All Episodes
Previous Next
April 29, 2022 - Epoch Times
24:47
450GB Of 'Deleted' Hunter Biden Laptop Material To Be Released, Whistleblower Flees to Switzerland
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good evening, and before we dive into Hunter's laptop, I wanted to quickly mention that Mr.
Peter Schweizer, who is a world-class expert on the topic of elite capture, or in other words, how the Chinese Communist Party has been both infiltrating as well as capturing the elites here in America.
He is also the author of this new book called Right-Handed.
And the other day, I had a chance to sit down with him and we had a phenomenal discussion regarding, among many other things, how Hunter Biden's business dealings with Chinese Communist Party-linked firms And many of them actually being linked to the state security apparatus have potentially enriched not only Hunter Biden, but also his father.
It's a phenomenal interview.
And if you'd like to check it out, you can do so over on Epic TV. I'll throw a link to it.
It'll be right there at the very top of the description box.
And now let's get into the main topic of our discussion.
Which starts right here with a photo of Hunter Biden.
But it's not just any photo.
This is one of the hundreds of photos that have been found on the laptop that he accidentally dropped off at a computer repair shop in Delaware and never picked up.
And because of that fateful accident, well, besides photos like these, we now have a lot more details about Hunter Biden's business dealings that he engaged in during the tenure of his father's government career, including many dealings that he had with Chinese Communist Party-linked businesses.
However, there are many forces in this country that appear to be working collectively to suppress our access to the contents of his laptop.
Now, of course, to start with, everyone already knows what Twitter and Facebook did during the 2020 election cycle.
How they quite literally suppressed the laptop story and suspended news organizations that dared to report on it.
In fact, just two days ago, Mr.
Elon Musk, who is of course the new owner of Twitter, he weighed in on that discussion and he wrote this, quote, Now, in my opinion, that statement is rather mild, given the fact that some studies suggest that the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story Actually, it altered the results of the 2020 election.
Regardless though, everyone already knows about what Twitter did.
But did you know that last week, Wikipedia got into the Hunter Biden censorship game as well?
That's right, the editors over at Wikipedia, they decided to delete entirely the page for Rosemont Seneca Partners, which is of course the investment firm founded by Hunter Biden.
The same investment firm, it's worth noting, that became a shareholder of a Chinese investment fund during the very same time that Joe Biden was vice president.
However, according to the editors over at Wikipedia, this is not newsworthy.
That's because on the discussion page of that particular entry, which is where all these Wikipedia decisions get made, here is what the editors wrote.
This organization, meaning Rosemont Seneca, is only mentioned in connection with its famous founders, Hunter Biden and Christopher Hines.
Christopher Hines, by the way, just for your reference, is John Kerry's stepson.
Then the editor goes on to write that, Keeping the page around could turn it into a magnet for conspiracy theories about Hunter Biden.
And then another editor chimed in by writing, quote, It's a non-notable company with a tangential connection to some conspiracy-related thing that didn't happen.
And just like that, the entry for Rosemann Seneca was deleted from the world's largest encyclopedia.
However, the censorship efforts against the laptop story go much, much deeper than that.
How do we know?
Well, because a whistleblower who recently quite literally had to flee the United States, he vowed to publicly drop 450 gigabytes of deleted material from Hunter Biden's laptop within the next few weeks.
Now, this particular whistleblower is named Jack Maxey.
And if he happens to look familiar to you, that's likely because he was a co-host of Steve Bannon's War Room.
And for the last several weeks, Jack has been in hiding over in Switzerland, where he has been working alongside IT experts in order to extract more data from Hunter Biden's laptop.
And he says that within the coming weeks, he will be posting the content online to a searchable database.
And in terms of what this database will contain, well, in an interview with the Daily Mail, here's what Jack said.
Now, The next question that you might logically be asking yourself is why exactly did Jack have to go all the way to Switzerland to do his work?
Couldn't he stay here in America and just dig through the laptop within the States?
Well, as an answer to that question, Jack told the Daily Mail in his interview that he fears retaliation from the White House.
Here's specifically what he said, quote, Now, in terms of the specific attempts that were made to try and in terms of the specific attempts that were made to try and stop him from doing
well, Jack said that last year, after he first contacted the media regarding the laptop, black suburban SUVs started to appear outside of his house, and he said that his friends, to whom he gave copies of the laptop, began to receive strange phone calls.
It's also worth noting that Jack said that he gave a copy of the laptop contents to the FBI, who appeared to have done nothing with it, except apparently turn around and target Jack himself.
They began to target the whistleblower rather than investigate the contents of the laptop.
Then, what happened next was that Jack...
Alright, the sponsor of today's episode is a phenomenal company called AMAC. That's A-M-A-C... And it stands for the Association of Mature American Citizens.
They are quite literally one of the fastest growing conservative organizations in all of America, and you should consider joining for three main reasons.
The first is the money saving benefit, because as a member of AMAC, you get access to a ton of discounts at many different verticals.
Things like vitamin stores, restaurants, retail shops, and so on and so forth.
If you want to check out the full list, it's pretty exhaustive, you can do so over on AMAC's website.
The second benefit is that you get exclusive access to the AMAC magazine.
It'll be delivered directly to your doorstep and it contains phenomenal coverage as well as deep analysis.
And then the third benefit, the one that people say is their favorite, is that AMAC fights for your values over on Capitol Hill.
In fact, you can check out The online version of this on their website, it's the AMAC Action Advocacy Annual Report, and it shows exactly what they're doing on Capitol Hill in terms of fighting what they call the socialist storm that's brewing in this country.
So head on over to amac.us forward slash facts matter and sign up today.
I'll also throw a link down in the description box below.
Then, what happened next was that Jack gave a copy of the hard drive to one of his friends who happened to be a former intelligence officer.
And this intelligence officer, he turned around and he told Jack this, quote, If you don't release enough of this so that they know you can release all of it, I'm telling you, brother, you're a dead man.
And so Jack, he took that advice to heart, and he began to post batches of the emails, as well as other files from the laptop, onto different file-sharing sites across the internet for people to have access to.
However, within an hour of him posting those files, the links were all taken down.
Here's specifically what Jack told the Daily Mail.
Quote, there were five draw boxes, two in the United States, one in New Zealand, two in the UK.
All the same draw boxes in which they tell us child pornography shared around the globe without any consequence because they can't look at it.
These are all Five Eyes countries, English-speaking countries in an intelligence-sharing agreement, and they were all ripped down.
So this means that our intelligence services, who still have not even acknowledged that they have Hunter Biden's laptop, were obviously diligently doing cash services across the internet to find out if any of that stuff was being released.
That should terrify every single decent person in the West.
Now, Jack said that one of the main reasons that he chose to go into hiding in Switzerland was because the only file sharing site that did not take down his files Was a company called Swiss Transfer, which is a file-sharing service based in the country of Switzerland.
And because it's based in Switzerland, it happens to not be subject to the Cloud Act.
And so in order to get an idea of what this all means, and why exactly Switzerland has become something of a safe haven for people's data, I got a chance to speak with Mr.
Alain Ghiai, who is the founder of Globag's Data.
They actually run Secure, S-E-K-U-R, the messaging service that is one of the sponsors of our channel.
Meaning that not only is he an expert on Swiss data privacy, but he is also a man who cares enough about the truth in order to sponsor a channel like ours.
All right, Alan, thank you so much for joining us.
So the whistleblower, as we mentioned earlier in the segment, flew to Switzerland in order to do his work safely from the encroachment of any type of government.
Why do you believe that he decided to go to Switzerland out of all the other countries in the world?
Well, a few reasons.
First of all, Switzerland is a neutral country.
Unless you're an international terrorist, there's no real extradition treaty.
And the number one thing is we do respect People's liberties, freedom, individual rights, and especially privacy.
Switzerland also is not part of the EU. We actually paid over a billion Swiss franc.
We pay every year not to be part of the EU, but to have commercial agreements.
It's been neutral forever.
And the thing is that The political system, the judicial system in Switzerland, when you change laws, etc., it's a total referendum system.
So it's as libertarian as you can get.
Now, Switzerland will respect your individual right, and unless there's an international criminal, like an Interpol type of arrest, and that still does a process, then Switzerland may prosecute you.
So probably he went there.
Now, because he's dealing with data...
On top of it, my guess is that he read about the Swiss data privacy laws, which are the strictest in the globe because they don't have the EU GDPR, I think.
They don't have the Cloud Act of 2018 or, you know, the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 or the Patriot Act.
If I may elaborate a little bit on the Cloud Act, the Cloud Act is an interesting law that came about in 2018 when American companies and citizens' data was all over.
Because what happened is after 9-11, the tragic event of 9-11, what happened is that there were laws that were enacted to really survey more the population because you had some bad guys among the myths, right?
But, you know, the law is interpreted by the executor.
So sometimes it goes too far.
Sometimes it goes according to what the law was designed to be.
So the Cloud Act is like a patriot act for the cloud.
Let me explain.
When Amazon, Microsoft, Google and the big tech, when they have their servers everywhere and they have them in China, in Russia, in Switzerland and all over, what happens is these countries decided to say, well, this is our sovereign law.
So they have these data residency laws.
That means that if you have AWS in China, for example, The Chinese have access to it and they were saying this data cannot leave.
So the US came up with the law that says, listen, if you're using a US infrastructure, so Amazon obviously is a US company, then we also have the right to subpoena and have access to that data.
So it's kind of interesting, you know, where we are secure is in data centers in Switzerland.
Amazon actually It takes a floor or two of one of the data centers we're in, so they have to obey by the Swiss law, but they also have to obey by the Cloud Act.
So I think what happened, this gentleman fled to Switzerland first because A, they respect his liberty and freedom to start.
It's a neutral country.
And then, looking at data, he found that company, which we can talk about in a minute, that has its own infrastructure And what happens is they don't have to comply with the Cloud Act.
So whatever data was there, which they could care less what's on your drive, they just keep it for you, right?
They have no right to wipe it out.
So the Cloud Act, the Cloud Act you mentioned, which country's law is that?
Is that America's law?
That is a U.S. law that was enacted in 2018.
Some people call it 2019, but in 2018 it was enacted.
Since the dawn of the internet, the US has been the master of owning everyone's data.
Then, when a government funds, seed funds through Hedge fund, organization, grants, etc., companies that dominate the internet, you basically control the data of the world.
What happened is some countries decided to say, well, this data is in Germany, for example, so we have to obey German laws.
Why should we obey US law?
But then the US came back.
Obviously, there was a lot of A difficulty dealing with China.
This is mostly because of the Chinese issue, political data, you know, we can go into it, cyber theft, et cetera, that the U.S. said, now, if you use a U.S. infrastructure, it doesn't matter where it is.
We have the right to that data as well, and we can decide to subpoena or duplicate it.
So if you use, and everybody, there's like four cloud companies in the world.
You have Amazon, AWS, you have Microsoft, You have Google.
You have Alibaba.
Alibaba is a Chinese company.
I'm sure everybody knows that.
And they have the Chinese laws in their best interest, obviously, because it was funded pretty much by the Chinese government directly and indirectly.
And they have to just obey.
So what happens is now you have no choice.
Your data is in one of those four.
So, you know, I'm in Switzerland.
If I'm going to use Microsoft and if Microsoft is in Switzerland, And, well, if I want something private, I can't put it on, I can use Outlook email.
And let's face it, 99.9% of the world uses those three big tech.
This gentleman was smart.
He figured that there is a company, it's called Infomaniac, with a K. I actually highly respect that company.
If I were to, if I didn't have my own Tech conglomerate and I would need a domain website someplace.
I would use Infomaniac.
I wouldn't use any of the U.S. Big Tech because that data is no longer private because it gets duplicated back to the States.
So the Cloud Act is a genius idea for the U.S. to gain back the world's data.
Essentially, the entire world uses this company.
Who doesn't use Microsoft, Excel, Word, We cannot live without it as businesses as well.
So that was a smart decision on the U.S. lawmakers.
That law passed very swiftly without people's...
People have no clue about that law.
You know, in Switzerland, if you want to change a law, you need 100,000 signatures to start.
Then it goes on a ballot once every four months.
And then there's an entire referendum in the country, and everybody has an application.
They can vote.
You can't just change a law on a Friday evening.
And then people wake up on a Monday, oops, there's a new law card that came up.
That doesn't happen.
So Switzerland is pretty tough when it comes to your privacy.
A lot of people believe that these laws are put into place in order to protect people from, let's say, terrorists.
However, from your perspective, being in this space and in this field of...
You know, having this more secure application in this conglomerate.
Do you see that the government of not only the US, but the EU and Australia and other countries, they're using these types of laws to actually target individuals who aren't necessarily a danger, let's say like a terrorism type of danger, but they're more of a danger in terms of public relations for the ruling government, like this individual here who is a whistleblower who's working to extract data from the Hunter Biden laptop.
Do you see these types of cases becoming more prevalent?
Yes, and you know, I've been talking on interviews since 2014, 2013.
The first thing I say is, those laws are here to protect people.
There was enacted laws from Patriot Act, and I agree 200% with the honest intention of it.
What happens later, it gets politicized.
You have political parties with different motives that are using laws that are, you know, they're made to protect everybody from every political view.
In this particular case, obviously there is a political party on power and they don't want this stuff to come out.
When there will be another political party, we may see a different version of it.
Maybe more respect of that law.
Maybe not.
It depends who is the executor.
The law is made for everybody.
The executioner, the one who executes that law, that's who you have to worry about.
And in this case, it is highly politicized.
So, yes, I see that it's just like everything humanity does.
We have great intention.
And then you have some people that will exploit the weakness and the flaws in that particular system.
And essentially use it to their gain.
In this case, from what I read from the article, it seems that this poor man's, you know, his crusades to really bring information to the general public, everything was wiped out except the stuff in Switzerland.
Because in Switzerland, again, it goes back to our DNA. Privacy is in our blood.
The judicial system is such That you need an entire referendum to change a law.
So it's not as easy, right?
It's not a system where you can get away with things.
When the law is the law, it's the law and it's for everyone.
And, you know, we don't have that huge duality in politics in Switzerland.
So, yes, I will say that there is a lot more.
You have political motivation, industrial motivation.
You know, you have lawsuits from one group to another, let's say.
And they can subpoena the data of an adversary without the adversary knowing it for 72 hours and without having what we call the discovery process in a legal system to defend themselves.
So the law is flawed.
In its intention, it's right because you do have bad actors in a society.
You need to find them.
You need to weed them out.
You're only as good as how you execute a law, right?
And in this case, I see a lot more politicized decision to exploit that weakness in the law.
But we can't do without it.
Imagine if you have some bad actors and terrorists, and then if you don't have that law, what do you do?
So it's a bit of a catch-22.
Yeah.
So, last question.
If, in your professional assessment, if this man, if Jack went, let's say, to another country, he didn't go to Switzerland, he went to Greece or another member of the EU, or let's say somewhere else in the Eastern Europe, let's say Ukraine before it was invaded, or some other country, Kazakhstan, What could have happened to his data?
What would the actual process look like if the U.S. wanted to...
What could they even do?
Could they take the data?
Could they delete it?
How does that actually play out?
There's two things you need to look at.
First of all, if you went to the EU, it would be a phone call, literally, from the U.S., and that data would have been completely gone.
This poor man wouldn't be able to do a thing.
Now, I don't know the judicial system of Kazakhstan, but most likely, even over there, they use the big tech, and that's where the Cloud Act comes in.
To basically have a global reach.
Jack was lucky.
So I don't know in Kazakhstan, legally speaking, but most likely would be hosted on Microsoft Azure or Google Cloud or something like that.
That means his efforts would have been completely wasted because that is duplicated automatically.
You can see the only data that stayed is the one that didn't use a big tech hosting company.
Now, just like us, we have our protocol secure, S-E-K-U-R. Why are we in Switzerland?
Well, obviously because of the laws, but we also have our own infrastructure, just like Infomaniac.
So the only way to protect yourself is to go to a country like Switzerland, Other countries have good privacy laws too, but of course I'm going to be biased.
I'm going to say Switzerland has had this in the constitution for 100 years before electronics came out.
And also you need to have your own infrastructure.
So if you do anything and you want to keep it private, of course, for non-criminal purpose, you want to have your privacy.
It's totally legit and it's your right.
Go with a company that doesn't use a big tech platform because you're never going to be protected on privacy.
And try to go to a country like Switzerland.
That would be my recommendation.
If he went to any other country, he wouldn't have had that data.
Guaranteed.
The EU is just like the US. Don't think because it's in Europe.
They have the same laws.
They have super agreement.
And Switzerland is fighting hard to have its independence.
I want to say one last thing, if I may, Roman, because sometimes some of our customers or Well, people, they say, yeah, but Switzerland doesn't have the banking secrecy anymore.
I want to explain the banking secrecy laws, which were enacted in the 30s to hide, unfortunately, money of, you know, the fascist government and other people.
Those are not part of the Constitution.
And in 2017, retroactively, at the request of the U.S., They were cancelled and the US made 85 countries sign an automatic exchange of financial info.
The US didn't sign that, funny enough.
So there's more privacy in the US for your money than Switzerland for foreigners.
But that's it.
The data privacy laws are very different and it would literally take...
A referendum to change that and nobody in their right mind in Switzerland would.
So it doesn't mean because the banking secrecy is a little bit loose now that the data privacy laws are different.
Those are two different elements and I encourage everybody who wants some privacy for their business, for their personal, You can go to secure at secure.com or you want to host your website.
You go to Infomaniac.
You can even email us and we'll get you the name of where to have your website hosted.
And of course, we would recommend our solution for email and messaging because we do respect your privacy and we don't use big tech.
Alan, thank you so much for your insight.
Thank you, Roman, and thanks, everyone.
Now, if you'd like to learn more about either the Hunter Biden laptop story, the 450 gigabytes of files that are likely going to be coming down the pipe in the next few weeks, or if you'd like to check out more regarding the Secure app, I'll throw all that into the description box below this video for you to check out, and all I ask in return is that you take a super quick moment to smash, smash, smash that like button so this video and all I ask in return is that you take a super quick moment to smash, smash, smash
And now, as I mentioned at the very start of this episode, today we published a very spicy episode over on Epic TV, wherein we sat down with Peter Schweizer, author of the book Red handed, and we discussed the Chinese Communist Party's strategy of capturing America's elites.
Here's a trailer for that episode.
The Bidens got some $31 million, based on the laptop, from a series of deals that happened beginning when Joe Biden was vice president of the United States.
And those deals happened courtesy of four Chinese businessmen.
And if you look at all four of those Chinese businessmen, they have links to the highest levels of Chinese intelligence.
When he leaves the vice presidency in January of 2017, other foreign deals are in the works, including with CEFC, the Chinese energy company.
And that's where the email, Hunter's going to hold 10% for the big guy, comes into play.
So after he left the vice presidency, he was going to start to be juiced in to some of these overseas deals.
Now, if I can be just a little bit biased, that interview was phenomenal.
Because Peter, he has very broad knowledge, but at the same time, he's great at the specifics.
And so he can tell you about elite capture in general, how it plays out in higher education, in politics, in Hollywood, and so on.
But he can also grill down and give you the concrete, specific examples of how this strategy plays itself out in the real world.
It's really a great interview that, frankly, in the end, gave me a lot of hope.
Because at the very least, these things are now getting exposed.
If you'd like to check it out for yourself, I'll throw a link to it.
It'll be right there at the very top of the description box.
And then, until next time, I'm your host, Roman from the Epoch Times.
▲
Export Selection