All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 3, 2025 - The David Knight Show
13:04
Martial Law One City at a Time
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Trump declares DC to be crime-free.
If that were true, would you be okay with federal law enforcement, with the military on the streets?
What is more dangerous?
An out-of-control MS-13, a pandemic, or an out-of-control government.
And I say the government.
King David got upset because in his pride he did a census of his military.
So God said, well, I'm going to give you a punishment.
You know, what do you want?
One of them was plague, and one of them was an attack by his enemy.
And he said, I'll take the plague.
I don't want to be at the mercy of man.
I don't want to be at the mercy of the federal government and the standing army.
We had an interesting statement from Squeaker Mouse Johnson, who is now, when he went on the Sunday show, somebody asked him, he said, well, you know, there's a lot of crime in Shreveport, Louisiana.
And I always remember, I always laugh when I see the name Shreveport, Louisiana.
I had, there was a, there was a, Richard Burton was on a program once and saw the clip from that.
And the person said, you sound so impressive when you speak.
I bet you could read the phone book and make it sound good.
So they hand him the phone book and he goes, Shreveport, Louisiana.
It's like, yeah, that's right.
He can read the phone book and sound impressive.
But anyway, that's actually the district of Squeaker Mouse.
And Squeaker Mouse was saying, yeah, we might have to do that.
If Trump wants to do it, he'll be all for it.
Absolutely.
Yes, sir.
Whatever you say, sir.
How high would you like me to jump, sir?
But while we're talking about a police state, this is from Technocracy News, Patrick Wood.
Do you feel safe now?
License plate readers are tracking you everywhere you drive.
And it talks about the Flock cameras that I've mentioned many times before.
It was founded in 2018, and it was funded by Andreessen Horowitz.
That's Mark Andreessen, and also the founders fund, Peter Thiel.
They have a scalable device that can be mounted anywhere.
It sucks data from every passing vehicle.
It is self-powered with solar panels and communicates via Wi-Fi.
So you just, it's self-contained, self-powered, solar-powered, and it communicates with Wi-Fi.
So you just put it anywhere, and it's constantly recording license plates.
It can be mounted on any type of pole, and they also will sell you a pole.
I bet they will.
These cameras can capture every license plate passing by on a busy four-lane freeway, but it doesn't stop there.
It records the make and the color of your vehicle, any identifying features like window stickers or vehicle damage.
Thus, it fingerprints your car.
So it's not just a license plate.
It gets a complete profile of the idiosyncrasies of your car.
Police systems integrate these so they can track the movement of any vehicle in real time, even across jurisdictions, states, and nationwide.
Your Fourth Amendment rights are being ground into the dust.
He is absolutely right.
And they're doing about 20 billion vehicles per month that they're scanning with over 40,000 cameras installed nationwide.
I start talking about this because even here in East Tennessee and some of the small towns around here, they've been putting them in.
Cities that are literally saturated with flock cameras include San Francisco, Loudoun County, Virginia, Atlanta, Georgia, Virginia Beach, Virginia, and Scottsdale, Arizona, leading the pack by integrating about 4,000 live video streams of different brands into their Flock system.
And this is the technocracy on steroids here, and this is where they want to go.
So this article here on Technocracy News, the guy said, I'm going to print some flyers and hand them out to drivers and give them a technocracy brochure to boot and ask them if it bothers them that they're being surveilled like a criminal without any search warrants.
But of course, you know, you can have your car stolen without being charged with a crime.
And then you have to sue them in court.
So now Flock wants to partner with a consumer dash cam company because it's not enough to put them on every poll.
They've got to put them on cars as well.
And they have a NEXAR is the name of the dash cam company.
I don't know who they are.
I would say, you know, I think dash cams are good.
They can protect you in an accident.
They can even protect you from aggressive police who are over-policing.
I've had that situation.
Not the accident, but the police.
I've been pulled over.
A guy says, you want to throw a red light?
And I pointed to the dash cam and I said, I've got a dash cam.
I said, go ahead and charge me.
We'll take it to court and I'll show you what I did.
And so he let me go.
He says, well, I'll give you a warning.
Have a nice day, sir.
Yeah.
He just backed off because I had the video evidence there.
And otherwise, he would have given me a ticket.
It would have been his word against mine.
But a dash cam is a great thing to have.
And so Nexar is going to team with the flight cameras.
And of course, it'll record the vehicle's precise GPS location and make that a part of the data as well.
Surveillance everywhere.
And while we have surveillance everywhere, it's kind of interesting to see that AI is now being used to unmask the masked ICE police.
Can Washington do anything about it?
This is politico.
A new twist in the debate over surveillance tech raises tough questions for policymakers.
You see, they want to know everything about us.
They don't want us to know anything about them.
So now they're wearing masks as part of their quote-unquote law enforcement.
Technology is a two-edged sword.
This is an activist who likes immigration, and he's in the Netherlands.
And so he has started using AI to identify ICE agents beneath their masks.
He says he only needs to be able to see 35% or more of their face, and they can recreate it with artificial intelligence.
And then he's got humans, or maybe some actually he's got AI that is then going through and trying to take the AI-generated face.
And there is a program actually that is available to everybody that, and this should concern you, that can take a face and match it up to a massive database that they have.
It's great.
We're fighting police state with some guy's AI invasion of privacy.
There's no winning this one.
This guy is some liberal moron that is pro-immigration.
This is a police state.
It's our invasions of privacy versus theirs.
Yeah.
Stuck in the middle.
Yeah.
And actually, there's a company that does reverse image search engine.
It's called PEMES.
And so once they have their AI-generated face, they feed it into PEMES and it comes up with people out of its database.
And then I think he said that they've got people who check it before they dox these people.
But again, he's in the Netherlands, and so it makes it hard for them to do anything about it.
A 2019 study from the Georgetown Law Center on Privacy and Technology found that police departments digitally altering pictures and using artists' sketches as a basis for finding suspects through facial recognition.
And so that's something that they've been doing.
Now it's being done to them.
He said, I don't believe in public justice, but I do believe in public shaming and public accountability, said the man in the Netherlands.
He acknowledged that the technology is flawed.
He said that about 60% of the AI-generated results on facial recognition searches led to wrong matches on social media profiles.
He says a group of volunteers verifies them through another process before they post the names online.
So that's the society in which we live now.
Trump declares DC to be crime free after a federal crackdown.
And I just have to say, you know, ask you a question.
If that's true, if that were true, would you be okay with federal law enforcement, with the military on the streets?
And that's the real issue.
And think back to COVID, right?
If the price to be safe, let's say that the virus was real, that the pandemic was real.
And if the lockdowns and all the rest of the stuff that were done, closing everything, if that was effective, and of course it wasn't.
But let's say that it was effective.
Would you accept that trade-off?
I don't find that as an acceptable trade-off, not at all.
And I said that at the time.
I said, I don't care whether this thing is real or not in the very early days in January.
I said, I don't support this kind of lockdown.
So you're going to violate the Constitution, positive comitanis.
What is more dangerous?
An out-of-control MS-13, a pandemic, or an out-of-control government?
And I say the government.
I even said the early days, I said, this reminds me of when David, King David, Got upset because in his pride he did a census of his military and things like that.
And it was all based in pride.
And so God said, Well, I'm going to give you a punishment.
You know, what do you want?
And he gave him a multiple choice of punishment.
And one of them was a plague, and one of them was an attack by his enemies.
And he said, I'll take the plague.
I don't want to be at the mercy of man.
I don't want to be at the mercy of the federal government and a standing army.
I'll take the plague of violence.
I'll take the plague, supposedly, of a virus.
Anything other than that.
We should understand and have that kind of wisdom.
David certainly did.
So again, coming back to Squeaker Johnson, he says it may be necessary to send the National Guard to Shreveport, Louisiana.
He was asked on one of these Sunday shows.
I'm going to ask you, you might be calling for the National Guard in Shreveport.
Part of your district is Shreveport.
FBI statistics show violent crime per 100,000 residents higher in Shreveport than in Washington, D.C. And he says, Well, it's because we got a Democrat DA, you know, that's put in there by Soros.
That may all be true, but what is remedy for that?
As remedy, it's sending military troops.
He says, Well, I don't know.
Let's take one city at a time.
That's the way they're going to do it.
It's going to be one city at a time, martial law.
We have to address a crime problem in any city where that's a problem.
In large cities like Chicago that you mentioned, it'd be a big help there.
That would be great.
We don't care what the law says.
Let's just do this.
And, you know, this is the way that they've operated the war on drugs, right?
I don't care what the Constitution says.
We got a problem here, and I'm going to use force, and I'm going to use federal police to solve this problem.
And we look at how both the drugs and the corruption have metastasized, like a cancer, based on that kind of decision.
The Common Man They created common core to dumb down our children.
They created common past to track and control us.
Their commons project to make sure the commoners own nothing and the communist future.
They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
That is what we have in common.
That is what they want to take away.
Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
Please share the information and links you'll find at the DavidNikeShow.com.
Thank you for listening.
Thank you for sharing.
If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.
▲
Export Selection