We're going to investigate, probably at a congressional level, the dealings of Google.
See, if you've been living under a rock recently, you might not know that Google has been straight up exposed, implicitly manipulating search results and content to their users to push a social justice narrative and prevent people from accessing free thought, Ideas that lean right and especially conservative commentators like myself.
Thanks to the hard work of project Veritas Okay, so today's story is absolutely incredible Basically, we have a trillion-dollar company, which is Google, that has been absolutely obliterated in their attempt to be deceptive and manipulate the future elections in 2020,
thanks to the investigative journalism of James O'Keefe, who runs a group called Project Veritas.
Now, Project Veritas, if you don't know what they are, they basically rely on whistleblowers or people in companies to come out immediately and to expose what's going on in darkness.
Like the saying goes, right, light is the best disinfectant.
And in this case, Google, you ain't getting away with nothing.
So basically, Project Veritas has this whistleblower from Google that came out, and this is kind of a background, and explained that this internal document, which covers this new algorithm called ML Fairness, which is set to sort of manipulate manually search results on Google and YouTube to provide information to the users that is not in line with what they're searching for, but instead promotes a social justice narrative.
For instance, he talks about the fact that right here, he says the Google Insider is quoted saying that they are bent on never letting Donald Trump come to power again.
And the Google head responsible for innovation, she actually says in this video that they uncovered on tape that even though she likes Elizabeth Warren, that she's misguided on breaking up Google.
She says that Google shouldn't be broken up.
Why?
Not because they want to be a fast, good company, but because Google Exec says, don't break us up because smaller companies don't have the resources to prevent the next Trump situation.
So basically what we have on tape here is an actual Google executive admitting that Google is trying to manipulate the 2020 elections by controlling the type of information that people can access.
And of course, some examples of that are seen.
Now, the insider that leaked this also said that other conservatives are being completely squashed by Google and targeted, including PragerU, Dave Rubin, and other right-wingers such as Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro.
And we're going to get into this.
This gets absolutely psycho because there's a new document that just dropped today.
Okay, but these leaked documents highlight something crazy.
It literally says that the machine learning fairness, Google's practices, are going to make searching fair and equitable, which means that Google is no longer in the business of providing information to what people want to search, but instead they're trying to take information that They want to provide to you to control the way you think.
Actually, they even say in the document that just like machines are programmed, so are people.
And Google thinks that they have the right to program you and control the way you think.
So they're going to manipulate your search results to get you information that you don't want.
They also show editorial practices to show how Google publishes news.
But this is where it gets absolutely crazy.
Basically, what just happened is that a new document was leaked from internal communication.
And it says here on this on Project Veritas that they obtained a newly leaked document from Google that appears to show a Google employee and a member of Google Transparency and Ethics Group calling the conservative and libertarian commenters, including Dennis Prager, who I've met before, Ben Shapiro, who I've met, the N-word, the German N-word, which we're not even allowed to say on YouTube anymore because they're allowed to say it in internal communication.
They can write it to each other and call us the N-word.
And I'm not talking about the N-word that people call other types of people with more melanin.
I'm talking about the German N-word, the one where they didn't like the Jews too much.
But, you know, of course, they're calling a Jewish person Ben Shapiro, which doesn't make any sense, part of this fascist party.
But Project Veritas received this document after the release of its investigation to Google by the Be Brave campaign.
But the document actually states specifically here: if we understand that Prager, you, Jordan Peterson, Ben Shapiro, et al. are the N-word using the dog whistles.
Basically, I don't even like to call people that word because it's just a stupid word that I'm not going to give credit to.
But Google is actually handling the information that is being stored on their servers and the websites that they're bringing traffic to on other servers.
And they're deciding that normal right-wing conservative conversations and commentators are extremists that have to be censored.
And so, what they're doing is it says further, it says, I don't think correctly identifying far-right content is beyond our capabilities.
So, Google's saying, Hey, look, we're not worried about all these left-wing extremist groups.
We're not worried about all this extreme rioting and in the streets after there's all these cops and these shootings.
We are going to look at far-right people because that's what's wrong with the country, right?
That's what these SJWs do.
They come in and they choose what is important and what's not.
Instead of facing the real issues like the homelessness crisis, illegal immigration crisis, the fact or focusing on good things like that the border is strong, they look and they go, Hey, we got to go to far-right extremism.
And instead of actually looking at far-right extremists, they go to moderate right-wingers who are actually changing the narrative, the populace, which is what Google hates.
Google is a tech overlord.
And they said, But if it is, why not go with Meredith's suggestion of disabling the suggestion feature?
And that's what YouTube is doing.
They're essentially not deleting conversations from the floor, they're not taking away our voice, but they're taking away the ability for us to share that information with the public.
So, what happens is if somebody goes and they search for, let's say, one of my videos, and usually when you watch a video on YouTube or you search something, relevant searches follow.
And on the right side of YouTube, there's this suggestion feature, which gives you videos that are similar.
However, YouTube has paired up now with the mainstream media, and they have decided to give priority to big media companies instead of independent creators because they consider our information and dialogue to be extreme, which is absolutely absurd.
And the leaked document appears to contradict Gen Janai, who was that person in the last video, claim that there's no notions of political ideology in its rankings.
Of course, when Gen Janai was confronted about this idea about whether or not she about whether or not she was actually basically caught red-handed in this video, I love what she says.
And in this video, she says, You know, we all got screwed over in 2016 again.
The people got screwed over.
The news media got screwed over, like everybody got screwed over.
So, we've rapidly been like, What happened there?
And how do we prevent it from happening again?
She says in another clip.
We're also training our algorithm.
Like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome have been different?
And so, what she's saying is, like, is there a way for our company to actually prevent the people of the United States of America from accomplishing politically and through democracy the way that they want to run their country?
Is there a way that we, as a special interest major corporate group, can come in and manipulate the algorithms to try to change this country into the way liberal elites want it that live in Oakland, San Francisco, and San Jose?
Yes, she believes that.
And of course, when confronted with the matter and asked about, hey, we caught you red-handed admitting to bias, of course, she admits nothing.
And she says that, oh, I just had some, I said some wrong things and Veritas got me, but she's not afraid.
And of course, she was interviewed by Senator Ted Cruz, not her, but another executive was interviewed by Ted Cruz, basically just caught red-handed and had that face you make when you get caught in your own BS.
