Glenn Beck, Kevin McCarthy, and Rep. Chip Roy expose the Southern Poverty Law Center's alleged $3 million diversion of donor funds to white supremacist groups via shell accounts, linking this fraud to authoritarian tactics and Virginia's restrictive voting measures. McCarthy warns of Democratic corruption involving Joe Walsh and Nancy Pelosi while advocating for breaking the SAVE Act to pass voter ID laws, alongside demands for FISA reforms after FBI abuses. The episode further analyzes Canada's housing crisis driven by population growth and zoning, contrasting US energy independence with Irish fuel tax protests, ultimately suggesting that unchecked liberal policies and foreign interference threaten Western stability. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Aftershocks of the Strait00:14:38
So, right now, everybody's watching the war in Iran, hoping that it ends quickly.
But there's something that people are not talking about.
Even if it does end tomorrow, the aftershocks are just getting started because the Strait of Hormuz has been disrupted, and that doesn't just fix itself overnight.
Ships that are arriving today left ports months ago.
And right now, shipments are backed up and supplies are tightening.
And other parts of the world are already feeling the shortages that we haven't fully felt yet, which means what you're seeing now is the beginning.
This affects shipping, manufacturing, and eventually medical supply chains.
And when the system slows down, medication shortages do follow.
And by the time that you get it at your local pharmacy, it's too late.
That's why I recommend Jace Medical.
The Jace case gives you a doctor prescribed supply of essential medications for antibiotics that are there for your emergency.
Also, Jace Daily can provide a 12 month supply of your everyday prescriptions delivered right to your door before you need them.
That way, you're not caught off guard.
Get a discount now.
Use a promo code Beck at J A S E dot com.
That's Jace dot com, promo code Beck.
Hello, America.
You know we've been fighting every single day.
We push back against the lies, the censorship.
the nonsense of the mainstream media that they're trying to feed you.
We work tirelessly to bring you the unfiltered truth because you deserve it.
But to keep this fight going, we need you.
Right now, would you take a moment and rate and review the Glenn Beck podcast?
Give us five stars and leave a comment because every single review helps us break through big tech's algorithm to reach more Americans who need to hear the truth.
This isn't a podcast.
This is a movement and you're part of it, a big part of it.
So if you believe in what we're doing, you want more people to wake up, help us push this podcast to the top.
Rate, review, share.
Together, we'll make a difference.
And thanks for standing with us.
Now let's get to work.
Well, hello, America.
Welcome to the Glenn Beck Program.
It's...
It is Wednesday.
There's a lot going on.
I mean, too much to get to.
We're going to expand the show today.
We're going to do an extra, probably half hour, maybe even an hour after the show because of all of the news.
We have FISA up for renewal.
I want to get deeply into that, but we have Chip Roy on that coming up in just a few minutes, probably about half an hour.
Also, I'm going to start the show with what happened with the SPLC yesterday.
That is very important.
Virginia, what the hell happened there?
This is criminal, what has happened.
They have literally taken the voice away from about 40% of Virginia.
The SAVE Act, Iran, the ceasefire, and so much more.
But we start with what happened yesterday with the Center for Poverty Laws, the Southern Poverty Law Center.
We get into that here in just a second.
First, let me tell you about our sponsor this half hour.
It's a burn a launcher.
Seems like somebody's always got to take a perfect day and ruin it, doesn't it?
Go ahead, punk, make my day.
If you're enjoying yourself, you know, maybe it's a hike, a walk, you know, a day downtown.
Evening with your family, and then out of nowhere comes a person who's decided to bring chaos into everybody else's life.
Aggressive, unpredictable, pushing too close, looking for trouble, whatever it is, that's the world in which we live now.
And most days we're fine until the day that it isn't fine.
That's what I want you to know about the Berna Launcher.
It is a powerful, non lethal self defense tool that cools chaos.
It can stop a threat from up to 60 feet away using pepper and kinetic rounds, no permits, no background checks, legal in all 50 states.
And here's what matters most it gives you an option when you need one fast, a way to protect yourself or the people that you love without having to rely on harsher force.
Nobody plans for somebody else ruining their day, but you can plan to be ready if they try.
Go to berna.comslash Glenn, learn more about it.
Try before you buy at a sportsman's warehouse location near you.
It's berna.byrna.comslash Glenn.
All right, yesterday, the Department of Justice dropped an 11 count indictment charging the SPLC, the Southern Poverty Law Center, with wire fraud, bank fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to launder money.
These guys, I just want you to know, I do have a horse in this race.
I think these guys have been a bane of my existence for a long time.
I have warned about them for a very long time.
So, you know, if you want an absolutely neutral view on the Southern Poverty Law Center, You're going to have a hard time getting it from me, but I'm going to try to be as fair as I possibly can with these guys.
They are a tool of the progressive engine, and I think so much more.
So prosecutors say from 2014 through 2023, the Southern Poverty Law Center quietly siphoned over $3 million donor dollars off to the top.
That's your grandma's $20.
You know, that's George Clooney's pledge straight into the pockets of Klansmen.
Neo Nazis, Aryan Nation bikers, Unite the Right planners, do you remember that one?
And American Nazi affiliates.
Now, why would you do that?
One guy tied directly to the National Alliance supposedly got over a million dollars.
Another deep in Charlottesville, that rally, he pocketed hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Hmm, that's weird.
All the while, the SPLC's website and mailers scream, help us dismantle white supremacy, and they are actually.
Funding it.
Now, how did that happen?
Well, the same way these things always do layer by layer of deception.
Starting back in the 1980s, they built a covert network of field sources.
Some were already inside of the hate groups, others infiltrated at the SPLC's direction.
They had to keep it hidden from the public and their donors.
I don't know where you find this in a 501c3's organization papers, but supposedly they were protecting lives.
This is exactly what happened.
I swear to you, These extreme right wing things that are supposedly everywhere, I swear to you, it is probably nothing but paid off people from the SPLC and FBI informants.
I mean, there are probably three people there that are actually real.
Anyway, they went so far to create shell bank accounts under fake names.
They fed false information to banks about who really controlled the money.
This is a violation of everything.
They routed payments through prepaid cards and cutouts.
This is what terrorist organizations do.
Donors thought they were funding lawsuits and exposes.
Instead, according to the feds, they were bankrolling the very racist the SBLC was denouncing on the evening news.
The indictment doesn't call it sloppy accounting, it calls it deliberate fraud.
A lie to get the cash, hide where it really went, keep the grift alive for nearly a decade.
SBLC says this was just intelligence work.
It's dangerous, necessary, and we shared it with the FBI.
Nope, no, they didn't, according to the DOJ and the FBI, they say we had no, there's nothing telling us that you were doing this.
DOJ said yesterday they weren't dismantling hate, they were manufacturing hate.
That they paid the arsonist to keep the fire going so they could keep raising money to put the fire out.
And on top of that, the DOJ said, never were we informed.
Okay, I want to take this to a different place.
Those are the facts.
I want to take this to if the allegations are true.
This fits directly into what we have seen all over the world in really ugly political systems controlled extremism.
Let me explain how this works.
This is the way it's happened all over the world.
First, you help create or intensify the very danger you publicly are claiming to fight.
If the indictment's version is true, the machine would look like this money flows in quietly.
Into radicals and to dangerous people, and it helps them become louder and more active.
The public then sees a bigger threat.
The organization points that threat out and makes more money, more moral authority, media defense, and political leverage.
And it's just lather, rinse, repeat, lather, rinse, repeat.
This is the self licking ice cream cone.
The danger feeds the institution.
And that institution narrates the danger.
Then you turn labels into weapons.
In authoritarian systems, extremist, terrorist, foreign agent, these are all tags that are used to not just identify real threats, but to isolate opponents.
You chill people's association, you cut off funding, you make the public afraid to defend the target.
This is what Sol Alinsky talked about.
Now, Reuters has reported that.
Russia, their Supreme Court recently labeled Memorial extremist.
And that created a mechanism to prosecute the donors, the contributors, and people who share its materials.
Belarus used extremist designations to do the same thing to media outlets and journalists.
So you begin to isolate people, Solzhenitsyn.
Third, you build a climate where the map becomes territory.
Once a group is publicly targeted as hateful or extremist or subversive, the press, the foundations, the bureaucracies can begin treating the label as proof.
So you'll notice that's what the press does.
According to the Southern Polarity Law Center, this group is put the label in.
This is where soft totalitarianism systems are born.
You don't start with gulags, you start with.
Reputational death, which kind of becomes a soft blacklist.
You start funding the choke points and public fear.
That's what the Southern Poverty Law Center was doing.
Freedom House has warned that authoritarian systems exploit broad extremism and misinformation networks and frameworks to tighten the control over speech and civic space.
Think of that.
What are they saying?
They're saying you control every once you get this label out.
Now you can control speech, you can control people, what they do in the public.
AI makes censorship and surveillance and disinformation easier and faster and cheaper.
Remember, what did the government do after it did all of this?
After the SPLC would label, what were they doing?
The Biden administration was using them as justification to go to people and say, look, the.
SPLC says these are dangerous people.
You have to censor them.
Well, what is this beginning to sound like?
This is beginning to sound like a color revolution.
Okay?
Usually, a color revolution, if it's not directed, it's a mass protest movement that arises because something is illegitimate.
There's an election fraud or whatever.
It's usually a disputed election.
And then they use civil society networks and independent media and public mobilization to challenge whoever the president is or the prime minister.
That's a color revolution.
So, what do they need?
They need an unpopular incumbent, a person that is running the government that is hated by at least half the people.
They need a united opposition and enough independent media to spread the case.
That the vote was falsified, or that this guy is an authoritarian, and you need to dismantle and make the other side defending him afraid and fractured.
You also need the ability to mobilize large protests like no kings.
So, Moscow came to view this sequence as a series of things.
First, you have to train the opposition networks, then, you have to delegitimize the government.
You have to spark protest, replace the regime.
That's how Moscow looks at it.
I told you for forever it is bottom up, top down, inside out.
This is how the Kremlin interprets these events.
Whether that's accurate or not, that's the way they do.
I think it's accurate.
So let me get back to the SPLC.
If an institution can inflate or steer the public perception of extremism, Then it can help manufacture a crisis atmosphere.
They are not the key to color revolution.
They are one layer of the color revolution.
I believe this, my theory.
Manufacturing Crisis Atmosphere00:08:00
Nothing is proven until proven in a court of law.
But if you can create that crisis atmosphere, it does several things at once.
It delegitimizes the political opponents.
It pressures media to conform.
It justifies surveillance and deplatforming.
It scares donors and churches and business and people away from the quote wrong side.
And it creates moral permission for extraordinary countermeasures.
How many times have you heard people try to kill somebody?
Well, let's use Charlie Kirk.
How many people say it was justified?
That's an extreme position, one that Americans have never held, never, except in our very worst times.
Now you have people justifying violence.
It's justified.
Why?
Because somebody has ratcheted up the labels.
In an environment like we have right now, they're priming the ground for street mobilization, government action.
Corporate pressure, selective law enforcement, it's all pushing in the same direction.
Now, that's not a revolution.
That's the precondition for a revolution.
That's legitimacy for war.
If this is true, an organization says these people are dangerous, that feeds or expands those kinds of people.
Those people continue to do dangerous things, and their dangerous things that they're doing is amplified and it's made to look much, much bigger.
Then the press reports the danger.
Then the public sees that report, they label, and they say, Oh my gosh, it's everywhere.
Then, because the people are rising up saying, Somebody's got to do something, the institutions demand crackdown.
The same organization that was pointing out the danger and funding the danger says, You got to do something about it.
They're elevated as the trusted interpreter of the threat because they're the ones who found it.
This is exactly how societies go from free debate into managed fear.
And once fear becomes the currency, totalitarian habits follow fast.
Look at what's happening right now in Virginia.
Look at what they did in Virginia yesterday.
What do they do?
And everybody who voted this way, I saw the people coming out, people who are coming out of the voting booth and voted to take away the voice of 40% of Virginia.
40% all said the same thing.
We have to stop Donald Trump.
That's fear pushing you into totalitarianism, and you don't even know it.
You label the enemy, you isolate the enemy, you criminalize contact with the enemy, you pressure media, financial channels, you make ordinary citizens afraid of being seen near the enemy.
This is what happens every single time.
Is that what the Southern Poverty Law Center was doing?
Well, I could sure make the case.
The last people that are pointed to and say these people are dangerous are the people who have been pointing out the danger themselves.
I will tell you that anybody who gave to the Southern Poverty Law Center, they are not going to read this the same way.
They're going to say, this is this totalitarian state coming after and trying to silence this group that has done well and done good things for so long.
We have to support them even more.
Because for a good portion of the country, they're in too deep.
And the media will never, ever disassociate themselves from the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Never.
Never.
So, what does this mean?
I'll give that to you here in 60 seconds.
First, super sure.
Sometimes when you meet a troll on the bridge and he won't let you pass until you answer three questions, the best thing you can do is hop in your car and drive over him.
That's what you do.
I'm not sure exactly that's the way the original story goes, but it's the version I prefer.
Why stand there dealing with needless obstacles when the whole point is to get where you're going?
A lot of business owners know exactly what that feels like when it comes to insurance.
You're trying to protect your company, your people, your livelihood, but instead you get jargon, delays, stacks of forms, confusing options, fine print, nobody that really has the answer.
This is why SuperSure is there.
They go right to the heart of the matter.
What risks do you face?
How do we get you covered properly without wasting your time?
Simple questions, smart answers, real solutions.
Right now, you can go to supersure.comslashbeck and get a full report on your current policies with no obligation.
Find out if you're overinsured, underinsured, or somewhere in between.
Go to supersure.comslashbeck.
One super agency, one powerful platform, and all of your policies in one place.
Go to supersure.comslashbeck.
That's supersure.comslashbeck.
Paid for by supersureinsurance agency, LLC, a licensed insurance agency.
10 seconds, station ID.
So here's the thing.
If the indictment is true, the comparison here is not that the SPLC ran a full blown color revolution.
The comparison is that the conduct, the alleged conduct, resembles one important piece of that machinery that makes regime destabilization politics possible the managed production of extremism, followed by moral framing, media amplification.
Institutional isolation of targets, the censoring of voices pushed by the government.
That's the family of tactics that authoritarian and hybrid regimes use when they want to reorganize public life without sending tanks.
And that is the goal.
If Americans knew history, that is the goal of progressivism.
Have revolution without the tanks.
That's what's happening.
I hope none of this is true about the Southern Poverty Law Center.
But I'm sorry, you'd have a hard time convincing me.
I'm not going to be on the jury because you'd have a hard time.
I have a very long, long relationship with them.
I think we looked it up yesterday.
Somebody on the staff looked it up and said, You know, they've reported that you're an extremist like 175 times.
Oh, they've accused me of inspiring murder and everything else.
They're liars.
They are liars.
And they are part of the problem.
And I'm glad to see that finally we're getting serious about shutting people like this down and exposing the tactics that they use.
Notice Charlottesville.
What was it that Joe Biden said was his reason for becoming president?
I wasn't going to run.
A lie.
I wasn't going to run until Charlottesville.
And then I realized I've got to run against this monster.
What was the lie of Charlottesville?
There are good people on both sides.
Exposing Extremist Tactics00:02:54
That's not what he said.
Who was it that was helping fund Charlottesville, we find out now?
The Southern Poverty Law Center.
Who was it that was pushing the narrative after Charlottesville?
The Southern Poverty Law Center.
This is what is going on.
Watch this story.
If they are not, if these are true, if they have the facts to back it up, if they do not go to jail and aren't permanently shut down, you don't have a chance of saving your country.
All right, we're going to Washington next.
We're going to talk about FISA and also the vote next.
First, let me tell you about rapid radios.
You know, rapid radios sounds like something only movie superheroes had.
You press a button, you talk instantly.
Somebody miles away on the other side of the country can hear you clear as day.
No drop calls.
No, can you hear me now?
You know, no dialing, no digging through menus or anything like that.
Something important is happening.
You know, Space Ghost, I need you now.
Well, that is available right now.
Rapid radios, ready to use right out of the box.
They work nationwide.
They let you connect with family or friends instantly.
They are perfect for the times when cell phones are slow, distracting, or just the wrong tool for the job.
If you are on the road with two vehicles, it is perfect.
You have family members spread out at an event, it's perfect.
If you're managing land, working a job site, you want a better way to stay connected, it's perfect for that too.
Right now, Rapid Radios is offering over $300 in free gear with your order, including a tactical radio bag, USB charger, and an EMP Faraday bag.
Plus, Every order includes a 30 day money back guarantee.
Go to rapidradios.com, use the promo code radio, get 5% off and free shipping.
Rapidradios.com.
Rapid Radios communication redefined.
We've got too much news and not enough time.
Go overtime with Glenn today after the radio show ends only at glenbeck.comslash torch.
So, one of the good guys in Congress is Congressman Chip Roy from Texas.
He is a candidate for Texas Attorney General and would be ruthless, I think, on that.
And I really like Chip, but you got to do your own homework.
Let me talk to Chip Roy about a couple of things that are going on in Congress right now.
And you can check him out his website, Roy.house.gov, or Chip Roy TX.
You can follow him on Twitter, Chip Roy TX.
Okay, Chip, let me start.
Oh, there are so many things to talk to you about.
Moving Forward in Congress00:14:01
Let me start with FISA, okay?
FISA, they're looking to renew FISA.
And of course, we're doing it in the middle of a war where you're going to be able to make this case a lot easier.
We got people here.
You said you voted for a 10 day extension, but you said that you will block a clean reauthorization without significant reform.
What reform do you want?
Well, Glenn, remember that this situation was created because of the abuses by the FBI and by our intelligence state in using FISA against the American people.
And your audience is very informed, so they know this.
They targeted President Trump.
They used a different section in 702, but nevertheless, they used 702 to go after the American people.
We have the Arctic Frost abuses where they went after members of Congress, including me.
I had my records targeted, and I didn't even know until three years later, which is just absolutely insane.
And so we're just looking for continued reforms.
Now, two years ago, we had to hold this all up, same game of chicken, where we said, guys, we're not going to give you a blank reauthorization and we need reforms.
And we got some pretty good reforms.
Big step forward.
We went through the Judiciary Committee.
We had, we put members of Congress inside the foreign intelligence surveillance courts.
We had a significant increase in reporting.
We had more standards on what they need to do.
Lots of other things we put in that bill that made a real big difference.
And we've seen fewer abuses.
The data we're getting is encouraging, it's trending.
But we didn't get a warrant.
We didn't get even something that would tighten in and make clear that if you're going in and you're finding this information, this warrantless surveillance of the American people, because you've got this authority under 72 to target foreigners, which That we all support going after bad guys using it, right?
Yep.
That are foreign nationals.
Correct.
But when you're talking about American citizens, we want to have every protection possible because the government abuses its authority.
Yep.
So we want to see greater empowerment of being able to have more review of what's happening in the foreign intelligence surveillance courts.
We want to have greater penalties, much stiffer penalties for abuses within the intelligence community and the FBI.
And we want to have greater warrant protection.
That is, you cannot use the stuff you find to embark on a criminal.
Investigation without getting a full warrant on an American citizen.
Those are the kinds of things that we're debating and arguing over and the kinds of reforms we want to see in moving forward.
As I told the president last week directly, so Mr. President, we trust you, we trust this administration to do the right thing.
But, you know, we've got to protect American citizens for three years from now, eight years from now, 20 years from now.
Yeah, that's the whole point of the Bill of Rights.
I mean, it was our founders that put the Bill of Rights together and they said, you can trust us, don't trust anybody else.
You shouldn't even really trust us.
But we don't trust the government, and we're the ones running the government.
So we're saying government should have these handcuffs.
You know, you talk about having a penalty, a stiffer penalty.
I'm going to make a case later today.
I'm staying on for an extra half hour because I want to make a strong case for the death penalty.
You violate.
FISA, it is our most sacred rights.
It's our Bill of Rights.
You are violating the most sacred.
And if you want to say, we have to have this, we have to have this, we must do it, good.
Then if you do it and you do what that FBI guy did to Carter Page, you knowingly falsify information, you lie to a judge, it should be the stiffest penalty our government can hand out.
It should be you're violating the sacred right.
And we have trusted you.
And said, we don't trust you, and you've begged for this right.
If you knowingly do that, I think you should get the death penalty, quite honestly, or at least life in Guantanamo Bay, no questions asked.
You will never stop the abuse unless the punishment is breathtaking and damn near automatic.
Well, Glenn, this is one of the things last week that we were pushing for.
I won't say that we were pushing directly for the death penalty, but your sentiment is exactly right.
And, like, our question was, how are you going to police it?
And we need to have greater triggers for being able to monitor and have oversight.
And if you marry all of that up, then we'll get greater comfort that our intelligence community is not being used against us and against the American people.
But you're right, you have to have a stiff penalty.
So, like, as this debate unfolds, our position is you're not going to get a clean reauthorization.
We're going to oppose that.
And we're telling the Speaker and Leader Thune and the White House.
Guys, we're open to ways to move forward.
I know you need this authority.
You know, we're dealing with Iran and all these issues, but we're going to continue to protect the American people.
So that's it's a non starter that it not have significant reforms.
We're open to what those look like and working with the White House and leadership.
I'll tell you, Chip, it's not enough to just have transparency.
Americans are starting to be transparent on a lot of stuff that happened and nobody gets punished.
You must have stiff, damn near as close to with fair trial, damn near automatic.
It's got to be an electric fence.
It has to be an electric fence.
Okay.
Yeah.
Well, Glenn, I will note that, you know, and I don't want to change topics on you, but this, you know, indictments for the Southern Property Law Center.
I mean, a lot of us yesterday were saying, finally, all right, you know, I held a hearing on this topic in December.
I know.
Brought in Turning Point USA, brought in folks from the Family Research Council, Tony Perkins, talking about what we knew was happening with the Southern Property Law Center, Antifa, all these organizations, well organized.
We called for a special select committee last fall, we meaning the Freedom Caucus and conservatives.
Finally, we're seeing movement.
We need more, more hearings, more exposure.
And then more action by the Department of Justice to indict these people that we know are targeting us.
I was glad to see that this actually came from the Department of Justice and our new acting attorney general yesterday because more hearings mean nothing, Chip.
You know this.
Correct.
More hearings mean absolutely nothing.
My point of that, though, Glenn, is from a congressional standpoint, our job is to expose and then get the Department of Justice.
You guys go indict, you guys go take action and have penalties.
And that's all I want is more action, right?
Yes, I know.
I want to have more.
Yeah, me too.
Okay, so let me.
I've got like three things to cover with you here in just a few minutes.
So let me go through with the Save America Act.
I think it was Anna Paulina Luna yesterday said tie it to FISA reauthorization because you're never going to get it any other way.
Tie it to that.
Possibility.
What do you think of that idea?
Well, like I know that it would meet resistance in the Senate.
I've talked to Ann about this.
We agree.
You know, I think there might be some ways we could get three quarters or 80% of the Save America Act.
I'm obviously the author, so I know the bill well.
I think we could get voter ID and I think we could get the voter roll cleanup if we added it to something that's a moving vehicle like FISA.
I think we ought to consider that.
I talked to the speaker about that last night.
You know, he's got to weigh the options of what he can move, but we need to leverage whatever moving vehicles there are because as we saw in Virginia last night, We're going to lose it all if we don't act.
By the way, the Senate is sitting around going, oh, we got to save the filibuster.
You and I, as conservatives, we want to stop bad legislation.
I appreciate the sentiment, but you guys are going to lose the Republican because Democrats are going to do what they did in Virginia last night.
They're going to come in, they're going to make D.C. a state, they're going to pack the court while you guys sit around fiddling while America burns.
I'm sick of it.
And I haven't decided this is absolutely right yet, Chip.
So talk me down from this tree.
When it comes to the filibuster, I want the standing filibuster, I want the traditional filibuster.
Well, if you're not going to do that, I don't want the filibuster that was made up in the 1970s.
Right.
Okay.
So, what is the problem with nuking the filibuster if it's that filibuster?
I want the standing filibuster.
But I'm to the point where I'm like, nuke the damn thing.
Glenn, you and I are singing from the same page in the panel.
Last October, I raised this point.
I said, guys, I want to defend the traditional filibuster as a cooling saucer.
But if we have to nuke it, nuke it.
If you guys aren't going to get out of the way and maintain this fake filibuster or a Mike Lee calls it a zombie filibuster of 60 votes.
There's nothing in the Constitution saying 60 votes.
There's no requirement that we have a default 60 vote position.
And by the way, that's also harming Congress.
We can't flex muscle as Congress against an executive branch.
I'm not talking about President Trump, but in terms of the balance of powers, Congress can't do its job while we're hiding behind a 60 vote threshold in the Senate.
So I agree.
In fact, I've told some senators who won't move, I said, guys, if you want to save any vestige of the filibuster, You better save the talking filibuster.
Right.
An actual, you got to go work for a filibuster.
And by the way, here's another idea.
Why not on this shutdown of DHS?
Why don't Senate Republicans say, look, if you have a shutdown and we want to have a bill for a continuing resolution, that's it, then it's 51 votes.
What's wrong with that?
You want to have a sort of shutdown prevention act?
If a majority of the Senate wants to fund government at current levels, great, you can do that at 51 votes.
Why don't we do that instead of right now we're going, oh, I guess we got to go pass something because.
The Democrats won't let us fund Border Patrol and ICE.
It's ridiculous.
Let me see.
Let me go here.
You introduced on Monday, reintroduced the Mom Dhani Act.
What is the Mom Dhani Act?
Why did you do it?
Why did you name it after Mom Dhani?
Well, look, I think Mom Dhani is emblematic of one of the major problems we have in this country.
We've been importing people who do not share our values and then allowing them to not only ascend to some positions in corporate America, but now increasingly in leadership positions, in this case, mayor of our largest city.
Look, Under our current laws, we are able to reject people who are affiliated with a communist party.
The United States Supreme Court has upheld that as far back as 1952, a Supreme Court opinion.
They said, Yeah, you can do that.
We're a sovereign nation.
We can choose who comes in and who comes out, and we can denaturalize and remove people who are carrying out activities that are undermining the United States if you're a naturalized person or if you're on a visa or whatever.
I think we ought to expand the zone of how we define that, not just quote communist party, but let's be broader in terms of Marxism, in terms of what we're dealing with the Islamist movement.
In terms of the Chinese Communist Party, let's lay that out and say, look, if you're affiliated with these entities and you're anti American and you're undermining Western civilization, we can reject you.
And if you came here on a visa or if you've been naturalized, we can denaturalize you and send you home because we're importing people who want to destroy our way of life.
You and I will die on the hill, as you guys, you and I have talked about on your show before, in defense of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
People saying, chip, this is unconstitutional and it's against the First Amendment.
No.
What I'm saying is, if we invite you here, Here, this is our country, okay.
We built this country on Judeo Christian principles, we built this country on the constitution of Western civilization.
If we invite you here, you got to tell us who you are, we need to know who you are.
And if you're affiliated with entities, or if you're espousing beliefs, or if you're promoting Sharia law or things that are inconsistent with our way of life, then we should not import you.
That's why, and by the way, that's that's why you should include Nazism too, fascism, Nazism, so it doesn't look like it's one side because who's going to argue again?
You want to import Nazis.
You want to import and naturalize Nazis who were lying to you about Nazis.
And then when they get here, they start affiliating with all the Nazis here?
No, you want them out.
You want them out.
It's a fair point.
And I'm happy to add that to the list.
I mean, again, it's so funny in this town.
You introduce a bill and they go, well, that's the bill.
I said, wait a minute.
Let's put it in committee.
We'll amend it.
We'll make it better.
If I did something that's bad, we can pull it out.
If we want to add something, that's great.
The whole prompt is a concept.
Why are we importing people who hate us?
Why are we importing people who don't want to preserve the America that we love?
It doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
None.
It's a suicide.
It becomes a suicide pack if we don't.
100%.
Chip, I appreciate it.
Where do people go to find out about your campaign?
Shiproy.com.
Thanks, Glenn.
Obviously, I'm running for attorney general.
Appreciate it.
Shiproy.com.
May 26th is the runoff date.
And, you know, we're running hard and I'm burning both ends of the candle doing my day job.
I've missed, I think, maybe two votes in this whole process.
They were inconsequential.
I'm doing all I can to keep doing my job that I promised to my constituents while running for Texas attorney general.
We've got to save Texas, Glenn.
I know.
We've got to save Texas.
I will tell you, we are closer than people understand.
We are so close to losing Texas.
And if we lose Texas, the Republic is over.
Over.
There is no saving it without Texas.
It will become California, New York, and then it's over.
It's over.
You never win another election.
What we saw unfold in Virginia last night?
Yep.
That's what the Democrats are going to do, and they want to do it to Texas.
And we will now, our last hope is that the Virginia Supreme Court throws it out.
And, you know, I have a case.
Do they have a case?
Because that's Cooch and Eliot.
I think they have a very strong case, but I don't know the court that well.
But I mean, the lawyers I talk to in Richmond and Virginia, they tell me, look, I mean, the wording of the, of the, um, Vote, right, of the referendum was terrible.
So that's procedurally wrong.
They had some other procedural problems that I think the Virginia Supreme Court could toss it out on in terms of how they set up the vote and the rules that you have to do it between, you know, an intervening election and other stuff.
I think there's strong arguments, but I don't know how strong the court will be.
You know how courts are.
So look, it's our last hope now.
The Virginia Supreme Court's striking it down.
I don't know.
Chip, thank you very much.
Appreciate it.
Chip Roy from the Great State of Texas.
You bet.
Let me tell you about my Patriot supply.
Protecting Your Home Now00:06:25
You don't have to be a doomsday prepper type to understand the basic truth.
The things that you count on most are the things that you notice only after they're gone.
And I'm talking about things like power and heat and groceries, full tank of gas, a store shelf that is stocked when you need it.
Most days you don't even think about it because it's just always there.
One blackout, one disruption, one bad week reminds you how thin that margin actually is.
That's why I tell you about My Patriot Supply.
They make preparedness practical.
This isn't about fear or panic, it's about just having food, water, filtration, emergency gear, you know, the kind of backup plan that responsible people put up, you know, before you need it.
Because when something does go wrong, it's the worst possible time to begin thinking about what you should have done earlier.
Right now, preparewithglen.com.
Go there now.
Get a three month emergency food kit supply.
They will include free mega protein upgrade.
That's an incredible $200 value.
It's a simple step you can take right now before the warning signs turn into something much darker.
preparewithglen.com.
Get yours today.
Be prepared today.
preparewithglen.com.
Glenn Beck.
Most of us think about protecting our home in very physical ways.
We lock the doors, we install the cameras, but there's another way that your home can be targeted, and it doesn't involve anyone stepping foot in your property.
It is actually called home title fraud, and it's exactly what it sounds like.
Criminals forge documents, they file them with the county, they transfer ownership of your home into their name, and then once all that happens, they can attempt to take out loans against your property or even try to sell it out from under you.
The scary part is you don't really know much about this as it's going on.
Regular homeowners' insurance doesn't typically protect you from this.
And the mortgage company isn't looking for it either.
That's why you need Home Title Lock.
They monitor your home's title and alert you to any changes that could signal fraud.
So you're not left discovering it after the fact, which is a big problem.
Something suspicious shows up, you can immediately act and you can knock it out quickly.
I've partnered with Home Title Lock for a while now because I want you to be able to protect your equity.
I want you to be able to find out if you're already a victim of this because it's devastating if you get caught up in it.
The promo code is Blaze.
Blaze is the promo code at Home Title Lock.
You'll get a free title history report, plus a free trial of their million dollar triple lock protection, 24 7 monitoring of your title, urgent alerts to any changes, and if fraud occurs, a US based restoration team will spend up to a million bucks to fix it for you.
It's HometitleLock.com.
The promo code is Blaze, HometitleLock.com, promo code Blaze.
Out on my podcast, wherever you get your podcast, every Saturday a new one comes out.
We're up to episode two.
Next Saturday will be episode three of The American Story.
And all ten episodes of the first season are available right now at glenbeck.comslash torch.
You're getting them commercial free if you're a torch member.
Some of the comments this is so amazing.
Glenn, thanks for your dedication to this project.
Got chills, almost teared up, laughed countless times.
It's so, so good.
K2 in Minnesota said, I listened to these this weekend, loved all of them, listened to all ten.
Thanks for this and the hours of hard work put into it.
I wish I had this when I was in eighth or ninth grade history class.
I would have learned something.
Mad Satter said, I've been waiting for more material like this from Glenn since the books like Miracles and Massacres.
Love, love, love.
Thank you.
Learn the American story the way history should be taught.
The facts and a great story.
Highly produced The Beginning, The American Story, available now at glenbeck.comslash torch.
It's in first season.
Also, if you join today, you're going to get an extra on the show today.
I'm going over time because there is way too much to cover today.
So, you get an extra half hour, 45 minutes today.
As America turns 250 this year, there's a lot of talk about the founding fathers and declarations and big moments in history, and that's all good.
But there's another group of people who built this country, too.
People who never signed a document, they just showed up before the sun even came up.
American ranchers.
Their legacy is what Good Ranchers is built on.
They're 100% dedicated to America every single step, every cut is sourced from local American farms and ranches.
From the pasture to the final seal on the box.
And the packaging and fulfillment happens right here in the United States as well.
Even their customer support team is in house.
Real people right here.
To support a company that is committed to honoring America's past and present and her future, visit goodranchers.com.
Start your plan.
You get a pick of free meat that will be included in every order for life.
And you'll get $25 off your first three orders by using the promo code GLEN.
That's code GLEN.
$25 off your first order.
Just try out GoodRanchers.
They're confident you're going to love it.
GoodRanchers.com.
American meat delivered.
Goodranchers.com.
I got a lot of heat a couple of weeks ago when I said the biggest enemy that we are fighting right now is ourselves.
And I was relating it to Iran.
And right now, the Iranians are stalling, trying to drag this thing out.
Losing Hope in Canada00:15:15
They're just trying to hold on, quite honestly, because they believe they can outlast us.
They believe that if they just keep holding on, we are going to tear ourselves apart.
And the reason why we would do that is because we have a lot of pressures on us.
We have social media, we have propaganda, we have our own institutions falling apart, we have our own people tearing institutions apart, and we don't really believe in anything anymore.
So, what's worth fighting for?
What's worth dying for?
I just want my stuff right now.
You don't survive as a nation if you do that.
And we are starting to see this happen in Canada.
Tomorrow, I'm doing a monologue on Canada that I really want you to hear because it is our future if we are not careful.
Canada is now killing their own people at just a record clip through medical assistance in dying.
And they're doing it because they can't afford medicine anymore.
They just can't afford it.
Why?
Because they've imported all of these people.
Why did they import these people?
Because Canada wasn't a growing economy, so we have to have more people.
But that's only making it worse because now you can't afford housing, you can't afford medicine.
People have lost the faith that they can actually get ahead and the next generation is going to do better.
We've always had that in the West.
My question is, are there things that we can hold on to and believe in?
Are there things that we can do?
Because once we lose faith, it is over.
And I want to show you how bad things are in Canada.
I'm going to start actually at the ending today.
I'm going to give you what's causing all of it tomorrow.
But I want to show you what's happening with their happiness.
Canadians have always loved their country and they've always, you know, they've been happy, generally happy.
We've been like, work, And they've had a better.
Handle, I think, in some ways, on how to live your life.
And they've always been happy, and they've been happy with their health care and their country and everything else.
They are not happy right now.
In fact, when you look at the happiness index, they have fallen faster than any other country.
And it is stark.
So I want to get a handle on that.
Daniel Foish joins me here in just a second.
First, let me tell you about American financing.
Most people think debt is just about numbers, interest rates, payments, balances, due dates.
But debt has a way of showing up in places the numbers don't belong.
It shows up in your stress level and the way you sleep, you know, how tense you feel, you know, opening that email.
In low grade pressure that never quite leaves, you're in trouble.
And that's when that happens when you're carrying high interest debt and it feels like you're working harder and harder every month and you're staying in the same place.
That's why I want to talk to you about American financing.
Homeowners have options to them using their equity to consolidate high interest debt more than, you know, more than just, you know, Opening up your mortgage and getting rid of that great loan that you got with that low, low, low, low interest rate.
You can now use a new program to be able to get a low interest rate based on your mortgage, but you're not resetting your mortgage.
This is going to give you breathing room.
Strategy.
If you own a home and you're tired of feeling like your finances are running you, see what American Financing can do.
800 906 2440.
800 906 2440.
Or go to Americanfinancing.net.
That's Americanfinancing.net.
Net.
NMLS 1 82334.
NMLS consumer access.org.
APR for Ritz in the Five starts at 6.799% for well qualified borrowers.
Call 800 906 2440 for details about credit costs and terms.
Daniel Foch is the Chief Real Estate Officer at Valerie.ca, Canada's first AI powered real estate brokerage, host of Canada's number one real estate podcast.
And he is here to explain what is happening with the happiness index because it is brutal.
Daniel, welcome to the program.
Thanks for having me.
You're back.
Tell me what is happening in the happiness index in Canada.
Yeah, so Canada observed one of the largest drops, I think the largest drop in the world in happiness.
And basically, it's been progressing since about, you know, it's not a brand new thing.
It's been over the last decade slowly falling, and then it sort of took a pretty steep drop over the last couple of years.
And the more interesting part is if you look at Canada, you know, from a generational perspective, it's young people are actually experiencing an even more severe drop.
So, we rank 26th in the World Happiness Index, right behind the US for the first time since the index has started.
But if you look at that from the perspective of young people, young people are like 71st in Canada in the world.
And a lot of it is because the way our economy is structured, it really makes it difficult for young people to be successful.
And they've sort of lost hope with their ability to participate in the economy, to be able to afford things, to be able to get ahead in life.
And achieve a quality of life comparable to what their parents had when they were growing up.
So, I wanted to have you on.
If you are listening to Daniel, I just want you to see our future.
Canada is ahead of us, and what is happening in Canada is happening here.
And it's why I speak about several things on this program, trying to show you what's happening in Canada to relate it to here.
Let's just talk housing first, because that's your expertise.
We are living in America.
And it is increasingly difficult to get a house.
People, especially young people, are losing their faith that they can ever change their status, they can ever buy a house and get ahead like their parents did.
And part of that is because the idea of the Great Reset was to bring people in from different countries because our populations were declining.
We needed more people to make more money.
But that didn't help anything.
Can you explain what happened in Canada?
Yeah.
So in Canada, we had a variety of factors that contributed to a very fast and severe inflation in housing costs.
So we had our, from a zoning perspective, and we have a lot of land use policies that are sort of like ESG derivatives.
So we have this thing called the Green Belt in the Greater Toronto Area, where it's sort of like imagined areas where you can't develop because of the environment and agricultural land and other factors.
And then you also have, Record population growth.
So we had record population growth in 2022, 2023, back to back.
Our population grew by like 1.2 million people, which is like 4% of the population, or sorry, it was between 2% and 4% of the population, depending on how you measured it.
And so that obviously contributed a lot to excess demand.
And the Bank of Canada even put out a chart that showed a correlation between the magnitude of population growth alongside.
Rent inflation and they basically correlated one to one.
So both your rent and your home values went up because there was excess demand for housing.
And at the same time, you know, young people were sort of coming of age.
Millennials wanted to move out of the city.
We had the pandemic, we had some of the most aggressive lockdowns in the world.
And then so a lot of people were suburbanizing and there was just not enough houses.
We couldn't build quickly enough.
Our economy, ironically, is, you know, massively exposed to housing.
So we have a huge concentration of our GDP is in residential investment, yet we're not very efficient at building it.
And so this ultimately led to young people basically being priced out of the market, but older people who already own homes and have paid them off and whatever benefiting from the inflation that was taking place.
And so now we have, you know, the kind of flip side of that is you also have a massive exposure of the wealth or net worth of your older cohort that depends on this home equity to fund their retirement.
And so The government's sort of trapped.
It's like, do we want to let homes lose their value and risk cutting into that nest egg of the older generation?
Because then you have to pay for the older generation.
Who's going to take care of them?
Exactly.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And I do think, if you look at Europe as an example, because it seems Canada is very much headed in that direction, they have some of the largest unfunded pension liabilities in the world.
If I were to really evaluate, if I'm a policymaker, why would I risk doing immigration at this level?
And it makes you wonder if we're really trying to pad that younger generation to make it more affordable for us to have that transition into the largest cohort of, and this is the same thing in the US, the largest cohort of the older generation retiring that we've ever seen in history.
Are we going to be able to afford it?
But wouldn't that make sense if you were not bringing in populations?
If you were bringing in populations that were more like Canada, understood, and not bringing in such large populations like we are here that is relying on the government to pay for it.
Yeah, well, I think this is one of the big issues with Canada's system.
And, you know, we, there's different layers of loopholes that have been exploited in Canada's immigration system that allowed this to sort of happen.
And a lot of them have been closed, but the, you know, the population growth just moves to the next loophole.
So the loophole that we're on right now is asylum and refugee status.
The one that they were on before was the idea that basically you could become an international student and you could pay to move to Canada, get a degree, and become a permanent resident.
And that was the path that was being sold to a lot of people.
That's since been closed from a loophole basis.
And they've made an effort to make that policy more appropriate.
The problem is that there are other policies downstream from it that haven't been closed.
And so the demand of people moving just basically shifts to now we have this.
I did a video on my YouTube with somebody from the CD Howe Institute who analyzed Canada's asylum system.
And there's huge issues forming in that now.
Well, you also didn't just open up a new path for citizenship and saying, If you come and you're in the Canadian Army, now we'll give you citizenship?
I'm not sure, but I can look into that one for sure.
Yeah, no, I'm pretty sure it happened in the last couple of weeks.
Tell me what's happening with the ESG stuff.
I think over in British Columbia, there was a couple of weeks ago where things got really bad because the 30 by 30 stuff is kicking in.
Do you know anything about that?
I don't, but in BC, the stuff that interests me is around land use, we have a lot of this.
So, BC was the only sub sovereign state or a province in Canada that actually took the United Nations under a framework and made it provincial law.
And it's really created this huge mess around indigenous land claims on land in British Columbia.
So, you basically have a big portion of the city of Vancouver, as an example, and large swaths of land, like hundreds or thousands of acres, that indigenous groups are creating land claims on.
And I've spoken to The two top lawyers on this matter in the country.
And they've both mentioned that basically this is a serious threat to property rights in that market.
So they're being appealed, and this will ultimately go to the provincial court and likely federal court.
But it is, depending on how the laws are interpreted by our province and federal government, this could set a pretty dangerous precedent for that to roll across the remainder of Canada.
So that's sort of becoming a mess in regards to property rights.
At least on the West Coast, right now in Canada.
Are Canadians starting to get and see that the policies of their government are just killing them?
Yeah, it's interesting in Canada.
Like, I would say that, you know, both of our political parties are relatively liberal from probably an economic and social perspective.
And I think that the challenge with this is that it seems like the conservative movement in Canada has sort of abandoned the, you know, the core tenet of individual responsibility, right?
That we are ultimately personally accountable for our circumstances.
And so I think they do realize this, you know, a lot of Canadians, but they don't.
Realize that there's an element of control or impact that they can have as voters, as members of society.
And so we saw that in our last election in April of last year, a lot of complaining from both sides, but nobody really, and young people especially, right?
Like young people are saying, you know, this isn't what we want.
We want to change.
But then when you look at voter turnout, baby boomers decided, and overwhelmingly liberal voters decided.
The outcome of a candidate's election.
Whereas young people have so much, you know, on social media and on the internet are so active, yet they barely saw an improvement in voter turnout.
And so, you know, this is where, you know, democracy becomes a bit of a headwind.
If your voting population communicates and wants to participate in politics online and on social media, that's great.
But if they don't show up to vote and do something about it, you kind of end up with.
With no change, right?
You get what you vote for.
And if you vote for nothing, you get nothing.
Daniel, thank you.
I appreciate it.
Thanks for bringing us up to speed.
We'll talk again.
The happiness index is what's going on in Canada right now is showing up first because people can't afford daily life.
That's what's happening.
And look at what he just said young people are complaining, but they're not getting involved.
That's going to be the death of all of Western countries because they're being taught to hate the country.
They're giving good reason to see that it's not working and nobody's doing anything about it, but they are not organizing.
They are organizing behind slogans.
They are not organizing behind things that actually can work to solve those things.
And that's the problem.
That's what happened.
I think that's what happened in Virginia.
How many people in Virginia do you know, Virginians, that didn't show up last night?
And now look at what you're looking at.
More in just a second.
Draining Our Resources00:04:11
Let me tell you about Patriot Mobile.
So, your phone company probably.
It talks a lot about coverage maps, unlimited plans, how many lines you can add, and all those things.
And they matter.
But here's the question they don't ever ask or want to answer.
Once they have your money every month, what do they do with it?
Because some of the big mobile companies, the dollars you send them, they turn around and support causes and activism that you would never have anything to do with.
You're paying the bill, you're funding the opposite of what you believe.
That's why I want you to look at Patriot Mobile.
They offer dependable service, competitive pricing, and access to all three major networks.
But they also stand for something different.
They support the First Amendment, the Second Amendment, the sanctity of life, our veterans, the values that you embrace.
You need a phone.
You need phone service.
The real question is whether your monthly bill should work against you or alongside you.
PatriotMobile.com slash back.
Call 972 Patriot.
972 Patriot.
Use the promo code BECK for a free month of service.
That's patriotmobile.com slash back.
972 Patriot.
Use the promo code BECK.
Make the switch today.
972 Patriot.
PatriotMobile.com slash back.
10 seconds.
Station ID.
You know, as I was listening to him talk, I'm thinking with all of the things that are going on in the world, and we look at everything as disconnected.
Glenn, why aren't you talking about what happened in Virginia?
Why are you talking to the happiness guy?
Why aren't you talking about, you know, the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Why you haven't mentioned what happened with Iran yesterday?
Well, I have.
I have.
And even if I haven't, because I haven't mentioned Iran, I've talked about the other things already, but I'm talking about all of them at once.
People don't see how connected everything is.
Again, our biggest problem is we are dividing ourselves and not just between from one another, but dividing ourselves and getting away from who we actually are or want to be.
Who do you want to be?
Who do you want the nation to be?
It's not just going to happen.
You know, you could say, I want to be a doctor someday, but unless you take the steps to go to medical school, you're never going to be a doctor.
I want to be happy.
I want to be prosperous.
Well, what steps are you taking?
And unfortunately, now you can say, I want to be prosperous.
I don't have to be rich.
I just want to be able to have a nice life for my family.
And you're taking all the steps, but you're taking the steps that I took when I was young.
Those steps don't work anymore because the world has changed.
So, what are the steps you have to take?
Unfortunately, you have other steps you have to take that I didn't necessarily take.
That weren't imperative for me.
And that is guard the system, understand the system, clean up the corruption, get the bad guys out of the way.
Why is Donald Trump spending so much time on Europe and the Middle East?
Because he knows those two things.
One is draining us, along with our own corruption here.
One is draining us of our resources.
We're constantly having to worry about Ukraine.
Why should we worry about Ukraine?
That's their responsibility.
Why should we have to worry about the Middle East?
Well, because it's oil.
Quite honestly, it's oil.
And they're the biggest exporter in terror.
We're never going to get out of the Middle East unless we solve the oil problem, unless we solve the terror problem.
So, what is the problem with oil?
We're not producing it ourselves.
Great, produce oil.
Now we have other steps.
It's not working at your gas pump because the oil we produce, we have to send overseas because we can't refine it here.
So, we have to build refineries.
That's a whole different story.
What is it you have to do?
Reshoring Oil Refineries00:02:46
What are the steps you have to take to fix it?
It's easy to say the president needs to fix the country.
He needs to fix the economy.
Well, how can you do that?
You have to have oil.
You have to invest in future tech, which is AI.
You have to reshore manufacturing.
All of that stuff takes time.
And if we don't start looking at everything that we have to do, that I never had to do as a kid because I was living off what my parents built.
That is over.
Now we have to build new things.
You have to change your actions.
And what's really hard is you have to do it and not lose faith in the system overall.
And that system's not the old things that we built, it's the idea that all men are created equal and they should be free.
All right, back in just a second.
Let me tell you about leaf filter.
You can learn a lot about a house just by watching how water affects it.
For example, when it rains, does it flow the way it should, or does it pour over the edge, pool near the foundation, streak the siding, and turn a small problem into an opening scene of a much, much bigger one?
Because water is patient, it doesn't need drama.
It just keeps showing up until something fails.
That's why I tell you about leaf filter, L E A F filter.
It's a gutter protection system designed to keep leaves, pine needles, and debris out so water can move the way it's supposed to, no constant.
Clogs, no seasonal ladder routine, no wondering what's happening up there every time a storm rolls through.
Sometimes the best home improvements aren't flashy.
They don't sit up, you know, they don't sit in the driveway, they don't light up the living room.
They just quietly prevent expensive headaches year after year after year.
So start protecting your home with Leaf Filter.
It's America's number one gutter protection system.
Schedule your free inspection at leaffilter.comslash Glenn.
Get 15% off at leaffilter.comslash Glenn back.
Sorry, got to have you both names, Glenn Beck.
Leaffilter.com slash Glenn Beck.
Minimum purchase required restrictions apply.
Talk to the people, get all the details.
Get extra insight and insider access with Glenn today by going overtime with him after radio.
Do it by going to glennbeck.com slash torch.
Welcome to the program.
You know, we're just talking about Canada, trying to show how we need to look deeper into all of our problems.
Policies Pushing Us to Suicide00:13:44
Instead of saying housing prices are so high and it's whatever, blame, whatever, it's that.
Why don't we look deeper into things?
You know, people are growing angry housing prices, affordable health care, loss of culture.
Why?
Why?
Because of the political decisions that were made to, in many cases, to import huge population growth.
And that drove up the price of everything, the loss of culture.
Why was that decision?
Are we talking about that?
And are we talking about what are we going to do to get that under control?
No.
Instead, we just argue about you have a right to be a country without a border.
Gas prices, fuel prices, heating prices, even groceries.
Well, blame it on Trump because of the Iran war.
Well, why?
Why did he go to war?
Because we had terror and he said he was going to stop all foreign wars.
No, he never said that.
See, this is a possible solution to be able to get ourselves.
I mean, to fix the oil prices in America, at least, you have to produce your own oil.
You have to refine your own oil.
And you have to stop being held hostage by crazy people in the Middle East.
So we have to go over to war all the time.
I don't want a war for oil.
So the war in Iran is a possible solution.
May not work.
May not be the solution you would come up with.
But it's at least a possible solution that the president chose.
Okay.
If you want to solve the problem, you have to come up with a way to not be held hostage by crazy people.
You have to stop doing business on oil with unsavory characters like Russia or Iran.
You have to stop shutting down your own supply to oil.
Start drilling for your own resources.
Open your nuclear power plants back up.
Open your oil rigs back up.
But that's not what's happening.
Nobody's talking about that because they're getting more and more angry.
And I'll tell you, one place I worry about.
And one place I cheer for and pray for are the people in Ireland.
They are rising up and they have had enough of all of this.
But I don't know how this ends.
Ben Scallon is with us.
He's Grip Media senior political correspondent.
He is a conservative leaning Irish news outlet, Gripped is.
And he's here to tell us about what is actually happening in Ireland and what the protesters are doing today.
How is this going?
What is the reaction?
And is there any progress?
Ben, welcome.
Well, thank you so much for having me, Diane.
Great to be here.
Thank you.
So, what is happening currently on the ground with the protest in Ireland?
So, as you have no doubt heard, because it did make international press, the last couple of weeks have been very eventful here in the Emerald Isle.
We've seen massive blockades of major roads all over the country with truckers and farmers in particular who are protesting over the price of petrol.
Many of these are business owners who are literally now operating at a loss where they can't even pay the bills, let alone make a profit or have any kind of a thriving.
And in a country like Ireland that is so known for its agricultural sector, you know, this is one of our major, you know, when you think of Ireland, you think of farming, you know, some of our agricultural products are the best in the world.
And so this is a huge deal.
And one of the elements of this, of course, is the Iran war.
Needless to say, that's been the primary driver of fuel prices worldwide.
But for many years now in Ireland, Over 50% of motor fuel prices are purely comprised of government taxes and levies.
So when you fill up your car, over half of what you're paying is going straight into the state's coffers.
And so that's been the case for a long time.
People haven't been happy about it for a long time, but they've kind of just accepted it.
It's been a grumbling issue in the background that people have begrudgingly tolerated.
But then when the price of energy worldwide explodes and people are not able to make ends meet, This has now become kind of the focal point where people are saying, well, why are we paying so much taxes?
And what are you going to do about it, given that this is something that you can immediately do to pull the ripcord and help every citizen in the state?
It's kind of like I think what they're demanding is kind of like when we have an oil crisis, we go into the strategic oil reserve and it reduces the price to some degree.
But with you controlling the government controlling 50% of the price just through taxes, you would think that it would be a no brainer, especially when people are this unhappy, just to go, okay, we're going to reduce it by 50%.
We have to have some of it, but we're going to take 50% of the taxes and reduce them, at least temporarily.
Why won't they do that?
Well, they did a small tax cut that many people who are in these industries are saying is woefully inadequate and has just been eaten up by inflation almost as quickly as it was put on.
And they, for example, just to give one practical example of a measure they took, we have annual scheduled carbon tax increases.
And the explicit purpose of this is to deliberately force people out of their cars.
That was actually what one transport minister said back in 2019 to make it so unaffordable to drive your car.
That you're forced to take a bike or public transport or get an electric vehicle or something like that.
So, that is the express purpose of the policy to hurt you.
And lo and behold, it's hurting you.
So, now that that's become very politically thorny for the government, they've postponed the carbon tax hike until October.
So, they haven't even said we're going to reduce carbon tax or we're not going to put carbon tax up.
They've just kicked the can down the road by a few months.
But as many analysts have pointed out by this point, October is going to be coming into winter when energy prices are going to surge.
So you're going to be hit with a particularly large bill, bigger than you would ordinarily be hit with, just when you need energy the most.
So that's where we are now.
It's not really satisfactory so far as many of the protesters are concerned.
So if you're flying through Europe, they're actually now saying, the EU is saying, we may not have enough jet fuel.
I really don't understand how this is not.
Going deeper to say to the politicians and to the people of Europe, saying, Wait a minute, wait a minute.
We can't afford jet fuel.
We have a real problem.
Everything stops without jets flying.
We have a real problem.
And you're either manufacturing this to get us to not fly and to not drive, or you've made so many errors.
Is anybody talking about opening up the oil rigs again, opening up drilling, opening up this, you know, the system that will give you cheaper energy?
There are people who are calling for that, but the government is emphatic that we will not be doing that.
You know, Glenn, that in Ireland we import 100% of the oil that's used on the island.
We have one oil refinery, but we don't actually generate any.
And it is estimated by independent assessors that we have hundreds of millions of barrels of oil potentially off the coast within our territorial waters.
But in 2020, the government actually banned oil exploration so that you can't look for it offshore.
So that's potentially sitting there under the ground, and nobody is allowed to look for it or try to utilize that.
And at the same time, we're importing it.
We don't have any nuclear power because that's something that we haven't really even discussed approaching here, let alone actually implementing it.
Yeah, we will import the electricity that's generated in nuclear countries like France.
So we are one of the most energy-exposed countries in Europe, and Europe as a continent.
Is incredibly energy exposed relative to a country like America, which obviously has its own domestic supplies of this stuff.
So we're incredibly serious position.
We were doing the same thing until Trump.
We were shutting it all down.
We were making it impossible to get our own energy.
And we were headed exactly the same way.
And thank God for Donald Trump to say, nope, we're drilling, drill, drill, drill.
We're pulling it up.
But we haven't built a refinery here in so long.
Everything we drill, we have to sell overseas because we can't refine its light, sweet crude.
We can't refine it here because we don't build refineries.
So, our prices of gas are still up through the roof because all the oil we pull, we have to sell to somebody else.
Ben, it seems like much of the West, including here in America, is on this suicidal course.
That the policies that are being imposed are just pushing us into suicide as nations or even a culture.
Do you see hope on the other side?
Do you think things are going to change?
Is this a straw that broke the camel's back?
Well, the protesters here, when they were blocking certain kinds of infrastructure as a form of protest, the government accused them of an act of national sabotage.
I wonder what kind of sabotage it is to deliberately increase the price of energy on citizens with the express purpose of making their life harder.
I think there's a lot of.
People in the crowd who would have called that an act of national sabotage.
I'm not aware of another region outside of Europe that does that, given, as you know, and as your listeners know, energy is the lifeblood of any kind of society or economy.
This is the essence of the modern world, how we are able to heat ourselves, feed ourselves, transport ourselves.
Without that, everything grinds to a halt.
And so the idea that you would go out of your way as a state to intentionally make it harder for people to utilize that.
Seems absurd to me.
And of course, they say if a government minister was sitting here that this is all being replaced with green energy.
But we've been pursuing that for decades now, and we're still in the position we're in.
So without even getting into it, you know, you could have all the arguments you want about the efficacy of windmills and offshore wind and all these different renewable measures that they push.
But if that was all it was cracked up to be, I don't think we would be in the calamitous situation we're in now.
The results kind of speak for themselves.
I'm going over to England to speak at the Tommy Robinson rally.
And my wife is like, What should we expect?
I mean, how dangerous is it going to be?
And I'm like, It's going to be fine, honey.
It's going to be fine.
But the one thing that has crossed my mind is it's easy to blame Donald Trump for the price of oil.
And I mean, it was his move that has caused all of this.
So, yes, in some ways, it absolutely is our fault.
How, what is the population's view on America and Americans at this time?
Well, frankly, Ireland is very hostile to Donald Trump overall.
There are exceptions, of course.
You're never going to get unanimity on somebody who's as polarizing as the U.S. president.
But I think there was a poll done not too long ago which found that if Ireland had a vote in the U.S. presidential election, we would vote Democrats with a bigger margin than California.
So we would literally be the most liberal state in the U.S. if we were to have a vote in such things.
So, yeah, a lot of.
A lot of people blame Donald Trump, and obviously there's a strong argument for that given everything that's happened.
But I also think all the measures that we're discussing climate measures, green energy measures all this recent crisis is doing is giving us a time machine like glance into the future of what they would be hoping for us.
How can you complain that Donald Trump is restricting our supply of oil when?
European leaders for decades have been deliberately trying to destroy their own supply of oil.
You know, isn't he just doing our own job for us that you guys tell us is the objective of successive governments?
You know, you can't really blame him for delivering us into the utopia that we were all aiming for.
Good, good, good point.
Ben, thank you so much.
And we pray for your people and I hope it works out.
We pray for your farmers.
I'm a When I say I am a farmer, I own farmland and cattle, a ranch, so I can relate to what the farmer is going through.
And it is a really, really hard life.
You don't need anything else to make it even more difficult.
So we pray for you.
Thank you.
Thank you, Glenn.
You bet.
Choosing Wisely When Life Moves00:02:46
Let me tell you about real estate agents I trust.
Most people don't move because they're bored, they move because life moved first.
It's a new job, a growing family, kids are moving out, financial reset, whatever it is.
Need less space, want more land.
Something changed.
And that's how you have to move because your house that fit yesterday doesn't fit today.
And then people make a really simple and costly mistake.
They treat buying or selling a house like a simple errand.
You pick any agent, you pick a sign, you see what happens.
You're not picking up dry cleaning.
This is one of the biggest financial decisions you'll ever have to make.
That's why I started Real Estate Agents I Trust.
I want to make a way for you to connect with the agents who have been vetted for experience.
Professionalism, they have a track record of actually getting results.
People who know their markets, who know how to guide you through the process the right way.
When life moves, choose wisely.
Please check out realestateagentsitrust.com.
We'll introduce you to a great agent in your area.
The name says it all realestateagentsitrust.com.
You're going to be thinking about that for a couple minutes, huh?
Glenn Beck will be right back.
So it is America Reads the Bible week.
And last night from the Oval Office, the president read the Bible and the media is apoplectic.
Listen to what he read last night.
If my people which are called by my name shall humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then will I hear from heaven and will forgive their sin and will heal their land.
Now my eyes shall be open and my ears intent to the prayer that is made in this place.
For now I have chosen and sanctified this house that my name may be there forever, and my eyes and my heart shall be there perpetually.
And as for you, if you will walk before me as David your father walked and do according to all that I have commanded you and shall observe my statutes and my judgments, Then will I establish the throne of my kingdom according to as I have covenanted with David your father, saying, There shall not fail you as a man to be ruler in Israel.
Notice the Difference Immediately00:02:27
He goes on, but if you turn away and forsake me and my commandments, which I have set before you, and you shall go and serve other gods and worship them, then I will pluck them up by the roots out of my land which I have given them, and this house which I have sanctified for not my name, I will cast out of my sight.
And it'll be a proverb and a byword among all nations.
You might think a mattress is just a mattress, you know, something you buy, put in the bedroom, and then you don't think about it again unless it's time to replace it.
But that changes pretty quickly when you actually sleep on something that is built differently.
Ghostbed does not build mattresses like furniture, they build what they call engineered sleep systems, health equipment designed for relief and recovery.
And once you understand that, Everything starts to make more sense because your body isn't supposed to be fighting for comfort all night.
It is supposed to be recovering.
And when that's not happening, when you're waking up stiff or tossing and turning all night or feeling like you never really got rested, it's easy to blame everything except the one thing that you're spending hours and hours and hours on every night your mattress.
With Ghostbed, you're going to notice the difference right away.
You get 101 nights to try it out at home.
If you don't feel the difference, set it back risk free.
Ghostbed, offering their lowest prices of the season plus an extra 10% off right now.
Ghostbed.com slash Glenn.
Use the promo code BLAZE.
ghostbed.com slash Glenn, promo code blaze.
Hello, America.
Welcome to the Glenn Beck program.
Internal Civil War Inside Iran00:15:28
There is a ton going on.
We have the latest on Iran.
Looks like there is an internal civil war inside of Iran that is going on.
That's a really good thing.
As long as we have Karg Island, they're toast.
It's only a matter of time.
FISA is up for renewal.
The SPLC, the Southern Poverty Law Center, that is, I mean, that's an organ of a color revolution, I believe.
Virginia redistricting, the SAVE Act.
All these things are happening all at once.
We're going to have an extra hour or half hour of the show right after we leave the air here.
I've just got a couple of things.
I'm going to propose something to settle this FISA thing.
And I want to share it with you.
But time is of the essence.
So we'll do it today.
Right after this hour, we will continue online at glenbeck.comslash torch.
I have Kevin McCarthy joining me now from the former Speaker of the House.
Now, what happens with Virginia and the House?
What happens with the SAVE Act?
I also want to talk about Swalwell.
I mean, there was an interview that I saw recently from 2019 with McCarthy, and he said, You know, we knew about this.
You know, we know this is going on back in 2019.
Well, why?
Who is protecting him?
Why were they protecting him?
How does that work?
I mean, I think I know the answer to this, but we're going to talk to him about it in 60 seconds.
First, the convenience of modern American life.
Sometimes complicates efforts to hold on to your own values.
Wasn't that long ago?
If you wanted a good cell phone coverage, you had to pretty much go with the big boys, companies like Verizon, ATT, or T Mobile, and you took the service that you needed.
You paid the bill and you hoped not to think too hard what those companies were doing with those company profits.
For a long time, that's how it worked.
You compromised a little for the sake of convenience because you felt like there wasn't any other option.
Well, now there is.
It's Patriot Mobile, America's only Christian conservative wireless company.
They give you coverage and reliability.
That you would expect with access to all three major networks, but without asking you to fund companies that actively push your values that you don't share.
Instead, Patriot Mobile supports the family, the faith, and the family, and the freedom values and the principles that built this country that you do share.
You don't have to choose between what works and what you believe.
Go to patriotmobile.comslash back right now.
972 Patriot.
Use the promo code Beck.
Free month of service.
It's patriotmobile.comslash back.
972 Patriot.
Kevin, welcome to the program.
How are you, sir?
Very good.
You?
I'm good.
It's a pleasure to have you on.
You know, I was just saying, I saw an interview that you did in, I think it was 2019, when you joined leadership and Swalwell was in his sophomore year.
The Democrats knew about his relationship with the Chinese spy.
You were talking about it then.
That's incredible to me that nothing happened.
Nobody said it then.
I tried to remove him.
I made a privileged motion.
And the Democrats, Pelosi, he's Pelosi's pet.
You've got to understand, to be on.
Intel, it's the hardest committee to get on.
Only the leader picks, okay, on both sides.
And as a sophomore, they're sitting in the minority.
There's not very many seats.
She elevates him.
The FBI then comes and says, Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, you've got a problem.
He's sleeping with the Chinese spy.
She gets the briefing.
And Boehner, nothing happens.
I become leader.
I now have the right to the briefing.
I find out about it.
She takes the briefing with me.
And I look at her and said, You can't keep him on.
She's now speaker.
You've got to put somebody else on.
And she wouldn't.
So I made a motion, and she worked against it to keep them.
Why?
Unbelievable.
And then when I became speaker, I removed him.
But why did she get him?
Because he was her protege.
She even elevated him to a position inside steering, besides where all the committees, who gets what when they fight and all that.
She made him vice chair so he would do whatever she wanted.
Same thing with Shift.
They all elevated him to make him something special and protected him.
I knew about the Chinese based upon the FBI, and I came forward with that.
That's why I removed him from Intel.
I didn't know he was drugging women, but I was told by Democratic congresswomen, don't get around that guy.
He's creepy, right?
And so that's what people knew.
She defended him this whole time, kept elevating him.
When I removed him from the Intel committee, Hakeem Jeffries, to become leader, he tried to reappoint.
Said wouldn't do it.
The San Francisco Chronicle, that eventually came out with these stories, criticized me for doing that, said I was just playing politics.
Think about the number of young women we could have saved had they not done things like that that followed his removal.
So, usually stuff happens like this, and you put corrupt people in because if you're corrupt, you can control them.
They'll do exactly what you say because you'll say, No, you are doing that.
Otherwise, I destroy you, I reveal everything I know.
Is that what was happening?
This is true.
That's what I believe because look what happened.
He didn't jump into the governor's race early.
You had Katie Porter in there that was rising.
Then all of a sudden, they dropped these videos on her because Pelosi and Gavin and Schiff didn't like Katie Porter, okay?
So she collapses.
Then all of a sudden, Swalwell gets into that race and the Democratic apparatus.
Schiff comes out.
Everybody gets behind him.
The CTA.
The SEIU, they start giving them a lot of money, but they also put a lot in for a super PAC.
But there is one person in that group that doesn't endorse them Nancy Pelosi.
When this comes forward, okay, right before it all, when it first comes out, she treats it like Joe Biden, protects Joe Biden the entire time when people know he's not all mentally there.
But the moment the nation finds out, she's the first one to remove him.
I believe she knew the other stories because.
About right when I left, I had a reporter come to me about a young Democratic staffer that had a problem with him.
I got her an attorney.
She didn't know I was the one to get an attorney for.
So I believe if I heard these stories, Pelosi had to have known.
That's why she didn't endorse him for governor when people started really looking into it.
And then she went to knock him out once the paper printed it.
So, how many people do you think, Kevin, are like this?
How much of the stuff?
Because, you know, we'll see stuff and we'll like, it's quite obvious something is wrong here.
What is the percentage of people like this?
Now, I don't want people to say, look, there's a lot of good people on both sides of the aisle.
A lot of people, I'm sure, all the way through.
It's a microcosm of society, Congresses.
So, you're going to have good and bad.
Now, I'm going to be fair.
I went to.
We had a member on the Republican side, Matt Gaetz, and I stood up to Matt Gaetz.
The reason he made the motion to remove me is because I would not stop the ethics investigation against them.
Right.
And lo and behold, I was correct.
He did sleep with an underage girl.
Now, the other concern I have here is on Smallwell.
He has two really close friends.
One is a senator now, Gallegos, and another is a congressman, Gomez.
Gallegos was his chairman of his campaign when he ran for president.
Gomez was the chairman of his race for governor.
They weren't just close, they were together all the time.
The stories I heard about Swalwell, I'd hear about those two as well.
How quickly they ran once it got printed.
And I had some of the Democrats come to me and say, How ironic that these two are running because they believe they have the exact same problem.
And they probably thought they had the same kind of protection.
They did.
If the Speaker, if Nancy Pelosi is protecting you in the Democratic caucus, You're golden.
If she elevates you because she tells you, now you're the vice chair, but this is who I want you to pick in a race to who gets the committee, he did it every time.
When Kevin comes after you, I'll get all the Democrats to vote one way and we'll protect you.
And then we'll elevate you when we don't like who's running for governor, we want you to run.
And they put all the political apparatus behind her.
And then what happens right after that, once the public knows it, it just flashbacks to Joe Biden.
Remember, I was the earliest one to come out and said, Look, I met with the president.
He's not all there.
They criticized.
I worked with the Wall Street Journal.
We had to work for more than six months to make that story come out for the public.
They all attacked everybody.
They put all the talk shows, Morning Joe, and all that, like, something is wrong with me.
And then once he gets on stage for the nations to see it, they're the first ones to run from him and said, he's got to go.
They knew and been lying to the American public this whole time.
So one of the CNN came out and they said, you know, this is just.
Good gumshoe journalism that finally exposed this.
And I said, That's not, I don't even think Swahwell is the story.
I mean, it is a story, but that's not the story.
The story is, How, who did know all these years?
Who did know this stuff was going on?
Who didn't know it?
Right.
It's the cover up of this.
Yeah.
And they're letting Nancy Pelosi know she, Oh, no, I didn't know about it.
You know what's so egregious to me is something's happening in the Republican group.
Tony Gonzalez, I hope that man gets elected.
He faltered, okay?
But I was the first one to say he needed to resign before the election, not to cover him.
And then after the election comes out, and then people want to.
This is a challenge that we have.
How are we, I mean, I'd be remiss in not asking you, how are the Republicans going to do in the midterms and then post Trump?
Well, right now, I'm very concerned, especially about the House.
And there's a couple measurements.
Yeah, Virginia.
Now, to me, I do not like what's happening in this redistricting because now we're letting politicians pick their voters instead of the voters pick who they want to represent us.
I'm opposed to all that.
I've put my own money in against California.
I sent $100,000 for the Virginias.
We did.
Now, one positive thing here.
When everybody's saying negative, we did increase Republican vote by 3% from the 24 presidential.
If we were able to do that in the election, we would be in a much better place.
But if you look historically, whoever wins on the off the election for governor in New Jersey and Virginia, if the Democrats win both, historically they flip the House.
If Republicans win one, we flip the House.
But if you look at that delegate races, there were eight Republicans who were running for reelection in Virginia.
And they were in seats that Harris carried in the presidential race, they all lost.
There were five Republicans running for reelection in those seats that Trump carried.
We lost five of them up to 4.5%.
So that concerns me.
If you look at the presidential race, President Trump carries all the swing states, he wins the popular vote, which is very big for Republicans, a president, and they lost seats in the House.
Four years prior, when we didn't win the presidency, This was the first time since 1994 not one Republican incumbent lost, and we beat 15 Democrats.
So, how do we win then and lose now?
That means President Trump did very well, but the party didn't.
And if you take it a step further, in the last 70 races for the Senate in the presidential year, 69 of the 70 states, however they vote for president, that party wins.
But this time, President Trump won Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
But the Republicans didn't win those Senate seats.
So they're underperforming.
And then when I'm watching the highest number of retirements, kind of in modern history, the number of times we're losing discharge petitions, in three weeks, we lost more discharge petitions than we have in 30 years.
And you've got to understand what that is.
It's a rule that if you get 218 members of either party to sign a discharge petition, it's about one bill, that bill automatically comes to the floor.
When you do that, you're turning the floor over to the minority.
In my entire political career in Congress, only one time did a discharge petition go, and the Speaker at that time, Republican Speaker, wanted it to happen.
Now they just had a discharge petition, a bill passed that was offered by one of the AOC crowd.
Unbelievable.
So that's a bad sign you're not working together.
And then when the Democrats shut down the government, you're only given 24 months to have a majority.
The Senate stayed in session.
The House did not.
I know.
If I'm in the minority and the House shuts down, the minority's winning because you're not passing.
Correct.
You're giving up two months of your 24 months.
I know.
I know.
Why wouldn't you be in there passing things every single day?
Put the 80 20 issues on the floor.
And you know what?
Come November, you'd show the Democrats voted against this.
So I would show those Democrats voted to keep Swalwell.
Run on that, too.
Let me, I only have about a minute left.
Let me ask you.
Yes.
What am I missing on Thune?
Because none of this makes sense on the voter ID stuff.
Why isn't that going through with as popular as it is?
What needs to happen?
Okay.
So the Senate has different roles than the House.
The House is pure whoever has the majority.
I don't like all this Republican on a Republican fight when we're trying to keep it.
Okay.
I just up front.
When I watch others on the outside fighting, you got to unite.
And what I would do, Thune wants this to pass through.
What Thune has is some members who may not and has some Democrats who may not.
So you need more votes than just Republicans.
Otherwise, you got to change the rules.
That's the decision where you want to go.
But the Save America Act, it is so popular with Republicans and Democrats.
Need More Votes Than Republicans00:06:21
I would take it by pieces then, okay?
And I would put each piece one by one, okay?
Voter ID.
Just put that up and see all who would vote for or not.
Then add the next piece.
And then what you can do, you can cobble it all back together after they vote for it.
But if you keep it all together, I've watched this on difficult bills, and everybody wants to pick one thing they can't be for.
Okay, then let's put it piece by piece and really show the American public and jam it right at you and then piece it back together and show no, it's the way to go.
You got to think outside the box and you got to put harder pressure.
That's the way I would look at it.
Kevin, great to talk to you.
Kevin McCarthy, former U.S. House Speaker.
Appreciate it, sir.
Thank you.
Thank you.
You bet.
All right, let me tell you about Relief Factor in the past few days.
I have signed, I think, approximately about nine and a half billion thank you cards for members of this audience.
And I know what you're thinking, Glenn.
You don't have nine and a half billion listeners.
No, I know, but I think there are, I think I've signed for nine and a half billion thank you cards.
It just never ends.
Relief Factor has kept me going from going insane.
I will tell you, I didn't, I was, there was a time where I was afraid I wasn't going to be able to write anymore.
My hands were so bad and so much pain.
But I started taking relief factor somehow or another.
I thought it was smart to say, I'm going to sign everybody who signs up for the first month on the torch, I'm going to send you a thank you letter, hand signed by me.
Oh, what a stupid thing.
Couldn't have been done without relief factor.
But I will tell you, it has broken the back of my pain in my hands like nothing ever did.
Nothing worked.
My wife convinced me to start taking relief factor, and it has worked.
This year, as we celebrate 250 years of freedom, ask yourself, are you living.
Freedom from your pain that you deserve.
Try the three week quick start today.
See how it works for you.
Visit relieffactor.com.
Call 800 for relief.
800, the number four relief.
10 seconds.
Stay shy.
Jason and Ricky, I know I've got one more segment here, another half hour.
I have John Sullivan coming up here in just a second.
We're going to talk about a few things.
What have I missed so far?
There's so much to talk about.
What have I missed that we got to jam in here?
Jason?
Jason.
Hey, Glenn.
Gosh, man, there's just so much stuff today.
I mean, there was the FBI on the new case that they were spying on the GOP.
I've talked about that a little bit to the insiders.
I thought just.
They must have been talking about Arctic Frost.
They had to have been.
Just more details leaking out bit by bit.
But it was actually something completely different.
They're calling it Operation Rampart 12.
What is this one?
So, pretty much the same thing.
But what's crazy is the predication that was used to start Biden's DOJ and FBI to spring into action on this.
It sounds like it was just rumors that spilled out from other Democrats that said, hey, we think that you guys should look into some of these Republicans.
And so they did, apparently.
It just makes me wonder, Glenn, if these people ever do get power again, just based off of what they have done, the little things that are leaking out now about it, and we still don't really see any kind of movement to ensure this does not happen again.
I mean, what the heck?
Look at what, you know, look at Spanberger, what she said, you know, she ran as a moderate, and look what she's done.
They're not saying they're going to be moderate on any of these things now, they're saying that there's going to be a purge.
You know, they're going to get rid of the filibuster there.
I mean, they are going to do all of it.
They're going to do all of it.
And I think there is real trouble coming.
My gosh, if we get the House, the House, or if we lose the House, the House is going to do nothing but impeachment for two years.
If you keep the Senate, it won't go anywhere, but it'll just be nonstop impeachment and scandal and everything else the whole time.
Yeah, I hesitate to call impeachment the bare minimum, but I mean, I think.
Yeah, that's just part of the plan.
I was just talking also to the insiders about, you know, there were comments from James Carville on don't talk about it, you know, just do it on day one.
He's saying to make two more states, D.C. and Puerto Rico, and pack the Supreme Court.
Now, that's just James Carville just saying this.
But just a few days later, the New York Times writes this article basically making the case that the Supreme Court is partisan.
Why are you doing that unless you're setting up this big push to pack the Supreme Court if you do get power again?
You pack the Supreme Court.
That is the last and final step to a dictatorship, to a banana republic.
Once you start messing with the Supreme Court and the numbers, history shows every time that leads to a failed state.
It's truly terrifying what they are openly talking about now.
Most people think of sleep at the end of the day, but it's not.
It's the start of the next one because tomorrow often depends on what happens tonight.
You know, whether you wake up clear headed or foggy, whether you have energy or you're running on fumes by 10 in the morning, whether you feel ready for the day or you're already behind.
That's why I tell you about Z Factor from Relief Factor.
It goes beyond melatonin, it's a blend of all natural ingredients, four different natural ingredients designed to help relax your mind so you can fall asleep faster, stay asleep more soundly, and wake up feeling refreshed instead of groggy.
It's safe to take every single night.
I take it every night when, you know, it matters because you have to build up a routine of sleeping.
Georgia wrote in, she said that she sleeps great.
She gets up early and gets an early start every day.
Flory said, great product, no morning grogginess.
That's really the key, I think.
Try it right now.
You can save 46% on your first order.
It's $19.95 for a 30 day supply.
Call 800 for Relief.
That's 800, the number for Relief.
Or visit ReliefFactor.com.
Better sleep, better days from Z Factor with ReliefFactor.
ReliefFactor.com.
Rare Glenn Overtime Segment00:15:36
The rare Glenn Overtime segment is coming up after the show.
Become a Torch Insider now to get access at glenbeck.comslash torch.
Welcome to the Glenn Beck program.
There is, man, so much to deal with today.
We are lucky enough to have John Solomon with us today.
He is one of my favorite journalists.
He is a guy who pisses off everybody on all sides.
And that's how you know he's a good journalist because he lets the chips fall where they may.
He started Just the News.
He's the CEO and editor in chief of Just the News.
John Solomon, welcome to the program.
How are you?
Yeah, doing well, Glenn.
Good to be with you.
Good, good.
I want to start with the SPLC.
How airtight is this case?
Yeah, it seems to be pretty airtight.
They have specific transactions, about $3 million in transactions that the government has traced through bank records and wires to people who were in extremist groups, people like the KKK and others, that were acting allegedly as informants for the SPLC.
And the question will become here does that constitute fraud?
If you're SPLC and you say your job is to fight hate, But you have delivered money to people who are members of hate groups without the controls that an FBI or Justice Department would have with a cooperating informant.
Have you committed fraud?
But the wire transactions are pretty clearly laid out in the indictment.
And this is an extraordinary flipping of the script of SPLC.
I mean, this is a group that grew its fame by standing alongside those who were being discriminated against in the 50s, 60s, and 70s during the civil rights movement.
Today, they stand accused of funding the very people.
Who continued to espouse hate in America.
And I think that the notion that a nonprofit could have an informant system moving monies to these groups is troubling to a lot of people that I've talked to in the last couple of days, even if it was well intentioned, probably not allowed for under the tax code under which they're constituted the 501c3 tax code.
I mean, I know I run a 501c3, and I don't think I, I think it would be pretty obvious that I shouldn't open bank accounts under false names.
And wire money to really bad guys.
Yeah.
That's it.
That's it.
Yeah.
So, USA Today, I think, is carrying water for them.
This is what it says The Southern Poverty Law Center was indicted for paying sources to infiltrate hate groups, a tactic used by federal agencies for decades.
But the key here is they weren't a federal agency.
So, that's exactly what are the important part?
What are the safeguards?
What separates them from the federal agency being allowed to do that?
Well, first, the federal agencies, when they do this, are often under the Authorization of a federal court.
There is civil liberties protections considered.
And when identities are used, they're approved under lawful measures.
Here, the SPLC decided it was going to be an FBI light, for lack of a better word.
And you don't have the right to create fictitious accounts.
There's nothing in the bank laws that say, hey, you can make a fake account if you're doing SPLC work.
And I think, and also keep in mind where this was filed.
This was filed in Alabama.
It's a no nonsense state.
It's going to be a tough jury for the SPLC to face.
But you and I can't create a fake bank account, nor can the SPLC.
Only the government can under the direction of a court and under very tight regulation that protects civil liberties.
And here, there are some really serious concerns about civil liberties, too, which is when a nonprofit group rises to government type work without supervision, do they risk harming someone's civil liberties?
So, is there any evidence at all that they were working in tandem with the FBI, DOJ, or deep state?
Well, we know that the FBI in the Chris Wray era, particularly, relied on SPLC to identify hate groups.
Remember that SPLC tried to suggest that Moms for Liberty was a hate group.
I think they flagged Charlie Kirk's group.
A lot of conservatives felt like those were extreme labels that didn't belong on either of those groups.
The FBI often in the past relied on SPLC to identify hate groups, oftentimes to the detriment of the FBI.
That's why we probably had the problems with going after.
Latin Catholics and Latin Mass Catholics in parents and school board meetings.
Now, I'm not suggesting SBC directly funded those or impressed those, but they created a nonprofit system that the FBI would listen to, and they were all on the far left.
And over time, the far left just used these designations to hang nasty signs and Hester Prynne A's on conservative groups they just didn't like.
And so Kash Patel comes in, he ends those relationships, and then in the course of ending those relationships, he found out what the FBI knew, which was.
Hey, these guys are setting up fake bank accounts and working at.
To date, we haven't seen any documents that suggest the FBI authorized a nonprofit to do so.
And it's probably unlikely given the code of law.
So, was it most likely that they just, the SPLC, just knew that the FBI will turn a blind eye because we're doing their work?
We're helping them.
Yeah, we'll see what their defense is.
I don't have a good sense of what it is.
The SPLC of 2026 is not the same SPLC of the 1960s and 70s.
And so.
These groups evolve and sometimes they get too big for their britches.
And we'll see where a jury comes down.
But it is kind of a remarkable thing to think that the SPLC was sending money to hate groups so that they could essentially be more hateful in hopes of being able to spy on that hate.
It just doesn't seem like the right sort of system from a common sense standpoint.
So, does this, I mean, at least this one was announced by the DOJ.
I mean, you know, it looks like we're going to prosecute here more investigations on nonprofits coming?
Yeah, I think we're about to enter into, and we have MAGA, we have MAHA, we have all these great acronyms.
I think we're about to enter into a period of MAAA, make America accountable again.
I think with Pam Bondi moved aside, the speed at which the Justice Department will move on things that have been working in the system for months is picking up.
And so there'll be more nonprofits that were doing things that probably are not allowed under the tax code.
If you incorporate yourself to say, we want a tax exemption because we're going to do public good, and you obstruct law enforcement proceedings on the streets of Minnesota or somewhere else, you're probably in danger of having committed fraud.
So I would look and see, I'm watching, I think there'll be more indictments in the nonprofit realm.
Then we're looking at those who may have given false testimony or obstructed Congress.
We know John Brennan was referred for that.
James Comey was targeted for that.
I think those are on the table right now.
Then those who may have gone and gotten phone records and pierced the privacy of individuals, they're next in line.
So this line keeps moving.
And then I think in the summer and fall, we're going to talk a lot more about a case called Operation Round River.
It may be the most troubling of the four known.
Oh, my gosh.
Yeah, Round River.
Just remember that name.
What we believe it is.
Yeah.
So it falls between Crossfire Hurricane and then Plasmic Echo and Arctic Frost.
Plasmic Echo and Arctic Frost are the things that evolve into Jack Smith's investigations.
The classified documents is Plasmic Echo.
Arctic Frost is the idea.
Years later, we're going to go back and charge President Trump with a conspiracy because he and his people wanted to.
Have alternate electors.
Now, it's important in that Arctic Frost, which there was a great hearing on yesterday, two times in history before this, presidential candidates did submit alternate electors to Congress.
1960, John Kennedy, 1876, Sam Tilden.
Neither time were those considered criminal acts.
But in Donald Trump's world, he's considered a criminal for doing the third time.
That's what Arctic Frost is.
But between that, when Russia collusion and Crossfire Hurricane was ending, the FBI opened up a new investigation called Round River.
And its goal was to neutralize.
Anyone who would dare suggest that there was a corrupt relationship between Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, and the Ukrainian government or the Ukrainian company Burisma, and to treat people who talked about it with certain speech parameters as national security threats.
And I'm working hard to get those files declassified.
And I think that's going to be the most troubling because I believe if what we're being told is true, and I want to check it until we get it there, there may have been speech parameters as the reason you were targeted.
If you said something, you might have been assessed as a security threat by the FBI.
That would be very troubling.
I've seen some evidence in court filings in the last few days that entire law firms had their client records taken secretly under this investigation or spinoffs from it.
You're supposed to have some privacy when you have a relationship with you and your lawyer.
So we'll see where that leads.
But all the people I've talked to in government think that Round River may be the most jaw dropping of the four codename investigations that targeted Donald Trump and his followers.
So talk to me about Tulsi Gabbard.
You said things may move faster now that Tulsi Gabbard has moved aside.
I mean, she just released some powerful things.
Yeah, no, no, Pam Bondi.
Pam Bondi.
I'm sorry.
Okay, okay.
Pam Bondi.
Pam Bondi movie.
Okay, good, good.
Yeah, Tulsi's been a fantastic.
I mean, listen, I've had to, you know, we had to work with the group because sometimes the intelligence community isn't prone to transparency.
But she listened to our arguments and she has been great.
And she's, I think, carefully and wisely declassified some very important things.
Really important things.
Yeah.
Go through the lectures.
What are we missing from the documents that she released related to the impeachment?
So, I think we have most of it now.
We've identified a lot of the players who had code names in those documents.
We identified witness two today as a former NSA employee who clearly was anti Trump.
So, we now know all the players, and she's made a criminal referral.
And I think the Justice Department will move on that quickly, determine if crimes are committed, if they're still in the statute of limitations.
Does there need to be a conspiracy charge?
Is there a great bundle?
Are we still thinking about a grand conspiracy?
Because it seems to all fit to that.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I think that's why Joe DeGeneva was brought down to Fort Pierce.
I broke that story on Saturday.
That's an important moment.
You have a guy, one of the few lawyers in the history of this company to hold the title of U.S. Attorney, independent counsel, and special prosecutor three times in his life.
He's been asked to run major, major criminal enterprise investigations.
You bring him down to Florida, you mean business, and he's a no nonsense, get it done sort of guy.
He's clearly conservative, clearly likes Donald Trump.
But at the end of the day, what he's most famous for as an independent prosecutor was not charging people who he didn't think committed crimes.
That's going to charge a fake crime.
He's always been honest about that.
But if he did commit a crime, he knows how to bring a conspiracy case.
And so you look at how he brought the Mary and Barry corruption scandal in the 1980s under Ronald Reagan, a really good conspiracy type investigation.
So he's got the experience, the wherewithal, and the independence to go make the decisions, sort the wheat from the chaff.
There's no doubt that the Florida grand jury in Fort Pierce is looking at the last 10 years as an ongoing conspiracy, a wash, rinse, repeat cycle.
Democrat has a problem.
Hillary Clinton has a Russia problem.
Democrats create fake narrative, hang Russian shingle on Donald Trump, and investigate Donald Trump, potentially violating his civil liberties and those around him.
Joe Biden has a Ukraine problem.
Wash, rinse, repeat.
We're going to hang our Ukraine problem on Donald Trump, start an investigation, neutralize his people, potentially violate their civil liberties.
Joe Biden has a classified documents problem.
They find him by the Corvette in the UPenn office as well.
And then they're going to hang a classified documents case on President Trump.
And then Joe Biden has a mental acuity problem.
It becomes very obvious in 23.
He's got a problem.
And so Jack Smith's Arctic Frost sort of invents a different concept, which is well, we were thinking about the violence at the Capitol.
We're not going to charge the president with that, but we are probably going to charge him for conspiring to look at alternate electors, even though it's been done twice in our country as a criminal conspiracy.
Every time the Democrats had a liability, they used the power of government intelligence and law enforcement and prosecution to project that problem onto Republicans and make it a liability.
Along the way, there's a lot of civil liberty rights and civil rights and liberties that.
Probably are violated.
And I think that's the theory of the conspiracy case.
We'll see if a grand jury buys it.
John, always good to have you on.
Thank you so much.
Great honor.
Thank you.
John Solomon, Just the News.
If you don't get your news from Just the News, you should go to justthenews.com, justthenews.com, and you'll find John and all of his.
It's a site that I check every single day.
I think they do excellent work.
All right, let me tell you about real estate agents I trust.
You know, some people will spend months preparing for a vacation that they take once.
Sometimes those same people will spend maybe 10 minutes choosing the person who's supposed to help them buy a house.
Think about that.
One decision involves, you know, sunscreen and airport snacks, and the other one involves hundreds of thousands of dollars, timing, negotiations, offers, and everything else.
You need to make sure you have the right person.
Okay.
Otherwise, it's the next chapter of your life.
It could go sideways.
This is why I started Real Estate Agents I Trust.
I wanted to create a network of agents who have already been vetted for experience and professionalism and have a proven track record.
So it would take the guess out when the stakes are high.
So the right thing to do is, you know, just go to realestateagentsitrust.com and Meet one of these people.
They know the market.
They know how to price your home.
They know how to sell your home in a tough market.
The name says it all.
Real Estate Agents I Trust.com.
That's Real Estate Agents I Trust.com.
Glenn Beck is back after this.
So I'm going to do an extra half hour of the show today because we had so much jammed in.
And I really wanted to go and do the pros and cons of FISA because I think this FISA argument, we have a real problem with FISA, obviously.
And this is not something that was born after September 11th.
This was born out of the church committee in the 1970s.
And it was born to be able to control the spying.
And it has just made things worse.
And I have a solution for it because I think we can't deny anybody who says that, oh, we don't need FISA, we don't need to spy outside of the United States and figure out what's going on and what's coming in here.
You're fooling yourself.
Born to Control Spying00:01:56
We have to know what's going on, but we have to be really very careful on what's happening inside.
And you should not be able to spy on American citizens without the highest, highest standard.
And so I'm both for and against all of this stuff, as I think anybody reasonable could look at both sides.
And I will lay it out for you here in a minute.
But the problem is not oversight, the problem is punishment.
And I laid this out for my staff today, and they were like, Are you sure you want to go on the air with that right now?
And I'm like, Yeah.
And they're like, Maybe you should rethink that.
And I'm like, Nope, not going to rethink it.
I just ran out of time.
I may share it tomorrow or at least pieces of it tomorrow.
But nope, I'm absolutely sure.
That I mean what I say and say what I mean.
And so we'll talk about that.
Also, if you'll get that coming up in about two minutes, we're going to just go from here to the internet, glenbeck.comslash torch.
So if you're a member of the torch, if not, sign up right now and we're going to give an extra half hour of the show.
Also, you get access to all 10 episodes of The American Story, which is just going gangbusters.
First two are out with commercials at the public, just wherever you get your.
Podcasts.
The first two came out last Saturday and the Saturday before last.
You'll get them on Saturdays.
And they're tremendous.
Tremendous.
You want to learn history.
You want to teach history.
You want to be engaged in history.
You want to live it.
Get the American Story.
It's based on David and Tim Barton's book, American Story.
And it's a fully produced audio podcast.
You don't want to miss all 10 episodes of the first season, they are out right now.