Epoch Times - Larry Elder DEBUNKS FIve Lies About The Rich and Inequality Aired: 2022-02-11 Duration: 15:18 === Wealth Concentration Debate (05:53) === [00:00:03] All the Democrats obsess over wealth and income inequality, don't they? [00:00:08] We need a federal jobs guarantee. [00:00:12] And we've needed a federal jobs guarantee for a very long time. [00:00:15] We should not accept unemployment at 3%, 4%, 7%. [00:00:21] There should be no unemployment in our country. [00:00:25] We are the wealthiest nation on earth. [00:00:27] We need to redesign our economy so that wealth is not continually concentrated in the hands of a few, but everyone gets to share equitably in the wealth. [00:00:37] Federal jobs guarantee, $15 minimum wage, prevailing wage for all workers, and more equity in terms of worker pay and CEO pay. [00:00:50] Because we are living during the time of the Gilded Age, right? [00:00:55] Like wealth inequality is so bad, as bad as the Gilded Age. [00:00:59] How do you unpack that horse bleep on stilts? [00:01:02] My goodness. [00:01:04] There are five left-wing lies told about wealth and income inequality. [00:01:08] This is based upon a paper done by an economist named Robert Tanner, except he called them myths. [00:01:14] They're not myths when they're pushed by people like Representative Bowman. [00:01:17] They're lies. [00:01:21] Inequality has never been worse. [00:01:24] It's never been this wide. [00:01:26] The gap between the rich and the poor has never been this yawning. [00:01:32] But all kidding aside, we have not seen this huge concentration of wealth. [00:01:39] And the folks at the top aren't bad guys. [00:01:42] I get in trouble in my party when I say wealthy Americans are just as patriotic as poor folks. [00:01:47] I've found no distinction. [00:01:49] I really haven't. [00:01:51] But this gap is yawning. [00:01:56] It's gaping. [00:01:59] First of all, the equality gap is not nearly as yawning as the left says it is. [00:02:04] They fail to take into consideration taxes paid by the top, and they fail to take into consideration benefits given to the bottom. [00:02:13] Quote, The top 1% of tax filers earn 19% of U.S. income, but in 2013, they paid 37.8% of federal income taxes. [00:02:27] That number is now probably close to 40%. [00:02:29] The wealthy pay a disproportionate percentage of taxes. [00:02:34] If anything, you could argue that based upon their income, the wealthy are overtaxed. [00:02:40] Quote, at the same time, lower income earners benefit disproportionately from a variety of wealth transfer programs. [00:02:48] The feds alone provide more than 100 anti-poverty programs, dozens of which provide either cash or in-kind benefits directly to individuals. [00:02:59] Taking the existing redistribution into account and the taxes paid by the top 1% significantly reduces inequality. [00:03:09] But even if that weren't the case, is income inequality and wealth inequality by definition a bad thing? [00:03:18] The rich didn't earn their money. [00:03:23] False! [00:03:24] If you got a business, you didn't build that. [00:03:28] Somebody else made that happen. [00:03:30] I mean, I do think at a certain point you've made enough money. [00:03:33] First of all, Americans don't really resent rich people. [00:03:37] They want to get rich too. [00:03:38] What they resent is the assertion that the money was not earned. [00:03:43] It is simply not true. [00:03:45] One report found that two-thirds of high-income, net-worth Americans could be considered to be self-made, compared to 3% who inherited the majority of their wealth. [00:03:57] Among the wealthy New Americans, 80% reported that they earned rather than inherited their wealth. [00:04:04] Another survey found that 70% of wealthy Americans either grew up middle class or lower than middle class. [00:04:11] Even among those with assets of over 5 million, only one-third of them grew up wealthy. [00:04:18] And there's this idea that the rich got rich by stock trading. [00:04:25] I am not a destroyer of companies. [00:04:29] I am a liberator of them. [00:04:33] The point is, ladies and gentlemen, that greed, for lack of a better word, According to one survey of the top 1% of American earners, less than 14% were involved in banking or finance. [00:04:50] Roughly a third were entrepreneurs or managers of non-financial businesses, 16% were doctors or other medical professionals, lawyers accounted for slightly more than 8%, and engineers, scientists, and computer professionals another 6.6%. [00:05:05] Regarding sports and actors, sports and entertainment figures comprised Two percent. [00:05:11] The other thing about rich people, they work really, really hard. [00:05:17] They earn it. [00:05:18] Get this. [00:05:19] One study found that those in the bottom fifth of the income ladder who work more than 40 hours a week dropped almost 40 percent since 1980. [00:05:29] But among the top 20 percent of earners, those who work in excess of 49 hours a week increased by almost 80 percent. [00:05:37] The chairman of NYU sociology department concludes that, quote, high income folks work more hours than lower wage earners do, end of quote. === Why Rich Stay Rich (09:17) === [00:05:46] Is this thing on? [00:05:50] The rich stay rich. [00:05:52] The poor stay poor. [00:05:54] Here's what left-wing people want to do. [00:05:56] They want to tax the rich, which causes the economy not to grow as well. [00:06:01] It also means poor people are not going to grow as well. [00:06:04] But that's okay as long as rich people don't grow really, really rich really, really fast. [00:06:08] It's okay if the poor don't make as much money and remain poor. [00:06:12] That's just bizarre as the Iron Lady sets out. [00:06:20] There is no doubt that the Prime Minister has, in many ways, achieved substantial success in the economy. [00:06:29] There is one statistic that I understand is not, however, challengeable, and that is that over her 11 years, the gap between the richest 10% And the poorest 10% in this country has widened substantially. [00:06:45] How can she say at the end of her chapter of British politics that she can justify many people in a constituency such as mine being relatively much poorer, much less well housed and much less well provided than it was in 1979? [00:07:03] Surely she accepts. [00:07:04] That is not a record that she or any Prime Minister can be proud of. [00:07:09] Mr Speaker, all levels of income are better off than they were in 1979. [00:07:16] But what the Honourable Member is saying is that he were rather the poor were poorer, provided the rich were less rich. [00:07:26] That way you will never create the wealth for better social services. [00:07:31] And what a policy! [00:07:33] Yes, he would rather have the poor poorer, provided there is no less risk. [00:07:39] That is the Liberal policy. [00:07:41] Yes, it came out. [00:07:42] He didn't intend it to, but he did. [00:07:44] I give way to the honourable gentleman. [00:07:47] I'm extremely grateful. [00:07:49] The Prime Minister is aware that I detest every single one of her domestic policies, and I've never had that. [00:07:57] And I think that the honourable gentleman knows that I have the same contempt for his socialist policies as the people of East Europe who have experienced it have before they have. [00:08:10] I think I must have hit the right nail on the head when I pointed out that the logic of those policies are they'd rather have the poor poorer. [00:08:18] Once they start to talk about the gap, they'd rather the gap were that. [00:08:25] Down here. [00:08:26] That. [00:08:28] Not that. [00:08:31] But that. [00:08:34] So long as the gap is smaller, so long as the gap is smaller, they'd rather have the poor poorer. [00:08:43] You do not create wealth and opportunity that way. [00:08:47] You do not create a property-owning democracy that way. [00:08:50] You'd be surprised at how much wealth at the top 1% dissipates from generation to generation. [00:08:57] How poorly off the heirs ultimately become because they misspend the money, can't manage the money, waste the money. [00:09:04] Who knows? [00:09:05] But the rich don't always stay rich. [00:09:07] Quote, Research shows that the wealth accumulated by some intrepid entrepreneur or business person rarely survives long. [00:09:16] In many cases, get this, as much as 70% has evaporated by the end of the second generation and as much as 90% by the end of the third. [00:09:27] Your expenses have exceeded your income to such a point that you have exhausted your capital. [00:09:32] Now you have no capital, no income, therefore no funds for the check, you see. [00:09:37] Don't treat me as though I were a child, Mr. [00:09:39] Beckett. [00:09:39] I am as aware of what it means to have no capital as you are. [00:09:44] Now, what about this check? [00:09:48] Well, are you entirely sure that you really do understand what I mean by capital, Mr. [00:09:53] Graham? [00:09:54] You see, you've exhausted the capital. [00:09:55] I can't cover the check because the check is for $6,000 and you don't have $6,000. [00:10:01] In other words, you don't have $60. [00:10:04] Come to the point, Beckett. [00:10:07] The point, Mr. [00:10:08] Graham, is that you don't have any money. [00:10:09] The capital and the income are exhausted and you no longer have any money. [00:10:13] I wish there was some other way I could say it. [00:10:15] How could I put it? [00:10:17] That money, you have no capital, you have no income. [00:10:20] No, it's only money. [00:10:21] You have no money. [00:10:23] And the heirs of great fortune have done particularly poorly. [00:10:27] Take the DuPonts and the Rockefellers. [00:10:30] 38 people from the DuPont and Rockefeller family were on the Forbes 400 list of richest Americans in 1982. [00:10:37] Guess what? [00:10:37] By 2016, none of the 16 DuPont heirs appeared on the list. [00:10:42] Only one Rockefeller did. [00:10:43] And there are no heirs to the great Hearst fortune. [00:10:47] So, the rich didn't stay rich, and the poor do not stay poor. [00:10:55] Inequality means more poverty. [00:10:58] False! [00:11:00] That's a bald-faced lie. [00:11:02] The idea that gains by one person necessarily mean losses by another reflects a zero-sum view of the economy that is simply not true. [00:11:13] The economy is not fixed in size. [00:11:15] As John Kasich, the former governor of Ohio, put it, We have to make sure that everybody has a sense that they can rise. [00:11:24] Of course, our friends in the Hispanic community, our friends in the African-American community, the promise of America is that our system, when we follow the right formula, is going to give opportunity for everyone. [00:11:36] It's what Jack Kemp used to say, a rising tide lifts all boats, not just some boats, but all boats. [00:11:42] The real problem is government interference and government taxation and government regulation. [00:11:48] More regulations mean that those who are winners can foreclose opportunities for newcomers. [00:11:54] They can create barriers to entry. [00:11:57] The more taxes, the more spending, the more regulation, the less economic freedom, the greater the inequality. [00:12:04] That is why people like Jack Kennedy wanted an across-the-board tax cut. [00:12:10] A creative tax cut. [00:12:12] Creating more jobs and income, and eventually more revenue. [00:12:17] And the right time for that kind of bill, it now appears, in the absence of an economic crisis today, and if the job is to be done in a responsible way, is January 1963. [00:12:30] Such a bill will be presented to the Congress for action next year. [00:12:34] It will include an across-the-board, top-to-bottom cut in both corporate and personal income taxes. [00:12:42] It will include long-needed tax reforms that logic and equity demand. [00:12:48] And it will date that cut in taxes to take effect as of the start of next year, January 1963. [00:12:57] The billions of dollars this bill will place in the hands of the consumer and our businessmen will have both immediate and permanent benefits to our economy. [00:13:07] Every dollar released from taxation That is spared or invested will help create a new job and a new salary. [00:13:14] And these new jobs and new salaries can create other jobs and other salaries. [00:13:21] That brings us to lie number five. [00:13:24] Inequality distorts the political process. [00:13:26] In other words, inequality creates societal chaos. [00:13:31] Even Joe Biden once said, "You know, those at the top, they're not bad guys." And the folks at the top aren't bad guys. [00:13:44] I get in trouble in my party when I say wealthy Americans are just as patriotic as poor folks. [00:13:49] The freer the economy, the less it is dominated by cronyism or corporate welfare. [00:13:55] In other words, countries with less government intervention in the economy tend to have lower levels of inequality. [00:14:03] So if you really want to improve upward mobility, cut taxes, cut regulations. [00:14:08] Don't burden the rich by thinking you're going to help the poor. [00:14:12] You are just doing the opposite. [00:14:16] These are the five lies that people like Mr. [00:14:19] Bowman push. [00:14:20] Don't fall for it. [00:14:22] I'm Larry Elder, and this has been the Larry Elder Show for Epic Times. [00:14:26] I think I must have hit the right nail on the head when I pointed out that the logic of those policies are they'd rather have the poor poorer. [00:14:34] Once they start to talk about the gap, they'd rather the gap was that. [00:14:39] Down here. [00:14:42] That. [00:14:43] Not that. === EpicTV: Censorship-Free Videos (00:34) === [00:14:45] But that. [00:14:48] We've got a country to say. [00:14:51] I'll see you next time. [00:14:54] Larry Elder here, and I've got some great news for you. [00:14:57] If you're tired of the censorship in this country, then you're in luck. [00:14:59] You can go over to EpicTV.com and watch honest programs that don't spin the facts. [00:15:05] EpicTV.com is a brand new, no-censorship video platform where you can watch not only my show, but other deep documentaries, great programs, wholesome movies that you can watch with your entire family. [00:15:16] So, head over to EpicTV.com.