Fat acceptance activists apparently hate this show, but I'm not surprised. Today, we are diving into some HOT discussions on the role of climate change in the Christmas story and a great debate over what we should do about America's obsession with adult content.
Hello my love books, how are you doing super well today?
I had a message of someone this morning who didn't follow me, who I don't know, like nothing at all, saying basically how I need to lose weight to be happy.
And the reason for my depression is because I'm fat.
And I was like, first of all, it did upset me.
I'm not going to lie about it.
It did upset me because I think it's just such a shock.
I was like, do I know you?
No.
I mean, you don't know who I am, first of all.
And you presume that my depression is because I'm unhappy with my body.
No, boo.
No, boo.
I was depressed.
My size eight.
I was depressed now size six.
I was depressed size 14.
I've been depressed.
16.
My weight doesn't affect my depression.
My depression affects my weight, if anything.
And so this lovely person decided to come on my weight and my depression.
First of all, that woman, Self-Love Live, is a fat acceptance activist is talking about none other than your favorite.
I used to be a gay black woman.
Now I'm non-binary.
You'll find that out pretty soon.
That's a new, I guess, growth or development in my identity.
She's talking about me because I sent her a message, which we're going to get into later.
By the way, I did not say she would be happy if she wasn't fat.
I just said that if she stopped promoting bad things like fat acceptance and started promoting health, she might find herself to be more of a happier person.
Anyway, today we're talking about the absolute disgustingness of what happens in our culture when we start promoting things that are destroying us spiritually, morally, and physically.
We're going to be talking about, of course, the porn debate.
Is porn good for you or bad for you?
We're also going to talk about the hypocrite of the week who, by the way, is trying to ruin Christmas for kids.
Christmas has been canceled for children.
We're also going to get into some amazing other stories as well.
We're going to talk about children who are advocating for abortion, how far the left has really fallen, and much more coming up in the next segment.
Welcome back to Slightly Offensive, of course, with your favorite host, me, Elijah Schaefer.
Before we get into the introduction of our guests, I do want to get into this real fast.
Before I introduce you guys, she said that I called her fat and told her she would be happy if she wasn't fat.
But I want to actually look at the real message.
Do we have the message that I actually sent her?
Can we see this so fast?
So I sent this woman a message, a private message, by the way.
She's a public figure.
She's verified.
So Amy Schumer on Huffington Post said, gets a lawyer to send hilarious cease and desist letter.
Basically, what happened was, is that Amy Schumer said she never felt happier since she's lost weight.
She's been getting in shape and she was joking because it's hard work and she wanted her lawyer to stop.
So I just wrote to this fat acceptance person, Amy Schumer feels better after losing weight.
It may be at the source of your depression because she said in her last video she'd been gaining weight and getting more depressed.
Someone with thin privilege, I can 100% attest to the fact that if you are in fact skinnier and do promote eating bananas and things, you are actually a happier person.
Yeah, and the first person to find the third banana, if you save the first two, if you comment near the first comment, I'll send you an email and I'll send you a free pack of stickers.
Speaking of fruit, thank you guys for coming here.
But I wanted to get into this first.
Our sponsor today, Awesome, is a really great movie that's out in theaters.
It's called No Safe Spaces.
You're familiar with that, right?
Did you see the movie?
And yeah, it's screened actually at Western Regional at a Turning Point conference.
And apparently, as you guys know, we're going to be talking about how crazy the left has gotten.
But of course, we're people who have the ability to have a voice.
We can speak out against it.
But the left has hijacked college classrooms.
They've hijacked the media.
And there's a lot of people out there who feel like they can't speak up.
They can't say things without getting a bad grade, without getting ostracized, without getting fired.
And they've made a safe space in society for people who what?
Only hold liberal ideas, not for people who believe in conservative ideas.
In fact, you're not only not safe, you're actually in danger of losing your entire reputation.
So basically, Dennis Prager and Adam Kroll, the podcaster and comedian, of course, paired together to make this incredible documentary type live-action film that looks at the power of what the left has done to make our country basically the opposite of what the framers set it out to be.
And they look at how they've taken over our classrooms and whatnot and instilled fear into people to actually speak their mind.
And what's really neat about this is that this film has amazing guests.
They have Ben Shapiro, Ann Coulter, Jordan Peterson, and many, many others who are coming together to understand that, hey, we can't just sit back and infight and bicker about, you know, do I like what you said?
Do you like what I said?
We need to realize that our liberties are at stake right now in this world.
And if we don't fight back, if we don't start using our liberties and our Bill of Rights, our First Amendment, our Second Amendment, these things are under attack.
And we've got to fight back against this and expose it.
And so if you want to see that video, it's awesome.
It's in hundreds of theaters across the country.
Go to no safeespaces.com.
Again, it's no safe spaces.com.
All right, so let's jump right into the first story of the week.
It's an English elementary school has banned Christmas cards because they apparently are not eco-friendly.
So the details is this guy, Principal Jonathan Mason of Belton Lake Primary School in Lincolnshire, decided to ban Christmas cards after a group of students reportedly approached him with their worries about the impact of setting Christmas cards on the environment.
It turns out he banned the ability for students to send each other Christmas cards.
They can only send up to one to the entire class.
And I say it's a hypocrite of the week because schools basically are built on stacks of papers.
But of course, the only papers that we can, why don't you ban tests?
Why do they always choose the wrong things to ban?
Like, now we've banned Christmas cards.
We've banned straws, but we still haven't banned the things that are actually causing the pollution, like China and India.
I can't really ban the countries.
But I'm saying we try to send our trash there.
We still send our trash in the millions and millions of tons over the years to like Malaysia and these countries, which are just dumping our trash in the oceans.
We literally ship it over there, our trash.
And all we've gotten is banning plastic bags, which also didn't work because when they banned plastic bags, they didn't ban plastic bags.
I mean, like, you see these, like, those little signs that are the little placards that are kind of like stuck in the ground saying, you know, no poopy or no dogs or whatever.
But I mean, this is a legitimate issue that you're having in your actual apartment complex.
I'm pulling in last night and taking up the, like in the place of the handicap spaces, there's just like a guy with like doing drugs with a baby stroller and just like trash all over the ground.
And like I'm driving into my community and I look at him.
He's just like, move along.
Like nothing to see here.
Like I'm just doing drugs in your community.
Like just like, no big deal.
Like it's just a stroller and like I'm leaving trash.
But it's the irony of saying, like, while they're banning Christmas cards, it's like, meaning it's like you're banning Christmas cards and you would literally have like homegrown domestic terrorists.
Have you seen it's like 20,000 or more people on the MI6 watch list or whatever in England to be potential domestic terrorists?
It's like you think you're going to save the environment.
You're not even going to have a country.
They always say we're not going to, well, we're not going to have a country if we don't have a world.
It's like, trust me, the world, we're doing okay.
We're going to move on without you, England.
You guys won't even have a nation.
You've let in so many people who don't hold your ideas and your culture and your values.
Won't mention what kind of people those are because I just, nope.
I'm just going to say, if you had parts of a bedding, blankets, pillowcases, and sheets, which one would they likely put on his clothing?
You decide, guess.
I'm not going to say.
I'm not going to say.
But if I had a guess, I would guess you're not going to say it.
I think it's a, this is like a, maybe in a way, like a unique Commonwealth country issue because Australia and Canada and, you know, the UK, like, we all do the same sort of stuff where we focus on the wrong issues.
It's like you're saying, you know, I mean, Britain has this influx of crime.
And I mean, if you look at knife crimes and acid attacks and things like that, it's skyrocketing.
And yet you have principals over here saying, just kidding, no Christmas cards.
They mentioned that.
Oh, well, I mean, at this point, I mean, I think in Britain, if you carry around a screwdriver, what about a narwhal tusk?
Actually, speaking of this particular topic with terrorism in Britain, did you guys read the article that was circulating about another guy who participated in stopping a terrorist in the UK who was then sent to basically like anti-don't become a Muslim hater classes where he basically they were trying to de-radicalize him because he stopped a terrorist.
So they have these people who are actually actively helping the community, protecting the community, protecting citizens.
Just, you know, like your citizen, you know, nice people who go out and good Samaritans, so to speak.
And they're being punished by the British government.
And I just think it's insane.
I mean, Australia, like I said, Australia is like following down this similar path, but that's nuts.
It really discourages you from being a hero because if I was going to save somebody and I had to go through some sort of compliance class and fill out paperwork after and like go to a government building, I probably wouldn't do it.
And if I'd ever got a Christmas card when I was in elementary school, I would be on the bridge and go like, well, like, what even culture am I trying to save?
I can't even send each other Christmas cards.
So just let that man stand.
Let that ghost lead, let that ghost husband send like, let him, let him in a sheet evil.
Let him just attack my people.
Like, I don't really care.
But honestly speaking, that's my case with England and the problems that they have there is they are absolutely hypocritical, which I want to get into, by the way.
Our next segment, which is alphabet people.
And, you know, before you call me a bigot for alphabet people, maybe I am.
I would have thought that most people would say no, but more regulation.
I mean, but I think like, I mean, you got to question what circles was that being shared and what's the general idea or I guess political leading of the people that are answering.
Okay, so I think porn definitely is having an influence on, this is why it's in the segment, on the sexual orientation of children.
And I think one book that I was reading recently called it Digital Sexuality, that basically your sexuality is being changed and molded by porn.
And I think this is where people are questioning its effect, right?
So, porn number one is one of the top reasons for 56% of divorces.
It's only the second most top reason, basically, for divorce.
The other one is obviously finding another romantic partner online or whatever.
But this is still a sub-case or on 56% of divorce cases.
Porn is one of the most reasons.
On top of that, right, we're looking at things, for instance, consumption of underage users, under 18 users, which, by the way, Pornhub, one of the largest websites, is even marketing memes towards children using the Yoda meme.
Do we put all this stuff on a certain type of internet that's like an X internet where you can get the people getting their heads chopped off and porn and all this stuff?
Yeah, what if we let it get privatized and like not the government comes in and do it, but maybe like parents get an app that's like a really good app that keeps certain sites down, knows which users are using it.
Maybe don't get your kid an iPhone for a while until they're older.
But it's like kind of like the wall debate too, where it's like you put a wall up, like, you know, you see the videos, people going over the ladder, people still get around it, but the masses do get kind of deterred.
So maybe if you do some sort of age verification similar to alcohol and tobacco, maybe that just like, say, goes from 100,000 to 40,000.
Like that actually is progress, and then you can start trimming it away and seeing what works.
We're talking about a lot of content already on the web, right?
So let's get into this.
It's a lot of content.
But then underneath it, it basically says, like, you know, you have the hyperlinks.
We'll probably have a picture up later, put it in a post here of this.
But it has the hyperlinks of what you would find, right?
Suggested searches.
I'm not sure if it changes it out every search.
But it has, of course, login, create profile.
And then the five suggested searches are gay.
It says gay sex, live cams, porn stars.
These are like big ones, lesbian and something else.
I forget what it is.
It's suggested.
Okay, so if you're going to look at porn for the first time, it's suggesting on hyperlinks that these are categories.
Now, nowhere in there does it just say like hugging.
a woman and man having sex it immediately goes in to like well yeah but look two of the top i know guys are really interesting because guys like i don't look at gay porn Well, if you look at porn, you look at lesbian porn, you're technically still looking at gay porn.
It's homosexuality.
You're looking at, it's homosexual acts.
I'm not trying to get judgy in this episode.
I'm just saying two of the five suggested searches were homosexual acts.
And those are two very different sexual scenes.
Men on men, women on women, like the opposite of each other, but still the same category.
So you're talking about someone new to porn.
If you're a kid and you type the first suggested link, you're going to get right into gay sex, which there was a activist guy who was saying there was, I forget his name.
This is Matt something.
He's online.
He has like 119,000 followers.
And he was talking about the importance of access to porn to LGBTQ kids because he was saying that a lot of us, a lot of us found out, this is what he's saying, though.
A lot of us found out that we were really bi or gay because with porn, we got turned on.
Maybe out of curiosity, we got turned on and then we realized we were turned on and it helped us realize that we were bi or gay.
And there's this idea that with the prevalence and the increase of people identifying as gay, lesbian, as trying these things out, that porn may be influencing this.
And I think that's where the main problem people are seeing.
On top of that, some of the greatest perpetrators of sexual assault on children now are other children.
In fact, in the UK, I think the greatest sexual assault of children is other children on children.
And the leading factor that psychologists are claiming is porn.
They're literally saying, I mean, psychologists are saying it's porn that's causing these kids.
So it's like we can protect our kids against predators in school, but how do you protect kids against other kids?
So what we're seeing is like for people that are worried about morality, right?
Or like that believe homosexual, these things are wrong, they're seeing it affect this.
And then people who maybe even, because you're not even a Christian, so people that maybe are like, dude, I don't care if you're gay or whatever, but I don't want their kids getting raped.
They're like, well, at least I can agree.
I don't want my kids getting raped by some 17-year-old kid on the playground or whatever.
Either way, it looks like porn is damaging the children and the evidence is there.
It's damaging the marriages.
And the lies are it helps teenagers develop, right?
It helps you understand your sexuality.
It helps spice up your marriage.
These are the lies, but it looks like it's doing the opposite.
But I mean, just to play devil's advocate here, is that not up to the adult and the person who's, I mean, if you're going and watching porn as an adult, that's kind of your choice.
I mean, it's not really up to a government or legislative body to mandate what you can and cannot access in that regard, provided that, I mean, and then you bring this whole thing brings up the whole thing of trafficked people and non-consensual acts on camera and all that sort of stuff.
And that's a whole issue unto itself.
But let's, for argument's sake, say that everything is consensual here.
Is that not up to you as an adult to do that?
I mean, that's sort of your choice, right?
Kids, I think it's a completely different matter because, I mean, we have this argument going in society presently that basically is discussing how we're exposing children to things that are completely destroying their innocence.
I mean, you think about it, like, what, 50 years ago, this really wasn't an issue because these things were sort of growing in their demand and what have you, but it still wasn't nearly as bad as it is today.
So, if we're really solely talking about children here as the main issue, then the thing is that it comes down to how much responsibility do parents have and how much responsibility does the government have in stopping this sort of thing.
So, I think you've got two really like major arguments.
And I think the adults thing and the children thing is separate when it comes to this debate.
Because what frustrates me about this is I'm a little bit split here because I don't think you can genuinely say that porn adds value to our culture or society.
Like, I know someone might make that argument, but I think genuinely, it's kind of like maybe with alcohol, too, when someone says, would you admit that life would be technically better?
And you go, yeah, I guess on a really rudimentary, like, spiritual, moral, physical sense, I could say, like, if you lived a life without alcohol, it's probably a better life.
But then, of course, you can bring in the things like, oh, what about people with anxiety at parties and weddings, and it makes it fun and blah, blah, blah.
And those are all fair arguments, too.
So it's like with porn, it's like, well, what about, yeah, with masturbation?
And people want to have pleasure or people want to, you know, voy or whatever.
Sure, no, I'm just saying it's a pleasure.
So I get it, and it's a freedom.
It's like, you can't you do things with, these are adults.
Let's just look at porn that's consenting adults.
Adults that consented to be on camera, blah, blah, blah.
Yes, but I think that the argument against banning porn like affects me negatively in the fact that like once it's already this prevalent and out there, I don't know what a ban could do, kind of like the war on drugs.
Like once the drug culture started and it went out, it doesn't seem like the war on drugs a stats show hasn't really helped.
And I'm not saying that that means that we go and legalize all drugs or whatnot.
I just see that it looks like we live in an imperfect world and the government stepping in and trying to play God for the people doesn't end up looking like it actually helps the country after the fact.
I think if we had banned porn initially and it wasn't produced and we could have gone into the future without porn as a part of our culture, I think that would have been more beneficial.
But it's like, well, what do we do now?
Now that there's over 10 million videos on just one site, there's ways around it.
Kids are smart.
I mean, is there an easy solution to this?
And that's why I don't like the argument against it because it's just like, if we just ban it, it's going to fix it.
And then if you say, I don't want it to ban, they go, oh, so you think porn's good for the culture?
And you go, no, I'm not saying that.
I'm just saying that I think that we don't know what to do.
And I always think I err on the side of more freedom than less.
When the conservatives go and go, so you're not a conservative.
I never said, I mean, I'm not as conservative as some people.
And the liberals go, we should have unrestricted access.
I go, there's a balance somewhere in here, but the argument can't be decided in one week on Twitter.
Like, this has to become a public conversation.
And it needs to become something that we discuss for some time to look at the ramifications of our decisions.
You know what I mean?
Like, it's not this easy.
It's just, yeah, let's just leave it and let's just ban it.
We've got to actually be taught.
It shows people.
We need to figure this out to let the best idea succeed.
Because I think if we do anything too rationally, and definitely what we're doing now is not good for our culture.
Like, the way that porn is easily accessible by children is not the way it should be.
I know it should.
I know that's the access to porn is too easy for children.
We're going to continue to talk about that actually.
We're going to do some street stuff.
It might already be actually out by the time this is released.
But I want to keep that argument open.
I want to talk about this more in the future as we develop this conversation.
But I want to get into our next segment, which is actually speaking of children, it's The West Has Fallen, which is our segment where we look at how badly we have fallen as a society.
This isn't a very long segment, but basically, you brought up this post.
They also have the sign language interpreter, which I think is fine, but we're just like deaf people getting skunked before this, not able to listen to anything, because now they're everywhere.
But then I guess, I mean, look, I agree that putting a kid in that situation, I mean, there's no, kids don't come to these conclusions on their own.
This is all adult-driven.
And that's, I mean, surely we can all agree that, you know, regardless if you're pro-choice, pro-life, that's not acceptable, at least in my opinion.
I mean, I'm sure you guys are on the same page with that.
But it's not acceptable because, I mean, you are indoctrinating your kid into a viewpoint that they, you know, ordinarily would probably arrive at one way or another on their own.
They might come to that perspective through whatever, you know, as they get older.
Or they might have a completely different opinion.
The point is that if you're telling your kid to think that, there's a bit of an issue here.
But I guess as I'm watching that, I'm thinking, as someone who likes to sort of sit on the fence sometimes with particular topics and issues and things, would you guys have a problem when someone brings their child to a pro-life picketing rally thing?
Yeah, so that's that's my question is, yeah, exactly what Fleck has just said.
I mean, so people attack you, and that's why like this is one of those arguments that I like to step back from just because people attack you no matter what you say.
But my question here is simply, if it was a kid who was pro-choice, sorry, pro-life, with their parents at a thing, you know, picketing, would that be okay with you?
I mean, because I think this is a moral, to me, this is more of a moral argument and scientific and moral argument because science, you can't have science without ethics.
No, that's what I'm saying.
So like for me, it's like, I know this might sound a little bit basically, it might sound a little bit reductionistic, but if you look at an argument, like, oh, so like, would you take your kids to a conference for purity?
Or and then would you then get mad at someone for like showing their kid porn?
It's like, yeah, because I think that the morally right thing to do, I think it's okay to put kids in positions to advocate for things that are morally good and right and pure and wholesome.
And I think abortion is an abomination.
I think it takes a life.
So that's in my view, having a kid advocate for something and talk about something that is clearly something that even when people get into, it's when they're sexually active and they're older and they feel desperate and there's a lot of complicated reasons of why people get abortions, right?
There's reasons why they do it.
I think a lot of most of the reasons I think are just convenience and I think that they don't know how to keep their legs closed and guys don't know how to respect women period and people don't seem to understand what condoms are.
Well, I'm just saying, but on the other end, I think that, yeah, I don't think it's wrong.
I would think that it would be weird to take a seven-year-old and like show them an abortion video and be like, they ripped these limbs off of a baby.
It's like, maybe they're like seven.
You don't need to show them that.
But saying, hey, people do take lives of children in the womb.
And we're going to go say that this is, we want to stand against violence of children.
Well, I think it is okay in the case of the pro-life.
Because think about it this way, too.
Remember the school shooting, and a lot of the kids that were under 18, the kids became public figures.
There was one side advocating pretty much anti-constitutional values, whatever you want to call it.
And there was one side of young kids that were like pro-Constitution.
So you don't want kids getting involved, but if someone's fundamentally sound in their argument, they're like, oh, we should respect the Constitution.
I'm 17, but I still get that.
It's like, what comes first?
I think the sound argument, and I think with the abortion thing, I don't think you can really be pro-choice unless you've seen what an abortion is.
You know what it looks like.
You've researched it a little bit.
Because I think the trick being told to everyone is, oh, it's a clump of cells.
It's a woman's right to choose.
It's her body, her choice.
It's just a clump of cells.
It's a procedure.
It's no big deal.
And if you believe that, probably like that little girl does, something along those lines of like a woman deciding, not even knowing what she's signing up for, once you go down that road where you're advocating for something without knowing anything about it, it gets a little murky.
So I think the pro-life kids in this example, they just want more babies.
And that's like a cool, fundamental place to start.
You would have a liberal watching this, say, or someone who's pro-choice, or, you know, maybe not even pro-choice.
Maybe I think there's a lot of pro-choice people who have.
Actually, I'm not going to go down that road.
But I think there's a lot of rational pro-choice people who would agree that's not okay.
There's probably heaps of them.
But the thing, again, it's just that we like to base our arguments around what our actual perspectives are, and that's when it's okay when kids are not going to be able to get away from that.
But I think simplifying an argument, like, I'm really, like, I don't compromise on this argument.
Like, by the way, I did an entire seven-month deep, deep research into this.
Like, meaning even in college, it was like an ethics class, and this was one of the topics I really looked into.
And I came out, I try to keep it with an open mind.
But after debating professors, teachers, people, and really getting into this, I found that the arguments for abortion were much more just about convenience and sexual liberation than they were about anything else in the end.
And I know that there's minor nuances of things like for when, for instance, when children, there's like these ectopic pregnancies, or for instance, mothers, I guess, during childbirth go through complications and you don't know who to take a life, blah, blah, blah.
Sure, those are minor instances, and I think that's up for people to debate those instances.
But even simplifying the debate as abortion is already too reductionist because it's saying, oh, yeah, just like abortion's abortion.
It's like, no, there's a difference between a medical procedure where you're literally choosing between lives and this is a complicated, like, this is literally a Hippocratic oath problem of you are supposed to protect life and whose life do you protect?
That's a medical question of like the value of whose life is more.
But the idea of when you're not ready to become a mother or whether or not you're going to be poor with the child, should the child grow up in poverty, these tend to be underlying arguments.
And so when I look at this with a kid, it's like when you're talking and you're even telling a kid like the argument is a mother's right to choose and a woman's right.
It already shows me that you are morally bankrupting that child with false political propaganda to make them think that they are doing something good when in fact they're fighting for the devil.
And so like, and I believe that.
Like, and you don't believe in the devil.
It's like you're fighting to kill children and you're telling your kid you're a sick, disgusting piece of shit, parent, because you're telling your kid specifically, yeah, it's this argument that's used and I'm going to brainwash you.
And I would say on the right, if somebody took a right-wing argument and brainwashed their kid to fight for something right-wing that's wrong, whether it would be an extreme idea or whatever, I don't think abortion is a moderate idea.
I think it's an extreme left-wing idea.
The most extreme.
I think it's more extreme than communism.
The idea of sacrificing children.
It's like old Molex style religiosity.
And so to me, it's like, but I'm not, I'm also not opposed to people who I've debated.
I don't mind talking to people or people who think differently.
I've just come to that conclusion.
And that, my faith, my belief, and understanding of even just basic scientific ethics shows me that this is, it's, it's disgusting.
Guys, just so you know, I want to let you know, please always make sure that you check out the audio-only versions of this podcast below to basically hear us in your car if you'd like to.
We put a lot of money into acoustic treatment.
We could have done more, but we had to get those bananas.
They were a necessity.
Anyway, we have a few things coming up in the next segment.
Number one, Sydney is going to eat $120,000 on camera.
It's going to be really cool.
Stay tuned to watch that.
We're also going to continue this conversation.
We're going to get into some woke stuff.
Our segment, You're Not Woke, Karen, as well, where we look at Chris Pratt and the director of Charlie's Angels and this upsetness in Hollywood about the way that you drink your water.
That and much more.
Make sure that you check out the rest of this on Blazetv.com.
Use code Elijah under the code.
Then you can use that.
You get $10 off, as well as you can find it under the contributors tab or also, again, listen to it for free, audio only.
As you can see, the lights are blinking because we got a hot, we're continuing this topic on abortion, which, of course, is both mine, Sidney's, and Austin's favorite non-controversial topic.
No, but anyways, as we just ended that last segment, Austin was about to make a statement.
No, I was just going to say, adding to Sidney's point from before, I agree that kids shouldn't be in politics, but the reality is that there are kids in politics.
So it's like, same with pop culture, too.
Same with pop culture and culture in general.
It's like, yeah, politics and pop culture shouldn't mix and entertainment shouldn't mix, but it is.
So we might as well get in and play the game.
So I'm not for kids in politics, but if there are going to be kids in politics, I want them saying what I think.
And I literally go, Elijah, I'm like, yeah, I'm bringing this person over for dinner.
This is like over a year ago.
And I was like, can you just like, you know, be a cool guy, whatever.
The girl comes in, my date.
He meets, she meets Elijah.
She meets Kezia.
And then before she even takes her coat off, Elijah mentioned that his uncle had an erectile dysfunction problem and that they didn't figure it out till the wedding night.
Because, you know, Karen is, she's a middle-aged woman.
She's trying to be relevant.
She doesn't want to be a boomer.
She just wants to like, you know, she's a Generation X. She's trying to stay relevant.
And she needs to make sure, like, well, how do I not have ignorant and copious amounts of debts and problems getting financially stable and married like the millennials while also not being a baby boomer and ruin the entire country?
He's not, you know, I mean, he's just like a normal guy.
He's not like wearing, it's not like an underwear ad, where they're like, This is a married man.
Nothing like wholesome about this.
It's just you look at this picture, it looks like a normal shot, and he's holding a plastic bottle, and they are pissed because he didn't use a reusable water bottle.
Yeah, he would like tell you, like, that, like, he would tell you that he was able to drink, like, you got drunk off two beers and he's able to drink 12, and you find out it's Coors Light that he's drinking.
Like, he's definitely one of those guys.
And he tells you he drinks them because it's like, because the mountain gets blue, and you always know it's like, it's a good night when the mountain gets blue.
Let's break this down for a second because the man with too long a hair who taps you too hard on the back, who drinks Coors Light, he had a single-use plastic bottle in one of his pictures at a giant hypocrite.
But then that would make sense when a man, a woman who's a man, could beat someone up with another man, and you'd be like, oh, that guy used to be a son of a man.
It's just they do it with such a cold heart that when you hit them back, you realize not only did you just hit a woman, but it's a woman who just doesn't care about life.
Like, they hit each other really hard, and sometimes they get knocked out, but it's not like a knockout power.
So in this movie, like, you know, Elizabeth Banks is going to go knock out these like security guys that have like earpieces in it and automatic weapons.
Actress and filmmaker Elizabeth Banks is pretty much woke as far as woke standards in Hollywood go.
For example, 45-year-old avid Planned Parenthood supporter recently created a terrible feminist film of Charlie's Angels reboot that bombed the box office.
And when it tanked, Banks naturally blamed sexism in the men.
True story.
But she's not woke enough, apparently.
On Wednesday, the Hunger Games actress was dragged on social media for a supposedly insensitive and tone-deaf health tip about drinking water.
Drink the water, children.
Banks captioned a post containing two side-by-side photos of herself.
The first photo is labeled beginning of the decade and the second end of the decade, which, to be fair, good for her.
I think when the world kind of burns down and the progressive lefts go back to wherever they came from, I think he'll be one of the celebrities that's like chill and is normal and speaks out and isn't like a psycho-rabid leftist.
Yeah, but to say this with the water thing, I just want to say the left has now taken down political correctness down to the way that you consume your water and the way that you talk about water.
Meaning, you can't win with them.
I just call this a farce.
I just say you can't be woke enough.
If water's not on the table anymore and it can't even be in the bottle, then where do we put the water?
Yeah, and that brings us to our last segment, actually, which is the favorite thing that happened this week or favorite thing you saw this week, which is, I really enjoy this one.
I would say my favorite thing of the week was the video.
It was actually the front of our last podcast, but it was a video going around of the trans activists that lobbied Olympia, Washington, because on Trans Remembrance Day, they held their hearings in a building with police officers and not enough wheelchair accessible ramps.
And it was, even though they were having a little trans remembrance day, like they gave a holiday to trans people.
There wasn't enough ramps and they couldn't, they said they didn't want police in City Hall.
Like they were mad that there's police presence in City Hall.
I just want to say, how dare you corrupt the symbols of my trans and gay siblings while also having those very same symbols protected by people who are meant to womenate us.
Anyways, as promised, as we would end this, this ends with Sydney decided she's going to eat $120,000 piece of art.
Can you get that off your thing there?
I think it made it kind of easy.
By the way, because guys can't eat.
The only well meet Pete Butige can eat a banana in public.
Everybody knows if you're a guy, there's only certain ways you can eat a banana in public as a guy, or else people ridicule you, which is really homophobic that you can't eat art in public anymore without finding people speaking slurs against you.
Can imagine just eating modern art in a public setting?