Sorry for the lay guys, you know, uh, first of all, we're black.
So, guess what you're saying?
Yeah, man.
I had to lie with the stereotype, but no, uh, guys, all jokes aside, um you know, we're talking with Anton about a bunch of different things behind the scenes.
You know, we're actually, you know, we'll rehash some of it because I do think some of the information we're just discussing is valuable.
You know, every now and then you get a guest that comes in, which is automatic chemistry.
You can sit there and talk for hours and there's really no it is what it just flows.
Yeah.
And I think one thing we could kick off on, and guys, we're going to cover a multitude of different topics, Redpill, streaming.
Streaming, backing money, becoming, making money, becoming successful, et cetera, as you guys know, because Anton came from the corporate field.
So, you know, it's an opportunity to, you know, get a lot of his insight.
But the first thing I was going to start with, we know, one of the most popular professions that young men want to get into is streaming, getting on the internet, right?
Yeah.
And I do think it's important that we need to do our due diligence, kind of let warn guys that getting into this world is great and all, but don't believe everything that you see.
Who?
Yeah.
No, don't believe hardly anything.
The viewbotting is at an all time high.
I haven't seen before unprecedented levels.
Yeah.
We see the monopoly clippers.
Yeah, and monopoly on clippers.
There's like there's so many things behind the scenes when it comes to this whole streaming thing that I don't want young men, right, to like say, I'm going to do this and not go in at least with their eyes wide open and have like, or quit their day job and put themselves in a bad spot trying to chase some type of clout.
Because I think the barrier to entry when it comes to social media.
media has gone up yeah because everybody is in it yeah and the thing about it is that the way i got into it was i was going to use social media in order to bring more visibility so that i can make more money in corporate so i just kind of like stumbled into it but i knew that in order for people to really be able to buy into me they had to get some get to know me they had to get the behind the scenes but you know i kind of got lucky because we caught a wave during the pandemic.
Yes.
And we was able to capitalize off it.
But the thing about that, though, is a lot of these guys that caught the same wave, they weren't able to sustain it.
Yeah.
And so what you were able to see and witness in that situation was you've seen how cutthroat and how brutal the game is.
And a lot of those guys don't want to admit it, but they had to go back and get regular jobs.
To be honest with you.
Yeah.
They had to go back and get regular jobs.
Whereas it's funny because I never stopped and I've grown at least 25% year over year over year.
And it's just because I've been able to get better at what I do because.
And y'all got to really understand this.
Anything that you wind up doing, and I don't care what it is, you're going to have to dedicate your life to it.
And I think that that's the part of red pill that people don't really take into consideration simply because you can't focus on women.
Oh, yeah.
While at the same time focusing on what it is that you're great at or what you're trying to build.
Tell them you genuine.
I mean, you got to understand that no matter what it is.
And we all in kind of different spaces.
I've been married for a while, but at the same time, my focus has never been, to be honest, it has never been my wife.
I can't focus on her.
She got to focus on me.
Yeah.
Well said.
That's the ugly reality of being successful as a guy.
That is.
Also, being a creator, it looks easy, looks fun, exciting, lifestyle, cars.
I don't have a life.
You just work.
That's all I do is work.
But it looks easy.
And people want to be streamers, right?
Creators.
But my thing is like, our lifestyle is not normal.
We wait up thinking about work constantly.
We wake up, you know what?
Here's my schedule for the day.
Work, podcast, work, podcast, work.
And for anyone watching this for the first time or want to be a streamer, think about this.
You're going to have to have things in place business wise as well.
Yeah.
Because it's a business you're running here.
It is.
It's cool to turn the camera on and talk shit, but like, if you're not getting paid, my friend, it's going to be tough to maintain that for a long period of time.
Also keep in mind, other creators want your spot.
So there's competition at all times.
They, they all, they're coming for you.
Even if y'all don't know it, even if they glazing you, I'm telling you that they're working to make sure that they replace you.
And I ain't even just talking about when it comes to streaming.
They want your life.
They want the cars.
They want your woman.
They want your clout.
If they're able to, if, listen, it's a lot of the people that's in the game right now, and this is always the way that it has been.
It's a lot of the people that's in the game right now that if they could talk about you and get clout, they would.
Yeah.
But, but.
Because you a cool person, if you give them an opportunity to collab, that same person that will talk about you will collab with you just so they can get the clout clout in this game is more important than actual money yeah it's more important than the money itself there's no principle at all at all and so a lot of people is faking a lot of people is pretending like they really got it people are acting like they don't have a real job ain't nothing wrong with getting a real job but as long as you're working on your business and
you're working on what it is that you in order to be great as a content creator really you're going to have to put in 14 to 16 hours a day seven days a week minimum and to be especially in the beginning yeah because um myaron we did for a year and a half how many shows a day two to three yeah yeah seven days a week yeah yeah who does that yeah yeah it's true.
I stream twice a day, most days, except for Wednesday.
I don't stream at night.
So it's, you know what I'm saying?
We could just kick it and do what we do in a day.
But I stream almost every single day.
But also, we didn't get paid a lot of money either at the very beginning.
Yeah, yeah.
It builds up.
And I do want to, and the reason why we're kind of kicking off with this is because I know we got a lot of young guys that are watching us or people that want to get into this thing.
And I think it's very important that we at least fill you guys in so you go in with your eyes wide open.
And I'll say if someone does want to get into this type of profession, get a job first, get skills, get real consistent income.
And then you can take that and funnel that income into your endeavor with, with, with, you know, concentration.
So if it works out, you make side money.
If it doesn't, you at least have a job.
And I'll, and I warn people all the time, this in between period of two to five years where you're working your regular job and doing this is going to be one of the most miserable that you're going to have in your lifetime because you're going to be doing both sides.
Yeah.
And that's really what's going to transition you because the job is what gives you the money to invest in the endeavor while the endeavor is still in the red.
100%.
So that's another thing that people don't understand.
And then on top of that, this is like the pre 2020 strategy.
Now in 2025, guys, you're competing with professional production companies.
Yeah.
I'm out.
Got a YouTube channel.
Yeah.
CNN got a YouTube channel.
Yeah.
Fox got a YouTube channel.
It's almost like you're competing with cable TV damn near on YouTube.
The streaming is just as competitive as the music industry today.
And if you're getting into streaming, it's almost like you're an independent, like you're an independent artist.
And you're competing, like you're thinking about all of these guys as botten.
You think about all these IRL streamers and stuff like that.
They are paying people in clippers to push them.
so that when you discover them, it make it seem like they're more relevant than they really are.
But they have a machine behind them.
Yeah.
And so even you, you're going to run into, even when you get into it, right?
Let me tell y'all something.
100 people watching you is a lot of people.
Yeah.
When you get started, if you can get up to 100 people watching you, that is phenomenal, bro.
But it is a lot of people that is faking it with bots.
They are pretending like they really got motion, and they don't.
This is the worst year, bro.
I've ever, like the past year or so, like has been the worst I've ever seen with bots, bro.
Everything, guys, is up like.
30 to 50 percent when you guys look at this shit.
And now it's brazen.
Like before they kind of did it subtly, bro, now they don't go.
I've been seeing this for years.
Like the video, man.
It's some gems here about to be dropped from all of us here.
If you guys don't mind, YouTube Rumble.
But listen, corporate is corporate, right?
Whether it's the music industry, streaming industry, and everyone needs to have revenue coming in.
No matter who you are.
So think about your favorite streamer, right?
How do they generate revenue?
Is it from views, from ads, from selling a course?
Whatever that may be, they need to make money for the company.
Now, if you get a deal for a company, right, they're going to say to you, okay, you're a streamer, why are we giving you a deal?
It's because you add value to the company monetarily.
So look at, for example, Kik, right?
Kik is funded basically by STEK.
Gambling company, they support the whole establishment pretty much.
However, for a streamer coming out to kick, why are they going to give you a deal?
And this is where They don't even handout.
I don't want to say names, but like you guys who know what I mean.
They came into the space and were giving like a big deal and what happened is they were told hey stream three times a week or two if you can do that for a year we got you mind you just promotion for the platform giving them a big boost and giving them you know a boost as well in return however what they do not stream at all Fucked up the deal.
Now they're saying, you know what?
Creators are not.
I'm saying plenty of people messed that deal up.
So now as a creator, it's like, wait, I'm coming into the space.
I need to get paid.
Give me a deal.
Sorry, the last two streamers that we give a deal to, fucked us.
Sorry, no deal for you.
So this whole industry, guys, it looks really good.
It is nice, but the game has changed a lot.
And also botting was back in the day heavily rewarded.
Nowadays it's frowned upon.
So the game has changed a lot.
But you got to do it just to even break the ice.
And I was talking with Anton about this.
So like what they do is like they'll bot, right?
Like they'll say, let's say they buy 10,000 live viewers.
Yeah.
Maybe 500 are real or 1,000 just for easy math.
Yeah.
1,000 are real, but they bought 10,000.
What ends up happening is that 10,000 of the people that are watching, it's slowly going to the 1,000 that are watching, they're going to continue to grow and be a higher percentage of that 10k because you start selling this real and yep people think oh this dude's lit yep you do collabs you lock in other features whatever your audience slowly grows and then now you actually got 2000 people watching real and and you've basically been able to artificially grow your audience without anybody knowing and then it's almost like a snowball where you fake it for long enough people have this perception and then they come and
collab with you then you actually do build a real audience and we've seen a lot of people do this yes but the reason why i tell you all this is like i just want you guys to know that um This is what people are doing behind the scenes and this is what this is what you're competing against.
Like maybe five years ago this wasn't this was like unheard of doing this type of shit.
Yeah.
But now it's like the norm.
But here's the problem.
You can do that for a short period of time.
However, at some point, companies are going to say, listen, promote this product for us.
But it's not going to be no conversion.
And then they can't sell.
So imagine this.
Consumers have a million followers plus, maybe 500 k plus, and they can't sell a product.
I agree.
It's a lot of people.
And y'all, honestly, I'm going to just tell y'all audience, because a lot of people want to get into it.
They think that it's easy.
First of all, it's not a job for young people.
Well, first of all, it's very hard to be able to.
People don't understand.
Used to be, I want to be an astronaut.
Now everyone says I want to be a fireman.
Growing up, and I know you're a little bit older than me, but like growing up, used to be i want to be a doctor i want to be an engineer i want to be astronaut astronaut bro now for like the past five years straight ask young people what do you want to be all of them say i want to be an influencer but you know what even people that are in the industry let's say basketball players athletes rappers they all want to be streamers now yeah they laughed at us yeah you're right they said that we like we not real that if you on these platforms and
you know you're not a real movie star you're not a real everybody wants to get in the game and be like us whereas they were talking about that we weren't really relevant and that we didn't really have any pull you know before they got into the Listen, I just want to do this real quick.
Look, I love RJ, right?
RJ is fucking dope.
He's funny as hell.
He's hilarious, right?
He's a comedian.
But I remember back in the day, I just know how he fell up with streamers.
Now I see a video of him asking DBG to help him.
I'm like, bro, hold on a second here.
Wait a minute.
You were saying a couple years ago, these guys are duack and duoyas.
But all of a sudden, you want help from us now?
I'm just saying.
Just saying.
And this kind of goes...
So what I noticed when things really did a turn, like obviously the streaming world has been growing exponentially, but I think last election really solidified things.
And I'll kind of explain what I mean by this.
So on one hand, you had Kamala Harris using what I call traditional industry-level celebrities.
Your actors, your musicians, your big time entertainers, right?
Taylor Swift, you know, who else?
Quavo.
Quavo endorsed her.
Meg Thee Stallion.
You had people like Taylor Swift from actors all over Hollywood that are A-list actors all endorsing her.
So she was getting what I call the aesthetic.
establishment approval for presidency correct meanwhile donald trump leaned heavily into influencers and internet personalities and what people don't realize is like this election was really also like a social test to see who garners more influence in modern America.
Now, twenty years ago, having these establishment celebrities would pretty much be a big fucking year.
Eminem or whatever like it is.
But now, Trump not only won the election, but he won it in a fucking landslide because while Kamala Harris was over here, you know, doing, you know, endorsements and having Quavo and show like that perform or speak on her behalf, Donald Trump was doing Joe Rogan.
Well, Donald was with Ana Ross on stream.
The interesting part about that, though, also the nuance in that was the reason why Donald Trump was able to go on those platforms, in my opinion, is because he was authentic, regardless of whether you agree with him or not.
Because when you go on the stream, see, even when she started to try to do it, when she went on Shannon Sharpe's program, she went on...
She did that.
She did all the smoke with Matt Burns and Stephen Jackson.
Call her daddy as well.
Yep.
She did that.
It wasn't authentic because, like, if you could tell, she was only going to stay on there.
It was pre-recorded.
She could only do it for 25 minutes.
Yeah.
And so the streaming actually exposed her.
Yeah.
not being as good as she really was or they couldn't ask certain questions and you can tell that they was nerfed whereas when trump sat on joe rogan's podcast and they just talked for like three hours and talked for three hours he even pushed back uh i think he had like a thing that he had to push back in michigan where he was flying to michigan you were able to really grasp who he is to get a better understanding of whether he was authentic and what he really believed yes so the streaming actually exposes whether or not politicians are who they are which makes them fearful of
even getting involved with playing along with streamers in the first place but in order for you to be successful a lot of people people no matter what it is that you do whether you're a politician or whether you're trying to promote a product you see all of the rappers trying to link with streamers now and all of this stuff in order to do their rollout and their album releasease, the record companies are literally integrated with the streamers now and stuff.
It's legitimately like a strategy now, which is crazy in the music industry.
But nobody's seeing it.
You called it.
I called it.
But nobody can.
Just to add to your point as well.
This is very important.
Baron Trump is one that told Trump to get into these cases, right?
He did.
His son.
His son.
Yep.
We're forgetting the youth is very important here.
Look at politics.
The next generation of people have come up that are seeing the bullshit with the Democratic Party and how, you know, what's happening with Israel.
They're going to make the shift to culture.
And I don't think they're going to make the shift though.
I think they're having a problem transitioning over into participating when it comes to the real, what what's really happening in the culture.
Well, we only need a few that are smart.
No, there is a few that are smart.
They have money.
All we need is a few.
Yeah.
And they can make the whole shift to this happen.
Our boy Nick.
Yeah.
People like that can shift the culture.
So I'm saying like that is important.
And imagine you say, no, sorry, Baron, you know what you're saying?
I'm older than you.
I know what I'm doing.
The generation that's younger, that's smarter than us, that are using AI, that's the future.
You know, you talk a lot about your social proof, you know, who you are online and whether or not you, you know, have made significant strides in trying to improve your social status online and what your perspective is and what your social profile is.
I will tell people, and I've been saying this for over 10 years now, who you are online is going to be more important than who you are in real life.
Thank you.
Who you are online.
So, fellas, you're going to have to clean up your social media.
I have to.
You're going to have to make sure that your pictures is lit, that you're going to, that, that who it is that you perceive yourself to be, you're going to, you're going to have to really be and live the life.
But at the same time, you're going to have to clean up what it is that you're putting out there, right?
And understand that whatever it is that you do, it's going to live forever.
So it's going to come back.
You know, for me, my whole brand was, I'm going to show you the journey of how I've evolved from this spot to this spot, even from being liberal, right?
I remember growing up in a black community, we're all expected to vote a certain way.
You know what I'm saying?
You almost got to, it's so hard to pull yourself off the Democratic plantation.
And I got to ask you about that because I definitely want to get your like your red pill journey of all of what made you go more conservative.
Because yes, I agree.
If you grow up colored in this country, blue or an immigrant, blue.
You're auto voting Democrat no matter what.
The people that hate me the most are the people that look like me that don't agree with the fact that I'm conservative.
In a lot of instances, to be honest with you, a lot of black people actually used to, you know., but they used to really live more conservative lives even if they voted blue.
Yeah.
They believe they used to believe in certain things.
Like, for example, even if you talk about immigration, as much as I don't agree with a lot of the people that's here when it comes to their liberal views, it shouldn't even be a debate and it shouldn't even be a division with the fact that if you are not, if you came over here illegally, then you really need to be held accountable for that.
Yeah.
But that's something that they've made a issue to divide people when in reality.
Black people have always been more conservative with how it is that they suppose a gatekeeper or how it is that they've always gatekeeped, but then they always vote against their own best interests.
The difference, all right, so let me say this.
The difference between Democrats and Republicans should be very simple.
Democrats want you to depend on them and they want to be able to manage how it is that you do things.
They want you to give them or they want to give you your objective of how you're supposed to live your life.
They believe in regulation, they believe in taking your money in order to give it to social services.
They believe in totality.
100%, right?
Republicans want to remove the barriers to entry so that you can do what you want to do.
That's it.
Yeah.
Yeah, I think from a bird's eye view, that's a very simple way to look at it.
That's it.
And people can kind of just, even if you're not politically inclined, you can know and i do want to say this real quick with the kamala thing because we're talking about that when you were saying that she didn't go on streams that fucked her up i agree and i think one of the biggest mistakes she made on her campaign now that i got 2020 hindsight was not doing the joe rogan interview yeah oh no she she they that was she she was scared so rogan for those of you that's because you can't control joe rogan yes so he he offered her because they got mad that he interviewed trump they're like yo what the like you know because because Rogan's a libertarian, bro.
If I want to put Rogan's in a politically, realistically, he's like center right-ish, center left.
He's a centrist that you could also say is libertarian.
He believes in smoking weed, people being able to do what they want.
He believes in feminism, shit like that.
So he has a lot of leftist ideology.
So I would consider him a libertarian slash leftist.
So him bringing Trump on had half his base kind of mad, or 30% of his base.
So he said, look, I'm also extending this invite to Kamala Harris so she gets an identical opportunity.
But she didn't want to go.
She fucked up because she said she could only do like an hour.
An hour.
And she needed to know the questions.
And he would have to travel to her.
But the reason that they said that they could only do an hour is because she didn't want to.
Kamala Harris got this thing where she just put a lot of word salad in.
And she talks very long And she's long winded that she can prevent you from being able to deep dive further into questions yeah and so they were scared and that's why they were they were very scared they were very careful about the platforms that they use.
So what the way that they tried to spin it was they tried to say, well, you know, he's going on Joe Rogan, so we're going to do Shannon Sharp.
Yeah.
And this is where the left is now.
Like the left, as we speak right now, number one, the two big problems with the with the with the with the Democrats, number one, they're trying to bring back the young men.
Correct.
Young men turned out an overwhelmingly voter for Trump.
Yeah.
Right.
And then so they need to bring the men back because the Democratic Party has been ostracizing them forever.
And then the second thing is they need kind of like an infrastructure like the right has.
Now, like I said, I don't consider Joe Rogan a right winger at all.
Correct.
But to an average, normally a lot of people might consider that.
Yeah.
And there is an infrastructure in conservative media to prop people up that the left doesn't have.
They don't have a Joe Rogan equivalent basically.
Well, one of the things that they messed up with, in my opinion, was when they brought out Obama and then they brought out Michelle Obama and then Michelle Obama told men or that she told women that they should go against their husbands and voting the opposite way.
of their husbands if it wasn't voting for Democrats.
So what she did was she came on and Obama did it too.
He got mad at black men and tried to say that yeah, yeah.
That it was because they were misogynistic as to why it was that they weren't voting for Kamala Harris because they've seen the shift in men and younger people actually shifting over into Trump, right?
Going back to conservative values.
You see a lot of men going back to conservative values.
They see that this stuff is not working for them.
Family court law.
Kamala Harris said, hey, black men, what is it that y'all want in order for y'all to join black women?
92% of black women in order to vote for Kamala Harris.
They said, well, we'll legalize.
This is Kamala Harris.
We'll legalize on a federal level being able to smoke marijuana.
Guys, overwhelmingly, this is what they say said though.
They said, no, we want changes to family court law.
Okay.
That's what they asked for.
Overwhelmingly, they said, listen, these are just the black men.
This was for men in general, but they were targeting black men, right?
Okay, yeah.
And so, this is the biggest grind.
What they said was, we want changes to family court laws, which people always ask me, they say, Anton, why are you such an advocate for men when it comes to child support laws, family courts, so on and so forth, because you've never been through it?
Well, I think that that is what puts you in the best position because nobody wants to hear from you when you're under duress.
Yeah.
Nobody wants to hear from a person once they're in it and they're complaining about it.
Because then they're going to say, nobody showed up for Tyrese when he was getting divorced.
Y. And going through with nobody showed up.
Nobody covered it bro.
Nobody cared.
Besides us on the red pill side, we talked about it bro.
Because the thing is people forget bro, we're like a minute portion of the internet's greater conversation.
This ideology of like, you know, feminism and the problems with it, et cetera.
Bro, we're like five percent of the population, bro.
Most men are Simpsons, stupid.
At best, at best, yeah.
At best, yeah.
At best, five percent.
I think it's way more than that.
Absolutely.
I think that there's a lot of guys that want to stand up for themselves, but is fearful of not getting pussy.
Okay.
Okay, so they think that pandering to women is going to get them more pushed.
Oh, I see a perspective.
They're aware of this ideology.
They just reject it.
Absolutely.
But they reject it.
But also, they don't lose their job, sponsors maybe, or be seen as a bad person to their peers.
Because remember, if I'm in corporate, as you know, and I'm not liberal to an extent, and I'm more like the alpha type guy, they're like, oh, this guy is not cool.
He's not one of us.
Yeah.
And it kind of puts you in a box where promotions aren't, are not good.
You're not getting much blame.
So, but behind the scenes, see, we're going to push that, right?
We're pushing in corporate America.
They make you take the trainer training, the gender equality training all of this stuff you have to take all of this stuff being aware if a woman says something or if she feels uncomfortable then you're you have a responsibility to make sure that she feels good and go and report it you're going to take all of those trainings right yeah but then when the guys come back together because I hate to say it and I hate to be honest with y'all.
We really don't want women in corporate because they messing up the game.
I'm just being absolutely honest.
When the guys step back and then we get out of the corporate settings and environments, I just link back up with the guy that recruited me to come to Flagstar Bank when I worked at Flagstar Bank for the last few years or whatever.
And I retired from there again in 2000.
Well, I retired from banking again, but I retired specifically from Flax Star Bank because they got sold or we merged with New York Community Bank, right?
And I ran into one of my old managers and we ran into each other at a casino and we were talking and who he is and who these people are when they leave corporate America.
They're straight up alpha men that play the game.
but they don't agree with what it is that they got to deal with in corporate America when it comes to women infiltrating men's spaces, traditionally men's spaces, and leadership traditionally was a men's space.
Now, that doesn't mean that there aren't women that can't do some.
some of the things that men do if they're willing to make the sacrifices that men make, right?
Because we dedicate our lives to this.
We don't come home.
We work 14 hours a day.
Women, they have children.
They take maternity leave.
They do all of this stuff.
But in an ideal setting, if you talk to most men in corporate America, they will tell you that they don't agree with most of the liberal policies, most of the equal pay for equal work feminism.
Even the way that women tend to negotiate their pay packages is they're idiots.
when they negotiate their pay packages the way that they do it and that's why women make less than men in corporate America is because they're not willing to walk away they're not willing to say no uh they don't have an it.
Absolutely.
They don't.
They horrible negotiators.
And so we've not, we took a turn and we overcorrected and making sure that we did diversity, equity, and inclusion to include women in men's spaces.
That's why you've seen stuff like black women cold or stuff like that, right?
It's because they had to push something that wasn't naturally for them.
Now, women don't select these particular.
fields of study and curriculums whereas men naturally or tend to go into it.
So we're, I got to ask this question because we're in a unique position where we're in front of someone that actually has been in this world extensively, right?
Because obviously there's what people think, there's what studies show, then there's people that actually come from that industry that could tell you real talk, this is how they practice shit.
Can you kind of give us like a quick overview on feminism and how it's affected the corporate world?
Have you seen like the quality of companies go down to meet this need of being more inclusive?
Have you seen it go up?
What are some of the positives of bringing women into the corporate world?
What are some of the negatives in general?
So a lot of it, to be honest with you.
um because feminism is like a plague it's a plague and we've it's almost like a marketing tool it was never meant for actually improving the prospects or the bottom line of the company or anything like that.
It was used as a marketing tool in order to make people feel as though the company was listening to the needs of what was happening in the culture or what was happening in social life, right?
So the more that women became a part of, like I'll give you an example.
I'm going to tie it all back in.
Yeah.
The more that women say, we're the most educated group.
We're in school.
We find in ourselves to not be able to find great partners.
They don't say husbands.
They say partners.
They don't even look at themselves as under you anymore.
They look at them as your equal, right?
We're not able to find great partners.
Well, what we found out when Trump got in office and 2016, first time?
No, second time.
Okay.
What we found out when Trump got in office is that a lot of them really just had a lot of student loans and they had underwater basket weaving degrees, right?
They had gender studies degrees.
They had, you know, African American studies.
They weren't studying things that actually added value to society.
Psychology.
100%.
And so what they would do is they would get government jobs.
That's why the jobs data was really so messed up and the government was overbloated because what you found was that a lot of women went into the public sector and what they would do is they would try to work for ten years in those sectors so that they can get their loans forgiven and they would go on an income-based repayment plan.
Okay, I got to add more credence to that.
There's something called public service loan forgiveness, guys.
Absolutely.
Okay.
This is very, very important to add context for what you're saying so people don't sit there and try to say, oh, he cut.
This is 100% true.
You make 120 qualifying payments over 10 years based off your income, not even based off of the amount that you would actually specifically supposed to pay for 10 years.
Because see, most, most, most, most student loan repayment plans are 10 years.
Right.
And so whatever it is that your student loan is and whatever interest rate that you have, whether it's a private student loan or whatever, it's a 10-year payment, right?
So the government says or whatever the public sector says is, well, if you make payments for 10 years, whatever it is that you owe, we'll forgive it.
But the women didn't care about how much they took out on student loans because what would happen is they would go on an income-based repayment plan.
So it was based off of how much you made.
So they were still able to pretend like, hey, we're buying homes.
We're doing all of this stuff.
It's so awesome out here.
The reality was that they were pretending and they were on income-based repayment plans.
Then you came, Biden comes in and he says, well, listen, guys, you vote for me.
I'm going to make sure that I forgive your student loans.
So they incentivize you in the same way that they tied you back to the federal government to give you food stamps, to give you welfare, to not, you know, build strong families.
They keep you dependent on the liberal side or the Democrat plantation in order for you to vote a certain way.
When in reality, all of these women, the same way that they try to say that men were faking, they were faking it.
They weren't more educated.
They were just in school.
They were doing things, but then they were getting the jobs that men weren't sinking because they were going into the public sector, which traditionally makes less money than the private sector.
They couldn't compete in the private sector.
Once they infiltrated the public sector, what they started to do was then say, listen, equal rights, equal pay, diversity, equity and inclusion.
We need you all to substantiate how it is that we need to move in these other spaces.
And so now we want to take over that.
Now we want to take over the corporate private sector.
Now we want to take over banking.
Now we got black girls at COVID.
Now we got all of these things.
But we had a reset once Trump got into office because he said, listen, now we're going back to merit based.
You got to be good enough and compete no matter who you are, whether you're woman, man, black, white, whatever it is, you got to be good enough to compete.
We're not just bringing you in based off of the fact that we need enough black women, right?
Or we need enough women, whatever.
And white women was really good at this, right?
right?
Because white women partnered with all other women, black women, whatever, Indian women, whatever, in order to designate themselves as a minority.
Oh yeah.
White women are the fucking Trojan horse of every liberal agenda.
Yeah.
Like, bro, whether it's LGBTQ rights, you know, racism, things, black women are at the forefront of everything because they're able to double this.
Well, they're the marketable face, right?
Yes.
And what black women, and they demonize white men in the process.
Black women are so stupid.
Let me tell you how dumb they are.
Honestly, yeah.
They were so stupid that they felt as though partnering with women to designate themselves as another class would actually help them when in reality, all it did was exacerbate the fact that they were breaking up their families and dividing dividing themselves against the very men that they should have been married.
And so now they got left holding a bag because that's why they say over three hundred thousand black women since the beginning of the year have been laid off and they can't find another job because they can't compete in the market.
So okay, this is fascinating because I never thought about this from the angle of student loan repayment, getting into the public sector.
So they infiltrated the and this makes sense because bro, there's a lot of women in government is actually kind of crazy.
They do admin jobs, random fucking things.
They don't do anything.
Yeah, and they just chill bro.
Like it's such a pain to have.
They don't really do anything.
So you're saying eight hours?
They work two hours.
Yeah.
I mean, you don't, you never needed this many.
We were never supposed to be this bloated as a government.
We're basically giving out handouts and we're subsidizing the general population and acting like women are more successful than men.
But that's why you see them not being able to compete once you got to get into it merit based instead of getting based off of diversity, equity, inclusion.
So I guess we can kind of segue that into the corporate world.
So how do you think?
So we know how they affected the public sector.
How did they affect the corporate world?
So I want to say it's the same.
Same thing.
Yeah, but what they did was they took the blueprint that we use in the public sector and they tried to make it applicable in the in the private sector right in the corporate world where you had to actually but what you're actually seeing is a lot of these women getting laid off now women are not looking to get promoted they're looking to hold on they trying to figure out how to keep their job survive It's all survival at this point.
But what you're seeing was you're seeing more men, more women in management.
You're seeing more women getting promoted a lot faster, even though men were the ones that were more qualified for the positions.
Because when you started getting into the federal government too.
When you started getting into the corporate world, it's not so much about how good you are at your job.
It's more about who.
it is that you know and whether or not you fit the corporate brand for what they're trying to promote and if they like you become the face of the company they like you okay yeah because you become the face of the company right so really corporate getting up into the executive level you're more not you're not necessarily doing a job you're selling It's all sales.
What people don't realize, and the guys, y'all got to understand this.
And this is one of the reasons why it's important for you to be able to talk to women.
I say this all the time.
If you're able to have a conversation and convince a woman to do what you want to do, you'd be great in corporate America.
100%.
Okay.
You're going to be great.
Because it's about whether or not you're likable.
It's whether or not you're a cultural fit is whether or not they actually want to do business with you if they want to be around you it's not about whether or not you are so great or doing this and some of y'all ask yourself the question why am I not able to get promoted?
How come I'm not I'm better than her?
Well actually you're not because she can sell.
She is better at sell, she is better at making herself likable and she fits the corporate mold.
So to answer your question about how feminism affected it, it was popular to promote women in corporate America, which is one of the reasons why they infiltrated it so high when it came to the higher.
When would you say this shift started?
Mid teens, maybe 2013, 2014, 2015.
Okay.
Because I've always said that I think the Obama era is what ushered in this fucking stupid woke ideology that I'm trying to get rid of now.
Nobody had jobs in 2008.
So it had to transition once we started to get jobs back.
Yeah.
Like the whole, you know, LGBT stuff, the, you know, the mass acceptance of degeneracy, whatever.
I always pin it back to, I think the Obama administration, culturally, was probably one of the most potent presidencies because we saw so many things change.
He was the most marketable.
And that's why he was able to get so much done when it comes to our social and society, gay marriage, you know, pushing ideologies, making sure.
minority representation holds primitive holds.
He's holding corporate America accountable for whether or not they're like even today he when he goes on a podcast why aren't universities standing up to this administration you know that type of stuff why isn't Harvard Harvard was supposed to be MIT Harvard Yale Princeton all of these all of these you know institutions were supposed to be of higher learning and of the best of the best it wasn't supposed to be woke ideologies It never was supposed to be that when we were coming up.
I was born in 82.
I'm 43 years old, raised in the 90s.
It was looked at as a higher institution of learning.
It wasn't looked at as a place where you're supposed to have diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Gotcha.
Yeah.
Even the University of Michigan, right?
One of the best institutions, one of the best research institutions, they were having trouble because a lot of their identity was tied into diversity, equity, and inclusion.
And so that's why they had so much trouble adjusting to the Trump administration because he was saying, hey, we're getting rid of that and we go on merit-based.
So even when it came to people don't want to say it, and I'm going to say the uncomfortable truth, you know, a lot of these foreign foreign students, they pay higher tuition.
They outcompeting people here in the United States of America when it comes to them coming into these universities.
They had to get them up out of there.
Bro, they had to, they, they, they, they're using strategies now to keep Asians from going to high league schools.
Yes.
What?
Yeah.
Yeah.
That was a problem.
I'm overrepresented now.
Is there something wrong?
Yeah.
Because they had to make sure that they met a certain criteria of letting in.
I knew girls.
Oh, Anton.
I used to go up to Michigan State and the University of Michigan.
And it was a girl that was in an architecture program that couldn't compete.
That's just to honestly be honest.
She couldn't compete.
She wasn't good enough.
But she got accepted into it because she was a double minority.
Yeah.
She didn't have the money to go, so she took out a bunch of student loans.
She couldn't compete when it came to actually, you know, going through the program and actually meeting the same expectations as all of the guys that was in there.
And she had a lot of trouble.
She was good to talk to.
She was good to stay overnight at her dorm, but she wasn't necessarily good at what it is that she was supposed to be doing in school, but she got accepted into the program because she was a black woman.
Just because real quick.
Just to add to your point, Anton, Demise in Rumble says, Anton is 100% correct about corporate.
I'm in corporate myself in IT as an army veteran.
We don't want them there, which is the women, especially in finance.
They make bad deals just to get rid of it.
So don't make bad deals in corporate America.
Yeah.
And you should fix it by making other bad deals.
Oh, listen.
Corporate America gave away billions, if not trillions of dollars over the last 15 years acquiescing and making women feel comfortable.
Yeah.
HR.
All that stuff.
And I guess we could talk about the ugly red pill side.
I think women being in men's space is a problem simply from a liability standpoint.
Yeah.
Right?
Like, we know that dudes are going to be dudes.
They're going to say and do dumb shit.
All you need is one Karen to get offended by the law of humor.
Yep.
And next thing you know, you got a fucking complaint, et cetera.
So would you say that also strains the corporate world where camaraderie might go down or people are worried about what they're doing or what they're saying?
We didn't even do the things that we were.
Usually when you go into corporate America, and you know this, they do what they call team building.
Oh, yeah.
Okay.
Where they have events outside of work in order to make sure that y'all work together better as a team.
They groom you.
That's a unique thing, bro.
They groom you.
We never did that in the federal government.
They have team building.
That's not a federal government.
Absolutely.
That's interesting.
Okay.
But we had to adjust what team building looks like in order to accommodate more women coming into corporate America.
Okay.
We didn't even do team building the same.
Right.
We can't say the things that we would normally say when it's just the guys.
Right.
Or when you're just comfortable outside of you have to watch your language.
Now, there's somebody and some people that's probably watching this and will say, good, because guys shouldn't be talking like that anyway.
No, that's exactly what we're supposed to be talking about.
Like we talk about all the things that we want to talk about, but you had to be a lot more careful because you didn't want women to get offended because, they were pushing more women in corporate america because and the reason that companies spent more money on this was not necessarily because it added more value They wrote it off as a part of marketing.
Yes.
It was marketing the company to be more.
I mean, absolutely.
You see brands dying every day because of it.
Jaguar, right?
Jaguar's cooks went with a new marketing campaign to make sure that they were more inclusive of people and the brand is dying.
It's dying.
They put out a ad.
I'm so glad you mentioned that.
They put out a ad a couple months ago, like something that super pro Alphabet community.
Yeah, it had nothing to do with the cars.
The Gillette commercial.
Gillette commercial, if I'm not mistaken, it was a woman that made that decision and gave the green light to put that commercial out.
And for those of you that don't know, there's a Gillette commercial.
We can actually even pull it up real quick because I think it shows perfectly what you're saying that women infiltrating corporate America leads to strategies that might actually be counterproductive long term in the pursuit of inclusivity.
So they're losing money to be more inclusive.
And in this commercial, what Gillette basically did was they demonized toxic masculinity.
Yeah.
Right.
And this is a men's razor company doing this shit.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Their target audience is not even.
I don't care.
I'll fuck this money.
I'll just add to your point real quick.
So I worked a company, right?
Very corporate.
And we had a session where team building was paid for by allocated budget.
Yeah.
And because women were involved, it was a bar super inexpensive, really good.
We can go to close by and they serve mainly beer, right?
So the men obviously don't want beers.
They don't want anything too crazy.
But because women are involved, they said, we need wine.
Bro, we had to drive fucking 20 minutes away to a high-end bar just to get some wine for women.
I said, bro.
Think about it like this.
Yeah, I'll do you one better.
I'm going to really make people uncomfortable, right?
The Me Too movement in corporate America got...
Men were so scared to even, men were so scared to even, like, let's say, for example, I'm an executive and I go and I got to go talk to this woman or I need to, you know, do a review with her or I need to do her annual review or something like that..
Yeah.
Guys then had to go and find another woman to go and sit with them to do a review just to have a conversation with the woman because guys were so scared at the fact that they could possibly get accused of something.
Wow.
Henry, we've seen Joy, listen, the lawsuit with Joy Taylor.
It was Skip Bayless that was against Skip Bayless inside of the lawsuit.
Joy Taylor herself wasn't necessarily being sued.
However, in the lawsuit, what you found was that.
They were saying that, and this is what was the accusation from the woman inside of the actual paperwork that was filed against Skip Bayless and Fox Force One, was she said that if she was to ever get held accountable get held accountable and lose her job what would she do she would accuse the guy that was above her that hired her of sexual you know unwanted sexual events so it's so problematic that managers have I guess strategies to mitigate inevitable.
Yeah, they had to create an entire different culture by which people, men could have conversations with women in corporate America in order to protect the men from being accused of something that they didn't do.
For giving her a bad review.
Or if a woman felt like she was under duress and about to lose her job or she wasn't getting the promotion that she wanted, then she could leverage that and accuse a man of something that she didn't do.
They weaponized it and this is why it was very when we start to look at the corporate culture culture culture in america in itself women infiltrating men's spaces completely changed the dynamics of how men had to operate and do their jobs bro bro can i can't just say okay this is very this is fascinating stuff i mean it was so diabolical that i never forget this right this is why i never talked to women at work ever no i don't i don't if i'm with a woman people need to be there This one guy at work, right?
And they tell you at work, don't do it on the job.
Yeah.
It's pretty obvious why you don't do it, but he still did it, right?
Then this chain.
We wait.
We wait for the whole.
It's true.
Everything's going long.
They're coming to events together.
They're holding hands.
We're like, okay, you know what I'm saying?
So they're together having fun at work, off-world, everything.
They break up.
They get arguments, right?
They start fighting.
I kid you not.
Two weeks after they started fighting, she accused him of, guess what?
Great.
Yeah, of course.
Lost his job.
Yeah.
I mind you.
With no due process, right?
No, because when you get into certain levels, bro, you're not protected.
You are an at-will employee once you get to a certain level in corporate America.
You are not.
They can let you go for any reason.
You lose more protection to how you go up.
Absolutely.
But that's also why they give you a golden parachute, why you make the big bucks.
because the expectation is that, you know, you are above standard.
You then represent the brand great.
You are, and this is a good lesson for guys that don't exercise a level of dig discipline, but they want to go into certain places.
You can't fuck a chick on a job, bro.
you just can't because you can't mix business with pleasure that's how you find yourself in a situation where a woman you already got you already behind the eight ball because they can accuse you of something without any kind of due process and you didn't even have to do anything Wow.
But you can get accused, but the very accusation itself changes the dynamic and they can let you go because you're an at-will employee.
They don't have to retain you.
You don't have no protections.
You don't have any rights.
They can let you go just for the sake of letting you go.
So let me ask you this, Anti, because this is fascinating.
Because in the government world, right, I come from law enforcement.
Mostly men, we don't deal a lot of this bullshit, right?
I think it's a little bit lagging on YouTube.
Is lagging on YouTube?
Yeah.
Okay.
Guys, come on over to Rumble if it's lagging on YouTube.
Yep.
But so we didn't have to deal with this, right?
In the government, right, when you have a clearance or whatever, frownerization is a bit more acceptable.
Because it's like, at least you're marrying someone on the job, whatever.
But in the corporate world, it seems like it's completely.
It's frowned upon.
So would it be fair to say that, like, just from what you're saying, women would use this as a very viable strategy to prevent being terminated?
They would use this and it was basically like a game?
Because at this point, she make accusation.
Some women wanted to get fucked by the guy that was her superior because that was her insurance.
Yep.
And ensuring that she was able to have it, you know, still maintain a job.
And or if he leveled up, the expectation was for him to take her with him.
Gotcha.
Just because you was a chick that fucked him.
That's incredible that a woman can kind of go in with the strategy and almost like kind of have fail-safe setup.
where they can never get rid of her.
Man, listen, women have leveraged pussy since the beginning of time, bro.
And it's taken place in corporate America at a level that people have no clue.
All right.
This is going to be no clue.
I want you to pretend that you're a woman getting into an entry-level job in corporate America.
And I want the guys to really learn from you because we got a bunch of guys that want to get in corporate America, et cetera.
What would you do?
to put yourself in a position where you have the most leverage where people can't get rid of you despite bad reputation.
The only thing that they need to do, the first thing that, all right, so let me help women out first of all.
Yeah, you go step by step.
The problem with a lot of these women is that they get involved with the guys that don't have any motion on the job.
Okay.
Most of the women, they should align themselves with the guy that actually has the ability to promote them.
Okay.
So we're talking second level supervisor maybe?
First level and second level.
If you just get in, you're going to be first level.
when you start to play into it a little bit differently, the thing that they probably do is that they start to associate themselves with the guy right above the guy that's on them.
So let's say, for example, if I'm a woman and I, If I'm a woman and you go through, let's say you got a first level supervisor, right?
The first level supervisor possibly wants to fuck her anyway.
But the guy that she should be targeting is his boss.
So you want to do drive-by's past the office of the guy that's right above you in order to get more visibility.
and you want to be likable.
And that's what they make themselves available to.
Honestly, it's crazy.
It's so many women that's fucking on the job, bro.
Oh, for sure.
Honestly.
You're right, it's insurance policy.
But just for the guy's point of view, it's not worth it.
No, it's not worth it.
Guys fall hook, line, and sinker for it all the time because it's hard for you to it's hard for guys to turn down a woman that likes them.
a guy a guy gets a compliment they go to he's going yeah and she's and is convenient and she understands you yeah you know what i mean so.
That's why it's important for guys, like if you get motion in any way, whether you win in financial, corporate America, whatever, for you not to be so smitten by the first woman that compliments you is important because it'll preserve your back.
It'll preserve your ability to continue to win and make money.
I think they should also read a book.
You know, one of my favorite books is 40 laws of power.
Yeah, 40.
Now that book is dangerous too.
It is, it is, because you can use it for good and bad.
If you use it for it, but understanding how to move in corporate world, it's a game being played.
It is.
If you played the wrong game, you're out.
If you're able to maintain, and listen, I'm not not telling y'all to don't go and get pussy.
That's not what I'm saying.
What I'm saying is don't go and fuck the chick that show direct direct report on the job.
That's what I'm saying, because it's going to mess up your bag.
And a lot of times it'll also mess up your career because it's directly tied to.
And the further up you get, the more it's just like content creation, because in a content creator world, the more the more motion you get, the smaller it is.
And really, it's all it's a lot smaller.
The further up you go, you start knowing who people are.
You start being associated with people.
You start being categorized with the same people.
You're going to meet people that's in your sphere.
Right.
And it's the same thing in corporate America, especially in certain sectors.
further up you go the more they're all associated and your reputation is everything when you get into corporate America.
That's why, that's specifically why I wouldn't talk about certain things until after I retired the first time.
Gotcha.
Then that's when I started having certain conversations because I knew that my reputation was directly tied to what my online image is, which is the thing that I was selling in corporate America.
So I couldn't do the same stuff and have the same conversations unless I was 100% sure that I was never probably going in corporate America again.
So I got this little commercial.
We can play a little bit of it.
I think YouTube is back as well.
So don't worry.
What happened?
Did it make another event?
It was glitching, but we're good now.
We are good now.
So it made a second event.
Oh.
Okay, perfect.
Okay, so we're down for what?
Two minutes?
Yeah.
All right.
Sorry about that, guys.
We're back up now, though.
Fucking so stupid.
At least they didn't make another event like the last time.
I don't know what the fuck is wrong with Restream.
Okay, so this Gillette commercial came out like what?
I think 2018, 2019?
Yeah, somewhere around.
And I'm showing you guys this as an example of this is what happens when you bring woke ideology that's typically brought in by women.
Because if I'm not mistaken, it was a woman that directed and approved this higher up at Gillette.
I don't doubt it.
And this commercial ended up losing them billions of dollars.
We'll play a portion of it.
Let's go.
Bullying.
The Me Too movement against sexual harassment.
Toxic masculinity.
Is this the best a man can get?
Is it?
We can't hide from it.
It's been going on far too long.
We can't laugh it off.
What I actually think she's trying to say.
Making the same old excuses.
Boys will be boys.
something finally changed allegations regarding sexual assault and sexual harassment once, but she says he's the talentless man.
And there will be no going back.
Because we believe in the best in men.
Men need to hold other men accountable.
Somehow, that is to say the right thing, to act the right way.
What's up?
Not cool?
Not cool?
What's up?
You guys see that?
He sees a girl, finds her attractive, dresses, walks up to her and, like, spit game and the dude says, Oh, not cool, bro.
Not cool.
Not cool, bro.
Like, what the fuck, man?
And he's black?
But see, a lot of people forgot about this, but this is what was being marketed to guys yeah you know and this is the woke ideology and this was years ago it's gotten worse since this this commercial just stands out to me because it was so fucking brazen yeah right like the whole term toxic masculinity became a thing off after that dumbass commercial yeah so uh bro it's it's absolutely wild to me how um the corporate and they lost billions of dollars for this they did yeah the valuation everything went down significantly what are your thoughts
on on this because obviously you coming from that world What are your thoughts on that commercial?
I think that companies tried to start to market to women.
And more importantly, what they also did was they lost the core of their audience by starting to try to participate in politics altogether.
Getting involved in diversity, equity, inclusion, and hiring people just because of, you know, their gender or hiring people because they were black was getting involved in politics.
And they just went further into it when it came to their marketing.
Gotcha.
And so I think that that was the mistake that a lot of these companies made.
And they still making it today.
Yeah.
They're still making the same mistakes today.
Does a loss of money, does a loss of revenue?
Like, are they okay with like losing money?
No, because they got to answer to their board, right?
They got to answer to shareholders.
Because they have a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders.
Your goal as an executive in a company is to add value to shareholders.
That is your only goal.
Long-term value.
And the reason that is long-term value, the way that executive compensation is set up is that you can't, you're incentivized to add long-term value because you can't even move your options, the equity that they pay you in, you can't move in your options until later on, even after you retired.
So if you're not adding long-term value, not just short-term, long-term value, then your financial compensation will be affected long-term as a result of it also.
Okay, I got a question with this.
obviously this is a publicly traded company the execs from that side are going to be a bit more i guess they're going to make they might have a different strategy than a company that's not publicly traded right can you kind of give us the difference not necessarily because a lot well it depends so like change is my question yeah um publicly and not i think that it's different because when you're okay i'll give you an example when you talk about a chick-fil-a okay a lot of times chick-fil-a has largely been marketed as a company that is more of a right-leaning company they close on sundays all of that
type of stuff right but they don't answer to anybody because it's not a publicly traded company right it is a family-owned company and then more importantly they do what they want to do even their franchising setup is much different you can't just buy into the chick-fil-a franchise they own it they own the land it's hard to get one dude well you got to get hired in to work it as a franchisee technically but you're not you're just really a store manager okay so they control the dynamics but also they're marketing themselves without marketing
themselves as a company that shuts down on sunday that traditionally traditional you know but they've also created a cult following because people actually like the fact that they stand on what it is that they stand on.
Yep.
I remember they tried to open up in Canada somewhere and people were protesting and shit like that.
Yep.
Saying that they don't like gay people and they're bigoted.
I remember.
Even though they've never said anything like that, right?
But it's easy for liberals to market to liberals because, you know, that's the way that they get themselves routed up.
Whereas if you talk about a publicly traded company, any company that you can invest in in the stock market, the shareholders are your boss.
The board is put together as a result of the amount of shares that they own in the company.
And so they may give you a board seat to help direct who it is or how it is that you suppose to move from a corporate perspective.
So the CEO answers to the board members.
When a lot of people say, yo, you, you know, getting to the CEO, you determine, no, the board is the ones that determine what happens.
They are the ones that approved Elon Musk's compensation had to go directly and get approved by the board.
Elon Musk answers to the board who also answers to the shareholders.
And so the point is that you have to bring value to the company.
I personally believe the reason why Elon Musk started pulling back, and I think that it was a strategic thing, I don't even think that him and Trump really hate each other, to be honest with you.
I think that it was strategic for him to start pulling back because him getting more involved in politics actually affected the bottom line of the company itself.
Right.
So when they start reporting quarterly earnings and then that starts to affect the valuation of the company, well, now you're starting to mess up the money and we got to start having some conversations because it is a publicly traded company.
How much stock do you need to hold or what percentage, I guess to keep it simple, would you need to actually be able to sit on the board where you're actually affecting?
different for different companies.
It's different because a lot of times 3% like it But a lot of times it's not through one individual.
It's through a private equity, right?
Or it's through a pension fund or it could be a lot of different.
When Tim Walls was talking shit.
about Elon Musk and Tesla.
Yes.
What he didn't realize was that the pension fund and the retirees and the system itself was directly invested in Tesla.
So they were affected by the very things and the protest that was happening against the company itself.
But because politicians are dumb and they're ignorant and they don't really understand business a lot of times, what they don't realize is that they're actually shooting themselves in the foot by being against American companies because his very pension and the government employees is directly affected by Tesla stock.
Gotcha.
But it could be the CSP effect.
A lot of times, a lot of times.
individual investors, they'll go in and they'll try to buy more shares in order to control what happens in the company and get more board seats.
Gotcha.
So they can start to say, hey, listen, we don't want to do this or you need to be more focused on this or you need to be more focused on that or hey Listen, I think that we should break off this part of the company and sell it and, you know, have this and put the debt over here.
You know, a lot of companies, for example, just from a business perspective, what they'll do is, let's say PayPal, right?
PayPal and eBay used to be directly tied to each other.
And what happened was once they broke off, then they actually separated the companies because they were integrated with each other and then they pushed the debt on the one side.
Right.
So you'll have these companies and all of that is based off of what happens at the board.
It's all based off of what happens with shareholders.
Shareholders are the ones that's directing what happens with the company, not the CEO.
The CEO has really taken a direction from.
the shareholders itself, from the board members.
Well said.
Yeah.
So I guess we can read some chats and I can ask for a follow-up question and take a quick whiz too.
All right.
Some chats on the way.
Steel Wall says, why would a content creator have more than one channel and have everything on just one channel only?
So that's a good question.
Well, it depends because I got a different audience for different things.
So, for example.
uh what we talk about on after hours or what i talk about on the anton daniels channel is much different than what it is that i talk about on the millionaire morning show the millionaire morning show i kind of use that as kind of like a morning show itself whereas the anton daniels channel it kind of was like an inside look into what it is that I am, but it's also the pioneer channel that I then have all of the offshoot channels created from.
So, you know, you have different channels for different things.
And then, you know, that's the way I kind of run my ship itself.
I don't want everything on one channel because I want to tap into different audiences and sometimes.
And I'll also tell you this.
And this is a little bit of game for y'all.
Every channel was not created equal when it comes to how much money that you make per channel because of the type of content that you put on there.
So if I'm talking about relationships, the CPMs and the amount that I make make per impression and a watch time is a completely different financial breakdown from what it is when I'm talking about finances and politics and money and credit cards and what is happening with advertisement and artificial intelligence.
So I make way more money per view, per watch hour.
on the Millionaire Morning Show than I do on the Anton Daniels channel.
It takes way more views to meet the same expectation as far as what it is that I'm making per live stream.
Well said.
Steve Wall again says Anthony Dennis, when you had to restart everything back at your mom's basement, what were the key things you were doing to progress from that situation?
Also, what is the biggest thing you learned from that situation in your life?
That I didn't have to spend money in order to, well, let me put it like this.
The biggest thing that I learned is that once I started making money, I didn't have to increase my lifestyle.
A lot of people, they increase their lifestyle according to how much money that they make.
You get a promotion.
That's why more Yeah.
And it's because they increase their lifestyle to reflect how much money that they make.
And so what I learned in that situation was that the more money I made, the more I just needed to invest instead of spending it on things in order to make sure people make sure, you know, keeping up with the Joneses, making sure that people like me.
When people say that they have a money problem, more importantly, they're really telling you they got a spending problem.
I realized that I previously had a spending problem.
I didn't have a money problem.
So that was deep.
So I just stayed down.
When I went back to the basement, I said, I'm going to stay here for at least 10 years.
Damn.
That was it.
I's chilling.
That's smart.
And what you'll also realize for a lot of you guys that's afraid of being in the basement, oh, I ain't going to get no pussy.
Chick don't want to come here.
Listen, bro, if you can fuck her in the basement, then you the man.
It's even better.
If you can bust her down in the basement, then that means that you really him.
It's even better.
So listen, bro, like, I'm not saying don't get your own place, but what I am saying is put your own long-term objectives and the things that you want to do before you put it before the host.
Because the hosts come with it.
It don't really make no difference.
And the dude that they, they're going to fuck who they like anyway if they like you they go in They don't have no rules for the guys that they like.
It's just the facts.
Get your money.
Get y'all money.
Focus on getting your money and doing what's best for you.
Whatever that is.
Whatever that is.
Do what's best for you.
There will never be a shortage of women.
Ever.
Do what you got to do to minimize your costs so that you can spend money on your investments and then you go and do what you want to do.
You do what you got to do so you can do what you want to do.
Our product says, hi FNF, Anton.
I'm a drug and alcoholic case worker in England helping people every day to overcome addiction.
How can I build myself to be a YouTuber slash streamer to reach a wider audience while staying relevant in the culture?
W show, first super chat ever.
And huge thank you to everything you do to help men become better.
I don't think that it's more or less about building yourself to be a YouTuber streamer.
You just got to do it.
And then you're going to start to figure out what you're good at.
You're going to start to, I always say just start talking about what you know.
I think that Myron is a good example of it.
Fresh is a good example of it.
Myron leaned heavily into his background, especially when it came to law enforcement.
It gives him way more credibility when he's breaking down different subjects from his lens of a person that really understands it from a federal level, right?
When you talk about fresh, fresh really is involved in this lifestyle.
So when he has these conversations, he's looking at it from a completely different lens.
I think that the problem with most streamers is that they try to duplicate what somebody else is doing instead of being authentically them and looking at it from your perspective.
Yeah.
We're going to have a different breakdown depending on who we are and what our lens is.
You looking at it from a case worker's perspective and understanding alcoholism, you're going to have a whole other conversation.
Let's just say, for example, just throw something after the diddy case, right?
Yeah.
The level of drugs and alcohol and how it impairs you and whether or not people are going to come and go and the lifestyle you're going to have a completely different lens of how you react to it and so a lot of times we all talk about the different the same stuff but we approach it from a different lens and you got to make people invest in why you are the person that they want to listen to well said that's really good actually yeah shit uh what else do we got And guys, we're going to be doing after hours here soon.
I think Chris just walked in.
Yeah, I think all the girls are here as well.
Oh, they're all here?
Okay.
So we'll end the show here soon.
Steel, Anton, I know your calculator is important to you.
How far ahead do you fill in your calendar?
I think you mean calendar from before.
What type of details do you put in your calendar?
A lot of my calendar is reoccurring because I do some of the same stuff all the time.
The only thing that changes is the little details.
But then here's the more important part.
Because you don't do the same thing pretty much every day, right?
The calendar basically breaks down how much time people are wasting in their day, right?
So, for example, let's say I got a calendar and I'm breaking it down and I say, okay, cool.
So this time I'm going to stream from this time work.
Let's use it from a regular person.
I'm going to work from this time to this time.
And then I'm going to allocate this time to this time for my business.
First of all, that gives you an objective because if you're following your calendar, you're going to stick to it, right?
You're actually going to do it instead of just winging it every day and thinking that you're going to be consistent.
It gives you some consistency.
But for me, because my stuff is kind of reoccurring, I can then plan what I'm going to do.
So if I say, yo, I'm coming to Miami to come on Fresh and Fit or whatever, I'm planning ahead of time to where my videos are still going to be released.
My content is still going to be released.
My streams is going to be released.
I know that I don't stream over.
on wednesday so this is the day that i'm going to really be able to dig in and create content i also know that tomorrow morning i'm going to jump right on the live stream so once i get off a plane i'm going straight to the studio but i'm also making sure that that aligns with my calendar yo calendar is your best friend it is It is your assistant.
It is the thing that people used to pay for as far as a personal assistant to make sure that they manage their time.
You have to.
Every guy, every guy needs to get a calendar that they live by.
Every guy gotta get a calendar.
Yeah.
That's the first thing that they give you when you get in corporate America, your outlook calendar.
How do they block off your time?
They look off what is available to you and then they say, okay, so you got some time here.
I want to be able to add a calendar meeting here.
I want to add a meeting here.
What's available for you guys?
Are you better in the morning or in the afternoon?
Corporate America looks at your time based off of your calendar.
They don't look at you as you, they don't talk to you as an individual.
They look at your calendar.
It's very smart what Anton did.
He applied the corporate rules to his business.
business and streamlined it yeah 10x yeah smart um uh what else do we got here so to brandon card as well yes brandon is real big on calendars yep um and this i don't know if you guys are starting to realize like there's a pattern here people don't people that are successful don't smoke don't drink yeah don't do drugs calendars don't chase women all day.
Right?
What do we tell y'all, bro?
Drop the weed.
Drop the booze.
Right?
Start getting more organized.
Go to the gym.
So I'm starting to notice like all my successful friends have very similar traits on certain topics.
What else do we got here?
The minority DEI idiocy is getting out of hand.
Anton is the most basic nigga.
This is a rarity to see because most black people chip out when they get emotional.
Amen.
Oh, listen, black people hateate me.
Some, some, let me not say that.
Black people love me, black culture, the things that we celebrate the most, they get very upset with me because they don't like to hear the truth.
Yeah.
But what I'll also tell you, they call you the tether and shot, like, wait, what?
Yeah, absolutely.
But the minute that they start calling you that, that's when you know you're really doing the right thing.
Yeah, yeah, good point.
Yeah, yeah, they call us tethers too.
So, uh, what else do we got here?
Top three names from Iron Few in a movie, Bruce IED, Vin Laden, or Johnny Twin Jets.
Okay.
Hey man, don't go with your day job, bro.
Mara, do you pick up from last show that one Indian chick who was complaining that Diddy had a power imbalance on a woman just because they're building her slummy?
Because a billionaire, let me get this straight, all these women and future women who make more money than her bosses them around.
Yeah, bro, you're trying to bring logic to the illogical female arguments of MeToo era and them wanting autonomy while simultaneously not wanting to be held accountable for their bad sexual decisions.
She said she feels like he had the power, so yeah, bro.
Like anyone that sat there in that courtroom, bro, like will know that this is a nigga that was a pervert.
Yeah.
It was a domestic violence case.
He's a freak.
And, you know, realistically speaking, if we're going to be all the way to 1000, bro, is about to do fed time for flying in a bunch of male prostitutes.
That's crazy.
Yo, imagine going to federal prison, bro.
What you win?
Flying niggas in, man.
What you win, folks.
Yeah.
Flying dudes in the fuck out there.
Yeah, flying niggas in.
Bruh.
It's crazy.
Damn.
You know, I think the biggest L is him just flying dudes in.
That's literally what he's going to jail for, guys.
Because these guys were male escorts.
And he flew them in, which affects interstate lines.
Craziness, bro.
Yeah.
He ain't never going to be able to live it down.
That's crazy.
What else do we got?
That's it?
Okay.
Thank you, Evan, for making RP aware for two to three years ago when he started in Panorama Towers in Brickell.
Yep.
Shout out to you, man.
Damn, make you doxing us all together.
I was just like, bro.
I mean, we gone, we gone, we gone, we gone.
We gone, but damn.
All right.
W. Ed Talk, W. Meyer, W. Fresh, WFNF crew just wanted to say the cameras are looking crispy, brother.
Thank you again for your trust in my work.
Yes.
TBC adjusted some of these cameras in the studio.
So shout out to him.
Is he here from?
He here?
He was here yesterday.
He was here yesterday.
Is he from here?
He's from Orlando.
No, but he can probably put you in touch.
I'm about to bring him in.
Yeah, yeah, I'll put you on.
Anton is 100% correct about corporate IT as an army veteran.
We don't want them there, especially in finance.
They make bad deals just to get rid of it.
Yeah, I mean, that was a red pill from Anton that they'll take the hit to be more inclusive.
And does the board, how about the boards that have like a fiduciary, you know, responsibility to their people?
Like, they're okay with taking these else?
Yeah, I guess.
I mean, how are the investors not pissed?
They should be.
Well, there's another layer there as well that people don't realize.
The board is the board.
But then there's the people that fund.
Yeah.
Like the enterprises and also those corporations.
It's kind of like they have another tier that are being told what to do.
And they fund the establishment.
So the top donors.
So do they offset the losses?
Well, you got to look at companies a little different.
They do.
So there are some companies that are established that have a profitability model.
they actually have real profits coming in and then there's other companies that are growth right growth companies are companies that's not necessarily making money okay but they're looking to get a higher valuation so that they can ultimately either get sold.
Like tech.
Yeah.
Or they can either get sold or absorbed or bought out.
So YouTube itself was its own entity before Google bought them.
Yeah.
Yes.
Yeah.
That's a perfect example.
A lot of companies are trying to not necessarily make money, but get a higher valuation.
So either they're going to go public and go, you know, issue an initial public offering.
That way they actually issue a stock.
That's why a lot of people go and work for startups.
It's a higher risk.
It's a risk that they may not be successful.
But if they do decide to go public and then they do get rich., then a lot of the times the early investors, the early people that come into it, they wind up making a lot of money.
OpenAI, the company that owns ChatGBT, when Microsoft came in and said, hey, we want to make a capital investment in you, it basically started to blow up their valuation.
The company became a lot more higher valued and a lot more profitable because of the product that they were putting out.
And then they figured out how to monetize later.
When Instagram first came out, they weren't running ads but the value of instagram it exploded when meta wind up buying them and then they figured out how to monetize it later and they brought them into the ecosystem so just so i make sure i understand this because obviously we're at a kind of in a unique situation here so they have an obligation obviously when they're public especially to make their investors money.
Investors have a say.
But the strategy for how they're going to make money differs because they may not necessarily be making money in the short term.
But if their strategy for marketing the company, Perplexity is an AI company that just made a proposition to buy Google Chrome for $34.5 billion.
They know that Google that is valued at $2.46 trillion is not going to take that deal.
However, what Perplexity did was, They didn't do that because they thought that Google was going to take the deal.
They made that proposition because they wanted more visibility for their product so that they can get more app downloads.
So it was really a marketing play.
So sometimes companies make smart marketing plays that bring more visibility to the company.
And sometimes they mess up by making bad ads that they think is going to tap into the diversity, equity, and inclusion or the feminist crowd that fall flat on their feet.
They have a fiduciary obligation to do what's best for the shareholders, but it don't always work.
Okay, gotcha.
So when you see bad ads like that, we look at it in hindsight and say that that was a bad idea.
Somebody up in marketing or somebody in the executive office has said, this will be a great idea to come out here and get more visibility for the company and maybe get more female buyers of Gillette.
Right.
Okay.
And it's not getting us attention because it did go viral.
But it backfired.
And so somebody probably lost a job as a result of that.
Yeah.
Okay.
Do you know what I'm saying?
But sometimes they can be saved by donors as well because they're following their...
So imagine them boys say, oh, go do this.
We'll make sure that you're okay.
So I'll give you another example.
I'll give you another example.
The valuation of a company is not entirely based off of how profitable they are.
Yes.
Right.
Gotcha.
Google.
Okay.
So I'll give you another example.
Twitter, before Elon Musk bought it, were never profitable.
Yeah, prior to Elon Musk buying it.
Its valuation was based off of the possibility of selling ads and making it more profitable.
Same thing with Uber, same thing with Lyft.
They were in competition with each other to gather more market share because ultimately the goal was that they would be able to monetize more effectively if they can.
push out the other one, right?
When you talk about Tesla, Tesla was never really more profitable than Toyota, but Tesla's valuation, how much the company was worth, is now not just based off of the fact that Tesla was selling cars.
It's because Tesla is a technology company.
That's a company that they can monetize full self-driving.
They bringing out the Tesla robot.
They're going with, you know, automation of large trucks and they're going to change the trucking industry and, you know, electrification and buying in the government subsidies and a Biden chipset, right?
All of that stuff factors into the valuation of the company.
So if somebody is looking at it and they're saying, man, how high is the stock going to go or how low is the stock going to go or if it's properly valued?
Well, you don't just look at it from whether or not they're profitable.
You look at the prospects of what the company is going to do long term.
And if it's a growth stock or if it's a stock of a company that's actually going to go down because it's not profitable and it's a company that's easily disrupted.
Can another competitor come in and take over?
A lot of what Elon Musk is doing, or a lot of Elon Musk's dependencies, is on the fact that they're dependent on the Trump administration and before that the Biden administration from preventing electric cars from China from coming over here in the United States of America.
As long as they can keep...
Their valuation is based off of what happened in politics, is based off of what happens as far as the future technologies, Grock, they got that integrated into the Tesla vehicle.
They're using camera systems to basically map out everything of America to ultimately push out full self driving to where they can sell a subscription service and not just sell cars.
So, you know, the valuation of a camera makes it so much more complex because we might look at a commercial like Bud Light, for example, and they bring Dylan Mulvaney, they, the people get mad.
They say this is trash, blah, blah.
We're looking at it like, man, they got to be losing money and they might.
But what we don't know is their valuation might have gone up because now they're broader.
And they've opened doors for them though.
We're looking at it like you niggas are stupid.
Yeah.
They might know, look, we're going to run this ad.
We're probably going to lose a couple of billions on the front end because people are going to get mad and not buy Bud Light.
But what we are doing is we're increasing our val valuation.
So, okay, that's the right thing.
So different companies take different strategic risks based off of what they're trying to do and bring long term value to the shareholders.
Right.
Gotcha.
Okay.
So it's not black and white.
No.
With are you operating up?
There's so many other layers.
Plays.
But see, that's why I honestly, and I'm not pushing or promoting, this is the type of breakdowns that I do a lot more inside of my Patreon.
Okay.
Because I'm breaking down when I say the eight things that I look for when I'm looking to invest in a company, I'm going based off of the charts, the valuations, the long term strategy, the leadership, politics, everything takes a play in what's happening and whether or not you want to invest in a company long term.
term so a normie might look at who owns but like anhouse or bush or whatever they're sure they probably have a they're publicly traded someone like me who is in like aware of this stuff might say i ain't buying that yeah they're going viral for the wrong reasons they're losing money yeah but someone like you might say nah it's going to go down but it's going to come back up because the revaluation is going to be a correction so like for example when the tariffs hit that's the that was the biggest buying opportunity ever because People that don't understand the market, the short-term play was, oh my God, everything is messed up.
The sky is falling.
But for people like me, I'm like, oh, man, this is going to be the biggest opportunity ever, especially for certain companies in America, because they're going to capitalize about what's going to happen with a lot of these trade deals.
It's going to be a huge opportunity.
That's why NVIDIA is now valued at $4 trillion, because we have a vested interest in making sure that they build more chips and become more profitable, because that's built into everything that we do in AI related.
Gotcha.
All right.
Yo, a lot of sauce this episode.
Ansel, thank you so much for saying.
I learned a bunch myself.
This is great.
I'm going to be collabing and kicking it with y'all on a regular basis.
Yes, guys, we're going to.
with anton behind the scenes about getting him a third chair and here him being a continual guest yeah yeah um guys by the hours we're doing it right now the girls are here see on a little bit we got a run oh also last thing i'll tell you guys while you guys wait i got a video up right now on my channel, could we pull it up real quick.
As you guys know, there's a lot of fucking people asking yo, is Nick Fuentes a federal or whatever?
In this video, I break it down in excruciating detail why it's damn near impossible.
I go through DOJ evidence, everything else like that.
So while you guys wait, Link is in the chat, go watch it, like the video, let's make that thing fucking blow up because we're not going to let these guys lie on our guys and say some bullshit about he's a federal.
They're trying to fucking stop him because he's unstoppable right now.
So go check that video out.
I break it down and explain to you guys how informants work, et cetera.