the advertising. | |
| That weird fat laugh he gives at the end. | ||
| Business prospects for Twitter itself. | ||
| I think that's very much... | ||
| Here's a real question. | ||
| Has Brian Stelter ever been to a party? | ||
| Like, I would just love... | ||
| I'd love to hear... | ||
| You know, Brian Stelter must have gone to school with people. | ||
| He must have... Interact with people that aren't on his payroll. | ||
| Can one of them call in to us and tell us what it was like to invite Brian Stelter to a party in college? | ||
| Hey, Brian, we're having this with this party. | ||
| Kegs, girls, it's a big get-together. | ||
| There's a swimming pool. Who knows what's going to happen? | ||
| Brian's like, cool. What are the rules? | ||
| What? Yeah, like, what are the rules? | ||
| What are the strictures that you are applying to the people at your party? | ||
| What rules do you have in place to make sure I feel safe at your party? | ||
| We're not invited anymore, Brian. | ||
| I'm sorry to tell you this. | ||
| There's no party. We're not having a party anymore, so don't bother coming over. | ||
| There's no party. Don't worry about it. | ||
| A party with no rules? | ||
| Is that really a party you want to go to? | ||
| What is he talking about? | ||
| Yes, that's the party you want to go to. | ||
| That's the only type of party there is, Brian. | ||
| Parties don't have rules. | ||
| So what are you talking about? | ||
| It's just insane. | ||
| These people are scared of their own shadow. | ||
| They're scared of their fellow Americans. | ||
| They are literally scared of freedom. | ||
| And that's what's destroying this country. | ||
| If you find out there's a party with no rules, is that really a party you want to go to? | ||
| It's the only type of party there is, Brian. | ||
| What type of parties do you go to? | ||
| What type of parties do you host? | ||
| It's my 32nd birthday party, guys. | ||
| And here are the rules. | ||
| Here are the rules, guys. | ||
| No homophobia. And you know what's actually sad? | ||
| This actually is a thing now. | ||
| This actually is a thing. If you... | ||
| You know any college kids, like, you'll go to a party, you'll be like, welcome to the party, here are the rules. | ||
| No homophobia, no straight men, like, you know, whatever the ridiculous rules are. | ||
| They really do have rules. It must suck to be a young person these days. | ||
| No, there are no rules, Brian. | ||
| Welcome to the jungle, okay? | ||
| Welcome to the real world. | ||
| There are no rules, and the rules that there are can and should be broken by anybody with the will to do it. | ||
| These absolute clowns. | ||
| Alright, we're going to get into some less fun information here in just a little bit. | ||
| If it's a party with no rules, is that really one you want to go to? | ||
|
unidentified
|
In that laugh, he's just like, I'm Brian Stunter. | |
| I don't know what I'm saying. | ||
| Does this make any sense? | ||
| Just read the teleprompter, Brian. | ||
| Leave the teleprompter. Leave the thinking to the people behind the scenes. | ||
| That's not your strong suit. | ||
| Folks, Welcome to the party. | ||
| If you want to have a party where there's no rules, if you want there to be a free-for-all of ideas and speech and the exciting, invigorating contest of liberty, then I hope you support Infowars. | ||
| I hope you support a world where people are free to be themselves. | ||
| People are free to say things, even if it makes Brian Stelter scared, even if it makes the Twitter employees frightened. | ||
| Come on! Yes, they're very scared. | ||
| The people who think that men can have babies, that men can get pregnant and give birth, are very scared that there might be misinformation on Twitter now. | ||
| It's an absolute joke. | ||
| Support us at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Second hour of American Journal has begun. | ||
| We'll get into some less fun information here in this hour. | ||
| We'll be taking your phone calls as well. | ||
| I don't know what you think Elon Musk should do now that he owns Twitter. | ||
| Yeah, what should he do? | ||
| Should he ban the leftists? | ||
| Should he just reinstate other people's accounts? | ||
| What do you think the what's happening tab is going to look like on Twitter now? | ||
| Right now, it looks like this. | ||
| Hashtag leaving Twitter. | ||
| Disney asked to cut LGBTQ scene in Doctor Strange 2 by Saudi Arabia. | ||
| Ivermectin does not reduce risk of COVID-19 hospitalization, clinical study shows. | ||
| So the propaganda is still coming hot and heavy in the What's Happening tab. | ||
| Maybe that'll be the first thing that he fixes. | ||
| This type of battle has been going on for decades. | ||
| You get that, right? That by the early 2000s, there was something called Google bombing where I think Opie and Anthony, I'm not sure if they were the first ones to do it, but they would always do it back in the day where they'd get all of their followers, all of their listeners to go Google the same thing. | ||
| So whenever anybody went to Google, that would be the first thing that popped up because it was a strictly algorithmically pure campaign. | ||
| A list of things that it would suggest, right? | ||
| It would just go, look, this is the thing most being searched right now, so this goes to the top of the list. | ||
| It was just pure, right? | ||
| So if you could get a million people to go search the same thing, that would go up to the top of the list. | ||
| And they changed that, right? | ||
| They wiped that out. Their algorithms really are impressive. | ||
| Like, they really are amazing how good they are at stopping you from finding things out almost before it even happens, right? | ||
| So, like, if you go and try to search, like, you know, Hillary Clinton death list or something, you type Hillary Clinton, it's like autofilling for you, and you type D, and suddenly all the autofill goes away. | ||
| And, like, it knows what you're going to search, and it's not going to suggest it to you. | ||
| It's not going to offer that to you, even though it's aware of what you're trying to search. | ||
| Somehow they do it It's like before it even becomes a trend or anything of the sort. | ||
| So I'll give out the phone number in the next segment here. | ||
| But I do again want to talk about the real attacks against free speech, the actual thing destroying our democracy in real time, the thing that everybody should be talking about. | ||
| And I just wish, I so wish we had the level of control over the... | ||
| Right wing, that the left wing has control over their people, because there are some things that are just like so big and so important, and if we were, you know, BlackRock or Vanguard, it would just be on all of the platforms 100% of the time, and everybody would be talking about it. | ||
| That's not what happens, unfortunately. | ||
| I guess it's a, you know, fact of free speech. | ||
| You can't actually tell people what to be concerned about, but the fact that There's so little talk about what's happening to Marjorie Taylor Greene right now. | ||
| It's just like, I guess we just deserve what's coming to us. | ||
| Because right now, a sitting congresswoman is being interrogated in a courtroom because she invoked 1776. | ||
| This is horrifying. This is the absolute destruction of our democracy. | ||
| And if we cared about that, we would all be focusing on this. | ||
| But people just go, yeah, well, you know, we'll see. | ||
| I guess we'll see how it comes out. | ||
| I guess we'll see how it turns out. | ||
| And maybe they'll stop. Maybe if it doesn't work with Marjorie Taylor Greene, they'll just go, ah, well, we'll do something else this time. | ||
| Or it works with Marjorie Taylor Greene. | ||
| They go, we got her. We'll never do this to another person again. | ||
| No, they are setting up their new modus operandi. | ||
| They are setting up their... | ||
| Method by which they will eliminate any political opponent to them. | ||
| They're doing it right now. They're setting the president as we speak. | ||
| They're working out the legal kinks and figuring out the legal magical spells they need to say, the words they need to say and the order they need to say them in order to eliminate their political opposition before ever even getting to a ballot box. | ||
| This is the destruction of the democracy. | ||
| This is the destruction of the United States and the Republic as a whole. | ||
| We'll show you at least a few people who are aware of this at the time. | ||
| And if we cared about actual free speech, In the actual running of our country, this would be the thing that everybody on Twitter is talking about, not Elon Musk buying Twitter. | ||
| It's really not that important in the larger scheme. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Yes, free speech is still under attack. | ||
| The day is not saved. | ||
| It really does feel like The election of 2016, not quite that same level, sort of that same energy. | ||
| In other words, 2016 was the last time we had a big victory. | ||
| That's basically what this means, is 2016 was the last time that people on the right went, oh, we haven't been utterly destroyed by the combined power of the media and the establishment. | ||
| Oh, they have failed in their ability to completely and utterly obliterate us. | ||
| Doesn't this feel nice? We can look back at 2016 and think about how we felt that election night, the victory of Donald Trump, all of the hope, all of the possibility laid out before us, and realize just how little of that actually came to fruition and how when you get a victory like this, it is just a beachhead. | ||
| It is just a start. | ||
| It is just the... | ||
| First pushback of the onslaught. | ||
| Now is the time to capitalize on this, double down on this, but also look at the left, think about what you understand about the left, and game plan how they're going to react to it, how they're going to push back, And what they're going to do next. | ||
| They're all jumping to a fully deep state-operated and owned organization called CounterSocial, just like we told you they were going to do. | ||
| That's what they're going to do. | ||
| And they're also going to, of course, launch a multi-front attack on Elon Musk. | ||
| Expect there to be investigations into Elon Musk and his business development. | ||
| Practices by corrupt attorney generals in various states or even the federal government expect the federal government itself to start getting involved in censorship, in an oversight role, in complete flagrant disregard and blasphemy against the Constitution of the United States. | ||
| And you can expect the media to go full bore on Elon Musk's Reputation and attempt to destroy him. | ||
| The banks certainly are going to be activating their ESG score algorithms to try to diminish the returns of his companies. | ||
| They're going to go full-on attack against this guy for daring to stand up against them. | ||
| Or he's a part of their little club and it's all for show. | ||
| It's one of those. | ||
| But of course, when we talk about ESG, we use Tesla as an example of just how improper and incoherent the ESG score really is. | ||
| Because Tesla, you know, if you believe the global warming myth, if you believe the myth of carbon causing global warming, then you probably believe that Tesla is the number one company doing the most to prevent emissions, doing the most, you then you probably believe that Tesla is the number one company doing the most to prevent emissions, And so you would think they would have a high ESG score since they're the ones creating the electric cars that everybody tells us is the solution to the problem. | ||
| But they have a very low ESG score because they don't symbolize their climate activities. | ||
| So GE or some other company That is the source of just massive amounts of carbon. | ||
| They'll have Greta Thunberg come and give a speech. | ||
| That gives them a boost on their ESG score. | ||
| It's about what you do performatively, what you do symbolically to show that you are adherent to their religion, to show that you are subject to their religion. | ||
| Dictates. That's what gets you a high ESG score, not the fact that what you're doing is actually helpful. | ||
| It's all about control at the end of the day. | ||
| It has nothing to do with misinformation, disinformation, saving the earth. | ||
| These are all very convenient tricks played on the American people, and that's the point at the end of the day. | ||
| I'm going to go ahead and open up the phone lines right now. | ||
| Give us a call here at American Journal. | ||
| 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| That's 1-877-789-2539. | ||
| Give us a call here at American Journal. | ||
| Tell us what you think about Elon Musk's takeover. | ||
| But again, the Elon Musk takeover is not the real threat to free speech. | ||
| Twitter itself... You know, being a privately owned company controlled by Vanguard and BlackRock, the people that own literally everything, that is a major threat to free speech. | ||
| But also the federal government getting involved is a threat to free speech. | ||
| But the real big threat to free speech is what's happening to Alex Jones right now. | ||
| People don't really seem to care about the same way they didn't really seem to care when he was kicked off of all of those platforms back in 2018. | ||
| They thought, well, it's Alex Jones. | ||
| It'll happen to him and then it'll stop. | ||
| Maybe the voracious, insatiable beast will just get full after he eats this big, delicious meal. | ||
| No. He eats one meal and they move on to the next one. | ||
| So what's happening to Alex Jones right now, and of course what's happening to Marjorie Taylor Greene right now. | ||
| Here is Liz Harrington, yesterday on OAN, talking about the show trial that Marjorie Taylor Greene is being put through. | ||
| And I think she puts it extremely well. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here she is. What do you think about where Marjorie Taylor Greene is right now? | |
| Do you think she'll be able to survive this lawsuit? | ||
| I think she will. She's incredibly strong. | ||
|
unidentified
|
She has really a lot of popular support. | |
| But it is scary. | ||
| It is amazing that we've come to this. | ||
| I mean, you have these phony, corrupt lawyers that are saying you shouldn't be allowed to run in your district because you invoked 1776. | ||
| I mean, this is unbelievable. | ||
| And they're trying it everywhere. | ||
| Luckily, you didn't have these corrupt judges that allowed these cases to go forward, and they stopped them before they did in the other cases that you mentioned. | ||
| But these radical leftists aren't going to stop. | ||
| I mean, it's a neat trick. | ||
| You rig the election, and then, if you happen to notice, you make it illegal for them to run for office. | ||
| I mean, it's absolutely ridiculous and appalling. | ||
| It is so anti-American and it's unconstitutional. | ||
| I mean, Marjorie Taylor Greene should not even have to suffer through this. | ||
| I watched it. I think she did an amazing job. | ||
| She's getting the same type of attacks that President Trump has to deal with on a daily basis because she's effective. | ||
| And that's who they go after. | ||
| But the people are on our side. | ||
| Yeah, I think she put it very well there. | ||
| This is horrifying. | ||
| This is terrifying. | ||
| Not just like, I'm scared. | ||
| I'm scared that Marjorie Taylor Greene is getting hurt. | ||
| No, I'm very worried that the people being empowered right now are using legal tricks to disqualify their political opponents on completely spurious grounds. | ||
| Of course, he says it very well. It's a neat trick. | ||
| You rig an election, and then if you happen to notice, you make it illegal for them to run for office. | ||
| And that's exactly what they did. | ||
| Of course, I'd love to show you the tweet that I put out in August of 2020 that predicted this exact thing happening because this was the plan from the very beginning. | ||
| And we were screaming it from the rooftops here at InfoWars. | ||
| Remember, you had people like Tim Poole watching the election progress happening and seeing what the Democrats are doing. | ||
| And it made no sense. | ||
| And he was going, it's almost like the Democrats are trying to lose. | ||
| We tried to explain at the time they are trying to lose. | ||
| They are purposefully doing this where it's going to be absurdly obvious that they cheat. | ||
| And this is what you have to understand about these schemers, about these conspiracies. | ||
| As outrageous as this seems, this is how these people operate. | ||
| They go, We're going to cheat in this election, but it's fine because we have control of the deep state who would be the ones to investigate. | ||
| We have control of the media who would be the ones to expose this stuff. | ||
| We have control of the electoral counting offices. | ||
| They have all these people in cooperation. | ||
| They project what they're going to do so everybody makes sure they're all on the same page when they have these things like, well, the blue wave will come later. | ||
| It'll happen a week later because of the mail-in ballot. | ||
| So they established this We're good to go. | ||
| That's going to make them really mad, and they're going to want to push back, and they're going to want to expose what's happening. | ||
| And so all we need to do is set it up to where when they push back, we call them domestic terrorists. | ||
| And then we say that believing the election was fake is the threat of violence. | ||
| Because if you believe the thing that the people doing the violence believe, then you're the person doing the violence. | ||
| It's a very simple sort of algebraic equation that they did, and that's... | ||
| How they carried this off. | ||
| And so now we're seeing the outcome of this with Marjorie Taylor Greene. | ||
| Since she questioned the 2020 election and since she invoked the year of our founding, 1776, she is now a danger and an insurrectionist, and she's attempted to be removed from the ballot. | ||
| All right, folks, going to your phone calls momentarily. | ||
| Just to finish off talking about the free speech. | ||
| Oh, you know what? Before I do that, I forgot to finish up with this... | ||
| You know, the biggest threat to American democracy as it stands. | ||
| You have, of course, Marjorie Taylor Greene pointing out that the 2020 election was stolen, and this apparently makes her a Confederate general. | ||
| That is ineligible for service in the American Congress. | ||
| That's the outrageous claim that's been allowed by a judge to move forward. | ||
| But now there's more evidence, in fact, that it literally was stolen and the Democrats bragged about it and were proud of it and will do it again. | ||
| Leaders of Zuckerberg's nonpartisan election fund have been ID'd and they are Obama's campaign manager and Clinton's chief strategist. | ||
| Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan, who, by the way, I don't know if you remember this, Offered to let Xi Jinping name their child. | ||
| Remember this? They're having their first baby and they were at a dinner with Xi Jinping and they asked the Chinese communist dictator for life, will you please do us the honor of naming our firstborn son? | ||
| And even Xi Jinping was freaked out by that. | ||
| A guy who is president for life of the most populous country in the world where questioning him is a punishable offense. | ||
| Even he was sort of freaked out. | ||
| By Mark Zuckerberg and his wife's devotion to him? | ||
| Yeah, that's who is controlling our elections now. | ||
| Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan spent more than $300 million on the 2020 election. | ||
| The couple said the money was intended to support a non-partisan effort to expand voting access, but a simple look at their staff calls this claim into question. | ||
| In the bombshell documentary, Citizen called Rigged, Citizen United President David Bossie revealed a shocking member of the leadership team for the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. | ||
| His name is David Plouffe, and he is best known for serving as campaign manager for Democrat Barack Obama during the 2008 presidential cycle. | ||
| If that was not enough, Plouffe also wrote the book called A Citizen's Guide to Beating Donald Trump. | ||
| Since the initiative was supposed to be nonpartisan, the fact that a member of its leadership team was developing a strategy to take down one of the presidential candidates certainly raises some red flags. | ||
| In addition, Bossie said that Chan and Zuckerberg wanted to use Plouffe specifically for his strategic mind. | ||
| The website listed him as a strategist in residence. | ||
| Yes, they bragged about it. | ||
| They wrote whole articles about how they stole the election, but if you question it, then you may very well be targeted by a well-funded team of lawyers to silence you entirely and prevent you from even getting on the ballot in certain states. | ||
| It is a full-on attack against the First Amendment. | ||
| And our ability to have a representative democracy, a representative republic, and should be the focus of all of our attention until the people that brought this case themselves are prevented from ever doing it again, perhaps because they're in prison for their treasonous and seditious activity as they attempt to manipulate and undermine American democracy quite openly. | ||
| You don't have to prove anything. | ||
| They're doing it. They're bragging about it. | ||
| All we need is somebody in power who actually cares about the law, cares about the Constitution, and will put these people where they belong. | ||
| Let's go now to the phone calls. | ||
| America Floats in Michigan says that Twitter will be sued for data manipulation. | ||
| Why do you think this, America Floats? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm definitely curious if they could. | |
| I thought that Twitter was obviously manipulating data. | ||
| I thought that Twitter was obviously censoring and shadow banning accounts, and particularly conservative and effective accounts. | ||
| So now with them having frozen their moderators out of their ability to lock those accounts down, to shut down free speech, I wonder if that by itself is a preservation of records. | ||
| Yeah, I think it might be, and that would be probably the best thing that Elon Musk could do is get his own people in there to figure out what exactly is going on and release some of that information to the wider world and perhaps bring charges against people who are using their power at Twitter to illegally You know, | ||
| ban their political opposition. I mean, just what happened with New York Post alone and the Hunter Biden story, that was an egregious attempt to manipulate the election and should be punishable by law. | ||
| I think that very well could be what's happening. | ||
| Thanks so much for the call, America Floats. | ||
| Let's go now to Alex in Florida, who has a question of what Elon running Twitter means. | ||
| What's your question, Alex? So, my question is a couple weeks ago, and hi, Harrison, by the way. | ||
| You're awesome. You're a rock star. | ||
| Oh, thank you. I was watching the Monopoly Who Rules the World documentary on your show, and they were talking about how Vanguard and BlackRock are the two biggest stakeholders. | ||
| Now, my question is, with the whole Elon Musk thing, does that mean that they're now removed from that influence, or are they still heavily influencing Twitter? | ||
| Well, they will never be fully removed since they quite literally own everything. | ||
| I mean, that's what the Monopoly documentary showed, right? | ||
| I don't know exactly you know I guess they won't have direct control over Twitter like at the administration level but they are not powerless in controlling the way things work and One of the things that they'll do, I mean, Patreon, when they first started banning people from Patreon, they came out and announced it was MasterCard that was making them do it, right? | ||
| These banks can literally go, we're going to pull your funding, we're going to freeze your accounts, we're going to not allow you to make any money anymore unless you do the things that we want, do the censorship that we want. | ||
| And so, you know, that's what they'll be doing. | ||
| That's the power that they still have, and that's not going to go away until we, you know, identify and remove these people from their position at the top of a multinational $10 trillion company that pulls a string in governments around the world. | ||
| Just like the World Economic Forum, they're not powerless now because Twitter is not firmly in their hands. | ||
| They still have much of the power that they had in the beginning, but... | ||
| In terms of the actual power they wield over Twitter or not, it's sort of impossible to say. | ||
| So I'm sorry if that's not a great answer, but just know they're still in power. | ||
| They still have all the money, so they still have all of the influence that they ever did. | ||
| With that, we go to Bo in Arizona, who has a similar question, sort of in the similar line, and that is mechanisms, outside mechanisms that can be used to control Twitter, other powers that can be wielded against Twitter free speech. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Bo. You're on the air. | ||
| Bo in Arizona? You guys? | ||
| Sorry, one second, Bo. We're having a little bit of trouble. | ||
| Okay, alright, Bo, are you there? | ||
| Yeah, you got me? I got you now. | ||
| What's your question? Or your statement? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Awesome. Well, I just want to say the funniest thing Elon Musk could do, would be hysterical, is just pick one person and kick that overinflated cupcake, Brian Stelter. | |
| That would be hysterical. | ||
| He should. I think what's going to happen is they're just going to kick Twitter off of the Google platform and the Apple platform. | ||
| You're not going to be able to get it, the same thing they've done to other companies. | ||
| Right. Same thing they did to Parler. | ||
| Same thing they did to Infowars. | ||
| Yeah. So, right. | ||
| That's the thing. Elon Musk owns Twitter. | ||
| He doesn't own Apple. He doesn't own Google. | ||
| He doesn't own the banks. They are still going to tell Twitter, look, you have to comply to our rules or you'll be removed. | ||
| So, yes, the top of the pyramid is still in control. | ||
| And I think you're exactly right. | ||
| And that's why I thought it went along with what Alex said previously, because... | ||
| Yeah, these banks are not powerless anymore. | ||
| They'll come out and they'll go well. | ||
| Now that Elon Musk has bought Twitter, the ESG score is going down. | ||
| So all of the massive assets that we control, the retirement funds of people around the country that we use to invest and make money for ourselves, we'll no longer give it to Twitter until it corrects some of these problems. | ||
| the Google and Apple Play Store have specific restrictions that you have to apply or you'll be removed from the Play Store. | ||
| That's why, you know, things like Getter and Truth Social and all these others, they claim to be free speech, but they still have to comport to the Twitter and Google or Apple and Google censorship. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Going to your phone calls in this segment. | ||
| Next hour, I will be joined by Brant Hadaway and Leslie Mnookin of Health Freedom Defense Fund. | ||
| They'll be talking about the actions they're taking to undo some of the unlawful mandates of COVID. We'll also be talking about a lot of other news that we need to get to. | ||
| Oh my gosh, okay. | ||
| Let me just read some headlines first, then we'll go out to your phone calls, because I got some videos I need to show you in the next segment. | ||
| So, I'm sorry, I want to take more phone calls, but I feel like I would be in dereliction of duty if I didn't tell you about at least some of these headlines so you can go do further research for yourself. | ||
| First, the January 6th committee leaks 2,319 text messages between Mark Meadows, Mark Meadows sent between Election Day and Inauguration Day to CNN, in case you were wondering just how deeply the cooperation between the deep state and the Media companies are. | ||
| Just know that even you as a private citizen, I mean, you think Mark Meadows would have more protection, but yes, they will subpoena your private communications and leak those to the media in a one-two punch to destroy you. | ||
| Meanwhile, you have this. | ||
| University will only give tenure positions to, quote, women, transgender, non-binary, or two-spirit people because apparently that is not a blatant violation of You know, anti-bias acts. | ||
| This is the University of Waterloo in Canada. | ||
| You will only be able to get tenure if you are not a man, basically, is what they're saying. | ||
| Either not a man or an insane man. | ||
| A person who's a man but thinks they're a woman, then you can get tenure. | ||
| Of course, this is in line with the rest of universities, as more than half of U.S. universities have anti-bias speech codes. | ||
| In other words, codes that determine who you are allowed to criticize, what you're allowed to say. | ||
| That's just another... | ||
| A little data point in the degradation of our university system. | ||
| Rhode Island Democrats seek to double the state income tax for parents of unvaccinated minors. | ||
| That's right. Rhode Island Democrats have introduced a bill that would double the state income tax for residents who have unvaccinated children. | ||
| Don't even need to expand on that. | ||
| Michael Tracy reports, UK Armed Forces Minister just told the BBC that it's entirely legitimate for US, UK and EU weapons to be used to launch attacks inside the Russian territory, one of which appears to have occurred yesterday. | ||
| Remember when these weapon shipments were for strictly defensive purposes. | ||
| So just reminding me so much of the outbreak of World War II. | ||
| Here we are in the outbreak of World War III where a minor conflict between two faraway countries that could be settled at the diplomatic table long before it becomes war. | ||
| And now that it is war, a war that could be minor and temporary and contained is rapidly spiraling out of control as NATO directly attacks Russia and gets us all involved in the conflict in their desperation to save this Zelensky. | ||
| Guy. | ||
| You also have this from the Daily Mail. | ||
| Alarming outbreak of World War II. | ||
| Of children's hepatitis may have been brought on by COVID lockdown, weaking immunity. | ||
| Health chiefs say as two more children need liver transplants in the UK and dozens are sick. | ||
| We already covered this story earlier this week and pointed out that it was obviously and undeniably the result of the vaccine in addition to the lockdown. | ||
| I mean, the lockdown certainly didn't help the immune system, but it's likely the injections that really caused the collapse of the immune system that allows the Heretofore, minor adenoviruses, which typically just seem like colds and then are dealt with by the immune system, are now wrecking havoc on the livers of children because they have no immune system because it's been actively destroyed by the policies of the COVID lockdowners. | ||
| This also, at the Hill, officials nearly 200 cases of mystery liver disease. | ||
| Oh, it's a mystery, all right. | ||
| Gosh, we just can't figure out what it is. | ||
| Just go watch the segment I did on this earlier to hear me explain exactly how this is obviously the consequence of the vaccine. | ||
| Then you have this. Japanese encephalitis detected in 30 New South Wales piggeries. | ||
| Pork supply set to plunge. | ||
| So on top of it all, yet another confounding aspect driving us towards worldwide global famine. | ||
| It's a plan. It's on purpose. | ||
| They're doing this as part of a scheme. | ||
| Recognize it. Combat it. | ||
| Prepare yourself and know that these people are not going to get away with it. | ||
| With that, we got to the phone calls. | ||
| We've got Aiden in Nevada. | ||
| Says, these damn liberals. | ||
| I agree, Aiden. | ||
| Thanks for calling in. You are on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
These damn liberals will never believe us. | |
| Every move we make They make the exact opposite move. | ||
| What if we have to explain the global famine systematically being pulled right now? | ||
| What if we have to... They will never believe us, ever. | ||
| They will starve before they believe us. | ||
| It's over. Yes, that's the thing. | ||
| I mean, I love free speech. | ||
| I am, in many ways, a free speech absolutist. | ||
| I don't think that's a real thing, because obviously there's... | ||
| There's things that you can't post or publish, things that are illegal, things like, you know, abuse that you can't talk about. | ||
| So no one's a free-speed absolutist absolutist, right? | ||
| You can't sell child pornography. | ||
| That doesn't fall in line. | ||
| But other than that, right, opinions, perspectives, I want everybody to be able to express themselves. | ||
| But I don't really care anymore. | ||
| I don't know. How do you feel, Aiden? | ||
| I hate to betray my values like this because I do love free speech and I want everybody to be treated the way I want to be treated. | ||
| I want to treat other people the way I want to be treated. | ||
| I want to live by Jesus Christ's golden rule. | ||
| But at the same time, it's like If we ban some money, they're like, I thought you believed in free speech. | ||
| It's like, well, I did. I did believe in free speech. | ||
| You people have ruined it for us, so we can't have it anymore. | ||
| We had a good thing going until you people got involved, and now we can't have it anymore. | ||
| This is why we can't have nice things. | ||
| I don't know. How do you feel about that, Aiden? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. It's just ridiculous. | |
| I just don't even want to argue with these people anymore because it leads to nothing. | ||
| I'll just do me and Please don't attack me, I guess. | ||
| Yeah, no, I absolutely agree with you. | ||
| I feel you 110%, Aiden. | ||
| Thank you so much for the call. I'm going to go to Christopher in New Mexico because he has some ideas about free speech. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Christopher. You're on the air. | ||
| You will be in just a moment. | ||
| Now you're on the air. Thanks for calling in, Christopher. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, what's up, Harrison? How are you? | |
| First time caller here. Thank you. | ||
| Good to hear from you. Good to hear from you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I've been following you for a while. | |
| You're probably my favorite person over there at Infowars. | ||
| Oh, thank you very much. I appreciate that. | ||
| I have a campaign going. | ||
| It's called the My Hour Campaign, and it solely focuses on child trafficking. | ||
| So getting to the free speech, before they knock you all the way out, they want you to censor yourself first. | ||
| So you'll go through an appeal process. | ||
| I got suspended from Twitter about a year ago. | ||
| They kept asking me, well, just take your post down and we'll go ahead and give you your Twitter account back. | ||
| So that's the first step is they want you to self-destruct yourself. | ||
| Right. Right, right. | ||
| They want you to contribute to your enslavement, right? | ||
| They aren't going to put a chain around your neck and drag you to where they want you to go, but they are going to put forces in place to make you do it yourself. | ||
| It's incredibly evil, nefarious. | ||
| Yeah, I completely agree. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, it's so wild. | |
| So you're subconsciously brainwashing yourself to be weaker. | ||
| So that's why when it comes to free speech, on the last call you were talking about, there is certain areas where there's not free speech, where like you said, like child pornography, stuff like that. | ||
| But there's also a realm where we the people that is called common sense. | ||
| We free speech, the common sense realm. | ||
| So, we're into that. | ||
| What I said on Twitter to get banned almost a year ago, just the only thing I said was, Kyle Rittenhouse did nothing wrong, and they suspended me for that. | ||
| And we went back and forth for three months, appealing, and I never gave up. | ||
| Finally, they just suspended the account all the way because I kept appealing. | ||
| But they finally suspended the account. | ||
| I'm in IT, right? | ||
| And I'm almost graduated with a bachelor's degree in cybersecurity because I'm a white hat. | ||
| So, the first question I ask myself now when I go to any platform is, Where are the servers located? | ||
| Because that makes a big difference on whether or not they have to pertain to our United States laws. | ||
| Right. No, it's a great point. | ||
| It's another point on why we need nationalism, why we need the United States government to serve the people, even when the people opposing them are American corporations. | ||
| That's why they need to be in America and subject to American law and not some tyrannical law from overseas. | ||
| Alright folks, we'll go out to your phone calls here in just a moment before we welcome Brant Hadaway and Leslie Mnookian in the third hour. | ||
| But I got two videos I want to show you and I'm struggling to figure out in what order I want them to be played. | ||
| I think we'll start with clip number two here. | ||
| Start with clip number two as we investigate an exciting new advancement in technology. | ||
| Yes, folks. It's not enough anymore to simply manipulate you through the information that you have access to through your hormonal receptions such as dopamine or adrenaline by invoking fear or giving you the pleasure of receiving a like on your post. | ||
| No longer is it this pseudo-direct control of the mind being exploited. | ||
| They've gone a step beyond now. | ||
| Direct control Overmines using remote controls. | ||
| It's really an astonishing thing. | ||
| Let's go now to this exciting scientific advancement that scientists are now making. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's so amazing that you just press a button and the beetle starts walking. | |
| It's I don't know it seems almost unreal That you can that you can kind of achieve this in a living creature If I press one more time to a 0.5 Hertz so it's faster Then this is really amazing one Hertz you | ||
| And this is when it runs faster, basically? | ||
| Uh-huh. | ||
| Wow. So for our radio listeners, yes, there is a beetle strapped to a table with wires going into it, and they are controlling it like a remote control. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And do you think, is he struggling to kind of stop these stimulation signals? | |
| Yes, I think so. | ||
| But it's still on pace. | ||
| And this just keeps on working like this? | ||
| Yes. It doesn't get used to it or something? | ||
| No, no, no. I stimulate even for more than half an hour, so it's still like this. | ||
| We stimulate more than seven days, more than one week. | ||
| And it keeps working. Yes, yes. | ||
| Did you say that on there? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're putting electrical signals into the beetle now, but is it using up its own... | |
| A couple of nerds stimulating a beetle. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Energy source, basically, is it using the food that it eats to drive the mussels, or are the mussels driven by the electricity? | |
| Yes, the food. So you have to feed it to be able to keep on doing this? | ||
| Yes, yes. Looking at this thing, it's unbelievable, actually. | ||
| Let's go quickly to clip three here. | ||
| It's titled, Enslave the Beatles to Save the World Peacefully. | ||
| You see this in an even more advanced mode. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is a very impressive room. | |
| We like a beetle to fly as long as possible. | ||
| Then we use this smooth paper, and we release the beetle and the flying beetle, even crash on the wall. | ||
| still the beetle go back to the arena to fry. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| We make the air gap between the paper and the actual wall. | ||
| Because the beetle crash on the wall, the beetle and our device does not be damaged. | ||
| Should I imagine that you have a right? | ||
| This beetle has a little remote control engine on it. | ||
| A Wii remote. They use a Wii remote to control the way that it flies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, all I gotta do is blow on its back to make its wings go, and then I can control it with this controller by pressing a button and moving it to the side. | |
| Elon Musk and he do this to liberals using Twitter. | ||
| So yeah, they have direct remote control access to the bug's nervous system. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It worked. It went right. | |
| Can I try again? And they can actually control which way it flies. | ||
| So there you have a brain implant on a bug that is controlling against its will. | ||
| The guy says, like, yeah, the bug's trying to fight it, but we control his brains. | ||
| And it's not, as he said, using the electricity that they're pumping into it to move it. | ||
| It's the natural processes of the beetle. | ||
| It's just the nervous system that's been hijacked by this implant. | ||
| If you don't think this is coming, you know, well, it's a beetle. | ||
| Sure, they'll do it to beetles. | ||
| Yeah. Yeah, because beetles are so different, right? | ||
| It's not like we have the same neurological impulses that can be controlled like this. | ||
| If you don't think this is where they're going, and this is where InfoWars is tomorrow's news today, there's a lot of people now talking about chip implants to pay for things and palm scanning, like we told you about that years ago. | ||
| Here's what we're telling you is coming next. | ||
| Direct brain control implants... | ||
| Mandated, just like the masks, just like everything else that they did through COVID, it will be an existential crisis that people are able to think the things that they think without oversight of the overlords. | ||
| And that's a problem for them. | ||
| So they'll soon have direct access, subdermal brain access to your physical functions. | ||
| You don't think that's coming? | ||
| Well, here's Klaus Schwab bragging about it. | ||
| Let's watch. But can you imagine that in 10 years when we are sitting here we have an implant in our brains and I can immediately feel, because you all will have implants, I can measure your brainwaves and I can immediately tell you how the people react or I can feel how the people react to your answers. | ||
| Is it imaginable? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think that is imaginable. | |
| I think... I think, you know, you can imagine that. | ||
| You can imagine, well, you're going to be sort of transplanted into, you know, the internet, so to speak, to live forever in a digital realm. | ||
| You know, you can imagine that, you know, you just in your biological incarnation are going to live to be some, you know, very long age... | ||
| So that was Klaus Schwab talking with Google founder Sergey Brin at the World Economic Forum about how you will have brain implants very soon, and they are trying to live forever, just like InfoWars has told you the entire time. | ||
| Just know where this is going. | ||
| Know that even now, as this is being implemented, even the far-right dissident people still see this as some sort of fantasy conspiracy theory that's not worth paying attention to. | ||
| And they'll think that right up until the order comes down that mandates they get an implant in their brain for safety and climate change. | ||
| That's going to happen, folks. | ||
| You don't think it will? | ||
| Then just imagine five years ago if I told you they were going to lock down the entire United States for two years over the flu. | ||
| You wouldn't have believed that either. | ||
| But of course, that's what they're going to do. | ||
| And of course, InfoWars has told you the entire time, support us in this mission to prevent the hellish dystopia that people, as we speak, are attempting to put into place. | ||
| Go to InfoWarsStore.com right now. | ||
| Take advantage of our incredible sales. | ||
| Support us in our fight to survive against the onslaught that we're facing and against the onslaught that is being directed now at humanity as a whole. | ||
| And folks, it's back. | ||
| Survival Shield X2. You can take your cellular function to the next level for 25% off right now at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| One of our most best-selling products of all time, Survival Shield X2, is now back in stock and on sale. | ||
| Let's go quickly to... | ||
| I'm going to go to Bone Crusher in FEMA Region 9. | ||
| Thank you for calling in, Bone Crusher. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You are on the air. Hey, how's it going, Harrison? | |
| I'm actually up in FEMA 10, but no big deal. | ||
| It says 10 on the screen. | ||
| It does say 10 on the screen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I misread it. So I wanted to touch... | |
| You're talking about them taking control of your body and stuff, and people think that can't happen. | ||
| Well, think of when you have a muscle spasm. | ||
| That's an involuntary movement of your muscle. | ||
| That's literally what's going to happen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You can't control that, and they can literally do that to you. | |
| Yeah. Yeah, no, it's not a fantasy at all anymore. | ||
| They have the technology. It's just a matter of... | ||
| So this way... Yeah, you're right. | ||
| This is what you need to understand. There were certain things that precluded them from having control over human beings like this. | ||
| One thing was technology. | ||
| It didn't exist before at this level. | ||
| It existed a certain way. We've talked about the Bull experiment and Aldous Huxley back in the 60s. | ||
| They already had this at a very primordial level. | ||
| Now they have the technology. | ||
| The only thing stopping them now is the resistance to it that humans have. | ||
| So that's their next target. | ||
| They'll break down that resistance. | ||
| They already have the technology. | ||
| They will implement it. | ||
| Thanks so much for the call, Bone Crusher. | ||
| We have about a minute left, and I want to go to Dawn in South Carolina. | ||
| She has a comment about Greg Gutfield last night. | ||
| Thanks for calling in, Dawn. | ||
| You were on the air. | ||
| I didn't watch it last night. | ||
| What was Greg Gutfield's episode like? | ||
|
unidentified
|
just listen to your show yesterday morning. | |
| It's literally the most plagiarism I've ever heard in my whole life. | ||
| What? It's exactly word for word. | ||
| I thought I was listening to you on repeat. | ||
| Gutfield. Stealing my material. | ||
| Do you remember what topics he was talking about? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It started with... | |
| I think it was talking about them stealing the kids and going after the children. | ||
| I can't remember. You know, it was one of those times where I thought of listening to the show on repeat. | ||
| I was like, well, why am I... Wait a minute, because I always have to listen to Fox. | ||
| I listen to my controlled opposition. | ||
| And there it was. | ||
| I'm like, why have I heard this before? | ||
| And I said, oh my God, this is your show. | ||
| Exactly. Well, that is hilarious. | ||
| I'm going to have to check it out last night. | ||
| Greg Gutfield stealing my material from American Journal. | ||
| You know, Greg Gutfield's got, he's got team, he's got rooms full of writers. | ||
| He's got, you know, millions of dollars backing him up. | ||
| You know what I got? Nothing. | ||
| I got no teleprompter, no writers in the back room, just me speaking my mind. | ||
| So I'm honored. You know, what is it? | ||
| It's the highest form of flattery, Greg Gutfield. | ||
| Thank you for your compliment. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. This hour, we will be welcoming our guests, Brant Hadaway and Leslie Mnookin, to talk about their struggle to stop the overreach of the American government on the basis of COVID. Very excited to talk to them, but I figured we'd take this first five minutes to get to some of the phone calls we weren't able to get to before, so let's keep it short and snappy here. | ||
| We'll try to get to as many as possible. | ||
| Let's go to Angel in Texas. | ||
| Thank you so much for calling in. Angel, you're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, Angel. Yesterday I was at the Plano City Council. | |
| Yep. The Plano City Council changed their rules to prevent Alex Stein from trolling them anymore. | ||
| Was it different? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Have you been there before? Well, I was there last month when he invited everybody to come check him out and see the And this time, I decided to actually go there and do an act. | |
| And then, yeah, I decided to have fun with it. | ||
| I called myself something like Borracha or something. | ||
| Okay. I remember the first name was Borracha, which means drunk chicken, Spanish. | ||
| And then I was trolling them. | ||
| And I even called out the mayor for trying to cancel the public comment part. | ||
| And today, like, one of my friends posted on our group chat that we have, the Plano City Council meeting yesterday, and he's like, dude, it's going viral. | ||
| I'm like, really? I didn't even expect it. | ||
| Is it on Twitter anywhere? | ||
| Can we watch it? Yes, no? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, it's on YouTube, Plano City Council. | |
| All right, we'll check it out. | ||
| Thank you very much. That's the right thing to do. | ||
| You know, these people try to change the rules to prevent regular citizens from going up and trolling them or mocking them or exposing them. | ||
| And the only response to that is to double down and do it twice as much and show them you want to try to stop us. | ||
| It's a Chinese finger trap. | ||
| The more you pull, the more trapped you are. | ||
| So the more they push back, the harder we need to... | ||
| Confront them. So, very good job. | ||
| We'll check that video out and maybe play it tomorrow when we have time. | ||
| I just saw this on Twitter. | ||
| Babylon B. Musk's Twitter purchase fails after 138,000 board votes are found overnight. | ||
| Dang it! They stopped counting last night at 12 a.m. | ||
| And as of this morning, God, they found a whole bunch of shares. | ||
| They... That weren't there before. | ||
| The mail-in shares. | ||
| Darn it. They got us again. | ||
| Good stuff from Babylon Bee, as always. | ||
| Maybe they'll be back on Twitter. | ||
| We can only hope. Let's go now to Patty in Boston, who's called in about Twitter and Elon. | ||
| Patty, what is your take on this? | ||
| Hey, man. So you've got to actually understand that Elon Musk is a jackass. | ||
| Right. Let's stop right there, Patty. | ||
| I don't have to understand anything, all right? | ||
| I choose to understand things. | ||
| Now, yeah, look, were you watching the show? | ||
| We started the first five minutes with a big expose about Elon Musk and his dishonesty in moving up. | ||
| That's why I keep saying, like, it's sad that just a dude that doesn't actively hate us, we're just like, thank God, Daddy Elon. | ||
| I mean, that's how demoralized Americans are right now, but... | ||
| He's a billionaire rich dude. | ||
| I don't know him. I don't know anything about him. | ||
| I just like that he isn't actively out to destroy our country. | ||
| Yeah, I can understand that. | ||
| I can understand that he's not, you know, necessarily a jackass. | ||
| But don't you think that he is? | ||
| Like, I mean, you know, slightly? | ||
| Like I said, I don't really know anything about the guy. | ||
| I think he posts funny things on Twitter, but I also think he wants us to merge with AI and is a proponent of UBI. What? | ||
| Am I a capitalist? | ||
| Yes. In many ways, I am. | ||
| I am a capitalist, and so I think that he should be able to buy whatever he wants. | ||
| Yeah. Yeah, well, he did. | ||
| And, you know, maybe now he'll actually... | ||
| Hear the music. I can hear the music. | ||
| Yeah, maybe now Elon Musk will actually make Twitter profitable. | ||
| Decisions being made were not for capitalism reasons. | ||
| They were for restriction reasons. | ||
| It's a violation of capitalism, actually. | ||
| All right, welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, Third Hour has begun here on American Journal. | ||
| You support everything we do here by going to infowarstore.com. | ||
| X2 is now on sale. | ||
| Very happy to welcome my next guest, Brant Hadaway and Leslie Mnookian. | ||
| Brant Hadaway is a Miami lawyer who is a board certified in international litigation and arbitration. | ||
| He joined Davalier Law Group and Health Freedom Defense Fund in early 2021 at the invitation of partner George Wentz in order to help fight the COVID tyranny. | ||
| He is the lead counsel for plaintiffs in the CDC travel mass case. | ||
| And Leslie is president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund, a nonprofit which seeks to rectify health and justice through education, advocacy and legal challenges to unjust mandates, laws and policies that undermine our health freedoms and human rights. | ||
| She's a former successful Wall Street business executive, award winning documentary filmmaker and qualified homeopath. | ||
| Their website can be found at healthfreedomdefense.org. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us, Brant and Leslie. | ||
|
unidentified
|
My pleasure to be here with you. | |
| Hopefully I pronounced that law group name right. | ||
| I was saying during the break, Duvalier, but I guess that's not how it's pronounced. | ||
| It's Davalier. Davalier. | ||
| Okay, all right, good. Well, thank you so much for being here. | ||
| I think the work you're doing is incredibly important. | ||
| Can you tell us what... Where are these mandates now? | ||
| Because I think a lot of America is just over COVID. We don't care about it anymore. | ||
| We try not to pay attention. | ||
| We're just sick of it. But that doesn't mean the mandates have stopped. | ||
| That doesn't mean the government isn't still trying to use COVID as a method of control. | ||
| So, Brant, can you tell us where are the mandates now in the legal sense? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, as you know from Judge Mizell's ruling in Tampa, the mask mandate for travel has been vacated. | |
| She lifted it. The administration chose not to move for a stay of her ruling, so her order remains in effect. | ||
| The mandate was originally scheduled to lapse on May 3, with the option to extend it. | ||
| But for now, the travel mask mandate is gone. | ||
| You are not legally required by federal law to wear a mask while on board a travel conveyance or in a transportation hub. | ||
| That's not to speak to local requirements that may still be in place. | ||
| Right, and we know that places like L.A. and others have imposed a mask ban on their travel, their public transportation there. | ||
| But we know that as of last week, the Biden administration said it would appeal the judges' ruling on ending that mask mandate on airplanes. | ||
| We've heard Fauci talk about this and Jen Psaki talk about this, basically saying that they were very concerned that a judge would be able to overrule dictates from the CDC. Leslie, I mean... | ||
| That is the power of the judge, right? | ||
| I mean, they're really trying to impose or usurp power from other branches of government by doing this, aren't they? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's actually kind of humorous, because, yes, we're supposed to have three equal branches of government—the executive, the legislative, and the judicial. | |
| And Fauci's coming out—and federal health agencies are under the executive, so that everybody understands that—but Fauci's coming out saying that, you know, that the judiciary shouldn't be allowed to overrule a public health official. | ||
| Well, yes, they absolutely should. | ||
| And that was the whole point of the structure of our government. | ||
| You know, from the founding fathers, they believed that we needed three co-equal branches of government in order to check the power of the other branches. | ||
| And what Fauci is calling for is something that is directly contradictory to what all of the original tenets of what it means to be, you know, what America is, right? | ||
| Right. I think it's interesting that for decades, a lot of kids have not learned about basic civics and the basic structure of our country. | ||
| And I think that's a real problem. | ||
| And because of that, it's easier for people like Fauci to come out and make these statements unchallenged. | ||
| And, you know, the media isn't helping either. | ||
| So I think that there's a real failure in our education system, and there's a real failure on so many levels that people don't understand what their rights are and what this country is supposed to be about. | ||
| And so this is what's happening. | ||
| Yeah, no, I think you're right. I think this goes directly to the heart of our republic. | ||
| I mean, this is what a republic is supposed to be explicitly for the reason that if you give too much power to one branch of government or one individual or one organization and have no checks or balances on that, they can run roughshod over the rights of the people. | ||
| I mean, that is the basis of the founding of our country, and that's exactly what they're targeting with these types of unconstitutional mandates. | ||
| And I know there have been a few politicians, senators or congressmen like Thomas Massey, who constantly have made this point and said, we never passed a law that says this. | ||
| They're telling you this is a law. | ||
| It's not a law. | ||
| But if they're enforcing it like it's a law, it almost becomes a law unto itself. | ||
| Now, Brent, I know you have helped to lead the fight against this, and we're lead counsel for plaintiffs in the CDC travel mask case. | ||
| Was this part of your argument, was that this was never duly passed as a law should be, therefore it shouldn't be enforceable? | ||
| Or how did you approach the human rights implications of the way the federal government is acting? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, what we focused on was the statutory authorization We did have an alternative argument, | |
| which the judge did not address, which was that if the statute was as broad As CDC was claiming it was, then it would be an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority. | ||
| And frankly, Fauci's appeal to science really gets no headway with us because this was a political issue. | ||
| It was based on a campaign promise that Joe Biden made to institute a nationwide mask mandate. | ||
| And CDC had done nothing of the thing of the sort for a year into the pandemic until he issued his executive order and the CDC dutifully fell in line. | ||
| Right. So even if it was scientifically sound and founded on scientific principles, it would still be overreach. | ||
| It would still be unconstitutional. | ||
| But the whole thing's sort of compounded, isn't it, by the fact that they don't have science to back this up. | ||
| There is no science to back up the forced mask mandate. | ||
| So, I mean, is that crucial to this issue, or is that just sort of another layer on top of it, Leslie, that just says how wrong all of these mandates are, that they aren't even scientific, they don't work? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, so that's a really interesting question. | |
| You know, the CDC did not support their mandate with a strong body of science. | ||
| In fact, there was not even a single randomized controlled trial that they submitted. | ||
| And that's a really damning point because CDC's own study published in May of 2020, which was a meta-analysis or a review of 14 randomized controlled trials evaluating the impact of using masks, enhanced hygiene and sanitation of the environment, found that none of those measures had any material impact on the spread of influenza. | ||
| They published that study in May of 2020, so they knew darn well in May of 2020 that none of these measures actually made A material difference. | ||
| And yet, they proceeded. | ||
| On top of that, there have been many, many other studies that have found that masks don't do anything. | ||
| One was in the U.S. Marines, where they took a bunch of recruits, and they had them observe extremely stringent, strict measures. | ||
| And the people who didn't abide by those measures actually had fewer positive COVID tests. | ||
| So these measures have been And so the question is, why are they persisting in these policies when their own research shows that they don't have any impact? | ||
| And I think that's really, really important. | ||
| This is something that every American should be skeptical about. | ||
| Why are they persisting when it's very, very clear? | ||
| I mean, there are hundreds of studies now showing the lack of efficacy of masks, and yet they're continuing with this. | ||
| It doesn't make any sense from a rational standpoint. | ||
| Yeah, it really does, and I wish more Americans would just ask themselves that simple question. | ||
| I also remember very early on in the pandemic a Denmark study that did exactly as you're saying, where they've trained people how to use the mask, they used the right mask, the N95 masks. | ||
| I mean, it was thorough, and it was thousands of people, and they came out with the same conclusion. | ||
| Masks don't work. | ||
| So there's no scientific basis. | ||
| There's no constitutional basis. | ||
| It's all fraud, in my opinion. | ||
| We'll be right back. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| My guests this hour are Brant Hadaway and Leslie Mnookian. | ||
| They are working with the Health Freedom Defense Fund. | ||
| And Mr. Hadaway is actually the lawyer that helped to end the CDC travel mask mandate in America. | ||
| It was his plaintiffs that got the ruling that ceased all of CDC mandated masking on airplanes. | ||
| So, you know, we have him and his legal team and his plaintiff to thank for that. | ||
| So it's it's really an honor and a privilege to talk to both of you. | ||
| Now, Leslie, I know during the break you were or well, during the last segment, we were talking about the scientific. | ||
| Invalidness of the mask mandate that it's not scientifically valid. | ||
| It's not backed up by science. | ||
| That's what they resort to because when they say science, it's almost like invoking a religion. | ||
| It's unquestionable. | ||
| You just have to do whatever they say. | ||
| But talk to us a little bit more about the way that the CDC is pulling this trick off and telling people that the scientific conclusions about masks are completely at odds with the actual scientific research behind it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's a very interesting point because even the Washington Post reported, I forget how many years ago, that it was known since the Spanish flu that masks don't have an impact on the spread of aerosolized masks. | |
| And yet they've proceeded. | ||
| So how have they proceeded? | ||
| And then I mentioned that there was a meta-analysis done by CDC itself, published in May of 2020, which reviewed 14 randomized controlled trials. | ||
| And the authors actually stated that while mechanistic studies may show some impact on the spread of droplets, These other studies or a review of all of the specific measures don't show any impact on the kind of public spread. | ||
| So I've had people ask me, well, what's a mechanistic study? | ||
| And I think it's really important that what happened was CDC looked at all these different randomized controlled trials, looking at the spread of viruses by lab-confirmed diagnoses, and they found that there was no impact, and they published this. | ||
| So then what happened was In the spring of 2020, they started doing all these different kinds of studies. | ||
| Remember how the big story was droplets, droplets, it spreads by droplets. | ||
| So what they started doing was these mechanistic studies. | ||
| And what that means is that they shoot some, crazy as it sounds, spittle, liquid, mucus, something out of a gun towards a piece of fabric, essentially. | ||
| And then they see that the fabric stops the mucus. | ||
| And they then claim that that means it stops the spread. | ||
| But that's a long jump from stopping a droplet of spit to it stops the spread of a virus. | ||
| And so what they're hoping is that the public and the media aren't going to dig very deep or anywhere beyond what the executive summary says or the abstract says in most of these studies, where they admit that these are mechanistic studies that are just showing that droplets are stopped. | ||
| And so that's a really important point for people to understand, and most of the people don't, that that's the kind of studies that CDC are relying on for the most part. | ||
| And so that's very problematic. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. And we've seen similar sort of things with the vaccine and the way that they claim vaccine effectiveness or vaccine efficacy is also sort of manipulated in that same mechanistic way, where if you really understand the studies, you understand, okay, this really didn't do much to protect anybody. | ||
| And in fact, some of the You know, vaccine groups had higher death rates than the placebo group. | ||
| So when you look at it in a holistic way, you see that it's not effective, just in the same way with the mask. | ||
| But if you take one specific mechanism and show how that works, then you extrapolate that. | ||
| But it's all just a shell game and an illusion that they're pulling off. | ||
| Now, I know, Mr. | ||
| Hathaway, your mask... | ||
| It was, of course, about stopping the forced masks. | ||
| And as ridiculous as it sounds, I know a lot of people go, well, if you don't want to wear a mask, you just want people to get COVID. You're on the side of the virus in this. | ||
| What was the impetus behind your plaintiff's lawsuit or your involvement in the lawsuit? | ||
| Was it about... The inefficacy of masks, or was it a wider and broader thing about just the freedom of people to take their own health in their own hands? | ||
| What was sort of the impetus behind the lawsuit, in your opinion? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, the broader principle we wanted to vindicate was that the federal government is one of limited and enumerated powers, and that the public health power has been generally reserved to the states. | |
| As a general police power of the states, and the federal government's role in public health has been historically very limited to that of playing a support role to the states. | ||
| And, of course, the more specific thing we were seeking to vindicate in this lawsuit were a number of points. | ||
| And one was that, assuming it was constitutional, which you can assume for the sake of argument, The CDC did not have the legislative authority to do what they were doing. | ||
| It was completely politically motivated, and the court agreed with that. | ||
| The second principle was that in implementing rules that are intended to govern our conduct and impose burdens on us and threaten penalties if we don't comply, Executive agencies are required to go through a formal rulemaking process and provide notice and allow for comments in the Federal Register. | ||
| And the CDC did not do this. | ||
| They claimed that they didn't have to or that it was unwarranted due to the, quote, ongoing public health emergency. | ||
| But at that point, the public health emergency such as it was had already been ongoing for a year, and a public agency, an executive agency, can't just sit on things for a year and then claim that there's suddenly an emergency. | ||
| The other point we made that the judge agreed with was that the rule itself was arbitrary and capricious. | ||
| The CDC failed to adequately explain its reasoning, including the reasons for the lines that it drew and where it drew them. | ||
| A couple of other points we raised that the court did not address, but are preserved for appeal in case we should wish to raise them with the appellate court. | ||
| Or what I referred to earlier, which is the non-delegation doctrine, which is that if the statute was as broad as the CDC claimed, then it would constitute an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority. | ||
| Right, so it's just corrupt on every level, or just wrong-headed on every level. | ||
| And of course, Leslie, we know that if you allow them to exceed their authority because it's a public health emergency, suddenly everything becomes a public health emergency, right? | ||
| It's less even about this particular topic and masks on airplanes as it is about holding the federal government in check. | ||
| Hopefully bring us back to a place that our founders intended us to be at where the federal government does not have the right to arbitrarily impose these measures on. | ||
| You can talk a little bit about just the foundational aspect of freedom when it comes to these decisions. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I think it's so important that people remember what our founders had in mind when they created this nation and all the documents that support this American experiment. | |
| And one of the things that was written in the Declaration of Independence is that our rights come from our Creator. | ||
| Now, that's a completely revolutionary notion. | ||
| No other nation that I'm aware of has such a con, such a ideal or a concept in its founding documents. | ||
| And this is really radical because it means it comes from that no government, no human, no entity can take those rights away. | ||
| They are natural and inherent to us by virtue of being born human. | ||
| And they can't be granted. | ||
| They can only be taken away. | ||
| They can only be restricted and stolen from you. | ||
| It's not a positive thing that the government's giving you your rights. | ||
| They can only take them away. We'll get more into that on the other side, the real implications that this decision has on the wider aspect of America. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Again, my guests are Brant Hathaway and Leslie Mnookian. | ||
| You can find their website at healthfreedomdefense.org. | ||
| That's healthfreedomdefense.org. | ||
| And of course, you can support everything we do here by going to infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Now, Mr. | ||
| Hathaway, I know that you've said that the Biden administration is not challenging the decision that was made to eliminate the mask mandate on flights. | ||
| I mean, do you think... That they're not ever gonna try to question this? | ||
| Do they have a chance to question this again? | ||
| Do you think they're gonna try to take a different route in order to circumvent this? | ||
| Because I can't see them giving up this easily. | ||
| They really want this mask mandate, even though it scientifically is invalid. | ||
| What do you think the federal government is going to do? | ||
| What do you think their game plan is? | ||
| Or have they thrown up the white flag in this case and are moving on to other things? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, let me be clear. | |
| They have appealed the ruling. | ||
| What they didn't do is ask the appellate court for a stay of the ruling, which would have basically maintained the status quo and sort of suspended the effect of the ruling while the appeal is pending. | ||
| They didn't do that. So the ruling is the law of the land. | ||
| They have appealed. | ||
| In terms of what exactly their thinking is, they have said publicly that their concern is with the first part of the judge's ruling, which is that the CDC didn't have the statutory authority to do what it did. | ||
| They're obviously concerned about the CDC's institutional authority going forward in case they should decide to do something like this in the future or something very much like it. | ||
| They want to have that option. | ||
| Exactly what's going to happen on this appeal remains to be seen. | ||
| You know, watch this space after May 3rd and see if they might not try some procedural machinations to essentially undo the ruling, or if they're actually going to prosecute this appeal on the merits. | ||
| That remains to be seen. | ||
| I see. And of course this goes to the heart of the matter, exactly what we were talking about in the last segment and the one before that. | ||
| The fact that it seems to me the CDC as well as a number of other federal organizations are exceeding their prescribed responsibility and obligations. | ||
| They are taking for themselves or really usurping for themselves Powers and processes and policies that are reserved by the Constitution to people other than themselves. | ||
| And so, again, it goes to the heart of the matter. | ||
| Does the CDC have the right to do this, to usurp this type of power? | ||
| And it seems to me like what they're trying to do is just set the precedent and go, look, we did it once. | ||
| Now we can do it over and over again when you've got the CDC making rulings on mask mandates and voter fraud. | ||
| Fraud and whether stores can stay open or not. | ||
| I mean, this is not in the purview of CDC, but if they take it upon, if they say this is our, you know, order and other people follow it, I guess that's a precedent they're setting, right? | ||
| I mean, Ms. Manoukian, this is where your concern is that, you know, if they're allowed to set this precedent, they can really expand on it and exploit it to do a lot of other stuff we don't want them to do, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. DOJ explicitly stated when it released its announcement that it was going to appeal that they wanted to preserve the power and authority of the CDC for future use on just this sort of health emergency. | |
| And it's so— This is why I founded Health Freedom Defense Fund, and this is why we're fighting not only the mask mandates, but we're also fighting vaccine mandates at the federal level, against the Los Angeles Unified School District, against the city of San Francisco, and others, right? | ||
| We're pushing back as much as we can because it is my belief that we own our bodies. | ||
| Government doesn't own our bodies. | ||
| We are not cattle or chattel. | ||
| We are sovereign human beings, and we possess the right to do whatever we choose with our bodies. | ||
| It's not appropriate for government to be intervening or intruding into those private decisions—how we raise our children, how we keep ourselves well. | ||
| It's up to me to decide, well, I'm not going to eat a lot of—I'm not going to eat GMOs, or I'm not going to use fluoride on my teeth. | ||
| We're constantly heard the refrain, oh, trust the experts, trust the experts. | ||
| Let us not forget that the experts brought us thalidomide and Vioxx and mercury in jabs and Roundup and GMOs and all these other things. | ||
| They are responsible for these. | ||
| And the CDC, the NIH, and the FDA suffer from what is known as agency capture, right? | ||
| That the industries that they are supposed to be regulating have captured them by paying them money for user fees and things like this. | ||
| It is vitally important that Americans understand that their rights do not come from government. | ||
| And government shouldn't be dictating what we do with our bodies. | ||
| So the mask mandate challenge is just the tip of the spear with respect to this entire fight, right? | ||
| And this has been going on for a long time. | ||
| Some of your viewers may know that I made an award-winning documentary called The Greater Good. | ||
| It's greatergoodmovie.org if you want to see it. | ||
| And it's all about how some children are being sacrificed in service to the greater good through the whole vaccination program. | ||
| Now, this is a major problem. | ||
| And so what's been going on is that media, the pharmaceutical industry and these agencies have actually been concealing evidence Which demonstrates that vaccines injure and kill some children. | ||
| And what's happening is state legislatures like in California and New York are taking away all the exemptions to these shots. | ||
| We must stand and we must fight back against this, what can only be described as tyranny, or else we will be nothing more than serfs in a... | ||
| You know, surfs to the system, essentially. | ||
| Right. And we've seen, you know, in the way that they've, now they're saying racism is a public health emergency and climate change is a public health emergency. | ||
| I mean, when you give them the key that they need to unlock the tyranny that they want, they're going to use it and they're going to use it in whichever way. | ||
| I think at the end there where you said, you know, we need to stand up. | ||
| People want to know how they can fight back. | ||
| Obviously, you know, filing this lawsuit and getting it to the point where a judge can actually make this ruling. | ||
| That is a huge victory. | ||
| Can an average American do that? | ||
| I mean, is that what it takes is for every American that's against this to just start launching lawsuits and start getting involved and start like how do how does it how would a normal people help contribute to The mission that you guys are embodying and that you're helping to fight? | ||
| I guess I'll ask Brent here. | ||
| How can a normal person fight back against this? | ||
| Should they be filing lawsuits if they feel their rights have been restricted? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's up to every individual to decide. | |
| Every American... | ||
| And every resident has the right to sue the government. | ||
| And whether they have standing to challenge a particular policy is a legal question. | ||
| And so I would recommend that anybody consult with an attorney when deciding whether to do something like that. | ||
| In terms of how people can contribute, I would turn that over to Leslie, and she'll direct you to healthfreedomdefense.org, which is her organization which has funded this litigation and is funding other litigations. | ||
| Other lawsuits challenging these various mandates that she referred to. | ||
| It's her organization and her passion and her guidance that has really made all of this possible. | ||
| And again, that's healthfreedomdefense.org. | ||
| Yes. So, Leslie, you know, if I think a lot of people, we just sort of go out, we'll just ignore the rule and we'll just like keep trying to live our lives or do what we can do individually. | ||
| But what's the best way to really fight back against this? | ||
| Because I think if everybody in America that didn't like these mask mandates stood up and fought back against it, there's no way it could have continued as long as it did. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I think there are a couple things here. | |
| First of all, compliance is complicity, as a good friend of mine likes to say. | ||
| I think that's really true. | ||
| You know, you hear people, well, I just do it because it's easier. | ||
| I don't want to make a scene. That's really causing a problem, number one. | ||
| Two, the best thing that they can do is join healthfreedomdefense.org because we have a membership. | ||
| It's $10 to join. | ||
| Support our lawsuits because we are— We're initiating this litigation in order to protect everybody, and we can't do it without the support of people across the nation who are like-minded and care about these freedom issues, right? | ||
| And health freedom isn't a partisan issue. | ||
| It shouldn't be left or right. | ||
| It should be anybody and everybody who cares about basic American liberty. | ||
| So please join Health Freedom Defense Fund. | ||
| You can get our newsletter, you can join as a member, and you can follow our lawsuits on our website. | ||
| Wow, and what other organization has had actual victory like you guys had that have actually made real, tangible change in the law of the United States? | ||
| I can't think of very many. | ||
| There's a lot of great organizations out there, but clearly Health Freedom Defense is bringing results. | ||
| More on the other side. All right, folks, final segment of The American Journal here on Infowars.com and band.video. | ||
| I hope you share these links, especially this interview, because people, you know, we've heard about the lawsuit. | ||
| We've heard about the fact that the CDC mask mandate was reversed, but it's good to know who's behind it and how we can contribute and help do that. | ||
| And of course, with me are the lawyer who was the Lead counsel for the plaintiffs in that CDC travel mask case, Brant Hadaway and Leslie Mnookian, the founder and president of Health Freedom Defense Fund. | ||
| You can find their website and join their cause at healthfreedomdefense.org. | ||
| Now, we could do, and we do, do many shows about just the sheer hypocrisy of the left. | ||
| It's been a big topic of today's show, talking about Twitter and the way that they are very mad that somebody other than them is in control. | ||
| Again, just sort of exposing the rank hypocrisy that pervades their every belief, it seems. | ||
| But the hypocrisy that was on display is they sort of vitriolically went after the Judge in this case was something to behold as Leslie was telling me during the the break that they were insulting her appearance and all of the things that they're outraged about when it's aimed at them suddenly that's you know arrows in their quiver to fire at their own enemies. | ||
| Did you notice any of that hypocrisy when it came to the media coverage of this case Mr. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hathaway? Well absolutely you know when Lawyers have a saying that if you don't have the facts on your side, pound the law. | |
| If you don't have the law on your side, pound the facts. | ||
| If you don't have the facts or the law on your side, pound the table. | ||
| What I saw was a lot of pounding the table, these ad hominem attacks on the judge, and it was very disappointing to see how many lawyers and law professors who should know better engaging this, sent a very clear message that they don't really want to engage the argument. | ||
| Engaging in this ad hominem attack on the judge, you should ask, what about the opinion do you disagree with? | ||
| What specifically was the flaw in her reasoning? | ||
| And, you know, people can have good faith disagreements about that, but, you know, you have to really articulate what it was you didn't like about the opinion rather than attack the judge. | ||
| I view that as rather inappropriate. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| And of course, as corrupt and as fallen as our Entire system seems to be at this point. | ||
| We still get these little nuggets of hope, and they almost always come from the judiciary. | ||
| They almost always come from little victories in courtrooms somewhere in America where an independent judge or a jury of, you know, 12 random citizens is able to stand up against that full force and weight of the media and government establishment that's pushing in one direction. | ||
| they can push back in the opposite direction. | ||
| And it's good to know that there's still some semblance of that freedom left in this country and that system working the way that it's supposed to. | ||
| And you guys have obviously had this massive victory with the CDC travel mask case that was funded at least in part by the Health Freedom Defense, which again can be found at healthfreedomdefense.org. | ||
| Leslie, what are you doing next? | ||
| Have you gotten your victory and now you're off into the sunset? | ||
| Or is this just the beginning of a larger push to help bring back the most basic freedom, the freedom over your own body in this country? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Oh, this is just the beginning because I don't think that this is going to end with just one victory in a, you know, about a Basque. | ||
| It's, this is a much, much bigger problem that pervades American society today. | ||
| We are seeing innocent children Being kidnapped with the door being broken down at 1.30 in the morning by CPS because the parents didn't take the child to the hospital because the child had a fever and the fever broke. | ||
| This happened in Arizona a couple of years ago. | ||
| We've seen children who've been taken babies, newborn babies, taken from parents because the parents refused the hepatitis B vaccine at birth. | ||
| This has to stop. | ||
| This is inhumane. | ||
| It's not just unconstitutional and illegal. | ||
| It's immoral. It's beyond unethical. | ||
| On top of that, we are seeing Medical procedures in the form of vaccines pushed on the public. | ||
| They're being mandated in many states. | ||
| You can't send your children to school unless you do it in some states. | ||
| And no bureaucrat, no legislator, no single individual understands what is best for you and your body or for your child's body and is in a position to make decisions about that. | ||
| And we must restrain this This power and this belief that it's okay. | ||
| Where is it going to end? | ||
| Are they going to argue that it's okay? | ||
| You know, Michael Bloomberg tried to ban big gulps in New York City when he was mayor, right? | ||
| And it was struck down by the courts, rightfully, because even though it's actually better for public health, it's not their power. | ||
| And so if it's acceptable to push on these things, will it be acceptable to force you to give your kidney to somebody? | ||
| Will it be acceptable to force you to donate blood to others? | ||
| Where does it end? | ||
| Where does this bureaucratic creep and this intrusion into our bodily autonomy stop? | ||
| I think it's so important, too, that Americans remember that we supposedly learned from history during the Nuremberg trials that utilitarianism, the idea that it's okay to sacrifice the few in service to the many, It's patently evil. | ||
| It is just wrong. | ||
| It's never okay to harm one person in order to protect others. | ||
| And yet we seem to have forgotten that. | ||
| But we need Americans to wake up and remember that no, a civilized, ethical society is based on the principle that every individual matters and that no single individual can be hurt in order to protect another. | ||
| It's one thing if they choose, but it can't be forced on them. | ||
| So this is what Health Freedom Defense Fund's mission is, to educate, As many people as possible about our rights, about the truth of our rights, about the protections in our founding documents of our rights, that the founding documents are a constraint on government, not on us as individuals. | ||
| And then to advocate for those same principles and litigate when they're infringed. | ||
| So I just urge everybody to go and join the different groups around the country, like Health Freedom Defense Fund, which you can find at healthfreedomdefense.org. | ||
| Support our work. Become a member. | ||
| Follow what we're doing, because there are a bunch of us who are doing this work, and we are doing it for future generations so that they don't have to live under this dystopian future that's being foisted upon us right now. | ||
| And you can see this. Harrison, have you heard about the WHO's pandemic treaty that they're trying to push? | ||
| I can talk about that. It's so important. | ||
| They want to confer all power and authority to the WHO in future pandemics so that they can dictate policy globally to the all-member nations. | ||
| And it will be legally binding if this is ratified in the countries. | ||
| Right, yeah, we've talked pretty extensively about that, but it hasn't got nearly the attention that it should, certainly not on the mainstream and not on other platforms. | ||
| But yeah, we've talked about the pandemic treaty gives full power over to the WHO, and if the nation decides to contradict the WHO, there's actually sanctions in place that the country will then be sanctioned. | ||
| I mean, and sanctions, as we know, from Russia. | ||
| I mean, that's an act of war. | ||
| So it is subverting our sovereignty under this international order that we don't have a say in. | ||
| We can't vote for who they are. | ||
| We can't question their directives. | ||
| It is a major violation of our most basic freedoms. | ||
| And again, you know, I don't even know what you guys' politics are. | ||
| This should not be a political thing. | ||
| And you made that point earlier, Leslie. | ||
| But, you know, Brant, with you as well, I don't know if you're Republican or Democrat, I don't know how you voted, but I do know that you're standing up for basic human rights, which, strangely enough, that makes you on the right in this media divide or the civilizational divide that the media has imposed on everybody. | ||
| I mean, do you think this is political or is this just something that you've taken on as a basic humanitarian who cares about human sovereignty itself and basic human rights? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think the real underlying issue for me, and it's a broader concern, is that we have creeped into this sort of post-constitutional order where people have increasingly viewed the executive branch as having all the power, and that if something seems like a good idea, then the president should just do it. | |
| You know, we had Obama saying, I have a pen and I have a phone. | ||
| Both parties have been guilty of this to some extent. | ||
| Biden came in on a campaign promise of exercising executive authority to the maximum extent possible to federalize the response to COVID. Several of his efforts have been struck down, but these efforts preceded Biden. | ||
| CDC became very active under the Trump administration. | ||
| For example, the eviction moratorium was instituted by the CDC under President Trump. | ||
| There was also another order by the CDC that essentially shut down the cruise lines and prevented them from operating. | ||
| That was also successfully challenged, although it didn't go out to the Supreme Court. | ||
| And so what we have here is maybe, hopefully, a chance to step back for people and say, okay, look, if you're so upset and concerned about who's Who's been elected president or who might be elected president, maybe you should consider the possibility that we've given the president too much power. | ||
| There's a reason why the framers of our Constitution put Congress in Article I because that's the most important of the federal powers, and that's where the power to legislate should reside. | ||
| Right. And again, this goes across the board, the ability to make war right now. | ||
| We're going to war with Ukraine, and the Congress hasn't been asked for it yet. | ||
| The mandates didn't go through the proper channels. | ||
| Thank God we have people like yourselves fighting back. | ||
| It's Brant Hadaway and Leslie Mnooki. | ||
| And again, it's healthfreedomdefense.org. | ||
| Thank you so much for being with us and for being champions in this fight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| This is a collectible. | ||
| It funds us and we're selling it for way lower than everybody else is. | ||
| You can go to Infowarsstore.com to see this. | ||
| Support free speech at Infowars. | ||
| Get the new limited edition Infowars Gold Collectible, Infowarsgold.com. | ||
| We have teamed up with the nation's leading mint to bring you a new way to support Infowars and free speech while owning a piece of history and real gold. | ||
| It's a little gold bar. | ||
| The new limited edition InfoWars gold collectible is minted in the form of a card that features a 24 karat gold in the center using proprietary technology. | ||
| Only 25,000 of these limited edition InfoWars gold collectibles have been minted. | ||
| This is a one-time run of InfoWarsgold.com and thank god these came in right we needed the money because I finally decided to do this like four months ago and it finally just came in. | ||
| Each one is authenticated using holographic technology. | ||
| The same precious metals group recently sold 300,000 gold cards for 170 each. | ||
| We are bringing you these collectible cards for just $129.95 to help us and when you purchase it. | ||
| You get a discount on the next one for $99.95 and the price goes down from there. | ||
| And so when you buy three you receive 50% off. | ||
| This is the first ever run of this proprietary design and exclusive to InfoWars. | ||
| The Mint was extremely excited that InfoWars would be making this product available to customers for the first time. | ||
| The limited edition InfoWars Gold Collectible comes in cards that can be stacked in your wallet, drawer, or glove compartment for easy travel. | ||
| And again, they're very collectible. | ||
| People are going to love them. | ||
| You're financing the American rebellion against the globalists. | ||
| This is so historic. | ||
| Be part of history. | ||
| Support InfoWars Free Speech and stock up today at InfoWarsGold.com before we completely sell out of this limited run. | ||
| This is the best way to support us and America and freedom and yourself today. | ||
| You know, it's going back to what we all thought was going to happen in the 90s when the Internet and mobile technology first came out, which is we thought, you know, this is going to level the playing field. | ||
| Everybody's going to have access to the same information. | ||
| Everybody's going to be able to freely communicate that information. | ||
| That's our goal, to get back to that place where we all have access to all of the information. | ||
| We all have the ability to freely communicate that information with whomever we want, whenever we want. | ||
| And we don't have to worry about anybody tracking what we're doing and trying to judge us or categorize us or figure out some way to go after us because of the conversations we're having, because of the internet searches that we're doing, because of the discussions, the people we want to talk to about these things. | ||
| So that's our goal, is to help people take back their freedom by helping them to take back their privacy. | ||
| And so that's really what we're trying to do. | ||
| And so I hope that everybody listening will check us out at boltawireless.com. |
Export Selection