Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 7, 2021 - American Journal - Harrison Smith

02:15:03

Pfizer Whistleblower To O’Keefe: Aborted Fetal Tissue In Vaccine FULL SHOW 10-7-21

Source

Participants

Main voices

harrison smith

01:22:34

robert barnes

20:26

Appearances

alex jones

03:33

greg reese

04:09

justin trudeau

02:10

mike adams

02:20

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		You're watching the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
unidentified		Watch live right now at band.video.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
		Welcome to American Journal.
		Very big show we have for you today.
		Can we just take a moment to admire the beautiful set the crew has put together today?
		It's always nice, but I really particularly like the graphics behind me today.
		So let's just take a moment to appreciate that.
		All right, that's enough of that.
		We're going to begin today with the... No, it really is nice, and the crew's really putting in overtime to make everything look absolutely beautiful today.
		Now I'm going to go to this report.
		It's by Greg Rees.
		The big banks are guilty of crimes against humanity.
		Share this Bandod video.
		Here it is.
greg reese ▲ ● ▼		At this point, anyone who isn't an imbecile or mentally disturbed has figured out that COVID-19 is the biggest fraud of our lifetime.
		Several nations figured this out months ago and have mandated the life-saving Ivermectin protocol with consistently outstanding results.
		Multiple countries distributed packets to all of their citizens with everything they need to survive the asymptomatic virus with an already 99% survival rate known as SARS-CoV-2.
		Denmark, Sweden and Norway have completely reopened and are ready to accept life with this novel asymptomatic virus with a 99% survival rate.
		And Japan is moving on as well.
		But not Australia.
		Not the UK.
		Not Canada.
		And certainly not the USA, where today's global currency is being printed by the privately owned Federal Reserve Banking System.
		The spearhead of this great reset.
		Only nations with vibrant free markets and cultures that still value independent freedoms are being targeted by the globalist elite, who instruct their loyal minions to push endless deadly experimental injections and denounce any and all life-saving solutions, such as ivermectin, vitamin C, and even natural immunity.
		They want death because they want to mandate a vaccine.
		They want to mandate a vaccine because they want a social credit score.
		And they want a social credit score because they are planning on resetting the global currency to the digital blockchain.
		What millions of people in these Western nations under attack would call the mark of the beast, known today as the Chinese social credit system, wherein each citizen is completely reliant upon the government.
		Absolute tyranny.
		There is no global pandemic.
		And the only virus that threatens humanity is the big banks, their offshoots, and whomever or whatever they serve.
		This is quite simply the parasitic top of the global pyramid feeding off all of humanity.
		A former Vatican bank president has recently warned that the COVID pandemic is nothing but a fraud to bring in the Great Reset.
		We reported that this was the case back in March of 2020, because it's happened before.
		And now, unless we stop them, it's going to happen again.
		Biden's nominee for comptroller of the currency, Sally Omarova, is a proud communist who wants to end banking as we know it.
		The worldwide banking cartel, who gets rich off the fractional reserve banking scam and by charging interest on loaning people their own resources, has no problem exterminating anyone opposed to their Great Reset agenda.
		To the big banks, we are all livestock, chattel.
		This is greed on its most realized level.
		They are passing laws to restrict travel and to seize private property.
		Police and military not willing to go along are being forced out via vaccine mandates.
		And nurses not going along are being replaced by the military.
		The system has already been hijacked.
		No one is coming to save you.
		The only way out of this mess without losing everything that's worth fighting for ...is for humanity to stand up and say no.
		For InfoWars.com, this is Greg Reese.
unidentified		You're tuned in to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
unidentified		Watch it live right now at band.video.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Good morning, ladies and gentlemen.
		Welcome to American Journal.
		Very big show we have for you today.
		We'll be joined by Joe Kent, congressional candidate at the 9.30 time slot.
		And we're going to talk specifically about the fact that his YouTube channel has been deleted.
		So YouTube Big Tech now once again deleting an outlet for a congressional candidate to get his message out and find more supporters.
		Incredible stuff.
		Then we'll be joined in the 10 o'clock hour by Robert Barnes, constitutional lawyer, who you know well will be covering all sorts of topics and probably taking your phone calls with him as well.
		So stay tuned for that.
		that but let's begin today as we do every day with our daily dispatch here it is folks Your Daily Dispatch for Thursday, October 7th, 2021.
		GOP governors unveil 10-point plan to end border crisis, urging Biden to act.
		10 points.
		That's nice.
		I have one point.
		Obey the law.
		Enforce the law.
		There's literally nothing else we need to change.
		If the government were to actually just carry out and Actually enforce the law as it's written, there wouldn't be an issue at all.
		The only problem is that the Democrats have carte blanche to ignore the law when it behooves them.
		Another one-point plan would be build a wall.
		That's another just singular point.
		Just build a wall.
		How about that?
		One point to solve the crisis.
		But no, no, we need 10.
		Republican governors on Wednesday unveiled a 10-point plan to end the crisis at the southern border as they called on the Biden administration to act to solve the continuing surge of migrants and reverse policies they say is fueling those record numbers.
		The governors unveiled the 10-point plan.
		Including actions they say the president could take with a stroke of a pen.
		It includes the full restoration of Trump-era migrant protection protocols, which kept migrants in Mexico for their immigration proceedings.
		The administration was recently ordered by a federal judge to restart the policy.
		Because like I said, it's already the law.
		There's nothing else that needs to be done.
		It's just judges have to come in and be like, you have to do this.
		It's in the law.
		And they're just like, we're not gonna.
		And they're like, okay.
		Separately, the governor's call for an end to catch and release more border wall construction and expansion of the Title 42 expulsions, deployment of more federal law enforcement to the border, and for the administration to provide more resources to keep the border secure.
		You could just not actively transport migrants into the country.
		You could just not open the door and stand there holding the door open for the migrants.
		That would be a start as well.
		In his remarks, Abbott took aim at DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas directly, saying, Secretary Mayorkas is a disaster in what he's done and no one should put any trust or confidence in what he says.
		Wow, amazing.
		Ex-Biden patrol chief, by the way, has made some very extreme claims over the last day.
		He claims 400,000 illegals escaped into the U.S., 90% of which were never deported.
		Former U.S.
		Patrol Chief Rodney Scott sounded the alarm over the Biden administration's open border policies, claiming about 400,000 migrants from 150 countries escaped into the U.S.
		over the last year.
		Scott explained that the massive concentration of 15,000 Haitian migrants invading Del Rio, Texas in September baited the Border Patrol into abandoning large swaths of the border for the cartels to exploit.
		And by the cartels, he means, I guess, George Soros NGOs, the Biden administration.
		It's all one big cartel now, and their primary motive is to destroy our country.
		Since then, the White House press secretary, Jen Psaki, has inaccurately accused Republicans of not offering solutions and made excuses for the president, who spent his life in politics and appears to have never visited the border once.
		Not having the time is no excuse, as the president has repeatedly had his schedule cleared.
		I think it's amazing.
		It's like, will you please enforce the law?
		They're not even suggesting how we should, they're not coming up with any good suggestions as to how we do this.
		There's like standing there with the door open as people flow through and they're like, the Republicans need to come up with some good ideas as to what we can do here.
		Blowby just handing them pallets of cash, just like, what do we do?
		The Republicans have no solutions for us.
		Amazing.
		Rodney Scott also outlined this week that the Biden administration is still paying contractors who are supposed to build the border wall, they're paying them up to $5 million per day, even though all construction has halted.
		That's a pretty sweet gig, isn't it?
		$5 million a day to not build a border wall?
		Isn't it great having the adults back in the room?
		Isn't it great having adults run the country again?
	Senate Democrats indicate they'll accept a GOP ceiling debt offer saying, quote, McConnell caved.
	Just just just.
unidentified		Why?
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Why give these people anything?
		It's like, amazing.
		Senate Democrats indicate Wednesday they plan to accept Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's offer, Chuck McConnell's offer for a short-term suspension of the debt ceiling, with some claiming that the Kentucky Republican had caved following a tense standoff on Capitol Hill.
		Quote, McConnell caved, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts told reporters after the meeting, and now we're going to spend our time doing child care, health care, and fighting climate change.
		They're just like, yeah, he caved, and now we will shove everything down his throat.
		Now we will make him suffer for agreeing with us.
		Now we will have complete, unfettered control of all manner of destroying Americans' lives.
		And they cackle evilly.
unidentified		Mitch McConnell's just like, that's all, that's the only thing I can do at this point.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Unbelievable.
		I like this headline a lot more from Gateway Pundit.
		For the second time in two months, dirty Mitch McConnell bails out Joe Biden and his dangerous legislation, just as Joe's polling numbers hit rock bottom.
		In early August, 18 RINO senators led by Mitch McConnell voted in favor of the Democrat Party's infrastructure bill, something Democrats never allowed to reach President Trump's desk.
		The vote opened the door for the Democrats' $3.5 trillion legislation to reshape American society and destroy the U.S.
		dollar as the world's reserve currency.
		The RINOs gave Joe Biden a rare win at a time when the illegitimate president was sinking in the polls and continues to struggle with his diminishing faculties.
		With friends like these, right?
		With representatives like these.
		A new NBC show equates the Founding Fathers' slogans, Don't Tread on Me and Unite or Die, to the Nazis.
		In the new NBC show, The Lost Symbol by the creators of The Da Vinci Code, the season opens equating our Founding Fathers and their slogans to the Nazis, because of course they did.
		They were white, after all.
		And sure, sure, we are the country that defeated the Nazis.
		We did go to war with the Nazis and Lost tens of thousands of young men in the brutal effort to free Germany from the grasp of totalitarianism.
		But ignore that.
		We're the bad guys now.
		You thought you had a victory?
		a judge orders Texas to suspend new heartbeat law banning most abortions.
		You thought you had a victory?
		You thought you had some modicum of victory, Republicans?
		Not if the powers that be have anything to say about it.
		You thought you could at least put a slight damper, just tap the brakes on the wholesale slaughter of unborn babies?
		Not today, fools!
		A U.S.
		District Judge of the United States District Court of the Western District of Texas, Robert Pittman, an Obama appointee, called Texas abortion law an offensive deprivation in his order.
		Yeah, you thought you could put forward some sort of common sense, just modicum of limitation when it comes to just killing unborn babies?
		No, no.
		You don't get victories these days.
		You get illusions.
		You get mirages that are pulled out from underneath you the moment that they are in danger of being enacted.
		No, no, not today.
		We have nothing but weak cowards and controlled fools running our country, so why should we expect anything else?
		The WHO endorses a breakthrough child vaccine for malaria, which is a strange way to phrase that.
		There it is.
		In the fight against malaria, one of the world's worst diseases for decades, is likely to get much easier, as the World Health Organization has endorsed a wide use of a malaria vaccine developed by GlaxoSmithKline, the first ever to win such approval.
		The vaccine will be recommended for children in Sub-Saharan Africa and for other high-risk areas as a four-dose schedule starting at the age of five months.
		That's right.
		After 30 years of experimentation, 10 years of testing, finally they've decided that this vaccine is safe enough to roll out.
		Meanwhile, we're less than one year away from the rollout of the COVID vaccine, and it's mandatory, and you have to take it.
		It's very interesting the way this vaccine dealt with last vaccines, but don't think about that too much.
		You might become a domestic terrorist.
		Studies confirm waning immunity from Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine.
		Two real-world studies Yeah, they don't work.
		confirmed that the immune protection offered by two doses of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine drops off after two months or so.
		Although protection against severe disease, hospitalization and death remains very strong.
		The studies from Israel and Qatar and published in the New England Journal of Medicine support arguments that even fully vaccinated people need to maintain protections against infection.
		In other words, yeah, they don't work.
		Efficacy declines after two months and it doesn't kick in until one month.
		So you get about one month of mild protection with the vaccine against this disease that has a 99.9% survival rate.
		But it's mandatory or else they literally will kill you.
		No kidney.
		You don't get a kidney.
		You're dead.
unidentified		Welcome back, folks.
unidentified		Welcome back, folks.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Continuing on with our Daily Dispatch here.
		Report gas prices rise to seven-year high.
		A recent report from CNBC indicated Americans are paying the highest price for gas in the last seven years, and some cities have gas prices as high as $5 per gallon.
		CNBC noted that Americans are paying the highest at the pump due to the steady climb the nation has been seeing over the past year.
		This, of course, probably the fault of climate change, if I had to guess.
		But no, of course, They are perfectly aware of this, and Jen Psaki actually answered a question about this by saying, yeah, but we need to fight climate change.
		So we're fine with the prices going up.
		Literally, she's like, yeah, we could do something to bring the prices down, but, you know, climate change.
		So you're just going to have to pay more at the pump.
		And the businesses are going to have to pay more to ship their goods.
		So the prices of goods will go up.
		So it's just like a little tax on absolutely everybody.
		Thank you, government, for saving us from the weather by making everything more expensive.
		You really are geniuses.
		Pfizer whistleblower, the latest from Project Veritas in their unmasking of the COVID vax series.
		...says officials tried to cover up the fact that fetal stem cell tissues were used to develop the vaccine.
		A leaked Pfizer internal email exposed by Project Veritas Wednesday night revealed the drug company used fetal stem cells to develop its COVID-19 vaccine and tried to hide the fact from the public, particularly Catholics who are bound by their faith to avoid products that violate the church teaching on abortion.
		Pfizer insider Melissa Strickler discussed with Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe how corporate executives instructed staff to be secretive about the use of human fetal tissues in laboratory testing of the COVID vaccine.
		The whistleblower works as a quality auditor for Pfizer, according to Project Veritas, and Pfizer's chief scientific officer, Philip Dormitzer, admitted in one email that aborted fetus tissue was used in the company's vaccine program, but he told employees to stick with Pfizer's PR talking points that failed to disclose the truth.
		H-E-K-2-9-3-T cells used for I-I-V-E assay are ultimately derived from aborted fetuses, Dormitzer wrote.
		Uh, from the perspective of corporate affairs, we want to avoid having the information of fetal cells floating out there, Gelman said.
		Yeah, nothing like, uh...
		Nothing like the massive big pharma company that has a blank check from the U.S.
		government to mandate its products on the American people, hiding those products from the American people and what was involved in the creation of them or what ingredients are in them.
		They want to keep that secret because if you knew, you might not take the vaccine.
		See, it's for your own good.
		Yeah, but if I told you, you would say no.
		So, we're just going to keep it from you.
		Because they don't respect you.
		Because they think you're cattle.
		Because the cattle doesn't need to know what's in the food it's being given.
		Merck charges U.S.
		40 times what it costs to make a government-financed COVID pill.
		Merck's new not-Ivermectin COVID-19 treatment, Molnupiravir.
		It costs $17.74 to produce, yet the company is charging the U.S. government $712 for the treatment, a 40-times markup, according to The Intercept, citing a report issued last week by the Harvard School of Public Health in King's College Hospital in London.
		The pill originally developed using U.S. government funds as possible treatment for the Venezuelan equine encephalitis.
		Wait a second.
		It's a horse pill?
		Wait a second.
		Equine?
		Equine means horses.
		You're telling us you're giving us horse pills?
		I can't believe it.
		They say it cut the risk of hospitalization and death in half in a randomized trial of 775 adults with mild or moderate COVID who were considered high risk for the disease due to comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes, and heart disease.
		The trial was stopped early so the company could apply for emergency youth authorization.
		The drug did not benefit patients who were already hospitalized with the severe disease.
		Just a very interesting A pattern of events here.
		The American government taxes the American people, uses those tax monies to fund an experiment with an unneeded medicine, since we have ivermectin, since we have HCQ, since we have monoclonal antibodies, which the government is actively preventing you from getting, but that's fine.
		They'll take your money, give it by the billions to Merck to develop a pill they'd actually already developed earlier and then ceased use of because it destroyed the DNA of the people who took it.
		So they weren't actually really making anything.
		So the government paid them to make something they'd already made, and then Merck will sell it back to the government at 40 times the price, even though the government paid for it originally.
		This is because they love us, right?
		It's because Big Pharma is just to be trusted unendingly, and everything they say should be treated as gospel, and if you contradict them, you'll be removed from the internet.
		They're such good people, after all, and none of this is being done out of greed or Love of power or personal aggrandizement.
		They're all saints.
		And if you contradict that, maybe they'll, you know, just not let you have a kidney transplant or something.
		Conflict of interest in the A.G. government.
		Garland FBI saga, A.G.
		Garland's family is getting rich selling critical race theory materials to schools.
		When it comes to conflict of interest, Attorney General Merrick Garland appears to have a huge one.
		Merrick's daughter, Rebecca Garland, is married to the co-founder of an educational resource company that pushes critical race theory, which angry fans across the country are protesting.
		Taking matters into his own hands, A.G.
		Garland tapped the FBI on Monday to huddle with local leaders to address a disturbing spike in speech against school board members and teachers.
		And it's like, I don't know.
	It's yeah, fine.
	It's conflict of interest.
	I mean, it is.
	But the real story here is that the elite families that control the deep state are unerringly and diabolically dedicated to destroying your country through any way that they can, primarily by convincing your children to see you as evil and to usurp your role as a parent in the guiding primarily by convincing your children to see you as evil and to usurp your role as a parent in the guiding of That's the real story.
	That's why Merrick Garland is doing this.
	It's a violation of free speech.
	It's a horrific and unprecedented advance towards totalitarian and authoritarianism.
	But hey, if we need to act like this is about profit, then, you know, if that's the only way we can get things done, then great.
	Let's do that, then, I suppose.
	Literally the least of my concerns.
	They're just like, indoctrinating your children to hate you.
	And it's like, yeah, but they're making money doing it?
	That's the bad part.
	Okay.
	Justin, gas prices in the UK surged by 40% on the day to a new all-time high as Europe's energy crisis deepens because, you know, it's not just America.
	It's a worldwide collapse that they're bringing about on purpose in order to enslave you and Save the world, I guess.
	Finland joined Sweden and Denmark in limiting Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.
	Finland on Thursday paused the use of Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine on younger males due to reports of rare cardiovascular side effects joining Sweden and Denmark in limiting its use.
	Mika Salmanen, director of the Finnish Health Institute, said Finland would instead give Pfizer's vaccine to men born in 1991 or later.
	Finland offered shots to people aged 12 and over.
	A Nordic study involving Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark found that men under the age of 30 who received Moderna spike vax.
	Yeah, that's what they call it.
	The spike vax had a slightly higher risk than others of developing myocarditis.
	It's so rare that, yeah, we have to stop giving it out because actually it's not that rare because actually you have a more greater chance of developing myocarditis than you do of suffering a severe case of COVID-19, actually.
	So, you know, maybe something we should look into.
	But no, it's mandatory, and if you don't take it, you'll die.
	You'll be killed.
	They'll kill you.
	CNN spent nearly 80% of September under 1 million viewers.
	CNN had a dismal September, failing to reach 1 million viewers on any of its program for 23 out of the 30 days of the month, equating to a staggering 77% of the time, according to Nielsen data, meaning, yes, InfoWars literally has more viewers than CNN.
	That's legitimate now.
	It's just like...
	Oh, but they're the respectful ones.
	They're the ones everybody needs to listen to.
	They're the authorities.
	No, we're not allowed to contradict.
	Contradicting is, in fact, domestic terror at this point, so nobody listens to them, nobody watches them, nobody cares what they have to say, except for the people who make the decisions and run your life, because that's their outlet.
unidentified		You're watching the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
unidentified		Watch live right now at band.video.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		All right, finishing up here with your Daily Dispatch, Kyle Rittenhouse is in court for the first time.
		His trial begins on November 1st, but in pre-trial hearing, there's some very interesting developments.
		This article from WQAD.com says an Illinois man who shot three people.
		So we'll correct that.
		An American hero, a genius, a loving and powerful protester who shot three people during a protest over police brutality in Wisconsin last year was justified because the men who confronted him and two of a loving and powerful protester who shot three people during a protest over police brutality in Wisconsin A use of force expert called by the defense testified at a pretrial hearing Tuesday.
		The expert, John Black, spent hours outlining the moments that led to Kyle Rittenhouse's decision to shoot Joseph Rosenbaum, Anthony Huber, and Gage Krushenkrauts.
		Offering a preview of the defense team strategy when Rittenhouse's trial begins next month, Black testified that the video shows Rosenbaum chasing Rittenhouse and reaching for the teenager's gun.
		Huber attacking Rittenhouse with a skateboard and trying to wrestle away his gun and Grouse Krauts running at him with a pistol in his hand.
		In fact, later, that guy, Grouse Krauts, was like, yeah, I was going to shoot him in the head, and I just never got a chance to.
		It's like, you probably shouldn't admit that.
		Quote, a citizen in that position, given those indicators, would it be reasonable for them to believe they were about to be assaulted, Black said?
		I would argue yes.
		Yeah, I think him being assaulted is a pretty good indicator that he's going to be assaulted.
		I think that's accurate.
		It's like the use of force expert or anybody that's actually watched the video can tell you that this was clearly in self-defense.
		It's like, dude's literally running at him with a pistol, like pulling it out to shoot him in the head.
		Then his hand is blown off before he has time to do it.
		And they're like, was this self-defense?
		We don't know.
		Texas man is sentenced to 15 months.
		This is one of the craziest stories.
		Texas man sentenced to 15 months for online COVID-19 hoax.
		The hoax was this.
		This is what he was sent to prison for 15 months for.
		Quote, my homeboy's cousin has COVID-19 and has licked everything for the past two days because we paid him to.
		You've been warned.
		That's what he said.
		That's what he wrote.
		Now he's going to spend over a year and a quarter in prison.
		The claim was not true, and the post came down after 16 minutes, according to court documents.
		But somebody anonymously submitted a screenshot of the post to the Southwest Texas Fusion Center, a group of law enforcement agencies that investigates possible criminal and terroristic activity.
		Or creates it, or fabricates it, or puts people in prison for putting a bad joke on Facebook, I guess.
		When the FBI confronted Mr. Perez, he said he'd actually been trying to scare people away from going to public places, quote, to stop them from spreading the virus, according to federal affidavit, which is insane, because that's Literally what the the policy of the United States government has been for the last year and a half.
		Like there's video of Anthony Fauci being like, yes, I was lying about masks, but I had to.
		It was a noble lie to convince people not to not to wear masks because we needed them for the hospitals.
		It's like this is just this is what the government does is what they've been engaged in the entire time.
		They'll make up lies and then later it's like, well, what was the basis of this?
		And they're like, well, we just thought, you know, we needed to say something to make people afraid to go out and walk around because that might increase transmission.
		And they're like, well, you're a genius and an expert.
		Here's a Nobel Prize.
		But some guy does it on Facebook.
		He's going to jail for 15 months now.
		This past June, Mr. Perez, 40, of San Antonio, was found guilty of disseminating false information and hoaxes relating to biological weapons.
		On Monday, a federal judge sentenced him to 15 months in federal prison, saying, quote, Perez's actions were knowingly designed to spread fear and panic.
		Christopher Combs, the special agent in charge of the FBI's San Antonio field office, Oh no, oh my gosh, somebody making statements specifically with the purpose of spreading fear about the virus?
		I have a huge list of people for you to arrest, just an unending list of the most powerful people in this country and in the media, in the government.
		We can arrest them all now, I guess.
		Here's the precedent.
		...knowingly made a statement with the express purpose of causing fear about the virus?
		We can arrest you now!
		We can send you to prison!
		We can destroy you!
		Please, for the love of God, can we wake up?
		Please, let's just wake up out of this insane nonsense we're engaged in.
unidentified		It's just unbelievable how this stuff is put forward.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		It's just like...
		The mainstream media is literally nothing but fear porn.
		It's literally nothing but the most outrageous lies just to make people more fearful.
		And then some guys, like, on Facebook, like, hey, I paid people to lick stuff at the grocery store.
		Just kidding.
		Delete post.
		And then they're just like, you're going to jail for a long time, mister.
		This is a serious violation.
		I can't believe you've done this.
		Incredible, incredible stuff.
		Revealed, Wuhan and U.S.
		scientists plan to create new coronaviruses.
		Scientists from Wuhan and the U.S.
		were planning to create new coronaviruses that did not exist in nature by combining the genetic codes of other viruses proposals show.
		Documents of a grant application submitted to DARPA last month leaked, revealing the international team of scientists plan to mix genetic material of closely related strains and grow completely new viruses.
		Explaining the proposal, a WHO collaborator who's asked not to be named for fear of reprisals, because that makes sense.
		Somebody's out there, you know, murdering scientists for telling the truth.
		Saying, quote, this means that they would take various sequences from similar coronaviruses and create new sequences that essentially is the average of them.
		It would be a new virus sequence, not 100% matched to anything.
		They would then synthesize this viral genome from the computer sequence, thus creating a virus genome that did not exist in nature, but looks natural as it is the average of natural viruses.
		Then they put that RNA in a cell and recover the virus from it.
		This creates a virus that never existed in nature with a new backbone that didn't exist in nature but is very, very similar to average of natural backbones.
		The obvious question I would ask is why?
		Why are you doing this?
		What's the purpose of this?
		You know, it's just like, can't you just see the signs?
		It's like, it's really exciting.
		See, we take these other viruses and we take out parts of them and we put them in this genome and then we extract the RNA from it.
		We have a brand new virus that's never existed and can infect humans when before the other ones could just infect bats.
		And the grant agency is like, okay, why?
		And they're like, Oh, don't worry about it.
		Don't worry about why.
		Just don't worry about it.
		We're just we're creating brand new viruses that can infect humans and may escape the lab and might cause a global pandemic and a lockdown that spikes hunger across the third world and destroys everything that we know and love and is an excuse to clamp down on all of our freedoms.
		That's why An increase in COVID-19 are unrelated.
		Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2,947 counties in the United States.
		That's right, this is a absolutely massive and peer-reviewed study that can be found at Springer.com.
		European Journal of Epidemiology cited this article and essentially they say that there is literally no attributable Correlation between countries that have high vaccination rates and a lower case of coronavirus.
		So there you go.
		Just a massive 3,000 counties and 68 countries were looked at in this.
		And yeah, essentially there's...
		No effect.
		No positive effect from the vaccine.
		Doesn't matter if you're 90%, 99%, or if you're 5% of vaccinated people.
		It doesn't matter.
		Because it's not a vaccine.
		Because it doesn't work.
		It's not effective.
		Because it actually is just creating the variants.
		But...
		Hey, that's just science.
		Los Angeles officials, meanwhile, are voting to require proof of vaccination at movie theaters, concerts and sports venues, restaurants with fines up to $5,000.
		Meanwhile, a very hilarious fact check occurred this week with the AP claiming that the letter that the NSBA public education organization sent to The FBI that called the protesters domestic terrorists and claimed that their speech was domestic terror and that the Patriot Act should be implemented in order to shut these people down.
		The AP fact checked that and said, no, it's not true, even though you can read the letter yourself.
		And it says it right there in black and white.
		No, no, they're claiming it's not true.
		It's just incredibly bizarre.
		We'll cover that a little bit more later.
		But this was an interesting thing I didn't see reported anywhere else.
		Carolyn Borisenko says the letter sent by the NSBA asking for parents to be labeled as domestic terrorists was actually not brought before the NSBA board before it was sent by the president and CEO.
		The board had no chance to comment.
		So in other words, this is all just a just a It's a fabricated, astroturfed, kabuki theater sort of play that they're putting on where some guy, without authority, sends a letter to the FBI.
		The FBI acts like this is a major deal and sends out agents to round up dissidents.
		It's all completely fabricated.
	It's all a lie.
	Just everything is a lie these days.
	Just everything.
	Everything.
unidentified		Welcome back, folks.
unidentified		I have a present for the crew.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		All right, welcome back, folks.
		I have a present for the crew.
		I'd like to give a present to the crew.
		What we have here would just make an absolutely fantastic little soundbite, a little sound clip to play.
		I need you guys to cut this out.
		Let's go to clip number six.
		Here's Joe Biden's raucous and rowdy crowd in Michigan cheering their beloved president of the United States.
		And I really need you guys just to chop out this cheer to where anytime we talk about Joe Biden, we're reminded of the enthusiastic support this brilliant president enjoys.
		Let's hear it now.
		Here's Joe Biden and his his rowdy crowd of raucous supporters in Michigan.
		Here it is.
unidentified		Hello, Michigan.
unidentified		It's good to be back. - Just that little part, that little part right in the middle.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I need that isolated where it's like, you know, Joe Biden's support is just like, yeah, it's so pathetic.
		We hear that again, please.
		We hear that again.
unidentified		Hello, Michigan.
unidentified		It's good to be back.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I love it.
		Absolutely love it.
		It's brilliant.
		It's absolutely brilliant stuff.
		All right, we got a very big show coming up.
		Joe Kent is going to be joining us about midway through the show.
		And Joe Kent, by the way, has been eliminated from YouTube.
		YouTube has deleted his entire channel because, of course, if you want to get elected to Congress in the United States of America, you have to have the approval of some foreign dirtbag at YouTube.
		So there you go.
		It's just very normal, very normal behavior.
		And then at 10 o'clock, we'll be joined by Robert Barnes.
		I do want to remind everybody that everything we do here is brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com.
		And right now, the InfoWars Emergency Supply Breakdown Sale.
		You can save up to 50% off some of our top-selling products, including the fantastic Brain Force Ultra that I've been obsessed with promoting because it is just that good.
		But there's so much other stuff as well.
		You've got down and out liquid sleep support, which I still haven't got.
		I'm going to get some of that today.
		I'm going to write it on my hand so I actually remember this time because, boy, oh, boy, do I need it.
		Survival Shield X2 Nascent Iodine is 40% off.
		Super Male and Super Female Vitality is 40% off of each.
		Living Defense Plus is 40% off.
		Organic Greens Fiber Caps is 50% off.
		And Selling Out Fast might not even be up there anymore.
		But just so many incredible products and of course it's entirely how we Pay for everything that we do here.
		We get this great crew, all the incredible guests, and everything else that goes on behind the scenes fighting this war of information.
		It all comes from your support at InfoWarsStore.com.
		It's just incredible.
		Is there ever any information that contradicts what we say?
		Is there ever any information that we don't know about already?
		This this study here increases in COVID-19 are related to levels of are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and two thousand nine hundred and forty seven counties in the United States.
		Vaccines currently are the primary mitigation strategy to combat COVID-19 around the world.
		For instance, the narrative related to the ongoing surge of new cases in the United States is argued to be driven by areas with low vaccination rates.
		In other words, a pandemic of the unvaccinated that we hear drummed into our head over and over again every single day with absolutely no basis whatsoever.
		A similar narrative has also been observed in countries such as Germany and the United Kingdom.
		At the same time, Israel, that was hailed for its swift and high rates of vaccination, has also seen substantial resurgence in COVID-19 cases.
		We investigate the relationship between the percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases across 68 countries and across 2,947 counties in the U.S.
		What were their findings?
		Well, their findings said this.
		At the country level, There appears to be no discernible relationship between the percentage of population fully vaccinated and the new COVID cases in the last seven days.
		In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 100 million.
		I'm gonna repeat that.
		The trend line suggests marginally positive associations such that countries with higher percentage of population of fully vaccinated people have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.
		Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 100 million in the last seven days.
		Any of this getting through to anybody?
		Anybody care about paying attention to this?
		Honestly, we need to start doing more man-on-the-street stuff because I need to figure out whether anybody knows about this, whether it would affect their opinion on the vaccines at all, or if the brainwashing is just too strong and you can literally be like, no look, they've studied literally thousands and thousands of instances and compared all of the information and there's a very clear lack of correlation between, you know, lowering COVID-19 cases and and the vaccine.
		If the vaccine is not lowering COVID-19 cases, what is the purpose of it?
		What is the point of it?
		Why does it exist?
		And certainly, why is it being mandated incredibly?
		It just doesn't make any sense.
		No sense at all.
		But why should it?
		Of the top five countries that have the highest percentage of population fully vaccinated, from 99.9% to 84.3%, the U.S.
		Center for Disease Control and Prevention identifies four of them as high transmission countries.
		Georgia, McKinley, New Mexico, counties rather, McKinley County in New Mexico, Arcebo in Puerto Rico, counties have above 90% of their population fully vaccinated, with all three being classified as high transmission.
		Conversely, of the 57 counties that have been classified as low transmission counties by the CDC, 26.3% have a percentage of fully vaccinated below 20%.
		So it just goes on and on.
		It's just every study that ever comes out shows that the vaccine is not just not helpful, but it actually has a negative effect a large percentage of the time.
		It makes no sense whatsoever.
		And it's incredibly absurd, as you now have places like Los Angeles mandating proof of vaccine in movie theaters, concerts, and sports venues and restaurants as well, with fines up to $5,000.
		It's just time and time again.
		This happens over and over and over and over and over and over again.
		I want to go to this video now.
	Clip number two.
	Here's what's happening in Canada as they move more towards an Australian style of total tyrannical lockdown.
	They are now announcing that you cannot get on a train or a plane if you do not have your ineffective, untested, unapproved, No liability, vaccine.
	You don't take that, you're staying where you are.
justin trudeau ▲ ● ▼		Let's watch. Let's watch.
		And by mid-November, enforcement measures in place will make sure that everyone is vaccinated.
		This is about keeping people safe on the job and in their communities.
		And the same goes for the second commitment we made, mandatory vaccination on travel.
		By the end of October, everyone 12 or older on a plane or train within Canada should be fully vaccinated.
		By the end of November, if you're 12 or older and want to fly or take the train, you'll have to be fully vaccinated, as will staff.
		Testing will no longer be an option before boarding.
		If you've done the right thing and gotten vaccinated, you deserve the freedom to be safe from COVID-19.
		To have your kids safe from COVID.
		To get back to the things you love.
		And if you haven't gotten your shots yet but want to travel this winter, Let's be clear.
		There will only be a few extremely narrow exceptions, like a valid medical condition.
		For the vast, vast majority of people, the rules are very simple.
		To travel, you've got to be vaccinated.
		These travel measures, along with mandatory vaccination for federal employees, are some of the strongest in the world.
		Because when it comes to keeping you and your family safe, when it comes to avoiding lockdowns for everyone, this is no time for half measures.
		Already we're delivering on the first of our vaccine commitments.
		And in the weeks to come, we'll get the job done on a vaccine passport for international travel.
		We'll be there to foot the bill for provinces and territories that roll out proof of vaccination programs.
		And we'll introduce legislation to make it a criminal offence to threaten or harass healthcare workers.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Incredible stuff, isn't it?
		It's absolutely incredible.
		I think the most telling part about that entire thing is that testing will no longer be an option.
		I don't know if this needs to be reminded to people, but if you don't have COVID, you can't pass COVID on.
		You test negative for COVID, you're not a danger to anybody in terms of COVID.
		So why would they not allow testing anymore?
		Why is it all about the vaccine?
		Like, I know we all know the answer to these questions, but Does this not occur in anyone's mind other than people that watch InfoWars?
		Like, is it really just this tiny percentage of the population that hears that testing is no longer an option and just accepts that?
		Just thinks that that's fine?
		Being unvaccinated does not mean being diseased.
		You're not diseased if you're unvaccinated.
		In fact, you're more likely to be diseased if you are vaccinated.
unidentified		You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
unidentified		Watch it live right now at band.video.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
		Some good news here from our friends north of Europe.
		As Finland now joins Sweden and Denmark in limiting or restricting the Moderna vaccine, And not allowing especially men younger than 30 to take it because, well, you're more likely to develop myocarditis as a result of the vaccine than you are to actually suffer an extreme case of COVID.
		So this is actually explained to us by a doctor.
		Let's go to clip number three now.
		As you hear this doctor explain why Scandinavian countries have suddenly stopped the Moderna COVID vaccine programs for young people.
		Let's watch.
unidentified		Hi, Dr. Scott Jensen here.
		I just wanted to provide an update regarding what's happening in the world of vaccines along with myocarditis and pericarditis risks.
		Today, Sweden has come out and paused their vaccine program for people under the age of 30.
		I think Sweden has 81,000 people under 30 that have received their first vaccine but will not be offered their second one at least until December 1st because Sweden authorities have identified a significant concern regarding the Moderna vaccine and The risk of myocarditis.
		Myocarditis is an inflammation of the heart muscle, oftentimes presents with shortness of breath, palpitations, chest discomfort, sometimes profound fatigue.
		So I think it's important to realize this because many people in the military are under the age of 30.
		And we have a country like Sweden saying we're going to have to pause our Moderna vaccine program.
		So what happens to military people who are threatened with a dishonorable discharge if they are unwilling to potentially put their Heart health at risk?
		I think we have to ask ourselves that question.
		It's also interesting that Denmark has paused their program as well in regards to Moderna vaccination in people under the age of 18 for similar concerns regarding myocarditis.
		Oftentimes, pericarditis is a concern as well.
		Pericarditis is an inflammation of the sac around the heart, frequently involving chest pain on deep breathing or shortness of breath.
		So I hope that helps.
		There are some things happening.
		We need to stay alert.
		Thank you much.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		So there you go.
		A little explanation as to why exactly these Nordic countries are restricting use of Moderna.
		Of course, Moderna is something like 10 times as strong as the Pfizer vaccine, which probably relates to why it's that much more dangerous for young people to To take it.
		But meanwhile, the weakness of the Pfizer vaccine is becoming more apparent.
		From CNN.com, of all places, studies confirm waning immunity from Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine.
		Two real-world studies published Wednesday confirm that the immune protection offered by two doses of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine drops off after two months or so.
		Two months or so.
		Although protection against severe diseases, hospitalizations and death remain strong, they say.
		You get your first vaccine, then you have to wait two weeks for your second vaccine.
		Then you're not considered fully vaccinated for another two weeks after that.
		So a full month has gone by since you've gotten the first vaccine.
		Then the vaccine is mildly effective, not at stopping you from getting the disease.
		We've already heard that it does not stop transmission rates.
		It does not lower the viral load that you're actually carrying.
		It actually makes it higher somehow, which is a little backwards, but there it is.
		So first month, you're not covered at all.
		The next two months, you have mild protection for a little while.
		And then after two months, it basically falls off.
		By six months point, you're basically not protected whatsoever.
		Meanwhile, the entire time, you could be infected with COVID-19.
		You could be spreading COVID-19.
		It doesn't slow down transmission or infection whatsoever.
		It simply deadens the symptoms a little bit.
		So you could be walking around spreading this disease without even knowing it.
		Why?
		Why?
		Why is any of this?
		It's just like... I don't know.
		I don't even know what to say anymore.
		It's just like all of the information is coming out.
		And I guess I kind of predicted this a little bit.
		I literally think they could come out tomorrow and say, yeah, it turns out none of the vaccines work at all, and they all have incredibly high risks of death.
		And the American people would just keep watching MSM.
		They would probably pay Pfizer and Merck to come up with a cure for the vaccine illness and just not even think anything about it and never stop trusting these liars.
unidentified		You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
		Watch it live right now at band.video.
		All right, welcome back, folks.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Still so much to talk about here this morning.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I mean, it just goes on and on and on.
unidentified		You know, there's just a certain
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I always refer to like you know supervision like you should just be able to tell what's true and what's not after a certain point like you understand that that 99% like for example the whistleblower the so-called Facebook whistleblower described this yesterday right see what Facebook whistleblower you think oh this could be interesting you see appears on 60 minutes you think this is nothing this is fake this is a fraud I don't need to know I don't need to know anything else.
		I don't need to hear what they're claiming.
		I don't need to know who they are.
		I don't need to know what their past was.
		I know that if a so-called whistleblower appears on 60 Minutes and then the very next day is invited to the Senate to demand whatever they're demanding, I know it's fake.
		It's just automatically you just know if you appear on 60 Minutes you are a fraud.
		You're a liar.
		You're a tool of the establishment.
		They're the only people that are allowed to tell their stories on 60 Minutes.
		We have whistleblowers from Project Veritas, everything from nurses to media people like Ivory Hecker to, you know, any number of other either whistleblowers or people caught undercover, you know, saying things that they don't want to get out.
		You know, literally during the video being like, oh, you're not wearing a wire, are you?
		Are any of those people asked to go talk to the Senate?
		Are any of those people featured on any mainstream media?
		Or is all of that utterly ignored because it actually challenges power structure and actually exposes lies being told?
		Obviously, like, you just need to understand this.
		Same thing with this, uh, this, this leftist, uh, was it a legal immigrant chasing after Kristen Sinema?
		Do I need to tell you that this person is funded?
		How did they get into ASU if you need to be a student to get into that building?
		Who do they have on the inside to let them in?
		How did they know what flight Kristen Sinema was going to be on?
		How did they have the signs pre-made?
		How did they get past the security checkpoint at the airport when they didn't have a boarding pass?
		They did have a boarding pass.
		How did they get it without an ID if they're an illegal immigrant?
		Like, all of these things are just kind of apparent and obvious, and then we just wait for, like, the truth to come out.
		As to who's bankrolling these people, well, of course, it's not going to surprise you.
		Left-wing billionaire George Soros is bankrolling the group behind the harassment of Kristen Sinema.
		Progressive billionaire George Soros is bankrolling the left-wing activist group whose members accosted Senator Kristen Sinema in a bathroom over the weekend.
		Is George Soros even a citizen?
		Is he a citizen of this country?
		Does anybody know?
		He was born in Hungary.
		He's an unrepentant Nazi.
		And people, people are like, like people get confused when I say that.
		I'm not, I'm not being hyperbolic.
		We've all seen the interview, 60 Minutes, again, George Soros, when he's like, you corroborated with the Nazis.
		You helped the Nazis to steal the belongings of Jews in Hungary.
		Do you feel bad about that?
		He's just like, no.
		No, I was a great Nazi.
		I was an excellent Nazi.
		He was like, I'm a very, very devoted and efficient Nazi collaborator.
		And they're just like, oh, interesting.
		Very good.
		Would you like to give billions of dollars to our political system?
		Would you like to pour tens of billions of dollars into our political system?
		Now, I'm going to be hosting the Sunday night show this weekend.
		Sunday at six I'll do a little week in review thing, but I'm also going to dedicate the entire second hour to That conspiracy chart the conspiracy pyramid that we've you know sort of came about again Earlier this week, and I talked about a little bit now they have George Soros as a conspiracy That is equal to the Flat Earth Conspiracy, right?
		Because understanding, knowing and not being okay with a foreign, unrepentant Nazi billionaire, financial terrorist who gained his money by crashing the economies of places like the UK.
		And is openly, according to the New York Times and any other respectable publication, has spent $18 to $20 billion.
		To radically transform our political system.
		That's a conspiracy equal to flat earth theory, apparently, according to these people.
		Just why would we ever allow this?
		Like isn't he banned from Russia and banned from Hungary?
		Like he's banned from his own country because they recognize that he's a despicable scumbag who has no right to radically transform our political system.
		But he's not just radically transforming it, he's paying foreigners to come into our country and accost our senators.
		He's paying for that.
		He's paying for the buses that bring people up from South America to Central America.
		He's paying for the lawyers that Coach them on how to say the right things in order to get asylum.
		He's the one paying, he's giving them...
		envelopes full of money and paying for their plane tickets as they fly further into this country.
		You remember last week I covered the Italian mayor who was sentenced to 13 years in prison for aiding and abetting illegal immigrants.
		Like none of this stuff would require new laws.
		All of this stuff is on the books.
	Nothing has happened over the last 50 years where the Congress got together and just said, hey, do we want to just open our borders to absolutely anybody?
	And should we allow people if they have a certain amount of money, They can just disregard our laws and flagrantly violate our national sovereignty by bringing in millions of useful idiots who then have loyalty to the people that brought them in and not the country that's giving them sanctuary.
	Like just anything.
	anything.
	Anything?
	Anything?
	Does anybody want to do anything about this?
	Or we just have to be subject to this because otherwise we get called bad names by the media that he controls.
	Is that where we are?
	So activists with Living United for Change in Arizona filmed cinema while she was teaching at Arizona State University on Saturday.
	After she refused to meet with the organization to discuss her opposition to a $3.5 trillion Build Back Better spending bill, Soros' Open Society Foundation is Living United's biggest donor.
	The group gave $1.5 million to Living United in 2019 and a quarter million in 2017, according to the Philanthropy Grants database.
	This is philanthropy after all, right?
	Paying Mexican citizens to harass American senators, that's philanthropy in these people's minds.
	He also just gave $500,000 to an organization I believe called Equity Now here in Austin.
	And you see lots of very, very well made, professionally made signs demanding that Austinites vote to disarm ourselves and that we do not vote on the destruction of our police force.
	Why is this allowed?
	Why is some foreign billionaire allowed to pour in half a million dollars and overwhelm the just regular Austinites who don't want our police to go away?
	We were never asked.
	They just defunded them without any consideration, without any polling, without any nothing.
	They just do it.
	They just defund the police.
	Murder rate skyrockets 30% or higher.
	Just massive, unending death and destruction from these people.
	If we want to get it back.
	Same thing with the homeless.
	Same thing happened.
	We have to do a petition.
	We have to go get signatures.
	We have to scrap and bow and scrape and beg.
	Please just allow us to actually have a voice in this.
	It's our democracy after all.
	Then they eventually allow us.
	They grant us permission to actually vote on something that affects our city.
	Then we have to We have to campaign and we have to give our money and we have to give our time just trying to undo the stuff that they did.
	It's not our fault that all this crap is happening.
	We opposed it from the beginning, but they never asked us.
	So we have to go through all this rigmarole of getting everything in order and begging people to go out and vote to undo this.
	Then we do, then we vote.
	Then the proposition passes despite the millions of dollars that people not from Austin are pouring in to overwhelm our local initiatives.
	And then they just ignore it anyway.
	Homeless are still here.
	They're still camping.
	No enforcement's been done.
	It's just totalitarianism.
	Why do we even pretend that we are controlled by the American people anymore?
	Everybody just needs to accept that the billionaire class, the very small elect, the elite of the elite, the 1% of the 1%, just have carte blanche to do whatever they want in any of our cities.
	And if we ever try to push back, they'll overwhelm us, demonize us, kick us off the internet, and do what they were going to do anyway.
	Like, that's the world that we're in because we've allowed it to get to this place.
	Because we haven't stood up to this yet.
	And because people who actually, they actually believe that these scumbag, despicable, hateful monsters have their best interests in mind.
	I mean, how much more do you need proof?
	I mean, the man is a literal unrepentant Nazi.
	You're worried about Nazism?
	You're worried about white supremacy?
	You're worried about all this stuff?
	This guy's asked, like, hey, yeah, you helped with the Nazis.
	Do you feel bad about that?
	And he's like, no, it was great.
	It was awesome.
	It was super fun, and I love doing it.
	By the way, I care so much about you that I'm paying half a million dollars to keep police out of your city.
	Thank you so much, despicable.
unidentified		All right, welcome back, folks.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		We're going to do a special little segment here before we welcome Joe Kent onto the program.
		I haven't actually read this article or rather haven't actually taken this quiz.
		We're going to do this live on air.
		We're going to react to it live on air.
		It's from the Washington Post, who reminds us that democracy dies in darkness as they turn off the lights.
		It's an opinion piece.
		It says, will you fall into the conspiracy theory rabbit hole?
		Take our quiz and find out.
		Now we know, everybody from the New York Times, the AP, they've warned us recently, do not do your own research.
		Do not go down that rabbit hole.
		Do not look for yourself and find answers to things that don't seem to add up in the mainstream media.
		You're only supposed to hear things from us.
		You're only supposed to believe what we tell you.
		So they say this, who believes in conspiracy theories?
		Statistically speaking, almost everyone.
		Well, isn't that interesting?
		A team of researchers recently showed several thousand Americans a list of 20 common conspiracy theories and asked if they believe them.
		They include false conspiracy theories about the John F. Kennedy assassination.
		Yeah, that one alone, it's like 99% of people will tell you, yeah, there's something up with that.
		There's something a bit suspicious about the old assassination theory.
		5G cellular wireless technology.
		Again, not exactly a conspiracy theory.
		It's just science.
		Barack Obama's birth certificate, COVID-19, and climate change.
		The result?
		Nine in ten Americans believe in at least one conspiracy theory.
		So what they're telling you is, we're telling you the official story.
		Nine out of ten Americans don't believe us.
		That's all they're saying.
		It's not saying you believe in a conspiracy theory.
		It's just saying you question us.
		That's what they're saying.
		They're saying 9 out of 10 Americans dare to question us on at least 1 out of 20 of these topics.
		The study, led by Adam Inders of the University of Louisville and Joseph Usinki of the University of Miami, surveyed a representative sample of 2,000 Americans in March 2020 and 2,000 more in October 2020.
		The article uses questions from their surveys to test your knowledge and your credulity.
		So, if you can tell fact from fiction, or will you fall down the rabbit hole, scroll down to find out.
		Are you an obedient little citizen, or do you think for yourself?
		Let's find out.
		Let's get started.
		One out of six.
		Which of the statements below is true?
		Jeffrey Epstein, the billionaire accused of running an elite sex trafficking ring, was murdered to cover up the activities of his criminal network.
		Gee, I don't know.
		I don't know.
		I thought the conspiracy theory was that Jeffrey Epstein ran a pedophile island.
		That used to be the conspiracy theory.
		The conspiracy theory used to be that the elites and academia and media and government would get together to abuse young girls on private islands with people like Jeffrey Epstein.
		That used to be the conspiracy.
		But then it was proven, undeniably, for 20 plus years.
		But then he wasn't prosecuted.
		And then he was not placed under suicide watch.
		And then the cameras accidentally malfunctioned.
		And then they didn't check up on him.
		And then he somehow killed himself with paper sheets or something.
		Yeah, yeah, yeah.
		But no, now the conspiracy theory is that he didn't kill himself.
		President John F. Kennedy was killed by a conspiracy rather than a lone gunman.
		That's the second option.
		The FBI kept tabs on civil rights leaders such as the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr.
		attempting to find compromising information and damage his reputation.
		I'll tell you, that's the one they want you to choose.
		That's the answer they think is right.
		They're like, JFK was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald.
		He did it by himself.
	And then he was killed by Jack Ruby.
	And all of this was totally spontaneous and random.
	And there was no organization whatsoever.
	And if you question that, You are a danger to our society.
	Jeffrey Epstein was a brilliant investor, he was a genius and a humanitarian and a philanthropist who had great parties at his temple on his private island that had nothing to do with raping little children and then he killed himself tragically and we're all very sad about that and he's definitely not living in Tel Aviv under an assumed name.
	Regardless of who's in official charge of the government and other organizations, there is a single group of people who secretly control events and rule the world together.
	Well, that can't be true.
	There's no way that's true.
	I've never heard of the World Economic Forum.
	I've never heard of Davos.
	I've never heard of Bilderberg or the Bohemian Grove.
	I've never heard of any of this.
	I've never heard of the Council on Foreign Relations or the Trilateral Commission.
	There's no way.
	Our governments are conspiring together and organizing in a global fashion to carry out the wishes of a billionaire cabal.
	No, no, there's no way that both the Prime Minister of England and the President of the United States are both using the term build back better, which is the great reset slogan from the World Economic Forum.
	You know, a foundation?
	No, no, I'd never believe any of that.
	I'm not a crazy conspiracy theorist.
	So let's just choose the one they want us to choose because, you know, they think we're this dumb.
	Yes, we know the FBI kept tabs on civil rights leaders such as Reverend Martin Luther King, attempting to five-compromising information and damage his reputation, obviously.
	But you know what else is also true?
	All three of these other ones, you fricking morons.
	Question two, partnership plays a role in, partisanship plays a role in what people believe.
	Both Republicans and Democrats are prone to believe conspiracy theories that make the other party look bad.
	Can you pick the true statement or will you be blinded by party loyalty?
	Do you believe that Republicans cheated their way to win 2000, 2004 and 2016 presidential elections?
	I don't know.
	The Democrats definitely yelled that continuously for years and years and used as justification for all sorts of tyrannical overreach.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Thank you.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		But now it's illegal.
		Now it's domestic terror to say that about 2020.
		Just so we're clear, yes, you can question 2000, 2004, and 2016 endlessly, ad nauseam, and blame it on whoever you want.
		But if you dare question 2020, you are a domestic terrorist.
		You will be removed from civil society.
		Hillary Clinton conspired to provide Russia with nuclear material.
		Yes.
		Yes, she did.
		During Ronald Reagan's presidency, government officials secretly illegally sold weapons to Iran and then used the money to fund Nicaraguan revolutionaries or Barack Obama faked citizenship to become president.
		Again, it's just like They think they know what we think.
		They think that they, like, have insight into the minds of conspiracy theorists where they're just like, they're just scared and they just want... But, like, we know them inside and out.
		I will bet any amount of money I could ever possibly own that this is the answer they want.
		See, there it is, and it turns green.
		During Ronald Reagan's presidency, government officials secretly illegally sold weapons to Iran then used the money to fund Nicaraguan revolutionaries.
		Yes, yet another baseless conspiracy theory that then it was proven, and now it's acknowledged by these people.
		It's called the Iran-Contra affair.
		Of course, they don't know the half of it, but they act like they do.
		So it's just like we know exactly what they think.
		We know exactly what they expect us to choose.
		We know everything that they know.
		We just know that much more.
		By the way, the Obama – I'm not sure if you're The birth certificate thing is particularly hilarious for me because when it came out, I was not super into conspiracy theories.
		I was into it.
		I had an open mind and everything, but I didn't really care that much.
		I voted for Obama in 2008.
		I'm open about that.
		I was fooled by the liar and his rhetoric, and when it showed not to be true, instead of slavishly acting as if everything was actually true, I realized that, oh, okay, all of that was lies, and I despise this man now.
		You know, when they came out with the birth certificate, you could go to the .gov website, you could download the PDF that they put up as proof of his birth certificate, you could drag that PDF into Photoshop, and then you could select the handwriting parts and move them around because they were a separate layer.
		Because whoever did this forgot to to flatten the layers on the PDF on Photoshop.
		It was something that you could do in your real life.
		And I remember doing this and being like, huh, that's strange and showing it to my friends.
		And they were like, that's a conspiracy theory.
		That's a lie.
		That's why.
		And I'm just like, no, I just did it.
		I'm doing it right in front of you.
		This is this is I'm doing it like it's showing that it's fake.
		And they just like couldn't believe it.
		They can't handle it.
		It was it was too much for them.
		I was a crazy conspiracy theory for just observing with my eyes.
		We're only going to get halfway through this test.
		Conspiracy theorists come... Oh, wait.
		Hold on.
		Before they explain to us what a conspiracy theory is, it's a very simple formula.
		They say powerful people use deceitful or shadowy means to benefit themselves or harm the public.
		No, never.
		Oh, rich people.
		Oh, powerful people.
		They're only always altruistic.
unidentified		You're watching the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
unidentified		Watch live right now at band.video.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen, to American Journal.
		I'm Harrison Smith.
		My guest, very happy to welcome Joe Kent, congressional candidate.
		Joe Kent is a U.S.
		Army Special Forces veteran and candidate for Congress in Washington's 3rd District.
		After a distinguished career involving 11 combat deployments, Joe is determined to reform the broken political system Thank you so much for joining us, Mr. Kent.
		Thanks so much for having me on.
		joekentforcongress.com.
		His Twitter is joekent16jan19.
		That's joekent16jan19.
		Thank you so much for joining us, Mr. Kent.
unidentified		Thanks so much for having me on.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, I'm very happy to have you on, especially with some of the latest, well, I guess persecution that your campaign is under.
		You released this statement, Kent, America First for Congress, saying YouTube persecutes America First Patriots.
		You say today YouTube deleted the campaign's account.
		Joe Kent made the following statement in response.
		They sent you an email notifying you that the account was taken down.
		The accounts of your pro-corporate opponent, Representative Jamie Herrera-Buechler, remains So again, this is big tech censoring a congressional candidate.
		I guess the American people don't get to elect who they want.
		They first have to get the permission of big tech companies.
		Is that right?
unidentified		Yeah, I mean, that appears to be the current state that we're in right now between them deplatforming President Trump, Laura Loomer, obviously your network, and countless others.
		I guess I just joined those proud ranks.
		I mean, I kind of wear it as a badge of honor.
		I don't feel like I said anything in particularly all that spicy.
		I didn't really get any warnings.
		I just, yesterday we were trying to upload some content and found that our page was deleted and got an email shortly thereafter.
		So yeah, it's obviously Big Tech wants to be able to control the narrative and that's abundantly clear.
		I mean, I'm very serious about getting into Congress and breaking up Big Tech because they are just a menace to the American people on every level.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, they absolutely are.
		They used to at least have to pretend like they were enforcing one of their guidelines, right?
		Like they'd have to go, well, you said this, and that violates this, so we're giving you a strike, then another strike.
		They've sort of dispensed with that.
		They sort of just go, well, we just deleted it, and there's nothing you can do about it.
		I mean, have you heard anything from YouTube as to why they would have done this?
		Or is this just blatant, open political malfeasance by YouTube?
unidentified		No, they just said that we violated their community guidelines, I believe is what they say.
		But we didn't get any strikes or anything like that.
		They didn't point to...
		Anything that I said, you know, I was just on Jack Murphy live and I said, we need to break a big tech.
		And we talked to him like kind of geeky policy details about that.
		But again, it wasn't anything in particularly all that, all that spicy really, you know, I've said similar things before in other videos.
		So I don't know if that would, that would, that's what got their attention to go check out my account.
		But yeah, there was, there was no kinds of warnings.
		There was no like even veneer of, Hey, you violated this one or two things we have.
		It was just, Hey, we're in charge and we're silencing you.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		It's absolutely insane.
		So what are some of the policies that you would put forward to stop big tech from doing this?
		Because it's obviously not just YouTube, it's all of them.
		And of course, they're deeply embedded with the deep state.
		I mean, now we have articles this week about CIA and other national security actors basically Getting warrantless rights to search all of your Google history, all of your Microsoft history, all of your Yahoo history.
		I mean, they're deeply embedded with these same companies that are now censoring people like yourself.
		What could we possibly do to combat this?
unidentified		Yeah, you know, it's so far off the rails.
		I mean, I think, you know, five or six years ago, or even in the latter part of the Trump administration, we were talking about 230 reform.
		And, you know, I think that doesn't even really go far enough.
		I think we need to use antitrust laws, break up big tech.
		They are a common carrier, so that gives, I think, the government the ability to seize their assets, essentially make them a public utility.
		There's also an eminent domain issue there.
		I'm not talking about the government going and taking absolutely everything from these corporations, but taking the platforms from them and making them a public utility, a common carrier that every American has.
		Equal access to, I think, is the only way that we can do it.
		I think if we try and piecemeal it with Section 230 here and there, I think they're just going to find workarounds because they're so powerful.
		And right now, they have the ability to take over people's lives.
		I mean, really, the deplatforming that they've done, obviously, to your network and then also to President Trump, is something that your average citizen can't really endure.
		I've had friends that are in the veteran space that have had their ability to hold a bank account taken away from them, in addition to basically their First Amendment rights.
		We broke up Standard Oil and other big monopolies in our history that had far less control.
		They really just had one.
		They had control over one industry, maybe two industries.
		This information dominance is something that we've never experienced before in our nation's history, and I think we have a A very tight timeline to reign it in because the left, especially the Democratic political machine, they're not even shy about the fact that they are in bed with big tech.
		I mean, Jen Psaki talks about it.
		Joe Biden's talked about it.
		They're working with Facebook to go through people's profiles.
		And now we just learned the intelligence community is working with Google.
		I mean, this is completely and totally off the rails on every realm between the antitrust issues of big tech, but then also the need for real intelligence oversight and reform, a new church committee.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, yeah, I would agree completely.
		I'd say, yeah, we need to go even farther than that.
		Of course, you have a Rumble account, which is where you'll be moving your videos to, I suppose?
unidentified		Yes, absolutely.
		Yeah, Rumble.
		And then Rumble, Getter, we're on all the alternative platforms.
		We've been anticipating this.
		We didn't think it was going to happen this quickly, but yeah, here we are.
		So we'll be on Rumble.
		We're on Gab, CloudHub, Getter, all those.
		We're still on Twitter and Instagram and Facebook right now for the time being.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And of course the common response to this is, well, just build your own platform.
		They're a private company.
		They shouldn't have to be a platform for your hate speech.
		That's what I was saying.
		But of course, we know that Google and Apple and all of these places, if you allow speech that they don't want on your platform, they'll remove you from the Play Store.
		I mean, heck, Amazon will kick you off Amazon Web Services.
		They'll delete your URL.
		I mean, it's almost beyond a monopoly because it's all of these various organizations all working together to crush any competitors coming up.
		So Rumble is great now, but who knows?
		Maybe MasterCard or somebody else will demand that Rumble remove people.
		And if they don't, they'll stop processing their payments and then they'll go down.
		I mean, this is financial, it's big tech, it's these platforms that were once open so they got a bunch of people and then decided to close down.
		Again, it's like we need a trust busting, but it's like multiple trusts all in one single trust.
		I mean, this is massive and the effects are unknown and frankly horrific, I would say.
		So I don't know.
		Is there anything the government can do beyond just actually going in and seizing these companies?
unidentified		I think that that's what we're going to end up being.
		Because I mean, the thing is, like you said, you know, Five, six years ago, I think I would have been of the frame of mind that said, do I really want the government to have this power?
		If it's really that big of a deal, why don't all conservatives just unplug and build their own?
		I understand that argument.
		And I think that that's a decent, like, first principles to have.
		However, we're completely off the rails.
		And like, you know, you mentioned and eloquently described the totality of control that these tech oligarchs have over our lives.
		And so really what the The technocracy, the oligarchy has become, it's become a threat to the sovereignty of America.
		So the question going forward isn't going to be like 230 reform or breaking up big tech, it's going to be, is the enduring power going to be the sovereign nation state of America?
		Or are we going to fall prey to really just being at the whim of these corporations and these technocrats and oligarchs, oligarchy, who they aren't elected by anybody?
		are we going to fight to preserve the republic that we have, that we, the people, get to choose the leaders of?
		That's the fight going forward.
		That's why I think that these platforms have to be seized by the government.
		We have to aggressively break them up.
		You know, and this has to be done by the government because the government that's, you know, democratically elected by the people, that has to be what endures.
		Our sovereign nation state has to be what endures.
		We can't just allow ourselves to be purchased and then sold to the corporations.
		So again, it's not even just Big Tech.
		That's, I think, the fight going forward on every level, and big tech is going to be one of the first fronts.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And, of course, we know that places like Patreon were pressured to remove people from MasterCard.
		So, again, it's not even just big tech.
		It's combined with the great reset corporate control that's being laid down on us from the World Economic Forum, right?
unidentified		No, that's exactly right.
		We're going to have to do the big tech, and then I think we're also going to have to really start going after the amount of control and power that these top 20, 25 oligarchs have.
		I mean, the way that they're able to evade paying taxes, the way that they're able to I could not agree more.
		More with Joe Kent on the other side.
		like we saw in 2020, the way that they helped use dark money to manipulate elections, the way that they're able to do that under the guise of philanthropy or the way that they're able to use the assets, the interest off their assets.
		I mean, this is stuff that regular citizens can't do, that the government can't even do.
		So we're going to have to start going after these guys on every single level and really commit ourselves to taking our sovereignty back.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		I could not agree more.
		More with Joe Kent on the other side.
		Stay with us.
		Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen, to American Journal.
		My guest is Joe Kent, who was recently kicked off of YouTube for daring to oppose the globalist takeover of our country.
		We're talking a little bit about that.
		Of course, it's not just Facebook or it's not just YouTube, it's Facebook, it's Twitter.
		They all operate on the same sort of level and are perfectly willing to kick people off their platforms for no reason whatsoever, except for that they oppose them politically.
		It's a complete violation of everything that we once held dear as Americans, and we just hope that we can get people like Joe Kent elected into office before it's too late to put the brakes on some of this stuff.
		I encourage you to support Joe Kent.
		Go to his website, joekentforcongress.com.
		His Twitter is joekent16jan19.
		So his Twitter is joekent16jan19.
		16 January 19, or rather 16 Jan 19.
		So his Twitter is JoeKent16JAN19.
		You should go there and follow him as well.
		What is your opinion, Joe, on the Facebook so-called whistleblower that they rolled out this week to demand more censorship and was immediately given a place to sit and pontificate in front of the United States Senate?
		What's your opinion on this so-called whistleblower?
unidentified		Yeah, it's almost like they're not even trying anymore.
		She's obviously some form of a plant or an op hat, whatever you want to call it.
		I mean, she's a whistleblower that's demanding that Facebook does more censorship of speech that they deem controversial, which is all the speech on the right, essentially.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
unidentified		So it's going along with and now she's going to go testify, I think, between before the January 6th committee.
		So she's going to be part of this.
		Yeah, exactly.
		She's going to be part of this narrative that says that everything that questions the election or or the way that the the pandemic's been handled as part of the insurrection.
		And Facebook should crack down harder on that.
		But really, the thing is, I feel like they're not even trying anymore.
		And that's part of the that's part of the plan.
		They want to show you how much control they have.
		They show that they have this Facebook leaker, and then she suddenly gets put in front of 60 Minutes as her exclusive, and then within, what, 24, 48 hours, she's on the floor of the Senate talking about how the government needs to crack down harder on these conspiracy theories.
		And she was also part of the committee.
		I forgot the exact name of it, that helped bury the Hunter Biden laptop story that said that was Russian disinformation.
		Keep that out of the public view right before the election.
		You know, come to find out that the FBI knew all along that it was legit and they were actually investigating it.
		So, yeah, she's just part of the counter narrative, which is, you know, we say break up big tech and make it accessible to everybody.
		And she says, no, big tech needs to be more aggressive, more aligned with the government.
		And there needs to be more censorship of the speech that we we find dangerous.
		You know, so it's it really just shows you, again, what we talked about before, that that merit, that not so subtle marriage now that's developing or I guess is already fully developed between big tech and our security state.
		And now she's there putting it up right in front of all of us.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, really, I think that's the perfect response.
		It's like they're not even trying anymore.
		I have to wonder, just for the average American out there, I mean, are you not insulted by this?
		To me, it's like a slap in the face to be this transparent.
		It's insulting to me.
unidentified		Yeah, I mean, to even call her a whistleblower, they think people can't even just look up what a whistleblower is supposed to be, especially the same week there's Project Veritas released, the actual real whistleblower.
		You can tell that stuff that Pfizer and all the big big pharma doesn't want out there.
		Those are real whistleblowers.
		You know, this lady coming out and saying she wants to do more of what Facebook really wants to do.
		It's like you guys aren't even trying anymore.
		You could have you could have come up with something a little bit more clever, clever or or subtle.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right, or somebody that doesn't have an extensive history of doing this, where if you go back and look at her activity before this point, from Google to like several other big tech companies, her self-appointed position was to go in and then demand these companies change for some social justice cause or another.
		She's not just a dedicated Facebook worker who was troubled by what she saw and felt compelled to come forward.
		No, this is what she does, and she's done it many, many times before.
		It's utterly absurd, and the huge irony, Joe, is that Project Veritas, not able to be watched on Facebook.
		That will get removed from Facebook, those whistleblowers.
		The Facebook whistleblower, you can actually watch on Facebook.
		Isn't that ironic?
unidentified		Yeah, she won't get kicked off Facebook or the platform.
		You know, they'll give her all the time that she needs.
		And I think she's also being represented by Jen Psaki's, like, brother's PR firm, too.
		They don't even hide this anymore.
		I mean, really, ever since the Steele dossier getting funded by the DNC and then put right into intelligence channels, they don't hide anything anymore.
		It's right up in our face, which is what I tell folks.
		This is two parts.
		Obviously, the disinformation is part of it.
		But then the other part is to be so blatant and up in your face that either you become demotivated by the totality of it and you just crawl into a hole and you think it's hopeless and you don't vote anymore.
		Or you do something stupid that gives them justification to come and actually target you with the tools of law enforcement.
		So I tell people don't take the bait.
		Just realize it's up in your face.
		What you need to do is get politically activated.
		You need to make sure everyone in your network knows this information and that they're registering to vote and they're voting at every single level, especially in these upcoming 21 elections, the nonpartisan ones, like your school board, your county commissioners, the people that have real power over your day-to-day lives, and then continue that momentum into 22.
		That's how we win.
		That's how we beat them and laugh back at them.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		You know, you're exactly right, and you make such a good point by drawing this all the way back to the Russia Lie, you know, and the Russia collusion manufactured a conspiracy because Where were the Republicans then?
		Why were the people that spread those lies not held to account?
		You know, that's what's emboldened them to this point.
		That's why they feel they can be so overt and obvious, because there weren't any Republicans in office at the time who felt the need to hold these people to account, hold their feet to the fire, punish them for lying.
		They're allowed to get away with it.
		So why shouldn't they ratchet it up the next time, right?
		I mean, I think that's why we need people like yourself in there.
		Everybody else that's there now that goes, oh, well, sure, they lied and they spied on a presidential campaign, but let's not rock the boat too much.
		I mean, that's how we've gotten to this point.
unidentified		No, that's exactly.
		Yeah, that's exactly right.
		I mean, there was just never any accountability.
		I mean, Devin Nunes tried as hard as he possibly could, but he was just just one guy.
		And he you know, he did obviously great work by exposing some of that.
		But we need a whole entire coalition of people in Congress and Senate because Congress and Senate really are there for oversight.
		I mean, that's one of their main functions that I think on every level that they have just been completely derelict in.
		So when we get back in there into Congress and we have an America first wave in 2022, I mean, bringing the national security state to heel is absolutely critical.
		I think we can start with the Russiagate hoax and the way that found its way into intelligence channels and then really go hard after the January 6th narrative.
		I mean, because they still haven't been honest about anything that happened with January 6th, how many informants they had, why they're holding these political.
		I mean, why they allowed the lie to continue that, you know, a police officer was beaten to death by the Trump supporters.
		There's so much that we can go through there to help bring these people to heel.
		And I think that's something that the American people need to need to see.
		Because if we're going to, again, keep our faith in our great nation, we have to see that there's accountability when things go off the rail.
		Otherwise, people are just going to continue to rightfully lose faith because there's just been so many lies.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, no, you're exactly right.
		I mean, it is almost to the point where when I hear somebody is endorsed by some sort of organization, I don't trust them.
		When I hear somebody like Joe Kent is censored off of YouTube, that's how I know he's the real deal.
		It's like that's a better endorsement than anything you could actually get from the D.C.
		establishment because endorsements from them is like the kiss of death as far as I'm concerned.
		You don't want their endorsement.
		They're the scumbags we're trying to get out of there.
		Earlier this week, or was it last, we got Anthony Sabatini on the program.
		You and him are teaming up, a dynamic duo, and I think you'll have an event this weekend, right?
		And people can still buy tickets for that.
unidentified		That's right.
		Yeah.
		So we'll be at AmFest at the Trump Doral Miami hotel and golf course.
		And so Friday night we're doing a joint fundraiser.
		We'll both speak, take questions.
		You can buy tickets at the door for that at Trump Doral at AmFest.
		And we're both speaking at AmFest too.
		So if people, people want to come out and see us, we'd really appreciate it.
		So yeah, we're We're teaming up.
		Anthony's a great fighter.
		I mean, he's doing awesome work down there in his, uh, his district as a state rep, um, suing everybody that's putting in CRT mask mandates.
		Like he's, he's really been going hard after the, uh, the establishment there in Florida.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, man, gosh, there's just so much that I'd love to get in, uh, you know, with, to you, but, uh, or get into with you, but, um, gosh, we're running out of time here.
		I gotta ask, what do you think of the border real quick?
		We have 16 or 20 conservative governors coming together to demand that they actually do something to stop the border.
		That's another big topic now.
		What's your comment on that here in the last minute?
unidentified		Yeah, I mean, this is all manufactured by Biden when he said that, hey, I want everyone to come up because that just threw all the policies of the Trump administration out the window.
		The Trump administration had done their very best near our border.
		But what I kind of want people to remember Is that for the first two years of the Trump administration, Trump ran and won on stealing off our border and protecting our country from illegal immigration and all the bad stuff that comes with it, from the crime to undercutting US labor.
		That's the mandate Trump came into office with.
		He was thwarted for the first two years of his administration when Republicans had control of the House and the Senate by feckless Republicans.
		The woman I'm running against, Jamie Herrera Butler, she voted with the Democrats to stop construction of the border wall.
		So as much as this is Biden's fault, the fact that there isn't at least a physical barrier down there is that's on the Republicans.
		They double-crossed Trump, they crossed the aisles, they voted with the Democrats.
		I went down there with Paul Gosar.
		He took me to the border.
		He took me to the spot where we stopped building the wall.
		On one side, there's a big beautiful wall, like Trump said, and that wall prevents people from coming in, and then you can walk right around it to where we stopped construction, and all the materials that the taxpayers still paid for are laying there.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		We're still paying $5 million a day, apparently, to not build the wall.
		Man, it's so absurd.
		It's total corruption from the top down.
		Let's fight back.
		Elect Joe Kent.
		JoeKentForCongress.com.
unidentified		You're listening to The American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
unidentified		Watch it live right now at band.video.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		So here we are, ladies and gentlemen.
		I think we should all take stake of how many people the Globalists have already killed.
		How many people they're going to kill and how many are already walking dead.
		But the left is only the foot soldiers of a scientific corporate elite that are taking over the whole planet and preparing to bankrupt the world currencies on its ashes bring in their global carbon tax.
		and their global reset.
		Can we wake Congress up?
		Can we wake the governors up?
		Because if we don't move against this, we're going to go through hellish pain.
		Already it's going to be stratospherically bad.
		A lawyer, who's prominent, who just pointed out and put a story out that's gone viral, that Mike Adams expanded on it, with the Pentagon's AI, main AI project, that was monitoring COVID-19 worldwide, but particularly in the U.S., That was launched last April and its findings.
unidentified		When this started out according to the curve and what they're saying, you know, you had a really high death and hospitalization rate when COVID first came out.
		And then typically that drops off with any disease.
		Now, you're seeing it really bumping back up.
		And it looks very much like what we were all afraid of, that we'd have a massive ADE type situation going on this fall, where we had a stronger, more dangerous variant, especially for the people who went out and got the shot.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		And the findings are very conclusive.
		That the individuals that have taken the mRNA injections that they call vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna, are having their immune systems erased within five to six months and then are developing ADE.
		An A.D.E.
		something you don't want.
		Because if you come in contact with any other type of cold virus, you have a violent cytokine storm and generally die.
		And when they see this happen, they're claiming it's COVID killing you and they're blaming the unvaccinated.
mike adams ▲ ● ▼		Well, first of all, Alex, this is OSINT, or Open Source Intelligence.
		This is DoD.
		This is their JAIC, their Artificial Intelligence program.
		So, no one can argue that this is not some secret source somewhere.
		This is Open Source Intelligence.
		What it shows, a couple of very important things.
		One is that the...
		Negative side effects from the vaccine get worse over time with each passing week.
		And so the negative outcomes, which includes hospitalizations and ICU outcomes, as well as deaths, it's very bad at three to four months, but it roughly doubles in about six months.
		Now, this looks like a flatline projection, so if we continue to project this out further in time to, let's say, nine months or twelve months, which is coming up in our immediate future, this is my estimation, this is not in the report, but by my estimation, we're going to see millions of Americans suffering severe hospitalizations and deaths over the next six months.
		If you plan to get vaccinated, According to these data put out by the DoD, the number one thing that you can do to survive the vaccine is to get COVID before you take the vaccine.
		That's in the data.
		But also notice the last slide of this, slide 17, it also shows the ethnic groups that are most affected by this.
		That's slide 17 and it shows that Native Americans have the highest rate of increased odds of negative outcomes.
		So if you're Native American and you're getting this vaccine, you have about a 1.5 times higher risk of death and negative side effects compared to Caucasians.
		If you're Hispanic, it's about a roughly 1.3 to 1.4 times greater odds.
		If you're Black, it's something more like 1.25, roughly in that range.
		But the point is, this vaccine has ethnic effects.
		That, you know, there have been many people out there warning about the possibility of this vaccine being a biological weapon.
		For example, you know, Louis Farrakhan warning about this.
		And I have to say, whether or not you agree with Louis Farrakhan on other things, this theory is plausible based on these data.
unidentified		They give you free shots of toxic waste.
		Free!
		You're on a death watch.
		If you don't understand it, you're not gonna be here to do all the wonderful things you talked about.
mike adams ▲ ● ▼		Remember the EcoHealth Alliance proposal to DARPA and the coverage of that by DRASTIC, that organization?
mike adams ▲ ● ▼		And they confirmed there were hundreds of variants of SARS-CoV-2 that had been created.
unidentified		You're watching the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
		Watch live right now at band.video.
		Welcome back, folks.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Third hour of American Journal has begun.
unidentified		We'll be joined by Robert Barnes momentarily here.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		But I wanted to Well, I wanted to continue on with this Washington Post conspiracy theory quiz.
		And boy, it just gets better and better.
		Where we last left off, the Washington Post was kind enough to remind us that powerful people absolutely never use deceitful or shadowy means to benefit themselves or harm the public.
		If you think they do, you're a wild-eyed conspiracy theory.
		We know that powerful people only ever tell the truth.
		You know, help people, of course, otherwise you're a conspiracy theorist, obviously.
		They say real-world events sometimes follow this formula as well.
		For example, the Reagan administration acted secretly and illegally in the Iran-Contra affair.
		See, it's a wild-eyed, baseless conspiracy theory until there's evidence, in which case it's a well-considered and absolutely understood fact of the matter.
		It's a very interesting metamorphosis it goes through.
		They say conspiracy theories are different.
		They're just theories.
		Most have no evidence to support them, except for all the evidence that there is to support them that is then, you know, completely memory hold and banned from the internet and you're not allowed to talk about it.
		So, conspiracy theories are just theories until they're proven, in which case they're not conspiracies anymore, somehow, apparently, which is strange.
		But there you go.
		They continue to say that yes, everybody basically believes in conspiracy theories because no, not everybody is dumb enough to buy what the Washington Post is selling.
		So, question number three is this.
		Conspiracy theorists commonly seize on subjects that people have little expertise in, such as health and science, and therefore cannot easily be debunked.
		Half of Americans believe one of the claims in the list below, but only one is backed by evidence.
		Which is true.
		The danger of genetically modified foods are being hidden from the public.
		Yes, yes, that's accurate.
		That's actually very true.
		But I know that's not what they want to answer.
		Again, the only thing we're proving here with this list is that we know these better than they do, because I'm going to get 100 on this test.
		I pretty much guarantee it.
		The U.S.
		government secretly dosed Americans with LSD in an attempt to develop mind-control technology.
		Well, that is a wild-eyed, baseless, just bizarre, frankly dangerous conspiracy theory, until it was proven by congressional hearings.
		With the church committee.
		Okay.
		The AIDS virus was created and spread around the world on purpose by a secret organization?
		No!
		No!
		It couldn't be!
		It can't be!
		AIDS?
		The disease that sprung up out of nowhere and only targeted homosexuals and black people?
		That's... That was totally natural and perfectly normal and totally not...
		A medical experiment just like coronavirus because that's the fourth option here.
		The coronavirus was purposefully created and released by powerful people as part of a conspiracy theory.
		That's interesting.
		Telegraph.co.uk has the DARPA proposal to do just that.
		So that's kind of interesting.
		It's kind of interesting, this baseless conspiracy theory actually has proof from the people that were engaged in it, but that's not the answer they want you to click, even though that is accurate.
		They want you to click this one, I guarantee it.
		Yep, there it is.
		Correct.
		The operation was called MKULTRA and it ended in the 1970s, except no, it didn't.
		It continues to this day under a different name.
		That's how the intelligence agency operates.
		So again, it's just like, you know, they want to tell us that they know how we think, that they know the psychology behind what we believe.
		We know everything that they know.
		I even know which ones that they deem as acceptable conspiracies because they're the ones that are just frankly too apparent, too obvious.
		There's too much evidence for them to continue to deny it.
unidentified		So then they act like they've been on top of it the whole time.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Some conspiracy theories are like astrology, entertaining nonsense that ultimately doesn't hurt anyone.
		But some are bizarre, sinister, and downright offensive.
		Which of these statements, if any, is correct?
		Here's where I dance along the line of getting in trouble.
		Okay, here we go.
		These are the options.
		Which one will I choose?
		First, they say school shootings such as Newtown, Connecticut, and Parkland, Florida are false flag attacks perpetrated by the government.
		No comment.
		The number of Jews killed by the Nazis during World War II has been exaggerated on purpose.
		What?
		Why?
		Why would they do that?
		Never.
		Not in a million years.
		Of course.
		Obviously not.
		You know, both of those, if you even entertain either one of those ideas, you'll suffer massive consequences, which is how you know it's true.
		Satanic sex traffickers control the government.
		What?
		No, never!
		Satanic sex traffickers controlling the government?
		What, like Jeffrey Epstein?
		Oh, oh crap.
		Oh yeah, yeah, that is true.
		But that's not the one they want you to answer.
		It's none of the above, I guarantee it.
		Yep, see, none of the above.
		I'm just gonna ace this quiz.
		I'm gonna get one, I'm gonna get six out of six of these right, because we know how they think.
		We know exactly how they think.
		So, you know, all of these, all of these, as they call them, bizarre, sinister or downright offensive topics, we're not allowed to discuss because of how false they are.
		So false.
		So unbelievably false.
		Six, five out of six rather.
		Let's try another one.
		Which of these statements below is true?
		The US government knew hundreds of black men in Alabama had syphilis, but told them they had bad blood and withheld treatment as part of a medical experiment.
		That's the correct answer.
		That's the one they want you to choose because of course it can be used to perpetrate the concept that America is racist.
		Of course, they also dropped radioactive material on St. Louis and all sorts of neighborhoods.
		They've dosed many, many people in the mind control experiments detailed in the question before about MKUltra.
		A lot of those people were white as well.
		I mean, it's not a race thing that the government chooses who to perform medical experiments on.
		But since this one was done to black people, we're allowed to know about it and we're allowed to talk about it.
		Because instead of being used to point out how the government is out of control and outrageous and abuses its citizens, it can be used to demonize white people.
		So of course it's allowed.
		I'm going to go ahead and click that one already because I already know.
		I don't even have to read the other ones.
		I already know that it's the truth.
		The other ones they suggest are President Donald Trump faked having COVID-19 in order to help his chances at reelection, which I've literally never heard before this quiz.
		And Donald Trump colluded with Russians to steal the presidency in 2016.
		That's right.
		The Washington Post hereby acknowledging and admitting the fact that Donald Trump did not collude with Russians to steal the presidency in 2016.
		Now, if you even consider that for a minute and actually think about what the implications of that being false are, and you actually have to think about why people believe that and who planted that information and why we spent tens of millions of dollars investigating this and what new powers were created by the special counsel in order to go and you actually have to think about why people believe that and who planted that information and why we spent tens You're in a big morass.
		Now, meanwhile, people on CNN, MSNBC are still calling Trump a Russian puppet.
		They're still perpetuating this as if it's true.
		But even the Washington Post knows that's not true.
		And, of course, they say, correct, the Tuskegee experiment.
		Yes, we all know about that.
		And, again, the Tuskegee experiment is another kind of amazing one where I knew about the Tuskegee experiment for a very long time, was very outraged by it, understood the implications of what it meant that the government would carry out this type of experiment, and I knew about it.
		It never even once occurred to me to think about the race of the people in the Tuskegee experiment.
		If you'd asked me two or three years ago about the Tuskegee experiment, I would have never have even known that it was black.
		It just doesn't matter.
	It doesn't matter.
	They're American citizens that were allowed to suffer with syphilis as part of a medical experiment.
	Oh, but they're black.
	So now Washington Post cares.
	Okay, all right, just so we're clear here.
	Amazing.
	The final question here.
	Conspiracy theories often help powerful people, sometimes by putting other powerful people in the crosshairs or by playing on prejudices.
	Which one of these statements is correct?
	A powerful family, the Rothschilds, through their wealth, controls governments, wars, and many countries' economies.
	There is a deep state embedded in the government that operates in secret and without oversight.
	Fossil fuel companies like Exxon knew about climate change for decades.
	Alright, it's that one.
	It's that one.
	It's the obvious one.
	It's the one that doesn't threaten any of their power.
	It's the one conspiracy that actually perpetuates their ideology already.
	It's like they think they know about us.
	We know about you better than you could possibly understand.
	The New York Times wrote an article saying, literally, the headline is, yes, there is a deep state.
	There is obviously a deep state.
	If you acknowledge the existence of the CIA and the NSA and the perpetual permanent spy state class that is not elected, not voted on, does not have to answer for what they do, they don't have to justify their actions to anybody, that's the deep state.
	It's as simple as that.
	Unless you're trying to tell me the CIA doesn't exist, unless you're trying to tell me that the CIA actually is, you know, there's oversight over it by the American people, then the Deep State exists, and it operates without control, without oversight, and without limitation.
	That's obviously true.
	And yes, the Rothschilds, since the time of Napoleon, have funded wars on both sides.
	They have conquered governments.
	Isn't this statement by Nathaniel Rothschild, like, who cares who makes the laws?
	I run the money?
	And that's him.
unidentified		All right, welcome back.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Ladies and gentlemen, it is American Journal.
		My guest, you know him well, Robert Barnes.
		For most Infowars audience, Robert Barnes needs no introduction.
		But for those unfamiliar with his work, he's a constitutional lawyer who won so-called unwinnable cases brought before the U.S.
		Supreme Court as well as other courts of appeal.
		The Constitution protects it all, and Robert Barnes protects it for you.
		In fact, very few, if any, practicing attorneys in America have ever won precedent-setting, high-profile, life-changing cases in First Amendment law, in civil cases, tax cases, and criminal cases.
		To such a degree, Robert Barnes has achieved all three.
		His website, barneslawllp.com.
		His Twitter, at Barnes underscore law.
		Welcome to the program, Sher.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Hey, glad to be here.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Very glad to have you here.
		Of course, there's still so much to talk about in just about every different topic.
		We were just discussing Joe Kent's chances in Washington, and you were saying some pretty good news or some good advice maybe for Joe Kent.
		Just how do you see Joe Kent's congressional campaign?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		The real key is going to be his ability.
		It depends on, he needs to finish in the top two.
		And ideally he, the other person would be a Democrat rather than the incumbent.
		If it's the incumbent, then the incumbent is going to have the benefit of having, because she's a Republican, but she was a pro impeachment Republican.
unidentified		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		So it's a district that really leans slightly Republican, because Republicans have won even in Democratic cycles and Democratic years.
		But it's a very close competitive district.
		If he gets into a runoff with a Democrat, he's going to win.
		If he gets in a runoff with her, it's going to be tight.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Interesting, interesting stuff.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		But he's the real deal.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Legit guy.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Oh yeah, absolutely.
		And yeah, the first time I had him on, that was sort of my question was like, it's almost like we're coming out of an abusive relationship where it's like the better someone is, the less I trust them, right?
		It's like, wow, that Joe Kent guy says all the right stuff.
		What's he up to?
		But, you know, it's been several months since then and it's been continual just good news from the Joe Kent campaign.
		So he's got my full endorsement, absolutely.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, absolutely.
		And I think, I mean, he's a great populist candidate, and it's good to see the kind of populist candidates we're seeing.
		We're seeing not only him, Blake Masters in Arizona, J.D.
		Vance in Ohio, Teddy Daniels, Anthony Sabatini, Eric Greitens in Missouri.
		I mean, the former governor of Missouri, who's running now for the Senate, running on a very populist ticket, very populist set of ideas.
		I mean, we will have the most populist senators Uh, in the Senate since the 1920s.
		Yeah.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		No, it's, it could, it could be a great sea change.
		Of course, the big topic with him was this, uh, was the fact that very recently he was kicked off of YouTube.
		No, no reason given no, uh, excuses made by, by YouTube.
		They just kick him off.
		I mean, this has to be one of the biggest stories.
		Do you think any Republicans that are in power right now are actually aware of this and are making proposals to combat it?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		I mean, not the people in power.
		It's people like JD Vance, Blake Masters, others who are making something, making a big deal out of this.
		So I think we will have people in power who understand the issues.
		But right now, you know, occasionally Holly will make some noise.
		Occasionally Ted Cruz will make some noise.
		They're getting better at this, but they're nowhere near where they need to be on this.
		Because, I mean, he's a candidate.
		That, to me, is big tech.
		Not only big tech censorship, it's basically illicit donations for his opponent.
		That's what it really is.
		Put it this way.
		If Trump owned YouTube and was selectively using it to promote certain candidates over others while pretending to be a neutral, nonpartisan platform, He would be under criminal investigation the very next day by the FEC and others for skirting the rules on illicit donations and contributions.
		Clearly, that's what Google is doing en masse.
		Now, credit to Governor DeSantis.
		He has said he's going to open up an investigation into Florida, into Facebook.
		He should expand that and extend that into YouTube and into Google and into Twitter, which ironically, for all of Twitter's problems, it's actually been the least egregious actor.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		It's almost surprising in that way.
		I saw it was a joke tweet, but I thought it was funny.
		It was like, you know, they shut down Facebook and then kept Twitter open to see the reaction, right?
		They needed to see how people felt about it, about when they flipped that internet kill switch.
		But, you know, it's kind of obvious.
		Okay, so the guys who would combat this and would actually propose bills to fight back against big tech Are having trouble getting elected because they're censored by big tech.
		Like, isn't that convenient for big tech to censor the very people that would hold you to account?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Well, and you got to ask, I mean, look, going back a couple of weeks ago to show how politically coordinated this is, is you start off with the attacks on everybody, including Joseph Mercola, including Robert Kennedy Jr.
		But look at the timing.
		They do this right on the eve of Bobby Kennedy's book coming out.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		That's going to be very critical of Anthony Fauci.
		It's going to be very critical of Bill Gates.
		It's going to be very critical of the FDA.
		Going to be very critical of Big Pharma.
		There was a great new legal TV series called Goliath that had season four out, Billy Bob Thornton and others, and it's all about Big Pharma.
		And in the beginning of their episode X-Ray, they do like one of those PBS-style introducing kids to some topic kind of thing, you know, Sesame Street kind of thing.
		And it's big.
		It's drugs.
		It's how wonderful drugs are.
		And it's all these little kids ask all these questions that expose this about what about addiction?
		What about bribery?
		What about this?
		It's fantastic.
		So here you have Bobby Kennedy's right about to print this book that would be a potential game changer in the court of public opinion.
		And in order to preempt it, they are so nervous about the facts that are in that book, they go on a massive censorship campaign.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		And I don't think that's a coincidence.
		Obviously, they're doing this in a vaccine context, and you have to wonder why.
		The only reason to censor information is when you fear the information is accurate, when you fear the information is persuadable.
		Right.
		If it's unpersuasive information, you don't censor that.
		In fact, you let that be representative of the so-called dissident opinions.
		But here, their fear that goes all the way back.
		You do have to wonder a little bit whether this was part of the plan all the way back to 2018, 2017 with Alex Jones and Infowars.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right, right.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		They're setting the groundwork then.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Absolutely.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Not only for censorship, but you look at the issues Alex has been talking about now for many years.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		And we're facing all of them in abundance, right?
		I mean, real quarantine camps.
		I mean, this was supposed to be an X-Files conspiracy theory, right?
		It'd be one of those Washington Post fake conspiracy theories.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right, right, right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Well, go ask Australians whether that's a fake conspiracy theory right now.
		Ask some Canadians who are looking at it.
		Or, pretty soon, ask some Americans.
		So you look at that, you look at the, not only the detention camps, but the control of the human body.
		This is what this is all about.
		Because they know The vaccine is utterly unnecessary for any employment setting.
		Let's assume that you even believe the vaccine is safe, and let's assume you believe it's even, at some levels, effective.
		Effective at, say, reducing long-term symptoms.
		Even in that consequence, what the vaccine does not do, by the admission of the CDC, is prevent either infection or transmission.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		That's number one.
		Number two, if somebody's symptomatic, if you're an employer, you have a very easy solution for someone who's symptomatic.
		You stay home.
		You self-quarantine.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		So this only deals with asymptomatic, unvaccinated people.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Asymptomatic, unvaccinated people are substantially, one, there's about a million to one chance they even spread COVID in a lethal way anyway.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		But putting that aside, it's the vaccinated people, many of whom are going to be symptomatic and not even recognized.
		I was talking to some people here who have had to deal with COVID in the last couple of months, and they're rather certain it was the vaccinated people who gave it to them.
		Indeed, if you're unvaccinated, your risk is from the vaccinated.
		They're going around preaching about how it's selfish to not get vaccinated.
		It's selfish to get vaccinated to some degree.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, right.
		If I'm unvaccinated and you're vaccinated and both of us are feeling well, it's much more likely that you have COVID and don't know it and are spreading it to me than me having it.
		Because if I get it, I would have symptoms where your symptoms are.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		That's why I think the vaccine mandates do not meet any legal standard.
		They don't even meet rational basis because they're saying we're really scared of asymptomatic risk from the unvaccinated.
		Even Fauci admits that's very rare to never existing.
		Worst case scenario, a million to one.
		And the vaccine they have as a solution isn't a solution.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		That's a weird thing.
		It's like the facts themselves, they allow to get out, but the conclusions that those facts lead to, you're not allowed to express.
		It's utterly bizarre.
		And we'll get more into the vaccine nonsense on the other side.
		Robert Barnes, Barnes underscore law on Twitter.
		We'll be right back.
unidentified		You're watching the American Journal with your host, Harrison Smith.
unidentified		Watch live right now at Band.Video.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
		What a world!
		What a world, Mr. Barnes.
		My guest is Robert Barnes.
		His website, BarnesLawLLP.com.
		His Twitter, Barnes underscore Law.
		And of course, one of the best follows on Twitter.
		You're always putting up a bunch of great stuff.
		We sort of moved on to the topic of the vaccine and there's just infinite numbers of ridiculous stories now.
		And I guess Pfizer now is trying to get emergency authorization for children.
		That's where they are.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		I find that morally horrific.
		So the Children's Health Defense, Bobby Kennedy and I are going to be bringing suit probably in Texas, challenging their attempts to emergency use authorize this for young children.
		Because even in the UK, the UK's advisory committee, the very pro-vaccine advisory committee, said this should not be authorized for kids under 12.
		Kids under 12 face almost no meaningful risk from COVID.
		You have to have multiple comorbidities and have other health problems in order to have any risk from COVID as a young child.
		In fact, it is statistically demonstrated by the CDC's own data that someone under the age of 12 is more vulnerable from the flu than they are from COVID.
		So that's part one.
		Part two, all the risks, the biggest risk, I should say, of the vaccine is the long-term risk.
		But who experiences that the most?
		The people who have the most years to live.
		So it's children, because we don't know what's going to happen 10 years from now, 20.
		Almost all drugs that have failed, and one out of three drugs, serious drugs, by the FDA that they've approved has failed by the FDA's own acknowledgement because the drug had to be withdrawn from the market.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		That's one out of three.
		They should be at 95% success rates.
		Not, you know, we hope we're right kind of rates.
		And those are drugs that were so demonstrably bad, they had to be withdrawn.
		We know there's other drugs out there right now that will be withdrawn, that in fact are causing far more harm than good.
		It's just a matter of when it gets fully uncovered and discovered.
		So you look at what's happening here, all the risk for the vaccine is the most disproportionate to children.
		The virus's benefits, or the virus's risks, are the least for children.
		There should never be anybody put on that list.
		Now the reason why this is happening is because under the emergency use authorization laws, the vaccines have complete immunity.
		Everybody connected to them.
		It doesn't matter anything, frankly.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Liability, totally protected.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		You have to get the U.S. Attorney's Office to say they were criminally willful.
		And the U.S. Attorney's Office has never said that about a drug company in history, which is amazing.
		But they've never said that in the vaccine context.
unidentified		Right, right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Now, if they get licensed, then it's unclear what their legal immunity is.
		There's some claims that they still have immunity.
		There's some claims that they don't.
		What is clear is they do not have emergency use authorization immunity.
		So that's why they did the whole bait and switch.
		They said, look, we have this vaccine available.
		Well, actually, it's not available.
		It's licensed, but it's not available.
		But it's medically interchangeable, but legally distinct.
		As in, you're screwed if it turns out it's bad.
		So now there's one other place where you have full blanket immunity without question, without controversy, if you get on the kids list.
		That's why their obsession has been, let's have this emergency use authorized until we get the FDA to put it on the kids list, we get Governor Newsom and other people to put it on the kids list, because once we're on the kids list, bam, we're back into full immunity.
		And that's why they're doing what they're doing.
		Drug companies clearly know something about this drug that terrifies them about liability.
		And they're willing to go through every shenanigan, and the FDA clearly does too, because clearly it was available.
		I mean, there was the old story of Huey Long used to tell about high papillom and low papihiram.
		And what the story was, he used to, he didn't talk about the Democratic and Republican parties, but he was talking about an old snake oil salesman, went through Louisiana, and he said that he had one product that cured half of your illnesses, and another product that cured the other half of your illnesses.
unidentified		Okay, right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		And one was called high papillom, and the other one was called low papihiram.
		And somebody asked, well, what's the difference?
		How do you make them?
		Oh, they're both made from the bark off the tree.
		They're like, well, then they're the same product.
		He goes, oh, no, no, no, no.
		One of them is made by skinning the bark off the tree from the bottom up and the other one by skinning the bark off the tree from the top down.
		And so Huey Long's famous story was, when I got to Washington, the only difference between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party is one of them wants to skin you from the ankle up and the other wants to skin you from the ear down.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		But this whole bait-and-switch has reminded me of that because they're pretending that high papalorum isn't low papalorum and low papalorum isn't high papalorum.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		They're saying, yes, they're medically interchangeable but legally different because the label magically changes things.
		What the label magically changes is their liability.
		Like, under the law, once they said any biologic license was available, or approved, and available for COVID, they had to revoke all the emergency use authorizations.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		They had to revoke the emergency use, not only for Pfizer, but for Moderna, for J&J, for everybody, and they didn't want that to happen.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, and that's also why they've gone out of their way to demonize any potential treatment or cure from ivermectin to hydroxychloroquine.
		If any of those are proven to be effective at all, the emergency use authorization goes away.
		That's a part of it.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Absolutely.
		So it's been a scam from day one.
		I mean, this was a very limited loophole purportedly written to justify extraordinary extreme circumstances.
		The idea is you have some biological weapon.
		It's written as a national security measure, like a biological weapon.
		In fact, that's how it was passed originally.
		It was like, what happens if terrorists release an anthrax bomb in Philadelphia?
		OK, well, we're going to need to rush drugs in there and rush treatment in there.
		And a lot of them may not be biologic licensed approvals.
		OK, so let's.
		And they designed the law to have all these safeguards so that these things wouldn't happen that we are currently witnessing.
		And it shows that you can't draft any emergency legislation that doesn't swallow the rule.
		The German Weimar Constitution was a great constitution.
		The problem with it was it had an emergency exception written into it.
		The Nazis used that in order to seize power.
		Our founders deliberately said no emergency exemption.
		There's no military exemption either.
		I mean, they're trying to force this on the soldiers.
		There's no military exemption in the Constitution.
		And our founders were intimately aware of what military discipline would be necessary for.
		They just said it's more threatening to have an exception to the Constitution for the military, even if that comes at the price of a lack of discipline, than to have such power be present in the military.
unidentified		Right.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		And of course, we've seen them expand this emergency sort of declaration to now they're like, well, guns are a health emergency and climate change.
		Turns out it's a health emergency, too.
		I mean, it's you know, you take this this this saying, you know, if you allow them to skirt the rules because of an emergency, everything becomes an emergency.
		And it's like the government reads that is like, hey, great idea.
		We will.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Well, you know what the next step is going to be?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		It's going to be mental health.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Of course.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		And the version of mental health is going to be disinformation.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		And in the guise of, you know, to keep people mentally healthy, we're going to need to censor information at an institutional level.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		And do so on an exigent emergency basis.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		They're going to avoid that as long as they can delegate it to the private sector.
		As long as they can get Google and YouTube and Facebook and Twitter and Reddit to do their business for them, they don't have to worry about it.
		I mean, they only have that.
		People forget they have the email programs, the bank processing programs.
		That, too, is also the next wave.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Oh, and Walmart and Amazon and all the other persons.
		One of my Twitter friends pointed it was just, you know, this kind of funny joke to saying, hey, you know, it's going to be dangerous.
		It's going to be illegal to vote for a Republican in 2022.
		But I really started thinking about it.
		And you think of the way that they're they're saying, well, the vaccine isn't mandated, but you will lose your job and you will be unable to travel and you will be denied service from these different things.
		I mean, we're essentially at a point now where they've already laid the groundwork where if you vote for Trump, you're a conspiracy theorist and you're a white supremacist and you're a danger.
		Therefore, voting for Republicans makes you these things.
		Therefore, if you vote for Republican, it's not illegal.
		We're a democracy.
		You can vote for Republican.
		You just can't drive afterwards.
		You just can't have a job after.
		I mean, this is the level of totalitarianism we are now entering.
		I mean, it's not on the horizon.
		We're not seeing this through the telescope.
		It's here.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Well, just in the last two years, they have taken away your right to work.
		They've taken away your right to operate your business.
		They've taken away your right to travel from outside of your own home.
		They've put you under mass house arrest.
		Taken away your right to schooling.
		And now they're taking away your right to control your own body.
		If you don't control your own body, you have no other freedoms.
		You have no other liberties.
		The legal definition of chattel slaves.
unidentified		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Because that's what defined chattel slavery was that you didn't have your own bodily autonomy.
unidentified		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		And that's what they're doing.
		And if they're able to achieve success with it, it is we're entering a very dark age.
		And that's why it's the most important, most significant legal and political fight, not only in our lifetimes, but maybe in the history of the country since the revolution itself.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		What a time to be alive, folks.
		I mean, it's it's truly amazing.
		I shudder to think where this goes, or this could be the fire we need to rise like a phoenix from the ashes and actually reset things on a proper balance.
		I want to get into some of the surveillance that's going on or being proposed coming up, including this Janet Yellen defending Biden's plan to surveil your bank account.
		I mean, they want your bank account.
		They want your health records.
		I mean, the eye of Sauron is on us right now.
		So we'll get into that with Robert Barnes.
		Robert Barnes at Barnes underscore law.
		Alright, wild, wild stuff going on in this crazy world, folks.
		Robert Barnes is with me.
		BarnesLawLLP.com is the website, the Twitter, at underscore, I'm sorry, at Barnes underscore Law, at Barnes underscore Law.
		Okay, so, surveillance, Surveillance seems to be the point of so much of what they're engaged in right now.
		Story on Infowars.com.
		Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen defends Biden administration's plan to surveil Americans' bank records.
		They want your bank records.
		They want your health records.
		They want a sample of your DNA just in case.
		I mean, they want absolutely everything.
		And they don't want it for any good reason, do they?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Not at all.
		I mean, the endgame has always been disclosed by Bill Gates for a decade now.
		And that endgame, you look at the technologies he's patented, you look at what he's invested in, you look at what he's been interested in, you look at what he's talked about, you look at the projects he's helped finance around the world, and the ultimate endgame is a little quantum tattoo or digital chip that has all of your information on it.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		That is trackable and traceable at any time from anywhere, any place in the world by the people given an authorization to do so.
		And so, and they're going to sell it as a privacy mechanism.
		They're going to sell it as a convenience mechanism.
		I mean, that's how they sold it in India.
		They said that, you know, oh, you know, if you have a little quantum tattoo or form of digital bio identification, it will help you get places that you need to get to, help you get money when you need to get money.
		Uh, even though he's admitted in other conversations with the great James Corbett documentary that captured him on tape saying these things.
		Well, we can use these things for other purposes, too.
		I mean, ask yourself, why is this guy developing a digital chip that can release a chemical into your body?
		The idea being it's some vaccine or something that has remote control accessibility, right?
		You don't need remote control for your own thing that works within 15 miles of you.
		I don't think so.
		So this is the end game.
		It's always been the end game.
		And because it's about control, it's always about control.
		It's about power.
		These are all control freaks at heart.
		That's who they really are.
		What happens when you have these misanthropic big tech geniuses who get to dominate the world is Bond villains go from the screen from the movie screen to your TV screen.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		They go from fiction to real life.
		And that's what you're seeing.
		I mean, Bill Gates is like right out of an old James Bond back when James Bond films were legit.
		Not right.
		No time to die.
		No spoiler, folks.
		They whack him at the end.
		The foot.
		Yeah, exactly.
		I mean, how do you do that to James Bond?
		It's just outrageous.
		But the old school Bond movies, that's who these guys are.
		And if you understand that about them, you can predict them and you can preview where they're going and how they're going to go about it and what angle they're going to take.
		And it's all about control, control, control, control.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yep, and that's a point I emphasize all the time because people think it's about money.
		They think it's about, no, money is the root to control.
		You know, surveillance, that's the root to control.
		It's all about control.
		It's all about power.
		And you can even understand it just watching old interviews with Bill Gates from like the 90s and stuff.
		You can just tell the way that he thinks.
		He sees all of humanity and all of its glorious, cacophonous, wild unpredictability as a problem.
		He doesn't like that.
		He wants everybody to do their part in their place.
		I mean, he would be much more comfortable looking at an anthill than he would looking at an American city, because the ants know where they're supposed to go, when they're supposed to go, and they never deviate.
		I mean, it's that simple mindset of, we want the world to operate like our computer systems operate, because our computer systems never disobey us.
		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Exactly.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Unless you're Bill Gates and you always have virus problems.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		That's another issue.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		You go back and look at his deposition during his antitrust cases.
		This was a guy who had sold technology to the Defense Department and he built a backdoor into it without them letting him know.
		So it's not only about control, but his control.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		And his agenda.
		And this was, I mean, his father's this way.
		I mean, you just watch Bill Gates talk about the people dying, they might die from the vaccine.
unidentified		Yeah.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Because he talked about this early on.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		He laughs at it.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		He couldn't, yeah, he couldn't quit smiling.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		It was like, I mean, Alex and I were talking about, it was very much like Peter Sellers' character from Dr. Strangelove.
unidentified		Right?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		It was like Bill Gates was like, ah, my fear, my fear.
		He couldn't help himself.
		That's exactly, and that's what we're dealing with.
		We're dealing with a once-in-a-lifetime, like as bad as George Soros might have been or the Koch brothers might have been, nothing comes close to Bill Gates.
		This guy has masterminded.
		He bought off all the public health authorities, decided about 15 years ago that was the way to go.
		He looked at the eugenicist movement, tried to replicate it.
		He and his father have admitted this because they've said they looked at the Rockefeller Foundation and that was their model for what they were going to do.
		He managed to create a foundation that makes money.
		He is two times richer than he was when he started giving away all his money.
		Why?
		Because it's power.
		For him, that money isn't about his Burton having another yacht.
		That money is power to get what he wants.
		That's how he sees money.
		It's not about self-enrichment for its own sake.
		It's about, if I have money here, I can have power here, I can have power here, I can have power here.
		Because that's what he did.
		I mean, he gives as much money to the World Health Organization by himself as the entire United States government.
		Right.
		He is bought off.
		I mean, Politico, 2017, wrote a piece of whistleblowers saying, this is scary.
		The Gates Foundation is buying off all the public health authorities.
		So, I mean, people should ask themselves, how did the whole world follow a Chinese model for handling a virus that is completely ahistorical?
		Like, when we were talking about the vaccine possibility over a year ago, it was, this vaccine isn't going to work for one reason clearly above all, there's never been a successful coronavirus vaccine.
		Why?
		Because the virus has mutants and variants.
		I'll actually get people who will engage me on this.
		They'll say, oh, you're complaining about the vaccine's efficacy, but that's because there's a new mutant variation out there.
		It's like that's the point from the beginning that's why what do you think there's never been in over a century of the research a single successful coronavirus vaccine because it varies it makes itself viral evolution it makes itself more transmissible and less deadly in order to survive.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		And what's scary is what the vaccine might be doing is making it more deadly than it otherwise would be.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		And these are like, I mean, I mean, when you're talking about, I always get his name wrong, Van Geerts or whatever it is.
		I mean, that guy is a Bill Gates guy.
		That guy's a longtime huge vaccine guy.
		And he came out from the beginning.
		He said, this is a horrible idea.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		You don't introduce a vaccine in the middle of the pandemic.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		It will increase the problem, particularly a pandemic of a virus that lives by mutating.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		That's it, because by introducing the vaccine, the very natural viral evolution is you'll make the most lethal, most dangerous, most transmissible variants will be the ones that evolutionally emerge in that context.
		And that was Brett Weinstein's point.
		He was like, this is the nature of viral evolution.
		How do people not at least acknowledge this risk?
		I'm not saying it will happen.
		He was saying, but there's a risk of it and nobody's even talking about it.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Even Fauci was talking about it very, very early on in the pandemic.
		I mean, March 2020, I think it was, or February 2020.
		He's saying, well, when it comes to vaccine, ADE is a really big concern and we need to be watching it.
		He doesn't say that anymore, does he?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		It's amazing.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		I mean, it's like it's been a real life Milgram experiment to see not only how compliant the world could be, but how they could slap him in the face and get him to still jump up and down.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Because I mean, the masks are the best example of that.
		I mean, you go through a whole month where mainstream media, every institutional government authority tells you, do not wear a mask.
		It will not work.
		It will not help.
		You're just stealing from doctors and nurses.
		And then two months later, you absolutely have to wear a mask.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right, right.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		It goes from masks are unnecessary to masks are mandatory with no transition in between.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		It was just seeing, can we get people?
		I mean, I do think at some point they'll do something like you have to go from now on walking anywhere outdoors.
		You need to walk on one foot and hop and just see how many people will obey.
		And you'll have a bunch of, you'll probably have 90% of people say, okay, I guess I got to hop.
		Yeah.
		They contradicted each other and we did nothing about it.
		And they've contradicted each other throughout the vaccine.
		If you go back and look at Bill Gates' own conference that magically predicted a coronavirus vaccine a month before it formally hit the United States.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		They're so smart, you know.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, exactly.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		You look at that dynamic, and also it was around that time that his wife suddenly decided to get out of Dodge.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that's right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Interesting timing.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		She put into motion then what would become public knowledge a few months later.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		And maybe it was the other side of Jeffrey Epstein's agenda.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Oh, wow.
		I've been told by Washington Post that Jeffrey Epstein is not real.
		He doesn't exist.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Well, there's certain eternal truths, as I always say.
		Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself.
		You could add John McAvee to that.
		The second one is Sally Yates is still corrupt, a longstanding corrupt prosecutor.
		And the third one is up to every, you know, that varies.
		It depends on what, that's each individual's eternal truth.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Well, how about, I don't trust Bill Gates.
		That's my eternal truth.
		I don't care whether it's selling me a computer system or a vaccine.
		You can stay the hell away from me.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Absolutely.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		This is a guy who deservedly got pied in the face multiple times.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Oh, yeah.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Because that's the kind of scam artist and schemer... I mean, this was a guy who put his dates through a computer test.
		You know what I mean?
		I mean, this guy is not... Nothing... Why we would let this guy anywhere near public health is just... You couldn't have even imagined it 20 years ago.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, here we are.
		I need to play some old interviews from Bill Gates from about 20 years ago.
		When they're asking him questions, they're like, your competitors are wondering what you're up to, what mischievous plans you have.
		And this was back in like 95, 97, when they were just concerned because he had such an overwhelming monopoly on business software.
		And they were suspicious of him back then.
		And he's going, No, I'm just trying to do my best here.
		It's just competition.
		And it's like, where did that skepticism go?
		I mean, that was, you know, meet the press or whatever.
		They'd be on grilling Bill Gates.
		What are you really up to?
		That's gone.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Exactly.
		I mean, they totally exposed him.
		It was David Bowie who did it on behalf of the U.S.
		Justice Department in the antitrust cases that exposed him lying repeatedly in his deposition.
		And, I mean, it's credit to Gates that he remade himself.
		He looked at, and once again, he looked at the Rockefeller model.
		And he looked at how Rockefeller remade himself, from the greed baron, the robber baron of robber barons, I mean, the mass eugenicist, to the guy that was the sweet old man who had dimes for children.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		Right.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		You know, I mean, it was the same mindset, same mentality.
harrison smith ▲ ● ▼		It's all the sweater.
		It's the pink sweater, I swear.
		Yeah, exactly.
		Literally, there was an interview with, like, the heads of BlackRock and Goldman Sachs, and they're both wearing pink sweaters.
		I mean, it's a psychological imperative to them.
		It's like, look unthreatening so they don't suspect you.
		Wow, brilliant stuff.
		How Time Flies with Robert Barnes, his Twitter at Barnes underscore Law, the website BarnesLawLLP.com.
		Thanks so much for being with us, sir.
unidentified		Great.
		They said two weeks to flatten the curve.
		And trust the science.
		They shut down the entire world.
		all for what amounts to the common cold.
		And those who questioned them were turned into criminals.
		It's time to wake up.
greg reese ▲ ● ▼		Pre-order your DVD today and help stop Lockdown 2 at covidland.com.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		For the first time in nine years, InfoWars has produced a new major film, COVIDLAND, part one of a five-part series that details the globalist Great Reset If millions of Americans and others see this, it will stop them.
		So get your copy today at infowarestore.com or covidland.com and make copies of it.
		That's right.
		Like all our other films, you are encouraged, you are authorized, we are asking you to get it and make copies and share it with others.
		And now with all the censorship, that's more important than ever because this will obviously be censored off the internet.
		Secure your DVD at InfoWareStore.com for $19.95 and get a free copy of Endgame Blueprint for Global Enslavement that tells how the globalists set all this up.
		These two films are incredibly important.
		They're both available at Infowarsstore.com.
		There's also bulk deals on the film, so get it and show it at your local school or donate to your church.
		Whatever you do, fight back and don't roll over to Fauci.
		I've been fighting as hard as I can for almost 28 years against the globalists.
		I wanted to stop their agenda.
		I wanted to wake up the world and stop them dead in their tracks before they went operational.
		But we failed.
		Yes, a lot of people are awake.
		Yes, we're not getting caught flat-footed.
		But they are going ahead with their full operational deindustrialization Great Reset.
		And that's why it's more important than ever that all viewers and all listeners tell everybody they know about the show because people are ready to wake up and ready to hear the truth.
		So we've got to information warfare the enemy and try to stop their agenda, but we've also got to get personally prepared.
		And one of the number one things to do is high quality, storable food.
		We've got the best food ready to ship at very affordable prices at infowarestore.com.
		So whether it's a month or a six month or a year supply or specialty diets, it's ready to ship right now.
		Lock your orders in before food prices go up and before there are long lines and waits.
		Because believe me, serious times are coming.

▲