Glenn Beck, Jaco Booyens, and Vera Sharav dissect the Mar-a-Lago affidavit's redactions, mocking "unlawful storage" charges while questioning FBI claims about Ina Yakashivin. Booyens urges parents to oppose Texas TEKS standards that allegedly erase Christianity and distort history. Sharav draws parallels between current vaccine mandates and Nazi eugenics, arguing the rollout violates the Nuremberg Code due to lack of informed consent. Ultimately, the episode frames these events as evidence of systemic government overreach and institutional betrayal requiring immediate civil resistance. [Automatically generated summary]
My house, my yard, my garage, everything in the house, because we have company.
And, you know, it's family.
And you can't have a dirty house with family.
Well, your family, of course, expects everything to be in perfect order.
Because they know.
They know you so well.
They know me so well.
You know what I mean?
So Tanya's, this is what I was afraid of.
We're throwing a big birthday bash for her.
It's 50th birthday this weekend.
Does she know about this?
Well, she knows that the party is happening up front.
Okay.
She doesn't know what's happening.
She knows what she's fine.
Okay, good.
No.
Smart.
She's smart.
I probably shouldn't talk about this at all.
Well, I was thinking it might be a risk.
You did mention it at one point during the show, and I was like, I don't think he's supposed to say that, but whatever.
Yeah.
Okay, well, thanks for helping me out there.
You had already said it.
I couldn't go back.
I couldn't delete the show.
Where we're going, there are no rogues, okay?
Man.
Anyway, I've been throwing this, you know, kind of a surprise party.
It started out as a surprise party, but my wife is impossible to keep secrets from.
Impossible.
I mean, I have done a pretty good job on the hookers.
Oh, geez, I've said that out loud.
She must have.
Let's get right to the podcast.
Here it is. You're listening to The Best of the Blend Program.
I heard a lot of talk this weekend of people saying, did you see the, did you see the Mar-Lago affidavit?
And I said, no.
And they said, yeah, it was mainly, you know, it was all just black bars.
And I'm like, yeah, no, I saw that.
I didn't see the affidavit.
I saw all the black bars.
And there's something new now.
The Department of Justice has redacted the reason for redacting the affidavit.
Really?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Seems appropriate.
Yeah.
The only thing they said that wasn't redacted there was agent safety.
Every other, you know, agent safety, that's because the violent extremists on the right.
So agent safety was not redacted, but every other reason for redacting was redacted.
So we have absolutely no idea what's in it, but also no idea why we can't see.
We don't see things.
We don't know what's in it, and we also now don't know the reason why we don't know what's in it.
So this is perfect.
It is perfect.
This is perfect.
No, no, no.
Seriously, it's really good.
By the way, the New York Times now demands criminal prosecution of Donald Trump.
Are we supposed to care about what the New York Times demands?
I don't know.
So let me give you this.
This one is from, I think it's YouTube, not YouTube, Yahoo.
There is little left for the Justice Department to do but to decide whether to wait until after the midterms to formally seek the indictment of a grand jury for Donald Trump.
Hmm.
Yeah.
I heard someone talking about this whole scandal earlier today, and the phrase they used.
Yeah.
And I mean this sincerely.
The phrase they used, what they were going to charge him with was unlawful storage.
Oh, man.
Does anyone think this is going to have an impact?
I am unlawful.
That is a death penalty sentence right there.
We're not talking about a guy getting access to documents he's not supposed to have access to, right?
That's not what we're talking about.
These are documents the man saw with his eyes while he was president of the United States.
Right.
So the issue here is he should have put it in a better closet.
He should have put it in a safe.
He should have let it be stored at the archives.
A storage conflict.
This is what's going to take down Donald Trump.
The guy who survived all of these other things.
Unlawful storage is the thing.
That's what they want us to believe today.
Well, that's the way we took Al Capone down.
Unlawful storage?
No, well, tax evasion.
We couldn't get him on the other things.
This is insane.
The difference is, is that Al Capone actually was killing people.
Right.
Donald Trump hasn't done anything.
Right.
You just don't like him.
Can I run a couple of scenarios?
Sure.
I would like to get your thoughts.
Okay.
All right.
So I want to boil this down for a second.
No one actually cares if Donald Trump has these documents.
I know that's a controversial thing to say, but no, it's really not.
It is for the media.
Maybe for the media, but no one actually cares.
The man literally, we are supposed to believe, saw them, and that's why he has them.
And by the way, it's not.
He didn't pack them up.
The GAO did.
GAO packed them up.
GAO.
So that's not him or his people.
One of the few things we know about these documents is they were put in between like newspaper clippings and everything else.
And you could say, well, that's so let's start at the bottom.
He didn't do anything wrong at all.
Okay, obviously that does not affect.
Because what we're talking about here is not whether these documents affected the national security.
It's just a matter of how it affects Donald Trump's future politics.
That's all the story is about.
It has nothing to do with whether he actually committed a crime or not.
So maybe he did nothing wrong.
Obviously, that's not a problem.
Next step up.
He was reckless with it.
He shouldn't have had the documents and had them, right?
Let's say he was reckless with the documents.
Okay.
Like, what would be reckless?
Like laying them out.
Well, when we put them on the menu at Mara Lawrence, exactly.
Like, let's say you're at Mar-a-Lago.
Your kid's ordering a grilled cheese.
He flips it over.
It's supposed to be the maze.
Right.
But instead, it's a nuclear document.
Right.
That would be really reckless.
Or I could get the ground beef, the sirloin, or the nuclear secret.
Right, exactly.
That would be bad.
So if any technically be selling them, Stu.
If it's just a process argument about documents, there is no impact to our politics, right?
The fact that he should have, let's just say, let's take the worst case.
He should have gone through some other process of declassification or whatever.
No one actually cares about that at all.
It's not going to impact our politics.
Step it up.
Was he reckless with them?
Let's say he legitimately put them in some closet and did not lock the door, which is what they're saying.
No, they came down and asked him to put a lock on it.
And he did.
But like, I'd ask you this.
Go try to steal a drink at Mar-a-Lago.
Would that be easy?
This is the president of the United States House.
They act as if people could walk into any closet and start stealing boxes.
Right.
This is not likely to occur.
Right.
While you might say, hey, they should be in a highly classified environment.
I get that.
Look.
But like, this is.
Hang on.
I think you're doing too much work here.
But no, let me give you the last two.
Okay.
Okay.
So this one I would say, let's just say he handled them recklessly.
I think in our politics, that could escalate to the point of like the Hillary Clinton scandal, where the people on one side of the argument think it's the worst thing in the world and the other side doesn't care at all.
It could elevate to that level.
The only thing that actually would make any difference with the story was if you had evidence, evidence, of Donald Trump using these documents for his own personal benefit, i.e. he was selling them to get golf events.
Oh, wait a minute.
Which was actually tossed out there by the left.
Wait, you could have, if Donald Trump, and this could happen, okay?
It didn't with Donald Trump, but it could happen.
Okay.
In theory, if Donald Trump said to somebody else in the White House, I want you to go into the skiff.
I want you to take pictures of those documents, then cut the top of them off so it doesn't say classified or top secret.
And then email them to my home.
That would be bad.
Right.
And of course, would be much, much, much, much more risky than having them in a closet.
Anything online anywhere would be more risky than having it in Donald Trump's closet, even without a lock.
How do you know it's not a virtual closet?
Go ahead.
We don't know.
But if you had evidence that, like, let's say he was taking documents that were central to American security that he was going to use to, in a political ad three weeks later, that he didn't declass.
I don't know what the scenario would be, but if you found something like that and had real evidence of it, maybe that would move the needle.
A process crime on documents is not moving.
This is a ridiculous controversy.
And I swear the left just wants to talk about Donald Trump because they think that's going to help them in some way.
They want to, they want to get in a fight with him.
They want to make it about them versus Donald Trump again.
They remember the good old days back when they were winning midterm elections in 2018.
They remember the good old days when CNN had more than eight people watching it.
They remember all of these wonderful dreams.
So they want to talk about it constantly.
But what the hell is the point of this?
Like, these are not documents he stole.
He didn't go into a bank vault and steal documents he wasn't allowed to see.
He literally saw them.
He's also the president and he declassifies anything he wants.
And he's the Secretary of State.
Anyway, that's a different story.
Let me ask you this question, okay?
Same kind of topic.
Who do you believe?
Who do you trust?
Apparently, a Ukrainian truck driver's daughter named Ina Yakashivin.
Are you a native speaker?
I am.
That's the way you pronounce it.
Yakashivin.
I could tell.
Who allegedly, who allegedly posed as a Rothschild heiress to gain access to Mar-a-Lago and meet former President Donald Trump is being accused now of the FBI of having ties to Russian organized crime.
Apparently, this woman who lives in Ohio, the FBI said she was making trips to Mar-Lago to get money from Donald Trump for a children's charity, which actually was a front for organized crime in Russia.
Okay.
So Donald Trump was writing checks to organize crime in Russia.
Is that?
Now, she says, no, nothing like that.
FBI says, yeah, everything like that.
My question is, who do you believe?
The woman you don't even know anything about that could have been, could have been masquerading as a Rothschild and a Soviet spy or the FBI.
Institutions Fail to Protect Children00:02:02
The fact that you have to ask that question is a problem with our institutions.
It really is, isn't it?
This is the best of the Glenn Beck program, and we really want to thank you for listening.
In case you don't remember meeting him before, you've met him a couple of times, I think, on the program.
Yako Buyans, he is the founder of Yako Buyans Ministry and CEO after Eden Pictures.
He's a guy who I first met, I don't know, a few years ago, and he was involved in stopping human trafficking because his sister in South Africa was kidnapped by human traffickers.
And if I remember right, Yako, didn't you quit school to go find your sister?
Yeah, it became a family effort.
Good morning, Glenn.
Thank you.
Family effort.
I was a senior in high school at the time, and Ilanka was 13.
Yes.
Jeez.
And you eventually found her.
How long did it take?
It was a long journey.
The process of Ilanka being trafficked was from 1994 through 2001.
So it's a big year journey.
And she was discovered early one morning in a casino by an undercover police officer who broke through a door by God's divine appointment.
And yeah, and so it was a long journey.
And since then, since 1994, we've been in this hellacious fight against evil coming for our children.
And it is, I tell you, Yako, it is what's happening in our schools right now is so evil.
And we are crossing the, there are no lines beyond minor attracted adults.
There's no line past that.
Proposed Texas Education Standards00:09:29
That's right.
You blow past the, you know, the child sex line.
You're at the bottom of society.
That's it.
There's nothing left.
Yeah, absolutely.
I wanted to talk to you about something because all my neighbors are freaking out.
And they're like, Glenn, why didn't you talk about this?
And I'm like, the guy works for us.
I mean, he's a contributor on the blaze.
I mean, that's close enough, isn't it?
But you've stirred things up in my household and everything else.
I wanted you to explain what TEKS is and how this is happening here in Texas, but it is also most likely happening all over the country in their own version of it.
Yeah, absolutely.
The TEECS program, which is a code, is an education code that's the guidelines for Texas education, of course, and by the state school board of education and the TEA, the Texas Education Association.
TEAKS stands for Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills Standards.
And every year they review one of these pillars.
There's four pillars.
And this year, it's social studies.
Next year, it will be mathematics.
Now, the interesting thing is when they review it, it only happens every 12 years.
Oh, my God.
So when they set a standard, Glenn, and one of your great friends, an amazing American, helped set the previous standards.
David Burton.
Yeah.
In 2009 with a lot of scholars.
And it was phenomenal.
It was pro-American, pro-God, pro-country, pro-Texas.
Right.
Pro-Texas history.
Pro-Texas history, where the Alamo was a place of honor, not dishonor.
Well, yes.
And look, this morning, breaking on your show right now, five minutes ago, your staff is so on point, Glenn.
I sent him a letter that was released five minutes ago substantiating what I've been saying.
And look, we've taken attack from the state school board this week because they've never been under a microscope like this.
But the parents need to know what these proposed standards are.
And they're radical from the left against our nation's history, Texas history, against Christianity, minimizing Christianity, teaching 20 days of Buddhism, divination, Hinduism, a day, day and a half, two days of Christianity.
Things like our founding document, our founding documents are labeled as not the founding documents, but the spirit of the founding documents.
Things like that.
So you have like any God stuff that's out, including even our motto, In God We Trust, that's out.
More space has been made for Islam and other religions.
Moses is being taken out of the standards.
How do you even begin to understand American law without Moses?
Well, without Moses, you don't have Ten Commandments.
And without the Ten Commandments, you don't have absolute truth.
And we're in a culture today where the left wants us to be fluid in everything, fluid in sex with children, fluid in gender, which, by the way, it comes up in a new proposed standards.
Now, these are proposals, but they are what now is draft F, which will be proposed tomorrow.
I'll be in Austin and I'm on the docket to speak.
We'll see if I'll speak or not.
But tomorrow is a big day.
And because parents finally said, well, wait a minute.
You can't remove Moses.
You can't teach that in history the Texas Rangers was an instrument of oppression.
You can't teach that having a border as a militarization zone.
This is what's being proposed.
You can't teach Chinese dynasties and Asian dynasties, but not teach Lincoln and Davy Crockett And American exceptionalism, they want that out.
Like, don't teach kids that we went to the moon and that we are an exceptional nation.
No, this is in draft form.
So, look.
But here's the thing.
Here's the thing that this is so important in every state because you'll have your own standards.
But in Texas, just like California, most states will adopt our standards.
So if Texas adopts this, then most likely all of the history books, you'll have a choice between the California history books and the social studies books and the Texas if they're not combined.
And so this is going to affect your children.
Nationwide, Glenn, here's why.
People don't know.
Texas has the most students in school of even more than California, 5.8 million students in school age 17 and under.
So the curriculum standards and the publishers draft off of the TEEKS education code.
And look, there's a code of what they should teach.
And this letter from the Freedom Caucus, and you can read it, it's scathing.
They actually said that some of these proposals are illegal against Texas code.
And so you got the Freedom Caucus with Maze Middleton that wrote this letter this morning saying we will pursue action.
I mean, the last paragraph here is if you further indoctrinate, they're talking about indoctrinating children, having to teach George Floyd and an uprising against police brutality, having to teach 28 genders in a certain age bracket in class, spreading Texas history over every grade, sprinkling it and blending it in versus saying, no, we're dedicated in first and second grade to Texas history.
Look, it's grade by grade, and it's in proposal form, but the clock is ticking, Glenn.
Tomorrow is a very, very significant.
Okay, so what do people have to do?
What do you have to do?
Email the state school board of education, each one of them.
And I tell people, be kind, but be firm.
Be nice.
Now, we do have a nine-stick Republican board.
96.
Yeah, but in Texas, that doesn't necessarily mean that should be a shoe.
And I go 96 Republican, not necessarily Glenn, 96 conservative.
Yeah.
There's a difference.
Exactly right.
Exactly right.
So email every single one of them today.
So but nobody knows who their school board, the state school board is.
How do you find that out?
We list it on our website, Yaku J-A-C-O-Boyan, B-O-O-Y-E-N-S ministries.org.
There's a button that says urgent TEACKS.
Click that button.
It's got all the information, the emails, the phone numbers.
And I ask people, look, there are, there are some of our friends on the school board.
There are people who really want to fight for children.
But tomorrow, there may be.
It's not on the agenda, Glenn.
But the conservative side of the SDOE tomorrow can call for a roll call vote.
They can.
Chairman Ellis, we have the chairman.
He's the deciding vote.
He only votes if it's a tie, 7-7.
They can strike this down tomorrow if they wanted to.
They could have, which was what riled me up.
August 1st, when they met, it passed through to the next phase.
Now, this has been coming since April, Glenn.
I ask this.
Why are we here?
Why are we one day before this momentous event in Austin tomorrow having to fight to convince that some of this stuff is absolutely obscene?
With a 9-6 Republican, come on, guys.
We've got to step up here and say we strike this draft.
We're going to go back to David Barton's draft that is pro-America, pro-Texas politics.
And we've been using it for 12 years.
We've been using it for 12 years.
That's right.
Let's update it.
Sure.
There's new legislation.
It has to be updated.
Let's update it.
But we can't scrap that and come with this radical.
Now, since we brought a lot of heat into the kitchen, look, there's a lot of momentum.
So thank you, Glenn, for voicing.
No, no, no.
I heard about it.
A friend came to me and said, this guy is great.
You know who he is?
And I'm like, yeah, he's a contributor of The Blaze.
He's fantastic.
And they're like, well, why aren't you talking about it?
And I'm like, because I'm talking about all the other stuff that's burning down.
But anyway, but when she started to explain it to me, I needed to get you on the phone because, I mean, that's an email that I'm going to make today.
So it's Yako spelled J-A-C-O, like Jocko, Yako Buens.
That's B-O-O-Y-E-N-S ministries.org.
Jacobuensministries.org.
I will tweet this out.
Stu, will you tweet it out on both of our Twitter feeds?
Yako, thank you so much.
I appreciate it.
Thank you.
Thank you, Glenn.
Thank you, Stu.
God bless you for all you do.
We appreciate that.
You bet.
I tell you what, this guy is an amazing guy.
He is a servant of God and very, very loyal.
Just a great guy.
Yako Buens, let's post this.
Could you post his video on the front page of Glennbeck.com?
Can we get that done?
Along with the link to what we were talking about.
See if we can put that on the front page of glennbeck.com.
Has to be done today.
It has to be done today.
New Eugenics in American Medicine00:15:56
This is going to affect everybody's school boards.
The best of the Glenn Beck program.
Vira Sherez is with us now.
She is the founder and president of Alliance for Human Research Protection.
I just want to just quickly go over some of the stuff that she has been involved in.
She has spoken out at the FDA, National Academy of Science, the Institute of Medicine.
She testified against the exposure of children in experiments that put them at risk of harm, against mass mental screening of children, which served as a market expansion tactic for psychiatric drugs.
She testified against human pesticide experiments sponsored by Bayer.
She was instrumental in the suspension of government pesticide experiments in young children called CHEERS, the suspension of smallpox vaccine tests in children, anthrax vaccine tests in children.
I mean, it goes on and on.
She served on the federal Children's Research Ethics Advisory Work Group, where she was the sole dissenter who objected to the loosening of federal regulations to expand the use of medical experiments without parental consent.
She was alone on that vote.
That is madness, madness.
Welcome to the program, Vera Sherev.
Thank you very much for inviting me.
Oh, it's an honor to have you.
You are passionate about this because you firsthand saw what happens when the medical industry loses their way and starts to play God.
You're a Holocaust survivor.
That's right.
When medicine becomes a partner of government, they discard the Hippocratic oath to do no harm to the individual, and they become government agents, essentially.
Yes.
And it's truly frightening when the doctors started to say that they wouldn't treat somebody if they hadn't taken the vaccine.
The first thing that came to mind was the Hippocratic Oath.
Wait a minute.
What?
Yeah.
Yeah, we're really very far into that dark place.
You know, really, in March and April of 2020, a big euthanasia project was implemented all across Western Europe, Canada, at least five states in the United States, where orders were given by the government to hospitals not to treat the elderly in nursing homes.
And they were essentially medically murdered.
This was exactly what the Nazis did, although the Nazis began The babies.
The infants and children under age three.
They were German infants and children.
And then it went up the ladder, the mentally ill, and then the nursing home people.
And they were regarded as worthless eaters and an economic burden.
Vera, I have, if I don't know if you know anything about me, but I have a very large collection, and the Holocaust has played a very big role in my life.
And I want to make sure we never forget it.
I happen to have in a museum that we are building the last prescription that Joseph Mengele wrote at the Children's Hospital.
And it was for the drug that they were giving to kill the children.
And when you think of that, he was in charge of the children's hospital, you get some idea of how far away from the Hippocratic oath they were.
That's right.
And, you know, American medicine has kind of picked up where the Nazis left off because at the time, Germany was, you know, they were the number one most advanced country in medicine and in a lot of fields.
I mean, that was the center of Western civilization.
And America picked up from them after the war.
Yeah, we brought them up.
And they brought in some 1,600 of the top Nazi scientists, engineers, and doctors.
And they scattered them all over the United States at most advanced scientific and medical centers.
Now, this was done in violation of the President of the United States.
Harry Truman had ordered nobody who belonged to the Nazi Party was to be allowed a visa.
Okay, but agents simply did it anyway.
This was totally illegal.
And they essentially trained a whole generation of American scientists and doctors.
Vera, you know the history better than most.
And to wake people up is seemingly impossible.
I mean, to ring this bell, people in America just think we could never do that.
We'd never get there.
And I am watching us get closer and closer to that line to where they're depersoning people.
And when the government took over healthcare here in America, my biggest warning was, they say they're not going to ration any kind of health care, but once there's a financial situation, of course they are.
And that's what Germany did.
That's exactly right.
Germany, their excuse for getting rid of the elderly and the mentally ill from the asylums was they need the beds for wounded soldiers.
Once you devalue some human beings and value only certain human beings, that's what opens the gates of hell.
My mother-in-law, I just talked to her the other day, and she's getting older, and she said they weren't going to fill my prescription, the insurance.
And we've never had a problem with it.
And she said, for the first time, I was scared, like, wait a minute.
Are you doing this because I'm old?
Am I just no longer a value?
Well, there you go.
I mean, she recognized the signal.
She's awake.
So you went to Nuremberg this year because we have a Nuremberg code that apparently nobody is paying attention to anymore.
It's the worst violation of the Nuremberg Code ever.
It's on a massive scale.
This COVID injections, this is a mass experiment like no other in history.
An uncontrolled mass medical experiment.
With people being coerced into it, not being informed as they're required as to what is known and not known about it as far as safety, as far as side effects, nothing.
The ingredients are secret.
It's being done under military secrecy.
Why?
Why is it under military?
And it happened both under Trump and continued under Biden.
I mean, there was no difference because there is, you know, there are those who are really running this who are unelected and unaccountable.
Yeah.
And they've been given total and complete immunity.
And I tell you, they frighten me in a way.
I mean, we've gone from the eugenics programs to now transhumanism, which is exactly the same thing, just with different technology.
Exactly.
By the way, at the time, one of the features was that Germany was the most advanced in technology.
Correct.
Correct.
And now we are, of course.
And it is really, it's terribly frightening to see the similarities.
And, you know, I mean, making those who choose not to accept to be guinea pigs are, you know, totally, again, ostracized, demonized.
You know, at that time, we, the Jews, were accused of being spreaders of disease.
Well, that's what they said.
That's what they said about COVID people that wouldn't get the vaccine.
Yeah, exactly.
They're using the same script.
It's just, you know, the names are a little different.
But in essence, it is.
It's dividing mankind, you know, into the valued and devalued, and they make enemies out of people.
And, you know, when you divide and separate like that, when you split human society, that's the most dangerous kind of thing.
This is what happened then.
And onlookers just looked the other way.
They chose not to interfere.
And that happened to a lot of people, you know, the unvaccinated, where people, you know, in public places were shunning them like they were pariahs.
So you're sitting, you're here with a very large American audience.
And if I'm sitting in my car and I'm listening to you or I'm sitting at work, I'm thinking, okay, that's scary as heck.
What do I do about it?
Well, this is just it.
We really, this will go nowhere if people rise up and stop obeying.
What they're being told to obey is against us, all of us.
It's not a coronavirus that we have to be afraid of.
It is the new form of eugenics that we have to be afraid of because it's one group after another after another.
Hitler didn't intend to end with annihilating the Jewish people.
He had bigger plans.
It was then going to be the Polish, the Slavs, on and on, you know.
And that's the same mentality.
I say that those who have done this COVID thing on the world, these are the heirs to the Nazis.
The same mentality.
Would you put the gain of function research and the push for that into the same category?
Because I think that's terrifying.
You would.
Again, gain of function is illegal according to international treaties because this is about bio-warfare.
Gain of function is a fancy phrase which means nothing, right?
What does it mean, gain of function?
They always do that.
Euphemisms.
That's another thing that the Nazis always had.
That T4 euthanasia program, it was to improve the children's health.
But it was putting them in a truck with the exhaust going into the back of it.
There's no way to improve health with that.
Well, you know, when you pervert medicine, then what the heck?
You can pervert language.
That's the easiest.
Yeah, I guess.
Abortion is healthcare now.
Yeah, right.
Right.
So this is terribly, terribly dangerous because people need to understand, and they should have gotten a whiff.
You know, first it was going to be right two weeks, they flattened the curve, two weeks of isolation.
And of course, they destroyed economy, which means, you know, middle-class people now are dependent on government handouts.
That's, again, that's a very, very bad sign because the government can always stop the spigot.
We're talking to Holocaust survivor, Vera Sherev.
She is also the founder and president of Alliance for Human Research Protection.
Vera, what does it mean just stop doing what they tell you to do?
Start disobeying.
Yeah, civil disobedience.
You know, it also worked with Martin Luther King.
Well, first of all, what I think needs to be done is now that it's the 75th anniversary of the Nuremberg Code that has been sort of left on a shelf because lawyers were too lazy to use it.
You see, it is in force, and it is part of the International Criminal Code.
What people need to do is download it and use it.
Use the Nuremberg Code as a defense weapon to protect yourself from being coerced into all kinds of medical.
What a great point.
I didn't hear anyone make that case.
That would have been a very strong case.
Exactly.
And that's what one can do.
I mean, we set up actually a website, just Nuremberg75.com.
And people can, and it'll be in different languages and all that, but of course it's in English for Americans.
You need to, if you just read it, one of the reasons that the Nuremberg Code has been sort of shafted, really, is the American medical establishment decided it didn't, it didn't apply to them.
This was just for the Nazi barbarians.
No, it's not.
It was to ensure that the Nazi barbarians don't pop up anywhere ever again.
Exactly, exactly.
This was meant, this is universal.
It applies to every human being.
Every human being has the human right to voluntary, informed consent.
And, you know, there's no ifs, buts, or maybes, and they spent a lot of, you know, really a lot of ink, as we say, to explain that, that first principle is specific.
Now, the Nuremberg Code is specific and simple.
People, everybody can understand every word.
They talk about experiment, not study.
But you hear now, if somebody is being asked to be in a clinical study, study means nothing.