Kristi Leigh and Christy Lee’s War Room preview exposes systemic election integrity failures, with Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai (MIT, PhD) leading a bipartisan audit of Maricopa County ballots on 10-14-21, revealing anomalies in early voting envelopes while dismissing partisan attacks as distractions. Meanwhile, Christopher Worrell’s cancer treatment was delayed in D.C. jail, Judge Lamberth’s contempt ruling against Capitol rioters’ civil rights violations goes unaddressed by Garland, and Dominion’s Eric Coomer admitted fabricating Antifa ties. Norway’s Islamic-converted archer kills five, while COVID-19 lawsuits—like McCullough vs. FDA over Pfizer’s rushed approval—highlight vaccine controversies, including Merck’s $712 pill pre-purchased by Biden and NBA players like Kyrie Irving facing backlash for refusing shots. The episode ties institutional failures to broader distrust in media, law enforcement, and public health, framing transparency as the only path forward. [Automatically generated summary]
We also have the latest nonsense that's happening with school boards.
Definitely have been dealing with that here.
Thankful for the other parents that have joined together as we fight our tyrannical school board.
And it just gets worse and worse.
Definitely having a story coming out soon of just how bad you find out it is when you take that road of seeing what's in your school and seeing what's happening and then trying to get advocacy Turns out that's pretty tough too.
You can see what I went through in trying to file a police report about a book in the school library.
You can see what happened with that.
That's up on my band video page.
We'll have a media malfeasance award for you later in the show because that's kind of my thing is pointing out All of the baloney that you get from the mainstream, having been in it for so many years, interesting to have my eyes opened wider and wider at just how big the problem is.
And as usual, I would like to share a verse of the day.
I do that when I get to guest host.
So today's verse of the day.
That's from Isaiah 54 at 17.
No weapon that is formed against you will succeed, and you will condemn every tongue that accuses you in judgment.
This is the heritage of the servants of the Lord, and their vindication is from me.
That's from Isaiah 54, 17.
I know that this was a really special verse that my parents quoted frequently growing up.
There was a time that trust was my parents' biggest crime, and they had invited someone into the business.
And he turned out to be a felon and literally con them.
And it's a kind of a dark season of my childhood when all that was going on.
But they always quoted this verse that no weapon formed against me shall prosper, will succeed or prosper, depending on the version you're reading.
And you will condemn every tongue that accuses you in judgment because they had to take a lot of flack for what came in.
And then I had to review the verse about sword of the spirit, shield of, but now I'm running out of time.
So maybe we'll get that in the next segment.
But I looked that one up again because I had tried quoting it in the war room the other day and I realized I had forgotten most of it.
So good reminder to always review the verses and be well acquainted with the word because that is the truth.
And in a world where we're thrown so much lies, so much propaganda, we have to stand on the word of truth that does not change and is always there to guide and direct us as we navigate.
Coming back.
unidentified
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Christy Lee guest hosting today, The American Journal.
Thanks for waking up with me.
I don't, I'm not too much of a fan of waking up, but if I'm gonna wake up early, might as well be here and spend my morning with y'all.
So before the break, I was talking about the verse that I needed to review.
So humor me and let's review it together because this is a spiritual battle we've been in.
We see it everywhere.
Gosh, when your eyes are open to the evil, it is certainly everywhere and we need to make sure we're putting on our Spiritual armor, so this verse is therefore put on the full armor of God so that when the day of evil comes, it's here folks, you may be able to stand your ground and after you've done everything to stand.
Stand firm then with the belt of truth, buckled around your waist with the breastplate of righteousness in place and with your feet fitted with the readiness that comes from the gospel of peace.
In addition to all this, take up the shield of faith, A couple things stick out to me as I review this verse that I've known, you know, my whole life.
It's funny how when you have the Word of God, different things stick out to you.
And as I was reading this, it says, stand, stand firm.
And it's such a good reminder because the evil and the opposition They want to wear us down, and it works sometimes.
As I've been fighting my own school board situation, it's discouraging because you're bringing them truth, you're bringing them evidence, and you get ignored.
And then, with the pornography situation, the law is very clear about distributing Pornographic content, two minors, and yet they're getting it from their library.
Try to file a police report and that particular deputy just outright refused to take my report.
And so you just have to keep on coming back and like, OK, now who's above this person?
You know, it just it feels like so.
Many losses.
And I just I think a lot of us are just craving a win.
You know, it seems like every time we have a win, maybe it wasn't a win or it's such a roller coaster and it is exhausting.
So it's nice to have the reminder that, you know, sometimes you can't even do anything and you just have to stand, stand your ground.
And that's the thing.
We're humans.
So we have to give it to God and let him fight the battle.
And just again, all the flaming arrows of the evil one.
That's so true.
It feels like arrows.
It's just they're coming at you.
I said lately, I feel like I'm playing whack-a-mole, just trying to keep up with everything.
And every time I think that I'm getting somewhere with one aspect or situation, something else pops up and it's just like, you can barely keep up.
And I found that even like hurts my ability to think clearly because your mind is going in so many different directions.
Definitely not the only one going through this.
I know that it's different for different people, different parents, certainly a totally different situation for this Ludon.
I'm not sure how to say that.
Ludon County, the father that was arrested for getting upset because his daughter was raped in a bathroom in direct correlation with the school's wokeness of letting boys in a girl's bathroom because the boy was identifying as a girl.
But he certainly wasn't a girl when he was, excuse my language, but able to penetrate his daughter and rape her.
And in the school, the response is so political.
They say, well, LCPS takes student privacy seriously and cannot reveal details concerning the action of any specific student.
We do want to clarify our investigative process.
We're required to tell law enforcement, but that is coming after Scott Smith, the father, said it's a totally different story for him.
He alleged that the school district tried to cover up the sexual assault by a gender fluid individual against his ninth grade daughter in order to further its transgender agenda.
The records are sealed, but it was his attorney that was able to confirm these are very serious charges against this boy that is identifying as a girl, but not in the case of rape, because he was able to rape another girl.
And the school just covers it up, and I can, from my personal experience, tell you that this is how these schools act.
My daughter told me about an incident of two boys in a bathroom at her school, and I reached out to the...
The school and I said, what's going on there?
And is it a far leap to wonder that if these incidents are happening, that there could be a correlation to the pornography that you're distributing out of your school library?
And the response I get is just evasive saying we can't talk about students.
We can't confirm or deny that this happened.
And I says, look, I'm not asking for student names.
I'm not asking for details.
You can't even confirm or deny for me that this happened.
And it's the same thing with this situation where all they send out to the parents after this experience with this father was that there was an incident in the office and they're referring to when the father was arrested.
So they didn't even take responsibility or let parents know that this incident even happened.
Let's play a quick clip about this certain situation.
unidentified
Various parents in Virginia calling for an entire school board to resign after allegedly trying to cover up sexual assault.
You will have a student who is currently charged with sexually assaulting a girl and be quietly transferred to another school.
What other crimes are you people hiding?
Do you people even have a moral compass?
Resign before you face a federal indictment.
It comes after this father, remember him?
He was arrested at that June board meeting.
Now says that he acted out after his daughter was attacked in the school bathroom and no one at the meeting would listen to him as outbursts like his are labeled acts of domestic terrorism.
So we can pull out from from there, but here's the context of that.
It says That Smith told the Daily Wire that he was arrested at the June 22nd school board meeting shortly after LCPS superintendent Scott.
Ziegler declared that to his knowledge, we don't have any record of assaults occurring in our restroom.
Can you imagine the rage you would feel knowing that your young daughter, because ninth grade, that's young, that's my daughter's grade.
It's a young daughter.
Can you imagine the rage you would feel when you're fighting for your daughter, something that could have been avoided if the school hadn't been Woke and allowed this to happen in the first place.
And then the superintendent of the school basically denying that it happened.
We don't have any record of assaults occurring in our restrooms.
Well, that's different than the statement that comes later, obviously, when they say that they notified the police right away.
But then the superintendent didn't know anything about this?
Really?
So he then flew into a rage after a local progressive activist said she didn't believe the daughter's story.
I'm Christy Lee guest hosting today, talking about a topic that is uncomfortable to talk about, but important to talk about since nobody else was apparently at the school in Luton County.
Hope I'm pronouncing that right.
A father enraged, understandably, because his daughter was a victim in a bathroom That a boy was able to come in and victimize her because he was a girl, identified as a girl, but apparently not in that moment because he was able to graphically rape this young girl
Dad clearly enraged understandably, and he's the one that gets arrested and dragged out of a school board meeting because the superintendent said he wasn't aware of this.
But then later the school board says, oh, they handled this.
According to protocol and they had made the report to the police right away.
So there's always conflicting stories.
That's part of the reason the father was set off is the denial that this thing happened when they buckled to the woke agenda and have made policies to accept this transgender movement.
And Paul Joseph Watson did a really great analysis on this, just talking about how with the whole Dave Chappelle thing, you know, that the transgender community always says, like, don't punch down on us.
Don't punch down.
And it's like, no, it would be punching up because clearly you have more power than just our regular average Joe parent does.
We can't seem to get anywhere with anything.
We can't seem to have any common sense.
But, you know, you have power over this whole situation.
Now you're completely reframing the schools and yet you act like the victim.
And Steven Crowder was a victim of YouTube's censorship.
They suspended Steven Crowder after his episode talking about this subject, discussing those rape accusations against transgender suspects.
It says that YouTube slapped Steven Crowder with a strike against his YouTube channel in connection with what the tech giant council describes as a segment that targets the transgender community in an offensive manner.
And obviously his reaction, a hard strike from YouTube.
And wow, this is terrifying.
We covered specific documented instances of rape.
This is so backwards.
This is the definition of evil, to twist things.
We're going to worry and focus on that a transgender individual could be offended more than we're going to acknowledge the rape of a 14-year-old girl.
This is the backward evil logic.
It is beyond maddening.
And this is the kind of stuff that does get discouraging.
There's no justice, there's no common sense.
Steven Crowder gets a strike on his YouTube channel because he's being offensive to transgender.
So what, we can't even talk about it?
If any transgender person commits a crime, you can't even talk about it now?
Yeah, I raped this person, but you're offending me by bringing it up.
Really?
This is the world we're living in right now.
Moving gears, I like to do and work on media malfeasance each week, which is just my name for pointing out all of the nonsense the mainstream is putting at you.
And yes, I will admit that I was lumped into that group, never intentionally misled anyone, and obviously that's why I got out of it, spent many years in traditional media.
But I will say that my experience Man, things really got worse in about the last two years.
Worse than they've ever been.
unidentified
And who knows, maybe because I was pushing back on that, maybe that's why I found myself no longer in traditional news media.
Contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life, which probably could not have lived in the places they came from.
As they became older, they realized that this was youthful folly.
This was the controversial statement that RBG made, really?
unidentified
And she edited that out, and now she admits to it.
And it goes on to say that Crick writes that she's always tried to keep her personal politics out of her reporting throughout her career.
Wasn't she the one that interviewed, and maybe I'm wrong, maybe you can tell me later, but wasn't she the one that made Sarah Palin look stupid, essentially?
Or maybe that was somebody else.
Goodness gracious.
But yeah, she's totally tried to keep her personal politics out of everything, sure.
And the day after the sit down, the head of public affairs for the Supreme Court emailed Couric to say that late Justice had misspoken and asked that it be removed from the story.
Now, if you're ever a journalist, this is like fundamental in your classes that if anybody tells you to take something out, that's probably what should go in.
That is what we're taught.
We're taught, do not let your interviewee know what your questions are ahead of time, because you'll get that all the time.
They'll say, can you give us a list of questions that you'll be asking so we can properly prepare for the interview?
Before we went to break, we're talking about all the bad actors and there is never a shortage of information or news to talk about when it comes to those that are Not doing an honor to their job, or theirs that are just plain evil.
So we were talking about specifically in the media, Katie Couric winning the award this week for her selective editing.
Isn't that funny that whenever James O'Keefe has these great investigative reports that actually expose the truth, the biggest resistance you get on those is they say, well, James O'Keefe selectively edits his stuff.
He's just selectively editing.
First of all, with any news organization, I didn't know that they were just putting out raw video all the time.
It's strange.
For as long as I've been in the news industry, everywhere I've worked has had this thing called editors.
And they've had to edit.
I mean, you could say selectively.
So that's an interesting phenomenon in and of itself.
But then you have Katie Couric saying like, yes, I admit it.
I selectively edited my interview with Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
But somehow They'll paint her as a heroine for doing that.
And I'm sure she'll get to sell her book.
But the latest is, which was so great to see, was Joe Rogan interviewing Sanjay Gupta, CNN star, Dr.
So why, if I've already gotten through COVID and I was really only sick for a day, and then five days later I was negative, And I do have the natural antibodies now.
Why would I take a chance in getting vaccinated on top of that?
I'm going to talk more about this later because he comes out with his own article and he's like acting proud that he went into the lion's den, he says, in talking about going on Joe Rogan's show.
And he acts like he handled it well.
Um, not from what I'm seeing.
You look mighty uncomfortable in that seat.
Shifting around.
I was going too fast.
I can't keep up with this logic.
Oh my goodness.
I'm sorry.
I'm kind of being crazy right now.
But it's just, it was just so funny.
And then he does, he has to admit like, yeah, yeah.
Ultimately, yeah, probably, probably shouldn't have lied.
Come on.
And they wonder why people don't trust CNN and MSNBC.
And shoot, even Fox News sometimes.
I will be happy to admit that, that, you know, you can get it from both sides.
An endeavor to understand a virus that has stopped our whole world.
And I would ask everyone, countries, journalists, and everybody else, to create a little space for that discussion to happen.
Because this is probably, right now, this is our best chance, and it may be our last chance, to understand the origins of this virus in a collegiate, collective, and mutually responsible way.
unidentified
Yes, so thank you for the question.
So, yes, I anticipate that the SEGO in its discussions about the urgent next steps for understanding, you know, the origins of the current pandemic will recommend further studies in China and potentially elsewhere.
And I very much hope, we very much hope that there will be further missions to China and other countries.
The hoop pretending like they don't know where it came from by now.
There is so much evidence, so much logic that you can use about how this happened, where it came from.
And they sit up there and act like, oh, and we're still working to figure out where this thing came from that stopped the entire world.
And we're going to make that a priority.
If you made that a priority, you would be more transparent, and you would talk about the fact that Peter Daszak went to DARPA and tried to get funding for this virus.
It's all documented, and other researchers say, could have probably went ahead and released this even without the funding.
But let's not talk about that.
We can't talk about that.
But let's bring it back to CNN.
Van Jones actually making a little bit of sense?
unidentified
The numbers are down.
The party is fighting with itself over what should be easy wins.
And then we have this issue of Democrats Wanting to bail out the media, as if we haven't already seen the influence of the government on the media already.
They act more as press PR reps than actual journalists.
Journalists are supposed to hold the government accountable.
They're just basically parroting whatever the government tells them to say.
say 1.3 billion media bailout in the 3.5 trillion spending spree.
And I'm running out of time and I want to go over this a little bit more.
So before you go, make sure you are visiting InfoWarsStore.com.
InfoWarsStore.com.
There's another sale going on right now.
I just started taking the Brain Force.
I'm waiting for it to kick in, and it will, and it is.
Me having come from mainstream media, but I'm reformed.
I'm reformed.
It feels good to be free.
Free from corporate controlled media.
So we're talking about media.
Speaking of that, since less and less people are actually watching mainstream media, actually watching the local news anymore, Well, we can't have that because, from the government's perspective, we can't have that because, shoot, that's our propaganda arm.
We need to make sure that they keep untelling our audiences whatever we need the narrative to be.
So what can we do to help our little propaganda puppets?
What can we do for our propaganda puppets?
Well, let's give them some money.
Let's give them some money from our $3.5 trillion spending spree.
Of which 1.3 billion will go to bail out our good friends in the media, since nobody will actually listen to them anymore.
And we need to keep them alive so that we can at least attempt to deceive people.
Let's give them money from this printing machine, because they're just constantly printing money anyway.
So this is from The Federalist.
It says, several weeks ago, I wrote an article asking why the media in general, and Politico in particular, refused to cover the irregularities in Biden's taxes.
unidentified
What?
You mean the journalists weren't holding someone in power accountable?
That was such a big number, I had to think about how to say that for a second.
Oh my goodness, a relatively unheralded program and the $3.5 trillion Democrat spending spree would provide well more than $1 billion in bailout funds to media organizations.
With our nation more than $28 trillion in debt, Democrats want to raise taxes to spend more money on their political allies and corporate media.
And what's crazy about this is it isn't just for large media, it is for even some freelance writers.
So it's essentially, a key says, welfare for writers.
Beginning on page 2326, section 138517 of the bill, it provides a payroll tax credit for compensation of local news journalists.
Defining a local news journalist as someone who works at least 100 hours each quarter?
Shoot, I know people here at InfoWars who work 100 hours in a week, let alone 100 hours in a quarter.
Language implies the credits will go primarily towards small town reporters.
Oh my goodness.
And of course, it will be eligible for the large media corporations who, you know, get plenty of payoffs, but it's not enough.
Let's pay them even more, but taxpayer funded.
Let's make sure you're paying to get lies told to you.
We're gonna work it out so you get to pay to have people lie to you.
That makes sense, right?
Well, the Wall Street Journal editorial and a few other stories have highlighted this atrocious bailout.
Thus far, no one has appeared to highlight its cost.
Because it's like monopoly money.
Pelosi says, our bill is actually zero.
It's actually free.
Don't pay attention to all those zeros.
It's fine.
This tax credit program represents the latest attempt from Democrats seeking to dominate news media.
Any honest journalist will actually admit to this.
I just had a phone call with one, can't reveal the name because he's still in the corporate controlled system.
But that's the frustration.
There's so many ways, I mean, now they're going to get a bailout.
But for somebody that doesn't feel comfortable, and they're a parent like myself, and this This anchor I spoke with the other day.
They feel trapped because he has to provide for his family.
So he's continuing to work for a company that he disagrees with and doesn't feel comfortable with.
But right now, where's the bailout for people that actually want to be bailed out, that actually want to be honorable journalists and leave and go independent?
It's not easy.
It is a lot of work, and you have to rely on donations, you have to rely on sponsorships.
There's not an easy way to break free from the system.
So my hope is eventually we can come up with some kind of independent media fund or something so that people can can get out.
Like how do we get people out that went out?
He wants out, but I was just telling him I understand.
I get it.
Here's some tips, but There's also this notion of bloom where you're planted.
You know, do what you can while you're in the system.
And I guess see how long you last doing that.
But that's what I tried to do.
I held to my integrity while I was in the system.
I couldn't have a drop the mic moment like Ivory Hecker, which is fine.
That's great.
That's needed.
But as a mother, I couldn't have that moment where I'm just like, well, I'm going to quit.
So basically that decision was made for me and God helped me figure it out.
But there are people that are needed in the system that will try and be honorable with it.
So where did I want to go with this?
Let's talk about this real quick.
Kind of still on the media subject is censorship issues.
And Facebook is now wanting to change the rules on attacking public figures in its platform.
It will now count activists and journalists as involuntary public figures and so increase protections against harassment, bullying targeted at these groups.
So this whole situation I found fascinating because basically they're going to make it harder for you to criticize journalists.
And so I'm like, well, there will go my, my little segment that I do each week, media malfeasance, because I mean, now if Facebook has this new rule, they'll just shut it down because I'm daring to criticize those that aren't doing their job honorably.
But I'm sure that won't apply to me.
People will be able to criticize me all they want, but if you, and I've been encouraging people, challenge your local journalists, challenge your local news anchor, challenge the people that are putting out the lies.
I mean, is this going to make it harder to even challenge anyone on their reporting?
It's interesting to, it will be interesting to see how this plays out.
And Fox News had this too.
Facebook will treat journalists and activists as public figures to limit harassment and bullying.
Interesting.
Well, on that note, let's close out this hour with some humor.
I was like rolling over laughing watching this.
And so let's just close out this hour with some much needed Much needed laughter.
It's medicine for the soul.
unidentified
Check out what it's like to believe, what it's like to actually believe everything the media tells you.
People are freaking out right now.
Like, they're tired of having their constitutional rights taken away with a mandatory stay at home orders.
Cities are suing the California governor so their people can go back onto their beaches again.
Idiots.
Like, I'll stay at home for the rest of my life if they tell me to.
Who knows how to make the best choices for my health and my life?
Definitely not me!
So I'm more than happy to put my blind trust in power-hungry politicians and definitely uncorrupt groups like the World Health Organization.
I think they know what's best for me, because, like, they know me better than I know me.
The last thing you want is people to have the freedom to make their own choices and then experience the consequences of their choices.
I think free will is a little bit of a sin.
I don't think we should have it in the first place.
Like, you wouldn't give a razor blade to a three-year-old because it wouldn't be in their best interest.
So you shouldn't give freedom to people either.
All these Americans that want their freedoms are just ungrateful.
I say, if you don't like how things are going and you just want your freedom, then why don't you move to a free country like North Korea or Venezuela?
You freaking heathens.
Oh, I 100% buy into the narrative, they tell me.
I think it's ludicrous.
Some people don't 100% believe the narrative like it's the absolute truth.
Why wouldn't you?
Think about it.
If you were in charge of a giant, powerful business that pretends it's a charity like the World Health Organization, you wouldn't spend your time carefully crafting your message to manufacture consent with the public to get them to go along with your mysterious agenda that's in your best interest that you tell them is in their best interest.
You'd probably just get up to the podium and have a spontaneous conversation and see what comes out of your mouth while you're riffing.
I think that's what they're doing.
That's why when Trump gets up there and talks about things like injecting Lysol, it seems so out of the ordinary because he spends months carefully crafting his message.
I also find the more scared I am, the more unwilling I am to believe anything other than the original narrative that they told me that they're still telling me, even when new, more accurate information emerges.
Like when USC did research in LA County a few weeks ago and showed the amount of people infected with COVID-19 is 28 to 55 times more than we originally thought.
Yep, because most of these people don't have symptoms, it suggests the infection is far less dangerous than we originally thought.
And in contrast to the original guesstimation of a death rate of 4.5%, You're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
So in other words, this open forum is going to be the beginning And this ends, so you'll already be ready to listen to something.
And I believe you will be able to call into this, but he has some information on that that I'm going to share with you in the next segment.
And then after that, he goes into other information on how that election is going.
But as far as my impressions of this interview with Dr. Shiva, I was surprised at how deep he went hard against Donald Trump, he had criticism for Tucker Carlson.
I was surprised by those things, especially when you're gaslit by the media all the time that like, oh, these people that care about what's happening in Arizona, they just are diehard Trump fans.
They're Trumpers.
And no, he was definitely not.
And he says he didn't even vote for Donald Trump in 2020.
So it's interesting, the perspective that you get and how far away from reality it is.
Another thing that I found interesting to talk to him about is just how frank he is and logical, I guess you could say.
I mean, usually when you ask people like, so what hope is there?
Is anything going to happen?
They're like, they usually tell you, yeah, I think we just need to keep on pressing on.
We have evidence, you know, it's going to happen.
But he was not like that.
He was like, no, everything that I'm doing probably won't make a difference.
I was like, wait, what?
A lot of us are counting on that something is going to happen.
We're so sick of waiting for something to happen, for justice to happen, for fairness, for anything.
And he was like, he was like, frankly, no, you know, we are not going to get out of this mess from the courts and corrupt judges and corrupt lawyers and a corrupt system.
He said it's going to be up to the people.
And then he goes on to explain.
How that's going to happen.
So it's all very fascinating.
We're going to have the entire interview with him.
It's about last day.
I think we're going to try and get it down to like a half hour, which is still a long, long time.
I know we're going to try and get that whole thing up later today, hopefully.
But for now, we're going to have these couple of segments to share with you in these next.
Like I said, two segments.
And good reminder before we head into our commercial break that now is the time to go to InfoWarsStore.com.
You have to keep us on the air.
There are less and less resources for the truth, less and less resources for open discussion.
So make sure you keep us on the air and go to InfoWarsStore.com, DNA Force Plus, back in stock at 40% off.
Brain Force Ultra.
It actually tastes delicious.
I just had some so that I will stutter less as I get nervous up here sometimes.
Back in stock 25% off.
Check it out.
unidentified
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host Harrison Smith.
Thanks for spending your morning with me, with us.
And this is going to be the election block hour, maybe.
We'll see.
I'm still it's still weird for me to be both telling you the news, prompter free, and also the producer and all of the things.
Well, no, I don't take full credit.
I do have producer help, but I'm saying as far as What we talk about and when and trying to time all that out.
It's all new to me, but it's fun and it's rewarding and it feels fulfilling.
And I mean, I don't feel complicit in all of the big.
That lying happening anymore.
So it's nice.
Nice to be at a traditional media.
Nice to have freedom.
Nice to feel good about what you're doing.
So I talked to Dr. Shiva and this was yesterday and talked to him for a good 45 minutes and I wanted to play a couple clips and particularly the clip that is timely.
So one of the things, you know, that we have been really trying to educate people on and frankly, educate everyone on because this issue of election integrity, you have to understand Republicans have been using What I call the squishiness or the arbitrary nature of these systems to, you know, uh, uh, you know, uh, do election malfeasance against other Republicans.
Democrats have been doing it against Democrats.
Democrats have been doing it to Republicans.
Republicans have been doing it against Democrats.
Um, this is systemic and that's what people need to understand.
The issues that we're dealing with, they're looking at systems in, in the modern world.
We have engineering systems.
So, for example, the airplane system, right?
The healthcare system and you go on the election voting system is a complex system.
And if you think about it, very simply, if you were in the business of making cookies, right?
You know, and you look at a cookie manufacturing plant, the.
You know, flour and the chocolate chips come in on one end, and it goes through a process, and at the end of it, you get cookies.
Now, if there's something wrong with the cookies, simply just looking at the cookies at the end of the process doesn't solve it.
You have to go way upstream into that process.
Where did the flour come from?
Where did the chocolate chips come from, right?
How were they processed?
This is fundamentally called an engineering system.
And the modern world is composed of all these systems that we as humans rely on.
And if in any one of those processes, something is not correctly managed, if something's not transparent, if you frankly even don't know what the process is, that's where quote unquote fraud can take place.
And what we're noticing here is we looked at the process of when a early voting ballot envelope, let's say comes to you, You sign it, put your ballot in, you send it back, then it starts this process.
It's called the early voting ballot processing process, right?
Where people are getting all these early voting ballots, the envelopes are first scanned, and then after they're scanned, people are looking at the signature on the cover of that envelope and then deciding, does that signature match what they have on file?
And if it's blank, you know, they go through this process.
What's a very complicated process?
The interesting thing is, this process is not really fully transparent.
When we found different anomalies in this process, right, we raised questions.
We never accused anyone.
If you remember that, the hearing that I gave, there was no accusations.
We said, here are anomalies and we just want to know answers.
The response, unfortunately, the culture of response by the Maricopa County officials and through their media proxies, Has been not to really have a transparent dialogue.
So this Thursday from 12 to 4 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time, you know, on behalf of the public, we're going to essentially discuss everything that's public.
You know, I have a right to discuss everything that's in the public stage here, which is all the reports we filed, any of the information we've shared publicly.
And it's basically to invite the Maricopa County officials to a dialogue to say, hey, look, I'm the one who did the audit.
You're the person who can answer this.
Let's have an open dialogue.
So we've done it as an open forum.
I'm not sure if they'll come, but perhaps other election officials will come.
So this left-right divide is really unfortunate because it's never going to solve a systems problem.
So tomorrow, Thursday, I think it's October 14th, 12 to 4 p.m., people can watch it on my YouTube or my Facebook.
We'll have a call-in where people can go over all the anomalies.
Um, it's for press.
It's for the public.
It's for the Maricopa County officials.
It's basically to say, let's move beyond vitriol and controversy and partisanship to have dialogue.
And there you go, him talking about this open dialogue.
And that was really spoke to me when he went over that, that we really, really need to get away from partisanship and making everything about left or right and come together and agree, see what we can agree on.
And what should be able to be agreed upon is that it is Part of the Constitution, part of our legal system to allow audits and to hold them in high regard so that we can all trust the process.
It's really that simple.
No matter what side you're on.
But in such a divisive climate, it's It's hard to get that across.
But I appreciate the conversation, which you'll get to hear more of when we get all of that up on band, of just getting away from that and being good human beings and being able to have open dialogue.
So that is happening.
Like I said, 11 to 3 Central, he gave you the information.
And so hop on there.
And watch after you're done here or at the same time as you're watching Alex Jones.
So just try and get all of it.
Take all of it in.
Keeping up with this topic on what's happening with the election.
Obviously, this all stems back to what happened with our last presidential election, which many of us obviously don't have faith in because of all the craziness that we saw with our own two eyes.
Suitcases being pulled out in the middle of the night, water pipes that were never, never actually did anything.
We just heard that there was like explosion issues or water pipe issues and then there was nothing.
And supposedly they had something.
I mean, it's all a mess.
We saw it with our two eyes.
Oh, the covering up in Michigan of the windows that we saw with our own two eyes.
And yet it's laughable when people are like, what?
It was the most free fair election ever.
Nothing to see here, even though it was the first time ever that we had all of these mail-in ballots and different rules and people being mailed ballots that never asked for them.
Somehow, even with all of the newness of that, it was the freest and fairest election ever.
Obviously, that's why we're covering up the windows so that you can't see what we have.
That's why we're pulling things out in the middle.
Wait, that's not going along with the free and fair election.
It's all such a joke.
So anyways, going back to that, Bannon could be arrested apparently and charged today.
This is according to an article posted up on populist.press.
Representative Adam Schiff says they're prepared to go forward and urge the Justice Department to prosecute conservatives who refuse to comply with their subpoenas.
The committee may refer Bannon for criminal prosecution by the Department of Justice if he doesn't show up for a deposition slated for today, according to The Hill.
And this is, again, coming from Representative Adam Schiff, who, in case you hadn't heard, just came out with a book recently.
And he was like, oh my gosh, they're asking for more prints because Amazon said they sold out already.
How many books is Amazon selling of Adam Schiff's book?
Well, the latest is that, you know, on September 24th, just to review, is when I presented my findings from analyzing the images of the early voting ballot envelopes, right?
The return envelopes.
We present that on September 24th.
And then after that, the Attorney General has asked us to submit some more evidence, which we're frankly doing today.
Um, so it's going to move to the attorney general who appears to want to conduct an investigation.
So remember, um, the, the ruling of something being fraud, quote unquote fraud is not what the Senate does, right?
The Senate and the house, um, in Arizona passed laws, but it is the enforcement division, uh, which is the attorney general's office, which is the one that's going to decide if something's fraud, if people need to be prosecuted, et cetera.
So that's where it's moving to and we've been asked to provide some more evidence for that.
So one of the things, you know, I was scheduled to speak at the house and they had someone else go, which is fine.
But when most of these congressmen, Do not even know the law.
The law of 52 U.S.C.
207-01, which was passed around 50 years ago, by the way, by a Democratic majority, was to encourage audits.
52 U.S.C.
207-01 says the 22 months after an election is when Americans are encouraged to audit things, encouraged to bring up questions, encouraged to bring up anomalies.
That is what the law was set for.
So when this guy, Ro Khanna, was asking the question, you know, that it was un-American to essentially run an audit.
He doesn't know what he's talking about.
He's a Yale school.
He's a Yale jurist doctor.
So he's sort of either dumb or he basically doesn't understand the law or both.
Because when you bring up anomalies, you know, I run a couple of companies.
When customers call us saying, hey, our technology is not working.
We don't say you're a conspiracy theorist.
We don't say you're an anti-vaxxer.
We don't call them names.
We say, thank you.
We'll go look into it.
Some of it may be stupid.
Some of it may be right on target.
Sometimes it's something really small that leads to a larger problem, which we go solve.
In business, you have to solve these problems.
Otherwise, you're gonna be out of business.
But these guys, these unelected officials, many of them who they are, think that they can violate engineering principles, which is when someone reports something, it is your job to have a culture of embracing it, thanking people, and going and finding out what it is and transparently answering it.
So 52SC20701 was set up to support that engineering process.
Yeah, Chrissy, the bottom line is this, that we know change is going to come from The legal system, the fundamental change.
When you go at the fundamentals of what's going on with the censorship infrastructure we uncovered in our lawsuit, when you go at the fundamentals of election malfeasance that we've uncovered, when you go at the fundamental of the scientific establishment no longer serving science, we're going down to root, root, root cause issues.
And if you go back to history, root cause issues were never solved by lawsuits.
They were never solved by legislation.
They were solved by something much more fundamental.
People's movements.
It has been movements beyond left and right, beyond black and white, working people uniting that has always created change.
You know, the the Southwest Airline workers striking the construction workers in in Australia who spit on their own unions and broke from them.
That's what it's that's where real change is gonna happen.
It's not gonna occur through elections.
Because the system is too swampy, it's too deep, and it'll take way too long.
It's going to occur through people's bottoms-up movements.
There you go, and there'll be more of that on Banned Out video, hopefully, later on today.
It was a long interview.
We're going to get that looking pretty for you, so you can see the entire interview.
But it was a pretty fascinating interview.
And clearly, like I said, I was intimidated by how smart this man is.
I was like, uh-uh.
Just tell me what's the latest.
So in keeping with election news, we talked about how something might happen with Bannon today, and then we were going to talk about the clearly partisan way The whole January 6th situation was handled.
The judge for the Capitol writers, as they always like to call them, it says there have to be consequences.
A federal judge in Washington has repeatedly sentenced people who stormed I love these words.
So this is from Reuters.
So of course, we're going to get all these salacious words like stormed people who stormed the US Capitol to more prison time than the prosecutor saw saying that even people who were not violent should face consequences for joining the unprecedented assault.
It's funny because this wasn't exactly unprecedented.
If you look throughout history, there's been situations that are worse than this.
If my memory serves me correctly, didn't someone at one point actually put a bomb in the Capitol and Bill Clinton, like, pardoned this person?
I know I'm only vaguely remembering this story, so help me out with that later, but I know that it's kind of a leap to say completely unprecedented what happened there.
And we've seen the videos of people, okay, so that video is showing people banging, but a lot of the videos just show people walking around.
Here's the Kavanaugh protest, there we go, that's why.
Yeah, so what happened at the Capitol was unprecedented, but here are the liberals at the Kavanaugh hearing banging on things, and there we go.
So this was fine, of course, because they were on the right side.
unidentified
Well, the left side, but you know what I mean, the right side according to the media, and doing that.
But we call what happened that on January 6th completely unprecedented.
So they're getting even more time than is being recommended.
Now, what's interesting is there's a little glimmer of good news that came out.
And this is a federal judge holding the DC jail in contempt, saying it violated the US Capitol rioters' civil rights.
A federal judge referred the Washington D.C.
Jail to the Department of Justice on Wednesday for potential civil rights violations after the jail failed to get treatment for a U.S.
Capitol rioter who needs surgery.
Warden Wanda Patton and Department of Corrections Director Quincy Booth were also held in civil contempt for failing to turn over medical records for the defendant Christopher Worrell.
More on this running out of time again, but after the break we're gonna go on to what looks like a glimmer of hope and then it becomes a disappointment.
unidentified
You're tuned in to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
And before the break, I was telling you about what seemed to be like good news.
But then I'm like, probably, probably not.
But this is about a federal judge that is holding the D.C.
jail in contempt and saying it's violating the U.S.
Capitol rioters' civil rights.
And so we have talked about Christopher Wuerl before.
He is the one that has cancer and has been sitting and waiting to get a trial and just rotting in jail.
And I was reading about this before.
It says it is Warden Wanda Patton and Department of Corrections Director Quincy Booth were also held in civil contempt for failing to turn over medical records for the defendant, Christopher Worrell.
It is more than just inept and bureaucratic shuffling of papers, said District Judge Royce Lamberth.
I find that the civil rights of the defendant have been abridged.
I don't know if this is because he is a January 6th defendant or not.
Well, if you have to wonder, Then that should tell you something.
Lamberth said that he would refer the case to the Attorney General to see whether the Department of Corrections is violating the civil rights of January 6th defendants.
Now you can see I have this circled and question marks because I'm like, wait a minute.
This is getting referred to the Attorney General to see whether the Department of Corrections is violating the civil rights of January 6th defendants.
That's where I got disappointed.
Because what is this attorney general that is classifying parents as domestic terrorists going to do about this accusation that those that are the Capitol rioters, their civil rights are being declined?
He's not gonna do anything, we know that.
So it seemed like it was gonna be a good thing that the DC jail was being held in contempt and saying it's violating the civil rights of Capitol rioters.
But when it gets referred back to the Attorney General, well then, you know what happens next.
Wuerl allegedly used pepper spray to assault police officers on that day.
He has pleaded not guilty.
A number of Capitol Riot defendants have complained about what they say are unsanitary or unsafe conditions in the DC jail.
Will anything be done about it?
According to court records, Wuerl needs surgery for a broken hand, is diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and at one point contracted COVID-19 at the jail.
So let's see if the Attorney General will do anything about the January 6th people not getting treated well.
And then we have our dear friend, Eric Coomer, head of Dominion.
He's a former director of security and product strategy for Dominion Voting Systems.
And after the 2020 election debacle, where votes in at least five states had very suspicious results while running Dominion computer systems, he came under fire.
The mainstream media has spent a year bullying and suppressing the thousands of eyewitnesses, filing affidavits, investigations, and proceedings meant to uncover the fraud.
unidentified
What's happening with him is he's getting exposed.
Eric Coomer decided to sue 15 organizations and people for defamation in his home state of Colorado.
He claims to have been defamed by center-right journalists alleging saying that he was tied to Antifa, that he helped rig the election against Trump.
Now what's weird is even with this whole court situation, the court acted on its own to seal the deposition without a hearing.
This is all coming from The Guardian, by the way.
Or no, The Gateway Pundit.
Excuse me, I had to double check.
The Gateway Pundit.
And the court acted on its own to seal the deposition.
The Gateway Pundit provides the transcript, exhibits, and video.
Says no other deposition in the case was similarly sealed by the court.
And the deposition, though, that they were able to obtain reveals Coomer's penchant for lying, such as when he authored an op-ed in the Denver Post misleading the public in stating that he did not have any social media accounts and that any Facebook circulating throughout the public were fabricated.
He says, I have no connection to the Antifa movement.
I did not rig or influence the election, nor have I participated in any calls, demonstrations, or other activity related to this.
And again, he said that those posts were fabricated.
However, in the deposition, he finally admits that he was lying, that he was the author of those Facebook messages all along.
He's been lying this entire time.
And another important part, defendant Sidney Powell's lawyer Barry Arrington was able to pin down Dominion's Coomer and get him to admit that he had indeed written the following Facebook message prior to the 2020 presidential election.
If you're planning to vote for that autocratic, narcissistic, fascist blowhard and his Christian jihadist VP pick, unfriend me now.
So this man flat out lied and said in an opinion that he didn't write these things and then he got caught because he was trying to sue.
And that's how this information comes to light.
Coomer deleted at least 80 of his posts, later telling colleagues that he'd screwed up.
His deposition evidence also shows him saying that it was illegal.
These words are important.
It was illegal not to flip election results, not that it was impossible.
Coomer admits that he posted F the USA on his Facebook media.
The person who is head of security for one of the largest national voting systems had regularly expressed the most toxic and extreme left views possible.
Coomer admits that he only meant to share these views with his 300 Facebook friends by setting his account to private.
Sorry, Coomer, you're a big fat liar and you were caught.
And then, if there was any doubt that there was more malfeasance going on with the election, AG Nessel, SOS Benson, provided an update on the new election fraud cases in Michigan.
Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel and Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson are sharing the outcome of three investigations related to attempted voter fraud, which resulted in charges against all three individuals.
These collaborative investigations, now this is what they say.
These collaborative investigations assist in maintaining the integrity of our elections.
We will not hesitate to prosecute anyone who attempts to undermine our elections.
So when they find the fraud, they say like, see, this is how great our election system is because when there's fraud, we find it.
That's how they change the narrative, not that before we were saying that fraud never happens, and this was the most free and fair election ever.
But then when you're caught, you're like, see?
Well, when we are backed in the corner and we have to admit that there was fraud, well, the fact that we found it, it should show you that this is so secure.
It's also circular.
No, you found fraud after you said that fraud basically doesn't exist, and that's a big lie.
But wait, he found fraud.
Stack of roughly two dozen absentee voter applications were dropped off for processing while cross-checking the signatures on the applications with voter signatures in the qualified voter file.
The clerk noticed the signatures did not match.
unidentified
This is the story that we talked about before, about how basically they were collecting absentee ballots from nursing homes, from patients that didn't even know they were voting.
And then Georgia election workers are fired for allegedly shredding hundreds of voter registration applications.
This is from townhall.com.
Two Georgia election workers were terminated for allegedly shredding a number of paper voting registration applications over the course of the past two weeks.
Fulton County released a statement Monday that said a preliminary review suggests the employees in question may have checked out batches of applications for processing.
But instead of fully processing the forms, the employees allegedly shredded some of them.
A total of 300 municipal election-related applications were allegedly shredded.
Raffensperger is saying the Department of Justice needs to take a long look at what Fulton County is doing and how their leadership disenfranchises Fulton County viewers through incompetence and malfeasance.
The voters of Georgia are sick of Fulton County failures.
Isn't that funny that that's what Trump was saying?
unidentified
Welcome back.
Christy Lee here in for Harrison Smith on the American Journal.
I was talking about this article from Fulton County where Brad Raffensperger is saying the Department of Justice needs to take a long look at what Fulton County is doing and how their leadership disenfranchises Fulton voters through incompetence and malfeasance.
The voters of Georgia are sick of Fulton County's failures, which just struck me as funny as the back and forth between Raffensperger and President Trump and how basically President Trump has been saying this to him, get your act together, get George's act together.
It's an embarrassment and he would hit back at him.
And he doesn't do much to suppress the mainstream media saying that Trump is just lying and it's the big lie and everything.
But then when he's acting to a corner, he has to kind of Subvert that and make it, it's just Fulton County's fault.
And state law requires election officials keep election documents related to primary or general elections for two years after the election.
Let me repeat that again.
State law requires election officials keep elections documents related to primary or general elections for two years after the election.
What's happening is, that's not happening in many cases.
And I was talking with Dr. Shiva about this yesterday.
In his case, when he was running for a federal Senate seat, that he was able to prove that they didn't do this in his state.
So who is actually following the law?
Is anyone following the law?
Will there be any consequences?
And that was another thing I asked him in frustration.
We're not going to get it out of this mess in the way that we want.
This is his opinion with the courts and through the legal system, because it's all corrupt.
It's all corrupt.
Obviously, he said, the way we're going to get out of this is like we've seen through history when people come together, And they educate one another and it's really the working class people coming together, whether they're left or the right, Christian, non-Christian, Republican, Democrat.
He said it's going to take all of the working class people to come together and remind these corrupt systems that we are who they're supposed to be serving.
And he said it's probably not going to happen in the traditional manner.
So that pretty much ends my election topic news.
And again, we'll have the interview with Dr. Shiva up on Band.Video later today.
That's the plan.
That's the hope.
We'll get something up.
And now I want to go into... So this is strange.
I found this article yesterday.
It is about an attack in Norway and the headline is man armed with bow and arrow kills five people in Norway attacks.
So my first initial reaction to this was like, wait a minute, doesn't have Norway have one of the strictest gun ownership laws?
I actually had to ask a producer because I was like, I think it's like illegal to own a gun there.
And he's like, well, I don't think that's the case.
He says, but it is one of the strictest gun ownership laws that there is.
And then we have an attack, an attack of terrorism, which we're going to get into with a bow and an arrow.
So I mean, just so are they going to start saying we must outlaw bows and arrows?
We need stricter bow and arrow control.
And this is why the argument always falls on itself, because evil people are going to do evil things Regardless of what you do or how you try and inhibit them.
They're going to steal.
They're going to get around laws.
You can't legislate things like this.
That's why it's ridiculous when you see a headline like this and respond with, well, we just need stricter bow and arrow controls.
A man armed with a bow and arrow killed five people and wounded two others in a series of attacks in the Norwegian town of Kongsberg on Wednesday.
One of the wounded people was an off-duty police officer.
The death toll was the worst of any in Norway since 2011.
And even that, like, so again, my original reaction was, well, are they going to call for stricter bow and arrow controls?
You know, just thinking of the ridiculousness of it.
But then you see this, the death toll is the worst.
I mean, when far right extremists, because this is from Reuters, when far right extremist Anders Behring Breivik, I don't know if I'm saying that right, killed 77 people, most of them teenagers.
Following the attacks, police directorate said it had ordered officers nationwide to carry firearms.
Norwegian police are normally unarmed.
Are you kidding me?
I read that, I'm like, what?
Norwegian police are normally unarmed, but officers have access to guns and rifles when needed.
So okay, that was my initial reaction.
I'm taking a long time to get to the point, but then there's an update that was brought to my attention.
Norway bow and arrow attack being treated as terrorism now.
So the bow and arrow attack that left five people dead in Norway being treated by police as an act of terror after officers revealed the suspect had converted to Islam and that they had concerns about his radicalization.
At least they bring this into the discussion because they are all too motivated to say, well, we haven't had a situation like this since there was a far right extremist.
That killed people.
So at least they're pointing out and acknowledging that this was a suspect that had converted to Islam and they have concerns about his radicalization.
The investigation will clarify in more detail what the incidents were motivated by, the Norwegian Police Security Service said Thursday.
The police have previously been in contact with the man, including as a result of previous concerns related to radicalization.
It's interesting that when I first saw this story yesterday, it had nothing about that.
And then the latest update does point out that they are treating it as an act of terrorism.
The attack came on the eve of a new government taking office after last month's parliamentary elections unseated the long ruling conservative party.
And the attack comes just over a decade again, since Norway's worst terrorist attack.
And then they have to mention again, the Norwegian far right extremist, Anders Baring Breivik.
I don't know if I'm saying that right, but you get the idea.
So do with that what you will.
So I'm going to try and move into some coronavirus news and then hopefully at the end of the next hour I can take some of your phone calls and some of the topics we've covered today.
That will be more towards the end of the next segment.
But let's get started.
A lot of coronavirus news to go over.
Let me start that again.
Dr. Peter McCullough and other top doctors are suing the FDA for the Pfizer vaccine data.
They filed a lawsuit against the Food and Drug Administration seeking to obtain the data relied upon by the FDA to license the Pfizer vaccine.
Data information they used to justify approving the experimental abortion-tainted COVID-19 Pfizer jab.
This is coming from LifeSite News, by the way.
Since the FDA is a governmental agency, the suit reminds the court that the public has a right to obtain and review all of the FDA's data per the Freedom of Information Act.
Dr. Peter McCullough informed the court that the FDA denied their September 9th FOIA request to have the information expedited by claiming that the group did not demonstrate a compelling need that involves an imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual.
Rebuking the FDA's line of reasoning, the group's lawyer, Aaron Suri, penned an article that states transparency demands the FDA immediately disclose the data.
It relied upon scientists, healthcare professionals, and every person in this country, especially those mandated to take it, deserve to know how they came up to this thing.
And time and time again, they're like, why won't people trust science?
If they were more transparent, perhaps they would be more trusted.
But when you submit FOIA requests, and they drag their feet, and they don't respond, and they look like they're hiding something, well, those who have nothing to hide, hide nothing.
Reminder.
unidentified
So that's what's happening with that, is that lawsuit's going on.
And then on top of this, Dr. Patricia Lee, an MD and ICU doctor based in California, issued a shocking letter to the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention claiming she has observed more vaccine injuries from the controversial COVID-19 vaccines than she has in the last 20 years working as a doctor.
She describes observing entirely healthy individuals suffering serious, often fatal, She points out that while she is fully vaccinated, her personal experience this year treating patients in a busy ICU does not comport with claims made by federal authorities regarding the safety.
unidentified
You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
In the southern part of Texas, in the town of Texas.
But this is a doctor based in California and she issued a letter to the FDA saying she's seeing more vaccine injuries from the vaccines than she has in the past 20 years.
And this is healthy individuals that she's observing this in.
She points out that while she is fully vaccinated for COVID-19, her personal experience this year treating patients in a busy ICU does not comport with claims made by federal health authorities regarding the safety of the vaccines.
The vaccine reactions listed in her letter depict healthy individuals suffering from serious and fatal injuries.
Including, you know, the thrombosis, the myocarditis.
She notes that approximately half of the patients detailed in her letter have since died.
Those who survived are struggling with long-term, I can't say that word, sequelae, and a diminished quality of life.
Since the issuing of the original letter, her attorneys have sent another letter to the CDC and FDA because, shocker, they didn't respond.
For as much as we hear the CDC and the FDA claiming, we're trying to save lives.
But she tries to tell them about people dying, healthy people dying from the vaccine at a rate that she's seen more than the 20 years that she's been an ICU doctor.
So since the issuing of the original letter, her attorneys have sent another letter to the CDC and FDA saying that the agency's failure to respond is, well, highly concerning.
They're trying to seek a response so they can arrange a discussion and information gathering session.
We'll see if she ever gets a response.
And I, oh, we are good to go.
Okay.
So just to take you behind the curtain a little bit, I had a clip of this fantastic podcast interview between Joe Rogan and Sanjay Gupta, but actually I still want to save that.
So I do want to play this clip, but you're going to have to wait until the next segment so that we have long enough for you to hear it in its full entirety.
unidentified
But this, if you haven't heard this podcast yet, Between Joe Rogan and Sanjay Gupta, boy, it is delicious.
It is great to hear him call Sanjay Gupta out for working for the CNN and flat out lying to people, but we'll get into that more after this next break.
In the meanwhile, in pointing out COVID-19 news, but also the malfeasance of the media, In this article from 10TV, they say, yes, hospitals can require organ transplant patients and donors to be vaccinated against COVID-19.
First of all, any article that either starts with yes, or no, is snarky.
People don't want headlines that are like, yes, or no, that's not true, because it's snarky and it's highly disrespectful to your audience.
So in other words, this headline, if you're going to go that route, should say, yes, hospitals can go ahead and kill people because they won't get the vaccine, because that's what you're effectively doing.
If you're not giving people the organs that they need because they refuse to get the vaccine, then you're killing them.
What, further safety?
For public safety, we're going to make sure that you go ahead and die, because you don't want to be coerced into getting the vaccine.
Snarky headline, terrible story.
unidentified
You're listening to the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
Don't you think that even with a breakthrough infection, untreated, you're probably more vulnerable than the average child who is not vaccinated who gets COVID?
Like, people have died who are double vaccinated.
In fact, there was a guy who just won an Emmy.
Yeah, I saw that.
Odds of that happening to a healthy child are very, very low.
What I'm saying is your attitude about not being concerned because you have antibodies and you think you would get through it even if you had a breakthrough infection.
That is the exact same attitude that a lot of young people have where they don't want to get a shot because they're worried about the consequences, even though they're incredibly small.
Right now, but I do want to remind you that in this last hour, I would like to hear from some of you about if you saw this podcast, also what you feel about what Dr. Shiva had to say, if you were around for that.
So make sure you do call right now to get in.
unidentified
In these final segments, the number is 1-877-789-2539.
And in the meantime, I'm going to continue talking some COVID news.
So then there was this other article that came out.
Merck asks FDA for emergency use authorization for its $700 COVID pill.
Biden already bought 1.7 million.
Yesterday, the pharmaceutical giant Merck asked the Food and Drug Administration to grant emergency use authorization for its new pill, That can treat COVID-19 for the eye-watering price of $712.
And Joe Biden already bought 1.7 million.
So then again, we have the administration jumping ahead of the FDA again.
They're counting on the approval.
And so they're just going to run ahead.
This is the very thing that caused FDA resignations.
Remember, they cited that it was because the White House was pressing what they wanted to happen and getting ahead of the FDA.
And here we go again, before this drug is even approved.
You have Biden buying it up.
And what news fails to tell you is the conflict of interest in all of this.
Merck is one of the leading producers of ivermectin under another name, usually.
And Merck came out saying that ivermectin is not approved, they don't recommend it for the treatment of COVID-19.
And people are like, well, they're the makers, so surely what they're saying is true.
Well, maybe it's because they were already working on something they could make more money off of.
Because since ivermectin is no longer under patent, then they can't make the big money.
MSN continues to lie about its safety and effectiveness of treating COVID-19 with ivermectin, and the medical complex makes it hard to get a prescription.
But two physicians known for treating COVID-19 with ivermectin have come out with statements saying that over 100 members of Congress were treated with it.
First physician is Dr. Pierre Corey from the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.
He took to Twitter to share the news that between 100 and 200 United States Congress members, plus many of their staffers and family members with COVID-19, received ivermectin as treatment.
And then our friend Dr. Simone Gold echoed Cori's statement.
She, of course, is the founder of America's Frontline Doctors.
She says, I can confirm this is true.
A number of elected officials have reached out to me over the last year and requested this treatment.
Ivermectin works, and America's top physicians know it successfully treats COVID-19.
She's also leading a lawsuit to come after those that the pharmacist that won't fill it and the fight never ends it seems.
Andrew Wiggins of the Golden State Warriors received the vaccine earlier this month after initially vowing not to because he knew that their definition of respect was we're going to take your money and livelihood away.
So he's forced into getting it basically.
Money, of course, playing that role in the decision-making.
Irving was slated to make almost $35 million this season under his four-year deal with the Nets.
So he gets coerced into it.
Probably the same for the NBA star Brandon Goodwin.
Chances are that he felt pressured.
He knew that that was going to amount to a lot of money he would be putting on the line and losing if he didn't get the jab.
Brandon Goodwin, an NBA player, suffered blood clots shortly after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.
Goodwin is a former point guard for the Atlanta Hawks, whose season ended early after developing the clots.
He's not been able to sign.
He says, I got sick, never quite recovered from it.
So you have people that are losing their livelihood if they stand up against the shot They get all their money, millions of dollars, doing what they love, taken away if they hold true to their gut, their integrity.
But then those that can't or succumb to the pressure, like Brandon Goodwin, Loses his whole livelihood anyways because he gets blood clots that he still hasn't been able to recover from for being coerced and forced into getting a shot.
It's so sad.
Let's take a phone call.
Anyone want to talk about that?
Let's talk to Nathan out of Louisiana about the Joe Rogan podcast with Sanjay.
I'm a longtime Joe Rogan fan, longtime Info Warrior.
And I was watching the Rogan podcast, and I seen that Dr. Gupta was on there, and I was like, yes, finally somebody that's going to, you know, that can, that's going to try it.
That's going to try to stand up to Joe and see if they can prove it, you know.
And I literally was cheering Joe on the whole time.
But it shows you what kind of bubble these people live in when they say, oh, I never heard of this report, or I never heard of this, or I haven't heard of this.
I mean, he was really sticking to his guns on some of the stuff when Joe was bringing up about some of the injuries that happened with myocarditis and about the girl and different things that happened.
He was like, well, I never heard of this.
And I almost don't want to blame them because of the bubble they live in.
They live in this bubble of people.
I mean, you are the circle that you associate with, you know?
And if everybody's saying the same thing, you're not going to go out and hear other things.
That's one thing about what Joe Rogan and Infowars does.
They look in all different places.
They get information from everywhere, you know?
It doesn't matter where it's coming from, as long as it's true.
That's what they think.
And that's what I noticed when he was talking to him, that he couldn't... You know, he just was backing... He didn't have anything to say because He was at the same talking point.
But I do commend the man for at least having a... Yeah, at least he had the guts to at least... Because oftentimes when people are challenged, and we've seen it over and over again, people are challenged, well, let's have a debate.
Let's have an open dialogue about this.
They don't show up.
They refuse.
So yes, I think that we do need to give him some credit for at least showing up.
unidentified
Right, and I want to give a shout out to X2.
It's definitely changed my life.
I had COVID myself, and I took it after that, and it cleared the brain fog up.
I mean, it really, really did what people were saying.
I was on the fence for a little while, and as soon as I took that leap, about two weeks, it definitely changed life, and it's definitely worth it.
I encourage everybody to go out and get it.
One last thing I want to talk about is ivermectin.
My mother, she's got cancer and she had caught COVID and was real sick and we couldn't come to no kind of, no kind of conclusion trying to help her.
And I was, I actually heard it on Joe Rogan's podcast with Dr. Pierre Corey, and they were talking about it.
And I got on Amazon and I ordered it.
I ordered a, you know, what people want to call the horse pace.
And I think if it wasn't for that, she'll tell you that.
I was explaining earlier, I feel like I'm in this brain fog because there's so much information coming from all of these different topics and from different sources.
So it sounds familiar, but this is the Liberty and Health Alliance?
unidentified
Yes, that's it.
And two months ago, our assistant pastor got up and he said, there is a seminar going on at a small church in Michigan, and the title is Coercion and Conscience, COVID-19.
Heart Attack and Hospital Oddities00:07:09
unidentified
You should watch it.
So we came home that day and we looked at the Friday night video and lo and behold, it was Dr. Peter McCullough who was leading out.
And my wife has always considered me to be a little bit extreme because of.
Hey, yeah, I was in the hospital a couple weeks ago.
I had COVID.
My wife had.
We both had it at the same.
I had it about a week before she did.
Maybe five days a week before she did.
And I'm 55.
She's 65.
And I had a heart attack.
It was just coming off the COVID.
I'm not vaccinated.
I had a heart attack.
But I had a quadruple bypass back in May.
So I had had a heart issue before.
And I went to the hospital for the heart attack where I was COVID positive and my cardiologist, after they got me out of the ER up into my room, my cardiologist first, not my cardiologist, the same hospital I was treated at, had the surgery at, but it's different because I never met the man before.
As soon as he walked into my room, he proceeded to He asked me if I was vaccinated.
He knew I wasn't.
He had my chart in his hand.
They know all about you before they see your chart.
And the first thing he asked me is if I was vaccinated and it wasn't in a friendly tone as if I was a very bad boy for not being vaccinated.
And I'm just wondering, I need to research vaccine shedding because I'm just wondering, it just strikes me as odd why I would have another heart attack.
Yeah.
And wind up, I do have blood clots now and I'm not back.
Yeah, and I love that you reminded us, thank you, Sam, for your phone call, that this is a weapon, and reminding from the verse, no weapon formed against us will prosper.
Welcome back to the American Journal.
We are in our last leg of this show.
It's been a fun show.
unidentified
It's been great starting my morning with you.
I'm not a morning person, but if I have to get up early, I'd like to do with you.
No, science is apparently also just majority rules, just consensus.
They constantly push consensus when we ignore the fact that throughout history, a lot of our scientific advancements have actually come from dissent, have actually come from somebody else with a new idea or a different theory.
And instead, we're pushing something very unscientific that just if everyone says the same thing, it's science.
It's important to have those reminders because it does get lonely sometimes, and it does get discouraging sometimes, and it does get exhausting sometimes.
And me being new to guest hosting and contributing, I think it's been a bit of a culture shock.
It's been a little bit depressing at times.
Though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I fear no evil, right?
So I do sometimes feel like I'm walking through the valley of the shadow of death because I'm allowing myself to be exposed to the evil and seeing it everywhere and just immersing it and letting other people know, letting other people know about it.
It's hard sometimes, but it's so important.
And it's so important to remind ourselves that we're not alone, that we have to come together and encourage each other and pray for each other and stay in the word of God.
Just quickly, yesterday, I believe, or the day before, University of Toledo Medical Center, UTMC, has hopped on the bandwagon of No Bags, No Transplant, and I thought that was heart-wrenching to read, yeah.
So that's a sad note, I guess.
The good is, my mother-in-law lives in Florida, right outside of Jacksonville.
She works at a salon.
She's a beautician.
And her employer took the, I think, great step and just gave all her people that work there, her employees, ivermectin like months ago.
And even if they didn't need it, she said, as soon as you start feeling symptoms, take it.
And lo and behold, a week ago, my mother-in-law felt really sick for about a day or two, started taking it, and she is perfectly back to normal.
And she's also maybe sending some via some package this way up to Ohio, but other than that, He's doing good and good for her to have the foresight to do that.
For the first time in nine years, InfoWars has produced a new major film, COVIDland, part one of a five-part series that details the globalist Great Reset and their medical tyranny takeover part one of a five-part series that details the globalist Great Reset and If millions of Americans and others see this, it will stop them.
So get your copy today at infowarestore.com or covidland.com and make copies of it.
That's right.
Like all our other films, you are encouraged, you are authorized, we are asking you to get it and make copies and share it with others.
And now with all the censorship, that's more important than ever because this will obviously be censored off the internet.
Secure your DVD at infowarestore.com for $19.95 and get a free copy of Endgame Blueprint for Global Enslavement that tells how the globalists set all this up.
These two films are incredibly important.
They're both available at Infowarsstore.com.
There's also bulk deals on the film, so get it and show it at your local school or donate to your church.
Whatever you do, fight back and don't roll over to Fauci.
I've been fighting as hard as I can for almost 28 years against the globalists.
I wanted to stop their agenda.
I wanted to wake up the world and stop them dead in their tracks before they went operational.
But we failed.
Yes, a lot of people are awake.
Yes, we're not getting caught flat-footed.
But they are going ahead with their full operational de-industrialization, Great Reset.
And that's why it's More important than ever that all viewers and all listeners tell everybody they know about the show, because people are ready to wake up and ready to hear the truth.
So we've got to information warfare the enemy and try to stop their agenda, but we've also got to get personally prepared.
And one of the number one things to do is high quality storable food.
We've got the best food ready to ship at very affordable prices at infowarestore.com.
So whether it's a month or a six month or a year supply or specialty diets, it's ready to ship right now.
Lock your orders in before food prices go up and before there are long lines and waits.