Right now, we are on the cusp of either finally getting our hands on the Epstein client list, or we're on the cusp of getting another major disappointment.
Let me give you the absolute latest in terms of the Epstein files, from Pam Bondi to Kash Patel to even President Trump himself just earlier this week coming out during an interview and confirming...
Before we do, though, I do hope you take a quick moment to smash those like and subscribe buttons so that this video can reach ever more people via the YouTube algorithm.
However, getting back to the Epstein files, after roughly two years of absolutely no movement in this never-ending Epstein saga, well, it appears that right now, for the first time perhaps ever, there is a real possibility of Epstein's client list getting made public.
To that end.
This woman right here is Ms. Pam Bondi.
Formerly, she was the Attorney General of Florida, and more notably, she was tabbed by President Trump to be the Attorney General of the United States.
Her Senate confirmation wound up proving successful, and shortly after she took office, Ms. Pam Bondi gave an interview over on the Jesse Waters program on Fox News, wherein she...
dropped what she referred to as a bombshell.
The fact that she had on her desk the Epstein files that she was about to make public the following day.
I think tomorrow, Jesse, breaking news right now, you're going to see some Epstein information being released by my office.
What kind?
Are we going to see who was on the flights?
Are we going to see any evidence from what he recorded because he had all of his homes wired with recording devices?
Hopefully tomorrow is a lot of flight logs, a lot of names, a lot of information.
But it's pretty sick what that man did.
Okay.
Now, obviously, that was huge.
As the Attorney General of the United States, Pam Bondi sits as the director of the entirety of the Department of Justice.
And so when you have someone like that say that she has the Epstein file sitting right there on her desk waiting to be released.
That's huge news.
Most people who are following the story closely were rapt with anticipation, including myself.
The next day, Pam Bondi was true to her word.
An event was held over in Washington, D.C., wherein you had a group of journalists, social media personalities, and conservative podcasters.
They were invited, and they were given these thick binders, which Pam Bondi claimed contained the Epstein files.
Sounds great, except for the fact that the redactions in those documents were extensive, with some pages being almost entirely redacted.
And then also...
There was nothing new contained in those binders.
All the documents that were handed out in that press briefing, these so-called Epstein files, turned out to just be the same documents that we've all known about for the past eight or nine years now.
And it notably did not contain anything new regarding who was buying those children from Epstein.
And so, this is where the whole story wound up taking an odd twist.
According to Ms. Pam Bondi, the documents that she released in those binders were indeed all that she had access to.
And therefore, she just assumed that those documents were all that there was.
However, according to her, just 24 hours before the release, Ms. Pambandi claimed to have been contacted by a whistleblower who told her that the FBI field office in the Southern District of New York was hiding thousands of documents from the Trump administration.
Here is Ms. Pambandi herself explaining the general situation in an interview over on Fox News.
I gave them the deadline.
Friday at 8, a truckload of evidence arrived.
It's now in the possession of the FBI.
Cash is going to get me and himself, really, a detailed report as to why all these documents and evidence had been withheld.
And, you know, we're going to go through it, go through it as fast as we can, but go through it very cautiously to protect all the victims of Epstein.
And so, just to recap here, according to Ms. Pan Bondi...
A truckload of files containing additional Epstein documents were delivered to her from the Southern District of New York.
And Kash Patel's team over at the FBI is now combing through them.
Now you might ask why exactly they need to go through them rather than just release them to the public and have the public go through them.
Well, this is where the story you can say gets a little funny.
The DOJ claims that they need to go through the documents and redact sensitive information in those files.
What's exactly considered sensitive, though?
Well, prior to becoming the Attorney General, Pam Bondi gave an interview wherein she said that the victims' names need to be redacted in order to protect their identities.
However, after she became Attorney General, she appears to have added national security concerns to the list of redactions that need to be made as well.
Take a listen.
What are the things, and maybe some people don't understand the need to redact.
In the case of a victim, that should be pretty obvious to people.
What are the other things that maybe you'd have to redact?
National security?
Oh, of course.
National security, some grand jury information, which is always going to be confidential, but we'll see.
Let's look through them as fast as we can, get it out to the American people, because the American people have a right to know, not only on that, but on Kennedy, on Martin Luther King.
Now, there are two very important things to mention here.
Firstly, Jeffrey Epstein was not a politician, and neither was Ghislaine Maxwell a politician.
And so, why exactly would things related to national security need to be redacted in regards to their case?
I mean, of course, Epstein's friends were the elites among the elites.
But Epstein himself was ostensibly at least just a private citizen acting on his own, and he was not a part of any government.
Meaning that his case, at least on the surface level, is just a criminal matter.
So why exactly would things related to national security be involved?
Just kind of a weird thing to consider in a case like this.
Unless, as many people suspect, there were indeed government agencies pulling the strings behind the scenes in Jeffrey Epstein's affairs.
Leave your thoughts in the comments regarding which specific government agencies you think were potentially...
All right, just to pause here for a super quick moment.
Listen, it's obvious that the financial system is not looking too great.
After being pumped up with trillions of virtually free government dollars for many, many years now, well, the stock bubble might actually burst in the near future.
And in that process, unfortunately, it could take away the nest egg of anyone who happens to be exposed to it.
And so, consider taking this opportunity to diversify into something which is beyond the grasp of Washington, D.C. and Wall Street, physical gold and silver.
And the best company to use, in my opinion, is the sponsor of today's episode, American Hartford Gold, who, I should mention, is also my own personal gold and silver bullion dealer.
And besides myself, they have thousands of five-star reviews from other Americans, and they also have an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau.
And working with them is rather simple.
They have a huge selection of coins, bars, and rounds to choose from.
They have super friendly staff who you can call, and they can set up either gold delivery directly to your doorstep, or they can even set you up in a gold IRA.
And then lastly, best of all, if you tell them that Roman sent you, they will throw in a free gold coin with your first qualifying purchase.
So give them a call.
The number is 866-242-2352.
That's 866-242-2352.
Or you can simply text Roman to 65532.
I'll also throw a link to their website.
Regardless of that, though, getting back to this Epstein saga, shortly after the whistleblower reached out to Ms. Pambandi, two things happened.
Firstly, as she mentioned in that interview, this alleged truckload of documents was handed over to the DOJ, and now it's in the hands of Kash Patel.
And then secondly, the man who was in charge of the FBI's New York field office, he was unceremoniously fired.
Specifically, Four days after the whistleblower came out, Mr. James Danahy, who was the FBI's top official in New York, he was quote-unquote forced to resign, saying only that he was not given any explanation from Washington as to why.
And interestingly enough, while the timing of his resignation might suggest that it was directly related to this Epstein case and the alleged hiding of documents, well, the media actually ran with a different narrative, saying that he was forced to resign after defending the FBI agents who investigated January the 6th.
Here's, for instance, an article that was published over on NBC News titled, Top FBI Official Forced Out After Questioning Trump Pursuit of Agents Who Investigated January 6th.
And here's what the article says, quote, The head of the FBI's New York field office was forced out on Monday, a month after he urged his employees to dig in after the Trump administration removed senior FBI leaders and requested the names of all agents who worked on January
6th cases last month.
Dennehy wrote an email to his staff after the Trump Justice Department demanded a list of all bureau employees who had worked on criminal cases against Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
It is widely believed inside the FBI that the resistance by Dennehy prevented a mass firing of thousands of FBI officials who worked on the January 6th cases.
Dennehy's removal is likely to reignite fears of mass retaliation.
And so, there was that as well.
Perhaps Mr. Dennehy would have been forced to resign anyway, but sort of as it played out, he was forced to resign shortly after the Epstein docs were found to have been hidden in that office.
That's not to say that he was actively hiding them, only that the timing of his dismissal makes it seem like there might have been a connection between these two events, although frankly, we'll likely never know.
And so just to recap thus far, the new Attorney General of the U.S. has claimed to have now taken possession of all the Epstein docs.
That were hidden in the New York field office.
The head of that field office was unceremoniously dismissed, and now Kash Patel and his team over at the FBI are sifting through the documents before hopefully releasing them to the public.
And to that end, just this past Friday, Ms. Pambandi gave another interview, this time over on Fox Business, wherein she said the following.
First, to the Epstein.
I'm mad that I didn't have more information on Epstein.
I was given 200 pages of documents.
I've asked Director Patel.
He came in after that, of course.
I had asked for those documents prior to Cash coming in.
Cash is going to get me all the information.
I have asked him to find out why I didn't receive all those documents, and he didn't receive all those documents.
We've now found out, of course, that they were in New York.
We've received truckload of documents of evidence, and Cash is going to give me a deadline on when he can go through that to protect, of course, the victims of sex trafficking who are wrapped into this.
And he's going to give me a deadline on when he can get this, and we will get out as much as we can, as fast as we can, to the American people, because they deserve to know.
Now, notably, though, she did not offer any kind of a concrete timeline on the disclosures in that interview.
President Trump, on the other hand, He did offer something akin to a time frame.
In an interview with Sheryl Atkinson just a few days ago, Trump said the following.
That's one of the most often questions I've been asked the last couple of days to release these records on Epstein, MLK, and JFK.
Well, Pam Bond has done a phenomenal job in every respect.
And there could have been some holdback.
I haven't heard too much about it, but they could.
But the bottom line is the records are getting out.
The Kennedy records are getting out.
Those are the ones I really wanted to see the most were the Kennedys.
And it's going to be released.
It's moving along, and it's moving along pretty rapidly.
It doesn't go that rapidly.
Weeks, maybe, or longer?
I say weeks.
Yeah, I say weeks.
Regardless, though, that is where we're currently at.
Trump's DOJ, they claim to have taken possession of all the documents and they now have them in hand.
The new FBI director is sifting through them literally as we speak.
And President Trump, he assured the entire nation that we can expect to have them be released to the public sometime soon.
However, having said that, I would love to ask you, do you think that after all these years, we are really going to finally find out who was buying these children from Epstein?
Or do you think that this is going to be just another wild goose chase that bears absolutely no fruit?
Please leave your thoughts in the comments section below because I myself, I've honestly always thought that it was the most ridiculous thing possibly ever in the world that Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced to 20 years in prison.
Pam Bondi claims that she was sentenced because there were over 250 victims.
And yet, not a single person who abused these kids has been brought to justice.
I mean, really, just take a moment to think about that.
There's a woman sitting in prison right now for trafficking well over 200 kids, but all the clients she allegedly trafficked the kids to remain hidden.
I mean, it absolutely defies logic.
If there are no buyers, then Ghislaine Maxwell should be released from prison because she did not do anything wrong.
But if there were buyers, If you'd like to go through any of the details of the updates that we discussed in today's episode,
I will throw all my research notes down into the description box below for you to peruse at your own leisure.
And I really do hope that you leave Some comments in the comment section below because I'd love to know what you think.
Because I myself, I've got a lot of thoughts on this issue.
None of them are great.
And they can be summed up in one word, which is frustration.
Anyway, that's me.
All the links will be down in the description box below.
And then, until next time, I'm your host, Roman from the Epoch Times.