The David Knight Show - The David Knight Show - 9/1/2025

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 1, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:07:06

The David Knight Show - 9/1/2025

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Anesthesize to that, especially conservatives.
	And they're just, and they're going to cheer the placement of the actual military in the various cities.
	So we're going to talk about the issues of that.
	But I want to begin with the Pentagon plans because this is something that's been going on for a long time.
	And let me just go full conspiracy theorist on you here because I don't think any of this stuff is a coincidence.
	I think that at the same time, He's talking about going to war with the Democrat cities.
	He's also talking about going to war with the drug cartels.
	You know, the first prohibition that we had, what happened?
	You had Al Capone and other people like him were shooting it out in the cities, weren't they?
	With machine guns.
	You had the St. Valentine's Day massacre.
	You had them riding on the side of cars shooting other people.
	Now, this is going on much worse in Mexico with drug cartels.
	I mean, you had like six heads found on a body on a bridge the other last week.
	Things like that.
	That kind of brutality.
	This was unusual because it was very close to Mexico City.
	Now let me ask you, what do you think is going to happen if the military starts to attack the cartels directly?
	You think they might engage in terrorism?
	You think they might do the same kind of stuff in some American cities that they have done in Mexican cities?
	You think they might come after journalists?
	You think they might come after politicians or whatever who report on them, who make laws against them, who run the war against them?
	That'd be a perfect opportunity then to come in.
	That'd be a real emergency that Trump could create.
	That'd be a perfect opportunity to declare martial law.
	We take the drug war to being a real war.
	And the Pentagon has been working on this for a long time.
	This is a video, and it's kind of long.
	It's about five minutes, but it's worth hearing this.
	And listen carefully because in it, you'll hear this has is done many, many years ago before they started talking about draining the swamp, that meme from the MAGA people.
	And you'll hear them say this in this Pentagon video as they say, well, we're going to have to get into urban areas.
	And I remember playing this.
	I said, this is really an ominous harbinger of what these people are really planning to do.
	They're really planning to...
	And so this is something just like the germ games and the mRNA vaccines and the lockdowns that they have been practicing, wargaming, and rehearsing for years and years and years.
	Here's the video.
	The future is urban.
	By 2030, urban areas are expected to grow by 1.4 billion, with that growth occurring almost entirely in the developing world.
	Cities will account for 60% of the world's population and 70% of the world's GDP.
	The urban environment will be the locus where drivers of instability will converge.
	It is the domain that by the year 2030, 60% of urban dwellers will be under the age of 18.
	The cities that grow the fastest will be the most challenged as resources become constrained and illicit networks fill the gap left by overextended and under-capitalized governments.
	The risk of natural disasters compounded by geography, climate changes, unregulated growth, and substandard infrastructure intersect to frustrate humanitarian relief.
	Growth will magnify the increasing separation between rich and poor.
	Religious and ethnic tensions will be a defining element in the social landscape.
	Stagnation will coexist with unprecedented development as impoverishment, slums, and shanty towns rapidly expand alongside modern high-rises, technological advances, and ever-increasing levels of prosperity.
	This is the world of our future.
	It is one we are not prepared to effectively operate within, and it is unavoidable.
	Megacities are complex systems where people and structures are compressed together in ways that defy both our understanding of city planning and military doctrine.
	It is an ecosystem that demands a highly agile and adaptive force to successfully operate within.
	Infrastructures will vary radically, with concentrations of high-tech transportation.
	Now they're showing a lot of pictures of the third world.
	This is about you.
	What said that?
	Intelligence and waste disposal intermixed with open landfills, overburdened sewers, polluted water, and makeshift power grids.
	Living habitats will extend from the high-rise to the ground-level cottage to subterranean labyrinths, each defined by its own social code and rule of law.
	Social structures will be equally challenged, if not dysfunctional, as historic ways of life clash with modern living, ethnic and racial differences are forced to live together, and criminal networks offer opportunity for the growing mass of unemployed.
	This becomes the nervous system of non-nation-state, unaligned, individuals and organizations that live and work in the shadows of national rule.
	Where physical domains can be seen, digital domains will have limitless potential to breed and expand without limit.
	Digital security and trade will be increasingly threatened by sophisticated illicit economies and decentralized syndicates of crime to give adversaries global reach at an unprecedented level.
	This will add to the complexities of human targeting as a proportionally smaller number of adversaries intermingle with a larger and increasing number of citizens.
	The scale and density of these domains is daunting.
	In a city of 10 million, where you hold the support of 99% of the population, the remaining 1% represents a threat of 100,000.
	It is an environment of convergence hidden amongst the enormous scale and complexity of the megacity.
	These are the future breeding grounds, incubators, and launching pads for adversaries and hybrid threats.
	Linked globally, these are man-made labyrinths that provide refuge and movement across the vast sections of these cities where alternate forms of governance have taken control.
	The advice of doctrine from Sun Tzu to current field manuals has provided two fundamental options.
	Avoid the cities or establish a cordon to either wait out the adversary or drain the swamp of non-combatants and engage the remaining adversaries in high-intensity conflict within.
	Even our counter-insurgency doctrine, honed in the cities of Iraq and the mountains of Afghanistan, is inadequate to address the sheer scale of population in the future urban reality.
	From the streets of Aachen to the citadel and way, we have defeated adversaries who attempted to use urban terrain to their advantage.
	But in tomorrow's conflict, these megacities are orders of magnitude greater in complexity.
	and our current options do not meet strategic ends.
	Our future operations must allow us to rapidly return the city to the people.
	They will be too large and complex to isolate or court on in their entirety.
	Yet our soldiers will have to operate within these ecosystems with minimal disruption and flow.
	Our current and past strategies can no longer hold.
	We are facing environments that the masters of war never foresaw.
	We are facing a threat that requires us to redefine doctrine and the force in radically new and different ways.
	The future army will confront a highly sophisticated urban-centric threat that will require that urban operations become the core requirement for the future land force.
	The threat is clear.
	Our direction remains to be defined.
	The future is urban.
	Yeah, and the Democrats can kind of see the threat, but they don't understand what it's really about.
	They think it's going to be January the 6th part two.
	This is another coup.
	They're going to try to take over the election like they did on January the 6th.
	That was not an insurrection.
	That was not a coup.
	And they still think it was, and they think that that's what this is about, and they're dead wrong on both accounts.
	Now, this is, there will be election rigging, but that's going to be done with gerrymandering, and both parties are doing it.
	They're freaking out because of, and we'll talk a little bit about that, but that's the politicians picking the voters.
	And they're trying to make sure they maintain a majority, especially during the midterm election.
	So they're in this redistricting battle that's going on Texas and California now Missouri is going to be next and they are going to increase the Republican seats so it's not about the election it's not about Trump Trump has been from the beginning a puppet of the military industrial complex and the Pentagon who wants to run all this stuff they were planning this stuff for decades many decades They ran the first one of these games.
	They'd already been planning it.
	They ran the first one of the games three months before 9-11.
	This predates Donald Trump and they just don't get it.
	But they needed somebody like Donald Trump, just like the Ross Child said.
	And we can use this guy, Wilbur Ross told him.
	And they're right, they can use that guy.
	The Pentagon understands it as well.
	And so do people like Davos and the rest of them.
	That's truly, I think, what this is about.
	And I think that once they pick a fight with the cartels, then you will either have the cartels directly attack, sabotage, infrastructure and other things like that, which will be a real emergency.
	And of course, then we got to do it to keep you safe.
	Or they will do a false flank attack and blame it on the cartels.
	Did you hear that old video where they're talking about how they defeated the enemy in the cities of Afghanistan and Iraq only in their imaginations and their war games?
	did they do that and that's the reality you know part of it was to say look at that in a city of 10 million if you only got one percent you know we got to deal with 100 000 people and so they have a daunting task therefore they're going to start practicing right away with donald trump this is not simply about dc it'd be bad enough if it was about dc it'd be a stretch of his authority isn't it amazing Like I said,
	I would have never thought in my lifetime, certainly, that we would see the kind of authoritarian fascist controls.
	And I mean that literally.
	When you take over, when you get a share in Intel, folks, that's.
	economic fascism and the militarism and the hyper nationalism is also characteristic of fascism.
	But it really is a technocracy ultimately, but it has these fascist elements in it.
	And I would have never thought that these types of things would have been allowed in America.
	This is why they have to get the so-called conservatives to support it.
	Because if it was done by the left, it would be too obvious.
	And the people who would stand for freedom would oppose it.
	But not when it's their own guy, not when it's somebody that they love so dearly.
	They will make every excuse in the book for him just as they have for what he did in 2020 and just like they voted two more times for him.
	So Chicago woman, here's an example of this.
	I couldn't believe this.
	This is a story from The Guardian and it was picked up by, she tweeted this out, it was also picked up by Breitbart and many others.
	Chicago woman was carjacked.
	but still tells Trump not to bring the National Guard.
	These people are saying, how stupid can you be?
	What's the matter with this woman?
	Actually, she's got a lot more sense than these conservatives.
	who are trolling her, I think.
	Federal militarized police, folks, are not a solution.
	They are another problem.
	What happened to these conservatives?
	Don't they realize, don't they remember when Ronald Reagan said government is not the solution?
	Government is the problem.
	Now you have conservatives out there willing to trade liberty for the promise of safety and security.
	You have conservatives out there who, as I said, John Burst Society in the sixties said, support your local police.
	It was actually should have been more like support local policing because it was a federal government that was incentivizing and rewarding financially and putting out the guidelines for how they wanted to change the way policing was done.
	That's why you've now got the Brazil-type raids, 1984 Terry Gillens, 1984 Brazil.
	That's why you have those types of raids rather than Sheriff Andy Teller.
	We've gone from that in my lifetime, those two realities that we had out there.
	And this is being driven by the federal government.
	They've always been the driver of this.
	And yet the saddest thing I thought, when I see this militarization of the police, As a matter of fact, the closest I could see to it was they're saying Trump is saying no American troops will be sent to Ukraine.
	Well, I hope that they are appropriately skeptical, but Trump also says he's going to send troops to Chicago and California.
	Where is the Tom Burt Society?
	Come on guys, wake up.
	Has Trump put you to sleep?
	I mean, it's like we talked about The Wizard of Oz last week, Travis.
	It's kind of like, you know, watching these people as they are going across the field and the witch makes them fall asleep in the field of flowers.
	That's really what's happened to the conservative movement under Trump.
	It's insane.
	Just as long as Trump does it, it's okay.
	Like Richard Nixon, when the president does it, it's not illegal.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	How are they going to like it when you've got a Democrat president of the same cut as Obama or Hillary running militarized police in your cities?
	And of course, there's nineteen different states that said, yeah, we're great with that.
	Let's put the military in our cities because in every city, even if it leans conservative and Republican, there's going to be a big city and that's going to lean Democrat and so it's like yeah bring them in let's get control of Nashville and Memphis and I mean we just had some some heinous murders in both of those places so yeah bring in the military police that's what we need anyway this woman says they car jacked her they stole her car they broke her arm but I don't want the the military in here and
	she is getting trolled left and right she had to shut down her account because the conservatives were trolling her so much conservatives pushing the militarization of the police she said Chicago's a mess you have an incompetent mayor grossly incompetent rather she didn't say say that.
	Trump said that.
	And we're going to straighten that one out probably next, said Trump.
	That'll be our next one after this.
	And it won't even be tough.
	There you go.
	So Trump's solution to crime is the same as his solution to a so-called pandemic.
	We declare an emergency.
	We operate as a military operation.
	And he is instinctively authoritarian in everything that he does, whether it's the way he deals with critics or whatever.
	And so in response, she wrote, I've been carjacked in Chicago with my arm broken.
	I still don't want your troops here, she said.
	And so this is a reply from the magotards out there who don't understand anything about politics, history, or what is happening.
	Are you mentally disabled?
	Truly asking for your sake.
	Oh, wow, guys, look, I can smile after somebody contact me.
	That means it's okay.
	Sometimes staying quiet is the best option.
	Yeah, that's especially true if you're going to be a conservative who's going to cheer the stationing of troops in cities.
	I'm disgusted with these people.
	They make me want to vomit.
	So does Trump.
	What's the matter with them?
	So if you're going to cheer martial law, yeah, you should be quiet..
	But these people voted for that.
	Screenshotting this to show my children what an idiot looks like.
	Well, you could just show them yourself.
	I mean, that's, hey kids, I'm an idiot.
	This is what one looks like.
	So, Democrats are...
	They think this is about elections.
	Yeah, it is about political power.
	Everything they do is ultimately about political power, but that's not the primary issue of this.
	So you have a Democrat representative, Adam Smith, a Democrat from Washington.
	And he went on.
	And he said, crime is the problem, but Trump's fascism is not the answer.
	He's absolutely right.
	It's not.
	Not even putting out more SWAT teams and armored personnel carriers are the answer either.
	So he said, there are two huge problems here.
	Number one, we're using U.S. military for domestic law enforcement.
	The second big problem is that Trump is basically giving himself a national police force.
	And I think that they know that this is what's coming down the pike anyway.
	That's one of the reasons why they've had the police wearing masks like they do in third world countries, like they do in Mexico, right?
	Because, yeah, we're going to be targeted by the cartels.
	And they want that to happen.
	They're going to create that problem.
	And if the cartels do not respond the way that they hope that they do, they'll do a false flag.
	That's what I think is really going to happen.
	I'll see you on the street, said Trump, after Pritzker, who I think is absolutely reprehensible on everything, pushed back against this, saying that we're going to send troops to Chicago.
	This is the governor of Illinois pushes back.
	But also the Maryland governor who's also a Democrat, Wes Moore, Moore urged Trump to use Maryland's model for fighting crime instead of deploying federal troops like the administration did in Washington, DC.
	He said, if there's anything Maryland has proven over the last two years, it's that we can achieve performance without being performative.
	We need the right tool for the right mission.
	Look, I'm not a fan of local policing mainly because of the things that the federal government has trained them to do and incentivized them to do.
	But it's only going to get worse as we pull this in.
	This is what they're practicing.
	So Trump put out on true social.
	on True Social, he accused Governor Maryland Moore of using, quote, rather nasty and provocative tone.
	That's the kettle calling the pop black, isn't it?
	And his invitation to, quote, walk the streets of Maryland.
	And he threatened to revoke the funds that were needed to rebuild the Francis Scott Key Bridge that was knocked down partially by that container ship.
	Remember that?
	Yeah.
	If you don't talk to me nicely, I'm not going to, uh, And I don't think the federal government ought to be doing subsidies of infrastructure.
	They always throw the money at the wrong things and do it in the wrong way.
	That was one of the big fights before the Civil War, the fact that it wasn't just about the trade, but it was also, or slavery or whatever, it was about tariffs, it was about whether or not we were going to have free trade or how the taxation was going to be done, but it was also about the fact that Washington was pouring big bucks into infrastructure in certain favored areas.
	And the people were not getting the money were very upset about that.
	So, yeah, they're building a big canal system, infrastructure in the Northeast with federal dollars.
	And the people in the South were saying, well, wait a minute, we don't benefit.
	from that, and they were absolutely right.
	So, yeah, to all the MAGA people who said during the lockdown that all the mask and all that kind of stuff and medical martial law, that had nothing to do with Trump.
	He didn't do that.
	And I said from the very beginning, I said, look, he paid them to do that.
	He financially incentivized that.
	And Trump understands that very well.
	Look at what he does.
	He reacts immediately by saying, oh, yeah.
	I'm going to cut off the money that we give you all the time.
	They do it over the boys and the girls bathroom issue.
	The Democrats said, we're going to cut your funds off.
	if you don't put boys in the girls' bathroom.
	And the Republicans will say, well, cut it off if you do.
	But they understand that that's a weapon.
	The MAGA people do not.
	At least they say they don't.
	I don't know if they're just trying at this point.
	I even wonder if even MAGA could be that stupid to actually think that Trump was not running this stuff, that the buck, as I've said so many times, doesn't just stop with the president.
	He's ultimately responsible.
	But it's where the buck starts.
	That's what the Declaration of Emergency on his side was about.
	He is the one that set everything in motion.
	And as such, as you said, it doesn't just stop with him.
	It started with him.
	It's full circle all in one person.
	Yeah, Bill Maurer says that this is a slow-moving coup, but he gets it all wrong because he thinks that this is like some kind of a J-6 thing.
	He thinks that the next election, Trump doesn't get the results that he wants, that they're going to run in with the military and say, that's it, we're keeping control.
	That's not it at all.
	It's going to be much more subtle, and it's going to be about a lot of other things, and he's absolutely ignorant.
	of what the Pentagon has been planning for a very, very long time.
	Bill Maurer can't comprehend the idea that the next president is going to be using all this that Trump is just a puppet that's setting up a larger thing of control.
	He thinks that Trump is the ultimate evil behind everything.
	Yes.
	That's absolutely right.
	If only we could get him out, then all these dictatorial powers would be fine.
	Yeah, it's a dance.
	It's a one-to-step.
	And it's one of the reasons why they had to put Biden in.
	Because Trump locks everything down, messes up the supply chain and destroys a lot of small businesses and farms.
	And then they put the guy in to mandate his poison that he produced.
	Also, personally, I'd be surprised if there is ever a dictator for life, at least in the United States.
	It seems as though they realize that Elections Act is a sort of pressure release valve.
	The guy comes in, he does a whole bunch of things you disagree with.
	But every four years, you get to pick a new dictator.
	So maybe the next guy will be better.
	Maybe he'll do a bit better job.
	Oh, he didn't do a good job, so he's out.
	New guy.
	Whereas dictator for life, it breeds a lot of resentment over time.
	People start getting very upset.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Sort of a sacrificial candidate.
	All of the sins of the government get put on one person's shoulders now.
	then you get a new president then he's cast out into the wilderness if only we could yeah it's my habit somebody sent me an article saying that gen that Gen Z is getting nostalgic for George W. Bush.
	I can promise you, there's nothing to be nostalgic about, guys.
	You miss me yet?
	I've said that a long time ago.
	I'll never miss him.
	The thing is, nostalgia is wishing for something better than what you currently have that you used to have.
	My favorite meme of George W. Bush was when...
	They didn't have to do too much morphing.
	Actually, he's pretty close to that already.
	And it was like, you know what?
	Me worry?
	So yeah, when you go.
	back and look at all the masks and all the rest of the stuff, think about that.
	In 2020, we had masks enforced by cops, right?
	In 2025, now the cops are going to use force and they wear the masks to hide their identity.
	It works perfectly.
	Bill Mars said, first they create a masked police force, get people used to looking at that, normalize snatching people off the street, get them used to looking at that, normalize seeing the National Guard and the military on the street.
	And he's right.
	This is about moving the overturned window.
	This is about normalizing it.
	That's what this all was about.
	That's what the passport, the vaccine passports and all the rest of this stuff is all ultimately about.
	Do you really want to have to live your life under military occupation like your Paris occupied by the Nazis or saying, the identity papers please?
	They wouldn't even have to say that.
	They're creating a biometric database where they can get your identity papers just by looking at you.
	He said, you start talking about crime in the capital, and it's always been a fairly crime-ridden city.
	So Trump says, yeah, we're going to make it safe.
	And then we're going to go after other places.
	And the Conservatives are more than willing to trade your liberty for Trump's promise of safety.
	As a matter of fact, on Bill Maurer's show, you had conservative activist Christopher Rufo, who has done a lot of good work against the LGBT and other things like that, I think, understanding that it is about ultimately about the Maoist struggle sessions.
	But he ripped liberals for just being too sensitive.
	Oh, your feelings are hurt.
	You just don't like the military, that type of thing.
	Well, I think they are completely wrong.
	The Conservatives in my lifetime, as I said, have done a complete 180.
	They've become the Democrats of my youth, but even worse than the Democrats of my youth.
	I can't imagine the Democrats of my youth pushing the kind of authoritarian policies that Trump is doing.
	Even the Democrats of my youth did not say we're going to take over major businesses like Intel.
	We're going to take a share in them.
	And let me ask you, how much of a share do they have to take before they really manipulate them?
	They can manipulate them without even taking shares, but to take shares in it is taking it to a whole new level.
	That used to be the province of these third world dictatorships and communist parties to have.
	have ownership of corporations.
	People in Chicago are screaming for us to come, said Trump.
	They're wearing red hats.
	Yeah, the red hated people are screaming.
	I think they are barking mad, as the British would say.
	They are screaming for Trump and screaming their approval of him for whatever he does.
	They're saying, please, President Trump, come to Chicago, please.
	I did a great job with the black vote, and as you know, they want something to happen.
	So I think Chicago will be our next stop, then we'll help with New York.
	So Mara said the militarization of U. S. cities could be how Trump puts systems in place to maintain control of presidential election processes.
	I think they've got something much bigger than that.
	They don't care about elections.
	They control the elections now.
	That's what all this gerrymandering is.
	They pick the voters.
	They know in advance which of their parties are going to win the election.
	And of course, they know which people are going to win because the Democrat and Republican parties pick who's going to run in a particular district.
	So they set the district up for their party.
	They pick the candidates.
	They keep independents and third parties off the ballot, off of the debates.
	And then they rig it with the voting machines, the vote by mail, and you name it.
	They've got a gazillion different ways to rig the vote counting.
	And so this is not about the election.
	This is about smart cities and how they enforce it.
	That's ultimately what this is about.
	And this is what the Pentagon has been talking about and practicing for a long time.
	They were talking about it and practicing it before they were defeated in Iraq and Afghanistan.
	So maybe there'll be the next fake pandemic.
	Or maybe it'll be some kind of a climate lockdown.
	Or maybe it'll be the cartels who are invaded.
	But what they're doing is they're practicing, rolling out literal martial law.
	I said it a million times in 2020.
	It was medical martial law pushed by Trump.
	And now he wants the real thing, just like we've had a so-called drug war.
	And now he wants the real thing with that.
	And the Democrats don't get it either.
	The presence now of this army in Washington is going to have its toll taken when the next election comes down.
	Well, this is all predictive programming.
	Congress and judiciary will also be growing accustomed to martial law.
	Let's start with Washington, DC.
	the congressmen and the judges and all the bureaucrats in Washington can't get used to seeing military on the streets so they don't think anything about it when you send them into the other areas.
	I mean, it's all just, it truly is, Bill Maurer was right in the sense that he said, this is a slow rollout of a coup.
	It has been this way from the very beginning.
	Again, Chicago is going to be next.
	He's boasting about it.
	And at the center of all this is the little authoritarian nerd Stephen Miller.
	He's at the center of all of this federalization of the police, this over the top actions that they're doing, and the so-called crime crackdown.
	He's got his fingerprints all over it.
	People in administration say, yeah, he's the guy who's running this together.
	And of course, you could look at it as just Trump is marking his territory.
	And that's the way many people on the left look at it.
	But it's much, much bigger than that.
	It is a bipartisan move.
	And let me tell you that somebody like Obama-Biden or Hillary Clinton are going to love having this kind of power.
	It won't be one of the three of them, but it'll be somebody who's just like them, maybe a conglomeration of the three.
	Maybe thinking in terms of like a hydra, you know, all three heads on one body.
	Yeah, just kind of like morphing George W. Bush and Alfred Newman from Mad Magazine.
	You can get AI to give you a composite picture of Obama, Hillary, and Biden.
	So Reason took it on and said, Trump's DC goon squads are un-American.
	Well, even more importantly, it's unconstitutional.
	They said, the president is ordering federal troops on the street.
	That's not how routine policing should work, even in the nation's capital.
	By the way, You know, we went for a very, very, very long time in this country without police.
	We had the sheriff, and the sheriff would bring together the posse when necessary if it was something that was really big.
	That was called the posse comatus was actually the power of the community.
	And it is the posse comatus act that Trump is violating here.
	But an elected sheriff and the people, the power of the community is a very, very different approach to law enforcement to begin with than a police force.
	A police force works for the city, hired by the city, controlled by the city.
	The police chief is not accountable to the citizens in terms of he's accountable to the other elected officials.
	But it's a very different model.
	Local street resistance says reason is the occupation was limited to a drunk guy throwing a sandwich at a federal agent.
	That was when they put some DEA and ICE people into Washington City, DC, and when he threw a sandwich at these guys, they came back later and rearrested him, overcharged him with a felony, and rearrested him in a big public show of force.
	Massed federal agents have set up an unconstitutional checkpoint, violently arrested at least one delivery driver, film themselves tearing down a banner that protested their appearance, their presence within the city, each day more and more National Guard members pour into the capital.
	You know, no institution has been worse about violating the Constitution than the federal government in its entirety.
	And this is just yet another example of this.
	The conversation about Trump's declared crime emergency has understandably, albeit unhelpfully, provoked a lot of discourse about how safe DC is, whether a federalized local police department will make it safer.
	But I would say this debate ignores the law, ignores the Constitution, ignores the elephant in the room, which is that he's trying to set up martial law that's in violation of the Constitution.
	These are powers that were not delegated to the federal government.
	So therefore, they don't have them, according to the Ninth and Tenth Amendment.
	So these are, it begins with powers that they don't have.
	Now, reason also takes a look at the Constitution and says, well, if we look at the Third Amendment, which, you know, for years and years and years, people said, well, the Third Amendment is the only one that's not being violated because that was when the British government would quarter troops into a town or into people's homes and that type of thing.
	So we don't have the military living in our homes.
	And I said, well, in a sense, you have the NSA living in your home.
	It's living in your computer.
	It's violating the Fourth Amendment where you should be securing your person and your property and your papers.
	And it's also basically living there and using your electricity to spy on you.
	Uniformed troops and mass federal agents doing routine law enforcement at the command of the president is just not.
	how we do things, said Reason.
	That's putting it a little bit too mild.
	I think we need to hate this.
	I think we need to speak out against this strongly.
	It's not just to say, well, traditionally, that's not the way we've done it.
	These people are beginning their martial law with a violation of the Constitution just like Trump did in twenty twenty.
	So this is not a situation where we're talking about mismanners etiquette.
	We're not talking about which side you put the forks on the plate.
	This is the Constitution.
	And this is a standing army.
	And this is a form of martial law, conditioning at the very least.
	The entire point of the U.S. Constitution is to prevent the federal government from becoming a despotism, said Reason.
	That's true.
	This is why the Constitution places strict constraints on maintaining a standing army.
	That's why there are only three times mentioned in the Constitution, none of which would plausibly require federal agents, three crimes, I'm sorry, none of which would require federal agents to patrol a street in Washington, D.C. or Chicago.
	So what they're saying is there's only three crimes that are defined there because law enforcement was not the purpose of the federal government.
	It really was for the common defense primarily.
	And they were very concerned that there not be a standing army.
	But the army has been standing around now since World War two.
	And they've gone, they've been sent to other countries, they stood around on the throats of other countries as well when we were not attacked.
	So we've used them, as Truman said, as a police force.
	And eventually when you use the military as a police force in other countries, they're going to be used as a police force in your own country.
	That was what Madison said.
	He said the instruments of defense abroad become weapons of tyranny at home.
	If you're going to have a standing army that's going to become a global police force.
	It's going to be a global police force in your town, in your state.
	And that's what Trump is now working on, I think.
	And it all folds in very nicely with the technocrats, doesn't it, Travis?
	It just keeps rolling together.
	I had a good comment here in chat.
	Someone's, I can't remember, can't find it, but he said, haven't seen a normal cop car in ten years.
	Now they all want the $80,000 suburban's and want to be some kind of enlisted blade runner type guy.
	It's just every single cop I've seen in my lifetime has had this sort of aura of, you know, I'm here to, you know, whatever I say is the law.
	You know, it's very judged dread.
	Yeah.
	And we're seeing this happen.
	Well, just take a look at Homan, the guy that he chose for ICE.
	I mean, he's a classic of that.
	You know, he's got that, that's his persona, absolutely.
	Yeah.
	And that set the stage for this.
	The cops have already become so militaristic that it's, we've already moved so far in that direction that this feels like the next logical step.
	Like a lot of people probably won't even notice the difference.
	Yeah.
	And the thing that bothers me is that conservatives are either silent or cheering it, because it's Trump.
	It's amazing the control that one person can exercise over this.
	They are cheering a literal standing army now.
	The Third Amendment says reason is mostly treated as an anachronistic joke today.
	In fact, it is a load bearing part of the Constitution that makes clear that the military and the police are different things and that Americans should not have to tolerate the presence of armed agents in the states as a routine part of daily life.
	Well, again, police were something that was invented in the nineteenth century.
	You had Robert Peel in the UK created police force in London, the Bobbies, and they were very civil for the longest time, unarmed even.
	even and but look at them today you know now they're going around arresting women for silently praying even after they've been it's been thrown out the court three times and the police department has had to pay of course they don't pay it's the the taxpayers who pay and they just did again even though they've been slapped they're like Colorado where Colorado keeps going after bakers the same baker you know because he won't custom make a transversary cake yeah it's probably about time for him to end up in another lawsuit Exactly.
	But yeah, that's their mission now.
	Also, I like the terminology that you hear load-bearing part of the Constitution.
	It's like, no, no, you can't.
	He's like, no, no, you can't take that out.
	That's a load-bearing amendment.
	You take that out, the whole thing comes down on itself, boss.
	We can't do that.
	Yeah, well, they're doing that with the First Amendment.
	That definitely is a load-bearing part of the Constitution, and the Second Amendment as well.
	In his book, Rise of the Warrior Cop, Radley Balco writes about how the trend of increased political militarization has eroded, quote, the symbolic Third Amendment and the free society that protects.
	It's darkly ironic then that after decades of politicians of both parties in D.C., gifting the federal government vast powers to police the rest of the country, that a militarized police force is now being deployed on the streets of America's capital against its residents.
	I think that is, first of all, the logical progression, but I think it's also predictive programming, as I said before.
	They want these federal bureaucrats and elected officials to get accustomed to what they're planning on doing to everybody.
	So they want to put it there.
	The federal government acting as a beat cop is inimical to our constitutional design, regardless of how effective its efforts are.
	That DC is a federal district might seem to complicate the point, but in fact, it reinforces it.
	Except that, you know, Trump has declared his intent to do it everywhere and anywhere.
	And he wants it to be seen as punishment of his enemies.
	You know, that is the subtext of all this stuff.
	He wants to be seen as a revenge administration.
	Even in the seat of federal power, says Reason, it's understood that a force of federal agents policing everyday life is not something that ordinary citizens should have to put up with.
	That's absolutely true.
	Again, another Democrat.
	Again, it's only the Democrats are criticizing this, which is the thing that bothers me the most.
	Conservatives should be up in arms.
	They should be angry about this, but they're just rolling over because it's Trump.
	Anybody that criticizes Trump is going to be taken down and out.
	That's whether you're doing it in the media or if you're a politician, he's going to get you out of there.
	Ro Kahana says the National Guard is in DC so that Trump can stay in power.
	Again, that's what Bill Maher said.
	And the Democrats see that because the only thing the Democrats care about is power.
	They don't care about the Constitution.
	They don't care what happens to the citizens.
	It's like, oh, is this a game so that he can beat us at the power game?
	That's what it's really about.
	So he was asked by Jonathan Capehart in an interview.
	He said, Congressman, let's switch gears to National Guard troops that are here in Washington.
	Also from about six or seven Republican states, and they're going to go into nineteen different states.
	Tennessee is one of them.
	Texas is one of them.
	I mean, all the Republican states are saying, yeah, yeah, send us a standing army.
	We want that because Trump wants that.
	So it's a good thing.
	President is threatening to replicate this in other cities like New York, Chicago, Oakland.
	What do you think they all have in common?
	And he says, black mayors.
	So is this racism?
	He said, It's going to be about political power, and they're going to play the race card.
	Well, I just have to say that there is a correlation with high crime and with black mayors.
	But so what?
	And if you don't like what's happening in Chicago with the dozens of people shot with gang violence over each weekend, then get out of the place.
	But the answer is not to federalize it.
	If the people there want to put up with it, if they want to like corrupt, ineffective leadership, then let them do that rather than setting precedents for military martial law.
	And the conservatives are pushing for this because, and you heard in that Pentagon megacities thing, they said, people of different racial and ethnic groups will be forced to live with each other, pushed into conflict with each other.
	And of course, the coming conflict is going to be when they crash the markets, when they take jobs with their AI stuff.
	And so the conservatives are freaking out over this guy, Kilmar, again.
	Kilmar Garcia, they call him Maryland man, is what the...
	Conservatives call him the guy that Trump when he was trying to make the case he didn't talk about the guy's real crimes.
	He tried to pretend that the guy was MS-13 because of tattoos on his knuckles.
	Now, what might indicate that he was MS-13 was that he was caught red-handed in Tennessee trafficking people.
	But the Trump administration doesn't really care whether it's true or not.
	They just want to, and it was evidenced by the phony, ridiculous narrative that they came up with to defend their actions.
	He should have focused on even after You could say well they don't they didn't know that this happened well the people in Tennessee Star hammered this the fact that he was pulled over.
	He had eight people or something in the car with him.
	None of them spoke English.
	None of them had any idea were American citizens.
	And the car belonged to another guy who was already arrested and convicted for trafficking.
	So it looks like, yes, he was cartel.
	Not because of the nonsense about the tattoos on his knuckle.
	That was easily debunked.
	It was almost like they wanted to have an argument about this guy.
	Yeah, this, him being released to me is a really, really bad thing.
	Because this is going to strengthen the position from the right.
	See, it's like, well, when we give them the option to go through the judicial process, these people try wrong.
	That's wrong.
	That's why he's been selected as a poster child to show we're going to have to act as extrajudicial.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Yeah, no trials, Fanny Speaker.
	See what happened to Kilmar, the Maryland man?
	We did it the right way, and this is what happens, and now you don't get any habeas corpus.
	That's right.
	So in terms of Chicago, actually, Washington Post is talking about the fact that the Pentagon is planning this.
	I showed you the video that's been planning this for a very, very long time.
	But now they're planning specifically to go to Chicago as part of Trump's strategy to address crime, homelessness, and undocumented immigration, according to the Washington Post report.
	And so we have reports that the Pentagon is planning to go into Mexico to fight the cartels.
	We have reports that the Pentagon is planning to go into Chicago, but MANGA media doesn't know, doesn't care what the implications of this are.
	The mobilization is set for September.
	Pritzker, the governor of Illinois, has received no requests, you received no requests or outreach from the federal government asking if assistance is needed.
	They're going to send it in preemptively.
	House Minority Leader Hakim Jeffries says Trump does not have the authority to deploy troops in Chicago.
	Well, he's right.
	So impeach him for something that's real.
	I mean, they've impeached him for a lot of phony stuff in the past.
	Now they've got a real reason to impeach this guy.
	The National Guard in Chicago, but he's also said about putting it in LA.
	And so in a thread, Pritzker said that he is using these cities, quote, as his testing ground for authoritarian overreach.
	Yes.
	It's not about what some of these other Democrats have said, but it is about normalization and about testing and about training.
	Okay, so now we're going to work on, we're actually going to practice this.
	I remember a decade ago that conservative alternative media, when I was at InfoWars, we were running stories all the time because Trump, not Trump, Obama, sorry, there's so much alike.
	Obama was repurposing MRAPs.
	They even had a situation where since World War II, surplus equipment from the Army was donated to fire departments.
	rural fire departments because rural fire departments didn't have a big population they didn't have a lot of money and they could have to deal with really really big fires especially because they're usually adjacentcent to some federal land, and the feds don't maintain their forests.
	So it was always a tradition that the military would donate heavy equipment to these fire departments.
	But that was right about the time that he was shoving these MRAPs on local police departments, and basically the things were massive white elephants.
	And that was more than anything else.
	That was what stopped that program.
	lot of uh sheriffs were saying you know the contract was that the pentagon maintained ownership of it they just put it there and then put the expense of maintaining it on the local police force and said we don't have the money to do this because those things were rushed into the iraq war and they were a maintenance nightmare and so it was i saw it as a forward positioning by the obama administration we also put all our equipment there we'll have the local people maintain it at their expense and then
	it'll be there when we want to roll out the military in some kind of an emergency so we were pushing back against that in terms of the fire shooting
	stuff that had a happy ending because the local fire departments are mostly volunteer firemen and these people are politically active and they started they got very politically active with their elected representatives and senators pushed back on this pretty hard and they stopped it about a month after they declared that they were going to terminate that program.
	They turned around and said, no, we're going to continue it.
	But we're not seeing that kind of pushback now.
	And we were talking all the time about, that's one of the reasons why I knew about this video, we were talking all the time.
	about the militarization of the police and what is Obama up to.
	But now that it's Trump, not a peep from Alex Jones, not a peep from Infowars or Breitbart or anybody else.
	If they say anything, they cheer it.
	And the biggest thing is I can''t even believe that the John Birch Society, hey, any of you people other than John Birch Society, tell them I said so.
	You guys have lost your spine.
	Wake up.
	Wake up.
	Sick of this stuff.
	Pitker said, after using LA and Washington, DC as his testing ground for authoritarian overreach, Trump is now openly flirting with the idea of taking over states and cities.
	Breitbart said Trump explained during an announcement in the Oval Office about the FIFA World Cup drawing that after his administration finishes cracking down on crime in the nation's capital, it'll go after another location.
	And they don't push back against that.
	This is Breitbart.
	So they don't push back against it.
	They don't say that that's wrong.
	So you've got people, we're in big trouble, folks, when the only people who are going to speak out against martial law are people like Pritzker, Rocahana, and other Democrats.
	We're in big trouble.
	We're in big trouble.
	The Pasi-Comitatis Act, says Breitbart, prohibits the use of armed forces.
	to execute laws except in cases expressly authorized by Congress or a constitutional act.
	That's right.
	It's a violation of the Constitution.
	It's a violation of the Ninth and Tenth Amendment.
	It's a violation of the Third Amendment.
	It's a violation of the Pasi-Comitatis Act and on and on and on.
	But it's Trump, so it's all okay.
	And the response from Children's Health Defense says regulators have to tell the public that digital IDs will be voluntary and optional.
	They get rid of the digital IDs, especially the biometric stuff.
	So they're pushing back and saying, you know, we can see all this stuff happening.
	We can see it roll out.
	can see that the federal government are turning into literal nazis so are they saying that regulators must tell the public the digitalids must be voluntary in order to get them passed through then they can make them mandatory yeah exactly they must tell them that or else it'll never happen well yeah we all know how that works out i mean we've seen you know real id was kind of a slow rollout and eventually it becomes mandatory for certain things we had e-verify and of course that you had to
	get the federal government to verify that you're really american citizen before you get a job well that was voluntary uh until you had Republican states like Florida start to make it mandatory.
	I said, Children's Health Defense requests that NIST publish a formal FAQ to confirm your department is committed to emphasizing the voluntary nature of digital ID, meaning that nothing in the new NIST guidance should be construed to require biometric identification.
	Well, they don't understand that digital ID was never intended to be voluntary, and especially the biometric and facial stuff, and that's what's rolling out now at the TSA.
	Remember, that was voluntary.
	You want to get to your plane with less hassle and quicker?
	Just sign up for our voluntary program.
	Now it's facial ID is mandatory everywhere.
	We could see that coming.
	This is the way these people operate.
	Let's not be naive about it.
	They said NIST is clearly moving towards digital wallets and biometric keys that will make it harder for Americans to access their online accounts, email, bank, everything online, unless Americans provide biometric identifiers, face scan, thumbprint.
	This is going to happen and you won't be able to travel.
	You won't be able to get out of your little fifteen minute area.
	You won't be able to use your money if you're geolocated outside the area that you're allowed to be in, and they will have gatekeepers like the TSA.
	You know, we talk about federal police.
	Let's not forget the TSA.
	That's essentially what they are.
	And it's just amazing to me that we don't care anymore.
	And look at what the U.S. military did in Afghanistan.
	I remember there was a freak out toward the end of it.
	They had the U.S. military in Afghanistan had a box that they took around and they used that to do immediate biometric facial identity on people.
	And it had a database that it was associated with.
	So it could pull people up just like that.
	And they're worried about it because they lost track of one of these boxes.
	And they said, oh no, now the bad guys, the Taliban, can use this to identify our people, right?
	They can use that as a counter thing.
	And they can show that if it shows up, you know, they point at somebody's face and it'll tell them if it's one of our guys or not.
	If this Afghan has been friendly to us.
	That was one of the things that was an impetus to try to get as many Afghans here as possible when the whole thing collapsed.
	So the military has been working on this for a long time, just like Palantir.
	Palantir first cut its teeth on helping the military to create surveillance states and areas that our standing army had taken over and was standing on the people's throats.
	And as I said, You know, it's the instruments of war that we use abroad become instruments of tyranny here at home.
	Biometric identification, all the rest of the stuff, that's what it's truly about.
	We'll be right back.
	The United States of America Making Sense Common Again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Well, let's get to what's happening at the CDC.
	And again, Susan Monarez, who I had no love for, this is someone who has been in the darkest corners of this public health dictatorship for the longest time, very concerned about her appointment.
	So much so that I thought, this is a plan, you know, to put this other guy up that Mago would like, who is a kind of a vaccine sceptic, and then pull the rug out from underneath him as he's on his way to his confirmation hearings.
	And he was going to toe the line with them.
	But they pulled the rug on him and they put this woman in who has been at the top of the deep state for the longest time in places like ARPA H, like DARPA, but for health and other issues like that, pushing mRNA and artificial intelligence, which was near and dear to Trump's heart.
	But it appears that there was something of a personal disagreement between her and RFK Jr. after he had showered massive praise on her when she was first put in.
	I mean, you look at her background.
	And it's like, how could you say anything nice about her background and her career?
	The White House and Department of HHS, which oversees CDC, did not immediately respond to requests for comments.
	The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive personnel matter.
	Trump had nominated Monarez, a longtime Federal Government scientist.
	Yeah, put the scientist in air quotes.
	After withdrawing his first pick, former Republican Congressman Dave Weldon, who was criticized for his views on vaccines and autism, Monarez was confirmed in July.
	She had scheduled an agency-wide call on Monday, but that was cancelled on Friday, according to several CDC employees who spoke on the condition of anonymityity.
	They mentioned that over and over again.
	That's the Washington Post.
	And she wasn't the only one who left.
	Others followed her.
	And apparently what happened was she was called to DC to talk to RFK Jr. and he said, I've got some people here that I want you to fire.
	She refused to fire them, so he fired her.
	And then some of these other people walked out in sympathy.
	Her departure was quickly followed by the resignation of several high-level veteran agency officials, leaving the CDC leaderless at a perilous time, says CNN.
	Perilous time.
	Have they got something planned for us?
	I say good riddance.
	Get rid of them all.
	Get rid of the entire CDC.
	We'll take our chances with the peril.
	Yes.
	The CDC, do you feel so unsafe knowing that the viruses are coming and we have no CDC director to stand between them and us?
	Yeah.
	contagion direct place.
	But the CDC has, for the longest time, It's this quasi-government, quasi-private thing, and they wear military units.
	It's a cesspool of an example of everything that's wrong with Washington, the federal government.
	The whole thing should go.
	Morale, which is already l low after deep staff cuts this spring, plummeted after a gunman opened fire on the agency's main campus on august 8.
	Evidently, that's what they're referring to, seeing in a perilous time.
	This person showed up to the building and just took shots from a long distance away, just at the building, shot up the building.
	He didn't shoot anyone that was there.
	I'm pretty sure he killed a cop, if memory serves.
	Wasn't that one of those that happened?
	Was that the case a cop engaged him in the I think he killed one cop and then was killed by the others, if memory serves.
	But he was angry at the CDC for the Trump shot.
	And kind of a metaphor from AGA, right?
	We're going to take our anger out on a building instead of the people actually produced the bioweapon.
	And he's probably a Trump supporter as well, but he doesn't really understand who's responsible.
	So HHS said in a post, Susan Monarez is no longer director of the CDC.
	We thank her for her dedicated service to the American people.
	Yeah, thank you.
	Thanks a lot.
	for what you did.
	RFK Jr. has full confidence in his team at the CDC who will continue to be vigilant in protecting Americans against infectious diseases at home and abroad.
	Let me just say, you know, when we look at the CDC, these vaccines and the viruses, I can't highly recommend highly enough and I need to get them back on.
	The Baileys and Samantha Bailey and her husband, I can't remember his first name.
	I remember her name because she goes by Sam Bailey.
	She's not a trainee.
	But they wrote a book, No More Pandemics.
	And if you understand just how shaky the entire quote unquote science of virology is, how unproven all of their assumptions are.
	There will be no more pandemics because the pandemics are something that does not reflect reality, but reflects their statements on public health controllers.
	Monarez's attorney just to let people know, the interview you did with the Baileys is called Silencing Dissent.
	Dr. Sam Bailey's license ripped, fortifying COVID lies.
	At least that's one of them that you did.
	Yes.
	I should get him back on though, because things are always being updated.
	Monarez's attorneys said in a statement, Dr. Monarez has neither resigned nor received notification from the White House that she has been fired.
	And as a person of integrity and devoted to science, she will not resign.
	So what's going on with this?
	Now you've got people that Trump is getting rid of or RFK Jr. that she works for, supposedly.
	Again, I wonder if she's going to make the case, well, we're a private agency, you can't fire me like the Federal Reserve, because it is, like I said, this kind of quasi-public, quasi-private institution, which is 100% outside of the Constitution.
	So they refer to her throughout this CNN article as departed, as endearly departed, I guess.
	Shortly after Monarez's departure was confirmed Wednesday, so she's not resigned.
	She says she's not been fired, but she has departed.
	Three other top CDC officials also announced that they were leaving.
	The agency's Chief Medical Officer and Deputy Director of Programs and Science.
	CDC, you'll hear.
	Exactly.
	The Director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases and the Director of the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases.
	Well, there you go.
	We are at a perilous time.
	We're open to a zombie apocalypse any day now.
	Oh, no.
	Not the zombie apocalypse.
	It'll be so cringe.
	Those went out of style in like 2009.
	Did you say something, Lance?
	Anyway, for the good...
	Yes, exactly.
	For the good of the nation and the world, LOL, the science at CDC should never be censored or subject to political pauses and interpretations, one person said in his resignation email to staff that was shared with CNN.
	Just think about the hypocrisy, the rank hypocrisy in that.
	For the good of the nation and the world, nobody was allowed to talk about either their imaginary pandemic or their real bio weapon that they were going to be the main sellers of.
	They have the audacity to say that.
	We are science and we're going to shut you up.
	Vaccines save lives.
	This is indisputable.
	No, it's not.
	Well-established scientific fact, she said.
	But actually, she lied.
	Informed consent and shared decision-making must focus not only on the risk.
	Informed consent?
	This is the first time I've ever seen anybody at the CDC mention informed consent.
	But also the true life-saving benefits that vaccines provide to individuals and communities.
	save the life of the community that's the whole idea behind public health we don't care about you you're just a member of the herd and the herd needs immunity as i said before that's just an abstraction to control you it's ultimately about the individual if the individuals in the herd are not healthy then the herd is not healthy if they don't have immunity to a disease then the herd cannot acquire immunity to the disease and if
	your vaccines convey immunity you wouldn't have to hit people with them multiple times except it's about profit which we're going to see here in a moment the while it's important to question and analyze research this must be done only by experts with the right skills and experience.
	Trust us, we're the authorities.
	That is the antithesis of the scientific method.
	So don't talk about science and say only experts can investigate this stuff.
	If you can't explain it to a layperson, you don't understand it, and they don't even want to try to explain it to a layperson.
	Just do it because I say so.
	It's an argument from authority, from academia.
	It's truly amazing how utterly ineffectual so many allegedly highly educated people are at explaining anything to the normal person.
	They're completely and utterly only capable of thinking about it in terms of their own jargon.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Which means that they don't really understand the issue.
	And if they could understand it, they could explain it to an eight-year-old.
	Or they're specifically wrapping it in jargon that you don't understand to keep you from being able to understand it.
	Yeah.
	Explain it to me, lady, like I'm an eight-year-old, and then tell me about the tests that you have run on these things to test their safety, to test their efficacy.
	Oh, that's why you didn't isolate it, did you?
	So people are being supposedly inoculated against something that they haven't even isolated and identified properly, according to scientific methods of observation.
	Hourley then said that misinformation has already cost lives, citing a record high number of measles cases in the US this year.
	Well, nobody died of measles.
	Not even the two cases that they mislabeled as deaths from measles.
	Those have been debunked as a lie.
	But even if those were true, two people from the most and they continually said, Measles, the most contagious disease we have anywhere.
	Well, if that's the case, why didn't we have a global pandemic once it raised its head again?
	It was very localized and small in terms of the spread.
	It didn't go over the entire country.
	I mean, think about that.
	We have the most contagious disease according to them.
	And yet, you know, we had Trump's HHS pharmaceutical czar, Alex's czar, who declared a pandemic for the entire United States after they had about two or three, they said, cases, whether they were real or not.
	And yet that did not, that supposedly quit And yet measles is supposed to be more contagious and didn't spread throughout the entire country.
	And you had two people that they alleged died.
	That has been completely debunked by the families, by doctors who were in attendance.
	But even if that were true, look at the millions, tens of millions of people that have been killed by their vaccines, killed by their ventilators and all their pandemic measures that have happened.
	There's a lot more people just in the last year that continue to be killed by the ongoing knock-on side effects of these bioweapons, as well as the boosters that they continue to get.
	Yeah, or probably just about any drug that they bring to market.
	Yeah.
	would be surprised if there is any drug that is sold that you need a prescription for that does not kill more than two people.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	Or do unbelievable harm to people that they don't warn you about.
	Talk to me about informed consent.
	What cynical liars these people are.
	Hey Lance, real quick.
	Do you think you would rather get the measles or go through what you went through with the antibiotic?
	Antibiotic again.
	Ciprobase.
	We need a black label for measles.
	Yeah.
	Well, yeah, the issue is that they had a black label on that drug and you had a doctor who casually prescribed that, like he's giving somebody doxacycline or something.
	Yeah, here you go.
	Whatever.
	Yeah, but he didn't inform you about the warning from the doctor or from the pharmacist.
	No.
	It is untenable to serve in an organization that is not afforded the opportunity to discuss decisions of scientific and public health importance released under the moniker of CDC, said one of the people who resigned.
	The lack of communication by HHS and other CDC political leadership that culminates in social media posts announcing major policy changes without prior notice demonstrates a disregard of normal communication channels and common sense.
	having to retrofit analyses and policy actions to match inadequately thought out announcements is poorly scripted videos or page long x-posts should not be how organizations function and yet that is exactly what they did when their own internal tests started showing the link to autism they went back and changed it all right and to cover it up they said we're responsible for the health of people and that's not the way that we should function no you're not responsible
	our health you're responsible for the diseases that are afflicting us in epidemic proportions the real epidemic is autism and you don't even want to talk about that you don't want to show the research that you've done you've spun that and lied about that and the one thing that gets the the like senator Cassidy and these other people who are covering for the vaccine industry.
	You even talk about doing some research on why we have an epidemic of autism and these people go ballistic.
	They don't want you to even look at that.
	That shows their hand right there.
	If they had any concern about the health of people, they would want to know what is causing this, but they want to shut down all research into autism.
	It's kind of like the smoking gun of a murderer, I think, when you see that.
	So the director of the Office of Public Health Data Surveillance and Technology also left the CDC on Wednesday, said, our agency is crumbling.
	Good.
	You should all go to jail.
	Said a source within CDC.
	All of our top people who kept us protected are being taken out by this new administration.
	Oh, no.
	From twisting science for their agenda.
	Science is data and facts.
	We're simple people that way.
	We trust numbers and facts.
	I don't trust any of the facts, so-called facts or numbers, from these twisted liars.
	I tell you, a total projection of these people.
	It's amazing.
	can came soon after Kennedy summoned Monraz to Washington and demanded that you fire these people that I've just been reading clips from.
	According to two people familiar with the matter, she refused, angering Kennedy and triggering his move to remove her.
	He should have fired her from the very beginning, but instead he praised her when she was put in place.
	Montez also clashed with Kennedy and his team over vaccine policies, including an impending announcement that could draw links between immunization and autism.
	They are preparing this.
	RFK Jr. is kind of preparing the public hinting that it's something external to the kids that is causing autism.
	In other words, it's not some kind of a genetic defect or anything.
	And of course, everybody knows that when you look at something that has exploded like that.
	And Trump has echoed that.
	They're going to be revealing that sometime in September, so we'll see what's actually said about that.
	CDC's kept it hidden for decades.
	They should be punished for the epidemic of autism.
	Think about how they have harmed people with this.
	It is truly amazing.
	I keep thinking back to that case here in Tennessee where the judge decided that these two kids in a divorce case that all the kids needed to be caught up on their vaccines and one of the kids who had the most severe reaction to it.
	is now has a fully grown child now has to be kept in a diaper all the time and his father has to take care of him and support the kids because the mother who vaccinated them in order to get custody then abandoned them after this child got that severe autism.
	Yeah, well, probably taking the children was more about getting back at the dad than it was ever about her desire to actually take care of the children.
	And so, you know, she got what she wanted.
	Yeah.
	Real quick before we move on, there's a comment here from Brandon Grateful Baptist.
	I have it here on my screen.
	It says, I agree with a lot of what you say, but I'm on medications.
	Unfortunately, I truly exhausted every way I could, but I have to pay rent and I'm in a great deal of physical pain every moment of every day.
	Please pray for me.
	So I just wanted to make sure that we got that.
	Yes.
	So please do pray for Brandon Grateful Baptist.
	But again, there once you've exhaususted everything else, there may not be any other options for what you need than some pharmaceuticals.
	And I think, again, you should be able to make that choice.
	It should be an informed decision.
	If there's something out there, even if the consequences, even if the side effects are really bad, they may not be as bad as what you're dealing with, and you should be allowed to make that decision for yourself.
	Well, going back for many years, when you look at the cancer industry and the pain and the nausea that they put people through with chemotherapy and things like that, I always felt that if somebody wanted to take a chance on some new drug, hoping that it's going to be a miracle, they should be allowed to do that.
	They're already in a terminal situation.
	And if there's something that they know that can help them in terms of nausea, like medical marijuana was rumored to be, they should be able to do that without fear of going to jail.
	I remember the case of Peter McWilliams, who was an LGBT activist that was in the Libertarian Party, and he got AIDS.
	found that the only thing that could keep him from throwing up constantly was medical marijuana.
	And he wrote about it publicly.
	And so they made a public example of him.
	The judge threw him in jail and so that he could not get access to marijuana and he died on his own vomit in the jail cell and that's you know that's that's the drug war for you that's the government our government is doing nothing but murdering yes I'm not gonna I'm not gonna judge you or anybody for the medications that you take That is a personal decision that you should be free to make on that.
	And I will pray for you and, you know, explore all the different spiritual issues with this, whatever it is that you are dealing with.
	There may be.
	some help that is there as well.
	So, because God is ultimately the one who heals, who gives us life.
	So, they said in their comments here, they said when CDC Director Susan Monrez refused to rubber stamp unscientific, reckless directives and fire dedicated health experts, she chose protecting the public over serving a political agenda.
	This is not about one official.
	It is about the systematic dismantling of public health institutions, the silencing of experts, and the dangerous politicization of science.
	So according to CNN, protecting these bureaucrats from the consequences of their actions is somehow protecting public health serving public health over the bureaucracy when she's literally serving the bureaucracy yeah i can confidently say that you know people have had mixed uh results from pharmaceutical drugs but i can confidently say nobody has been helped by a vaccine right nobody has been helped by that they supposedly
	even if they they were right and they stopped measles I had measles as a child it's no big deal and it's not worth the side effects to have stuff directly injected into your veins.
	That is something that you ought to think about.
	When God designed the body, he did not design it to have things directly injected into your veins.
	And that's a very serious thing.
	You got a lot of different levels of protection in your body, the skin when you breathe in through your nose and other things like that to filter out stuff.
	But this is when they put something into your veins, there's nothing there.
	There's no bodily system that's there to really help you with that.
	You're very vulnerable and they take advantage of that.
	Yeah.
	There's also the fact that you can take steps to mitigate your exposure to, you know, I don't believe in, like you said, don't believet believe in viruses, but whatever it is that might make you sick, whether it's bacteria, you can mitigate the risk when it comes to colds and other things like that.
	There's nothing you can do to mitigate the risk of a vaccine once it's in the system.
	It's just, it's playing Russian roulette and you don't know how it's going to turn out.
	That's right.
	So we've had Patty Murray, who is a senator from Washington State.
	She's weighing in on this to criticize RK Jr.
	Trump administration.
	But Monrez was principal deputy director and acting director of the CDC from January to March.
	She has a PhD in microbiology and immunology, but she is not a medical doctor.
	She just plays one at the CDC.
	This is somebody who pushed artificial intelligence and mRNA.
	That's why I'm kind of surprised by this, because she seemed to fit the pattern of what Trump and his billionaire investors really want.
	And I thought she was there to...
	Monerez's tenure in government spans Republican and Democrat administrations.
	Before coming to the CDC, she was Deputy Director for Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health.
	That's R. ARPA H, and was founding director of the Center for Innovation at Health Resources and Services Administration.
	She held other leadership positions at the Department of Homeland Security and the Biomedical Advanced Research Development Authority, BARDA.
	So I'm saying she has the deep state pandemic written all over her, a very dangerous person, and whoever got her.
	needs to be exposed.
	Where's Laura Lumer when you're like, you're like, right?
	Come on, Laura, do it.
	Maybe she was just too old and unattractive for Trump.
	Maybe he's just going to start staffing the entire government with nothing but, you know, like attractive young blondes.
	Yeah, he has.
	She's old.
	She's old.
	Gotta go.
	Gotta go.
	She's old.
	He had this very uncomfortable eye rolling moment in his three-hour live TV cabinet meeting the other day where he started talking about how attractive he thought Pam Bondi was.
	And everybody's like, ooh.
	This is awkward.
	Well, I guess that explains why she has her job.
	Exactly.
	Yeah.
	Oh, she looked great.
	Hire her, yeah.
	At the day of her swearing in, Kennedy had said that Monrez had unimpeachable scientific credentials.
	No, she should have been impeached based on her LinkedIn profile.
	So if you look at it, it's nothing but a list of the usual suspected organizations.
	Maybe he's talking about blackmail material.
	You could not impeach this person.
	They can't even fire her.
	That's how connected she is.
	Yeah.
	CNN and the Democrats and establishment are just freaked out about this, and you have to take some Schadenfreude out of that.
	For 80 years, said former director Tom Friedman, for 80 years, CDC's been a beacon of health protection for the U.S. and the world.
	That beacon is now in grave danger of being extinguished, please, endangering all of our health.
	Eroding health protection capacity at the top further undermines trust at a time when it is most needed.
	If these reports are true, the firing of Susan Monarez represents a very dangerous turn for American health.
	Yeah, letting people get away from some of these vaccines.
	If the CDC director was fired because she would not embrace Kenny's lies about vaccines, we truly have entered a dangerous time for U.S. health and security.
	The possibilities are limitless, they said.
	Well, what he did was he changed the framework for this.
	And the bottom line is that, like I said, I suspected when I first saw this on Twitter and I responded to it yesterday, I said, I think this is all headfake and deception.
	And the more I look at it, the more convinced I am that's the case.
	The FDA rescinded emergency use authorization for COVID-19 vaccines.
	Yet, folks, the bioweapon poison is not banned.
	It's still out there, as Katie said, for people who want it.
	Well, who wants it?
	The people who have been lied to, who have been gaslit.
	It's like saying, we're going to let people have training surgery if they want it.
	Okay, this is the same equivalent to it.
	The emergency use authorization for COVID vaccines, once used to justify broad mandates on the general public during the Biden administration, is now rescinded.
	Well, if you go back and look at what happened, the emergency use authorization was really to get them liability protection of the PREP Act.
	And I remember when I interviewed the individual from Children's Health Defense, her name was Meyer, and she said, they want to get this approved and put into the children's schedule, because if they can get it put into the children's schedule, then their legal immunity is conveyed via this 1986 childhood vaccine act.
	And so they're able to do that.
	They didn't really need to have the emergency use authorization anymore.
	There's this overlap there.
	But he said, I promised four things.
	To end the COVID vaccine mandates, to keep vaccines available to people who want them, especially the vulnerable, to demand placebo controlled trials from companies, and four, to end the emergency.
	In a series of FDA actions today, we accomplished all four goals.
	That's not true at all.
	I mean, we still don't have any placebo controlled trials from companies and this this emergency use authorization is not the same as the declaration of the emergency that was done by the prior HHS guy maybe that's what he did maybe he removed that executive order that was put in there by the Alex Cesar but nevertheless they're still making these vaccines available and I'll I played this for
	you once before but Let me just, it was a movie that I saw that I thought had a really striking scene.
	I always remember this scene.
	And this is a housewife who's kind of going nuts and at one point she goes to the family dog and she tells him I'm putting some poison in your milk.
	If I were you I wouldn't drink it but she puts it right in front of him and that's the analogy I think of what RFK and these other people are doing when they say well I wouldn't recommend that you get this mRNA stuff but if you want it you can get it.
	I know you're a very wise dog and the wise must know how to make decisions.
	I'm going to put poison in your milk.
	Whatever you do is up to you.
	Informed consent.
	She told him.
	You can drink it or you can leave it alone.
	Whatever you do is your decision.
	Okay.
	Wait a minute, wasn't there a statement that all poison had been removed from the milk?
	Yeah.
	That folks is what these people..
	are doing and I think it's as reprehensible as that scene is So yeah, I promise people if you want them if you want them you can get them especially the vulnerable people This scene implies that the average American is not as intelligent as a basset hound Yes, that's right one of the dumbest dogs out there and I can say that as Since we had two basset hounds at one point, we decided to go the other direction with Scout and we got a border collie He was perhaps a bit too smart for his own good.
	He is.
	He is.
	He is almost autistic in the way that he gets fixated on something.
	You can get very destructive with that.
	But anyway, the FDA has now issued marketing authorization.
	For those at higher risk, they can get Pfizer or Novavax or Moderna.
	These vaccines are available for all patients who choose them after consulting with their doctors, who won't be honest enough to tell you, as she told that Bassetthound, there's poison in here.
	I wouldn't take this if I were you.
	But it's up to you.
	They won't tell you that there's poison in the milk.
	The American people demanded science, safety, and common sense.
	And this framework delivers all three.
	That is total BS from RFG, Jr.
	Yeah, just for those who want them.
	And so he's approving these vaccines, but he's putting them there with restrictions for age.
	So those, he says, they've been approved for adults who are age 65 or older, and for those who are between the ages of 5 and 64 who have at least one underlying condition that puts them at high risk.
	So this is the game that they played at the very beginning where if you have, if you're somebody that's 65 or older, if you die from their vaccines, they can claim that it wasn't their vaccines.
	It was your age or underlying conditions.
	And that's the reason I believe that they're also making it available to the people between the ages of 5 and 64.
	It's to protect the vaccine companies who already have legal immunity but they don't want the public to see that they're killing people with these vaccines.
	They'd love to get rid of the people 65 and older save on Social Security and that's where they started with this whole fake pandemic in the first place.
	So Americans who are six months and older, those who are 12 years and older can get the Novavax machine.
	If you're six months or older, you can get Moderna.
	12 years and older can get Novavax.
	Healthy children under 18 will be able to receive a COVID-19 abomination.
	The American Academy of Pediatricians says that limiting the availability of shots for kids is deeply troubling.
	This is about nothing other than money, folks, because one of the things that CNN and the mainstream media is saying is that by changing the approval stuff for this, if somebody wants to get it, if somebody really wants to get it, they can get it, but they're going to have to pay for it.
	out of their own pocket because insurance companies now will not cover it if it's not put into the schedule by the CDC and they said it can cost $140 per shot.
	Think about how many boosters they put out there.
	No wonder these pharmaceuticalsal executives all became billionaires overnight.
	And that was because Trump gave them the money to ramp up their production, gave them the liability protection so they couldn't be sued for anything, and then paid them $140 a shot.
	And that's why they're still pushing this stuff, because they get paid so much money.
	And the pediatricians are pushing this as well.
	And the Academy of Pediatrics, this...
	They are getting tens of millions of dollars contributed to them by pharmaceutical company and by government grants to continue to browbeat people into getting these shots.
	So that's the real way that they made a killing, not just in the literal killing of people, but they made a killing financially.
	$140 a shot, the vaccine companies are making out like murdering bandits that they are, and so are the pediatricians.
	It's amazing.
	As a general rule, the bandits didn't leave you crippled or destroyed for life.
	They would just take what you had on you in the moment.
	Yeah, these people take your money and your life.
	And the $140 per shot, I've never seen that figure before until these people complain now about the fact that the government and the insurance companies are not going to be paying for that.
	You're going to have to pay for it out of your own pocket.
	How are we going to kill the poor people?
	American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists are also pushing the COVID vaccine and hopping mad that it's not going to be paid for by government and by insurance.
	And the obstetricians are pushing this for pregnant women.
	They said they ought to have this schedule changed so that pregnant women can get this at any point during pregnancy when they're planning to become pregnant or when they are lactating.
	Always until I guess maybe about six years before this nonsense began, they would always tell pregnant women, women who were breastfeeding, they would tell them, do not take a vaccine.
	But now they push it specifically for pregnant women.
	That tells you just how ruthless this planned eugenics thing is really.
	Yeah, when my wife was pregnant, they continually were pushing one vaccine or another.
	Oh, you should really get this.
	You should get that.
	The whooping cough vaccine was one that they continually kept trying to be like, well, it'll, we've got a new version of it, and it's better at passing on the immunity to the child.
	Just I don't want anything that is going to be passed on.
	Yeah.
	It'd be bad enough if it was just going to, you know, you were going to inject my wife and it was going to stay there.
	But the fact that it's going to reach the embryo, it's going to reach the child.
	It's a very vulnerable developing disease.
	No, I don't want you doing that at all.
	Well, this is why we have seen the massive numbers of miscarriages and things like that, and children that have died after their mothers.
	I remember at the very beginning of this insanity, they had a doctor who had just given birth and she was one to be at the front of the line to get a COVID shot.
	Her child died.
	And, you know, for all the people who think that Donald Trump is pro-life and he saved us from Roe v.
	Wade, I wonder how many millions of people he's personally responsible for, how many millions of babies he's responsible for the death of because of the shot globally.
	He's probably killed more people directly than Bill Gates has.
	The FDA approved, updated, I mean, this is the thing.
	You look at Bill Gates and all these people rightfully blame Bill Gates because the money that he gave Planned Parenthood and so forth and so on and the cover that he gave them.
	What about when the president gives money to Pfizer Moderna?
	What about when the president does a massive PR campaign and pressure on everybody that you can't live your life unless you get the vaccine?
	Is he as responsible for the deaths of babies with these abortions and miscarriages because of these COVID vaccines as Bill Gates is?
	No wonder they've met many times privately.
	They've got a great deal in common.
	It's a shift from previous policies that used to broadly recommend COVID shots.
	So they're playing the recommendation it or not recommend it?
	That's the big difference between the Republicans and Democrats recommending it, right?
	And so that's supposed to be a virtue.
	We don't recommend it.
	We don't mandate it.
	We just pay the government to manufacture the pharmaceutical companies to manufacture it.
	And we tell the insurance companies they should do it.
	And that's the big difference between them.
	They won't stop.
	Neither one of them will stop the poison.
	It makes me think of the whole thing about how Moderna failed to get a single product to market before this warp speed thing and ignoring all of the laws that they had in place to prevent these horrific side effects from these unsafe medications.
	But they got the emergency authorization, so they were just able to ignore all that.
	That's right, they've been in existence for a decade, never could get anything approved, even with the lax rules of the FDA.
	They had one story after the other.
	We've got an mRNA injection that's going to fix this or fix that.
	It's like losing a case after you've bribed the judge.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And they've got this miracle RNA.
	That's, I guess, what the mRNA stands for.
	And they had one thing after the other.
	They sold the story on Wall Street.
	Everybody bought their stock and it turned out the story was just a pump and dump.
	Because when anybody took a look at it, it said, Everybody's dying from this stuff.
	It's like Gilead and the Remdesivir.
	They tried to sell that for every wave of so-called pandemics.
	They tried to do it for Ebola.
	They tried to do it for AIDS and all the rest of the stuff.
	Their patent was about to expire.
	So Fauci bought stock in them and pumped it.
	One of the most horrifying things to think about is that the pharma bro Martin Schrelley might be the most honest person involved in the pharmaceutical industry.
	Yeah, that's right.
	At least he tells you that it's all about money.
	He doesn't care what happens to you.
	So yeah, they want to talk about it being the so-called new framework where they only go for the sick and elderly because then they can say that it wasn't their poisoned bioweapon that killed them.
	So as I said on Twitter, I said I think removing this emergency use authorization is a trick.
	The bioweapon poison from Trump needs to be banned.
	And after they approved it for the children, it got the legal immunity that comes with the 1986 Act on Children's Vaccines.
	Removing the EUA does not stop the vaccines from being used.
	It doesn't even take away their immunity from lawsuits.
	And people who want it, who've been gaslit with lies, can still be given it.
	I believe that it's a headfake.
	And I think we'll see that I'm right here on this.
	But I had somebody reply to that and said, Ah, you are suffering from TDS, Trump derangement syndrome.
	They're delusional and idolater.
	They can only speak in memes and soundbites and they don't even know what they're doing.
	They have absolutely no knowledge about what is happening.
	When you think about it, what even is this?
	You know, they've still got the immunity for all side effects.
	They're still available.
	They're promising to push it a little bit less.
	They're no longer going to be propagandizing us as much with their recommendations.
	They're not going to recommend it.
	Remember Trump spent 250 million dollars at the Ad Council to push it.
	That was unprecedented.
	They've never done that for any Ad Council thing.
	I mean, we've had we've been hectored with nonstop ads about this is your brain on drugs, you know, only you can prevent forest fires, all the rest of the stuff.
	We've had these long Ad Council things in the past.
	Nobody came close to the amount of money that Donald Trump put on the vaccines.
	I don't know.
	We don't watch TV, so I never saw the results of any of that stuff.
	But then he got people like Dwine and Ramaswamy was part of his committee, and they came up with it.
	We're going to put you in a lottery where you can win a million dollars if you take this.
	And I talked about that.
	I compared it to the scene, the Russian roulette scene from The Deer Hunter.
	Wow.
	Oh, yeah.
	Different kinds of shots.
	I say keeping Trump's COVID mRNA available for people who want them is the American version of Canada's made assisted suicide.
	These poor people have been lied to.
	And, you know, again, just a lot of virtue signaling.
	So HHS announces that certain interventions are behind the rising autism rates.
	And RFK Jr. said this during the Trump three-hour live cabinet meeting.
	And Trump echoed those sentiments.
	So hopefully they're going to finally tell us the truth about autism.
	Well, we'll have to wait and see.
	That's com good to have this discussion.
	Kennedy noted that in 1978, fewer than one in every 10,000 children had autism.
	Today, the numbers are about one in 31 nationally.
	It has to be external to the child.
	There has to be something like the vaccine that is doing it.
	And so it's just kind of interesting that it coincides with a rapid escalation of the push of these vaccines and 72 of them.
	Just coincidence, I'm sure.
	Yeah, but when you look at that, when it's exploded like that, why is it that you've got people like Senator Cassidy, a Republican?
	from corrupt Louisiana.
	I say corrupt Louisiana because he's from there and Squeaker Mouse Johnson is also from Louisiana.
	But anyway, when you have people like that who reflexively just lose it on you if you say anything about we need to see if there's a correlation about autism.
	You don't even have to say anything about it being a vaccine.
	You just have to say, we need to investigate autism.
	Well, they go ballistic on you.
	They know what this is.
	And as I said before, that is the smoking gun that they know exactly what it is and that that's what it is, the vaccine.
	Brian Chulhavey says, I'm sorry, that's not Brian Shalhavey.
	This is Children's Health Defense.
	Says that the AAP, the pediatricians, have sold their soul.
	That sounded like a headline from Brian Shalhavey.
	I thought it was from him they said sooner or later the devil will come to collect the AAP briefly sided with truth during the COVID-19 lockdowns I read the subtitle about I don't remember them siding with truth in one iota and so I went through this article and their The credit that they try to give to the Pediatric Society is the fact that they said at one point the kids should be allowed to go back to school.
	That was the big move where they sided with the truth or whatever.
	That was the one thing that I wanted to see continue.
	Shut the schools down and let people see what's going on in the classrooms and school from home.
	I thought that was the only silver lining to come out of Trump's lockdowns, and I still do.
	The prime directive of Western medicine used to be first do no harm, says CHD.
	Unfortunately, COVID era taught us that from the patient's point of view, it is let the buyer beware.
	You should beware of the person who was the buyer, and that's Trump.
	He's the one who bought the vaccines, who paid them to develop it and it wasn't the COVID-19 era ERA it was the Trump error ERROR Trump himself was the error he didn't make a mistake every medical student is taught that first and foremost they should not cause harm to the patients every doctor is familiar with this maxim but that no longer applies actually it's first do no harm to pharma and their profits and your profits they'll make sure that you're protected that
	you get money if you look out for them This has been the core tenet of medical ethics, but we don't have medical ethics anymore.
	They replaced it with a brutal, inhumane, unethical martial law as public health approach to medicine with Trump's emergency.
	It's interesting to see the Children's Health Defense Fund call it medical martial law.
	I said that in the spring of 2020 when it happened.
	Everybody said, oh, you're exaggerating.
	It's not medical martial law.
	Take the vaccine for Trump.
	It's just sugar water, right?
	Constant propaganda and lies from public health authorities.
	the medical establishment, the mainstream media, medical professional associations.
	And then you have the American Academy of Pediatrics.
	No group was harmed more or unnecessarily than children who lost multiple years of education, socialization and normal growth and development.
	I'm in favor of shutting the schools down.
	I thought that's a great thing.
	Let's just keep it down.
	Anyway, that was their issue that they had sided with that policy, then pulled back, then caved again, because you know, it's all about science and science is constantly changing.
	You gotta trust the science.
	But the one thing they do have here is they looked at the money.
	You need to always follow the money, Jerry.
	And the AAP was handsomely rewarded to push vaccines and to combat misinformation.
	That means anybody who pushes back against the official story.
	By 2023, the year for which data is most available, the AAP was absolutely raking it in.
	They got $34.9 million in government grants during 2023, according to the organization's most recent tax disclosure.
	Documents show some of the money was used to advance childhood vaccination in the U.S. and abroad.
	to target medical misinformation and disinformation online.
	That's yours truly.
	To develop a regional pediatric pandemic network.
	And as they comment, they said the mouthpieces for government.
	initiatives and the advertisers for big pharma will be paid well and that's exactly why that's why they say they made a deal with the devil it's nothing more than a professional guild that's in it just for the money They said the value paid membership to these organizations like AAP has disappeared over the years, causing income from membership fees to fall.
	Individual paid subscriptions to their flagship journals have nosedived as well.
	Their financial survival increasingly relies on big pharma largesse, and as we saw above for the AAP during COVID-19, they relied on the government payouts.
	In return for Big Pharma and government money, these professional organizations function less and less as champions for their professional members and their patients.
	Well, they are championing the government's cause.
	That's exactly what's happening.
	It was Brian Schohave who talked about what is happening in Mississippi.
	He said, they have now declared a public health emergency over infant death rates.
	And it's especially high with black babies.
	He pointed out that death rates are going up because of SIDS.
	and that for black babies it's been much higher than it has for other ethnic groups.
	He said infant mortality in Mississippi is now the highest that it's been in 10 years.
	In Mississippi, 97 infants died for every 1,000 live births in 2024, nearly double the most recent national average of 5.6 deaths per 1,000.
	Since 2014, more than 3,500 Mississippi infants have died before their first birthday.
	Infant mortality is mostly with these, is SIDS and things like that.
	it is tied to the vaccines and it has been so the
	So he recounts how the professional basketball player, instead of accepting the vaccines, lost, I think it was $100 million by refusing to get vaccinated.
	And he stood with the black community to oppose these vaccines because they have learned the hard way from experience.
	As you look at all this stuff, where is Kennedy?
	To say that he's sending mixed signals is to put it mildly.
	He has authorized six COVID vaccines have been approved by the FDA so far this year after he's been there.
	So you have to ask yourself, is he really pushing to shut this down?
	Or is his real mission what he said?
	And that is to restore trust, trust that you should not give them, trust in pharmaceutical companies, trust in the CDC and HHS and the FDA, and trust in the vaccines.
	You should not trust any of those things.
	And that may be what his ultimate mission truly is.
	The only thing you can truly trust is Christ.
	That's right.
	The only thing you can trust.
	That's right.
	Yeah, in God we trust.
	Well, Travis, how easy is it to get an indictment with a grand jury?
	What's the old meme that we have?
	Well, the old saying is you get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich, but apparently not if you're ham bondy, it seems like.
	You can't indict a person who's thrown a ham sandwich.
	Maybe they were trying to assert that it was a club sandwich to try to show what a threat this was to their agents who were there.
	There was a guy who was upset about the fact of the policy that they were doing, the deportation policies, which I don't disagree with.
	I want to make sure that they follow due process very strictly because I think that's a very dangerous thing.
	If you're going to get rid of illegal aliens, let's not get rid of illegal aliens by having illegal federal police.
	That's not a good exchange.
	I don't want to replace the illegal aliens with illegal federal police.
	I think it's even more dangerous.
	But they bragged about how they were going to come down hard.
	on anybody that pushed back against them.
	And so this is Jean Perot.
	I believe this is this video here.
	And she has been, she, by flattering Trump, she was able to get.
	her husband, who had been jailed for financial crimes, to get a pardon for him.
	And she is now the head of the she's now the federal attorney for the District of Columbia.
	So President Trump has vowed to make DC safe and beautiful again, and as part of his effort to fight crime, he's bringing in our federal law enforcement partners like FBI, ATF, DEA, Apart Police, everyone to help the Metropolitan PD fight crime.
	And the President's message Oh, that's real crime right there, isn't it?
	If you spit, we hit didn't quite do that the other night when an individual went up to one of the federal law enforcement officers and started jumping up and down, screaming at him, berating him, yelling at him, and then took a Subway sandwich about this big and took it and threw it at the officer.
	He thought it was Oh man, that's funny.
	Well, he doesn't think it's funny today because we've charged him with a felony, assault on a police officer.
	Yeah, well, I don't think your overcharging is funny either.
	It's a felony.
	And you got it shut down by grand jury.
	A felony sandwich somewhere else.
	Yeah.
	You're right.
	This lady, this lady can't indict a ham sandwich or a ham sandwich thrower, and she has a a terrible record from the Trump administration.
	But there's something very important about this.
	It's not just about partisan politics.
	First of all, let me talk about the partisan politics angle.
	Does she sound exactly like the people that were trying to overcharge from the Biden administration?
	She sounds like she's straight out of the Biden administration.
	They've just switched the J sixers for a peanut butter and jelly sandwich person.
	And same game, folks.
	It's just a different club, a different cult that's doing this.
	You could probably cut down on crime a lot by having her wander the streets at night.
	She looks kind of ghoulish.
	I wouldn't want to.
	Well, this guy had actually been a Department of Justice trial attorney.
	They fired him, which isn't true.
	Which is fine, okay?
	If he's that adamantly opposed to this administration's policies, maybe that's the appropriate response.
	But they came after him and charged him with a felony.
	And that kind of overcharging is exactly what was reprehensible about all this January the 6th stuff in the Biden administration.
	And now she's doing that and bragging about the idea that if you spit, we hit.
	I think that is not.
	I think that there ought to be a proportional response to things like that.
	I don't think you ought to give license to uniformed people who say, well, you know, if you talk back to me, I'll kill you, you know, that type of thing.
	I am the law.
	This is the kind of judge-fred thing.
	And I think what is happening is the appropriate response to this kind of tyranny that she's boasting about, you spit, we hit.
	And I think the appropriate response to that, the overcharging of her department and the over-policing that we see on the streets in some of these places, the appropriate response is for a jury to refuse to convict people.
	That was a thing that in the early 20th century, that was really what shut down alcohol prohibition.
	It was juries refusing to convict people for what they considered shouldn't be a crime.
	And now we're back to that point again.
	And we saw in the documents, the emails that were released as part of the SmartMatic v.
	Fox News lawsuit, we saw what a sycophant and suckup she was to Trump in those emails that were there.
	Anyway, federal prosecutors failed to obtain a grand jury indictment.
	against a former Department of Justice employee who allegedly hurled a Subway sandwich.
	I have the, when I look at the things that the Trump administration is doing, I want to hurl.
	As in throwing up, it makes me want to vomit to see what this administration is doing in terms of police state.
	So, yeah, I guess they could also charge him with assault and pepper.
	It was a felony assault that they charged him for.
	A grand jury, however, failed to indict him in the case, which was heavily touted by Trump administration law enforcement officials like her.
	It's not clear if prosecutors will try again to get an indictment of him or to lodge another charging instrument against him.
	And they said, Again, Trump is boasting about, I'm sorry, it's Pam Bondi.
	He says, if you touch any law enforcement officer, we will come after you.
	And I gotta say that, you know, if they're going to talk like that, if I was on the jury, I would let these people go because I don't like to see this idea that the police are judged by a different standard.
	I don't think we're going to have a two-tier justice system.
	I don't think they ought to be able to beat and kill people and you can't talk back to them.
	I utterly reject that idea.
	That is a federal idea.
	We've got a good comment here from High Boost.
	He says, maybe Jared from Subway should have thrown it.
	Then Trump couldn't have pardoned him since he's a pedo.
	Yeah, there you go.
	That's right.
	So again, to charge this guy with a felony and to drive home just We've got some statistics here.
	It was a remarkable failure, says the New York Times.
	They said the U.S. Attorney's Office in Washington, this is the second time in recent days that a majority of grand jurors refused to vote to indict a person accused of felony assault on a Federal agent.
	It also amounted to a sharp rebuke by a panel of ordinary citizens against the prosecutors assigned to bring charges against people arrested after Trump's deployment of National Guard troops and Federal agents in cities.
	Before he threw the sandwich, he called them fascists and said, I don't want you in my city.
	So that's really what they're concerned about, right?
	You got to stop that and cannot have that kind of speech, just like Biden.
	So if you look at the actual statistics about this, well, you know, maybe the officer had a gluten allergia or something.
	Maybe this really was an attempted killing.
	Well, it is kind of interesting.
	It's the LA Times that actually pointed out the statistics.
	In July, they noted that in LA, more than three dozen people who were targeted with federal charges, only seven of them were actually indicted.
	Now think about that.
	That's about one sixth of them.
	Okay?
	That's about 16, 17 percent.
	What is the typical situation for a grand jury?
	Grand juries, the reason you can indict a ham sandwich is because the prosecutor can make his case to the grand jury and there is no case being made on behalf of the defendant.
	None of the assertions or the evidence is challenged whatsoever.
	So it's just put out there unchallenged.
	That's why having public trials instead of star chamber processes like the British were doing to the American colonists and what FISA is doing when it puts somebody on a no fly list or a no buy list or whatever else they're doing.
	That's why it's so important that you are allowed to confront your accusers and present your side to this because like the grand jury operates, you only hear one side of it.
	And so they typically get their conviction.
	Now remember that you had only seven out of 36, only about one sixth of them were convicted.
	in LA.
	The grand jury even was doing jury nullification.
	That's what's really rare.
	And so they point out that less than 1% of the time the grand jury fails, but it is far, far less than that.
	Listen to the actual statistics.
	Federal data show that out of 155,615 total offenses that the government investigated, only six were dropped because they couldn't get a grand jury indictment.
	Six cases out of 155,000.
	And then they said figures are similar for previous years.
	In 2015, 19 out of 163,000 grand juries, they did not get a grand jury indictment.
	And then, let's see, in 2014, it was five out of 196,969.
	969, five out of almost 200,000 in 2013.
	In 2014, it was 14 out of 170,000.
	Folks, that's not 1%.
	That is far, far less than 1%.
	That is one, one hundredth of 1%.
	Or to put it another way, when the grand jury is operating without the other side being able to present any evidence, they get an indictment 99.99% of the time.
	99.99% of the time.
	That's why they say you can indict a ham sandwich.
	Yet what is the record for the Trump administration with these charges, sixteen percent instead of 99.99 percent.
	That is jury nullification, and that's the way that it should work.
	Juries are pretty much gone now, especially grand juries.
	So it just shows you the level of dissatisfaction of the community, and it's one of the reasons why we have to have juries.
	That's why the founders thought that was so important.
	They said it is the power of the citizenry comes out of three boxes, the cartridge box, the ballot box, and the jury box.
	Well, you can forget about the ballot box.
	We don't even want to go down the path of civil war.
	So the peaceful way to do this, the peaceful way to nullify tyranny is as these jury are doing.
	And it's even more amazing to see this with a grand jury.
	So you know that they're not going to get these convictions if it actually were to come to trial.
	That's one of the reasons that they have the grand jury.
	They know they're going to get an indictment, but they're trying to test to see how strong their evidence is with kind of a mock jury.
	before they actually have to make the case with the other side pushing back.
	And so instead of getting 99.99% of the time an indictment, they're only getting it 16 or 176 or 17 percent of the time.
	So that's good news.
	That's the wisdom of the founders at work right there, I think.
	Judges have also been pushing back against the Trump administration, rebuking the government for bringing cases that traditionally wouldn't have been prosecuted at all, like throwing a sandwich, making that a felony, or that would be handled locally rather than in federal court.
	One magistrate judge has repeatedly condemned the Trump administration in multiple cases, reports the Post, saying that law enforcement decision to search one man's bag where they found firearms was, quote, without a doubt, the most illegal search I've seen in my life unquote.
	In another case in which federal agents tackled and detained a delivery person who was leaving a coffee shop, the judge commented, this is not consistent with what I understand the United States of America to be.
	It's not what I consider it to be either.
	So from that we look at the other over-the-top reaction of Trump burning the flag.
	And this is an op-ed piece from the Rutherford Institute.
	from John Whitehead.
	His headline is Burning the Flag or Torching the Constitution, which is exactly my take on it.
	He said only one of those actions destroy freedom.
	And we got a clip of a guy who immediately challenged Trump's executive order, saying that he's going to put people in jail for a year.
	This guy is a 22 year combat veteran.
	Yep, I'm being detained because I expressed my first amendment right to burn the United States flag in public, not causing harm or causing any danger to any citizens or personnel in the area.
	We're doing this for every single one of you American citizens.
	We burn this flag in protest.
	Do that.
	President feels that it's his right to do whatever he wants, make whatever law he wants, regardless of if it's legal or illegal.
	our First Amendment right to burn this flag, regardless of what the President says.
	Thank you.
	You know, my first thought when I saw this and people were saying, oh, there's going to be a lot of people that are going to be burning flags now just to make a point.
	And I kind of thought about it.
	I thought, you know, Washington is not that far away.
	But then when I watch him, you know, what he said is he's being handcuffed.
	I absolutely agree with it.
	But then when I watch him, you know, actually doing the flag burning and all the rest of this stuff, it's like, I really hate stunts like that.
	That's what I hated about Infowars.
	I hated the stunts and the, you know, look at me.
	I'm doing this or that, you know, and I just, so yeah, I would not do that.
	But I was watching, I was assured that, you know, This led to riots.
	So I assumed that we were about to see just, you know, people start storming the capital.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	He's inciting a riot right there in the park.
	And he's got to be arrested and charged with a felony.
	Yeah.
	And he was arrested, but wasn't the argument that, or what they were claiming was that it it was going to be something where if you committed another crime, this would increase the severity of the other crime.
	I don't know.
	What they arrested him for, it was the park police who arrested him for setting a fire, basically.
	Not because he was burning the flag, but he poured gasoline on the ground and on the flag and then lit it.
	So they arrested him for that.
	I don't know what they're going to charge him with.
	I don't even know if they've got a law.
	I mean, Trump's executive order is not a law.
	And we got to stop treating them as such.
	And that's reason enough right there to defy it.
	John Rutherford says we are living in an age of intolerance, intolerance from both sides.
	Nothing illustrates this more clearly than Trump's latest executive order calling for criminal charges for anyone who burns the American flag, a symbolic act long upheld by the Supreme Court as protected political expression.
	This push is not about patriotism.
	This is political theater, which is what Trump does all the time.
	This is what this guy was involved in.
	It's counter-theater, I guess.
	In an administration that's under fire from the Epstein cover-up to tanking approval ratings and mounting constitutional crises, flag burning serves as a symbolic outrage staged as political cover.
	a culture war diversion to distract from the more serious abuses of power.
	Consider the timing.
	On the very same day that Trump announced penalties for flag burning, he also signed an executive order establishing specialized National Guard units to patrol American cities under the guise of addressing crime.
	This is the real bait and switch.
	Cloak military policing and patriotic theater and hope that no one notices the deeper constitutional violations that are taking root.
	Trump's flag fight is a decoy to distract people away from his creeping martial law.
	I absolutely agree with John Whitehead.
	He's spot on with that as he usually is.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break and we come back.
	We're going to take a look at an outrage, many outrages that are happening as the UK and the EU governments are at war with their own citizens over the immigration and the crime that is happening there.
	We'll be right back.
	with us.
	PIANO PLAYS
	Defending the American Dream.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	Joining us now is John Richardson of RNC Store.com.
	Great to have John on and I really do like the product that they've got there.
	One of the ones, and it's what got me connected to John, was when I interviewed Jedward Griffin, his book A World Without Cancer.
	And now we have a world with turbo cancer.
	So you should go to rncstore.com.
	They have information to educate you about that.
	They also have products that G. Edward Griffin wrote about in A World Without Cancer.
	And you can also use the code NIGHT to save ten percent off.
	They support not only the health of our listeners, but the health of our show.
	So we really do appreciate John and what he does at RNC Store.
	And I wanted to get him on because he just had a health issue as well.
	Thank you for joining us, John.
	Tell us a little bit about that.
	What happened to you?
	Well, yeah, thank you so much, David.
	It's my pleasure to be here.
	I know as we age, we tend to forget the fact that we need to take care of ourselves.
	So even when we get into these situations, I've always thought of myself as being bulletproof because I know I'm never going to die of cancer and no one in my family is ever going to die of cancer like GR Griffin., our mutual friend, I just saw him in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
	He'll be 94 this year.
	And his book, World Without Cancer, has been, you know, it's kind of like the Bible of what I do, because he's been talking about for 50 years.
	So going through my own health scare, which I've never been through anything like this, basically opened my eyes further to how incredibly deviant or devious the medical system is.
	Not necessarily because everybody in it's bad, David.
	I'm not.
	We all have friends that are in the medical industrial complex and most all of them are good people, most all of them mean well, but most all of them are learning they've never been taught what it really means for good health.
	So their answer in our system is just to cut, burn, and poison us.
	As Americans, we want to have immediate surgery.
	So my story, not any different than anybody else's, thankfully had a better outcome because I am who I am, but it's given me, David, a whole new mission to get the world into a place where people don't have to be John Richardson to have the good outcome.
	So it was Easter Sunday.
	I had been having for months, I had been having stomach pains and I was just dealing with it because I'm bulletproof.
	I was just dealing with it, you know, like us, we do.
	I don't need a doctor.
	I've got friends that will tell me, you know, eat sauerkraut and, you know, take some bentonite clay and some psyllium hus, and it'll clean your system out.
	Drink this, drink that.
	Not getting any, you know, support from my hundreds, literally hundreds of naturopathic doctor friends until on Easter Sunday, I went out to brunch with my son afterwards and I had.
	some pastrami, you know, eggs benedict.
	And I developed this blockage in my intestine.
	And the rest of Easter Sunday, I just felt worse and worse to where I was just throwing up incessantly.
	I had been losing weight, but I thought it was all good.
	I had been losing weight while I had this pain in my stomach.
	And so my 17-year-old said, Dad, I'm tired of seeing you throw up.
	This is just, this is not working.
	I'm going to take you in to urgent care.
	My wife happened to be in Florida.
	So I didn't have my wife who's, you know, into health and nutrition and she wasn't there by my side.
	So I kind of couldn't call any of of my doctor friends, so I said, okay, let's go in.
	And I threw up on the way to the urgent care.
	I threw up while checking into the urgent care, signing away all my rights.
	Yeah.
	Oh yeah.
	And then I threw up while I was in the room.
	And by 3 o'clock in the morning they had ambulanced me over to the, it was gosh, the Honor Health Care.
	I usually have, it was Honor Health Care, five story, high rise, multi million dollar hospital here in Arizona.
	And they immediately put me on an IV, offered me morphine, which I declined.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, they offered you morphine, which, by the way, as I've learned about morphine it basically helps you not make good decisions it might take away pain but it also makes you pliable that they say well we'll take off your foot if we take off your foot it'll make you feel better you go oh great do it sounds like fun let's try it yeah yeah and so as I've told this story David it's people go yeah that's they did to me too they offered that to me too yeah I'll get to that later but by 3 o'clock in the morning I was getting a CT scan and
	then by Monday this was Sunday night Easter Sunday by Monday at about 3 o'clock in the afternoon I was sitting with a a good looking you know straight out of Central Casting surgeon who told me I had stage three colon cancer and that I had an emergency surgery scheduled for, you know, Wednesday.
	Within David, I hadn't even been in this hospital for 24 hours.
	And of course, I knew I didn't have cancer, but he was sure I did, and I said, Well, how do you know?
	And I said, Have you, you know, what did you do?
	You know, I was awake during this whole time.
	I wasn't on marphine.
	I probably fell asleep a couple of times and they were sticking things in me and pulling blood and all this stuff.
	But one of the things, David, is they stuck a tube, a nasal stomach pump, in through my nose down my throat and were pumping out this bile that was causing me previously to be throwing up so much.
	Now they were taking that pressure off so I wasn't feeling sick to my stomach even without the morphine or any other things, but they were putting fluids into me.
	And so I said, How do you know?
	He said, Well, we see from the CT scan we can see you have an apple core lesion and we know that that 99.5% of the time if you have that presentation that means you have colon cancer.
	So I said, Well, that's that's all of the indication.
	Yeah, well, we know that that that you have colon cancer and so we can't do a colononoscopy.
	And at that point, David, I didn't know how horrible colonoscopies were.
	Because again, I've grown up my whole life eating apricot seeds and never knew anyone that's ever had cancer.
	So I was never worried about when people say, Oh, you have to get a colonoscopy when you're 45 now or 46 and 47 every year.
	Since this, I've learned, which I'm happy to share, how deadly colonoscopies can be.
	One in a thousand people that gets a standard colonoscopy dies during the colonoscopy.
	So it's a horrible procedure that many people watching have said, Well, I just got mine and they clipped off some polyps that's what starts the process down to getting you know sick more sick getting cancer so getting a colonoscopy thankfully they didn't do one when i was like not coherent and i didn't take any morphine so they didn't they didn't offer one but he said we couldn't do a colonoscopy because we it's 100 percent certain that we perforate your colon So
	we're going to take out this much of your colon.
	He drew a cartoon picture on the whiteboard of my room.
	I took a photo of it and shared it with people.
	And I can even share it with you.
	But I took a photo.
	He had literally like a first graders picture of my colon.
	I'm going to take off this section down to this section and I go, why do you have to cut out so much?
	And he said, because we want to make sure we get all that cancer, because there's going to be some lymph nodes and things like that.
	And I said, you know, that seems pretty, you know, drastic.
	You know, I want to see how I feel and talk to some, natural pathic doctor.
	There's no other choice.
	That's it.
	There's only three options.
	Okay, so I go through the surgery.
	I'll have a colostomy bag, he'd explain.
	I'd have to come in every three months and get anti-rejection drugs, because, David, they would have to connect a tube this big to a tube this big.
	They were going to cut out my margin tests to the top all the way down to my duodenum, because I had I was for sure had cancer.
	Well, that started the process.
	Now I got started getting on the phones, which I should have done before with my good friends, my doctor friends, doctor John Murphy, a cancer specialist who uses integrative therapy here in Arizona for 25 years.
	I talked to my good friend Darryl Wolf, who is called the Doc of Detox, who's been doing colon, non-chirurgical colon repair for 40 years.
	He says 95% of colon surgeries are unnecessary, John.
	Don't let them give you a colonoscopy.
	Don't let them cut into you.
	Don't do anything of that.
	So I was pushing back these doctors, but that just started, David, a process of fifteen white coded doctors coming into my, including palliative care, when I told them I wasn't going to do the surgery.
	They said, why do you want to die, John?
	You know, you're 60 years old.
	We can get you to 70.
	You know, you can live another 10 years with your kids, your 11 grandchildren, or your 11 children, see some grandchildren.
	If you don't do this, John, you'll be dead within 10 days.
	And literally, David, 15.
	They put a lot of pressure on you.
	Wow.
	Yeah.
	GI., the head of GI, I was told he was the top GI guy in the state of Arizona, and I have his name.
	The head of the whole hospital, the payload of care, the nutrition, every one of these people said, you have a, you know, you're healthy.
	I had no symptoms of any other kind.
	It was good blood pressure, good heart rate, good, all my, you know, the only thing I was low on was iron because I was throwing up so much and hydration.
	I needed some hydration.
	So they continued that.
	Into Wednesday, about Wednesday morning, about midnight, I started having bowel movements.
	And I was told by my friend, Dr. Doctor, my doctor of detox, Daryl Wolf, who has become a very dear friend of mine, he said, John, you know, let them keep getting the pressure off you.
	You've got some kind of blockage.
	Your colon could be twisted.
	You could have some kind of food blockage, whatever it is.
	Just let them get that pressure.
	Keep that tube in there, don't let them take it out and stay with it.
	So I started having, I had 15 bowel movements between midnight on Wednesday till about six PM on Wednesday when I was scheduled for my emergency surgery.
	Wow.
	So I told all the nurses and all the doctors, David, and you know what their response was?
	No sense.
	No change.
	You still need to do the surgery.
	So I requested against their advice to have another CT scan.
	Although, you know, I wish I didn't do that, but I did another CT scan.
	To this day, David, 120 days after this whole episode, I've never seen that second CT scan.
	And my doctors who have requested that second casket, I've not seen it, but they said, no, John, there's no change.
	Everything's the same.
	But guess what?
	We found a colonoscopy expert.
	We found one that will do a colonoscopy now.
	And he will, no, he's not going to perforate.
	He's not going to perforate.
	He's never had a perforation where you would die on the operating table because you get sepsis and everything.
	So this, we've miraculously found this expert and because I refused the surgery.
	And so I was, I was considering it, David.
	I was thinking, well, you know, they're saying I'm going to die.
	They're telling my kids that.
	They're telling me, you know, everybody's around me.
	So I was considering getting a colonoscopy.
	And that's when Darrell Wolf said, I wouldn't do that to my worst enemy, John.
	All they're going to do is dump radioactive materials down you.
	Yeah.
	It's going to be like cement.
	It's going to destroy your gut biome for five weeks.
	They're going to find a polyp that they're going to cut.
	off or they're going to find this blockage and they're going to do the surgery.
	You're going to sign away your rights.
	You're going to be passed out sleeping.
	Now these doctors, fifteen doctors told you need surgery are going to prove that you need surgery.
	If you think you have inflammation now, John, which I was a ten out of ten with colon inflammation, they're going to increase that inflammation.
	Don't do it.
	So I was literally, they were sending in nurses to give me the medication to make it so I could have this colonoscopy.
	And I said, no, I'm declining.
	And they all looked at me, the nurses, everyone looked at me like I was crazy.
	He said, you know, we're going to have to write you off.
	We're not going to be able to keep you here at this hospital.
	You're going to have to sign a document saying that you're going against medical advice and none of your procedures going forward will be covered by insurance.
	You got your surgery covered.
	It's going to be a $50,000 deductible for the $250,000 surgery that was going to be covered.
	But if you continue down the path you're doing, John, you're not going to be covered.
	So, of course, David, you're.
	It's about money.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	It's about money.
	It's all about money.
	Yeah.
	It's all about money.
	And the surgeon, that guy with a good bedside manner, said he had six surgeries scheduled for Wednesday, I was the sixth, and I had an average of 200 to 250,000 dollars per colon surgery.
	You can imagine how much the hospital stood to gain that day.
	So I just started having these epifanies after epifany.
	Never, never was I considering it, David, but I was seeing what the average Joe who has no history, I remember I grew up with GR Griffin.
	I grew up with a woman Without cancer.
	I grew up with my father.
	And so I had this backbone knowing I didn't have cancer, but they were all telling me I did.
	And on, I think it was Wednesday or Thursday, Fox News, a flash dub was a sign from God.
	Fox News, I took a photo of it, said there's been 158,000 diagnoses of colon cancer so far in 2025, and one out of five of them are occurring in people under 50.
	So there they are, Fox News, saying this is an industry, basically, David.
	There's my friend, Dr. Murphy, and my friend, Dr. Ed Group, and Henry Ely, and Brian Artis, and all these amazing healers.
	are all saying, you know, 95% of colon issues are just irritation.
	You've got something going on.
	You just need to change your diet, change your lifestyle, change whatever you're doing.
	Stop drinking alcohol, John.
	That one drink I have to make me relax that day, that's not good if you've got stomach pains.
	So here I am watching it.
	I took a picture not only of all the different doctors that were listed on my chart and how they were drawing.
	So I was just being hit and I had those 15 valve movements.
	And then so by Thursday, when I refused the colonoscopy, they basically they started writing me off.
	I was told, oh, am I going to hear from the guy?
	No, he wrote you off.
	The gastroenterologist, the most famous one in Arizona, had never even come to see me David.
	He never even came to my room.
	They've all got the number one guy and the most famous one.
	Every hospital's got one of those guys.
	Yeah, and one of those, what does that mean David?
	What does it mean when they're the number one guy?
	You know what it means.
	Who rates them?
	Yeah, he has the most surgeries.
	There you go.
	Why is he number one?
	Because he produces the most income for that hospital of anybody.
	He's not number one because he sends the most people home without destroying their life.
	So again, I'm just a statistic, and they told me they had never had pushback from anybody.
	So they told me, okay, John, the only thing you can do is surgery, chemo, radiation.
	That would start Monday after five years of healing.
	So of course, David, I kept pushing it out.
	My friends were saying, stay in with the tube in.
	Let them keep you comfortable.
	Keep getting the liquids out.
	I was pumping out this bile that was backed up in my colon, and so it was helping relieve that pressure.
	Otherwise, I'd have to be home just throwing up.
	Yeah.
	You know, because that's what your body does.
	If you've got a blockage, your body's going to naturally throw up.
	Doesn't feel good, David.
	It's not fun.
	But it's a lot more fun than cutting out two and a half feet of your colon.
	So by Friday, I had negotiated with the.
	main doctor, he and I had become friends with each other, and we agreed that, okay, I can come back and get the surgery at any time, right?
	Yes, you can.
	But you're much higher risk, John.
	You're going to be right back in the hospital immediately if I send you home.
	But you want to take the risk, so I'm going to let you, but you first have to take the tube out and you've got to eat some food, and we've got to see how your body reacts.
	If you have the same problem all over again, I'm not going to be able to let you go.
	And I'm like, what do you mean, you're not going to be able to let me go?
	He said, well, I'm going to have to send you to another hospital because we can't take that liability on.
	I said, well, okay, let's do that.
	I knew that I could get up and walk out, David.
	I knew they can't just Gestapo hold me.
	Actually, there was 10% of me that wasn't sure.
	Yeah.
	Oh, yeah.
	They only knew what the laws are.
	They're very good.
	They're very good at stopping you.
	So I basically went through that on Friday, and then by Saturday, the doctor signed me out.
	Then I was persona non grata.
	Nobody stopped by anymore.
	There was no interest in talking to me, except that one main doctor who made me promise that I would come back if, you know, get the surgery if I didn't heal.
	The last words he said to me before I finally said, Okay, this episode is over is he said, John, if there was a natural way to heal, which you have, natural, the guy that would do that would be a trillionaire, John.
	And I that's when I realized these guys are so they're not just they're not evil.
	They just don't know that there's any other way.
	So if you've got colon blockage, you've got to have surgery that shortens your life to seventy.
	And when they told me I could live to be seventy, David, I thought, well, you're going to shorten my life by fifty years because I plan to be 120 years old.
	Like for your audience, CNBC did an article.
	on February of 2024 that said the Hunzas of northern Pakistan, just like Ed Griffin said, live to be over 100 years old.
	And the number one way that they live to be 100 years old is they eat apricot seeds and apricot kernel oil.
	So the CNBC, they're not a friend of ours, aren't they?
	But they said that and they linked it to a study that said amygdala causes apoptosis and cancer cells.
	So I got out.
	on that Saturday.
	I was weak.
	I could, you know, I felt like I had a new lease on life.
	And I started 40 days and 40 nights of drinking my meals, taking, you know, a B7.
	I did everything that I would recommend or that a doctor would recommend to a true, a real colon cancer patient.
	And I, at the end of 40 days and 40 nights, it was funny, I didn't plan it that way.
	My mama bear, we call her Jan, said, Do you know it's been 40 days and 40 nights?
	And you just said, 100%.
	David, I feel better than I've felt in years.
	I always have felt good.
	I've always felt bulletproof, but now my energy levels are incredible.
	I've been doing, you know, 15 podcasts a week telling the story, letting people know about it, because never was I concerned that I had cancer.
	But they were telling me I did.
	So I went through the entire process.
	So the natural question is, how are you doing now?
	I haven't gone back for my third CT scan because I just recently went back and saw Dr. John Murphy, who's been practicing for 25 years using Laitrol as his practice as an MD in Tempe, Arizona, but underground.
	He's never really published.
	He's never told people, but he took over.
	He took over the practice of a doctor named Dr. Benzel, who was in the Midwest, who wrote a book called Alive and Well, and I'm looking for it right now.
	My assistant is usually in the office, she's not here, but I'll try to find it.
	He wrote a book called Alive and Well about his practice in the 1980s, 1990s and the first year of 2000 where he was treating patients with Laitrol successfully.
	And Dr. John Murphy, an MD here in Tampe, Arizona, who has Az Good Health, has been doing it for 25 years.
	His very first patient, David, is still alive today that he treated with Laitrol.
	He tells a story about it regularly.
	And he's got over 400 patients currently taking Laitrol right now., and he's an MD.
	They tried to take his license in 2016 and were unable to do it because they couldn't find anything he did wrong because he doesn't recommend against people doing chemo radiation.
	He just recommends they also take care of their immune system at the same time, he actually offers...
	If there was a natural way to do this, they'd take away your license.
	Exactly.
	Take away the people.
	That's what we've seen over and over again.
	And Dr. Murphy chuckled when I told him that story because he said, John, I actively try not to become wealthy because they'll always claim, oh, he's just doing this to get rich.
	Whereas he said, I've got friends that are hundred millionaire because they do chemo radiation surgery and no one ever says, Oh, they're just doing it to get rich.
	But if you try to treat someone naturally for a couple of thousand dollars or maybe ten thousand dollars for their entire natural treatment, but you have to charge cash because there's no insurance policies that cover it, then you're then they claim you're just doing it to get rich.
	Yeah.
	So I went through the process and so now, David, you know, so I had some people going, Oh, you know, they said you had cancer, John.
	I thought, you know, if you took apricot seeds, you never have cancer.
	Well, I don't believe I don't, and never did.
	But I think you ever found out what it was?
	It was I believe, and Dr. Murphy believes, and other doctors believe, that what I had done is created a blockage from bentonite clay and psyllium huss, which are great things to use, but I had used them improperly.
	So it is a lesson that even if you think you're the most smartest guy like I am as far as history of B17 and all that, I think God let me know in a way that, John, just because you know a lot about B17 and cancer and all that doesn't mean you know anything about bentonite clay.
	So it's given me this new epiphany, David, to find natural healing doctors out there and let people know about them.
	So when people ask me about what they need to do, I've never given medical advice.
	I always say, I'm not a doctor.
	I've just said, here's what my dad said.
	But I really want people to have someone to hold their hand alongside them.
	Because if you try to do it yourself, you can't know it all about everything.
	And there's doctors like Dr. Murphy who have been practicing for 25 years that have seen a situation or they've seen at 5% of the time somebody had some other issue they had to deal with.
	So he does, the doctors I'm talking to do a lot of testing.
	They do a lot of testing.
	Then they say, John, it's like a roadmap.
	If you're weak in niacine or you're low in iodine or you're low in vitamin C, we get all those things adjusted and then the B17, the B15 and the enzymes work that much better.
	So many times we've seen people take them and get great results and then other times they don't get the great results.
	So what's the issue?
	They might be have some other thing going on.
	So it works really great when someone's diet's balanced.
	So that's what I've discovered throughout this.
	So I've really been.
	And of course, having a medical professional that's there and monitoring what's going on, always whatever kind of treatment or medicine you're talking about, it always comes down to dosage, right?
	Too little of something, it's not going to be effective.
	Too much of it, it's always going to be a problem.
	I mean, you can die of too much water, you know?
	We've seen that over and over again.
	And I had that thrown back in my face many times.
	But when I was in the hospital by these doctors, well, you know, water can kill you.
	And it's like, yeah, but I'm not taking your statins.
	and all the rest of this stuff.
	I sat through a couple of different lectures about the frame study from the doctor that was there who did the operation trying to get me to take statins and it's like, I'm not going to take them.
	I've done my research, I know they created the cholesterol deficiency.
	I don't want anything else messing with my brain.
	And of course, my thing when I got into it, I'm looking at it and I'm skeptical of their motivations for money as you were talking about.
	And yes, absolutely.
	Yeah, I'd had like a, probably a TIA, and I fell out of my chair, and then the And so it's getting worse.
	And they took me to a hospital nearby.
	And the hospital said, well, we can't do this operation.
	But you really need to have this operation.
	Because they did an MRI and they saw that I had carotid blockage.
	And of course, I wondered, how do they know what percentage that blockage is?
	You know, that sounds a bit suspect.
	But they weren't trying to do anything with it to make money.
	So I thought, all right, well, I'll listen to what they have to say.
	And the doctor who was there spent a great deal of time trying to get me into one of the two hospitals around here that did it, trying to get me into the closer one because it was one down in Chattanooga.
	And so I thought, well, maybe I should listen to them.
	And then they come in, they say, well, you know, you've had two strokes, you're going to have another one unless we clean this out, you know, because it's breaking off and causing you to have strokes.
	And they showed that to me on the MRI.
	You could see the different areas where it hit my brain.
	So I okayed it and I really regretted that.
	I woke up in the ICU and I call it in retrospect, you say there's a lot of good people there in the world and I had a lot of really good nurses.
	They were very thoughtful, very kind, very responsive with things.
	But then this ICU nurse that I had there was going to be leaving in a couple of days and he had this real attitude.
	And I woke up and my mouth was so parched.
	I was begging for some water and he wouldn't give me any.
	And I'm all wired up with all this other kind of stuff.
	And I'm begging him.
	I said, please have mercy on me.
	Give me some water.
	He wouldn't do it.
	And I'm fidgeting because I also had this, what do they call it, thing, canola or something in your nose and it was drying out my nose it wasn't a breathing it was oxygen they were giving me yeah it was oxygen and I didn't need it and I'm trying to get this thing out because it's drying my nose out to boot you know my mouth was so dry he says don't touch that and and I moved it again and he says I'm gonna put you in restraints you know that was like it was a war between the two of us and so he set me up to fail a swallowing test and he put a tube down my nose and in my throat and
	damaged my vocal cords but I'm better now and praise God I had a lot of people praying for me yeah Yeah.
	But, you know, they caused me to have a third stroke.
	The operation caused me to have a third stroke, and then they damaged my vocal cords, and as part of the operation, they damaged the hypoglossal nerve, the nerve under your tongue, and I'm still not fully recovered from that, but it was really bad.
	It did cause me problems with swallowing, and it did cause me a lot of problems with talking, and it even felt like my tongue was burned.
	I mean, it was really, the side effects of the operation were horrific.
	And it was so bad, I was so fed up with the whole thing that as soon as he got off the shift, I couldn't even stand up.
	But I pulled out that thing and threw it on the floor.
	And the next nurse, she was really nice, but I was a very bad patient.
	And I got up on the edge of the bed and I said, Get this thing out of my arm.
	I'm getting out of the hospital.
	And I would have if I could have walked.
	I would have walked right out of there, but I couldn't.
	And did you have any support with you?
	I mean, was your wife or at that point Karen got in and she was invaluable.
	You got to have someone there as an advocate.
	You do.
	You need it.
	You need it.
	That's one of my, one of my epifanies.
	You need an agent.
	And if you don't have a relative that can be that agent, they call it a, I don't know, Graith Care Priscilla Graith is a friend of mine.
	I didn't even know what she did, what she offered before, but now I understand how great it is.
	And that is having an advocate that will be there so you can ask, what are they trying to shove this in me?
	What's the good and the bad about this?
	And you have people available to you.
	So all that stuff that happened to me happened before she got into the ICU and after she got in, that stopped.
	It really is important that you have someone there watching out for that.
	Yeah, and they're always trying to push the next thing.
	At one point I said, can I get an IV of vitamin C?
	And they said, well, no, we don't do that.
	Insurance won't pay for that.
	I said, I'll pay for it.
	You get to, well, we don't do that because you can just take a vitamin C. But then they wouldn't give me a vitamin C pill.
	You know, I mean, it's like, what is this?
	I couldn't get it.
	Yeah, and the fact is the vitamin C that they use, even if they did the hospital, it has to be GMO.
	That's a whole other subject.
	Yeah.
	So if you're going to get high dose vitamin C, don't do it in California.
	Because California made a law, David.
	They made a law that you cannot do high dose vitamin C unless it's GMO.
	Really?
	Because it's got glyphosate in it.
	Yes.
	The medical system is so stacked against us.
	Wow.
	And that's why mission.
	So each step of the way, what you went through, you went through the exact same thing I did about something else.
	And here's the good news, David, that now I know where to send people to to get the proper advice.
	But our system is broken because we don't have an emergency system that takes you, that gives you options.
	The emergency systems lead you right into the MIC.
	Once their clutches are around you, only a strong personality like you, there's no other 95% of people probably wouldn't have survived what you did.
	They would have, they would have continued keeping the MIC for weeks and then got you on stints and this statin and that thing and this and then you just you're in that cycle of keeping you alive just above dead so they can suck as much money out of you and that's what they're that's the system that's the system I got into and you know and so now I'm I'm looking actively and I'm finding and God is putting in my path doctors I met a doctor just two days ago in Florida that's
	that's doing miracles with natural medicine as an MD another doctor that's doing that's treating the he's an MD named Scott Stoll that my son introduced me to that is treating the ten percent.
	10% most unhealthy people at Whole Foods Because he's got a relationship with the CEO.
	They take him away on a retreat and they give him organic food, vitamins.
	They teach him about breathing, teach him all the things and they're having miracles happening to these people.
	So everything you've gone through, there's a natural, God-given thing that will help you.
	Chelated minerals is one that I've known about for 50 years that I'm not an expert on by any stretch of the imagination, but that's one of the things that helps clear arteries.
	And vitamin B15, which helps oxygenate the blood and helps the blood clear out arteries.
	And that's something that my dad offered 50 years ago and we have it as part of the our this is not the sales pitch, we have it as part of our prevention bundle because Hans Nieper said that B17 apricot seeds are the most let me just read from the quote from his book.
	Laitril extracted from apricot pits is one of the most powerful anti cancer substances found.
	He said it's the most powerful.
	And he is the one that helped Ronald Reagan wipe out his colon cancer.
	We have all the documented proof of that.
	He helped him wipe it out.
	I'm not going to say cure because Ronald Reagan was afraid he couldn't run for seven a second term.
	And so he got secret injections of Laitrol in the Oval Office and on a naval vessel off the coast of West Germany from Hans Nieper.
	But Hans Nieper said that it also helped with cardiovascular disease.
	So if there's a nutrient that has been demonized for fifty years by the FDA, by the AMA, by all these organizations that profit from pharmaceuticals, it's B17.
	It's amygdala.
	I need to do more research on that.
	I still haven't gotten Jedwell Griffin's book.
	And if it does, if it helps with cardiovascular stuff, I need to do more tell you.
	Well, I'm going to have some good news for you and your loyal audience today about the book.
	I'll finish at the end, but I first want to say I've put into the notes if you want to give people links to it or if Travis wants to bring it up on the screen.
	I don't know how you guys do it, but I did the CNBC article about the Hunzas.
	And let me just click on it in case if Travis wants to bring it up, we can do it.
	We got it up.
	Yeah, we got it up on the screen now.
	All right.
	if you look at that, it's fascinating because this is CNBC, David.
	You know how they like to tell you the truth but then kind of keep it quiet?
	Oh, yeah.
	We told you that the people in Hunza live to be 100 years old.
	We did that right there.
	They consume, the number one reason, David, that CNBC says, if you scroll down, it says they consume apricot seeds and oil.
	Apricot seeds are one of the most important local crops in the valley.
	Studies have shown that apricot seeds can help fight cancer, another source of inflammation in the body, in part due to a compound called amygdaline.
	You know if I said those exact words on YouTube or Google or anything?
	Wherever they delete me immediately, David.
	But here it is on CNBC.
	You can click on it.
	And NBC gets NBC and CNBC, they get a lot of pharmaceutical money.
	I guess they figured they were safe and the sensors aren't paying attention to them, I guess, right?
	Exactly, because there's probably article, there's probably advertising on this article that advertises some kind of pharmaceutical.
	But we there it is.
	They consume apricot seeds and oil, which the reason they consume apricot seeds is because that's their major crop.
	The wealth of the Hunzas is developed on how many trees they have.
	And we've known this for a hundred years.
	Ed Griffin wrote about it in We're Without Cancer.
	And there you go.
	So I also linked to our prevention bundle and I also linked to our oil.
	So I don't shy away from the fact, David, that people should be on the prevention bundle.
	It's the click, the fourth click, and they just use the night discount.
	They can get a discount down to a dollar a day.
	Is that too much to have the peace of mind that the Hunzers had?
	The prevention bundle is available.
	It's the fourth link that I gave to Travis.
	But I also linked The link to the most recent study by NIH about how and you can click on that.
	It says the protective and chemotherapeutic role of amygdalene in induced mammary cancer in experimental mice and upregulation of related genes.
	Right there in plain sight, they say that amygdalene kills cancer cells on the NIH.
	And David, if we put that on NBC News, they would cut us off immediately.
	Yeah.
	But that's right there with our National Institute of Health.
	So what do you think is going on with RFK Jr.?
	I mean, I'm getting such mixed signals from him about things.
	You know, he talks about the importance of food and many other things like that.
	And yet, you know, they authorized and they pull back some of the authorization for the mRNA vaccines.
	How do you read that?
	Well, I mean, David, like always, we have those that tell us the truth, and then we have those that lie to us to make us hate the people that we shouldn't hate.
	RFK Jr. was on vacation.
	I know what I'm about to tell you because I meet every two weeks with the Maha Action, whatever, okay, it's called the Maha Action Media Hub, where they're having us be the mockingbird media of the truth.
	Now there's not anybody on this platform that will lie for administration, so not me included.
	But they told us he was on vacation, these two plants allowed these mRNA vaccines to be approved.
	He not only fired them, he repealed that, then he came out and said that we've pulled all the 500 million dollars of funding from all mRNA vaccines.
	That is a win, David.
	Oh, yeah.
	That's a huge win.
	And so, you know, I will defend RFK Jr. although I don't know him personally.
	I've never had any meetings with him.
	I try to dig down into what he's doing.
	He's got a tremendously difficult job.
	I have been doing this for 30 years.
	Let me ask you, why do you think they're reluctant to ban the Trump shot?
	I mean, we saw this first there was, you know, the Trump shot, the warp speed so-called vaccine, the mRNA COVID shots.
	When we went to Florida, you know, DeSantis and Latipo there stopped recommending it first, you know, for one class of people, then they broadened it, then they said, no, you know, we don't want to have that here at all.
	So they did it in a gradual process like that.
	I guess the question is, you know, It seems like RFK Jr. has been avoiding that.
	I don't know if it's because it's a pet project of Trump or what the issue is.
	But what we're doing is, let me explain it.
	A brilliant guy like you can get it, and I mean this sincerely, that the deep state is far deeper than even you or I believe.
	I mean, you know what I'm saying?
	I've been doing this my whole life.
	I was born in the John Burke Society.
	Robert Welch used to have meetings at my house as a kid.
	GR Griffin, you know, fed me.
	GR Griffin still thinks of me as a five year old running around his house.
	He has to watch out that I don't tip something over.
	I've known I've been in this industry that long.
	I've been in this industry, this truth movement that long.
	My uncle was a member of the Bohemian Club and you know all the stories about that.
	Oh yeah.
	The deep state is about 3,000 people that are in there right now that are kind of undercover.
	So, for example, we get RFK that says fluoride should be banned from all drinking, but the Attorney General, Pam Bondi, pushes that aside because her last job was with one of the legal firms that promotes chemical poisonous chemicals.
	So you would think that she would.
	would, you know, there's so much proof about how poisonous Florida is, but yet it's Yeah, her Department of Justice is appealing the decision that said, you know, take it out.
	And she decides to just What the heck they're saying?
	We're going to walk away from this and it's a big win, but no, she's going to continue to pursue that.
	Yeah, what the heck?
	I I I've hung out with Cash Patel.
	He was in my hotel room.
	I talked to him.
	I thought I knew who he was, but he's now in there and he's being his we find out his pilot is a deep stayer that was against all the J six guys and he didn't know for eight months.
	It's just so deep, you know, it's so deep that it's and I'm not saying it's we're going to fix it, David.
	I'm not saying we're going to fix it.
	I do.
	But I'm telling you, the grassroots is stronger today than it's ever been in my lifetime.
	I can point to that.
	Things are happening on the grassroots level.
	We're saying we don't want to wait for them to tell us it's okay from the top.
	There's not a single person I know in Arizona that I've bumped into in all these Maha movement things will ever take another vaccine for some pandemic thing.
	The general public in Minnesota might still be 60% or 70% willing to follow what the deep state tells them about a vaccine.
	But the people in the know, the people that have woken up in states like Arizona, where one of our Andy Biggs, I hung out with his wife at a meeting.
	They know the truth.
	Andy Biggs is now running for Senate.
	He's one of our congressmen out here.
	The movement is happening from the ground up, David, more than ever.
	And once you see the deceptionists there, you'll never foresee it.
	And you'll never trust them again.
	That's the key thing.
	If you can get through to them on one issue, and that's the hopefulness about this is that, you know, with these Epstein documents and stuff, maybe that'll be the thing that will wake people up.
	And then it'll just be a cascading thing and they say, well, you know, he lied to me about this, maybe he's lying to me about this other thing, most likely he is.
	And it's very true.
	So that's what my hope is.
	I'm not a, I'm no, you know, oh, there's a savior up there.
	I'm not one of those guys.
	I'm not, you know, there's people that I have friends that, you know, still think there's some plan, you know, whatever.
	I've lived this for 60 years and there's good and there's evil.
	And today, 2,000 people will die of cancer, David, needlessly.
	That's right.
	Needlessly because we've been lied to about everything.
	And even my own compatriots, even people that will consider me a friend, don't really understand how deep the cancer lie is, how deep it really is.
	But we saw it in live time with COVID, so we get it.
	We get that they lie to us about ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.
	And the average sheeple knows that at least they got to look at ivermectin or at least they got to look at vitamin D. And the average Gary Brecca, who's out there being famous for teaching people about health, may not believe me about apricot seeds yet, but he does believe that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and these other things and some of these movie stars are coming out and going on Tucker Carlson and saying the truth that,
	you know, David, you and I would have said five years ago, they're saying it and they're getting away with saying it.
	Whereas we were tin foil hat conspiracy theorists, now the general public is waking up to it.
	And of course, there's also the PCR quote unquote test, the procedure that they have.
	You said earlier that you are glad that you didn't get the other CT scan.
	Was there something in particular that you learned about CT scans that you'd warn people about?
	Well, yeah, CT scans are just they stick poison in you and then they radiate you.
	And so it really we as we as Americans been taught let's let's let's figure out what it is and then cut it out that's that's our whole medical system so all the tests mammary they've proven that mammograms are cancer causing you know I I could go a whole show with you about Dr. Harold Manner who said in 1978 that breast cancer and mastectomies should be a thing of the past.
	This amazing doctor that had 50 published articles and six textbooks said that in 1978.
	He proved it beyond shad a shadow of doubt that breast cancer is just a deficiency of B17, vitamin A, and pancreatic enzymes, and that he had 100% good results with not only the laboratory mice that were bred to grow breast cancers, but the 15 women that were sent home to die.
	And he was fired after 30 years at Loyola.
	That is a tragedy that my dad went through the same as he did.
	And Harold Manner, his life ended in October of 1988, the same month my dad died.
	So I could tell this story and people would go, Oh, is that real?
	Is he telling the truth?
	manner until less than nine months ago.
	And David, it's been proven by like thousands of studies and tens of thousands of case histories and current case histories about B17 eliotro, but people that are listening to you that know you only tell the truth, they're still going to think, this John Richardson guy, he's just crazy.
	There's no way an apricot seed could prevent my grandmother from dying of breast cancer.
	There's no way B17 could help somebody not ever get cancer in the first place, even though it's been proven, David, beyond a shadow of a doubt.
	And Geo Griffin, 94 years old, will tell you if you ask him point blankank, do you know anybody that's ever died of cancer that regularly eats amygdala or B17?
	And he'll tell you, no, I don't know anybody.
	And I was just with him three weeks ago in Tennessee, or it was gosh, I've been to so many places.
	Where was it?
	No, I was in Tulsa, Oklahoma with JR Griffin for the most recent Red Pill Expo.
	And Ed's 94 still speaking.
	Well, I know somebody who took apricot seeds when he was diagnosed with cancer and he got over the cancer.
	And I said to this doctor who was a not a cardiovascular doctor, but it was, I can't remember what her title was, but basically she works on arteries.
	So she was pushing me with the stuff.
	She told me several times about, I kept pushing back against statins, and she wanted to sell me the Framingham study, and I said, look.
	I'm not interested in studies.
	I'm much more interested in anecdotes, quite frankly, because I know that studies can be manipulated to hide certain things and to escalate other things.
	And I would like to know from people.
	So it actually has more weight with me to get somebody's anecdotal experience with a particular substance or what they have done in treatment.
	I just don't really care about studies anymore.
	Well, I agree with that.
	I agree with that completely.
	Even though I show an NIH study about a make-up one, it's more to help the normies.
	Because I want to give you, I gave you a list of just the doctors I have personally vetted or the clinics I have personally vetted.
	It says it's the third link I sent to you.
	You can share with the audience.
	These are all doctors I've personally talked to that are working with natural path or integrative at least, natural.
	There's all sorts of other lists.
	GoldCare has a list of doctors.
	So I'm searching to get people in touch with doctors that are actually telling the truth and not just doing what they've been trained.
	I've had tearful doctors say, John, I've had to relearn 20 years of what I was lied to about to now know the truth.
	And all this stuff with COVID helped them wake up.
	And so Dr. Avery Jackson, who's a neurosurgeon, is opening a medical school in North Carolina that's going to teach people 80% natural God-given answers and 20% allopathic.
	One of the richest women in the world, Walton, just opened a medical school in Bentonville, Arkansas, where they're teaching 70% of the education will be about lifestyle, eating properly, all the things that these MDs will graduate in four years, and they'll know the truth.
	And so it is actually happening.
	But in the meantime, we have to be our own.
	We have to be our own best defender, so you've got to And right now he's working on a documentary on stem cells.
	And he's going to be going to Japan to interview people there because in Japan they have a different model.
	They look at it and they say, the government says, okay, if you can demonstrate that this doesn't harm people, go ahead and do, or let you go ahead and do a study on this and we won't restrict the use of that.
	And then, you know, so first step is you show that does no harm, which ought to be the very first thing in all of our medicine.
	First, do no harm.
	That used to be the medical community's ethics.
	And if that's the case, then give it a try and show us your data to show if it was effective or not.
	Now, that's a very rational approach and frankly that was the approach that I took after these strokes.
	I looked at this stuff and it's like okay well if that's not harmful I'll try it you know and so and we did find that things like red light helped a great deal I think it helped a great deal with my tongue and Absolutely.
	No question.
	The studies are proven.
	But again, we don't want to do studies.
	But the actual results, what I know for, David, I literally talk to doctors that are having 100% results with diabetes if people follow their treatment plan.
	100%.
	Wow.
	Okay.
	So they can't advertise that.
	This doctor I talked to, he's on the list of organizations that I sent you, he's saying, John, I'm having such incredible results.
	I don't even advertise.
	I'm an MD that I don't even put my name out there.
	I just I have 24 staff members and I can barely contain and I don't advertise.
	Wow.
	I said, Can you do phone consultations?
	He says, Yeah, John, I'll do phone consultations.
	But every time I refer a new doctor that I trust, he gets six months out.
	I start referring somebody, people to him and they go, Oh, well, doctor, I'm not going to name a name.
	Doctor such and such is a great doctor, but I can't see him.
	He won't see me for two months.
	The medical industrial complex wants you to start chemotherapy within 224 hours of giving you a diagnosis of cancer, David.
	Oh, yeah.
	They don't want you to wait.
	So they suck you in.
	And every one of these doctors say, I'm so much more successful with someone that hasn't been had their immune system destroyed with chemo and radiation and surgery.
	My success rates are approaching 95 percent for people, you know, or higher.
	And of course, I'm not going to give you there's a hospital here, a medical system here in Arizona, and I can say their name, but the founder of the hospital says they're having 3500 times better results with cancer than a normal oncology department in a normal hospital.
	I mean, I don't even know how they get to a statistic like that, but they're publishing that and they're called NVIDA.
	Now, I'm not related to NVIDA or have any, you know, I know this.
	They're kind of a transition between a half a million dollar cancer therapy that cuts you, burns you and poisons you for colon cancer and $125,000 therapy through NVIDA that's all cash.
	It's all being paid out of your pocket.
	So the system is still not like it should be.
	It's all driven by insurance.
	I mean, Karen, my wife.
	injured her ankle, broke her ankle, but she also injured her knee in the same fall.
	And they focused on the ankle because they could see that it was broken, but there was a lot of damage in her knee, and they wouldn't take a look at the knee because they had to get special approval for the insurance, and it got worse and worse and worse until finally it swells up with a lot of fluid.
	Then they'll open up another ticket on it, but it's all driven by insurance, and that's the key thing.
	And that is changing, believe it or not.
	You're not going to hear for a while.
	In the health world or even in the political world, we look at all these things and we decide, hey, the most important thing should be this.
	on a given day david i don't even know what the most important thing is anymore like is it the stuff they're spraying on us is it the fact that our food has no nutrition in it isn't the fact that they put poisons in all our processed food that's not in any other country isn't the fact we've been lied to about natural god-given answers i all the above all of the above and so it's a lot of work and the good news is guys that we would have never politically agreed with like russell brand or
	uh you know or some of these other guys you know even Joe Rogan or some of these people are making a difference for the normies they're waking them up because Because again, my dad didn't believe my dad was a hero of the liberal left because the hippies loved the fact that he was using natural treatments even though he ran for Congress under God, family and country.
	They loved him in the 70s because he was telling people the truth about nutrition and nobody ate organic food in the 70s unless you're a hippie.
	Now, you know, we were knowing the truth that organic food is the best way to get the health and nutrition we need.
	So there is a lot happening, but it's never fast enough.
	And so all of us, or such a time as this, need to be, you know, working hard because it may switch completely in two years or four years and they switch well that's what I want to do I want to give people an idea of you know where they can find help to identify problems that are out there.
	And certainly one of the biggest problems that are out there, and I think that is the only silver lining that came out of the 2020 thing, is that people became skeptical of the medical community and its motivations and these treatments and that type of thing, even if they're not skeptical of the politician who ran it.
	They at least are skeptical of the product that's out there.
	So there's still this double think that is going on, but it's opened our eyes to a lot of things like that.
	And I think it's very key that we pass the word along as to where we can find help.
	We need to keep the communication lines open to each other so that we can take control of our own life.
	And, you know, they don't want us to have informed consent, but we can still not give consent to this system that is out to victimize us.
	So I was saying before, you know, we look at insurance.
	It's so strange that insurance would be driven to the most expensive treatments rather than the cheaper treatments that are out there, isn't it?
	It's really a lot of this is very counterintuitive.
	It's just a cycle.
	Yeah.
	The pharmaceutical companies own the insurance companies, so it just supports the same system.
	People always go, well, if it's paying for it, how do they make profit?
	Because they keep the dollars that are spent so high that the only way you can get those treatments is to have these insurances, which then in turn support this whole system.
	And we're paying higher costs for pharmaceuticals than any other country in the world.
	How does that make sense if the insurance companies are owned by the pharmaceutical company?
	Because they keep that locked circle that everybody's on the dole.
	Everybody's on the dole in this trillion dollar cancer industry.
	So the truth about things like Laitril or ozone therapy or even high dose vitamin C or any of these natural cheap effects, effective things will never be covered by insurance when it's locked in this system that the government owns the patents.
	That's right.
	We are going to have to see the system crumble, and I'm watching it crumble real time.
	I did send you another link to something that was put out by the Truth About Cancer folks, Ty and Charlene Bollinger.
	That just I didn't even know they were putting it out.
	And it's all about the truth about B seventeen and Leitril and how the medical mafia buried a cheap natural cancer remedy.
	It seems like that's all I want to talk about.
	But that's my lane, David David.
	That's my nose.
	That's key.
	That's the second leading cause of death.
	And I think it's, well, of course, the vaccine also upped the number one cause, which is heart disease.
	So it stepped them both up to a new level, I guess.
	I was going to say maybe it can't.
	Destroy our immune system.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Destroy our immune system.
	Yeah.
	Well, I'm very interested to take a look at what you sent.
	We'll cover it here on the show.
	If you've got anything about rheumatoid arthritis and natural remedies that work with that, I'd be very interested in hearing about that.
	My son, Travis, suffers with that quite a bit.
	So we've been trying a lot of different things to see if we can find something that works and so far have not been able to do so.
	So if you got anything like that, I'd be very interested and I'll pass that along to the audience too.
	What was that again?
	I want my assistant to write that down.
	Rheumatoid artritis.
	Rheumatoid artritis.
	Okay.
	I will get back to you, I promise, as my best resource.
	Not that I'm an expert.
	Yes.
	But I'll give you my best resource.
	Because I like, I said, I'm running these circles with doctors that are just the results are speak for themselves.
	But they're still kind of underground.
	But we are in a transition phase.
	We are in a transition phase where I'm watching people open clinics that are helping people all over, and we're trying to add them as we go.
	The last thing I want to say, David, is that I offered before about the World Without Cancer book.
	Get your free PDF of the World Without Cancer sent to your email today.
	Everybody watching, they can have it before the end of this podcast.
	It's at myworldwithoutcancer dot com.
	My just the word my with the title of the book.
	You should be able to remember it and everybody can tell all their friends.
	Because with this information, David, we could take the next step to them never being able to lie to us again.
	Once people read this book, which Ed Griffin says they've never found one fact that they could prove he was wrong in, Ed?
	Not one in 50 years.
	You can get the copy of the book at myworldwithoutcancer.com and it's free.
	There's no strings attached.
	All we do is put you on our mailing list.
	And what does that mean?
	You get updated information about all sorts of things.
	And so that's that, Ed's gladly doing this.
	He knows that people need this information and that also people will buy the copy of the book sometimes as well.
	So it also supports Ed.
	But it's a free copy that anybody can get.
	You don't need to have any excuse.
	Oh, it's too expensive.
	I can't afford it.
	It's not covered by insurance.
	It's free.
	myworldwithoutcancer.com and you can get that today.
	That's great.
	I will get that today.
	Thank you so much.
	John Richardson, rncstore dot com, and if you use the code NIGHT you can save ten percent off what you get there.
	But of course you can get myworld without cancer dot com.
	You can go there and you can get a free copy of the PDF of the book.
	Thank you so much for joining us and thank you so much for what you do.
	Thank you, David.
	I'm so happy.
	I was so happy because you're one of my heroes.
	It wasn't the first time.
	Because you're a truth teller.
	I'm so happy that you're healthy and you look great and I will continue to support you any way I can on your health journey.
	Thank you so much.
	Thank you, John.
	Okay, thank you, David.
	God bless.
	Thank you.
	Well folks, that's it for today.
	Thank you for joining us.
	a good day.
	music
	The Common Man.
	They created Common Core to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	and the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary, but each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what we have in common.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidnightshow.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲