Putin DESTROYS the West in INTERNET-BREAKING Interview | Guest: Jackson Hinkle
➤ SUPPORT THE SHOW: https://censored.tv/ promo code “OFFENSIVE” for 20%Show more Streams on Rumble, X, Locals, & YouTube MWF 10PM EST + Censored EXCLUSIVE content every Thursday 10PM EST
__
DESCRIPTION:
THE MSM is in FULL-BLOWN PANIC MODE.. after Tucker Carlson took a trip to meet with our good friend in the east, VLADIMIR PUTIN — but WHY the panic and pandemonium?
Tonight we’re joined by self-proclaimed MAGA COMMUNIST and chief russophile JACKSON HINKLE to discuss.. What exactly is in this interview that’s got leftist so UP IN ARMS?
Also.. why did BIDEN call for an EMERGENCY BROADCAST TONIGHT? Wild times ahead..
__
⇩ ADVERTISERS FOR TODAY’S SHOW⇩
➤ PARASITE CLEANSE
What if I told you - there is a hostile alien species that controls your appetite, emotions, sleep and focus - destroying your body from the inside out. PURGE SUDDENLY - Remove the parasites today! https://www.purgestore.com/ - Promocode ELIJAH for 10% OFF!
➤ NOTICER T-SHIRTS: https://slightlyoffensive.com/
__
⇩ FOLLOW JACKSON HINKLE⇩
X: https://twitter.com/jacksonhinklle
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/TheDiveWithJacksonHinkle
__
⇩ELIJAH’S SOCIAL MEDIA ⇩
➤ RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/c/SlightlyOffensive
➤ INSTA: https://www.instagram.com/slightlyoffensive.tv
➤ X: https://X.com/ElijahSchaffer
➤ TELEGRAM https://t.me/SlightlyOffensive Show less
What an enormous day we just had with Tucker Carlson interviewing Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, or some people call it currently the Russian Federation.
It was an interview that many in the American elite did not want to happen, but it went through, and Biden had an emergency address after being deemed mentally incompetent.
We are talking today about all this and so much more on this episode of Slightly Offensive, only on censored TV.
let's begin the show.
Well, good evening for the special address.
My name is Elijah Schaefer, and my guest tonight is Jackson Hinkle.
He's a commentator and expert in all things Russia and Eastern European conflicts.
Well, I think Tucker had to figure out how to have this monumental conversation with someone like Vladimir Putin and probably want to go into a whole lot of depth that would otherwise be useless for the average American that doesn't follow these issues as closely.
And also tried to keep this entertaining and engaging and informative, I guess, for that person.
So that was his paradigm.
And I think he did a pretty good job of it, maybe focusing a little bit too much on the latter.
But overall, I thought it was a stellar interview.
I do think that this is monumental for world peace and the geopolitical history we're living through.
And Putin, Putin just, that dude cracks me up.
He starts it off by going on like a 40-minute semi-autistic lecture about Russian history and then really dives into it about how America and the West is really screwed and they don't seem to even know it.
So overall, I thought it was something that no one's ever going to forget.
It's a privilege that we get to witness the brilliance of these two minds coming together.
And I think it's going to be one of the most viral interviews of all time.
And Brian, as you bring up my screen, you know, we have this image of Putin here.
I noticed that back on the 17th of January, you had quoted Putin saying that Ukraine failed the counteroffensive.
And if this continues, the question of their statehood will soon arise.
And I think that that's what a lot of the interview is about.
You know, even Tucker said that he really thought that Putin was going to be trolling them through a filibuster, that he was just going through history.
But to give credit to Matt Walsh, who gets everything wrong about the Israeli conflict, he did say that, you know, Putin showed one thing: that he's, though older and though aging, he's got an extremely sharp mind enough not only to hold down a two and a half hour conversation, but also to talk about dense subjects.
Where Putin, at the beginning of the interview, clarified to Tucker, are we going to have a show or are we going to have an intelligent and a real conversation?
He even knew the difference and realized that he could put on a show if that's what he wanted, or he could really present himself stately and as a leader.
And I think this is coming from a position that sounded like a position of somebody who feels like he's won.
Yeah, I've watched probably every Putin interview and speech that there is out there since, you know, and I've also read some of his works from university.
And he is a very smart dude, very well-spoken, extremely historically literate.
And that distinguishes him from really, you know, any leader that we've had in the United States in a long time.
Xi Jinping, whatever you may think of him, he too is very historically literate and can go back thousands and thousands of years and recite it as if it were yesterday.
And I think that's part of the problem that we have here in the West is that we don't understand these complex issues and we don't understand why we're losing on the global stage militarily, economically, diplomatically, etc.
And I think that what you mentioned there, particularly about our history and about knowing this, is I felt like we were able to get to some truth.
And I want to look at a few of these clips here that we're going to talk about.
But I want to remind you guys, if you're wondering why we're live on Thursdays and you're wondering why you're seeing this, that's because we have an exclusive show on censored TV right there, censored.tv.
They are able to sponsor this show.
They are able to make it possible.
We are able to do this with minimal ads.
We've been able to reduce even ad placements in some of our shows because you guys are supporting them to such a great extent.
You make this possible.
And we are in a place where we're going to talk about the losers who didn't want this interview to happen.
Plus, we're going to be looking at the clips and so much more.
Anyway, a little background on my guest tonight, in case you want to know Jackson, who he is and what he's done.
So Jackson, of course, was reported.
I'm going to see if I can bring this up here.
There was an American journalist.
We have this from News Unrolled.
If you could bring up my screen, an American journalist reported that he was detained in the USA after his trip to Russia in particular.
Journalist Hinkle reported that he was detained in the USA after his trip.
The report stated that famous American journalist Jackson Hinkle was detained at the U.S. border after returning from a trip to Russia.
After spending the last month in Russia reporting on the war in Ukraine, I was detained for questioning by the U.S. Border Patrol.
I am an American citizen under attack by the deep state.
He reported that he was released from custody after a while.
During his trip to Russia, Hinkle was interviewed by leading Russian media.
The journalist shared on his YouTube channel that he admires Moscow and that there is nothing like it in America.
And so to, you know, to make sure that the people watching this know who you are and they know what they're getting into with this.
Number one, I think this is a really interesting story because this is was an indicator that, you know, by Tucker going to interview Putin, he really risked a serious opportunity of possibly being arrested, not only by some sort of NATO member if he had to cross into different borders, but also by the United States directly.
You were detained.
And I kind of want to know, though it's complicated.
Why is the United States security apparatus so determined to bully and pressure anyone who seeks to uncover the true story of what's going on in Moscow and what's actually happening from Putin's government?
Because you experienced that.
What was the kind of questioning or what did they put you through?
Well, I think that the mass media in the West and the, we can all agree on this, the mass media in the West and the political class and financial capital have painted this caricature of not just Russian politicians and Russian people, but also of, you know, their power of the things I just listed, the military, economic, and the cultural power that they hold.
And for anyone who goes there and tries to document what is actually happening, what the infrastructure is like, what the major cities are like, what their mindset is like, what their economy is like, or even on a person-to-person level, how they treat Americans.
That's obviously going to be met with very, very rigid censorship from the U.S. because it strikes at the heart of their narrative.
So when I was there, not only did I get detained on my return, which is not that uncommon.
You know, I met other people, other Americans in Russia who were on less high-profile visits than myself and also had been detained upon their return to the States.
It's not that uncommon.
But, you know, when I was there, my YouTube was also banned and it was just a nightmare.
So that's just how they respond to everything.
They view it as this ultimate fight to cancel out and apply this enforced censorship.
But of course, that leaves behind and throws away into the dustbin of history our First Amendment, which is very startling.
So it is weird about the pressure because I just recently got invited to a trip.
And I hate, I don't know if we're supposed to still call them the Kremlin, but I got invited to a trip there last year.
They invited me back in February.
And I have the same problem with my Russian interactions is that I was told by my lawyer from January 6th that the United States government would try to weaponize my meeting in Russia as a way to show that I'm a Russian asset.
Now, I'm obviously even an active journalist.
I was a journalist.
I work with the Gateway Pundit.
I have an incredible show that's there twice a week.
It's getting hundreds of thousands of views an episode.
And people want to hear my original takes, my original investigations, and I help with some of their reporting.
I'm going to be traveling Europe.
I'm going international.
I can go in to countries like England where they have a literal invasion of Islamic extremism that has taken over their country and I'll have no rapport.
But I was told by my lawyer, if you go to Russia, you will face backlash.
I think it was really interesting that Tucker waited until after the interview to kind of say that he was there in an extremely strategic positioning.
You know, we'll talk about that a little bit later in the show, some more of your thoughts, but I want to go right into some of these clips.
I don't know what's going on there.
Sorry about that.
I want to go into some of these clips and some of the things that were going on.
And one of the main things that was happening is you mentioned here, and this is a pretty bold statement, that Ukraine is the Israel of Europe.
Like Israel, Ukrainian Nazis slaughtered 15,000 ethnic Russian civilians in the Donbass, imposed a fascist government on the people, and were uses a NATO proxy to provoke Russia into war.
Russia is liberating the Donbass.
Hamas is liberating Gaza.
You have a pretty strong position on that.
So you are staunchly in favor of Russia.
I want to clarify for those watching.
You are 100%.
Are you a Russian asset?
Are you a Russian puppet like people accuse you of?
Never been paid by the Russian state or media or in any capacity or anything like that.
But I am a strong believer that as Americans who want to strike at the heart of the chains of imperialism that have gripped our country, we should support anti-imperialist ventures in other countries, like in Russia or like in the Middle East that we're witnessing right now.
Doesn't say anything about whether or not I support a given leader in their domestic policies or their economic policies or their culture, their religion or whatever it may be.
And in the case of Russia, I do with regard to a lot of those sectors.
But I think that, you know, we should support anyone who is taking up a similar struggle like you and I and your viewers are, which is to overcome the deep state.
I mean, the same deep state that we're fighting is the same deep state that Putin and the Russian military and the Chechens are fighting.
It's the same deep state that the axes of resistance is fighting in Israel.
So that's primarily why I support these campaigns.
You personally may have an alibi, but the CIA has no such alibi.
you have evidence that nato or the cia did it you know i won't get into details but people always say in such cases look for someone who is interested But in this case, we should not only look for someone who is interested, but also for someone who has capabilities.
Because there may be many people interested, but not all of them are capable of sinking to the bottom of the Baltic Sea and carrying out this explosion.
In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat the United States because the United States controls all the world's media and many European media.
The ultimate beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial institutions.
Don't you know that?
So it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak.
We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information and we will not achieve results.
It is clear to the whole world what happened, and even American analysts talk about it directly.
So, Jackson, it's interesting, though, like in this, is that Putin literally says directly here that it was 100% the U.S. that blew up the Nord Stream pipeline.
And I think this is one of the interesting aspects of this interview and why they didn't want to hear it from Putin is because we know that the U.S. was involved in the blowing up of the Nord Stream.
We don't know if it was the U.S., but we know that it was NATO, right?
It could have been ultimately a Swedish tactical team.
But then he talks about in the interview how the U.S. basically rules NATO.
And one of the diminishing reasons why there's heightened tensions with Russia and why they did not want Russia to be inside of NATO was because, well, at least he alludes to that America didn't want another large country with its own opinion dictating what Europe does.
The U.S. wanted ultimate fiscal responsibility for all of NATO and that all the countries, whether they disagree with the U.S. or not, do their bidding.
So ultimately speaking, it is their fault that this happened.
I'm kind of confused, though, when we talk about this.
Are we finding here right now with Putin, is Putin saying the U.S. did this?
It's funny you bring them up because Switzerland just came out with their official report onto the Nord Stream bombing this week, and their grand assessment was that they could not assess who was behind it.
And you got to sit back and think about how insane that is.
This is the largest, as Tucker put it, industrial terror attack that we've ever seen.
And it was committed against one of our main allies, Germany.
It's as insane as if you were to say that it's as insane as if you were to look at the assassination of JFK and the U.S. government came out with its official assessment of who killed JFK.
And instead of saying, you know, it was Lee Harvey Oswald or the CIA, they just simply put it as we don't really know who killed JFK.
His head just kind of magically exploded one sunny day in Dallas, Texas.
So the fact that they aren't even willing to name a person, Germany's not, Switzerland's not, who could be behind this, because we know they're not going to say Russia blew up their own pipeline.
They're not that stupid, implies that it was, yes, the CIA, yes, NATO.
So when we're talking about this, ultimately speaking, I want to look at another clip here, which is interesting.
This is that the EU actually wants to impose sanctions on Tucker Carlson, particularly for this interview.
I'm going to play this.
And I don't know, I don't understand why.
I wonder if this is why they were so afraid is they didn't want him to talk about the fact that Europe was behind sabotaging their own pipeline.
And the reason why I talk about our own governments being at war with us is because if they sabotaged it, then the reason why people are freezing in their homes, the reason why people are unable to pay for heat in the winter is because they chose to make a disruption.
They chose to launch a terrorist attack.
And I want to connect this even further.
If we did the Nord Stream pipeline bombing, which I believe we did, then that means that also this proves that we could have done 9-11.
This proves that all the world's terrorist attacks need to be called into question, right?
I mean, all the way back to the Holocaust itself, there's going to have to be real questions asked about what's true and what's not.
If the U.S. and NATO brazenly disrupts a pipeline, again, not just commits a terrorist attack, which they do regularly, but one that directly hurts people and will lead to the deaths of individuals.
People are going to die, they say on the news from this.
And yet the populations of the English-speaking countries seem mostly unaware.
They think that nothing has really changed.
And they think that because no one has told them the truth.
Their media outlets are corrupt.
They lie to their readers and viewers.
And they do that mostly by omission.
For example, since the day the war in Ukraine began, American media outlets have spoken to scores of people from Ukraine, and they have done scores of interviews with Ukrainian President Zelensky.
We ourselves have put in a request for an interview with Zelensky, and we hope he accepts.
But the interviews he's already done in the United States are not traditional interviews.
They are fawning pep sessions specifically designed to amplify Zelensky's demand that the U.S. enter more deeply into a war in Eastern Europe and pay for it.
That is not journalism.
It is government propaganda, propaganda of the ugliest kind, the kind that kills people.
Americans have a right to know all they can about a war they're implicated in.
And we have the right to tell them about it because we are Americans too.
Freedom of speech is our birthright.
We were born with the right to say what we believe.
That right cannot be taken away no matter who is in the White House.
There is this, there is this bullying and there is this intimidation, right?
So, whether you're in the White House or not, it is a rather remarkable reason that the EU and the United States want to bully people.
And this is where I start questioning things, Jackson.
I really start to ask myself questions because if we were on the side of truth, if we were on the side of reality, why would they not want an interview with Putin?
Why would they not want to show how evil he is?
I'm starting to think that perhaps our broken relationship with North Korea, with Russia, and increasingly with China is on purpose.
This stuff is completely mendable and fixable, but they want us to have a boogeyman, but I just don't know why.
Yeah, I mean, when it comes to the subject of this interview, I mean, don't you think it's insane?
Vice News does interviews with ISIS, FICE News does interviews with Al-Qaeda, the BBC does positive interviews with Al-Qaeda and Syria, refashioning themselves as this, you know, benign leader of the Idlib province.
No one has any problems with that.
But the moment Tucker Carlson goes to investigate as to why we had to send 200 plus billion dollars to Ukrainian Nazis for this proxy war, the entire media establishment gets very upset.
Journalists, quote-unquote, journalists get upset at a journalist for doing journalism.
That's where we're at now.
And I would also agree.
I think you are right to point out that the fissures between the American people and North Korea, the American people, and the Chinese people and Russia as well and other countries are, in fact, manufactured, artificial, and they shouldn't be there.
For American fissures between the United States and Britain, I do think they should be there, but that's another story.
But I also look at Bukele, which I want to go to an example here.
Bukele down in Central America, he's been able to get his country completely in order and talks about how the oligarchs around the world are actually mad.
They're mad that he got the gangs under control.
They're mad that he brought the country from being one of its most violent places in the world to being one of the safest institutional places to visit.
And it reminds me: it's like, holy crap, man, these people literally desire chaos.
This stuff is all avoidable.
It's intentionally destructive.
I want to play a clip from that.
And it's absolutely crazy to me to realize that we're in a position to where we could be living in a freer and a betterful country.
And here, the president of El Salvador talks to the people and he thanks the Lord.
And this is what I see as being the issue: they hate anybody who's Christian and thanks God.
They hate Putin and orthodoxy.
And one thing Putin kept mentioning in the speech was: look, when it comes to these caucus states, et cetera, we share an orthodox culture.
And he took that seriously.
We're Christians.
We're brothers.
We are believers.
And the West is increasingly atheist.
It is godless.
They hate God.
Look at Bukele speak in front of his country like Caesar at an 83% approval rate, up to 90% in some districts.
Literally, the most popular leader possibly on the face of the earth in a free country.
And watch and listen to this.
unidentified
Nosotros respetamos a todas las religiones, respetamos a los ateos, a los agnósticos, los respetamos y somos sus amigos, pero déjenos creer en Dios.
Nos dan la gloria si así lo queremos.
El que les monesta, el que les afecta.
Talben les afecta eljemplo porque talbés la populación de es paíces a la que less matero la téismo en Pi es tampien.
O vuelvan a creer en Dios.
Ustedes han visto.
Gracias a Dios. Y gracias a este pueblo noble y unido.
Como el salvador, pasode dece el más el seguro, el más eguro.
All right, so people were asking what was that noise.
That noise is called, I think they're called the Vuvu Zuelas.
There's a few different things, they're like a loud instrument.
Just in case people wanted to know.
But Jackson, I mean, you see this: the fact that people are happy because what the people want, what the populist desire wants.
I saw someone write: the reason why people like Bukele is because Bukele circumvented the weakness of democracy by going around the institutions that seek to only advantage the elite.
And he did what the populace would desire.
So he did what was in the best interest of the people, not of the institutions that, quote unquote, are controlled by the people, which we know are really just the elite class working against the people and subverting them.
And from what I see, it's like, how is this any different realistically than any of these leaders, like Putin, right?
Who said they've tried to seek peace, they've tried to come to terms, and the U.S. and NATO simply did not want them and they prefer aggression.
I mean, I'm not saying that I'm an apologist for Putin.
I'm not even a Russian citizen.
I am an American.
But from what I see with Bukele, it seems that a lot of this chaos and disorder, these wars, are simply because the U.S. and its allies and partners want this for whatever reason, economic, the military-industrial complex, to keep the war on drugs.
I don't know all the specifics, human trafficking to name a few, but it doesn't seem like it's on accident.
And it definitely seems like these leaders are up against a truly evil empire.
Yes, and the whole goal of the empire is to sow disunity.
And you heard it and you saw it in that great victory speech from Bukele.
And that was just, he's such an amazing leader.
And I think you really also heard it in the interview with Putin tonight.
In the last line, it was the most poetic way to ever end that interview.
And he said, Do you know why they're trying to dismantle the Ukrainian Orthodox Church?
And he said, they're trying to do it because the Orthodox Church not only brings together our people territorially, but also it brings our souls together.
No one can separate the soul.
And that just strikes at the heart of what every good leader should strive for.
And it also is because of that is what the U.S. deep state takes aim at when they want to try and topple a leader or create a phony revolution in a country or tear an economy apart.
And that's what they're trying to do to Russia.
And I'd imagine we're probably going to have some sort of a direct threat, not just, you know, a verbal one, but a direct threat on El Salvador soon enough if Bukele continues down the line that he's already drawn.
It is interesting, though, during this time, you know, Biden, we're looking at a few of these clips from his speech that he called an emergency address to the country.
Do you feel like that was necessary or was that just a distraction from this?
It was, yeah, I think that was 100% a distraction.
I mean, and it went so poorly.
He made multiple gaffes.
The most notable one was he said that El-Sisi, the president of Egypt, was the president of Mexico.
There was others, but everyone kind of knew that was going to go poorly.
And while Biden is forgetting who the president of our neighbor is, Putin's giving a two-hour lecture about like Russian history from thousands of years ago is quite the quite the paradox.
So before we look at these clips here, obviously Biden was about to give a key address about his mental fitness.
We're supposed to be thinking that Putin is the bad guy and Biden is the good guy.
As we give another 60 billion to Ukraine, another 17 billion plus to Israel, and we cannot even allocate 20 billion to our own border.
We are at war with our own government.
And I want to remind people that your government is at war with you.
Even if you think you're at peace, you don't want it.
The American government is waging a war against its own people and it's being paid in the raping of your children and the blood of your grandchildren and the wallets of us all.
But here was CNN, the audacity of these people talking about as Biden was about to give his address, he was moments away from how he's not in cognitive decline.
And we're all crazy.
You should believe CNN.
And then we'll watch the clips and you tell me if they're correct.
unidentified
Yeah, the stutter, God bless him.
I mean, the man deserves a lot of credit for fighting through that in a very public way with a camera aimed at him every second of every day for someone to go through that and put up with it.
You know, it takes a lot of courage.
And he just, whether you're a Democrat or Republican, Independent, you know, people with hardships have to deal with hardships.
He deserves a ton of credit for that.
I first covered Joe Biden in Iowa in 1987.
I was out there covering Governor Dukakis and went to other events.
He has never been a great communicator, but he is good in small settings and he's a good small talker.
And he puts you at ease if you're in a small group with him.
He's never been great off the teleprompter and the stutter.
I mean, I don't really, it's just, you know, dementia.
It's a decline of the mental state.
But all I know is if Putin, Xi Jinping, or Kim Jong-un ever had a gaff in a single speech like Putin has or like Biden has every time he goes out and talks, the media in the United States would report that either Putin, Xi, or Kim Jong-un is having a heart attack.
For Biden, it's just a simple stutter, nothing to get worried about.
And you can see the problem is, is the media, and I'm really happy about this, the media is unable to lie convincingly enough because the footage that we see is so contradictory.
There's no way for them to twist it.
So they tell us that Biden is into decline.
Putin is evil.
We see Putin.
It doesn't sound like somebody who even desires a war with Ukraine.
It doesn't seem like he wanted it.
It actually seems like for 20 years, he's been trying to prevent it.
And he's offered peace deal after peace deal.
And the U.S. is provoked and provoked and provoked.
And then Biden comes out with an emergency address saying, we are the champions.
And here's what he had to say.
Take a look for yourself and tell me, is this a man in power?
I just want to remind you that he even got, he mixed up countries.
He tried to say the rosary and could not even remember the words.
He's telling us he's in power.
He's in charge.
I think what we're seeing clearly is, is if they're lying to us about who's running our country, then why would they not be lying to us about the Ukraine conflict?
Why would they not be lying to us about anything?
We're in an extremely toxic relationship with our own regime.
That's what this is.
It's a regime that is in power of the United States.
And you cannot be pro-America unless you stand against this regime who is lying to you from the top down on who's pulling the strings, what's going on in the world.
And all I want to know is how long has this actually been going on, Jackson?
Is this just now?
Or are they just so brazen about it because they don't care anymore?
I think it's a matter of the leadership we have and the education system that we've birthed here in the West that we have the type of leadership that we have.
And I don't mean Biden, who he also forgot the word for Hamas today.
He also said, I don't care if you live in a red state or a green state.
I'm here to represent all of you.
Like, that's insane.
But specifically, the type of leadership that now views everything as, you know, itself being a hammer and the problem being a nail.
It is a crazy world we're living in.
And I think that that does stem from the elite universities that grant these Ivy League hacks the ability to find themselves in positions of power in these presidential administrations.
And you said, has it always been like this?
I think to varying degrees, but we used to be a country that prioritized diplomacy.
We used to be a country that could pick up arms and go fight alongside Red Army soldiers.
We used to be a country that didn't try to strike at every perceived issue that we witness with a closed fist, but instead we would try to have collaboration and cooperation and figure out where we can agree and disagree.
So, no, I don't think it's always been like this, but there's always been a colonel of that sort of mindset in U.S. politics.
And now it's just overcome the system.
And that's why we have the problems we have.
And now it's so bad, we can't even recognize that this sort of worldview has brought about the inevitable end of the American empire.
And as we look at this, you know, with Ukraine, I want to, I don't want to let President Vladimir Zelensky fall through the cracks here.
He's supposed to be the Western hero.
Now, here's a video.
I'm going to play it on mute here of a man being led to his death.
So this is forced conscription, right?
A man was being pulled out of his apartment building, allegedly, and being forced into the car.
Now, I want to remind you where 500,000 people have either been murdered, and I got murdered by the NATO Warhawks, you know, whether they're foreign Russia or Ukraine or injured.
And they're just marching people to the front lines.
I watched videos, Jackson, of people, you know, saying, oh, look at the beautiful woman fighting for Ukraine.
And I hate this because they're not fighting for anything.
What they're fighting for is American dominance, but not like, again, it's like, well, aren't you American?
Shouldn't you be happy?
They're fighting for American dominance in a place that we don't need it, that doesn't help the world and doesn't bring any us closer to any more unity or power.
All this does is bring up the interests of an internationally controlled currency, monetary fund, and banks.
The same reason why we're involved in the Israeli war, it's the same people that want us in these same conflicts due to regional and global control unification strategy to control the money, to control its usury and invasion tactics to create a global order.
And Russia just wants its independence, you know?
And that's what I keep seeing here.
These people are like, please leave us alone.
And the U.S. says, yeah, but have you tasted freedom yet?
I don't even know why we went to Iraq.
And I still don't know why we went to Libya.
I've heard good ideas, but I don't know.
And when I watch stuff like this, it makes my blood boil because I don't want to like Putin.
I wish he was evil and it was that easy.
And I wish we were the good guys.
But the more and more I look into it, it's not that I'm pro-Putin, it's just that I'm pro-truth.
And I realize even if Putin has done some things wrong, like all leaders probably have, he's probably made some questionable decisions and probably hurt some people along the way.
But that doesn't make him any worse than the U.S. regime.
And at least I can respect a man who's hard on his balls and does tough shit if he's upfront about it than the U.S. that talks nice to the camera, pretends to know what they're doing, and meanwhile is more corrupt, more deadly, more manipulative, and less faithful to its people than Putin's entire regime.
That's what I'm seeing here is the U.S. is everything they're accusing Putin of being.
Yeah, I think Putin in the conversation tonight brought up an interesting point that is true.
He said that the people that led the 2014 Maidan coup in Ukraine and the people who make up the Azov and ADAR battalions fighting in Ukraine today are the ideological inheritors of Stefan Bandera and other individuals that carried out acts on behalf of the Nazis in World War II in Ukraine and Poland.
And not just the ideology I think is important to talk about, but also the judgment of the ideological inheritors themselves.
It's like in World War II, these people were promised a free Ukraine if they simply fought for Germany.
They would get an independent state and that would be that.
And there would be this end of times, end of history, final, you know, Reich that would be established by Hitler and they would be guaranteed some sovereignty under it.
That obviously didn't pan out.
That didn't happen, but I think it was also probably a bad judgment call to assume that the guy who's violated so many previous military agreements in the past would grant them a sincere level of sovereignty.
Now today we're witnessing these same people, not the ones that you just brought up who are being forcibly conscripted, but the leaders of this movement in Ukraine of this proxy war, they're being promised a free Ukraine under the guise that if you just help the United States establish our thousand year globalist Reich, that you will be granted sovereignty.
Well, it's not really sovereignty if the U.S. funds your entire pension system, your government, your military, and makes every decision for you.
And I think just like the bandwidths, they will probably meet a similar final blow from the Russian people like we saw in World War II.
Except this time it'll be less costly for the Russians.
And you bring up this adversarial point where I think a lot of it rests in our media and why this interview was so important because the media rarely has decided to do anything other than just suck on the tits of whoever that they're told to.
And I know this, for a matter of fact, I want to play a clip from CNN before we rip into Sebastian Porka, who, by the way, is one of the greatest sellouts in American media history.
Don't trust anyone with that accent telling you what to think about your country.
That's the truth.
But this was a real interview from CNN with Zelensky at the beginning of the war.
And I keep telling you guys when you're watching this, it's easy now to call Zelensky as corrupt and evil.
It wasn't easy in the beginning because we were all called sellouts and we actually risked even our safety at some point.
People like Gonzalo Lero died at the hands of this.
And it is a very serious thing.
And the media, who's supposed to be questioning and asking, what is this conflict?
Why are we getting into this?
What is the intention of this?
Why should we be financing this?
Even my own colleagues betrayed me.
And part of the reason why I don't work in Con Inc., this was definitely a thing, is I wouldn't submit to narratives.
And they'd say, here's the position we're taking.
You know, we're going to back Zelensky.
We got to back the Ukrainians.
Like, the fuck does that mean?
We need to back that.
How about fuck you?
I don't think that's true.
So you can say that, but when it comes to backing Ukraine and Israel, that's bullshit.
I know it's what we're supposed to be doing, but who's we and who told us to do that?
I think for myself, I'm reminding you, this is what CNN did.
Check this out.
And sorry about things playing music in the background.
I'm having sound issues today in my home studio, and the internet is out in my main studio today because we're in the middle of a cyclone.
So apologies and some of these sound issues, guys.
And I appreciate your patience as we don't cancel shows here.
So that's a really cool thing.
A lot of people have these problems.
They cancel.
We make it happen.
So check this out.
Here is CNN talking about this.
It is insane.
unidentified
As a human being, so many people look up to you.
They rely on you.
No one can imagine how hard that is.
Do you do anything for yourself?
Are you ever able to take a minute to read or to listen to music or something to sort of give yourself that moment?
I have such moments.
Important to be in silence, to be alone, and early in the morning when there are no sounds, sounds.
No people, nobody.
I mean, the people, people, our staff.
I mean, nobody is in my cabinet.
Nobody.
I can just read, think, think, and the music helps.
Really?
What music do you like?
Oh, I like ACDC.
ACDC, I don't understand all the words because of the music.
Yeah, I like the energy.
Maybe it's too old, the music for sometimes at six, seven in the morning, some trainings.
Workouts.
Yes, workouts.
but to do something with music or such music, which gives you energy for all the day.
And then I remember he's, you know, he's killed 500,000 of his uh men and women, and you know, gender non-conformings as they probably are in the Ukrainian military in this proxy war.
And it's like, it's funny until you remember that.
You know, it's funny until you remember they had a country and now they won't.
It's funny to remember that this all happened with CNN and MSNBC until you remember that they lost already 74% of their country, 110,000 square kilometers, and they're never going to get it back.
Well, I want to, I want to bring up the idea of comparing that journalism with the journalism of individuals in our media in America on the right wing, because they're really just as bad as those in the left wing.
They just have American flags.
It's more patriotic.
So as they're lying to you, they're more patriotic.
So Sebastian Gorka, I'm really happy about this.
People have been finally waking up.
Now, I've always, I'm not going to get into the personal side of it, but he was working with an old colleague of mine to try to get me fired for a while.
It didn't work out on that end.
But he was a simp, right?
A white knight.
He was the worst kind of simp, too.
The kind that, you know, claims to fight for good.
You know, like, oh, I fight for women, but then he'll like voluntarily sacrifice 500,000 Ukrainians in the name of freedom, you know?
And you're like, dude, you're a fucking, you are, you are a faggot.
That is what you are.
Okay.
You're not a good man.
You're not a nice guy.
I don't care.
I would rather have a guy who's done terrible things.
And at least when the choice comes to do the right thing, he does it.
But you don't care about women.
You'll watch them get blown up on the battlefield.
And I didn't even remember this happened until he got in a fight with Jack Pisobik about sucking Zelensky's balls.
And somebody sent me this clip and they're like, do you remember when he was simping for a feminist and he decided to attack you publicly for being against the war?
This is what I say about you were against it too, Jackson.
You got, don't look at what people are saying now about COVID and issues.
Look at what they were saying then or not saying when it was tough.
That's how you know if someone's trustworthy.
If when the masks were being pushed, I told you, put on a mask moron.
Don't listen to that person about any difficult issue.
Unless they've done a real public apology and they've really said, like, that's fine.
I really got this wrong.
I really messed up.
It won't happen again.
Then let them prove themselves.
But if they just brush it off, like, oh, I got vaccinated.
It was a bad decision and they move on with their life.
That's a fraud and a phony.
And you'll find that in every issue, they cannot be trusted.
This is a real clip of Sebastian Gorka, a grown-ass man getting mad at me right when the war started.
This is right when it started about how I did not support Zelensky.
It's one of those moments like Elijah Schaefer is so irrelevant.
Here is a five-minute sit.
This entire episode was about me, by the way.
It was called like a fake man or something.
It was like an hour episode about how irrelevant I was.
And it's like, this fucking cocksucker.
And I don't mean to be crass here, but this is what I mean.
It's like, dude, he's not a man.
You're a fucking war hawk.
You're a criminal.
And in a just country, you would be hung for crimes against the world by the state.
How about that?
How about you stop being a shill for the military industrial complex, stopping a fucking twat on the internet and acting like, well, I can take advantage of boomers.
I can take advantage of them and make them think I know what I'm talking about.
Well, fuck you.
You are the problem with geopolitics.
And I would much rather get shit on for not defending a feminist who no one knows why I didn't.
And I justifiably did not defend a feminist.
And hopefully everyone understands now why than fucking advocate for a domestic genocide against white people, you fucker.
I don't know.
I just think I hate these people with a deep passion because they're so fucking two-faced.
Yes, on day one of the invasion, I was defending Putin as well and got banned from Twitch within several days for doing so.
And I think people like, you know, Sebastian Porka, he tries to paint you or me or whoever, the audience, as being like insensitive or not standing up for the little guy in a situation like this, as he kind of was implying with his response.
And he is irrelevant.
You got that 100% correct.
But the fact of the matter is, you can only take a view like that, that Ukraine is innocent.
I mean, just the sentence where he said, oh, you're defending the guy who's bombing kindergartens and churches and schools and homes.
Like, when he said that, what goes through my head?
What goes through my head are the photos and the videos of the kindergartens, the churches, the homes that Ukrainian militants bombed in the Donbass for literally eight years, 15,000 people killed.
So you can only have a position like that if you are an extremely historically illiterate Brit living in the Anglo box.
And that's exactly what he is.
And he's got plenty of cookies in there for him because he's fat as hell.
And anyone who really lives their life like that and disrespects themselves has such a low level of, you know, self-respect.
I also look at them and I say, can I really trust that they will carry themselves with any sort of respect in these complex geopolitical discussions if they can't even maintain their own house?
You know, it gets under these people's skin, just calling them names, right?
They'll advocate for your daughter to have her arms and legs blown off and her eyes completely blinded in an improvised explosion or in a drone attack from a NATO military apparatus, and then be like, how dare you not defend women?
You, and you go, you're a fat fucker named Porka.
How about that, pig?
Oink going, you fucking pig.
You know, you can't even control what you put in your mouth.
Okay.
And like, it's like, oh, well, you can't control yourself too.
Yeah, exactly.
But you don't see me, you know, dedicating episodes to advocating for the genocide of an of an entire nation.
I'm not even mad about that.
It's just like, don't tell me that you're a good guy and you know what you're talking about.
I'd rather have you have personal problems.
Just be fat, but don't advocate for genocide, Jackson.
That's my point.
But if you're going to be fat and advocate for genocide, then fuck you, little piggy.
And that's why these people are spineless because they have no code of ethics.
And that's why they're so influential, because they're astroturfed into a significant position because they say nothing.
A lot of these people on the internet are like that.
You know, there's genuine shadow banning going on on X.
And then there are elitist Republican establishment feminists in New York who come out and say, well, the reason why some of you guys aren't getting the views you want, and I'm not talking about myself, they're like, because you just don't post good enough content.
And you go, well, maybe if I too was sucking the cocks of certain individuals in the right-wing movement, literally, I would get ahead further too and could write stupid bullshit on the internet and somehow be promoted.
But that's unfortunately not a choice that I've taken yet.
May get there if I don't get remonetized on X. I'm completely joking, but it's you're demonetized on X completely, completely demonetized.
And they put a note, a note, a flag that my content will be like suppressed or whatever.
It's currently suppressed.
And I don't, and they didn't send me an email.
They said we'd send you an email telling you what you did.
And I don't know what I did, but yeah, they got me.
You know, it's something I've just become accustomed to, but thankfully they started a new partner program on Instagram meta and I was able to make 36 cents off 15 million views for the month on my reels.
Okay, well, that's, I'm sorry to hear that too, but you could be making 36 cents.
So like you're really missing out on the 36 cents.
I'm telling you, I'm not going to spend it all in one place.
And that's about, that's about the price of a credit card transaction fee that they're about to cover.
It's one, one, it's 36 cents I can't give to the banks.
And I was crying about it for several days because all I've been thinking about is how can I send more money to bankers?
You know, we don't have any new wars to start, so I can't do it through them through Northrop.
So I'm going to have to do it somewhere else.
And dude, but I'm with you on this.
Like I'm accustomed to this stuff.
Luckily, none of that hurts my endgame.
I'm completely fine and monetized in other ways that I make all my money off and on that.
But this sort of these people think because they make money because nobody holds them accountable, that it means that they're getting away with it.
All it means is that your audience is low IQ.
If your audience, you're appealing to a low, a low tier of humanity.
It's like, well, that's why you're popular.
You're appealing to a mass audience of retarded people.
If you think that you are getting any act more accurate news from Ben Shapiro than you are from CNN, I have to question your sanity at worst.
And at best, I have to ask, are you just ignorant and perhaps only know half the truth, right?
Maybe you just only know about CNN.
Like, how are you doing that?
Because, dude, this Israeli stuff, I want to talk to you about some of this Israeli stuff because it has to do with this interview.
It is crazy to me.
I need to bring this up because even I fucking don't believe this.
Speaking of sellouts and individuals that hurt my heart, okay?
Let's talk about Rebel News and Avi Yemeni, who, by the way, I want to remind people refused to shake my hand after we worked together for years because I was against the war in Israel.
Refused to shake my hand in public because he said that my opinions on Zionists were unacceptable because I had said that Zionists worked together to de-platform and destroy people they disagree with.
And then when I asked him why he wouldn't shake my hand, he said because Zionists that he likes could see him shaking my hand and then would de-platform him and defund him.
The most ironic response I've ever heard in my life.
Literally the case.
While we're fighting these wars, while we're the populists are trying to interview Putin, while we're trying to expose the mass immigration while we're fighting, Rebel News has unfollowed me everywhere.
They've blocked me.
Avi won't work with me.
He gets nervous when he's in the same event as me, tries to avoid me.
It's insane as if I'm like a far leftist, reminding you guys, and Daily Wire will have nothing to do with me anymore, but they'll talk to Destiny because why?
He's a cock, he promotes sodomy, promotes homosexuality, pornography, but he's pro-Israel.
And I find that to be a really interesting contradiction because you can literally be completely antithetical to somebody.
And as long as you agree on that point, you're fine.
Check this out.
Avi, while we're going through all this, has decided that he's going to go after, he's been going after a random car on the road that has an October 7th license plate.
He's contacted the Transport New South Wales and he found out it was registered after October 7th.
He's going after a random fucking civilian citizen who, by the way, it's irrelevant, even if he is celebrating or commemorating.
He could be Jewish and sad about the day, but also that could be his birthday.
And I want to add that Australians are really not interested in, they're not really interested in politics.
So I doubt this has anything to do with Israel.
But even if it does, you're posting a random person's identity and license plate to publicly harass it and trying to get the government to put them in jail for anti-Semitism laws.
That's what Rebel News is doing.
And they're raising money right now and fundraising.
So you too can donate money as a patriot to help jail a trady, a blue-collar worker who has a license plate that he doesn't like.
This is a real tweet.
It's still up.
And I screenshot it because it's fucking crazy.
These people have lost their fucking minds, Jackson.
The founder said he wanted to start a Zionist news network.
And I just want to remind you that Rebel is like the biggest alt-right-wing media in Australia, in Canada, in New Zealand.
Like the biggest right-wing media while we're facing all of these issues is trying to get the public's help, raise money to track down a blue-collar worker for having a license plate that says October 7th.
Yeah, I mean, the question of the question of like Zionism and everything, it's just, it's, I don't understand why there's any section of the American right, let alone, I don't know if I mean, Avi and many, probably not, but the other people who are Christians who support this, I mean, it just makes no sense.
It is when you look at anyone who supports Russia, who's Russia fighting in Ukraine?
They're fighting the U.S. deep state, a proxy.
Who is the axes of resistance fighting in the enemy of Israel?
Same thing.
You know, who are we fighting in America when we challenge this woke cultural degeneracy and the strangleholds that the financial elite have on our country?
Same enemy.
It's the same enemy through and through.
And I just think it's laughable that you could like pick and choose which times you want to fight them and when you want to support them.
It shows a fundamental lack of understanding of who you're actually fighting.
And if you don't know who you're fighting, you're never going to be able to defeat them.
I mean, I think you have a bigger problem with anti-Semitism in Italy than you do here.
And no one talks about that.
But, you know, I think any country you look at, it's going to have random deviations and subsects of every sort of political extreme.
Russia is a country who's fighting Nazism as a state-mandated policy in Ukraine, essentially.
But Russia has Nazis.
They have skinheads.
They have all that as well.
Not as much, and it's not state-mandated.
But I think they're creating like a false villain, essentially, in this question of anti-Semitism in the United States.
I mean, they call everything anti-Semitic.
They say that, you know, you're anti-Semitic if you support Hamas, which I vehemently disagree with.
So I don't really necessarily even believe that.
But the answer is definitely not to silence people.
If you are going to investigate that issue, enforced silence only breeds, what do you call it, the Streisand effect, where people get more and more popular.
And that's happened with you.
That's happened with me.
The more times they censor us, our following goes up another 100,000 to when I got banned from YouTube, my Twitter following was 200,000, 300,000 followers.
Even on a small night like this, we've been getting around 2,000 live viewers on Rumble, which is pretty good for the size of our channel.
Like we've been averaging about 2,000 live viewers.
We never get featured.
And that's the thing is like, no matter what, we never get featured.
And that's because Dave Rubin at Rebel, we believe Dave Rubin at Rumble has sort of, you know, he unfollowed me and, you know, everything over the Israel stuff.
And then they stopped communicating with me.
Rumble did after that.
So it was really weird because there's a lot of people on Rumble who disagree, but a lot of this stuff is personal.
And that's when I began to question this stuff with Ukraine and Israel.
And I bring up this tweet here.
Go ahead and Brian, bring up my screen.
Of why is it that everybody's allowed to be contradictory with this one, with this issue, whatever the regime sponsors?
And somehow they're still respected in the media movement as people who are trustworthy.
Dr. Eli David said a gold verified organization on X is spreading blatant anti-Semitism safety premium.
Are you okay with this?
Now, he shared a tweet from somebody called Defund Israel Now that says the world would be a better place without Jewish Israel.
Unfortunately, these damn Jews who have gotten booted out of 80 countries can't allow the rest of us to live in peace.
So again, giving the benefit of the doubt to Dr. Eli David, I would say, okay, yeah, he is sharing something that somebody who doesn't like Israel is saying.
Now, the idea, what he's advocating for is that people who say things you disagree with should be banned on the platform from being an organization.
They should not be allowed representation, which I disagree with.
Whether I agree with the statement or not, I agree with the principle of allowing people who I disagree with on the platform.
So you would assume that Dr. Eli David would be a radical example of somebody who has verified himself that would not be spreading racially discriminatory posts.
But it only took a couple posts earlier for me to find this, where he posted a anti-Semitic photo towards the Semites, towards the Palestinians, of them as rats in rubble, making fun of them being dead with dead people laying around saying, we are winning.
And so it's like he's complaining, oh, there's a guy who's verified who says Israel shouldn't exist.
And then he's literally laughing at a photo of Gaza not existing.
The scary part is not that somebody on the internet has a double standard.
It's that that double standard ends up affecting all of us.
And we have to abide by that and act like it's normal.
We have to act like it's normal that there are individuals who are our intelligent class.
There are individuals who are in our intelligent class who continually, no matter what.
So I don't know.
Can you hear that when that call comes through?
No.
Okay, good, good, good.
I don't know what that is or why that's coming through.
But we have our intelligent class telling us it's okay to be discriminatory towards Russians.
It's okay to be discriminatory towards Palestinians.
But when it comes to the Jews, particularly, not even the Ukrainians got such a pass.
You can't even criticize this.
And to me, I don't want to because it doesn't come with any benefit.
People say you're grifting.
It comes with no benefit.
But what it bothers me is, is like, hey, this is a real problem because it's violating our constitution.
It's violating our order.
And I mentioned to my audience, I had three videos taken off of YouTube.
I know you're banned there.
I had three videos taken off.
Why?
Because one of them, they said that my video about the tunnels under New York, which I made the day after it happened, is now a conspiracy theory.
It's an anti-Semitic conspiracy theory, they said, used to target a protected class.
And they took down my other two videos about Ben Shapiro because they said he's a part of a protected class and the ADL sanctioned him as an attacked individual.
unidentified
So YouTube was using the ADL to protect Ben Shapiro.
Yeah, he's protected by the ADL as a number one Jewish target.
But on top of that, it is.
It's all been downhill from there.
We all know he had secret backdoor meetings with Mark Zuckerberg too.
He had dinner at his house.
We know about all this stuff.
But even I have, I have more information about Daily Wire that I know from working at Blaze that I couldn't say because of my NDA.
But I can tell you during COVID, there were backdoor deals made as well to not let the truth come out and that there were offers made to retain so they didn't get censored.
It's all I can say.
They did things that were immoral and a crime against their own listeners.
But anyway, on the flip side, on the flip side, it is remarkable that they said it's a conspiracy because it happened and those tunnels are real.
And I didn't say they were anything other than the fact of what happened and watching videos.
But it's a conspiracy now to play videos of something that really happened.
Let us go back to 1991 when we were promised that NATO would not expand to 2008 when the doors to NATO opened to the Declaration of State Sovereignty of Ukraine, declaring Ukraine a neutral state.
Let us go back to the fact that NATO and U.S. military bases started to appear on the territory of Ukraine, creating threats to us.
Let us go back to coup d'état in Ukraine in 2014.
It is pointless, though, isn't it?
We may go back and forth endlessly, but they stopped negotiations.
So, realistically speaking, this stuff could be over.
And I really want to make a statement here.
I want to be careful so I don't get taken out of context.
You'll notice the same people are in power of the media and in control of the biggest Twitter accounts too.
And they all focus on wokeness, on fighting wokeness, fighting DEI and wokeness, like corporate DEI.
Good stuff.
That's good.
I'm glad.
But it's not the main problems.
And whatever they're focusing on is usually intentionally so that you don't focus on what's going on.
If you start questioning the wrong things, you'll get kicked out of the club faster than you could know it.
You'll get banned and they won't advocate for you.
You get censored.
They don't say anything about it.
They just do not care.
They enjoy seeing you suffer.
Because if you don't get on the bandwagon, on the right-wing bandwagon of being against trans issues, and which, by the way, come from the same people that run the media, it's pretty remarkable stuff.
Then you're not on board.
So they'll have you focus on a few things, right?
You can be against woke, but you can't be for identity politics.
You can't fight for your country to be restored back to sanity.
You can't fight for Christianity because they'll say that that's anti-Semitic, right?
You can't fight for these things.
They'll come against you.
When in reality, the world's just trying to live at peace.
And we're trying to find our way to get the users out of our banking system.
We have to shut that down.
Because the banking system is rigged.
We have these high interest loans.
You can literally find this fat guy sitting in his room tweeting with his fat, ugly wife.
His kids are in public school.
He can barely afford the interest rate on his mortgage.
And he's like, what we need is less Dylan Mulvaney selling beer.
And it's like, no, what you need is a home loan without interest.
What you need is a home that you don't need a loan for.
What you need is a world where the women do not work and where you can earn an income for your family so your wife can raise your children and educate them at home.
What you need is the ability to live in a country to where you can speak your mind as a man so you're not emasculated and overweight so that you live a free life and you have power and your testosterone levels rise.
That's what you need.
And even if we banned all the Dylan Mulvaneys from the world and we stop putting black people in white roles in movies, that's not going to help you lose weight.
That's not going to fix your marriage.
That's not going to make your kids straight.
And it's not going to help you get rid of your stress of paying that mortgage that keeps changing rates that you know you're never going to pay off.
With a system itself, it's not a system like the left says.
The system's corrupt.
The system's corrupt.
No, there are groups of people with names that control these systems.
They abide in homes.
They live in certain countries.
And they can be kicked out.
They can be taken out of power.
And so we're arguing about the wrong things personally.
And like Putin said, look, if you wanted the war to be over, it could have been over.
But these same people that have you arguing about trans bathrooms, they don't want it to be over.
I think what we have to look at in the interview that Putin did with Tucker, like some people, Andrew Tate, I love Andrew Tate, great guy.
And I read his full analysis of the interview.
And what he was basically saying was he was questioning, you know, Putin could have been a lot more direct, a lot harder.
He could have eviscerated the Western society, economy, military in a whole host of ways.
And he didn't do that.
And why did he not do that?
And I think we need to take a big book out of the big page from the playbook of Vladimir Putin and even of the Chinese and how they view the Western deep state threat.
Because again, we are fighting that same, we are fighting that same enemy in America as we try to get our country back.
And basically, what I took from the interview and from the entire Russian approach and the Chinese approach to the West is that, you know, sometimes people say that if you are a skilled debater or warrior, you're playing chess versus your opponent who's playing checkers.
What I see in Russia and what I see in Putin, and even in that interview, when he's not going as hard as he could, he's playing the game of Wei Chi, which is a Chinese version of chess.
It differs in the sense that you have 19 by 19 lines.
You have 180 pieces.
And the whole goal of the game is it starts out with an empty board and you have multiple battles of strategic encirclement that are taking place throughout the game across the whole board with your 180 pieces.
By the end of the game, you have this partial entanglement in various parts of the board and you try to surround your opponent.
Chess is a game of total victory where you try to trap the king and checkmate and take him out.
It's about like direct clashes, whereas Wei Chi is about strategic encirclement and mitigating the enemy.
And I think we need to start focusing on that.
And when you talked about we're not fighting or talking about the fights and the discussions that we actually need to have, this is, it perfectly explains how we're viewing this.
We're viewing this battle that we have to face as something that will have a simple solution, like libs of TikTok posting transgender, you know, crazy teachers and saying that's bad.
That's not going to address the crisis that we have before us.
That's this Klausvitsian method of war, direct war, where we can take out our enemy in one strike.
But we're fighting an enemy that is trying to surround us on all the edges and trying to take us out in the economy and our home life, our culture, our religion, you name it.
They are attacking us.
And we have to start fighting in a way that recognizes that we have to mitigate the strategic potential of this deep state rather than take it on with these single-minded approaches.
We need to have strategic flexibility instead.
And until we start thinking like that, we're never going to win.
Anyways, if you guys want to support this show, it was provided ad-free and the whole entirety of it because of the issues we had is provided free on X and Rumble.
Do not forget to support directly at censored.tv promo code offensive, where they allow me to say what I want, interview who I want without any repercussions.
Again, I'll be doing some traveling around Europe and the United States.
I'll be working on a film and some other things over the next year.
And it's all possible thanks to your help and provision.
I give a shout to my guest, Jackson, for continuing to wage the war and the fight against the corrupt establishment and the regime that is seeking to destroy our beautiful homelands and also wants to topple Russia so they can all be gay and have the sweet, sweet thing of more mosques in Moscow, more of their issues.
And I'm not even anti-Islam, by the way.
I'm not even anti-Muslim.
I think that they would be great in their countries and they could stick in their countries if the U.S. would stop fucking them up in Israel.
So that's my whole point.
People always get mad.
They're like, oh, you're anti-Islam.
No, I'm anti-Islamification of the West.
Okay.
I don't want the West as Christian.
The West is Christian and we're not Islamified.
And the only reason why the Muslims are coming over in hordes is because their countries were literally destroyed.
And they're being shipped over here by NGOs that are run by Zionists and by the American Global Homo complex.
So it's really an issue that I want to get down to.
So I don't focus a lot of my attention fighting Islam because I want to focus on who's causing this change.
So please continue to support this work as we try to figure out who's at the bottom of this.
Believe it or not, they might not just be at the bottom of the barrel.
They might be at the bottom of a sewage drain crawling out and then telling you you're a conspiracy theorist for pointing it out.
My name is Elijah Schaefer.
Have a great rest of the week, as always, and may God bless the United States of America.
I'll see you tomorrow night at 10 p.m. Eastern Time.
