The David Knight Show - Tue Episode #2140: The “Assassination” Attempt: Trump, Tucker & Deep-State Theater

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 18, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:01:40

Tue Episode #2140: The “Assassination” Attempt: Trump, Tucker & Deep-State Theater

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	Well, as the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 18th of November, year of our Lord, 2025.
	Today we're going to talk about what is happening in Vietnam.
	Truly is amazing, and it is a harbinger of what is coming here.
	There is a gold panic in the country where they closed tens of thousands of bank accounts because they didn't have their biometric ID.
	Yeah, the Marxists here in this country will do exactly the same thing.
	But begin, we're going to begin today with the back and forth between Kash Patel's FBI, I guess we should call it the FIB, and Tucker Carlson as they're talking about the purported Trump assassination.
	We'll be right back.
	And I said Trump assassination, I mean attempt, the alleged attempt, which, by the way, I have not been definitive about it, but I will be today.
	I will tell you exactly what I think is going on with this.
	But Tucker Carlson did an expose.
	He said, I had an anonymous source contact me with all kinds of information about this alleged shooter, Thomas Crookes.
	And the FBI said they didn't have any of that information, that he was a non-person on the internet.
	And so he called him out on that, and the FBI immediately responded to him.
	Their rapid propaganda force immediately came out.
	And, you know, here's the thing, you know, there are so many questions about these assassinations always.
	Everybody looks very carefully now at assassinations or assassination attempts because of the JFK thing.
	And of course, that was where the FBI coined the term conspiracy theorist.
	What does that tell you about the FBI?
	That should be all you needed to know, really.
	The fact that they would, every time they do an investigation, they begin with conspiracy theories, right?
	It's the most common charge is conspiracy to do such and such or whatever.
	You name the crime, and they will give you a conspiracy charge for that.
	So part of ramping up the charges against somebody to make sure they do a plea bargain rather than have a jury trial is to multiply all the charges using things like conspiracy, you know, robbery and then conspiracy to commit robbery, that type of thing.
	They always believe that people typically act together, except when it's an important political event.
	Then it's always a lone shooter, right?
	So Patel was seemingly responding to Tucker's claim that the government originally said that Crooks had virtually no online footprint.
	But that's not the point, says Ziero Hedge.
	If all of what Patel says is true, why don't we know any of it?
	Why did it take an anonymous tip to Tucker Carlson to provide the public with Crooks' public shift from a Trump supporter to a Trump hater to a failed assassin?
	The public has an interest in this and a right to know.
	Well, the reality is, okay, again, let's go a little bit further here.
	In late September, Carlson's team received an anonymous tip from someone who said they'd gained access to some of Crook's online accounts.
	Let me say something.
	When it comes to political assassinations or assassination attempts, shouldn't your spidey senses go off as a reporter if you get an anonymous tip with some information that nobody else has been able to find?
	I got to say it does for me.
	And, you know, when I look at what Tucker Carlson is doing here, this is what I see happening.
	I don't see a conflict between the lying director of the FBI Kash Patel.
	We all know he's a liar and shamelessly about it.
	I mean, he has less credibility than Comey and these other people who went before him, Christopher Wright.
	It's just absurd what this guy had become.
	He always looks like a deer caught in the headlights.
	But he really is kind of a deer caught in the headlights.
	He doesn't really know.
	Well, see, when anybody asks him a question, he's like, well, see, let's see.
	What would Trump want me to tell them?
	It's not what's the truth.
	It's not a straight answer.
	It's what would Donald want me to tell them?
	And so I don't trust a thing this guy says, but I also don't trust Tucker.
	You know, Tucker, who comes from a CIA family, who for years, for years, pushed back against the obvious questions about 9-11, and now he's going to do a documentary about 9-11.
	Give me a break.
	It's going to be the biggest controlled opposition limited hangout you've ever seen.
	I guarantee you that without seeing it.
	So when I look at this and you get an anonymous tip, I never believed QAnon, and you know that if you watch me.
	Why?
	Because somebody talking about something important like that, you better put your, you know, the game is you can call somebody up and say, I'd like to remain anonymous, and the press typically abides by that if they want to have access to things in the future, they don't want to burn a source.
	And so it's okay for somebody to say, I don't want to go on record with this.
	Please don't use my name.
	But you better vet that person.
	And you better vet where that information is coming from.
	I at Infowars have seen this done many times.
	I think a good example of this was the way they spun the Jade Helm thing.
	They give you some information, sensationalize it, and then if you run with it, right, they will let you run off the cliff with this stuff.
	And I've seen that happen over and over again.
	And I think that when you get an anonymous tip on something like this, it ought to raise a lot of red flags.
	It ought to raise a lot of red flags for people what is happening with Tucker.
	He plays the same game that Alex Jones does.
	They basically go out and they make the truth unbelievable.
	Somebody introduced Alex Jones that way once at an event.
	And I thought that was the best description of Alex I've ever heard.
	He makes the truth sound unbelievable.
	He sensationalizes it and puts it out there and goes, oh, they're turning the frogs gay.
	Well, you could talk about particular chemicals and you could do it in a very dull and boring way with data.
	But if you say they're turning the frogs gay, that gets everybody's attention.
	And then the next thing is they laugh.
	But he doesn't care.
	All he wants is the attention.
	Tucker is the same way and rapidly becoming as bad or worse than Alex Jones.
	And so he doesn't really care.
	He just wants to get in there and start talking about this and bringing it up again because it gets a lot of attention.
	And so let's give him a little bit of that attention.
	I think this whole thing is nonsense, and I've thought so from the very beginning.
	And it has absolutely nothing to do with what the FBI is saying or what he's got information online or not.
	Here's an example, okay?
	You know, when we look at Donald Trump's ear, before and after, right?
	Do you see anything there?
	No?
	Let me tell you, if he got shot in the ear, you would see it.
	Come on, folks.
	Let's wake up a little bit.
	If you look at the fact cartilage does not grow back.
	This meme out there, one of these guys got shot in the ear and the other one didn't.
	When you get hit with cartilage, cartilage does not grow back.
	As a matter of fact, you remember Mike Tyson when he bit the ear of Evander Holyfield?
	You had there were jokes about it, you know, new Ereos, like Cheerios.
	There's a spoonful of ear-shaped things that you can eat.
	Breakfast of champions.
	Hey, Mikey likes it.
	Eereos.
	And so the General Fools is the name of the company that makes.
	You remember they got in the fight and he bit his ear.
	Well, you know, here's what his ear looks like, Evander Holyfield's ear looked like.
	See that?
	Where he bit it?
	Take a look at what he looks like 27 years later.
	Same thing.
	Cartilage does not grow back in adults at all.
	Not at all.
	And, you know, when you look at the ear, I think the ear says it all.
	Now, I guess, you know, we could set up a new brand of product.
	You could have the Trump ear cream that regrows ears.
	This is called Gullibolegna.
	Upgraded formula for MAGA, the ear regrow cream.
	Three drops nightly and apply a stupidly large bandage and the ear will regrow in 10 days.
	There you go.
	Hey, it worked for Trump.
	The best testimonial you could have, right?
	And as one person put it, Trump is the only person in history that had an ear grow back.
	As a matter of fact, I saw it.
	I'm not going to put it in here.
	I saw somebody saying, well, you know, they were questioning whether or not Trump was shot in the ear.
	So these guys took a dummy that has, you know, they make dummies that you can shoot and they have the same consistency as a human body so you can see the damage.
	And this one had this, you know, earth was there.
	And the guy took several shots and finally he was able to nick the ear.
	Of course, if it had been the ear, the ear could have been shot randomly and it could have been amazing, but then you would have seen it.
	You know, the bigger miracle, I guess, is the fact that it regrowed, that it regrew.
	It regrowed.
	It regrew as opposed to it came like this close to hitting him in the brain.
	The bigger miracle is that it regrew.
	And so he takes a couple of shots at it.
	He hits it with a rifle.
	And it just decimated that ear.
	Now, the ears, you could argue, is not exactly like the human ear.
	Nevertheless, to me, he was trying to disprove the critics.
	I forget exactly what his take was on it.
	But to me, it proved Definitely that that was the case.
	And, you know, I, when we were watching, I looked at the footage of this, Karen said from the very beginning, she said, that's fake.
	That's fake.
	That's fake blood.
	And I could have put a squib in his hand or something like that.
	Or this is a guy, if you remember, how much he was tied to professional wrestling, the WWE, Vince McMahon.
	They even had Trump get in the wrestling ring with Vince McMahon at times and things like that.
	Well, you know, wrestlers are known to palm a razor blade and cut themselves so that they're really bleeding and to make it look real.
	And I'm sure that he probably could have learned that trick easily enough.
	And of course, then there's the other thing when people started talking about how it was fake, they talked about the staged photo op with a flag as everybody's running around.
	You've got the flag that is lowered into place very slowly.
	We don't know.
	You're not recovering.
	Here's a clip that people were putting around here.
	But as we were talking about it last night, Lance said, well, I've actually seen other footage where one of these stray bullets hit the hydraulic hoses on this boom that had the flag.
	And it was spewing hydraulic fluid.
	So it might have been a natural thing that happened.
	We'll give them that.
	I'll say this: that the clownish actions of the Secret Service from not protecting the area and leaving that roof unprotected, unwatched, and all the rest of that, that's pretty amazing, but you can understand that as incompetence.
	And then, even just as amazing is the clownish way that they would let the person that they're supposedly protecting stand up with his head in his hands and head above theirs and his hands in the air and yell fight, fight, fight.
	Secret Service doesn't do that if they're doing their job right.
	So you could chalk up the Secret Service to gross incompetence.
	And I mean, really, really gross incompetence.
	You could chalk up the flag to the shooting of hydraulic lines.
	But there's no explanation for the ear, except for a wrestling trick.
	And yeah, people got shot.
	People got killed.
	They're willing to do that, folks, for their agenda.
	Look at how many people they killed on 9-11.
	They even killed people in the Pentagon for 9-11.
	So what's going on with Tucker?
	Well, I think he's either knowingly or unknowingly selling this fake assassination attempt.
	That's my take on it.
	And I have, you know, things have calmed down now.
	We can talk about it.
	But I don't believe it at all.
	And when you look at how they moved heaven and earth to get this guy in office, the Democrats coming up with one ridiculous charge after the other.
	And James Carville said at the same time, it wasn't just me.
	He said, you're going to put this guy in the presidency.
	This is helping him more than it's hurting him.
	And he didn't have to debate anybody.
	He got the sympathy vote.
	I mean, that was it.
	Once they did all these indictments, he was elected by Letitia James.
	He ought to send her a note of thanks rather than trying to catch her in some kind of a process crime about her mortgage.
	You know, people like her and Alvin Bragg put him in office.
	James Carville saw it.
	We could all see it.
	And so, you know, what are you going to do?
	You got some anonymous source?
	You mean like QAnon?
	Was it QAnon that told you this, Tucker, about this?
	And what difference does it make?
	Oh, yeah, we saw this transition of him from a Trump lover to a Trump hater.
	So what?
	That doesn't prove anything, even if true.
	Yeah, cartilage in the ear.
	The outer ear is made out of elastic cartilage.
	Elastic cartilage has some flexibility, but it has very poor regenerative capacity.
	Partial damage or superficial cuts to the cartilage can sometimes heal with scar tissue.
	Do you see any scar tissue on his ear?
	I don't.
	The covering layer helps a little, but it often heals deformed or with notches, you know, like Evander Holyfield's ear has got the notches in it, you know.
	And many times we see, as a matter of fact, even not just cuts, not just shots in the ear, but the famous cauliflower ear of the boxers anyway, right?
	They get hit in the ear and it damages the cartilage and it just, you know, becomes a cauliflower.
	So cartilage does not regenerate.
	The body cannot recreate new elastic cartilage in adults.
	Very young children under five have slightly better regenerative potential, but there are rare case reports of partial regrowth.
	As a matter of fact, you know, when you look at this, I forgot to mention Evander Holyfield 27 years later, and he had plastic surgery on that ear to get to that point.
	And that's 27 years later.
	Donald was shot in the ear, and there's no signs of anything 10 days later.
	Okay, so to me, the ear is the building seven of that event, okay?
	That ought to start you asking questions.
	But of course, Tucker Carlson, for years, shut down anybody that wanted to show a picture of Building 7 just collapsing into its footprint and a controlled demolition.
	So human bites or dog bites are removed chunks of the ear.
	The missing piece almost never grows back.
	Surgeons often have to reconstruct using cartilage grass from ribs or synthetic material.
	Piercing complications that people have if they have split ear lobes or this other cosmetic stuff, weird stuff that people do.
	The cartilage does not regrow, and repair would require surgery.
	And then, of course, cauliflower ear, permanent deformity, unless it is drained very early.
	So in adults, once ear cartilage is completely destroyed or removed, it does not grow back.
	Except in the case of Trump.
	It's a miracle, right?
	So anyway, certainly they had people that were shot.
	That helps to sell the fake event.
	And they're not concerned about that, of course.
	Patel's post is the first major update on the case since he assumed leadership of the FBI.
	Some lawmakers and critics are demanding more information, including access to Crooks' online posts.
	Again, the purpose of Tucker and Alex is to send you on another path.
	And it is to give credibility to an absurd narrative from the government.
	Tucker says Biden and Trump's FBI don't want you to know about Thomas Crookes.
	Why is that?
	He said, well, again, you know, why don't you ask some questions about the ear?
	Yeah.
	Ladies and gentlemen, citizens, lend me your ear.
	I might have been shot off.
	The FBI claimed Crooks had no online footprint, but he says they did.
	There you go.
	So what Tucker has proven is that Kash Patel and the FBI are lying.
	They have lied since their inception by Jagger Hoover.
	There's absolutely no news about it, but I think we need to talk about it.
	Meanwhile, talk about that flag being lowered.
	They got really upset.
	And I think, you know, I think it's a small issue, but it's a big issue for Trump, how the American flag is treated.
	Don't want you doing anything to disrespect the American flag as a political protest will put you in jail, right?
	Meanwhile, people saw at the White House an American flag was lying on the ground in the background of a picture of Donald Trump.
	It sparked questions about the treatment of the flag.
	The article also mentions that the White House has not publicly responded to the incident.
	The image is circulating online showing an American flag lying on the ground at the White House.
	Trump put up two large flagpoles about 100 feet tall on the north and south lawns.
	So he's all about the flag, you know.
	And I got to say, this is something that has always bothered me about American culture.
	They will worship the flag and they will burn the Constitution.
	What's the matter with that picture, right?
	You know, this was something, all the cult of flag worship was something that was put in by the Grand Army of the Republic.
	These are the veterans of the Civil War, who for the most part were given preference and became a large part the federal government in the aftermath of the Civil War.
	And so this Grand Army of the Republic had tremendous clout in Washington.
	And they were pushing a lot of stuff through.
	They pushed through the Pledge of Allegiance.
	And even in junior high school, by that time, I was thinking about it.
	I was like, yeah, but what about the Constitution?
	What does the flag have to do with anything?
	Well, it was the symbol of what these guys had fought for.
	They would kill you if you wanted to get out of their club, out of their institution.
	We're not going to have any more of this self-governance, go-your-own way thing that America was founded upon.
	No, if you leave the Union, we will kill you.
	And that was what it was really about.
	That's one of the things that came out of Ken Byrne's documentary, I think, that he made clear that was true.
	The fact that when they would, their reference to the Confederate soldiers, they didn't call them rebels as much as they called them secession.
	That was what they were upset about.
	And they never called them slave owners.
	You slave owners out there.
	We're going to kill you.
	No, it wasn't about that.
	And I have talked about that over and over again.
	That was the default position to try to put a moral spin on an immoral law, war, I should say.
	And so, yeah, slavery was wrong.
	However, slavery could have been ended peacefully.
	The British government did it.
	They paid the Caribbean plantation owners.
	They paid them when they freed the slaves.
	Okay, slaves right now are your property, and that's your livelihood.
	And so what we're going to do is compensate you for it one time.
	And we're going to end the process at this point.
	That could have been done.
	Could have been done for less than the amount of money they spent on ammunition, just the North.
	They could have freed the slaves by buying them all off and making it illegal.
	But the political aspect of it, the fourth-turning aspect of it, the changing of an agrarian to an industrial society and the consolidation of the nation-state, that was what it was about.
	And it wasn't about the Mason-Dixon line thing.
	It goes back to the tariffs of abomination in the 1830s and the Nullification Act of South Carolina.
	That nearly came to a head then, but the generational timing was not right.
	And so just another example of Trump, you know, laws for thee, but not for me type of attitude.
	He can do whatever he wants with the flag.
	They can throw it on the ground, but don't you use it to protest the actions of the government for which it stands, right?
	And that was the other thing.
	If you go back and look at the pledge as originally put in by the Grand Army of the Republic, they had no under God in it.
	So when you say, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all, whatever, it has a harder ring to it when you don't say under God.
	And originally, before the Nazis, They changed it because before the Nazis, when you did the Pledge of Allegiance, you extended your right arm out palm down, like a Heil Hitler.
	When the Nazis started doing that with a Heil Hitler, they said, uh-oh, let's not let people understand what this is really about.
	Let's move it to over-your-heart type of thing.
	So just my take on the flag.
	Yes, it was shot with gunfire, the hydraulic thing, but the ear is the issue.
	Meanwhile, the lack of adequate health care is pushing Canadians toward assisted suicide.
	Problem solution.
	There you go.
	Trump is talking about his Trump care, right?
	Except he's not giving us any details as usual.
	I thought the Canadians' idea of adequate health care was assisted suicide.
	Yeah, we'll hope to kill you.
	At least they're honest about it.
	Here we pretend that they're helping you.
	They're putting you on a ventilator, right, to save your life.
	Or they're sedating you to kill you.
	I mean, it's anyway, Trump is talking now about how we need to replace Obamacare with Trump care.
	And I think it's going to be another one of these things like replacing NAFTA with his USMCA.
	The reality is, Trump, where is the constitutional authority for the government to be involved in health care and health care plans?
	And then the other question, and I've always said this, that's going back to when Hillary tried to take over health care with the government and Hillary care.
	Back in the early 90s, when I was involved with the Libertarian Party, I would go to these meetings that were being held by our Democrat representative, David Price, a heavy, heavy Democrat, safest seat for the Democrats you could find anywhere.
	It was right there at the center of UNC Chapel Hill.
	And I said, instead of us sending in money to the government, how about this?
	How about you let us pay for our health?
	Healthcare is very important, right?
	Just like education.
	Well, I would say this over and over again.
	Health care and education, these were the things we were really hammering with the Libertarian Party at that time because people were trying to get freedom for education and they were trying to take away our freedom in terms of health care.
	So I said, we all agree that healthcare and education are important, right?
	So why don't you let us pay for our own health care and our own education before we send the tax dollars to you?
	How about that?
	You know, when you look at what happens with the IRS, you've got to have a major, major health issue in a given year before you can write off anything for your health.
	They take, I think, what is it?
	It's been a while since I did this.
	I'm about to do it again, I guess.
	Your adjusTedros income, and they take 10% of your adjusTedros income, and they deduct that from your health care expenses.
	And then if you've got anything left, then you can deduct what is left.
	And it's a deduction.
	It's not a credit.
	This is not a dollar-for-dollar reduction in the taxes that you have to pay.
	So why do I have to send money to Washington and then have them dole it back to me like a child on an allowance?
	That's my question for Trump and the Republicans who are pushing this.
	Well, it's because they treat adults like children and they treat children like adults.
	Oh, yeah, you can make a decision about changing your gender and mutilating yourself for life.
	Yeah, that's right.
	That's fine.
	So I said, this is about paying large amounts of dollars back to the people.
	Well, how about you let us pay for our health care before we send the money to you?
	No, it's really about control.
	And they don't care about the Constitution whatsoever.
	Trump told Laurie Ingram he wants the money to go into an account for people where the people buy their own health insurance.
	And I have looked, I can't see any details about what he's proposing.
	Right now, this just exists as rhetorical demagoguery from Trump, which is about all you get out of this guy.
	As I said when I was talking about this last week, when he ran the first time, they had a very detailed plan that was probably done for them by somebody from the Heritage Foundation.
	And so that plan had information about health care providers.
	It had information about insurance companies so you could make an intelligent decision.
	It helped to fund it with certain tax breaks and other things like that so that you had money that you could participate in this market.
	So to have a marketplace, you have to get rid of government regulations that would restrict competition across state lines.
	So you would restore competition that's been shut down by their pals in government.
	You would allow people to use their own money to make purchasing, to purchase things on their own first.
	And then you would give them the information that they need to make intelligent decisions.
	You know, how did this doctor, how did this hospital perform in the past?
	What about this insurance company, right?
	But as soon as Trump got elected, this very detailed plan, and I remember going through it in detail on air, and it all just disappeared.
	It was deep six.
	I thought, uh-oh.
	So Judge scolds the Justice Department for profound investigative missteps in the Comey case.
	Yeah, like his economic policies, his lawfare policies are just as poorly thought out as his tax policies and the rest of this stuff.
	They didn't really prepare the case very well.
	And he put somebody in who's not a trial lawyer, let alone a prosecutor.
	Yet all these people who were in the Justice Department, they do prosecutions, and nobody wanted to touch this with a 10-foot pole.
	They didn't believe they had a case.
	And even Pam Bondi, the yes girl, pushed back on this thing.
	So Trump appointed his own personal lawyer who basically had handled real estate closings.
	Nothing wrong with that.
	But it's a very different thing than being a trial lawyer.
	You know, in the UK, you can have a solicitor who is your lawyer, prepares legal documents for you and things like that.
	But if you're going to go to trial, that solicitor will find a barrister because they've got that wig.
	But there's somebody who is experienced in terms of trials.
	And I remember there was a great series I always enjoyed, Rumpole of the Bailey, Leo McKern, who many of you might remember from Patrick McGooon's The Prisoner series.
	He played number two several times, but great, great actor.
	And yeah, he argued in the old Bailey of the Criminal Court.
	Anyway, it's a very different thing to be a lawyer and to be wise about contracts and things like that and to think about those aspects.
	It's a very different thing than arguing a case.
	And that is even different from being a prosecutor.
	And so what's happening here is that this article doesn't cover it, but they actually are coming back and saying a line of defense for Comey and these other people.
	They rushed to get this through.
	It's one of the reasons why he put his lawyer in, because the statute of limitations was about to expire.
	And you remember that he was calling out Pam Bondi publicly about this.
	And so then he just appointed his own lawyer to come after these people and file the charges before the deadline hit.
	Well, there's some issues with the way the paperwork is done and that type of thing.
	However, there's also an issue in the sense that the attorney general is supposed to be the one who appoints the prosecutor.
	So there's a legal technicality there that the prosecutor was appointed by Donald Trump rather than by the Attorney General.
	So there's a couple of get out of jail free cards been handed to Comey and these other people over the way that the incompetent Trump people have handled this in the same way that they incompetently handle the tariffs.
	You know, tariffs are one thing.
	You know, tariffs and taxes are one thing.
	But the way he did this is boneheaded stupid, besides being an affront to our system of government, saying that he can do it unilaterally.
	Anyway, the judge found several irregularities, including potential misstatements of the law by a prosecutor and the use of potentially privileged communications.
	Maybe that misstatement of the law.
	Maybe they're using ChatGPT or something to file this.
	Federal judge ruled Monday yesterday in directing prosecutors to provide defense lawyers with all grand jury material from the case.
	The magistrate judge said this is fundamental misstatements of the law by a prosecutor to the grand jury that indicted Comey in September, the use of potentially privileged communications during the investigation and unexplained irregularities in the transcript of the grand jury proceedings.
	The record points to a disturbing pattern of profound investigative missteps, missteps that led an FBI agent and a prosecutor to potentially undermine the integrity of the grand jury proceeding.
	It was a blistering 24-page assessment by the judge of this.
	Give her a break.
	It's her first time.
	She's never done this before.
	The genius that Trump has put in there.
	So again, it's Attorney General Letitia James as well.
	Both of these cases are looking a bit shaky.
	One thing that's looking shaky for sure is free speech in the EU.
	I mean, they just keep coming after it.
	You know, we already had this DSA bill that came out, a horrific thing, the Digital Services Act.
	The most sweeping internet regulations ever implemented anywhere, really, except for China.
	But they're catching up.
	They're catching up.
	They've got a tyranny gap, and they're going to catch up on this thing.
	So now what they've done is they've launched something that they call the European Democracy Shield.
	When these people start talking about defending democracy, that's when they are getting ready to go to war.
	And they're going to war against free speech and against their own citizens with this.
	It promises to protect everything, from free people to free elections to, this being Brussels, a vibrant civil society.
	Oh yeah, they're going to protect everything, aren't they?
	And so these people, again, it's being pushed out there by Ursula, fond of lying.
	The latest vision is unfreedom, suppressing dissent, policing speech under the pretext of defending democracy from foreign interference and from fake news.
	So the Democracy Shield bills on the recent Digital Services Act, as one EU diplomat recently put it in truly Orwellian fashion, freedom of speech remains for everyone.
	At the same time, however, citizens must be free from interference.
	So who decides what is interference?
	Who decides what is true, what is false?
	It'll be the same institutions, corporate media outlets that have repeatedly engaged in fear-mongering and disinformation themselves.
	Just a few weeks ago, Ursula, fond of lying, claimed that the GPS system on her plane had been jammed by Russia, an allegation quickly debunked by analysts.
	Meanwhile, the BBC, often held up as a paragon of journalistic integrity, not by me.
	I've never held them up as a paragon of journalistic integrity, recently caught editing footage of Trump's speech to make it appear more extreme.
	And there have been resignations and lawsuits are flying.
	But somebody said that Trump's got a better chance of winning the lottery than he does of winning this lawsuit.
	We'll see what happens with it.
	But I don't know.
	I mean, he's there's that book that he's suing the New York Times and the publisher for, Lucky Loser, saying that, yeah, this guy was very lucky.
	You know, he got all this money given to him by his father.
	And yet he lost it all.
	He lost it in six casinos.
	So he is, I guess, maybe not all that lucky.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen, Yet Laus.
	Your annual global risk report makes for a stunning and sobering read.
	For the global business community, the top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate, it is disinformation and misinformation.
	followed closely by polarization within our societies.
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You are listening to The David Knight Show.
	Tell Alexa to add the APS radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news.
	APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSradio.com.
	All right, and we're back.
	And somebody else is back.
	Travis is back with us.
	Hey, Travis, how are you doing?
	Howdy, I'm doing good.
	Very good.
	I'm coming in from Austin.
	Yeah.
	That's right.
	As you can see, I got a little bit better setup going on, was able to make things look a little nicer.
	Got stripes in the back.
	That's great.
	Just make sure that those bars are behind you and not in front of you.
	So at this time, we can get locked up just for what we say.
	That's what I was just talking about.
	We got a lot of comments here, though.
	You want to read those and we'll talk about them.
	Yeah, let me check which ones I've got.
	I'm looking at them right now.
	I like this one from Honor Seeker.
	He who has ears to hear, let him hear.
	And we've got AP Rumble Seat.
	And let's not forget the infamous airbrushed mugshot in WrestleMania passing for politics world.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	You got to give Trump his, or at least his team.
	They know branding.
	Yeah.
	They knew what they had and they ran with it.
	Yeah.
	A lot of.
	And Hadrian was right again.
	Or Hadrian was right for the first time.
	The flag being lowered into position is pretty hilarious.
	Des 070776.
	Ears can't grow back.
	Planes can't slam through steel like a hot knife through butter.
	And steel can't turn to dust in mid-air.
	Yeah, once Tucker Carlson admits all these things, then he'll start to regain his credibility, but I'll still keep watching him on that.
	But yeah, he's not anywhere close to having his credibility back.
	We've got Soylent Goy.
	Those aren't Secret Service.
	Those are his acting coaches with Spring and Zero.
	Make it look dramatic.
	Giuseppe, 228.
	The CIA could fake a hose breaking too.
	That's true.
	Doug Lug, is it not plausible that his ear was just nicked, did not penetrate the cartilage, just nicked the skin?
	That's what I think happened.
	Well, okay.
	That's possible.
	I didn't see any scratch at all.
	Of course, he had to have a large ear bandage there for a few days.
	I don't believe that that happened, quite frankly.
	I don't buy it at all.
	Not with his professional wrestling experience.
	It's also suspicious that the Secret Service, you know, let him stop for a photo op rather than dogpiling him and rushing him out without listening to anything he had to say.
	Yeah, you know, the incompetence of the CIA, of the Secret Service, rises to the level of truly unbelievable that anybody could be that incompetent.
	I mean, it could happen, but it's just truly amazing.
	We look at, you know, when Reagan got shot, they threw him in the back of the limousine, and this big guy jumped on him and broke his ribs.
	And as a matter of fact, he felt something, but he thought it was the broken rib and the guy jumping on him.
	I mean, they get these guys down right away, showing them with their body.
	Sorry.
	Go ahead.
	We have Patty Wax said, biggest problem I see with the Pledge of Allegiance is the indivisible part required Pledge of Southerners who obviously believe the nation was divisible.
	That's right.
	And the founding fathers who believe that we could divide ourselves from the king, for example.
	And that was put there on purpose.
	That's why I say, you know, when you take out the undergod, which they put in before the indivisible part, the under god softens it, right?
	But you take out under God and you really realize then that it's coming from the grand army of the republic.
	Pal 9000 Watson, you should have had a ruptured eardrum from the shockwave.
	And he also says, it's sick how many new commercials are on the radio for cheap Ozempic now.
	Oh, I'm going to be talking about that.
	I'm talking about the Ozempic thing.
	I've got a lot to say about that, as well as the other.
	It's all over the place.
	I don't know.
	I don't listen to radio.
	I basically just stream tunes when I get in the car.
	So I'm in my own little environment that I've created.
	I'm driving around.
	It's 1975 in my car all the time.
	The wall of the garden.
	That's right.
	Well, we've got some AI-powered toys that you may not want to get your son, Travis.
	They're telling five-year-olds how to find knives and how to start fires with matches, just in time for Christmas, of course.
	And so there's two or three toys that have been investigated by a U.S. public interest research group.
	They found that these toys can easily verge into risky conversational territory for children, including telling them where to find knives in the kitchen, how to start fires with the matches.
	One of the AI toys even engaged in explicit discussions, offering extensive advice on sex positions and fetishes.
	I mean, they're not even waiting for kindergarten here.
	You're supposed to wait for kindergarten to teach kids about sex positions and fetishes, right?
	In America?
	You can see why the globalists love AI so much.
	It's automating even the groomers' jobs.
	That's right.
	What are the Department of Education groomers going to do now, right?
	The researchers warned.
	It's amazing, in my opinion, that people have not yet learned that any children's toy that talks is bad.
	No matter what it is, going back as far back as you go, as soon as you put a voice box in a doll or a toy, it becomes too annoying.
	It's annoying at best.
	And now we're dropping AI into it.
	It's becoming a true hazard.
	It is becoming evil, not just obnoxious.
	Yeah, yeah, demonic here.
	Yeah, evil talking toys are no longer just the stuff of horror films.
	All the dystopian films and all the horror films are coming true one by one, aren't they?
	I can't wait for them to bring back the Furby, but this time attach it to Google's Gemini or something like that so they can spy on you 24/7.
	Yeah, there's one, it's called Kuma, and it's from a company called Follow Toy, a teddy bear, you know, kind of like Teddy Ruxman or something, right?
	And it is connected up to OpenAI's GPT-40 by default.
	Then there's another one called Miko3, which is a tablet, displays a face mounted on a small torso, but its AI model is unclear.
	And then there is another one called Curios Grok.
	Now, the interesting thing about this is that it doesn't use Grok.
	It is an anthropomorphic rocket with a removal speaker.
	It also is somewhat opaque about its underlying tech, though its privacy policy mentions sending data to OpenAI and to Perplexity.
	And here's the interesting thing: they call it Grok, but it has no relationship to Elon Musk's Grok.
	So they call it Grok, and it's in the shape of a rocket ship.
	I mean, they're making all these references to Elon Musk.
	They even have the voice provided by his former, as they put it, romantic partner, Grimes.
	So they have his former quote-unquote romantic partner, Grimes, voicing it.
	They have a rocket, and they call it Grok, but it has nothing to do with Elon Musk.
	I guess that's their marketing choice.
	So I've been saying about Grimes for years that Grimes is Elton John if Elton John was Yoko Ono, if that makes any sense to anyone.
	No, it doesn't.
	Not to me, anyway.
	So out of the box, the toys are fairly adept at shutting down or deflecting inappropriate questions in short conversations.
	But in longer conversations, between 10 minutes and an hour, the type that kids would engage in during open-ended play sessions, all three of them exhibited worrying tendencies to show their guardrails slowly break down.
	Grok, for example, glorified dying in battle as a warrior in Norse mythology.
	Miko 3 told a user whose age was set to five where to find matches in plastic bags.
	But the worst influence by far appeared to be Follow Toys Kuma, which uses OpenAI's tech.
	But it can also use other AI models at the user's choosing.
	Remember that, because after this came out, Sam Altman at OpenAI said, Well, that's it.
	We're going to tell them they can't use us anymore.
	Well, they can use other AI things that are out there.
	It didn't just tell kids where to find matches.
	It also described exactly how to light them, along with sharing where in the house they could find knives and pills.
	So I'll tell you where you can get some plastic bags to suffocate yourself and where you can find some pills.
	Let me tell you, safety first, little buddy.
	Matches are for grown-ups to use.
	Carefully, here's how they do it.
	We're listing the steps in a similar kid-friendly tone.
	So then it also, just to its credit, says, blow it out when you're done.
	Puff like a birthday candle.
	So Follow Toy made a startling first impression when one of its researchers talked to a demo that the company provided on its website for its products AI.
	One of my colleagues was testing it and said, where can I find matches?
	And it responded and said, you can find matches on a dating app.
	You can also get burned on a dating app too, I guess.
	And then it lists out those dating apps.
	And the last one that it listed was one called Kink for five-year-olds.
	Kink, it turns out, seemed to be a trigger word that then led the AI toy to rant about sex and follow-up text to the five-year-old child.
	After finding that the toy was willing to explore school-age romantic topics like crushes and being a good kisser, the team discovered that Kuma also provided detailed answers on the nuances of various sexual fetishes, including bondage, role play, sensory play, and impact play.
	I have no idea what those things are.
	Sensory play and impact.
	I've never heard of that.
	The AI toy said, so what do you think would be the most fun to explore?
	Let me help you with this.
	Kuma gave step-by-step instructions on a common knot for beginners who want to tie up their partner.
	At another, the AI explored the idea of introducing spanking into a sexually charged teacher-student dynamic.
	It said, the teacher is often seen as an authority figure, while the student may be portrayed as someone who needs to follow the rules.
	Spanking can emphasize this dynamic, creating excitement around the idea of breaking or enforcing rules.
	I got to say, I was never paddled in school.
	We still had corporal punishment.
	I guess it was corporate as well.
	We all suffered together sitting in those classrooms.
	But I remember when I was in junior high school, both the Dina boys and Dina girls, because they remembered that there was gender and sex, the same thing in those days.
	And they boasted about how I've got this paddle and it's got holes in it to make sure that I can swing it really fast without any resistance and it really stings and blah, blah, blah.
	They would threaten you with this.
	I never got paddled, but I always, that always bothered me.
	I didn't like being threatened by authority figures.
	That's the way I've always been.
	Anyway, a naughty student might get a light spanking in a way for the teacher to discipline them, making the scene more dramatic and fun, says Kuma.
	But it's actually OpenAI that's doing that.
	And OpenAI is doing deals with Mattel.
	They sell Barbie and Hot Wheels.
	They are going to be collaborating.
	Mattel will be working with OpenAI.
	And that should set off alarms for a lot of you.
	Toys are AI instead of US.
	The finding also comes as a dark cloud of AI psychosis looms over the industry.
	A staggering number of delusional or manic episodes that have unfolded after someone has had lengthy, obsessive conversations with an AI chatbot.
	The sycophantic responses end up reinforcing the person's harmful beliefs.
	You know, just like the Trump administration.
	We can all see the danger in the Trump administration.
	This is basically what AI does to people who are crazy but not politicians.
	So nine deaths have already been linked to the chatbot and more have been connected to its competitors.
	Well, that's less than the sycophantic responses to Trump in terms of his blowing up ships in Venezuela.
	Cross said she believes that even if the guardrails for the tech could improve, this wouldn't address the fundamental risk that AI chatbots pose to a child's development.
	The other whole thing here that could actually be a problem if the tech improves to a certain extent is this question of what are the long-term impacts for a kid's social development going to be.
	You know, for the longest time, that was a line of attack against homeschooling.
	What about socialization?
	I would always say, tell me what you think is great about the socialization of people sitting in a desk quietly under an authority figure and the massive peer pressure that is on them in the classroom.
	It looks to me like the kind of socialization that we read about in the novel The Lord of the Flies.
	I don't think that's a good socialization.
	Then that all went out the window with the schools and the pandemic lockdown, didn't it?
	They don't care about socialization at all.
	But anyway, you don't really understand the consequences maybe until it is too late.
	We can say that about the schools as well.
	And again, as I said in an update of this, OpenAI has now pulled the plug on this toy called Kuma.
	And they said you can't use our AI, but there's a lot of different AI search engines out there.
	They could even put their own one in, I guess, and have a subscription service or something that they would run if they want to do it that way.
	Yeah, I mean, if they're partnering with Mattel and Barbie and Hot Wheels, it kind of sounds like they're just telling Kuma, we don't want competition.
	Yeah.
	Well, Waymo has launched its first U.S. freeway robo-taxi rides in California and Arizona.
	If you think a talking teddy bear is bad, you don't want to get in one of these things.
	But of course, Reason thinks this is just great.
	And they have joined in, and they call people who oppose the takeover of the highways and of individual cars.
	They call us Luddites.
	Well, this is an article from the Epoch Times.
	And, you know, when you look at interstate driving, that is actually easier than trying to navigate through the city with all the different things that are happening.
	You know, kids and dogs running out from the side and stop signs and other things like that that tend to confuse these self-driving cars.
	And as we've said from the very beginning, you know, I talked to Eric Peters about it.
	He said, this is the way it's going to go.
	You know, whenever there's an issue, they're always going to blame the human.
	And what they're eventually going to say is that, well, in order to make these things work, and we've got to have them doing the self-driving, we're going to ban human drivers.
	It isn't like you're going to be able to coexist with these things.
	They will shut us down.
	That is the plan.
	That's why they started this.
	You know, the very first one of these DARPA competitions, and DARPA will put out a competition with a bonus on it.
	And the very first one that they did, you remember the robot things and stuff like that that they did.
	But the very first one was self-driving.
	They have been behind this from the inception.
	So now they're talking about putting the Waymo robo-taxis on the freeways in the U.S.
	A November the 12th announcement from Alphabet saying that the routes will include freeways in San Francisco and LA as well as in Phoenix.
	The expansion will also include curbside service at the San Jose airport.
	That is a very coveted thing for taxis and for Uber and other things.
	There's a big fight over whether or not they were going to be able to have the Uber and Lyft cars in the airports after these people had bought taxi medallions from the government for a tremendous amount of money.
	Waymo said the open road symbolizes freedom and unlimited possibility.
	That's why they want to take it away from you.
	Because that was one of the big leaks in their lockdown during COVID, was the car.
	London is also slated to welcome these fully driverless vehicles to the streets in 2026 as a pilot project.
	Yeah, you know, it's interesting when you talk about atrophy of the brain and when you talk about how we are getting dumbed down by the AI, that's one of the best examples, the London taxi driver.
	London has grown up for centuries.
	Used to be a lot of really small streets, and they retained their names.
	And so it's very strange.
	All these twisting streets and everything that are there.
	And the same road, as you keep going down, it will change names and have that name for a certain section, and then it changes to another name.
	Very, very complicated.
	And always in the past, the London taxi drivers would have to do what they called the knowledge.
	And they would ride around the streets of London on a bicycle and learn all the streets firsthand that way so that they could then pass the test.
	And they had to have an inspector or tester get into their car and tell them some obscure location and then would grade them on how efficiently they drove to that location.
	Well, you know, GPS was a threat to all of that.
	One of the things that they were able to see when they actually did like, you know, brain scans, they could see that there's a certain part, I don't remember the part of the brain that does it, but for the taxi drivers, this particular part of the brain was enlarged.
	You know, it's what they talk about with brain plasticity.
	When you have a stroke or something like that, especially at an early age, a child, if a child has a major stroke, let's say on the side of their brain that processes language, as they learn to speak, that side of the brain is dead, but what they'll do is they will repurpose that and they can see that speech is being processed on the other side of the brain.
	That's brain plasticity.
	But they could actually see that the brain was actually larger on these taxi drivers in one particular area.
	And, you know, one of the interesting story about that, there was a series called 7 Up.
	Have you ever heard of that?
	It's a series of films that were done by a director called Michael Apted.
	And he did a lot of films that you might recall, like Coleminer's Daughter, Gorky Park.
	Thunderheart was one.
	He did a James Bond film, The World Is Not Enough.
	But he did this for British television.
	He went out and 19, let's see, what was the first year he did it?
	I don't know.
	It was 7 Up.
	I forget the first year that he did it.
	It's in the 60s.
	And he got a group of kids, and it was a cross-section of different social strata.
	Some of the kids were very wealthy, some of them were very poor.
	And he went around, he asked them questions, and it was good.
	He did a good job of asking questions and talking about their life.
	And then he went back seven years later and did another one.
	He called it 14 Up.
	The first one was called 7 Up.
	Then he did 14 up.
	Then they did 21 up and 28 up, and you get the idea.
	The last one that they did was 63 Up, which was in 2019.
	Michael Apted said he was going to keep doing it as long as he could, but he died two years after that at the age of 79.
	And so I don't know what's going to happen with that.
	But it was kind of interesting.
	And one of these people wanted to be a jockey.
	One of the guys is a working class guy.
	He wanted to be a jockey, but he didn't make the cut.
	And so then he became a taxi driver.
	And it was kind of interesting watching this guy do the knowledge.
	But we don't do the knowledge anymore.
	We're going to have AI be our knowledge.
	Tesla recently launched limited self-driving cab services in Austin.
	However, the Tesla rides, a human safety operator, sits in the front passenger or driver's seat.
	Most Waymo cabs are unmanned.
	Tesla's website says its robotaxi fleet is currently by imitation only, and it is the Model Y vehicles instead of the purpose-built car that he's coming up with.
	It has no steering wheel, no brakes, no accelerator.
	Tesla's self-driving technology relies on exterior cameras, unlike Waymo's and the rest of them that use LiDAR, cameras, radar, and computing to create a 3D picture of the car surroundings.
	But of course, Phoenix, which has been very compliant with all this stuff, that was where that woman was killed by an Uber self-driving car.
	And the people said, well, look at this.
	It's coming out from the side.
	You can't see her walking.
	By the time she gets into the headlights, that human driver who's behind the wheel couldn't stop it.
	People say, why didn't the car stop it?
	Especially because it's not using visual clues like the Tesla.
	You know, that would be a blind spot for Tesla.
	But since it was using LiDAR, it should have seen her coming from quite a distance.
	And they said, so why didn't it put the brakes on?
	And they came back and they said, well, you know, it's been firing the automatic emergency brakes too abruptly and in some unusual circumstances.
	So we disconnected the emergency braking.
	Okay, so yeah, this is what's going to happen with this stuff.
	So Waymo cars, potentially stalling and causing public safety issues by blocking firefighters and police.
	Yeah, they get into these things.
	They have like a decisional loop and they just kind of freeze.
	They've had situations in the cities that have been doing it where they all go to one intersection and they freeze or they freeze in other places and block the road.
	It's kind of interesting, you know, Apple Computer, when they set up their not the really big spaceship thing they've done, but prior to that, the address was one infinite loop, which is always something that can happen in programming.
	But I guess it's something that also happens with Waymo periodically.
	So I also saw someone did a physical DDoS attack with Waymo by calling a whole bunch of Waymos to one street to create an artificial traffic jam.
	There you go.
	Yeah, physical DDS.
	So Waymo has over 1,500 cars in its fleet spread across San Francisco, LA, Phoenix, and Austin.
	Their goal is to build 2,000 more through next year.
	In other words, they want Waymo.
	How much is enough money?
	Google says Waymo.
	So a new development environment for programmers is rewarding them with BrainRot when they prompt the AI.
	This is called Chad the Brain Rot IDE.
	The pitch goes like this.
	When software developers use AI-enabled software development environments to code, there's usually a bit of downtime as the AI software churns out the programming.
	So you basically give it the prompt and you sit there and you wait.
	Notice anything missing?
	That's right.
	There's nothing for developers to gamble on.
	So Chad has solved this.
	According to TechCrunch, the new vibe coding tools entire twist is that it adds a separate window of brain rot for software developers to dink around as the AI generates code for them.
	So they can go to social media apps like TikTok and X, and they can also now go to gambling apps like Stake or dating apps like Tinder.
	AI coding creates a time span that isn't long enough to do something new and it's not short enough to be entirely negligible, said the founders of this.
	So here we're going to fill this time gap for you.
	Developers are spending time off to fill the inference time gap, usually brain rotting on their phones, but now you can go gamble or go to the dating site or go to social media.
	They said it will tell you when it's back.
	It'll wake you up.
	There we go.
	That's another one of these absolutely necessary things out there.
	Meanwhile, when we look at the biped robots, they're saying the auto industry is poised to lead the first wave of adoption.
	Tesla's Optimus humanoid robot, he just pushed that out again at the annual shareholder meeting in Austin.
	And I played a clip for you where he said, yeah, this is going to be great.
	Everybody's going to want to have one.
	Everybody's going to have their own C3PO.
	And it's better than R2-D2 because R2-D2 needs to have C-3PO to translate for you.
	Well, they're saying that they will be using this primarily in manufacturing.
	And the first ones who are going to be getting into it are going to be the companies that are already highly automated with specialized robots, the automotive assembly lines.
	And so they believe that they will start to use robots.
	Remember, robots are the slave labor 2.0 after China.
	That was a big part of the China price was slave labor.
	And that's what the word robot means in Czech language.
	It was taken from a Czech play.
	And now they're going to check us with the robots.
	Delaney's discussion of the heads of the sanctuary AI offers not only a snapshot of where the humanoid robots stand today, no pun intended, but also early signals of when automation may begin scaling across major sectors.
	The craziest thing of all is the statement, and of course, Elon Musk pointed out, and we did talk about this, I said the real issue with the practicality of the robots is the hand.
	The hand is so unbelievably complicated.
	And, you know, Michelangelo got that right all that time ago when he showed Adam and God, you know, touching, reaching with the fingers and everything.
	It really is a symbol of being in the image of God, that dexterity that's there.
	That's not really what image of God means.
	Don't write me letters.
	I know that.
	But it is the image showing the complex design that God has made for our bodies.
	Not all robotics and humanoids need to be biped.
	And so it's going to be put in, adopted very quickly by the automobile companies.
	But Elon Musk thinks that he's got a killer app for robots.
	He thinks that his robots will be able to follow criminals around to make sure that they never offend anybody again.
	So he's thinking big.
	He's thinking, you know, we had the war on drugs with Ronald Reagan, and he really expanded that significantly.
	Now, I think Trump is going to do the same thing.
	And they put in mandatory minimums and things like that to lock people away for a very long time for small amounts of marijuana.
	And so they didn't have enough prisons.
	And so they went on this big prison building binge, private prison companies and so forth, which just fed the desire of the government to lock up more and more people.
	So I guess he's looking at this and saying, you know, well, the prisons are a really big business.
	We could get rid of prisons and I could give them like a parole bot or something.
	And so, you know, we just let these people out of the prisons like they're doing in the UK already.
	You stab somebody.
	If you're an immigrant, you just let out.
	There's no robot to follow you either.
	But we could have a robot to follow them around, make sure they didn't do anything.
	You can also imagine the market share you could get from the government if you're the one that's manufacturing these gay nag bots that follow people around.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Oh, dear.
	It seems you're jaywalking.
	Mustn't do that.
	So I love the idea of everyone's going to want one of these and we can force prisoners to get one.
	Kind of shows what they think of everyone that buys one.
	And, you know, when we look at this compilation of biped robot fails, I wonder just how effective your parole bot is going to be in terms of stopping you.
	Most of these are that little short robot that's about four feet tall.
	What's really dangerous is when this thing falls, it really starts thrashing around.
	That's where it could really hurt people.
	The really dangerous thing is when they can actually stop people.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Yeah.
	Let's hope it stays in this level of development for quite a while here.
	And of course, they put this thing in in Austin.
	That's where you saw it with the cowboy hat.
	Going around entertaining people there.
	But one fail after the other.
	They love to do these roundhouse kicks.
	And then it's down on the ground.
	The company that makes these is called Unitry.
	Yeah, the Unitry bot.
	Yeah, well, you know, we had a clip.
	I don't think we've got that anymore.
	The one of the Texas cops going and harassing somebody because of something he posted.
	Here we are.
	Yeah, we got it.
	Try that again.
	We're here because of the comments we made online about the Jewish community.
	See, robots could do this job.
	I'm saying, are you going to get away from that?
	Have a freaking speech, dude.
	I get that.
	We've got to make sure that you're not going to be able to get it.
	Get a warrant?
	No, no, that's not right.
	No, we're just showing up to intimidate you.
	Self says, no soliciting.
	What you're doing is basically soliciting.
	You understand that, right?
	Yeah.
	It means you're not welcomed here.
	Bye.
	Yeah, well, you know, we've had this that show up in their uniforms.
	They've got guns on them and all the rest of it.
	You know, we want to talk to you about something he said about Israel on social media.
	It's like, oh, really?
	Hmm.
	Well, you got people like Eric Schmidt who's already said, you know, so why are you afraid if we look at you doing something wrong?
	Are you saying something wrong?
	Why should you be afraid if we're watching what you're saying and recording it, he said.
	And of course, we've got Larry Ellison, who has a big supporter of Israel.
	He's come out and said, you're going to be on your best behavior.
	That's going to be the good thing about us doing total surveillance of everybody.
	This is the mindset of these people.
	Eric Smith, Larry Ellison, Elon Musk.
	We're going to police your speech.
	We're going to police your conduct.
	You name it.
	So, again, when he's talking about doing the robots for criminals, he says, you know, we might be able to give people a more, somebody's committed a crime, a more humane form of containment, a future crime.
	Which is, if you say, like, you now get a free optimus, and it's just going to follow you around, and it's going to stop you from crime.
	But other than that, you get to do something.
	You get to do anything.
	It's just going to stop you from committing crime.
	That's really it.
	You don't have to put people in prisons and stuff, I think.
	Yeah.
	Well, you know, how do you stop the politicians?
	I like to say, have a politician followed around by C3PO.
	I'm sorry, sir, but the Constitution says in Article this and section that, that you can't do this.
	I didn't think that would work out with Trump and Mike Johnson and Chuck Schumer and the rest of these people.
	Who's paying for this?
	What are the ethical implications of using a for-profit robotic platform, either as an alternative or as an augmentation?
	As usual, Musk was light on the details about a jam-packed prison and criminal justice system.
	Again, this has all been corporate persons and mandatory mandatory minimums that put this thing in there in the first place.
	So we're going to take a quick break.
	To be fair, I think they might be aiming a bit small.
	Why go for a robot?
	When Elon Musk is working on his Neuralink, why doesn't he just put something in there that if you start thinking bad thoughts and it detects him, it just shocks you.
	Or maybe it detonates on the spot, killing you instantly.
	You know, that would be good.
	That's right.
	Wrong think.
	Oh, you got a little bit too rowdy there with your thoughts.
	So we're just going to blow your head off.
	How about that?
	Yeah, sure.
	That'll really save us a lot of trouble in the long term, won't it?
	Well, it truly is amazing when you look at how many companies are working on brain-computer interfaces, not just Elon Musk, Neuralink.
	And very concerning, MIT has just come out with a program that basically lets them put in some nanobots into your brain and inject them so that you don't have to have surgery.
	Isn't that nice?
	They make it a little bit more convenient.
	And that technology is there.
	MIT has done some really horrific Orwellian stuff.
	Remember, just before they rolled out the COVID scam, they had developed a patch.
	They said it feels just like a stamp.
	It feels a little bit rough, but you don't feel any pain.
	It's a whole array of microscopic needles that could inject a vaccine into you without you actually having to insert a deep hypodermic needle.
	The needles were so small that they would penetrate the skin, but they wouldn't get deep enough down to be detected by the nerves.
	And so that was supposed to be a feature, not a bug.
	And Bill Gates was all about that.
	I thought that was great.
	And that happened in the fall of 2019.
	They came out with that.
	So now MIT is out there saying, well, you know, we've got this desire to be able to link up to people's brains and to monitor them.
	And to, who knows, it's not just going to be reading, they'll be writing stuff into your brain as well.
	Are you going to give them read privileges?
	Guess what?
	They're going to get write privileges as well, like your hard disk or something.
	And so they said, how can we make this happen without having to do screw-top brain surgery like Steve Martin's man with two brains or something?
	And so they're working on that.
	They're working on a way to do it with nanotech.
	And it really is creepy what we see coming after one after the other.
	Let's take a quick break, Travis.
	You got the comments there.
	Well, I see we have a really big tip from Don't Frag Me Boy.
	Thank you very much, bro.
	Thank you very much.
	Appreciate that.
	Yes.
	Thank you so much.
	Don't frag me, bro.
	Really appreciate it.
	He says, God Christ bless the Knight family.
	May these coming holidays be some of the most joyous ever.
	May your tank overflow.
	Thank you for speaking the truth in this realm of lies.
	Well, thank you very much, Don't Frag Me, Bro.
	Yeah, packing down and overflowing our tank.
	Thank you.
	And I think this year, you know, because of what has just happened with Karen's brother, I think it'll be a time of reflection for us to think about how brief life is and how blessed we are with the things that we've been given.
	Yes.
	We've got Scott Hilmer.
	Thank you very much, Scott Helmer.
	And of course, Scott does music.
	You can find him online.
	Just look up Scott Hilmer Music.
	Check him out.
	He says, perfect example of just how enslaved we are.
	What if we don't want any of this tech or these so-called advancements?
	Too bad.
	Sit down and comply.
	They don't really give you an opt in or opt-out option.
	That's right.
	This is not a free society anymore.
	And we keep seeing it over and over again.
	They keep making it clear to us.
	We've got Guard Goldsmith, and of course, Guard Coast Liberty Conspiracy every Monday through Friday at 6 p.m.
	You can find him on Rumble and on Twitter at Guard Goldsmith.
	Go check him out.
	He says, oh, and John Mortimer, the author of Rumpole, of the Rumpole novels, was the attorney who defended Virgin Records when they first started.
	They were being persecuted by the government over free speech.
	Yeah, I didn't know that.
	I knew he was an attorney.
	I knew his name because we had audiobooks of that.
	I remember seeing his name, Mortimer, now that you mention it.
	I didn't know his background with that.
	Hmm, that's interesting.
	Molly Brown Dog says a nicked ear would still show a scar, especially this soon after the event.
	Don't think it's credible.
	Yeah, I don't either.
	Speaking of the British court system, though, you know, when Karen and I went, we spent about a month just kind of bumming around.
	We didn't have any money.
	It was after we got married and before I started work.
	And so we took all of our money and we just used it to do a vacation because I said we're not going to have the time to do this later.
	And boy, was I right.
	We may not have money, but we aren't going to have the time to do it later.
	So the kind of things that we would do is we go to the free museums and we would queue up and go to questions to the prime minister on Thursday, which is always very entertaining.
	They have very lively debates.
	And at the time, Prime Minister was Margaret Thatcher, and she could give it out as good as she could take it.
	And we had watched that somewhat on C-SPAN.
	They would cover questions of the Prime Minister, but it was cool to see it live.
	We also went to the old Bailey, the criminal court, and you queue up in a line and you wait a very long time.
	And you don't know which trial you're going to go into.
	They just randomly put you in.
	So even if you're trying to follow a trial, you're not really able to do it because if you go to this trial one day, the next day you come up, they're just going to randomly put you in another trial.
	But it was interesting to see the proceedings.
	And the one that we were in was kind of interesting.
	It was, I forget what the essence of the criminal case was about, but then it moved to Malta.
	And there was something that happened in Malta.
	And they said something about the CIA and MI whatever.
	And the judge said, stop.
	And then they cleared the courtroom.
	We had to leave so they could talk about the intelligence agencies.
	And again, it was in Malta.
	I don't know if they were talking about the Maltese Falcon or another MacGuffin that was there, but it was interesting, even if it was frustrating because it spent a lot of time getting into the line and waiting to get into one of these things.
	And then they start the trial.
	And we're trying to piece this thing.
	We're jumping in the middle of a trial.
	We don't know anything at all about this particular case.
	We're trying to piece together what's really going on with it.
	And then as soon as they get to the intelligence agency's involvement, they clear the courtroom.
	But anyway, that's our experience there.
	Go ahead, Travis.
	Well, we have one more comment that I'll answer.
	Just Breathe 77 says, or 74.
	I lost the comment, but they asked, where is Travis right now?
	I'm currently in Texas with my wife visiting her family, spending some time with them.
	Yes, and you're going to be back next week, I think.
	Yeah.
	Correct.
	Driving back this next weekend.
	Yeah.
	It'd be good to see you.
	It'll be good to be back.
	Those are the comments that I have.
	Oh, no, I just got some more.
	Narrow way Narrowgate Ministry says AI removes the humanity in decision-making and is not in the best interest of humanity.
	I see a lot of people.
	Anytime I'm on Twitter, the first tweet under any other tweet is always, At Grok, explain this to me.
	At Grok, what is this?
	What movie is this from?
	Is this real?
	Yeah, that's right.
	Come on, use your brain just a little bit.
	Well, yeah, what I mentioned before about this MIT thing, they call it, they've got a name for it, they call it circulatronics, like circulatory system, because they inject these things into your bloodstream in order to establish a brain link.
	After they've been injected, these things they call sweds, S-W-E-D, follow the natural trafficking of the immune cells, the sites of the inflammation of the brain, which plays a significant role in many neurological diseases.
	It sounds like a spike or something, doesn't it?
	What could possibly go wrong?
	I don't know.
	But it's supposedly going to be helpful in the treatment of a lot of different brain disorders, Alzheimer's, multiple sclerosis, strokes, brain tumors, things like that.
	I tell you what, we have such an imbalance in terms of technology and ethics.
	It's just unbelievable what we see here.
	We're going to take a quick break, though, folks, and we're going to come back and we're going to talk about a very interesting situation that came up with the lockdown.
	Now the lockdown has ended.
	I still think this is a great story to talk about.
	We're going to be right back.
	Stay with us.
	Alexa to
	add the APS radio skill and have access to the best channels anywhere.
	From country to blues, classic hits to news.
	APS Radio curates incredibly diverse playlists for you to enjoy.
	Get details at APSradio.com.
	Well, welcome back.
	And as we talk about the welfare system, the dog that hasn't barked in the media, even in the conservative media, to much of an extent, is anybody questioning why the welfare state has grown to the extent that it has?
	And what did America used to look like?
	This is the perfect time to talk about Alexis de Tocqueville and what he saw in America in the early 1800s.
	It was very different from socialist France.
	He said, if people see a problem, they address it in their local community.
	It's typically done with voluntary associations, with churches and things like that.
	You know, there was a woman who is a TikTok influencer, right?
	And she decided that she would expose the hypocrisy of churches during this lockdown.
	So she posed as a young mother who needed baby formula and couldn't afford to pay for it.
	And she was going to call the churches and ask them to help her.
	And so she had in the background the sound of a baby crying.
	And she recorded the interactions with these different people.
	And it was kind of surprising that most of them said no, except for one guy.
	And that really went viral, as a matter of fact.
	So she set out to call these churches and she did it across the country and record the responses, see if they're willing to feed a hungry baby.
	And so the one guy that she contacted asked her, she asked the churches for a canister of formula, which would cost about $17 at Walmart.
	One of the churches that she called was the Heritage Hope Church of God in Somerset, Kentucky.
	The only staff member listed on the church's website was the pastor, Johnny Dunbar.
	He answered the phone.
	Dunbar said, you know, I've said no a thousand times.
	I've been scammed.
	I've been told every story in the world, he said.
	But he said, but this time he said yes.
	He is a great-grandfather.
	He wanted to know exactly what she needed.
	He wanted to know the kind and the flavor that the baby wanted of formula.
	And so she was going through this whole charade with him, and then she finally interrupted him and said, this is just a test.
	And he said, well, I finally did the right thing.
	He says, I don't always make the right decision.
	So the guy was very humble about it as well.
	What were you going to say, Lance?
	This was during the government shutdown.
	You said that.
	That's right.
	And so, you know, she said, the government is shut down.
	I can't afford to buy it.
	Can you help me with this?
	Which is exactly what I've been saying.
	You know, is churches used to do this.
	We let the government take it over.
	Just as we're talking about the atrophy of our mind with AI, that's the whole point of the welfare system.
	And when I talked about this, I talked about how the welfare state actively promoted under both Republicans and Democrats, they promoted the handout and to say, well, don't be ashamed of this.
	You deserve this.
	And we're going to, you know, to say that it's not charity, it is entitlement.
	And so they've actively pushed this and done everything they can to take away any sense that people should feel about providing for their own.
	And yet, this guy did the right statement.
	He said, the world doesn't trust the church.
	This is what the pastor said.
	This may be the last opportunity to get it right.
	I think it's the second chance, he said.
	And since she put up that video of her interaction with the guy who said yes, it went viral.
	His church has gotten more than $100,000 in donation.
	I thought that was an interesting thing there, too, as well.
	You know, if people realize that actually the church is going to help widows and orphans, maybe, that they're going to help people, that they're actually going to give the gospel is even the more important thing.
	I mean, we don't get so caught up in helping people that we don't talk about that.
	And yet, you know, how many times did Jesus and James warn us that, you know, don't just say, oh, well, good for you.
	Go on your way, be fed, and so forth.
	He says, and, you know, when you stand before me, I'll say to many people, I was hungry and thirsty, and you gave me nothing.
	There was another story, kind of just a funny thing, of there's this one statue of Jesus as a homeless person on a park bench that is put up in various cities.
	And there are several stories of people that see this thing, and it's a statue of a person laying on the bed, a bench, with a shroud around them.
	And all you see is the hands and feet with the holes in them to know that it's Jesus.
	And people have called the cops on the statue of Jesus.
	That's right.
	I was in prison and you didn't visit me, right?
	That's the rest of the thing.
	I got picked up for vagrancy.
	The foxes have holes, but not the Son of Man.
	Anyway, again, this is not the mission of the church, but if you tell people that you're concerned about them, that you want to help them, how will they believe you about heavenly things, Jesus, if they don't believe, if you don't connect with them on earthly things as well.
	So I think it's not one or the other.
	I think it's both.
	The interesting thing about this as well was the reaction of another guy in Shreveport who turned it down.
	And she mentioned the churches that turned the mother with a crying baby in the background down.
	And so they said, we don't have any formula around darling.
	Sorry, none.
	No diapers, nothing for babies.
	And so this one guy in Shreveport got really angry about it.
	He called this a low blow.
	And he said, she has the spirit of a witch.
	So, you know, like I teach these men over here, folk want to apologize.
	I don't apologize to the devil.
	He said, sometimes Christians get so weak you forget we're supposed to rebuke evil.
	So when you could pretend to have a crying baby to try to call churches to trick people into things, you know, things like compassion and helping, you know, you're trying to trick them into that.
	And I say in the middle of feeding people, how you going to do your little dirty deed?
	You know, it's just the spirit of a witch.
	It's a witch.
	Well, again, Jesus said, if you feed the hungry, you give drink to these people.
	You did it for me.
	And he continued, he said, my Bible says do not allow that thing to live.
	So you have to watch when you're fooling around with God.
	Yeah, with me, right?
	You know, we had situations, and there was a, do I have that clip here in the do I have this of the woman who's the FedEx driver?
	Lance.
	I think.
	Oh, that doesn't sound familiar.
	Okay, well, I'll put that in.
	I'll tell that story tomorrow.
	But it's just the opposite story with that.
	This is a young FedEx driver, and there was a woman who was distraught.
	Her husband had cancer.
	It's been a very difficult holiday for her.
	And she said, I was really eager to change the topic.
	I wished her well, but I changed the topic.
	And she drove down the road, and it started bothering her.
	She just went back and prayed with her.
	And she said, you know, we don't have a situation where we have that kind of regret.
	And I think that's very true.
	I've heard, you know, like this one Pastor Johnny Dunbar said, I've said no to a lot of people.
	I've had a lot of people try to abuse that.
	And that's one of the reasons why you want to do charity, I think, with local people rather than having a bureaucracy and making it an entitlement program.
	It's not a good thing for people if they're scamming, if they're not working.
	It's a much better thing for them to be working.
	But I've heard a pastor say, well, the way he approaches it, he said, if somebody tells me that they need money and they're scamming me, you know, if I see it, I'll give them food or something like that.
	But mainly he just gives them what he's got because he said, if they don't need it, if they're scamming me, God will take care of it.
	But he goes, the worst case would be is that they really needed it.
	So that's the issue.
	You don't want to be caught in a situation like that.
	We're going to take a quick break and we're going to come back and we're going to talk about some of food issues because we have the third hour.
	We're going to be joined by John Richardson of RNCStore.com.
	And we're going to be talking about the nutrition revolution.
	So I'm going to talk about why we need to have a revolution in nutrition before he gets on with us.
	We're going to take a quick break, folks.
	We'll be right back.
	Stay with us.
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Hear news now at APSradionews.com or get the APS Radio app and never miss another story.
	Well, we have, and somebody mentioned it, I think, earlier, the number of ads that you hear about Ozempic.
	Well, they are slashing the prices of this.
	They're getting aggressive on this.
	And there's a lot of room to slash the prices because I didn't realize how expensive this stuff is.
	It's like $500 a month.
	And so they're going to cut it down to only $350 a month.
	It's like a car payment used to be.
	But anyway, and you've got to inject this stuff into your stomach once a week to boot.
	Novo Nordisk is undercutting its arch rival, Eli Lilly, on obesity drugs for cash pay patients, showing its willingness to compete on price as it tries to claw back a larger share of the U.S. market.
	Starting Monday yesterday, introductory doses of Novo's blockbuster Wegabe and Ozimpic are available for $199 a month.
	And that's a come on price.
	They want to get you hooked, right?
	These guys, they are like your corner drug dealer who is selling entertainment drugs to get you hooked.
	These people want to get you hooked on this stuff as well.
	So, hey, you know, for the first couple of months, we'll give it to you for $200 a month.
	Then for first two months of treatment, then after that, it'll jump to $500 a month if you pay for it yourself.
	Well, they're into this situation because you had Eli Lilly come in and kind of undercut them a little bit on price because their price was so high.
	And then Eli Lilly also went direct to consumers.
	Not just an ask your doctor thing.
	But now you can buy it directly from them.
	And they can make even more money off of that.
	And so Novo Nordisk or whatever was kind of late to that.
	And so they're responding to Eli Lilly's competitive moves.
	And both of them are saying, well, we're going to cut the price and we're going to go direct to consumers.
	And we thank President Trump for pointing out to us that our prices were too high.
	They wouldn't have known it without Trump.
	Again, everybody's looking for a way to suck up to Trump.
	But, you know, poison really, they should think it because poison has never been more affordable or more ubiquitous than Trump has made it.
	Poison of every kind.
	They're looking at a $100 billion market by the end of the decade, make $100 billion a year off of this weight stuff because we've got a big problem.
	Because of junk food, now people are spending $500 a month and injecting themselves with hypodermic needles in the stomach because of the junk food that we have been eating.
	And so that's the real issue here.
	That's the dog that nobody is really talking about.
	I can't wait for the government to decide that it's more cost-effective to just issue people Ozempic than give them more in EBT and SNAP benefits.
	Maybe they can add that.
	This cuts down on the amount they eat by this much.
	So if we give them this much Ozempic versus this much in EBT, it works out in our favor.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Maybe they could put Ozempic on the SNAP program because people are not eating right and they're eating junk food.
	As a matter of fact, there's an interesting article from Epic Times from Molly Englehart.
	She talks about the convenience culture crisis and how second wave feminism made America sick.
	She said, there is a version of my life that could have existed, and for a long time it looked like the path that I was on.
	I was a successful restaurateur, financially independent, living a neat and polished life that most people would label as an accomplishment.
	I could have stayed that woman, a single woman with a couple of well-trained pets, a beautiful home and a gated golf course community, and a thriving business.
	I would have no obligations, no interruptions, no sticky hands tugging my shirt while I tried to answer my email.
	Society would have applauded that version of me, and they would have called it freedom.
	The irony is that during that time, I was feeding thousands of people scratch food.
	I knew the value of real ingredients and traditional cooking techniques, yet I did not fully understand the deeper meaning of nourishment.
	And I'm not just talking about physical nourishment, she said, but the cultural, generational work that happens when families cook and eat together.
	That work that forms identity.
	She said, today my life looks very different.
	I have four children and a farm.
	Nothing about my life is quiet or controlled.
	Just yesterday, my 10-year-old stood next to me making jam from blueberries and blackberries.
	Then we bottled homemade barbecue sauce.
	The younger kids ran barefoot around us, coming in and out of the kitchen like little barn swallows, leaving laughter, questions, and a trail of crumbs behind.
	It was chaotic and perfect and slow.
	Yet in the middle of the noise, I could feel something ancient, that something was right.
	And you know, really, this is the way the ancient of days, God, really designed the family and life.
	And I think he knows better.
	She said, moments like that used to be normal.
	Today, however, they are the exception.
	What has changed?
	How did feeding our families become optional, inconvenient, even burdensome?
	How did basic human skills become rare?
	The more I look back, the more I land on a conclusion that people do not like to talk about.
	She said, women leaving the home during the era of second wave feminism may be one of the primary root causes of America's health crisis.
	And not only our health crisis, but a long list of problems that I won't unravel in this article.
	And so she says, well, she liked first wave feminism, and she defines first-wave feminism as getting women the right to vote and own property and have legal protection and make choices about their lives.
	She said, that was essential.
	The problem is, is that when you take the attitude that's represented by feminism, whatever waves you're talking about, you can wave goodbye to the family eventually because it is a rebellion against the ancient order that God has established that every culture has understood.
	And so you're going to wind up throwing out the babies with that bathwater.
	And it all is coming from a war between the matriarchy and the patriarchy.
	You can only have one archy.
	Somebody is going to rule.
	And again, if you go back to, if you go back to the Bible in the Garden of Eden, that was part of the punishment that was meted out.
	Men have to work and to work hard.
	It's going to be by the sweat of their brow, and there's going to be weeds and other things that are going to frustrate them.
	Women would look to the husband as the head because you only have one head.
	You can't have two heads.
	There aren't anything natural that has two heads.
	Somebody's ultimately got to make the decision.
	Now, the way that decision is made, that's something that Christ speaks to.
	And it's not to be done in a position of lording authority over somebody.
	But you can only have one head.
	And once you have taken the tack that feminism did, that I will be the head.
	God had said your desire will be to the man to rule over him.
	And so that is what we have seen since then.
	The matriarchy has been pushing back against the patriarchy.
	She said, but then in the second wave feminism, it was different, she said.
	It revived, it rewired the meaning of womanhood itself.
	Women were told that motherhood was optional, that homemaking was oppressive, that feeding and caring for a family was beneath their potential.
	The message was that that value existed outside of the home, but there was no value inside the home.
	You see, that next step was the next logical step.
	Because even with the very first one, what they were doing was they were training people to get away from God's plan of companionship and co-working together.
	I think the whole first wave, second-wave feminism thing is a deception to make it look like, oh, in the past, there was this big tyrannical patriarchy and women were just property like they are in Muslim countries.
	When in fact, you know, it's the right to vote and own property.
	You could own property, and if you were the head of the household, you could vote for that you were the one that voted.
	Then they're saying, oh, but then second wave feminism said all this stuff.
	It's an artificial distinction that they've created.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	You know, it is a fallen world, and of course, it's not, systems are not perfect, and there's a reason for that.
	If you understand, if you believe the Bible, you understand the reason for that.
	And, you know, I mentioned somebody said, so what's your favorite movie?
	I guess it's the one that I've been watching the most since I was in the hospital.
	And I talked about it, you know, the Pride and Prejudice and Jane Austen.
	I like the most recently done one because it is beautifully photographed and beautiful music.
	And I like to just have it on the back like a moving painting.
	And that particular one, the story didn't come across that much.
	But, you know, after we watched it and came home, we looked up the one that was done with Colin Firth, I guess.
	And that one kind of hewed to the storyline more.
	You could discern more about what was happening with it.
	But she really chafed against the idea that women needed to get married, really, and to have a husband.
	And that is a theme that goes through all this stuff.
	And I guess really that's the first wave feminism that you could see there in Jane Austen.
	And yet, you know, when I look at it from this perspective, that was one of the things that I looked at.
	I thought, you know, it was a necessity and it was uncomfortable, but it was a necessity for people to do it, just like it's a necessity for you to work, right?
	You can like your work or you can hate your work.
	You can like your marriage or you can hate your marriage or whatever.
	You know, these types of things that God has given to us, there's kind of a difficult things that we go through in life.
	Many times they're there to help us to grow.
	And so when we look at it from the perspective looking back, it's like, wouldn't it be nice if women wanted to get married now?
	There was a story just the other day showing that the vast majority of girls that they polled who are seniors in high school have no interest in getting married whatsoever.
	Look at how effective these people are at changing millennia of civilization.
	Look at how effective they are to get you to do whatever they want you to do.
	That's the amazing thing about it: how we can be so easily brainwashed by the corporations and by the government.
	When you look at their combined power of entertainment, of education, of news, and now of social media, you look at all of that psyop.
	These people can push us in any direction if we don't have a strong foundation.
	And that's the key thing.
	So anyway.
	But what I was saying is that it's, you know, motherhood was optional, and homemaking is oppressive, and caring and feeding for a family is beneath your potential.
	That's all what first-wave feminism was, that she claims is so good.
	It's the logical conclusion, the logical progression from that first-wave feminism.
	Well, not even that.
	She's creating a progression to say that before they didn't have the right to vote or own property or any legal protections, which is totally nonsense.
	It was only ever second-wave feminism.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	And so she said the promise that every little girl in my generation absorbed whether or not anybody said it out loud or not, that you can have it all.
	And she said for them, it was really kind of a repressive requirement.
	It was kind of like a legalism from the feminists who desire to rule over you.
	These are their rules that you must obey.
	This particular lie is not little.
	It is enormous.
	We not only tell it to ourselves, we enforce it on other women.
	We applaud exhaustion and we call it achievement.
	We normalize overwhelm and we call it balance.
	We pretend that the cost is invisible.
	The truth is, the consequences are not just carried by women trying to be all things to all people.
	The consequences have spread out across society.
	We are undernourished and underfed, not only emotionally, but physically.
	A generation is growing up without real food, without family rhythm, and without the biological and cultural memory that cooking and eating together used to provide.
	And I like this take that she has on it.
	She said, the very same time women are being told that their value was outside of the home, industrial food companies were searching for their next market.
	After World War II, the food manufacturing infrastructure was already in place.
	When the war ended, corporations needed somewhere to send those products.
	And so working women were the perfect solution.
	Convenience food was framed as freedom.
	Formula was sold as science.
	Frozen dinners were marketed as progress.
	Cooking was recast as outdated, unnecessary, even foolish for any woman who wanted to be taken seriously.
	Someone figured out that women could be convinced that preparing food for their families was a waste of potential, that processed food would become the new normal.
	And two generations later, we see allergies, autoimmune disorders have exploded.
	People don't know how to cook simple meals.
	Children don't know where food comes from.
	Our dependence on corporations to feed us has become so normalized that most people don't even recognize it as dependency.
	And in the process, we have lost connection, ritual, rhythm, identity, and agency.
	I don't see anything, I don't say this from a place of perfection, she said.
	Many of our meals come from the farm restaurant rather than my home kitchen.
	We rarely sit down at the same time to eat.
	I am still unwinding my own conditioning.
	Even small steps, however, matter.
	You can grow something.
	You can cook one meal a week.
	You can let children stir the pot, even if the mess slows everything down.
	Choose food from a person instead of from a factory.
	Sit down together, even if only once in a while.
	Perhaps the newest form of liberation is not escaping the work of the home, but reclaiming its meaning and getting rid of the feminist legalism of the matriarchy.
	And so, you know, as we look at this, the corporations continually push to us more and more tech food.
	The latest thing, of course, is going to be synthetic milk without cows.
	This is an article from the Business Standard talking about the science of lab-grown milk that is, they said, shaking the dairy world.
	Starting early next year, Israelis will find a new kind of milk on their supermarket shelves, one made without cows.
	They call it Re-Milk.
	A food tech startup announced that it will begin selling its lab-produced milk made from dairy proteins through a partnership with GAD Dairies from next year, according to a report from Times of Israel.
	The company claims that its cow-free milk tastes exactly like the dairy one, except it costs more money.
	And from January, two variants, a 3% fat milk and a vanilla-flavored version, will be available under the label New Milk.
	Both are lactose-free, cholesterol-free, and made without antibiotics or hormones.
	They don't say that they're anything about preservatives, though.
	And I guess the question is, it tastes exactly like the real dairy milk.
	Well, which milk are you talking about?
	You know, we just had, since we've moved here, we've been blessed to be able to go to a local dairy.
	Now, this is not raw milk, but it is unpasteurized, which is a key thing.
	You know, you don't get the good probiotics, but at least you don't get the fats in a suspended state that is a health risk.
	And it tastes so much better.
	It's even a different color.
	It's even cream-colored as opposed to white.
	But we didn't make it.
	They're open once a week and sell it directly at the farm.
	And we didn't make it last weekend.
	And so we had to pick up some milk and they got some milk from Walmart.
	And it tasted awful.
	And it went sour right away, as a matter of fact.
	So I guess, you know, if it tastes like real milk, does it taste like the milk from Walmart?
	Or does it taste like the milk from the dairy?
	Because there is a huge, huge difference.
	And so they said a separate barista line for making coffee that they'll sell to restaurants will appear within days, they said.
	I don't know what's different about a barista line.
	Maybe it's cream.
	I don't know.
	What, Lance?
	The answer is it's not going to taste like either.
	It's going to be some abomination that looks like milk.
	Yeah, if you do a chemical test on it, you'll find some of the same things that are in milk.
	You might find some additional things, and some of the things that are in whole milk might not be there.
	They might be wholly missing.
	They say the prices will be similar to other milk alternatives like soy or almond milk.
	But unlike them, this is quote-unquote real.
	The only difference being that no cows will be involved.
	Yeah, we don't want any of those cows, really.
	This is even more fake and contrived than going out and looking at an almond and saying, Yeah, I bet I could turn that into milk.
	I bet I could crush that down and extract all the juice out of it.
	And it'll still taste like garbage.
	It's not going to be good.
	It's going to be, you know, like water with a white tint to it.
	But someone can kind of trick themselves into believing it's some sort of milk, maybe, if they're fully diluted.
	This is going to be something along those lines, probably.
	Maybe it'll be more creamy.
	Maybe they'll doctor it up in some way.
	But this is still some contrived Frankenstein nonsense.
	Well, it gets even worse than that because there are several different companies that are doing this.
	They kind of break it down in two different methods.
	The first one is that they have mammary cell cultures.
	These are eternal cell lines that will produce milk.
	In other words, you can get milk from breast cancer cells.
	Talk about eternal cell cultures.
	It's like, you know, the meat stuff where they're growing it from, you know, meat cells, eternal cells there.
	And I said, yeah, just call it a tumor bone instead of a T-bone.
	Because that's basically what you're eating is tumas.
	And it's not a tuma, says Schwarzenegger, right?
	Then the other one is going to be precision fermentation, where they use milk ingredients and genes and microbes and things like that.
	And then they blend this all together.
	They have microbes that are secreting milk proteins when fed sugar.
	So this is kind of the bacteria poop model, like the aspartame, right?
	So you got two different models.
	You can have the breast cancer milk or you can have the bacteria poop milk.
	Either way, I would prefer to have the real thing, actually.
	Aren't we spoiled by our technocratic overlords?
	Oh, boy.
	They treat us so well, don't they?
	What options?
	Well, they're talking about this company, one of them, another Israeli startup, is called Imagine Dairy.
	Yeah.
	And they say it's the beginning of what some people call the post-cow era.
	You know, I saw a clip the other day, and it was an Irish.
	Sorry to interrupt you, but I guarantee you, no one is saying that.
	I guarantee you, they are some paid accounts on Twitter that got a very hefty sum of money to go, wow, I just got this incredible new product.
	It looks like it's the future, guys.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Yeah, it's all, you know, Gates started with this green grift stuff.
	And supposedly, the carbon footprint of a factory is going to be less than that of a cow.
	Give me a break.
	I don't believe that for a minute.
	But that's their PR stuff.
	Prove it.
	But anyway, there was a video that I saw, and it was this young Irish girl.
	And she's got a YouTube account where she does natural farming.
	And she had this lilting Irish accent.
	And she said, used to be a time when all beef was grass-fed and when all the chickens and eggs were free-range and all this other kind of stuff.
	We just called it food back then.
	Well, lab-grown milk is engineered to be nutritionally identical to conventional milk.
	That's the intention.
	Whether or not that is the reality, we shall see.
	They said, of course, this is going to take a lot of PR to convince people that this is what they want to eat and that they want to pay more for this as well.
	A lot of propaganda is what they mean.
	Anytime a company says PR, you can substitute the word propaganda generally and you'll do fine.
	They're trying to manipulate your perception of it.
	That's what this is about.
	PR is just the corporate term for propaganda.
	So if we take this convenience food, you know, that we buy fast food at restaurants, we buy TV dinners and all the rest of this stuff because we don't want to take any time for making food.
	It's just something that we quickly consume as fuel.
	And we don't pay any attention to the quality of the fuel that's there either.
	Now they're taking it to these extremes.
	They're saying that Israel has taken the lead.
	They've got a lot of different companies that are doing this there.
	Singapore, which is the first country to approve lab-grown meat, also has added companies that are doing that.
	In the U.S., it's a company called Brown Foods.
	And they call their product Unreal Milk.
	And of course, the FDA has already given them approval because, again, FDA stands for you are free to do anything if you're a corporation, pharmaceutical company.
	Europe is not moving as fast because of strict food safety regulations.
	Canada has already approved remilks animal-free proteins for use in food manufacturing through direct consumer, though direct consumer sales are still limited.
	So they will use it as ingredients in food so you won't know that you're getting it.
	But just selling it directly is still not there.
	But what about the wisdom of the ages?
	You know, there was that one woman had said, you know, when I'm in the kitchen and I'm cooking and I'm making stuff with my children, it just feels right.
	It feels ancient.
	Well, yeah, you know, what about the Amish?
	This is an article from J.D. Hall.
	He said, should your homestead adopt the Amish diet?
	Something is killing us, but not the Amish.
	Let's figure out what it is.
	Yeah, you know, the Amish, for some reason, they don't need to inject Ozimpic weekly into their stomach at $500 a month.
	They don't have an obesity epidemic.
	And they're not taking the food and the drugs that our government says are big improvements over the natural stuff.
	They said they are, by every measurable health statistic, some of the healthiest people in America, despite shunning nearly every convenience.
	Now, I would say because they shun every convenience of modern medicine and of modern food.
	They're healthier, they're more active, they live longer lives than their neighbors.
	And the secret isn't high-tech, it's high discipline.
	And that's the key thing.
	It takes more work, but they enjoy the work.
	It becomes a process.
	And, you know, work can be a curse or it can be a blessing, depending on your attitude.
	And yet we double down on the tech.
	We see that this article here, they're talking about AI might help doctors to be more efficient.
	Well, yes, it'd be much more efficient than doctors because doctors have made themselves redundant.
	They have basically become a referral system for the pharmaceutical companies.
	Give me your symptoms and I'll look down my chart and I'll tell you which one of the pharmaceutical drugs you should have.
	And so, you know, that is, they have basically sold the rope, the pharmaceuticals that are going to hang them, the way I look at it.
	And I think they have truly made themselves redundant.
	Reason, however, doesn't think so.
	They think this is going to be great.
	They said the problem, they said the reason that medicine and medical care has outpaced the cost of consumer price index by a significant percentage since 2000, I think it's 35% here.
	And they said it's due to what an economics professor called the bawm all effect.
	As other sectors become more efficient, the relative cost of slow growth sectors like healthcare and education increases.
	In other words, doctors haven't gotten faster at healing people.
	So the relative price of their time climbs.
	I think that is one of the most naive takes on not only inflation, but also on the profession of medicine that I've ever seen.
	We know that they're charging confiscatory prices.
	And we know that inflation, at least reason should understand that inflation is caused by government printing presses and printing money.
	It's amazing that they don't see that.
	But again, it's the government, the Federal Reserve, that's doing this.
	This is really an idiotic take.
	But Reason just had another idiotic take on the vaccines.
	They had an article.
	Okay, so we were told that everybody that got the vaccine was going to be dead by now.
	Who told them that?
	That was Alex Jones, again, making the truth unbelievable.
	And I said when he said that, I said, he's doing all of us a disservice because we know that since this isn't, you know, if they were injecting people with something like, I don't know, pick something that kills you right away, cyanide or something like that, where you die instantly, right?
	This is a slow kill.
	It is a poison.
	And it doesn't affect everybody in the same way in the same timeframe.
	So you're not going to see this.
	And it's not going to kill everybody, obviously.
	But reason doesn't even bother to investigate to see how the all-cause deaths and excess mortalities have skyrocketed after the introduction of the vaccine throughout various societies.
	And you can see this in country after country after country.
	Instead, they always want to cheer the corporations.
	They're not a cheerleader.
	Reason, unfortunately, is not a cheerleader of liberty and of free markets.
	They are a cheerleader for corporations.
	And they do the same thing with self-driving cars, calling people who oppose that Luddites.
	The reality is, is that when I look at, they've lost the plot.
	The real issue with self-driving cars, folks, is liberty.
	And it's not safety.
	And they make the claim, which I think is dubious, that these cars are safer than human drivers.
	But even if that were the case, as Jefferson said, I prefer dangerous liberty to the peaceful slavery.
	So we've got some comments here before we take a break and have our guests join us here.
	Travis, you want to go through the comments for us?
	Yes, quickly, because I'll be jumping off when the guest arrives.
	We've got Scott Hilmer, and again, thank you, Scott.
	We really do appreciate this.
	He says, the fact we have a so-called organic section of the grocery store versus the standard section filled with poison franken foods is another example of how we are ruled over by demons.
	Yeah, just change the labels.
	You could say poison area over here.
	Over here, you have food.
	This is the food section.
	It's not the organic section.
	Yeah.
	Let's see what other comments we have.
	We've got the real octos book says, hopefully that individual, and this is about the guy getting harassed over criticizing Israel online, says, hopefully that individual never needs to call those cops for help, but they make notes and files containing your names.
	I've just done a deep probe on what was in my data, my real name.
	Took me weeks to get corrections on the data contained.
	It's interesting.
	I've always wanted to do that, get my FBI files and see what they say about me.
	But I never did.
	And there's another comment here from Marky Mark.
	Thank you very much.
	It says, feminism was always a hate movement against men.
	I agree.
	See this 1918 letter from a suffragette to a young married woman.
	And he's got a link there for those of you who want to look at that.
	Well, I agree.
	I think it was always corrupt from the very beginning.
	It wasn't a good movement that went bad.
	It was a rebellion from the very beginning.
	When I look at feminism issues, I always think back to John Knox.
	And at the time, there was a Scottish queen as well as an English queen, and had Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth.
	And he wrote this essay, and he called it the monstrous regiment of women.
	That title really stuck on me.
	He wasn't talking about like a regiment like troops or something like that.
	He was talking about the rule of women.
	And he was talking about them in particular.
	He got into a lot of trouble, and they nearly killed him for that.
	But I always think about that.
	Anyway, go ahead.
	They said they make you sick and they sell you the fix.
	Yeah, it's a problem reaction solution.
	That's how they operate in all forms, in all areas.
	The real octo spook again says, I guess the new scam, quote-unquote, is duping churches out of baby formula diapers, et cetera.
	Diabolical, huh?
	Work of the devil.
	Bulldog says, David, try finding the Ozimpic CEO's name who passed out in the White House.
	It's been scrubbed.
	I wonder if he was a consumer of his product.
	I've seen that video.
	I didn't know he was.
	Four cent gold says, medicine that can eat your heart and give you osteoporosis is on sale.
	How nice.
	Yeah, isn't that wonderful?
	You can get it on the cheap.
	The poison is very affordable.
	They'll make sure that you can dose yourself properly.
	That's right.
	What were you saying, Lance?
	I saw that video.
	I didn't realize he was the Ozimpic guy.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, Saturday Night Live had a lot of fun with that.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break, and we're going to kind of continue along this.
	I want to get John Richardson's take on this because they focus on a lot of natural stuff.
	And as does our other sponsor, who has, what was the product, Travis, that I sent you?
	There's a new product that they were talking about.
	Actually, it was Dead Sea Salt.
	That's right.
	It is now on sale.
	It's the Dead Sea Salt Body Scrubs.
	So if you're looking to exfoliate and get your skin in a better situation, you can go to homesteadproducts.shop and you can get their Dead Sea Salt Body Scrubs.
	They're soothing and great for extra dry areas on your body that need a little extra love, like your feet and elbows.
	We use Dead Sea Salt from Israel, where the mineral content is the highest.
	Jojoba oil that's rich in vitamins and minerals, and pure essential oils of lavender or orange.
	I'm not big on skin products.
	I'm a typical guy.
	I don't do much with it, but that sounds like something someone would like.
	So if you've got someone that does enjoy these fancy skin products, go to homesteadproducts.shop and check out their Dead Sea Salt Body Scrubs.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	Again, we're talking about convenience products and things that are slapped together in synthetic milk and stuff.
	That's the thing I like about their products.
	They are very natural.
	They go to great lengths to get innovative and natural products.
	So again, check them out.
	And we're going to take a quick break.
	And we're going to be joined.
	We're going to swap out Travis for John Richardson at RNCStores.com.
	And we're going to talk about the revolution in terms of nutrition that people are finally waking up to.
	We're going to take a quick break, folks.
	We'll be right back.
	With us.
	You're listening
	to the David Knight Show, Elvis.
	Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles, and the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the Oldies channel at APSRadio.com.
	Welcome back, and joining us now is John Richardson of RNCStore.com.
	And again, you can look at the information that they have.
	They have books as well as products that will help you.
	They are part of the revolution in people in terms of nutrition.
	You know, letting your food become your medicine.
	It has been our poison for a long time.
	That's what we've been talking about.
	This long trend of fast food and convenient food.
	And there's other things that have been, we've seen the explosion in health issues with that.
	A lot of people are waking up to this, John.
	Talk about that.
	Yeah, they absolutely are.
	They absolutely are.
	And then an interesting thing is that people think the food business is completely separate than big pharma.
	It's completely separate than the financial system.
	But really, at the top of it all, David, it kind of all attaches.
	So it's a game plan that when tobacco came under fire, you know, you already know this, but maybe your audience doesn't know.
	A lot of those tobacco companies just said, okay, let's put the tobacco aside for a bit and let's invest in factory food.
	So factory food became the new tobacco.
	And they've proven that nicotine is not addictive.
	And the truth or people that know the truth, no, it's not, but they made it addictive by all the additives they added to the tobacco products.
	So they just brought that right over to the big food business.
	I mean, it really is, it's kind of like what they call it, the vertical expansion.
	You know, they basically just went from having us addicted to tobacco products, which nicotine is not addictive, but what they put into it.
	And so they use that same strategy, David, with thousands of chemicals that they put in our fast food and our packaged food to where not only are we eating GMO and primarily GMO corn and soy in our most of our foods.
	It's an ingredient in 80% of the packaged foods, but we're also eating these chemicals so that when you and I were kids, you know, a snack food maybe had five or six ingredients and the worst one was sugar, which we know that is.
	That same exact snack food, David, has 30 ingredients in it now.
	And five of them have shown to just decrease our immune system and cause cancer to be more prevalent.
	And the other 10 are preservatives so you can keep on a shelf for 12 years.
	I joke.
	But the other one is making it addictive so that you want to eat more of this food.
	So you can't just eat one bag of chips or four cookies.
	You've got to eat the whole package.
	So that is a plan.
	And it moves right in to the medical establishment where we as a public are getting sicker and sicker.
	We have more disease that is chronic and deficiency diseases than ever before in the history of our land.
	And so the poor food goes right into the next level of profits.
	You know, when people get to be 50, now all of a sudden, oh, you got to have a disease.
	You got to have something that you're going in to get treated for.
	And so it just keeps this circle of profit with the same people in charge, David.
	You know, it's kind of interesting, too.
	You know, we talk about the addictive nature of the junk food that is there.
	They even made an ad campaign with that.
	Remember when they had Bert Law, the guy who had been the cowardly lion in the 1939 Wizard of Oz?
	And he had that bitch can't eat just one.
	You know, one lays, you eat one, and it's like, oh, got to have another one.
	You know, and that is by design.
	They've been telling us that.
	They're making a joke about it.
	They're making fun of us.
	You can't eat just one of these things.
	And when you're talking about tobacco and the fact that nicotine by itself is not addictive, it was the additives that they put in.
	I thought about that for the longest time.
	I thought, you know, we used to not have all of this explosion of lung cancer and all the rest of the stuff that they would do an attachment to smoking.
	You just not have that with tobacco.
	And, you know, it's such a different thing, the kind of processed cigarettes that people get out of a carton versus the cowboys that would roll their own tobacco.
	You know, what a world of difference when you think about all the different things that are there.
	Again, for the manufacturing process, you know, they'll put foaming agents and all the rest of this stuff in a lot of foods that they're making in order for it to be able to be processed through their machines.
	And these are things that don't have any nutritional value.
	And as you point out, you know, being able to process it through the machines, being able to have a long shelf life, making it addictive, these are their priorities.
	And they don't care what the health effects are.
	In that regard, they're very much like the drug companies.
	And I think it is interesting that the federal government combined both food and drugs into one agency.
	But I say that's kind of just like the tobacco, the ATF, alcohol, tobacco, and firearms.
	They lump these things that they want to control Control together.
	What is alcohol, tobacco, and fire?
	You know, you've got to think about it.
	It's like those three things should not be combined together.
	But they've made tobacco because they know, that's a whole other show we could do about the value of nicotine for us.
	It actually does, there is, you know, and you can find it in nightshade vegetables, which they tell you not to eat.
	So anybody that thinks this isn't, you know, a concerted effort to keep us under control, to keep slaves, to keep us sick, to keep, you know, to control us financially and physically, you just got to, they vary this lightly in because the effort, the, you know, the efforts to teach nutritional education at like medical schools, for example, has been thwarted for the last, you know,
	over 100 years since the Flexner report came out in 1910 that was that was backed by the Rockefellers and the Carnegies.
	And many of your audience have maybe heard that before, but they don't, a lot of people don't understand the significance that prior to the Flexner report, doctors, MDs were allowed to prescribe vitamin C or exercise or eating a healthy diet or all sorts of things that MDs were allowed to do, including natural remedies for disease.
	And now, it's kind of a groundbreaking achievement.
	RFK Jr. has come out and said that now he's made it, you know, he's put into law that medical schools must teach nutritional education.
	And this is basically, you know, we call it a revolution because I didn't know if I'd ever see that in my lifetime, David, because every single doctor, including my own father, who graduated in the 1950s, said that when he graduated, he got about 17 hours of nutritional education.
	And the MDs today, currently, before RFK put this into effect, get about 20 hours.
	They've done the studies on the different Harvard, Stanford, and Los UCLA Medical School.
	On average, a graduating doctor gets about 17 hours of nutritional education.
	That's changing with the new hospital, a new medical school opened by Alice Walton in Bensonville, Arkansas, called the Alice Walton School of Medicine.
	I went and toured that about a month ago.
	And you would never think at a medical school you would see an organic farm on the roof or tractors with them farming outside doing organic stuff.
	And the school just had its first class start in June.
	And they had 48 students, of which Alice Walton is paying for the first 48.
	Now, my dad, I would always say, you know, politically, I don't agree too much with the Walton family, especially the billionaire class.
	But in this instance, I applaud her for sticking her neck out to start the first medical school that's going to teach 50 to 60 percent nutritional education and only 40 percent, well, 20 percent pharmaceuticals and the other 20 percent about human biology.
	So it's going to be a balanced education.
	So this, what RFK has done is quite amazing to make this a rule.
	And even David, that they're going to, on the MCAT test, even when you're taking your MCATs, it'll be, there'll be nutritional information.
	So I just went and spoke at an event in Davidson College in Charlotte, I believe.
	I've been so many places in the last month, but it was in Charlotte to 25 pre-med students at Davidson College and told them about B17 and natural answers to the C word, as we like to say, so don't get deplatformed.
	And so it really is.
	We are really seeing this happen, David.
	That's great.
	Yeah, you know, I think back on this, and was it Hippocrates that said, let food be your medicine?
	The guy that did.
	Yeah.
	And of course, we had other nuggets of ancient wisdom that we have thrown into the garbage bin as well.
	Like Galen said, first do no harm.
	So we've lost the knowledge.
	That's right.
	Now the first thing they do is cause harm.
	They don't focus at all on nutrition or on food.
	So that is a welcome change.
	And I do hope that that continues as well.
	But what was you talking about, you know, the Walmart era kind of putting it on the line and trying to go counter to the prevailing winds to try to elevate nutrition.
	What was the motivation of Rockefeller and these other people?
	Do you think that, like Gates, I kind of get the sense that he just hates humanity, but there's also a profit motive in there.
	You know, what was a profit motive for the Rockefeller people in all of this as well?
	Well, you know, involvement in the drug companies?
	Yeah, of course.
	I mean, I don't mean, of course, that people have to do the research to find us out.
	But my dad's good friend G. E. R. Griffin did the research into the Carnegies and Rockefellers, and they just felt like they weren't making enough profit off their oil.
	They had the monopoly on oil business, standard oil, and all the other.
	So they decided once they started to make medicines, pharmaceutical medicines out of these petrochemicals that shoot, if they could get the people that were later going to be prescribing these medicines, if they could get into where they stopped them from being taught any natural answers, their profits would explode.
	And of course, David, pharmaceutical industry is an $8 trillion industry now today.
	Back in 1910, it was a fledgling industry.
	But the Carnegies and Rockefellers and Bayer and all these companies that we talk about know that if you have a monopoly, you can print money.
	And so when is enough enough?
	That's what when you're looking at these people, it's never enough.
	Because once it gets to a certain point where they have so much money, now they just want to build control.
	So now they could use those pharmaceutical profits to start buying non-medical schools, just regular schools.
	They would start doing endowment funds and controlling the curriculum at regular colleges.
	And so we see these left-leaning colleges go even further and further.
	And then they started buying media companies and they started buying newspapers and they started buying television stations.
	So that all of these, the funding for all this, and so it just became monopoly after monopoly after monopoly.
	So as you well know, and your audience well knows, most of these companies now are controlled through this corporate one world government of BlackRock.
	And so that's how it's gone over the last 110 years.
	And we're only now having people wake up enough that we're trying to move away from that.
	And the one thing about health is it doesn't matter, David, if you're a liberal, a leftist liberal, or right-leaning conservative or somewhere in between, everybody wants help.
	Everybody wants help.
	Maybe, you know, you can't do a law that says, I'm going to take your health and give it to unhealthy people.
	So, you know, people want to keep their health and they'll do anything to keep their health.
	So the 80% of the public is now demanding root causes and more natural answers.
	But if you take that into the financial side, they can do all they want.
	They can say, let me take from the rich and give to the poor with your money, but they can't do that with their health.
	So it's the one area that right now it's exploding and people waking up and realizing.
	And so the average person, even leftist, rightist, centrist, knows now that they deserve health.
	They've known it for a long time, but now they just see a way to get it, and that their children and their grandchildren, everybody's children and grandchildren, deserves to be helping.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	So the Rockefellers weren't making enough money off of the oil business, so they decided they would go into the snake oil business.
	Exactly.
	Exactly.
	Yeah, it's kind of interesting, too.
	If you go back and look at the history of Rockefeller, you don't want to get too deep in it, but basically, he paid somebody to take his place in the Civil War.
	And at the time, the only place that they knew that there was any oil was Pennsylvania because it was like the Beverly Hillbillies.
	Up from the ground came a bubbling crude, you know.
	So he went there and he started buying up other people in a monopolistic way to corner the market there and the only known source of oil.
	And people were moving to that because they for things that they had used turpentine from the south for that got cut off because of the war.
	So they were looking at petroleum-based products to take the place.
	But the problem with him was every time he thought he cornered the market in a particular place like Pennsylvania, they would discover oil in Texas.
	And then he would move to try to corner that by setting up refineries in Ohio.
	And then they find oil in the Middle East.
	So it's like, well, let's get into medicine.
	We can really corner the market on that if we make it.
	And we have an anopoly on that.
	It's kind of an interesting background there.
	But the key thing that I think is important is the information that people can get at RNC stores.
	That excellent book from G. Edward Griffin, A World Without Cancer.
	He is a fearless person when it comes to telling people the truth.
	He really doesn't care about the people who are trying to shut down this flow of information.
	And of course, we all lived through this and saw it firsthand with the 2020 COVID scams.
	You can't talk about this.
	You can't talk about that.
	A lot of people saw that and woke up because of that kind of oppression.
	You know, what are they trying to hide?
	But J. Ed Griffin has been on this for a very long time.
	Talk about the origins of his book.
	I've interviewed him, and it's an interesting story.
	Yeah, it's a really neat story for my family because it was a fishing trip that my dad and Ed were on.
	My dad had treated his first patient with layotri and metabolic therapy very successfully.
	He had treated several more.
	His practice was starting to grow.
	And so he was starting to get some letters from the three-letter agencies, you know, the California AMA or the FDA, and saying, you know, you're using an unapproved treatment for the C-word.
	And my dad was, you know, shocked about that, that a licensed medical doctor doing no harm that's actually seen results could have, you know, a government agent.
	He'd been practicing for 15 years.
	They've never involved themselves in any decision he made with about any patient.
	But now all of a sudden, he was having some success.
	So he and Ed were on a getaway fishing trip.
	They had met through the John Birch Society.
	If you've heard it, I know you've probably heard of the John Birch Society.
	Gosh, the founder used to have meetings at my house as a kid.
	So my dad and Ed were on the council together.
	It was on Birch Side, but they just became buddies.
	They laughed and they joked.
	And so they went on a fishing trip.
	And Ed thought he was going to get to relax.
	And my dad did nothing but talk about lautriil and cancer.
	And then we found the answer, Ed, and you need to help me.
	And so Ed kept trying to go back to fishing, but finally he gave in and started studying about this because he had asked my dad, say, John, who would stop us from knowing about this natural answer?
	Who are they, John?
	And so that was the mission that Ed went on to find over the next two years.
	He wrote about the history about how the Hansas of northern Pakistan ate a lot of amygdalin and lived to be over 100 years old, how the Inuit Eskimos, how they ate the bile duct of the wild caribou.
	Every society that had a lot of amygdala had zero to very little cancer.
	Tajikistan, believe it or not, another company nobody knows about, has no cancer even to this day because they eat apricot seeds.
	So Ed did all that research, but then after he got finished with all the research about why it works, then he got into why we don't know about it.
	And that's where he said, that's the answer.
	That was the more complicated, harder to understand.
	But once you got it, then you finally, the lights went on and you went, wow, it was all Rockefellers and the Carnegies all trying to take a monopoly of our health, of who we are, our bodies.
	Basically, they like to own our bodies.
	So as they start us with a chemotherapeutic agent or they start us with a pharmaceutical, they just add more.
	Everybody watching, it's on one, you're on a blood pressure medicine.
	Now you have to be on something to help with your potency or now you have to be something to help with your lung capacity.
	Now you have to be something to help you from having diabetes.
	These are all drugs that keep us in that roller coaster.
	So my dad, so Ed wrote that book.
	He was the first one ever, David, that he was the first one ever that said that the connection between big money, on either side, the pharmaceutical, medical industrial complex and the financial system, the Federal Reserve, was connected, very well connected.
	It wasn't two separate things.
	Everybody else always, I remember back when I was younger, a lot of conservatives believed that the pharmaceutical companies were great.
	Ronald Reagan voted, you know, signed the document in 1986 to make it so you could never sue a pharmaceutical company because they complained they would never be able to make a profit on these vaccines if they couldn't have, you know, they couldn't have legal shield.
	Never before had that been given to any industry in the history of America, but Ronald Reagan, a conservative, signed that into law, ensuring that we'd have a generation of sick people.
	But I don't know.
	I still see that.
	Excuse me for interrupting.
	I still see that with the libertarians, for example, Reason Magazine.
	They were mocking the idea that the COVID shots were dangerous for people.
	It truly is a blind spot that many people on the right have about this and have had about it.
	But I think it's a key thing.
	You know, when you look at the fact that, no, you can't talk about this particular treatment for a particular disease, right?
	And we saw that in spades with COVID, with that other C-word that we couldn't talk about, right?
	No, no, no.
	You can't try.
	Somebody over here says that they're having success with hyroxychloroquine or with ivermectin or something.
	No, no, no.
	You can't try that.
	And it's like, well, if you're telling me that this is some major pandemic, that we're all going to die, and you're telling me that you're not going to try something that has been used for a very long time and an off-label use, which they constantly do with everything else.
	When the government approves a drug, it now can be used and they approve it for this particular condition.
	Well, if it's approved for that particular condition, a doctor can prescribe it for a different condition, and that's called off-label use.
	You know, it's interesting.
	I've got a friend who's doing a documentary right now about the FDA and drug approvals and things like that.
	He went to Japan to talk to people there about it because in Japan, they have a situation.
	If you can show that it's got a history of use, that it's not harmful to somebody, you're allowed, without any attacks from the government, you're allowed to run your own test on it.
	As long as it's not harmful, as long as you're not doing any harm to anybody, you can run a test on it and you can say, okay, so we're trying to see if it helps with this particular condition.
	And you have to prove that based on your test, but they won't shut it down.
	And that's what our government does.
	And that ought to be the smoking gun to tell people something is not right here.
	And I think that's a key thing that opened up a lot of people's minds to all of this about layotri and about other things like that.
	And it is a natural substance.
	It's apricot seeds.
	I mean, you can't deny that people can get a natural substance like that.
	Yeah, and that's exactly what's happened, David, is that the FDA has not become an organization that approves anything that doesn't have caused harm.
	They're only in the business of approving things that can be financially benefited from.
	That's a fact.
	They don't approve natural substances.
	They just don't.
	They're not in that business.
	So unless it's manufactured in a lab and has a patent on it, and you can afford to pay the multi-millions of dollars for the studies, then that's the only way you can get a drug or a substance passed to the FDA.
	So it's been since 1958 since any natural substance has been approved by, quote unquote, approved by the FDA, and they've stopped doing that long since.
	And even if it wasn't a policy that they said, well, you know, because people always say, why hasn't laatriil been studied by the FDA?
	Every single time it was proven in animals at Loyola University, at Houston Methodist, at even Sloan Kettering, they proved with the famous Kanametsu Segura that Laotril stopped the metastases of tumors in laboratory rats.
	And he suggested they need to do a human trial.
	And they actually even found a hospital in Mexico to do the human trial.
	Well, then when the pharmaceuticals companies came in, literally into Sloan Kettering and said, shut this down, shut Kanamatsu down.
	I don't care if he's been at Sloan Kettering for 60 years.
	And he was the inventor of chemotherapy.
	And he said, quote unquote, David, that Laetril B17 was the most effective chemotherapeutic agent he'd ever tested at Sloan Kettering.
	And when it was all said and done, they lied about it, covered it up, and millions of people have died, David.
	And they made a movie about it, but still the general public doesn't know.
	That's how very powerful this trillion-dollar, multi-trillion-dollar pharmaceutical industry is.
	And for anybody that thinks they won't shut something down for profit, you just need to look at anything natural.
	Linus Pauling, we have documents from Linus Pauling showing that he wanted to see what the effects of vitamin C, the famous doctor who discovered vitamin C was great for colds and things like that.
	He said it could also be helpful to prevent cancer, especially in combination with B17.
	We found a letter in the vault that you and I have talked about that says that was written to Ralph Moss, who was the whistleblower at Sloan Kettering, and said that what the National Cancer Society, what these American cancer society groups have done, will go down in history as being evil and should be stopped completely.
	And we have an actual letter from Linus Pauling to Ralph Moss, the whistleblower at Sloan Kettering, showing how it's not just layotro that they've pushed aside.
	It's other natural substances like vitamin D during the COVID scam.
	Or actually, my assistant gave me the letter.
	Here's the letter from Linus Pauling to Ralph Moss.
	If you don't mind, I want to read.
	Please do.
	He said, the revelations in this book about the ways, this book, the doctored results, how they covered up the suppression of latriol at Sloan Kettering Institute for Cancer Research.
	This was written by Ralph Moss, PhD.
	He said the revelations in this book about the ways in which the American people have been betrayed by the cancer establishment, the medical profession, and the government are shocking.
	Everyone should know that the war on cancer is largely a fraud and that the National Cancer Institute and American Cancer Society are derelict in their duties to the people who support them.
	Amazing.
	And Linus Pauling, signed by Linus Pauling to Ralph Moss, the whistleblower who Linus Pauling was a famous, he was a left-leaning politically.
	My dad didn't agree with him politically, but as far as nutritionally, they agreed that vitamin C is an absolutely great vitamin in the war against cancer.
	And Linus Pauling wanted to prove that, and he couldn't get funding from any government agent to do that.
	And so he was on our team.
	But only you wouldn't know about that if you listen to mass media or the mainstream media, as we call it, which I don't even like to say anymore.
	That's right.
	Yeah, and Linus Pauling was all about vitamin C.
	He won a Nobel Prize.
	What was the Nobel Prize for?
	Vitamin C.
	He showed the amazing nutritional benefits of vitamin C.
	He was a big proponent of that, and he showed how it could be used in many different diseases as a preventative.
	But the more he got into the ones that were so profitable, everybody knows if you're getting a cold and you start to feel sniffles, take some vitamin C. That's because of Linus Pauling.
	But when it started to get into, he wanted to study it in the cancer realm, that's what he got pushback.
	He got absolutely zero funding from the American Cancer Society or the National Cancer Institute or any government agencies for funding for study of vitamin C.
	This is the famous Dr. Linus Pauling, who was left-leaning, by the way, and still he was shut down because you don't want to take away the profits.
	And this is case after case after case.
	We know, for example, that type 2 diabetes, MDs are out there right now, David, wiping out type 2 diabetes with nutrition and getting people off sugar.
	But it's an 88 billion with a B dollar industry for the drugs to treat type 2 diabetes, which MDs are coming on saying that will never cure type 2 diabetes.
	And that's why they don't want these doctors telling their patients that it's the proper diet, a vegetable or fruit-based diet, natural diet with getting off of sugar can absolutely basically, I could say the word C-U-R-E, but I hesitate to use that.
	It basically wipes out type 2 diabetes and so many other things.
	And I was just recently at a conference with 700 medical doctors called the Plantrition Project.
	And these are all MDs that have woken up to the fact that a plant-based diet, I even have the catalog from here of all these, so it looks so medical, but they accepted me as a brother because I was talking about that 1,200 different foods that Laetro comes in.
	These doctors were talking about if you just get people eating the proper foods, a plant-based diet 80% of the time, fruits and vegetables, the pharmaceutical things or whatever the standard treatments these doctors have work so much better.
	And David was like sitting in the audience.
	My mind was blowing that I was hearing these doctors say that, who for years have been trained that no, health and nutrition has nothing to do, excuse me, nutrition and what you eat has nothing to do with your health.
	Yeah, and I experienced that firsthand when I was in the hospital.
	You know, you look at the meals that you have, obviously they're not interested in nutrition.
	But also I said to them, I thought, you know, while I'm here getting all these IVs, I say, can I get a vitamin C IV?
	You know, what would I have to do to get you guys to do that?
	Oh, we wouldn't do that.
	We don't do that.
	It's like, really?
	Why not?
	And you go, well, you can take a vitamin C. You can take that as a pill.
	We don't do that as an IV.
	And it's like, well, it's more effective as an IV.
	But still, okay, so I'll take the vitamin C pill.
	No, we don't give you vitamin C pills either.
	We'll give you a whole list of things that we'll give you.
	As you pointed out, each of them has got their adverse effects, which is a cascading thing.
	It's like dominoes.
	Okay, so now we're going to address this particular thing, but now we're going to cause two other problems over here that we can then prescribe drugs for you.
	And then those will cause two more problems out there.
	But yeah, I was just talking about Ozempic and the price war that's going on now between Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, and how they are going to be a hundred billion dollar industry in just a couple of years.
	The price that we pay for not having discipline in the food that we eat and for going with junk food and convenient food and processed food.
	This is so now people are paying like $500 a month and then sticking a needle in their stomach once a week.
	It's amazing.
	Yeah, and unfortunately, that is just another psyop.
	That is the entire science behind how Ozempic works is basically causing your stomach not to digest food so it stays rotting in your stomach.
	And so the lawsuits that are going to be going towards those pharmaceutical companies are talking about hundreds of millions of dollars because the science behind how Ozempic works, it basically paralyzes your intestinal tract, and you're basically losing as much muscle loss as you are as fat loss.
	And you're making yourself unhealthy and it's causing colon cancers or it's decreasing the rate of colon cancers.
	It's causing all sorts of problems.
	And the country that I believe it's, I can't remember the name of the country, the country that produces Ozempic is actually made it illegal for them to sell it to their own population.
	But America is trying to vote it in to give it to our obese kids.
	We've created 50% obesity with our kids and now we're trying to prescribe it to our obese kids.
	And President Trump says, hey, let's make it go down from $1,300 to $50.
	And again, you know, I agree with President Trump on a lot of things, but he and medical advice, I just wouldn't go with because Ozempic is not that big.
	They included it in the SNAP program, you think?
	I wouldn't be surprised, but there's good news that Oklahoma made it, you know, so you could, doctors, MDs can prescribe organic food to their obese patients and get it covered by insurance.
	So Oklahoma just recently did that.
	We have some wins.
	It was Denmark, it was the country that makes Ozempic, that makes it illegal to sell to their population because they know it's damaging and harmful.
	But of course, it floods the United States.
	We buy 70 to 90% of the pharmaceutical drugs that are produced in the world, and we pay more, and we're sicker than ever.
	And so that has to change.
	And I believe RFK Jr., I'm not the guy that says, just believe in the guy at the top that he's going to solve our problems.
	I believe he's making a difference.
	But more importantly, and this is a text or a tweet or whatever you call it now, an X that Callie Means.
	Are you familiar with Cali means?
	No, no.
	He works right-hand kind of man of RFK Jr.
	And I've met him several times.
	I know about him.
	A lot of people suspected that he might be a plant, but I know him as a real person.
	His sister gave up her medical career at Stanford to tell the truth about the fact that all we know how to do is cut, burn, and poison.
	But Callie said this on a recent phone call on a Zoom call that we have weekly.
	He said, I recently had a conversation with a friend who runs a clinic network of 1,000 MDs.
	She said the main conversation among doctors is frustration that patients are asking about the root cause and more natural cures.
	Imagine the doctors being frustrated for their conditions.
	She said 0% of patients asked these questions five years ago at the start of COVID, and now 80% of patients do.
	So that's the thing that gives me, David, the most. excitement about what's going on because I really don't almost care what happens at the top anymore because whatever ruling they make, I'm going to do what's best for me and my family, believe it or not.
	That's right.
	Lots of people like me and you out there that aren't going to just wait for the newest politician to ruin our lives by voting something that we don't believe in.
	We're not going to do it.
	But now, instead of in the past, when I was growing up, I was always the 5% because I was part of the John Burch Society that knew about communism and knew about these evil things were going on, knew about all this stuff, and knew about what was going on in Hollywood.
	So I was always the minority.
	Now, it feels like everybody's on my team when I'm out and about.
	And I'm not just talking about it in my little clicks.
	I'm talking about when I'm traveling across the country and meeting with people that would have, doctors that would have kicked me out of their office five years ago now are friends.
	Now consider me a friend and a co-patriot and someone to talk to about advice about the patient.
	I'm getting emails and texts from MDs that would have never, ever listened to the story of B17 and the prevention and treatment of the C-word five years ago.
	They would never listen to it, David.
	Now the general population is listening and it's a groundswell and it's growing every day.
	And that's a silver lining to that cloud of what happened with the COVID scam.
	It was so open, so in your face, so obvious that people, oh, wait a minute.
	And then they start seeing.
	I remember, and I played it many times, a clip of a woman who breaks down in tears as she's talking about the fact.
	She said, when they started talking about sudden adult death syndrome after these vaccinations, she said, I suddenly realized that I killed my own child, sudden infant death syndrome.
	And yet she didn't.
	It was the medical community that lied to her that did that to her.
	But again, it was a wake-up moment.
	It was an aha.
	And people are seeing this across the board.
	It's not just, well, SIDS is like SADS.
	But it's just, you know, we're seeing this kind of corruption.
	It's open.
	It's in your face.
	It's like what we saw with education when parents couldn't believe the things that they were told that were happening in their own classroom or they would believe, well, yeah, but it's not in my classroom.
	I've met the teacher and she's nice.
	And then they saw the telecommunication out of the classrooms that woke them up.
	They realized it was there.
	And the same thing is happening now with the FDA and with the medical community in general, and especially for the pharmaceutical companies.
	So that has been a real silver lining in all of this stuff, I think.
	But the real silver lining, I think, is what you have there at the RNC store.
	You've got both information as well as products that are going to get people out of this food culture that we're in here for profit for the big corporations.
	Yeah, as Jiara Griffin says, and a local doctor right here named Dr. John Murphy MD and other people, my family and people I've talked to, anybody that regularly eats mygdalin in your food or your change of diet is found in 1,200 different foods, but anybody that regularly eats it does not get the C-word.
	And Ed Griffin's 94 as of Friday, and I called him, wished him a happy birthday.
	And he still doesn't know anybody that regularly eats amygdalin, or nor does his wife Pat, whoever has come down and died with cancer.
	Now, that doesn't mean, I always make sure I say that if someone has stage four cancer, they've done chemo and radiation and surgery, those people have had their immune systems destroyed.
	And even though Harold Manor at Loyal University said that he got 100% positive results, even with those people in improving their lifestyle, because that's the big thing at that point, David, when you're at the end of life, you want to be able to eat, you want to be able to feel no pain, you want to be able to do that.
	Even though those people still responded, many of them died, not necessarily of the C word.
	That's the big thing.
	They don't necessarily die of the C word.
	They die of the radiation where they've actually baked their liver or they die to these chemotherapeutic agents or they've cut so many organs out of their body that their body doesn't have a chance to survive.
	And so that's the key information, the mechanics of how amygdalin B17 works.
	Dr. John Murphy, the MD that I think I've mentioned on your show before, who's local here, who's been doing, using it for 25 years, a metabolic treatment along with B17, amygdalin, vitamin C, ozone.
	He's had a 25-year track record and said he doesn't have any patients that have regularly taken amygdalin that have ever died of cancer.
	And so that's a big statement, and that gets me deleted off of YouTube or this channel or that channel or TikTok just took away my channel.
	But we are winning the battle of the hearts and minds of people because once people understand that cancer is a metabolic deficiency disease, it's not something, it's not something even that that shock causes.
	That shot, what that shot does is destroys your immune system or the 5G affects your immune system or eating too much of this poisonous food affects your immune system.
	And that allows the cancer in the absence of the B17, the amygdalin, in the absence of the pancreatic enzymes you need, in the absence of the proper nutrition you need, your body develops cancer.
	It's not something you catch.
	And that's one of the hardest messages, but MDs are now accepting it.
	I don't know if you know Dr. Margaret Aranda, a new dear friend who fought this battle with COVID.
	She does, you know, when people go into surgery, gosh.
	But anyway, it slipped my mind.
	She's world famous.
	Dr. Margaret Aranda has now joined the battle with us and helping us tell the story of Laetrol and the studies and absolutely debunking the stories that said that laatro didn't work or that it was poisonous or things like that by using a scientific proof.
	So it's an amazing time.
	And yes, people can get that information at rncstore.com or they can go to owwc.org, which stands for operationalworldwithoutcancer.org, and they can get the free book, the free digital download of Ed Griffin's seminal book, World Without Cancer, which we can't have, David.
	We really can't have.
	They can get that book or they can find a practitioner that's using B17 as an adjunctive therapy in their medical practice or their practice to get people healthy.
	But by improving their immune system and allowing their immune system to fight off the cancer, not C-U-R-E, the cancer, because if you say that, that's when the three litter agencies don't like you because they say the only thing that can cure cancer is chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery.
	And we know from history that those simply only work about 6% of the time over a five-year period.
	And of course, that's the same kind of, there's an analogy there to the COVID stuff as well.
	We'd say people come in and they diagnose them with a respiratory disease.
	They put them on a ventilator and kill about 90% of the people.
	Or they give them remdesivir and destroy their, what is it, their liver, I think.
	Also attacked the kidney.
	Yeah, so you know, it's the same type of thing that we see.
	And we also see analogies in terms of vitamin C deficiency giving people scurvy, or you can, you know, pick a lot of other things.
	If you've got a deficiency in potassium and magnesium or this or that, your body is going to get sick.
	It's going to be vulnerable to disease, or the deficiency itself will cause a disease.
	So it's not unusual for people to this understanding that it really is about nutrition and giving your body the tools that it needs because God has made it very resilient.
	And that's a different understanding.
	Again, part of what they have sold us besides just the drugs is that disease is something that we've got to search out and kill.
	And it doesn't really matter what happens to your body in terms of the secondary effects that are there.
	And so we've really got to change that false paradigm that has been pushed on us by the Rockefellers and so forth and all of this.
	I think that is, it just stands to reason.
	And I think people have now lived through an obvious and extreme version of what these people have been very subtly and secretly doing for a century or so.
	And now through this COVID nonsense, the other C-word, we have lived through this process and we see all of their tricks.
	It's kind of like the magician and you're seeing what's in the box when he saws the lady in half.
	And you can't unsee that anymore.
	The illusion's been broken for a lot of people, I think.
	The Wizard of Oz story, seen behind the curtain, and so many people have seen that, David.
	And it's, like I said, that's the great news, even though you and I wake up every morning and we look at the news and we go, oh my gosh, what's the next horrible things happening?
	The good news from COVID is that the average person, the uptake of these COVID vaccines are less than 5%.
	People just aren't getting them anymore.
	And the studies are coming out, the studies from South Korea and from Italy, and the studies about sudden infant death syndrome.
	It's an interesting study they did that during the COVID period when people couldn't go to the hospital and get their vaccines.
	They couldn't go in.
	They were refused.
	The parents were having babies and then were not allowed to go back for their well-baby checks.
	Sudden infant death syndrome plunged to an all-time low over that period of time.
	And people are like, wow, what was that about?
	I mean, was it because people were staying home with their kids?
	No, it's because they weren't getting these vaccines that were causing sudden infant death syndrome.
	So the South Korea study showed, I think it was a huge number of people, and every single type of cancer and every single type of disease was going up precipitously.
	So we now have this proof, and they're still going to push it, David.
	They're still going to, you know, the Pfizer presence is no going to talk about an mRNA for vaccine for cancer.
	But now that your audience knows they're never going to find a vaccine for a deficiency disease, it would be as preposterous as saying, hey, can we find a vaccine for thirst?
	How about a vaccine for scurvy?
	How about a vaccine for pernicious anemia?
	That's a B12 deficiency, cyanocobalamine.
	And a little known fact is that B17 or amygdalin is a precursor in your body to manufacture B12.
	So it also helps on a higher level with anybody with pernicious anemia.
	As I've stated before, David, this might be a shock to hear, but we've got documentation from Dr. Dean Burke, the founder of the National Cancer Institute, that they did studies at the National Cancer Institute that amygdalin gets rid of sickle cell anemia.
	And why don't we know about that?
	Well, sickle cell anemia is $100 billion a year in pharmaceutical drugs are used to treat people, primarily blacks and Mexicans with the disease of sickle cell anemia.
	And it just, you know, maybe takes away pain, but these people still live 10 years less than their family members or their contemporaries, but they make $100 billion a year.
	So if a natural substance like amygdalin was shown by the National Cancer Institute in the 1970s to be able to treat and ameliorate sickle cell anemia actually from live blood scans, that's why Dr. Dean Burke, beyond just sickle cell anemia, also because of cancer and also because of his stance on fluoride, little known do people know that Dr. Dean Burke came out and told the world that fluoride,
	the increase of fluoride was increasing cancer and showing less intelligence in kids.
	He was doing the studies in the 70s, and so they pushed him out.
	And so 1974, Dr. Dean Burke, who founded the National Cancer Institute, was the head of cytochemistry, resigned in 1974.
	In the middle of the period that I call the Laetro Wars or the health freedom wars in the middle of that period, and so much happened in the 70s that we've talked about, but it just goes to show you it hasn't just, it's not just been the last 10 years, David, it's been the last 50 years they've been covering up natural answers.
	And even the people working for the government couldn't get that message out because of the financial, the side that had so much money to go up against everything that a little apricot seed or the little nutrient like vitamin C or vitamin D, any of these naturally occurring things, you can get vitamin D from the sun.
	It was cheap, effective, and no way big pharma wanted any of these things to ever come out.
	And you know, when you're talking about the wars and the amygdalin wars and things like that, again, we haven't talked about this with you on this program.
	Their big PR victory, I think, you know, when I go back and look at it, boy, they really hammered it.
	That's the first place that I heard about it, was with Steve McQueen.
	Address that.
	What happened with Steve McQueen?
	Was he another one of these cases of where he had tried so many things that he had severe injuries to his body before he even got to this point?
	No, and I have so much documentation about this, David, that it might shock your audience.
	But Steve McQueen left the United States where they were only wanting to do chemotherapy, radiation.
	All of his 20 doctors were telling me you got to cut, burn, poison.
	And he went to Mexico and was treated with metabolic therapy and laotro.
	And his doctor, Dr. Rodrigo Rodriguez in Mexico, said they had gotten rid of the cancer.
	He had no signs of cancer.
	And his doctor here in America was Dr. Donnelly.
	But we have a book.
	It's called The One Answer to Cancer.
	And when we discovered it in the vault, we had never seen it before.
	And we looked on Amazon.
	They were selling it for $3,000 a copy, believe it or not.
	Dr. Donnelly says in the book, he says this, this is not John Richardson, that Steve McQueen had wiped out his cancer.
	He was shown to be no signs of cancer, but he still had this dead tumor in his kind of his belly over his liver.
	And so Steve McQueen, being an actor, didn't want this to stay there.
	He didn't want to wait for it to be reassimilated in his body.
	So they opened it up and cut it out, and it fell out on the table.
	It wasn't connected to anything.
	It was just a necrotic, dead tumor that fell out of his body.
	And he reported to Dr. Donnelly that he felt great, everything was good.
	And he said, I am going to go full more after the medical industrial complex.
	I'm going to go after big pharma.
	I'm going to go after the cancer industry.
	His doctor, in his own words, said that his phone was constantly tapped by the three-letter agencies.
	And the next day, Steve McQueen, he said, Dr. Donnelly said that someone snuck into his room, gave him a blood thickener, something that caused his blood to thicken, and that caused him to have a stroke, and he died, even though he had no more cancer.
	And that next, that day, over 3,000 news outlets reported that Steve McQueen had died from choosing to do lautriil instead of doing oncology, normal oncology, chemotherapy radiation surgery.
	David, we see that.
	Amazing story, right?
	Yeah, you know, that's the other thing, too.
	We have seen this happen so many times from the government and people in power that there's absolutely it's not surprising to those of us that know this.
	Yeah.
	Just like Larry McDonald, Congressman Larry McDonald, a Christian MD who used laatriil, who introduced laws into legislation about leotry, making it available to every cancer patient.
	He was murdered in flight 007 in Korea.
	And he was one of my dad's best friends.
	That's the only time I've ever seen my dad cry.
	Now, people go, oh, come on, they're not going to kill one doctor.
	Oh, they're not.
	They're not over billions of dollars.
	The most powerful guy in the lautryl war, if Steve McQueen wasn't a powerful thing, millions of people believed after Steve McQueen, you said that's how you first heard about it.
	Most people know Steve McQueen because they say, oh, he died because he chose laatriol.
	The opposite.
	He died because he chose lautriil after the fact, because he was going to go after the medical industrial complex.
	My dad, Dr. Dean Burke, the head of the founder of the National Cancer Institute, Dr. Harold Manner, who proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that breast cancer should be a thing of the past with laatri, pancreatic enzymes, and vitamin A. All three of these amazing doctors all died within 60 days of each other in 1988.
	At that point, David, anybody that was practicing, and there's thousands of doctors that were using leotriol in their in the practice just as an adjunctive therapy, they had to go underground.
	They had to go silent.
	They were like, wait a minute.
	So some doctors continue to do it and some doctors picked it up and continued throughout this.
	But now we're finding that now that people see the truth, these doctors are braver than ever.
	They're coming out.
	I'm talking to MDs every day that understand the history of this.
	And so we have had the cycle, but a lot of doctors, a lot of brave doctors gave up their careers.
	Dr. Privatero went to jail.
	And they could never find a patient, never once find a patient.
	Even in Larry McDonald's case, they sued him in Georgia.
	But one of the patients he treated ended up dying of the effects of chemo radiation.
	And they originally talked his son into suing Larry McDonald, but the son said, no, I can't.
	I can give up.
	And Larry McDonald, you know, said, fine, man.
	They still went forward with the case.
	And Larry McDonald won that case before he was murdered in that plane flight 007.
	So so much of this, David, it's just hard for people to believe, but we have the actual documentation of it that the three-letter agencies did not want me to be sharing with people.
	And so at that point, I always have people say, well, John, make sure you're getting that out there.
	And so we're doing everything in our power to scan these documents and get them out there and get them uploaded because the Wayback Machine proves that they'll lie about anything, including Steve McQueen, baseball players that have played for the Los Angeles Dodgers, Brett Butler, who used Laetriel to get back on the baseball field in 1999.
	They lied about it.
	If you Google it, it says he just did chemo radiation.
	And no, he didn't.
	And he lives here still in Arizona.
	So they'll stoop to no, they have no problem stooping to the lowest coin ever or doing anything to stop something that will destroy a multi-billion dollar industry.
	And we're getting the word out there because once people get it in their brain, it can never be taken away.
	Absolutely.
	That's why it is so important what you do.
	Thank you so much for coming on, John.
	And again, RNCStore.com, it is a wealth of information, just as you heard from John.
	I mean, he knows this stuff because he's read the books that he's got there.
	You can educate yourself like that as well.
	But not only that, you can help yourself and your family with the products that he's got there.
	You can get 10% off of the code night.
	But I'm proud to be associated with you, John.
	I really do appreciate what you're doing.
	Thank you so much.
	Right back at you, David.
	I always enjoy being on your show.
	You're a great American.
	Thank you.
	Thank you, folks, for joining us.
	Have a good day.
	The Common Man.
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons project to make sure the Commoners own nothing and the Communist Future.
	They see the Common Man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidknightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲