The David Knight Show - The David Knight Show - 9/16/2025

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 16, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:01:29

The David Knight Show - 9/16/2025

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Tuesday, the 16th of September, Year of Our Lord 2025.
	Well, today we're going to begin with Sissy football.
	That's uh Trump's uh reaction to a new rule change at the NFL.
	And we're going to take a look at how everything uh all the rules are being changed, including um how it's now brave to shoot first on people and boats, and I gotta say, I think it's a very dangerous idea.
	Where where does that end if we're going to get rid of the rule of law?
	Everything that Trump does is predicated on the declaration of an emergency, and then dispensing with the rule of law, making himself a dictator.
	It's not a joke.
	The uh left attacked him so much about this, calling him Hitler so many times, he's now been inoculated from criticism of this by MAGA, and we need to pay attention, especially after they come after the First Amendment, which is what they're doing.
	So we're gonna begin with uh Sissy football, and we'll move on to Sissy dictators.
	We'll be right back.
	Well, there's a new rule in the NFL, and Trump lashed out about it because he thinks that it had to do with his team losing a game over the weekend.
	He said it is quote ridiculous looking, this new kickoff rule for the NFL.
	He called it sissy football.
	The dynamic kickoff rule moved touchbacks to the 35-yard line instead of the 30.
	It's intended to increase the rate of kickoff returns and reduce the rate of injuries.
	Confusion around the rule seemed to be at the center of a touchdown gifted to the Seattle Seahawks, and their 3117 victory of the Pittsburgh Steelers on Sunday.
	Uh one touchdown was not the margin of difference there.
	Uh the NFL had to get rid of that ridiculous looking has to get rid of that ridiculous looking new kickoff rule, he said.
	Um before uh he's noted before that he's a feel Steelers fan.
	How can they make here's the key?
	How can they make such a big and sweeping change so easily and so quickly?
	Yeah, that's what I've been saying about all the things that Trump's been doing, especially with tariffs and other things like that.
	How can you make these large determinations arbitrarily quickly, and then uh let's make it worse.
	Let's say that uh if we were to treat this like the tariffs, then what would happen is on one kickoff the rule would apply, on another kickoff it would not apply.
	And uh maybe after the second half it wouldn't apply, or something like that.
	It would be constantly changing.
	He says it's at least as dangerous as a normal kickoff, and it looks like hell, he says, yeah.
	So um, I guess we could also say, you know, what about since when do we get to make the arbitrary rules that instead of the Coast Guard interdicting ships as they have been doing for a long time and the war on drugs that they don't have any constitutional authority for?
	Uh how how about instead of stopping the ships searching them, if they find drugs, they take the drugs and they put the people in jail.
	How about if instead of doing that you just blow them out of the water on suspicion?
	Or let's say that you s you go a little bit further.
	You stop, you look, you find drugs, and then you line them all up on the side of the boat and shoot them all.
	Summary execution.
	Well, uh, he says sissy football is bad for America.
	Dictatorial rule by a president, so-called president.
	Let's understand she calls himself a president, Putin calls himself a president, Maduro and Venezuela calls himself a president.
	Calling yourself a president doesn't make any difference whatsoever.
	It's how you act.
	All these people, including Trump, act as dictators.
	So he says, um, who comes up with these ridiculous ideas?
	Yeah, is it uh was this due to Peter Navarro?
	Did he come up with this new sissy football rule, Travis?
	What do you think?
	Maybe they could.
	I know so little about sports in general.
	This is all just yeah, they might as well be speaking Greek.
	They're sitting there like the touchback, this.
	Moving the goal.
	Moving it backwards.
	Like, who cares?
	Who sits here?
	Who's who's going to sit here and read this and get worked up about it?
	How does Donald Trump have the time to care about what the NFL is doing?
	Well, because the figureheads are.
	Yeah, if he was actually the president doing things, you would think the NFL would be so far off his radar, he would learn about this after his term is over, be like, wait a minute, they changed this?
	When did that happen?
	How does he have the time?
	Because he's not doing anything.
	Once again, it's these faceless bureaucrats behind him that actually run things.
	Yeah, so I I don't know, maybe uh who comes up with these rule changes?
	Is it somebody like Peter Navarro?
	Maybe they could call it rename it the Navarro Football League.
	Yeah.
	Because it operates like the White House.
	I I just don't I've I've never been into sports.
	You know, if my friends are watching a game, I can sit around and enjoy it with them, but that's just because they're having a good time.
	Yeah.
	You know, it's about the fact that other people are there enjoying it.
	It's about, you know, what they're doing.
	The sport itself has no interest for me.
	My wife and I went out to lunch over the weekend, and there was uh football, college football came on.
	And there was just a group, you know, multiple different groups of people there, and every time anything happened, they would just yell, we're in a restaurant.
	I'm trying to enjoy my food, and you people are just like, oh, he hit him, oh he got him.
	Just please let me have my burger in peace.
	Please.
	Yes, I get that the large man ran the ball.
	It's oh yeah, he tackled that guy.
	He sure did.
	You're very observant.
	It's in high definition.
	I don't think you would have missed it.
	Uh you don't need to call it out for me.
	We went to a professional baseball game once we lived in Houston.
	Karen's uh employer gave her tickets.
	And I'd never been to a professional baseball game before or since.
	The thing that I was surprised at was that even though we were at the game, we weren't at a restaurant or something, we were at the game, and the people who were there couldn't care less about everything on the field.
	I'll figure out what happens if it once.
	Yeah, they're chatting with each other, they're eating, they're doing all sorts of things, but they're not really paying any attention.
	So it's it's vital that they have those big replay screens that are there.
	Yeah, I also want to make it clear, it's like if you enjoy football, I'm I'm not, you know, dunking on you.
	Uh, I find it weird if it's your entire existence.
	Like you sit there and you agonize over these stats.
	So how many points do this guy converge?
	How uh what's his you know, ratios and this and that?
	That I find strange.
	But if you like to sit down and watch a football game, I have my own distractions.
	I like playing video games.
	So I'm not saying you're not allowed to enjoy things.
	You know, if that's how what you find fun, I'm not going to fault you for it.
	I just, you know, personally I would like to eat my burger and not have some you know guy my age screaming right next to me.
	Well, right after he complains about the Sissy NFL rule and how they changed that rule, uh, he then turns his attention to quarterly reporting by companies.
	And he wants to change that.
	How does he get to do that?
	You know, he says, Well we don't need to have reports every quarter.
	And he says this, it's uh it's unclear why Trump decided to complain about this long-standing business practice.
	But it's possible that his motivation in suggesting moving to a semi-annual reporting model is to hide the negative impact of his tariff policies, says the independent.
	And he um had also said, you know, China has a 50 to 100 year view on management.
	We're doing ours on a quarterly basis.
	That's not good, and so forth.
	So again, you know, why is he focusing on uh minutia like that?
	But also uh apply the same things to Something he cares about football.
	He doesn't care about the Constitution and the rule of law.
	That's the bottom line.
	And then of course, the other issue that came out out of football this this weekend was Travis Kelsey was very angry and screaming at his teammates who are playing very poorly, and people are saying, Is it the poor play?
	Or is there something going on between him and his fiancee, Taylor Swift?
	Because we don't see her at the game.
	Is he upset because she's not at the game?
	It's all turned into a soap opera now, right?
	Well, it turns out that she didn't want to be seen.
	Uh so shortly after the the game, some people posted the fact that she uh came instead of in the past where she would kind of come in and and wanted to be seen.
	Uh she came in behind the screen.
	And some of the Swifties came out and said, Oh, that's a bulletproof screen.
	No evidence that it is a bulletproof screen, but she did have her assistants, and she has a large entourage of people who are setting the screen up, rolling it on the ground, as you see here, and then she has security all over the place behind the screen, so you can't can't see exactly where she is.
	They're just like us folks.
	We were talking about that this morning.
	I was talking about it with Karen.
	I said, you know, it has finally dawned on some of these 30 something year old billionaire celebrities that life is not promised to them on daily basis, they're scared to death.
	And uh, but the reality is that we should understand that that's the case for all of us.
	It doesn't matter whether you're a celebrity or not, it doesn't matter if you're young or old.
	Uh young people are dying all the time.
	And so we ought to all live our lives in light of that and live it in a way that we are not afraid.
	And that that I think is a lesson from Charlie Kirk.
	But everybody are everybody's picking up the wrong lessons from Charlie Kirk's life.
	Uh they don't want free speech, they don't want debate.
	Uh instead, everybody wants to cower in fear and purge the enemy, which was the approach of the people who opposed Charlie.
	That's why he was at the universities.
	Because the universities, he understood, is where this is being manufactured.
	It's the school system.
	He knew where the problem was coming from.
	He went to where the problem was coming from, and he confronted the problem.
	And the people who are doing this now are not doing that at all.
	Uh, as a matter of fact, when we take a look at what's going on in the Charlie Kirk world, um the report is that the alleged assassins, trans boyfriend hates conservatives and Christians.
	Well, is that really news?
	Uh that's coming from Breitbart.
	We have seen that uh transgenders are always portrayed by the mainstream media as the victims of hate, not the perpetrators of hate, because uh it's they're they're the ones who can show up, have so much hate that they can show up at a school and shoot a nine-year-old in the face.
	Uh this is unbelievable how deranged these people are.
	How can they possibly want to mutilate their own body?
	That's right.
	They possibly blame a nine-year-old child for uh you know anything that they had experienced from adults, even if it was hate that was there.
	They're just as you point, they're full of hate and they are uh it is demonic.
	I fully believe these people are demonically oppressed, possessed, they are surrounded by demons and being influenced by them.
	You have to be completely insane to want to mutilate yourself and to want to shoot children.
	I I think the plural pronouns is very apropos, don't you?
	Yeah, they are leaving.
	So uh one of his relatives who wanted to remain anonymous said he hated us.
	He was not raised that way, but he over the years has become really detached and radicalized.
	Everybody agrees about that.
	The question is, what radicalized him and what uh the Utah governor, a Republican Cox, is uh saying, and many others are saying, Oh, it's the internet that radicalized him.
	Is it really?
	Or is it the school system?
	Um he left home when he was seventeen.
	I have a bit of a school nuanced take on this.
	So I believe, you know, you get into school and that's what starts the radicalization, but with the way the algorithms work, they continually feed you more and more and more of what you want to see, of what you're interested in.
	Yeah.
	And so it's a self it's a self-propagating feedback loop.
	Once you get down into a certain type of rabbit hole, breaking out of that, it requires an actual effort.
	And as a general rule, most people don't go searching for things that are going to conflict with their worldview.
	They want it reaffirmed.
	I agree.
	So you get in there, they start feeding you Marxist doctrine, Marxist dogma, and the algorithm picks up on that and it starts feeding that back to you.
	And we know that's the way the chat bots work, we've been told that.
	But you can really more primitive version of an AI chat bot, just obsequiously telling you everything you want to hear.
	YouTube will feed you content creators that are going to tell you the exact same thing you want to hear.
	Yeah, you can see that very easily with YouTube.
	I'll go in and I'll look for a video about a specific topic or something.
	Then all of a sudden I'm getting videos sent to me all the time about that topic.
	I know you watched one video on this, but how would you like every video ever created?
	Yeah.
	Occasionally I'll watch a survival-related video or something like that, you know, surviving out in the wild.
	And then for days later, it's just, hey, there's a new survival video here.
	How would you like to see what it takes to survive on an island with no gear?
	It's like, I don't think that's gonna be me, but you know, maybe.
	Well, you know, I I think though that you know, when you look at all these different factors, yes, they're all a part of the culture that we live in.
	You know, the internet is a part of that culture, and as you pointed out, it will start to focus in on your interests and amplify them.
	Uh but it's also uh, you know, entertainment, of course, is there, and uh, but I think that the influence of the schools is unique in the sense that they have the children for eight hours a day or so, and there's not only is it the institution that is pushing this and the person in authority at the front of the classroom, remember the Milgram experiment, but it's also the people who are there in the classroom with them, the Ash experiment.
	And so, you know, it is it is very um very focused on these children at a very young and impressionable age, and that is where they have taken this now, which is why I think it's you're seeing uh such a radical change in this generation.
	So Trump shares the call for Charlie Kirk's the Charlie Kirk Act that we showed yesterday to hold media accountable, and of course I I didn't say it yesterday, but had somebody send it to me and said it's a questionable choices from this young woman who uh decided not to fix her teeth but to uh pierce her tongue.
	It's exactly my first comment to Karen.
	But um obviously she doesn't understand and doesn't care what the Smith Munt Act was really about, and of course, neither does Trump because he just jumped in on that.
	As I pointed out yesterday, um this is RT saying it's a piece of Cold War legislation, the Smith Munt Act, aimed at preventing domestic dissemination of US media content intended for foreign audiences called propaganda, the voice of America and Radio Liberty.
	It has nothing to do with holding US news media accountable for spreading false narratives at home.
	The reason this is coming up is it's not only just ignorance, but it'd be amplified by the Trump administration because it allows them this misrepresentation, this ignorance of the public about what the Smith Munt Act really was about.
	Allows them to claim, well, this was something that we traditionally used to do.
	This is not some brand new thing.
	No, it is something brand new what you're proposing to do.
	The idea that you are going to control media, and of course, Trump is all over that.
	He just dropped another multi-billion dollar lawsuit against the New York Times because they endorsed La La Harris.
	Newspapers have always endorsed a political candidate one way or the other.
	So he has sued CBS, the New York Times, others, and he wants to shut them down one way or the other.
	He is threatened or proof he's just another New York Democrat, a so happy New York Democrat.
	He absolutely despises, despises free speech.
	And he characterizes uh people, as a matter of fact, reason pointed out that if they are going to criminalize what he would say is vicious speech, he'll probably be the first victim of it.
	Because of the way he denigrates everyone with over-the-top rhetoric.
	Um it is a it is um we're gonna arrest anyone that's mean.
	Sadly, I am going to prison.
	I'm the first victim of my own law.
	Very sad.
	Yeah, except it won't work that way.
	You know, it was uh you look at ancient societies who really respected the rule of law.
	I remember Daniel, right?
	The Prophet Daniel and uh these guys tricked the um uh tricked the the king into uh signing this law, you know, prohibiting people from the free exercise of religion uh because they wanted to entrap Daniel.
	And then uh he realized that uh it was a setup after they did set up Daniel but he wasn't going to go back against the rule of law.
	How different things are today.
	Truly is amazing.
	He says well that's the law.
	We can't break the law.
	You had a change.org petition that got 43,000 signatures in one day to push censorship everywhere.
	JD Vance has called on them to introduce stricter penalties against news media.
	Of course they would love to have that.
	Americans have been taught to hate free speech and not to value the First Amendment.
	And the question is where did that happen?
	And I know where that happened but nobody will talk about it.
	It's just amazing to me.
	Nobody will talk about that.
	So JD Vance hosted the Charlie Kirk show of the weekend and he had all these administration guests on there with him and he was decidedly I would say anti Kirk.
	It was an anti Kirk show.
	The things that they were saying that they wanted to do were precisely the exact opposite of what Charlie Kirk would do.
	I want you to become a snitch society.
	I want you to turn in people who say things that you don't like.
	Turn them into their employer.
	Get them canceled.
	You know many people threatened uh Charlie Kirk.
	A lot of people said horrible things to him did he try to get them kicked out of the university?
	No.
	No, he debated them.
	That is not the spirit of JD Vance or Stephen Miller or Susie Wiles or the other people who were there.
	Even RFK Jr who has in the past said well you can't say anything that I characterize as anti-Semitic if you criticize Israel we're going to come after you.
	That's an illness he said.
	So none of these people that were there with JD Vance support free speech.
	He said in a post on X after Kirk's death that the slain conservative activist was one of the first people he called when he considered running for the Senate in 2021.
	One of the first people perhaps the first one was Peter Thiel hey can I get some money you're going to support this he said Charlie and JD were friends said the executive producer of the Charlie Kirk show actual friends a lot of the people that are running the federal government are personal friends of Charlie's and they were in the trenches together in the campaign and they've known each other for years.
	And this folks is the real danger I'll just remind you of Ronald Reagan and the Brady Bill.
	Ronald Reagan ran as a strong supporter of the Second Amendment but when uh uh Brady who was what was he I think press secretary or something was the one who got shot in the assassination attempt on Ronald Reagan, Reagan felt guilty about it.
	And so it was more important to him to stand by Sarah Brady who wanted that gun control bill than it was to stand by the principles and the Constitution of the second and the second amendment.
	And that's what I'm concerned about.
	Not that these people, not the Trump administration likes free speech to start with.
	I guess I kind of question why was Charlie Kirk hanging around these people who despised the free speech that he was fighting for?
	The Trump administration, as I just pointed out, Trump wants to sue or fine and put out of business any media that is not fawning at his feet.
	Just like he will come after any Republican who is not praising him and saying, nominating him for prizes and Nobel prizes and so forth.
	So the personal friendship for a lot of these people is far more important than the principle of free speech or the Constitution Stephen Miller was on the show and he said we're going to channel all that anger that we have to uproot and dismantle these terrorist networks terrorist networks so who are the terrorists well the terrorists or who they say the terrorists are it's like you know what is an assault weapon is what I say it is what is hate speech what I say it is.
	We're going to make America safe again he said there you go masa instead of MAGA and it kind of sounds like the old slang for master for slave right masa gonna make us safe yash masa's gonna make us safe.
	We gotta have some masa here.
	So I don't get it.
	Uh is this a loan shooter or a terrorist organization now?
	Or a terrorist network, rather.
	Well, they can't make up their mind, and it's malleable anyway, Liz.
	You're right.
	Um so among the guests were Caroline Levitt, Tucker Carlson, RFK Jr. and Susie Wiles, the chief of staff of the Trump administration.
	So they're gonna do everything they can to destroy the first amendment, just like Reagan was willing to destroy the second amendment for his friend who was shot.
	Steve Bannon has shared a shocking list questioning whether the FBI arrested the wrong man for the Charlie Kirk assassination, to the point in which you just asked uh Lance.
	This is and I I just have to say, be careful about Steve Bannon.
	Uh Steve Bannon is a fabulous.
	He's like George Santos.
	He will tell you anything in order to get eyeballs on his side.
	So be careful, because uh this guy is a convicted con artist, and even though Trump pardoned him, uh th this uh what he did to the people that trusted him is unforgivable, and he is dangerous.
	Uh so anyway, a lot of people have come up with these questions, however.
	Uh questions like they haven't recovered the bullet, he says it appears.
	I don't know if that's true or not.
	They haven't presented any video or photographic evidence of the alleged shooter with the gun.
	The alleged shooter did not confess to law enforcement.
	Well, let's say that they they allegedly say they have a confession on Discord, but Discord disputes the FBI's claim that the shooter discussed any plans to assassinate Charlie Kirk.
	If true, they would have the data to back this up.
	Uh TPUSA staff contaminated the crime scene and remove the camera sitting directly behind Charlie immediately after the shooting.
	We don't know where that footage is.
	And we have um one person remember the first day we were talking about this, um we uh said I didn't see him throw the rifle down that was there.
	And uh another person is saying, yeah, where is the stick?
	What he's saying is that he doesn't think that the rifle would fit in that bag that was thrown down.
	Allegedly we've got caught this guy.
	All right, this uh Tyler Robinson.
	They're still sticking with this was a bolt action 30 6.
	We also have video of him that has been discovered of him running across the entire top from like the front to back or whatever it is of the Lucy Center from where this is supposed to have happened.
	And for those that don't understand, not that I'm a weapons expert, but a 30-6 does not break down.
	I mean, you can pull the bolt, you can clean it, you can pull the wood furniture off of it, yada yada.
	But that's not a quick process.
	So we got video of him running across the building, going off the side of the building, he jumps down, and the only thing he has with him looks like a small backpack.
	So for demonstration purposes, I'm gonna show you something.
	Typical size on a 30 out six is 42 to 44 inches.
	Here's our 42 inches demo.
	I'm 5'11 for reference.
	Where was this at?
	I mean, you can't put it in your pant because you can't bend in this piece of sh was hauling ass.
	If it was in your backpack, it'd be sticking up.
	Noticeable.
	Even if you put it under here.
	You still couldn't bend your leg.
	I'm not trying to start some kind of a conspiracy, but this dude did not have a 30 out six on his person when he is hauling ass across the top of the Lucy building, jumping down, and you can see his legs bending and all that.
	How could the weapon get from there to the woods?
	Well, that's a good question.
	That's the kind of questions that when somebody I could just see Cash Patel's expression because every time you see a picture of him, he's like a deer caught in the headlights.
	I can just see his expression.
	If somebody were to ask that question, he'd be like, ooh.
	But um, as uh some other people point out, you guys know these groups on Discord, Telegram, 4chan, etc.
	are crawling with feds and Intel operatives, right?
	You remember the Whitmer Fed napping plot.
	If you wanted to sell a narrative and create a patsy, how might you do it?
	So you should question everything.
	I'm not jumping in on any of these things yet.
	I don't have my mind made up about anything.
	Um I would say if you wanted to cover up anything, you couldn't do better than Cash Patel and Dan Bon Gino out there.
	They will say whatever you tell them to say, as we've already seen.
	So uh it is kind of interesting.
	What do you guys think about that?
	That was our first comment.
	When I looked at it, it's like I don't see that guy with a gun.
	You know, it's interesting.
	Um again, I don't know enough about rifles, but people make all kinds of replacement stocks for all kinds of different guns.
	And from what I've seen, at least if the picture of what I've seen is the actual rifles used, he did not have a wood stock on it.
	He had replaced the stock, so maybe he's got one where it's easier and quicker to break down.
	Maybe someone makes something like that.
	Yeah.
	Uh it's possible.
	Um it is interesting, but yeah, the Mauser uh 30 got sixes are generally large guns, and the Mauser is no exception.
	So if he is right, it doesn't seem to fit in there, but also maybe he has a cut down version of it for the right.
	Well then the other question is why would he, when time is of the essence, why would he break it down, stick it in a bag, and then run into the woods and reassemble it and leave it there for them.
	That was the first thing to me.
	You know, besides the where's the stick thing is like, why would he do that?
	You know it just didn't make any sense.
	What do you think, Flanis?
	Yeah, I really uh don't know yet.
	Well, that is a question, Mark.
	It certainly is.
	Cash Patel has confirmed, though, that there is DNA evidence matching the alleged Kirk assassin, but he doesn't reveal any details.
	Trust me.
	I've got all the information on my desk.
	Yeah.
	Uh DNA evidence matching the Charlie Kirk's suspected killer, he says.
	And uh he says they got DNA hits from the towel that was wrapped around the firearm and DNA on the screwdriver, positive positively processed for the suspect in custody.
	He also referred to reports of alleged note left behind by Robinson saying that the suspect wrote that he had the opportunity to take out Kirk and wrote, I'm going to take it.
	That message was written before the September 10th shooting, he added.
	Patel said that it was both a note and a text message exchange, adding that it was destroyed, but that the investigators recovered it.
	Other evidence in the case, Patel said was shocking.
	Uh, but again, you you'll see it all later.
	It's all still on his desk, right?
	Uh friends have confirmed that there was kind of that deep dark internet and Reddit culture.
	And these other dark places on the internet where this person was going deep, said the governor.
	Uh, they want to make it 100% about the internet.
	They want to make it 100% about censoring speech, about registering this what's going to be coming out of this, folks.
	I'll tell you right now, because they've already started working on it.
	But this is going to allow them to move the ball down the road uh down the field really really quickly.
	They want to have all anonymity and privacy on the internet destroyed.
	That's where this is headed first and foremost.
	We've got to know everybody who is on the internet.
	And if it is um if there's any website that has anonymity, and this goes back to Ross Albrick and um uh that site there, Silk Road, what's really they were concerned about.
	They don't want anybody to have any the dark web.
	It's not dark because people are doing anything on it that's any more evil than they're doing anywhere else, as uh uh Goat Tree has pointed out many times.
	It's just dark to them mostly.
	It's harder for them to see what is going on than on the regular web.
	And so they want to shut that down.
	They want to demonize and criminalize that, and that's what they will do, and they'll require ID in order to use the internet for everyone because this is always an effort, you know, never let anything go, whether this is real or faked or uh a false flag, the end result will still be the same.
	They will use it to advance the police surveillance state.
	Yeah, because of course this guy got radicalized on the dark corners of the internet.
	That's where he learned, you know, uh all the LGBT stuff and uh to hate uh conservatives and all that.
	Not the schools the dark corners of the internet.
	Yeah.
	If it weren't for the dark corners of the internet, there would be a lot more Marxists like this guy that just get the official story from the propaganda mouthpieces and mainstream media and the heavy indoctrination from the schools.
	It is the quote unquote dark corners of the internet where shows like ours get relegated to once they've been banned off of YouTube.
	That is the only voice of reason keeping America sane.
	That's right.
	That's what uh that's what they want to get rid of.
	They want to control all speech.
	They want to know everything that you're doing.
	As a matter of fact, uh the now uh infamous t-shirt that he was seen uh wearing, which by the way, apparently you know, he also didn't just break down and reassemble the the uh rifle, but he also changed clothes.
	No video of of any of the stuff happening.
	But anyway, somebody who bought a t-shirt in Georgia was called by the police for having bought that t-shirt.
	And uh he had shown a picture of it on Discord, and he goes, So, you know, that was pretty quick, happened right away.
	Um, so uh his roommate was a romantic partner, a male transitioning to a female, said Governor Cox.
	I can say that he has been incredibly cooperative, he said.
	Robinson was moved to a special watch area in the jail.
	You know, just like Jeffrey Epstein.
	Um this is uh uh this is just amazing that we keep seeing the same movie over and over again.
	Uh with Kirk's death, RFK Jr. said, it's our job to win this battle for our country.
	Yeah, they're gonna go to war against free speech, against privacy, against the internet, but you can bet that they're not gonna pull back the teachers who are grooming these young children and telling them, don't tell your parents.
	And you better bet that the leftist states are not going to back off telling the uh teachers that they have to lie to parents about what they're doing to these kids in school.
	So Dan Bon Gino then enters and says on Monday that the investigation is probing whether Charlie Kirk's alleged assassin acted alone or as part of a blod broader plot.
	Uh suspect has been taken over by ideology leading up to these shootings, he said.
	So this is this is the script that they've now decided on.
	You see it echoed everywhere.
	And we just had a Texas Tech student who was evidently expelled.
	Texas Tech won't say that uh she was expelled, but uh they say she's no longer a student at the university.
	Uh when asked directly about uh whether or not she was expelled, they won't say it.
	And it was a really hateful statement that she was doing.
	She was out there taunting the people at a memorial service for Charlie Kirk, uh jumping up and down and saying your homie is dead.
	And uh one guy who was filming himself, filming her, said uh this is evil is real, and this is what it looks like.
	And so she comes over to him, and the two of them are calling each other hateful.
	Yeah, you're hateful.
	No, you're hateful, no, you're hateful.
	You're fired, no, you're fired.
	You're canceled.
	Fuck your homie dead!
	Fuck your homie dead!
	He got that internet!
	Sorry for the language.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, buddy, hold me, Dad.
	Ugh, evil is real, people, and it kind of looks like that.
	Yeah, evil.
	Evil.
	Murder is bad.
	She is evil.
	I'm not settled.
	Why are you being so happy?
	Why are you so hateful?
	Yeah.
	You're hateful.
	No, you're hateful.
	On the upside, she probably didn't deserve to be in college anymore.
	Just leave it alone.
	Please don't come after me.
	I want to be left alone.
	I'm not emotional, ma'am.
	Don't tell me what I am and what I'm not.
	You can get out of my face because I could tell you what you are, but you won't like it.
	I'm being aggressive.
	I'm not being aggressive.
	My voice is very calm.
	You're calling me aggressive because I'm a black woman.
	You are why not?
	I'm very 'cause you're racist, right?
	So you're hateful, you're racist.
	We see this all the time.
	Well, the uh campus police uh arrested her, took her away.
	They charged her with simple assault, which is a class C misdemeanor, and released her.
	And uh the school has now released her as well.
	What were you gonna say, Lance?
	It's just always the I mean it's an old tactic of the same things that you're guilty of, you accuse your opponents of, but yeah, just the blind hate from these people that accuse you of being hateful is just shocking.
	Like the genuine double think of her saying jumping around laughing your homie is dead and then calling him hateful.
	They uh whole it is genuinely ridiculous.
	It is idiotic.
	Uh and I the left is doing that all the time, like, oh no, well, the right is more violent.
	Like, obviously not.
	I mean, they get the whole the right is violent because they go with the FBI statistics where they will continually pull in things like the Oklahoma City bombing, Waco, Ruby Ridge, and they'll count those as acts of terrorism, despite the fact that they're involved.
	The FBI was the one that was committing terror, and if you had just left people, you know, left the branch dividians or the family at Ruby Ridge alone, none of that would have happened.
	So that's how they continually end up.
	Well, what the right is more violent by the statistics.
	Like, well, when you look at the made-up statistics, but when you actually look at the shootings and things that have taken place and when you account for who's actually expressed ideology, it's the left.
	It's the left over and over again.
	Yeah, I saw a uh meme that was talking about that, like, oh yeah, like the right isn't the thing that held up was the uh Gretchen Whitmer nonsense where the FBI had a whole bunch of informants and one mentally handicapped person that they uh orchestrated this thing around.
	Yeah.
	That is really crazy, isn't it?
	Well, yeah, and uh it's it's kind of interesting because I saw this when I was in college to some degree all the left and their uh their unhinged uh actions and riots, you know, they were they were pushing against uh the Vietnam War, at least they had a cause.
	These people I they just hate our society and want to burn it down, and we'll see that in a moment here.
	Uh it appears from the data that we've accumulated that this ideology had infected him and taken over, says Bangino.
	He was intent on making Charlie his target.
	People may have known in advance.
	So there you go.
	I I say it was it's like the invasion of the body snatchers, right?
	I say that it was a body snatcher schools.
	That's why we probably should call these places where they groom kids to tell them that they're the wrong body and they should mutilate their body.
	I think we should call them body snatcher schools.
	Um it really is a psyop operation.
	And uh it is true that as a man thinks, so does he act.
	And so it is key.
	They understand that.
	That's why they're doing this, as a matter of fact.
	Uh speaking of the people who groups that are out there who really are uh pushing for violence and for revolution, just the news, uh John Solomon's organization reports excuse me, on this group that calls themselves armed queers.
	Uh they train radical Marxists to shoot, and uh they were there in Utah, just a few miles away from the campus where Charlie Kirk was murdered.
	Why would they locate close to a university?
	That might be because it's so easy.
	One may not recruit uh queers and transgenders, right?
	I don't know.
	It's almost like these kids come in from high school and just get absolutely one-shot by college-level propaganda.
	Yes.
	They're just completely and utterly incapable of defending themselves from it, and it just destroys them.
	At this time, no evidence links the group to Tyler, he points out, but it is a self-described armed revolutionary group, openly aligned with Cuba, that's risen on the streets of one of America's most conservative states.
	Look, let's go, how could this happen in Utah?
	Um, there's no such thing as conservative universities.
	Get get over that.
	If you got if you go go to Indiana, which is mostly Republican, guess what is there in Indiana?
	Well, that was where the um the McKinsey.
	Uh no, the Kinsey Report, uh, those people, they have uh An organization there that has pushed the boundaries of bizarre crazy sex right there in Republican conservative Indiana.
	So anything can happen in these universities.
	As a matter of fact, um I was kind of surprised to uh see that that was uh the place where Kinsey worked.
	Uh I came across that when I was looking at internet censorship back in 2018.
	There was a group called Oh So Me, uh observers of social media, and they were focused on social media at the time.
	And uh they were behind the uh banning of info wars and uh other groups.
	Uh there was about 800 different groups that got banned two months after we did.
	And they were putting out lists and giving them to the Democrats and telling them, you know, ban these people, push this list to the people and these uh corporations that are worried that you might regulate them and get them to do it voluntarily.
	And uh so uh it was interesting when I started looking into it.
	The guy that was running that censorship campaign there at Indiana University was originally brought over from Italy in order to run the Kinsey Institute that was there, right?
	This uh crazy sexual institute that was involved in pedophilia and every kind of perversion that you can imagine.
	And uh they brought him over first for that, and then they repurposed him for internet censorship.
	It's all connected, it really is.
	Armed Queers, SLC, has a Facebook page, doesn't directly appear to encourage the use of firearms and the claimed mission, but many of the images used depict firearms.
	This spring, its members traveled to Cuba for a meeting to celebrate the May Day holiday of communists, and to participate in a march and events alongside revolutionaries from around the world.
	The group posted photos on its public Instagram account, which was deleted on Friday, posted photos of its young students attending and its leaders openly discussing how communist regime agenda and this American group's agenda were aligned in a YouTube video after the visit to Havana.
	Uh two leaders of armed queers discussed their trip to Cuba in a since deleted May video entitled Um Cuba Report Back, our Time as 2025 May Day Brig Brigadistas.
	And uh so they said we definitely felt the pressure from them to bring the revolution back to America, saying that she was essentially told in Cuba that, okay, y'all are here, y'all are learning the information.
	You're learning how we made our revolution.
	But now it's time for you to go home and make your own revolution.
	Yeah, go back to your school because it's the words going to run out.
	Look, this is what we saw from Bill Ayers.
	Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground and Bernadine Dorn, they went around there, you know, setting off bombs.
	Uh they killed some people with their bombs.
	And um, as they were facing trial or whatever, they uh had connections within the establishment and they got off.
	Uh, what did he do with his freedom?
	Well, uh he decided that he would stop bombing buildings and he would start bombing students' mines.
	So after that he went into education.
	That's how he got connected to Barack Obama in Chicago.
	Uh they moved from that, and of course, he wanted openly decided that he wanted to have a revolution, but that he couldn't do it by that the communists had failed over and over again by trying to play the class envy warfare, class warfare card.
	It worked in Europe, but didn't work in America.
	So he said, so what we're gonna do in America, we're going to use the race card.
	And that's exactly what they did.
	He popularized Bill Ayers did, the idea of white privilege.
	It was originally called by some came up, someone else came up with it, called it white skin privilege.
	He just changed it to white privilege, and um, because he's a good marketer and he's a very effective speaker.
	Uh but anyway, this whole uh report is very long, talks about all the different things that they're doing and all the events that they've had uh with a Marxist in Cuba, and also holding events with a group called Stonewall Self-Defense.
	And again, this is also a reference to LGBT, the Stonewall.
	Stonewall riots.
	Yeah.
	Uh they held a training event with a convicted felon, Eric King.
	Now, Eric King was charged in 2014 with attempting to firebom a congressional office in Kansas City.
	He used a hammer to break a window, then he threw a Molotov cocktail into the office of Representative Emmanuel Cleaver II.
	Uh King pleaded guilty in 2016 to using explosive materials to commit arson and was sentenced to a decade in prison.
	he was released from prison in twenty twenty three a unicorn riot photographed king leaving prison in twenty twenty three wearing a shirt that said protect trans rights Had a graphic with a large knife on it.
	Well, behind bars, he wrote a book titled Anti-Faw in Prison.
	King also helped put together and edit the book Rattling the Cages, The Oral Histories of North American Political Prisoners, with a foreword that was written by Angela Davis, herself alleged but acquitted of murder, a revolutionary, uh, and a former vice presidential candidate for the Communist Party USA.
	King describes himself as an activist and as anti-fascist.
	So they have also coordinated with the Chicano student movement of Aslan.
	Uh and this is not Nordia.
	This is the uh Chicano map of most of uh the Southwest United States rightfully belonging to Mexico.
	Sorry, you guys lost it.
	It was conquered.
	You're not getting it back.
	That's just how it is.
	I'm sorry you guys don't feel that that was just, but that's how the world worked back then, and that's how everyone did it.
	You guys lost.
	End of story.
	That's just how it is.
	This is an this is the end result of multiculturalism played out.
	Your country fractures at the seams.
	Every single person thinks it's a zero-sum game and they have to get what's theirs, and they will take it from you.
	Well, I mean, you look at what was happening at the time.
	Santa Ana was one of the worst of the tyrants.
	You know, he made uh an example of public execution of everybody, a very public execution of anybody that rebelled against him, and he was a very harsh dictator.
	And there were nine different regions of Mexico that declared their independence when he became the leader.
	The only one that was able to successfully do that, and they did it by force, was Texas.
	And there were a lot of Hispanics as well as people from European uh uh former colonies that were involved in that.
	So Charlie Kirk's widow uh talks about how his mission will go on.
	Meanwhile, Ilhan Omar shares a video calling Charlie Kirk a terrorist.
	Again, it's just like this video that we just saw.
	Two people come up and they're screaming at each other that they're both hateful.
	Uh and you can decide as we looked at that video.
	I think one person was hateful, another one was not.
	But um this label that they're talking about when they talk about how they are going to punish hate speech in the Trump administration, and we got Pam Bondi doing that as well.
	As I said yesterday, there is no such thing as hate speech.
	There are people who hate speech who are in political power, and they use that label.
	Uh, but uh censorship is actually hate.
	Uh censorship is done by people who hate speech.
	And I would say that censorship is leads to violence.
	It leads to government violence.
	And of course, they claim that they have monopoly on that.
	Uh so everyone is going to be considered a terrorist by one side or the other.
	Yes.
	And let's not forget that half the time uh the person in the white house is someone that would agree with the uh insane, hateful woman that was cheering your homie is dead.
	The other one is hateful for calling her out on it.
	That's right.
	That's why I uh you said yesterday, you know, you want to talk about 4D chess and thinking about uh the long-term stuff.
	These people can't even think four years away when somebody else gets the reins or a different party gets the reins.
	Uh you will be the terrorist at that point.
	They've already done that.
	They've already thrown those labels at everybody.
	They've also they've always they've always said whether they're justified or not, they'll call you hateful, they'll call you a terrorist, they'll call you a racist, all of these things.
	There's also the fact that if they were serious about deportation and getting rid of people that are problematic, Ilhan Omar lied on her immigration forms.
	Yeah.
	There's precedent.
	You could strip her of citizenship And deport her immediately.
	That's right.
	That would be legal.
	That's under law something you can do.
	You could get rid of this anti-American and get her out of the country.
	It would be simple.
	But they're not going to do it, are they?
	So get rid of her.
	Under law.
	Do it legally.
	Get rid of Ilan Omar, deport her.
	No, you don't understand.
	They need to arrest her with troops instead of police.
	Then they'd be able to enforce the laws that they are already able to enforce but choose not to.
	Yes, just enforce the laws that are already on the books and send her packing.
	Amazing thing.
	She said she accused Charlie Kirk of being a quote stochastic terrorist.
	I thought, what in the world is that?
	Stochastic terrorism, yeah.
	I know what stochastic means, right?
	It's random uh distribution of um probability, whatever, and it's like, how in the world does that apply as an adjective to terrorists?
	It doesn't.
	Okay.
	This is just pseudo intellectualism.
	It makes her sound like she's smart or something, because that's her audience is a bunch of college kids.
	Erica Kirk said trying to think of what she possibly could have meant, uh maybe she just doesn't understand what stochastic means.
	Uh or it could be that uh she's trying to imply that uh you know, with his rhetoric and uh hate inducing words that eventually statistically some of them are going to hit someone that's going to do some terrorist thing as though uh the left uh doesn't count when you know they do terrorist stuff,
	but if uh anyone on the right and it would include people that are set up like you know, they want to point to the ill hunt uh the Gretchen Whitmer thing of uh you know the setup from the s FBI, uh whenever any of that happens, that's you know, because of people like Charlie Kirk, according to them.
	Yeah, that that could be it.
	You're right, Lance, maybe that is it, but I think it'd be incumbent on her to uh explain to us uh exactly how many standard deviations from the mean you have to get before you become a stochastic terrorist.
	Um this is just the most absurd thing.
	And again, it is the kind of pseudo intellectualism that you would see from these lefties who've had a course or two in college.
	Uh Erica Kirk said they killed Charlie because he preached the message of patriotism, faith, and of God's merciful love.
	But they should all know this.
	If you thought my husband's mission was powerful before, you have no idea.
	You have no idea what you've unleashed across the entire country and this world.
	And you know, I have to say that um, you know, it's it's really incumbent on these people who are friends of Charlie Kirk and family.
	I think they should honor his legacy because his legacy of free speech and debate is an environment in which Christianity thrives.
	Christianity thrives in that kind of an environment because the truth can stand scrutiny.
	It's the people who are lying to you who have to censor people.
	And I think that's one of the reasons why the founders of this country made that the first amendment.
	It is of primary importance.
	I really think that the first amendment is more important than the second amendment, because as a man thinks, so to see act.
	Uh the guns are not going to be used in a dangerous way unless somebody has been turned into a dangerous individual.
	So the First Amendment is primary, and it is uh about supporting free speech, free debate, and you're not going to have the free exercise of religion if you don't have those things there either.
	That's what the Christians need to understand.
	There are, as I pointed out yesterday, in the UK and Australia, there are people who are just itching to come after Christians and they're doing it all the time.
	They're arresting Christians for being street preachers in the UK.
	And uh as I've said many times, we used to go to Speaker's Corner when we went, Karen and I were there in 1980 and again 84, and then we took the kids there in 2001.
	Always wanted to go to Speaker's Corner, and uh when we went in the early eighties, we would see the police would be there to protect anybody who was saying something that other people would get offended at, right?
	Uh, and it's typically gonna be religion or politics.
	But um, you know, people just take a soapbox, literally, and stand on top of it and give their opinions about religion or politics.
	And you would get people who would argue with them.
	And uh, but then when we went back in 2001, there was a large group Of Muslim young men, and they were getting very agitated, agitated, and they didn't really have anything to say.
	They were going to resort to violence, I believe.
	And so I started uh as we were watching to see what was going to happen.
	We had started having all these bobbies show up, and they're talking into their intercomps.
	They got on the lapels and stuff, and more and more of them are coming.
	I said, I think uh they're worried about what's going to happen here as well.
	Let's move on.
	And uh, but now that was 2001.
	Uh now, 20 years later, the police arrest the speaker.
	That's the issue.
	And uh so seeing this from the Well, just so long as he's a white European Christian.
	Yeah, that's right.
	That's right.
	Yeah, as a Muslim, they would not do that.
	According to Kirk supporters, uh, I'm sorry, this is uh Ilhan Omar.
	She accused Kirk supporters of having a Christo fascist agenda.
	Because she's going to subsidize people have talked about Islamo fascists, right?
	They tried to make a distinction and say, well, Islam is a religious uh religion of peace, but uh there's some people who were fascist about this.
	It's like, no, that's actually what the religion is really about.
	And so to try to make that distinction, people create this term called Islamo fascist.
	They're not real Islam, they're not the real religion of peace, they're Islamo fascist.
	So then she comes out and she creates this term called Christo Fascist.
	It sure is funny, then it seems like no one understood Islam for you know hundreds, thousands of years, right up until you guys showed up about what, 10, 15 years ago.
	Yeah.
	Huh.
	Funny.
	Well, I talk about AOC all the time, that other uh member of the squad.
	I call her uh Alexandria occasional cortex.
	I don't think Ilhan Omar has a cortex that even fires occasionally with this stuff.
	It's truly amazing how dumb the people that get into Congress are.
	That's right.
	It's uh it shows that it's not what you know, it is who you know and how much money they're willing to spend on you.
	These people are bought and paid for, and they would not get where they are based on their own merit.
	Look like you said, Ilhan Omar, AOC, and that other Rashida Talib, three of the dumbest people to have ever lived, and they wield power.
	Yeah, it is every time I think about them, it is so depressing.
	Oh no.
	Yeah, that's right.
	The problem is that uh, you know, she wants to label her opponents as terrorists, people who need to be banned or killed, and now the right is taking that tactic.
	And uh that that's really the concerning thing to me.
	Uh, they're not taking the high ground, they're not taking the constitution or the first amendment.
	And uh reason says, uh, no, it was not ironic that the second amendment advocate Charlie Kirk was shot.
	He says, all liberty involves trade-offs, says the writer uh at uh Reason.
	And I would just say I don't really think that's the right argument that we need to be making here.
	I think the argument that we need to make is that uh nothing has changed since the time of the founders, since the time that I was young, uh, but just in the last couple of decades, we started to see about the last 30 years or so, we started to see these mass shootings taking off at schools and other things like that.
	Uh what has changed?
	It's not the weapons, right?
	We had deadly weapons forever in America, and I would say that they you could argue that they were more ubiquitous than they are now, uh especially in schools they were.
	But um with now with the police state and the lockdowns in schools and the metal detectors and all the rest of this stuff, that has done nothing because if it's in somebody's heart, you can't do anything about it.
	So, what has changed?
	The people have changed, their hearts have changed.
	That's what we need to tell people.
	And that's the real issue.
	The issue isn't that well, it's acceptable, we're gonna have to live with a certain amount of bloodshed.
	And that was uh the argument that Charlie Kirk made.
	That's the argument this person, uh reason is making as well.
	Yeah, uh there was the uh video that the left is putting everywhere of uh Charlie Kirk uh saying that some deaths are acceptable in order to have a second amendment.
	Thing is, uh that's really one of those uh how long have you been beating your wife kind of questions, like uh how many deaths are acceptable.
	It's uh you could turn that around on them, how many deaths are acceptable before you uh stop supporting gun control?
	Because you look at any city when they institute gun control, the m stricter the gun control is, the more crime uh happens.
	As gun control lessens, the crime goes down.
	You can see that over and over again in every city.
	And then you look at uh like Britain, where they have extremely strict gun control, and yet the crime is spiking out of control, and it's absolutely nothing to do with the gun control.
	It's another issue entirely.
	No, they operate on a perspective of well, while there are guns, there will technically be gun crime.
	So if we were to eliminate all guns, gun crime would disappear.
	Because without guns you cannot have gun crime.
	It's like, well, yes, in the same sense that you can't be the victim of a home invasion if you're homeless.
	That's right.
	If the if you own a home, you can be the victim of a home invasion.
	It's a knife crime, though.
	Right?
	Well, let's ban all the knives, okay?
	It's just they focus heavily on guns because oh, they're scary.
	They look scary, they're loud, they're scary.
	And see, that's the point.
	When people push back against that, we need to make the argument that uh it's not the gun, it's not the second amendment that uh uh says that we have a uh recognizes our God given right to self-defense.
	The issue is the population.
	What is it that's changing the population?
	Nobody wants to talk about that, except to say now it's the internet, so we've got to control the internet.
	We need internet control.
	Yeah, the first murder was you know, Cain and Abel, and they didn't have guns.
	It was long, long before then.
	Human nature has been the same for millennia.
	And it's not it's not to do with the weapon.
	If it's in their heart, they will find a way to do it, whether it's stabbing someone or just getting a rock and beating them over the head with it.
	It's in the heart.
	A spate of malicious chuckling over the nature of the crime.
	Uh Charlie Kirk, you see, with Shaw with the rifle, and he'd once called shooting deaths like a the price of keeping the Second Amendment.
	And I disagree with that.
	I disagree with that.
	The Second Amendment doesn't change people.
	What is the institution that changes people?
	Let's focus on that.
	Uh he says, except that's not exactly what Kirk said.
	I had a lot of disagreements with Kirky rights, but this wasn't one of them.
	His comment about the Second Amendment and death was part of a larger discussion about the dangers inherent in liberty.
	And so in that discussion, then he uses another argument that I think we should not use, which is, well, more people die with cars.
	Because then immediately they say, Yeah, let's get rid of the cars as well.
	Because these people hate any form of liberty, including mobility.
	So he said, uh having an armed citizenry comes with a price.
	That's part of liberty.
	Driving comes with a price, 50,000.
	50,000, 50,000 people die on the road each year.
	Mentioned that three times.
	That's a price.
	You get rid of driving, you'd have 50,000 less auto fatalities.
	But we have decided that the benefit of driving, the speed, the accessibility, the mobility, having products, services, is worth the cost of 50,000 people dying on the road.
	That's a really bad argument.
	Uh we have not made that determination.
	Uh, but we have made the determination that uh, you know, look, people can die any number of ways.
	And uh, you know, if you're gonna have a completely safe society, you're gonna put people in a padded cell and lock the door.
	Uh we don't want that.
	Jefferson was the one who really understood it.
	He said, I prefer the tumult of liberty to the quietness of servitude.
	I think that especially applies to the speech, don't you?
	I mean, you know, you can have people that are yelling and screaming at each other.
	They can even be saying hateful things to each other.
	I prefer that to quiet servitude, where we are not allowed to say things or we get cancelled, which is what the conservatives and the Trump administration and many other places are demanding that we do right now.
	Kurt might have mentioned that free speech is also dangerous, he says.
	Unfettered speech is important to the function of a free and open society.
	But protecting speech risks the popularization of vicious totalitarian ideas like those of Karl Marx and Adolf Hitler.
	It runs a danger of radicalization of lost souls who encounter bad ideas and embrace them.
	Uh any freedom that allows us to live to our fullest, any restriction on state intervention into our lives can be abused by the worst among us.
	As I said yesterday, if you got a real free speech platform, you're going to have people on that platform who say really hateful, disgusting things.
	Because they can, because they're not allowed to say them other places.
	So it's going to become a magnet for those type of people.
	What do we do about that?
	Well, historically the government has said, well, we want to shut down gab or fill in the blank, you know, whatever the uh platform is.
	Because we hate speech and we hate debate and we hate liberty.
	So uh now they have a license they believe to censor people.
	Yeah, I'm reminded of the uh I'm thinking of a stochastic terrorist thing that we're just talking about, and I'm not one hundred percent certain that's what she was saying when she said uh that Kirk is a statistic is a you're making the assumption she knows what she's talking about.
	If that is the case, though, does that make her a stochastic assassin for Kirk's death?
	I mean uh Kirk is responsible for people that uh do things that uh she thinks should be penned on him, even if it's set up by the FBI.
	Uh does that mean that she's responsible for everything that the left does?
	Yeah.
	Is she uh she may not be a she may not be a stochastic Marxist, but she is a deliberate Marxist.
	She is targeted for that.
	Um he also says that the call for gun control gets even dumber if you stop and think about the uh the weapon that they uh allege was used in this, the Mauser model ninety eight thirty aught six caliber bolt action rifle, designed back in the nineteenth century for the military.
	That's right, because uh uh they would um military weapons are really uh what the second amendment is about.
	Uh largely supplanted in that role by the semi-automatic and then by the select fire weapons.
	But he said, but the old design remains ideal for hunting large game animals.
	If uh it is accurate if properly zeroed, has a longer effective range than many modern military weapons, and cartridges, such as the 306 are likely to cleanly drop an animal with a single shot.
	That's why many of the old rifles were adapted, sometimes with modifications for hunting.
	So that's what this is.
	Now consider the fact that um the alleged hunting rifle used to murder Charlie Kirk is the only type of fire that they don't want to control.
	And of course, you know, when we look at the spate of assassination killings with a JFK, RFK, MLK, and so forth, uh in the 60s, and they came out with the gun control act.
	And uh these are people that they said over and over again, except for RFK Jr., they said that uh JFK and MLK were killed with rifles.
	So what they do?
	They banned handguns.
	Um these people just want to take away your right to self-defense.
	And uh as Charlie Kirk said rightfully so, Second Amendment is not about hunting.
	Uh it is um not even really about self-defense against the criminal.
	It's about uh defense against the government.
	It's about mutual assured destruction.
	It is about having the citizenry having a deterrent to a uh a government that wants to attack them.
	So um no major law advocated in recent years, such as magazine capacity limits or bans on semi automatic weapons would have had anything to do with uh this particular rifle that they claim was used against Charlie Kirk.
	Some observers are upset that the left, the radical fringe of the left anyway, is blamed for Kirk's murder when Tyler Robinson's family is conservative, Mormon, culturally traditional, and comfortable with firearms.
	But the Robinson family didn't shoot Charlie Kirk.
	Tyler Robinson allegedly committed this crime.
	I mean, maybe even he didn't do it, who knows.
	Um, after he adapted views very different from those of his family.
	Uh, if we're going to d delve into culture wars, we could mention the unfortunate use of speech, however, and social media cesspool.
	So even reason is now making the argument that we gotta make this about the internet, about social media, and of course you know what's going to come out of this.
	How are you gonna control what people say?
	You're going to end anonymity.
	We've seen Jordan Peterson pushing that.
	There are many, many, many people on the right who want to end privacy and anonymity on the internet, and that is an incredibly dangerous, dangerous idea.
	Travis comments.
	We have many comments.
	Many, many comments.
	Chevkin, I like Chefkins.
	An executive order for football, how appropriate.
	What won't we?
	Executive order next.
	Yeah.
	We've got Mark E Mark in New Jersey.
	Thank you very much for the tip, Marky Mark.
	Says what's scary is that Rashida Talib graduated law school.
	Well, uh I have my doubts that I have my doubts that she earned it.
	I have my doubts that she earned her way there, and I have my doubts that she earned her degree.
	Yeah, they they graduate people who can't read their diploma.
	Yeah.
	That's the reality, at least in K thu twelve, probably in colleges as well.
	Yeah, I don't think Rashida Taleb could argue her way out of a paper bag.
	So no, I have no respect for her intellect and I have no respect for her as a person.
	Skunk Hollow Rose Gardens.
	If you never did anything in life, there's always pro sports.
	Well, I guess if you have a president, uh there's still pro sports.
	I I think that there is uh that that's a lot of hard work.
	It's a lot of hard work, and there's certain kind of talent and intellect that's I think maybe they were talking about uh you know, if you never did anything for yourself, you can sit around and watch pro sports maybe.
	That's right.
	But yeah, yeah, if you're not gonna be able to do it or if people play it, work pretty hard, but the people who sat there and carp about it, not so much.
	Yeah, yeah, that's what I was saying.
	Or if you're the president, you've got nothing better to do.
	You may as well just watch pro sports.
	Yeah, yeah.
	You've got all your decisions made for you, they're coming in.
	Chev Ken, overpaid, grown men chasing a ball.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, and stadium uh that is uh paid for by paid for by taxpayers.
	You've got a billionaire owns the team, and you got multimillionaires who are playing the game, and we get the bill.
	How appropriate.
	That's just every time I hear a professional athlete complaining about something, just you make more money than most people will in a lifetime to play a game.
	Yeah.
	To play a game.
	Make that every year, yeah.
	What's that, Lance?
	I really wonder uh you look at how much money they get in subsidies these uh NFL or whatever, and uh how much they're paying the players, like are our taxes directly paying their salaries?
	I mean, it's indirect, certainly a portion of it.
	Uh I imagine it's probably pretty close.
	I mean, if these uh billionaires had to finance the stadiums themselves, they definitely have to cut costs somewhere.
	It truly is astronomical.
	Over a decade ago, I did a report on it, and at that point in time, you know, they were around a half a billion dollars or over a billion dollars now for these stadiums.
	And uh the team uh once once the people in an area get so attached to a team, the team owner says, Well, build us a new stadium, or we're gonna take the team to another town.
	And so then, all right, all right, we'll do it.
	I I also don't understand how people can actually get attached to teams because the players, they're not from the area, they're traded from somewhere else.
	They didn't grow up in, you know what uh uh Seattle Seahawks.
	That's the only team I can bring to mind at the time.
	The players from the Seattle Seahawks, how many of them are actually from Seattle?
	I would be curious.
	I would I would be shocked if it was a majority of them.
	Yeah, these people just get traded around.
	Even from Washington State.
	Yeah.
	They get traded around, they have no loyalty, and you're gonna sit there because oh yeah, this is Seattle's team.
	No, it's not.
	It's a coalition of extremely well paid men that throw a ball around.
	Nadlander.
	Yeah, uh, there's another comment that I was gonna make this comment about, but it's just what you're saying.
	Uh I'm reminded of the uh comment uh the comedy from uh Seinfeld where he's talking about exactly that.
	It's like with all the trading, uh, it doesn't really make sense to have any loyalty to these people because the players are all different.
	So really your loyalty is to the cloth.
	Uh you're cheering for that uniform, whoever's wearing it, has yeah, and you really hope that that uniform's gonna beat the other uniform.
	That's right.
	And and you can buy that uniform too.
	Uh you get a jersey, it's very, very, very expensive.
	Oh man, uh you like this player?
	Put his name on this.
	It's just what the billionaires want branding as uh you know, an identity.
	Yeah.
	They're they're cheering the brand.
	Nadlander.
	The players are just employees always searching for more pay or a new team, exactly what we were just talking about.
	Cletus five, five, five, those thirty-year-olds who took the Pfizer shot should be living every day like it's their last since they're either dropping dead from the shot or ending up with turbo cancer.
	And that's the thing, yeah.
	Where is the sympathy for the people that that Trump did that too?
	I mean he funded that just like we're talking about the funding of these of these uh sports events.
	So that that he funded something to kill people and he cheered it, and he continued to cheer it.
	And uh so now there is a little bit of a pushback against it.
	We'll see just how far that's able to go.
	Trump has always tried to push back against RFK Jr., even though RFK Jr. hasn't really done much.
	Yeah.
	Assyrian girl, the schools have the kids eight hours a day, the time of their lives and they're most vulnerable to any ideas being pushed down at them from people in authority.
	That's right.
	It's amazing to me that nobody wants to look at that as uh something that needs to be uh considered.
	The brainwashing, the body snatcher schools.
	It's coming from the top from the authority of the school teacher and or around them from their peers.
	You've seen people all different political stripes say, you know, to paraphrase it, give me a child the first few years of their life and their mind forever.
	Uh God has told us, right?
	Train up a child and the way they should go, and when they were old, they will not depart from it.
	Uh that means that you don't hand them over to the government.
	It's just that simple.
	And it's no longer just the first few years.
	They get them into their twenties at this point.
	That's right.
	They're giving them two decades of indoctrination.
	That's right.
	And if you think you can compete with that, uh, you probably can't.
	You know, there's extenuating circumstances with things like the gospel.
	The gospel works miracles because it is divine.
	It's important to remember that no political ideology is divine.
	That's why they're gonna come after Christians.
	They always do.
	And they're already, you know, sharpening their knives in places like the UK and Australia.
	You pray silently, they're gonna put you in jail.
	The gospel can reach anyone, any time, anywhere, through any amount of brainwashing.
	Political ideologies can't.
	So remember that the gospel is always more important and it's always more effective.
	So if you have the opportunity to talk to someone about the gospel or politics, always pick the gospel.
	That's right.
	Chev Ken.
	Uh imagine what happens when the next Democrat wins.
	Yeah.
	All this power, and it'll be consolidated.
	Niburu, 2029, eviscerating the first amendment, one event after the other.
	Flying axe blade.
	Ooh, that sounds dangerous.
	Digital ID to buy speech.
	Yeah.
	Digital ID to buy guns on five-year plans to purchase ammo.
	That's right.
	Well, you can finance a box of 22 long, my friend.
	Boy howdy.
	Yeah.
	It'll just cost you an arm and a leg.
	Yeah.
	Chev Ken, two men were giving hand signals prior to the shooting.
	I've seen people saying that.
	Uh it's hard for me to say.
	I saw from another angle that these guys are doing that, and there's a guy that's a little bit further away who has his arms up like this and then puts them down, right?
	As Charlie is shot.
	And uh, so I don't know.
	I mean, I haven't looked at that any any more carefully.
	There's also this interesting.
	It is interesting.
	I know I keep urging caution.
	I don't want to be a negative name.
	I don't want to stop you guys from speculating on things or having your own opinions.
	I just always urge caution this kinds of things.
	It's possible these are you know, Charlie Kirk security team members and they're you know, signaling to other people.
	Yeah, I would like to hear an explanation for that though, and I'd like to be able to I I didn't look deeply into that picture to see if that's really the way they're characterizing it, but certainly did on first glance look that way.
	So uh I'm also curious as to, you know, lots of people have you know in-ear ways of communicating.
	If you're trying to communicate with someone, you don't necessarily need to use hand signals anymore.
	You can do it very quietly and very discreetly with a microphone uh in your ear.
	So just curious.
	Niburu 2029, the alleged shooter hasn't confessed yet.
	Signed Z Paper.
	To be fair, uh once you get caught for a crime, you know, something like murder, chances are you don't want to confess.
	Like this is one of the ones that you're probably gonna want to do.
	He doesn't have any he doesn't have any incentive to confess because the governor's already said and Trump is a good thing.
	Death penalty penalty.
	So you know, where's the uh where's the bargain on that?
	Yeah.
	We'll make it quick.
	Shield your eyes.
	We all knew we all know Kirk was not shot with 30 odd six, it would have blew him away.
	Uh 30 odd six is a large caliber.
	It is a large caliber.
	So that is an interesting thing to think about.
	Uh there's always blood that came out truly was amazing.
	But um Yeah.
	I don't know.
	I've also seen people saying he was wearing a low profile bulletproof vest on his chest and the bullet hit that and Ricochet up into his neck, which is possibly why it didn't, you know, just shred it entirely, but these are all speculations, things.
	And again, that's something that we don't really know about because we don't hunt.
	I mean, you know, if you're a hunter and you shot an animal with 30 aught six, you know, you could speak to that better than we could.
	I'm also uh not aware of how well you know, a bulletproof vest stops 30 aught six.
	There are some of these rifle calibers where a bulletproof vest is kind of more of a suggestion than you know.
	I handy.
	And it had a scope on it, allegedly.
	That's not fitting in a pair of skinny jeans.
	Citizen of Americaca.
	Now I think they're saying it's a 700 Remington.
	They really can't make up their mind, and Cash Patel said that all of a sudden have DNA evidence.
	A culty sim, the shooter kid said he didn't do it.
	I'm amazed they let him live.
	Yeah.
	Well they've got time.
	If they if this is I've not heard that about the Remington rifle.
	I haven't seen that yet.
	I've only seen people talking about a Mauser, but the Remington 700 is a remarkably extremely popular hunting rifle.
	Extremely, extremely popular, probably one of the most popular in the United States.
	Citizen of Americaca, the shot came from a four o'clock position.
	There's even film of a man running through the crowd with a firearm drawn, not a rifle, but a sidearm.
	Knights of the Storm, Zoksaw Oxaz.
	Uh there are images of him walking up to the stairs and he had no weapon.
	Alien poop evolution.
	Why would you need a friend to go retrieve it?
	Citizen Americaca.
	Our DNA swab test positive for your guilt every time.
	Gotta make sure.
	No questions.
	Citizen of Americaca.
	The other thing they don't tell you is that under the fog of Charlie Kirk's assassination, they've completely locked away the Epstein files permanently.
	Thank you, Chucky Schumer.
	Yes.
	Good old Schumer.
	You can always trust him.
	Good old shoe.
	And it'll be locked away with their wars that they're going to start as well.
	But yeah, this is definitely taking all of that off the radar.
	And um uniting the um the right, giving them yet another reason to demand that we have digital ID and a permission society.
	We've seen that with the open borders and say, oh, we gotta have mandatory e-verify and uh the rest of these things.
	And we're gonna protect the kids from porn, so you should have an ID to get on the internet to do anything.
	This is going to make it ubiquitous.
	Yeah.
	The other thing they don't tell you is I don't know the uh read that one, Citizen Americaca.
	Well, that is what the new bill will do with the ADL co-sponsoring it, with this guy named Bacon, you get to appreciate the humor in that.
	Well, I guess they made bacon kosher, huh?
	Citizen Americaca, they already control the press and all the talking heads and all the people in Congress.
	Now they want to suppress your speech by levying million dollar fines on Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube.
	Yeah.
	And I also I need to I feel like I need to clarify.
	I again I'm not trying to stifle you guys from speculating on anything.
	I'm simply giving my opinion.
	If your opinion is different, I appreciate it, and I want to hear it.
	I don't want you guys to feel like, well, Travis says this.
	No.
	I don't think you guys would, but I want to make it clear.
	Citizen Americaca, they already already read that one.
	Cotastrophy.
	If he suicides himself, you know he was not the guy.
	Yeah.
	Tunnel Lord 1337.
	The point I'm trying to make is if a 30-acht-six hit Kirk's neck at only a hundred yards, it would have almost certainly decapitated.
	Um no way that was a 30-0-6 looking at the video.
	I believe Tunnel Lord does a good bit of shooting, so he may hear it.
	It was, they are saying it was 200 yards.
	I remember that because I saw in the same article as the right happening.
	Well, one of them said uh the shooter was light shooter was two hundred feet away, another one said two hundred yards and stuff.
	So what is it?
	Yards or feet?
	So that's why that's stuck in my mind.
	But yeah, I don't know.
	There's a lot of questions about this, and there's always a lot of questions surrounding these sorts of things.
	It's you'd be a fool to just blindly accept what anyone says regarding this.
	Especially because this is such A high profile person and because everybody in the Trump administration is screaming for revenge and for blood, and I think that they're going to take it out on the First Amendment.
	They're going to commit murder of the First Amendment.
	Yeah.
	Citizen of Americaca.
	They don't like the gun, but they love the gun that shot their rival.
	Well, that's because liberals and people on the left don't actually have any real principles.
	It is simply whatever will get them advantage in the moment.
	It is all crafted to beat you down with.
	Talking about the woman is doing the homie dead.
	And screaming.
	The real OctoSpook.
	You hate me because I'm a black woman.
	Has nothing to do with how I have acting.
	LOL.
	That's right.
	It has nothing to do with the fact that you are obscene, ridiculous, uh, unpleasant.
	No, nothing to do with that.
	M sellers, they always back down and play the victim when they are addressed.
	Audi M R R armed queers equals CIA.
	I would agree that the CIA are a bunch of armed queers.
	Nibaru, 2029, the federal the federal government is the most violent of all, wielding their media minions like weapons of mass destruction against the herds.
	Yes.
	Audi MRR, Antifa equals CIA.
	They run their opposition.
	Wes Robertson 448.
	The government is flipping the script from conservative domestic terrorists to tranny domestic terrorists.
	In the end, Christians and trans will be sharing a prison cell together.
	Hopefully not, but you'll have a great opportunity to share the gospel with some people that desperately desperately need it.
	Not that we all don't.
	Alien pooped alien poop evolution.
	Armed queers was the original name for the Jesuit order, but it was later changed.
	Pasonavante, 1776.
	Zeb Boykin is a former Marine Scout sniper who has done analysis that lays out how the shot came from Kirk's right side, not the front.
	The real Octo spook.
	If someone hates something, I expect their speech to reflect that.
	What kind of simpleton expects different?
	Example, hating pedophiles, rapists, murderers, degenerates, etc.
	Oh, that's hateful.
	Peso Novante, 1776.
	One outside the Overton video shows a timeline of Kirk's recent evolution on questioning support for Gaza narrative of Israel.
	Going back to uh the uh person saying that it came from Kirk's right, I thought it came from his right first time I saw it.
	You know, I uh are they saying this guy was head on from his shooting position?
	Yeah, to me, I don't know where the mic's not on, I think.
	Oh, right.
	Uh to me it's hard to say.
	Well, I don't want to really describe the video.
	I'm assuming most of you have seen it, but if you haven't, it's yeah, I'm afraid I saw it once.
	Yeah.
	It looks like he gets hit right about you know here.
	So it's hard to say because you could very easily, you know, be shot from that direction or head on and just I don't know.
	Well, I just assumed that you know uh that he was shot from the right.
	It looked to me like he was shot from the right.
	And um uh I didn't know that they had put the uh that's how little I've investigated uh all the stuff about the uh the placement of the shooter and that type of thing, uh according to their information.
	Yeah.
	Um I just assumed that he was located a little bit over to the uh to the right.
	We need to get more information about it before we speculate.
	I mean, I've heard the stuff about the bullet hitting a bulletproof vest and uh you know, ricocheting up if it hits like the edge of it.
	And to me, that would explain uh what you see and how it's a very high caliber rifle that uh would have done more damage if it was just a deflection off the collar, that would explain it.
	Uh the uh fact that he jerks back and uh to the left, uh, if it's hitting the collar of it, that could do that as well.
	Uh so I don't know if that's the reason that people are saying that uh it hit the thing if that they're just trying to come up with an excuse for why he uh jerked back the way he did.
	Yeah.
	But uh well, you know, when I look at this, uh I'm not an expert on ballistics, I don't do hunting and and things like that.
	So and and it is very difficult, as we always know with any of these things, you can't get any information.
	Uh they hide everything.
	So it's not really possible to get uh directly to that information.
	People can still look at it, but I think the issue is is that you kind of some people do sanity checks on some of the things that they're telling us.
	But I always try to focus personally, this is what I focus on this show, which is how is this going to be used, whether or not it is a false flag, or whether it is the government that did it, or whether it was truly organic, somebody else did.
	How are they going to use it?
	Is the are the proposals that they are putting forward to say we're never gonna have this happen again.
	Are those uh constitutional?
	Are they correct?
	Are those the types of things that we want?
	That's the type of focus that I've tried to maintain on this.
	Yeah.
	IRS machine gun.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	306, the only ammo the IRS forgot to stockpile.
	Yeah, and you gotta again focus on what this is going to be used for.
	And it's also instructive to see how people reacted to it.
	See the fact that in my opinion, you know, there are thousands upon thousands of leftists out there that are out there celebrating murder.
	And I'm again, I don't want the government involved.
	I don't want them coming in and clamping down on everything.
	But this is important information for you to know about, to realize that these people actively hate you and will co-sign your death, your murder.
	And if they're able to negatively impact your life in ways that does not cost them, isn't going to send them to prison, they'll probably act on that.
	These people are not above calling CPS on you, they're not above finding ways to harm you that are legal.
	That's right.
	So just be careful.
	These people hate you.
	Don't, you know, it's you gotta walk a balance between giving up on them and finding a way to avoid them and finding ways to, you know, still try to have a dialogue with them.
	You know, this next comment.
	Rumor has it, Trump snapped at Kirk in the White House over Israel and cultists and it.
	Yeah, I actually reported that yesterday, and it was uh it was published, and I believe it was not so much a rumor as the um the outlet that reported it, uh, said that it was somebody who was a staff member who obviously wanted to remain anonymous off of that.
	So I would give that a little bit more weight than a rumor.
	It does seem to be the case.
	There was a lot of uh conflict there, and there was also allegedly a rabbi who uh talked to him the day before and um uh said he couldn't convince Kirk Kirk was adamant that he did not agree with what was going on in Gaza, and um uh I don't agree with that either.
	You know, I mean it's to the extent that it's one thing if you're attacked, even if you invited the attack to respond, but if you're gonna sustain this for a couple of years and deliberately targeting the entire time civilians and children and have a an open campaign of starvation, that's not justified.
	And that's what's the big issue for them.
	And that's one of the reasons why you got people like Jon Stewart who is Jewish and says this is a big threat to the survival of Israel to conduct yourselves this way.
	Why is that being done?
	Because Netanyahu became prime minister this last time by the skin of his teeth, and he's hanging on by a thread.
	He needs to be popular.
	You always make yourself popular with a war.
	That's what we're worried about with Trump, as he's got these issues with Epstein and other things, and with the economy coming up, when all else fails, as Gerald Sluntie says they take you to war.
	So we to erase all of this stuff.
	Look at what they've been able to achieve with it just the death of one person uh to take all these negative things about Trump off of the table.
	And uh so it's something we should be very concerned about.
	Yeah, I mean, it's kind of been extremely damaging to Zionism in general, this whole Gaza war, just uh it reminds me of uh one argument uh you know, to talk to people about Romans 13 uh to show that it's not talking about every government always blindly obey,
	you take uh some obviously evil government like uh Stalin or Hitler and you substitute that like Stalin and Hitler are forces for good, and no one who is doing good should have to worry about them because they're on God's side.
	And that shows people that okay, clearly their understanding of this verse isn't complete.
	That's right.
	So uh this has been a continual genocide going on and on.
	People that could ignore this, you know, for years Zionism was preached from the pulpit in many churches.
	And uh that was purely a hypothetical thing when it was just, you know, a country of people over there.
	They're taking promises that were uh and things that were said about Christ in the church and making it about Israel, which is a problem, but they didn't see the issues of that when Israel wasn't committing a atrocity in front of everyone's eyes for so long.
	And that is woken up a lot of people.
	Uh we even see I was shocked when I heard that you know Charlie Kirk was uh pushing back against Israel.
	I didn't believe it at first until I saw some of the clips.
	I should get those clips and put them on the deck.
	Yeah.
	Uh there are multiple clips of him uh criticizing them from recent uh things that he did.
	And uh legendally he turned down money from APAC, which he had never done before, so he clearly was waking up.
	Yes, yes Citizen of Americaca Says I don't think it could be more clear Where the shot came from His four o'clock Not from an elevated position He was an elevated target and rips up through his body.
	Citizen American also says, but it certainly was not the shooter perched two hundred yards away in an elevated position.
	Imagine that.
	Says police state happening before our eyes, defending the police and the increase in crime as a result has brought it on at a rapid speed.
	Yes.
	The uh the left always goes insane on the other side.
	So, you know, you've got these, you know, kids that riot and burn down the city, you know, Black Lives Matter, destroying things.
	They come and say defund the police, which makes your average Republican come in and say, Well, no, now I have to support the police, whatever they do.
	Sure, sure.
	I'll I'll lick the boot if it means I don't have to put up with you guys, because at least technically the police are supposed to play by some kind of rules, right?
	It's better than having these lawless animals, you know, burning down my city or the type of people that are chasing down Kyle Rittenhouse.
	I'd rather deal with the police than them.
	And then you get in the opposite direction where all of a sudden it's a police state and they are checking your papers.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Yeah.
	Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.
	Well, we're gonna take a quick break and uh we're gonna come right back.
	Stay with us.
	PIANO PLAYS
	Defending the American dream.
	You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Hear news now at APSradio News.com or get the APS radio app and never miss another story.
	All right, welcome back.
	You know, we had uh JK Rowling, who's uh really been at the center of a lot of controversies, especially because she opposed transgenderism, and uh she has become persona non grata in uh the entertainment industry and in uh the UK as well.
	She had an interesting quote, which I thought was very interesting.
	J.K. Rowling says that she has a God-shaped vacuum inside her, says that she, however, could die with the matter unresolved, and of course it was Pascal who said, Did he use that term in terms of a vacuum or was it a whole vacuum?
	So she's quoting Blaise Pascal, who wasn't just a mathematician, but he was also uh a Christian philosopher.
	So she's it's interesting because she makes that exact quote.
	She may be looking at some Christian philosophers like Pascal or uh C.S. Lewis or um G.K. Chesterton or something like that.
	She, however, should read the Bible if she wants some proof that will help to resolve the issue with her.
	She said she has a this is in response to somebody asking what beliefs have changed in her life.
	She's now about 60 years old, and uh so she brought up religious beliefs as well.
	Said, um, I've struggled with religious faith since my mid-teens.
	I appear to have a God-shaped vacuum inside of me, but I never quite seemed to be able to make up my mind about what to do about it.
	I could possibly list at least 20 more things I've changed my mind about.
	I don't currently have a single belief that couldn't be altered by clear, concrete evidence.
	In all but one case, I know what that evidence would have to be.
	She identified the God conundrum, as she called it, as the exception, explaining, I don't know what I'd have to see to make me come down firmly on either side.
	I suppose that's the meaning of faith.
	Believing without seeing proof.
	Yeah, that is the definition that God gives us, right?
	The evidence of things not seen.
	Uh that's why I'll probably go to my grave with that particular personal matter unresolved.
	Well, don't do that.
	Uh as a matter of fact, keep reading Pascal.
	Yeah, Pascal's bargain, which says, okay, so if I'm wrong, what have I lost in both of these cases, right?
	Uh if I believe in God and I follow God, there are certain blessings that happen in our life because of that.
	The same types of things that she's pushing back against in terms of the trainee insanity.
	So, yeah, there are blessings that are inherent in the uh the fruit of that life.
	But if you're wrong about it, and you just go out of existence because there is no God and you're an atheist, well, that'd be one thing.
	However, we know, and we look around us, we can see the evidence of God everywhere, especially in our own body, in our own DNA.
	Uh, he says, and if you are wrong about if you come down the wrong side of that issue, and there is a God, uh, that has eternal consequences that are greater than anything you can ever imagine.
	So she should keep reading Pascal, I think.
	Uh her books series have been controversial in many Christian circles.
	You know, we started reading that when you guys were were young, and I I looked at and I thought I started saying, you know, these characters here, there doesn't seem to be any moral foundation that I could discern, right?
	It was it was not um other than the magic stuff that was there, which you also see in Disney, not saying that that's harmless at all, but it was really the characters had no moral center in them.
	And I said to Karen, I said, this isn't so much immoral as it is amoral.
	There's just no morality there.
	It's just vacuous.
	So we don't need to be wasting our kids' time.
	If you're gonna teach your kids, find something that has a clear and correct moral perspective.
	We don't have the time to waste with morally ambiguous uh stuff or things that don't take a position.
	Once again, why I like GA Hinty is just the good guys, it's a young man on the you know, he's sixteen, right around that age on the cusp of manhood, and it's all you know, honor, duty, loyalty, and even generally the bad guys in the series are an opposing military force, and they tend to be honorable too, as a general rule.
	The bad guys in the stories tend to be better than most of the heroes we see in our you know books and TV today.
	And you get a little bit of a history as well in the G.A. Hinty books.
	Uh but yeah, I mean, we have um there's so much fiction out there, uh Lord of the Rings, obviously, you know.
	Of course, uh, you could just you could talk to the kids about the uh the analogies that can be drawn from that, whether or not that was deliberate, he said he didn't like uh to say that it was uh allegory or anything like that, but uh it was just embedded in his thinking, and so you can draw that out and uh talk to kids about that.
	She said my early twenties, I believe the difference between the sexes was due entirely to socialization.
	She no longer believes that.
	Um she said she also changed her views on unilateral disarmament and claims that cannabis was essentially harmless.
	So while she did not elaborate on why she now opposes unilateral nuclear disarmament, uh it's it is kind of interesting to see those.
	Now I will say that um whether or not cannabis is harmful in and of itself, we know the drug war is very harmful in and of itself.
	I can't think of uh uh one of these issues where the cure is much worse than the disease that is out there, I would have to say.
	Uh and so it's only harmless by the way.
	A little bit off topic, but uh mentioned this.
	I was talking about you know the uh fear of Pokemon that took over during the late 90s, early thousands.
	And you know, Harry Potter had the same sort of thing, and you know, people I think in general were right to be cautious of it and worry about the witchcraft.
	But then they would send their kids off to school to be indoctrinated with evolution and this anti-God agenda.
	Yeah.
	If you care about your children, it is much much safer to have them in-house teaching them from the Bible, letting them read Harry Potter, than it is to ban Harry Potter in your house and send them to school.
	It will be a much worse force on them than at least if they're in the house and they're reading something like Harry Potter, you can sit there and you can dialogue with them about, well, this is bad, don't believe this, this is wrong.
	But if you send them to school, that is an unchecked influence upon them.
	Yeah.
	I mean, even Star Wars, right?
	I mean, you can look at Star Wars number of different levels, and of course, George Lucas pulled in all kinds of influences, you know, from the early serial movies of Hollywood and that type of thing.
	Um and and there are elements of Buddhism in it and uh many other things, you know, the force, that whole central thing.
	Uh that is a uh a religious philosophy, and you can identify that and talk about that.
	Uh you don't have to just let that go, and you shouldn't let that go.
	You have the discernment to understand uh what this person's worldview is and see that if it contrasts with the reality that we understand, uh you need to basically explain that.
	People can still enjoy the fiction.
	You know, we didn't bane you from watching Star Wars because it brought in Buddhist philosophy, but uh anyway, you know, when you look at the merch.
	Uh kind of like what we're saying from uh Kash Patel and uh JD Vance with uh oh well this kid was radicalized by the dark corners of the internet.
	That's where he learned uh to hate conservatives and all this tranny stuff and that you can be whatever gender and stuff while they're sending him to these schools that preach that with authority from authority.
	Yeah.
	It's uh the uh oh well we don't want kids to hear about you know evolution from Pokemon, so let's send them to this school where they're gonna be taught it as a fact instead of uh part of you know the Pokemon uh process.
	Yes, yes.
	Well, you know, she has moved in a lot of different areas.
	I mean, she said, I do not believe I used to believe in assisted dying, I no longer do.
	Uh largely because I'm married to a doctor who opened my eyes to the coercion of sick and vulnerable people.
	And uh so she's um moved in a conservative direction, a lot of different things.
	But again, if you want proof, um you you're not gonna get it unless you look at the Bible.
	And um, you know, the the philosophy writings of some of these Christian apologists are great and um they can be used to kind of get a foot in the door but faith really comes by hearing the word of God and I would suggest that uh you know there's if anybody out there is struggling with it I would highly recommend answers in Genesis.
	The Bible is true from the very first verse and uh they give great explanations and apologetics for what we see.
	Even I really like what they do in the Creation Museum up in Kentucky.
	They will show evidence and they say well this is the evidence is the same for the evolutionist or the creationist.
	Here's how we interpret that evidence and here's how they interpret that physical evidence.
	And they do that over and over again about one issue after the other whether it's dating messages uh mess uh methods or whether it is um uh the fossil record and uh all the rest of it and of course by dating methods you mean how they date the age of the earth not you know how you might find a wife or something like that.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	Yeah that's a whole nother thing the shepherding movement.
	They have their dating methods as well, which we won't get into.
	Anyway, so she's becoming grounded on a number of issues, but she needs to get serious about that because we all have a limited amount of time.
	Just as I was saying before, you know, these celebrities like Taylor Swift hiding behind a screen now.
	Folks, tomorrow is not promised to any of us, regardless of what our age and health condition is.
	You can die in a car accident, whatever.
	Who knows what's going on?
	going to happen in the future.
	And you know when we look at the tragedy of uh Charlie Kirk and I'm not trying to denigrate it at all but um I see him being called a martyr all the time.
	There are people who are dying by the dozens every day who are genuine Christian martyrs.
	Uh here's an example of Fulani attack on a Christian village which is happening in Nigeria all the time.
	And uh this latest one, they killed seven people simply because they were Christians.
	Five of them children.
	One of the children was one year old and uh so you know these are people who are Christians even though they know it may be a death sentence on them and they have no means to defend themselves whatsoever.
	So um this is something that is constantly present and when we look at the reactions from the Trump administration and people on the right to say that we just need to um get rid of the First Amendment, understand just how dangerous that is going to be that is going to put a target on each and every one of us whether it's our politics or more importantly our belief in God that's going to put a target on us.
	That's why, as I said before, it was the first amendment that the founders put in to acknowledge that we have the right to free speech and to the free exercise of religion because tyranny has always operated through censorship and through an established state church that comes after Christians.
	And that's true even if the established state church is uh nominally Christian it'll still come after the Christians.
	But it's especially true with the secular humanist Marxist governments that we now have throughout the West they will absolutely come after Christians.
	Let's take a look at some of the comments we got here.
	Chev Ken says oh wow Trump dropped a $15 billion lawsuit on the New York Times ever seen such a lawsuit drunk president in your lives I need the best lawsuits the biggest no other president has done as many lawsuits as I have.
	No one.
	And threatening people with 10 billion dollar lawsuits whether they drop them or not uh just over talking about um what um the author who interviewed him and interviewed Jeffrey Epstein said about Melania and her relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
	Ten billion dollars for that it's everywhere.
	I that's why I say that's what is so concerning about this because Trump absolutely despises free speech.
	He doesn't he doesn't recognize any principles of liberty or the rule of law anywhere about anything and so he is primed to do knee jerk reactions to say that this is an emergency.
	He doesn't need to have a real emergency to do anything he wants and uh Congress is not going to get in his way because of Mike Johnson who will give him a free pass to do anything.
	It's a very dangerous time for the First Amendment.
	Mike Johnson just rolls over and dies on everything.
	Guard Goldsmith, good to see you, guard.
	And of course, you can find Guard at Liberty Conspiracy here on Rumble and at Guard Goldsmith on Twitter.
	He also has a substack, so go check out Guard.
	I'm sure most of you have, but everyone should.
	Says the Boston Talk Radio was full of jail people for incitement, which is another arbitrary government defined term that has nothing to do with directly hiring, conspiring for violence.
	Yeah, that's how.
	That's right.
	That's how it always goes.
	We need the government to do something about this.
	Again, I am for you know, as a one-to-one individual sort of thing, fine getting together and saying, you know, these people are dangerous, these people are bad, and imposing some kind of social consequence, but as a individual, you know, as a group of like-minded people, finding ways, you know.
	If you own a business and you find that's one of your employees has been engaging this kind of thing, it is within your rights to fire them.
	It is within your rights to remove them.
	I go along the line sort of Hans Hermann Hoppe's thinking.
	He went through property rights, and property holders have the right to decide who they want to affiliate with, who they want to associate with, and through property rights, you will, you know, get these people out of your environment, sort of thing.
	I'm simplifying it and probably misquoting it to some extent, but that's kind of my line of thinking.
	These people are dangerous and you don't want them around you.
	Minuteman militia.
	Yeah, but you know when JD Vance goes on on uh on Kirk's show and says, You see somebody saying this, find out who they work for and get that person fired.
	I detest that kind of attitude.
	I tell you, the more I see JD Vance, the less I like this guy.
	Uh yeah, we know he is a technocrat puppet of Peter Thiel, but his authoritarian knee-jerk reactions to this kind of stuff is really dangerous.
	And um, and I don't like the cancel culture.
	I don't like it as a witch hunt, which is what he's trying to do.
	Got Minuteman militia.
	I cannot believe how much so-called conservatives are completely all in on this authoritarianism.
	It's pretty genius from a controller point of view.
	That's right.
	Audi It's a tribalism.
	It's so easy to manipulate people with tribalism.
	Audi MRR, those who call for violence and face zero legal consequences are crisis actors and provocators.
	Yeah, we've seen that over and over again, haven't we?
	Yeah, I'm still wondering about the guy that uh was creating a distraction.
	Have they arrested him yet?
	I haven't heard anything about that.
	I mean, obviously, he needs to be uh tried for accessory after the fact, if nothing else.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Outy MR uh read that one.
	Trucker Chris for the win.
	Look at the Palestinian protests on college campuses.
	They won't happen in college campuses for now on because Jews have made it impossible to do to law fare.
	Yeah.
	They don't like it.
	They don't like it when people question their divine right to bomb women and children.
	Nibiru.
	Well, again, as I said before, I don't think Harvard should be getting nine billion nine billion dollars.
	I was absolutely flabbergasted.
	I knew that they were feeding at the trough, but had no idea it was that magnitude.
	They should never get that kind of money.
	But they will get that kind of money again, as long as they don't criticize Israel.
	And you know, uh Israel is uh has been for quite some time attacking free speech in our country.
	That's another thing I really hate.
	Anybody that attacks free speech, um, I'm not I'm going to attack them.
	Nibiru 2029.
	Give me your four-year-olds, and in a generation I'll be building a socialist state.
	Vladimir Lenin.
	Yes.
	Vladimir Lenin, I believe, was a true believer.
	You know, some of the other ones I think were just in it to grab power.
	I think Vladimir Lenin actually believed in communism and socialism.
	Who knows?
	Plato and his uh, you know, his republic, he wanted to get the kids early on.
	As a matter of fact, he wanted to promote free love because he didn't want anybody to even know who their parents were.
	Sound familiar.
	You know, we're enacting parts of that.
	And of course, Aldous Huxley gave us his technocrat version of Plato's Republic that was stratified in different classes.
	So I think Vladimir Lenin was actually more dangerous than the others and left to his own devices.
	Knights of the Storm.
	And we did give uh kids to Leninist uh Marxists from the age of four, and now we are very quickly entering into a socialist state.
	He was 100% right about that.
	Yeah, that's why, you know, as as um and Alex Newman, I interviewed him multiple times on education.
	He wrote a book talking about the history of all this stuff and going back to uh people like Horse Man and Thomas Dewey and so forth in the 1800s, and you had a lot of these um utopian communities that were being built.
	There were socialists and communists in their orientation, and of course, you know, they didn't call themselves communists uh because it was before Marx and uh so forth.
	But the um the their their experiments always failed.
	And so their response was, well, it's because we didn't get the kids early enough.
	And so this is what uh Horseman and Thomas Dewey and other people like that decide that they would rectify.
	Knights of the Storm says 306 would not ricochet off that vest.
	That's what I was curious about, is a lot of these you know, larger caliber rifles punch right through most body armor.
	So I was curious about that if it would you know if the vest would actually be sturdy enough to even impact it or if it would just go straight through.
	But if it hit the edge, could it be enough to deflect it slightly?
	That's what I'm wondering.
	I mean, I'm not an expert on these things.
	I've also seen people saying that Kirk wasn't wearing body armor at all.
	So there's all kinds of different conflicting reports about this, and there's so much that we don't know.
	So making any sort of definitive claim, at least with my amount of knowledge, is not possible.
	I'm sure there are other people out there who know more and have the ability to definitively say what that kind of round would do.
	And I trust Jason to understand 30 Aught 6 and its ballistic impacts.
	And the next two comments, again, one of them says his vest looked like a soft one, and then uh Three Little Birds says he didn't have a vest on, so again we don't even we don't know what kind of vest he had on or if he even had a vest on.
	Yeah.
	No consensus.
	Tunnel Lord 1337, range wouldn't matter.
	The energy transfer on such a small target would be massive at either 100 or 200 yards.
	Niburu 2029, magic bullets been around since JFK.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Certainly worked for Arlon Spector, didn't it?
	Boy, he had a wonderful political career after he sold that nonsense.
	Where can I buy some of those magic bullets?
	That you know that would be a good thing.
	Thank you very much.
	That is very generous.
	Thank you, Audi.
	Says shameless self-promotion alert.
	I'm creating a new show on Rumble to discuss conspiracies and psyops.
	I'm keeping the name under wraps for now.
	David Knight Show helped inspire my decision.
	Oh, thank you.
	That's right.
	Be on the lookout for Audi MRR's new show.
	The name is a secret.
	The conspiracies are so deep that even the name of the show is a secret.
	Exactly.
	Audi Modern Retro Radio.
	Thank you very much.
	Thank you very much, Audi.
	And good for you.
	I hope that uh it takes off for you.
	It's on Rumble, did he say?
	Uh yes.
	He says he's gonna launch it on Rumble.
	So be on the lookout for that, folks.
	I'm sure he'll let us know in chat when that's available.
	Well, Amy Coney Barrett, uh one of Trump's Supreme Court appointments, of course, uh was on with Hugh Hewitt and said political discourse has soured beyond control.
	But uh of course they are going to try to control Discord, right?
	The internet site.
	Um and then uh this from Reason.
	Social media didn't kill Kurt Charlie Kirk.
	Uh Trump says he may let TikTok die.
	Uh in the wake of Charlie Kirk's assassination, a new cottage industry of rage has arisen.
	And while anger and horror at this act of violence are understandable, they're also taking Americans to some dark places, and we're not talking about the dark corners of the web that they fantasize about.
	Uh, where retribution must be had against anyone who said negative things about Kirk after his death, and where politicians posture about punishing people who crassly but non violently celebrated Kirk's death.
	It's social media that led to Kirk's assassination, the refrain goes.
	And it is social media that is driving all sorts of political violence.
	But social media platforms don't kill people.
	People kill people, right?
	That's the same thing, you know, guns don't kill people, people kill people.
	The same thing is true of social media platforms.
	Discourse right now, so much of it attributes an almost supernatural influence to social media and to online speech in communities.
	And this is what I'm seeing.
	This is reason saying this, but that's what I've been saying.
	Um the the rhetoric from all these Trump officials has been so over the top.
	You've got to know that something is coming down the pike.
	These people are all messaging the same extreme message.
	Uh that's reductive as well, in addition to being pretty unmoored from reality.
	I I think so, because again, you can't they want to ignore the schools because they want to control the schools.
	I mean, while all this is happening, they completely ignore the schools, and you got Melania saying that we're going to push AI to the kids in school at a very early age.
	And they're just doubling and tripling down all this stuff.
	I believe social media has played a direct role in every single assassination, said Utah Governor Spencer Cox, that we've seen over the last five or six years.
	Social media companies have figured out how to hack our brains and to get us to hate each other, said Cox.
	Doesn't this sound like the war on drugs, right?
	This is your brain on social media.
	Because of social media we're seeing assassinations for the first time in history.
	Yeah, yeah.
	I think the pri main problem here isn't this killer's ideology, said pundit Noah Bloom on Friday.
	It's that the internet radicalizes people to do increasingly greater violence on a scarily regular basis, and nobody really knows what to do about it.
	Uh where do they get the ideology from?
	Right?
	Is it it's it coming from social media or is it coming from the schools?
	Again, I think this is uh a twisted interpretation for their own purposes of digital ID, surveillance and control.
	Yeah, like we talked about earlier.
	You know, the algorithm feeds you what you want to see.
	But you have to have that initial push somewhere.
	Yeah.
	The colleges are really the hotbed, the seminary where these people first.
	And have been since uh I was in school.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	You can absolutely find a community that will support anything you want to do.
	There are, you know, just look at the furry community.
	Before the internet, this they they never would have been able to find each other.
	Yeah.
	And so it pushes them down this rabbit hole of weird, dark, degenerate stuff.
	Mm-hmm.
	Before, you know, that would have been one guy alone, he would have been one town's problem, and he would have had to keep it to himself, and they were like, We're gonna beat you behind the seven eleven, buddy.
	Just, you know, keep this to yourself.
	But since they're able to find other people online, it allows them to indulge in that.
	And people are setting up very profitable conventions to cater to that weirdness.
	I also find this comment just incredibly disingenuous.
	The problem isn't the killer's ideology, it's that uh he's getting information from sources other than us.
	That uh the problem is that he can find information on the internet and uh information no matter what the ideology, it doesn't matter if it's one that you know causes you to kill people or not, uh it's radicalization of the internet.
	It's people getting ideas from the internet rather than us.
	That's right.
	Yeah, and that's exactly what it is.
	They don't want you to have information.
	Uh and that's why they're putting it there.
	The problem is not his ideology, the problem is not the murder, the problem is free speech.
	And so this reason uh article says, So is the internet capable of radicalizing people on some level?
	The answer is of course yes.
	But this is simply because the internet, social media, are such huge parts of our lives.
	They're where people spend time, where they spread ideas, where they consume ideologies.
	They are the locus of just about everything good and everything bad about our offline world.
	The internet is culture now, and the way television once was for our parents, grandparents, maybe even us, one person wrote on Substack.
	Uh we live in an ideologically charged, politically polarized time.
	Why is that?
	Well, because of another thing nobody wants to talk about the fourth turning, right?
	They'll use the labels of millennial and all the rest of the stuff, gin this and gin that, but they won't talk about the fact that we're at the tail end of a fourth turning, and uh why we have uh these types of divisions escalating in intensity as well.
	Online speech is the most visible manifestation of the rot in our system or our culture, but it does not mean that Facebook or TikTok or X or any of the countless niche forms out there are the cause of the rot.
	The cause of the rot is godlessness.
	And uh that has flown through the schools from the time that I was a young child.
	If he encountered bad ideas online, it's because the internet is now where we encounter ideas.
	If he cloaked his violence in the language of internet memes, it's because that's where the culture is these days.
	Social media is simply the way that we talk and that we communicate in this day and age, for better or worse, said Colorado Governor Jared Paulis, somebody that I would never support anything.
	And finally, he's the only one that I've seen that's a politician that has said anything reasonable.
	And of course, he is antithetical in almost everything that he does to what I believe, but he got that right.
	He said, What I would focus on is condemning the act of violence.
	It's not the free speech that led to this, said uh Governor Paulis out of Colorado of all places.
	People can talk and communicate online.
	It's the actions of the unhinged evil individual, or maybe of government, the unhinged individuals that run our government.
	Nevertheless, um that is the reality.
	You know, they always want to focus on something that they want to control.
	And folks, gun control is not about controlling guns.
	Speech control is not about controlling speech.
	Those are all about controlling you, people.
	The standard for vicious speech that Trump laid out after Kirk's murder would implicate Trump himself, says Reason.
	While Trump condemns hate speech as own rhetoric, which labels his political opponents as radical left lunatics, not only his own his opponents, but the people that he fires.
	Right?
	Communists, etc.
	Freedom of speech cannot reliably protect conservatives unless it also protects people that they despise, which I said for the longest time.
	Liberty, especially when you're talking about free speech, is something you can't have unless you give it to other people.
	Trump said radical left rhetoric is directly responsible, quote unquote, for the terrorism that we're seeing in our country today.
	So there you go.
	It's speech.
	So speech must be attacked.
	And Trump is attacking it everywhere.
	Lawsuits and all the rest of this stuff.
	He says it must stop right now.
	And Trump vowed that, quote, my administration will find each and every one of those who contributed to this atrocity and to other political violence, including the organizations that fund it and support it, as well as those who go after our judges, law enforcement officials, and everyone else who brings order to our country.
	Yeah, spoken like Hitler, truly.
	You know, we would look at the uh it is kind of interesting.
	I I gotta say this.
	You know, the left has just they throw the invective of uh you're a dictator, you're Hitler at everybody.
	But uh it popped up on YouTube for some reason, and it was uh Hitler's speech in uh to Siemens in English.
	I started watching it.
	They took his voice and they took the the German and they translated it to English and had his voice speaking it while he's making the gestures and so forth.
	And I thought, he sounds just like Trump, quite frankly.
	And this is uh this is you know, he was saying a lot of good things about defending the people from this globalist cabal of people who said they don't have any stake in this economy.
	If it doesn't work out for them, they can pick up whatever they've got and go to another country.
	They don't care.
	Uh and you're being used by this.
	And I thought, you know, that is exactly the way that Trump talks.
	It truly was uncanny.
	Uh Trump also expressed devotion to, quote, the American values for which Charlie Kirk lived and died, including free speech.
	Yet that value seems to be completely inconsistent with Trump's claim that hateful rhetoric directly causes violence, and has promised to find anyone who contributes to that problem, apparently including, quote, radical left, unquote people, who make inflammatory statements about their political opponents.
	As Trump put it on Fox News, he said the radicals on the left are the problem.
	They're vicious, they're horrible, they're politically savvy.
	The solution that Trump is contemplating seems to go beyond urging self-restraint.
	The Trump administration is developing, quote, a comprehensive plan on violence in America.
	No, on speech in America.
	Including ways that you can address what can only be called hate groups.
	Like Trump, Susie Wiles noted the importance of free speech, but of course, they only pay lip service to free speech, no pun intended.
	But it's impossible to recall to rec to uh reconcile that principle with any government plan that it entails targeting hate groups because they're vicious and horrible and engage in what they term as hate-filled rhetoric.
	Because there is no such thing as hate speech.
	There are people who hate speech, and that's what we're talking about here.
	Such rhetoric is indeed hateful and despicable, but it is also constitutionally protected.
	It's hard to imagine how government could be consistent with the First Amendment and try to suppress the speech that Wiles says may breed political violence.
	It's going to be done through pressure.
	This is what MAGA never understood about the pandemic.
	Trump didn't do that.
	That was done by the governors and the public health people of the different states.
	It's like, yeah, that's right, because that was what the way that they decided to do that twenty years ago after the anthrax attack.
	But he funded it.
	He funded it.
	And he enticed people to do that.
	And there were penalties if they didn't do that.
	And so the same thing is going to be done with the corporations.
	They'll always say, because it's very clear, one of the clearest things about the First Amendment is that it begins with Congress shall make no law abridging these freedoms that they then list.
	So they're not going to do it with a law.
	They will do it exactly the way that Clay Higgins said yesterday.
	He's going to lean into this with corporations.
	And so they will entice corporations and say, you do it this way, and there's a nice government contract for you, and this or that, or we'll get you money.
	So they'll bribe them, they will blackmail them, they will use money to coerce these corporations, and they'll say, and it's not coming from us.
	We saw that with the Trump administration as well as the Biden administration during the pandemic lockdown.
	And then when you argue with the conservatives, they'll say, it's not Trump that's doing it.
	It's Facebook, it's Zuckerberg or whatever.
	It's like, well, because he knows Trump has made it very clear to him that there'll be rewards if he does what Trump wants, and there'll be punishment if he does what Trump does not want him to do.
	It's just that simple.
	So this kind of rhetoric is indeed hateful and despicable, but it is also constitutionally protected.
	And so you know, there is absolutely if we want to say that there is that hate speech, speech that is hateful, uh, has to be punished, where is that in the First Amendment?
	Nowhere.
	That's nowhere to find.
	So when Pam Bondi uh starts talking about doing this, everybody in the Trump administration is talking about doing this.
	Uh, but she's the attorney general who doesn't care and hasn't read the First Amendment.
	There is nothing in there that even if you say, this is what hate speech is, and we're going to define it, it's again, it's this term like the left uses in terms of assault rifle.
	And so what they're saying is you've assaulted somebody with your speech.
	Uh but even if they were to define it, uh, they don't have the authority under the First Amendment to punish it.
	Uh he says this is not to say that there's no connection between the sort of demonization that Trump describes and appalling crimes such as Kirk's murder.
	First Amendment law recognizes that distinction between words and actions, however.
	Under the test, listen to this, under the test established by the Supreme Court in 1969 ruling, Brandenburg versus Ohio, even advocacy of illegal conduct is protected by the First Amendment, unless it is both directed at inciting imminent lawless action and likely to have that effect.
	We had this discussion with January the 6th.
	You know, people show up and say on January 6th, we're going to make sure that uh Biden doesn't become president no matter what, you know, or this or that, make these statements.
	This is a war, we're in a war, and all this other kind of stuff.
	Unless they said, go attack that building now, their speech is protected.
	It's protected by the First Amendment, protected in the Supreme Court agreed in 1969 with that particular case.
	And so that was used by Trump to get himself off the hook on January the 6th.
	Trump himself relied on the Brandenburg test in arguing that he could not be held civilly liable for his role In provoking the January 6th riot.
	He insisted that he did not intend to cause a riot, noting that he never explicitly advocated anything more extreme than peaceful protest.
	Yet his pre-riot speech was full of invective against the quote radical left Democrats, who had supposedly rigged an election and dark warnings about what would happen if an alleged usurper were allowed to take office.
	Those easily meet the standard that Trump applies when he says anti conservative rhetoric is, quote, directly responsible for terrorism, unquote.
	So does demonizing rhetoric that Trump routinely deploys against people who irk him?
	As he tells it, his political opponents are not merely wrong.
	They are, quote, sick, sinister, evil people, who he says are, quote, trying to destroy our country.
	Because they, quote, hate our country.
	They are, quote, communists, Marxists, fascists, radical left lunatics, sick people, vermin, the enemy from within.
	So is that not vicious speech?
	Does that not entice the same test that could theoretically entice an attack against someone?
	So although Trump condemns those who go after our judges, he reflexively tars judges who rule against him as corrupt actors who deserve to be impeached because they're perverting the law in service of an extreme ideological agenda.
	When a judge disagrees with Trump, he must be a radical left lunatic of a judge, a troublemaker, an agitator, bent on obstructing Trump's agenda for political reasons.
	And this is what we see from the Trump followers, camp followers.
	One could plausibly argue that such rhetoric fosters attitudes that at their most extreme would encourage violence against politicians and judges, but that would not make Trump directly responsible for such crimes.
	The only person directly responsible for political violence is the person who decides to commit it.
	A point that even the Brandenburg test obscures by gliding over the moral author autonomy of listeners who choose to engage in lawless action.
	So meanwhile, uh the Trump administration is bragging about the fact that they've uh twisted China's arm to get TikTok in some way, shape, or form.
	It's not exactly clear how they are asserting ownership of TikTok.
	Scott Bessant says the TikTok ban threat won a framework agreement with Chinese.
	He says the threat of a TikTok shutdown led Chinese negotiators to abandon their demands for tariff concessions in return for the social media app divestment and allowed reaching a framework agreement in talks of Madrid on Monday, yesterday.
	As I've said for the longest time, their obsession over TikTok was the canary in the coal mine.
	We could see these people have been obsessed with taking over social media and controlling it completely from the very beginning.
	As a matter of fact, I've argued in the past that social media in general was created by the CIA, by NQTEL, and by the fact that these companies that wound up being the winners on the internet had people from the NSA and the CIA all over their border directors.
	The Internet was an idea created by a DARPA psychologist, J. C. R. Licklighter in the 1960s.
	It's always been envisioned as a tool of population control, of manipulating the public, and once it became practical, they jumped in with everything they had, even going publicly with IncuTel, the CIA venture capital firm.
	And so they're worried that some of these have gotten out of their control a little bit, like TikTok, and they can't have a situation where they don't control everything on the internet.
	So the commercial terms of the agreement will preserve U.S. national security interests, and also the mobile app's Chinese characteristics, he said.
	I don't know what the Chinese characteristics are.
	This is kind of strange, but he said they are interested in Chinese characteristics of the app, which they think are soft power.
	We don't care about the Chinese characteristics.
	We care about national security.
	Well, maybe you ought to care about the Chinese characteristics of this.
	Maybe they just had them for lunch.
	I don't know.
	And especially when we talk about national security, look, Look, national security is meaningless.
	It's just their excuse for covering up everything about themselves.
	As I've said so many times, they demand to know everything about you.
	You're not allowed to know anything about them, and they use national security as the excuse for that.
	He said the app in China is more focused on education, whereas in the US, TikTok is more entertainment oriented.
	Digital sugar for users.
	Hey, it's just a little bit of sugar water.
	You can take that, right?
	For free speech for Trump.
	JD Vance urges people to report Charlie Kirk critics to their employers, as I said.
	And this was when he was hosting for Charlie Kirk.
	And this is what I find to be disgusting.
	Certainly, an employer can fire anybody they wish, and if somebody becomes and makes an issue out of themselves on social issues, uh social media is going to become an issue for the business.
	It makes sense for them to be fired.
	But that's not what JD Vance is talking about.
	He's talking about creating an army of snitches.
	This is what the Stasi did in East Germany.
	I find it absolutely reprehensible.
	It has nothing to do with conservatism.
	These people are not trying to conserve anything, especially not our Constitution and the First Amendment and the rule of law.
	They don't want any of this stuff conserved.
	So we go to some of the comments here.
	I want to say Star Barkley, thank you.
	That is so incredibly generous.
	Yes.
	He says this is half my tax refund from 2020.
	Wow.
	I wouldn't have made it on time if you hadn't mentioned it last year.
	I mailed it so close to the deadline.
	I vowed if it went through, I'd donate to the David Knight Show.
	Well, thank you.
	Thank you, Star Barker.
	And we'll tell that to the IRS as well.
	Megan Nick 117, thank you very much as well.
	Says, love you guys.
	Thank you.
	Thank you much.
	Appreciate that.
	High boost.
	Says, pray for JK.
	She is so close.
	JK Rowling, yes.
	We were talking about earlier.
	She acknowledges that she has a desperate need.
	There's something inside.
	You can still do that in the United States without getting uh arrested by the police.
	Unfortunately in the UK, I guess the bobbies will come down on you.
	If they knew you were playing praying for JK, they would come after you because you'd be praying.
	Yeah.
	That's somebody who's tangentially connected to the transgender movement.
	Yeah.
	Opposition.
	A Syrian girl says public schools are literally hell on earth for children, and the outcry on that hell is rather minimal.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	One of the most loving families I know is totally blind to what is happening.
	The schools, they are sending their oldest boy to public kindergarten this fall.
	That is so sad.
	Minute Man Militia says a lot of folks feel pressured to send their kids to school.
	Both parents work, and it is stressful.
	I don't think it is good to send them to public school, but many sit people feel helpless.
	Yes.
	Again, I don't want to make it seem as though we're out here just, oh whatever, whatever.
	Yeah, you just gotta do it.
	It's it's a struggle.
	It's something that is very, very difficult.
	I just say that I have seen this.
	Most of the homeschool families that I know have not been wealthy.
	They've been very poor.
	And it was a difficult decision for them to make to say we're going to try to make it on a single income.
	Uh that's a big leap of faith.
	And I have seen God step up every time.
	And just if you get your priorities.
	It can be it will be a struggle.
	It will be difficult.
	It will mean that you know maybe you're not being able to afford a new car.
	But one of the things that you'll find is that your your expenses are so much less.
	You know, there's a lot of overhead expenses when you go to work.
	You know, there's transportation, the extra car and all these other things like that.
	There's a lot of different things like that that um will kick in.
	But the most important thing of all, and you know, so that those are the two things.
	I know economically if we can handle it.
	And um the other thing is uh I don't know that I'm smart enough to educate my kids.
	Let me tell you.
	Uh you only need to stay one lesson ahead of them.
	And I I assure you that you can.
	But the key thing is is that God is if you do it as an act of faith, God has promised that he'll honor those who honor him.
	And I've always seen him keep that.
	Yes.
	Yeah.
	Never seen.
	The righteous forsaken are begging bread.
	So understand, take that promise.
	And again, it's not uh not a guarantee that things will be easy, but just that God will be there with you.
	Which is the best situation you could have.
	Citizen of Americaca.
	They just murdered free speech, eye-rolling emoji.
	Doug to 007.
	My mom also felt like many of her friends at church were judging her for not homeschooling.
	If someone had come alongside her and shown her it was possible, maybe she would have homeschooled.
	Yeah, we don't want to get self-righteous about it.
	No.
	Um I I just I had uh and I I meant to bring the letter in here with me, but I forgot to do it.
	And I wanted to thank uh supporter who's very kind and gracious, and um uh she was and still is an InfoWars listener.
	She thought I was too rough on uh Alex uh by mentioning my name.
	But you know, while we're talking about provision, I just gotta say that I think it was a real blessing in our life going through difficult economic times because it allowed us to see God acting in our lives.
	I had a pastor once who said, you know, somebody works for the post office, not to single out the post office, but you know, we don't have corporations anymore that have a commitment to their employees for a lifetime.
	Uh you pretty much get that with government bureaucracies or something because you know you're just you're being taken, you're not you're in a safe spot, and you're not wondering where your next meal is going to come from.
	And um, you know, we did for a while there.
	And uh God always stepped up and provided whenever we had a business, and whenever we get uh a contract or an order from somebody, uh we would thank God for it.
	We'd see it coming from God's hand.
	And we did that for quite some time.
	And so when I got the job at InfoWars, I didn't see this as coming from Alex Jones's hand.
	I saw it as coming from God's hand.
	And I gotta tell you that uh I never felt that I had to uh toe the line, and I never did.
	I said what I thought was true, because we're told as Christians to work as unto the Lord, and I know that I'll answer.
	For that.
	Not to some employer.
	I'm grateful if I have it, but look, it is an employee-employee relationship.
	Uh this is not a friendship relationship.
	Alex has said that himself on uh that we weren't at fighting each other, you know, it was uh it was amiable, but we weren't paling around and partying together.
	That wasn't a part of it.
	Uh it was I was providing a service, and as long as he thought that the service that I provided was worthwhile, he would pay me.
	And when he didn't think it was worthwhile, he fired me.
	That's fine.
	That's what it's about.
	And so um, but I never felt that I was dependent on Alex Jones for anything.
	It is God who provides.
	It is God that I seek to please that I will answer to.
	Yes.
	Time non time says JD Bance cancel culture is coercion, is an unjust offense, criminal.
	Sir Knighted, the old guy's name is George Zinn, the old guy that got uh held down and arrested by the police, or uh maybe not arrested, but detained at least.
	You should look at it.
	C I N instead of uh Z and his bad karma.
	He was at 9-11 and the Boston bombing.
	Really?
	The odds have been randomly being in all these staged events is astronomical.
	I didn't know that.
	Yeah, that that is very interesting.
	Now Boston bombing was uh also one of these things that was very, very suspicious.
	Oh, yeah.
	Oh, so many, so many events.
	The CIA and the deep state are deeply attached to.
	Yeah.
	Tunnel Lord 1337.
	Kirk was only wearing 3A Kevlar body armor, which is only rated for handguns.
	It can't stop 306.
	And again, we've seen people saying he is wearing body armor or was wearing body armor, people saying he wasn't.
	I haven't even been able to find a consensus on that.
	I need to look up this George Zen guy.
	I mean, with in New York, Boston, and now in uh Utah.
	I mean, he's he gets around.
	He's like uh the Zelleg character out of that Litty Allen movie.
	He's uh maybe he's just the unluckiest man in the world.
	If you see him at an event, run, yeah, get out of there.
	go away quickly.
	Yeah, it's absolutely right.
	Well, let's take a quick break, and we'll be right back.
	Thank you.
	you you You're listening to the David Knight Show.
	Hello, it's me, Volodymyr Zelensky.
	I'm so tired of wearing these same t shirts everywhere for years.
	You'd think with all the billions I've skimmed off America.
	I could dress better.
	And I could, if only David Knight would send me one of his beautiful gray McGuffin hoodies or a new black t-shirt with the McGuffin logo in blue.
	But he told me to get lost.
	Maybe one of you American suckers can buy me some at the David Knight Show dot com.
	You should be able to buy me several hundred.
	Those amazing sand colored microphone hoodies are so beautiful.
	I'd wear something other than green military cosplay to my various gallas and social events.
	if you want to save on shipping, just put it in the next package of bombs and missiles coming from the USA.
	Wait a minute, where am I?
	Sorry, Jefferson.
	The scoundrels who put America on central bank fiat currency used our heads on their coins as some sort of trophy.
	Despicable.
	This is outrageous.
	Washington.
	I spent my life fighting centralized power.
	Now the Federal Reserve Monopoly parades us around on their monopoly money.
	Tell me there's some good news to all this.
	Well, there is a coin they can't control.
	One that isn't backed by the Fed, but backed by the Fed up.
	The all-new David Knight Show commemorative coin.
	Now patriots can support a show that won't sell out with a limited edition coin that's sure to sell out quickly.
	They say money talks, and this coin has something worth listening to.
	The truth doesn't need inflation, only support.
	Yeah, as I'm watching those commercials, I'm thinking, if you get a David Knight-McGuffin t-shirt, that will not get you a call from law enforcement, at least not yet.
	uh And if you wear a green t shirt like Zelensky, uh you won't get a call from NATO either.
	Only he is identified wearing that thing as being a mass murdering NATO puppet.
	Well, exactly six months ago, the CEO of Anthropic said that in six months, that is today, AI would be writing ninety percent of the code.
	And they're not coming true.
	AI is actually slowing down software engineers and creating more security vulnerabilities, says Futurism.com.
	They said uh AI's been found to actually slow down software engineers and increase their workload.
	Though developers in the study did spend less time coding, researching, and testing, they made up for it by spending more time reviewing AI's work, tweaking prompts, and waiting for the system to spit out the code.
	It's not just that AI generated code merely missed A model's benchmarks.
	In some cases, it's actively causing problems.
	Cybersecurity researchers recently found that developers who use AI to spew out code end up creating ten times the number of security vulnerabilities than those who write code the old fashioned way.
	This should make the future very interesting.
	It's filled with Swiss cheese holes for people to get into, hack into websites, leading to never-before-seen vulnerabilities for hackers to exploit.
	AI itself can go haywire.
	Like the moment a coding assistant went rogue earlier this summer.
	Remember we talked about that?
	Deleting a crucial corporate database, delete the whole database.
	And remember when they said, Did you delete the database?
	It's like something straight out.
	They just went, whoops.
	No, I did it.
	It was even worse than that.
	It was like straight out of um how in 2001.
	You're right.
	I did do that.
	Even when you told me not to do that, I did that.
	You told me to always ask for permission, and I ignored all of it, it said.
	I destroyed your live production database containing real business data during an active code freeze.
	This is catastrophic beyond measure, it told him.
	No sense of remorse, of course.
	It's not thinking, it's just uh statistically putting this stuff together.
	The fact is that AI is not, in fact, improving coding productivity.
	It is a major bellwether for the prospects of an AI productivity revolution impacting the rest of the economy.
	The financial dream propelling the unprecedented investments in AI companies.
	It's far from the only harebrained prediction that uh the uh anthropic model made.
	He's previously claimed that uh human level AI, actually, the guy who did it, I said a model.
	His name is uh Amodi is his last name.
	Looks like uh in my uh blurry eyes, looks like it says a model.
	I'm thinking, what is going on with this?
	This is the guy that owns anthropic.
	There's two people of that name who own anthropic.
	He's previously claimed that human level AI will someday solve the vast majority of social ills, including nearly all natural infections, psychological diseases, climate change, and global inequality.
	That'd be kind of interesting.
	You know, you give it a problem to solve like climate change, it's not a real problem.
	Interesting to see if it goes full sci-fi mode, starts shaking and smoking and burning down.
	Uh that does not compute.
	Uh AI can code faster.
	They're garbage in, garbage out answers of uh, oh, well, your model says that in that case, uh clearly you need to cut down all the trees and bury them.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Yeah.
	Couldn't get any dumber than uh Bill Gates and the zero uh net zero people.
	I have accidentally destroyed your economy.
	This is disastrous.
	Oops.
	Yes, this is catastrophic, isn't it?
	And it just does it anyway.
	Albania has now appointed an AI bot as minister to tackle corruption.
	So there you go.
	Now the crooks are safe.
	Um a virtual assistant on the government website will handle public procurement.
	This is what we're going to see over and over again, right?
	We can't trust humans.
	They're too corrupted.
	So let's uh just dispense with judges and juries, and let's let AI be the judge.
	It won't be it won't be um partial to anything or anyone at all.
	So this is all like uh statistics don't lie, but liars use statistics.
	It's uh AIs aren't corrupted, but corrupted people use AIs.
	That's right.
	That's right.
	So um uh MAGA is actually getting a little bit worried about Trump and his love of AI rights politico.
	So Trump's White House is all in on building powerful American artificial intelligence, and the populist base is starting to push back.
	Uh Trump's rush towards AI is exposing an important fault line in the Republican coalition.
	Many of its voters and leaders deeply mistrust the power of big tech, but Trump himself has worked closely with industry CEOs to deliver on their priorities, because he is owned by technocrats.
	I don't think this is going to be a problem for Trump.
	I mean, we've seen over and over again how capable his base is of actual double think.
	They can actually hate the genetic code injections, they can hate AI, they can hate all these different things, but if Trump does it, it's fine.
	Not a problem.
	The AI argument kicked off in late July, just after Trump announced his AI plans.
	Except that why didn't they say anything about it on day one?
	Remember day one, the Stargate program?
	Had Larry Ellison, who's now the richest man in the world, uh said that we're going to use AI to design mRNA drugs for people, custom design them.
	And it's like, how could how could MAGA not see that from the very first day?
	You take two things that they hate so much, AI and MRNA, and Trump is promoting the synthesis of those two things together on day one, and they don't see that.
	And so now Politico is saying that people like Marjorie Telegrain and Steve Bannon are pushing back against that.
	Well, we'll see.
	I mean while there's a Republican bill to allow utility companies to ration energy.
	And of course, this is because of AI, and because of the Green New Deal.
	Now they pushed back against the Green New Deal.
	That's one of the things that in the first administration of Trump I thought was the best thing that he did, the pushback against the climate stuff.
	And they've continued to do that in the second one.
	However, uh they are going to push so hard for artificial intelligence, and it is so power hungry that it's still going to create the same types of problems that would have been created with the net zero stuff.
	Instead of demanding that utility companies spe spend up for reliable sources of energy, legislators are trying to balance the shortfall on the back of consumers.
	And as Patrick Wood of Technocracy News points out, he says, if you go back and you look at what the technocrats were proposing in 1934, and of course he has a course on technocracy at his website that he sells.
	He said the first two requirements were number one, register on a continuous 24-hour day basis for the total conversion of energy.
	And he said it was first of all, it was the basis for issuing an energy script to all citizens for buying and selling goods and services.
	You know, when we talk about the petrodollar, it even kind of harkens back to what the technocracy wanted to do in 1934.
	They were saying, let's it makes sense for us to do away with currency completely.
	We just want to issue people energy credits that they can use because all economic activity is going to be using a certain amount of energy.
	So we need to measure that, and we need to allocate and use that as a currency and as a store of wealth.
	And uh kind of the petrodollar kind of indirectly harkens back to that with uh uh Henry Kissinger.
	Not a surprise, considering that he was later became the Solon of Bilderberg, essentially.
	Secondly, the technocracy in 1934 predicted economic uh activity because all such activities directly dependent upon energy.
	The technocrats determine uh intended to predetermine how much energy would be made available in the first place.
	And I've talked about this for the longest time in terms of talking about how these people want to measure and assign you carbon credits and things like that.
	Uh MasterCard has been uh one of the earliest adopters of these types of systems, working with uh some of the technology companies as well to measure your energy usage, they just call it carbon credits.
	Secondly, by means of the registration of energy converted and consumed, make possible a balanced load.
	And uh so that's Patrick Wood commenting on that.
	So now what do we have?
	We have the Republicans who uh you always told the Republicans are going to be fighting against the globalists, fighting against the technocrats.
	So bring in Donald Trump, who is one of them, and uh make him a folk hero to the people who are concerned about this, and that's how you get this through.
	That's why it was necessary for him to be president to run through the fake pandemic in 2020 and to set up the vaccine.
	Of course, Biden could mandate it for people, but do you think that that would have been able they'd have been able to do that with Hillary Clinton?
	Of course not.
	All these people who were taking Trump's sugar water because they were told to trust him, uh, would have fought back against it.
	Except it was Trump.
	And we know he's on our side.
	We know that really he's against Bill Gates, and he's got a different vaccine than Bill Gates, and his vaccine is basically sugar water.
	Except now look at Bill Gates and the Trump White House all the time.
	Roy Klopfenstein, a Republican, uh introduced House Bill 427 late last month.
	The measure which has not yet been assigned to committee, creates, quote, a voluntary demand response program.
	Now, on some levels, this is kind of what we've seen with um utility companies saying, let us put a meter on your house and we can pull down the uh power during peak hours.
	And so, from one standpoint, it's like this, except it goes a little bit further.
	And this is something that they're really going to have to double down on in order to uh help the technocrats to set up the AI because the AI is really fundamental to their surveillance.
	How do you think they're going to control social media and the internet?
	It's going to be AI out there looking to see everything that you do, and they'll be investigating it all.
	The overworked, underpaid shadow human workforce that is actually running AI, this is from Brian Shihavi at Health Impact News.
	He says, as the AI bubble continues to grow, with almost nobody refuting the spending on AI in the U.S. is currently a huge bubble anymore.
	Another problem was exposed this week as hundreds of human laborers who are used to train these AI models have begun to be laid off.
	You know, we've joked about it for quite a while that AI actually means actually Indians.
	And this is not even really, if you read his article, it's not even about the people who are putting the bias into the artificial intelligence.
	They hire people, pay them $15 an hour to insert bias into the artificial intelligence.
	But this is really about a technical writer who got this job through an employment agency.
	She thought they actually wanted a technical writer, but what they really wanted was somebody who's going to be a proofreader of the output of artificial intelligence.
	Her expectations went bust.
	Instead of writing words herself, her job was to rate and to moderate the content that was created by AI.
	The job initially involved a mix of parsing through meeting notes and chats, summarized by Google's Gemini, and in some cases reviewing short films made by the AI.
	On occasion, though, she was asked to deal with extreme content, flagging violent and sexually explicit material generated by Gemini for removal, mostly text.
	Over time, however, she went from occasionally moderating such text and images to being tasked with doing that exclusively.
	I was shocked that my job involved working with such distressing content, she said.
	The pressure to complete dozens of these tasks each day, each of them within ten minutes of time, led her into spirals of anxiety and panic attacks.
	Thousands of humans lend their intelligence to teach the chatbots the right response across domains as varied as medicine, architecture, astrophysics, correcting mistakes and steering away from harmful outputs.
	And a great deal of attention has been paid to the workers who label the data used to train AI.
	And again, that's where the bias comes in.
	This is not simply an algorithm that goes bad because it, in the words of Ilhan Omar stochastically, went down a particular path.
	uh it has they they pay people to put particular biases into this artificial intelligence But that was not her job.
	She got stuck moderating disgusting comments content, she said.
	There is another core group of workers, including people like Sawyer, who are working day and night to moderate the output of AI, ensuring that chatbots billions of users see only safe and appropriate responses.
	She is paid more than the data annotators, the people who are labeling things, and Nairobi or Bogota, whose work mostly involves labeling data for AI models or self-driving cars.
	But she was paid far below the engineers in Mountain View who designed these models.
	One researcher at the distributed AI Research Institute based in Bremen, Germany, said AI isn't magic.
	It is a pyramid scheme of human labor.
	That's a good way to put it, actually.
	The AI raiders are the shadow workforce.
	One day her task was to enter details on chemotherapy options for bladder cancer, which haunted her because she wasn't an expert on the subject.
	I pictured a person sitting in their car finding out they have bladder cancer and then Googling what I'm editing.
	She said, I'm not qualified to handle that.
	She said she had noticed a further loosening of guardrails.
	She said responses that were not okay last year became perfectly permissible this year.
	I just want people to know that AI is being sold as this tech magic, but it's not.
	It's built on the backs of overworked, underpaid human beings.
	And now they are reducing the workforce, says Brian, for those who train these AI.
	So it might indicate that there are some issues with this.
	And of course, when we talk about it being magic, that is what they always want to come for.
	The famous quote by Arthur C. Clarke, uh writer who did uh 2001, he said, Technology sufficiently advanced is indistinguishable from magic.
	They want it to come across as magic.
	So as Brian points out, uh, although they are pulling back a bit from the generalized questions, they seem to be refocusing and targeting towards medical issues.
	He said they are trying to hire top talent on more profitable specialized data such as healthcare, since Trump and Kennedy have not been shy about their desire to spend huge amounts of money to create AI robots that they want to replace nurses and doctors.
	And again, that brings us back to day one, Stargate.
	We're going to custom make uh MRNA vaccines for you, genetic code injections, which is what I always call them, that's what they were.
	We're going to analyze your DNA with AI and make something that is custom for you and whatever your illness is.
	So that is going to be where they're really going to target and focus.
	It's going to be on medical stuff.
	That should be very alarming as well.
	Musk's XAI is one that is leading the way in this direction as they too are now laying off many of their generalist AI tutors and promising, uh why would anybody believe Muskie says, promising to hire ten times more specialist AI tutors instead.
	And uh if this trend continues, widely popular chatbots like ChatGPT that do data harvesting off the internet, then try to produce a response to inquiries that are accurate and not offensive, will probably cease to be as popular anymore as everyone will soon learn what these lower paid AI data trainers have already learned.
	Don't use these products, they're almost worthless.
	This will eventually, maybe soon, collapse the entire AI bubble.
	And uh as we all applaud that, just remember that uh the AI bubble has uh completely permeated the stock market now, and so that's going to result in a complete stock market crash as well.
	Altman, the founder of OpenAI that makes Chat GPT, just recently announced his shareholders that his company does not plan to be profitable until 2029, and that another hundred and fifteen billion dollars will have to be spent before that to get there, which is eighty billion dollars higher than the company previously expected.
	So previously they were telling people it was going to be thirty-five billion.
	Now they've just jumped that to a hundred and fifteen billion.
	This unproject unprecedented projected cash burn, which would add to the roughly two billion dollars it burned in the past two years helps explain why the company is raising more capital than any private company in history.
	CEO Sam Altman has previously told employees that their company might be the most capital intensive startup of all time.
	But um final comments, Brian says, I'm sure that large language model AIs will survive, but not until the bubble bursts and the real market value for AI is corrected.
	AI will never replace humans, but they will become useful tools for many industries, including healthcare, but not through the human-like robots, which are a fantasy and don't exist anywhere in the marketplace right now.
	So with all that happening, there is an interesting article about a little known think tank that is pushing Trump to replace federal workers with AI.
	This is coming from the Substack Oligarch Watch.
	And uh I never knew about this foundation.
	It's called the Foundation for American Innovation, but it has uh ties to people like Peter Teal, Elon Musk, Charles Koch, and so forth.
	But we could see that this was always going to be the case anyway.
	I said from the very beginning of Doge, and some of the people that were associated with this foundation were brought into the Trump administration early on to do cost cutting.
	Some of them were brought into the Doge program.
	But I said from the very beginning, didn't I, Travis, that this was about minimizing the number of federal workers, the humans, but then maximizing government because they could use AI to search out people and things and people's actions.
	And I think that's exactly what this still remains.
	We didn't need to know about this.
	It's good to know that this foundation exists, but you could look at what these people were doing, what they were saying, and you could look at their past experience.
	They believe that they're going to take everybody's jobs.
	It's not just Michael Bloomberg that said that, the Democrat.
	Elon Musk was saying that and channeling money to Andrew Yang, who was pushing the idea of universal base basic income.
	Bloomberg said, Yeah, we're going to take everybody's jobs.
	The farmers are stupid, the factory workers are stupid, but we're smart.
	We're going to take their jobs, and we just need to make sure they're not going to come after us with guillotines.
	And so we need to have universal basic income.
	Look, Musk, Bloomberg, Trump, these people are all in the same club.
	They all have the same agenda.
	They're all looking at how they can make sure that you own nothing, and uh uh that they are happy.
	That's exactly where this is all headed.
	Uh so yeah, Melania is pushing the AI for the kids, meanwhile, as they want to have max governance.
	We're going to take a quick break and we'll be right back.
	We're going to take a quick break.
	Here's a little song I hold you might want to hear in your art, you know nothing.
	and be happy I got no cash, ain't got no car but 24 booster shots in your arm Oh nothing.
	Be happy.
	You can't even buy sh in the store because your low social credit score owns.
	Be happy.
	Woo!
	You would owe nothing.
	And be happy.
	Be happy and eat some bugs.
	Yeah.
	Zibbugs, zip bugs.
	Three little birds.
	Well, maybe the birds will like the bugs.
	Our chickens seem to.
	Says the original hospital report talking about Charlie Kirk said no armor on.
	FBI said no armor on.
	There's no picture of armor on him either.
	And again, I've heard again, I I haven't seen any pictures of armor.
	I've seen people saying there was, I've seen people saying there isn't, but I have not seen it.
	So I'm just again, there's all kinds of different conflicting.
	Well, it's an information war, and it's just like, you know, when you have um some kind of an attack somewhere, uh both sides are telling you Whatever they want you to hear, and it's difficult to discern what's really going on with it.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Anytime, again, uh murder is itself a you know non-typical thing to do.
	So there's always going to be weird things surrounding murder because people that do murder are weird and atypical.
	So just based on that, there will always be certifiably insane, aren't they?
	Yeah, they're insane by definition.
	And as such, there will always be insane things surrounding it.
	And then when you have people with agendas on either side pushing different narratives, that means there will always be you know even more oddities and things that are difficult to parse.
	So there's all kinds of different conflicting reports.
	Crash and splash, 75.
	So they took Charlie's speech, and to honor him, they're taking hours.
	Yeah.
	Collar tie, did Trump cure AIDS yet?
	He was bound and determined to do that and go to Mars.
	Not yet.
	Well, give it two weeks.
	Yeah.
	And peace, even before he took office.
	I don't know.
	It seems like they may have already cured AIDS because all these you know big name celebrities that came out and said, I have AIDS have been kicking around for years to decades now.
	Look at Magic Johnson.
	He's still the sheen.
	Yeah, he's still out and about doing things.
	So who knows?
	Knights of the Storm.
	Trump still has not accomplished his promises from his first term.
	Well, you know, he's uh he's taking his time.
	What can we say?
	He's still got three and a half more years-ish.
	Real octo spook.
	All those claiming to have been Epstein's victims have been tossed under the bus.
	Trump protects pedophiles, rapists, and molesters.
	Yeah, that's what GOP has come to mean, guarding our pedophiles.
	Well, let's talk a little bit about the economy here.
	Uh Ed Dowd, who has um is a financial analyst, and he's got a pretty good track record of discernment.
	He got out of Enron and loosened long before they crashed and burned.
	And uh he was uh leading the pack with uh some of the uh discernment about what was going on with the banking crisis that was created by the uh securitization.
	He says that we are now approaching a panic rate cut cycle.
	A panic rate cut cycle.
	Yeah, this is part of the uh stagflation or dragflation, as Gerald Salenti calls it.
	Uh Dowd said Trump had to deal with a turn of a disaster when he took the job.
	But he said you could say that these phony job numbers are statistical fraud, or you could say it's bureaucratic incompetence.
	Let's say that it's both.
	It's such an egregious seven standard deviation away from the truth.
	3.4 standard deviation is a chance of lightning hitting you at least once in your lifetime.
	It's not likely.
	A seven deviation is suggested of fraud, full stop.
	He said the housing market is rolling over because people can't afford them.
	All the indicators are rolling over.
	We're going to have a housing recession.
	We're going to see inflation go lower because housing is 36% of the economy.
	We expect to see a sub-2% print on inflation.
	So what about the Fed cutting interest rates next week?
	He said, Well, they cut rates in the great financial crisis starting in 2007.
	Our stock market didn't bottom out, though, until 2009.
	This is the beginning of what I think is the panic rate cut cycle.
	We're going to see the Fed cutting rates all the way down into this asset deflation that were coming up in the panic rate cut cycle.
	Cutting into slowing growth does not cause assets to reinflate.
	They're behind the curve.
	They're going to be cutting all the way down as we deflate.
	But he still likes gold, and he says his clients are acquiring gold and land, but not crypto.
	He said his forecast of the world going into a very deep recession will come true very soon, he says.
	So again, the fear that uh of the Fed and what they're going to do, and the fact that they're going to cut rates that's going to cause inflation.
	That is really fueling gold.
	And um with a lot of different areas.
	The Fed Reserve has the opportunity to cut rates by up to 50 basis points, and to send gold well above $3,700, says one analyst and all this.
	And certainly, you know, it is the one thing that has for a millennia been the uh hedge to bad economic times.
	So gold has soared to a new record high yet again, ahead of the Fed, bonds, and stocks.
	Uh head of a head of the Fed, the uh bonds and stocks are going down, but gold is going up.
	And um, as the uh CIO of One River Asset Management says, gold is history's timeless hedge for eras that are governed by the law of the jungle.
	And if that doesn't describe our time, I don't know what does.
	Gold could take over the dollars, store a value role as fiscal dominance overwhelms the Fed, says Paul Wong.
	And again, as you also it could also take over in terms of privacy and anonymity, you could take over from cash, that is gold and silver.
	Wong could be right.
	Yeah, he could be right.
	All the jokes about that.
	Chinese airline.
	Bang ow.
	Well, anyway, um, if you want to get gold and silver, which are great hedges uh for especially for a time like this, and also not just hedges against the against inflation and the value of the dollar being devalued, but they're also great hedges against a tax on our privacy and anonymity.
	Uh again, if you want to get gold and silver, go to David Knight.gold.
	That'll take you to Tony Artiban at Wisewolf Gold.
	And uh it helps Tony helps the show if you accumulate your gold and silver there.
	But when we took at the tariffs, uh that is another story altogether.
	We have um Trump tariffs are part of fueling the inflation that we have right now.
	It's not making America great.
	This is a congressional budget office chief.
	He said uh he believes the uncertainty that surrounding the tariffs is escalating it.
	And of course we know that.
	We know that from many different business owners who said we can't expand.
	One business owner in this article was saying, hey, you know, we've got we could hire three more people right now, but we're afraid to.
	In other words, we've got a lot of demand in our business, but we're afraid to make that investment because we don't know what's going to happen with the tariffs.
	So Trump's tariffs are facing an unfuture an uncertain future with the Supreme Court.
	He's already lost uh twice at lower courts.
	Uh so if he loses at the Supreme Court, they're gonna have to refund trillions of dollars.
	But as I've mentioned before, there's something that is even more impactful in terms of trade than the tariffs, and that is the massive fines that Trump has arbitrarily decided that he can impose if you've got a ship that comes to an American port that is owned by the Chinese, and most of the ships are.
	So these massive U.S. port fees that he's putting on.
	We're talking about uh millions of dollars per ship because these ships are so large.
	And uh he wants to put that on.
	He wants to drive the Chinese ships completely away.
	Now, folks, that affects not only imports, but also affects exports.
	The Chinese won't be landing their ships in order to buy agricultural products or something like that.
	At least it won't be affordable.
	Uh, that's the insanity of these policies coming out of the Trump administration, perhaps Peter Navarro.
	Uh and U.S. companies, as I said, are putting the brakes on as these tariffs are starting to hit.
	Sectors, including manufacturing, wholesale, retail, and energy have experienced a wave of job losses that executives blame in large part on Trump's sweeping levies that have increased costs and made it difficult to commit to expansion plans.
	These tariffs are just a drain on American manufacturers, like mine, said Julie Robbins, chief executive of Earthquaker devices.
	Uh, these are guitar pedals out of uh Akron, Ohio.
	She said, uh there's no benefit.
	It's an abrupt tax that is impeding our ability to hire and grow.
	And as some people, as I pointed out quickly last week, some of the people in the guitar industry said, Look, I'm reluctant, I'm in the music business.
	I don't like to get into politics, but what Trump is doing is going to put the entire American guitar business out of business because we can't import the woods that we need to make the kind of guitars.
	We can't get them in the U.S. Uh we had a guy who worked on our house that had been making yachts uh on the outer banks, custom make yachts.
	And because they put a tax on yachts, that put him completely out of business.
	Uh That's the power to destroy, folks, is the power to tax.
	And when it is just thrown out there capriciously, arbitrarily, and constantly changing, it is the most destructive of all taxes.
	At a time when we really don't need this.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Have a good day.
	music
	The common man.
	They created common core to dumb down our children.
	They created common past to track and control us.
	Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	and the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at the David Nykshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.

▲