David Knight critiques Donald Trump as an "unhinged Bulgarian" war monger influenced by Benjamin Netanyahu, analyzing Supreme Court birthright citizenship arguments and Pam Bondi's tenure. He exposes alleged cover-ups in Epstein documents involving Todd Blanch and Rod Rosenstein, noting over 23,000 closed criminal cases under Stephen Miller and JD Vance. Knight argues these actions constitute criminal malice that ignores due process, potentially inciting civil war if Democrats seize Congress midterms to impeach Trump, ultimately granting a "license to kill" American citizens. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, sat-12l-sm, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Telling Truth Is Revolutionary00:09:21
And in fact, if you look, come to think of it, well, I got to look at this myself.
Wow.
Of Deceit.
Telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
It's The David Knight Show.
As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 6th of April, year of our Lord 2026.
Well, over the weekend, we saw Trump was not having a good holiday.
His rant tells us something very important about him.
Not only is he an unhinged Bulgarian, but he's also desperate and dangerously losing that everybody worldwide should be concerned about.
But we're going to take a look at what you and I can do about this.
Even as he's finally given up on Pam Bondi.
He apparently has not given up on war mongers' routine.
Yeah, he likes to just take the oil and kill people.
That's what he prefers to do.
So we're going to take a look at that.
The Supreme Court arguments, what comes next after Bondi is gone, and what is her legacy?
What is the argument about birthright citizenship?
Could it be that he can't execute even that and that he poisons the water for anybody who would try to do so in the future?
We'll be right back.
Well, you know, some people have seen.
A.B. Todd Blanch can do even better.
This is what he said when he was asked about the Epstein documents.
Thank you.
You said this is the end of your review of the Epstein files.
So.
Question that I have never said.
There are perpetrators when there's victims.
I want you to learn about men that abuse these girls.
Like, what does that mean?
What does that mean?
I don't know what you're talking about.
Through Epstein's.
We said in July.
And it remains as true today as it was in July.
If we had information in the Department of Justice about men who abused women, we would.
You can trust them.
Prosecute them, right?
Of course.
We're so honest.
I said this earlier.
There's this built in assumption that somehow there's this hidden tranche of information of men that we know about that we're covering up or that we're choosing not to prosecute.
That is not the case.
I don't know whether there are men out there that abuse these women.
Don't know about that.
I mean, come on, let's get real here.
You know, even John Kennedy of the Republican Party, Senator from Louisiana, was laughing about that.
He goes, You seriously want to tell us that we have all these victims, but there's no perpetrators?
How does that happen?
Yeah, if there are people out there, you know, and so what they do is they redact the names.
And he was a part of this.
Remember, he's been the deputy attorney general.
He was a part of this.
Redact the names of the perpetrators, expose the names of the victims.
I don't know what you mean about that.
I was going to, I didn't have time, but I was going to put that clip of Martin Short where he's, uh, This sleazy tobacco company executive examined on 60 Minutes.
You know, it's funny that you'd say that, Izzy Sweats.
I don't know what you're talking about.
Yeah, it's funny that you say, you've baked in an assumption there that there are criminals when there's victims.
I don't think there's any criminals.
I can't see any.
And of course, they're seeing the same thing with the farm disgusting.
They rape children, they murder people, they start wars, and yet I don't know what you're talking about here.
And supposedly, he's a really tough guy, according to Jonathan Turley.
He said, he'll gut you like a trout.
Well, I have no doubt about that.
And I have no doubt that after the elections, DC will be swimming with Democrat trout who are out to gut Trump and impeach him.
And so I imagine it's going to be open warfare there.
This is what it's really about.
They want a domestic civil war.
And the way we don't do that, what we do as individuals is refuse to be co opted into their tribes.
We have a standard of right and wrong.
That is outside of Trump and his regime, outside of this criminal that you just saw there.
This is the guy who spent hours with Ghislaine Maxwell, and then all of a sudden she ends up at Club Fed.
What kind of a deal did he do with her?
Did he gut her like a trout?
Or did he gut the Constitution, justice, and the victims like trouts?
That's the real issue.
As a matter of fact, Judge Napolitano had this to say about how this folds into everything.
One of the reasons that I believe he will commence a war, whether he announces it tonight or not, is because he's very much under the thumb of the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his Zionist donors here in the United States.
And if Trump were to abandon them, they would make nations of a personal inappropriate behavior, which they can document.
Or by their use of cash to fund people who would be elected to the Congress will make his life miserable.
If the midterm elections were held tomorrow, the Democrats would control both houses of the Congress, and that is enough to pretty much stop him in his tracks.
He won't get any legislation passed, and they'll commence impeachment investigations immediately.
Yeah, and so when we look at Pam Bondi, the issue comes back to the same issue for everybody in the Trump administration from the guy himself on down.
Is it incompetence or malice?
Criminal malice.
So the Justice Department, for example, has dropped 23,000 criminal cases to make room for Trump's immigration crackdown.
You know, we're told over and over again, well, they're getting rid of the worst of the worst.
We've got to get rid of these people, and whatever it takes.
You know, we're going to have to have a Nazi like Gestapo out there completely ignoring the rule of law, completely ignoring the Bill of Rights, due process, search warrants, all the rest of this stuff.
Just if you think somebody looks illegal, they are illegal.
Just take action on that.
You can kill American citizens protesting your violation of the Bill of Rights, and we'll grant you absolute immunity.
You have a license to kill, quite literally.
This is Stephen Miller.
This is JD Vance saying this over and over again.
And it's warranted because we've got to get the worst of the worst.
Well, the reality is, if you look at these statistics, and two different organizations have done so, in the first six months of Trump's second term, Bondi's DOJ has closed over 23,000 criminal cases while shifting resources to immigration.
The majority of these cases, the analysis found, were closed without prosecution, calling into question the Trump administration's commitment to the rule of law.
Whoever thought the Trump administration had a commitment to the rule of law?
That's what I want to know.
I've never heard that charge leveled against him.
He is the person who is most contemptuous of the rule of law, whether it is federal, constitutional, or international.
He hates it or God's moral law.
He cares nothing about any law anywhere.
And he said that over and over again.
He said it himself.
Well, fortunately, you know, he says there's, I'm not restrained by any law, just by my own quote unquote morality, of which he has none.
Within weeks of Pam Bondi being A.G., the Department of Justice declined to prosecute nearly 11,000 cases, ProPublica found, and the number of declines.