All Episodes
Oct. 12, 2024 - System Update - Glenn Greenwald
58:11
Interview: New Documentary Exposes Israeli War Crimes with Director Richard Sanders

Watch the Documentary by Al Jazeera: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPE6vbKix6A or at https://www.youtube.com/@aljazeeraenglish Watch full episodes on Rumble, streamed LIVE 7pm ET. Become part of our Locals community - - -  Follow Glenn: Twitter Instagram Follow System Update:  Twitter Instagram TikTok Facebook LinkedIn Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good evening.
It's Friday, October 11th.
Welcome to a new episode of System Update, our live nightly show that airs every Monday through Friday at 7 p.m.
Eastern, exclusively here on Rumble, the free speech alternative to YouTube.
Tonight, the total Israeli destruction of civilian life in Gaza is now more than a year old.
Even those who have been closely following the devastation and indiscriminate killings of tens of thousands of civilians by Israel We're good to go.
has just been released and is available to watch that fully provides a complete and sometimes difficult to endure historical record of what has really been done to the people of Gaza, all with the direct and vital, the indispensable support of the West in general and the US in particular.
Entitled, Investigating War Crimes in Gaza, the one-hour, 20-minute film heavily relies not simply on the words of the Palestinians or even on the videos that they recorded, but very much so on the words of IDF soldiers in Gaza, including many of the repulsive and degenerate videos so many of them routinely posted of what they were doing to civilian infrastructure in Gaza and why they were destroying it.
What has been done by Israel and the U.S. and Gaza and to Gazans for a full year should never be forgotten or even minimized.
And watching this documentary will ensure that never happens.
The documentary can be seen in full on both the Al Jazeera English site as well as on their YouTube channel, both of which we will link to in the notes below this video.
We asked the director, Richard Sanders, to come on to talk about how and why he made this film, what evidence it relies upon, and also to discuss some of the revelations that will be new to many people, and it was to me, even to those carefully following this attack on Gaza day by day, such as, for example, the incomprehensible horrors endured by Gazans every time the Israelis ordered them to, quote, evacuate one area of Gaza and move to another.
What makes Sanders such an interesting figure to have directed this film is that he has spent much of his career not working on the fringes but working in the heart of mainstream British media.
And our interview with him contains some truly interesting insights about what both this documentary reveals and how it was made.
As soon as our interview with him ends, we will show you the first 15 minutes of the documentary with the permission of Al Jazeera.
Not in the hopes that this will satiate your interest in the film, but the opposite.
We do it with the hope that it will motivate you to watch the whole thing, which I promise you is very well worth your time.
Before we get to that, a few programming notes.
First of all, we're encouraging our viewers to download the Rumble app.
If you do so, it works both on your smart TV and telephone.
Once you do that, you can follow the programs you most like to watch here on the platform.
And then if you activate notifications, which we hope you will, it means the minute any of those programs begin broadcasting live on the platform after scheduled time or some other time, you'll be immediately notified by email or text of the link.
You can just click on the link and begin watching those shows as soon as they broadcast live.
It really helps the live viewing numbers of each of these programs and therefore the free speech cause of Rumble itself.
As another reminder, System Update is also available in podcast form.
You can listen to every episode 12 hours after the first broadcast live here on Rumble on Spotify, Apple, and all the major podcasting platforms.
If you rate, review, and follow our show there, it really helps spread the visibility of our program.
Finally, every Tuesday and Thursday nights, once we're done with our live show here on Rumble, we move to Locals, which is part of the Rumble community, where we have our live interactive aftershow.
That aftershow is available only for members of our Locals community.
So if you'd like to join, which gives you access not just to those aftershows, but also to multiple interactive features we have there.
It's the place we publish original written transcripts of every program that we broadcast here.
There's a lot of original exclusive content, interviews, and videos and the like that we put solely on the Locals platform.
But most of all, it really is the community on which we rely as independent journalists to do the independent journalism that we're doing here every night.
Simply click the join button right below the video player on the Rumble page and it will take you directly to that community.
For now, welcome to a new episode of System Update, starting right now with my interview with Richard Sanders about his great new documentary.
Richard, thank you so much for taking the time to talk to us.
Congratulations on this very important documentary, and we are excited to talk about what went into it and everything else.
So we're delighted to have you.
Thank you very much. Thank you for having me.
Sure. As a journalist, there's been a lot of things I've covered that have been really excruciating and awful to write about, but then also to witness.
And I know in the past, once I feel like I have an understanding of the extent of the horrors and suffering entailed by whatever I'm writing about, I almost find myself wanting not to look anymore, just because it almost seems like gratuitous suffering.
And there have obviously been a lot of people watching and talking about and reporting on the atrocities that have been taking place in Gaza over the last year.
This film, I think, does a remarkable job of synthesizing it, of putting it into a whole narrative, but a lot of it is extremely difficult to watch.
So what is it that you feel that this documentary adds that people who've been following all along maybe haven't quite gotten yet?
Well, if you've been following it all along on Western media, I think it adds an awful lot.
I mean, for people who've been following it on the sort of sites and news outlets that you and I perhaps follow, then, as you say, I think it synthesizes it and brings it all together.
I think it was inspired by two things.
One is the desire simply not to leave the space to Western media outlets to cover this because they do it so appallingly.
But also this realization that there was this extraordinary resource out there.
You have this extraordinary phenomenon of Israeli soldiers posting videos of themselves continuously, which were completely candid.
They seemed to have no sense of shame and a complete sense of impunity.
And it struck us this was a quite extraordinary and unique source for being able to tell the story of a conflict.
Yeah, and I want to get into that a lot because obviously I know when defenders of Israel hear that Al Jazeera has any role in anything, they immediately dismiss it as unreliable or anti-Semitic.
You know all the accusations that get hurled.
But in this particular case, so much of what you're reporting Relies not upon even necessarily Gazans or critics of Israel, but about what IDF soldiers themselves have said and shown about their own conduct in the war.
And I want to get to that in just a second.
But before I get to that, there was a woman in Gaza who is a journalist with Al Jazeera, and she described the last year as being, quote, the first ever live-streamed genocide.
And I think clearly...
Beyond what the IDF has shown, one of the differences in this war, as compared to almost any other, is the Israelis tried to keep journalists out.
The ones that were there, they tried to kill, but they couldn't prevent real-time videos taken by the people there.
How much of that did you rely on and how were you able to confirm that what you were seeing was, in fact, what was reported to be shown?
Yes, so we rely quite heavily on Al Jazeera footage.
I mean, Al Jazeera has been in there all this time and filming, so we rely very heavily on their footage.
You're right, we do rely on stuff shot by Palestinians in Gaza.
I mean, unlike... The BBC and ITV, I think, here in Britain, we don't start from the presumption that they're trying to get one over on us.
You just have to look at that footage.
They've set up the most extraordinary movie set, if it is false.
Now, there are one or two videos you censor a little bit contrived.
And, you know, we have Palestinians working on the team who are very tuned into these things.
And, you know, we filtered out a few.
But on the whole with those, I mean, you know, if you're looking at a ruined landscape and shredded bodies, you know, I don't know what else you're looking at but the truth.
Before we get into the substance, let's talk a little bit about the film, how it was produced, who was behind it, who financed it, because whenever there's a film that in any way reflects negatively on Israel, not just a film but a report or any kind of document of any kind, there's immediately an attempt to discredit it as some kind of propaganda against Israel.
Can you talk a little bit about Who worked on this project?
Who financed it?
Where it came from?
And who kind of oversaw it?
Okay, so, I mean, I made it.
I'm a freelance journalist.
I've made about 60 films for British television, primarily for Channel 4, but also the BBC. I've made a lot of dispatches for Channel 4.
People who worked on it, it's the superb team at the investigative unit at Al Jazeera, so Al Jazeera funded it.
It's an Al Jazeera production, specifically the investigative unit, and some excellent freelancers we brought in as well.
One of the things that called my attention to your work in particular and to your involvement in this is that a lot of times people who are willing to be so harshly critical of the Israeli military or Israeli policy are people who are in some sense already kind of marginalized.
They're people who are already on the fringes.
They don't have a lot to fear.
One of the things that's so notable about your work, your body of work over many years is that as you just got done saying, you've done a lot of your work for some of the most mainstream and well-regarded media institutions in the UK.
For those who don't know, Channel 4 News is among those.
Obviously, the BBC, the Daily Telegraph, many of these institutions that are among the most mainstream and established in the UK are ones with which you've had a relationship.
Did you think about, and I'm sure you did.
but... What were your thoughts about what possible implications there might be for your career or for your standing inside the British media world by having overseen a documentary of this kind?
It's true. If you step out of the, frankly, very peculiar consensus there is about Israel in the West, you do come to be regarded as a marginal figure.
And it's quite tricky when you're trying to pick people to interview, because you track people down and you talk to them and think they're very interesting.
Then you suddenly discover they're regarded as very marginal.
Andreas Krieg, who we interview in our film, a fascinating man, a security expert.
He was on the BBC last week saying the same sort of things he said to us, just sort of rational analysis, and it provoked an absolute firestorm.
He was heaped with abuse and so on.
In terms of myself, well, Al Jazeera is continuing to employ me for the moment, so we'll see how it goes.
One of the things that I'm always interested in is sort of the idiosyncrasies of Brazilian political, rather British political culture, because it goes back so many years, it has a lot to do with centuries-old animosities between various countries, a residue of the British Empire in a way that I think a lot of people outside the UK, certainly in the US, don't quite fully understand.
And there has been, over the last several years, things involving Jeremy Corbyn and other incidents like that, very clear expressions of just how strong the pro-Israel consensus in the UK is, not just in the Labour Party but in the Tory party and just in the general media establishment as well.
Why is that? Why is the UK so devoted to and intense about defending Israel or justifying what it does?
I mean, it's interesting you put that point.
I don't think it's worse than America.
It's certainly not worse than Germany.
I think it's a broader question, and I think it's a fascinating question.
Why is the Western media political establishment so enthralled to this very small and very questionable country?
And I think one of the fascinating things here And here I can speak for Britain specifically.
There's a problem in Britain generally at the moment that the media political class, which is very much a club in Britain at the moment, is very out of touch with the general public.
You just have to analyse the figures in elections and so on.
There's a real problem.
But it's massively out of touch on this issue.
So you watch British media, you listen to British politicians, and yes, Yes, you would think Britain is a sort of slavishly pro-Israel country.
You look at the opinion polls, and that's not the case at all.
And what support there is for Israel is deteriorating sharply.
Yeah, I mean, just one more question on this before I have a lot of questions about the substance of the film.
Most of them are about that, actually.
But before we delve into that, I just want to ask you on that last question.
Obviously, there have been books written about what's called the Israel Lobby, including by very respected scholars like John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, who were the first to, I think, really kind of have the courage to document it, one at Harvard, one at the University of Chicago.
But there's been a lot of revelations about the ability of pro-Israel activists to kind of What role do you think that plays in that question you raised,
namely why is it that the West is so enthralled with and so devoted to this kind of tiny little country on the other On the other side of the world.
Well, the first of the three films I've made for Al Jazeera was the second episode in The Labour Files, where we picked apart this whole extraordinary anti-Semitism crisis around Jeremy Corbyn, who was a radical left leader of the Labour Party.
And there I very much came to the conclusion, yes, the Israel lobby is very powerful.
The thing was there, it tapped into the vested interests of a whole range of groups.
I mean, there were an enormous range of groups, most particularly the security establishment, that really, really didn't want Jeremy Corbyn to be a prime minister.
And the Israel lobby is powerful, but it ain't that powerful.
And these groups all came together, essentially.
And it was the perfect weapon to beat him with, because it left him, you know, he was a man who'd spent his life combating racism.
And it rather left Jeremy Corbyn disarmed.
He appeared to be totally powerless to fight back against it.
And it proved an immensely effective weapon.
Not that I... I think an awful lot of people were very puzzled by it.
They didn't really get why Jeremy Corbyn was supposed to be an anti-Semite.
What they did get, though, was that the Labour Party had this problem.
It was being criticised day after day.
And it wasn't pushing back. It was doing this mea culpa and sort of squirming around.
And what people got was there was a problem and the Labour Party couldn't solve it.
And it was a very effective weapon to destroy Jeremy Corbyn.
So it's... Yes, you have the Israel lobby, people who are intent on pushing the interests of Israel and delegitimizing the Palestinian cause.
Very often, because the people they are targeting are the radical left, or increasingly just the broader left, then there are other people who have a very vested interest on jumping on that bandwagon.
Yeah, I think the way Jeremy Corbyn responded, instead of kind of being very aggressive and rejecting the idea or even showing a great offense that he is anti-Semitic or would tolerate anti-Semitism, instead constantly feeding into it, like, yes, there's a problem, but I'm fixing it, I'm working on it, Unintentionally, but very much in line with Corbin's character, I think, is a big part of what enabled that to succeed.
But that's for another day. All right, let's get to this documentary, some of the more specific aspects of it.
Although I began by saying I think people paying attention to this Intently and not just through the Western press might have known a lot about it Even though this documentary watching it all at once kind of gives you a newfound sense of just how extreme These sufferings and atrocities have been one of the things that I felt like was new Was a lot of the information about what these quote-unquote evacuation orders entail. We were constantly hearing
Almost as though it was like a humanitarian thing that the IDF would order civilian populations to evacuate the area They were about to attack And in the West that got depicted as, oh look, the IDF does something that no other military does, which is it warns the civilians about where the bombing is coming and it tells them to leave.
And yet a lot of these quote unquote evacuations were not just extremely arduous, but themselves very violent, very deadly, very brutal.
Can you talk a little bit about what it is that this film was able to reveal about just that part of it?
Well, it's very, very vivid, isn't it?
Because it's a specific evacuation.
There have been so many evacuations, but there's a specific one where we focus on.
Now, right at the beginning of the war, the Israelis ordered everyone to leave northern Gaza.
A lot of people didn't.
They couldn't or they didn't want to or whatever.
Now, when you then get the Israeli ground invasion at the end of October, the situation becomes untenable for a lot of people, including people we interview in our film.
That includes Yuman al-Sayed, the Gaza correspondent of Al Jazeera English, also a young journalist, Mohammed al-Hellou.
And they both flee at that time.
It's an extraordinarily vivid portrait, isn't it?
And there's the pictures to accompany it, which are obviously always so important with television, of these great columns of people being forced...
You know, the resonances of this are so awful.
These great columns of people being forced to walk along with their hands in the air, holding white flags, holding their identity cards in the air.
You know, Mohammed says, if you drop something, you weren't allowed to bend down to pick it up.
You couldn't look to the left or the right.
You had to keep walking straight forward.
And the children had to walk with their hands in the air.
And there's pictures of that. And yes, that, you know...
It made quite a profound impression on me.
Yes, and as Mohammed says in the film, Mohammed Al-Halu, these weren't safe corridors.
As you walked along them, you could see the bodies on the ground.
They weren't safe. Yeah, I mean, I think just on that issue alone about what these evacuations entailed, this film does provide a lot of new information even for people who were paying close attention because on some level, I think the evacuation seemed like almost benign compared to what everything else that was happening.
And then when you see the reality of what those entailed, they turned out to be anything but benign.
Another thing that was new to me...
And yet resonated a great deal, because I have worked on this issue for a long time, was that the Israelis used artificial intelligence in order to assign different values to different people based on a whole variety of We're good to go.
One of the things that alarmed me the most that we were able to report on was that the U.S. military was using a much cruder version at the time of kind of assigning numerical values to people based on who they were speaking with.
And a lot of journalists, including Al Jazeera journalists, ended up at the top of the list not because they were terrorists but because they tend to talk to people the U.S. considered militants because they're journalists.
And the ability to just kill people based on numerical assignments with no real human judgment Is beyond dystopic.
It's the sort of thing you might expect in a scientific film set, you know, 250 years from now, and yet it's something the Israelis are using to a great extent.
Can you talk about what it is that you were able to learn about how the Israelis identify who they think should be assassinated?
As you say, Glenn, we credit 972 magazine, very good radical Israeli magazine, English language magazine.
They've done the research. They had all the sources.
The Israelis have denied this, but I have to say they haven't denied it terribly convincingly.
I think you've described it there as absolutely terrifying.
They scrape all the intelligence they can about you, a lot of it coming from your phone.
And, you know, including which other phones you've been near and so on.
And if you pass a certain number, then you're going to be killed.
And the horrifying thing is there's then this second bit of AI, which is called Where's Daddy?
Which is basically where are you?
Because they're going to kill you when and how and where.
And it's much easier to kill people at home.
So where's daddy?
When daddy's home, that's when you kill him.
And of course, you kill everyone else in the house as well.
I've got to say, during those first perhaps two or three months, it seems to me that this AI system is simply providing the thinnest of veneers for what is essentially a punitive slaughter.
I think it's as near as, damn it, random, the bombing the Israelis are doing for the first two or three months.
I want to get a little bit into that.
And by the way, just to emphasize this, where's daddy name itself is so creepy.
And we have seen so many instances of not just where Journalists or suspected militants were killed, but their entire families were wiped out precisely because their homes were targeted.
I mean, we've seen so many of those.
And actually, one of the examples was an Al Jazeera journalist who had been working almost every day on reporting what was going on, only then discovered, I believe while he was about to go on air or shortly after he came off the air, that his home had been targeted while he was working and most of his entire family had been Either killed or severely wounded.
Can you talk a little bit about that case?
Yes, well, this is Wael Dardou.
He was the bureau chief for Al Jazeera in the Gaza Strip.
And the horrific thing there is his family had done what they were told.
They had evacuated. They'd left the northern zone.
They'd crossed the Wali Gaza.
They were in Nusrat refugee camp, which was in the supposed safe zone.
And the building they were in was directly targeted.
He lost four close family members.
A son of his, who was a cameraman, was later killed as well.
One of the most disturbing things that is included in the documentary and that we've heard as well is how often people who were speaking out on social media or reporting for established news outlets like Al Jazeera were receiving direct threats over their telephones and over their texts.
From identified Israeli intelligence or military officials basically saying, we know who you are, we know where you live, and if you continue to do this, we will end up killing you or you better evacuate your family.
What is it that you were able to find out about those sorts of things in the documentary?
Well, Yumla El-Sayed, the Al Jazeera English correspondent, actually tells the story of her husband gets a direct call on his mobile phone from a private phone number.
And they clearly know who he is, and they're telling him to get out and leave at a time when he can't possibly get out and leave.
There's bombardments all around...
But Yumna speaks very powerfully about this, as does Maha Husseini from Euromed, Human Rights Monitor, another remarkable interviewee we talked to who is still in the Gaza Strip.
And it means you're carrying this terrible burden You're terrified for yourself, but you're terrified for your family.
Indeed, you're terrified for everyone around you.
And everyone around you is aware that you are a threat because you're likely to be a target.
It's a very simple thing. You know, when journalists had finally to leave Gaza City and were moving into Khan Yunus and Deribala and so on, they often had to pay a premium for property because landlords really didn't want to rent property to journalists.
I mean, you began by describing this kind of indiscriminate attempt on the part of the Israelis just to avenge what they believe happened on October 7th, what did happen on October 7th, to avenge it through what the documentary calls purposely disproportionate force as a way of re-establishing fear of the Israelis or a deterrent.
So there was just this kind of deliberately indiscriminate destruction on the one hand.
And then on the other, we know of a lot of cases of prominent Palestinians, prominent Gazans, who were active on social media, who were journalists, who ended up being killed as well.
Did you walk away convinced that the Israelis were, in fact, targeting prominent Gazans?
Prominent critics of the Israeli war effort in Gaza as opposed to just having these people die as part of this indiscriminate violence?
There's no question people are being targeted.
I mean, you just have to look at the circumstances of the deaths of some of our Al Jazeera personnel.
It's absolutely clear they're being targeted.
They're sort of hunted down.
One of the bizarre features of this war and you cover it in your documentary and it's actually so bizarre that even Donald Trump in the course of making clear how supportive he was of Israel actually criticized this as well and said Israel needs to put a stop to this is just how many Degenerate,
sadistic, gratuitously cruel, creepy videos have been posted, not by a few Israeli soldiers here and there, almost systematically, you know, to the point where they were getting celebrated in the Israeli culture for it.
And one of the components of this that the film delves into a little bit, and I'm just interested in your understanding of why you think this happened, Is how much of an obsession there was with kind of a psychosexual humiliation of, in particular, a lot of these videos involve rifling through the lingerie drawers of women whose houses they were ransacking and destroying, showing this lingerie, often wearing it.
And there's a lot of Scenes posted by the Israelis themselves of deliberate psychosexual humiliation of the kind, for example, that we saw in Abu Ghraib, which the US government kind of wrote off as an apparition and punished the people involved, even though I think that turned out to be untrue.
Do you think that, in general, when young people, young men and women are trained to go and invade another country and kill them and are trained to dehumanize them, this is a natural outcome of that kind of training?
Or do you think there was something particular about the Israeli military that led them to do these specific sorts of things in what seemed like a quite common and disproportionate way?
Well, you know, let's not be naive.
Soldiers behave badly. And I think what's extraordinary about this is that there's been no attempt to control the production and publication of these videos.
That's what's astonishing. So the soldiers behave as if they have a complete impunity, but the high command behaves as if it has complete impunity.
That is what is really extraordinary, that they keep being posted online without the commanding officers being at all worried.
Does that simply reveal them behaving like normal soldiers?
I suspect they are worse than normal soldiers.
This is a society which is built on the subjugation and dispossession The dehumanization of Palestinians is the psychological prerequisite of that.
And that goes back long, long before October the 7th.
I think then October the 7th served to legitimize a lot of the nastiest, darkest emotions within Israeli society.
But also, as I say, I think What often stops young men, in particular, behaving very badly in combat situations is good command.
I mean, that's part of the point of officers, and particularly ground-level officers.
I mean, it's one of the problems Hamas had on October 7th, was they had this sort of catastrophic success.
And once they had that success, they didn't have good ground-level commanders.
That's why, you know, many very serious human rights abuses are committed on October 7th.
What seems to be extraordinary, as I say, with the Israeli soldiers is that their officers are not exerting any control and indeed can very often be seen joining in in these videos.
One of the things that has, I guess, confounded me in the last year or so is that Israeli abuses and war crimes and indiscriminate violence is absolutely nothing new.
But for a long time, the Israelis cared a lot about presenting a positive face, especially to the West, that Western support, not just of governments, but of populations was very important to them. The IDF was constantly called the world's most moral army. They were very boastful of their extreme military discipline and ensuring that immoral acts of this kind don't actually
happen. It seems to me, and I'm wondering what you think, that in some sense the Israelis have almost stopped caring. I mean, like I said, even Donald Trump, who has been running his campaign based on almost a kind of let's make Israel great again platform, said the one thing that the Israelis have to stop doing is allowing these soldiers to post these horrific videos online because it makes them look terrible.
And they haven't been punished.
There's been no attempt to stop it.
It's as if the Israelis don't really care anymore.
The Israelis seem to be instead saying we're going to do whatever we want.
And we don't think there's anyone in the world, particularly in the West, who can stop us.
And maybe they're right about that. Have you perceived a change in their mindset, the leadership's mindset, about the extent to which they care or don't care about how they're perceived in the West?
Extraordinary. When Donald Trump thinks you're behaving like a crass idiot, then that really is quite extraordinary.
I mean, don't overstate the degree to which, before October the 7th, Israel was a responsible, moral army that cared about how it was seen in the West.
I mean, just take a single incident, the murder of Arjun, Shereen Abu Akleh, in the West Bank.
I mean, they've been granted extraordinary indulgence and leeway for decades, but I think it has increased to a whole other level after October the 7th.
And I think they're doing it because they can.
Israeli foreign policy, to a degree, is very, very simple.
Israeli foreign policy consists of one thing.
What can we get away with?
And what they've learned over the last year is that it's astonishing what they can get away with.
And they're now doing it to Lebanon.
The question of what the Israeli motive has been in terms of What they're doing in Gaza since October 7th has been one that has been well debated, I think, among a lot of Israeli critics.
And typically, trying to debate motive is very difficult.
It's like, why did the U.S. invade Iraq?
Why did the U.K. go along?
Probably there's different interests inside the government.
You can't really reduce it to just one motive or another.
Different actors have different motives.
But I want to focus on one just so that we can set it aside, which was the main one offered, namely that we're doing what we're doing because we want to save the hostages or get our hostages back.
And the fact that that could be said with a straight face and was repeated so often in Western media was always so astonishing to me because as several people in the film said, If you wanted to save your hostages, the last thing you would be doing is indiscriminately bombing the place that you know they're being kept or starving on purpose the place that you know they're being kept.
And a lot of Israeli hostages who were released from captivity said that by far their biggest fear was not Hamas but was dying in an Israeli airstrike.
Why do you think something so facially ridiculous That, oh, we're doing this in order to get our hostages back while we're bombing the entire place we know that they are, was taken so seriously by Western media.
Well, I mean, this is something we don't do in our film.
The Israelis often make denials or give explanations for things which are just absolutely very, very obviously flatly contradicted by the fact It's on the ground.
And this is one of the exasperating things about watching, for example, the BBC, where you will have an overwhelming mass of evidence about something.
You'll have a very puny, rather absurd denial by the Israelis.
And the two things are given equal weight.
So, yes, I mean, why...
And this ties into a broader cognitive dissonance the West has about Israel, that it treats it as if it is a serious Western democracy.
Which it isn't.
Particularly the government that currently runs Israel is an extreme right wing.
Certainly many members of the government are extremely right wing and overtly racist.
So why the BBC solemnly repeats Without scrutinising more of the things these people say, I don't know.
In terms of what the game plan is, yes, it was obvious from the very beginning and quickly became obvious to the families of the hostages that Netanyahu did not give a damn about their safety.
So what is the game plan?
Now again, I mean, you know, I'm...
Long enough in the tooth that I picked apart in minute detail the Iraq wars and the Afghan wars.
You know, sometimes people just do really dumb things.
You know, they just do sometimes.
Now, is there a strategy?
Is there a plan? I think what we can see absolutely clearly, and again, you wouldn't really grasp this from watching Western media, is they plan to depopulate the area to the top half.
of the Strip, the area to the north of the Wadi Gaza.
I was at an event last night where Yona El-Sayed, the Gaza correspondent for Al Jazeera, she was saying that she thinks the Egyptians are going to be bullied slash bribed into effectively opening the border and shepherding an awful lot of these people into new settlements in the Sinai Desert.
That was Yona's view.
I'm not enough of an expert on these things, but it's incredibly bleak to try and look forward and to see what is the Gaza Strip at the end of all this?
What does it consist of?
What do the lives of the people who currently live there consist of?
Around 180,000 have already left.
They have to pay a very big bribe to the Egyptians to get out.
But a lot of people have already left.
I remember very vividly, and again, I realize motives are difficult to talk about, but I also think they're extremely important to understand why a country or government is doing what it's doing.
When there was all that propaganda from the actual Israeli government about saving the hostages and all that or destroying Hamas, Naftali Bennett, the previous Israeli prime minister, gave an interview in The Economist, and he was asked about what the Israeli goal is going to be and what it's about to do over the next however many months or years it responds.
And he was very candid.
They will basically be all terrorized, subdued into ever again thinking about, as he put it, trying to harm the Jews.
That was part of what he was saying, was we want to show we're basically a crazy state, that we don't abide by international rules, that we're willing to do anything.
The other theory, of course, is one that has been explicitly defended by the current Israeli government, including the more extremist people in Netanyahu's government, which is saying a lot, which is that We consider the West Bank and Gaza part of Greater Israel, and we want to flatten Gaza.
We want to make it so that the people there have to leave.
I have always kind of been a little bit in doubt about what the motive is, but I have to say one of the things that I concluded, having watched your documentary, And you see so many Israeli soldiers saying that.
I mean, they're going on purpose once they order people to evacuate, and they're destroying their shops, they're destroying their buildings, they're destroying their homes, they're destroying their sewage systems, their water systems, and they're explicitly saying, look, they're going to have nothing to come back to.
It seems like Gaza, if it's not already, is well on the way to becoming completely uninhabitable.
In a way that you can't almost even conceive of how it can be rebuilt as a society where Gazans can live.
What is your view on having delved into this in order to make the film on what the Israelis at the top level, the ones kind of guiding these actions and this policy, are hoping to achieve?
I mean, as you say, maybe it's just an irrational desire to destroy and kill, but it seems like there's more going on than that.
Well, no, I think they...
To a degree, it is a bit like 9-11, that 9-11 was grasped as an opportunity by a lot of people in Washington who for a long time wanted to do all sorts of things.
And there's clearly an element of that going on.
As I say, I think they clearly want to empty the space to the north of the Wadi Gaza, the northern end of the Gaza Strip.
But at the moment, quite grotesquely, the Israelis are using their...
Their destruction of Lebanon to distract from what they're doing in Gaza.
And there is at the moment, almost unreported, going on the final cleansing of the final pockets of population in northern Gaza and hospitals being closed down and so on.
So that seems to me quite clear.
They don't want any Palestinians north of the Wadi Gaza.
But also the impulse to annex and settle The West Bank has clearly received an enormous impetus over the last year.
And horrific things have been happening on the West Bank.
Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed on the West Bank.
And yes, I mean, I think those expansionists...
I mean, I don't think the two things...
Bennett's comments and...
The annexation of the West Bank are exclusive.
I think they go very, very much hand in hand.
But to simply ratchet up the deterrence of terror seems to me, in the long run, very dangerous.
It's always struck me that Israel is a colonial settler state.
It just clearly is. Israel has always struck me that it's South Africa trying to pretend it's Australia.
Even after almost a century of dispossession, apartheid, ethnic cleansing, half of the population between the river and the sea are Palestinian.
And the lesson of these situations throughout history, throughout the world, is people never resign themselves to being second-class citizens in their own country.
I would invite anyone to spend any time in the West Bank, and you get it.
You get it immediately.
You know, I'm not a particularly aggressive, assertive person, but I could not live like that.
You cannot live as a despised second-class citizen in your own land.
The only way colonial settler countries become permanent is when you exterminate the local population effectively, as happened in North America, as happened in Australia.
This is what is so terrifying.
These societies carry within them genocidal impulses And, you know, I think to a degree, that's what we're seeing now.
Just a couple more questions. First of all, did you attempt, as part of this documentary, to request or obtain any kind of response from the Israeli government about what you were showing and what you were claiming?
Oh, yeah. And we always, you know, write a very thorough right of reply to the Israelis and they always ignore us.
They did reply to 972 magazine.
They gave quite a full reply to that.
And so we take that.
Denying that report.
They denied that, but also said, basically, Hamas is a terrorist organization which hides behind the civilian population.
We are a society and a military that abides by the rule of law.
I mean, that's essentially their argument.
Right. Last question.
I know this goes beyond the scope of your film, which we're going to very heavily promote and recommend.
I've already started to do that, and I will definitely continue to in conjunction with this interview.
So just I want to take the opportunity while I have you to ask—and you mentioned what the Israelis are doing in Lebanon now—and It seems to me like if you compare the first month or month and a half to what the Israelis did to Gaza, it looks a lot like what the Israelis are doing to Beirut, including purposely attacking medical workers and health clinics and hospitals so that the people who they kill or wound have no place to go to seek out any kind of medical services.
Flattening residential buildings and the like.
Do you think the Israelis have planned for Beirut more or less what they have done to Gaza?
And if they do, or even if there's something short of that, do you think the world will stand by and allow it the way they did with Gaza?
Well, I think the Americans have made a statement, haven't they, saying, don't do to Lebanon what you turn to Gaza.
But it's just horrific that we are in this position.
It is unimaginable that any other country would be being granted this sort of license.
And that you and I are having a conversation about whether the Israelis intend to entirely destroy southern Lebanon is just breathtaking.
And, you know, this was one of the reasons for making the film, is to bear testimony For history, there were people at this time who could see what was happening and who told the story of what was happening and didn't take shelter in the idea that it's all terribly complicated and nuanced and it's not black and white and so on.
I would very much hope the Israelis aren't going to do to southern Lebanon what they did to Gaza.
And I would very much hope that if they try to, the West will stop them.
But I wouldn't bank on it. Yeah, I was about to say, it is true that Biden said, and spokespeople said, we don't want to see and don't expect to see the Israelis do to Beirut what they did to Gaza.
At the same time, there were a lot of things that the U.S.
told Israel not to do over the last year with respect to Gaza, including when Biden declared as a red line, a very meaningful and heavy term for a president to use, for the Israelis to invade Rafa, one of the very few refugee camps that had been somewhat safe.
And Netanyahu made very clear very quickly that he had no intention of even considering for one second that red line, and he immediately violated it.
The Americans first tried to defend it, oh, it's just a limited invasion, and then they just gave up on it. So I guess that's what...
As grim as it is, I guess I'm not very optimistic about the West's willingness or ability to prevent Israel from doing whatever they want, not just in Gaza, which is pretty much an already done deal, but wherever they want to extend that to.
Yeah, and very importantly, remember in four weeks' time, the President of America might be Donald Trump.
But yes, you have this extraordinary phenomenon that the Israelis just again and again and again completely humiliate the Americans.
I mean, if you're British, you know, I've studied British-American relations in micro detail, going all the way back to Suez, really, but particularly the wars of our lifetimes.
And our relationship with the Americans is astonishingly imperial.
I mean, it's quite strange the way we handle our relationship.
We don't really have an independent foreign policy at all.
Now, the contrast with the way the Israelis treat the Americans, which is – I mean, it really is the ultimate example of the tail wagging the dog.
And again, it's just one of these bewildering things.
Why – Why did the Americans allow themselves to be treated like this by the Israelis?
And I think there's a quote from Bill Clinton in the mid-90s when dealing with the Israelis and, you know, to excuse my language, you know, the quote was, who's the fucking superpower here?
And it's America, but you would never guess it to actually look at the relationship between the two countries.
Absolutely bizarre. The U.S. funds the Israeli military, pays for their bombs, pays for their wars, and then the Israelis turn around and say, we don't care in the slightest what you think is in your interest.
We're going to do whatever we want, even if it harms your interest as you perceive it.
And the Americans just continue to send more money and more weapons, no matter how often that happens.
It is bewildering.
Until you start interrogating the reasons why.
Well, once again, congratulations on this documentary.
I wish it were a happier and more uplifting documentary.
But unfortunately, the events don't permit that.
Like I said, for me, even as somebody who has followed it, it put together a lot of things that I had already known, but in a different way.
And it showed me a lot of things that I actually didn't know.
So I can't recommend it highly enough.
And I'm sure a lot of work went into it.
I believe there was probably some...
Personal sacrifice on your part that I want to congratulate you for as well, and I appreciate your taking the time to talk to us.
Thank you very much, Glenn.
So as I've indicated, I cannot recommend highly enough watching the entire documentary that was produced by Al Jazeera and directed by our guest.
It's called War Crimes in Gaza.
And as I've said, even if you've been following the situation very closely, it's a film that is about an hour and 20 minutes long, but it really synthesizes everything that happens in a way that packs a big emotional punch, but also provides a kind of deeper and fresh perspective on the extent of what has been going on in Gaza, what the Israelis have been doing.
We have obtained permission from Al Jazeera, for which we're very thankful, to show you the first 15 minutes.
But I really hope while you watch this, it doesn't deter you from watching the entire film, which can be seen both on the Al Jazeera English site as well as on YouTube.
We will put the links to each of those underneath the video of the show.
There's a lot of information, a lot of important revelations that are not contained in this 15 minutes that I really hope you will watch the whole thing.
It's not an easy film to watch, but it is extremely important, if for no other reason than just to make sure that history is bearing a real reflection of what has been done.
So here's the first 15 minutes of the film.
The West cannot hide.
They cannot claim ignorance.
Nobody can say they didn't know.
We live in an era of technology, and this has been described as the first livestream genocide in history, and I believe that to be true.
They are conducting a genocide now with glee.
They're setting their atrocities to music.
and putting them on catchy reels on TikTok.
♪♪ Ordinary Israelis see what their military's doing and celebrate it.
♪♪ It's not just fringe elements who see this and think it's a good thing.
When a nation protects its home, it fights.
And we will fight until we break their backbone.
It's not true.
This rhetoric about civilians not aware, not involved, it's absolutely not true.
It's an entire nation out there that is responsible.
It's impossible.
The city becomes a strip in 1948 with the creation of the State of Israel.
you.
Three quarters of a million people are driven from their homes in what Palestinians call the Nakba, or catastrophe.
Close to a third of refugees end up in Gaza.
In 1967, Gaza and the West Bank are occupied by the Israelis.
After the Israelis withdraw settlements from Gaza in 2005, Hamas wins elections throughout the occupied territories.
It advocates resistance to Israeli occupation.
And is prescribed as a terrorist organization in the West.
When it takes control of Gaza in 2007, Israel imposes a blockade.
In the years that follow, it carries out a number of attacks on Gaza, citing security requirements.
Thousands of Palestinians are killed.
1,200 Hamas fighters stormed through the fence separating the Gaza Strip from Israel.
The main goal was to bring the Palestinian cause on the table and to oblige all the politicians in the region and outside the region that no one can bypass the Palestinian, no one can overcome the Palestinian cause and without solving this no one can enjoy security or stability.
More than 1,000 Israelis are killed.
More than 250 hostages are taken.
250 hostages are taken.
The impact of October 7 is immense.
It's a society in complete trauma.
We could never in our worst nightmare think that October 7 would happen.
The aura of Israeli invincibility disappeared on the 7th of October last year.
Israel has survived because neighbors have always believed that Israel was omnipotent, a country that cannot be defeated militarily.
And then over a couple of hours, all of this fell apart.
Immediately became clear to most Israelis they're not secure and the enemies around it are not deterred.
This is what, Israel is desperately now trying to restore the strategic posture of deterrence to make themselves feel safe.
And I think from the beginning it was obviously that in order to restore deterrence, it will respond disproportionately.
But we can't escape that there was a strong element of avenging and revenging.
This investigation assembles evidence of war crimes committed during the year-long Israeli assault on the Gaza Strip.
And of complicity in those crimes.
crimes.
The evidence includes the voices of those who ordered the assault.
We will stand in the name of the law and we will stand up for this black day that they have brought to the State of Israel and its citizens.
Those who supported it.
This video was made possible by the support of the viewers of this channel.
Oh Those who enabled it.
The United States stands with Israel We will not ever fail to have their back.
Those who endured it.
And above all, those who inflicted it.
Al Jazeera's investigative unit has compiled a database of over two and a half thousand social media accounts, containing photos and videos placed online by Israeli soldiers.
It is a treasure trove which you very seldom come across.
So to have that is something which I think prosecutors will be licking their lips at.
Do you know anything about that?
What can you report at this stage?
All right. Yumna, please take cover.
We knew that this or the retaliation is going to be so much bigger than before.
This is a missile attack on Palestine Tower, right in the middle of Gaza City.
Yumna, take a moment to breathe.
But we didn't expect it.
Take a moment to breathe.
In no means to be what it has turned out to be.
The fact that there are Israeli captives in the Strip, wouldn't that be a red line for Israel?
that it would be afraid for its captives.
Even if Israel wanted to cross these red lines, we thought for sure that the world would stand and say no.
The End You wake up every morning thinking that this would be actually your last day.
You know you might be next.
There have been journalists and human rights workers who have been directly killed during the previous attacks.
Export Selection