Christy Lee, Kristi Leigh, and guests expose how the Rittenhouse trial’s hung jury—amid claims of withheld drone footage (August 25, 2020) and a predominantly white panel—mirrors broader media manipulation, including Tegna’s abandonment of journalistic ethics and the Aspen Institute’s push to censor dissent. They link vaccine mandates to forced medical trials on children as young as 12, police brutality against protesters, and the suppression of doctors like Dr. Mary Bowden (2,000+ treated patients with zero hospitalizations) while mainstream outlets downplay inflation’s real impact—4.9% wage growth vs. 6% food and energy costs. Alex Jones frames it as a globalist "Great Reset" war on parents, using experimental vaccines to destabilize society, with InfoWars’ products touted as resistance. [Automatically generated summary]
So of course, we're going to be keeping an eye on that.
We're doing something a little bit different today.
I'm really interested in what your thoughts are on the rent house case.
Um and what you think is going to happen because, uh, we know many of us that have actually watched the trial know that this should just be open and shut.
But we know many have not actually watched the whole trial and continue to repeat the same tired phrases of that he was a white supremacist and just out to ask for trouble.
unidentified
All of those things, you know the narrative, but we're going to keep an eye on that.
And if you want to start calling in as I break some of this down and give me your thoughts on what you think will happen.
If we can throw that phone number up when you get a chance, call in.
Well, and I'd like to hear what you think is going to happen with that.
The jury of 12 deliberated for a full day yesterday, Tuesday, without reaching a decision.
unidentified
That right there is a bit concerning to me because you would think that with all of the evidence in Rittenhouse's favor, they would have been able to come to a Swift decision.
It makes you wonder if they are thinking and worried about the promises from the protesters that they're going to basically raise H E double hockey stick if this does not go out the way that they want it to, or the conclusion does not come the way they want it to.
So it says, but then it points out in an unusual move.
The judge allowed Rittenhouse himself to play a minor role in selecting the final panel of 12 who would decide his fate.
Rittenhouse reached into a raffle drum and drew numbered slips that determined which of the 18 jurors who sat through the case would deliberate and which ones would be dismissed.
So the article says, And points out it's an unusual move, but and it's the further you read into it says.
But Schroeder, the judge, he said he's done this for 20 years, at least.
The insinuations up front because most people don't read the whole article, but it admits in the very next sentence that he's been doing this for 20 years.
So, you know, nothing weird.
unidentified
He let him reach into a drum.
I don't even know why it's worth worth mentioning.
The former police youth cadet, oh it does admit that the former police youth cadet in this final sentence of this paragraph after talking about it, you know, the racial injustice protest of that day, it says the former police youth cadet is white as were those he shot.
So I guess good on you AP for finally making that clear because many of us did not know that even a year ago when we were reporting on this.
Will today be the day of reckoning for Rittenhouse?
We're going to be keeping an eye on this trial after a full day of deliberations yesterday.
No whammies.
We don't have an answer.
unidentified
And I have been really struggling with what will happen with this.
Seems pretty cut and dry, but stranger things have happened, and we are still dealing with PTSD for a lack of justice in so many other areas in our country right now.
So it's any wonder that I am sitting here wondering how exactly this will play out.
Wondering if you think you know how it's going to play out.
So as I was trying to pull together some information to prep for the show, which I do, I stay up way too late thinking like, well, I'm not a morning person.
And what if I wake up late and then I'm not going to have anything to talk about.
So I got to force myself to look at all this stuff tonight.
And so that's why I Stutter and like, I have a hard time speaking because I'm not even getting enough rest.
Okay, so he put breaking new motion and put Kenosha prosecutors withheld video evidence from Kyle Brittenhouse defense team and has attached the pictures of this motion filed.
It was a bit confusing for me because it says, well, this was filed on 11-15.
Maybe you can explain that to me, but it kind of breaks down Why they're motioning for mistrial and one of those areas which I think is what was focusing on was that on November 5th 2021 the fifth day of trial on this case the prosecution turned over to the defense footage of a drone video which captured some of the incident from August 25th, 2020.
Problem is, prosecution gave the defense a compressed version of the video, and so it was not as clear.
And the dimensions of the video were smaller than what the prosecution had.
And it goes on to say that because of this and so many other reasons, the prosecutor's conduct was clearly intentional.
So there you see, you can see just how This one is as opposed to the one the defense was given.
unidentified
And just, you know, more negligence on the part of purposeful negligence on the part of the prosecution to not follow the rules, not follow the rule of law.
And they continue to poke that bear when the Associated Press, which is supposed to be this division of neutrality, You know, the associated press that all of the news sites supposed to be so neutral.
unidentified
They make sure they point out.
Well, most of the jurors are mostly white and continue to press and make this all about race, even though he issue most people didn't know that all three of the people shot that day were also white that gets lost in the mix.
Six days before he testified about his encounter with Rittenhouse, a DUI charge against him was dropped on a technicality and that prevented the defense team from questioning him about his criminal past.
The jury likewise heard nothing about it.
He was, um, and, oh, this hero, according to that protester out there, this hero was allegedly involved in an incident in which he hit his own grandmother in the face and smashed a lamp against a wall.
Which we'll cover later in the show if we have time about more evidence of Merrick Garland perpetrating The basic harassment and doxing of parents, which we've seen happen in other counties, finally allowing one of the superintendents to get booted once they exposed his dossier on parents.
But anyways, I'm going down a rabbit hole.
I'm going on a tangent.
I want to hear what you think is going to happen in Rittenhouse.
unidentified
Reminds me of a circus, this music a little bit.
And boy has it been a circus in the Renton House case, right?
You know that InfoWars has come under attack in so many ways for daring to give you other information besides the corporate controlled narrative that is approved by those that are In control of the media.
unidentified
We'll get into more of that later, but I wanted to get your phone calls, so let's do that.
Texas Truth Teller, haven't heard from you in a while, so let's hear from you today.
What do you think is going to happen with this Rittenhouse case?
Our meeting and I asked them and I mentioned this to please and Sunday morning we got to pray for Kyle Rittenhouse because this the outcome of this is going to set a precedent for all law abiding gun owners in America.
Now that just like the Alex Jones situation that's setting a precedent for the First Amendment right of freedom of speech.
So that said this situation What I said to your screener was, the outcome of this is going to come down to one main thing, and that is whether the jury has a proper understanding of biblical justice.
And I want to mention this.
This is Isaiah chapter 5, starting with verse 20.
Woe unto them that call evil good and good evil, that put darkness for light and light for darkness, that put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter.
Woe unto them that are wise in their own eyes and prudent in their own sight.
Woe unto them that are mighty to drink wine, and men of strength to mingle strong drink, which justify the wicked for reward, and take away the righteousness of the righteous from him.
Therefore, as the fire devoureth the stubble, and the flame consumeth the chaff, so their roots shall be as rottenness, and their blossoms shall go up as dust, because they have cast away the law of the Lord of hosts, and despised the word of the Holy One of Israel.
No.
I'm thinking back to, this is years ago, the Menendez brothers in California.
They killed their parents for their $14 million inheritance and yet the jury in the first trial said, those poor boys, they lost their parents.
They killed them, you morons.
Don't you understand justice?
The evidence was there.
And then, a year ago, What's been said since this man, Jay Bishop, a.k.a.
Aaron J. Danielson, I wrote this down, this is over a year ago, was killed in cold blood, executed on the streets of Portland, Oregon.
He was with this Patriot Prayer USA, and Alex interviewed Joey Gibson and Chandler Pappas about this.
Has any justice been done when this was on video showing they just walked up and blew him away in the head?
No, nothing.
But yet here's a young man, a courageous young man who defends himself rightfully.
And so what I'm saying is that, you know, These jurors, if they have a proper understanding of justice, that the punishment fits the crime.
There's no crime here, so there should be no punishment.
And I agree with his defense team.
There should be a mistrial declared by all the shenanigans and the criminal activities of the prosecutor who, as Jones pointed out, But that's the problem, is they're so brazen.
unidentified
There's been this precedent of being able to be brazen with things and not have to face any consequences.
We saw with the protesters themselves getting bailed out, not having to face any consequences.
And we see it with those in the legal system.
They do these things because they think they can get away with it, because they know that the justice is usually corrupt.
And so that's why it's going to be so interesting to see what happens with this, because we can't have confidence in justice anymore.
We have been basically traumatized from not getting to see justice in so many cases.
So it will be interesting to see what happens and what your verse, I believe you said Isaiah 520, that was so good, but also I was thinking as you were reading it, maybe we are already in judgment and maybe there isn't a hope for there to be justice, but we do know that God wins in the end, but it's frustrating in the meantime, right?
Well, yes, ma'am, and that's the whole bottom line.
You know, He is the God of justice.
The Bible says justice and judgment are the habitation of His throne.
If we would turn to Jesus Christ, and I'm talking about primarily the churches that are so fake and apostate, and all these people that say they're Christians, but they have no understanding of proper biblical doctrine and of being saved by Jesus Christ, well, it's no wonder the ungodly are pulling all this stuff and getting away with it.
So until we come to grips with our own injustice against our Creator for taking His name in vain, claiming to be saved when we're not even converted, well, what can we expect but more of the heathen doing what they're doing?
But I just hope that Kyle Rittenhouse does get justice in this and is declared not guilty as he should be.
And I'm expecting, you know, you're going to have backlash from this, of course, from all these idiots out there that think that he's a, you know, a bad guy and whatever.
But, you know, this is just where we're at.
This is not your great grandpa and grandma's America anymore.
unidentified
That's for sure.
You also have to worry about, I mean, there's a part of me that thinks that we didn't get to see anything play out with the questions on election integrity, with the Supreme Court not taking up the Texas case.
I felt like a lot of those judges and even the Supreme Court were simply not willing to look at it because they were afraid of the unrest and the protests and the riots that would occur if they did take a look at it.
And so that's my concern here, too, is that We won't see justice because they're just too afraid to do the right thing because of the threats that they're getting.
Thank you for your call, and we'll try and hit you back later.
unidentified
you want to do this and what i did do i didn't try to get it the second time because it didn't go to the first one all right we're running out of time thank you for your call and we'll try and get hit you back later but thank you for your call welcome back to the american journal the
Christy Lee in for Harrison Smith the rest of this week until further notice, unless you're otherwise.
But we're talking about Rittenhouse trial because we're keeping an eye on that, wondering what's going to happen.
You know, you would think that it's pretty open and shut if you've been paying attention to the trial and getting to watch all of it.
But in today's clown world, you just never do know what's going to happen.
And I feel like some of us do have some kind of PTSD at this point.
This time, because we've seen a lack of justice over and over in so many other areas.
So interested to know what you think, taking calls on that.
So what we've been talking about, like the hypocrisy of the left and unequal justice, one set of rules for Democrats And also the Second Amendment.
If you don't support the Second Amendment, then there has to be police on the street.
And why is the mayor, governor, they should be charged with obstruction of justice, possibly willful endangerment, because the people have the right to defend their property.
But where are the professional police?
And even in the liberal city of Newark, New Jersey, We're close to where I live.
You have the Newark police, the county police, the state police, the two colleges, NJIT, Rutgers.
So where were the police or even the National Guard?
So they're negligible, Governor and Mayor, for not protecting the city.
So they can't have it both ways.
And where you can't be against the Second Amendment and then not have the police doing their job.
And, uh, just sorry for the warriors that, uh, I worked for the Associated Press on election night, but, uh, that got me a chance to see what seemed like corruption because Governor Murphy had this big seed throughout the day.
And then in the county I was at, which was a Republican county, Warren County, New Jersey, then at the end, Cittarelli Excuse me, overtook.
And one, why did Murphy have this big lead because of the absentees in the mail?
So it was very suspicious that there were that many, all these early votes for Murphy that lasted almost the whole count.
But I just want to say with the shooting, it's, um, we, we know it was self-defense.
And I mostly wanted to say that the people, the lady that said that they were heroes, man on the street sound, I was always good at.
I would have said, oh, the lady said, well, I have a criminal.
I would have said, what is your criminal record?
And she probably would have paused because she's lying.
She might be paid to be there by George Soros or Soros types, just like the prosecutor.
I think the lady might be paid to be there, but that just I'll let you go.
Thanks for taking the call.
TurboForce, if you're not a coffee drinker, that shows why we need the Second Amendment.
We can't trust the government to do the right thing, even though we pay massive taxes.
Where was all the law enforcement?
That's the giant elephant in the room.
And I hope that the leaders of the city get charged with obstruction of justice.
And they're actually, sorry, I'll let you go.
But when they say racism, they're actually disrespecting Black people that actually went through racism and their grandparents because they're demeaning.
Like when you call someone a Nazi, it's actually, when it's inappropriate, it's disrespectful to those who suffered under the hands of the Nazis.
What do you think is going to happen with this case, James?
Well, for one, it should be thrown out.
Carl Rittenhouse should be on InfoWars signing autographs and selling them.
The prosecutor should be disbarred.
He's a complete idiot.
And Hitler used the course to justify his crimes.
I want to talk about Veterans Day real quick.
I woke up with a hole in my soul on Veterans Day because of the Biden's Afghanistan debacle.
The Brian Killed Me show pointed out the government's illegally targeting vets.
It's what I've been saying for years on Infowars.
It's called Operation Vigilant Eagle.
Seven babies dead from a drone strike, not one person fired, and Ashley Babbitt denied military honors.
Veterans are afraid to speak out because of retaliation.
It's not about justice when the government gets a free pass to lie to Congress, steal, murder vets, and rig death penalty cases.
Article, federal prosecutors accuse one another.
Do you think this government cares about your health?
Ask a veteran that's lucky to see a doctor once a year why the pills that cause suicide are on time every month.
Ask a family member of a disabled person that died waiting on the broken disability system that cries it's broke while the government has $85 billion to arm terrorists.
The government that says it cares about suicide is the one causing it.
You might want to take notes on this one.
Texas Statement did an opinion article that was scrubbed from the internet on the government breaking federal prescribing laws while veterans going through side effects get jailed.
I am part of a private group now where they're literally speaking in code in a Facebook group about how they're trying to avoid these mandates, that they're being denied religious exemptions, they're being denied any logical Push back that they gave.
And there's multiple, multiple people in this group talking about adverse effects, even when they are coerced into taking it and then suffering the consequences.
So sad.
I understand why you woke up with a hole in your heart on Veterans Day, because it's a sad state of affairs, what we've been watching go down.
unidentified
Is there anything else, James?
Yeah, real quick.
If Lieutenant Colonel Scheller, if anybody can reach out to him, he can most likely salvage his retirement.
I heard Congresswoman Majorie Greene wants to give him a job, possibly.
Veterans are unaware that they can transfer their military time into federal service time.
But just like the regular federal government, they like to punish veterans and they charge them thousands of dollars to do it.
But that's one way to salvage his retirement.
And the other thing, too, is the Postal Service has been illegally spying on people's accounts and whatnot, even though social media is completely unreliable because, you know, kids play in accounts and whatnot like that.
But the Postal Service owes billions of dollars for illegally targeting disabled employees, which the majority of them are veterans.
They've refused to pay out the case, but then they want money from Congress to illegally spy on people while they're ranked number one for retaliation.
This isn't just a case of Rittenhouse, but it's a case for the Second Amendment, our right to defend ourselves, how much the media can influence a case if you're just watching the trial with no outside commentary or Good morning, Christy.
of certain parts of the trial, then you're obviously going to have a different picture of what's going on.
So, so many ramifications here that we're keeping an eye on that and taking your phone calls about what's going to happen.
Going to take a few more of those before we hit the other news.
Verses 10 through 12, it says, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish, because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
And for this cause, God shall send them strong delusion that they should believe a lie, that they all might be damned who believed not the truth.
So that's the point is you see all the gremlins running around.
They're having so much fun just destroying everything.
And I've said this before.
This comes down to creation versus destruction.
And creation is there for everyone to see.
And now destruction is being, you know, released and so forth for this end time, I suppose.
But talking about Kyle Rittenhouse, I think it's important that, you know, just like a magic trick where they kind of just, you know, get you distracted and you only see part of it and that's how the delusion is performed.
I think it's just all coordinated so well when you have this whole thing that's shown for the Kyle Rittenhouse trial.
Everyone knows we're going to have the closing arguments.
Now, first up, We get the prosecution and they go on and on and on and on all day long.
It just goes on forever.
And you see every single second on every single network.
But then when it came time for the defense, OK, it's time.
I think the one that gave them the most generous coverage skipped the whole first hour and then had a commentary for another hour and then kind of dipped into coverage at the end.
But many of them just moved on like it wasn't even happening.
So I think it's comical that you can show a guy holding his trigger on a finger pointing it at the jury box on an AR-15 that's the prosecutor.
But we can't hear the defense just give their closing argument.
I mean, it seems like it's all part of the plan that if God wills it that he does get the not guilty, it's been part of their effort to cover up why he would be found not guilty, because they haven't shown you the defense and ramp up more of those riots and violence.
It's all part of the plan, it seems, to destroy our country, destroy the economy, destroy the places, and keep it Keep this unrest going.
And I don't know if I've ever said this before, but I slipped out when I first saw one of these protests during the summer, and the camera was just panning by and they had all these protests behind.
And many of them were pre-made, but this guy made his own.
And it had, like, in the first chapter of the first verse of every book in the Bible, there's this Gothic letter in Old English, like, you know, gee, is this really enormous You know, old English G kind of looking thing.
Well, this guy had that.
And the first letter on his protest sign was the letter D. And as the camera panned, I saw the word and I just blew up because the word was DESTROYED!
But I'm going to tell you just how dangerous these people are when they're messing with all this science and all this stuff.
You know, I've dropped this a couple of times before.
I'll drop it with you.
You know, there's a thing called the Large Hadron Collider.
H-A-D-R-O-N.
And they built this thing.
It took 10 years to build it.
It's underground.
It's like 20 miles underground.
It's between Switzerland and France.
And this thing is the world's largest machine.
There's tens of thousands of scientists that it took to put this whole thing together.
And it's well known.
And they create antimatter.
And they talk about breaching other dimensions and so forth.
But I'll leave you with this.
You know, when guys get upset with their wife or whatever and they're an airline pilot and they got a hold.
You know, plain load of people and they just deliberately fly the plane into the side of the Swiss Alps and kill everybody.
That's somebody that's not getting things going their way and they don't care because they don't believe in God and they don't want to do it and they don't even realize they've been taken over by Satan or whatever.
But these people that built this thing, it's so dangerous that Dr. Stephen Hawking, the guy that was all twisted up in the wheelchair that died not too long ago, world-renowned physicist, he said that what they're doing at that hadron collider could cause the entire universe To undergo catastrophic vacuum decay and that this would occur at the speed of light and without warning.
Everybody that is not having the Holy Spirit of God with them, They're being consumed, and this lie and this division and all this, it's really just two sides.
Creation, destruction.
And you see the destruction all around you.
And you're trying to bring the creation.
I get it.
But I also hear Alex say all the time, you know, people, they're bringing their goodness or whatever, you're going to get hurt.
And so we want to worship God, we want to praise God, we want to have the Holy Spirit dwell with us and all that.
By the same token, you've got to recognize these people, they are not with God.
That is apparent, but the Bible puts it out clear, you know, He has come to steal, kill, and destroy.
You've been saying destroy, and that's what the Bible tells us, it warns us, and it also doesn't say that as Christians you're going to have a flowery, beautiful, Life actually says the opposite, says that, you know, you will be hated as they hated me and you'll be persecuted and but we're prepared and we know that he's with us.
So I am calling in regards to the Rittenhouse verdict.
Everyone with half a brain knows that the kid is innocent.
I mean, the proof is in the pudding.
I mean, everybody's seen the footage.
Maybe not everybody would because half the country still thinks that he shot two black eyes and killed himself.
But basically, I think basically it's going to be an unfair verdict.
I think he's going to be found guilty because what comes to my mind is at least half the country willingly gave up their freedoms because of COVID, right?
So what are the chances that A majority of these jurors are going to... I mean, if they're going to give up, people are going to give up their own freedom.
We've learned that critical race theory is now endemic through America's Fortune 100 companies.
I have documents from now more than 33 companies where they're training their employees in intersectionality, telling white employees that they're actually internalized white supremacists, and then telling employees of color, racial minorities, that they suffer from internalized racial inferiority, that they're filled with self-loathing and rage and hatred, that they're incapable of seizing opportunity.
It's really an all-around bad deal for everyone.
The only people it's good for are the executives.
They get to get a pat on the back.
They get to be lauded in the media for being pioneers of social justice, while they're denigrating their hourly wage employees as white supremacists and hapless human beings.
Jeff Zucker wrote this, or the CEO, his boss at AT&T that says, quote, white people are the problem.
Re-educate them in re-education programs.
Being white genetically is evil.
So, these are the folks telling you that they're protecting you from white supremacists.
When they're just trying to brand any opposition to foreign corporations, looting the country, devaluing the dollar, locking us in our houses, starving the third world to death.
Well, if that's white supremacist, I mean, that's what I see as supremacist.
It's not white supremacist.
It's a bunch of megacorporations engaging in depopulation.
So Peter, what I'm not going to speak to right now is anything about an ongoing trial, nor the President's past comments.
What I can reiterate for you is the President's view that we shouldn't have, broadly speaking, vigilantes patrolling our communities with assault weapons.
We shouldn't have opportunists corrupting peaceful protests by rioting and burning down the communities they claim to represent.
Anywhere in the country.
As you know, closing arguments, in this particular case, which I'm not speaking to, I'm just making broad comments about his own view, there's an ongoing trial.
We're awaiting a verdict.
Beyond that, I'm not going to speak to any individuals or this case.
Jim Acosta, again, is the mouth of AT&T, the mouth of one of the most evil corporations out there that seeks to divide us while they engage in all their different crimes.
That's the owners of CNN.
So here's Jim Acosta while AT&T is funding Black Lives Matter, racial division, whites are inherently bad, CRT, hardcore curriculum to their own employees.
Saying Tucker's insane, none of this exists, and there's no establishment move to divide America.
There's no establishment move to Declare the American people as terrorists.
That's in the official executive order signed in June by the puppet president.
But getting back to all the white supremacists and the racists in the Rittenhouse case, which we're going to be keeping an eye on, and also the same tired terms and the treatment of January 6th.
There's this article from the National Pulse saying that the January 6th commission member representative Elaine Luria has six-figure investments in Chinese Communist Party tool.
And she's on the January 6th commission.
It says that the Chinese Communist Party-linked tech firm flagged by the U.S. State Department for aiding the regime's military and espionage capabilities.
The Virginia Congresswoman's most recent financial disclosure reveals an investment worth $250,000 to $500,000 in Alibaba, a Chinese e-commerce giant whose executives include powerful members of the Chinese Communist Party.
The State Department has also flagged the company as a tool of the Chinese Communist Party, aiding in its building up of technology-facilitated surveillance and social control.
So they always have referred to the commission as bipartisan, but more and more we see they're all controlled by China or fake Republicans, obviously.
This is why and just another reason why I feel like we suffer from a form of PTSD when seeking justice, because it's so hard to find.
Fairness.
And then in new Biden's America, which is half the reason that we are dealing with the Rittenhouse case is because there was no proper penalties for the writing and looting.
That's why prices go up because- And they just do this brazenly, obviously, they know they're not gonna- Take their job like the rest of us.
Have to face any consequences.
And you might wonder, well, these people are just stealing laundry detergent, paper towels.
You know, what's up with that?
But let's go ahead and pull out of that.
But as Zero Hedge pointed out, the exact same group of looters were wheeling big screen televisions right out of the front door of another store in Connecticut.
And They again seem to have no fear of being confronted, probably because they know that even if they're caught, they will never be charged with a felony.
Many states have changed their laws to be more lenient on shoplifters in recent years, and this appears to be helping to fuel an enormous boom in organized retail theft.
Of course, they're far from alone.
This sort of thing is happening all over the nation, and it's being reported that theft is now costing our retailers $45 billion a year.
So they're not having to face consequences.
It's costing retailers money.
We already have supply chain issues.
As thieves get away with stealing things and not having to pay consequences, the prices go up all for the rest of us, which contributes to inflation.
It's almost as if they're allowing all these things to happen on purpose, to destroy the economy on purpose.
In addition to retail theft, there's been an alarming rise in the number of follow-home robberies in the Los Angeles area.
Apparently, criminals are specifically targeting highly vulnerable people.
Once a sufficient target has been identified, the crooks follow the target all the way home before robbing the individual.
So be safe and vigilant.
I used to work at a mall when I was a teenager, one of my first jobs, and I just remember That my parents would always say, be vigilant.
Because there's still some that are just either blissfully unaware that this has become completely hijacked and completely no integrity anymore.
Or they're just all too happy to walk, lock, and step with where all of this is going.
But it starts with, actually, where was I?
It starts with, we saw the article on media's epic fail with the Steele dossier.
They actually admit in this Axio article that a reckoning is hitting news organizations for years old coverage of the 2017 Steele dossier after the document's primary source was charged with lying to the FBI.
They say why it matters.
It's the most egregious journalistic errors in modern history and the media's response to his own mistakes has so far been tepid.
We saw the media frenzy at the start of Donald Trump's presidency helped to drive an even bigger wedge between former President Trump and the press at the very beginning of his presidency.
So as much as people complain about Donald Trump and how he was abrasive and how he was mean to the media and he called them fake news.
They created the monster like they came after him with this always fake and phony story, and then they act shocked and surprised when he called them out on it.
This is what drove that wedge because they were pushing and they were targeting him with these fake stories with a very thinly sourced story to begin with, perpetuating that pushing it out for.
Basically his whole presidency.
What kind of president would Donald Trump have been if he hadn't had to have been dealing with that big lie during the presidency?
Would he have been as abrasive?
Would he have been saying fake news all the time if they hadn't targeted him with literal fake news?
The Washington Post on Friday corrected and removed large portions of two articles.
That's to the post's credit, but BuzzFeed News, which was the original one that posted the full dossier, said they had no plans to take the document down, accompanied by a note that says allegations are unverified and the report does contain errors.
So they leave it up there, but they're saying this is basically a bunch of BS, but we're going to leave it up anyways.
CNN and MSNBC did not respond to requests for comment about whether they planned to revisit or correct any of their coverage around the dossier.
No surprise there.
We know where they stand.
And then we have been noticing, my husband and I, because we've been keeping an eye on this, that other media outlets after Axios came out with that have been kind of piggybacking, coming out with their own thinly-veiled admittance of media malfeasance in this case.
So New York Times had come out with, how did so much of the media get the Steele dossier so wrong?
BuzzFeed News published a photo rendition of the 35-page memo when that came out.
Those online that evening, remember the jolt?
Yes, these were just allegations, but perhaps this was the Rosetta Stone of Trump corruption.
So it basically admits that people were excited to see this news because it could be what could get them, get Trump, who had clearly become the enemy of the media before he was even given a chance.
to step into his presidency.
It's all corrupt.
We're going to be digging into just how corrupt more after the break.
unidentified
Welcome back to American Journal, Christy Lee filling in this week, the day, talking about possibly the biggest media malfeasance ever, which is the handling of the Steele dossier, which I'm thinking could very well have contributed to how Trump was as president.
How much more effective would he have been if he wasn't fighting fake lies all the time?
How much better would the relationship have been with the media if they hadn't tried to perpetuate all of this on them and basically working hand in hand with the Hillary Clinton campaign to perpetuate this Russian collusion hoax idea.
So Axios came out with an article breaking down How all these media outlets ran with it, what went wrong and New York Times piggybacked on that and talked about how BuzzFeed BuzzFeed did all of that on just allegations.
It admits that.
And then it says, sure, the memo provided little hard evidence or specific detail, but BuzzFeed said it had circulated at the highest levels of the U.S.
government and had acquired a kind of legendary status among journalists, lawmakers, and intelligence officials.
Tantalizing tidbits like source A confided.
So basically no actual source listed or confirmed by source E. I mean you could say this about anything.
Is this the new standard for journalism?
I mean this is what they were perpetuating then.
And then it says any caveats even BuzzFeed's own opening description of allegations as explosive but unverified could be dismissed as kind of obligatory cautiousness.
So the Steele dossier would inspire a slew of juicy and often thinly sourced articles and commentaries about Trump and Russia, now largely discredited by two federal investigations and the indictment of a key source.
Many of the dossier's allegations have turned out to be fictitious, or at best, unprovable.
But don't let that hold you back from continuing to perpetuate that lie.
Because over time, the standards for proof diminished to the point that if something couldn't be proved to be false, the assumption was that it was probably true.
MSNBC Rachel Maddow, of course, put it as, a number of the elements remain neither verified nor proven false, but none so far have been publicly disproven, is what she had said.
The dossier's credibility suffered a grievous blow in December 2019 when an investigation by the Department of Justice Inspector General found that the FBI investigations raised doubts about the reliability of some of the Steele reports.
Then this month, the primary source of Mr. Steele's was arrested, charged with lying to the FBI about how he obtained the information that appeared in the dossier.
The thing that kills me is if any of them had actually done investigative journalism, I mean, these are supposed to be the best journalists out there.
If any of them had done actual investigative journalism and dug a little deeper with Devin Nunes and dug a little deeper with Kash Patel, they would have gotten the heads up and could have gotten ahead of this before it Ran out of control.
But no, because we know that they had their goals in this anyways.
And everybody else was doing it.
I mean, when I challenged a former colleague as this was going on, as far as, where's your source in this?
unidentified
He said, it's been widely circulated.
I said, your source is that it's been widely circulated.
Conservative media outlets have built their own echo chamber to the detriment of the country, but news organizations that uncritically amplified the Steele dossier ought to come to terms with their records sooner or later.
This is hard, but it's not unprecedented.
Newsrooms that can muster an independent thorough examination of how they handled the Steele dossier story will do their audience and themselves a big favor.
But again, still no word from CNN or MSNBC on how they will handle or correct any of the lies they perpetrated.
And these are the very places that always like to say Trump's big lie, Trump's big lie.
Well, give it back to them.
What about your big lie that you pushed on the American public for years?
It quite possibly could have affected how Trump tried to run the country because he was busy defending himself based on a fake dossier.
Also last night, Project Veritas dropped their newest piece.
Let's watch a little of that and I'll have some commentary as it plays.
unidentified
I don't want to destroy the news.
I don't want to... I don't want anybody to get fired.
I want people to change and realize that they are supposed to be objective.
I challenge you to stop thinking in terms of objective journalism.
What?
Because... and we'll discuss why that's not very feasible.
brett mauser is a promotions producer at kns5 which is owned by tegna tegna is a media company that owns 64 television stations and two radio stations in 51 markets and boasts a reach of 39 there's my former station in the list when i worked in toledo under tegna trusted impactful and innovative content that helps bring positive change to their communities however change is happening inside tegna and it's not all positive
let's talk about grady trip also at kns5 diverting Okay, let's pull out of that.
In many of my media malfeasance pieces, I'm referencing the Society of Professional Journalists' own code of ethics.
To point out why the media is getting it wrong, yet they have a screen up that says SPJ Code of Ethics and say, we need to throw out this notion of objectivity.
What?
unidentified
Did you read SPJ Code of Ethics?
One of the main tenets is to hold those in power accountable.
We just before the break, we're playing the latest that James O'Keefe put out good on him that he's continuing to put information out there while currently being attacked.
unidentified
In coordination between FBI and New York Times, the ones that he has a lawsuit against colluding with the FBI, clearly being attacked, persecuted, but continuing to put the information out there.
But before the break, we saw the latest thing that he put out exposing the new training that they are doing, putting out there.
And it's by the parent company of Tegna.
So we're hearing from a CBS San Antonio whistleblower that went public that works under Tegna.
Tegna the parent company.
Now, I've explained this before that there are major companies that own all of your local affiliates.
So a big one is Nexstar.
A big one is Sinclair.
Another big one is Raycom.
And we also have Tegna.
Now, the last station I used to work for or parent company used to work for was Sinclair.
Before that, I worked under Tegna.
And what I will say is I was really excited about Tegna when Tegna bought out my station there in Toledo.
And what I liked about Tegna is that they were forward thinking.
They said.
We need to make changes in the news industry.
People are looking for different things.
We need to be innovative.
And so I threw my hat in the ring and applied to be part of an innovation summit to talk about ways that news could improve.
And crazy chain of events.
I had reported on an accident, a breaking news accident, and it happened to be my brother that was killed in that accident yesterday.
Obviously very traumatic, but it was shortly after that.
That, um, I had submitted an application to be part of this innovation summit for Tegna and actually got chosen to go.
So what I can say is when I met with all these other journalists, there was talk about okay, well, how can we And we talked about things like making the news delivery more fun, maybe more casual, going ahead and to build trust, showing more of our personality, ways we could serve about the things that they care about.
So this same company that I worked under before three years ago that I was actually chosen to be part of this innovation summit at, we talked about some of the ways of serving our audience better, but we certainly didn't talk about not being objective or only serving one side, which is crazy to me.
So just a little perspective there.
It wasn't, Like like this, um, to my knowledge three years ago when I worked under this company, Tegna, but I'm shocked and appalled to see just how blatant they're rolling out the fact that they've been hijacked.
That's how I see it.
News has been completely and totally hijacked to serve the interests of those that are powerful and those that are in the elite.
And so it's crazy to me that they will talk about this society, professional journalists, code of conduct, a code of ethics.
And you look at all of those values and ask yourself for each one of those values.
Is this happening?
And it's not.
And how can they cite this and then talk about, don't worry about being objective anymore?
And like I continue to say, one of the major tenets of the Code of Ethics is to hold those in power accountable.
It's so glaringly obvious, and it's so frustrating.
And to me, to have really loved and admired, and I still respect and admire a lot of my colleagues, to see that not more of them are speaking up is just mind-bending.
Well, there's this article from Statista.com, and it says, where are the most journalists are imprisoned worldwide?
Maybe we should keep an eye on this because as they're going after James O'Keefe and Project Veritas, 274 journalists were in jail due to their work as of 2020, a figure that exceeds the high of 272 recorded in 2016.
More than 250 journalists are behind bars for the fifth consecutive year and Shocker, I'm sure this will shock you, right?
China is the worst jailer with 47 journalists identified as being in prison there.
Turkey in second with 37, Egypt with 27.
According to CPJ, the crackdown has continued sometimes because of, because of rather than spite of COVID-19 with at least three journalists arrested for their work covering the pandemic.
Is this where we're headed?
They keep on talking about how dangerous it is to give any news that is against their narrative.
And then it shows up.
We're not on this list yet.
China, Turkey, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and so on.
Not here yet.
But if we don't do something soon and these journalists don't wake up, then this is where we're headed.
That TV put another article out about the panic that has come out.
The sub stack scaries are over for media companies announced Axios today.
Tag to a story with the dramatic headline.
Big media strikes back at sub stack.
They're so threatened by independent media, so threatened.
A good newsletter exit strategy, hard to find, that described how some writers who'd come to the platform like Substick had run up against unexpected logistical problems like wrestling with the issue of how to quit and return to traditional media jobs.
While I, for one, have no interest in returning to traditional media.
If this doesn't work out, I don't know what I'll do.
Maybe I'll serve burgers.
I just said that the other day.
Maybe I'll be a waitress.
But I have no interest in returning to the corrupt traditional media until it is fixed.
Until it is reformed.
It is completely broken.
I have no interest in returning.
But anyways, the Axios Bottom Line Observation.
Journalists that crave the infrastructure and editorial support offered by the newsrooms are finding more happy mediums as the newsletter industry grows.
unidentified
Bearing the lead just a tad, the same article noted Substack announced Monday that it has more than 1 million paid subscriptions to publications on its platform, up from about 250,000 in December 2020.
So I'll go through more of this article and we'll hear what Joe Rogan has to say about censorship, who actually wasn't identified as a journalist before, but he's actually speaking up against censorship.
at Battenmore after the break.
unidentified
Welcome back to the American Journal.
We were talking about media malfeasance, pointing out the destruction, corruption, and hijacking of the news industry as we know it.
It's angering, but it's also very, very sad for me as I worked very hard to enter into the news business, worked in the traditional news media for 20 years, and to see it change, and to me, from my perception, change so quickly.
From just three years ago when I was at a Tegna Innovation Summit and we were talking about completely rational ways of how the news industry needed to change, to just a few years later tossing out the idea of objectivity.
It is crazy, mind-bending.
Cheering on censorship is what many journalists have now chosen to do in the name of freedom of the press, in the name of freedom of speech.
Doesn't make sense to me one bit.
Many journalists are just Rationalize their way out of these conversations.
But beyond some journalists that have been brave and spoken out, we're getting other people that maybe I didn't identify as journalists before that are speaking up.
I wanted to take clip number six because Joe Rogan was just talking with Alex and others just last night, and he touched upon this issue.
All these like internet companies, whether it's Google or whether it's Facebook or Instagram, if they can just censor you based on ideology, then you don't have freedom of speech because they're the primary means that people communicate.
So until we accept that there is some sort of utility, it's not as simple as it's a private company, when it's literally one of the main two or three ways that human beings share ideas across the planet.
earth it's bigger than just a company and and i don't know what the solution to that is but we have to have that conversation free the software right now they're abusing their power right because the way it it censors is always in favor of the left and the people in the left think that's a good idea but eventually you can't be left enough it's just going to keep going it's going to it's a machine it's pac-man it's just like can i wait so there you go so Some actual rational thoughts.
unidentified
I tried to have some of these conversations with my colleagues when I was still in the news business about this is the way more and more people communicate.
So we need to, it's our duty to defend freedom of speech, even on that platforms, instead of coming back with the tired terms of like, but they're private companies.
So agree with what Rogan had to say in that bit, but.
It is crazy to see so many journalists sell their souls, essentially, to the narrative, to the one that they think will prop them up and lead to the big network job or whatever it is that they're aspiring to.
But also a good video that I wanted to show you of just how smug they are in trying to weave their narrative in.
Instead of just get an interview, they want to try and make sure that they can weave their argument in.
This is quite Funny, really, to watch clip number five.
unidentified
In your book, you're describing the directives of Mao Zedong during the Cultural Revolution that would be distributed publicly every night.
And then you write, this is your quote, they served... She's so giddy right now.
A function similar to Donald Trump's late night tweaks while in office.
They were the direct communication of a leader's thoughts to his devoted followers, enhancing the sanctity of his authority.
She can't believe that she's already been snookered into being controlled.
She is a propaganda puppet.
Sorry, you win the award today.
And let's see.
So these people are so mad.
She's so mad and people like her.
The independent media is becoming more popular because people can actually trust them because they're not muzzled by corporate and advertising dollars.
They have more Freedom to try and effort to get both sides, but what you are seeing and is a fair argument I suppose is that a lot of independent media Is covering let's say more of the right or more of the conservative values But here's why because when you shove down everybody's throat only one side only the left side only the side of the
authoritarians, the true authoritarians, the only the side of the administration, only the side of Fauci.
When you shove that down everybody's throat, then when you are put into independent independent media, it's like, well, why bother even mentioning this side?
It's so exhaustively covered.
I can mention it, but I'm not going to waste my time and go deep into the lies that they're perpetrating on the side that you can easily prove are lies and just cite CDC and FDA.
Why am I going to spend my time digging into that when they're failing so badly at bringing other sides So what you are seeing more of the independent media bringing you what's censored and suppressed because there's a need.
And so whenever I'm challenged about like, well, wait a minute, you said you just wanted to do journalism fairly and you wanted to bring both sides.
I'm like, you're getting both sides.
You're still getting both sides because you have that side shoved down your throat everywhere you turn.
So I have decided that my time is better served in trying to seek out those that have been suppressed those that have been censored and do what little I can to magnify their voices.
That is my effort to balance things out.
So I am still seeking balance.
I don't try and censor or suppress.
What's shoved in your faces?
I have challenged other journalists to be on a panel with me.
Let's debate about these, the tenets of journalism.
I don't censor them unless it gets like crude or disgusting.
That might be where I draw the line, but you're allowed to have a different opinion or a different take or bring some different information on the platforms that I can control.
So I was talking about how ticked off The corporate controlled media is about independent media because of that reason.
They can't control it.
So there was a Substack article put out by Matt Taibbi.
Where he's talking about how Axios is, like, basically cheering on saying that, oh, some people that join Substack find it hard to have structure and find it hard to market.
But then they buried the lead, like he said, that it has more than one million paid subscriptions.
The notion that Substack is or was a threat to traditional media itself speaks to the comical inability of these organizations to understand cause and effect.
Happening number one traditional media companies and the Trump years suffered catastrophic declines in audience trust which have translated lately into Struggles with clicks and ratings happening number two those companies notice podcasters like Joe Rogan We're drying and retaining mammoth audiences even as efforts by outfits like MSNBC to create glitzy new on-demand shows hosted by people like communications director Nicole Wallace somehow flopped and they are tipped and
They are so mad that they can't get the same audience that people like Joe Rogan can pull in.
And so rather than do a better job, rather than try and earn trust, rather than seek out the other side, rather than try and do what they're supposed to do and be a voice for the voiceless and maybe seek out those voices that other media companies are suppressing, they would rather Just take take their speech away.
They would rather just remove the competition so that all can be controlled, and they don't even have to, um, address it so.
But I wanted to get back to a couple of your phone calls, and then I'll get back into more of the news.
But let's go to Jennifer in Canada, because she has some news about what's going on there.
Jennifer?
unidentified
Hi Krystaline, I'm calling to let you know that today we have the potential for a precedent-setting case that's happening here in Canada.
We have Dr. Byram Bridle that's presenting an injunction for the defence, presenting an injunction against, not the defence, sorry, against vaccine mandates for the Toronto General Hospital.
And what's happening is that there is a blackout on watching this case unfold.
They have a Zoom meeting.
And it gets even worse.
It's a Zoom meeting, so you can log in, but it's capped at 500 people, so you cannot see what is going on.
This is a precedent-setting case that we are not allowed to witness.
It does seem that everything has like that we already are in authoritarianism, both in the U.S.
and Canada, and blocked on every side.
My gosh, when something is decided in this case, is there going to be any opportunity to appeal, especially since people couldn't observe this case?
unidentified
You know what?
I'm not even sure at this point.
I've got my fingers crossed that something good will come of it.
However, the judge that is presiding over this case has enforced parents that were in a custody dispute to vaccinate the child or the mother could not see the child.
Thank you for your phone call and drawing my attention to that.
Thank you, Jennifer, for your phone call.
unidentified
I will get back to some of your other phone calls, but since I only have a minute left in this segment, I don't want somebody to get started and then have to cut them off.
I've always thought that they just, they always push these cases with, you know, the police, black people getting shot, where obviously if you look into it, the cop was on the right, the dude who got shot, it's something that the media never reports.
Just so they can say when they get acquitted, see we told you, we told you the justice system is racist.
But now I'm starting to think with this Kyle Rittenhouse that now it's being used more as bellwether.
But I got I got your point that yes, basically, the media takes over, they elevate and push the information that they feel like will Cause the most unrest, essentially, and get people fired up so that then the justice system, all those involved, judge, lawyer, jurors, then all have to worry that if they make the right choice, they have to face the consequences of what will happen and they've been threatening.
That if they don't get the verdict that they want, that if Rittenhouse is not found guilty, then they're going to have more violence in writing.
Although this time we're told that National Guard will be on standby.
So that would, you would think, make a big difference.
And maybe if we had done that in the beginning, we wouldn't be dealing with this, but we'll see.
But yes, absolutely.
Chris was saying that anyone that has actually watched the trial ends up having a total different perception than the media gave them, which is something else we've been talking about.
All right, let's go to Justin in Minnesota.
Oh, actually, we're going to, we'll get to you, Justin, but let's go to Isaac in Australia first.
So just how bad is it getting out there in Australia?
unidentified
Well, I think we're in what we call the eye of the storm.
A lot of people think it's over.
The first battle's over.
This battle's just begun.
So a few months ago, maybe even a month ago, the unduced people, we're not even allowed to say the word vaccinated here in Australia.
We call it unduced people.
We're still on lockdown.
We're still not allowed to enter restaurants, cafes, We're not allowed to get our hair cut, can't buy shoes, clothing, and they're putting a lot of pressure on the people that are on vets.
Just a few months ago, the police were actually beating the people up They were throwing them to the ground, they were hitting them with the butts of rifles, kicking them, kneeling them.
I'm not going to send you all the footage of this.
We've got helicopters, like, 24-7, military helicopters flying really, really low, and they're dropping stuff on us.
OK, and I was a big Jim Crow guy, sending people dropping stuff on us, people flying outside with their cameras, filming the planes dropping, and their cars getting covered in white powder, or black metallic stuff, which is very magnetic.
Not only that, the mental health problems here have really escalated.
What I do on my program, I do a lot of hip-hop music and everything, in Houston, Texas.
That's why I love you guys.
Texas is the place.
I put my music on hold because a lot of people here, I didn't realize how many people were actually suffering.
You've got a house full of people, but they're alone.
You're not connecting with anyone else, I will.
I run about five or six hours.
I do five or six hours with the Y programs.
Interview people, interview politicians, and I do a lot of interviews with adverse reactions.
In our country, you cannot put anything about adverse reactions on the radio, on talkback radio.
They won't even allow any reports about adverse reactions, even if there was them, they just won't even allow it?
unidentified
They allow it, and then they cut your mic, and they call you a conspiracy theory, they try to get out of the rabbit hole, and I get very upset because I'm like, What I've been doing is I've got a protocol.
I spoke with the doctor that looked after President Trump and got the protocols like the zinc, magnesium, glutathione, vitamin B, vitamin C and everything that goes together.
They banned the drug ivermectin here in Australia.
They banned it literally and the doctors got a gag order.
The doctors can't say anything bad against the vaccine.
Not only that, they're not giving out exemptions.
People could have heart failure.
People could have kidney failure.
People could be a transplant recipient.
And people that have had a really bad adverse reaction.
The most things that we're getting down here is heart disease, myocarditis, pericarditis in the youth.
We're getting the blood clots in the females.
And just females, this is something no one likes to talk about.
I've highlighted, I've brought out to the news, I'm pushing and pushing for it to be brought out, is that women just standing around people that have been vaccinated, not vaccinated themselves, but just standing around someone who has been vaccinated, their periods are coming out in massive blood clots.
I've got one lady that's had 12 weeks of clotting, periods which are clotting.
I've got all the photo evidence, I've got, I've got everybody's send it to me, I get about 700 bands a day.
That is where Australia finds itself to be in right now.
Things just keep getting worse and worse.
We were speaking to Isaac from Australia who was making a point before we had to go to break.
unidentified
Isaac, you're back on the air and and try and maybe bring us back to what you're talking about and finish out your thought.
OK, yeah, I just went live again on my Instagram channel, like I said.
If anybody wants to, like, follow me on there, it's I-Z-A-K-B-A-V-I-D, like IsaacDavid13.
And I've got a whole range of channels for different... Because our censorship here is abhorrent.
I can't say... I can't even say the word ivermectin.
If you put that up on your list, bang, you get a ban.
We have to call it juice.
We have to talk like the code words.
It's really, really tough down here.
But yeah, back to what I was talking about the school kids.
They just started injecting the school kids 12 years old to 17.
And what they said is that children can actually give consent under the term mature minor.
So you don't have to have your parents consent.
Even if your parent says no, we don't want this happening.
Just having your child at school, they call that implied consent.
I think there's a lot of paperwork on that.
Now, if the children, basically the children, it's totally mandatory.
It's not mandatory.
It's totally your choice.
If you don't take it, you can't go play in the playground.
You can't go to your high school formal.
And you can't graduate.
You can't sit for your test.
You can't play sports.
But it's your choice.
They're putting this pressure on the children.
So what me and a few of our teammates have done, we've got a guy named Romeo here that does a lot of work behind the scenes.
We are involved.
We're going to hold our own formal for these children.
Then they're going to miss out on the school formal.
A school formal is basically the prom in Australia.
You can't go to your school prom for graduation.
Yeah, they're just punishing the kids.
Yeah, and what this is creating is an entity between the parents and the children.
A lot of the children are saying, Mom, come on, man, I just want to play sport.
I just want to play sport.
Then they get injected and they're coming down with Lung clots, blood clots in their lungs.
Myocarditis, pericarditis.
I've got one girl that was just on about 15 minutes ago.
She stutters now.
She talks like this.
I've been giving her the detox that President Trump's doctor talked about and also sending her a whole heap of bystaff and just supporting her, loving her, praying for her.
But the worst thing is they're going to start, what I was saying before, we've got a premier downstairs which is like the governor of a state.
In Australia.
And what he's done is he enacted something in 2017.
He signed a contract with Moderna on six-month-old babies.
All right?
2017.
This is way before we even knew what a COVID was.
2017.
A six-month, four-year-old baby.
Everybody says in his post, every baby born 2020, 2021, will be part of the world's biggest clinical trial.
Not part of, not a vaccination, Cesar.
This is a clinical trial and your baby, your baby's going to be part of it.
Yeah, we'll continue to follow up with you on that.
unidentified
Yeah.
Can I say one more thing to you guys?
I just wanted to say a prayer for Kyle because I know the guy is innocent.
I follow American politics very closely.
You guys probably know me as the guy that made the Hillary Clinton meme while waiting in line.
We were doing the meme wars back in 2016.
We're massive Trump supporters down here.
We love President Trump and I don't want to see I love to just send out my best wishes to the kid and just let you know that Australia supports the United States of America.
We've seen what the President, I can't call him the President, I'm sorry, the President sitting in the White House at the moment.
We've seen what he's done, the tragedy that he's brought to the country and the actual embarrassment that he's done to such a proud country and a proud people.
I just want to send my best wishes to my friends here.
And we do believe that we're going to get out of this.
I mean, we are in the eye of the storm and we've got another run coming at us next year.
I believe that they're going to give us Christmas and the New Year.
They're going to make up the false numbers again.
We're going to have a virus that's going to be more compressible and resistant to the vaccine.
So we're going to have to get another booster and another booster.
Then they're going to lock us down again.
They've crushed our small business down here.
They've crushed a lot of people's spirits.
And what I do, I do my best.
Sometimes we've got a thousand people watching.
I give a voice to the people that are going through adverse reactions.
I interview the politicians.
And I just give hope to the people.
Sometimes it's up to 5.30 in the morning.
I've got people in New York.
John Matlin in New York.
We're outside New York.
Your friend Clown Car.
That was on earlier.
We love America.
We're going to do everything we can to unite with you guys.
When we lost those 13 Marines, God rest their souls.
Um, I am calling in from California, um, for help.
I have a direct message to my Minnesota friends and family.
If you're listening, my friends and family, I was downtown in Rochester, Minnesota with a loudspeaker to protest you against medical tyranny and many of you showed up and I appreciate that.
But, We need to move in larger numbers than that of this.
And we can... We have the power to end, particularly Minnesota, because we're a medical state.
If we... We need to get down to the Mayo Clinic Hospital with a little bit more order, and we need to stand up to this before it's too late.
Bad information has become as prevalent, persuasive, and persistent as good information.
Do you understand that?
Right here, even these terms that they chose, bad information as opposed to good information.
So they're qualifying it in those terms as opposed to both sides or The perspective of these doctors as opposed to the perspective from corporate controlled big pharma doctors.
You know, now they've split it by bad information and good information.
This is the information we'll approve of because it's paid by big pharma Pfizer.
And this is the information that we're not going to approve of.
They've broken it down to bad information versus good information.
They say the bad information can create harm and makes any health crisis more deadly.
Where's the proof of that?
Where's the proof of any of the information about ivermectin or any of that has made the crisis more deadly?
Where's the proof that the vaccines have done any good when we have more infections, more rates than we did before the vaccine was even here?
We don't need to worry about proof.
We're just going to say it undermines health crisis and makes it more deadly with no proof.
Slows down response time on climate change.
Here we are.
We're introducing the next crisis in case they can't control the narrative with the vaccine.
Well, they got to back up.
Climate change.
And it undermines democracy.
So they co-chaired this thing, this final report on information disorder.
It's co-chaired by Katie Couric.
Reminder, Katie Couric's the one that misrepresented, cut parts out of the Ruth Bader Ginsburg interview she did, censored her own interview.
Misrepresented with what Ruth Bader Ginsburg said because she said Ruth Bader Ginsburg was getting old and probably didn't know what she was saying.
This was when Ruth Bader Ginsburg was critical of those that were kneeling.
And she decided to cut that part out because, you know, it didn't really fit with the narrative.
And then she's the excuse.
It was because, well, she was old.
She probably didn't know, really know or understand the question.
She was still serving as a Supreme Court justice.
And this is the award-winning journalist Katie Couric that thinks that she can co-chair what is true and what's not true when she herself was misrepresenting one of her major interviews.
And then also, if that's not enough, they have cybersecurity expert Chris Krebs.
If I'm not mistaken, wasn't he the one that said the election was the most safe and secure and ever?
I mean, we did all these brand new things we've never done, like send mass mail-in ballots out everywhere.
In many states, this was a new thing.
We had all these weird, unexplained issues, counts that were going on days after the election, but it was the most safe and secure election lockdown ever.
And this guy is apparently on This commission on information disorder.
But then it goes on to say the commission is composed of a diverse group from across the political spectrum.
That's weird because every person that I read about being in this commission is from the left.
So that just seems like a flat out lie.
And so it makes 15 recommendations for how government, private industry, and civil society can help to increase transparency and understanding, build trust, and reduce harm.
But the whole thing is, it's about information disorder, which means they want to control the information that's being put out there, but then they say it's to help increase transparency.
So we want to hide what we're doing but we're going to call it transparency.
Doesn't make any sense.
So if that's not enough, Prince Harry says online misinformation is a global humanitarian issue.
So globalist.
Harry says misinformation is a global humanitarian issue.
And look, he contributed to this report on information disorder.
He contributed to the report by a U.S.
think tank into disinformation.
making 15 recommendations after a six-month study.
He described online misinformation as a global humanitarian issue that needs to be tackled by policies, including investment in local journalism.
We've seen that they want to make sure that they're funding that because there's nothing wrong at all with the government using public tax dollars to fund and prop up journalists and journalism that they can control.
There's no conflict of interest there.
And it's basically saying, like, well, since we're losing advertising dollars, since people are not watching the news anymore and going to independent journalism and putting their dollars there, well, then we'll just still take your money through tax dollars and give it to the journalists and journalism that we can control.
This is what that means by when they say including investment in local journalism.
They've already been talking about bailing out traditional journalism and cracking down on super spreaders of false content.
How would they do that?
With more censorship.
Wait a minute, didn't they say in this commission they were going to be more transparent?
So today is Jimmy Kimmel's unfriend on social media day.
Here's how to decide who makes the cut.
So talk show host Jimmy Kimmel said today is the day to unfriend those you disagree with, because we wouldn't want you to be able to get any information other than what's the approved narrative from the mainstream.
And if you have a rogue friend that is actually bringing information that we didn't approve of, then make sure you unfriend them.
That's what that means.
That's what I take it to mean.
Virtual world has grown more integrated with the physical one as well as more politically divided with the magnitude of information coming our way.
It's important to be selective about who is allowed into our virtual world, says Susana Flores, a licensed clinical therapist with New Orleans and author of the book Facehooked.
Whereas we once would debate with friends in person, agree to disagree, and then get a beer together, we are now frequently using public posts and isolated messages to communicate in ways we never would face-to-face, she said.
Engaging in contentious discussions at all, let alone on a virtual platform, takes a lot of effort.
And Flores said it is only worth engaging if the other person is also similarly willing to engage in a mature conversation.
Well, that I would agree with, but by the very merit that they disagree with you, it doesn't seem like you should unfriend them.
But to me, this is another effort to shut down those that are trying to get the other side out there and maybe Get people to think beyond the echo chamber that they're in.
And so they're like, nope, we can't have that.
Make sure that you just go ahead and unfriend those.
And then you have media saying inflation is fine or a worse problem for the wealthy.
The media is seeking to placate those most adversely affected by that.
I'm going to go deeper into this article and then maybe take some of your phone calls to wrap things up.
It looks like I'm not going to get to all this news that I wanted to share today.
Welcome back.
unidentified
We're in our final segment of the American Journal, and I'm going to try and get through some of the other news I had to share today.
was talking about how media is always trying to gaslight you into bleeding what the narrative commandments are telling them to say.
And particularly, we've seen this happening with inflation.
I've seen many articles addressing gas prices and saying, no, the president has nothing to do with gas prices.
It's never news.
It's always more like public relations for the administration.
News is dead.
But anyways, so here's an article from the Liberty By claiming inflation is fine or at worst a problem for the wealthy, the media is seeking to placate those most adversely affected by it.
So this article brings up the whole Erin Brockovich thing, who really exposed what PG&E was doing, trashing the drinking water.
And it said part of the condemnation against PG&E in relation to that story was the fact that they distributed brochures Telling the townsfolk that chromium was an important part of their body's chemistry and therefore was a healthy substance, but then they left out any of the harm that it was causing.
Does that sound familiar?
They were trying to say all of the positive things that this harmful substance could do, but leaving out any of the negative.
Sound familiar?
So this article says, my point is this, the people that were poisoning everything are the same ones insisting everything is okay.
And so this is where the mainstream media comes in.
unidentified
It's been publishing some telling headlines recently from CNBC's Twitter account, inflation's silver lining, higher salaries.
From Bloomberg, America needs higher, longer-lasting inflation.
From Washington Examiner, by the way, of Yahoo News, White House thinks inflation and supply chain woes are high-class problems.
They won't affect you.
This is just affecting the very rich.
From the Wisconsin Examiner, inflation boogeyman scares only the extremely wealthy.
Well, anyone that knows anything about inflation knows that this can and will affect anyone and arguably will affect those that make less even more because they can't get the basics of life, of food, being able to travel, fill up their gas tank.
I'm still paying twice as much to fill up my car than I was before.
That's the working definition, according to Investopedia.
The rise in the general level of prices, often expressed as a percentage, means that the unit of current Currency effectively buys less than it did in prior periods.
So again, arguably, this would affect those that make less or have less income.
This would affect them even more than the wealthy.
But the media is gaslighting you into thinking inflation will only affect the wealthy.
Wages are up quite a bit, but the biggest reason is the labor shortage.
But the increases in those higher wages aren't enough to offset the inflation.
So CPI came in at a whopping 6.2%.
Hourly earnings are up 4.9%.
But if you break them down by sector, the picture becomes worse.
Energy is up over 25%.
Well, food and household operations each are up around 6% each.
So this is basic fundamental math.
If your cost of goods and services is now higher, Then your wages are higher but your wages aren't as high or haven't seen the increase as your basic cost of goods and interests has risen, then you're still in the hole.
So calculate how much of the monthly budget each of the inflationary effects consumes and you have the real effect of inflation on that house.
When adjusting for inflation, real average hourly earnings were down 1.2%.
Okay, so I wanted to get through a little bit of COVID vaccine type news.
And so, saw this.
This is from 100% FedUp.
Three courageous nurses walk away from jobs they love after Catholic Hospital denies their religious exemptions.
Three of Ascension Providence Rochester Hospital's best nurses walked away from their beloved jobs on Friday after the Catholic Faith-Based Hospital Network refused to consider their pleas for religious exemptions.
Yes, you read that correctly.
unidentified
Catholic Faith-Based Hospital denied Christian nurses their religious exemptions.
The nurses with decades of combined high-quality service have voluntarily resigned after their applications for the religious exemptions were denied.
A fully vaccinated manager at the faith-based hospital shared their thoughts on watching the three highly qualified nurses who bravely cared for patients through the COVID pandemic as they walked away from the jobs they loved.
This fully vaccinated nurse said today was the saddest day of my 33-year nursing career.
Religious exemptions were denied, and these wonderful ladies were three of the many health care workers who followed their conscience and will be losing jobs they love.
I've been blessed to work alongside these ladies for many years and have learned so much from them.
They're my heroes, not because they furiously stepped up to the plate for their hospital and patients during the initial COVID crisis.
After all, they were just doing their job and they were employed, but because they're willing to give up There are livelihoods to be true to themselves.
God bless these brave women who will be looking for new jobs and possibly entirely new careers.
And as we know, this story is not unique.
When I've been blessed to talk to some of you that have called in on the various shows I've popped in and guest hosted, I've been hearing from many of you who have gone through the same thing.
Thank you for your bravery.
I heard on Mike Adams the other day, he was saying, when you comply, you die.
So this is the answer, don't comply, or something to that effect.
I might have messed that up.
But saying something like that, this is, gotta keep on being brave, gotta keep on not complying.
That's the only way out of this.
And then I see this article has been shared, of course, parroted out by multiple local news affiliates, Local 12 being one of them.
Doctors' privilege is suspended for spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID.
So you'll notice here they put quote in the headline, spreading dangerous misinformation.
Doctors' privilege is suspended for quote spreading dangerous misinformation about COVID.
Other articles that I saw apparent the same exact story didn't use the quotations.
Just another interesting thing I noticed.
So Texas Hospital says it has suspended the privileges of a doctor who spread misinformation about COVID-19 on her social media.
Dr. Mary Bowden posted harmful and they make sure they put that in quotes.
Dangerous misinformation about COVID-19 and its treatments.
According to the hospital, she used her social media to express her personal and political opinions about the COVID-19 vaccine and treatments.
unidentified
Houston Methodist said in a statement on Twitter, her privileges have been suspended.
Bowdoin's attorney Stephen Mitby said the doctor has treated more than 2,000 patients with COVID-19 at her private practice and none, none of them have ended up in the hospital.
So they're using words like harmful, dangerous, misinformation, and oh, but by the way, none of her patients died.
To say that InfoWars has been accurate in the last 28 years, predicting and chronicling what was coming, is an understatement.
We have been absolutely dead on, except for one aspect.
The New World Order actually launching its bio attack and its global lockdowns and it's great reset tyranny is even worse than I imagined reading their own documents and their own war game plans.
And there's no doubt that they're not beta testing their New World Order.
They're going ahead with the whole thing and plan to depopulate the earth by 80% by the year 2030.
And I know that sounds hard to do, but my God, 200 plus million are set to starve to death now.
Extra 25 million just starved to death because of the global lockdowns.
And now they're talking about bringing back the global lockdowns in the West that are still going on in Africa, many areas of Africa and Asia and Latin America.
I mean, this is just genocide.
And now they knew bringing forward these poison shots would make a lot of people quit or get fired.
That's causing things to shut down with huge amounts of people that work at the power companies being fired or quitting and the nursing homes and the medical It's a new kind of war.
and the doctors and the auto plant workers and the grocery store workers and the teachers.
And just everything's falling apart all over the country in blue cities.
There's piles of garbage everywhere and people overdosing on fentanyl.
And it's a new kind of war.
It's a globalist deindustrialization system that they pledged to engage in back in 1992 at the first Rio de Janeiro Agenda 21 meeting.
And now we're under Agenda 2030, and that means extermination of 80% of us in just eight years.
I hope to stop that.
I hope to be more than just a speed bump to that.
But if you don't spread the word about the show, if you don't share these videos, these reports, they're going to succeed.
I mean, I'm sad to tell you, InfoWars is the best hope we've got.
That means you're the best hope we've got.
So let's work together and spread the word and stop these madmen now.
It's Thursday, November 4th, 2021, when I'm shooting this important news bulletin that's only gonna last four short minutes.
But here are just some headlines, and then I'll give you my view on it.
This is the Financial Times of London.
UK supply chain crisis to last at least until 2023, business leaders warn.
Here's another headline.
The world could run out of food by 2023, study shows from the United Nations.
Here's another one on Axios.
Healthcare plagued by new supply chain shortages.
All these are establishment statements.
China urges citizens to stockpile food in preparation for potential winter supply chain breakdown or war with Taiwan.
Supply chain issues.
How global shortages are affecting consumers nationwide and worldwide.
People are hoarding.
Food shortages are the next supply chain crunch.
And it goes on and on with these similar headlines.
Here's one out of CNN.
The global supply chain nightmare is about to get worse.
Here's another one out of WBUR.
What America's supply chain shortages mean for your buying from phones to cars.
Supply chain crunch sparks food shortages in the U.S.
On and on and on.
So when we have a food shortage or we have a gas shortage or we have a electricity shortage, it's a super bad convenience and it might even make some people become homeless, but in general, millions of people don't die.
But as I warned 20 plus months ago, when this whole global lockdown began, it's going to cause mass death in the third world.
And so the UN came out Just a few days ago, it's told Elon Musk he should give six million dollars to save the extra millions and millions of people that are now starving to death.
And Elon Musk said, well, wait a minute, you're the ones running child kidnapping rings and raping children all over the world and caught running sex slavery and also just regular labor slavery operations.
And I'm glad he countered with that.
He said, you're a bad organization.
You can't be trusted.
But maybe I will give six million to try to actually help these people.
But he should have gone further and pointed out it was the UN that ordered the global lockdowns.
They bragged about it.
They defended it.
And they were the ones 21 months ago that said, we need a global lockdown.
In fact, the head of the WHO wanted to keep them going into the year 2021, which in some African and Latin American countries, they're still doing because they're controlled by the IMF and World Bank that also controls the UN.
So it's the UN and the global corporations that have caused the global collapse, they're the ones that are causing all this famine, and they're the ones that are causing the supply chain breakdowns here in the West.
A, because a lot of the raw materials aren't available, but B, because millions and millions of people in different countries have been fired for not taking the experimental deadly jab, which again the UN and others knew a large portions would not take the shots, especially when it came out it was killing so many.
So we've got to get ready for this, and we've got to get physically prepared, but we've also got to be aware this is a war by the globalists, and until Congress wakes up to this and points out this is all part of the Great Reset that Klaus Schwab and Bill Gates brag about, and until they're called in for Senate hearings, they're just going to keep running this operation that's consolidating corporate power and vertically integrating society.
So that's why InfoWars is so important, because we're the only major leading media organization pointing out the elephant in the room.
At the same time, we've got high quality storable foods ready to ship to you right now.
I told you food prices would be going up around the world.
It's 10% off until November 15th, and it's going to be going up in price.
After that, we have the highest quality storable food ready to ship to you right now, and so many other great products.
It's a 360 win.
You get prepared, you get great food, and you fund the InfoWar.
Infowarsstore.com Infowarsstore.com After years of being off the shelves, we're bringing back one of the biggest fan favorite formulas ever and it's now been reformulated and is even stronger.