Joel Salatin: The Hidden War on Small-Scale Food Producers
|
Time
Text
There's been an incremental move by government regulatory agents to criminalize and prohibit direct neighbor-to-neighbor food commerce.
All right?
So let me give you an example.
So we have a lady in our church.
We all call her Aunt Grace.
We love this lady.
She's got a big garden, some chickens, and she loves cooking.
And so at every church potluck, she brings a chicken pot pie.
It's the first thing gone at every buffet.
And we all love her to death.
So we want to go to Aunt Grace to say, would you cook a couple of these pot pies that we love so dearly?
We'll pay you 20 bucks or whatever you say.
A piece?
No. That's illegal.
It's illegal for her.
To make a pot pie for us.
To feed our guests.
Now, that's wrong.
We should be able to engage in a freedom of choice as consenting adults transaction with Aunt Grace without a government agent in between that.
I'm not suggesting that she should be free to, you know, whatever.
You know, sell them to Sri Lanka or put them in Walmart or Costco, okay?
But I am suggesting that neighbor to neighbor, friend to friend, we should be able to engage in a consensual, and I'm using powerful words because it's important to understand in our country right now,
we love freedom of choice.
We have choice in the bathroom, choice in the bedroom, choice in the womb, but no choice in the kitchen.
And people say, well, I go to Walmart, look at all the choice I have.
Yeah, but that's a very narrow funnel.
All that food comes through an industrial funnel with a bureaucrat oversight that doesn't allow for the kind of localized, customized, non-MSG ingredients.
Right now, for example, we shoot several deer every year, deer season.
We can take these deer up.
There's an Amish Mennonite outfit near us, and we can take that deer up, add a little bit of pork to it, and they can make, it is the best summer sausage.
I mean, I could live on this.
I could just live on this the rest of my life.
Best summer sausage in the world, but they can't do one pound of beef because it's illegal.
They can do a million pounds of venison because that's not in commerce.
But because beef is a commercial product, they can't do beef.
So what we have right now, we have many people that are wanting clean food, safe food, stable, secure food from their neighbors and can't get it.
Because of prohibitive regulatory infrastructure and paperwork requirements, we have farmers desperate to be able to get a retail dollar to stay in business.
They can't sell it.
And we have a rural-urban divide that desperately needs the connectivity.
of direct food commerce to occur.
And so the idea of a food emancipation proclamation to be able to unfetter, unshackle, and de-enslave our food system to this federal, bureaucratic,
regulatory intervention so that you and I can engage in a transaction voluntarily.
To choose our fuel for our microbiome so we can choose our fuel to go shoot, pray, and preach.
I mean, those are guaranteed to us in the Bill of Rights, but what good is it to have the freedom to go shoot, pray, preach, and assemble if I can't choose my body's fuel to give me the energy to go do these things?
And so food, the ability to transact a food interaction, Without a bureaucrat involved is, I think,
it's foundational to solving multiple threads.
The rural economy, entrepreneurial agriculture, food choice, food stability, all those things happen when we de-enslave.
See, in 1906 when Upton Sinclair wrote The Jungle, Seven companies controlled 50% of America's meat supply.
Today, four companies control 85%.
That's how much centralization and concentration there is in the food industry, which we saw manifested in 2020 when store shelves went empty.
I mean, just think about it.
If we had had 300,000 Neighborhood, community, processing facilities, you know, abattoirs functioning instead of 3,000 mega facilities.
Would we have had as big a hiccup in 2020?
Of course not.
Another element of this in our country, hazardous substances are controlled on all levels.
The buyer, the seller, and the user.
In other words, I can't...
I can't use fentanyl.
I can't use methamphetamine.
Prescription drugs, I can't buy them.
I can't sell them.
I can't use them without a prescription.
So you have this pretty broad umbrella over these hazardous things.
But in food, it's only on the seller.
I can give you raw milk.
I can give you homemade charcuterie, bologna, and my chicken pot pie.
She could give these to me.
And I can feed them to my children.
In fact, I can even buy them if she's willing to be a criminal and sell them.
So there's no prohibition on buying it.
There's no prohibition on using it.
And no prohibition on feeding it to my children.
The only prohibition is on selling it.
So if it's really that hazardous, if raw milk is really that hazardous, if Aunt Grace's pot pie is really that hazardous, she shouldn't be able to give it away, I shouldn't be able to eat it, and I certainly shouldn't be able to feed it to my children.
This shows the great hypocrisy, the inconsistency of these food police that they're only taking The prohibitory side against the seller and not any other user.