David Duke and Andy Hitchcock compare the Derek Chauvin trial to historical witch trials, arguing his conviction is politically driven despite George Floyd’s fentanyl overdose. They claim media bias and systemic discrimination against whites, citing U.S. Justice Department stats (2018) showing black attackers overwhelmingly target whites—548,000 white victims vs. 59,000 black ones—and reference a Belgian virologist, Dr. Geert van den Bascha, warning vaccines may worsen COVID-19 through viral mutation, while UK reports list 594 vaccine deaths and 116K injuries. Lockdowns, they argue, harmed mental health more than the virus itself, yet authorities ignore credible dissent like van den Bascha’s. The episode frames Chauvin’s trial as part of a broader war on whites, fueled by deceptive narratives and unchecked medical risks. [Automatically generated summary]
Ladies and gentlemen, friends and open-minded people, wherever you live, across the United States of America, across the world, this is David Duke, and this is the David Duke program on the Rins Radio Network.
We call this show Human Rights Radio because that's what it's all about.
And we've got to tell you something, folks, right now.
And Andy Hitchcock, first of all, let me welcome Andy Hitchcock from Great Britain.
He's our guest on Tuesday, and he's a great correspondent, thinker, activist from Great Britain.
Andy, welcome to the show.
Thank you, Dr. Duke.
It's always nice to be doing the show with you again.
We have an ongoing witch trial, and that's the only way I can put it these days because there'll be a time when all this madness is overthrown and people get in charge of their senses and their freedoms and their media and just become rational again.
We're going to look back on this trial going on in Minneapolis as we look on the Salem witch trials in America.
Of course, the Salem witch trials were pretty famous in the United States.
Of course, Europe wasn't immune from that either.
I mean, we have witch trials all over the continent.
There are a lot of witches burned at the stake in Great Britain, or given the dunk test or the swim test where they were bound and then they were put into a stream or a lake or the ocean or whatever.
And they determined somehow, some way, not very scientifically, that if they bobbed up when they were put into the dunked into the water, then they were a witch.
If they sank, they weren't.
Of course, a lot of times when people sank, they ended up dying.
But at least people knew they weren't a witch, and so their soul wasn't condemned to hell forever or whatever.
But we have a witch trial going on right now in Minneapolis against this officer, Chauvin.
And Chauvin is obviously not guilty of anything, rather than being really nice to this drug-dealing criminal record guy who took a massive overdose of fentanyl, three times the lethal dose of fentanyl.
He also, you know, one serious killing drug isn't even enough to kill this guy.
He also took methamphetamine, he was in the system, and cocaine.
Methamphetamine, cocaine, and fentanyl, three times the fentanyl that could kill somebody.
And he was begging to be taken out of the police car.
There's no evidence there was a massive autopsy, one that was very carefully monitored and very carefully researched.
And this is a very liberal place and a very woke place, Minneapolis.
And they found the cause of death.
And the cause of death was not suffocation.
It was not the restraint.
And of course, the police officer put on the subject, this drug dealer, this criminal, habitual criminal.
He was passing a $20 bill, which is even a federal crime, at the time when he was arrested.
He acted totally crazy.
He was becoming violent.
He was hurting himself.
He begged to be taken out of the police car.
They did that, but he still acted violently.
And the police officer restrained them as they could, as they were trained to restrain people like that, where you put your, where they lay them on the ground and you put your foot on their upper back to restrain them, your knee or your foot.
And then you're able, then, as far as you can use your hands then to stop if they start trying to grab you or grab a gun or do whatever they want to do.
It's a method that's taught.
They do videos on it.
They had a manual that showed that that's exactly what they did.
Now, in the trial yesterday, they showed the fact that it was, oh, well, in eight minutes and 49 seconds, it was nine minutes and 32 seconds or whatever.
But nine minutes really is a short period of time to restrain somebody while you're waiting for the ambulance while a person is being violent and crazy.
And he was actually hurting himself in the car, banging his head up against the door, the door jambs and the window jams.
He was being violent against the police officers.
And they could have left him in the back seat hurting himself.
They could have left him in the back seat, whatever.
But they took him out actually at his request.
They did subdue him after he was violent.
And now these people are being charged with murder.
But more than that, the entire white race, which includes Europeans, because you people in Great Britain and in the rest of Europe and all over the world, any white person is being charged with guilt of the murder of George Floyd.
Because this was white racism that killed George Floyd.
It wasn't his criminality for decades.
It wasn't his drug dealing and how many people did he hurt.
He is the hero.
He is the great patron saint of human rights for black people.
And of course, the realities are in this country and around the world that white people are far more victims of non-white violence, third world violence of people in their country, whether they're refugees or whether they're immigrants, illegal or illegal, whether they're people around the world who come to the country, far more white people are harmed by blacks violently in Great Britain, for instance,
than black people harmed by white people in Great Britain or in France or in Germany or anywhere else in the world.
However, if a white person ever does something in any way, even to restrain a violent black person or defend themselves from a violent black person, or if a police officer acts to protect himself and the community and subdue somebody who's acting crazy on drugs, then they're going to be charged with maybe taking their own or destroying their own life, locking them up for the rest of their life, or God knows, and put them in a jail full of people who want to kill them.
So we have a witch trial going on because what's being tried here is not, you know, it's not a murder trial.
It's a trial of witchcraft, which and the modern witchcraft or the modern witchery or modern witch is a, quote, racist today.
It is a white supremacist today.
And it is a guilt and a crime by all white people.
This is a hate trial.
It's a witch trial.
It's a ridiculous proceeding, and it's a violation of the human rights.
And they have all the people outside the courtroom with their, so to speak, their torches, you know, their pitchforks screaming for, you know, to burn this witch.
And this is a sad day that this is going on for not only for the European American people here, but also Europeans anywhere in the world.
And it's a sad day how the media is able to just broadcast non-stop this hate speech against your people, my people, and all white people when the realities of violence in the world is exactly the opposite in spades.
In fact, the violence is far, there's a far greater magnitude of innocent whites being harmed by black violence, black people attacking white people, raping white people, robbing white people, like, for instance, or even if he's, I guess he's not white, so they can't call that a hate crime against white people, even though to black people he looked white, which was the immigrant that was killed in Washington, D.C. by the two black teenagers who basically killed him by stealing his car,
tasering the guy, and then crashing his car and killing him in the process of stealing his car.
And then CNN tried to get out of that by saying, oh, that's just, you know, that was just an accident.
No, it's not an accident.
It's the commission of a crime.
You kill somebody in the commission of a crime and you cause somebody to die.
That's called murder.
But this police officer committed no crime.
He's not a witch.
He's not a racist.
He's not a criminal.
He is being prosecuted because he's white, because the black guy that died is black, and because we have a media that's constantly prejudiced any jury and prejudiced society against them by saying that he committed murder when there was no direct evidence that he did commit murder.
Your thoughts, Andy?
Well, Dr. Duke, I mean, what I would say really, when I saw it all happening at the time, it was my understanding that the neon-the-net technique is something that they were trained to do.
And there was talk as well of this being developed by the police in Israel.
So if I was that police officer, I would be like, right, here's the training that I had, here's the training manual, goodbye.
But of course, we know it's not going to go that way because they're going to do all that they can to politicize this and get this guy, you know, sentenced to prison for a very long time.
So there is no justice even for the people who are purported to be the arbiters of justice or the men on the street, the police officers.
And that's what would be my defense line.
But like I said, we live in a world where, you know, there's a saying, truth is no defense that applies to other issues, particularly in Europe.
And I think that we're seeing that rolled out into all forms of society and into all different subjects today.
If it doesn't, what someone does, it doesn't matter if they can prove that they were following orders or they had the right to do it or that was their training.
If the media doesn't like it and they display in such a manner to inflame the public, which is what they're so good at, they seem to have been behind promoting all the immigration.
And now that they've got it here, they're using these people to attack whites, which I believe was always the plan.
And if you look at the Mossad motto, it is by way of deception, thou shalt do war.
And so they tell us that these people need to come here because they're being persecuted in their own countries and what have you.
I forget the term.
It was, you know, asylum seekers.
Do you remember that one?
Because, oh, they're being politically persecuted in their country.
So they have to come here.
And as soon as they've got enough in our country, their own media is now inflaming them against the white population who we know these people hate most of all.
Back to you, Dr. Duke.
Yeah, and I do believe in something called the jury system.
Because you can't always, you know, judges who know the law can sometimes, especially if they're very cogent and they're educated and intelligent and literate and sensible, They can determine probably more accurately in a way whether somebody actually did break the law, or if all of the requirements and all the preconditions of being charged with a crime.
For instance, one of the principles of a crime in the United States and Europe is intent, that if you had no intent to break this law or commit a crime, then you shouldn't be charged with the crime.
You shouldn't be facing a court of law.
And it's true that jurists are, and in Europe, you have much more likely to get like a judge deciding a case or a three-judge panel deciding a case.
That's fine, though, except when politics, because when you have judges who are part of the political system appointed by the aristocrats or the politicians or the people who control our government, and when they also have a career that they're looking for to go to higher courts or other political careers or their reputation, they also, you know, most of these people who rise in the level of government, they really want to advance their career, their image, their values, right?
So, as a protection against that, our founding fathers in this country really pressed the idea, the laws, that we could have a trial by a jury.
And by the way, they were very careful to express that as a trial by a jury of our peers, or your peers.
And in a colonial America where you had a jury, which were all of your basic heritage, your own values, who were people who could fairly reason.
And I think that even in the colonial America, there was a lot more sense than what we have in this society because people wouldn't be driven to insanities and silliness and emotional reactions to people by a media that doesn't use facts to hurt somebody, that basically makes up facts, that appeals to the emotion.
Showing a video and a video again and again, dozens of times to almost every American creates an image of guilt.
We also have a concept in America that we should move a trial if there is a community bias against the individual, if there's been a lot of pre-court publicity.
And no one that has any sense and any sensibility can say that Chauvin has not been tried in the mass media and convicted already of murder again and again and again.
And also, the people of that community have been threatened by the mob with the torches and the pitchforks, you know, and the kill Chauvin signs.
That if he doesn't get burned at the stake, or the modern equivalent of being burned at the stake as a witch, which, as I keep talking about, the truth is that calling somebody a racist or a supremacist or a hater, for that matter, or a white supremacist, that's equivalent to calling somebody a witch.
It's just, there's no validity to it.
It's just, why is he a white supremacist?
Witches Burned at the Stake00:04:30
Because he is.
It's not like, well, exactly, what did he do?
What did he do to suggest or something that he was a white person?
Because he subdued a criminal who was passing a $20 bill or trying to, a counterfeit bill, who was acting crazy, who was on drugs, and they were waiting for an ambulance to come get him.
The ambulance came the wrong direction.
They were subduing him a little longer.
But, you know, I don't think there's any possibility that this cop was trying to kill him with 10 people doing a cell phone.
He had to see the people with the cell phones, right?
He had to be able to see this.
He had to know this.
He knows that if this guy was going to die, he had no idea the guy was going to die.
He realized the guy was on a drug trip, but he was actually protecting him from hurting himself.
I mean, this whole process is just insane and it's unbelievable.
So everybody knows that there's a lot of pressure to get a conviction.
That even though the jury is supposed to be unknown, they are seen by a lot of people.
It's easy to discover who a jury was and is.
And if they voted the wrong way, any of these black people or white people on the jury knew and they knew that their life was in danger.
In fact, some of the jury, the potential juries in the cross-examination of the jurors, jurors, said that.
That I don't want to do this.
I can't be in the jury because I'm really afraid for my family.
If I rule the wrong way, if I rule according to my conscience, my family can be hurt.
My kids can be hurt.
And you know what?
Probably the likelihood would be that if some white guy in the jury, or some black person for that matter, they'll be viewed as a traitor if they came out and they found him not guilty and it got out.
And these things get out.
There's ways to do that.
It's not hard to do some investigative reporting or some investigation to find out.
And there's a lot of people who want to find out because they want to intimidate anybody in the future in these kinds of decisions.
I don't think there's any question in my mind that they would have to, you know, they would not get a witness protection program.
They're not a witness protection person.
They're on a jury, but that's how bad it is in America.
They would be in danger of their lives, their children's lives, destruction of their homes, destruction of their career, disruptions of their reputation, maybe for generations to come if they didn't vote to convict, if they didn't vote to punish this guy as strictly as they can, even if they didn't even come up with the full sentence that they're calling for, the full punishment they're calling for.
This is a witch trial.
And Salem, Massachusetts, you had 25 people who were executed for being witches.
I don't think one of them was a witch.
It was based on a couple of teenage girls saying that, and that they were going into fits in the courtroom as witnesses.
They were saying that the defendants were controlling their emotions or were the demons were coming and getting them.
And they were convicted.
25 people were convicted and executed for being witches.
And if this thing goes on, it's going to be a tremendously black mark that someday, if we ever have justice, which we hope and pray that there is, you know, but when that happens, it will be such a shame for America and what America has become and what's become as well in terms of our people, our Western European people, your people, the jurisprudence, in fact,
that was created in Great Britain, the common law that was created in our ancestral home, the ancestral culture of the American nation and the American people, Great Britain, overwhelmingly, and the rest of Europe, that these very basic rules of common law and justice are being completely abrogated at every step along the way.
And he's being people are glued to their television sets in a show trial, which is nothing more than a show trial like what you'd have under Stalin during the communists that killed so many tens of thousands of people in those trials and many millions of people in the suppressions by the communists.
Rick Adams' Funeral00:02:27
Well, Dr. Duke, I've got an answer ready, but before I do, I just wanted to throw in very quickly a colleague of ours who's at RBN, who's been a radio host for many decades.
He sadly passed away last Tuesday, last Thursday.
His funeral is today.
He was commonly known as Rick Adams.
I've got his obituary very quickly.
I know you like to support other people in the truth movement who do honest work.
It says very briefly, Richard J. Rick Adams Janetta, 67, passed away unexpectedly at home on March 25th of this year.
He was the son of the late Sabatino Sam and Mary P. Pontorelli Janetta and brother of Louis A. Janetta and his companion Diane DePree.
He also leaves several close and dear cousins, Frederick Pontorelli, Ruth Iacobo, Dorothy LaRose and Raymond Pontorelli.
Richard was the host of Uncensored Radio Free Rhode Island and broadcasted over WALE 990 AM as well as many other stations during his 26 plus years working in the industry.
He was also known as Mr. Movie and was a real man.
His film collection is endless, consisting of over 4,000 titles.
He projected his personality well through his love of the film industry, both past and present.
And then it gives details of the funeral, which is literally taking place as we speak.
At 9 a.m. Eastern, we had the visitation.
At 10 a.m. it was the funeral service.
And at 11 a.m. when the show started today, it is the burial.
And that is at St. Francis Cemetery in Portucket, Rhode Island.
So I just wanted to pass my condolences on to Rick's relatives.
He was a good friend of mine.
And when I talk about my favourite presenters out there for interviews and what have you, I've always said Rick Adams and Jeff Rents.
And they both had that ability to tackle.
I know how much you appreciate Jeff Rentz as well, Dr. Duke, because I listened to your shows with him.
But they both had that ability of a softly spoken, engaging voice that tackled very difficult topics.
So I think it's important that we honour those people who've gone before and have taken the risks that you have suffered.
Jeff been, you know, literally attacked.
They tried to kill him by running into his car.
You were thrown in prison, something to do with tax.
And then you've got a letter while you're in there telling you that you actually paid more tax than you owed.
And that was supposed to be what you were doing in there.
I got a refund for the government.
And this is what the fundamental things they were going after me for.
But we know that the government never goes after anybody for taxes.
Transformed Klans and Free Speech00:04:31
I mean, even go over mild-mannered pro-Zionist conservatives, you know, if they're, you know, if they're just even conservatives, much less people that defend the white race and actually go after the Zionists that are destroying our country and leading these terrible wars and promoting the open borders and promoting ethnic cleansing our own people.
So that's true.
Well, okay, let's.
Any more comments?
I also want to go to another subject, too.
And this is.
One quick comment, because I threw that.
I wanted to get that insight.
I meant to get that in earlier, but it wasn't appropriate then.
But the comment that I had that I wrote down is now we know why six companies control 96% of the media.
And think about it.
All the way that the media has been jumping up and down about this guy who you described very well earlier in the show, but they're telling you how persecuted he was and how evil white people are.
If you had other media that were properly on the rot who were pointing out what you were saying, then they wouldn't get away with what they're getting away with, which is essentially socially engineering certain groups of people to be violent against a group of people for some reason they absolutely loathe.
And that's, of course, white people.
If you had a balanced media, so they needed to get this control because this was the plan that they had in mind to use the media as a weapon against their sworn enemy, the white race.
Back to you, Dr. Duke.
Yeah, I want to bring up something to you that's really pertinent to Great Britain right now.
Now, one of your great universities, one of the most famous historical universities of your country, of course, is the University of Oxford.
I actually gave a lecture there years ago when I made my trip to Britain in the 1970s.
And I was well received by both the teacher and the classrooms that I spoke at.
Even though I was ahead of the, I guess, the best-known Klan group in the United States at the time.
It was a non-violent Klan, by the way.
The Klan was always a generic thing.
There's always been dozens of Klan groups, if not hundreds of Klan groups with different ideas and different leaders.
The Klan was like a generic white rights or white agenda, white activist organization.
And my Klan was always non-violent and anti-violent, but it was a defense of our European culture and heritage.
And at one time, you had free speech at Oxford.
At one time, you had free speech in Great Britain.
In fact, they invited me over to Britain where I did the BBC Tonight program.
And the newspapers, in fact, headlined the next day after my appearance on the show, they said that millions of Britons may be forgiven after the appearance of David Duke on the Tonight program.
That there's something to be said for the Klan after all, you know, because I talked about issues that were facing Great Britain then.
That was the beginning, really, the earlier days of the massive immigration that's transformed your country, just like my country is being transformed now that they're bragging about this change.
But to show you the insanity and the true hate, the anti-witches and anti-witchcraft nature of the beast of the establishment and the elite of our respective countries, your country and my country, we can see it in this.
There's an article I saw on Breitbart.
The University of Oxford is considering proposals, this is a direct quote, that we remove sheet music from its curriculum over woke claims that teaching the Western form of musical notation has roots in colonialism and complicity in white supremacy.
I mean, so in response to widespread Black Lives Matter protesters and riots, who, by the way, are mostly pretty damn ignorant and stupid, I must say that too.
Last year in the United Kingdom, music educators at Oxford University have joined the wider iconoclastic movement which has been sweeping through British academia.
The music department at the prestigious and ancient university has seen calls to remove music notation from the curriculum as professors seek to focus less on white European heritage and culture, according to documents seen by the Telegraph.
Telegraph apparently ran this too.
But Woke educators went on to claim that musical notation itself is a colonial representational system that has complicity to white supremacy.
I mean, this is absolutely insane.
Mathematics and Racism Controversy00:11:42
The climate is similar to leftist pronouncements in America that mathematics is inherently racist.
Well, you know what?
I believe probably notational music, sheep music, is something to do too with quote racism or race, if that's what you call it.
And that's not racism to oppression, because nobody was repressing anybody by notating music.
So you could make these fantastic compositions and you could repeat them, and people play music and do this perfectly anywhere in the world.
There's no question.
This was developed by Europeans.
And it was a magnificent creation, and it was a magnificent creation in addition to art.
And mathematics was something also created by Europeans consistently over really a few thousand years, started originally by the more complex early mathematicians like the Pythagorean Pythagorean theorem in Greece and other higher mathematics.
And then, of course, your great compatriot, Isaac Newton, who gave us modern calculus, which gave us the mathematics, all the mathematics we needed.
A lot of technical issues made it possible to go to the moon, but made it possible for us to do the math needed to go to the moon.
Everything was right there in the principles that Isaac Newton, and yet they're even taking, they're trying to take his name off the so-called laws of gravity and the different laws of motion and the other mathematical things that he invented and he created.
And the fact of where we went from before Newton to after Newton shows us he was the greatest scientist the world ever known, was ever known.
But you can't even mention the fact of who the guy's name is anymore, and you certainly can't identify him as white, and you wouldn't identify that he's white.
And yet, they make Einstein to be the most intelligent person that ever lived, which he's not.
In fact, a lot of his theories, he wouldn't even first effect, they always show you memes and pictures.
Again, the emotion of how they program us.
They show pictures of Einstein next to E equals MC squared.
Yet, guess what?
That equation, E equals M C squared, was absolutely not created, worked out, invented by Einstein.
It was other European scientists, non-Jewish ones, in fact, that actually created that famous equation, which you always equate with Einstein.
But in terms of science, on the rank of science in terms of the world we live in, Einstein is a small fry compared to Isaac Newton and so many others.
Just, in fact, Pythagoras of Greece, you know, in that period of time to create that mathematics that we have as a foundation is amazing.
Now, I'll just continue one more quote here.
The professors of the university said the classical music, which is taught at Oxford, includes Beethoven, Mozart, and Schubert, among others, is too focused on what European music from the slave period.
What in the hell does that mean?
The truth is that slavery existed in every country of the world, every race of the world.
It existed in Africa long before there were ever Europeans in Africa.
The slave trade existed among blacks and existed among Muslim blacks in one great period of it, before that, other slave traders, Ethiopians and other people, long before whites even got into the lower continent of Africa.
I mean, it's just insane.
And the idea that somehow we can associate composers of music.
Now, that's talking about reaching with slavery and colonialism because they were white.
My God.
I mean, you better not ever say anything.
The Indians and the mestizos that are flooding into America from Mexico, they even have an organization called Asland after the Aztecs.
They revere their Aztec ancestors.
They were not only mass slavers, but they were mass murderers.
They were genociders who wiped entirely out many, many individual Indian tribes.
They would do sacrifices, vicious, vile sacrifices where they cooked their hearts out and eat them, you know, at their pyramids and in ceremony.
Right?
I mean, I don't think there's anything in European, you know, American history where we would wholesalely slaughter Africans in America and eat their hearts out and, you know, and so forth.
It's just insane.
This is the kind of viciousness, and it shows you what's really happening on a massive level.
And it's crazy when you think about this and you see this insanity.
So that's the latest from your very prestigious, fantastic University of Oxford, a university that I actually once was privileged enough to give a couple of lectures at.
Sorry, Dr. Jukes, I was just getting to unmute myself.
Yes, I mean, one thing that you do notice as well, and I imagine this is similar in the US, but all these sort of student, like you have the student union in the UK.
Well, certainly all the ones that I see in the media, all these people of color now are like the heads of student unions.
And that's this virtue signaling that they're doing throughout the place there.
And it just amazes me.
I mean, when you look at a lot of these Black Lives Matter demonstrations, which tend to turn into riots very quickly, and what you find, and the ones that I've seen in the UK, is the people look primarily white.
And the thing is, you've got so many of these Generation Z and these millennials and all this that have completely bought into this.
Well, they're the last people that they're going to come after, but they're going to come after them too.
One of their most esteemed professors, Noelik Martia, I'm not going to pull up the quote, but you and I both know, and I'm sure most of the audience recognize the name, that he said whiteness needed to be completely eradicated from society.
And so they make no bones about it, their own academics.
They want the white race off the face of the earth.
And these idiots that go promoting things like Black Lives Matter, which essentially means kill whiting, that's what it means, are actually going to be the architects of their very own destruction.
And they'll be, if the elite gets their way, they will be the last white people on this planet to be dealt with by them.
Back to you, Dr. Duke.
Yeah, I quoted a black author who often is given big space in the New York Times.
He's a New York Times op-ed writer.
And in this Root magazine, which is a very anti-white, pro-black, but anti-white publication, he had a big article just a few days ago called, you know, Whiteness is a pandemic, and that white people are just murderers and destroyers of the ice cap and all this other crap.
And then he goes on to say the way that we root out this white supremacy virus is by making sure there are no more bodies that can take the virus.
Basically, he was preaching a genocide against white people.
This black anti-white racist, which is printed in the Jewish New York Times, of course.
And that, again, who gave him that forum and who gives them and those kind of people the forum that may advocate this kind of a massive thing.
And of course, we talked yesterday also about the Jewish mayor of Oakland, California, who is overseeing a program to give $500 to people who have low income in Oakland, poor people who have children, but they're not going to give the money.
The $500 extra a month, they're only going to give those to black people.
They're not going to give it to poor white kids.
Poor white kids don't count.
Poor white kids don't deserve any help.
They can just cash in their white privilege, right?
Oh, yeah, yeah, right.
Those poor people.
And when you really think about it, to show you how it's not even talked about.
But again, as I've data and I've backed up with the Justice Department, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the U.S. Justice Department, under Eric Holder and Obama and under all the rest of them for years, they've been keeping data, and they show that blacks are 20, 30 times more likely to attack, rob, rape, assault, murder. white people than the other way around.
That's the probability.
And in terms of numbers, just in 2018, according to Justice Department figure, according to their own figures, that there were 548,000 white people who were violently attacked, violent incidents of blacks against whites, cross-racial crime, and only 59,000 blacks bothered by whites.
Now, whites are 60% of the population.
Blacks are 12%.
So 12% of the population attacked 548,000 white people violently.
And you think about the small 10% of whites in Oakland, a very violent place, a criminal place.
And you think about those kids, those white kids walking the streets.
And they live in an environment where the media is teaching black people to hate white people and blame white people for every problem in their lives and continue to show the stuff with Floyd and engender hate.
Already the white kids being forced into these schools, at one time we allowed whites to have their own schools and blacks to have their own schools, so each school could be oriented to their own needs.
We can't do that anymore.
So those 10% white kids, if they're less than 10% of a lot of schools, a lot of schools are just a fraction.
But they're enduring a classroom where teachers are teaching the black kids to hate white people, how evil white people are.
And this is what these white kids have to put up with.
And the assault, the intimidation, the evil that these white kids have to face in these schools is unbelievable.
And of course, they're also in an environment that's 10 times more violent and liable to expose them to violence than they would among their own people.
Because we know in terms of cross-racial crime that there's far more blacks that attack whites and blacks are actually, whatever you want to cause the reason for it, we know that blacks are more violent and commit far more violent assaults than white people do, among their own people and other people.
So to send white kids who, if they're among their own, their own people, their own heritage, they wouldn't face this kind of assault by anywhere near the same level, to send them into black schools that are much more prone to attack, make cross-racial crimes, it's horrible.
I want to go to another subject, if you don't mind.
I want to talk a little bit about what you're facing in Britain.
We've got about 10 minutes left in the show.
And I want to tell you something that really is kind of scary, Andy, and that the people should have some knowledge about this.
Vaccines and Viral Escape00:13:30
Now, there is a famous vaccine executive and scientist and researcher from Belgium.
He's actually Flemish in Belgium.
His name is Gerd van den Bascha, obviously a very Flemish name.
And he's one of the most famous vaccine researchers and experts and leaders in the world.
Maybe the most famous, far more famous than the same thing Fauci was.
I'll give you an example.
Let me just give you your background.
Then I'm going to tell you what he's told us.
He has warned the world that if we continue to administer this vaccine to millions, if not billions of people, an untested really vaccine, a vaccine that's really a medical experiment, that we could be endangering the very existence of mankind, the survival of mankind.
Who is this guy?
Okay, so he's been with GSK Biologicals, one of the biggest in the world, senior project leader, adolescent vaccine projects, new biotech vaccine development and QC and QA manager, head of adjutant technologies and alternative deliveries, research and development.
He was one of the directors of research program leader and the head of adjudence at Novartis, which is one of the biggest vaccine and diagnostic companies in the world.
Solvay Biologicals, right?
He was the global project director of North Windsor Vaccines.
He was the senior program officer of global health vaccine discovery, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, for God's sakes.
He was program manager for the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization.
He was the chief innovation scientific officer of UNIVAC.
He was head of the vaccine development office of the German Center for Infection Research, DZIF.
And he is the manager of Verico, another one of the large vaccine companies in the world.
And he has, so this guy is an authority.
He's not some anti-vaxxer.
And he would be considered really an amazing, intelligent, powerful researcher, knowledgeable person, one of the most in the world on the vaccines.
And he says, quote, he says, in this agonizing letter, I put all my reputation and credibility at stake.
All right, let me put this down here, read it all.
I expect from you, guardians of mankind, this is a letter, an open letter to the members of the WHO, CDC, and other scientists all over the world involved in vaccines and involved in top science.
He said this is of the utmost urgency.
Do not close this debate.
By all means, open the debate and turn the tide.
Quote, as a dedicated virologist and vaccine expert, I can only make an exception when health authorities allow vaccines to be administered in ways that threaten public health, most certainly when scientific evidence is being ignored.
The present extremely critical situation forces me to spread this emergency call as the unprecedented extent of human intervention in the COVID-19 pandemic is now at risk of resulting in a global catastrophe without equal.
This call cannot sound too loudly and strongly enough.
He says, for those who may have some difficulty in understanding how mass vaccination drives viral immune escape, and by the way, viral immune escape is the principle as with an antibiotic that when you give people not enough antibiotic or you give people antibiotic and you use it too much around in terms of spread it around too easily, it causes the development of superbugs.
And the fact is that a vaccine like this nature, based on one simple snippet of RNA, can end up causing huge increase in infectivity and morbidity rates.
In other words, a weaponizing of the virus, making the virus more powerful by not killing all the germs, that even this vaccine is being argued, that it's not simply a vaccine that stops infection, it's a vaccine that stops death from the infection.
So, it doesn't really wipe out the virus.
And it's the same principle that you have with any sort of pathogen, whether you're talking about viral or whether you're talking about bacterial, that if you don't wipe out all the viruses, the ones that are able to resist the antigens, the specific antigens that are produced by the virus, will cause the virus to evolve to a that definitely weaponize those viruses to be more deadly and even more epidemic.
And he's saying this: he says, He says, It will suffice to watch infectivity and morbidity rates in these countries who now have succeeded in vaccinating millions of people in just a few weeks.
In other words, UK, Israel, USA.
Whereas these countries are now enjoying declining infectivity rates, which, by the way, started even before the vaccines even got out very much.
They will undoubtedly start to suffer from a steep incline in COVID-19 cases in the weeks to come.
The steep decline we're seeing right now may be followed by a short-lived plateau, but a subsequent steep incline of severe disease cases is inevitable.
Sufficient scientific evidence has been brought to the table, unfortunately, remains untouched by those who have the power to act.
How long can one ignore the problem when there is at present massive evidence that viral immune escape is now threatening humanity?
How we can hardly say we didn't know or were not warned.
So, basically, Andy, and if you have any questions, I'll be glad to try to answer them.
I think I understand the points that he's making here.
But what he's saying is that this is an experimental vaccine.
It was produced in just a few weeks, actually, in terms of testing.
The testing wasn't even done by an independent force, say, at Oxford or any other universities or independent organizations, even though those are often funded by the big pharma and the big vaccine makers.
It was actually the tests on it were actually funded by people standing to make billions of dollars from these vaccines.
And we've seen fraud in big pharma productions of things, even when they study them for years.
We've seen fraudulent research, we've seen fraudulent testing.
And there's a lot of evidence that even the testing wasn't done rightly.
So, you're giving an experimental vaccine, not to a few thousand people or a few hundred thousand people, you're giving them to perhaps billions of people.
And these are being produced by companies that are standing to make billions of dollars, billions of dollars.
And the more people that get sick and the more mutants of the virus, and this is what he's saying, he says that this vaccine program, because of its nature as compared to the immune system, will produce more mutants that will be spread more rapidly.
In other words, they're more contagious and that will be more deadly in form, because this is a way of weaponizing viruses and kind of promoting an evolutionary development of the viruses in what's called immune escape that will make them more deadly, which could actually inflict incredible damage to human beings.
What he's saying is that every virus, and he's the vaccine person, right?
He is one of the top authorities on viruses in the world, as I talked about with his background.
He's saying that these viruses are always behind the curve.
In other words, for instance, the behind the curve are the, let's say, the vaccines are behind the curve of the development of mutancy in flus.
That's why vaccines are only developed after the fact.
Like, if you have a flu when they have the big flu wave, it takes a long time to develop a vaccine.
We've already had a lot of deaths from COVID, supposedly.
Certainly, far less deaths than they're saying in the media, but still a bad flu season.
But the point is that when you do these vaccines, what you're liable to do is you're liable to weaponize the virus.
And he's concerned, he thinks we're going to have much bigger waves and much bigger deaths because of this virus, not because of the didn't vaccinate people, but the vaccines themselves will accelerate the development of these killer bugs, of these killer viruses.
It's really a scary thing, and because every flu epidemic, whatever it is, every flu epidemic, every viral epidemic, every pathology has all ended in the history of the world pretty much by the development of human immunity, by the development of human herd immunity.
And most of the 80% of the people don't even get the antigens of this virus.
They've got a strong enough T-cell immunity, N cells, K cells, with the microphages, they can destroy the cells that were infected.
This vaccine is only about stopping certain antigens, which means that you're not really wiping out the antigen.
You're not really wiping out the virus itself.
And when you do that and affect only the weakest of the viruses, and they are able to survive, it basically causes the virus to get even more viral and more dangerous and more spreading, and which may cause a huge disaster, maybe the biggest disaster in the history of mankind.
Any questions or any thoughts on this?
Well, I mean, Dr. Duke, it's going to be interesting how this plays out.
We know that some people are being affected immediately.
Every Monday on my show with Paul English, Andrew Cones, and Hitchcock.com, I go into the figures for this week since they started publishing the figures.
And so far, as of yesterday, in the UK alone, we are now up to 594 deaths and 116,632 people injured from the vaccines.
And that's according to figures off the UK government website.
So if you want to go to the US government website, it's state.gov.
In the UK, it's gov.uk.
So these are our official figures.
Yet our media, for some reason, doesn't seem to be able to broadcast them at all.
And we even had our own health secretary, Matt Hancock, being asked about deaths and injuries from the vaccines.
And he claimed to not know what these figures were in the House of Commons on Thursday last week, less than a week ago.
And he quoted the NIHRA, which actually provides these figures on the government website that he claims was completely unaware of.
And none of the politicians asked him questions about it seemed to be aware of it either.
The whole thing is an absolute damnable duke.
And I hope that it can bring down governments around the world.
Well, you know, we've talked about this a lot.
You know, the lockdowns and all these things have caused far more deaths than they're saving because you can look at countries and areas of America, like states that have had strict lockdowns and strict mask wearing mandates to those that haven't.
And the death tolls aren't appreciably different.
In fact, in some ways, they're better in Florida, for instance, that had much less lockdown of schools, much less lockdowns of society, much less mandates of mask wearing than other states like New York and California that had used disasters.
So there's no evidence that lockdowns and the result of the WHO and the CDC has saved any lives at all.
But then you look at the massive, the doubling of suicide rates, including young kids who are never almost killed by this virus, which is less deadly than the flu to them.
You look at other people, the murder rates going up, the mental illness rates going up, the undiagnosed millions of people across the world, undiagnosed cancers that could have been cured if they were caught early, and the other diseases that we're facing.
This is a disaster.
And I'm not saying this is what's going to happen here, but you've got to think of it this way.
Even if Geert is one-tenth possibly right, or maybe there's one chance in 10 that what he's saying is true, and he's really convinced this is going to happen, and he's one of the biggest authorities in the vaccines.
So even if he's one-tenth right, is it not worthy?
Why don't all these medical authorities create a study effort and an effort to study what he's saying and the evidence about this danger that we're facing instead of just running out headlong and giving it to billions of people, which might cause a real virus of massive death across the world?
This is a very scary thing, and certainly we should always err on the side of caution.
The greatest form of immunity is, of course, a natural immune system.
It's an innate immunity that's developed by contracting the disease among people who are not killed by it, but the body reacts to it and destroys the virus.