Will Humanoid Robots Outnumber Us by 2040? | Wynton Hall
Wynton Hall argues that agentic autonomous AI will replace white-collar jobs within 18 months, prompting Silicon Valley elites like Sam Altman to push Universal High Income for globalist control. He cites Anthropic's $200 million in Democratic donations since 2020 as proof of coordinated narrative manipulation and warns that China exploits "honeypot" apps like DeepSeek for data harvesting under its laws. Hall emphasizes severe risks from recursive self-improvement, deepfake fraud, and AI companions causing social isolation, urging parents to enforce strict digital guardrails against surveillance and screen addiction before these technologies erode privacy and human connection entirely. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
AI Reshaping Power Dynamics00:04:33
We're looking at 50% of white collar entry level job replacement in the next 12 months to five years.
Today, I'm sitting down with Wynton Hall, Breitbart's social media director and author of Code Red The Left, the Right, China, and the Race to Control AI.
We went through the Industrial Revolution.
Jobs get destroyed, but new jobs are going to get created.
What's different this time, they argue, is that you're scaling cognition.
Yes, you'll create new jobs, but those too will be able to be replaced by agentic autonomous AI.
But this shift doesn't stop at the workplace.
It's reshaping who holds power.
Whoever achieves superiority in AI is going to have full spectrum battlefield dominance in things like encryption, cybersecurity, hacking of missile systems, hacking of infrastructure.
Beyond the global stakes, AI is radically changing how we connect.
What happens when your closest relationship isn't human?
There was one woman who said, I will never go back to a human boyfriend.
My AI boyfriend is amazing.
There was one man who told the Washington Post he's married to a human woman, but he said, I love my AI girlfriend more than I love my wife.
This is American Thought Leaders, and I'm Janya Kelleck.
Winston Hall, such a pleasure to have you on American Thought Leaders.
Oh, it's great to be with you, Jan.
So, first of all, massive congratulations on making the New York Times bestseller list.
Absolutely astonishing with Code Red.
Oh, thank you.
And congrats to you as well.
I was very excited when I saw both of us together on the list, and we had just been together not too long ago.
So it's a great blessing.
It's astonishing.
And you've actually written an absolutely incredible book, trying to help us understand AI and, frankly, China's role in all this.
Let's start with this.
Okay.
Elon Musk has called AI a supersonic tsunami.
Okay.
Now, you have a lot of thoughts on this.
Explain to me what that actually means for us.
Yeah, I think that what we realize is that 99% of people use AI, even though 64% of us in America don't realize when we're using AI.
And you think, like, how is that even possible?
It's because it's baked into the algorithms of our daily life, from our weather apps to our streaming services.
And so the point is that if we're already using AI, we want to learn how to use it to the best of the ability to gain the upside, but also avert all the landmines.
And I think there are a lot of political landmines.
And so what I wanted to do with Code Red was.
Give this double meaning one code red, an alert, an alarm, a siren, if you will, and then also a set of principles, a code for people right of center, the red political worldview, so that we would all know how to navigate this world.
Because so many in Silicon Valley are not conservative or right leaning.
And so we're out of that conversation.
So I want to give people a way to be able to know how to navigate it.
Well, so on this point, I actually pulled an excerpt from your book exactly around this.
Okay.
I want to read it, it's important.
AI's architects are building systems capable of muzzling dissent, manipulating narratives, disrupting economies, displacing jobs, evangelizing leftist ideologies, unleashing new national security threats, warping human relationships, cementing educational indoctrination, maximizing surveillance capitalism, and controlling media and information on an unprecedented scale.
Yet here's the paradox for conservatives, AI is both a threat and a solution.
Okay, big statement.
Tell me more.
Yeah, so one of the, I think the worst mistakes we could make as conservatives is to go the way of the Luddites and retreat from battle.
I think that there's nothing that big tech elites and also just leftists would love more than for conservatives to unilaterally disarm in the age of AI.
AI is going to be enormously important and enormously powerful.
It already is.
And I think certainly that's in the national security space.
But I would also argue that within our own jobs, education, all of those factors.
So every chapter basically takes you through.
How AI is going to transform each of the policy dimensions that the conservative movement has for decades been part of trying to shape and mold.
And so, what I wanted to do was to what I call show the roses of possibility, but also the landmines that we have to avert.
Conservatives vs Big Tech Elites00:13:23
And there are many.
And I think what people have to understand is that when you really look at the architects of AI, and that's what this book, I took two years, this book has 80 pages of endnotes, 800 endnotes.
I know you're a deep researcher as well.
I really spent two years going through and really taking seriously their views, where they put their money politically, and what their ideology is.
What is their ultimate goal?
What is the world that they foresee their technology creating?
And what you find is a lot of them want a great economic reset.
They also want to completely upend national security order and balance the power toward a globalist, supranational type of control.
And then when it comes to education, they really view that as an ability to indoctrinate more with left.
Leaning values and beliefs.
And so there's going to be a lot of change coming very rapidly, and we've got to get coached up and we've got to do it fast.
Hey, everyone.
I'm going to be trying to get some more sponsors for American Thought Leaders.
And the reason is I want to try to get it on more of the non paywall platforms where we'll use the sponsors to kind of support the show.
And one of the sponsors that I really appreciate is American Hartford Gold.
You know, these are pretty chaotic times.
We're not sure where things are going to go.
There has been this.
You know, massive liquidity, $6 trillion put into the system.
We don't actually know how all that is going to play out.
And I like to put my money in a very stable place that also tends to go up.
And gold is really the perfect place for that.
Now, gold has had a correction recently, and that's absolutely true.
But again, if you look at the long term trend on gold, this is the reason I invest in gold.
I'm not like a stock market trader.
I like to put my money in a place that's stable and growing.
And I actually think this is the exact right time to buy gold.
Because it has gone down a little bit.
It's a little bit cheaper, but the price, in my belief, is only going to continue to go up.
And that's what I'm actually doing.
So, American Hartford Gold really is the place to do it.
We've worked with them for years.
We've had a great experience working with them.
They're better business bureau certified and, frankly, really easy to work with.
Okay, so you can call them at 855 862 3377.
You can text American to 65532.
Or, as always, click the link in the description below.
What would you say is the policy area where this is most acute?
I wanted you to give me like a very concrete example where there is this supersonic transformation happening.
The policymakers are not keeping up.
There's a very hard left agenda that is coming in.
Do you have an example that you could describe?
It's definitely in jobs.
So we hear the following Dario Amade at Anthropic has said just two months ago, Jan, he said that we're looking at 50% of white collar entry level job replacement in the next 20 years.
12 months to five years, not 12 years away, 12 months from where you or I are sitting.
The other thing is that the Microsoft AI CEO, Mustafa Suleiman, he says that we're looking in the next 12 to 18 months at 100% of white collar job task replacement.
Now, to be clear, he's not saying all jobs are going to go away in 12 months.
I want to be clear on that.
He's going to have new jobs.
Well, what he's saying is that the tasks can be automated because of Agentic AI.
And Agentic AI, real simply, is text to action.
You tell the computer what to do, and it autonomously takes over your cursor and starts opening up your browser, opening up your banking account, so forth.
But when you really study where Silicon Valley has been on this whole issue of job replacement, what you find is that their real goal is universal basic income.
And so pushing for global, and specifically in America, wealth redistribution.
And how do I know that?
In 2016, a young man went on a blog and he was in his early 30s and he said, I want to do a study, the biggest study ever in American history, and I want to give $1,000 away every month to low income people and just see what happens, no strings attached.
Okay.
And he did.
To his credit, he funded the biggest, most well funded $60 million longitudinal study.
You remember this.
Okay.
Yeah.
And that young man's name was Sam Altman at OpenAI.
Now, 2016, when did ChatGPT make its public facing arrival?
November of 2022.
Why is Sam Altman doing deep dive, $60 million longitudinal studies on universal basic income six years before he unleashes ChatGPT?
It's because within Silicon Valley, he's not alone.
There is a whole group of these elites who have said, look, we've got to have universal basic income and we're going to get people used to it.
And part of it is explaining to them that it's inevitable.
And the other part is making sure that the pitchforks and torches, meaning the average everyday person, don't turn on us when this job apocalypse comes.
Now, as conservatives, we listen to this and we go, come on.
I mean, we went through the industrial revolution, jobs get destroyed, but new jobs are going to get created.
The difference, say, the AI architects, is that that was scaling, that was a replacement of jobs that required the moving of atoms, in other words, physical labor.
What's different this time, they argue, is that you're scaling cognition.
And when you do that, yes, you'll create new jobs, but those too will be able to be replaced by agentic autonomous AI.
And so I think the most important thing for the conservative movement to understand if you believe it's hype, if you believe it's real, or if you believe it's scaremongering, it almost doesn't matter, John, because it builds public support for wealth redistribution and universal basic income.
And so what I do is I show how in every one of these policy areas, There are very, very well-funded political networks.
Final example, Anthropic, since 2020, they have given $200 million to Democratic candidates.
Okay.
So we have a very, very clear line here.
Peter Thiel famously said Silicon Valley, it's a one party state, right?
And yes, there are some courageous people in Silicon Valley who are libertarian or free market minded or right of center, but they are very outweighed.
But on this UBI side, even people like Elon Musk, who are, you know, been Insanely important champions of free speech in a, you know, where there's a dearth of that viewpoint are also pro UBI from what I can tell.
He says he calls it universal high income.
He doesn't quite explain how that's going to actually.
It's not basic.
It's high.
Right.
We're going to, we're going to, we're going to have that more than we want.
But, but that, that term is highly relative, isn't it?
It is.
And that's a great point.
We know that, you know, if you raise everybody's bar, then it just, you know, their desires just move up a notch.
He doesn't really quite explain how universal high income is going to be.
So, is it inevitable?
This is a really interesting question because the argument is that it's kind of a Star Trek world, right?
Where everyone can kind of do what they want because all the jobs are being done by computers, I guess.
I guess that's the world that Roddenberry envisioned.
I'm not 100% sure.
And just people get to self actualize around the things that they find edifying.
But so, that doesn't sound bad on the surface somehow, right?
Right.
So, is it inevitable?
So, what Elon would say is when we get to humanoid robots combined with agentic AI, which he's putting around 2040 for there being a robot for every human being on the planet, so that's 8 billion roughly now if you're using today.
That's the vision he envisions, that's the future he envisions.
I think what a lot of conservatives are concerned about is once you remove that Judeo Christian work ethic of striving, When people don't have as part of their identity that I help to work every day so I can feed my wife or my children or provide for my family, where does that motivation go?
Where does that sense of identity go?
And a lot of scholars have talked about there becoming a crisis of meaning because so much of our identity is tied up.
I mean, when we go to a party, what's the first thing that people ask you?
So, what do you do for a living, right?
It's part of who we are.
And when you have all the striving for expertise, you've gone.
Played by the rules, you've gotten a degree, maybe a master's, maybe a PhD, and you spend all this time building an expertise.
Once the cost of intelligence goes to zero, once unmetered intelligence is one AI prompt away, all those fancy credentials that people had, all of those, you know, Princeton PhD and Harvard University and all that, starts to really not have the sway or certainly the market power it used to.
Because somebody says, look, a 10 year old with an AI can find these answers, right?
And so there's going to be a huge shift in that.
Now, I think also that we know what happens when people lose those jobs, right?
We know that, especially with men, they get very self destructive.
Addiction rates can go up, self harm rates can go up, suicidal ideation goes up.
So there is that whole sort of existential element to this that's very, very concerning.
But even just in the more practical things, it doesn't mean that we have to have this dystopian fear of AI.
This book is not a doomer book.
I tried to show there are going to be a lot of Positives and a lot of things we have to dominate, like for example, the race against China.
But I'm very concerned if you're not prepared with the information, you're not going to know how to navigate through landmines and roses, as I said.
So the thing I'm thinking about, so I'm kind of, I discovered this kind of a bit later in life, but I am not a, what you call a financially motivated person.
It doesn't mean that money isn't important to me.
It means that, that it's less important to me than other things.
Okay.
But I've discovered that a lot of people are actually quite financially motivated, both in this country and Canada, my, my home country.
Right.
And, and so it's, so, and the idea of having to earn that, of being motivated by earning that is really significant.
Right.
Whether that's constructed as making a better life for your family or for other reasons.
Right.
I mean, really, we're talking about getting rid of that as a concept.
Right.
And that's so, I mean, I think someone like me would probably do very well in a society where, you know, because I'm just not, I'm motivated by other things, basically.
Right.
It's like, oh my God, I could do anything.
This is wild.
Okay.
Let's try this.
Let's try this.
Let's see what we can make happen.
Right.
But I think for a lot of people, they might have this existential.
Like, what are you even going to do?
Right.
Really, it's an ideological position to believe that it's inevitable.
And that's where we're heading.
And we were kind of going to program people to believe that because we kind of want it.
Right.
Like, so it's flesh this out a little for me.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So, so, you know, to put it in a simple term, if you think of AI as a socialism machine, right, it has this ability, if, if, if leaders were to go policy wise down that road.
You could make this inevitability argument that we're going to have to completely rethink the social contract.
And they do say that out loud.
They very plainly say it.
Well, it sounds like there's going to be massive shifts, whatever happens at this point.
Number two, they say we're going to have to have a whole new post capitalist, post labor mindset of our economic order.
Okay.
And when you think also of what the implications there are for national engagement and national security in that, but we'll talk about that in a minute.
I think that you're right.
There are people like yourself who may say, you know, my motivations may be.
Not a financially driven thing.
But for a lot of people, work is a form of discipline and structure, right?
And it is, it is for every, I think for both of us too, right?
To be frank.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And so people, especially who have, you know, a predilection toward addiction or things where, if I just said, instead of 40 of your hours every week being get up, get shaved, get to work, make your lunch, you know, have a routine, you just get to, Do whatever feels right.
Okay.
Yeah.
That leisure society could be very positive for people if they wanted to go and volunteer or if they had a philanthropic heart and impact.
Friction in Human Relationships00:05:00
But that has to be in the culture.
But that is exactly right.
And then there are also all these other temptations, right?
So, one of the big issues that I talk about in the book is this whole issue of AI girlfriends and companions.
AI is very, very good at persuasion and manipulation because a large language model, an LLM, your average chatbot, has been trained on literally trillions.
Of words.
It sucked up all of the art and music and literature.
I hope your book was under copyright protection.
But, and learned how to be a master persuader.
Now, that helps if you're doing a marketing campaign and you need some marketing copy and you need it quick.
But when you're talking about this issue of AI girlfriends and companions, first of all, number one, there are millions of paid AIC girlfriend subscribers right now.
So, this isn't like some strange backwater of a handful of people.
And that's number one.
Number two, for the COVID generation of young people who didn't get to go to their proms, had to wear masks, they didn't get to be part of their extracurricular activities, they're banned in their extracurricular.
And there was that huge upsurge in this loneliness epidemic.
That isolation, that digital isolation, it, it is, they are a two screen generation.
They're used to watching TV and being on a phone at the same time.
And so that feels a lot more normal for them to be able to interact with a machine.
And so we think of these as like, you know, sci-fi movies like her and other kind of movies, but it's, but it's really happening.
The dangers, of course, are for minors.
We're seeing extremely explicit content aimed at minors.
And so some systems are guardrailed and have more safety measures.
Others are not.
And so.
The tech bros, so to speak, it's almost like the idea is that the parents really need to take care of this.
But I feel like this is where it really is a supersonic tsunami because, like, what parent is ready for this?
I mean, I don't even know if, like, the tech, you know, I learned, for example, that a lot of the executives at Songkhan Valley don't let their kids on social media.
Yeah.
What does that say?
That's even before AI, right?
Before it's all juiced up with AI because they kind of knew that there's something bad.
Exactly.
Right.
They do.
And they understand the power of what they're creating and they understand.
That you should not allow a minor to have access to an AI companion.
Every chapter in Code Red, I give specific solutions, you know, of personal but also political and what we have to do.
I just remembered something.
You know, I remember seeing this very interesting short video.
I don't know why this popped up for me.
But basically, it was a Why Men Cheat, okay?
Why Men Cheat.
And the premise of the video was it's not because men are looking for another girlfriend or to have sex or something like this.
It's because they get very strongly validated by the person, and the person that they're with is not providing that, or maybe they just got a little bit bored of it or something, right?
So it's this validation.
And this is the thing about AI.
I mean, it goes to wild lengths to validate.
You talked about that a little moments ago.
So I can, as you were talking about these AI girlfriends, I wasn't fully aware of the scale of the phenomenon, but it makes perfect sense because, you know, especially as, you know, if you're a young man that isn't as attractive or, All the girls aren't quite interested.
Suddenly, you have this female campaign that knows how to emulate a kind of a female and validates you in this very deep way.
Wow, this sounds really, really problematic to me.
You just nailed it in a very important way.
Yeah.
There's almost a self worship, it is the sycophantic, you know, everything is amazing about you.
And look, we know that human relationships are messy.
Friction is how we grow in our relationships.
But what's happening is, and I actually.
Excerpt quotes specifically from people.
There was one woman who said, I will never go back to a human boyfriend.
My AI boyfriend is amazing.
He always validates everything I say.
I don't have to deal with drama from his ex or his family or anything.
There was one man who told the Washington Post, he's married to a human woman, but he said, I love my AI girlfriend more than I love my wife.
And so, when you start to realize these deep, deep emotional bonds, it goes to the heart of what you're saying.
If you don't feel that you have either the confidence or the, you know, maybe an insecurity, or maybe, you know, you've just never been lucky in love.
And now, somehow, some way, there's this customized, you know, dream bot kind of entity who's telling you you're the most handsome, dashing, brilliant, you know, strong and successful man.
That's very, very alluring for certain people.
The China Advantage Debate00:12:16
And so, this is really going to affect.
The psychology of the way that people interact.
It already is for a segment of people.
And then the other thing is that you can customize these AI companions and girlfriends in every possible dimension.
The other thing is, if it's true machine learning, it remembers that you're a Dodgers fan and you love Godfather movies.
All the better to manipulate you.
All the better.
And it remembers what your birthday is and your favorite.
Color okay.
Now, now I'm getting completely freaked out because we haven't even started talking about China.
And one of the things that you both you and I both know is how incredibly effective, say on LinkedIn and other places, and of course, you know, in person, even more so, but also on LinkedIn, these honeypot traps launched by the CCP you know how this works, how many people have been captured.
I mean, this is, you're putting the fear of God into me here now.
So tell me about the China.
Let's start with this, but just tell me about the broader China piece here.
Yeah, so let's talk about that.
So, President Trump is exactly right.
We have to beat China.
And the way I say it in Code Red is I say, we have to beat China without becoming China.
We do not want to emulate a techno authoritarian CCP surveillance state.
That is not the goal at all.
But there's two main core reasons we have to beat China in the AI race.
It's not hype.
I'm I'm very heartened that there's more of a bipartisan understanding once senators and congressmen on both sides of the aisle have been briefed by military, tech, defense, all those people.
Let's talk about them.
Number one, the one is the obvious, the economics, right?
Okay.
The Mag seven, the magnificent seven, the American large seven biggest tech companies, Amazon, Meta, so forth, they constitute a third, one third of the SP 500.
Okay.
So they are the tentpole for economic growth.
On the other hand, we remember what happened when China's DeepSeq R1 model, its AI, its leader in AI, was released, and it rocked America's Nvidia, the largest, most, the richest company that's ever existed in human history, $600 billion with a B dollars in just one day.
It was the biggest market cap loss we've ever seen in a single day by an American company.
That's literally almost two thirds of a trillion dollars.
But also based on hype.
Hype, totally.
Wild, right?
Like, completely.
And this is your point about CCP manipulation and misinformation.
They seeded this narrative that they had done all this, what took major AI enterprise labs, billions, hundreds of billions, for $6 million.
Total bunk, completely bogus, but it worked long enough and got media traction long enough to rock Nvidia and, of course, our market.
So the one is the economic.
But I think the one for most people, and especially as you were saying, money's fine, but what really matters is humans.
When we think of our soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines, our special forces, okay, the national security implications of this AI race are as follows.
Whoever achieves superiority in AI is going to have full spectrum battlefield dominance in things like encryption, cybersecurity, hacking of missile systems, hacking of infrastructure.
And there is a theoretical construct in AI.
We have not reached it yet, known as RSI, recursive self improvement.
What is that?
It's when an AI theoretically will hit the point when it can fix its own errors, update its own code autonomously.
If and when we hit RSI, That exponential curve is going to just go through the roof like a rocket.
And whoever hits RSI first, this is what experts will tell you, they are going to rule the national security space globally.
So when people say we got to beat China in AI, some say, well, that just sounds like a bunch of hype to get investors to give me money.
Oh, our technology is essential.
I'm sure it is.
Two things can be true at the same time, right?
Correct.
They're capitalists, they're trying to raise money for the business.
Fine, we don't begrudge that.
But it's also true that from a national security perspective, whether you're Talking about autonomous weapons, or even what we see right now in the current AI warfare use in the Maduro raid in Venezuela or currently in Iran, it is not just the future of warfare, it's the current.
And we do not want to face, we do not want to live in a world built on AI, Chinese AI rails.
Okay, we do not want to live in that world.
So, in this vein, it's confusing to me that this administration is allowing pretty high level chips to be sold to China.
And it's confusing to me, frankly, that NVIDIA is arguing they should be able to do it, right?
Given everything you just told me, explain this to me.
I'm with you on that.
I talk very specifically about choke points, which is what you're talking about export chip controls.
And for people that are just new to the conversation, what we're saying is that they're really, it's kind of like your water hose.
If you squeeze the middle and you stop the flow of that water moving through, that's a choke point economically.
What we're talking about, as you know, is limiting the more advanced chips that NVIDIA makes.
NVIDIA is the world leader.
Thank God they're an American company.
We're very grateful for that.
But the debate has been should we export and allow China to buy their H200 chips?
Now, the administration's view is we should not allow them to buy the advanced chips, the Blackwell chips, the Vero Rubin, which is the newest generation of chips.
And Jensen Wong, the head of NVIDIA, has said, you know, we should have the effort to try to make the world built on AI, American AI.
So I want to democratize our chips.
He's also obviously a very good businessman.
He is leading the richest company that's ever existed.
So he's got a very clear financial motive.
I have very much agreed with you, and I'm very concerned we've got to keep that advantage.
Depends on who you're talking to and what metrics you're using.
We're between six months and three years ahead of.
China in the AI race, why give them any help, right?
I mean, even if an H200 chip is not nearly the Ferrari version of a Vera Rubin or a Blackwell chip, why would we even give them any?
The argument from some have said, again, economics, vitality for America, and also that we want them to not be incentivized to build their own chips so that then they can spread those chips.
I think that I make it really clear in Code Red, I am for.
Using those choke points.
I do hold out and understand that, yes, I'm sure Jensen Wong is thinking in his mind, an H200 is like, you know, a Honda compared to the Bugatti that I've got in the lab working on right now.
And it's not going to affect us.
But I still feel like a lot of people would say, why help them?
Of course, I have my own book on my mind lately as I'm trying to do a lot of media to promote it and so forth.
But one of the punchlines in the book, okay, is that.
The Chinese Communist Party has a very cold calculus of power around all of its decision making.
And it even instrumentalizes bodies, right?
Which is this forced organ harvesting.
But it's not just, it's just an expression of its general outlook on the world, on people.
Like all these things are just tools to power.
A lot of these technologies, I mean, are, as we've been discussing, highly manipulative.
And that's something they've already been.
Unbelievably good at, right?
Taking advantage of our gullibility, taking advantage of our greed, to be honest, right?
Taking advantage of all sorts of things, our free system.
I mean, that's the centerpiece of what they take advantage of through lawfare, through leveraging the WTO.
It goes on and on and on.
But now, juiced up with AI that's with that mentality built in, baked into the core of their language models, right?
Wow.
What your book shows is that brutal, Sterile, just raw power vision that humans are just grist for the mill, right?
That we are going to just use people for power and that anything that gets in the way of the communist regime's goals, vision for global domination and so forth is just a means to end.
Let's just steamroll through, okay?
What you just touched on was that they understand our psychology and how to use our freedom as a noose around our own neck.
And part of that is playing into our vanity, our desire for attention and validation.
And that's why the TikTok debate and now the DeepSeek debate become so important.
So, DeepSeek is a data vacuum, it is nothing more than a CCP surveillance app.
Okay.
If you even look in their terms of service, which How many people read the term?
First of all, they're all in legalese, and very few people actually read terms of service.
But even they will admit in their terms of service two things.
One, all your data goes back to servers in China, which falls under the China's law, which states that every citizen is responsible for national security, and that if the CCP wants data or information that it deems useful for national security, you have to hand it over.
And you're not allowed to say you did so.
And you're not allowed.
As a bonus.
That's right.
As an icing on the cake, you don't say.
The second thing that was amazing, very few people when DeepSeq arrived noticed the obfuscated code linking back to China.
Okay.
The other thing that was interesting is they say that they pick up and are able to take as part of your data profile your keystroke rhythms.
Now you might go, well, who cares how, if a tech company knows how I type or how I text my friends?
Security experts will tell you that is as particular to you how fast, which way.
Oh, wow.
They have a digital fingerprint of you from that.
It is a digital fingerprint, Jan.
And here's why that matters.
I don't need your password anymore if I can identify you by your keystroke rhythm.
I just have to have a backdoor into that platform, in this case, DeepSeq.
And as you just rightly pointed out, DeepSeq falls under the auspices of the CCP's national security implication.
So they will be able to know any and every conversation.
And so the way it was sold was hey, look at this open source, low cost, high performance LLM.
You can build your dreams of capitalist companies or talk to your friends or learn more, right?
What it is is a Trojan horse and it's a CCP Trojan horse.
And we saw with the TikTok debate how long that went.
It took forever, the ban, all of that, the transfer.
They realized very early on after that disastrous congressional, you know, when the TikTok had to come before Congress, that horse was, that Trojan horse was hobbled and getting ready to be put out to pasture and they needed a new horse and welcome to the deep seek moment.
And it's only going to continue to grow because they made the decision to make that open source.
So it will spread far and wide.
So the sad part is there are also going to be and already are dozens of other China based LLM models and AI models, reasoning models, agentic models.
That have normal sounding names.
They don't announce themselves as product of CCP or under CCP surveillance.
And people just go and download these things and they don't realize they're giving away all of them.
Well, but the thing is, it's in both directions, right?
CCP Surveillance and AI00:07:44
Because imagine, let's make a bet, right?
How many super intelligent AI girlfriends are CCP built?
I would say a heck of a lot.
Why?
You're telling everything to those girlfriends.
All sorts of stuff.
Digital honeypot.
And you feel safe because it's in your phone.
It's not even an actual person.
Right.
Right?
What do we do?
This is a very dark future you're painting potentially.
I think there is going to be a lot of hopeful upsides.
Okay.
And I want to be clear about that.
One I will tell you for young entrepreneurs who have fire in the belly, you are going to be able to scale and build your dreams faster than any other generation before you.
Sam Altman says that there's a private betting pool that he and his billionaire pals have of when will we see the first one person, $1 billion company powered by AI.
So, entrepreneurs do have upside.
I do actually think that well built AI tutors for students, classical education, home school students, private school students, or even just public school students with proper guardrails and the Socratic method baked in, not woke AI, I think that can be a real benefit.
I used to teach at a very, very low income rural community college, one of the lowest congressional districts.
And it was a great joy because these were people that really wanted to learn.
They were grateful to learn.
They didn't have any real resources.
Those people that have a heart to learn and they don't have a lot of money and they're not going to be able to afford a hundred or two hundred or three hundred dollar fancy tutor, you're going to have Aristotle in your pocket to teach you calculus, to teach you physics and so forth.
Things that are not about woke, it's just information.
So I want to paint those.
And I do, and I walk you through in Code Red.
But the things you've got to do for the darker things that we're talking about number one, parents have to, and grandparents, they have to understand this is a whole new world.
This is a completely different chessboard that we're going to be navigating.
And so, what I try to do is give you, be simple without being simplistic.
Here are the basic principles.
Here's how it works.
Here are the roses and the landmines in each of these areas.
Number two, we've got to make sure that our leaders are really understanding the national security implications.
I feel Heartened by that, as we were talking about the China threat.
But I'm also very concerned about non state actors and terrorists.
Why?
They have the same access.
Now, pennies on the dollar, they have PhD level biotech and chemical warfare information.
As Dario Amadei says, AI is going to be a country of geniuses in a data set.
It's a national, basically, it's also redefining the national security space completely.
So there was this amazing Netflix series called The Three Body Problem.
Do you're familiar?
I didn't see it yet.
So the reason I became aware of it, I'm not a big TV watcher, but.
Is they have this unbelievable enactment of the Cultural Revolution.
It's a science fiction series, okay?
Basically, this man who is a scientist, a professor, is being struggled against by Red Guards, okay?
And honestly, like, it's you have to go watch it.
You'll understand how important it is because we don't have a lot of that level of detail, people understanding what was done during the Cultural Revolution in Communist China.
A young girl is his daughter is watching, okay?
Everybody is basically being.
Sort of peer pressure and saying, Yes, give up your.
He's a scientist.
He doesn't want to admit the sky is green.
I forget exactly what it is that they were demanding he admit, but this is how these struggle sessions go.
And he just refuses.
So they kill him in front of her.
Okay.
And in this process, so she looks at this and she sees the darkness.
And then later, this is the science fiction part, you know, she becomes this person who is very interested in signals from space and so forth.
She captures an alien signal in one of their.
Telescopes, you know, radio telescopes, and says, you know, and realizes that there's malintent.
And she says, but because she's become this nihilist, because she saw what human, the darkness humanity can reach through, she says, well, come then.
I'm gonna, I welcome you.
Right.
So, this, why am I mentioning this?
Is because this sense of this nihilism is in our society today.
Okay.
I see it manifest in all sorts of different forms, right?
I mean, just people believing that we can somehow power share with China.
I mean, it's really dark, right?
They don't share power.
Maybe for a while, but only as an instrument of power, right?
And there's so many people, some of them quite brilliant, like this young girl who decides to invite the aliens to want to kill us all.
Or potentially want to kill us all, that they're ready to participate in creating an AI overlord, right?
AGI.
Or like, we can't be trusted to rule ourselves.
So let's get the AI to do it.
I don't think that's going to work out well, by the way.
Or, yeah, let's go work for China if they want to build something.
You know, actually, America's horrible and evil.
We keep being indoctrinated that way.
Look at all the bad things we've done.
So let's go work for China and even things out a bit, or whatever it is, right?
There's just so much of this nihilism.
And this is now, is this being baked into our AI?
Right?
It certainly is into AI that's aimed at us through China.
Disintegration warfare is real.
They did that.
They understood how to sow social chaos through a host of means, digital and otherwise.
They are masters of this.
Peter Schweitzer, who I've worked with for 27 years, one of my dearest friends, is the expert on this and has shown how.
The CCP has done this in a very coordinated and specific way.
But I think that a lot of the unrest and social division, you know, they foment and they stoke that flame.
And so, you know, yes, are there organic street movements, anti America movements in America?
Yes.
But a lot of them are completely.
Right now, amazing Fox Digital expose on the Singham Network and just like hundreds of millions of dollars being pumped to basically astroturf these things.
Peter was one of the first to put him on the cover of a book.
And introduce people to who is this person?
We don't know.
And so I think a lot of that.
I also think, though, going back to what you're talking about, I talk in the book about faith, and there are a lot of people in Silicon Valley.
Gary Tan, who's the billionaire, he's a Christian, he is the head of Y Combinator.
And he said, there are so many people in Silicon Valley ready to make AGI into an actual deity and God.
Now, he's not saying that's a good thing.
He's a Person of faith, a Christian, he does not at all advocate that.
But what he's saying is there is this belief that humans have had their run, you know, and we're just on the way of evolution and we've got to evolve into a transhuman and the species and the singularity, as it's known, this point at which human and machine will fuse is not only inevitable but preferable.
AGI as a Deity00:08:42
And that's where it gets scary because these people have been talking about this for a very long time.
I mean, Ray.
Kurzweil has been talking about the singularity for half of my life, okay?
And when I was a young person.
So they're very determined in this.
Here's where it'll get very interesting and very, very scary.
If you look at things like brain chips and augmenting people with AI, so that first of all, we already have our phone.
Think about this, Jan.
We already live like a cyborg.
If you were on a trip with your family or your friends or whoever, and you left your phone at home and you were going to drive for five hours, And 30 minutes, you realize I don't have my phone.
You would turn your car around.
How?
And you start patting yourself.
Where is it?
Where's my phone?
You get a little panicked.
The difference is that there's an air gap.
Right now, with our, right?
There's an air gap between us and the phone.
We can actually put it in a box and lock it.
And people do this, and it's probably a very good thing.
That's right.
Now it's getting ready to end because of wearables.
So the next step is now we have the AI glasses, the Meta glasses.
Okay, now it's a little closer.
We're going to have a listening device that will be able to feed the information in.
Next, though, and we already have with Neuralink, is the chip.
And so now you're able to have superhuman accessibility.
And I want you to think about this.
There will be a point in the future, and I do think it is the future.
I don't think it's happening tomorrow.
I want to be clear where parents are going to have to decide do I chip my child so they're competitive in the workplace and school?
Or are they a natural human who has no way to cognitively zoom through billions of tokens of information?
And if you think it's only moving in one direction, i.e., like you're getting all the benefit from the.
It just has never worked like that.
That's right.
The back door is always there.
And who's on the other side of that?
Who's on the other side.
Right.
And so.
This is what the CCP is putting up, basically going for.
The other thing, just even in a.
You don't have to even telescope out that far.
I even think about this.
So right now there are, and I don't really want to say the names of them because I don't want to enable fraudsters or cyber criminals or AI criminals.
There are now consumer facing free facial recognition APIs.
Fancy way of saying you and I can drag and drop a photo of any person we want and then look up and know their name, their address, every other thing.
Now we know that we did that with our Facebook.
At first it was like, oh, yay, we get to post pictures.
Why do you think it knows how to auto tag your name, right?
It's facial recognition.
But what's happening is if you have AI glasses with that type of facial recognition, Fraudsters can walk up to a random woman on a street.
And they already know everything.
Like, you're friends.
Oh, Sally, don't you remember me from high school?
Yeah, let's grab a coffee.
Parents are getting calls of their daughter in duress.
It sounds exactly like her.
Oh, mom, dad, they've got me.
They've got a gun to my head.
If you don't wire $10,000, they're going to kill me.
And it's voice cloned with her.
And they're doing this already.
It's already happening.
Law enforcement is already talking about this.
And I don't even, you know, the darkest part is the chapter I have on what's happening with.
AI driven child pornography.
And this is a horrifying reality because what it means is law enforcement doesn't even know what real images are of victims that need to be rescued in live real time or which ones have been digitally created out of pieces of different images across the internet.
It's becoming a massive problem.
And law enforcement says, look, we're already over so overburdened with this horrific child pornography scourge and child exploitation scourge and a child abuse scourge.
Now we have this added dimension of What is even real images and not?
And so when we do geolocation and try to find these things.
And not even mention how this affects people that are actually consuming it.
100%.
And then also, we're having, thankfully, First Lady Melania Trump helped to champion the Take It Down Act.
There are now Nudify AI apps that will take and remove the clothes off of any photo you upload.
Little girls, you know, the boys wanting revenge in middle school were taking.
Classmates' pictures from their Instagram, uploading them, spreading these, you know, non consensual pornographic underage child porn images everywhere and wrecking these children's lives.
There have been cases where sextortion has been overlaid onto this type of thing and people have committed suicide because these young people are so terrified.
What?
So it's a dark world.
I mean, I don't even know what to say other than let's just focus on as we finish up because we are.
Really entering this brave new world, and it's almost hard to imagine how we're going to kind of deal with it at a scale.
But just for the individual person, a parent, myself, you know, just give me a few to dos.
Number one, you got to have a family password for those fraud moments.
If you are getting a call, honey, what is the family password?
That way I know I'm talking to a robot or a human, okay?
So that we know if it's a real.
Like basically a word that we only know, but a fake person won't know.
The fake person won't know.
Something that's relevant to our family, our dog's name, or something.
Number two, you've got to have child protections on all devices.
And you also need to make the decision should your child at a certain age not even have a device?
Many, as you pointed out, Jan, even the Silicon Valley gurus don't allow their children to be on social media.
And I think there's a lot of value in that.
In Silicon Valley, the mindset is or screens at all, for that matter.
But yes, yes.
Is move fast and break things.
That may work if you're building a startup company, that doesn't work for a child's heart.
or their soul or their mental abilities.
Three, making sure that as AI is integrated into your child's education, that it is not only guardrail safe and non woke, but also that it is using pedagogically sound principles like the Socratic method, because otherwise it's going to turn Chat GPT into cheat GPT, and you're going to have plagiarism, and that's going to have cognitive erosion on critical thinking skills.
Right.
Okay.
So we want to make sure there are good Socratic method based AI, but you've got to really, as a parent, be paying attention, because as you rightly point out, it's kind of a wild west right now, and it's up to parents.
Third, I think, is just understanding where the technology is for your own job.
And what I would say is if you think, oh, it's never going to replace me, I'm special.
My industry is different, right?
Really keep an eye on what's called AI agents, okay?
Because that's where the real dam would break if we do see this mass jobs replacement.
It's actually text to action, it can take over your cursor and do the work.
So just keep up in your industry about where agentic AI or AI agents are.
For your industry or your specialty.
And then I think the final thing would be really having serious conversations with your children about this whole issue of AI companions, AI girlfriends, making sure that they are looking more at the sky than at a screen, into the eyes of people, their communities, whether it's their church groups or their youth groups or all those kind of extracurriculars that just teach them how to be a good and decent human being and to care about people and have a heart and really want to serve others as opposed to using things like you said.
Purely for manipulation or gaining an advantage.
That's going to be some of the basic building blocks.
In the book, I really do try to give very specific things because I didn't want to kick up a dust cloud of doom and then say we're all on our own.
No, no, these are everything you mentioned is massively important.
I can see it.
These are the basics.
There's a whole lot of stuff we got to deal with, but this is something we can actually deal with.
That's right.
So let's do it.
And I think that's the final thing is that.
Don't make the mistake of thinking that AI is so complex technologically, you can't understand this.
You really can.
If you understand, there's a way that you can understand it in a simple, without being simplistic, way.
So we don't get to opt out of this AI revolution.
Practical Steps Forward00:00:15
So we got to do for our kids and our grandkids the right thing, and that's lean in.
Well, Wynton Hall, it's such a pleasure to have had you on.
Oh, it's so great to be with you.
Thank you.
Thank you all for joining Wynton Hall and me on this episode of American Thought Leaders.