Epoch Times - Four Ways to Reduce Cancer Risk: Dr. Paul Marik
Aired: 2025-05-09
Duration: 02:30


=== Route Four Protocols (02:13) ===

[00:00:00]  I'm working with Dr. Justice Hope, that's his pen name, he's written a book on cancer, to figure out the best prophylactic protocols to prevent cancer, both in people of low risk, moderate and high risk.
[00:00:15]  The higher the risk reduction, the more nutraceuticals and drugs you need to take.
[00:00:21]  Which would also depend upon your risk.
[00:00:24]  So if you're particularly low risk, maybe you'll take three or four.
[00:00:28]  We call it the route three, route four, route five.
[00:00:31]  But if you have a...
[00:00:34]  BRCAG and you take the Root9, which has more extensive medications and nutraceuticals.
[00:00:41]  So we're busy working on this.
[00:00:42]  It should be available on our website soon.
[00:00:45]  The most effective nutraceuticals, the first most effective is green tea.
[00:00:50]  EGCG is very effective in preventing cancer.
[00:00:55]  Primarily because of its effect on cancer cells, but also the tumor microenvironment.
[00:01:01]  So it's very effective.
[00:01:03]  And then we have curcumin, which acts on multiple biological pathways.
[00:01:08]  We then have vitamin D, which as we spoke this morning, is a very strong association between vitamin D deficiency and cancer.
[00:01:19]  And then number four is omega-3 fatty acids.
[00:01:23]  Which was in that original study.
[00:01:25]  So our basic protocol, we call it Route 4, are these four drugs.
[00:01:30]  They're reasonably cheap, they're safe, there are no side effects, and so that I think people over the age of 60, even if you're healthy, should consider taking these drugs, because it will significantly reduce your risk of developing cancer.
[00:01:46]  Obviously, it won't completely eliminate it.
[00:01:50]  But think how cost-effective this is because we know the cost of treating a patient with cancer with conventional chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors runs into the millions of dollars, let alone the lost time of work-related activities and lack of productivity.

=== Cost-Effective Approach to Public Health (00:15) ===

[00:02:14]  So it's a highly cost-effective approach.
[00:02:18]  And you would imagine that it would be an approach that public health would be interested in because it's public health.
[00:02:26]  We should be preventing diabetes, obesity and cancer.