All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 20, 2024 - Fresh & Fit
52:34
Diddy Arrest Footage LEAKED! Ft.Akademiks
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
My phone tapped.
Obviously, they're not going to admit right now that they ever tapped the phones.
But how do you think they're getting these information if they're not tapping the phones?
And then, of course, you can explain on Title III. Go ahead.
Because the things that you're mentioning, which you're referring to phone frequency and contact, that can simply be done through a subpoena.
You can just do a subpoena to AT&T or whoever his phone carrier is.
And they'll give you all the tolls.
And you can see that he called these individuals on these days this many times or a pen register like before.
So the things that you're saying that they're collecting, these are things that don't rise to the level of a Title III. Okay, okay.
Alright, that makes sense.
Yeah.
That does make sense.
But I can give you a full thing on from A to Z, what it takes to actually wiretap someone's phone if you want me to, but that's up to you.
Well, maybe you could do a little bit of a hybrid.
So, let's...
You're back in your, you know, agent shoes.
You're doing an investigation.
A guy kind of, like, feels like the feds are closing in a bit, so he's trying to tie up his loose ends.
How do you monitor that?
And, you know, like, how do you juggle it both, like, three ways?
Like, how do you juggle it...
By saying, oh, we need to take this guy in custody now?
Because who knows?
He might be reaching out to people who you're trying to flip.
You're trying to flip these people.
He's reaching out to them trying to offer whatever incentive, right?
He's intimidating people, possibly.
You know that, say you're working on the southern border, some of these people are prone to a lot of violence.
They might be like, yo, if you're talking to Fez, I'll kill the shit out of you.
You get what I'm saying?
And also just...
It's at the point in the investigation where obviously you have your evidence, which may be dated, but you are hoping this person fucks themselves.
You're hoping that for whatever reason they just get on the phone and just start ranting or does something now to basically verify your case that is based on evidences that's from over like 15 years ago.
Okay.
I'm gonna answer this question.
I'm gonna...
Give me one sec.
I'm gonna take a quick piss and get an energy drink, and I'm gonna knock this out the fucking park for y'all.
All right?
Give me one sec.
All right.
It's all good.
It's all good.
I'll be right back.
All right.
Chat, while we wait for Myron to come back, hopefully he remembered the question, but hopefully he got a notepad.
He always be writing shit down.
Chat, yeah.
I can't call my boy because I don't know the nigga, but...
This is how NBC Brooklyn...
You know, back in 2019, notoriously there was no heat...
There was no electricity.
Apparently the inmates were in sub-zero temperatures for six days.
This was a really, you know, dire situation.
And people have just said, like, for example, here, people have just said, this is a really...
A horrific place to be.
Now, if we're just expecting that Diddy's in the same type of place that every other inmate is going to be, maybe just on an isolation-like wing, he is going through it, right?
Also, what we do have to get to...
Actually, I got my little list here.
Chad, don't worry.
If you're rocking today, we're going to be here for another at least five hours, so don't you worry.
We'll cover all the Diddy stuff within the next two, and then we'll rock out with a regular stream afterwards.
All right, I'm back.
Okay, do you remember the question?
Yeah, I do.
First, it was, what do you do if you're listening to the phone and you hear him trying to intimidate witnesses or threatening violence, etc., and how do you operate?
So, to get to that point, you actually have to be on something called a Title III. And a Title III intercept is monitoring emails, phones, BBMs, etc., real-time, and you're getting the content.
So when they get a text message...
BBMs?
That's my Blackberry shit, huh?
Yeah, BBMs, exactly.
A lot of Mexican drug traffickers use Blackberry Messenger.
Still?
Yeah, they do.
Because it's one of the most secure phones.
Oh shit, okay.
BBM, alright.
Go ahead.
So yeah, a lot of the drug lords do it.
So a Title III is where you're actively monitoring and collecting information from a device and you're getting the content.
That's the most important thing.
You're not just monitoring it, you're getting the content.
So if I wiretap you, Ak, and someone sends you a text message, I see that text message as well when you get it.
If someone calls you, I hear that phone call and I can listen to that phone call as you get it, right?
So, that's a Title III. Now, how do you get a Title III? The Title III intercept is the most invasive law enforcement technique there is in the United States of America.
Okay?
And it requires a lot.
I'm going to kind of go through what's required and this is going to answer a lot of your questions.
Step one.
You're going to need, and I've never explained this before, so your audience is going to get some fucking crazy right now.
I'm going to go through how the feds do this shit because I've done it myself.
Step one.
You're gonna need to do a pen register, okay?
And a pen register is a trap and trace.
That device, what it does is it...
Oh shit, look at that picture.
What the fuck?
Yo, I think he's pouring champagne, but you never know.
It might be, you know what I mean, carbonated baby oil.
You know what I'm saying?
Fuck, man, this dude.
Anyway, so step one is you're going to get a pen register, a.k.a.
a trap and trace.
That is a court order, right?
So for that, you don't need much, like reasonable suspicion, right?
So let's say I'm investigating you, Ack, right?
Yeah.
For drug trafficking.
I know that you're committing the crimes.
I've been watching you on surveillance, etc.
and I know some of your conspirators.
I put a pen register on your phone.
Now I'm seeing who's contacting you at certain times, right?
So when I'm watching you on surveillance, I know that you like to meet up with Tom on Tuesdays to pick up drugs.
So not only am I watching you on surveillance, I'm also looking at your phone, who you're contacting, who you're texting, etc.
Again, it doesn't show me what you're doing.
It just shows me frequency.
So when you're doing this, you're contacting these numbers.
I subpoena those numbers and I identify another three individuals that are involved in drug trafficking because you're calling them when you pick up, you're calling them when you drop off, and you're calling them when you're driving home.
That's more than likely co-conspirators.
Then, I get an informant in.
The informant talks to you and makes what's called dirty phone calls to you, right?
And we need two dirty phone calls.
Now, what we've effectively done is...
Wait, wait, wait.
Hold on, hold on.
What would constitute a quote-unquote dirty phone call?
That is a phone call where the informant calls you and you guys are talking about criminal activity, whether it's drug trafficking, money laundering, etc., So, and the reason why I do that is because I'm making the phone dirty, so now I can start writing paper on it.
So, now I've established that your device is used to facilitate criminal activity.
Now, I got my pen register, I got my dirty calls, and I got my informant proving that the calls are dirty, right?
Because I have the monitor phone calls where you guys are talking about criminal activity.
Now I start writing up my Title III affidavit.
Right?
And that affidavit has to go from my supervisor all the way to the United States Attorney's Office, and it's gotta go through something called OEO, right?
And the Department of Justice.
Then it comes back and I gotta take it to a district judge.
This is a whole bunch of fucking work, right?
Then, after I get my Title III signed, I gotta go and get interpreters to listen to the phone lines, and it's gonna cost me about $50,000 to listen to one phone for 30 days.
Now, that's a lot of work.
And on top of that, the reason why I know that more than likely they didn't do a Title III in Diddy's case is because to listen to a phone, you need active criminal activity right then and there to be able to hear what they're talking about.
Now, let's go into a dream scenario and let's assume that they were listening to Diddy's phone, right?
Now that we know that it's highly improbable that he had the Title III, let's go into, let's say they did have the Title III and they caught him intimidating witnesses on the phone.
They'll be able to use that As a separate crime.
That he's calling individuals threatening him.
Now, if he actually makes a real threat where, you know, I'm going to kill you if you fucking talk, blah, blah, blah.
You have to go tell that individual, right?
Or let's say he tries to kill somebody with someone else on the phone.
You have to go talk to the person whose life is in danger and tell him, look.
We can't tell you how, but we know that your life's in danger.
You might want to leave town.
Right?
That's what they did with 6ix9ine.
When they brought 6ix9ine in, after the Jim Jones call, we're going to super violate them, they told 6ix9ine.
I was just about to say that.
As you're mentioning this, it's eerily...
Yo, Chad, I'll give you a real quick story.
Please save where you're at in your explanation.
I just want to give you a real quick story about the 6ix9ine thing.
So, 6ix9ine goes to, I think, like, Dubai.
Right?
And he didn't come back for a long time.
And I remember, like, people were, like, saying, like, he fired his team.
He was falling out with Shadi.
And I remember I talked to him, and he's like, yo, Ak, yo, bro.
Yo, shit has just changed.
And he said, yo, Ak, I'm gonna tell you something.
And shit is crazy.
I said, what do you mean?
What's going on?
Because I was also advocating.
I'm going to tell you why.
I was advocating for his driver.
His driver was a very nice guy.
His driver was always the person when I went to a party, six times, like, yo, so-and-so was coming to get you at the front.
Like, he always, the driver was almost like the runner.
So when the driver got fired, the driver called me.
And it was basically one of those calls to be like, yeah, I don't know, 6ix9ine, he's changed up on me.
I know you're friends with him.
And basically he was kind of asking me to talk to 6ix9ine to get him rehired.
And I was just like, yeah, I'm a good guy.
You've been pretty good to me.
I'll talk to 6ix9ine.
If he's tripping out, let me tell this nigga to calm down.
I'll call him and I'll say, bro, why you fire your fucking driver?
He said, yo.
He said, that guy's an informant.
And I remember, I think I got, like, probably pale.
Because everything I remember talking to the driver about...
By the way, the driver was an informant.
The driver was the one who had the car bugged.
The driver was indeed an informant.
The driver called me.
I remember talking to him.
Everything he was saying to me...
Hold on.
When he bugged the car, that was a Title III, bro.
That's what I'm trying to say.
I don't know how 6ix9ine found out, but he stopped working with him during the investigation.
I guarantee that call, the feds got that call somewhere where the driver calls me and is telling me a version of the story for me to go hit 6ix9ine up to bring him back into the fold.
6ix9ine tells me he's an informant.
I'm like, yo, bro, you're bugging the fuck.
Like, when 6ix9ine told me, I thought it was lying.
I'm like, yo, you're bugging out.
But at least, I'm like, that?
He's like, you know, that guy's an informant.
Wait, let me ask you a question real quick.
Because I want to make sure I'm accurate about this.
Was the car, did the car belong to him?
The car belonged to the driver.
Okay, never mind.
It wasn't a Title III then.
They just bugged up his car and that's called a consensual recording because since it was his car and he owns it and he's cooperating with the government, he could put cameras and audio in there without a Title III. It's a Title III if no party knows that they're being recorded.
That was just a consensually moderate one.
My bad.
It's clear and free.
But there was definitely Title III shit going on because there were multiple recordings that got played later in court.
Yeah.
They had the main guy's fucking phone tapped.
Oh, my God.
Jamel...
His name was Jamel...
Jamel Murdoch's phone was tapped.
Yes, Jamel Murdoch.
They had him.
I believe a bunch of 6ix9ine phones were probably tapped, too.
Because 6ix9ine was pretty hot at that time.
When I mean hot, like...
Yo, he's the type of nigga...
I mean, he wouldn't say it to me, but he's the type of nigga to get on the phone and be like...
Yo, what, what Trippie say online?
Man, shoot that nigga.
Like, he's that type of nigga.
Like, he was, he was, he would just say it.
You know what I mean?
He's not the coded guy.
Like, he's like, yo, yo, we'll boom at that nigga.
Like, you know, like, he's that type of nigga, right?
So, like, I could imagine they were probably, they were licking their chops listening to 6ix9ine on the phone.
Like, that nigga was just on the phone wilding.
You know what I mean?
So, definitely there was, there was, there was Tyler 3.
There was a guy that used to work for TMZ. I don't know if he does anymore.
He used to call me.
69 used to leak shit to him to TMZ. And he told me, and he said, yo, they got word from the TMZ sources that there was this investigation.
And I remember he said to me, I'm going to be honest with you, from what I've heard, Danny's definitely on some wiretaps, and I know you talked to him, and I talked to him.
Like, well, obviously we don't talk to him about crime, but it's like, yo, I guarantee we're on some wiretap somewhere.
And I was like, oh, shit.
I ain't gonna lie.
I've never been happier that I don't talk about crime or do crime.
You know what I mean?
But yeah, all right, go back to your story.
I was just saying, in that situation, they had an informant.
And I think the informant kind of validated everything that could lead to them getting a warrant.
Because that was a driver who 6ix9ine would have bring other people around.
Who would probably be in the car talking crazy to other niggas about crime.
And they'd probably be like, well, this informant is corroborating that this guy's making quote-unquote dirty calls.
Let's get this Title III shit going on.
They're doing this shit now.
This is in real time.
I know for a fact they had Mel Murda's phone tapped.
I know that for a fact.
And normally, the way Title III's go, just because I just explained to you guys how hard it is to get a Title III. Since it's so difficult to get one, you typically reserve it for like...
The top targets.
Obviously, in the beginning of an investigation, you have to work your way up, but your goal is to get to the top phone.
So I doubt that they were tapping Mel Murda's phone and had a Title III going on on Tekashi at the same time because I don't know if they...
I don't know.
I'd have to look at the discovery, but I don't think they had Tekashi's phone tapped because he incriminated himself so much and they had a debt to rights and he flipped.
But anyway, to go back to what you're saying, so now that we established...
Hold on, hold on, hold on.
I'm sorry.
Let me add one more thing.
Yeah, go ahead.
They had Shottie's phone tapped, too.
That makes sense, because he was high-ranking.
Yeah, according to 6ix9ine.
If they had Shottie's phone tapped, they don't need 6ix9ine's phone.
Well, I guess 6ix9ine was, like, he was probably the easiest person to get tapped.
Well, I don't know.
Who knows?
I never heard anything about 6ix9ine's phone tapped because he cooperated, so they didn't have to use those evidences.
If I was the case agent, if I had Shottie's phone, there's no point to write paper for Takashi's phone.
Supposedly, with Shadi, so when they bring in 6ix9ine on, who am I forgetting the dates now?
November 18th, 2018.
Yep.
I always remember arrest dates.
Yep.
They bring him in on that, like, two days before.
They say, hey, listen, we have gotten information that somebody's going to try to kill you.
Yep.
Do you want us to protect you?
He said, nah, I'm good.
He leaves.
And I told you, he was going to go to the casino.
He was going to Mohegan Sun.
That's why they stopped him.
Now, the only thing I'm unclear about, because when I talked to 6ix9ine, I think that's the...
They were looking at him as a potential target to flip.
According to what he told me, and we talked offline about this a lot.
Oh yeah, I told you he was the guy they wanted to flip the whole time because I don't know if you want me to explain it again, like where he was in the hierarchy, why he was so valuable, but I'll let you finish then if you want me to explain that I can.
Well, they played him audio of Shadi supposedly talking to his girl and basically almost like corroborating that.
I forget if it was his girl or to the other guys, but he somehow said like, yeah, I messed with his girl.
That was enough for 6ix9ine to be like, okay, if this goes down, I'm flipping.
You get what I'm saying?
So, like, that's a dirty game.
And by the way, obviously, that's not what wiretimes are for.
It's supposed to be criminal activity.
But throughout the mix of whatever they recorded legally or kept legally, they had enough to play for him and say, hey, listen, just to let you know, these are the guys who are your brothers.
6ix9ine says fuck that I'm telling.
That's a successful flip right there, right?
Absolutely, absolutely.
That's a dirty game too, though.
Hey, I'm listening to your phone call for criminal activity, but I hear that you've been fucking your other homie's girl.
Now I get to use that info to fuck with his mind that he flips on you.
Yeah, no, absolutely.
And, you know, and I can talk about that a little bit.
So when you're monitoring a phone, you have about 30 seconds to listen.
And if it's not pertinent criminal activity, you can't use it, right?
You can't use it, like, from a criminal standpoint.
But that doesn't mean that you can't use it to flip and inform it, though.
You might not be able to bring it in court on an admissibility situation, but you can absolutely use it to...
Create an informant, for sure.
So...
What he told me?
He said he heard wiretap that heavily influenced what he was going to do.
Heavily.
Like, he said he was in disbelief until they played other people's recordings of people he thought he was friends or was dealing with.
And he...
It made him now feel like, well, they're not my friends.
So now when the feds say, hey...
We have a situation where you could cooperate.
He says, all in.
Yeah, yeah, no, of course.
And they probably showed him all the evidence they had against him.
Like, it was, you know, it was just overwhelming, and he's going to decide.
But to finish what we're saying, so we talked about what it takes to get a wiretap.
Now we're talking about intimidating witnesses.
Yeah, they're going to absolutely, you know, use that against them for a charge.
Then if he goes, if they're able to, then the next thing is, if he threatens someone's life, then they're going to go tell that person.
That's how we ended up with the 6ix9ine story.
And then there was one more scenario that you asked me about, the wiretap, if they hear it.
Help me out, help me out, help me out.
Those three scenarios you gave, trying to remember what the last one was.
Help me out.
Yo, the chat better like this goddamn video, bro.
We're giving him so much sauce right now.
I don't think I've ever heard anyone explain how a wiretap works in the federal system.
I don't think I've ever heard anyone say that shit.
So these dudes need to subscribe to you and like the video and cheer some bids and everything else.
And by the way, no, no, you know, they're definitely important.
We have so many people who are just fascinated by the case, but also the process of this, right?
Because, you know, just a month ago, there were people just saying, Yo, there's nothing.
Like, why do we keep talking about this?
Nothing has came out of it.
And obviously, this was all happening in the background.
What you're doing is giving the context of what's happening.
Imagine if there was a Title III. Let's just suppose, right?
You just explained how laborious it would be to even get to the point of getting that.
How much money?
How much resources?
I think we spoke about, like, how much this investigation will cost.
And this is a historical case, too.
That's the big one.
Since it's a historical case, and they got to go back, and it's really dependent on witness testimony, They just probably wouldn't be able to get the probable cause required to get up on a phone line and listen to him actively, if that makes sense.
So, wow.
Yeah, so I forgot the question about wiretap.
But what I will say is...
It'll come back.
I want you to react to this.
So, Chad, check this out.
Obviously, you know, there's more sources, and I don't know if people feel a little bit more brave because he's incarcerated, but New York Post, and, you know, usually they're, I won't say all the way right or always right, but they do have a good high accuracy rate with them using sources, right?
Yeah.
They know people who are former law enforcement or sometimes they know people will just come forward to them rather than other outlets.
They ran a story to say inside Sean Diddy Combs Hampton sex parties featuring gay rappers who was high on ketamine.
And it says jailed hip-hop mogul Sean Diddy Combs alleged freak-off party stunned one drug dealer after he saw household celebrities having sex with each other.
The dealer said Diddy opened the door to his former Hamptons mansion.
By the way, Chad, we have to think about the Hamptons.
The Hamptons are the place of usually the rich and famous.
When you think about the now-white parties with Michael Rubin, Hamptons.
for whatever reasons the hamptons is like the place where rich famous celebrities go to unwind right and it doesn't mean always sexually but jay-z is out there you'll see jack dorsett you'll see them just walking down the street you'll see you know um leonardo leonardo dicaprio i don't don't know why but that's the place anyway uh diddy used to throw white parties i was I don't know if you guys know.
Diddy is the original provocateur of the white parties that now seemingly is taken over by Michael Rubin.
This is why I call him the White Diddy.
Now, this is supposedly a drug dealer who popped in.
They said this guy went to the former Hampton's Mansion.
Diddy opened the door.
He was wearing nothing but a robe.
And he brought him to a back bedroom to do a cocaine deal.
This is what the guy is saying.
He says, weird shit was starting to happen.
Celebrity guys fucking each other.
They were back bedrooms.
And it was like an inner sanctum.
By the way, I do want to pause and ask a question.
Because I've seen Wack made this point.
And I've seen Umar made this point.
What's the difference between...
Because some people are saying, yo, he's being charged for being a freak.
What's the difference between freaky and sex trafficking?
Because also, here's the thing too.
The thousand bottles of baby oil, people are torn on it.
It makes for great headlines.
But people are saying, wait, owning baby oil?
Why are you acting like this is a thousand kilos of Coke?
Yeah.
So, there's a couple of things why they're going after Diddy here.
The main thing is...
This is what the government's going to argue, that the sex wasn't consensual because of the witnesses' fear that they would deal with severe consequences had they not participated.
Which, obviously, I predict...
Diddy's team is going to fight and say this was all consensual.
They traveled across country to see this man.
He will fly them in.
They didn't have to come.
They didn't have to do these sexual acts.
They don't have to participate.
They didn't have to keep traveling with him for days or weeks on end.
That's more than likely what his defense is going to do.
They're going to argue that all of this was consensual and the beatings and the fear and all this other shit are bullshit.
That's what they're going to say.
But where the government is going to get him is that some of these girls...
I don't know how many victims they have here.
We're underage, which in that case is game over.
It doesn't matter if it was consensual.
So, you know, that's what people also pointed out.
And by the way, his lawyer has been using that.
His lawyer says there isn't any, you know, at least I guess he hasn't gotten discovery yet, but he says at least in the initial indictment, there isn't any indication that there's underage women.
And he actually took offense to Diddy's case being related to R. Kelly's case and of course Jeffrey Epstein's case, both in which there were underage victims who are unable to give consent, so automatically any sexual activity and transporting them from state to state just initially falls into sex trafficking.
If you're an agent investigating this case...
And you're starting to see, you're dealing with a celebrity, right?
So put your, you know, your agent hat on again.
What are you looking at to see if it fits under sex trafficking versus, hey, these were willing participants who are just freaky like Diddy.
Like, what are the things you're looking at?
This is a fucking great question, bro, because it's going to allow me to kind of...
And also, you have to manage that there are civil suits, so people, there's a financial incentive.
Go ahead.
Okay, so this is a fucking great-ass question, bro.
So here's the thing, when it comes to human trafficking, and I really want to explain this to the audience.
There's a difference between human trafficking and human smuggling, and the problem is that people constantly forget that they're two different crimes, right?
So, what ends up happening a lot of times is human trafficking gets conflated with human smuggling.
Human smuggling is the illegal...
Oh, yeah!
Oh, my bad.
Oh, you're good, okay.
No, no, go ahead, go ahead.
I'm going to play the video in the background.
No, you're good, you're good, you're good.
Human smuggling is the illegal migration of illegal aliens into the United States.
Right?
That are immigrants or illegal aliens and whatever.
Right?
That's human trafficking.
They typically pay a fee and they come in.
Human trafficking is the forced labor of an individual or moving them around for some type of benefit to the person where the other person doesn't get.
Right?
There's different elements of the crime.
Right?
Under duress, can't leave, etc.
All this other stuff.
That's the two main things.
Now, what happens a lot of time is people think that prostitution rings are human trafficking rings.
What the reality is, it's just prostitutes that work with a pimp.
And they got mad at their pimp and said, I'm being human trafficked.
Then when the, you know, feds actually show up and ask questions, they're like, no, I was just mad at him.
It wasn't really human trafficking.
He didn't pay me and I was pissed off.
It's not human trafficking, right?
Because they were doing it electively.
So I say all that to say...
That human trafficking isn't easy to prove.
It's actually a pretty hard charge to prove because you need to prove that it was against their will.
And I predict that his defense team is going to use the fact that it was consensual and they made overt attempts to engage in the said acts when they didn't have to.
Now, where they're going to...
Where the feds are going to come in, and this is why feds typically take human trafficking cases in the first place, is when underage girls are involved, because it makes it a lot easier for them to prove their case, because even if the girl was consensual to it, it doesn't matter.
The girl can't consent, so therefore, it's human trafficking automatically.
Okay.
So, you know what?
So, and I know some people are like, thank God I moved off the Drake and Kendrick stuff, but a lot of times when people think about trafficking, we think about like containers, like, yo, you're locked against you.
I heard someone say, bro, Y'all gotta come with better...
Like, if you're saying trafficking or sex trafficking, y'all can't just say, baby, well, where's the handcuffs?
Where are these physical things that show that people could have not left, walked out the door?
Hey, oh, y'all about to have five niggas and two girls all fucking goodbye?
In your experience...
Is that just a fallacy that sex trafficking or human trafficking, well, let's say sex trafficking, is like people locked in vans and traveled across?
Because I know Diddy's lawyers are going to make the point that, wait, how was Cassie trafficking?
Number one, she was flying around in private jets.
Who gets trafficked getting on a private jet?
Also, and I feel like I keep giving you multi-part questions for her to explain.
No worries.
But this is going to be another part of it.
Allegedly...
Diddy had Cassie book a lot of the escorts.
So maybe her credit card.
I don't know if you pay for escorts or credit card.
However, she was paying for them or soliciting those people.
Emails, hitting up an agency, calling.
She was doing it.
Wasn't Diddy saying, hey, give me three niggas with long dicks.
Pause.
Even though she said in her civil suit he would instruct her to.
That seems like hearsay.
Unless there's written in a text or something.
And also...
How do we know that she's not just throwing it on him?
Is that a valid defense?
No, and you best believe that I guarantee Cassie is probably a witness in this investigation.
And real quick, I just want to tell everybody that's watching me.
Guys, I'm going to get off Twitch.
I'm going to be on YouTube and Rumble.
So come on over to YouTube and Rumble, guys.
I'm going to get off my Twitch stream.
Fresh is going to go stream with Faze.
So that's what's going to be going on on the Twitch channel.
So I'm going to get off.
Okay, sorry about that.
He's over at TwitchCon, bro.
You should have went too.
But to answer your question with Cassie, okay, so I'm pretty confident that she's probably a government witness at this point.
However, I anticipate that one of Didi's defenses, I'm glad that we're having this conversation, he's probably going to have receipts and proof that she aided him in facilitating these sex parties.
They were together for so goddamn long, he probably has some dirt on her too, to show that she was involved as well with helping him set the shit up.
Because make no mistake about it, she was, you know, when he was sitting there watching her get plowed by other guys or whatever, it was consensual a lot of the times.
Was it every single time?
Maybe not.
But there was a lot of consensual fuckery going on too.
Okay, is it possible?
And now we're into the woods, but again, I want you now as an agent to think about it like that.
Well, if you're saying this is against her will, well, there were many other men that were either being paid or involved.
Diddy wasn't the only person having sex with her.
Why aren't they charged?
If everything is against this, because again, we keep seeing, at least right now for the indictment, we see this one victim, which is Cassie, If you're saying all the sexual conduct was against her will, why aren't the prostitutes charged?
Why aren't other people charged and just Diddy unless you're saying Diddy had everybody doing it against everybody's will and why aren't they listed as victims?
Yeah, and I anticipate that the defense is going to be getting witnesses that will support Diddy.
The defense is going to have people that can prove that it was all consensual.
And I think that's going to be what they do.
Their main defense is going to be that this was sexual.
They're going to pull out receipts showing that Diddy might have paid for them, but they traveled from across the country to come see him, etc., etc.
The other thing the defense is going to do, which I'm glad we're having this conversation, they're going to attack the credibility of all the witnesses in this case to show that they have maybe financial incentives to come after them.
They had professional incentives to come after them.
They had revenge incentives to come after them.
They're going to attack every single one of the government's witnesses with some type of nefarious purpose as to why they're cooperating with the government, to include Kelsey.
And, you know, I'm sure Diddy probably has some receipts and video that shows that some of this stuff was consensual, etc.
So it'll be interesting to see the defense that his team is going to put together.
Okay, would this be on the agent side or AUSA side?
So, I'm now starting to believe, as this is shaping up, the main victim clearly seems to be Cassie.
They haven't listed her by name, but they have listed actions with someone they call Victim 1.
It clearly, you know, describes Cassie directly, if you ask me, from the Kid Cudi thing that we've heard from before, from the, you know, the jealousy, some of the dates, and obviously the infamous video that was in 2016 where there was an assault caught on camera.
Let me ask you this question, right?
So, if she's the main victim of all of this, right?
And she's not seen as a perpetrator, isn't this almost like a hearsay type of situation, right?
Like, you know what I mean?
If he has some stuff that can say, yo, she kind of was with it, like...
Yeah.
And also, oh, and also, these other cases, right?
You know, and by the way, we're watching, like, there's a video of, like, a quote-unquote Diddy party where we see Fabulous and we see Trey Songz and, you know, Kevin Hart's, like, narrating.
These other people who are, like, ancillary to the situation and all of these other lawsuits, why not go get them?
Does it make the case look weaker if they're not involved?
And I think that's where Diddy's going to come in.
I think he's going to come in.
Diddy's job on this situation is what he's going to do is he's going to try to show that this was consensual.
He's going to show other people that were involved.
And he's going to identify other conspirators.
And I think that's going to be his defense strategy.
Attack the credibility of the witnesses.
Identify other individuals.
And...
Present evidence that shows that other individuals were also involved with facilitating this.
I think that's what his game plan is going to be.
You know, I've heard people mention Trey Song's name and not to throw him into the fire or anything like that, but obviously there wouldn't be no name as an entertainer that's bigger than Diddy.
And when people think about there's bigger fish, they're thinking about possibly executives.
Of course.
People have mentioned a few names like Clive Davis and, you know, other people.
Some of them who unfortunately have even passed away.
Who may have enabled or put him onto game to some of this behavior.
You know, Trey Songz has a bunch of, you know, civil cases, nothing criminal.
Do you think maybe...
They look at Diddy and be like, yo, if you could corroborate or help us get an investigation on this nigga going on, we might give you a little bit.
Yeah.
No, I think it's possible.
If he can give them other names of big individuals that would bring the United States Attorney's Office some positive press, I think they can do it.
They can give him a proffer, right?
Or a 5K letter, safety valve, whatever you want to call it.
They're all basically the same thing.
King for a day, queen for a day.
And he can provide some information with his lawyer there and not be prosecuted for it.
And if he provides substantial assistance, at least to an arrest or advancement of the investigation, they'll definitely give him some time off.
Okay.
How would you play it if...
Say you're the agent.
Would you have talked to Young Miami?
Yes.
She's made some tweets that have seemingly corroborated some of these freak-offs.
Yo, if I wanted, Diddy could have you, you know what I mean, sucking dick on your knees or whatever the case is, like eating my pussy.
She made a couple of those tweets.
Yep.
What would you do as an agent?
Would you threaten her with maybe charging her to get cooperation?
Or you would just, you know, maybe just pulling her in.
She knows what it is.
Bro, I'd be at her front door like fucking Domino's Pizza, bro.
I'd be there.
I'd go and talk to her.
Let her know, look, we got some questions.
We don't want you to get wrapped up in this.
We want to hear your side, blah, blah, blah.
Get her to talk.
And see what happens.
And the beauty here, going back to that Miranda discussion me and you had earlier, I don't really have to Mirandize her when I'm just doing like a knock and talk, right?
Unless I'm like overtly asking her questions and she doesn't feel free to leave.
Like I don't really have to Mirandize her in that situation, right?
So I would definitely be talking to her.
Another person I would talk to, I'll go talk to 50 Cent.
I'll go, like if I, there's people that I know that like don't like Diddy, even though that this might be biased, I'll go talk to them too.
Why?
If I'm trying to build a case, a lot of the times enemies have the best evidence.
Right?
But the thing is, when you deal with someone that's biased like that, right, let's say I go talk to 50 Cent and he tells me XYZ. I'm like, alright, cool.
Do you have proof of that?
Can you give me corroborating evidence of what you have?
Do you have footage of maybe one of these freak-offs?
Do you have text messages or video from someone else that you know that has been to these freak-offs?
Because anytime you deal with a witness, I mean, this goes for all witnesses, but especially biased ones, you want to always have...
Corroborating evidence that independently stands on its own that builds credibility for the witness.
So like, for example, I go to 50 Cent, right?
I know he hates Diddy and he has an X to grind.
Yo, can you tell me about Diddy?
Oh, I hate that motherfucker.
He, you know, grapes girls and he does this and, you know, he deals with young girls and all this other shit.
I'll be like, alright, cool.
That's great information, but do you have proof?
Yeah, let me show you this text message that I got here.
Let me show you this video, blah, blah, blah.
Bam.
Now everything that he told me...
He's a credible witness now because he gave me independent evidence that proves what he's saying is true and it's not just an axe to grind, if that makes sense.
How dirty could this get?
Because for example, what people have pointed out is this mad niggas quiet, right?
Yo, yo, listen.
I mean, I heard Fab on a recent song, but Fab ain't saying nothing.
Meek Mill right now, the only thing he's saying is he's just trying to, like, you know, churn up his sexuality.
He's like, I'm from the trenches.
Find a video of me doing gay stuff.
But he's not speaking on someone who, you know, think about these celebrities that attended the party.
If you're an agent, do you play this dirty game?
Even if maybe some people might know information but never really participate, do you almost pull up on them and say, hey, listen, We might be looking to charge you as well based on what we know.
Just feed them false information that it could be truthful.
And hey, your name might be in that indictment with Diddy as a defendant unless just tell me everything you know.
Tell me the worst things you've ever seen about him.
And that could probably aim us in the right direction or maybe if you have a video or incriminating video or whatever, that could really help us really do our thing.
Yeah, no, you can absolutely do that.
I think it's very important that I let your audience know this for their own protection too.
Guys, the police can lie to you, okay?
Law enforcement can absolutely lie to you.
So that's something that people need to understand, know, and kind of have in the back of their mind anytime they're talking with law enforcement.
So, you know, sometimes they're bluffing, hey, we can charge you with XYZ, and they can't actually do it.
And there's other times where they'll tell you, yeah, we can charge you XYZ, and they can do it.
So it's kind of on you to, you know, Understand when you can tell what you're involved in, what you're not involved in, what they're lying about, what they're not lying about.
But yeah, they can absolutely go to people like Young Miami or something like that, someone that was kind of close to the criminal activity and threatened to indict them as well if they don't cooperate.
Okay, we've heard about a few things.
I'm wondering why there aren't charges now.
I'm not saying they won't come later.
If Diddy supposedly held footages, and there's one report, and we're going to get to that, it's a New York Post article where there was a federal source who supposedly claimed they had some knowledge of the investigation, and they claimed that...
Yeah.
Yeah.
If you're filming sexual activity, even if it's consensual, but the...
And maybe that's the state thing.
I don't know how the federal government sees it.
It's like when you record someone's phone call, right?
In certain places, it's a one-party consent.
In certain places, it's two-party.
You need both people to consent to it.
But, again, I'm pretty sure filming someone sexually...
a little bit different because if it's within his residence what i've learned is that supposedly as long as you're not using it for blackmail or you're not putting it out that might not be illegal how do you treat that situation because we keep hearing about there might be video proof of the freak off but we're not seeing charges that essentially charges guy with filming supposed to non-consensual sexual activity yeah no that's a good question um And I think the reason why you're not seeing federal charges for that is because...
For child porn, if they're minors, right?
Because child porn is usually a really...
That's the one that...
You know what I mean?
Yeah, so if they're underage, that's a different game.
Now the feds can come in.
But if it's adults, consensual sex between two adults, it's going to pretty much go to the state.
You know, hell, even if it...
Yeah, it's going to more likely go to the state.
But...
That's probably why they're not charging.
And the other thing too is, you know, Diddy can make the claim that everyone that came into my house knows that I record everything.
A lot of these artists, a lot of these, you know, wealthy people, they make these women sign NDAs when they show up.
So in the NDA, it might say, hey, I have a right to record every single part of the house and you're going to be under surveillance.
So, you know, that's another way to kind of get around it.
But I think the reason why it's not being raised to a federal issue is because typically voyeurism or recording people During sexual acts, it's like a state thing, because some states are one party, some states are two party, etc.
It's not really a federal issue unless children are involved.
Yeah, Chad, this was one of the infamous Diddy parties from six years ago.
This might have been his 50th birthday, right?
What year is this?
This is 2018.
Yeah, this is 2018.
He's like 59, right?
Yeah, did he...
No, he's 54.
He was born in 1969.
So he's actually...
He's turning 55 this year.
That would have been like his 49th birthday.
Yeah, that would have been like his 49th or 50th birthday.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Wow.
Again, obviously...
And I think...
You know, a lot of people are misinformed about his freak-off shit.
He's...
Like...
These aren't the freak-offs.
This is just a regular over-the-top party that's sponsored by Ciroc.
Yeah.
The freak-off is like, you know...
Yo, it's like Baby All Central.
If niggas ain't like, you know, you ever slip down a bowling aisle?
If it ain't going like that, a thousand bottles?
Come on.
Yeah, bro.
Hey, by the way, on this, we don't know if, you know, again, this is New York Post.
I did want to point this one part out.
And we still haven't seen this in the indictment.
This is what the source said, right?
The source said that you...
And I'm reading it.
You see two people you wouldn't think of be hooking up.
Rappers.
That was what shocked me, the dealer told the post.
I won't say names, but they were rappers that I immediately lost respect for and could not take them serious ever again.
The people...
The drug peddler added that many people at the party, which included a mix of female rappers and hookers, were already high on ketamine and GHB. That's...
This is a very interesting point that I've heard many people repeat.
But how do you prove this 20 years later?
They're saying Diddy had these parties and he drugged drinks.
Now, if there's no toxicology reporter, there's no...
Like, is that hearsay?
Like, how can we prove that Diddy was spiking drinks?
Yeah, that's going to be a piece of evidence.
And that's a great thing that you pose, right?
And this is also where his defense can kind of come in and fight this.
A fact like that is going to be heavily reliant upon other witnesses corroborating it, right?
So what more than likely happened is the HSI special agents spoke to a bunch of different People that attend these parties.
And each of them, right?
Remember, you're interviewing each of them at different times.
So one day you interview witness one, another day you interview witness two, another day you interview witness four, five, three, whatever the fuck it is, right?
And if all of them say, yo, when I was there, this dude had GHB and cocaine, etc.
And they all corroborated independently, right?
Because again, they don't know that you spoke to the other individual.
They're just telling you what they saw.
Then that adds credence and credibility to each witness because they've all independently corroborated the same facts.
So that's how you kind of get around the whole was he in possession of drugs or not because you got a bunch of witnesses saying that the same exact drugs were there.
By the way, also, this article leads with the headline that says featuring gay rappers, but we're not hearing men.
I mean, there's some guys, obviously Lil Rod is saying he was sexually assaulted, but he never said he got penetrated.
We're not hearing men saying that they were...
You know, like, penetrated by Diddy.
And I'm not shooting a Nobel, but we just, like, we've always heard the rumors of gay shit with Diddy.
We're not seeing it, though.
Like, honestly, we're not seeing the men.
And it might be the men are just not making the allegations, right?
Or they're hiding and they don't want to go public yet because it's so embarrassing.
Mmm.
That's another option, too.
They might have testified at the grand jury, right?
But they're not, like, going public, like, you know, public to the general public.
But, you know, when Diddy's defense attorneys, which I'm sure by now they probably have a majority of the discovery, Diddy's team is going to look through and see...
Wait, do you think they've got it already?
Yeah.
They're supposed to have a pre-trial conference on 24th.
They probably have a significant amount of the discovery already guaranteed.
Because, like I said before...
When I'm going into the grand jury room to testify, my AUSA already has all the documents she needs or he needs for trial, pretty much.
A lot of AUSAs don't like to indict until they got like damn near 80% of the stuff they need for trial.
So they've probably already started the discovery process and DD's defense team probably already has a significant amount of it.
Hey, by the way, I'll read this other article, which, again, New York Post, they have these sources.
This one happens to be, it says, and let me read this.
I want to hear your reaction to it.
One of the Department of Homeland Security agents who helped to raid Diddy's Florida abode claimed the music mogul had rooms that were clearly dedicated to sex with all cameras around.
So if you were in the sex party, this is a direct quote, you are being recorded from every possible angle, including angles you wouldn't even have known about, the source said.
Referent to the sometimes day-long orgies he called freak-offs where drugged up victims were allegedly forced to have sex with male prostitutes.
It says, and this is the agent again, in my opinion, he's as bad as Jeffrey Epstein.
The source added about the late pedophile who hung himself behind bars.
It says, these women are young, either barely legal or barely illegal.
Internally, officers said that they see a lot of similarities between Combs and Epstein, the well-connected financier who served time for trafficking dozens of girls in New York and Florida.
Epstein was awaiting trial on additional charges, but he died in his jail cell in 2019.
Hmm.
Yeah, what fucked Epstein up was that all the girls were underage.
That's what fucked Epstein up.
What do you think would have happened if maybe they weren't?
Probably a very weak case.
Really?
Yeah, very weak case.
Yeah, because he was flying these chicks around to like...
Keep in mind, he had plenty of homes.
He had homes in...
He had West Palm Beach.
He had a huge place in New Mexico.
He had, obviously, his infamous house in New York City.
Like, he had the island, etc.
So he was flying these girls all around on his private jets and shit like that.
So if they were adults, bro, he would have been able to have a pretty strong defense that it was consensual.
But what fucked Epstein up is that he recruited young girls and kind of groomed them when they were young.
To, like, fuck his rich and powerful friends, and that's what got him jacked up, is dealing with the underage girls.
And that's what gives people, it gives the feds jurisdiction a lot of times, is the girls are underage and they're being transported interstate.
But I got, like, a minute, bro, and then I gotta get off his fresh ones to stream, and he's...
Complaining.
Absolutely, absolutely.
Chat, any questions for Myron?
By the way, definitely.
Anytime you hop on my stream when we're talking about shit like this, you always give so much valuable information.
Absolutely, bro.
I love it, man.
Like I said, if it wasn't for, you know...
Doing a podcast and shit like that, bro, I would have never left and resigned.
It was literally one of the best jobs ever.
It was fun.
And I'm very passionate about it.
I'm sure you guys can tell from the way I speak about it.
But the reason why I know all this shit is because I worked really hard when I was an agent, so I got to learn all this shit through experience.
Okay, one last question, still multi-parted.
This question I really have, I have it written down that I'll eventually ask Bradford Cohen, a very notorious defense attorney, but I do want to hear your take on it.
Sure.
So, you know, on a lawyer legal side of it, You know, you have civil complaints and then you have a criminal.
Clearly the criminal is going to be the most important thing.
It's the reason why he's locked up.
You know, a civil case can be drawn out for years or it could even be just waived because it's frivolous and just doesn't mean anything.
Here's the interesting part.
The last thing he's gotten is not a civil case.
It's a criminal case.
Which now, if we are in the belief that maybe this investigation was spurred off of a civil litigation, should Diddy almost try to drag the civil stuff out?
Or should he settle?
Or because here's the thing.
If new people are jumping into the civil market, they all want money.
But they're coming with additional investigation leads that the prosecutor could be like, oh, let's go talk to this person.
We just read this new civil filing or oh, shit, they know the person or they have this.
They have a video of this.
How how do you think what I'll ask from the agent perspective?
Would you be still, number one, are you done with the case after you hand it to the AUSA? And number two, are you looking at these new civil filings to get additional leads as you either try to go for additional indictments or bolster the case for the AUSA? That's a great question.
So this is a double-edged problem, right?
There's a double-edged sword.
So on one hand, these people are coming with civil cases, which means that they have ax to grind, they know Diddy personally, they can be a good witness, and they probably have some intimate knowledge that can help you on your criminal case.
However...
The fact that they're launching a civil case and trying to get money and recuperate from damages, etc., also hurts their credibility to a degree.
Because what the defense is going to say is, yo, well, these people, of course, are going to tell you what you want to hear and cooperate because they want to get money.
They have an axe to grind with this individual.
They want revenge, right?
Are they really victims?
These people went ahead and they consensually had sex with him and now they want to come back and jump on the fucking bandwagon and make some money because everyone else is suing this guy.
So, yes, you are getting individuals that are kind of coming forward and allows the feds to kind of go identify them and talk to them.
But them launching a civil suit does hurt their credibility a little bit.
So it's a double-edged sword in that regard, I would say.
Oh, wow.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Hey, just send me a text the next time, you know, because I'm going to be doing this for the rest of the day, but, like, you know, tomorrow or whatever, I'd love to coordinate that we at least get, like, an hour or two in.
By the way, if this ever goes to trial, I do have a really, I think, decent plan of how this could be covered.
I would definitely love you involved.
We can talk about it offline, though, clearly.
Absolutely, bro.
Absolutely.
We'll have to go there in person because they don't let you record in federal court, but I could definitely be there.
No, no, no.
Of course.
That was part of the plan.
Yeah.
All right.
Real IRL streaming.
Yeah, no.
Let's fucking do it, man.
But yeah, thank you for having me on, bro.
Guys, check me out on twitch.tv slash freshafit.
FedReacts on YouTube and on Rumble.
And Ak, thanks for having me on, bro.
And, you know, I'm always happy to do this.
I'll jump on it next time you do a Diddy stream.
No, of course.
I appreciate it, brother.
All right, bro.
Anytime.
Be safe.
All right, you too.
Later, guys.
All right.
you're right.
That was a great stream, guys.
I'm gonna get off.
Guys, we're gonna end it there.
Fresh has got a stream to do with Faze right now, so go check him out, guys.
Love you, ninjas.
I'll catch you guys back here.
I don't know if we're gonna do the Ian Carroll stream.
I'm fucking dead.
I haven't slept yet.
I'll probably do it maybe tomorrow for you guys, but let me figure this out, and I'll catch you guys on the next stream.
Love y'all.
▲
Export Selection