The David Knight Show - The David Knight Show - 9/22/2025

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 22, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:01:23

The David Knight Show - 9/22/2025

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Monday, the 22nd of September, year of our Lord, 2025.
	Well, today we're going to begin with the death of free speech everywhere.
	U.S., UK, Europe.
	And there will be no memorial service for it either.
	Both sides want it so badly.
	And we're going to take a look at war.
	As we see the narrative of the Russian incursion into Poland was an ad hoc false flag attack, folks.
	There's no end to the lies that NATO will tell to drag us into a global war.
	And of course, when they want war, Trump is their guy.
	He's now saying that Afghanistan has to turn Bagram Air Force Base back over to the U.S. or perhaps what?
	That he will restart the Afghan war that he never ended for four years.
	He's still bragging about the war against the American people.
	And he still has MAGA people shamelessly and foolishly defending him.
	We'll be right back.
	Good morning and welcome to the show today, folks.
	Any of you have briefdown what we're going to cover?
	Looking at the death of free speech.
	We've got Watch, UK cop grills woman in her own home over a Facebook post that upset someone.
	Oh no, we're upsetting people.
	Can't do that.
	Republicans are turning on free speech in wake of Charlie Kirk's murder.
	Then we've got David Ike on Twitter and he's asking some interesting questions.
	It's extraordinary how MAGA now stand for everything they once claimed to oppose.
	It's okay when we do it.
	Hate speech isn't real and Pam Bondi is an enemy of freedom.
	That's from the Mises Institute.
	Then Charlie Kirk reached out to Van Jones about civil discourse.
	Hair Starmer and Starmer Troopers confirm Britain will ignore U.S. and Israeli anger and recognize a Palestinian state.
	That's from the Daily Skeptic.
	The Kimmel knows under the tent.
	Actually, libs are being hoisted with their own petard.
	That's from the New American.
	And Rand Paul, absolutely inappropriate for FCC to weigh in on Kimmel suspension.
	And the left calls for the genocide of conservatives.
	That's been happening for a while now.
	The residents on X, this terrorist is May Golan, who said, I'm personally proud of the ruins in Gaza and that every baby, even 80 years from now, will tell their grandchildren what the Jews did.
	National Trust sacks volunteer gardeners for not being inclusive enough.
	How dare they?
	How dare they not have enough multiracial volunteers?
	Trump criticizes Pentagon's new press restrictions and Trump threatens Code Pink with Rico changes after public confrontation.
	Don Bacon rips Trump on Russia.
	Kimmel in CNN interview.
	Dana Bash battles Mark Wayne, Mullen on Trump and free speech.
	And Trump says Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch involved in TikTok deal.
	I wonder if that's part of the deal for their lawsuit.
	He files $10 billion lawsuit against them and then puts them on the new board of the fascist TikTok that'll be owned and run by the government.
	You guys take a dive on this lawsuit and siphon me some money.
	You know, we're going to take a look first at the UK cop that grills this woman.
	If George Arwell had done a black comedy like Terry Gilliam did in 1984 when he did Brazil, this is what it would have looked like.
	You can come in, but you better have a damn good reason for being here.
	I'm a member of the free speech union and I'm an American citizen.
	I'll have you on my scar you so quick your feet won't touch.
	You're here because somebody got upset.
	Is it against the law?
	Am I being arrested?
	You're not being arrested.
	Then what are you doing here?
	My plan was, if you were admitting that it was you who wrote the comment, you could just make an apology to the person.
	I'm not apologizing to anybody.
	I can tell you that.
	The alternative would be that I have to call you up for an interview.
	I'm here to talk to you about the delegation.
	They've reported it to the police.
	So what?
	We get a lot of reports like that.
	Are there no houses that have been burgled recently?
	No rapes, no murders?
	Yeah, that's all going on as well.
	Well, then why aren't you out there doing, you know, investigating those?
	Because I've got to investigate everything that gets reported.
	Well, you're not investigating houses being burgled.
	No, that's not my job today.
	Would you like to have a look at the comments?
	I don't need to.
	I know exactly the things I've said.
	You know how many people in this neighborhood have been broken into?
	I don't, I don't know.
	I'm the feelings, please.
	No, of course you don't, unless it's a tweet, then you do.
	It's so bad.
	I haven't broken any laws.
	So you're going to be wasting your time when you can be instead doing things that are more important.
	That's why I wanted to come to you directly, have a chat back.
	No, no.
	You should not be doing this.
	I'm a cancer patient.
	You can see that because I'm bald.
	I didn't know that before I came, but it doesn't change.
	Still can't break laws.
	If you haven't broken the law, then nothing happens.
	Well, you know whether I've broken a law.
	You can judge for yourself before you even break a law by offending.
	The public knows what you guys are doing.
	We know what's going on in this country.
	We've got to get into prison many times.
	Get onto them and tell them to apologize to me.
	A cancer patient, a woman living on her own, who has never broken a law in her life, by the way, ever.
	An older woman, you tell them, I'm an elderly woman.
	I'm a cancer patient.
	You may have to come back and arrange an interview then.
	Well, you can arrange it, but I'm going to tell you the same damn things that I'm telling you now.
	Next time, I'm going to have a free speech union lawyer with me.
	Well, I don't know what the rules are in the UK, but let me just tell you, that's the wrong way to handle it in the U.S. I'm glad she stood up for her rights.
	I'm glad that she gave him a tongue watching.
	I enjoyed hearing that.
	If the police show up at your door or stop you somewhere, you say, am I under arrest?
	Am I under arrest?
	No?
	Okay, am I free to go?
	No.
	Well, since I'm being detained, I have nothing to say to you.
	And in the U.S., you plead the Fifth Amendment.
	That's the way you handle it.
	You don't let them in your house.
	You don't let them sit on your sofa.
	And you don't engage them in speech no matter how angry you are, no matter how unjust the charges.
	Understand that.
	Understand what you're dealing with.
	They're trying to entrap you.
	So you heard the issue there.
	And of course, it reminds me of Rowan Atkinson.
	I guess it's been now about 10 years.
	They were trying to head this off.
	They saw this coming.
	And Rowan Atkinson and some other comedians were there to support free speech against a proposed rule.
	I've played it a couple of times where he talks about, he says, this is very much like the skits that we used to do in comedy.
	He said, where the police officer is arresting a man for walking about with a loud shirt at night and things like that.
	And, you know, just making up these charges.
	Nonsense.
	But they knew that it was coming for free speech.
	And he had a big sign behind him.
	Go ahead, offend me.
	We must not come after offensive speech.
	And yet now in the U.S., we have conservatives doing that.
	Most appallingly, in the name of Charlie Kirk, who is adamantly exactly the opposite of this.
	He was someone who engaged people in debate.
	That was the thing that he did so well.
	And they are just destroying his memory by using his death as an opportunity to undo everything he believed in.
	And I think he believed in it.
	So we're going to talk about his death, by the way.
	We now have a magic bullet that has been unveiled in this assassination.
	It is, I don't know what happened.
	I'm at the 9-11 stage right now where the only thing I know is that what the government is telling me is impossible.
	So I don't know who did it.
	I can pretty much guess what the motives are, and I know how the government is using these events.
	So she is a Trump supporter, which I don't understand.
	It's by still being a Trump supporter when you see that kind of attack on free speech.
	And they told her to apologize, but they would not tell her what the offense was or who to apologize.
	She still doesn't know what it was that was offensive, and she doesn't know who she offended.
	You know, we've had these types of situations in the UK centuries ago.
	That's why when this country was founded, they said you have the right to Answer your accusers face to face to know the charges against you, to bring witnesses in your defense.
	That's called due process, which Trump is thumbing his nose at at every opportunity as well.
	So he told her that I'm there to get an apology, but I won't tell you to whom or for what.
	You apologize to the state for having an opinion.
	He's not going to record something and send it in a text message to the complainer that's there.
	I'm so sorry.
	I don't know what it was that I said that offended you, but I'm so sorry.
	This sounds like sometimes arguments that somebody can have as a married couple.
	I don't know what I offended you for, but whatever it is, I'm sorry.
	But that's a different thing.
	We want to keep that relationship going.
	So she said when the Free Speech Union got there to help her, they contacted the police and they said, we would like to see the charges here as part of this investigation.
	And then the police claimed that they had accidentally deleted the record of the complaint.
	They must be keeping them in the same dust where the Epstein files are kept.
	We have accidentally deleted and redacted that.
	And one person tweeted out, Tyrant says, we're investigating you, your potential commission of thought crime.
	You.
	What was the thought, Tyrant?
	I'm not at liberty to say.
	Are you going to apologize or what?
	I can't tell you what you did.
	I can't tell you who you did it to, but would you like to apologize for it?
	How are you supposed to apologize for something when you don't know what it is?
	In fact, most people tend to get very upset if you just apologize as a blanket statement as opposed to actually knowing what you did wrong.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	I think the communists just want you to be sorry in general.
	They want you cowed down to the government is what they want, to the police state.
	And so when they said we've lost the complaint, that made people more angry.
	One person posted, you are not police.
	Your bullies picked on average people who have expressed opinions because you two are too cowardly and useless to do your actual job of going after criminals.
	You and all of your officers should apologize to your citizens for your bullying and threatening them.
	So this is the problem, folks.
	We have a disconnect in what we think the government is supposed to do and what the government wants to do and does do.
	It shows up when we talk about the police.
	It shows up when we talk about schools.
	You think schools are there to educate your kids to read and write?
	To think critically?
	You better grow up.
	You think the police are there to protect you against violent crime and property crime?
	Come on, let's grow up.
	That's not what they're about.
	We need to have a discussion about what education is and this institution that is interfering with that.
	And we need to have a discussion about what a real safe community is like and how the police are interfering with that.
	We need to define what the police are supposed to be doing.
	And we need to define the role of government.
	That was done in the Constitution, but that document has been destroyed, especially now by Trump and Mike Johnson.
	The statement from your officer, quote unquote, the alternative to the provision of an apology would be that I have to call you in for an interview, was absolute nonsense then.
	A threat to induce capitulation, just like Trump and the FCC are doing to news networks, threats to push them into capitulation.
	It's just the difference is this is a small version of that versus the bigger version.
	If you want to see how that looks, what happened to Jimmy Kimmel, what you should do, conservatives, is take a look at this and substitute a TV network for that woman.
	I know they're big and you don't like them.
	I don't like them either.
	But substitute the press or any news organization, maybe one that you like.
	And then for the policeman, you substitute FCC's Brendan Carr.
	It was kind of interesting that over the weekend, or at the end of the week, Ted Cruz came out and criticized him.
	And interesting, Travis called him.
	He said, this sounds like a mafia threat.
	Remember what I said to the ABC executives wake up with a horsehead in their bed?
	Gonna make them an offering against.
	He didn't say that.
	But that's basically it.
	I think the best response to all this is from one individual who simply tweeted out two words.
	He said, I'm offended.
	I'm offended at the actions, I guess, of these police.
	But again, don't let the police into your home, especially in America.
	You have Fifth Amendment.
	Say, get a warrant.
	Am I under, or if you're outside of your house, am I free to go?
	Oh, I'm not.
	Okay, I'm being detained because words have meaning, and so does the Fifth Amendment.
	Not saying another word to you.
	Republicans are turning on free speech now in the wake of Charlie Kirk's murder.
	You know, one of the things that we had yesterday, I was surprised that we didn't get the rest of the details about the ballroom, evidently, that Trump is doing.
	That was his response when people asked him about his grief of Charlie Kirk's death.
	I assume that what he meant is the ballroom, he's going to be bawling in there.
	He's so upset that he's going to go in there and he's going to weep.
	Yeah, he just immediately changed the subject, started talking about his great ballroom that he's building.
	Well, the question is, should elected officials censor Americans?
	Reason says the Trump administration says yes.
	And so do the people who knee-jerk support this jerk.
	Republicans have long cast themselves as defenders of free speech against cancel culture and the censoring impulses of the political left.
	There was merit to the argument.
	Reason has covered many cases of overreach.
	But over the last week, MAGA Republicans have scoured social media for government employees who are posting about Kirk's murder, contacting employers in an attempt to get them fired.
	Kirk's online defenders have snitch tagged the employers of government workers over social media posts and saying that they don't care about the assassination or that they didn't like Kirk, even as they condemn his assassination, even criticizing Kirk prior to his assassination.
	Well, then that's just it.
	You know, these are people who are engaging in a Stasi tactic.
	It doesn't matter what the subject is.
	It's what they're doing about it, how they despise free speech now.
	Free speech that they were clinging to when they were being persecuted by Biden unjustly less than five years ago now.
	And so what has happened to these people?
	Is this just people online?
	It's not that those with government power are advocating such a thing, right?
	Well, Trump is advocating it as well.
	He said, I think maybe their broadcast license should be taken away.
	All they do is hit Trump, referring to himself in the third person.
	They're licensed.
	They're not allowed to do that.
	They're not allowed to criticize me, your dear leader.
	This is straight out of North Korea, folks.
	When you see someone celebrating Charlie Kirk's murder, call them out, say advance, and report them to their employer.
	His argument bears a striking resemblance to the comments made just a few years ago by his alleged ideological enemies, except now they're all really strange bedfellows, aren't they?
	Anyway.
	And we have the video of Trump saying that on the board.
	Yeah, let's go ahead and play that.
	It was consequence culture is how they're spending this.
	The people who are apologizing for Trump.
	Oh, well, there's consequences to speech.
	Not if it's free.
	Not if it's legal.
	There should not be any consequences.
	I don't care if you like it or not.
	There should be no consequences.
	But that is a cute little soundbite that is being echoed throughout social media chambers.
	I've even seen it on some comments here.
	Get over it.
	Understand what free speech is.
	That means free means free.
	You're free to say whatever you want without any recrimination without any consequences.
	We already have consequences for speech that is not free.
	And that means things like libel, slander, legitimate threats that are imminent.
	All of these things have consequences, but not something that simply because it offends somebody.
	Did you find that clip?
	That's something that should be talked about for licensing, too.
	Sell this free speech question because you've said that you've restored free speech in America.
	Is that free speech, including for people who are harshly critical of you, for your political opponents, for people who say things you don't know?
	I've become immune to.
	I've become immune to it.
	There's never been a person that's had more unfair publicity than me, and that's why your network made me million dollars or $16 million.
	He filed a $10 billion lawsuit and a $15 billion lawsuit.
	That's why CBS paid me a lot of money, too.
	He's a thug shaking people down.
	I'm two days ago.
	I'm going to work for a lot of money.
	Just because I, well, I'm winning.
	I mean, I'm winning the cases.
	And the reason I'm winning is not guilty, John.
	You're guilty.
	Got your lawsuit thrown out.
	Network, a very unfair network, and you should be ashamed of yourself.
	NBC is equally bad.
	I don't know who's worse.
	I think they're equally bad.
	And, you know, for you to stand there and act so innocent and ask me a question like that.
	But look, you paid a big price because you were dishonest, John.
	The reason I won that lawsuit was because you were dishonest.
	You were proven to be dishonest.
	And so you can't sit back and just say, oh, well, what do you think?
	You know, like you're some wonderful person.
	You're not a wonderful person.
	Frankly, you're a terrible reporter.
	You know it, and so do I. Okay.
	He didn't win the lawsuit.
	They kow-towed to financial pressure.
	And so you hear this.
	Fair, fair, fair.
	Does he sound like a Democrat to you, like a Democrat from New York?
	Certainly sounds like it to me.
	You know, the fairness doctrine was what they used to stifle conservative speech for decades.
	It was only when Ronald Reagan got rid of the fairness doctrine, quote unquote, that you had the rise of conservative talk radio, Rushland Ball, and others.
	So if you want to talk about fair, just understand where this guy is coming from and where he is pushing us.
	He's not a conservative.
	He's not a legitimate Republican.
	He is a Manchurian Democrat.
	So we have two videos of Trump talking about censorship.
	We've got to play the other one.
	Should I play the other one?
	Yeah, sure.
	That's something that should be talked about for licensing, too.
	When you have a network and you have evening shows, and all they do is hit Trump.
	That's all they do.
	If you go back, I guess they haven't had a conservative more than years or something, somebody said.
	But when you go back and take a look, all they do is hit Trump.
	They're licensed.
	They're not allowed to do that.
	They're an arm of the Democrat Party.
	Thank you, everybody.
	You know, that's the problem with licenses.
	They have, you know, with the broadcast and with the FCC, that's the way they're going to come after people.
	Again, the licenses, they brought them in.
	Same reason they brought in police, same reason they established government schools.
	There was a stated purpose, which made sense to people on a practical, pragmatic basis.
	But there was no authority for it.
	And so what happens is when you create a government program on the basis of some pragmatic compromise of the Constitution, it metastasizes into a cancer.
	And that's what we see over and over again.
	But we have the MAGA influencers who are out there nudging people, say, hey, say this.
	There's consequences for speech.
	Sure, your speech is free, but there'll be consequences.
	You know, you might get a knock on the door from a cop who wants to sit in your living room and lecture you about hurt feelings.
	It's no surprise that Trump has no principles on free speech, said Reason.
	From the beginning of his first term, he called the press the, quote, enemy of the American people.
	But Vance's position marks a notable pivot from just a few months ago.
	Yeah, they are all spinning very rapidly.
	If you've got to pay consequences, folks, it is not free.
	And there's a lot of consequences that there can be for speech that you don't like.
	I mean, you personally can boycott the corporation if you don't like it.
	If they come after you individually, there's slander, there's libel, there's other things like that.
	And, of course, the threat of violence has to be not only credible, but imminent.
	People have used warfare type of talk forever, forever, both sides.
	That's the thing is, like, what Jimmy Kimmel said was factually wrong, but he's protected under the First Amendment.
	It gives very, very strong protections.
	Now, potentially, the MAGA movement could have come forward and said, you know, this is slanderous and defamatory against our movement, and they could have brought some sort of lawsuit as a group of people.
	But the FCC has no room here.
	It doesn't give them the ability to do that.
	Now, I think they would have lost that lawsuit.
	I don't think it has any real bearing or weight enough to be carried through court.
	The real remedy to bad speech is more speech.
	It's debate.
	It's what Charlie did.
	He wasn't afraid to go in and engage people who were just making baseless accusations against people and slanders.
	That's the best way to do it.
	And again, I'm not saying that I think they should have brought a lawsuit.
	Yes.
	I'm just saying, you know, technically.
	But you have to have free speech in order to have the right approach to all of this stuff.
	Yes, absolutely.
	One thing, though, they're talking about government employees at the beginning of this Reason article, which I think is somewhat different.
	I mean, there can't be any government consequences for public employees, or else it's not free speech.
	But government employees, it's kind of people that are, in a way, working for you.
	So it's different to make your opinion known that you don't think they should be in that public position working for the American people with them shouting that Charlie Kirk deserved it or whatever.
	I agree.
	One of the most egregious one of these types of issues that J.D. Vance is out there creating witch hunts for was an individual who was fired because his wife posted something.
	He didn't post it.
	His wife posted it.
	And they couldn't reach him for comment, the press couldn't, but they were able to get his father.
	And he said, well, that's soon to be my ex-daughter-in-law.
	So I don't know if that was something that came up because of this, but he got fired because of what his wife said.
	This is the ridiculous extreme that's being taken to.
	This is the hallmark of communism and all authoritarian regimes.
	Yes, Lance.
	And didn't you say that he wanted to go or tweet something about it against his wife, what his wife was saying, and his company told him, no, don't say anything about it, and then later fired him.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	They didn't want him talking anymore about it.
	They just wanted this all to go away.
	Let's just put a gag on everybody and let's put something over everybody's mouth so they can't talk.
	Then we will hear no evil and you will say no evil.
	I saw another thing about that where it was a teacher that posted a meme about Trump.
	And because the meme referenced Charlie Kirk, it was saying the meme was Trump talking to Charlie Kirk.
	I said, the Sepstein thing isn't going away.
	You need to take one for the team.
	And that's a meme about Trump.
	It has Kirk in it, but it's not a meme making fun of Kirk.
	And she got fired for that.
	Yeah.
	Well, you know, that is.
	They did have, it has gone away in the U.S., all the Sepstein stuff that has helped him very much.
	But it hasn't gone away in the UK.
	They have, and we'll get to this video later, we have a video about the police there now confiscating, seizing and confiscating a van.
	You know, first last week, they arrested four guys for an unauthorized projection on the castle, right?
	Showing, and it had sound and all the rest of this stuff, showing Trump and Epstein partying together, what great friends they were for about 15 years.
	And so the police showed up and arrested them.
	This group does that kind of thing all the time.
	This is the first time they've ever had an arrest.
	Now that's been followed up by a van that was confiscated.
	And it was, here it is right here.
	Let's just play it.
	You can see this van has got pictures of Trump and Epstein together.
	And so the police stopped them and stole the van.
	Like civil asset forfeiture theft.
	That type of thing.
	Yeah, pretty amazing.
	Well, he can run, but he can't hide.
	And he can try to hide the documents.
	But he's not going to be able to understand what's going on.
	The interesting thing is, if they had complied with this and released this stuff, even as he had his army going through scrubbing and sanitizing this stuff, if he had released that, it wouldn't have been as damaging to him.
	He and his administration, and that includes people like Bondi and Cash Patel, Dan Bongino, all of them together, working very, very hard to do a cover-up.
	It only makes everybody's suspicions more and more confirmed and stronger.
	The interesting thing about Watergate was not the essence of what was there.
	It was the cover-up that came afterwards.
	You might should remember that.
	When the opposing party was in power, Brendan Carr, the FCC chair, recognized the errors of threatening people with the FCC over speech.
	In 2022, Meta CEO Zuckerberg told podcaster Joe Rogan that during the 2020 election, Facebook artificially decreased the spread of a story about Hunter Biden in response to requests from the FBI.
	Again, it comes from the government and they use the private corporation as plausible deniability.
	But it's really the government that is doing this.
	We knew it.
	We knew it all along.
	We have now seen the documents released by Musk, and we've heard Zuckerberg talk about it as well.
	Carr posted in response on X, Brendan Carr, the FCC guy who just throttled Jimmy Kimmel because of a joke.
	It really, you know, talking about what you were saying before, Lance, the offense, I think, was not the fact that he falsely said a MAGA guy did it.
	I think the real offense was for him to show the absurdity of Trump's reaction to all this, to pivot, didn't really care, pivoted from that question to talking about the ballroom.
	And he says he shows all the compassion of an eight-year-old who just had his pet goldfish die.
	I think that struck home.
	And I think that was what resulted in the sky's got to come down.
	Because satire is the most powerful weapon.
	And that was very true satire, showing the true character of Trump.
	Anyway, back in 2022, you had Brendan Carr say, quote, the government does not evade the First Amendment's restraints on censoring political speech by jawboning a company into suppressing it.
	Rather, that conduct runs headlong into those constitutional restrictions as Supreme Court law makes clear.
	That's not what he's saying today.
	Now he's doing just the opposite.
	And even more troubling, listen to this quote from Senator Cynthia Loomis, who is out of Wyoming.
	She says, under normal times, in normal circumstances, I tend to think, and notice that she says tend.
	She's not really sure about the First Amendment.
	She says, I tend to think that the First Amendment should always be sort of the ultimate right.
	Well, we don't get our rights from the First Amendment.
	What the First Amendment does is it prohibits government officials like these hypocrites of Brendan Carr and Cynthia Loomis.
	It prevents them, or prohibits them, I should say, from violating our God-given rights.
	She says, and that there should be almost no checks and balances on it.
	Almost, almost.
	She doesn't want to say she supports free speech.
	She supports nearly free speech, maybe, maybe, under normal circumstances.
	But of course, these aren't normal circumstances.
	Everything now is an emergency.
	And emergencies call for a strong man to issue dictates.
	She said, we just can't let people call each other those kinds of insane things and then be surprised when politicians get shot and the death threats they're receiving and then trying to get extra money for security.
	Well, just wait until you establish your dictatorship and see what happens.
	Loomis's complaint sounds like a more aggressive version of the Heckler's Veto, which is a form of censorship where speaker's event is canceled due to actual or potential hostility of ideological opponents, wrote Zach Greenberg of FHIR, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.
	And he knows this very well because FIRE had been supporting a lot of people.
	Charlie Kirk was not the only one going to different campuses and talking.
	As a matter of fact, somebody sent me, I've had a couple people send me statements saying Erica Kirk is not going to be running Turning Point USA.
	It's going to be Ben Shapiro.
	Look at what he had to say.
	He went out there and said, I'm going to pick up the bloody microphone.
	I'm going to carry on his work.
	I don't think that there's some agreement to put him in at the top.
	Understand, Erica is the CEO.
	She answers to the board of directors and especially to the donors.
	They tell them what to say.
	But Shapiro's got his own organization, and he's been doing some of this.
	He didn't do it as well or on the ground like Charlie Kirk did.
	Charlie Kirk just went out in the open and engaged the students.
	Ben Shapiro would go into more formal debating settings where he'd typically debate somebody on something.
	Of course, Charlie Kirk has done that as well.
	But I think what he's trying to do is to virtuous signal to the people that he is the successor to Charlie Kirk, not that he's going to take over Turning Point USA.
	We'll see what happens.
	But the Heckler's veto has been used over and over again.
	They start saying, well, I'm going to, you know, threats, whether real or imagined, are going to happen if this conservative speaker comes on campus.
	And the university then says, okay, well, we don't want to have any problems, so you're disinvited.
	You can't speak.
	It's going to be too controversial.
	And that is now what the conservatives are doing.
	The Heckler's veto.
	Zach Greenberg said Loomis is telling us the government must punish people for saying offensive or inflammatory things because of how others might respond.
	He says this is not only completely wrong, it's unconstitutional.
	And I don't care who you are, senator, or whether you're somebody who is just working in state government.
	If you swore as a condition of your office to uphold the Constitution, you have no authority for anything after you violate and shred the Constitution and ignore what it has to say.
	First Amendment to the Constitution protects speech no matter how offensive its content, said the ACLU.
	Speech that deeply offends our morality or is hostile to our way of life warrants the same constitutional protection as other speech because the right of free speech is indivisible.
	What it is, is a litmus test for your belief as to whether or not there should be something called free speech.
	The litmus test is if you support free speech when you don't support the speech that's being said.
	You support their freedom to say it.
	We've seen this over and over again.
	So David Icke came out.
	He called out MAGA.
	He said, it's extraordinary how MAGA now stands for everything that they once claimed to oppose.
	It's okay when we do it.
	We were never against it to start with, only when it was done to us.
	The lack of self-awareness, says Ike, is stunning.
	Whether it's Trump on the right or Starmer on the left, it's the same agenda promoted with different excuses.
	And he was referring, in particular, he responded to a post that Trump put up talking about how people who screamed at him in a restaurant, that's code pink, those are the people he wants to use RICO statutes against.
	And he views them as terrorists because they're anti-war.
	I kind of think the terrorist is more like the guy who drops bombs on boats without even talking to them or establishing what they're doing.
	To me, that fits the definition of terrorism, not free speech.
	I think we have a right to peacefully redress our grievances.
	And you don't have a right to violently execute people because of suspicion.
	And a woman, in many cases, women, you can see they're professional agitators.
	I had one the other night.
	I had four the other night, all in one group, total phonies, that started to scream when I got into a restaurant.
	Oh, you know, something with Palestine.
	I said, well.
	Four women, he couldn't handle it.
	Peace in the Middle East.
	I should get lots of awards for that, right?
	With the Abraham Accords and everything else.
	But a woman just stood up and started screaming.
	And she got booed out of the place, too.
	The people, there were a lot of people in the restaurant.
	I went there to show how safe, and it was safe.
	I mean, a woman is just a mouthpiece.
	Oh, she was a paid agitator.
	You're a paid shell for war.
	I've asked Pam to look into that in terms of RICO, bringing RICO cases against the criminal.
	Yeah.
	Because they should be put in jail.
	Criminal RICO to this country is really subversive.
	Yeah, where's the crime?
	Speech or the desire for peace?
	Is that a crime because people want to see a declaration of war and a debate about it before you do it by executive order?
	So again, those four women were there.
	Well, you know who else was there?
	It was Trump and Bondi and Hegseth and Marco Rubio and all other security details.
	You can imagine how large that was and all the different security details overlap.
	They couldn't handle four women.
	You can't handle the truth, can you?
	No dictator can't.
	You're just like Kim Jong-un.
	So Kim Jong-Trump.
	So Bondi declared that as a prosecutor, she'll go after those who engage in what is called hate speech, especially if it's the kind of speech that El Presidente hates.
	But hate speech does not exist, says the Mises Institute.
	It's just a phrase that the left invented to define speech the left doesn't like as being outside the protections of the Bill of Rights.
	I guess it's kind of like the assault rifle that they invented.
	I can't get a definition of assault rifle.
	We can't get a definition of hate speech.
	Fully automatic assault words.
	Their knees are jerking on fully automatic.
	Maybe she call it assault speech.
	There we go.
	Combine the two memes together.
	Perfect.
	I mean, it's the same definition.
	It's anything they don't like.
	That's right.
	Any gun they don't like, any speech they don't like.
	That's right.
	So it's just called assault speech.
	The very fact that Bondi unironically uses the term hate speech illustrates how deeply immersed she is in the culture of coercion and despotism that permeates the Washington ruling class.
	Any politician who promotes the concept of hate speech, says the Mises Institute, should be considered an enemy of our most fundamental natural rights.
	And her political career deserves to be ended immediately.
	She needs a new career behind bars.
	That's where she needs to be.
	So traitor to the Constitution.
	I 100% agree with the Mises Institute on this.
	Bondi's dangerous comments on a broader level, she has talked about anti-Semitism, what's been happening at college campuses around the country, which are war protests.
	She said it's disgusting, but it's not as disgusting as Trump's reaction to it, the Trump administration.
	She said, We'll absolutely target you, go after you, if you're targeting anyone with hate speech.
	And again, we now see the right using the same tactics again.
	What are the tactics of the left?
	You're racist, right?
	That's hate speech.
	You're racist.
	Now they say, that's hate speech.
	You're anti-Semitic.
	Same stuff.
	These people are a mere image of each other.
	It's amazing.
	Miller then gave Bondi an opportunity to clarify her outrageous comments, but Bondi doubled down.
	Miller said, Do you see more law enforcement going after these groups who are using hate speech and putting cuffs on people so that we show them that some action is better than no action?
	But Bondi responded, No, we will absolutely target you, go after you if you have speech that she hates.
	She also seeks to justify prosecution of alleged anti-Semites, by which she really means people who don't like the socialist state of Israel.
	And that's the reality.
	You know, when we talk about what's going on, the things that they've done in universities, isn't it interesting that when you talk about the universities as being the center of evil?
	That's what Charlie Kirk said.
	He said, I go to the heart of where the evil in our society is coming from.
	And it is.
	It's coming from these seminaries that we call educational institutes.
	And he says, I go there to combat it.
	How about if we just cut off the money to these institutes, right?
	So we could own homes or things like that.
	Imagine the amount of money that we could say because Harvard was getting $9 billion with a B from the federal government alone.
	Harvard is a private institution.
	It has the largest endowment of any university on earth.
	And that's one of the reasons is because they're so politically connected.
	Trump cut that off because he didn't like the content of people's speech on campus.
	But if they change their content to suit him, then the spigot opens up again and they start flooding them with money again.
	This is the sickness that is at the heart of all this.
	The sickness that will not be named and will not be addressed.
	The freedom of speech is a property right, says Mises.
	It is a natural right to own oneself, to own one's property.
	The right to use your body to express certain opinions stems from the basic natural right of self-ownership.
	Well, I don't disagree with that, but I think the founders couched it in a Christian understanding of the fact that we are all created in the image of God.
	That's my basis.
	It's not an economic understanding of rights, which, again, is fine.
	But, you know, this is ultimately going to come back to being the conservatives should think about this.
	It's going to ultimately come back to being a gospel issue.
	Why is that?
	Well, because faith comes by hearing.
	We know that.
	We're not going to shut up about it.
	It doesn't matter what the consequences are.
	We're not going to be quiet about that.
	And so that means the consequences are going to be falling on Christians.
	Prison, cancellation, and unable to earn a living, that type of thing.
	Maybe more severe penalties are going to happen, as we have seen in other authoritarian societies.
	So we will die or be imprisoned, but we will not be silenced.
	And people need to understand what this is coming.
	It's just amazing to me how blind these people are.
	Trump has turned them around.
	The only thing they can see is what is in the past.
	And they can't learn any lessons from what happened to Trump in 2020 or J Sixers in 2021.
	They can't see any lessons from that.
	A person cannot make speeches or express opinions in places where the property owner does not allow it, says Mises, again, continuing down the theme of economic justification for rights.
	A person cannot distribute political op-eds in the grocery store if the store owner says no.
	And I've had this argument with, who was the guy, I don't know if it was, it was a lawyer.
	I can't remember his name now.
	Anyway, we had disagreements about this.
	We've had Supreme Court cases saying that you can't hand out flyers in the mall.
	And I said, the mall is private property and it's a business that's going on and people pay to have a store there and to use all of this stuff.
	They don't want it commandeered and stolen by that.
	So I said, it's not the same thing.
	Robert Barnes.
	Robert Barnes, yeah.
	I said the controlling factor here should be the 1946 case against the person who is handing out, as Marsh versus Alabama, is the person who is handing out religious texts.
	Again, it's not a religion that I would agree with, but they're handing out religious texts in the public square.
	But the public square was privately owned by the company that was a mining town and they owned the town.
	The Supreme Court said, even if the public square is privately owned, you can't shut down free speech.
	And so it was not something that was being used, even though it's privately owned, it was not being used as like a retail space.
	Barnes would say that subsequent hearings in the Supreme Court shut down that right of people to get into malls.
	Well, that's not the same thing at all.
	The mall is not the public square.
	It is private retail property.
	Pam Bondi may not like it when people criticize the state of Israel or cheer the murder of Charlie Kirk on a privately owned website.
	But whether or not that person is allowed to say things in that place is not something the U.S. government can legitimately regulate.
	The only legitimate limitation on free speech is when that speech involves a real and specific threat against another person.
	The 1969 case of Brandenburg versus Ohio concluded speech can only be limited when that speech is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action.
	This was the get out of jail card that many of the people who organized and promoted J6 pulled to get out of it, the same people who are now calling for the left to be purged.
	It's just amazing, this urge for self-destruction that has surfaced during the fourth turning.
	I'm glad Charlie Kirk is dead.
	Doesn't even come close to that standard.
	Neither does saying, I hope members of the IDF get killed.
	Vague attacks on foreign armies are a form of free speech, pure and simple.
	Even the idea of incitement lends itself to abuse since it's not always clear when speech is encouraging something in general or if it involves a specific imminent threat.
	Not every call for violence is necessarily an incitement to imminent lawless action.
	Remember that we kept hearing incitement, insurrection, all this kind of stuff all the time about January 6th.
	None of it was true.
	It is clear, however, that in her comments to Katie Miller, Pam Bondi is not concerned by either legal standards or by property rights.
	She's just a politician.
	We should not be at all surprised to discover that she is likely to be more concerned with sounding tough to pander to certain interest groups and to please her the guy who put her in the position there.
	Bondi's embrace of the absurd notion of hate speech is dangerous because it is so vague, undefinable, and open to abuse.
	Any practicing Christian sees this every time the left claims that opposition to gay marriage is a form of hate speech.
	The Bondi facsimiles on the left would love nothing more than to target and go after any Christian who criticizes gay marriage, especially those who do it from a pulpit.
	And as I said, this is going to be the tit for tat that's going to lead us into massive Christian persecution now being pushed by Trump.
	Virtually anything can be defined as hate speech.
	In a lecture in 2004, historian Ralph Riko pointed out the inherent malleability of the hate speech canard.
	He said, hate speech can include everything that you might think of, including hate speech that might very well include, it could be argued in court, doing away with, for example, welfare in New York City.
	One could say, well, that's hate speech, because the implication is clearly that we should do away with welfare for minority populations, which are the great bulk of the people who get welfare in New York City.
	So it's obviously racist and hateful speech.
	But it's also when you look at anybody who uses this as a weapon, it always comes back to this type of thing.
	To the credit of many rank-and-file MAGA people, Bondi has faced substantial blowback.
	Matt Walsh has denounced her comments and has called for her to be fired.
	I think she should be jailed.
	She later claimed, as she tried to walk it back, hate speech that crosses a line into threats of violence is not protected by the First Amendment.
	It is a crime.
	That's still not a crime, Pam.
	I mean, this is just juvenile.
	How did she ever win a case?
	As a prosecutor, did she ever win a case with an argument like that?
	So when hate speech leads to threats of violence, it's a crime.
	Why?
	Because threats of violence is a crime.
	Hate speech is not a crime.
	So she tries to make that connection to it.
	This is little more than damage control, says Mises.
	It's unlikely that Bondi will be removed for declaring the First Amendment null and void.
	Trump has shown a willingness to be, quote-unquote, flexible when it comes to the rule of law, and that he's more than happy to use the same immoral and unconstitutional methods used by his predecessors, both left and right.
	Good article on Mises.org.
	Well, interestingly enough, Van Jones spoke out about Charlie Kirk.
	I wonder if he's going to get canceled now.
	He said he was getting racist death threats.
	And then Charlie Kirk reached out for a civil debate.
	Guys, I've decided I'm going to do something.
	I'm going to share something, something personal that I wasn't sure I was going to share.
	But I think it's important.
	Charlie Kirk and I were not friends at all.
	In fact, the last week of his life, we were beefing hard, beefing online, beefing on air.
	But the day before he died, he did something that shocked me.
	He sent me a personal message calling for personal dialogue, wanting me to come on his show.
	He said we could be gentlemen together.
	He said we could deal with our disagreements agreeably.
	And in the past week and a half, just watching people talk about civil wars and censorship and all this stuff coming out of his death, I just thought it was important to let people know.
	Don't put that on Charlie Kirk.
	Because the last day of his life, he was reaching out to have not more censorship, more conversation, more dialogue with somebody who honestly was one of his adversaries, me.
	And I just want to share that with the world.
	And I hope that maybe it might help somebody on both sides deal with issues more like you did.
	Well, good for him.
	You know, I can't think of any issue on which I would have an agreement with Van Jones except on the importance of free speech and trying to dial this back.
	And that's what Charlie Kirk was trying to do.
	That is not what the people are doing who claim that they are honoring his legacy.
	They are not.
	They're trashing it.
	They're defecating on it.
	The Kimball's nose under the tent, actually, libs are being hoisted with their own petard.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	See, you did it.
	This is an article, unfortunately, on The New American by Selwyn Duke.
	I think he got it exactly wrong.
	He is the issue of what we've been talking about.
	Well, okay, the left did it, so therefore we should do it.
	Well, the left did it, therefore we should take the high road and stop it for everybody, right?
	Let's not propagate this.
	Let's not multiply this.
	Let's end it instead of the tit-for-tat.
	Let's diffuse this.
	Instead of, you know, oh, okay, they dropped these landbines here.
	So let's drop some more on the ground and not going to clean up the ones that are there.
	And so they start with Lala Harris tweeting in 2009.
	Let's be honest, Trump's Twitter account should be suspended.
	And he was suspended from Twitter.
	We also deplatformed conservatives.
	How do we stop this from moving forward?
	I'm one of the conservatives that got deplatformed so many different places, de-banked from some payment providers like PayPal, Venmo.
	So how do we stop this downward spiral of authoritarianism?
	Do we stop it by saying they did it first?
	This is like a couple of kids fighting in the back seat.
	What did I do with you guys when you would have a fight with that?
	Do you remember?
	I don't.
	To be fair, we didn't have that many fights.
	You didn't.
	You didn't.
	One of the reasons why was because early on when they started, you know, he hit me first or he did this first or whatever.
	Karen came up with this approach.
	She made the two of them hug each other until they got over it.
	And they didn't like doing that at all.
	So it's like, don't make us make you hug each other like that.
	So that worked.
	And that's really what the left and right need to do.
	They need to come in and have some group hugs, I think, maybe.
	Treat them like toddlers because they're acting like toddlers.
	USA Today columnists.
	They're saying, well, we get to trample on free speech now.
	It's our turn because the left did it, but it's the American people that get hit by it both ways.
	That's right.
	Yeah, we're the ones, when they have a war, we're the ones in the middle.
	We get trampled on by the left, and then the right comes and tramples on us and then the left again.
	USA Day columnist Nick Russell said that she is, Nicole Russell, I'm sorry, is disturbed about Kimmel's nixing being partially driven by pressure from FCC Chairman Brenda Carr.
	Nevertheless, she says the left's cancel culture amnesia is striking.
	Just as striking as the rights is.
	The rights got amnesia about what happened in the aftermath of J6, don't they?
	Do they not understand what really happened?
	Do they not understand how it's going to happen again?
	And of course, the left will say, well, it's justified.
	Look at what you guys did when Trump was president.
	They're all becoming the monsters that they supposedly fight because they're really not fighting any monsters.
	They're all monsters that have come out of the same laboratory, basically.
	So again, this guy goes to this long litany on the new American.
	He talks about all the different people and things that have happened to them.
	Let's talk about Roseanne Barr.
	Let's talk about this person.
	Let's talk about that person.
	Hey, just stop it.
	Just stop it.
	This is the Christian approach.
	This is not a partisan political approach.
	This is the Christian approach.
	If you're going to keep dredging up every offense that happened in the end, there will be no peace.
	There will be no agreement.
	At some point, you've got to say, we're going to take the high road.
	We're going to forget what is past so we can have a better future.
	But they don't want to do that.
	I'm ashamed of them.
	They just get over it.
	And, you know, it's interesting that in the funeral, Erica said she forgave the killer, even though we don't really know who the killer was.
	But still, it's that kind of forgiveness that you see many times from Christians after they've had a relative who's been murdered.
	They will say they forgive the killer.
	So it goes to this long litany of people.
	Tim Hunt was nixed by the University College of London for making a joke.
	Mozilla CEO Brendan Eich was compelled to resign.
	Larry Summers is dislodged from Harvard.
	Professor Burt Weinstein was bullied out of Evergreen State College and on and on and on.
	So all this justifies what the right is doing, right?
	Not a whip, not one of these justifies them acting like the monsters that they criticize.
	What's the matter with these people?
	I don't get it.
	It's all the more reason to oppose Trump when Trump acts like Biden.
	This is a totally wrong approach.
	You're feeding the divide.
	You're doing exactly what they want.
	You're doing exactly what Trump is here to do.
	And that is to set the two sides at war with each other.
	That's what he's about.
	He's the globalist Manchurian candidate.
	He's the leader of chaos.
	And we want to get smart.
	Then there was the aforementioned pressure that the Biden administration.
	He just goes on and on for page after page.
	Every time that you had somebody punished for free speech or canceled, leftists are pretending as if conservatives somehow originated cancel culture.
	They started it.
	They started it.
	We're going to finish it.
	That type of thing.
	They're blown up by their own, hoisted by their own petard.
	That means petard was a bomb.
	Hoisted means that they got blown up, right?
	So let's just put more bombs out there everywhere.
	Let's bomb everything because that's exactly what Trump and the technocrats want.
	It's what the World Economic Forum wants.
	It's what the UN wants.
	It's part of the great reset.
	First, tear everything down, just like they're doing in Gaza.
	Then we can rebuild whatever we want.
	Because we'll own everything.
	You won't have anything.
	So this is freedom of speech does not mean freedom of reach, which ideologists made that a common smug retort some years ago, says the new American.
	Who was it that said that over and over again?
	Well, the hero of the right for free speech, Elon Musk.
	That was his way of shadow banning people, and that's the way he described the shadow banning that he would do to people, like me.
	So it's like, yeah, freedom of speech, but no freedom of reach.
	If you say something we don't like, we'll hide you.
	We won't kick you off the platform.
	We don't want people to see that we're censors, but we'll censor you nevertheless.
	So Rand Paul, as I said, also Ted Cruz, a couple of the only people that have come out here and actually criticize FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr for what he did.
	Rand Paul said it is absolutely inappropriate for the FCC to weigh in on the Kimmel suspension.
	He said Brendan Carr has no business weighing in on this.
	The government has no business in it.
	The FCC was wrong to weigh in, and I will fight any attempt by the government to get involved in speech.
	Well, it's all justified because the left is calling for the genocide of conservatives.
	Well, the right is basically doing that as well, to one degree or the other.
	Is it better then for the right to call for the destruction of the Constitution?
	That it is a genocide of conservatives on the other side.
	Elon Musk is doing this as well.
	We must fight back or be murdered.
	This is where they want you.
	They want you afraid and desperate and ready to kill the people that you have a disagreement with.
	That's what Musk, the technocrats, Trump, all of them are doing that.
	It is the left-right divide.
	Are you going to be that foolish to fall for this?
	Can you try to talk down people that you know that are conservatives and try to remind them what it's worth conserving rather than trying to tear down our society and the foundation that it was built upon?
	Can someone drop a bomb on them, please?
	Like, kill them all.
	Thanks, wrote one person.
	Does that matter whether that's left or right?
	It's protected speech.
	Can somebody just drop a bomb on them?
	We're going to fight this guy.
	We're going to pull him out one way or the other.
	Is that something that you should go to jail for?
	Or is that rhetorical fight speech?
	It is protected speech.
	And I don't think we should be friends with somebody like that, but it is protected.
	Christopher Rispoli, the woke owner of an animal hospital in Oklahoma, suggested on social media that people should be inspired to kill more people like after Charlie Kirk.
	He is only the first, he said.
	So now you've got conservatives out there saying, just this guy needs to be canceled.
	He needs to be punished.
	He needs to be targeted.
	Conservatives need to stop this because they're becoming the left.
	Do you want to conserve anything?
	Well, if you do, you better start leading instead of just reacting to what the left is doing because you're going to react.
	If you're going to be influenced and nudged by these people on social media, they are pushing you into a literal civil war.
	People are taking that very seriously right now.
	Let me give you an example of what this looks like.
	This is a woman by the name of May Golan.
	And this kind of hatred has been festering in the Middle East for a very long time.
	And this is eventually where it leads.
	IDF is the most moral army in the world.
	I repeat, it's the most moral army in the world.
	He's not shooting.
	One second, one more sentence, Mr. Morgan, please.
	He's not shooting at population.
	He's not shooting an innocent population.
	But you tell me, what do we need to do when Hamas terrorists are hiding behind human people, are hiding behind schools?
	You know the first thing you could do of hospitals.
	What do we need to do?
	Do you know the first thing you could do?
	You could lift the ban that the Israeli government has put on international journalists going into Gaza so that all the claims that you make, which always blame Hamas for absolutely everything, could be verified by independent journalists.
	Why don't you do that?
	Why for 20 months have you banned international media from going into Gaza?
	An unprecedented ban for any modern warfare.
	Why have you done this?
	Well, I want to tell you that, first of all, you have to understand something.
	The IDF army is trained to shoot in births.
	They are trained to shoot through sites in a single shot mode.
	That means they are not shooting like in the movies like you think spreading.
	That's something going to do with the media being banned.
	I will tell you.
	I will tell you right now.
	So if you just let me finish.
	So you would agree with me that if the IDF would have shot in birth, I got there would have been a parking lot within 12 hours.
	And that's dangerous to the humanitarian.
	Gaza is a parking lot with all Jewish bait minister.
	You have reduced two-thirds of the people.
	I couldn't park my car on the bodies and the rumble that is on Gaza.
	No, I'm not pretending.
	I don't think that's a good idea.
	You think that's funny?
	I'm saying the reality like it is.
	You think that's funny?
	Of course, it's funny.
	It's funny when you think that I'm pretending.
	I'm sitting here in front of you.
	I don't have to.
	Yeah, well, but you won't let the journalists in, and you won't let the food in.
	And some of the only journalism that we're getting is from some Israeli people who are talking to IDF people who say that she's lying, that they were told deliberately to target and assassinate.
	And we've had doctors from other countries who are there saying that's a lie.
	They were targeting.
	Yeah, they weren't doing massive fire.
	They were targeting children.
	Once in the chest, once in the head, make sure.
	That's what this kind of tit-for-tat stuff, folks, leads to.
	It leads to just insanity and monstrous actions by governments doing what they always want to do.
	Well, David Icke said, retweeted this from one person who was talking about Carl, who's a reporter, said, you've said you restored free speech in America.
	Is that free speech including people who are harshly critical of you?
	Sell this free speech question because you've said that you've restored free speech in America.
	Is that free speech including for people who are harshly critical of you, for your political opponents, for people who say things you don't like?
	I've become immune to it.
	I've become immune to it.
	There's never been a person that's had more unfair publicity than me.
	And that's why your network paid me $15 million or $16 million, I believe, to be exact.
	George Slapadopoulos.
	And that's why CBS paid me a lot of money, too.
	And that's why I sued the New York Times two days ago for a lot of money.
	Judge.
	Because I, well, I'm winning.
	I mean, I'm winning the cases.
	And the reason I'm winning is because you're guilty, John.
	You're guilty.
	ABC is a terrible network, a very unfair network, and you should be ashamed of yourself.
	NBC is equally bad.
	I don't know who's worse.
	I think they're equally bad.
	And, you know, for you to stand there and act so innocent and ask me a question like that.
	But look, you paid a big price because you were dishonest, John.
	The reason I won that lawsuit was because you were dishonest.
	You were proven to be dishonest.
	And so you can't sit back and just say that.
	You didn't win the lawsuit.
	You won the intimidation.
	You're not a wonderful person.
	You're not a wonderful person.
	Frankly, you're a terrible reporter.
	You know it, and so do I. Okay.
	And with CBS, of course, as we've talked about before, he came after them with a large lawsuit and settled for a smaller portion of it.
	And the reason that happened was because he intimidated the owner of CBS.
	She wanted to sell, had cancer, wanted to sell.
	And they were going to use the government to hold up the transaction so she wouldn't be able to sell.
	So she capitulated over government pressure, not over the fact that there was a free speech issue.
	Look, when we look at these free speech things, as I said before, with the Infowars lawsuit, for example, there was, you know, whether they were right or wrong, they had a right to say whatever they did, have a right to be wrong about something.
	And the test is not whether something is true or false, because that can't be determined by our government overseers.
	The test is whether or not there is malice.
	And so they never got to that because he decided he didn't want to comply with discovery.
	So Alex Jones lost.
	That came out in the trial when they found the text messages that he claimed he didn't have that was sent to opposing counsel by mistake.
	The bottom line is that free speech was not defended in the Infowars case.
	Free speech was not defended in the ABC case.
	It was not defended in the CBS case.
	These people all settled, in a sense.
	The other two settled, and he lost because he refused to comply with Discovery.
	But they all did what they did for their own personal benefit.
	Nobody wanted to defend the First Amendment.
	And one of the things that happened over the weekend, Friday, I read you Reason's excerpts from this Trump lawsuit against the New York Times.
	And they said it was written like a childish hagiography.
	In other words, a kind of biography that makes somebody into a saint.
	And said it just went on for like 80 pages of praising Trump and how amazing and important he was.
	And that's basically a lawyer ought to be ashamed to turn something like this in as a lawsuit.
	And that's essentially what the judge said.
	He goes, this is not a valid lawsuit.
	He said, go back and rewrite this so that you actually can file a complaint.
	And he goes, and when you do it, I don't want it to be longer than 40 pages.
	It's the same criticism that all these lawyers that Reason had talked to, their criticism of the New York Times lawsuit, they were all laughing about it because it was all just this big praise of everything that Trump had done in his life.
	And so that got thrown out.
	But he doesn't have a chance of winning that case against the New York Times.
	They're not going to cave if they don't cave, if they're going to fight it.
	And I think that they will.
	He doesn't have any leverage over them like that.
	So I think they'll fight it and I think that they will win.
	But it's interesting, this Wall Street Journal case where there was the birthday card that had the birthday suit that he drew.
	And it looks like this is he's going to continue on foolishly with this case and he's going to get shoved down his throat.
	The thing is, when the judge says, you didn't write a valid complaint, you didn't even define what you're concerned about.
	Redo it.
	When he does that, the way it's spun by the MAGA press is to say, see, another leftist judge.
	They're always against Trump.
	We can't have courts.
	We can't have rule.
	He needs to act as a dictator and shut this thing down.
	It only helps him to do this.
	And this is why he does these kind of clownish things out there, because it helps his left-right divide.
	Well, Trump came out actually against a new restrictive rule from the Pentagon, restrictions on journalists, which is really surprising.
	Pentagon's widely criticized new restrictions on journalists, which reportedly forbid reporters from publishing unauthorized information, even if it's not classified.
	This sounds like something that happens during war, doesn't it?
	Except they are at war.
	And not just with more than a half dozen other countries and wanting to start it up with another half dozen.
	This is war with the American people, and they want all of this stuff censored and kept quiet.
	We never did end the war.
	That's what the national security state was, which is a continuation of this.
	Well, you can't say anything about this.
	I've classified it as secret.
	Now they're saying, even if it's not secret, you need to have our permission to report it, even if it's unclassified.
	And so Trump has asked about that, if he favored the Pentagon allowing journalists to only report information that it approved beforehand.
	He says, no, I don't think so.
	Nothing stops reporters.
	You know that.
	Well, again, he's just prevaricating around the bush.
	He's lying as usual.
	He will stand with Hagseth.
	But doesn't this tell us something about Pete Hedseth, who used to be a reporter?
	He hates free speech and a free press now.
	The Washington Post reported on Friday that the Pentagon is forcing journalists to sign a new policy in which they agree not to gather information which has not been approved for public release.
	So now everything is prohibited unless expressly permitted by the Pentagon.
	And that even goes beyond this absurdity of classifying everything, which is what they have been doing now since the end of World War II.
	Don Bacon, who came out to criticize Trump and many different things, rightfully so, by the way, and he's doing it now because he's retiring.
	None of the politicians who want to stay in office are going to criticize Trump.
	He said, this is so dumb, I have a hard time believing it's true.
	We don't want a bunch of Pravda newspapers that only tout the government's official position.
	This sounds like more amateur hour.
	The thing is, John, the dumber it is, the easier time I have believing it is true when it comes out of our government.
	The stupider and more authoritarian the idea.
	The more like, oh, yeah, they're for sure doing that.
	Absolutely.
	Well, listen, if you want to hear something really dumb, listen to Pete Hegseth's reply.
	He defended it, and he said, the press doesn't run the Pentagon.
	The people do.
	Did you know that you run the Pentagon, Travis?
	My goodness, I'll have to go do an inspection of it immediately.
	Apparently they've been doing some rather naughty things.
	Yeah, I'd like to know where my lovers of control are, where my ballot is on any of this stuff.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	No problem.
	I'm not from the Pentagon.
	I have a message, guys.
	You're all fired.
	Pack it up, go home.
	You won't be getting a severance package.
	By the way, figured out that what I wanted was to have all the press not be able to report what's going on in there to me, so I don't know what's happening.
	By the way, this is shared by an official Rapid Response 47 account.
	A rare instance of that account amplifying a position which contradicts a stance held by another department of Trump's government.
	So this is, they're blowing the whistle on themselves.
	And then we come back to the Code Pink issue.
	These are the people that scared Trump so much at a restaurant for women who protested and did it, by the way, peacefully.
	But, you know, hey, if speech could kill, they would have been dead by now, right?
	And that's the thing.
	We need to understand the hate is really the censorship.
	The censorship is hatred of speech.
	And when you censor people, what you're going to do is you're going to eventually lead to violence, as Kennedy said.
	If you make peaceful change impossible, you make violent change inevitable.
	Activists from the anti-war group Code Pink confronted Trump and his cabinet at a restaurant September the 9th, and it sent the Trump administration into a frenzy.
	The activists got surprisingly close to Trump and the cabinet members, including Vance, Rubio, Hegse, shouting, free D.C., free Palestine.
	Trump is the Hitler of our time.
	Oh, so it kind of a little bit of a rhyme, huh?
	Trump appeared to react with a visible frustration as he gestured for security to remove the protesters, saying, get them out of here.
	It's good to be the king.
	The people are revolting.
	Look at this, and every one of these characters named here, the president, the vice president, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of State, they've all got massive security details.
	These security details, you've got basically, with those four people, you've got four security details.
	The four security details could not keep the four women away from Trump to suit him enough.
	So Trump said, what they're doing to this country is really subversive.
	We need RICO charges or something.
	See, that's the hypocrisy of it.
	It's the RICO charges that are subversive.
	As this article on Andy War points out, RICO was intentionally, originally intended to combat organized crime.
	And then like everything else, we see that it had mission creep and it metastasized into civil asset forfeiture.
	And the other thing that it did, instead of it being, it was used by Rudy Giuliani against organized crime with great effect, but he killed due process in doing that.
	I think that's too high a price to pay.
	And then what happened shortly after that, I've told the story about Randy Alcorn.
	He was a pro-life pastor and a very successful author.
	He has sold many millions of books, and he was charged with the RICO statute because he was part of a peaceful abortion protest.
	And Planned Parenthood won an $8 million judgment against Randy Alcorn.
	Rather than pay it, he lived on minimum wage for 20 years.
	He donated all of the millions of dollars from the books that he wrote.
	And they were Christian commentaries as well as fictional books.
	He donated all of that money to charity so that he didn't pay Planned Parenthood a penny.
	But that was all basically the RICO statute.
	And so they create this thing.
	And then one of the first things they do is target Christians, pro-life Christians with it.
	We should remember history so we don't keep repeating it all the time.
	Anyone who values free speech should be appalled at this attempt to criminalize it, said a spokesperson for Code Pink.
	And hopefully people will remember history enough to remember that they were charged with false crimes when they peacefully redressed grievances on January the 6th.
	We've never shied away from disrupting power regardless of which party is in office, said Code Pink.
	They began organizing in the lead up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, kicking off a four-month all-day protest vigil in front of the White House on November the 17th, 2002.
	Code Pink members composed of anti-war women activists participating in numerous actions against the war on Iraq.
	And if these kinds of protests were effective, they would have been banned a long time ago.
	But now they're effective at tweaking the ego of this narcissist in chief.
	And that's why he's coming after them.
	Code Pink has been organizing against war for human rights ever since.
	And unfortunately, these types of tactics, and I saw this with the Vietnam War protesters.
	It was absolutely counterproductive what they were doing.
	February 7th, 2024, Code Pink activists confronted Marco Rubia, who was then a senator, about his support for Israel amid the killing of Palestinian children by Israeli forces.
	And he said, yeah, Hamas is responsible for killing all those kids.
	So over the weekend, as I said, Don Bacon was unleashing on Donald Trump, the only one to do so in the GOP because he's not going to run for re-election.
	And he had some very effective things to say, but we're going to look to see what our comments are here.
	Yep.
	We've got quite a few.
	B.T. Taylor246, we're watching that video of the UK cop.
	This is when these comments came in.
	Said pure dystopia.
	That it is.
	That's right.
	Sorry, you've been very naughty.
	You'll have to let me in so we can discuss it.
	Such a literal nanny state coming in and lecturing you on how naughty your words are.
	Yeah.
	You're going to have to issue an apology.
	B.L. Houghton says, I wouldn't open the door.
	That's again for the nannying UK police.
	Come back with a warrant.
	Then again, I don't know what UK law is on that subject.
	Well, they should be able to get that doormat.
	It's on Amazon in the U.S. It says, come back with a warrant instead of welcome.
	Get out.
	Citizen America, it's really quite simple.
	If you're a school teacher and you are applauding the murder of someone on a college campus, you don't need to be teaching kids because before long you'll be encouraging someone to come on your campus, correct?
	Well, the reality is, is that I've got a long list of things that are wrong with the schools.
	The schools themselves are the problem.
	The teachers are just a symptom of the problem.
	Let's stop shooting at the little things on the side and let's hit the foundation of all this stuff.
	You want to say trainees are crazy?
	I agree with you.
	I mean, they're like Norman Bates.
	I said that from the very beginning.
	But let's get to the heart of the issue instead of hitting around the edges.
	That's irrelevant.
	It's absolutely irrelevant.
	And what it's doing is instead of fixing the problem, what you're doing is you're creating a second problem.
	And that is this censorship cancel culture.
	And also, it's the critical difference of school teachers, if it's a public government-run school, are government employees and then responsible to the public.
	If it's a privately run thing, then they have free speech about that.
	That's right.
	Who do you work for?
	Who's your daddy?
	And as we talked about, government schools are inherently collectivist and always will be.
	You cannot divorce them from that.
	To try to would have them work against their own interests, which basically no organization will ever engage in that sort of thing.
	Frankly, I see somebody cheering the murder of Charlie Kirk as less offensive than them pushing pornography on children in kindergarten.
	And that's going on in the schools, and they're not stopping it.
	They want to make it about trainees playing sports.
	Come on.
	You know what the problem is.
	We know what the problem is.
	Get to the problem or shut up.
	Seriously.
	The real octo spook, the FCC needs reduced in size to about one-tenth of the insane size it is.
	You could just get rid of it entirely.
	It doesn't need to be there at all.
	You can have an auction and then record who had it, and then they can enforce the trespass on their stuff if you want to do something about it.
	Y'all can go too.
	This massive bureaucracy looking for something to do, trying to expand its empire.
	Cabos 888, when are people going to admit Trump is a Democrat and he just changed the letter at the end to win elections.
	That's right.
	Olivio Roslow, the government just released an app to snitch on anyone who makes bad remarks about Charlie Kirk.
	Dougalug.
	Of course, that app is the same one they'll be using for whatever the next snitch thing is.
	We'll just rebrand a few things, change the text around.
	I don't know if it's an app.
	I think it's a company called Palantir.
	We already know.
	Yeah, there.
	Dougalug, 30 arrests per day in the UK.
	Yeah.
	Over speech.
	Yeah.
	Just absolutely insane.
	The UK is Fallen from what it once was.
	Christine really fired for a meme.
	Really?
	That's insane.
	Look, you need to understand, social media was always set up as a tool of psyop control.
	And this is a part of it.
	JCR Licklider, a DARPA psychologist.
	And of course, it only happened when they had to wait 40 years for the technology, or 30 years, I guess, for the 30 to 40 years for the technology to catch up to them so they can actually put up something like social media.
	But it was all these spooks who were sitting on the venture capital boards.
	The CIA even went public with their venture capital board, Incutel, so they could control the internet so they could control you.
	B.L. Houghton says, I knew from the moment that FBI's fibs started arresting the wrong people.
	Sicata 17, those media sources incited the violence that killed Charlie.
	They have definitely been stoking the flames.
	They have been increasing the animosity on both sides.
	But that doesn't mean we've got to be careful about this claim about incitement.
	It cuts both ways.
	Look at January the 6th, okay?
	And you can have inflammatory rhetoric if somebody uses violence because that's on them.
	It's not on the person who was making arguments.
	Let's get real about this stuff.
	Yeah, there's an interest between incitement and, as you said, inflammatory rhetoric.
	And that's what I was about to say: is that Charlie Kirk, or rather, this shooter is going to say that it was justified because Charlie Kirk had bad rhetoric, apparently.
	I mean, obviously, Kirk didn't have any extremist rhetoric, but that's their justification for it.
	So you can't really use that for this.
	Yeah.
	When we say he didn't have any extremist rhetoric, we think he was kind of moderate in what he had to say.
	Very moderate comparatively to me.
	Secluded Oyster, hate is just an emotion.
	M. Sellers, amen.
	Hate speech is a heart issue, just like LGBTQ is, and you cannot change it.
	Only Jesus can.
	That's right.
	But we can shut down the seminaries for Satan that we're being taxed to support.
	And notice that nobody wants to do that.
	Nobody in power is even talking about doing that.
	Not at all.
	Centurion Blood, they let their emotions control their governance.
	Audi, MRR, good to see you, Audi.
	Has Pam Bondi gone after any of the pedos in the Epstein files yet?
	I think we know the answer.
	She decided not to target them.
	That was a conscious decision not to target the pedos, but to target criticism of Charlie Kirk because that is the effective way to move things out.
	Modern retro radio, Audi.
	Thank you, Audi.
	And this is from a Syrian girl, I believe.
	Most funerals use photo slideshows and soft video memory showing a graphic death scene on a big screen is generally considered inappropriate or even harmful because it can traumatize mourners, especially kids or anyone of PTSD, overshadow the person's life at their final moments, conflict with religious/slash customary norms around dignity of the dead.
	Yeah.
	I agree.
	That's a totally inappropriate way to honor the life and death of a Christian man.
	The world has lost its collective mind.
	This is replying to a cultie sim.
	That's right.
	I agree.
	I think, you know, they want to wave the bloody shirt and revel in it because they want a revolution.
	Guard Goldsmith, the key is private property, market response versus government pressure, an outright threat.
	And I agree with Guard there.
	That's the side I come down on.
	The government is not about persuasion, it's about coercion.
	And again, I fall under the lines of sort of the Hans Hermann Hoppe idea.
	These people have gone insane.
	We don't want to be involved with them in our society.
	We should try our best to exclude them and remove them from our lives as much as possible.
	We cannot have a decent functioning society with people that revel in death.
	We cannot have a decent functioning society with people that would absolutely revel or engage in violence against the government that revels in death and engages in violence, threats, and intimidation is going to protect us from the trainees that revel in death and function with all the same things.
	That's the absurdity of all this stuff.
	There are no allies to us on this.
	We're out here on our own.
	Denver Attaway, Trump is such the perfect straw man.
	The manipulative fading system is going full ham to instigate a civil conflict.
	The predictive programming in movies like Civil War.
	What kind of American are you?
	Yeah.
	Denver Attaway, the ban, eh?
	Never mind the 230 or so dead journalists.
	And I'm assuming that's referencing what's going on in Israel.
	They have killed many journalists.
	Oh, that's right.
	They just indiscriminately fire and kill.
	Well, no, actually, they targeted journalists just like collateral murder targeted journalists, and Wikipedia exposed that, and so then they came after Wikipedia.
	Tried to kill Julian Assange for a decade.
	Not Wikipedia.
	Oh, yeah, WikiLeaks.
	WikiLeaks.
	Wikipedia is the leftist shill organization.
	This is why I have Travis here.
	He catches those things that just go right over my head.
	Epstein Island, Trump made sure to praise himself at the Charlie Kirk funeral.
	The greatest.
	I didn't watch it.
	I got to confess.
	Good for you if you were able to stick through it.
	Again, I feel terrible for Charlie Kirk's widow.
	But yeah, I have no interest in watching the funeral.
	Except the spectacle has been turned into a huge marketing opportunity.
	Yeah, it was going to be a good idea.
	Which is cringe in the extreme, I think.
	Used by these soulless politicians to push the opposite of what Charlie Cook still is.
	That's right.
	Absolutely.
	Liberty Valiant says, Now there is proof that alleged assassin Tyler Robinson is innocent.
	His 30 ought 6 caliber rifle would have blown Charlie Carrick's head off.
	The bullet never exited his body.
	Yeah, we got a report about that, the magic bullet, and it's a surgeon speaking out about that.
	And we're going to talk about that in detail.
	That is the strangest thing about all this.
	Everything else, I think, has a reasonable explanation.
	Well, not the 30 oh 6 cents.
	Not the rifle thing.
	I mean, he couldn't fit that in anything.
	We don't see it when he jumps off.
	And then, you know, why would he disassemble that, reassemble it, disassemble it, reassemble it, leave it in the woods?
	None of that makes any sense.
	When I watched the video of him jumping down, he had a towel, and it did look like there was something long and thin that was being covered by it.
	So I could potentially see the rifle being under there.
	I think there's reasonable enough doubt that you can't say definitively one way or another.
	But the 30 ought six not exiting the body, given how powerful, how large of a caliber and what it does on entry and exit.
	So another magic bullet.
	Yeah.
	Those are going around.
	Liberty Valiant, Charlie Cook's death, obviously.
	The shot was from a small caliber handgun from close vicinity.
	Be my Valentine.
	Love Randy Alcorn's books.
	Yeah, I do too.
	Treasure Principle, by the way.
	He's got some really good fiction books.
	There was one about underground Christian church in China, I remember.
	But he has some really good books about the Christian principle, heaven, other things like that.
	He's a good writer.
	Yeah.
	Christian Constitutional Conservative says, Will this drive up the cost of beef?
	They got a Reuters article linked there.
	It says, China, Brazil's beef exports, U.S. fall further September after a tariffs industry group says, Well, probably, probably.
	Anytime you start reducing this supply, the price goes up.
	Well, of course, what we're seeing in Brazil is political warfare gelling their opponents, which Trump would like to do, but he doesn't like it when it's done to his friend, bows and arrows, as a transcript likes to call them, bolsonaro.
	And so he slapped tariffs on just because of his personal feelings about it.
	That's not why we should be doing tariffs, but that's what Trump is doing.
	Just another example of the stupidity.
	Denver Attaway, when Rico was sold at preventing and breaking up monopoly, and somehow the entire U.S. economy is as centralized just about as China.
	So Rico was never enforced as intended.
	Funny how that always seems to happen with what the government sets out to do.
	Op Tomorrow, the war on speech is about government protecting themselves from truthers waking up others who are under the government's hypnosis.
	They've effectively kept people under the left-right paradigm.
	Tunnel Lord, 1337.
	I've had a really good senator want to create some sort of system to filter out trainees from owning guns, except the system sounds like it would have the government screening people's mental health.
	And of course, mental health is a somewhat nebulous term.
	Mental health has always been the excuse, the go-to excuse for totalitarian regimes.
	You know, the jokes about it like, well, if you criticize Stalin, you must be crazy.
	To an asylum and or kill you.
	That's the way this all works.
	So just real briefly before we take a break, because we're going to be coming back to the same theme in different ways, that's not what he's talking about.
	CNN's Dana Bash battles a GOP senator on Trump redefining free speech.
	This is always the kind of misdirection that we see from the MAGA people.
	No, it's about consequences about free speech or this or that.
	And we see this as Trump was bragging about warp speed and his vaccine yet again.
	I've got someone that I saw the comments, so they put up to that and said, that's not what he was talking about.
	He was talking about the lockdown and how the vaccine saved our lives from the lockdown.
	The lockdown was going to kill us.
	Oh, so why were we locked down?
	I thought we were locked down to save us from the COVID imaginary fairy that was out there.
	And of course, COVID didn't lock us down.
	Trump locked us down.
	Trump paid states to do it, just like he pays them for the tranny policy and Obama pays them for the different tranny policy.
	You know, put the girls, the boys in the girls' bathroom or take them out.
	Do this, do what I say, and I'll give you money.
	If you don't do it, I'll cut your funding all the way.
	That's what he was doing.
	That's what the Declaration of Emergency that he did on March the 13th, Friday the 13th, was about.
	We already had an emergency declaration from the big pharmaceutical executive that he put in, Alex Azar, the former CEO of Eli and Lilly.
	He did that at the end of January.
	And when he did that in this so-called global pandemic, they only pretended that six people had been killed by COVID.
	Were they killed by COVID or were they diagnosed with a PCR procedure that said that they died with COVID when actually they died from other things?
	So we're going to be talking about that when we come back.
	We're going to take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t-shirts everywhere for years.
	You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America, I could dress better.
	And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful gray MacGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the MacGuffin logo in blue.
	But he told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at the DavidKnightshow.com.
	You should be able to buy me several hundred.
	Those amazing sand-colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various galas and social events.
	If you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA.
	Your annual global risk report makes for a stunning and sobering read.
	For the global business community, the top concern for the next two years is not conflict or climate.
	It is disinformation and misinformation.
	followed closely by polarization within our societies in a world of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act You are listening to the David Knight Show.
	Welcome back.
	And of course, as you heard, Ursula fond of lying.
	She said that the top priority for the next two years, when did she say that?
	2024.
	She said it was going to be misinformation and disinformation.
	And that was going to be the result in societal polarization, she said.
	And they've got to fight that.
	Well, that's exactly where we are, isn't it?
	They tell you their plan.
	They monologue like a James Bond because that's exactly who they are.
	Before we get back into this, and we're going to talk about the magic bullet here in just a second.
	Travis, tell us a little bit about how people can support the program and our sponsors.
	A very easy way to find out how to support the program is go to DavidKnight.news.
	Have all of the links there.
	So, if you'd like to support the show, it's an easy way to do it.
	You can go there and see that we have Zelle, Cash App, the P.O. box, which is David Knight, P.O. Box 994, Kodak, Tennessee, 37764.
	And Subscribestar is an excellent way to support the program.
	You can sign up, and we have many, many different tiers there that may fit your budget.
	It will charge you monthly.
	Of course, it helps if you go and check occasionally because cards expire and other things can happen.
	So, that's a great way to support the show.
	Subscribestar.com forward slash the David Knight show.
	And of course, the link, as I said, is on davidknight.news.
	Another way to support us is to leave a tip on Rumble.
	If you do that, we'll try to make sure that we read your comment.
	We really do appreciate all the support that we get that way.
	We appreciate the chat and we appreciate the engagement we have with you all there.
	You can also subscribe on Kick.
	That's another place we stream.
	It's got a lively community and it's a fun platform, very, very smooth.
	You can also go to davidknight.gold.
	Tony Ardern has kindly set that up.
	So if you're looking to start accumulating gold or silver, you can go there.
	Well, you better start looking at that because we've got a whole segment coming up about the push for digital ID is really, really escalating, just like the push for censorship.
	And it is coming at us from across the spectrum.
	It doesn't matter who, what country you're in or what their supposed political ideology is.
	They're all pushing it from conservatives to communists.
	They're all pushing digital ID.
	It's coming very quickly.
	Yeah, it's going to be the easiest way to track and control everyone.
	Oh, we don't like what you said.
	Well, we can just turn off your entire wallet.
	And sorry, no one accepts cash anymore.
	Beast system.
	Yeah, you combine that with the free speech stuff.
	You've gone total beast.
	Got to make sure you can't buy or sell.
	Gold and silver is a great way to hedge against market uncertainty.
	Gold has always been a store of value and it continues to be so.
	As the dollar goes down, gold goes up.
	But of course, if things get as bad as they possibly can, you want something like the civil defense manual so you can learn how to protect yourself and your community, your family, your loved ones.
	Teach you how to protect your community, how to and we'll be talking later in the program as well as to what happened to the no-fly weekend.
	So many airports going down.
	First time I ever talked to Jack Lawson, we were talking about the fragility of the complicated, interconnected infrastructure.
	And what happened to flights over this last weekend just drives that home.
	It's not speculation, folks.
	It's happened time and again.
	And of course, it can be done by fiat order, as our dear leader, Kim John Trump, did five years ago.
	So, yeah.
	You want to defend yourself.
	You want to be able to defend yourself and know how to survive.
	Civil Defense Manual is an excellent resource in that regard because you want to be able to make it to the point where you can use gold and silver to trade if necessary.
	So civil defense manual, and that's at jacklawsonbooks.com.
	And we really do appreciate all the support.
	There's other avenues to do that.
	I'll briefly mention trendsjournal.com.
	Use promo code Knight for 10% off.
	There's rncstore.com where you can look at their products, see if they can help your health.
	And you get 10% off with promo code night there as well.
	And Homestead Products.shop.
	They've got high-quality Made America products, and they are the good guys.
	And we'll have more about that later.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	So promo code Knight for 10% off there as well.
	We appreciate all the support.
	Cannot thank you enough.
	We really do appreciate the people that work with the show.
	And Dougalug, thank you very much, Dougalug.
	We appreciate it.
	The gas gauge is at half full.
	Let's hit the like buttons and help spread the word.
	That's right.
	You can also hit the like button.
	That does help.
	And sharing the show where you can helps us as well.
	Cannot thank you enough.
	We appreciate it.
	Well, we had somebody mention this last week.
	I've been slow on the uptake on this because I don't hunt.
	But they mentioned how powerful that bullet was and how it would have taken his head off, as Travis mentioned.
	Now the physician who worked on Charlie Kirk is saying the same thing.
	Listen to how this is couched, though, right?
	Because when people start saying, wait a minute, that's not the kind of wound that we see from that caliber of bullet and that powerful rifle.
	They couch it as Charlie Kirk's final miracle.
	This is going to be his canonization, I guess.
	Revealed by the surgeon who examined the fatal neck wound.
	The surgeon who operated on Kirk revealed that the bullet miraculously did not exit his death.
	It's a miracle.
	So did they find it?
	Well, notice that they don't really say if they have it, right?
	All through this article.
	I'll tell you what the guy has to say.
	This is from Daily Mail.
	The surgeon who operated on Charlie Kirk said the bullet that killed him miraculously did not exit his neck, likely saving others from getting hit.
	Turning point USA spokesman Andrew Colvet revealed on Saturday night that he had spoken with a surgeon who made the comments directly to him.
	In a post on X, Colvet said, I apologize, this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn't an exit wound is probably another miracle.
	And I want people to know, maybe there's something else happening here besides a miracle.
	The surgeon told Colvet that the bullet, quote, absolutely should have gone through, which is very, very normal for a high-powered, high-velocity round.
	I've seen rounds from this caliber many times, said the surgeon, and they always go through everything.
	This would have taken out a moose or two.
	And again, this is what the hunter told us last week.
	And a 30-odd six-bolt action rifle, the kind discovered hidden in the woods after Kirk was killed, is used to kill deer, elk, moose, bear, and other big game animals.
	Because of this, because this rifle can kill animals six times bigger than humans, the fact that Kirk's neck stopped the bullet was an absolute miracle, according to the surgeon.
	Yes, another government miracle.
	We've had government miracles in the past around assassination attempts.
	And they said, this is where things get really, really just ridiculous to me.
	Listen to this comment that's reportedly from the surgeon by, according to Colvet.
	His bone was so healthy and the density was so impressive that he's like the man of steel.
	Though now he's Superman.
	It should have gone through and through.
	It likely would have killed those standing behind him, too, said the surgeon.
	Other people have talked about, by the way, the angle of the wound and other things like this, but I think this is the most suspicious thing, just like the JFK magic bullet.
	And just as a reminder, all the issues about the magic bullet, and of course, this all came to light yet again with a book that was written in 2023 called Final Witness.
	It was about one of the Secret Service agents that was there at the assassination.
	He was 28 years old at the time.
	And he was talking about this special magic bullet that took center stage.
	Arlen Specter was a small-time politician, and he took the case to argue about the magic bullet and how it changed and reversed courses and all this other kind of stuff and did all this damage.
	But it was only a single bullet.
	And they liked what he had to say, and he was rewarded with being senator for life.
	That's the way these things work.
	So the magic bullet from the JFK Commission Exhibit 399, and they refer to it as CE399.
	It's even got a name.
	It's so special, this magic bullet.
	The magic bullet was found in pristine condition, near-pristine condition with minimal deformation, despite allegedly passing through Kennedy's neck, Connolly's chest, wrist, and lodging in his thigh.
	It didn't have really any deformation.
	Critics argue that a bullet causing such damage would be significantly deformed, as seen in ballistic tests with similar six and a half millimeter Carkano bullets.
	Then there was the trajectory and the timing.
	The Warren Commission conducted, or rather concluded, that this single bullet caused seven wounds, entry and exit wounds in Kennedy and Connolly, while following a complex trajectory, including sharp turns, to align with the lone gunman theory from the Texas School Book Depository.
	The Zaputer film suggests these injuries occurred within a very tight timeframe, one and a half to 1.8 seconds, leaving questions about whether one bullet could account for all the wounds without defying physics.
	I guess we need a new category.
	Instead of UFOs, we need UBOs, unidentified ballistic objects.
	We have seen evidence of this in the past.
	Sounds like they're doing a right-wing rebranding of the magic bullet.
	It's now the miracle bullet.
	It's not magic.
	We're going to make it, we're going to Christianize it.
	We're going to baptize it, right?
	Instead of it being a magic bullet, it's now a miracle.
	Yeah, you're right.
	We don't believe in miracles in magic, so we believe in miracles.
	Then there was a weight discrepancy of the Kennedy bullet, the CE399.
	It weighed 158.6 grains, close to the expected 160 to 161 grains of an unfired Carkano bullet.
	However, ballistic experts noted that the fragments recovered from Connolly's wrist alone weighed more than the mass that CE399 could have lost, suggesting that it couldn't have caused all the attributed damage.
	Then there was a chain of custody, and this is where the Secret Service agent, who, like I said, he was 28 when he was there on that detail that day there in the cars.
	And he's now, well, I guess he wrote this like two years ago, three years ago, two years ago.
	He is about 90 years old.
	He said he wanted to get this down.
	His name is Paul Landis.
	And he said that people said, well, why didn't you say something about this before?
	And he said, you've got to understand that it's perceived as a gigantic failure, and he just wanted to distance himself from it.
	Everybody was coming after him.
	He just walked away from the Secret Service and all the rest of the stuff.
	He didn't want to talk about it.
	And he said there was also survivor's guilt, feeling bad about this, and he didn't want to get involved in talking about it.
	But now, after more than 50 years, he did talk about it.
	The bullet's discovery on a gurney at Parkland Memorial Hospital, where Kennedy and Connolly were treated, has inconsistencies.
	It was reportedly found by a hospital employee, Darrell Tomlinson, but its exact origin, whether from Connolly's gurney or another, is unclear.
	The chain of custody from discovery to FBI analysis is poorly documented, raising suspicions of tampering or planting.
	As a matter of fact, he says that he found it on the seat behind Kennedy.
	He doesn't say that it was embedded there.
	He said just the seat that was there.
	And he said that he said it on the side there with Kennedy, and he said somebody picked it up and put it on the gurney that had Connolly on it.
	And then people said, look at this, the same bullet that was with JFK and it's now with Connolly, and they created that narrative.
	That's the beginning of the narrative, he said.
	But he said he first saw it there in the seat behind Kennedy.
	The bullet was found hours after the assassination, and its connection to the crime was not immediately established.
	The delay and the lack of clarity about its source, for example, whether it fell from Connolly's body or was unrelated, undermined its evidential reliability.
	Its near-pristine state contrasts with the extensive damage that it supposedly caused.
	Some witnesses, including medical personnel, described Connolly's wounds as suggesting multiple bullets or fragments and very inconsistent with a single intact bullet.
	And so now we're going to revise, relive all this stuff, and we've got a new conspiracy theory about a miracle bullet.
	Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him with his man-of-steel bones.
	Just amazing.
	This is what his assistant is writing at Turning Point USA.
	The canonography of this guy is ridiculous to the point where he is now Wolverine.
	That's the other way to look at it.
	Yeah, Wolverine.
	But yeah, I mean, you know, give the guy his due for what he did.
	He did a great job of debating.
	He was very courageous to go in places where everybody hated him and were threatening him with violence.
	And eventually he was killed.
	But again, you know, what?
	You don't have to make up stories about him.
	The real thing is impressive enough.
	And now they're twisting his life's work and inverting it because that's what the power structure always does.
	They always invert the truth.
	180 degrees.
	The gun that killed Charlie Kirk is a World War I-era rifle that may be untraceable.
	It has no serial number.
	And that's one of the things that they were writing in the text messages, which, by the way, many people, not just the people who were in the audience last week, questioned whether or not that text message was really something that would be written by somebody of that age.
	And I got to say, regardless of age, when you're under that kind of a system like that, I wouldn't take the time to be formal with it.
	I try to add commas and punctuations and things like that when I put text messages for clarity.
	But if it was a situation like this, you would be going real fast and furious, and you'd be using some abbreviations, I think.
	And all punctuation aside, it is also somewhat suspicious that they have a chain of text messages just completely incriminating every aspect of the plan.
	Oh, yeah, it covered it all.
	Like, you've never heard of the government going after and getting these documents and text messages from people's phones.
	Yeah, they got that.
	They can't find the Epstein stuff, though, somehow.
	I don't know.
	I mean, it's just amazing how that fell into the lap.
	But Epstein, unattainable.
	Absolutely.
	So it predated the serial number mandates that they have on all guns, as a matter of fact.
	And they believe to be, they said, this is from the New York Post, so they use this to scare people about guns.
	There are believed to be millions of such weapons in homes throughout the country, raising concerns among federal authorities of the potential for other assassins to carry out similar attacks with their untraceable rifles.
	So how long is it going to be before Trump bans that?
	Yeah, I mean, it's a good thing they were able to.
	I mean, if they had a serial number on the gun, it wouldn't have made any difference in the investigation, right?
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	Short of the security afforded to the president, there's no way to defend against the threat posed by this, said a retired official with BATF.
	Because, you know, now we know that if you do have the Secret Service, of course, the President is completely protected.
	They never fail.
	Anyway, cops found the weapon hours after the assassination.
	Everybody was pointing to the building.
	We got video of somebody running across the top of the building.
	But even though he dropped it in the woods, they couldn't find it.
	I don't know if it has a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me, he wrote in some of these text messages.
	I'm worried about Prince.
	I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits.
	Didn't have the ability or the time to take it with me.
	Again, the questions about this rifle, as I showed last week, the stick issue.
	You know, how long would this thing be?
	And do we see anything like that?
	Now, Travis, you said that you thought that maybe this towel thing was that, but I don't know.
	I mean, to me, there's a lot of pushback.
	Yeah, to me, there's enough plausibility.
	The quality of the video is so bad at that distance that it's hard to make out.
	You can see there is something under the towel that's kind of keeping it straight as he sets it down on the roof as he goes to jump down.
	So you can't make out what it is.
	It could just be a stick under there for all we know.
	But to me, it does look like there is something.
	We'll talk a little bit more about that and about breaking the rifle down.
	Many believe the text exchange reads like a bargain ben harlequin romance novel.
	They say it's cheesy, unrealistic, nothing like how young adults, even mentally ill adults, would actually talk in a text message.
	And of course, you know, taking the time to do all the punctuation and all the rest of this stuff.
	Drop what you're doing.
	Now, look under my keyboard.
	And of course, you would expect, I would think, the person would say, what for?
	Right?
	But the reply is not that.
	The reply is, you're joking, right?
	I'm still okay, my love.
	Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I got to grab my rifle still.
	You weren't the one who did it, right?
	I am, comma.
	I am, comma.
	I'm sorry.
	Again, it doesn't read authentic.
	Of course, what the right is focusing on is not how phony this looks, but the fact that you have a mainstream media commentator saying, well, this looks very romantic.
	I really, really feel for these guys.
	So that was ABC News and Matt Gutman called the messages touching.
	He called him my love.
	And he said, I want to protect you, my love.
	Very touching in a way that I think many of us didn't expect.
	People said, so why is ABC romanticizing a murderer?
	Well, in order to sell it.
	That's exactly why they're doing it.
	And these people have bought into it.
	If you sell this training aspect of it, people get upset about that and they focus on that rather than focusing on the questionable nature of the text messages in their entirety.
	So do you believe the texts are real or fake?
	The more I look at this stuff, the more I'm where I am with 9-11.
	I don't know what happened on 9-11, except I know what the government told us is impossible.
	I don't know what happened to Charlie Cook.
	I just know what the government is telling us is impossible.
	And I know how they used it for 9-11, and I know how they were using this event as well.
	They always take these events, whether they did them or whether somebody else did them, and they use them for their purposes.
	Here's a guy talking about the rifle breakdown.
	On this episode of You Might Be a Dumb Motherfucker, this is my rifle.
	It takes two different tools to take it apart.
	It takes a Torx key and an Allen key.
	Now, if I take a shot and immediately disassemble this, I have to remove the bolt, remove the magazine, grab my Allen key, hit the two bolts on the bottom, put those away in the Allen key, grab my Torx key, remove the scope, put everything in the backpack, make sure I have everything, and make my way downtown.
	Okay, which is going to take a lot longer for him than it is for me, especially because his fine-tuned motor function, something as simple as grabbing an Allen key to a little bolt, is going to be extremely impaired due to a dump of adrenaline throughout his bloodstream.
	An extreme elevated heart rate is going to make these fine-tuned skills extremely difficult.
	I mean, just for him to think and analyze of what needs to be done to disassemble this rifle and get away would be difficult.
	And we're not even going to touch the topic of him assembling the rifle on top of the roof, which if you reassemble a rifle and you take a cold dead shot, it's not going to be 100% accurate.
	Or the fact that he disassembled this after taking a shot, which the rifle's going to be hot.
	They found no gloves.
	There's just so many inconsistencies.
	It just makes zero sense.
	I mean, I'm still working on this, and I have taken this rifle apart a thousand times.
	And now he has to put the pieces of the rifle into a backpack.
	And this is a gigantic backpack.
	Shout out, Wolfpack, best backpacks on the fucking planet.
	Anyways, as you can see, this barrel broken down does not fit in this backpack.
	And this is a big boy, way bigger than the one he was carrying.
	Okay.
	I put the rifle stock in here, and guess what?
	It doesn't fit.
	It sticks out.
	Now, let's just say for sake of argument that he put these in his pant leg and he was walking.
	These are still so long broken down that he would not be able to walk straight.
	He wouldn't be able to bend his legs.
	Doesn't make fucking sense.
	Sorry about the language.
	We missed that.
	But we had a video talking about just the stick.
	And he says, this is how long it is, the different components.
	And he goes, where would he put this?
	Where he could hide it.
	He couldn't stick it in his pants like it'd pop out of the backpack.
	So there's a lot of things like that.
	Again, I think the bullet is very conclusive.
	And they don't say they have it.
	The only thing that we've seen about that is the surgeon saying that it didn't exit his neck and harm a lot of other people.
	I mean, why didn't they say that sooner?
	Because all week people are saying, well, where's the bullet?
	And just don't see the damage that would have been done by that bullet.
	David Icke says, how about some research before jumping to conclusions?
	Do we want the truth or do we want the truth that suits the narrative?
	They want us to believe that it was the left that was responsible.
	And we're supposed to believe that this guy shot Kirk, then took the rifle apart, put it in the knapsack, jumped down, and hurry away.
	We're then told he hid it in a wood in a reassembled state.
	And then tells his mate on a text where he's admitting everything in the official story.
	And so what you need to do before you start jumping to conclusions.
	Echo left.
	There may be elements in which that is the case, but who's orchestrating it?
	Let's do some freaking research and let's find out what really happened instead of jumping to conclusions immediately.
	People have killed him.
	Which are the conclusions they want us to have.
	Why are they looking into this now?
	They want civil war between left and right.
	What you have to do is you have to go here and you have to go to that level that is working through both left and right.
	That's right.
	Yeah, the left did it, right?
	Well, where did Alex get that?
	Well, he got it from Trump.
	You're going to repeat whatever Trump says, regardless of how ridiculous it is.
	Here's Trump.
	If we attack people, we have to be careful.
	Well, the problem is on the left.
	If you look at the problem, the problem is on the left.
	It's not on the right, like some people like to say on the right.
	The problem we have is on the left.
	And when you look at the agitators, you look at the scum that speaks so badly of our country, the American flag burnings all over the place.
	That's the left.
	That's not the right.
	We'll see.
	We'll be announcing.
	They're already under investigation.
	You know, they're already under major investigation.
	A lot of the people that you would traditionally say are on the left.
	They're already under the start of the visas of those who have celebrated Charlie Krishna.
	When have you asked to start revoking the visas of the foreigners who have celebrated Charlie Krucc?
	No, we haven't, but we are looking at names.
	We don't like that.
	That's not right.
	We wouldn't celebrate if something happened on this and we don't.
	No, you wouldn't?
	These are sick people.
	These are really deranged people.
	Any talk on the Fed Chairman?
	Well, other than I don't like him, well, he's incompetent.
	The Fed chairman.
	So, yeah, that was a video that was put out and said, Breaking Trump just said there are a large number of people on the left who are being investigated in the wake of Charlie's assassination.
	That was put out by Alex Jones.
	And so that's why you had the response to it from David Icke, where he put up that video.
	And he said, you know, let's just not fall for this silly left-right paradigm, Hegelian dialectic that's here.
	He says, why do you think that happened?
	How the mighty have fallen.
	Talking about Alex Jones, he said, you are a disgrace to everything you once claimed to stand for.
	The deep state is now only the left.
	Pathetic.
	And remember, you know, Alex did a whole series of documentaries about the police state.
	He had Police State 2000 that he did in 1999.
	Police State 2, the takeover, 2000, year 2000.
	Police State's Total Enslavement, 2003.
	Then in 2010, Police State 4, the rise of FEMA.
	But now the FEMA camps are good because they're being used to deport people, right?
	And we don't have to worry about the police state going into cities like we did when it was Obama because now it's Trump.
	And so we don't have to worry about Police State 1, 2, 3, and 4.
	I mean, this is like a Jaws franchise.
	This would be like Steven Spielberg.
	Now sharks are a good thing.
	We want more sharks out there.
	Let's chum the water.
	Well, the problem is, is that Alex is such a chum of Trump that there is blood in the water that's there.
	I guess coming will be Police State 5.
	Trump, our Sugar Daddy.
	That's going to be the final sequel, I think.
	That's where the series ends.
	It's when Trump is your sugar daddy.
	David Icke said, this, by the way, is where the claim that Alex Jones is always right comes from.
	You know, after towing the line for Trump and saying, the left did it, left it, which he put in there.
	He got a lot of pushback from people who believe that Israel did it, for example.
	Again, you first dogmatically say, but he's right about, regardless of what happened, as I said, I don't know what happened.
	I don't claim to know what happened.
	I just know what did not happen, which is what the government is telling us, just like 9-11.
	He said, so this is the way that Alex creates this mythos that he is always right.
	He said, you first dogmatically say this is what happened, and then you dismiss other possibilities.
	The left did it, right?
	Then as belief and other possibilities grow, you say, I never said there was no other explanation.
	Finally, when other possibilities turn out to be true, you say, I said from the start that other possibilities is how it happened.
	I am always right.
	It works every time, says David Icke, so long as your audience has the memory of a goldfish.
	I never said it could have not been a false flag or a setup.
	I just simply said, when I see evidence, I'll cover it.
	And I certainly couldn't, for his body was gold, saying Israel did it with the weapons.
	Israel was definitely pissed off at him and does stuff like that, so maybe Israel did it.
	Yeah, okay, that's it.
	We've seen this over and over again.
	You take every position, and then whatever happens in the end and becomes a consensus, you say, I said that all the way from the very beginning, and then you get your staff to pull out the eclipse.
	It's especially easy when you create the amount of content that Alex does all the time.
	It gets buried under an avalanche, and no one really has time to sit there and catalog the list of claims you make.
	And so just so long as you are able to go in and then cut out, like you said, the one thing you said that was right in the ocean of things you said you were wrong, you get to go, look, I was right.
	And it's just to sit there and go in and fact check, you know, like 100 hours of content to see if you said anything else.
	No one's got that kind of time.
	He also makes the truth unbelievable.
	That's the real issue here.
	And that's why I don't want to jump into anything and say this group or that group did it, and this is how it was done, because we don't want to set ourselves up for that type of thing.
	They want you to do that so they can discredit you.
	We just need to look at what they're saying.
	Are they telling the truth?
	No.
	How are they going to use this?
	That's the key issue.
	How are they going to use this?
	We knew right away they were going to put the Patriot Act out, and we knew exactly what that was going to be.
	You know, what I didn't see at the time, which I've tried to explain to people over and over again, is how dark winter was an integral part of 9-11 and how it was the other shoe to drop after 20 years of practice.
	These things were always tied together because they were always focused on pushing a police state.
	So just remember how those who question the impossible government magic stories are treated and how they're treated with smug contempt.
	And here is an example of it from Tucker Carlson.
	Remember when anybody who questioned the official story of 9-11 was treated with smug contempt by Tucker Carlson?
	How are you doing?
	You're doing good.
	Good to see you after we met briefly at the event in 2008 in Minneapolis for Ron Paul.
	Oh, it was fun.
	But you had to leave early.
	What happened?
	Why did you bail on Ron Paul?
	I didn't bail on Ron Paul.
	No, I don't know.
	It's when Jesse Vincre got up and started saying 9-11 was an inside job.
	He didn't say that.
	He did say that.
	No, he said that it was curious why the FBI have been lauded in on 9-17.
	I got it.
	I was there.
	So you had to leave because that one copy was a lot of people.
	I was enraged.
	I was enraged by it.
	What's the copy of the person?
	Sure.
	It wasn't controversial.
	It was stupid.
	And if there's any evidence that the government was behind 9-11, I believe anything if there's evidence, but there isn't evidence.
	So knock it off.
	That's my view.
	Okay, but I said that to him.
	Sure, sure.
	But one stupid person says something stupid at a Ron Paul eventually.
	Yeah, well, I hate that.
	And by the way, I am open to almost any crackpot theory about anything.
	Is he really open?
	Come on.
	You know what I mean?
	That's too much.
	Even for me.
	So just out of curiosity, then what's your take on Building 7?
	Which explanation do you believe?
	Come on.
	No, this is a serious question.
	Which explanation did it exist?
	Which explanation?
	There's two explanations.
	It was either it was pulled or it was isolated pockets of fire in the building that blew, that were sort of stupid, the stupid towers coming down that bought it down.
	This is a no-win conversation, so I'm not going to continue that.
	But let me just say one thing.
	The macro, my macro viewers, the obvious one, which is the buildings came down.
	Okay, so are you still singing?
	Yeah, well, now he's going to reinvent himself as a 9-11 documentarian after mocking this stuff.
	And Building 7, especially.
	Play that clip, Lance, about Tucker Carlson when he had the engineer on who wanted to show the film and explain why this is a controlled demolition, as everybody can see with their own eyes.
	And Tucker knew it was damning evidence.
	And he refused to allow that clip to be played.
	Claims.
	Do you have any other questions?
	Let's go.
	Sure, sure.
	Let's start with the collapse of Building 7.
	Can you roll the video clip that I sent to you?
	Okay, I'm not sure if we can, but they're specified.
	Maybe there's some kind of code.
	You just don't show the collapse of Building 7.
	I don't know what it is.
	They don't care if you think the Earth is flat.
	It's not a threat to anyone.
	But if you say, like, what actually happened with Building 7?
	Like, that is weird, right?
	It doesn't, like, what is that?
	Right.
	If you were to say something like that on television, they'd slip out.
	They would flip out.
	So you'd lose your job over that.
	Why?
	This is World Trade Center 7 just before it collapsed on September the 11th, 2001.
	It had not been hit by an aircraft.
	It had been damaged by falling debris and fire.
	But by 5.20 p.m., most of the fires had been extinguished.
	Although the building was 47 stories high, it doesn't fall sideways, nor collapse unevenly.
	For this to have happened, all of the building's vertical supports must have given way at almost exactly the same time.
	Yet the Federal Emergency Management Agency reported that the collapse was due primarily to fire.
	But what does it look like to you?
	Yeah, so you would be fired if you showed this on Fox News.
	Fired by Fox or fired by whoever he really works for?
	That's the question, right?
	And so right now, Tucker is in the process of rebuilding his credibility with a different group.
	So he may throw out some truth nuggets out there before he had a problem with truthers.
	You know what the opposite of a truther is?
	A liar, I think.
	And so we saw that it was they seize on a very believable boogeyman to do it, Islamic terrorists, because we know that Muslims want to murder people.
	And we know that trainees are crazy, and we know they want to murder people as well.
	So let's go down that road and build that up.
	So we've got more reports.
	This is from the Daily Wire.
	They're exclusive.
	The attempted Kavanaugh assassin identifies as a transgender woman, show the legal filings.
	Okay, so yes, yes, like I said before, they are nuts.
	They're like Norman Bates.
	But what is going to stop it?
	And when you look at this and people don't want to address the fundamental issues, I think that they're just putting this out as a misdirection.
	In other words, you're going to ignore the SSRIs.
	You're going to ignore the role of schools and making kids crazy and suicidal, and then you're going to hype them up with murder-suicide pills like the SSRIs.
	Why don't you stop this?
	Why don't you stop the schools?
	None of this is ever talked about.
	So we know that it is part of an agenda.
	And we know, as Travis, you mentioned this, you know, you go through these processes of what they're doing to the kids in the school, and it's like MK Ultra training.
	You know, once you get these people in process, you can actually then nudge them in the directions that you want to go.
	I think they ought to rename one of these high schools after Jolly.
	Call it Jolly High.
	Very unjolly, it would be.
	It really is incredible how it mirrors what he talked about with DDD, debility, dependency, dread.
	You debilitate someone, you take something away from them, you harm them in some way.
	You make them dependent on you.
	You're their source of whatever it is, food, shelter, information, anything, really.
	They look to you as a source of what they need, dread.
	You make them fearful of something, whether it's pain from you or consequence from outside sources.
	And then they worry about the withdrawal from that drug that you gave them that made them feel that way or whatever.
	And so it just mirrors it incredibly well.
	In almost every single aspect of American life, they're almost utilizing this against everyone.
	Yeah.
	And of course, the thing with SSRI drugs is they have so many other adverse effects, like it feels like your body is on fire, something like that.
	Somebody will cut that cold turkey.
	And it's like a diver who's down at a deep level decides that, well, I've got to get out of here.
	He panics and he runs up to the surface real quickly.
	He gets the bends.
	And that's what happens in a pharmaceutical way.
	It gives your body, gives your brain the bends.
	I guess we call it a mind-bending drug.
	And people go on these murder-suicide things.
	They have no recollection of it.
	They don't have any idea what they're doing.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break.
	And when we come back, we're going to ask some questions about what does it really take to win a culture war?
	How do we fight it?
	We'll be right back.
	with us.
	Defending the American Dream.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Welcome back, folks.
	We got a lot of comments from Liberty Valiant.
	Have you seen a watermelon you get hit by a small caliber bullet, smaller caliber bullet than a 30 odd six?
	The watermelon explodes into thousands of pieces.
	Kirk's head was intact.
	Impossible.
	Well, I think if he had been hit in the neck, it probably would have just shredded the neck and blown out the other end.
	I don't know if it would have had an impact on the head, but if he was shot in the head, it would have absolutely done massive damage.
	It would have been horrific.
	Karen Carpenter 27, absolutely ridiculous.
	No one is buying this story about the bullet.
	Yeah, that's this is where it becomes utterly unbelievable to me.
	The 30 odd six is far too powerful for it to get lodged in the throat.
	It's not going to deflect off the spine, I don't believe.
	It's going to punch straight through.
	It's not going to be deflected by that.
	Assyrian girl, guess Charlie Kirk was not shot with that rifle then, huh?
	Doesn't seem like it.
	Tunnel Lord 1337, yeah, no. 30 odd six doesn't stay in the body.
	Every big game animal hit by any such cartridge always has an exit wound.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, this is kind of like the collapsing steel buildings, collapsing out of their footprint.
	It's like that just doesn't happen.
	Didn't happen before that, hasn't happened after that.
	And this is the same type of thing.
	There's always some kind of a foundational flaw in their lies, no matter how well constructed.
	Yeah.
	If what really happened with 9-11 actually happened, they would have had to tear down every skyscraper in Manhattan and rebuild them from scratch.
	That's right.
	It wouldn't have been.
	They would have been looking at the legs.
	Oh no.
	And change all the building codes and change all the ways that firemen handle fires and skyscrapers.
	No rules would change.
	That was the point of Tony Rook.
	I think Tony was his first name.
	I think Rook, I know, was his last name because we made a joke about Knight and Rook.
	And he had a trial talking about that.
	And that was one of the points that he made up in the mock trial: there's been no changes in any country to change the way the building codes or the way fires are fought.
	Therefore, no country believed that.
	It's not just us.
	It's not just the Truthers.
	Yeah.
	Liberty Valiant says 30 odd 6 caliber bullet, 3,000 pounds per square inch force at a range of 150 yards.
	And Assyrian girl says the bullet may have been old and charge getting weak.
	It was Grandpop's gun after all.
	It was applying to Doug Lug there.
	It was Doug Lug that said that, and then Assyrian's Girl is the reply after that.
	Oh, okay.
	So Doug Lug said the bullet may have been old and charge getting weak.
	It was Grandpop's gun after all.
	I don't know enough about the decay of gunpowder, but I imagine even at that point, the 30 odd six is going to be carrying enough kinetic energy that it's not going to stop.
	I don't think you're going to lose enough of it over time to be that big of a difference maker.
	I don't know about those numbers because I'm not saying that they're right or wrong, but I mean, it looks reasonable.
	3,000 pounds per square inch of force at a range of 150 yards.
	That is just incredible.
	And even if you were to derate that a little bit, it's still incredible.
	I think even if you're shooting a subsonic round, it's going through and through.
	I don't think it's stopping.
	Doug Lug, Assyrian girl says, but if it was a big rifle, Doug, it would take out a moose, and I think it would have passed through Kirk's body.
	I agree with that.
	Up tomorrow, that round was designed for deep penetration.
	Tunnel Lord 1337, big game animals have denser muscles and bones than any human.
	There is no way the exit wounds on big animals, which are big, can somehow be smaller on a human.
	That's especially true because you're talking about the neck.
	The neck is not a large area, right?
	It's not a lot of flesh that it would have to pass through, but the bone supposedly stopped it.
	Don't think so.
	Yeah.
	Very shadow boxer.
	I used to watch a YouTube channel called Demolition Ranch on YouTube.
	They did a great job of showing that different calibers would do to different objects.
	Demolition Ranch was a great channel.
	Really, really great channel.
	I enjoyed his videos a lot.
	He also seems to be a really genuinely nice guy.
	He gave up YouTube because his children were getting older and he wanted to spend more time with them.
	So despite the fact that he was making a lot of money, he decided, you know, I've done enough.
	I've made canceled by YouTube.
	He quit?
	Yeah, he just quit.
	He decided, you know, I want to spend as much time with my kids before they go up to college as possible.
	So I really like Demolition Ranch, and he seemed like a really nice guy.
	Tunnel Lord 1337, a big game heart shot has to cut through at least two feet of flesh, and the exit wound is still big.
	If it can cut through that, it can cut through Kirk's neck without issue.
	Yeah, exactly.
	This is, again, where it starts to become completely unbelievable for me.
	If it's a 30-odd 6, what they're saying just doesn't make sense.
	Wishbone or Backbone says I shoot long-range 22-long rifle all the time.
	At 572.6 yards, a 40-ground, a 40-grain subsonic Normatch, 22-long rifle will punch through two pounds of beef, through an entire pumpkin, and embed in a half-inch of plywood just south of 600 yards.
	Wow.
	22-long rifle has a surprising amount of kinetic force velocity.
	And that's subsonic.
	Usually, 22 is supersonic.
	Yeah.
	Liberty Valiant says Tyler was a decoy, just like the two guys arrested in the crowd, decoys.
	Yeah.
	Trump Berger, this reads like a CIA intern wrote.
	I imagine he's talking about the text messages.
	It could be.
	I've also, sadly, I've dealt with a lot of leftists online and younger leftists.
	I've interacted with them and I've seen a lot of other people interact with them.
	So to me, the text messages do read like a very specific type of sort of theater kid leftist, very pretentious, very, my love.
	Oh, I've seen a lot of people like that.
	So I could believe they're real, but also I could believe that this is some, like you said, CIA intern.
	It wouldn't be that hard for them to mimic that.
	I mean, you could feed that into AI and say, you know, say these particular things in a way that somebody who writes like this, here's an example, would write that.
	And it's also, as you pointed out, this is an extremely high-stress situation where they're also under a lot of time pressure.
	So you typically aren't going to have time to write out your pretentious nonsense way of doing theater kid texts unless it's an AI trying to spit out content similar to what they typically text to make it when adrenaline kicks in.
	Your hand is shaking and your heart is pumping.
	Defy Tyrant 1776.
	When the news reports a knife killing, they never say knife violence, oh, but they always say gun violence.
	Yeah.
	Well, you know, knives aren't as scary.
	Liberty Valiant, apparently it had to be someone nearby with a very small caliber handgun.
	Yeah, and we have some people who have identified some suspects in some videos.
	But again, I'm not interested in solving the crime because I don't have the expertise to do that, and I don't have access to the information to do that.
	I think that's something of a trap, a briar patch, if you will.
	But what we know is how it's being used, right?
	They're going to use this for gun control or for speech control.
	If they want to use it for a police state, we know that that's just another indicator to me, another red flag that this is something that was set up by the government.
	Of course, they can always use something that was even a real event for their own agenda, and that's what we have to be concerned about.
	How are they going to use this?
	That's my focus.
	We have Doug Lug saying Tucker did an interview a month ago with a 9-11 DOLT pushing the narrative he will never tell the truth.
	You know, why give up on a lie?
	Audi MRR, anyone whose dad is CIA, ain't on your side.
	That's right.
	And it was CIA disinformation news broadcasting, the voice of America.
	Yeah, that was one of the things that when Nick Fuentes and Tucker had their recent back and forth, Nick really hammered him on.
	You didn't know your dad was CIA, really?
	You had to find out from other people?
	Come on.
	It was such an easy dunk for Fuentes.
	Well, and the other thing, too, is when you look at all this back and forth about the Smith-Munt Act and all the rest of this, nobody in writing about this mentions the fact that this was about the voice of America and what it was truly about.
	I mean, they just gloss over that.
	And they don't acknowledge what it was about if they cared to even find out what it was about.
	Yeah, the Smith-Munt Act really was written to keep Tucker's dad and others like him out of the U.S. to keep them from doing their propaganda here on U.S. Go away.
	Go live in a foreign country.
	It's the anti-Carlson Act.
	That's right.
	Audi MRR read that shadow boxer.
	None of the crimes against humanity were possible without the mocking bird media.
	They've been in bed with the CIA and the government in general for decades.
	Audi MRR, imagine having to spend your entire career lying and deceiving the masses.
	Yeah.
	Dougalug, I will say it.
	Our government killed 3,000 people in 9-11.
	My eyes were open.
	Yes.
	Yes.
	Secluded Oyster says trannies are a collective patsy.
	They're actually just mentally ill people abused by a medical industrial complex.
	And they are a perfect scapegoat for psyops because everyone knows they're unwell.
	That's right.
	I have a lot of empathy and compassion for a lot of trans individuals.
	I think they have been lied to.
	I think they've been abused.
	I think you also still have to be very careful with them because once they start advocating for policies that are going to harm other children, you know, you have to somewhat distance yourself from that empathy and compassion.
	Well, it's kind of like somebody who may be a pedophile.
	Maybe they were abused as a child, right?
	But they're still a dangerous pedophile, right?
	That's the issue.
	But yeah, they are becoming the scapegoat, and they are, this is how they're running the left-right thing in the same way that they had the Islamic terrorists, who are dangerous, very dangerous.
	I'm not minimizing that at all.
	But they were not capable.
	Men in caves are not capable of pulling that off.
	And they didn't even hit Building 7.
	And you can ask yourself why there's no videotape at the Pentagon, a place that was surrounded by surveillance tapes and all the rest of this stuff.
	It goes on and on.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, though, if you're looking to do a MKUltra-type thing, you can start with someone that's already halfway there.
	Don't start with a sane person.
	You get an already somewhat crazy patsy.
	They've been prepared.
	Exactly.
	It's just do not obey.
	They'll laugh at us and how easy they get away with their organized crimes.
	I mean, look at trying to discuss these matters with your neighbors.
	Nothing but conflicting beliefs.
	That's right.
	Narrow way, narrow gate ministries.
	9-11 was the beginning of the quelling of rights in the beginning of the end of propping up the dying American influence politically, economically, militarily of the world.
	And it was tied with the pandemic from the very beginning, the two of them, and that was the other shoe to drop after they'd practiced what they wanted to do with the lockdown and the vaccine.
	They practiced it for 20 years, put out the model legislation, but it was two months before 9-11, and then they set it up with another false flag attack, the anthrax attack.
	That anthrax and that attack, and of course the 9-11 engineers have done a good job of investigating the anthrax thing as well.
	That form of anthrax, that weaponized form of anthrax, was only done by the CIA, as well as the delivery mechanism, how they atomized it and made it very easy to spread in an aerosol way.
	And yet, they even moved people.
	The FBI moved people away from the two facilities in the U.S. that were making that specific kind of anthrax.
	And they picked a patsy and blamed it on him and insinuated all the time, never indicted him.
	And then when he died, they said, he was the guy.
	We never indicted him.
	But now that he can't defend himself, he's the guy.
	It's just so obvious.
	Right overture says, in a world of magic bullets, anything is possible.
	Minuteman militia.
	That's not true.
	I've shot bears of 30 out 6 and the bullet was still inside.
	Bear hunting.
	Well, Minuteman Militia has some real-life hands-on experience.
	Though also, there's a big difference between a bear and a human neck.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	So.
	Yeah, was that Senator Mass shot or was that his paw or something?
	Minuteman Militia seems to live a very interesting life.
	I believe Memory Server sees our listener who works in a silver mine.
	So bear hunter, silver miner, very interesting.
	Living the life.
	I know.
	A very interesting fellow.
	Very cool.
	And also, there's a bit more of a conversation about this where they're saying that it depends on the type of bullet that was used.
	So he's just saying that it's uncertain that some types of bullets it well, that's the other thing, too.
	For a week, everybody's saying, where's the bullet?
	Where's the bullet?
	Remember, we had all, look, they're paving this over, or they're putting grass in, or this or that.
	You know, we don't have any information about the bullet has been recovered.
	It's been matched to the gun.
	None of that stuff was done.
	It was just crickets about the bullet.
	And then all of a sudden, first thing we hear was it was magic.
	And he stopped it with his superpowers.
	Yeah, and again, like I was saying, even if you have a type of bullet that can get stuck in a bear, there's still a huge difference between that and a human neck.
	Yeah.
	Tonel Ordin337 says the decay of gunpowder in this case is negligible.
	That's kind of what I was thinking at NDPIO.
	If the bullet was getting weak, which they really don't, it would have affected the accuracy a lot.
	That's also true.
	When you're shooting, you're trying to, you want to have as consistent a batch of ammo as possible.
	You don't want to have to account for variances in the amount of powder and things.
	So if your bullets are all kinds of difference in decay, you're going to have a very hard time making consistent shots.
	And Trump Berger says, I've shot ammo from World War II.
	That was still 100%.
	Wishbone or backbone, subsonic rounds will absolutely go through a human.
	Yeah, 30 out 6, I assumed subsonic is not going to make that much of a difference.
	Well, let's talk a little bit about the digital ID and also about the H-1B visa applications.
	Now, I've seen this smattering of criticism about the H-1B visa thing that's happening with India.
	And WND has really focused like a laser beam on this.
	They've been running multiple articles each day on this H-1B visa issue.
	And it is a problem.
	It really is a problem.
	It's how they are taking away not just manual labor jobs at the bottom, but they're taking away the kinds of jobs that people typically go to college to get.
	And it is a crooked system.
	They're bringing in people that they claim have educational credentials and abilities that they don't have to replace American workers.
	So Trump has signed a proclamation imposing a $100,000 annual fee for H-1B visa applications by executive order.
	Turns out that this whole thing is a massive Trump lie.
	It is a head fake.
	It is huge, fake, fishy taco.
	That's entire nonsense about this.
	There's all kinds of exceptions that are riddled throughout this executive order, which makes it basically ineffective.
	And the key thing, Lance and I were talking about this.
	The key thing is it doesn't even start for another year.
	And by that time, the executive order has expired.
	I mean, that's how fake this whole Trump thing is.
	He just is doing this, making a statement to appease his base.
	There is no reality in it whatsoever.
	None at all.
	Yeah, I saw a thing that it was specifically starting a few days after this year's immigration lottery thing.
	So it's not affecting this year.
	It might affect next year, but it only has a one-year date.
	So even if it does affect next year, it would only be a one-year thing that it was affecting.
	So this is when they say they can't find any qualified Americans, and so they've got to bring somebody in from a foreign country.
	We saw this first at Disney World where they kicked out Americans and they said, well, if you want to train your cheap replacements from India, we will give you severance pay, but only if you train your replacements.
	Over and over again, we see that they are embargoing these jobs so they can get in people who will work at a lower rate.
	So the idea was that they would raise these H-1B visa fees from $215 to $100,000 for new applicants.
	But again, it's all smoke and mirrors for his fan club who want to believe that he's going to do something to protect them.
	And he's not really.
	The key thing is when we look at what is happening with the digital ID, again, Vietnam is a good example of this.
	Take a look at what has happened in Vietnam just the last couple of days.
	This is Vietnam's digital ID.
	I say it's a total loss of privacy and it's set up for control.
	Miss it and you'll be stuck in immigration.
	Airports shut down, flights grounded, not dictated by the OECD, where one late payment dings your score.
	What's for sure is Vietnam is the test and America is next.
	I've seen this movie in other countries.
	The trailer says efficiency, the plot twist, is control, leaving room for abuse.
	Vietnam sells this as part of Agenda 2045, and the fallout was apocalyptic.
	This exposes the trap.
	One glitch, and you're practically locked out of your own life.
	Picture this.
	You are sipping your cafe Seda in Saigon and scrolling your banking app.
	And boom, your bank account vanishes in thin air.
	No email, no warning.
	Just a digital black hole where your money used to be.
	Sounds like a nightmare, right?
	Well, for millions in Vietnam.
	Sounds like 2021 with us and PayPal.
	Vietnam wiped out over 86 million bank accounts.
	That's right.
	86 million.
	The official narrative says it's about security and efficiency.
	But come on.
	This screams of the World Economic Forum playbook: a self-strike in the great reset wars.
	Remember when Vietnam fired 245,000 officials overnight and called it efficiency?
	And when Vietnam issued the gas vehicle ban starting in 2026, this is the next chapter in Vietnam surrendering to the great reset and the globalist agenda.
	And it's happening faster than a motorbike dodging traffic on Wing Wei Street.
	Stick around as we're exposing today about what's going on, why this can be a trap, and what are the workarounds.
	If you're an expat investor or someone who just cares about again, it's the real domino theory, folks.
	The real domino theory is about global governance and a permission society everywhere.
	Total surveillance and permission that you have to beg your masters to do anything.
	It was also covered by Dr. Andrew Kaufman, who had this to say: We must, you must, take this deadly seriously.
	Pushing extremists off Wikipedia might not seem equal to the challenge of pushing Hezbollah north of the Latani River.
	This is ADL.
	Capturing TikTok might seem less meaningful than holding on to Mount Hermon.
	Libelous tweets certainly might seem less deadly than missiles from Yemen.
	Okay, that's not just the intro to it.
	That's actually the wrong video.
	That's the TikTok has been taken over by the technocracy.
	And Trump is handing out shares to all the usual suspects.
	I mean, this is very much like the Godfather where he had the guy in Florida and he's cutting the cake and he's handing out different pieces to this family and to that family.
	That's what Trump is doing with TikTok.
	But what Andrew Kaufman said, and I apologize, we don't have the video.
	Maybe you could find it, Lance.
	He said it was 86 million accounts, bank accounts, deactivated overnight.
	No warning, no grace period.
	Individuals who failed to submit biometric data were immediately denied access.
	This is not speculation.
	This is applied state-level biometric enforcement.
	And it's coming everywhere.
	Which video?
	David?
	Huh?
	Which video are you looking for?
	I was looking for the one the Vietnam deactivates 86 million ban on bank accounts.
	But David Icke said, this is what I have been warning about for decades.
	Stramer is planning to impose digital ID on the say-so of his cult handler, Tony Blair, who's been pushing this for year after year.
	Those who shouted conspiracy theory should prepare to apologize, but they won't.
	They'll say, what's the problem?
	If you have nothing to hide, what's the problem?
	Then they'll say, who is that banging on my door at this time of night?
	By then, it'll be too late.
	Yeah, we've already seen this.
	This happened to us with PayPal.
	When we started this show, we were only five months into it.
	At that point in time, the only way that we were getting, we didn't have Subscribestar, we didn't have Zelle, we didn't have Cash App, and we didn't have a PO box that we'd set up at that point in time.
	And instead, what we got was PayPal.
	PayPal was working out our first contributions.
	And it was still pretty much the place that we, all money that was donated to the program came through that.
	And they just cut it off.
	No explanation.
	As I've said many times, I asked the guy two hours I was on the phone with him.
	All he could say was, I can only find one thing, and that's a message saying, you know, delete this account immediately.
	Well, here's the clip.
	Why is Vietnam the testing ground for the new banking order?
	Well, recently, Vietnam imposed a requirement for a digital ID, including a biometric scan of everyone in order to have a bank account.
	And what they did to enforce this is they closed 86 million bank accounts and seized all of the assets in those accounts.
	So the owners of those accounts have no ability to do banking or access their funds because they chose not to sacrifice their privacy and submit to this biometric surveillance tracking mechanism.
	Well, this is not something that is going to stay in Vietnam.
	This is a test because if we look at, for example, what's going on with the European Central Bank and Digital ID initiative in Europe, as well as the real ID and the CBDC system Fed now being imposed in the United States, we can see it as well.
	So what are you going to do about it?
	Yeah, mandatory e-verify, real ID that they're pushing really, really hard after getting pushed back for 20 years.
	Now Trump's in, we don't have to worry about it.
	Now that Trump's in, we don't have to worry about censorship by the government of free speech.
	So let's go for the censorship.
	Let's go for the real ID.
	And as many Republican jurisdictions like Florida, for example, they're pushing in mandatory E-Verify.
	Well, we've got to do that because we've got illegal aliens that are in here.
	And as you point out, it's going everywhere.
	And as David Icke pointed out, it's coming into the UK as well.
	And here's a Labour Secretary, a Labour Minister, actually, Liz Kendall in the UK, threatening punishment if you don't get the digital ID mark of the beast.
	We know the government is looking at digital ID cards at the moment.
	How would that help prevent the situation that we're in now?
	Well, Kier Stahmer, our Prime Minister, has said we are looking at what countries have done to bring in a sort of digital accreditation.
	I think there's real actually benefits right across here from obviously dealing with illegal working, but also actually, imagine if your viewers imagine one credential that would allow them to access all the different government services and our public services too.
	I'm sure many of your viewers often tear their hair out with all the different numbers and passwords of the different bits of government that they have to deal with.
	I do think this could be a real benefit here for people who are here and working legally and accessible.
	It's the government that makes me want to tear my hair out.
	It was on routine, as well as the benefits it could have with illegal migration.
	We're looking at that.
	I think it is an interesting idea that other countries have taken forward and we want to learn from what they've done.
	Illegal immigration is their key tactic.
	Herr Starmer is all about illegal immigration.
	Now they're throwing that out there, some kind of a carrot to the population saying, you take the digital ID and we'll help you with this.
	It's not believable at all coming from labor.
	Some people will fall for it when it's put out by the Republicans.
	Yes, Lance?
	Yeah, I think it's real interesting how she carefully avoided saying social credit system.
	It's, well, we've been looking at what other countries have been doing with a sort of accreditation, and it's very promising.
	Yeah, it's a plot.
	It's a plan.
	I've shown the video many, many times.
	I'm not going to show it again now.
	Ukraine 2030.
	Remember?
	That was put together by the NATO people.
	Well, it's 2030.
	We've won the war.
	And look at this.
	You can go to the Department of Motor Vehicles.
	You can register to vote.
	You can do this.
	You can do that.
	All of these things are your interaction with government, which I didn't want to have in the first place.
	But now they're going to make it easy for you because you've got this electronic thing on your phone.
	And so it makes it easy to do all the things that you never wanted to do.
	And if you don't accept that, there is punishment and exclusion.
	And here's the issue and what she is pushing in the UK.
	Lose access.
	If you don't get it, you lose access to welfare.
	You lose access to pensions.
	You want that's a Social Security check?
	You have to get a digital ID.
	That's the only way that we'll pay you.
	You lose access to public services and so forth.
	This is the same plan, folks, that Gates ran through in India.
	They call it the Oddhar system.
	Gates went to, Bill Gates went to India, and he said, I'm going to help you with a numbering system, and you've got all these poor people out there.
	We've got to get them under control.
	They're operating in a cashless society.
	We can't see or control what they're doing.
	So let's make medical care and welfare and all these different things that they're dependent on for their very existence because of their poverty.
	Let's make that only acceptable access only through the Aadhaar system.
	So everybody must take the number or you will not be able to live in India.
	In developed countries, they don't go for the jugular right away.
	What they do is say, it's going to be a lot easier for you to deal with all the things that government mandates if you've got this.
	And if you don't have it, we're going to make your life exceedingly difficult.
	So this is, as a matter of fact, here's Tony Blair talking about his long dream of digital ID.
	This issue to do with the technology and the digital infrastructure, I just want to emphasize how important I think that is.
	Because in the end, you need the data.
	You need to know who's been vaccinated and who hasn't been.
	Some of the vaccines that will come on down the line will be multiple, there'll be multiple shots.
	It was a perfect Overton window move, wasn't it?
	Well, generally, but certainly for a pandemic or for vaccines, you've got to have a proper digital infrastructure.
	And many countries don't have that.
	In fact, most countries don't have that.
	Yeah, the common pass.
	And that was something that was sold heavily by the World Economic Forum.
	And they all came up with their own version of it.
	The EU had its own version of it.
	Well, we know how that's going to work.
	And we know we saw the police van that they, the police getting that van and confiscating it.
	This is all just playing into the hands of the police state.
	And if you want to fall, if you want to jump onto these absurd narratives about assassinations and 9-11 and all the rest of stuff, then they have got you on the road to the real police state.
	Forget the four documentaries that Alex did.
	That's what's really happening now.
	Any money laundering is the stablecoin use case that nobody talks about.
	This is coming from Zero Hedge.
	This is the permission society.
	And let's understand, it's not going to be CBDC.
	There's been enough talk about CBDC that they want to avoid that label.
	Stablecoin is the rebranded Trojan horse that has all of the functions that we did not want to have with CBDC.
	Look, we want to be able to clear transactions easily and efficiently around the world, perhaps.
	But is it worth it to have a surveillance permission state?
	And that's what stablecoin does.
	It allows them to shut down where your money is.
	The trajectory of the stablecoin industry is heavily influenced by warring factions on opposite sides debating possible criminal use.
	There's a lack of awareness of how a deep integration of stablecoins and global finance can drive the use of the blockchain's properties of immutability and transparency in order to fight financial crimes.
	Think about this.
	Why should there be financial crimes?
	If you have somebody who wants to buy something and somebody who wants to get paid, why should the government be in there determining that it is a financial crime?
	Go back again to Dennis Hastert, the pedophile, who was the longest serving Speaker of the House for the Republicans.
	And perhaps for the Democrats as well, I'm not sure.
	But he was caught taking money out in a way to avoid the withdrawals getting attention.
	In other words, he's structuring his deposits, taking out a little bit at a time to get a large Amount of money that he would then pay to the blackmailer.
	And of course, the people in Congress who put him in Congress, who put him in the speaker's position, knew that he was a pedophile.
	And even after they found this, they never came after him for being a pedophile.
	They never prosecute him for being a pedophile.
	What they prosecute him for was a so-called financial crime of taking money out to avoid being reported to the government.
	Are they doing anything about the financial strange withdrawals that were being done by Jeffrey Epstein?
	No, those are all secret and hidden.
	So if you want to run a pedophile ring, if you want to run a blackmail sex ring like Jeffrey Epstein, or you want to pay off your pedophile victims that are blackmailing you, the only thing they care about, in that particular case, I said, is the financial crimes, but they're not caring about the financial crimes of the Epstein issue.
	So it's very selective, isn't it?
	What they're looking at.
	Stablecoin industry is being aided by increased regulatory clarity and meaningful use cases.
	In other words, Trump is greasing the skids to let them do whatever they want because the stablecoin is going to bail out their U.S. dollar.
	It's going to be the new petro dollar.
	And it is also going to be the means by which they put in a stealth CBDC.
	If you go back to the technocracy blueprints that they had, the organization that was selling technocracy originally in the 1930s, what they were saying was that we need to have exactly what the stablecoin and the CBDC provide, and that is tracking of energy resources.
	They started bringing in this idea as something that was a real feature, not a bug, because of the climate MacGuffin.
	And so we've got to track your carbon usage and prohibit it if you've had too much steak to eat or whatever.
	You've driven too much this last time.
	You're using too much gasoline.
	So we're just not going to let you pay for this.
	That was always a part of the technocracy's plan.
	And it kind of was echoed in what Henry Kissinger did when he set up the petrodollar.
	Again, that was a recognition that the real thing that moves society is energy.
	That is why they did the Paris Climate Accord in 2015, to take energy away from the U.S. and the EU, to deindustrialize us, to make us poor, third world, so they don't get any resistance from us.
	It's always been about that.
	The ability to facilitate swifter, more cost-effective transactions than traditional banking has accelerated their adoption worldwide.
	That's how they will sell it.
	That is the marketing ploy.
	But the real reality is worse than that.
	And even in this article, the stablecoin thing, they have a chart up there that was put up by the World Economic Forum.
	Over and over and over again, there it is right there.
	We see that Trump is pushing the World Economic Forum agendas.
	He is 100% in on all of these agendas.
	It doesn't matter what it is.
	This is just another one.
	And he really loves this one because this one, while he makes us poor and puts us in a surveillance state, a prison planet, he gets fabulously wealthy feeding off of the stablecoin industry.
	But they say that it is about tracking illicit finance.
	Again, if we don't want government permission to speak, why do we need government permission to engage in financial transactions?
	What business is it of theirs?
	There is no use case to explain this, even though Zero Hedge tries to make that case.
	Anti-money laundering.
	So if you're going to get paid for something that is part of their prohibition, again, drug war, this is mainly coming in the drug war.
	And Trump is going to try to use the drug war to drag us to war.
	That's really what's going to be happening with Venezuela.
	And that's what is already happening.
	The drug war has been a war on the rule of law, the Constitution, and due process from the get-go.
	They decided from the very beginning of this drug war, which is put together by the United Nations, as a matter of fact, they created the four schedules.
	They sent it to Richard Nixon.
	He called it his own, put his name on the legislation and turned it in, right?
	But they had decided from the very beginning that they were not going to do this constitutionally.
	Again, when we look at alcohol, that was the first time anything had ever been prohibited by the federal government.
	They had no authority to do that.
	Everybody knew they had no authority to do that.
	So they had to have the 18th Amendment.
	And then later they repealed it with the 21st Amendment.
	But when they started the UN's war on drugs, Richard Nixon just completely ignored the Constitution.
	And so it was born out of contempt for the Constitution and the rule of law, and it's only gotten worse since.
	So now we have all these financial crimes.
	Stable coins flowing through the globe on immutable, transparent, public blockchains.
	No privacy, right?
	Because these people want us to be, in the words of B.F. Skinner, beyond freedom and dignity.
	If you have no freedom, you have no dignity.
	If they can barge into your house as we began the program and tell you that you've got to apologize for something that you said, and they won't tell you what that is, is there any dignity for citizens in that kind of a state?
	No.
	No.
	So they add teeth to the global fight against illicit finance by providing traceability in international finance with a much-needed leg up.
	But you better believe that we will never know what happened with all the payments that Jeffrey Epstein was receiving and sending out to and from the people that he was blackmailing.
	But they will always come back and say, but, but, the drug cartels and the terrorists.
	Matt Tiabi had a great series when he was at the Rolling Stone talking about the banks that were too big to jail.
	And he really ripped Eric Holder, Obama's attorney general, who was every bit as bad as Pam Bondi, if not worse, just in different ways.
	And he joked that these banks were not only too big to fail, they were too big to jail.
	He went into a great deal of detail about how the Hong Kong Shanghai Bank, HSBC, it began as part of the drug trade with the opium wars and things like that.
	And they were still trading with terrorist cells and with drug cartels.
	And so all this stuff that they need to have this massive surveillance of everything that you and I do is all based on this fiction of the drug war and the authority to do prohibition that they don't have.
	Let's get some of these comments before we run out of time.
	Yeah, we're close.
	Empty Grave says they might not get their civil war, but they'll settle for the thrashing of the Constitution.
	They'll shoot for the genocide and settle for the deconstruction of our God-given rights.
	I agree.
	AP Rumble seat, they're building so much propaganda, legislation, and censorship around the Kirk incident, which alone makes it suspect to have been orchestrated.
	Don't get too drawn in or caught up in hostility.
	Paleo Armory, I've seen Wild West ammo that was from the 1800s that was still good.
	Oh, that just reminded me.
	Remember the case where we had Andrew Jackson, who shut down the central bank, right?
	He went to war with the central bank, and they tried to kill him, just like they did JFK and so forth.
	This guy comes up to him point blank and tries to shoot two times with this pistol that he's got, and it misfired both times, and that was enough for Andrew Jackson, even though he's an old man, to thoroughly thrash him with his cane and take him out.
	Decades later, like 100 years later, perhaps, somebody pulled out the gun to see what was wrong with it.
	Why did it misfire?
	And they shot it, and it worked.
	Still had that ammunition.
	And it's about 100 years old, and it worked.
	So, yeah, God moves in mysterious ways.
	Funny thing about that.
	Paleo Armory, there are 55 million visa workers in the U.S. and 20 to 50 million illegals.
	That's insane.
	Yeah.
	And it's something that does need to be addressed and great replacement.
	You cannot have a country.
	You cannot keep it.
	But Trump is fixing that.
	Look what he did with the H-1B visa.
	It's all fixed, folks.
	Great.
	Trump.
	We're winning, right?
	It's all ahead fake.
	People aren't replaceable.
	Different peoples have different values in different cultures.
	If everyone was the same, every country would have achieved the same things and have the same architecture.
	And, you know, you just can't replace people and expect the country to remain.
	Doug Lewis says it would be nice to see the bullets.
	They leave a lot open to speculation for some reason.
	I hope they release the autopsy.
	Well, the FBI has been completely silent about that.
	So have the police.
	We won't hear about it from the PR guy.
	Then Defiatyron says they only show us the scripted stuff, not the truth.
	Audi MRR, I was warning folks that the manufacturing migrant crisis was a ruse for the global digital ID.
	Trump is the Trojan horse.
	And again, just because they manufacture real crises, but that doesn't mean you have to give in to their plan on how to fix it.
	It's just going to make everything worse.
	Big Brit is back again at CBDC.
	They just rename it.
	Talking about stable coins.
	High Boost.
	Trump Carp Palantir.
	Celebrate.
	We need more AI.
	That's right.
	And there's a huge contract that the British are doing with Palantir now.
	Let me just say this before we run out of time: $6,600 gold.
	History says yes.
	This is an article from Zero Hedge.
	So you need to go to Tony Artaban's WiseWolf Gold.
	You can get there with DavidKnight.gold.
	That'll let him know that you came through us.
	Folks, you need to start making some measures to try to protect yourself from this enslavement they want to put us under.
	Yes.
	I'll see you all tomorrow, folks.
	God bless you all.
	Thank you so much for joining us.
	Have a good day.
	The Common Man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at the DavidKnightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲