All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 12, 2024 - Fresh & Fit
02:46:37
How Trump Must Run His Administration
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
What's up, guys?
Welcome to Fresh Your Podcast.
I feel like we were just here.
But anyway, guys, we're going to be covering the news.
We've got a couple of different stories, how Trump should run his administration.
We're going to cover this woman going ahead and attacking Nick in Illinois.
And we've got Ivan in the house.
Let's get into it, guys.
Let's go.
And we're back.
All right, we're back.
What's up, guys?
Welcome to Fresh Fit News, man.
We've got a special episode for you guys today.
We've got an expert when it comes to the U.S. government and exposing the bullshit, but also understanding how the government works at a very deep and intrinsic level.
We've got Ivan Raiklund in the house, man.
Welcome.
He's calling in from wherever he's at.
He's calling into the show via Zoom.
He is here.
Shout out to Ivan Raiklin, a.k.a. the Deep State Marauder.
Welcome, Ivan.
Welcome back to the show, bro.
We're happy to have you.
Can you introduce yourself to the people for those that might be unaware?
Welcome back.
Yeah, yeah, it's good to be back.
For those that don't know who I am, I spent a quarter of a century getting after it against ISIS, Taliban, MS-13, Russian aggression.
And then I finished off my career in kind of two roles, if you will.
One on the East Coast, teaching intelligence analysis, intelligence support to multinational operations.
And probably most important to this discussion, again, about three and a half years worth teaching our U.S. intelligence community officers and international partners on what the entire United States national security system looks, smells and sounds like.
From top to bottom, left to right, mission roles, responsibilities, every single entity across all branches of government.
And then, on the part-time side of things, in the Army Reserves, I finished off my career as a technology scout out in Silicon Valley, focused on artificial intelligence, mixed reality and gaming companies that were interested in kind of selling their products and capabilities to the Army and the broader Department of Defense.
And in the interim, I guess, if you will, in between when I wasn't doing too much, I picked up a law degree to focus on national security law and constitutional law.
That's it.
Quite the resume, man.
So we're happy to have you on the show.
And I know you have to wake up early tomorrow, so guys, we don't have them for all night, but we do got them for all night.
No, we can go a little bit.
We'll vibe a little bit.
Alright, awesome.
So we're going to cover three main things with Ivan, guys, and then we're going to get into other stories.
We want to kick it off with Ivan first, because he's here.
We want to utilize him while we have him.
So...
First, obviously, we've got the Senate race going on, and then we also, Trump is picking people for his administration.
And lastly, we're going to talk about Congress and how to kind of really assure that we don't run into the same issues that we ran under the first Trump administration.
Which of those three do you want to tackle first?
Let's start off, I think, with the first one that is most important, which is the Senate race.
Okay.
I kind of want to go into a little bit of detail so that people think through things before jumping to conclusions and following somebody else's lead that they think that that person knows what they're talking about when making the decision on who should be the best Senate majority leader.
Okay.
So can you explain to people what the Senate is, how it works, and then why these races are so critical?
Yeah, so what just happened last Tuesday, a lot of people only saw the headline that President Trump won and secured the presidency for a second term starting...
Again, these dates are critical.
Take notes if you need to.
January 20th.
January 20th is still over two months away.
Yeah.
So a lot could happen from now until then.
Let's face it.
The left and the enemy, as I call it, the domestic terrorist left...
They're going to do everything in their power to, one, either continue to try to take out President Trump, and I mean that when I say that.
They've already done two attempted assassination attempts.
They can go ahead and conduct other activities that will essentially neuter him and his ability to conduct business how he wants to and how he's campaigned on, just like they did in 2016 and 2017.
But I think he's much more intelligent, understands the system better, and he's bringing in people, and that's what we're going to talk about in Phase 2, the different cabinet-level officials.
But he can't bring in those cabinet-level officials quickly, whether it's Secretary of Defense, the CIA Director, all the appointments that he has to make.
Many are Senate-confirmed.
Overall, there's about 4,000 senior political appointed positions in what's called the Plum Book, or they call it the Green Book.
All of those positions, not all of them, but they're confirmed by the Senate.
So the leader of the United States Senate, now that the Republicans have control of the Senate, that is a very crucial role.
Because at the end of the day, those Senate appointments is a conversation between the president, the Senate majority leader, and then the appropriate chairman of the committee that has jurisdiction over that particular political appointment.
So, for example, the attorney general, whoever that's going to be, I'm...
I shouldn't say vouching, but I am endorsing Attorney General Ken Paxton for that position.
But let's just say it's him.
Get Carlin out of here, man.
I said get Merrick Garland the fuck out of here.
Oh yeah, absolutely.
So, the confirmation has to go something like, President Trump appoints, this is under the United States Constitution, the Senate Majority Leader obviously has a say in who that's going to be, because they have the constitutional role to guide the Senate on whether or not to hold a vote on the confirmation, and then that Confirmation process starts with the Judiciary Committee.
So it's going to really be important who the Judiciary Committee chair is.
Now, who appoints those chairs?
It's the Senate Majority Leader.
Now, when we look at all, right now we're sitting at 52, there could be maybe more 53 or 54, depending on what happens in the Cary Lakes situation in Arizona.
And we might be able to litigate and pull off one or maybe even more Senate seats.
But let's just say, you know, we have the majority.
So then of the 52 Senators that are incoming into the Senate, by the way, the Congressional calendar is different than the Presidential calendar.
January 3rd is when Congress, the new Congress, comes into play.
A full two and a half weeks before the swearing in for Trump.
A lot can happen before that, and I'll kind of go into detail on that.
So let's take a look.
Who should be the Senate Majority Leader?
And right now the vote is supposed to take place on Wednesday at 9.30 a.m.
in Senate Dirksen Room 50.
So if me and one million of my closest friends wants to make this vote transparent, you might want to show up.
Because they're trying to do it behind closed doors.
Just like they try to do it within conference for the speakership, Republican conference, before they presented it, before the whole House body.
Some of you may have seen that over the last couple of speakerships.
When it's an open vote, that means the senators or the members of Congress Then showcase who they're supporting, and they're going to face the wrath of their constituents.
Whereas if it's a closed vote, they can always say, oh, I voted for this person.
Meanwhile, there's no evidence that they did or didn't.
So they can lie based on what their constituents want them to say, but meanwhile they actually didn't vote for that particular individual.
So right now we have three...
What's that?
No, that's crazy.
Okay.
So first thing is we want an open and public vote.
How does that look?
You got 52 senators.
Well, I'm not sure it's going to be 52.
It's going to be the ones that are probably remaining, but let's just say it's 50.
I think orientation started today or tomorrow for the senators.
You got McCormick's finally in there, new Pennsylvania senator that just got elected.
And so you basically need, you know, what's half of 52?
26.
So you need 27 votes to become, you know, 50% plus one, 27 votes within the Republican conference to be able to secure the Senate majority leader position.
Right now we have three senators that are running.
One is Senator Thune from South Dakota.
Another is Senator Cornyn from Texas.
And the third one is Senator Tim Scott from Florida.
President Trump ran on the MAGA and MAHA kind of rubric, which is make America great again and make America healthy again, which is kind of the fusion of the RFK campaign push and then the America First policies of the Trump campaign.
When you look at the details of...
The way I always look at things as I assess things critically...
I always try to look for and advocate for the very best person for a particular position, whether or not they are running for that position or not.
So let's start off with the maximum pinnacle, number one, all-star, superstar, and then from there we start to work our way down the priority list, right?
So I don't care if you're not attempting to run or if you're trying to run for office.
I'm going to look at all the potential possibilities and then rack and stack it based on criteria that I think are appropriate criteria to kind of weigh the different candidates.
So when you look at the 52 Republican Senators that could all be potentially Senate Majority Leaders, because that's the only people that can be, I look through and see who fits the mold of Maha and MAGA as a direct representative as closely as possible of the 52.
That's criteria number one.
Number two, I don't want a freshman to be there because they do not have the understanding of Senate rules.
They don't have the relationships with the other senators to be able to create a little bit of leverage and influence, right?
You want somebody that has been in there at least a term.
And I get it.
It's establishment, but you don't want them to be there too long either.
So there's that sweet spot.
And then lastly, I'll say is somebody that has proven through exhibited leadership and action over the last specifically four or five years that has taken risk In pushing forth the truth.
And when I say that, I'm talking about pushing back against the COVID con, exposing the Biden criminal syndicate, many things, the censorship industrial complex, etc., etc.
So when you go through those criteria, there is one person and one person only that meets all those criteria for me.
And that is the Wisconsin Senator, Senator Ron Johnson.
Ron Paul?
He's not running for Senate Majority Leader, but let me step through you.
Myron, I sent you a text, and it was a tweet that lists, basically, it goes through a laundry list of what Ron Johnson has done to deserve and has earned, and I think it may be Yeah, it's the second text that I sent you today.
Or second tweet.
From New York Times?
No, this was to Elon Musk.
It's a tweet.
Subject.
Best MAGA Maha leader in the Senate is Ron Johnson.
Ron Johnson has earned...
Becoming the U.S. Senate Majority Leader as the best representative of both MAGA and MAHA through his leadership the last four years as exhibited here.
He was the only member of either chamber in Congress to do the following.
Back in December of 2020, he chaired the Homeland Security Government Affairs Committee in the Senate and held a hearing exposing the 2020 electoral heist.
The only senator to do so.
And there's the link if you want to watch the hearing.
By the way, one of the witnesses at the hearing, Was the guy by the name of Chris Krebs, who was the CISA director over at DHS, who you probably remember.
Myron?
Yeah.
And he was the one that said, it was the most safe and secure election ever in the history of humanity.
Never has the human race experienced such a pristine endeavor such as the 2020 election, he basically told us.
Which is complete bullshit, right?
Mm-hmm.
Total perjury.
The other witness that was there was a Trump campaign attorney also who was formerly General Flynn's attorney during that fight against the deep state.
But he was an attorney focused on Nevada and how Las Vegas and Clark County was essentially allowing illegal illegitimate votes to be counted in the 2020 election.
And he exposed that, right?
And I happened to be there with him, helping him prep for that hearing.
So I've had a front row, second row seat to a lot of these things that have taken place over the last five years.
Next up...
Ron Johnson, along with Senator Chuck Grassley, who's older now, he's 80-something, 88 maybe, they exposed the Biden criminal syndicate.
Laptop.
Again, one of only two U.S. senators of the Republicans to do so.
That is important to me.
He took on the risk and he went back and kind of exposed the illegitimate, belligerent regime and its criminal activity going back quite some time.
Next, Senator Ron Johnson's office was the first one and only Senate office to have two interim reports about the July 13th Trump assassination.
This is well before the House created this so-called July 13 task force, right, to investigate the...
And he goes into the timeline.
He was the first and foremost to do it, a report in July and a report in August.
So he jumps on the opportunity to take a leadership position when maybe it's not popular in the first two instances, or maybe it is popular in that instance, but he's showcasing what needs to be done for the country.
And then lastly on this note, I'll say this.
He had three hearings.
Calling out the COVID-con, the vaccine dangers, and then he assembled the world's premier subject matter experts that were exposing the Fauci-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology lab incident and subsequent COVID, you know, all the DNA mutilation injection products, etc., basically calling them out for what they were.
Bring in all the doctors, all the thought leaders that are now, you know, have formed and assembled into the Maha movement.
And then he also held a hearing maybe a month or so ago with health experts explaining on what are, you know, it's essentially the RFK crowd.
Saying that this is what we're going to do in order to make America healthy again.
So Ron Johnson is literally the epicenter, the focal point of both of those movements, more so than anyone else.
And he's exhibited leadership by doing what he can, even in a minority position, because the Republicans have the minority.
He still was able to do this, even amidst the commie tube censorship and posted these hearings on Rumble.
Get this.
An official hearing was blocked and censored by Commitube, and that's where we're at in our country.
And so hopefully somebody like him will move forward in becoming the Senate Majority Leader.
And I get it.
Everybody's pushing for Rick Scott, but Rick Scott has not lifted a finger on any of the things that I just explained.
Not one.
And the reason why this is so important is because the Senate Majority Leader obviously dictates when people get appointed and can either make it a smooth process or not.
So you want different...
The Senate Majority Leader will then appoint who the chairman of the committees are in Congress, meaning he will then decide who the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman is going to be.
Homeland Security Committee chairman, who then determines on confirming and vetting the Homeland Security Committee Secretary.
Or, you know, all the different chairs of these committees.
It is a very important and powerful position.
That a lot of people don't know about.
Like, I mean, the fact, like, I mean, I'm glad that you, like, systematically explained that, that this person coming in, like, pretty much is an integral part of people that run entire agencies, right?
They're involved in deciding who that person is.
So, you don't like your Attorney General?
He can block any appointment that President Trump puts forward.
Wow.
Okay.
So now I see...
So we need...
You said it was Todd Johnson?
No.
Ron Johnson.
Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin.
Ron Johnson out of Wisconsin.
You think he's the best candidate where we're going to be able to put people in position.
And so I would like to challenge Elon Musk to go ahead and put out a poll tonight.
If he hears this, if anybody can get this to him directly.
If he could put out a poll, because he already put out a poll of the three candidates that are running, how about we match up the one that is preferred of the three running, which is Senator Scott from Florida, and then as option B, put down Ron Johnson.
And how about include a list of, these are the accomplishments of Senator Scott, and these are the accomplishments of Senator Ron Johnson.
If you go pound for pound based on what they've done, Ron Johnson will, when everybody understands what Ron Johnson has done and hasn't done, versus Senator Scott, I think that vote would be a 95 plus percent for a Ron Johnson.
Albeit, he's not running for that position, but if Elon Musk Puts a poll out.
The whole country sees that Ron Johnson is the better candidate.
And I mean, I think it would be an interesting dynamic.
A lot of people tell me like, well, he's not running.
Stop, Ivan.
Stop arguing this.
We get it.
He's the best person, but he's not running.
Let me remind folks.
I called it that when we removed Kevin McCarthy, who I was instrumental in blocking him.
I did my best, but it took 15 votes finally, I think, for him to finally get his speakership, Kevin McCarthy.
And then I was very instrumental in facilitating behind the scenes the removal of Kevin McCarthy.
And I said that if we remove McCarthy and the Rhinos go full bore and the Magus wing of the party in the House go full bore, they will probably settle on a Mike Johnson.
I think I was probably the very first one that called it, based on my understanding of the political dynamics.
And lo and behold, it became Mike Johnson.
So it would be nice to see a Johnson& Johnson, but it would be even better to see a Speaker, Elon Musk, And a Senate Majority Leader, Ron Johnson.
And I'm going to pause there to take a question before I go into explaining why Elon Musk would be the best Speaker of the House.
I have a question.
Yeah.
So is Rick Scott not a good choice?
Because Elon endorsed him.
Rick Scott.
Who?
Rick Scott.
He's saying is he not a good choice because Elon endorsed him.
Rick Scott.
No, no, I didn't say it that way.
I said there are three senators that are running to try to be, well, technically four, but three real ones.
Three that are running to be the Senate Majority Leader.
Okay?
I'm arguing that there is an even better candidate than those that are running.
Yeah.
Okay.
And so everyone's taking the traditional path.
I always look at the best case scenario, and I get it.
Many people say it's an unconventional path.
Well, the very first time in our nation's history we removed the Speaker of the House.
So let's just use that as precedent.
So let's take a look at this.
Before we go into the House, I want to address one other thing that is probably the most important thing That the Senate Majority Leader is going to do on January 3rd that almost no one knows.
Maybe like five people in D.C. understand the importance of what I'm about to say.
Hopefully it's going to be 500,000 now.
So the Senate Majority Leader appoints a Senate Sergeant at Arms.
I think it's the full title, Senate Sergeant-at-Arms and the doorman.
Basically, the role of the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms is the senior law enforcement person on the Senate side of the Capitol and the Senate office buildings.
They have their own separate jurisdiction, law enforcement capability, and they're one of the three voting members of the Capitol Police Board.
And that Senate Sergeant at Arms is the chair of this Capitol Police Board that directs the U.S. Capitol Police completely, and it alternates annually between the Senate Sergeant at Arms and the House Sergeant at Arms.
Guess who becomes the chair of the Capitol Police Board on January 3rd?
The Senate Sergeant at Arms.
So, from January 3rd through January 20th, which is that 17-day period when the new House and Senate come into play, but before the new administration comes into play, I would argue that the best person to be the Senate sergeant at arms would be Kash Patel for those two and a half weeks.
Why, you may ask?
Well, as you may or may not recall, The January 6th fedsurrection of 2021, there's a lot of documents and information that was controlled and influenced at the behest of the Senate Majority Leader and the House Speaker through their Sergeants-at-Arms to direct the Capitol Police Chief and the General Counsel of the Capitol Police To go ahead and say,
hey, why don't you form a patriot target list of 1,500 people, to include Donald Trump, and go ahead and persecute them.
And then make sure that your evidence is manipulated, both CCTV footage and sworn testimony, and then sent over to the DOJ for political weaponization before it goes to the district court in Washington,
D.C. So when you understand those insider, insider baseball game dynamics, the only reason why you have January 6th defendants, as opposed to $50 fines addressed to 99% of them for trespass,
it's because the Speaker of the House, Pelosi, and the Senate Majority Leader, Chuck Schumer, directed their sergeants-at-arms to then hire Which is controlling two-thirds of the Capitol Police Board to go ahead and hire a Capitol Police chief that was willing, ready, and able to provide cover for the general counsel, Tad Tobias, to go ahead and create his Patriot target lists and politically weaponize.
So, if we use the precedent that they set, how about we retake control of the Capitol Police Board One, with a strong Senate Majority Leader, appointing the strongest Senate Sergeant at Arms, who then is dual-hatted as a chair of the Capitol Police Board on January 3rd, and during that two-and-a-half-week period, basically hire a new Capitol Police Chief.
Hire a new general counsel of that Capitol Police to disclose all documents to the public to show that January 6th was a fedsurrection and then disclose all the charging documents and all the manipulated, curated lies via CCTV footage and sworn testimony to debunk the entire insurrection narrative and prove the fedsurrection narrative.
Make sense?
Yeah, so...
Isn't that fucking huge?
No, that would be.
So, let me ask you this.
It is.
Did this footage not come out?
Because a couple of these guys, did any of the January Sixers, some of them went to trial, right?
Yeah.
I mean, we're at like 1,500 defendants.
Yeah.
Did they not show the Capitol, because obviously the Capitol Police control the footage in the CCTV footage.
Right.
Did they not show that at trial?
Here's how it works.
The U.S. Capitol Police is under the legal authority of Title II, U.S. Code, Chapter 29, and when you look at specifically Section 1979, Paragraph B, it states there that the Capitol Police Board is the controlling decision maker on what information is considered security information and what is not.
So then, if it's Okay, I see where this is going.
They're going to claim that it's security footage.
I see where this is going.
So they won't even release that on the political targets.
So to make this clear, just so I can kind of explain this to the audience, because we went into the weeds there, so I'm going to bring it back out to make it easier for them to understand from the law enforcement perspective.
So the Capitol Police...
Right?
Basically, led the charge to get these guys prosecuted.
The FBI went ahead and took the case criminally.
Wait, say that again?
So, it seems to me, and please correct me if I'm wrong here, the Capitol Police led the charge to get these guys prosecuted, right?
Yep.
Then, turned the case over to the FBI. The FBI did the investigation to prosecute these guys.
The DOJ, FBI, U.S. Attorney's Office, yep.
Yep.
And then when the January Sixers got their discovery, they didn't get the CCTV footage to properly defend themselves because Capitol Police probably argued, hey, it's security footage.
We're not going to give it to you guys because we don't have to.
And then under the statute you just gave there, Section 2B, I think you said it was.
1979-B, yep.
So, the FBI prosecuted it, and they took these guys to trial, but the government didn't have to disclose everything that they needed to under pretenses of security.
So, Capitol Police didn't have to get the footage.
Wow.
It's even worse than that.
Yes, but it's even worse than that.
So...
Imagine this.
Like, yeah, here we go.
I'm going to use a little piece of paper here.
So imagine I'm the U.S. Capitol Police Board and Chief.
So remember, it's Nancy Pelosi as the Speaker of the House back then and Senate Majority Leader on the other side telling their sergeant at arms to tell the Capitol Police chief and then the general counsel, meaning the lawyer of the Capitol Police, to say, hey, why don't you go ahead and work with our staff director for the January 6th why don't you go ahead and work with our staff director for the January 6th committee, which is David Buckley, one of the 51 spies who lied that signed on that, and say, hey, let's
Liz Cheney is going to participate in that, and Benny Thompson is going to participate with you from the Democrat side, from the Uniparty, and we're going to go ahead and this piece of paper represents the CCTV footage.
Oh, wait.
There's exculpatory evidence on the political targets we're going after?
We're not going to include that, and we're not going to include that, but we're going to include this and send it over to the DOJ. That's a big Brady violation, and they got away with it.
It's not, because Brady applies to the prosecution, and the prosecution is the DOJ, and the DOJ can't get the original footage because of separation of powers.
That's how they did it.
Wow.
The whole thing right here, I own as U.S. Capitol Police, but now I give you DOJ this, the remaining, the DOJ does not even know that I gave you the only incriminating.
The DOJ doesn't even know about this right here because I never sent it over.
And then the DOJ, with their bias, Right?
Then takes this and then puts a little bias on top of it and then says, hey, judge or jury, I know you've spent two years consuming the U.S. Capitals, or I should say Nancy Pelosi's January 6th cover-up committee evidence, which was false, doctored, manipulated also.
Along with the doctored evidence from U.S. Capitol Police.
And now you get to get 100% conviction rate.
Because there's no exculpatory evidence.
And the judges won't include personal, individual, you know, how people were out there with their own video cams.
They won't allow it.
They'll only allow the governmental stuff coming from the U.S. Capitol Police.
And in addition, here's the other piece of paper.
Imagine this is what happened.
And this is like the sworn statement of a U.S. Capitol Police officer that bore witness to whatever they're charging the particular J6 defendant for.
Well, if I'm the U.S. Capitol Police officer, and I sign a sworn affidavit impact statement saying that so-and-so defendant did the following to me, and I submit it to the general counsel, guess what the general counsel and the acting Capitol Police Chief Yogananda Pittman were doing?
They said, if you don't change your testimony to the following, we're going to fire you.
Wow.
So, you choose.
And oh, by the way, you have to sign an NDA that you're signing this doctored and manipulated and coerced sworn impact statement, Harry Dumm.
Akanilo Ganel, two U.S. Capitol Police officers that were duped, not duped, that were told to create testimony and then also be used on the January 6th committee as witnesses, and then they would be given a book deal, and then they would be, you know, nothing would happen to them other than positive actions.
That is the level of...
I investigated this entire thing.
I got whistleblowers.
I got insiders.
Everybody's telling me about this.
That is what happened.
That is why it's so important to have control of the Capitol Police Board.
Because when you control the Capitol Police Board, Myron, this is probably the biggest thing that I'm going to say today.
If you control the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms, the Senate and the House Sergeant-at-Arms, on each side of the Congress, you control votes.
And this is how you control votes.
If I control all of the infrastructure, Senate Sergeant R, for example, of the Senate, and every email that's transmitted, and every government official issued phone, computer, and email, you're probably going to find some transgressions of staffers you're probably going to find some transgressions of staffers and senators in those emails, wouldn't you?
Yep.
And what if you also own as the Senate Sergeant at Arms all of the CCTV footage of the entire campus of your respective chamber or Senate or House?
Would you suspect that there may be some after-hours transgressions maybe taking place?
Of course.
So now I have dirt and blackmail as the Senate sergeant at arms for potentially all dirt that is to be had by senators and staffers in those buildings.
Is that why potentially Mike Johnson, after meeting with Paul Ryan as his first meeting when Mike Johnson became the Speaker, all of a sudden changed his tune on every single issue so that it would be kind of aligned with Paul Ryan's?
It's because Paul Ryan, the former Speaker of the House, his Sergeant-at-Arms was Paul Irving, who later became Nancy Pelosi's Sergeant-at-Arms, who is nowhere to be seen, retired down in Tampa, Florida.
As he is being provided top cover for his role in the fedsurrection of January 6, 2021.
And no one touches him because he has dirt on every single person left and right of both political parties at the highest levels.
Wow.
So which begs the question, what's the most important thing that a Senate Majority Leader does?
It is appoint his Senate Sergeant-at-Arms.
And then who would be in a position as chair of the Capitol Police Board to then expose the January 6th parliamentary coup and then the subsequent cover-up.
And then last position on the Senate side.
And this is Civics 101 Constitution.
It's actually Constitution 401 or 501.
I'll say this.
There's a position called the Senate pro tempore.
Now, this is complicated.
The President of the Senate is the Vice President.
But when the Vice President is not in the Senate, meaning J.D. Vance, for example, on January 20th, the leader of the Senate is this ministerial position, traditionally, called the Senate pro tempore.
Traditionally, it's been voted as the senior most senator of the majority party.
So like a Chuck Grassley, probably.
It does not have to be that.
This position is actually third in line of succession.
You get the president, the vice president, the Speaker of the House, three.
So, like, you know, president, first in succession is the VP, second in succession is the Speaker of the House, and then the third in succession is the president pro tem, if something happens to those first three.
So, the president pro tempore does not have to be a U.S. senator.
So then it begs the question, who of any U.S. citizen would be in the best position to go ahead and influence and help and support Senator Ron Johnson to rein in all of these China-first, Israel-first, Ukraine-first Republican senators?
What do you think, Myron?
I don't know.
Beats me.
I'm trying to think here who would be best to rein in Brainstorm it.
I've done it.
I just want to hear your thoughts on it.
I'm trying to think because everyone is so fucking pro-Israel or pro-Ukraine.
I'm trying to think here who is actually like non for foreign aid.
Anybody.
Any American citizen.
That has enough...
I would say Thomas Massey.
Thomas Massey hates foreign aid, but he's not even...
Who?
I was going to say Thomas Massey is the only politician I could think of that hates foreign aid.
Well, he's in the House, so...
Yeah, that's what I was going to say.
It doesn't matter.
You can bring him in.
He could technically be Senate Majority Leader, but I think...
Yeah, that's what I could think of.
Senate Pro Tem.
But he's a sitting congressman, so there's an issue there.
Yeah, and they're trying to move him, too, by the way.
They're going to move him to agriculture?
Agriculture, possibly, I'm hearing, yeah.
So let's talk about it.
These are my criteria for a perfect president pro tem.
Somebody that can go ahead and have a national voice that can essentially create political pain to senators to keep them in check.
Because what you need is, you need a counterbalance of...
If the Senate majority leader has, through his sergeant at arms, has dirt, there's leverage there, right, to keep them in check.
But if they want to stray, you have to have another check, which is a massive national information reach, as well as a fundraising capability and an understanding of the entire government and bureaucracy to be able to call them out if they want to try to run circles around you.
What about Alex Jones?
Okay.
We're starting to get in the ballpark.
I thought you meant like a politician.
I was only thinking of politicians.
I didn't think about...
Mike Jones understands the system.
He's also not going to sugarcoat it.
He's going to say what it is.
Wait.
I didn't know that.
So, Ivan, I can name anybody that...
I thought you wanted somebody that's like...
Anybody?
A politician.
Oh!
I'm in my head just thinking of politicians.
That's why I'm like...
I can't think of a politician that isn't for foreign aid.
Besides Thomas Massey.
It's that guy, man.
Okay.
Um...
Someone that can bring pain to the other Senators to keep them in line.
Michael Flynn.
General Flynn.
Exactly.
That's my number one draft pick.
Okay.
Yeah.
General Flynn.
My number two draft pick would be somebody like a Tucker Carlson.
Okay.
Okay.
All right.
And then RFK potentially, right?
On some issues.
Yeah, he's going to have his hands full at HHS, though.
You've got to keep in mind, I'm talking about January 3rd through January 20th.
Oh, yeah.
Just a short amount of time.
See that?
Yeah.
I see what you mean now.
And same thing with the sergeant at arms, with Kash Patel.
It only takes a week to make a decision to release all of the information and documents.
Just like he did with Rick Grinnell when he was over at the DNI. People forget...
January 20th is a long way away.
Let's start adding wins.
I get what you're saying.
Like, yeah, we won.
I want this to be like a thousand to zero by the time it gets to January 20th.
So let me summarize this real quick, Ivan, because obviously we went through a lot of things here, so I'm going to try to...
This is just the Senate, bro.
Yeah, we haven't got to other stuff, so let me just kind of summarize this for the audience, and Ivan, please correct me if I'm wrong when I try to summarize this for them.
So, the Senate Majority Leader and the Senate Sergeant at Arms control a large portion of the Capitol Police.
The Capitol Police is the agency that's holding on to critical information that can be utilized to free and exonerate a lot of these January Sixers.
But they're purposely holding on to that information under the pretense of it's for security purposes.
So they only gave to the FBI and the Department of Justice, who's responsible for prosecuting this, certain information which is exculpatory, which for the audience that means that it can be favorable to the defendants, which is a violation of Brady.
But they don't have to adhere to Brady because of technicalities, which I won't go into, legal technicalities.
And you're saying, from the span of roughly January 3rd up until January 20th, before the president is sworn in, we can put people in, in these positions, to finally release this information, to exonerate these individuals, and put some goddamn, how do I say this, transparency and onus on these assholes that are corrupt.
Would that be a fair summary?
That is a perfect summary, and I'm just going to add one more thing.
Imagine from January 3rd to January 20th, Elon Musk and everybody on X and Rumble, to include Fresh and Fit, exposes all of this with full stop evidence of it.
Now the entire country is demanding and clamoring for the pardon of every single January 6th defendant because now they realize that that happened.
In addition to that, we still have five weeks of session in this current Congress in the House and Senate where the House Admin Committee, Subcommittee on Oversight, chaired by Barry Loudermont, is the committee that has oversight over the Capitol Police.
And guess what I'm hearing?
My sources are telling me that as early as this week that committee is going to propose a resolution in the House to be voted on by the whole House to completely nullify and strike from the record the January 6th committee report for its complete bullshit lies.
You know, this is fucking incredible that...
And I've been working with that committee for almost two years.
I've been expending calories here and there.
You know what's crazy to me is that, you know, 99% of Americans don't know this.
Obviously, you explained it to us, and now it makes sense.
But nobody knows this crap.
And unless you're a constitutional lawyer like you are...
You never know.
Nobody's gonna know.
I didn't even know that...
The FBI and the U.S. Attorney's Office, which is responsible for prosecuting all these January Sixers, I didn't realize that the evidence that they pulled, right, came from the Capitol Police.
And the Capitol Police was able to kind of put it where, we're going to give you some of it, but not all of it, and they don't have to deal with Brady.
Normally, right?
Yeah, and guess who the person is that decides who to charge and how much to charge them?
Mayor Garland.
No, Capitol Police Chief and his General Counsel.
Wasn't that the black lady?
Oh, that we talked about last time?
Yeah.
So check this out.
Yeah, yeah.
I'm talking about positions here.
Man, there's so much here.
So she was the head of Intel and Interagency Coordination Division, did not provide Intel to the chief at the time so that he wouldn't have a reason to keep the Capitol protected.
So that was an intentional failure.
They wanted that breach to take place.
And then she was replaced by a guy by the name of Thomas Manger, who's in power right now as the Capitol Police chief.
And guess what?
Guess what?
He's a constituent of Jamie Raskin.
So remember when Jamie Raskin said he was going to create civil war conditions on January 6th?
Yeah.
You heard about that?
Yeah.
Here's what I'm thinking occurred.
Jamie Raskin probably had a conversation with his best friend constituent, Thomas Manger, the Capitol Police Chief, who he helped put in in July of 2021.
And he said, hey, on January 6th, you take all...
If he's in power, right?
You take all necessary legal steps in order to physically ensure that Donald Trump is not going to be certified on January 6th.
Which means, run another January 6th.
Fed's direction coup.
So I'm keeping an eye on these guys.
Damn, man.
Alright.
So, we covered...
In detail.
Oh, wait.
One last thing.
All right, go ahead.
So most of the defendants have four criminal charges that are laid on them.
Okay.
The first two apply, I think it's a Title 40 charges that apply to a transgression against Capitol office buildings.
Okay.
So that's solely within the discretionary jurisdiction of the General Counsel and Chief of Capitol Police, you know, signed off by the Chief of Capitol Police before it goes over to the DOJ. Okay.
And the facts that support that are those manipulated CCTV and sworn testimony facts coming from the U.S. Capitol Police.
So even if it's fake, pejorious, Sworn testimony, that's not really something that the DOJ can pierce, because the U.S. Capitol Police and its officers are a separate branch of government that, on a technicality, you're not going to be able to go after them for these lies.
The only way to expose it through the oversight committees, which I've been working with, or through Board of public opinion, like we're doing here, exposure to then create the political dynamic change, which just happened with the change of, you know, with the election of the trifecta of Republicans in the House, Senate.
That's the only method and mechanism to get, like, some sort of accountability.
So, are you talking me, Ivan?
The same fact pattern to support the criminal charges on that are then literally copied and pasted for the two Title 18 charges that the FBI and DOJ slap on in addition.
All stemming from the false, manipulated, curated, doctored CCTV footage from U.S. Capitol, as well as the fake, false, sworn testimony of U.S. Capitol Police officers.
Yeah, so Title 18 for the audience, Title 18, guys, is the criminal code generally, right?
Now, when you're charged by other agencies, right, like the FBI and Department of Justice typically is going to go after you for Title 18 charges.
If you violate immigration, it's Title 8.
When I was with HSI, we would do Title 8 some charges, like human smuggling is Title 8.
But Title 40 comes from Capitol Police violations, it seems.
And this is interesting because Capitol Police went ahead and charged them Title 40 charges, and then the Department of Justice went ahead and piggybacked those Title 40 charges under Title 18 charges.
But the problem is that the Title 40 charges...
Aren't, I guess, subject to the same scrutiny that Title 18 charges are scrutinized by.
So what that means is, if I come after you, right?
Fresh, right?
Say you rob a bank and I charge you with an 18 USC code for robbing a bank, right?
And I take you to trial and we prosecute you.
I have to testify, I have to present evidence, I have to do all of these things, and any evidence that I've come across that might make you innocent, I have to disclose that under Brady, right?
In the discovery process where the prosecution sends information.
Dude, you're hitting it out of the park.
Keep going.
So since I have to disclose that information to you in the discovery process, your defense can now adequately defend you against the federal government.
Right.
But the issue here is that Capitol Police, who started this investigation, provided information that isn't subject to what I just talked about with Discovery and Brady.
So they're able to kind of get around and do all this bullshit because they're not under the Department of Justice And they can't be held accountable.
So what ends up happening is they come up with this bullshit under Title 40, charge you, and then the FBI also comes in with Title 18 stuff that piggybacks off this Title 40, and then they also prosecute you.
But here's the problem.
The Title 18 charges come from the Title 40 charges, so you don't have due process, really, and Brady, because we're not giving you everything to defend yourself.
Because we can argue and say, hey, this CCTV footage from our Capitol, we're not going to give it to you because of security reasons.
Tough.
Now you can't probably defend yourself against the Title 40 charges or the Title 18 charges.
Now I'm cooked.
Now you're cooked.
Damn.
Holy shit.
Bro, this is a travesty.
I can retire now.
I finally got the message across to one other person.
I've been trying to explain this for four years.
So that one other person understands it.
Here, this is coming from a guy that used to do Title 18, and I used to charge people, so now I understand, because, dude, Brady, right?
Let me show you guys why I understand this.
Me as an agent, right?
I go prosecute someone, or I go to the U.S. Attorney's Office, I gather my evidence, we prosecute somebody.
I have to give everything to the AUSA, even stuff that exonerates the guy.
If I don't turn it over, I'm gonna be...
It's called...
You become a Brady agent, which means, like, basically you're a fucking liar.
You lose your credibility, you lose your job for this, right?
Because the discovery process is very important.
So me and the U.S. Attorney's Office work very closely together to get this information.
But, you know, the fact that Capitol Police don't have to deal with this because they're under a whole other...
Agency, and they have these go-arounds where, sorry, we can't give you everything because it's security.
That's crazy to me.
But I'm confused.
What's the benefit of them withholding this to make Trump look bad?
Like, what's the benefit of them doing this?
Because some of the information in the CCTV footage will exonerate the January Sixers because the January Sixers a lot of times argued that it was a peaceful protest and they weren't, you know, being as rambunctious or violent as they claim, but they don't have the footage to show that they were peaceful.
Hey, Fresh, I'll give you an example.
So imagine...
Wow.
This is crazy and corrupt.
By the way, perfect explanation.
You totally get it.
Like, you get it more than I do.
So that was a perfect explanation.
So check this out, Fresh.
Imagine you're in the Capitol, or you're a...
Yeah, you're even outside of the Capitol, and there's a U.S. Capitol Police officer near you, and you're basically yelling at them saying, hey, bro, I know most of the people here around me.
If they're doing something wrong, like, tell me, where do you want them?
Just let me know, and I'll help you out so that they're not doing anything wrong.
The CCTV footage only has video, not audio.
So what happens to that U.S. Capitol Police officer when he's asked to do a sworn statement?
Because guess what?
Fresh is on the list of people that we want to politically target.
Because his Facebook says he's a supporter of Trump.
And he's pretty vocal about it.
And so what do they do?
Hey, U.S. Capitol Police officer that was right by Fresh, you're going to go ahead and Write an impact statement saying that Fresh was calling you names, assaulting you, and was threatening you with his yelling at you.
Me?
Because the audio's not there.
But you're going to testify to that so we can prosecute him.
Thank you, U.S. Capitol Police Officer.
Dude, this is fucked.
And then they're gonna delete the video of where Fresh is actually helping physically the officer and repelling others from assaulting the officer.
That part we're gonna remove so that there's no exculpatory video.
That's stuff that you can't, you have to pull that part out.
But the part where Fresh is yelling at the Capitol Police officer, they fill it in with false testimony.
So they literally chop and screw the CCTV footage how they see fit because they have the authority to do so under Title 40.
Under Title 2, U.S. Code, 1979, Paragraph B. And then the criminal charges are from Title 40.
Got you.
Yes.
So their authority comes from Statue...
The entire existence of U.S. Capitol Police and the Capitol Police Board is to USC all of Chapter 29.
Gotcha.
So basically, it's like a video edit.
Wow.
They only show the parts where it incriminates the people, but it doesn't show where they actually did good things.
And here's the thing that's crazy fresh.
Yeah.
No other law enforcement agency can do this.
They're doing it because they have a go-around, because their argument is, we can't give you all the CCTV footage.
It's part of the legislative branch?
Yeah, because a part of the legislative branch, and also, they can argue, one of many reasons, I assume, is we can't give you all the CCTV footage because it shows security and precaution and how we keep the building protected.
Damn.
Wow.
What a loophole.
Crazy loophole, bro.
They played it pretty well.
Wow.
Incredible.
Nobody knows this shit.
I mean, I didn't know it.
Even your January 6th former food bloggers and experts...
They don't even look into this.
They think I'm crazy.
I'm like, alright, I guess you're a constitutional lawyer.
So the only person that's going to know this stuff is someone that you have to actually read the statutes.
You literally can give us Title II USC 29.
Most people are not even going to know.
People don't even know what USC stands for most of the time.
And check this out.
Since we're on this, you've got to keep in mind, remember the pipe bombs at the DNC and the RNC? Yes.
Yes.
Well, when you look at 2 U.S.C. 1967, paragraph B, it lists the jurisdiction that the U.S. Capitol Police has concurrently with Metropolitan Police Department and then a separate jurisdiction zone between U.S. Capitol and Park Police.
Guess where the pipe bombs RNC and DNC jurisdiction is?
It's within U.S. Capitol Police and Metropolitan Police Department.
So then who is the lead agency to investigate those pipe bombs?
The Metropolitan Police Department and the U.S. Capitol Police.
And when I went further down the rabbit hole and contacted the head of RNC Security, he told me that he contacted immediately his former employer, the U.S. Capitol Police, to call it in.
And then from there, somehow the FBI got a handle on it.
And I think when it's all said and done, when it's exposed who the pipe bomber is, it's going to be, the FBI is going to say, oh, it was just a training exercise.
And we dropped off a pipe bomb there that was a training dud.
Damn.
All right.
So we explained the sentence.
By the way, it's all under the rubric and all under the authority.
Of the Capitol Police.
So if it was a covert action, diversion, and the undercovers that, remember, all the undercovers that were on Capitol and then inside of the Capitol, from MPD, as well as from FBI and DHS, they all were operating under the authority of the U.S. Capitol Police Board.
Wow.
Which is House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving reporting to Nancy Pelosi and Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger reporting to Mitch McConnell.
Extremely bureaucratic agency.
If you were there and you didn't get arrested or charged, what does that mean?
Well, here's how it works.
Remember in October when they had the insurrection in the Cannon Building?
Yeah.
2023?
Mm-hmm.
And no one was arrested?
It's because it was a Democrat op.
And Pelosi and Schumer told Capitol Police Chief Manger, eh, don't worry about it.
Let them protest and do their thing, and then just release them.
Nothing to see here.
Same thing at the DNC, because it's within the U.S. Capitol Police jurisdiction zone in December of 2023 when they had the Palestinian mob at the DNC. Guess what Thomas Manger was told to do by Pelosi and Schumer?
No, that's a good fundraising thing.
Let them free.
Interesting.
It's all political.
So when we take over the Capitol Police Board, by the way, we can take over all three of those, because here's how it works.
The Speaker of the House appoints the House Sergeant-at-Arms, the Senate Majority Leader appoints the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms, and the third voting member is the architect of the Capitol, appointed by the President, confirmed by the Senate.
That's the other reason why a Senate Majority Leader that is friendly and compliant with the President is going to be very important, because the Senate Majority Leader, or excuse me, the Senate confirms the architect of the Capitol.
So in essence, the Capitol Police Board is leveraged by the Senate Majority Leader I should say one and a half positions to a half that a president has and then one that the House Speaker has.
So the Senate Majority Leader has a very significant outsized role in the Capitol Police Board infrastructure and the power dynamics.
No one knows this.
I might be like 10 people.
Yeah, I mean, I'm learning right now.
I had no idea how painful this is.
Now we know why this Senate race is so goddamn important.
Okay.
Wednesday.
And it's Wednesday.
And they're trying to do the vote.
Do you think Elon Musk knows this when he's like...
But I just wonder...
He doesn't know this stuff.
Okay, so, Ivan, you know this, but let's be real here.
Are they going to actually do a fair vote?
Well, that's what he's pushing for.
He wants it to be public because they want to do it behind closed doors.
Because knowing how they move, nigga, they're not doing this shit with our guidance.
They're doing this shit for them.
Earlier today, two of the three senators were complaining that they feel like they're being bullied into...
Or senators are saying that they're being bullied into voting for Tim Scott.
So they're feeling some heat.
They're feeling some pressure.
Shit.
Okay.
That's only phone calls, friends.
I'm going to tell you where the vote is going to take Blake's.
This is where my sources tell me.
Senate Dirksen Office Room 50.
9.30 a.m.
Wednesday.
Okay?
Am I going to be there?
Well, you can pretty much guarantee I'm going to be there.
And then I wonder how many other people are going to join me as we try to ensure public transparency.
Ivan, it's open to the public, right?
Well, they're going to claim it's not.
But the Senate office buildings are open to the public.
They're going to try to claim that that office room is closed.
But I would say let's test things out.
Let's see how it works.
All right.
Okay.
I got a phone.
I got access to X. I got access to Rumble.
And C-SPAN should also be covering it.
Oh.
Okay, so the media will be there.
They're going to try to keep it closed doors.
Yeah, secret.
But imagine if, I don't know, a million of my friends show up and request peacefully that this be transparent.
That's how you get changed, man.
All right.
Speaker of the House, I want to talk about that real quick.
Yeah, you want to talk about Speaker of the House?
All right.
The most powerful position on the planet...
It's the position that can dictate and control how $7 trillion goes into the global economy.
Elon Musk is only worth $300 billion, right?
$7 trillion is quite a bit more.
Name one other person.
Even China, their budget is not that big, right?
The American federal budget is $6-7 trillion annually.
So if you're a Speaker of the House for two years, we're looking at $12-14 trillion that you decide how they are allocated.
So if Elon Musk is serious about being the Director of the Department of Government Efficiency, I recommend to him that the best place to do so and the most efficient way possible is to become the Speaker of the House to then change the federal budget from $7 trillion to approximately $500 billion.
That's about a 90% removal of the system.
That is the fastest path to doge.
And so if you're the Speaker of the House, you also get to appoint the House Sergeant-at-Arms.
In this instance, I would recommend that he appoint the previous Capitol Police Chief, Chief Steven Son, that was thrown under the bus on January 6th when he tried to protect the Capitol and then was removed because he was duked by the others that were working for Pelosi and Schumer, right?
So he would be institutional knowledge to help get the record straight on January 6th.
He even wrote a book about it.
So Elon Musk, if you're listening in, as the Speaker, you have the ability to shape all the federal budget and which agencies continue to exist and which don't, because that is done through the budgetary process.
And constitutionally, that starts in the House of Representatives, and the Speaker of the House is the one that controls that parliamentary procedure.
And you don't have to be...
A member of Congress, and for those that are really historians and constitutional kind of experts out there, the reason why Elon Musk is in the best position to do so is, well, let me put it this way.
How did he get that position?
All it would need is 218 members of Congress to vote him in.
I think he has enough leverage over a sufficient number of Republicans to do that, based on what just took place.
And he can improve his position over the next five weeks, six weeks before January 3rd, when the vote's going to take place, is to go ahead and decide, you know what?
I am going to expend more resources from the America PAC to go ahead and audit and remove all illegal votes that took place in all these jurisdictions nationwide, thus potentially flipping another two dozen House seats.
Could he do that as a dual citizen?
He still has South African citizenship, doesn't he?
Well...
The odd thing here is the Speaker of the House is somebody that does not, there are no qualifications for it other than what 218 members of the House decide it is.
Wow.
See, hold on, that sounds good, but are they really going to vote Elon Musk in?
I'm recommending the best course of action, okay?
That's what I'm doing, and I'm explaining methodically the reasoning and the rationale behind it.
The other thing I'll say is, because he is not a natural-born U.S. citizen, while he can still hold the speakership, he cannot then accede to be the president or vice president because he does not meet the qualifications.
So then, after the president and vice president, guess who it goes to?
The Senate pro tempore.
You have to be born on U.S. soil to be a U.S. president, right?
You can't be naturalized.
Correct.
I don't know.
I... I think it sounds good, but let's be real here, bro.
How'd they move, bro?
Well, no, he was critical in getting Trump in.
I know, but are they going to really put him in that position?
Give me reasons why they would not.
Tell me a better person to be the Speaker of the House.
Seriously.
No, no.
I agree with you myself.
I just think that for them, it's more like we want someone that we know pretty well.
Elon's pretty new.
He's amazing, by the way.
He did amazing stuff for Trump.
But I'm just saying, like, them, they've been in there for, what, two, three terms already?
Why would they vote Elon in as somebody new?
I don't know.
Just my opinion.
I hear what you're saying, but if you're President Trump, who better than Elon Musk?
If you're running on stopping the weaponization, if you're running on making the government more efficient, if you're running on shutting down the Department of Education and all these other institutions, the fastest path to that through our constitutional methods and mechanisms...
Is having a Speaker of the House that is all in to do that.
That's where it starts.
And then having a Senate Majority Leader that is all in to do that.
And then you have...
The House, the Senate, and the President's like, yeah, I'm signing off on this.
Let's roll.
And can you explain to the audience real quick why it's so important to have someone that you could trust as the Speaker of the House, having the Senate be represented majority by Republicans, like how that's important for the President to actually get shit done?
Because that was one of the problems that Trump faced in his first administration was getting things passed through.
Can you kind of explain to the audience why that's so imperative and how things get passed in the United States and the bureaucracy you've got to overcome as President?
Right.
Every bill to include any budgetary stuff, it starts with the House.
They pass a bill in the House.
Then it goes over to the Senate.
The Senate looks at it and agrees with it, and it goes to the President.
If the Senate does not agree with it, because there are different political parties, then it goes into what's called conference, where the House conferees and the Senate conferees that are designated senators and House members meet together to negotiate a deal between Yeah,
and I think that's very important for the audience to understand.
This is why the Senate majority that you're talking about, this position, why it's so imperative.
Because they're almost like the last line.
The key distinction for people to understand, the House starts the whole budget planning process for the entire federal government, all federal funding, all of it.
The Senate, its main roles are to confirm every single federal appointed officer by the president.
That's their power.
They can block any appointment should they want to.
Speaking of appointments, let's go through them.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, we're actually going to talk about that.
So right now, Trump is in the process of pretty much assembling his administration.
Thank God.
He said no Mike Pompeo, no Nikki Haley.
Great.
Got rid of those neocon war hawks.
Mike Pompeo was obviously critical.
For those that are unaware, he was critical in the JFK files not being released.
And Trump actually talked about this during the Joe Rogan interview.
And Pompeo, if I'm not mistaken, was Secretary of State and former CIA director, correct?
Correct.
And then obviously Nikki Haley, we know she's a fucking crazy war hawk Republican.
US ambassador to the United Nations, former governor of South Carolina, and then, yeah.
So he's not going to bring them in his administration, thank God.
But he's in the process right now of bringing people in.
Can you kind of, I'll kind of turn it to you, as far as some of the people that he's picking and putting on his team.
He just appointed his chief of national security, right?
So let's kind of start off in sequence, if you don't mind.
Please, go ahead.
So the first one is Susie Wiles, his chief of staff.
So she was essentially, her and Chris Lasavita ran his campaign.
I believe I've only spoken to her once briefly, so I don't have any sort of relationship or any context that I can provide.
I've...
I've heard mostly good things about her.
To be in that position, you have to be a very strong-willed person, obviously, because you have all these people coming from different angles.
I don't have a strong assessment either way of her, just because I don't have any personal experience.
I can't really comment there.
Real quick, what I can say is this.
Her and Chris LaCivita, basically, when all this happened with January 6th, is why a lot of people don't...
Didn't, you know, some people didn't like the Trump campaign because those two individuals, they kind of like, after January 6th happened, they kind of like turned their back and they're like, oh yeah, get him out of here.
Like, the election is legit.
They basically were trying to say that, you know, that Trump was trying to stave off, you know, the transfer of power and, you know, get him out of here and everything else like that.
I know Chris Lasavita definitely tweeted about it after January 6th.
Yeah, absolutely.
Listen, bro, she's a woman, man.
She could be corrupted.
Yeah.
This guy, let's keep it real.
So, alright, so Susie Wiles, okay, chief of staff.
They'll trust her.
You know, which obviously probably feels that way because she obviously...
There's quite a few people that I respect that have said good things about her.
Okay.
But then also George, what's his name?
Jeb Bush also said it was a great pick.
So to me, that's a red flag, right?
If a Jeb Bush does that.
Well, I mean, it's kind of like what?
She won, right?
Because she ran his campaign, he won.
Her and Chris Lasavita were instrumental in running it.
Not necessarily, but I mean...
Yeah, she's going to get a position in administration after being a successful campaign manager, right?
It's kind of like a thing.
Yeah.
So I think I can say that a really good pick was, I think yesterday or today it was announced, was Steve Miller.
He's going to be the deputy chief of staff for policy.
Okay.
That is a fantastic pick, because he was in the White House previously for Trump's first term, and then he became the head of, I think, legal at America First Policy Institute.
Okay.
And so he gets the issues.
He's been helping litigate some of the key issues on the censorship industrial complex, some of the COVID stuff.
So from my understanding...
I've only crossed paths with them maybe once, twice, just in a social setting.
So I can't give any professional, other than kind of as an outsider.
That, I'm confident and comfortable with that appointment.
Okay.
Next, we got the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, which is Elise Stefanik.
That came as a surprise, but at the same time, I think that's a pretty good pick.
I wouldn't say anything negative about that.
Also, for the audience, can you describe what this job position is and how important it is?
UN Ambassadors in the United States.
What does that position entail and how important is it, do you think?
Great question.
I used to teach all this stuff, so I kind of know it pretty well.
So you have the...
The foreign policymaking community within the United States falls under the State Department's purview.
But you have a cabinet-level equivalent official that technically reports to the Secretary of State, which I'm hearing it's going to be Rubio, which is a horrible pick over at Secretary of State, by the way.
Should have been Rick Grinnell, but that's another pick that just happened earlier today, Marco Rubio, and I'm hoping that we can reverse that because we've still got quite a bit of time before January 20th to kind of showcase why that is the absolute worst pick possible for Secretary of State.
But yeah, I'll let that play out.
The U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.
So you've got to remember, United Nations is the international governmental organization, the premier, most influential globally, headquartered in New York, and it's really run by the five main permanent members of the U.N. Security Council.
Five members are United States, Russia, China, United Kingdom, and France.
So it's essentially the United States government's point person to essentially communicate U.S. foreign policy and national security objectives when we're trying to get buy-in globally with the other 192 countries on the planet, whether it be a U.N. Security Council resolutions.
But mostly it's just a...
It's kind of coordination.
You have 12, I think we're still at 12 UN peacekeeping operations globally.
The US, we're at about 20 to 25% of the budget of the United Nations.
So it's a venue and mechanism for the United States to communicate, coordinate, and synchronize global action on the formal head of state level.
But the direct representatives are kind of like the respective countries' ambassadors to the United Nations.
And so it's a critical position for that international touchpoint.
But you're kind of...
It technically falls under the Secretary of State, but it's really a combination of...
If you have a very foreign policy-minded...
President, it's going to be essentially any time that the UN needs to be engaged, they're going to be always in the room for a National Security Council meeting with the Secretary of State and the President, and the Vice President, National Security Advisor, and SecDef.
I would argue it's extremely important now, given, obviously, the turbulent amount of foreign conflicts we got going on.
So it's a very important position, especially now, I would say, with this transition.
I mean, Trump spoke with 71 world leaders already.
You know, we obviously got a bunch of tensions in the Middle East, obviously Russia, Ukraine.
So I think that's an even more important position ever before.
And Secretary of State.
Yeah, it's a strong pick.
She's a congresswoman from New York.
She's the number three Republican.
In the Republican conference right now currently, she was really instrumental in helping two cycles ago with her PAC, affiliated PACs, to bring in the largest number of women, if you want to look at things from that perspective fresh, into the Republican conference.
So she's kind of instrumental in that leadership position.
Listen, I like Tom Holman.
I think that was a good pick.
Yeah, so I told you about the strong pick.
An absolute fantastic 1,000% support pick.
Tom Holman, baby.
That is...
Yeah, absolutely.
He don't play gold.
Yeah, for immigration, he's very good.
He should have been in office with that Chinese expert, man.
AOC tried growth on him a few times, he didn't give a shit.
And he's going to be, he got picked for Secretary of Homeland Security?
No, for ICE. He's going to be the border czar.
Yeah, border czar.
Okay.
Yeah, that's going to be the title.
Which agency is he going to head?
Is he going to head Immigration Customs Enforcement?
ICE? Wait a second.
If I send you something, can you play it real quick?
Yeah, sure.
I think I know what you're going to show me.
Gunther's tweet, right?
No, no.
I'm going to send you something here real quick.
Let me see if I still have it in here.
He was the director of Ice.
He was my boss for a while.
Really?
Yeah.
He was my boss for a while when I worked for HSI. You ever met him?
HSI is Ice.
I never met him.
He's too far up there, huh?
Alright, play that tweet.
I got the director's award, but he was gone by the time I got the director's award.
To me, he's a no-nonsense guy.
Get him out of here.
Yeah.
He was the director of ICE for a few years.
You guys knew who I wanted to get out.
No, he just tweeted out, or he just said, I think in an interview, that they're going to be doing workplace raids.
Workplace raids of illegals.
Yeah.
Get them out of here, man.
It's called...
Oh, that's going to be so good.
I responded to that tweet.
I don't remember who said it.
I said, just keep in mind, make sure it's transparent, so please do live streams.
Can you tell us real quick why you don't like Marco Rubio for Secretary of State?
All right, so Marco Rubio...
All right, let me go into a little bit of detail.
Follow me.
Take some notes.
So during the time, in 2016 to 2017, during that spying operation on the Trump campaign, right?
Way back, because you talked, I think, a little bit with General Flynn about it.
We talked about it, I think, last time.
But just to kind of remind you, in the Congress, there's a subordinate construct known as the Gang of Eight.
It's the eight people that are briefed on the most sensitive intelligence matters of the executive branch.
Primarily covert action, right?
But other things ancillary to that.
Who are those eight individuals?
So it's the leadership on both sides.
So Speaker of the House, House Majority Leader, excuse me, Minority Leader, The Senate Majority Leader and the Senate Minority Leader, that's four, and then the House Chair of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, the Ranking Member, and then the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman and Vice Chair.
Those are the specific names of them.
So the chairman during that illegal spying operation on Trump and General Flynn and Carter Page and Papa Dallas, all those guys, right, in the Trump campaign, the Republican guy was Richard Burr, senator from North Carolina.
Okay?
Rubio's been on that committee for a little bit.
So he may have known, but I'm not sure.
But afterwards, when Richard Burr got in a little tangle, along with Kelly Loeffler from Georgia, for doing insider stock trading as a result of the COVID con, guess who took over the Senate committee?
Rubio.
Okay?
So Rubio...
Not a peep.
Of all the people in the Gang of Eight that have been in those positions from 2016 to today, the only person that stepped forward to expose the entire illegal spying op and subsequent weaponization by our intel services was a guy by the name of Devin Nunes and his senior staffer, Cash Patel.
So I consider everyone else to be complicit in either involvement in allowing for it to take place, the illegal spying, or its subsequent cover-up due to ignoring it.
And that's from both the Senate Committee and the Judiciary Committee in the Senate, which was chaired by Lindsey Scumbag Graham.
Okay?
Mm-hmm.
That's why it's so important to have the Senate Majority Leader that can then appoint a decent chair of Senate Judiciary, a decent chair of Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
So Marco Rubio has been the ranking member on Senate Select Committee on Intelligence for, it's probably going on three, four years.
So this guy has done absolutely nothing to expose, really, the censorship industrial complex, the CCP influence, the, you know, he's done some little bit noises here and there, but he has not really gone to the mat.
So which begs the question, is he protecting the system?
And now he's going to protect the foreign policymaking system in the role of Secretary of State.
Yeah, because that's a very important position.
So why would Trump trust him?
Clearly the guy didn't step up when he needed to.
Why would Trump trust him with such an important position?
I would argue the Secretary of State is incredibly critical, especially now, given all the foreign conflicts we've got going on in the world.
Why would he give him such a position?
Well, politics is a dirty game.
I mean, who has leverage over the decision-making process of the Trump transition team?
Let's go down the list.
You got...
Some folks that are publicly out there, and then you got other folks that are not really publicly out there, but I suspect have an outsized role on who gets picked for what.
And so it's an internal fight and struggle.
Let's go through some names.
Some good ones.
You got Eric Trump.
You got Don Jr.
RFK is on the transition team.
You have Elon Musk, right?
But then you also have what we mentioned earlier.
Unknowns.
Susie Wiles.
Chris LaCivita.
So Susie Wiles has a very close relationship with Ron DeSantis.
Yeah.
Ron DeSantis is probably whispering in her ear that Marco Rubio wants to be the Secretary of State.
And Susie Wiles is probably recommending to Donald Trump that that is the best pick, and here's why.
And Donald Trump's like, oh yeah, that's good.
Thanks, Susie.
Yeah, let's do that.
The other person that's probably going to be whispering is Kevin McCarthy and Paul Ryan's bestie, Chris Lasavita.
Shall I say more?
Okay.
I see.
Yeah.
But it's an internal...
I don't have any direct knowledge of the conversations, just to be clear and transparent.
That is my assessment based on the collective knowledge of interactions that I've had and just generally observing all of these people.
Yeah.
So that's kind of your educated hypothesis on how it came to be.
Susan Wiles and Lastivita obviously were instrumental in getting them elected.
So they're going to have...
There's horse trading going on.
It's like, hey...
If you let Marco Rubio, we'll allow you without fighting on this other position.
Gotcha.
Yeah, it's a compromise, and this is kind of politics, so I definitely understand your perspective.
And you said Wiles is going to be Chief of Staff, right?
Yes, Susie Wiles.
Real quick, can you tell the audience?
And then the last one we didn't talk about is Mike Wiles.
Okay, before we go into Mike Wiles, can you explain to the audience real quick what the Chief of Staff is, what kind of position is it?
Is it important, or is it just a ceremonial position?
What are your thoughts on it?
So technically, I mean, traditionally, the chief of staff is essentially the focal...
If the president does everything kind of conventionally, traditionally, all cabinet-level officials...
So you have 14, 15 cabinets, and then you have other cabinet-equivalent-level officials like the Director of National Intelligence, the CIA Director, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. They all technically have to go through, in order to get to the President, through the Chief of Staff.
So this is the gatekeeper.
This is the maximum gatekeeper to get any piece of information to the President.
So I always have to say that...
It's very important.
I think, personally, Michael Rubio's just playing it smart, man.
They basically become the mouthpiece for the president to the entire cabinet.
So you have an outsized Florida influence so far.
You have Marco Rubio, a senator from Florida.
They're trying to vie for a Tim Scott Senate Majority Leader, right?
You have Susie Wiles, who ran DeSantis and then Trump campaigns based out of Florida.
You have Mike Waltz, who is a congressman from Daytona, Florida, who has been appointed as a National Security Advisor.
Now, here's where I can give a little bit of insight.
I've known Mike for 20 years.
I crossed paths with them, I think in the reserve infantry captain's career course in 2004 at Fort Benning, Georgia.
I think it was down there.
And then later on, we deployed together to Afghanistan in 2006.
So pre-mission training in Mississippi 2005-2006.
He was a detachment commander, a liaison over there when he was out deployed with the Emiratis, working with them.
In addition to that, we were both in the 20th Special Forces Group in the National Guard.
His full-time job later on became, at this time, he was first a contractor at the Defense Department, and then he later became the Senior Policy Advisor for Drumroll.
I'm not a fan, but for Dick Cheney.
So, I know Mike personally.
I respect him from a professional level, military level.
I have no issues whatsoever.
He's been a straight shooter, credible, honest, I do take some...
We do disagree on a couple of key issues.
I'm going to keep it diplomatic because I have such a long-standing relationship with him.
And I'm honest.
We're honest both ways.
I think he could have done much more when it comes to pushing back against the COVID-19 Psyop, essentially, right?
The whole COVID con.
Yeah.
Because he was, at the time, a colonel in, I think, the Maryland National Guard or maybe Florida National Guard.
And the demand signal was there.
I mean, the evidence was there.
Maybe he just didn't look at it.
But later on, he could have been much more forthcoming and pushing back against the illegal vaccine mandate within the DOD, etc.
But more importantly...
I'm just going to say it.
My biggest issue, he's very professional.
He understands the global order from that perspective.
I don't quite know his professional loyalties and how deep they go, and if it's more towards Trump or if it's still a lot of back-end kind of relationships and networks with the Bush-Cheney Yeah.
And that is my concern.
Okay.
I get it, like, people change and whatnot.
It's a matter of seeing how things happen.
Over the last several years, he's been really good.
Okay.
But let's step it back just to contextualize it.
He was on that staff with Dick Cheney, so obviously a close relationship because you're working your butt off in any of those positions, so there's a lot of interactions, and I'm sure you build relationships and loyalties, and obviously with the Lizzie Cheneys potentially.
That's problematic.
The other thing is in the run-up to January 6th of 2021, I had numerous conversations with him, and I explained to him that, you know, after December 23rd, when Mike Pence failed to do anything under the electoral contact and send it back to the states,
the illegally transmitted electors, I kind of explained to many members of Congress, to include Congressman Waltz, that it is now in your court, going into January 6th, Basically, if you agree that the six states ran their elections not according to the election law of the state,
it triggers the federal Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 violation where the authority to allocate electors by the states rests with the state legislature, and if the state runs it not according to the election law of the state, then you have to object.
I explained it, and he's like, yeah, that makes sense.
And for that reason, he said, I'm going to object to, at a minimum, Arizona and Pennsylvania, and then we'll have to study further on the other states, namely Wisconsin, potentially.
That was January 5th.
So on January 5th, he puts out a tweet thread the day prior to January 6th, explaining why he's going to object.
And he His committee man, I think, and committee woman from the Republican Executive Committee in his most prominent county there in Florida, basically, they had a conversation and they prayed together and said, yeah, I'm going to object tomorrow.
The very following day, when the Nancy Pelosi facilitated breach of the Capitol took place, he immediately changed his tune and did not object.
Hmm.
So even if it was a wrong that day, two wrongs don't make a right.
And I've conveyed to him on numerous occasions that that is, to me, is the biggest constitutional violation that any member of Congress could commit, knowing that the electors that were transmitted were fully illegitimate.
And I had briefed it to him, and he basically changed his mind knowingly.
And to me, that is...
20 years of knowing him, our relationship went to basically zero when that happened, but we've been building since then.
Since then, he's been doing some pretty good stuff and calling out China.
I would say on the China perspective, he gets it.
He understands the threat.
He understands the situation in Afghanistan.
But I'm concerned that his financial interests, based on his former CEO of Metis, he's a defense contractor.
So there's these multiple, overlapping, conflicting interests that leave me with concern.
As it applies to his decision making.
That's probably the most accurate explanation I can give.
And again, professionally, just for full disclosure, from a professional military perspective, I consider him a mentor and up until that January 6th decision, kind of a political mentor, if you will.
Because he's always been there to kind of answer any questions.
So he is a professional.
But I do have concerns on some policy and decision making issues.
It's not anything illegal, immoral, or unethical.
It's just, it's concern.
Yeah.
Okay.
All right.
I mean, that's a pretty balanced approach to it.
You know, obviously being able to make your distinctions between like, look, I respect him in this regard, but I disagree with him in this regard.
Obviously, a very measured approach to it.
Give it a cordial.
And real quick, can you tell the audience the importance and the significance of the National Security Advisor, what their roles are to the president?
Because that's obviously a very important position.
The National Security Advisor does not have to be confirmed by the Senate.
Okay?
Oh, okay.
That's huge.
Okay.
Okay.
So, he basically is at the pleasure of the President fully.
The National Security Advisor, so, let's do this.
Can you see me here?
The papers?
Yep.
Here's the National Security Advisor.
Yep.
And above him is the President.
Yep.
The National Security Advisor coordinates every single aspect of the intelligence community, the Department of Defense, the foreign policy-making community, The domestic security community, every single thing that has a touchpoint, foreign, domestic, everything.
Intel defense has to be coordinated through the National Security Advisors.
So all the 33 intelligence agencies report to him?
17 intelligence agencies, one Director of National Intelligence, one Secretary of State, one CIA Director, one Secretary of Defense, one Secretary of Homeland Security, which is normally not even a member of the National Security Council meeting.
So the statutory requirement minimum for a National Security Council meeting to take place, it is the president, the vice president, the national security advisor, the secretary of defense, and the secretary of state.
And sometimes you have some additionals that are advisory members like the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and any other members that the president wants to have.
This is the position that General Flynn had, right?
Correct.
Okay.
Yeah.
But Mike Pence and Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell did not want Mike Flynn in there because he was going to look into every single black budget program and every covert action going back to the origins of the CIA and expose it.
And so they had to remove him.
Yep.
And make it a split.
Makes sense.
Yeah.
At the behest of the Bush-Cheney syndicate.
So maybe the Bushes and the Cheneys, through their friends, Susie Wiles, Chris Lasavito.
Yeah.
Recommended.
Aren't most of these people compromised anyway?
Mike Waltz.
I think, to me, Mike Waltz is more like...
He's been able to...
Oh, one other thing I want to mention that most people forget or may not even know.
I don't even know if it's out there.
But Mike Waltz spent quite a large sum of money during the primary in 2016 to support Jeb Bush for the presidency.
But he was able to pivot, endorse Trump, etc.
So just keep that in mind.
Do we have some chats here real quick?
Yeah, we can read some chats.
And then anything else?
Because I know we're running short on time here for you.
I think we're kind of nailing it.
Because a lot of the stuff that I'm putting out, I might be the only guy on the planet that can give this level of depth.
Yeah, no, absolutely.
Absolutely.
I mean, I don't think people understand the real inner workings in a bureaucracy of how the government works, right?
And obviously, like, for me, I understand from a law enforcement perspective because I know how that works, but obviously from a government oversight slash constitutional law slash how things are done and who has power here and there, etc., this is insight that, quite frankly, 99% of people do not know.
That was a good breakdown.
Yeah.
So I really Before we finish, just kind of like get things spiced up a little bit.
Did you get that text that I sent you?
Can you play that like 30 seconds?
I gave it, yeah, for Holman, right?
I gave it to my guy, Bill.
Let's pull it up right now.
We'll pull it up right now.
This is what I think of Tom Holman being appointed.
Okay, it goes here.
Turn volume up and put your hands together for the real Tom Homan.
Okay, so Trump does this on True Social.
He goes, I'm pleased to announce that former ICE director and stalwart on border control Tom Homan will be joining the Trump administration in charge of our nation's border.
The borders are including, but not limited to, the southern border and the northern border.
On maritime and aviation security.
I've known Tom for a long time, and there is nobody better at policing and controlling our borders.
Likewise, Tom Holman will be in charge of the deportation of illegal aliens back to their country of origin.
Congratulations to Tom.
I have no doubt he will do a fantastic and long-awaited job.
Long-awaited for a job.
Awesome.
America.
Fuck yeah.
Come in again to save the motherfucking day.
America.
Fuck yeah.
Freedom is the only way.
Terrorists, your game is true.
Because now you have to answer to America.
Fuck yeah.
America.
There it is.
America.
Fuck yeah!
Basically, we're back.
Yeah, bro!
I'm balanced.
We're in a much better position than we were.
But we've got to keep an eye on things.
He still has six, seven weeks.
And they have six or seven weeks to subvert.
I just want to know, what position is he going to give him exactly?
Is he going to kick Mayorkas out?
Is he going to become director of ICE? Is he going to be...
I'm trying to figure out what...
I know Bordazar is a cool name, but what official...
Do we know what official...
Tyler's going to have?
I mean, it wasn't really depicted.
I'm guessing ice, but I don't know for sure.
He's going to be in a position to guarantee whatever that's going to be.
That's got to be the DHS security, right?
Would you agree?
To have that level of power that he wants him to, you know, if you want to coordinate the mass deportations, like, that's going to have to go through, because you're going to have to, you're going to, and I can speak about this because I come from DHS, like, the Secretary of Homeland Security oversees all of the immigration enforcement agencies, which is...
ICE, Immigration Customs Enforcement, Office of Enforcement and Removal, ERO, Homeland Security Investigations, HSI, Border Patrol, and then Customs and Border Protection, Office of Removal Operations.
Those are the four main agencies that have office field operations.
Those are the four main agencies that have Immigration Authority, Title VIII. You've got to keep in mind that the president has a lot of latitude for executive order, and then if you have a friendly Speaker of the House and Senate Majority Leader...
I mean, it's pretty much what, it's carte blanche.
He's got a blank check to do really whatever.
What position would you say, I mean, wouldn't you say that the DHS secretary is going to be the best position for him so that he can do everything unobstructed?
Under the current construct, yes.
What I'm getting at is that that current construct does not have to remain in place starting January 20th.
I see what you mean.
He could put an executive order that basically delegates all the authorities of the Secretary of Homeland Security to Homan directly and he could just kind of act.
Yep.
Well, I'll say this.
That was a W pick from Trump.
Yeah.
And we had on Zach from Border Patrol here.
So, under what he exposed, would he kind of facilitate what needs to be done?
Well, that's what I'm trying to say.
If he's only the director of ICE, no.
Because ICE doesn't control Border Patrol or Customs and Border Protection.
Got it.
That's why I'm trying to say, like, because it's one thing when the aliens are in the United States and you want to deport them, cool, that's ICRO all day, they're going to go pick them up and remove them.
But when they get caught at the border, right, which is how most of the aliens get caught, they get caught at the border by Border Patrol or they get caught by Customs Border Protection, you want to have a system in place to immediately remove them.
That's why the DHS, the Secretary of Homeland Security is so important because he oversees not just ICE, but he also oversees Customs and Border Protection, which handles most of the actual deportations.
It's not ERO that does it.
Border Patrol does the most deportations, by far.
So that's why, but like you said, the President could write an executive order and put home in some kind of special position that he has all the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security.
All right.
America!
Fuck yeah!
I didn't know that.
I didn't know that he could literally get an executive order to do that.
That's crazy.
So, hey, that just goes to show how much power the president really fucking has.
And that's unobstructed?
That doesn't need the Senate majority or any of that other crap, Ivan?
Again, under executive...
I would say that it's better to do it through legislation.
Of course.
But you can do it temporarily.
You can start it off with an executive order.
Fair enough.
Yeah, that's the power of the president right there, man.
So, I mean, America sucks anyway, man.
Get him the fuck out of here.
Yeah, so, can I close with this last one?
Yeah, please.
Alright, you see my screen?
Uh, we can't see your screen, no.
You want to do it again?
No screen share?
You can screen share, yeah, but we don't.
Bells, do we have them on Zoom that you can screen share?
Try it again, bro.
It's you?
Okay, okay.
There we go.
Now try sharing it.
Screen share.
Yeah, that was a fire song, man, that you put on my video.
Okay, Trump Secretary of Retribution.
Yeah, Trump Secretary of Retribution.
I need to make a little clarification and a point.
This is the first time I'm making a statement publicly, so here's the deal.
The media, back in May of this year, I came out with that viral clip with Zoe from the National Poison Radio explaining what's going on.
And basically, I call myself the Secretary of Retribution, and I have no affiliation to the Trump campaign or the Trump transition, okay?
So the Secretary of Retribution, the media tried to somehow attach me to Trump, right?
I don't know why they do that.
It's probably to try to discredit or try to somehow create some negativity around it.
Of course.
Yeah, I consider myself America's secretary of retribution, grassroots, whatever.
And what that is, is that position is like for me personally, since I created it, this is what it means.
It means that I am helping you through my First Amendment activity to the max, coordinating, synchronizing with my knowledge of all these institutions to be able to inform And motivate federal, state, local officials that have discretionary, lawful constitutional authority to create maximum consequences and accountability for those actors on my deep state target list.
And those are individuals that are named by category, date, place, and transgression of crimes, particularly treason, over the last 10 years.
Okay?
And massive, at-scale constitutional violations.
And what does that mean?
That means at the federal level, I've already been doing this.
It's communicating with members of Congress, House and Senate.
It's communicating with state attorneys general, with state House and state senators and chairs of those committees, with sheriffs, with district attorneys, to basically explain to them, hey, This is what we have for traders.
If Elon Musk decides to pull his data dump, and I've been trying to motivate him to do that with what I call the mother of all Twitter files, imagine coordinating all of this and the evidence shows that they communicated through direct message or some way, shape, or form through Twitter.
Elon Musk's on board now.
Now he can go ahead and kind of dole out to Attorney General Ken Paxton or the incoming Attorney General at the federal level or both to go ahead and say, hey, Here's the evidence of treason.
Go ahead and action it.
In some instances, we action it at the state attorney general level if it's COVID-con, like with the Kansas Attorney General, Chris Kobach, or with, you know, you name the state and you name the red attorney general, or with the red district attorney.
And I remind them, hey, why don't you just continue the precedent, but with evidence, what Fulton Fannie just did, what Alvin Bragg just did in Manhattan, or with what the Attorney General of New York just did.
And then I remind them and say, hey, Sheriff, you can conduct reasonably objective activity just like what they called reasonably objective when Michael Byrd murdered Ashley Babbitt and when Lila Morris murdered Roseanne Boylan.
But yet they call that reasonably objective.
So here it says, a retired soldier turned election denier is keeping a list of the former president's deep state enemies.
Well, guess what?
I got no relation to President Trump.
I voted for him three times.
I'll continue to expose the deep state on my own, with or without anyone's permission.
And I'm going to continue to escalate exposing the scum within the legal, moral, and ethical frame.
And if people don't like the term retribution, by all means use the term justice as well as accountability.
And I'll continue to call for retribution.
Well said.
Well, Ivan, it's always great to have you on.
I have one last question before we let you go.
Yeah.
Who would you say are the top five worst deep state offenders?
Oh, that's a great question.
I did this with CanCon.
I would have to say that knowing and understanding that the most powerful position in the planet is the Speaker of the House, I would have to, in that top five, put in Nancy Pelosi.
Okay.
Number one.
Yep.
Number two, former failed Vice President Pence.
He is a failure.
Yeah, it's tough.
These next three don't have to be in order.
They don't have to be in order the next three.
You can just say names.
It's fine.
I mean, John Brennan, former director of the CIA. Mm-hmm.
Jim Comey.
I mean, there's so many, but I would say John Brennan is probably going to be the top five.
Comey, former director of the FBI, if I'm not mistaken, right?
Yeah, I mean, exactly.
Yeah.
I'm trying to think.
I mean, I would say take a look at my deep state target list.
We're up to 1,400 people now.
Goddamn.
Started off at 350.
And that doesn't even include their staff.
So we're only at 1,400 and then the staff.
And they're going to need to be actioned.
And I'm going to guarantee that this is done with or without whoever's appointed at the federal government for the president.
I am creating the requisite demand and culture now that we have our First Amendment back on Rumble and X. At the end of the day, someone has to start the conversation to move the Overton window.
Some people call me a narrative scout.
So, you know, no one uses the term retribution.
I'm like, look it up.
It's the maximum lawful necessary justice for illegal activity.
Some people confuse it with revenge or whatever, some negative terms.
No.
There needs to be consequences Tangible, physical consequences that everybody can see so that our future generations, when they consider, oh, let's do another genocide using COVIDCon, they're going to take a look at what happened to those actors and be like, ooh.
That didn't end well for Fauci and that didn't end well for every single person all the way down to the school board member that voted to put a face toilet and mandate a face toilet on the child.
They all faced maximum consequence to the tune of being convicted for the school board in this case.
They were convicted of child asphyxiation, child neglect, child mutilation, felonies in every state.
So, that's where we need to go and it needs to be quick.
So, let's call it rapid retribution starting on January 20th.
Alright.
Ivan, thank you for coming on the show, man.
It's always great to have you on.
I learned a bunch myself.
I'm sure the audience did too.
Thanks for having me, man.
You got a big platform.
I truly appreciate it.
You're one of the few that has the courage to have me on.
Most of these folks are just, they're scared.
People in the Trump campaign, the betas, senior influential people are like, hey, uh...
We don't want to have any interactions with the Retribution Instigator or whatever.
Meanwhile, they've never even looked up the term.
What can I find you, bro?
Yep.
Find me on X and Rumble.
Ivan Raiklin on X, guys.
I follow him, so check him out over there.
Deep State Marauder.
And Rumble as well, Deep State Marauder.
Thank you, Ivan, so much for coming on the show, man.
We're always happy to have you on.
Like I said before, most people are scared, but we're not.
So thank you so much, my friend.
Boom.
They're just contagious.
Let's roll.
All right, brother.
Get some rest.
I think you got early morning tomorrow.
Peace.
Peace out.
All right.
Don DeMarco for Ivan.
That's a lot of info, man.
Yeah.
Don DeMarco.
Hey, guys.
What do I tell you guys when I say that we're the number one podcast in the fucking world, bro?
We're about to have conversations that other people are scared to have.
We went from helping y'all make some money.
Now we're talking about how the government works.
We went over the Capitol Police and all that other stuff.
We went into the weeds with that one.
Yeah.
Fascinating stuff.
I didn't even know.
That was deep.
But obviously, once he explained it, I was able to put it together.
I was like, oh, wow.
Holy shit.
Hopefully, Trump pardons these fucking January Sixers.
We'll see what happens.
Hopefully, he pardons the Tates, too.
We can't.
I know.
It's not in the US. Unfortunately, yeah.
Unfortunately, it's Romanian charges.
We have some chats here we need to get to because they've been waiting for a while.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
Let's read your guys' chats.
You guys like that?
Someone in the chat said, oh, this is boring.
And then someone said, you're low IQ. Which is hilarious.
What do you guys think of the Rubio hire?
I'm not too sure on it, but everyone is saying it's a bad move.
Love the Tom Holman move.
Don't worry, we answered that earlier, so you know exactly why Rubio.
Happy Veterans Day.
Thank you for your service.
Thank you, Rich.
Shout out to you, bro.
And guys, he had to get going.
He has an early morning, so that's why we kind of wanted to get as much info out, get him through, and then maybe I'll bring him on again if you guys got questions for him particularly.
But I'm sure he answered a lot of these.
Did you guys see the clip of Alexandra AOC asking Trump supporters what podcast they listen to?
No, I did not.
Yeah, they're wishing to find a cause for their concern.
Well, a bunch of the mainstream media have been trying to call for censorship.
The View, CNN. We need to moderate these podcasters.
Get the fuck out of here.
They're mad because they don't have the fucking thing anymore.
Need help with my sheriff, Terry Coe, Texas.
Local government kidnapped my daughter.
Serious abuse concerns.
How do I get your program here?
Hit them up on Twitter, bro.
It's pretty responsive.
Yeah, on X. Ivan Raiklin.
Anything else?
That's it?
That's it.
Okay.
Hit the next story?
No closeout?
Yeah, next story.
Okay.
So, this next story, guys, doing a whole, it's going to be a whole different topic here, basically.
As you guys know, our boy Nick, we're going to do, what?
Who?
What?
Who?
Okay.
Cool.
Go ahead.
Okay.
So, he made a tweet saying, your body, my choice, right?
And it got like 90 million impressions on Twitter.
Went viral all over the place, right?
And this led to Nick's address getting doxxed, right?
Damn.
Yeah, the slightly offensive one.
Yeah, let's use that article.
It's from my boy Elijah.
He sent it to me.
So we're going to go ahead and read this.
Nick Fuentes doxing.
Far-left intimidation plot ending with one far-left activist getting pepper sprayed.
Okay, so this comes from Slightly Offensive.
Go ahead and support my guy, Elijah Schaefer, by the way.
This is his news company.
So it goes here.
Doxing, which is the sharing of personal information off and online with the intent to harm another person, is illegal in Illinois thanks to a new law, 740 ILCS 195, better known as the Civil Liability Doxing Act.
However, the law wasn't enough to stop self-described far-left Jewish feminist activist Marla Rose from violating the CLDA in an attempt to intimidate and harass a popular podcast host named Nicholas J. Fuentes at his home in Chicago, Illinois, over a political disagreement.
After getting pepper spray during the provocation at Fuentes' home, which she voluntarily instigated, she decided to press charges.
But will this legal battle against Nick succeed in court?
Let's discuss the details.
First, we need to dive into what is doxing and why it's illegal, specifically in the state of Illinois.
Section 10A of the Civil Liability Doxing Act states that, quote, A, an individual engages in the act of doxing when that individual intentionally publishes another person's personally identified information without the consent of the person whose information is published.
And, one, the information is published with the intent that it is to be used to harm or harass the person whose information is published with...
1.
Knowledge or reckless disregard that the person whose information is published should be reasonably likely to suffer death, bodily injury or stalking and 2.
The publishing of the information caused the person whose information is published to suffer a significant economic injury or emotional distress Or to fear serious bodily injury or death of the person or a family or household member of the person or causes the person whose information is published to suffer a substantial life disruption.
And the person whose information is published is identifiable from the published personally identifiable information itself.
So, looks like all the metrics are met there.
And we've seen other streamers we'd get doxxed to as well.
Sucks.
Popular, like Aiden Ross, other people.
I've been doxxed.
Sucks.
You become a subject of concern because now all your haters can go to your address and do random shit.
And it happens, guys, all the time.
Very common.
Should we switch to Rumble only?
Oh, I should, yeah.
Yeah?
Yeah.
Come on over, guys.
Yeah, guys, come on over, Rumble, so we can cover this thing in more detail.
We'll finish off the show over there.
Get real.
Keep it 100.
Yeah, just to keep it safe, because you guys know how YouTube is.
Guys, come on over, Rumble.
Rumble.com.
Let's drop the link in there.
And also, guys, go ahead and, you know, now that we got, we completed the portion with Ivan, which is a very insightful portion, come on over, guys, to Rumble.
Super chat in your questions or comments on this thing.
It's time to switch on over to Rumble.
Let's get ready to Rumble!
They got a lot to say.
We got a lot to say on this one.
Alright.
We can keep Twitter up, yeah.
Come on over, Rumble guys.
Rumble.com slash fresherfit.
The YouTube version ends here.
Come on over, guys.
Let me know when we're clear.
All right.
Which, by the way, I'm going to be on Temple tomorrow.
Guys.
Tomorrow night.
Fresh didn't want to come with me, so I'm going to go by myself.
Wait a minute.
You know why we divide and conquer?
Like you said before, my friend, divide and conquer.
I got your back here.
You got my back over here.
But you don't got to do that tomorrow.
Think about this, man, nigga.
I got better here, bro.
Politics is not my strong suit, but I got to do it for you, man.
You know what I'm saying?
Okay.
I'm trying to put me on top of the block.
This nigga, bro.
Yo, Bill, get this nigga, man!
Nah, man, I'm just saying, you should've came too, man, but it's fine, bro.
Mill of nowhere, man, I don't belong there, bro.
You see this right here, bro?
I just don't belong over there, man.
I ain't gonna lie, this nigga 10 minutes out in the middle of nowhere, bro.
In the boonocks!
Every time me and Fresh go out there, we're like, nigga, what are we doing here?
Bro, we look at each other, we're like, what are we doing here?
I'm about to get killed over here.
Yeah, bro.
This thing's out of the sticks.
Oh, man.
I'm just waiting for the dudes in the fucking house to come out.
Gotcha, nigger!
Like, this is a wrap.
And then we're cooked.
Yeah.
Literally.
Like, literally.
I'm just waiting for niggas to come out in the hood and be like, we gotcha!
Good thing is, they can't see us at night, so...
You know?
Wait, we've been on Rumble, right?
Yes, yes, yes, yes.
Okay, since I've been...
Okay, I was about to say.
All right, let's go back to this thing.
Back to the doxing of this.
- Yeah.
All right.
Cool.
So, um...
Since it's clear...
Where we at here?
Okay.
Since it's clear that doxing is not only culturally immoral and anti-American and generally frowned upon behavior, both online and in the real world, it's important that we cover the crucial details of this altercation between far-left activist Marla Rose and America First commentator Nicholas J. Fuentes outside his home in Chicago's suburb.
Who is Marla Rose?
Well, online, she's a self-described feminist activist who is pro-abortion.
Picture below.
Look at this bitch, bro.
57 years old, by the way.
Somebody get her a nice bath.
57, bro.
Yo, bro.
Bro.
Cat lady to the max, my guy.
Facts.
Dude.
Happy Kamalaween, whatever the fuck that means.
Bro.
She was incredibly upset at a recent video of Nick Fuentes joking about women's rights after Kamala Harris lost the 2024 election.
In an infamous clip, he states, your body, my choice, while celebrating the victory of Donald Trump on election night.
The clip quickly went viral and became...
Began circulating in left-wing algorithms on TikTok, serving as a way for left-wing activists to feel justified in their accusations that Republicans are still radical misogynists.
Well, they're kind of right about that.
This video is becoming an internet sensation, obtaining more views on X, formerly Twitter, than Kamala Harris received votes from the American electorate.
And there we go.
Your body, my choice, forever.
72 million views is crazy.
Nigga, hold on.
I think it got more than that now.
That was...
That's insane.
Let me see.
And that got more votes than Kamala.
What is it now?
Hold on.
I gotta check this shit.
It's gotta be...
That's insane.
But the amount of news press this gave him is quite a lot.
91 million now!
Yeah.
I don't know if that's a good thing, though.
Because when you get put into a spotlight like that, you become a massive target for everybody.
It's kind of scary.
Actually, if you guys remember, take me through something very similar.
Because kids were talking about it in school, telling teachers and their mom.
Yo, imagine your son and daughter saying to you, Yo, my body...
What is it?
Your body, my choice.
To their mom or sister or cousin.
That shit's crazy, bro.
Bitch's name is Marla Rose, right?
Should be Shrek wife.
Yo, bruh.
She's chopped, bro.
Shorty is chopped.
Literally chopped.
Okay, Mo, would you smash that?
No, I am not optioned.
See, if Mo hit that nigga, nobody's hitting that shit, bro.
Mo, you hitting that, stop playing.
I'm telling you, bro.
I've had older.
Older is crazy.
Fuck, nigga.
How you had older than 57?
What the fuck?
Well, I mean, like, older than me, but I think that's alright.
No, this nigga me is older than 57.
Yo!
I mean, I've gotten down like that, so, hey.
That's scary, bro.
What the hell?
That's scary.
I get down like that.
Shout out to North Miami.
Bruv.
Really?
What you doing on there?
I just commented below that shit.
I put suck a dick Marlowe Rose.
91 million.
It's fucking hilarious.
Let's go back to it.
And guys, follow me by the way on X. Can we pull up my X on my Instagram by the way?
We can pull up on the side while we go back to read this thing.
Follow me on X niggas.
I'd be cooking on there.
Myron Gaines X on both Twitter and on Instagram.
And follow Max too, man.
I'd be cooking up some cars on there, man.
You know what I'm saying?
Share it, bro.
You never tell niggas because you're scared of getting banned.
Yeah, I don't want to get banned.
Yo, the worst part is getting bad, bro.
Dude, shit is trash, bro.
Six years building my Instagram page, gone.
Cooked, bro.
Cooked.
I'll tell you this, though, bro.
Being low key Is a little bit better I think Dogecoin about He said He said I'm in a necrophilia Oh shit Dogecoin Damn Yo chat chill man Chill on me, man.
Yeah.
I mean, they alive.
They alive. - See a lot, yo.
Okay, so 90 plus million views.
Insane.
Yeah, 91 million, bro.
I'm cooking a cigarette out next, bro.
Crazy, right?
Yo, go on my X real quick.
I'm cooking this stupid ass nigga.
You can bring it up.
Faggot.
Yeah, we on Rumble, so I can cook.
I'm cooking this bitch ass nigga.
This Somali pirate just commented on my shit just now.
I had to cook that faggot.
Somali pirate?
Yeah, some Somali nigga said, you're a self-hater of your shit, these people.
Cocoon punch!
I'm about to fucking cook this nigga right now.
You don't even follow yourself, Myron?
What?
How do I not follow myself?
What's your counter you on?
I'm on, I'm on, I'm on unplugged fit.
You're on up?
Wait, I do follow myself.
Nigga, no you don't.
What the fuck?
I can follow you right now.
Nigga, just unfu- Bro, follow me too, bro.
Follow me too, bro.
You want Myron to follow you?
You want that account to follow you?
Alright.
Go ahead.
Scroll down real quick.
Nevermind.
Scroll up.
Scroll back up.
Nevermind.
Scroll up.
Scroll up.
I just thought about it.
Okay, yeah.
Click that one.
91 million.
Hold on.
And it scrolled out.
I said, where the fuck did I put...
There should be a recent one.
What the hell?
Just refresh, Bobby?
Oh, no, no.
Because it's Myron Gaines.
I just commented it.
91 million.
Yo, click that real quick.
Click the comments.
This bitch-ass nigga.
100 soon.
W. Myron as usual.
Scroll down.
This guy goes, go to hell, you self-hating.
Sudanese racist.
You're a disgrace to the Sudanese people.
Bro, that's how niggas talk a shit.
Yo!
Nigga, what is that?
Yo, nigga, what?
Is that Dr.
Cortez from Crash Bandicoot?
No, no, no.
That's a nigga, bro.
If you niggas like that, that talk shit to me, bro.
Niggas head is so long, bro.
What the fuck is wrong with these niggas, man?
Niggas head is so long.
Just Somalian pirate, dirty fuck.
Bro, I had to look like a Beyblade, bro.
What the hell?
Nigga really talk a shit.
He's got a Beyblade.
How does nigga look like that talking shit to me, bro?
Fucking faggot.
This should be a rule.
If you talk shit on the internet, you gotta show your face.
This should be a rule like that.
That should be a rule.
You wanna talk shit?
Show your face, nigga.
Show your face, nigga.
And there'd be people like that that talk the most shit to me, bro.
Yeah.
Yo.
Fuck out of here.
That's crazy.
Fucking faggot.
Wow.
He literally commented that shit just now.
I got the notification.
I was like, nigga, this is you.
Somali headass.
The fuck?
Mega mind headass.
Fuck out of here, nigga.
Bruh.
Fuck wrong with your head, man?
Fuck wrong with your noggin, man.
You over here talking shit about me.
Nigga, I got the most to say.
Nigga head look like a strawberry.
Pause.
If you had a YouTuber, call it Akka and your leech.
Yeah, man.
Fucking faggot.
Anyway, go back to the story.
Let's go back to the slightly offensive thing.
Besides us cooking these niggas.
Bro look like a dreidel.
Yeah, bro.
Nigga do look like a dreidel.
Nigga do look like a dreidel, bro.
Sorry, Noble.
Insane work.
Which, by the way, we're already at 45k on a brand new fucking account.
We cooking, baby.
I literally just made this account in September.
So we cooking, chat.
Okay, so this is where we were, right?
While the statement was edgy and a bit provocative, most viewers could easily see through the entertainment smokescreen and didn't make much of it.
However, as it began circulating through left-wing algorithms, some users located Nick Fuentes' home address and began posting it online.
Guys, some people I saw, there was like, somebody posted his address, I saw 85k likes.
Likes!
Damn.
Yo, when they hate you, they hate you, they hate you, man.
Yeah.
Some users located Nick Fuentes' home address and began posting on online social media platforms did little to nothing about the online abuse that violated locals' laws in Illinois and violated almost every social media platform in terms of service, including on Instagram, Facebook, and X. Users were celebrating the criminal doxing with posts garnering millions of views themselves.
Me liking posts doxing Nick Fuentes, right?
Look at this, like this bitch over here, right?
However, it didn't appear that the doxing would result in anything beyond internet harassment.
While still grotesque and un-American at heart, it appeared everything was dying down around the trending quote from Fuentes, which had found its way onto TikTok's song on post-election reaction videos of young liberal women crying, some of which gained tens of millions of views.
But not everyone lives perpetually online.
Marla Rose, though not young or attractive like the girls on TikTok, wrote on Facebook.
You can tell Elijah wrote this shit.
Yeah.
Wrote on Facebook that she had obtained Nick's home address and contemplated doing something about it.
Please read the entire tweet below in full detail to understand her perspective.
Okay.
So this is her tweet.
Actually, I think she posted this to Facebook, guys.
I don't think she put this on...
This is Facebook.
This is from Facebook.
Yeah, it's Facebook.
That's a Facebook picture.
Huh?
Well, she's old, bro.
She's old, bro.
Yeah, she's old.
Yeah.
So she can use Facebook.
Old niggas, bro, use Facebook, bro.
Yeah.
So she goes...
And I read this with Sneeko yesterday.
This is fucking crazy.
Let's break this down.
This is content right here for y'all niggas.
That's why I kind of had to do this story.
Okay.
So what would you do if a neo-Nazi white supremacist who called on a holy war against Jews and is a loud pod misogynist lives in your town, you're a Jewish feminist, and you know his address?
Further, what would you do if friend after friend messaged you with his address and told you that you should pop over since you live in the same town and report what it looks like from outside his home with the address?
Not go there because it's illegal.
Yeah, see, but you have common sense, Fresh.
Are there boxes potentially possessing dog poo?
Are there boxes potentially possessing used menstrual products?
What would you do if it's a Sunday and you've done your work for the day?
Pop over there.
You would.
You're a good friend.
You're curious as well.
So that is what I did.
See how she's coping and coming up with excuses because she knows what she's about to do is wrong.
Stupid.
And quite frankly, can warrant some type of consequences.
So let me get it straight.
If my friends message me and say, okay, go to this person's house and do some dumb shit, am I going to say, yes.
I should go through that over there and arrest it.
Yeah!
Yeah!
I don't agree with this person's views.
Of course not.
But I'm going to go ahead and fucking go to their house.
I'm smarter than the law.
Yeah.
I'll do this right now.
I'm going to do it.
And then she goes ahead in this Facebook post and says, what would you do if you were in my shoes?
Um, not go to someone's house?
You stupid fucking bitch!
I can't hate somebody the worst in the world.
To do this is just retarded, bro.
Like, like, like, for what?
Nigga!
But because people hate this person, it's okay.
I got a couple of opposite dresses.
Guess what I'm not doing?
Going over there.
Like, what the fuck is wrong with people?
And they say, go buy a house?
Nah, bruh.
Stupid.
Nah, bruh.
Okay.
And this is someone you don't even know.
What if they shot you?
Get hit with the Zimmerman treatment.
Wait, she got maced, right?
Yeah.
So, it goes, I shot a short video, less than two minutes, from the public property on the sidewalk, outside this address, noting that there were no boxes.
Can you make this bigger for me, Bills, please?
Yeah.
Thank you.
As I did, a woman pulled up in her car, rolled down her window and was like, quote, is this where the douchebag lives?
End quote, paraphrasing.
And I was like, I think so.
And we laughed about his incel last for a minute.
Then she was like, you should ring his doorbell and see what he has to say for himself.
And I have one serious weakness.
It's chocolate.
What that has to do with this story, I don't know.
Going back to it.
Okay.
I have two.
I have two.
One more relevant for this situation.
I cannot back down from anything that even smacks of a dare.
Lose some weight.
I dare you.
So I figured.
Yeah, right?
Yeah, lose some weight, bitch.
So she goes, I figured she puts this emoji.
There were no solicitors.
Signs up.
And believe it or not, I would have respected that.
So, does someone have to put a no solicitor sign outside of the house for you to not knock on?
Let me put a sign in your house that says, eat food so you don't die, and drink water so you don't die either.
Is that where we need to go?
I thought you were a feminist.
I thought a part of feminism was being treated equally, that you have the mental capacity, right, and the wherewithal to kind of know things and have common sense.
Well, remember, under the delusion itself, they believe that their worldview is right, so whatever she believes is okay is okay.
And here's the thing.
This quote Reveal something more sinister that I want to bring to everyone's attention.
During the Trump and J.D. Vance campaign, I vividly recall multiple times where J.D. Vance would say, vote for us because we're going to bring common sense back to politics.
And I thought to myself, hold on.
Why is the vice president candidate or vice president elect now That graduated from Yale, has a very strong command of the English language, good vernacular, intelligent guy.
Why is he stooping down to something so remedial is saying, vote for us, because we're going to bring common sense back to politics?
It's gone.
Because in my head, I'm looking at it like, hold on, bro.
The whole concept of common sense is that it's common!
So you're campaigning on something...
That is no longer common.
And that kind of made me realize, holy shit.
If you're campaigning on the concept of common sense, that means that common sense is no longer common.
And if common sense is no longer common, that means that the commonality is people are fucking retards.
And then it came to me, I was like, oh!
We put Biden in office.
We have people that identify as lawnmowers.
We have people that identify as squirrels.
We have people that say that there's 90 plus genders.
We have people that think it's okay to transition children.
We have people that think that sending money to a foreign nation state in the middle of fucking the Middle East that's as big as New Jersey serves us geopolitically somehow.
Right?
And We think it's okay to not have any borders.
Just let a bunch of fucking Mexicans and foreign nationals come in.
Yep.
Right?
And that's when it hit me, right?
These other countries that we're facing, Iran, Russia, China, even North Korea!
You know what they, when you go to fill out a box in their country?
It's two genders.
You know what they're not doing?
Not letting gays adopt children.
You know what they're not doing?
They're not fucking sitting here and worrying about, oh, do we gotta protect our borders?
And they're not TikTok driven as well.
You know?
Yeah.
So, in my head, I'm like, okay.
We have a presidential candidate campaigning on common sense.
We're supposed to be the world's superpower.
We're supposed to be the example.
But we're campaigning on common sense.
While our adversaries already have the common sense.
So that's when it hit me.
I was like, wait.
If we don't fucking fix the course of the United States, we're going to be in a very dire situation.
Then a story like this comes along.
And it fucking reminds me.
Smacks me in the fucking face.
And I get reminded that common sense really isn't that fucking common.
And there's a reason why Trump and Vance had to campaign on common sense.
Because you got purple-haired, stupid feminists like this, that neo-sign that says, no solicitors, for you to understand that you can't go up to a private residence of someone that you don't fucking know and harass them.
That's where we are in America.
This encounter that you guys are seeing here, right, whether you like Nick Francis or you fucking don't, that's not the point.
The point is, how the fuck did we get to this position in the United States where we have a bunch of idiots that see a fucking tweet and get angry about it when the guy's clearly fucking trolling?
And think it's appropriate and okay to go out to his front door and knock and think there's not going to be any fucking consequences for it.
Is this where we've gone?
Where common sense is no longer fucking common and we need our world leader...
To remind us that we need common sense.
And they campaigned off of it.
Could you imagine in any other functioning country?
Yeah, we're campaigning off of common sense.
How fucking far left and deranged have we become when we need to campaign on that?
Well, I'll tell you how.
We've gotten to this point.
We're 57-year-old bitches with purple hair are walking up to a 26-year-old guy's house Angry about a fucking tweet!
Do you guys now see the larger implications here of what the fuck is going on?
This encounter that you guys are seeing is where we are in America in 2024 going into 2025.
This is a serious fucking issue.
And it speaks volumes as to what I told you guys before.
If the roles were reversed, okay?
And Nick walked up to this bitch's door.
And she shot him fucking dead.
And he died.
Right there on the steps.
No one would bat a fucking eye.
No one would care.
Why?
Because men get held accountable for their poor decisions.
But bitches don't.
As you guys are going to see when we keep reading this fucking thing.
But I find it in-fucking-credible.
That a 57-year-old woman...
Bitch was born in the 60s, by the way, nigga.
She was born when the Zodiac Killer was stabbing bitches in parks.
Alright?
I find it incredible that she goes on there, on the internet, by the way, on a public forum, in front of everyone, and says, I didn't see a solicitor side there, so I walked up.
I gotta fucking write it out for you, you fucking retard.
Don't fucking walk up and intrude on someone's home that you don't know to antagonize them over an internet tweet.
This is where we are in America, ladies and gentlemen.
Someone argues too far gone.
You wanted to say something?
You said it all, bro.
I'll just say this, man.
Listen.
You were looking at me a few times, so I thought you wanted to say something.
Yeah, no, because at this point, bro, that right there just goes to show no regard for respect, safety, or the American person as well.
But you know what's weird about this?
She actually is taking the word Karen to a whole other level.
Yeah.
Because now...
Super Saiyan 3, Karen.
Because now, adding to her background...
What she is as a feminist, and her hatred towards this individual, it's okay to do whatever she feels like.
Because now, her head is like, oh, people hate him too?
I'll go ahead and do what I feel like.
With respect, it's gone.
So common sense is not here anymore, bro.
It's gone.
I knew where it felt.
Once I saw that these niggas, I heard J.D. Vance say it once, and he kept saying it.
And I was like...
We're fucked!
We're cooked!
I blame feminism on TikTok.
100%, bro.
Social media destroyed the fabric of common sense.
Because now it's like, oh, two-second clip, ten-second clip, information overload.
That's all you got.
So, common sense is gone, bro.
Clearly.
Go back to the article.
Clearly.
Bitch needed a no...
I didn't see a no solicitor sign.
And she put this shit on the internet.
Caring to the next level, bro.
Stupid bitches.
Isn't this like a crime?
Legit crime?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Should she be arrested?
He cited the law for it.
Okay.
While reporting on her altercation with Nick Frenz, it's apparent by her dehumanizing choice of words that she arrived at his house with what would be considered nothing less than nefarious intentions.
Of course.
Calling someone a neo-Nazi, white supremacist, and misogynist while describing herself as a Jewish feminist can only mean one thing.
She sees him as an enemy.
Absolutely.
Choosing dehumanizing language, such as this, during a time when Fuentes' personal information was being spread around online with relentless death threats from people that belonged to her political ideology, this can be considered nothing less than doxing with the intent to harm someone based on their opposing political ideology.
Thank you, Elijah.
Someone has common sense.
Which no longer is common.
This is a violation of section 10A2I, which defines posting such information to cause emotional distress to the victim is illegal.
Oh, we didn't finish reading her stupid ass thing.
By the way.
Scroll down a bit.
So I rang the doorbell.
Going back to her story.
There were no solicitors.
I believe it or not, I would have respected that.
No, you wouldn't, bitch.
Because you obviously needed it there for you to respect it in the first place, which means you're a fucking retard.
So I rang the doorbell.
He immediately swung the door open like he was at a damn Waco.
Yeah, because you came to his house.
Sprayed me with a burning liquid.
Yeah.
And pushed me down the stairs into his sidewalk.
I rolled into a protective position because I was anticipating kicks or stomps.
He grabbed my phone, ran back inside, bolted the door, and shut the blinds.
Friends, it is dark in there like a bunker.
I have video I'm holding onto that for evidence.
One more time.
So he goes, I want to read that one more time.
So I read the doorbell.
He made me to swing the door open like he was at damn Waco.
Sprayed me with a burning liquid and pushed me down the stairs onto the sidewalk.
Yeah, fuck you, bitch.
Don DeMarco for dick.
He hit that bitch with the fucking Leonidas kick, man.
With the fucking, uh...
This is Sparta!
I don't understand.
Thank you.
I rolled into a protective position because I was anticipating Kickstarter stomp.
Because he kicked her off.
Hold on.
He grabbed my phone, ran back inside, bolted the door, shut the blinds, and then she says he has video.
How does she get video if he has her phone?
Good point.
Might have been recording.
Yeah, but he has the phone though.
I know.
He gave it back.
Oh, okay.
Yeah, what a fucking idiot.
Let's keep going.
She didn't put that in there.
Of course not.
She was a clear violation of the Civil Liability Doxing Act.
However, Marla Rose wasn't happy about being met with a defensive act from Fuentes while intentionally trying to cause him emotional distress.
Yeah, bro.
Guys, here's the thing.
I'm actually in a unique position where I can talk about this.
Roughly two years ago...
Gonna be three years, I think, very soon.
If you guys recall, we had the whole Asian Doll debacle.
And Asian Doll used this moment to paint me as a racist, that stupid nigger bitch.
And...
Well, she's not wrong.
And, uh...
It's a joke.
It's a joke.
I keyed, I keyed, right?
But the point is that she used that to paint me as a racist when the clip went viral when I told her to get the fuck out of here, right?
January 2022.
January 2022.
So going on three years now.
And we went viral everywhere.
Because a clip resurfaced of us saying that we don't date black women.
Right?
We made the joke where we were saying, oh yeah, blocked.
Ha ha ha.
You know, we don't fuck with us.
Apparently we can't have our own standards.
We don't dabble in the dark.
We don't dabble in the dark.
Thank you, Mo.
Which we do kind of so.
Yeah, we actually kind of do.
But we just don't do it publicly for obvious reasons.
I'm just kidding.
But the point I'm trying to make is, guys, right, is they took a clip where someone has sent a super chat in, for full context, right, someone sent a super chat in, this is from an old-ass show, too, and says, yo, have you guys ever used the dating app Black?
And we joked and laughed and said, no, we don't dabble in the dark if you want those Shaniquas, blah, blah, blah.
So Asian Doll, right, and Twitter framed it as, I kicked her out because we are long-term, lifelong racists.
Why do I say that?
Because with that virality came a lot of fucking death threats, guys.
I got, literally on my old Instagram, stories that go for minutes of me going through my DMs with thousands upon thousands of death threats saying, fuck you, hope you die, we're coming after you, we know your address, etc.
You know what?
It might have been even more than what Nick is getting now.
Right?
Because it was bad.
Really bad.
And I remember going through and getting all this hate and looking at my DMs and all this other shit.
And it takes like really thick skin to deal with this bullshit, right?
Thankfully for me, I've been involved in way more serious shit, dealing with criminals, whatever.
So some idiots talking shit on the fucking internet.
It is what it is, right?
But I can tell you guys that it's incredibly annoying.
It's incredibly frustrating to be getting these death threats.
And I put you on edge.
I carried my gun everywhere during that period.
Everywhere.
Right?
Because all you need is one dumb Tyrone.
Say, nigga, what'd you say about black people?
And try to start some shit.
So I carried my gun everywhere for most of 2022.
So I can only imagine Nick, 91 million views on fucking X. His address gets stocked.
He's not in a fucking high rise like us with security that could put off a lot of weirdos.
It's his actual house.
People showing up, mailing him shit, whatever.
So clearly he's on edge.
That's why he probably looked at the people, saw some purple-haired feminists at his front door.
He don't know this bitch.
He don't know if she got a gun.
He don't know what she's there for.
So, swings it open.
Boom!
Kicks that bitch.
Fair.
Self-defense, 100%.
Because given the context, what is she there for?
Yeah, who are you?
Who the fuck are you?
And mind you, he's probably had a bunch of people show up at his house at this point.
I mean, hell!
A bitch drove by and said, oh!
Yeah, you know that's his house?
Random!
It's a random bitch!
That's why she, allegedly, did this.
So, if random bitches are driving by the house, so that's Dick Ford's house, and she's standing there, and that's what got her inspired to go over there, that tells me that a bunch of people have probably already tried this already.
So he's clearly on edge.
And I can tell you guys from a personal perspective, because I've actually went through this shit as well, Getting my address docked, getting hundreds of, thousands of death threats.
It's annoying!
You know?
After this, you know, hundredth dumbass nigga with a gun emoji on his fucking thing.
I'mma find you a nigga and kill you all!
Right?
Fucking watermelon warriors coming after me.
Yeah, niggas are watermelon warriors.
Stupid niggas.
But bro, like, real talk!
That is funny.
Right?
After a hundred Tyrone messages me saying, I'm gonna kill you, nigga.
You're like, okay, bro.
Like, thank you for confirming the stereotype, retard.
Right?
We talk about make jokes about blacks being stupidly violent.
And then they can say, I'm gonna kill you!
Oh, thanks for proving my fucking, you know, my theory right.
But yeah, man.
It sucks, bro.
It fucking sucks.
Being in that position.
So, um...
Yeah, and very few actually experience it.
Guys, it blows.
It really does blow.
Because, look, even though people are on the internet, it only takes one person to actually make good on that threat, bro.
Yeah, as a creator, though, that type of pressure is definitely a high amount of...
And it's something that 99% of human beings, let alone creators, most creators don't even get attention.
Bro, it's something that 99% of human beings won't fucking experience.
Yeah, you see people have crash notes and meltdowns on livestream.
Bro, imagine that.
It's immense pressure on you.
When you see niggas go crazy on the internet, it's because of this, guys.
And listen, the argument of...
It's like shit like this.
We have pussies, though.
Yeah, the argument of this being a place where it's easy work and it's always easy to do live streaming is not true.
It is still hard work.
It's still very emotional.
It's very driven based off of people's comments.
And at the same time, man, is it harder than nine to five?
I don't think so.
But that type of pressure, bro, for anybody is intense.
So you're going to be on edge, no matter who you are.
So, yeah, that's fair.
So yeah, guys, and I don't think I've ever talked about that publicly on the podcast, but yeah, guys, 2022, I ain't gonna lie to y'all, man, I carried a gun everywhere I went, bro, because I was getting death threats every fucking day, man.
It was bad.
On every platform.
Even black people.
Even I had one.
Huh?
Even I had one.
Yeah.
And I'm a nice guy.
Yeah, that whole fucking Asian doll thing, like, that brought a whole bunch of fucking hate my way, because everyone painted me as a racist.
Yeah, me too.
Good thing I'm extra black.
So it don't fit me too well.
Anyhow...
Alright, let's keep going to the article.
We'll finish this, wrap this thing up.
Yeah, I'm trying to fix something for you on the back end.
What?
Oh, okay, okay.
Yo, you gotta go.
I can finish this myself.
I mean, we're always done.
Alright.
Yeah.
It's no surprise that this Jewish feminist activist then tried to play victim after a flagrant violation of civil law, claiming she was going to press charges after an incident she provoked.
However, it appears many in the general public, including popular commentator Candace Owens, were on his side after hearing the details.
Candace goes, she was lucky she wasn't in a stand-your-ground state, or she could have been shot.
I do not recommend showing up at any person's front door down here in Tennessee.
It's a very fuck-around-to-find-out state.
Yeah.
And even this guy, who doesn't like Nick, says the lady deserved it.
He had his address leaked online.
She was out of her mind to show up there, IRL, over some stuff said online.
Exactly, stupid bitch.
One of my worst fears is any person doing anything even mildly threatening around my children because I already know I'm going to have to spend at least one night in jail while my lawyer sorts through my reaction.
Yeah, understandably so.
Funny enough, even the EMT that treated her at the scene for her alleged injuries were on Nick's side, citing common reasons and common sense, you can see her post below.
Anyway, the EMTs, and this is from her Facebook post again, and my husband all asked, why did you ring the doorbell?
Kind of incredulously.
I don't know, why not?
Yo.
Incredible, right?
Again, no.
No soliciting sign.
And I was shown off for my new friend.
Also, showing off for my new friend.
Bro, you don't know that person.
This bitch is stupid.
Yo, see, but this is the type of woman, bro.
You marry, bro, you're cooked.
Bro, these feminists are deranged.
Yeah.
A bitch like this will have sex with you?
Oh my god, it was great!
And then come back and say, oh yeah, you raped me.
Facts.
Facts.
You gotta record these hoes now.
Imagine marrying her.
Her husband is cooked.
Oh yeah, that nigga cooked.
He's probably a fucking vegan cuck faggot.
White boy for Harris.
Also, I think threatening women and girls everywhere deserves some kind of explanation.
No, it doesn't!
You stupid bitch!
Nick doesn't have to explain himself to you, you stupid whore!
You dreidel-spinning, feminist, stupid fucking bitch.
He doesn't have to explain himself to you.
Are you fucking retarded?
What the fuck is wrong with you?
People are fucking dumb.
Can't explain himself to you over a fucking tweet?
You know the worst part?
This encourages other people to do the same.
Bruh.
Which is...
It's fucked.
I want to make it very clear that I'm not whining about being pushed down the steps and pepper sprayed by a 26-year-old who then took possession of and possibly broke my phone.
Bitch!
I'm 57 years old and 5'1", so it's kind of funny that he's having this melodramatic reaction to me, but here we are.
Bitch, I don't know you!
You can have a weapon!
Yo, accountability is gone.
Gone!
Oh, why'd you ring the doorbell?
I don't know.
My new friend dared me.
Nigga, you don't even know her name!
What the fuck?
Dog.
I guess them are breaks.
Dems are breaks when you're despised by about half the country and millions overseas as well.
Not really.
I'd be touchy as well, but then again, I'm not making rape jokes or demeaning bodily autonomy.
Bro!
Yeah.
Okay, so dumb bitch, you literally went over there because he made a rape joke.
Let's go ahead and use your logic.
You went over and put your life in danger.
Because the nigga made a joke that you didn't like.
See, at least Karen's make a phone call.
You went to the Astral house and did something.
She literally went to go see the manager, nigga.
Super Saiyan Karen.
Super Saiyan Karen.
Let me talk to your manager.
Goddamn.
Let me go to the manager's house.
The source.
And the manager went ahead and reminded me.
Super Saiyan Karen.
He hit me with the fucking Leonidas, bro.
Yo.
This is smart talk!
She goes, one, I have forgiven my husband.
Wait, okay.
So, if you wanted to send Nikki a care package, but were concerned you might not have the correct address, this is all I have to say.
It is confirmed.
And bitch puts the right address there!
I have forgiven my husband.
He made me a nice vegan hot chocolate with many marshm- You're right.
Yeah.
White boys for Harris.
Strike again.
Yo, look, man.
The Taliban were right.
Niggas took away women's abilities to speak.
This is why!
You know, the Taliban, women can't even talk to each other?
Well, bro, I mean, at this point, we might need this shit, bro.
Now you see why the Taliban literally don't let women talk to each other.
If this bitch wasn't there and didn't get engaged by this other dumb bitch to go, she probably wouldn't have got kicked with a fucking mace spray.
Because I'll tell you this, even some dumbass dude that would be a vegan soy latte faggot driving by would probably say, you know what?
It's probably not a good idea for you to knock on the door.
I hate Nick too.
He's a misogynist, blah, blah, blah.
But it's probably not a good idea to knock on the door.
Why?
Because men understand the concept of violence and consequences.
Even the biggest faggots...
Okay?
The biggest vegans, the biggest Kamala supporters, the biggest Tampon Tims, right?
Even these fucking homosexuals understand that there's consequences in life as a man.
Whether gay, straight, fucking bi, whatever the fuck that is, men live a way harder life than women because part of the reason why our life is harder is because we've got to deal with the consequences of our stupid actions.
But what did that bitch do?
Oh!
This other dumb bitch is telling me that I should go knock on this stranger's door Who's been antagonized, by the way.
His tweet is fucking viral.
He's probably on edge, but let me go knock on there anyway and see what happens.
Bro, he needs to move, man.
He needs to move ASAP. She did this in jest as a funny reaction.
Yeah.
She could have died.
Yeah.
But hold on.
She posted address again.
Who knows what's next?
Yeah.
He needs to move, bro.
And again...
This is why women shouldn't be talking.
Taliban is right about that shit, bro.
Tell you this, nigga.
God damn.
Niggas literally made it against the law for bitches to talk to each other.
I say why now!
Nigga, we in America.
They fought too hard for their rights.
They don't go back on that shit.
But now I see why these niggas made that law, bro.
Bro, imagine marrying a feminist like that, bro.
You're cooked.
Bro, oh my god.
My husband is forgiven.
Holy shit.
What else did you say?
Alright, let's keep going.
Yeah, this article, guys, I have to read this with y'all.
This shit is crazy.
Fuentes is very frightened, widow man.
Don't ring the doorbell, he's a little on edge.
Go figure.
Yeah, bitch!
Are you serious?
Should I file a police report?
Yes, I rang his doorbell.
Wait, can you?
If you committed that crime, can you get a police report on him?
She can file a police report, but that doesn't mean charges are going to be guaranteed.
Do not hop a fence or anything, but it does that merit assault and property damage.
Bitch, you gotta understand, even under federal law, when you walk up to someone's door, that's considered cartilage.
Like, you being on his lawn is his property.
Yeah.
Also, the cop actually had the nerve when I asked about pressing charges to say, for what?
Yeah, bitch!
Even the cop knows!
I said dumbfounded!
For assault!
And he was like, well, you went to his door.
You what?
The fact that she thinks that she could press charges is comical.
Yeah.
Even the police appear to be taken for into the side of the manor, implying that she provoked the altercation and would be liable for inciting the incident on its private property.
She should be thankful she didn't do this in a standard ground state such as Florida, Texas, or Tennessee, where the consequences would have been much more severe than burning eyes and a few bruises from falling.
Being that she is quite obese and the fall would have likely been pretty severe due to her personal disregard for physical health.
That was Elijah statement.
I think Elijah funny, bro.
In the end, time will tell what charges Marla presses against Nick or if she even decides to press charges at all.
We all know Chicago is a far left city, and perhaps she sees how heroes like Daniel Penny have been treated and is hoping for similar sympathy through her protected Jewish status and Nick's past comments about Jewish influence in American politics.
However, only one can hope that a jury would see the events that, the same way the EMT and police did, as just another stupid far-leftist who bit off more than she could chew.
Well, she chews a lot.
For now, the whole event has become a permanent meme and will go down in history as another win for the right-wing movement.
Whether you like Nick Fuentes or not, I think he's the worst person on Earth.
Nobody deserves to be accosted at their home that way over an internet joke.
The right to free speech and to protect your own property from those who seek to harm is both an American right and a lawful defense of the CLDA. That was a picture that came from her phone.
That's crazy.
Yeah, that's funny.
That's hilarious.
If you like stories like this, make sure to watch the Slightly Offensive podcast every Tuesday and Thursday at 8 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time on Rumble.com.
Guys, go support Elijah Schaefer Mann.
He's a good dude.
Yeah, Slightly Offensive.
He comes right up the road from us here.
He's down here in South Florida, too, so go check him out, guys.
Go check him out on Rumble.
Great piece written by him.
Good article.
So true.
I mean, guys, that is literally First Amendment and Second Amendment rights, right?
Right to freedom of speech and then right to bear arms to protect said freedom of speech.
Bro.
And this dumbass bitch is lucky that this wasn't like Florida or some other shit, man.
He could have just fucking just opened that door, pow, hit her with a shotgun, and she's gone, nigga.
I think he needs to move, bro.
Yeah, I told him.
Actually, I told him to get a gun.
Bro, he needs to move, bro.
You know what?
Thank God he didn't get the gun.
Yeah, he needs to move.
If you listen to me, that bitch would have got blown away probably.
Because them to have your address like that, bro, you got to move.
Yeah.
You got to move.
Got you.
Man.
And people have been sending him poop and shit like that.
What the fuck?
Yeah, I've heard feminists are sending him...
Apparently, there's a service that you can send poop bags.
Actual poop?
Yeah.
Or send...
Their poop or someone else's poop?
I don't know.
It's like dog poop or a human...
I don't know what it is.
You can sell niggas feces.
We can make some money, bro.
I don't know, Chad.
You guys correct me if I'm right.
Hero, you up for it, bro?
That nigga dead.
Niggas slump.
Chad, show this nigga, bro.
This nigga slump.
Can we show up?
On five?
Camera five?
Curl ball.
Yeah, look at that.
He dead, man.
Don't wake him up.
That nigga dead.
Don't poke him.
Don't try to wake him up.
Look, he's awake, bro.
Yeah, he's awake.
He's awake.
Bro, he chilling.
This nigga a cat, bro.
Yeah, he's a cat, bro.
Bro, he shows no affection to Fresh ever, bro.
Yeah, he don't like me.
I just feed him, that's all.
Yeah, real time.
You're just a human to him, nigga.
Give me sustenance, human.
I'll tell you this.
When I'm home alone, he'll lick me and then be like, this nigga that is bad, I'm about to walk away.
Then they go away in his corner, bro.
I'm like, yeah, nigga, you don't love me?
Anyhow, we got some shots here.
He was my bum, though.
He's my bum.
I love him.
Chris is my bum, too, but, you know, he's old.
Not like that, but, like, you know what I'm saying?
Big pause.
Chris really is a bum, though.
Wait, where's he at?
Never mind.
We got on Wednesday.
Yeah.
Well, no, actually, yeah, Wednesday.
Nathan Rods.
The problem with these types of people is that they think the world resolves around their beliefs and mindset.
That's true.
That is why they want to silence everyone that goes against what they feel and like.
Sorry, what they like and feel.
I'm very happy that Nick defended his home.
When I read it, I had to take a moment from my work because I couldn't stop laughing.
Bro, I'm not going to hold you.
It's funny but not funny because his life could be at stake because these people are crazy.
But yeah, her actual comment was insane.
We got here, Fresh Update says, Debbie Nick for pepper spraying her ugly eye.
Bro.
That was Lisa Horace.
Fresh updates?
She got no ass.
What?
Nigga, she got no ass.
Alright, so real quick guys, I want you guys, a quick announcement.
I want you guys to go ahead and sign up for Castle Club for absolutely free.
Guys, get on the newsletter, get on the email list.
We're going to show you guys how to do it real quick.
CastleClub.tv, right?
Jump in there.
Alright?
When we do free Zoom calls for you ninjas, you can jump in for free.
You just go in here, join the class club, click that link, then you're going to go ahead and you're going to...
If you have a Rumble account, you can sign in with your Rumble account.
If not, just put your best email in there and create a password and then bam, you're in.
That's all you got to do, guys.
Alright?
So join up!
Use any of these accounts, whether it's Google, Apple, Facebook, whatever it is.
You can use any of these accounts.
CareerCastClub account.
You get an email that you actually use, so you can go ahead and get the newsletters that give a bunch of free value.
And you can join for free, guys.
Also, whenever we do meetups, we're going to send it to you in email.
And the other thing, too, right?
We got 200 guys watching right now on Castle Club.
Guys, the Castle Club chat is lit.
It's hilarious.
Like, you can literally go in there, and this stream right now, you could be in there watching on Castle Club, and you could be in there with the memes.
It's funny as fuck.
And when you donate on there, you get a discount, and you could put pictures and all this other shit when you super chat, which is fucking hilarious.
So, Cast Club Chat is lit.
And you can join in the Cast Club Chat.
Yeah.
Noby says, Question for your brothers.
Why do you think the Democratic Party aims so hard to get the black vote?
When we are only 13% of the population, even if every black person voted, it wouldn't be enough to cover or overrule the election.
Also, you know you ain't doing something right if you ain't got haters giving you death threats.
May the Lord continue to protect and bless y'all boys.
Shout out to you, man.
Shout out to you.
And guys, um...
Hey, this dude said, for free, I got Jude.
No, bro.
Like, it's because they can only type in a chat.
They can't see the posts.
They can't see the posts or anything.
They can't see the updates that we do, and they can't really even...
Yeah, when you're in Cast Club for free, there's two sides.
If you're in Cast Club, and only $35 for a month, you get everything.
But if you're in Cast Club for free, you can only see the streams that were already, like, live right now on Rumble, right?
They could go on that chat and type in.
Like, yeah, that's it.
But they can't, like, see anything else.
Also Discord and also the community.
Yeah, they don't have access to that.
So that's only when you're Ink House Club, for real.
What do we got here?
Plus, it's funny as hell, when you guys are in...
You guys be going crazy.
They be having battles in the chat.
Facts.
Okay, so a quick little announcement from one of our sponsors here.
What's my sponsor?
This is Rumble Premium, guys.
This sponsorship is from Rumble, one that is incredibly important to the survival of the company.
When Rumble first started in 2013, they built a platform for the small creator.
They didn't censor or have biases.
They were fair and true to all creators equally.
No one thought platforms would censor political conversation or censor opinions on COVID. We know that fucking YouTube did that.
But they did.
Facebook admitted they felt...
What?
Oh, my bad.
Slipped.
But they did.
Facebook admitted they felt the pressure from the Biden and Harris administration.
Rumble did not.
They held the line.
They're attacked daily for giving us a voice to talk to you.
They're attacked by corporate media.
They're attacked by governments like France.
They're attacked from brand advertisers and refuse to work with them.
Corporate America is fighting to remove free speech.
Rumble is fine to keep it.
Rumble won't survive with brand advertisers.
They don't get much of it watching our Rumble show.
This is the most they can ask from you.
But if you really believe in this fight, and if you have the means, one major way you can help Rumble survive is by joining Rumble Premium.
Join a community that believes in the First Amendment and believes in our human right to free speech.
And guys, Rumble Premium allows you to watch the show without ads.
Yes.
It's a fucking no-brainer.
Right?
Unless you're on Castle Club.
Right?
Rumble is offering $10 off with the promo code FRESH. When you purchase an annual subscription, go to rumble.com slash premium slash fresh and use the code FRESH. rumble.com slash premium slash fresh.
Use that code, guys.
Get the discount.
Like I said...
If you have the means and believe in the cause, now's the time to join Rumble Premium.
If you don't have the means, we're just happy you watch us on Rumble.
All right, guys?
Which, honestly, that's really what it comes down to.
If you don't have the money, no problem.
Just watch on Rumble.
Go ad-free.
It's a better way.
And also...
If you're watching on Castle Club, open up a tab, watch the Rumble as well, support.
And guys, Castle Club, which is locals, is Rumble.
It's all in one company.
So if you guys really believe in free speech, you guys like the fact that Rumble was critical in getting Trump into office, by the way, because the biggest streamers that were live during the fucking election were who?
Don Bongino.
Dan Bongino.
Yep.
Sorry, Don Bongino.
Crowder.
And Crowder.
500,000 each watching.
And the biggest person that was covering the election on YouTube?
PBD at only 270.
Yeah.
Rumble is the fucking future of political discourse, guys.
Because we know that YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, etc., they censor significantly, by the way, right-wing fucking voices.
X and Rumble, by far, were a huge part.
Of the Republicans being able to take back this fucking country through Trump because of conservative platforms like Rumble and X that didn't stifle fucking free speech.
So they were able to get the creators out there, get the message out there.
And obviously the truth resonated with the people and they fucking went to the election polls and they voted for Trump.
Guys, it's because of platforms like Rumble and X. And just so y'all know, Rumble is free speech for real.
Rumble never banned Nick Fuentes.
Rumble never banned any of the most controversial creators ever.
X did.
Rumble did it.
I love X. I love Elon Musk.
But if we're going to go ahead and talk about freedom of speech, Rumble doesn't even...
No one even comes close to Rumble, bro.
It's facts.
No one even fucking comes close.
Alright?
So support Rumble, guys.
Support us on Castle Club.
You can join Castle Club for free right now.
Jump into chat.
Shoot the shit with these niggas.
They're putting fucking funny-ass memes like this of Sneeko with Kentucky Fried Chicken.
Fucking hilarious.
Link is in the chat, guys.
Join Castle Club for free.
Also, you guys have two paid Zoom calls this week.
One on Tuesday and one on Wednesday.
Yeah, for the paying members.
You guys got two Zoom calls this week.
We have David Amari.
So you want to make money on YouTube?
Automated, by the way.
It's going to be Tuesday, 7 p.m.
We had an awesome open Q&A yesterday with you guys.
Yeah.
A lot of value in there, man.
I pushed back my FedRexP, y'all niggas.
I love y'all, man.
Facts.
For the paying cast club members, you guys get a lot of value.
And we have another chat here.
WCommonSenseRant and WElijah.
Appreciate that from PoachLikePutin.
What else we got?
Now, we'll do it next time.
That's too much ads.
Alright.
Another chat here as well.
In our Rumble.
Nathan Rods.
The problem with these type of people is that...
Oh no, we did this one already.
Did we read that?
Yeah.
Okay.
We need the Rumble one though.
Oh, Rumble Rat?
I think it's from JR. Okay.
Get your shots in now, niggas.
JR Samuel.
He says...
I do armed security in a hospital in Milford, Connecticut.
Okay, yeah.
And they want me to take the measles vax.
If not, they will take me off the schedule.
Can I fight this, or should I just take that bullshit?
Goddamn.
Uh, measles.
Life for death.
Life for death, huh?
Gotta fight, Winnega.
Yeah.
Well, you didn't hear that from us, but, you know.
Allegedly.
Allegedly, that's what you can do.
Get with a lawyer, bro.
See, if they can force you for that shit, bro.
Yeah, bro.
Get with a lawyer, man.
Fuck that.
Don't do it, bro.
Yeah, I mean, I don't know about, to be honest with you, I don't know what the fuck measles, vax, what the health implications are.
You don't know what it's mixed with, bro, so.
Europa, don't worry guys, we'll keep watching that.
I gotta fucking leave tomorrow.
Oh yeah.
But when I come back...
So guys, he's gonna be at Tim Cass tomorrow.
I gotta leave early tomorrow.
And this is the W Show, man.
Listen, a lot happened today.
Don't worry, we're gonna keep going with the Europa streams, guys.
For those that are wondering, I'm watching Europa on Cass Club.
And if you guys missed it, Ivan was on earlier giving some game about how things actually run behind the scenes, especially with January 6th, so go check it out.
And we'll see you guys on Wednesday with a girls show and dating show.
Hopefully.
Wait, is there anything else that we missed?
That's pretty much it.
Got everything.
All right.
All right, guys.
We'll see you guys on Wednesday.
Yes.
Tomorrow, Timcast for you.
Yeah, I'm going to be on Timcast tomorrow, 8 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time.
I'll be back Wednesday.
What do we do on Wednesday?
We'll figure it out.
Might have a guest, too.
We'll do a dating show.
All right.
Might have a guest?
Yes.
Dating, though.
You want to tell them who it is?
No.
Oh, it's not on LinkedIn?
Not yet.
Okay.
Tomorrow we got a call on Castle Club Premium with David Amar, right?
Yep.
Okay.
7 p.m.
Sharp.
Okay.
Can I step into that?
A lot of value there, a lot of money to make too as well.
Maybe we'll start on regular Castle Club and then cut it?
No, no, no.
This is premium only.
Premium only?
What he's bringing in there, bro, is money making things right now.
And he's doing his best stuff.
Oh, you niggas.
All you guys that want to get on YouTube, you guys might want to get on there with Dave Amari then.
65 bucks a month, man.
Stop being brokeies, niggas.
Facts.
If you guys want to make money on YouTube, this is going to be how to do it.
And then, what else?
We've got one more chat here from Sammy.
When is the Tai Lopez podcast?
First to make it happen?
I could text him.
I could text him for you guys.
Yeah, let's make it happen again.
Yeah.
He's been in his mansion in LA, living his lifestyle.
Yeah, well, uh...
That guy got some bread, bro.
I think he wants to do a podcast right now.
He mentioned, like, if you want me on your podcast.
He wants to come over there.
Why don't we go?
Yeah, we...
Don't mind too much.
Yeah.
I mean, we could.
We'll figure it out.
You go, bro.
Divide and conquer, nigga.
Remember that?
I'll conquer it.
Nigga, I got shit to do for you right now!
Well, I mean, it's not that.
Eh.
It'll help with a lot of stuff, too.
Man.
But either way, W Show.
We'll see you guys tomorrow for Zoom Call with David Amari.
What time?
7pm.
7pm.
Castle Club Premium, niggas.
Yep.
So yeah, guys, go in there and what else?
That's it.
That's it.
See you guys tomorrow for TimCast.
I gotta fucking get ready.
Literally, I gotta fly in a few hours.
Alright, guys.
So, love you guys.
Peace.
▲
Export Selection