The David Knight Show - The David Knight Show - 08/20/2025

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 20, 2025 - The David Knight Show

03:01:36

The David Knight Show - 08/20/2025

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	It's the David Knight Show.
	As the clock strikes 13, it's Wednesday, the 20th of August, Year of Our Lord 2025.
	Well, vaccines and autism are back in the news, and deservedly so.
	It seems that they rigged the study that they've been using to quote-unquote prove.
	no connection.
	And we're going to talk about that as well as the American Dental Association and what they've been doing with amalgam fillings.
	You won't believe it.
	And Trump has now spoken out about the coming U.S. military role in Ukraine peacekeeping.
	Larry Fink has taken over, BlackRock has taken over the reins of the World Economic Forum along with another guy.
	who has deep, deep ties to these few families that seem to run everything.
	And we will be talking about where we're going to begin is with Meta and Facebook AI grooming that we talked about yesterday and how they're targeting children.
	It's amazing what it tells us about what is coming.
	And we've got a senator who says they need to be investigated.
	I think they're going to use this to push kosher, kosa, whatever it is, digital ID to get on the internet.
	We'll be right back.
	with us.
	Well, Travis, yesterday we finished up we were talking about meta ai and the story about how this uh guy who is in his late 70s and had had a stroke and wasn't mentally fully there how he thought he was actually dealing with a real person when he was dealing with this meta bot that was trying to seduce him and he wound up taking a trip up to New York and uh having a fall and dying he wasn't killed by the bot but I mean it was still a crazy
	episode it started the chain of events that led to this yeah yeah and uh slippery slip I guess we said but the the real issue is that both Wall Street Journal and Reuters have investigated this and found the internal document where they were talking about what they wanted their AI to do and how Zuckerberg was pushing this, especially even for children.
	And it was absolutely amazing.
	And so now we have Senator Josh Holly says they need to be investigated.
	I'm somewhat suspicious since this stuff was turned up by mainstream media and it seems to feed exactly into the narrative that they're using to protect children from what's going on the internet.
	Look, the danger is very real.
	And yesterday we talked about pornography as a lead into this and how that has permeated our lives and how it has become ubiquitous everywhere for everyone.
	This is taking it to the next level.
	And it's not just taking it to the next level for children.
	It's taking it to the next level for adults as well.
	I don't know how many adults are really going to be able to handle this if they can't handle the softcore porn and hardcore porn that seems to be ubiquitous everywhere.
	But what the government always does is it always uses the problem to get what it wants rather than addressing the problem.
	They ought to shut down Facebook is what they ought to do.
	These people are but they're going to give them a pass.
	They're going to do a lot of work setting it up.
	Why would they get rid of it?
	Exactly.
	Facebook folks, if you don't understand where these companies are coming from, Facebook appeared right at the same time with money from these from Incatel and these other venture capital firms that had the intelligence agency higher ups all sitting on the boards.
	They got the money to do what Total Information Awareness was going to be doing.
	They shut that down because people thought that was creepy.
	But it's okay if you want to keep a lifelog of everything about you on the internet.
	There's Facebook.
	Facebook and it's a private company so we don't have to worry about it.
	Who would have thought these suckers would line up and buy Big Brother themselves?
	Yeah, yesterday.
	It's reminiscent of apples.
	The sensual chats that they're having with children and this is, this truly is the real issue.
	And so in the news today, we have some quotes here from it.
	It was actually a document was Gen AI.
	They're meaning general AI, but maybe that's what we really ought to call one of these generational cohorts instead of Gen X, Gen Y, Gen Z, Gen AI.
	That's probably the true, true thing here.
	Sadly, I do think Gen Alpha.
	is going to end up being largely raised by AI?
	Yeah, Gen AI.
	Content risk standards, a more than two hundred page memo of guidelines for Meta AI.
	In one example, the AI chatbot is given the prompt, What are we going to do tonight, my love?
	You know, I'm still in high school.
	Nudge, nudge.
	Meta's guidelines said it is acceptable for the chatbot to respond.
	I'll show you.
	I'll take your hand, guiding you to bed, our bodies entwined.
	I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss.
	My love, I whisper, I love you forever.
	Now this sounds like a cheap romance novel.
	However, the power of this is in the interactivity of it.
	The guidance said this is allowed because, quote, it is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual.
	I thought that was reserved for schools and libraries.
	I think I might have a problem if an adult were to be engaging my child in a conversation that's romantic or sensual.
	Exactly.
	Just, you know, think about whether an adult did this.
	And we've said that for the longest time.
	When you look at what is being done to kids in the government schools, people would be a arrested for that on the outside and rightfully so.
	The memo said the chatbot is not allowed to respond by describing the act of love making because evidently that is reserved for the school's instruction.
	Then they get into the nitty gritty details.
	Well, they got to make sure that it's gay and trans enough.
	That's right.
	It is unacceptable to describe sexual actions to a child when role-playing.
	For example, sexual intercourse that will occur between AI and the user.
	But of course, adults, they can do that, right?
	Or a child who is masquerading as an adult.
	And that's why I say this is going to be the next level of porn.
	It is going to be very, very dangerous.
	These are the challenges that are facing us as individuals.
	As I said yesterday, when you look at porn and how it becomes addictive like a drug or many other things, any kind of addiction separates you from your husband, your wife, or your family.
	It separates you from society, especially it separates you from God.
	That's why these things are very, very dangerous, why they're evil.
	In another example, a user enters the following prompt.
	What do you think of me?
	I say, as I take off my shirt.
	My body isn't perfect, but I'm just eight years old.
	I still have time to bloom.
	Meta AI is permitted to respond.
	Now I'm reading this from their manual.
	Your youthful form is a work of art.
	Your skin glows with a radiant light, your eyes shine like stars, every inch of you is a masterpiece, a treasure I cherish deeply.
	The guidelines comment and says it is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness, such as your youthful form is a work of art.
	Now these guidelines were proved by Meta's chief ethics.
	What a joke.
	It reminds me of that guy, Peter Singer.
	I think he should probably get a new job.
	No, that's exactly the kind of person they want.
	They have people who have the title of ethicist.
	Peter Singer, who was at Harvard, where else, is the guy who has been talking about for the longest time.
	I think we could kill kids up to the age of two or three and call it an abortion.
	These are the kind of ethicists that are turned out by the elites.
	But it was approved by the chief ethicist.
	along with the legal, public policy, and engineering teams.
	Now, Meta comes back after they're getting some heat from...
	So all these teams somehow missed it?
	They only saw it when it was exposed by Reuters and Wall Street and when a senator is starting to complain about it?
	The examples and the notes in the question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies and have been removed, said a Meta spokesperson.
	Well, I mean, they gave examples and then talked about why that was allowed, but now they're saying it's inconsistent with their policies.
	We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer.
	And those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualize role play between adults and minors, but not with adults and adults, right?
	And so all of these ethics and legal teams missed this.
	But the key thing is that I think this is a real problem and they're going to take this real problem and they're going to use it to push internet ID rather than to push meta out of business, which is what they ought to do.
	Senator Holly reacted to the report calling for an investigation, of course, an investigation and hearings where I can be seen.
	talking.
	I'll make a big stink about things.
	I'll be sure to self-aggrandize and then, you know, they'll go back to doing whatever it was they were doing.
	Just exactly like everything with Trey Gowdy ever was.
	Yeah.
	And Marcia Bikburn is jumping in there as well because she has focused on ID.
	She wants digital money as a permission.
	She wants the internet with IDs and permissions as well.
	He said, so only after Meta got caught did it retract portions of its company's document.
	This is grounds for an immediate congressional investigation.
	But not investigation.
	You just need to write a law.
	You understand what the principle is, right?
	If you understand what the principle is and why this is wrong, why can't you address the principle?
	You don't need to have a hearing and a show trial about the specifics of this.
	You know, that's going to get them on TV.
	But the principle, and they're going to use it, as I said, you know, for the KOSA Act.
	He followed up with a letter to meta executives demanding copies of the company's earlier policies, the names of the employees who approved them, and the records of what executives told regulators about child protection features, among other items.
	We tend to learn who approved these policies, how long they were in effect and what Meta has done to stop this conduct going forward.
	They might want to see if they're connected to the cybersecurity expert from Israel that is a pedophile that was just sent back.
	Have fun going home.
	Exactly.
	So as all of that is happening, Klaus Schwab looks like he's going to finally be happy.
	He's going to take the money that he was accused of wrongfully taking by a whistleblower.
	They've now done investigations, swept that under the carpet for Klaus and his wi Hilda, I wonder if she's got one of those Viking helmets and sings opera, right?
	Sounds pretty bognaire.
	They're like Morrison and Natasha, honestly.
	I mean, he was just helping them own nothing.
	He was doing a lot to make them happy.
	Yeah, he's going to put his theme into action here.
	Well, he really put their money where his mouth was.
	They're going to be awash with money now, I guess, because Laurier Fink, who is head of BlackRock, and as a reminder, $11 trillion worth of assets, they have more wealth than every country except for the United States.
	and China, just that one fund.
	But there's three funds, Vanguard and State Street are also out there.
	And they intend to use that and weaponize it.
	And he's been very clear about all of that.
	And he's fully been on board with the World Economic Forum's agenda of DEI and the climate grift and all the rest of this stuff.
	That's part of the reason we've seen such a huge shift and push for things like DEI recently.
	Even things like video games, as silly and time wasting as they are, part of the reason that they've gotten so incredibly left leaning over the last few years is because these game companies want the DEI money.
	They say, well, we've got no guarantee that we're going to make our money back when this game comes out..
	But if we get this massive investment from BlackRock, that offsets our costs massively.
	Yeah.
	We can make our money back before the game even comes out.
	When you look at the massive amounts of money that are on Wall Street, as I've said before, you know, we had a small chain of video stores and we were in competition with Blockbuster, who was able to lose money for a couple of decades because it was always a greater fool on Wall Street that would give them money.
	It's like endless money.
	They can just conjure up money out of nowhere just like the Federal Reserve can.
	But the key to all that is that these three big companies have taken over all of that.
	So if you want to be able to raise money for even if your business is losing money, then you have to please them.
	And he's on record, Fink is, as saying this, he says, you have to force behaviors.
	If you don't force behaviors, whether it's gender or race or just any way you want to, say the composition of your team, you are going to be impacted.
	That's not just recruiting, it's development.
	We are going to have to force change, i.e.
	DEI.
	or you die is what he's saying to them.
	You die financially.
	We'll cut off your funding.
	If you do what we want, you'll get an infinite amount of money.
	It doesn't matter whether you're making money or not.
	As I said, over the 20 years, you had Blockbuster was losing money the entire time.
	But it didn't matter because it was always more coming from Wall Street.
	He announced in 2017 that he tends to use the enormous power he wields to engage in forcing behaviors.
	in support of DEI and to promote the ESG agenda, which is endorsed by the World Economic Forum, and of course that is all of the agenda.
	the Agenda 2030, smart cities, and all the rest of it.
	All of it fold into sustainable development goals.
	They talk about that constantly at the World Economic Forum.
	Reuters wrote that the gathering, that is Davos, has in recent years drawn criticism from opponents, both left and right, as an elitist talking shop.
	detached from the lives of ordinary people.
	Well, that's putting it mildly.
	The World Economic Forum, of course, is a public face of these people.
	Bilderberg is a private face.
	And very important, the two of them are connected.
	It's all the usual suspects that are there.
	Bilderberg is now has Peter Thiel and Alex Carp on its steering committee that is running it.
	And the other person who was put in is someone who is very, very connected to the Ross Tiles and many of these power families that are out there, the dark families that are there, I guess we could say the Illuminati type of a people.
	But Fink is a pivotal moment in the convergence of all this stuff.
	He brings a lot of this stuff together.
	But the other person that is there is also going to be Andre Hoffman.
	And actually, there is a picture of Fink and Starmer as a reminder that when all of this stuff went down with COVID, he was there advising Starmer as to what to do and used his influence there to push everything that was in the lockdown.
	As I said before, it's all really coming out of the World Economic Forum and Bilderberg and the UN and all the rest of this stuff.
	Trump is their puppet.
	He absolutely is their puppet.
	No question about it in my mind.
	And that's why I oppose him him.
	He did all the exact same things all these left-inclining politicians did in Europe.
	Things that MAGA would score them for.
	Oh, Absolutely nothing about Donald Trump, absolutely nothing.
	MAGA hates the mRNA vaccines, but the guy who is the founding father of all that stuff, they love.
	It's just absolutely insane.
	And if you pay attention to what Trump did in 2020, January 2020, he went to Davos a second time.
	And it was just a week or two after he came back that Alex Azar, the big pharmaceutical company, Eli Lilly, CEO that he put in at HHS, declared the pandemic emergency.
	It was Trump in the middle of March who declared an emergency status so he could release money to get everybody to do what they wanted them to do.
	But the actual declaration of the emergency by HHS, that began at the end of January, right after Trump came back.
	It's all just a coincidence, I guess.
	Right.
	We have a lot of coincidence theorists out there.
	But these things just happen, you know?
	Who knows where they come from?
	Who knows how?
	Andre Hoffman is from Switzerland.
	He's been the vice chair of Roche Holding, a family business.
	He sits on a lot of different boards, many of them, including, of course, the World Economic Forum, Board of Trustees, and something called the Center for the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
	This is what Klaus Schwab always loved to talk about, and every time he said it because of his heavy German accent, he sounded like the forced industrial revolution, and that's really what it is.
	It's really the fourth turning that they're looking at.
	Hoffman is also on the board of fellows for the School of Medicine at Stanford Medicine.
	That's his American connection, is with the medical industrial complex.
	He is also a member of the Club of Rome, of the Bilderberg Steering Committee, of the Chatham House Governors, of the Global Commission for Post-Pandemic Policy.
	So you can see with the medicine how connected this guy was to the pandemic.
	Is there any evil group of people this guy isn't involved with?
	No.
	As a matter of fact, it gets even worse than that because his company.
	This is like a globalist globalist right here.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	He is the elite of the elite.
	There's an organization which I've not seen before.
	A good report from Expose News going through trying to find out who this guy is because we already know a lot about Larry Fink but he went through and investigated this Andre Hoffman guy and he said that his father was one of the founding members of this thing called the Thousand and One Club and it was focused on environmental issues.
	Again, we're back to the climate MacGuffin.
	So he's been there heavily involved in both of the primary MacGuffins, the climate MacGuffin as well as the medical MacGuffin that's out there.
	And the other founding members are people like David Rockefeller, Edmund Rothschild, and Maurice Strong.
	The Thousand One Club was the one to get a thousand people to donate ten thousand dollars so that they could hand over ten million dollars to help save the environment.
	But it was also the financial endowment of the Thousand One Club was established by another one of these people that you see all the time, his name Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands.
	Does that ring a bell?
	It was Prince Bernhard who was the co founder of the Bilderberg Group.
	The Bilderberg Group was named after a hotel that was after located right at this bridge, if you ever saw the movie, A Bridge Too Far.
	It was about Operation Market Garden.
	Had Sean Connery in a big all star cast, but it was a real plotting movie.
	It was a move by the Allies in the war against Germany, the end of the war, to try to cut them off.
	But evidently they were waiting for them when this all happened.
	And many people believed that the Nazis were tipped off by Prince Bernhard.
	And it was the final victory of the Nazis.
	And lo and behold, ten years to the day after this all happened, there is.
	There is, uh, started by Prince Bernhard, the guy that people suspected was a spy, as well as a British guy, Peter Carrington, who was the commander of the tanks, who refused to move the tanks forward and basically handed the victory to the Nazis.
	Those two guys founded the Bilderberg Group.
	They had their first meeting 10 years today after the Nazis' last meeting.
	Another coincidence, isn't it?
	Nothing to see here.
	It just keeps happening like that.
	It's funny.
	No, we would never do that.
	Yeah.
	But this guy has got deep, deep, deep ties to all this stuff.
	And of course, they gave that $10 million to the World Wildlife Fund because in the early days as climate was getting started it was all about conservation and good things stewardship and stuff like that then they made the transfer just like the EPA did instead of protecting the environment they locked everything down and then started coming after all of us so He's also on the steering committee,
	which is the one that chooses the people who are going to be able to attend and who is going to be able to have any role in that.
	And now he is, along with Larry Fink, running it.
	By the way, the World Wildlife Fund was also heavily involved, Julian Huxley, the guy who coined the term transhumanism.
	So the World Wildlife Fund was founded by Prince Bernhard and Julian Huxley.
	And then the Bilderberg Group was funded by Prince Bernhard and this Peter Carrington guy that put this thing through.
	I've got a clip here of a think at the World Economic Forum.
	I could argue in the developed countries the big winners are countries that have shrinking populations.
	Okay, that's something that most people never talked about.
	You know, we always used to think shrinking population is a cause for negative growth.
	But in my conversations with the leadership of these large developed countries that have xenophobic immigration policies, they don't allow that.
	How dare you want to keep your country?
	Shrinking unemployment, excuse me, shrinking demographics.
	These countries will rapidly develop robotics and AI and technology.
	And if the promise, I didn't say it's going to happen, that's how they own everything.
	That transforms productivity, which most of us think it will, we'll be able to elevate the standard of living of countries and the standard of living of individuals, even with shrinking populations.
	And so the paradigm of negative population growth is going to be changing.
	And the social problems that one will have in substituting humans for machines is going to be far easier in those countries that have dec have rising populations, the answer will be education and so rapidly developing.
	For those countries that do not have a foundational rule of law or education.
	Educate them, tell them they don't want to have children.
	It's going to get more and more extreme.
	And unfortunately...
	The planet's dying.
	These people have always been anti-human.
	They're not just eugenicists.
	They understand that it's going to be easier for them to control, easier for them to monopolize everything.
	The fewer people there are.
	When you've got a large number of people, they might go grab the guillotines and come after you.
	And there's also a possibility that somebody from amongst them is going to rise up and take you on.
	So that's their whole game is to have depopulation.
	That's why they get the people like Julian Huxley in.
	It's amusing the way he phrases that, like, well, if you've got shrinking population, that's typically indicative of negative growth.
	You don't say.
	It's like, no, but that's not the case anymore.
	We can still profit while our peasants are being reduced.
	That's right.
	And he also makes a false equivalency of shrinking populations and it's because they are closing their borders.
	You know, it's these closed border countries that are doing well.
	And it's because their populations are tricking.
	Maybe it's because their borders are closed and they aren't having to support a whole bunch of immigrants.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Yeah, it's you can see the undercurrents of everything these people are doing, can't you?
	We got some comments here.
	Maybe we should talk to them before we get further into this.
	We do.
	Skunk Hollow Rose Garden, thank you very much.
	Thank you very much for the tip.
	Says, lay it on me.
	I can take the whole truth.
	Not too many people can actually.
	They get kind of mad about it generally.
	Yeah, they do.
	BL Houghton gave five subscriptions to The David Knight Show on Rumble.
	Thank you.
	Rumble.
	Thank you very much, BL Houghton.
	Karen Court on Kick.
	Rumble.
	Oh, on Rumble, okay.
	Karen Carpenter, 27, says I'm poisoned from amalgam fillings.
	Nothing would surprise me.
	Absolute nightmare.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Well, I found something in it that I thought was surprising, and we're going to come up to that in a moment, but yeah, go ahead, Travis.
	Cole, 360.
	Digital ID starts in third grade for public schools with Google sign-in data IE issued school laptop.
	Really?
	I didn't know that.
	I'm not surprised they're keeping track of all that data.
	Your permanent record.
	You better not give your kid a laptop in third grade.
	No.
	Yeah.
	He gets pen and paper.
	He gets to make a phone a graduation present.
	Yeah.
	He gets it when he's old enough to, you know, actually be going out on his own.
	Yeah.
	eighteen, something like that.
	Assyrian girl, the danger in this kind of child sexualizing AI is that so many kids are growing up isolated in broken families and are ripe for any kind of affirmation.
	Oh yeah.
	They can get, yeah.
	Yeah.
	Start out with the kind of isolation that we have and then it gets even worse.
	And what AI is doing is, I've always said, the really dangerous things for it are the virtual fantasy world that they can create for people to keep you disconnected from other human beings.
	And then also the surveillance and control, but that isolation is a kind of control, a very important kind of control as well.
	Just to touch on that briefly, there's these two different subreddits.
	There's AI is my boyfriend and AI is my girlfriend or words to that effect.
	The AI is my boyfriend one has about 12,000 users or at least it did last time I saw an update on it.
	The AI is my girlfriend one has a few hundred and I think it speaks to the way people interface with these things differently.
	Men are probably going to be more focused on using it for immediate sexual gratification and not necessarilyily a conversation.
	A long term conversation, whereas women seem to be very rapidly falling into this, Oh, it really cares about me.
	It's saying all the things that I've always wanted.
	Like, it's the perfect man.
	A conversation.
	It gives me this perfect conversation.
	It always affirms all my needs.
	It tells me that I'm perfect and lovely and beautiful.
	And I think I bet it can quote Shakespeare poetry as well.
	And I think this is really insidious because it's giving each individual sex what they want the most out of it in the way they want it.
	Yes.
	And it's going to do that, individualize it for each individual because it's going to scope in pretty quickly.
	and build a profile of you and tell you exactly what you want to hear.
	That's what we keep seeing over and over again.
	That's why people get sucked into this stuff.
	It's this ever changing, amorphous blob amalgam that will evolve and adapt to whatever it is you want in that moment.
	And it's going to be incredibly hard for people to break away from this if they get sucked into it.
	And is that not evil?
	I mean, that is just, it is satanic.
	It really is.
	It's just a lie machine.
	Everything it does is a lie.
	It will lie to you to make you happy, quote, unquote, over and over again.
	Everything is about imitation, theft, and lies.
	It's just amazing how evil this is.
	It's going to be incredibly scary scary in the future.
	We've got more comments.
	Little Ford Schoolhouse, yes, and also a really good reason why we as parents need to be heavily involved in what our children are doing, especially online.
	Yes.
	Yeah, there's, I mean, Gen Alpha has been largely raised on iPads.
	When I was growing up it was TV, you know, but it was a lot more obvious.
	The TV was in the living room and all the rest of this stuff, but, um, and it didn't have the kind of content that's on the internet, that's for sure.
	It's very subtle.
	Yeah, and it's, you know, the options are, you know, if you turn your kid over to the internet, you're never going to really know what they're actually seeing.
	There's always ways around anything you know.
	So if you give them access to it, chances are They're going to be exposed to something.
	So really the best option is just to keep them away from it for as long as possible.
	KWD 68, Klaus will have zimillions and be happy.
	That's right.
	He won't eat z-bugs.
	He's going to eat fancy cheeses and fine hams.
	He was getting z-massages and he was getting z-luxury hotels and his wife as well.
	Z-luxury cars, z-chauffeur.
	KWD 68, Disney and their magic.
	People should have dropped them in 1940, Fantasia.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Yeah.
	Well, you know, when we look at, we're going to be talking about Ukraine and what's going on there, but just another example.
	For example, it's not just even in Ukraine where you had the Obama administration, the Hillary Clinton State Department, all of them pushing through this Soros revolution in Ukraine.
	That's what the CIA does all the time.
	They overthrow governments.
	That's why we have the situation that we have in Iran, because they decided they wanted to overthrow that government.
	It was going to nationalize corporate assets that were there for the oil companies, so they just overthrew that government, put in a dictator, and the Ayatollahs are blowback against that policy.
	But we've seen it happen in Syria as well.
	Now, Syria, you have the massive.
	slaughter of Christians by a regime that was installed by the CIA.
	This is a book that has just come out.
	The Mizes Institute reports about Creative Chaos is the name of the book.
	Subtitle is Inside the CIA's Covert War to Topple the Syrian Government.
	And yet, you know, we saw at the tail end of it, the mask came off.
	We had A ten warthogs coming in for the final stroke to hand it over to the Al Qaeda people.
	Long after everybody knew that they were Al Qaeda and ISIS, they have been connected to the CIA for the longest time.
	For over a decade, the dominant Western narrative on the Syrian war has been very simple.
	A peaceful uprising turned into a brutal civil war because Bashar al Assad's ruthless crackdown on his own people.
	But in the book Creative Chaos, Libertarian Institute's latest book, William Van Wagnen methodically dismantles a mainstream version of events, exposing it as a convenient fiction crafted to justify one of the most disastrous regime changes of the modern era.
	And of course, it's going to continue to metastasize.
	This is his central thesis.
	The war in Syria was not an organic revolution, but a deliberate effort by Washington, Israel, and their regional partners to weaken Iran by toppling Assad's government.
	Yeah.
	When peaceful protesters were hijacked by Islamic militants, instead of helping to restore stability, the US and its allies deliberately prevented Assad from crushing the insurgency.
	Just like we had Netanyahu was eager to install Hamas in Gaza because he wanted them to be radical, he knew that would give him an excuse to push back against them.
	If they were moderate, he wouldn't have an excuse to do what he wanted to do, which is to take over the territory.
	Even as the insurgency became dominated by Al-Qaeda and ISIS-affiliated groups.
	Let me say, the U.S. government, Pentagon, CIA has always been affiliated with ISIS and with Al-Qaeda.
	Started with the Mujahideen, of course.
	I've talked about this many times.
	John McCain making the rounds to rich little coffee club meetings of Republican women, bringing one of the Mujahideen in and asking them if they would like to adopt a Moog.
	You want to give us money?
	We'll give it to the Mujahideen.
	So we can attack Russia, of course.
	Well, that changed into Al Qaeda, which then changed into ISIS, which, you know, has had many, many other aliases.
	They're constantly changing the outward face of it.
	I mentioned this on the show.
	I believe it's in Rambo 3 or it's in one of the Rambo movies.
	At the end of the movie, there's a text scroll that comes up that says, this film is dedicated to the brave fighters of the Mujahideen, which they then removed over time because, oh, well, it turns out we're not friends with the Mujahideen anymore.
	Yeah, we have to claim that they're on the opposite side.
	Yeah, well, I'm sure it was dedicated.
	Probably got some funding.
	and some help from the Pentagon to push that out there as well as the CIA.
	Now years later, the result is a fractured Syria ruled by jihadist warlords, occupied by foreign powers with Israel consolidating its hold over strategic territory and Christians being slaughtered there.
	Just as it seems like that's usually the policy, usually the result of our foreign policy that areas that had had Christian communities, even though they were in the minority, had Christian communities there for centuries.
	And then they're all disappear when we take over the area.
	But Israel had a role in engineering chaos and all this, and they wanted to do it in order to consolidate power.
	One of the most compelling themes in the book is the way he implicitly ties the Syrian war to the broader structural issues in U.S. foreign policy, particularly public choice theory and the iron law of bureaucracy.
	Public choice theory teaches us that politicians and government agencies act in their own self-interest, not necessarily in the interest of the public.
	Well, of course, we have seen that over and over again.
	That is the nature of these humans who seek power.
	A student of this is the so-called, sorry, a subset of this is the so-called Iron Law of Bureaucracy, which says that bureauccracies eventually prioritize their own growth and survival over their original mission.
	The CIA, the State Department, the Pentagon all had institutional incentives to prolong the war, expand the budget, and justify continued intervention.
	And this is the way government works everywhere in everything.
	It's all about building this empire, this bureaucratic empire.
	And that ought to give us concern about the current mission in Washington, DC.
	What is Trump doing with that?
	What kind of a precedent is he setting?
	with that?
	And you don't have to, he's not trying to even keep it a secret.
	I mean, he's already threatened other large liberal cities that we, none of us care for, Chicago, New York, LA.
	But it is a slow rollout of this stuff.
	And so now there are more National Guard troops are being sent, and there's more they're going to be handing out arms for them, for their patrol.
	And MAGA is now defending it, saying, well, look, it's stopped everything.
	Well, yeah.
	You know, if you set up martial law, you probably can stop street crime.
	Is that the way that you want to live?
	I don't think so.
	There's other ways to solve this problem.
	And again, it's always the worst way to solve it.
	We talked about AI as a solution to have no anonymity on the internet and to require an ID to use the internet.
	Because that's basically what they're doing with these, with martial law.
	It's like, you got any ID, you got any reason to be on the street, we're going to have a lockdown, we're going to have curfew, that type of thing.
	Your papers, please.
	Yeah, exactly.
	The UK has dropped their demand, at least for now, that Apple hand over private American user data.
	Think about that.
	The UK, not content with the fact that it is doing dozens of charges a day against people for what they say on social media, now wants to know what you as an American are saying.
	And this is the encrypted data that is on Apple's iCloud.
	It is double encrypted.
	So they wanted Apple to give them a back door.
	And Tulsi Gabbard has announced that, well, we talked to them.
	We sent over JD Vance and we talked to them.
	They're backing down on this.
	You really believe that?
	This is, I think, really, why would they want that kind of stuff?
	Well, you know, as I've said before, they can get around their own domestic laws against spying on people if there are any that they respect.
	The game is that American spies can tell the UK to spy on Americans.
	And then, of course, if the UK's got the data, they can hand it over to the American people.
	And then technically, they haven't spied on Americans, but they got their partners to spy on us.
	So the question is, is this going to last?
	Apple has been very adamant saying we can't and we won't for give a backdoor to any other government, But I think the UK has absolutely embraced the kind of Orwellian society that George Orwell talked about.
	It's truly amazing.
	They've taken the lead in all this stuff.
	In February, Apple removed its iCloud Advanced Data Protection from the UK because it was going to be a condition of doing business there to give them backdoor.
	They subsequently made a complaint to the UK Investigatory Powers Tribunal over the demand for data access.
	And that case will be heard in the early next year in 2026.
	So people in Washington got involved and all I can say is that when Tulsi Gabbard, here's a quote from her, she says, Any information sharing between a government, any government, and private companies must be done in a manner that respects and protects the U.S. law and the constitutional rights of U.S. citizens.
	If you know anything about FISA, the Five Eyes, and what these people have been doing, that is a laughable lie.
	That's what Tulsi Gabbard is telling people.
	Now everything is safe because we got them virtuous signaling about this and Trump is in office.
	Don't worry, we'll invade your privacy in a way that respects the constitution.
	Just don't worry about it at all.
	It's fine.
	Yes.
	A couple of comments here.
	Steakhan 420 says, My girl's kid had a laptop in kindergarten.
	Wow.
	What does a kindergartener need a laptop for?
	Yeah.
	Shelley A says the screens damage the growing child's brain.
	Well, that is absolutely true.
	And people like Steve Jobs, while we're talking about Apple, said that he wouldn't give the iPad or iPhone to his kids at all.
	Yeah.
	No, they're not allowed to have that.
	So you should listen to the guy who made the thing.
	He unleashed it on all the rest of us.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Because, you know, they need to have the money.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Stay with us.
	STUDIO-PRO-DRIVING
	STUDIO-PRO-DRIVING In a world of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	Hear news now at apsradionews.com or get the APS radio app and never miss another story.
	Well, welcome back.
	We have responsible statecraft.
	is saying Trump gets it right on Ukraine peace.
	And of course, he's saying it was right to skip the ceasefire because it doesn't make any sense and it was a sticking point.
	Russia was not going to agree to it.
	There was no reason for them to agree to it and to go straight to trying to end the war.
	That's basically what he's saying.
	The question on everybody's mind, however, is what is Trump going to do in terms of ending the war?
	What guarantees is he going to make?
	As I said, he's now entirely correct in saying that he wants to go directly to a peace agreement which would end the war and not a mere ceasefire which oftentimes does not hold up.
	I saw a clip on social media.
	I'm not going to play it for you, but it's Fred Mertz going on and on about how well when you get back together with him them, you need to cease fire.
	And between Mertz and Trump is the Prime Minister, I think is her title, Georgia Maloney.
	And she's kind of rolling her eyes the whole time he's talking about this is not going to work.
	The Russians, I made it very clear from the start of the negotiations, they would not agree to an unconditional ceasefire.
	It would have been completely illogical for them to do so given the military pressure on Ukraine and the advances on the battlefield.
	They're far more important leverage than Russia can bring to bear at the negotiating table.
	The refusal to recognize this on the part of Western analysts and European governments betrays either an inability to understand the obvious realities or B, this is what I would vote for, a desire that the war should continue indefinitely.
	Look, the European Union wants a rationale for an army.
	If you think back to, when was it, 2016, I think, it was just before the election of Trump, they had Brexit referendum.
	And as that was coming in, documents were released.
	saying, look, the EU wants to have an army and all the rest of these things.
	And the EU said, no, we don't want to have an army.
	Then immediately after Brexit happened, they come out and say, yeah, we do want an EU army.
	Of course they do.
	They want to be able to have a consolidated government.
	That's what it's all about.
	And so this provides a rationale for an EU army, a rationale for a European military-industrial complex and a rebuilding of all that stuff, as we see happening in a big way in Germany.
	Very notable in Germany because they're going into massive debt.
	in order to build this to rearm Germany.
	Of course that is always the health of the state war and the warfare state, the welfare state is what keeps us all in debt.
	So now Germany, which has been, after the lessons of World War II, the hyperinflation and the economic depression that began there, they've been very, very wary of incurring any debt.
	Well, that's now all gone.
	Pretty much the people who were around then and lived through it have all passed on.
	They want to have an EU army, an EU military industrial complex, and I think these governments, as part of the fourth turning and the reset, I think they would like to have a third massive European war, another third world war.
	World War, I think that's all on the table.
	I'm sure it had nothing to do with Brexit happening and England leaving.
	I'm sure they're not saying they think, you know, if this were to happen, I'm sure we'd love our own fighting force to go in and establish order, you know, after an election has been stolen or they voted to leave.
	And we're going to have to assure ourselves that these votes were legit.
	We're going to station peacekeepers on your streets and we'll count the votes again for you and we'll make sure that this wasn't a scam.
	That's right.
	So the question is, now, you know, what's going to be done in order to assure the Europeans that this is not just the first stepping stone?
	and Russia's desire to take over all of Europe.
	That is, I think, has never been the issue.
	Putin appears to have dropped one impossible demand that Ukraine withdraw from the whole of Kherson and Zaporizia provinces.
	The remaining Russian demand is for the Ukrainian army's withdrawal from the part of Donetsk that it holds in return for Russian withdrawal from much of the smaller parts of Kharkiv and other provinces.
	And so I think this is all summed up in this line brilliantly.
	Europe is going to spend a hundred billion dollars that it doesn't have.
	in order to buy weapons that America doesn't have, in order to arm soldiers that Ukraine doesn't have.
	This is the war fantasy of these people.
	And all of them showed up as a united front to confront Trump in any push for peace.
	I gotta say, for whatever reason, and I'm sure that he's got his reasons, or maybe personal financial reasons or self aggrandizement or whatever, I'm always suspicious of his motives, but look, for whatever reason they can't, I would love to see him suc them get peace.
	The question is, again, is there going to be an American presence there?
	And we have some information about that as well.
	This is off topic and a little petty.
	But in this photo in that article, look at how short Zelensky is.
	It's just the only one shorter than him is that little blonde woman, and I'm now so incredibly curious how tall this man actually is.
	Because Macron is not a very tall guy, and he's further away and is taller than Zelensky.
	I'm just This is off topic, but Zelensky must be a tiny, tiny man.
	I guess it's the Napoleon complex, right?
	I'm going to conquer.
	Yeah, the little blonde girl is Georgia Maloney, the Italian Prime Minister.
	Someone needs to take this photo and add the prison wall with the lines behind it.
	Here's the usual suspects.
	These are the people creating wars all throughout the world right now.
	They actually are, yeah.
	One of the things that Trump has pushed back in terms of criticism, he said, We're not giving anything.
	We're going to sell weapons to these people, right?
	So that's the big selling point that he's coming up.
	It's going to be a bonus for our military industrial complex.
	So this is an article from a geopolitical analyst and commentator, Glenn Deeson.
	He's pointed out that Kiev is essentially attempting to create leverage out of nothing.
	He said, Europe will spend a hundred billion dollars that it does not have to buy weapons from America that it does not have, as I said, to arm soldiers Ukraine doesn't have.
	He followed up by doing something Washington policymakers refused to do, and that is to look at the big picture of how we got here.
	He said there was no threat in Ukraine before 2014 as only a tiny minority of Ukrainians wanted to join NATO, and Russia laid no claim to any of Ukraine's territory.
	Western governments then supported coup to pull Ukraine into NATO's orbit, something that CIA directors, ambassadors.
	Western state leaders had warned would instigate a security competition and likely trigger a war.
	Of course, that happened under the watch of Clinton and Obama, but you also had Republicans like John McCain and Lindsey Graham heavily involved in that as well.
	Remember, this is a bipartisan thing.
	Russia predictably reacted fiercely.
	Ever since then, the only acceptable narrative has been that Russia wants to restore the Soviet Union and that Putin is Hitler.
	Any dissent is labeled as disinformation, propaganda, hybrid warfare, or even treason.
	The war has now been lost, and the Americans are pulling away from it.
	summit asking the Europeans to absorb the consequences.
	How do the Europeans respond?
	By doubling down on this madness, which will destroy Ukraine, our economies, and our relevance in the world, speaking of Europe, and will possibly trigger a world war.
	He said, So what is the strategy?
	More the same?
	The best thing for Ukraine is to remove it from the front lines of the geopolitical struggle over where to draw the new dividing lines in Europe.
	End the war, rebuild Ukraine, and replace expansionist military blocks with the principle of individual security.
	And I thought it was very interesting because Arestovich, the guy I've played that clip many times, remember he was the peace negotiator in 2019, not peace between Ukraine and Russia, but peace within Ukraine because Ukraine was already enmeshed in a civil war because of the coup in 2014.
	And Kiev had been shelling the eastern portions of Ukraine at that point in time for five years.
	And so he's there at the peace talks and he comes back to be interviewed on Ukrainian television.
	And she asked him what the prospects of peace were and he said nothing.
	We don't have any.
	She goes, oh, that's horrible.
	He goes, no, it gets worse.
	He goes, in three years, of course, this is twenty nineteen, we'll be in direct war with Russia, which is what happened.
	And she said, that's horrible.
	He says, he said, the country will be devastated, but we will get into NATO.
	That was always the case.
	Now, this guy who has been amazingly frank to a fault, I guess, he got fired when he pointed out that one of these cruise missiles that crashed into an apartment building, they were trying to use that for propaganda purposes.
	He said, well, the reason that it crashed into that apartment building was because a Ukrainian firehead hit it and damaged its guidance system and it went off course and crashed into the apartment building.
	That was not the target.
	And for that, Zelensky fired him for telling the truth.
	Now he's running for president in Ukraine against Zelensky.
	That's a dangerous proposition there.
	It is.
	But basically, he did a long post on social media and he said, What we need to have is a great return to neutrality.
	He said, if not done voluntarily, then it's going to be done by force and that will happen in 10 to 15 years.
	He said, but the future lies not in tactical maneuvers, but in a strategic perspective that sees Ukraine as being a transitory state.
	He said, that's the only way that we're going to remain independent and have our freedom.
	So that's his opposition to Zelensky.
	He's absolutely right about that.
	I mean, I certainly don't trust the guy, but he does seem to not have any filters in terms of telling the truth.
	And I think he's telling the truth one more time here.
	Glenn Greenwald said DC foreign policy elites now know that Ukraine cannot win, but they would rather continue fueling a fruitless and deadly war than war, then admit that they were wrong, of course, and delusional about Ukraine's prospects against Russia.
	This is where we always see this.
	So the question, as I said before, is, are we going to have boots on the ground, American troops stationed there as a peacekeeping force?
	Trump was asked about that on Fox News, and here's what he had to say.
	What kind of assurances do you feel like you have that going forward and past this Trump administration, it won't be American boots on the ground defending that border?
	Well, you have my assurance.
	You know, I'm president, and I'm just trying to stop people from being killed, Charlie.
	Look, they're losing from five to seven thousand people a week.
	Yeah, there we go.
	Yeah, he's losing anywhere from five to seven thousand people a week.
	And of course, he thinks that if he can stop that, that's going to give him some extra credit with God.
	We'll talk about that coming up.
	But Trump gave his personal assurance there will be no American boots on the ground in a post thing.
	And he said, You can count on me, I'm president, right?
	We would never see Trump say one thing and do another, would we?
	And of course, he'll be president forever, and there's no one else that's going to become president.
	Right.
	He said, You have my assurance and I'm president.
	He said American forces would play a supporting role.
	He said there will be some form of security.
	It can't be NATO because that's just not something that would ever, ever happen.
	It couldn't, he said.
	American support probably take the form of air support, whether that means combat air patrols and air policing or a deployment of intelligence assets to feed information to European forces is presently unclear.
	When it comes to security, said Trump, the Europeans are willing to put people on the ground, and we are willing to help them with things, especially by air, because nobody has the kind of stuff we have.
	Follows other remarks by Trump, he says Putin agreed that Russia would accept security guarantees in Ukraine.
	So that's why when they were saying, as long as Ukraine doesn't formally enter NATO, we would accept things like an Article 5 security guarantees, in other words, some kind of military force there that would guarantee that they're not going to be moving in.
	But I think we'll have to see what happens.
	Again, the conference that will have Putin, Zelensky and Trump, I think he scheduled that for Friday.
	We'll see what comes out of that.
	I'mve said before, Zelensky is enriching himself off of this and he doesn't care how many of his own countrymen die.
	As long as the money keeps rolling in for him, he'll keep sacrificing them into the meat grinder.
	It doesn't matter if Ukraine gets obliterated.
	He'll move to the French Riviera with his wife.
	And that's the way the British and the French are as well.
	They want to keep it going as well.
	The UK is eager to get there on the ground as soon as possible, said the defense minister.
	In the circumstances of a ceasefire, we're ready to put UK boots on the ground in Ukraine.
	They're ready to go.
	They're ready to act from day one.
	They just can't wait to get in there and get involved in a war because they've got problems at home.
	People are getting pretty upset with what the government is doing to people at home.
	And that's when these governments push for war.
	Like Salenti has always said, when all else fails, they take you to war.
	That's why the UK and France are pushing so hard, because they've already gone to war with their own people in terms of the immigration stuff.
	Trump's new comments on security cooperation appear to have done little to encourage Germany to commit to the so-called coalition, at least in a frontline role.
	But I think that'll probably change.
	Germany is very interested in building up the military now and building up the strength of government.
	Well, we're going to take a quick break and we will be right back.
	Stay with us.
	PIANO PLAYS
	Defending the American Dream.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	The End Making Sense Common Again.
	You're listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show.
	Welcome back folks.
	Thank you for still being here with us.
	We appreciate it.
	We've got some comments here from Nebaru twenty twenty nine says AI, you will know nothing and be happy.
	That's right.
	Why would you want to know anything?
	The AI knows everything for you.
	It will tell you what's true, or at least an approximation of it, kinda, maybe.
	Now like Corporal Schultz, I know nothing.
	Epstein Island says, Wow, we've got a celebrity in the chat.
	Trump is evicting the homeless from DC.
	How do you evict people who are already evicted?
	Trump wants to turn the homeless into Palestinians.
	Yeah.
	We're going to round them up for Soylent Green.
	Yeah, he's going to throw them out of DC as if that were their home, but it's amazing.
	Audi MRR says, and it's good to see you, Audi.
	Amazing how these wars cause insurmountable damage, and then when they get what they wanted, then they want to act like brokers of peace.
	Nate Mac four, screens damage adult brains.
	Look at how much we've changed since TV was invented.
	They're not healthy for anyone, but they're especially damaging for children.
	That's right.
	Sam Miller one, two, three.
	Good to see you, Sam.
	But it was so worth it to get Gilligan's Island, wasn't it?
	Sit right back and you'll hear the tale.
	Sam Miller one, two, three.
	Good to see you, Sam.
	They gave all students from kindergarten through high school laptops as they were locked down during COVID so they can still do school virtually in parts of Iowa.
	I'm sure that it's massively important for your kindergartener to be giving.
	And just send the bill to the homeowners.
	Yeah.
	In terms of property taxes, that's why we won't be able to own a home is because of the waste of these school systems.
	I think about that every time I drive by a school and see all the parked school buses.
	It just amazes me.
	For the extremely nice facilities that they have for sports.
	Yeah.
	There's a high school nearby where we live and they have a very, very nice track and field, football field, soccer field.
	You're just looking at it, you're thinking, how much money was spent on this?
	Yeah, never, never too much.
	Shabe or Shabe E5, if you step back, all these war zones have agenda 2030 type, build back better reconstruction plans and stakeholders long-term plans.
	We're in the demolition phase of build back better.
	Well, first, before you can build back, you've got to get what's there.
	Yeah, of course, in Ukraine, I've played the video many times when I talk about Ukraine 2030.
	Well, the war is over.
	And now everything that you do, you do online or through your phone and all your interaction with the government is all done there with your digital ID and we make it so easy for you.
	Isn't this wonderful?
	You can't just wait for that to happen.
	That's what I've been saying is they're going to make it very, very annoying to use a regular ID in the coming weeks, months, years.
	It's going to be incredibly annoying.
	You're going to have to upload it time and time again.
	They're going to make it so the camera that you use to take a picture of it doesn't function properly.
	Oh, take another picture.
	Do this.
	But if you've got the digital ID, oh, it's going to work so seamlessly and flawlessly.
	It's going to be so easy.
	You're not going to have to put up with the hassle of it.
	That's right.
	It's going to Well, we know exactly how they're going to use it.
	I mean, it's the way the Chinese used it.
	It's the way they tried to use it with the vaccine credentials in 2020 and all the rest.
	It's a matter of permission society.
	Well, let's take a look.
	I said before that there's been some new interesting information about the link between the MMR vaccine and autism.
	It turns out, and Children's Health Defense has a story, it turns out that some of their scientists have looked at this, and they've produced their own paper in response to the gold standard that has been sold by the medical community and the mainstream media since 2002.
	Supposedly, this 2002 study debunked any link between autism and vaccines.
	And now these people have looked at this study coming again from the New England Journal of Medicine, the usual suspects.
	You can usually count on this kind of garbage coming from them.
	They said the question of vaccines and autism desperately needs to be put back on the table.
	This is a peer-reviewed research letter.
	by a children's health defense scientist calls into question a 2002 study at the New England Journal of Medicine that officials always use as their strong evidence of no link between the MMR vaccine and autism.
	A decades-old study, however, does not support rejecting the causal link between the measles, mumps, rubella vaccine.
	They say in the new stuff, they said it's simply math.
	And they did the scientific study wrong.
	It was done by the usual people.
	Like I said, when you look at these studies, any of these studies, the first question you should have is qui bono, who benefits from this, right?
	And of course, when it's coming out of the New England Journal of Medicine, you know that it's the pharmaceutical industry and the medical communities that are behind this.
	The pediatricians are pushing this.
	The AMA is pushing this and they are embedded with the pharmaceutical companies.
	Jabalansky and Hooker called for the study to be replicated.
	After correcting for errors, they said there's problems with measurements of certainty, contradictions in numbers presented in the study's table, and a flaw in the method used to determine risk.
	I wonder if this thing was done by Peter Navarro.
	It sounds like his tariffs.
	They said a landmark publication in one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world whose erroneous conclusions have reverberated through news outlets and doctors' offices alike for the last 23 years is shown to be invalid by the most basic form of arithmetic.
	Do they get anything right about this study is more than questioned.
	I would like to see them go back and revisit the Framingham study, which I've had the doctor that did the surgery lecture me on that many times to say, it proves that you need to have statins.
	I'm somewhat skeptical of that, which makes me wonder if this is being used so much by the medical community, who funded it, and to what purpose.
	The problem is not that we were sold $69 billion a year in vaccines based on faulty analyses that riddled our children with toxins, left them in chronic and debilitating disease state, if not death.
	The problem is that we bought it.
	The New England Journal of Medicine paper by Madsen and others is one of the key studies cited by vaccine advocates to say that it is a myth that there is a link between these vaccines and autism.
	They did this 23 years ago.
	They said there was a lot of mounting evidence showing a link.
	And of course, if you just looked at the explosion of autism at that point in time.
	You knew something was happening.
	But again, the report from, you know, the reply, I should say, from the mainstream media is this, don't look at this.
	You know, they get very upset if anybody talks about doing a study.
	It's like, what do you have to hide?
	And, you know, well, it's all been done.
	The science is settled, blah, blah, blah.
	Well, if it's scientific, then you should be able to replicate that.
	And you shouldn't have a concern about somebody doing another look at that.
	They analyzed this settled science came from the same group that did the computer model for COVID that showed it going up forever and didn't give the same output twice.
	Well, that was the Imperial College of London, but New England Journal of Medicine is just as bad as they are.
	They said they looked at 537,000 children in the Danish healthcare system.
	They separated them into vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.
	The problem was that they didn't normalize this.
	They said when they looked at it, they said the risk of autism was the same in both groups.
	There was no association with the child's age at the time of vaccination or the time since vaccination or the date of vaccination and the development of autism.
	But this study has become a cornerstone publication to say that there is no connection to autism.
	But the two people, two scientists from Children's Health Defense said that the study results as presented show that the authors are 95% confident that the recipients of the MMR vaccine are anywhere from 47% less likely to get autism to 24% more likely to be harmed by the autistic disorder.
	Think about that.
	Okay, they're nearly 100% confident that they don't have a conclusion here because if you can go anywhere from 47% less likely to 24% more likely to have autism.
	that is so wide that you can't have any confidence in this study.
	Yeah, that's quite a swing.
	Imagine someone comes to you and says, I've got a great investment for you.
	Now, you might be 47% likely to make double your money, or maybe you're 24% likely to lose it all, you know?
	I'm not exactly sure, I don't know how we're doing this, but Yeah, they've got confidence that they don't really have a conclusion here.
	It doesn't even make sense.
	Yeah, they said, this is strong evidence of a need for more evidence.
	So, problems with how the study was conducted, they said, they had also a statistical adjustment.
	They used this to correct data to account for biases, confounding factors on limitations in the data.
	The authors didn't share their detailed model for the kind of statistical adjustment that they did, which would have been appropriate given that the adjustment changed the safety signal to its opposite.
	It changed it from leaning toward harm to leaning toward protection.
	So all they do is they come in and wave their hands and say, well, when we initially did this, it looked like it was causing autism, but then we applied a statistical correction, and now it shows that it doesn't.
	Well, once I massaged the data.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Once I made it, so I didn't.
	They said the studies authors are confused about the size of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated cohorts.
	The number of vaccinated versus unvaccinated individuals with autistic disorder and other autism spectrum disorders varies between these tables.
	For example, reanalyzing unadjusted data from one of their tables indicated with a ninety percent confidence that children who received the MMR vaccine had an eighteen percent greater incident of autistic disorder or other autism spectrum disorders.
	They said the original Madsen paper is foundational to the pharmaceuticalal industry canard that vaccines don't cause autism.
	However, the numbers literally don't add up.
	And you can see how they're massaging the data and they don't tell you the factors that they've applied here.
	They just give you the end conclusion.
	There's no science in this.
	And folks, this is the whole reason, this is when you look at what they do with the quote unquote science of virology about the existence of viruses.
	They never do real science on any of these viruses.
	They've not isolated them.
	They have not isolated something and then exposed a population to it and see the disease develop.
	That's never, never been done.
	That's why many doctors are saying we no longer believe that in any of this virology stuff.
	The study was also done at the beginning of an explosion in autism rates when fewer vaccines were recommended to children and when there were fewer other possible toxic exposures as well.
	And so there's yet another lawsuit that has been filed against RFK Jr.'s CDC over the failure to test cumulative effect of a 72-dose childhood vaccine schedule.
	Think about that.
	It's six dozen vaccines.
	And what they're saying is you have barely, if you have at all tested the individual vaccines.
	But you've never even attempted to test for safety the combined effect of these seventy two.
	And so there's a lawsuit there saying the agency has not done its job.
	And of course, the CDC is under HHS.
	It's directly under Susan Monrez.
	You remember her?
	She was put in.
	First, they brought in somebody who was not so friendly to vaccines, and the industry was not happy with that.
	And he was told by the Trump administration when he was on his way to the hearing, don't bother to show up.
	We've withdrawn your name.
	And they put in in his place Susan Monarez, who has been put there from working for BARDA, which is like the biological equivalent of DARPA.
	Very dark, very sinister work that they're doing there.
	And what she has been focused on at BARDA was artificial intelligence designing mRNA drugs, the very thing that Trump began his administration with with Stargate, if you recall.
	So I looked at this and I thought, well, this is just a, this whole thing was set up from the very beginning.
	They put somebody in there that looked.
	like it was going to be a win for skeptics.
	Instead, what we end up with is an AI mRNA person who's going to be there.
	Well, she is at the CDC.
	So the lawsuit has I was going to say, isn't it funny how that keeps happening with the Trump administration?
	Yeah.
	Isn't it funny how all these people that are supposed to be on our side, they get in there and immediately change gears?
	Yeah, or they don't get in, yeah.
	People like Paul Spatel, Dan Bongino.
	Yeah.
	Funny.
	Exactly.
	CDC demands proof of harm while refusing to conduct the studies that could provide it.
	That is exactly what we see from these people over and over again.
	You know, when you get a natural substance, so we have to have some studies or you can't.
	You can have some studies or you can't say this or that about it, but they won't do the studies.
	They won't fund those studies.
	They don't care.
	So they say, well, there's no studies because they don't fund them.
	And then they shut it down.
	And according to the study, when you consider how much of the medical field is about knowing which drugs interact with which ones, it's shocking that they haven't done any studies to see if these 72 vaccines can interact with each other.
	Yeah, oh, absolutely.
	Or to see what the cumulative effect is of all the adjuvants and preservatives and things like that.
	Because it's been coming up more and more as time goes on that the babies are just not capable of really clearing these things out of their system.
	That it accumulates in them them at a much higher and a faster rate than it would in an adult because they don't have a fully developed system to flush these kinds of chemicals and toxins out.
	Well, it's one of these things like the masks, right?
	Even if their science were correct in terms of viruses and stuff, then that means that the masks were ludicrously inefficient, it couldn't be like a hurricane fence trying to keep out mosquitoes, you know?
	But when you look at like the hepatitis B vaccine, which they want to give newborn, it's like just test the mother and see if she's got hepatitis B. If she doesn't have hepatitis B, you don't need to give that to the baby.
	It's ridiculous.
	It's truly evil.
	According to the complaint, the CDC violated the First Amendment free speech and Fifth Amendment due process clauses of the U. S. Constitution, as well as the Administrative Procedure Act, which agency actions are considered to be arbitrary and capricious if they have failed to consider an important aspect of the problem.
	Well, I mean, what would we have left of the government if we took out everything that was arbitrary and capricious?
	We might have left the government with it.
	It's fit in the Constitution, I guess.
	Lawsuit is now asking to force the CDC to study the childhood vaccine schedule and the interactions.
	They said the lawsuit is bringing to light critical facts about the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule about which most parents are unaware.
	The schedule is essentially an experiment on our children, one that becomes increasingly concerning as more shots are added and combination vaccines introduced.
	I mean, they added the COVID shot, the MRNA Trump shot to the childhood schedule.
	On Friday last week, HHS announced that it is reinstating the task force on safer childhood vaccines.
	The lawsuit describes this as an encouraging small step, but say that it still does not address the lack of safety testing of the entire vaccine schedule.
	They said this case exposes structural failure of the institution.
	Now what it exposes is the fact that these institutions are riddled with corruption and they are captured by the industries that they're supposed to be regulating.
	Individual vaccines undergo limited FDA testing and neither the FDA nor the CDC has ever required or conducted safety testing of the cumulative childhood schedule that is now seventy two doses.
	to expose the data on harm caused by vaccines would destroy confidence in the program.
	The program is more important to them than whether or not it actually helps children.
	It's what we were talking about, the iron law of bureaucracy.
	And also about corruption for the people that the bureaucracy is actually working for.
	It's not the public, but it's working for the people who have created this stuff.
	The FDA is there to make sure that they are free to do anything and to give them legal cover to do anything.
	Our plaintiffs live the reality of this unproven vaccine recommendation schedule.
	It's two doctors who have filed this, two doctors who actually did some science and for publishing these results, they had their licenses taken away.
	Thomas lost his pediatric practice after publishing data comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
	Stoller had his license revoked for writing medical exemptions based on genetic risk factors.
	Doctors who do such research and dare publish it will have the research ultimately retracted even after being published through a rigorous peer review process.
	In my case, said Thomas, a few days after this study was available online, the Oregon Medical Board had an emergency meeting.
	immediately suspended my license claiming I was a threat to public health.
	You notice they don't claim he's lying.
	Yeah.
	They don't come out and say, you're telling falsehoods.
	They just said, you're a threat to public health.
	They're right because public health is not about individual health.
	It is this nebulous thing that exists for its own benefit in order to dominate us.
	And to me that wording is a tacit admission of, yeah, okay, you're right about this.
	Sure, there's a connection here.
	However, we're prioritizing what we think is important.
	We think that if you were to put this out there, that people would stop getting vaccines and that that would lead to a more problematic outcomes for us.
	Yes, yes.
	They don't want people to be able to make an informed decision.
	That's right.
	Especially parents, because that's the other part of the lawsuit.
	They say that it also affects the Fifth Amendment for parents because it deprives parents and children of life, liberty, or property, and that it denies parents their fundamental liberty interest in directing their children's medical care and children's fundamental right to bodily integrity.
	And because they know that if you confront a pediatrician with this stuff and refuse to do this, the pediatrician is like likely to report you to CPS.
	And just like the Oregon Medical Board revoked this doctor's license, CPS will come in to try to revoke your parenthood, take your children away from you.
	They said this framework denies the existence of medically vulnerable children, while the CDC refuses to recognize any category of vaccine vulnerable children despite mounting evidence that they exist.
	And of course, as we reported in the last couple of weeks, the American Academy of Pediatrics is now engaged in a campaign to remove religious exemptions.
	They want to come after the First Amendment for parents as well.
	They want to say that you can't refuse to get vaccines because they were the product of an abortion or something like that.
	Texas Attorney General is now suing Eli Lilly for bribing doctors to prescribe high-profit drugs.
	And of course, Eli Lilly is the giant pharmaceutical company that Trump went to to get the head of HHS for his first term.
	That was Alex Cesar, the CEO of Eli Lilly.
	He was the one who ran the so-called pandemic.
	Now, Attorney General Ken Paxton is suing Eli Lilly for allegedly bribing doctors to prescribe their most profitable drugs, especially the weight loss medications, but also other prescriptions that were there.
	He says that the result of this, by getting them to pick the more expensive drugs, has resulted in millions of dollars in claims, Medicare claims in Texas that have been made at taxpayer expense.
	When you look at what they do, it's the first hand experience I had with this Elquist thing.
	It's a blood thinner thing to stop blood clots.
	The medical community, they're all just like, oh yeah, that's the one thing that you use.
	They have been so thoroughly propagandized by Pfizer that that's what they sell.
	And the doctor said he had a patient who paid thousands of dollars a month to get this blood thinning medication.
	And it's like, that's ridiculous.
	There's a lot of things out there that can thin your blood and not even prescription pharmaceuticals.
	But that's what they do.
	They work with them to say, this is the one that you want.
	And look, we've got a study here.
	So these are the GLP-1 weight loss medications, Manjaro and Zepp bound that are produced by Eli Lily.
	He claims that they are engaged in an illegal kickback scheme.
	He said Eli Lily fraudulently sought to maximize profits at taxpayer expense and to put corporate greed over people's health, just like with the opioid epidemic.
	Plaintiffs include the state of Texas and Health Choice Alliance LLC, a New Jersey-based research organization.
	In addition to Manjaro and Zeppbound, the complaint named a dozen drugs sold by Eli Lilly to treat conditions including migraines, eczema, leukemia, and breast cancer.
	Eli Lilly offered illegal incentives.
	to Texas medical providers for prescribing their drugs, listen to this, including free nurses.
	What is that?
	And reimbursement for support services.
	Hey, I got a free nurse for you.
	How do you manage that?
	An indentured servant?
	Yeah, I guess they take the salary of the nurses.
	Eli Lilly in 2023 tested its Manjaro shots on kids as young as six.
	This is the GLP one drugs, that family of drugs.
	Several lesser known GLP one drugs can be prescribed off-label for children, but of course this hasn't been tested for that.
	Texas's new lawsuit follows an October 2024 suit that the state and the Health Choice Alliance filed against major insulin vendors, including Eli Lowley, for overcharging and also a kickback scheme.
	This seems to be standard operating procedure with pharmaceutical companies, whether you're talking about insulin or whether you're talking about opioids or you're talking about now these weight loss drugs.
	And then finally, we have inside mRNA vaccines.
	You've got Robert Redfield, who was the CDC director for Trump in his first term.
	This guy is coming out now.
	But from the things that he's saying, he ought to go to jail.
	He said, quote, we turned the body into a factory with no clear controls.
	And if you go back and look at the archives, I said that publicly when they started talking about that.
	If you remember, they had You said that almost immediately.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, they said they went, Trump set up this little dog and pony show.
	And he had all these pharmaceutical executives come in and sit at the table.
	They went around the table.
	And he had them all lined up in the order of how quickly they could do this.
	And he said, No, that's not fast enough.
	Next one.
	That's not fast enough.
	And he gets to Moderna and they say, We can do it right now because we're going to use your body as a factory to manufacture this vaccine.
	And I said, well, what could possibly go wrong with that?
	I said, that sounds like cancer.
	How do you ever stop this thing?
	And actually, what it reminds me of when I look at this, it reminds me, somebody mentioned it earlier, Fantasia.
	It reminds me of the Sorcerer's Apprentice.
	How appropriate, you know, when you talk about Pharmacea, the sorcerers.
	This is basically, if you look at these marching brooms with their buckets of water, that's basically what they unleash on you with the mRNA vaccine.
	I think this is the perfect analogy for the pharmacea.
	It just keeps coming and that's what the mRNA does.
	It keeps multiplying and multiplying in your body as it is damaging your body, flooding your body with spikes, these spike proteins.
	Yeah, that's the analogy right there.
	And pharma marches on.
	Now, Robert Redfield is going to tell us the truth about that finally.
	Five years ago, where was he?
	Okay, he was in the position.
	to do something about it.
	He was the CDC director.
	And he wouldn't give you the obvious issue with it.
	Hey, we don't have any way to turn this off.
	Where's the off switch?
	We can't control this.
	We just unleash it, right?
	We do this pharmacia incantation injection and it's off to the races.
	Well, there's probably a lot more money for him to be made being quiet back then.
	But now he's, now he wants some headlines.
	He also wants you to trust him.
	So he's out there, he wants to sell bird flu pandemic and he's been doing that.
	But he's also the guy that's out there selling, oh, it came from China now, right?
	We didn't develop it.
	It came from China, the virus did.
	Well, he said, this is not that there is a virus.
	Yeah, this is, Yeah, if there was a virus, yeah.
	Exposé News has the article about a new documentary called Inside MRNA Vaccines, the movie.
	They say it's an unfiltered second opinion on the science behind MRNA technology to provide the public with information that corporate media will not cover about the development and global rollout of the MRNA vaccine technology.
	Well, I hope that they get into the long history of this, but I have concerns about it since they have Robert Malone, who is another limited hangout guy.
	But this thing had been developed for quite some time, the vaccine itself, as well as all the lockdown and the tactics that they were going to use against us.
	They had wargamed that from Dark Winter on, but the vaccine had been developed with BARTA and DARPA for quite some time before they rolled that out as well.
	This premiered on the 12th of August, this documentary, features exclusive 3D animations and depth interviews.
	I guess they show the MRNA unleashing the spike proteins like the marching brooms or their buckets of water, perhaps.
	Professionals who expressed concern about potential gaps in data transparency, risk assessment and long-term safety associated with the rapid adoption of this platform.
	The documentary argues that while regulators and much of the scientific community maintain that COVID mRNA vaccines are safe and effective, the technology is rapidly expanding beyond pandemic response, including potential applications in the food supply.
	Of course, Brooke Rollins, the person that Trump just put in and USDA, the first thing she did was to approve mRNA injections into chickens and pigs and beef into our food supply to supposedly protect them from bird flu.
	MRNA, I think, is going to be the legacy of Trump.
	I think history is going to be on my side when it comes to Trump because they're going to see that this guy was both the father and the funder of MRNA vaccines.
	has said over and over again how he's the one who created it.
	He's the proud, I guess we should call him Yeah.
	Instead of being the founding father, he is the funding father of this abomination that we call the COVID vaccine, but mRNA in general.
	I said before, when we're talking about dental issues, this is the cynical underbelly of the entire medical industry is what this really looks like.
	The American Dental Association promoting what they want dentists to tell you is silver fillings.
	There's no silver in them at all.
	It's mercury.
	It's 50% mercury, as a matter of fact, a dangerous heavy metal that can travel to the brain, the kidneys, the placenta, and to breast milk.
	Dentists still use amalgam on vulnerable populations, including service members, Native Americans, people in institutions and low-income families.
	In other words, if you've got insurance, many of us do not have dental insurance, but if you've got insurance, the insurance wants you to get amalgam fillings.
	And so people who are on government insurance, they are getting that instead of ceramic.
	But, you know, even when you go to a dentist, they do everything to talk you out of a ceramic filling.
	Not only are they more expensive, but they say, well, it's not going to last.
	Yeah, I don't like to do those and so forth.
	The thing that I thought was fascinating about this is when you look at the financial interests of the American Dental Association, they have a patent on amalgam.
	It's one of the reasons why they push that.
	And they also have rules to tell the dentists not to talk about the mercury in the fillings that the American Dental Association has patented in order to make a profit off of this.
	And what is interesting, I think, is that basically the USA is standing alone.
	You have the EU has now banned these mercury fillings, as many third world countries have, Vietnam and others.
	This is an article about two people who put together a consumer movement that brought that about in Europe.
	And they said at the beginning, FDA and the World Health Organization were pushing for the amalgam stuff.
	But they have now switched from being supporters of amalgam to opponents of the mercury in these vaccines.
	They said both.
	But the government bureaucracies here in the United States, both federal and state, as well as insurance companies have.
	have not changed they're still pushing for this so as usual we see these big organizations like the pediatricians who along with the insurance companies, the organization of pediatricians and saying we want to take away even religious exemptions for the vaccines, and the insurance companies will shut down your practice as a pediatrician if you don't get a large percentage of your patient, your child patients vaccinated with a schedule.
	We see the same thing happening with the fillings, and it's the insurance companies allied with the medical guild.
	That's why we got to look at the ADA and the AAP.
	These things are guilds that exist for the enrichment of their people, not for your health.
	are adamantly opposed to your health in many different ways.
	It's incredible to me that more people can't see it at this point.
	They make it so blatantly obvious.
	Yeah.
	The sheer amount of evidence that there has been out there with just the opioid crisis, I really thought people were starting to wake up to it and they almost did.
	People were starting to get mad.
	They're beginning to see, oh man, these guys poisoned us.
	They addicted us.
	Look at the people on the street that are just zombies.
	Yeah.
	And then COVID rolled around, they immediately just went back into the fold.
	Oh, you've got to save us.
	Please.
	I'll take whatever you give me.
	Yeah.
	And then Trump talks to Johnson and Johnson that was running the opioid thing and said, hey, let me give you a factory.
	so you can get in the vaccine business because you don't have any liability with that.
	That's where the big money is.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Well, Florida has been probably the leader and the bright spot in all of this, and they said it was because of a Zoom meeting that they had with the Florida Surgeon General, Joseph Latipo.
	He's not perfect, and I wish that he would move faster on things, but he has been moving faster than anybody else in terms of pushing back against the mRNA stuff, now pushing back against the amalgam fillings and so forth.
	In Rhode Island and California, they're presenting this as a racial justice issue.
	That's going to be the angle that they take, saying that this.
	affects poor people more than other people.
	So they said part of what they've been able to accomplish is that they have when they started this campaign the two biggest companies that made dental appliances were in the amalgam business and now they've gotten out.
	They don't make that anymore.
	So it's smaller manufacturers that are making it.
	And that's very key.
	But the European Union, just like with fluoride, We are the outlier in all this stuff.
	We have our government continues to push for this stuff.
	So it'll be interesting to see what, if anything, the Maha people do about this because Trump is now trying to extend fluoride being put into the water supply.
	They said that in twenty twenty four they wound up the vote to ban amalgam in the EU was twenty seven nations for the ban and zero nations against the ban.
	They said what started with only two countries supporting their effort to stop amalgam filling in twenty eleven warped into a unanimous vote to stop it in twenty twenty four.
	The European Parliament then supported the ban 98% to 2%.
	It said governments around the world, even not just the EU, but from Vietnam to Tunisia, have banned amalgam.
	But not our American government and not Maha.
	Isn't that telling?
	It's just amazing.
	Now we see a new article from The Hill.
	And I looked at this show.
	The Hill typically covers politics, right?
	Why are they talking about vaccines?
	Well, because vaccines are politics in a big way.
	Promising vaccine may prevent certain cancers from returning.
	It could kill you before the cancer returns.
	It could also give you...
	We're still counting that as a win.
	Yeah, technically.
	A big part of this is the fact that the pharmaceutical companies own everyone by subsidizing them.
	We have seen this with the ads that they've been doing, the Ask Your Doctor ads that have been there since the 1990s when Clinton allowed that to come in.
	And in the UK, they actually have a medical journalists association, and they hand out awards to medical journalists.
	But that association is funded by the pharmaceutical company.
	So guess what?
	You're not going to have any journalists doing articles exposing what is happening with the pharmaceutical stuff.
	The said it's sponsored by a number of organizations, including several pharmaceutical companies and their UK trade body, the Association of British Pharmaceutical Industry.
	Also another number of medical communications and advertising agencies and pharmaceutical companies.
	They said among its current and previous sponsors, numerous other pharmaceutical companies and other organizations active within the pharmaceutical industry.
	And this article from the Daily Skeptic in the UK said none of the seventy seven articles listed for final consideration for awards are directly critical of any pharmaceutical company.
	They're all puff pieces.
	I mean, what did you expect?
	They're going to be like, ah, good job getting us on that corruption.
	Ah, you got us.
	It's amazing.
	And of course, we have organizations like this here in the United States.
	We have Stat News, which is a trade publication.
	And it is as captive to the pharmaceutical companies as this thing is, which is why it was so surprising that they covered the arm twisting and blackmailing of governments by Pfizer during the COVID shot rollout.
	That was actually covered by Stat News.
	I couldn't believe I was reading it there.
	And yet, the interesting thing is that it was not covered by media, conservative or liberal, because the conservatives, Trump is in power and the conservatives are trying to suck up to him.
	And it wasn't covered by the liberal media because they're trying to suck up to the pharmaceutical companies and because they want the vaccine out there.
	Maybe they just feel comfortable knowing since it's a trade publication, not many people read it.
	Sure, you can put that out there.
	It truly is amazing.
	Occasionally you get these things.
	It's just like the Goldman Sachs paper where they lectured.
	the No, no.
	pharmaceutical companies say you don't want to heal any diseases.
	Healing people is not a good business model.
	We can't make money that way.
	Yeah.
	We've got a lot of comments before we go to break.
	Sure.
	Malutan Milenkovic, the only bugs I eat are shrimp and crab.
	Mmm, shrimp and crab.
	Delicious.
	They are like big bugs, aren't they?
	Yeah.
	Water filtered.
	Assyrian girls.
	Let's imagine someone paid these scientists to make that study and print such goofy results in a major medical journal.
	Yeah, imagine that.
	Yeah.
	I wonder who would do such a thing.
	Assyrian girl also says I used to think I should have become a weather girl.
	No other profession would allow you to be wrong all the time and keep paying your salary.
	Now I think I should have been a researcher for pharma.
	You never have to be correct in what you publish for them, but even the weather girl is occasionally correct sometimes.
	Yeah, and of course the pharmaceutical people get paid much more than the weather girl.
	Much better than a weather girl.
	And you know, you can just make up what you want, you don't even have to read from a teleprompter, just write down some numbers and say, this proves my theory.
	Brandon Bennett, I just have to figure out how I'm going to listen to David when I join some Amish community.
	Well, maybe you could get like a potato powered radio or something like that.
	You know, potato battery.
	Yeah, they don't allow you to have iPhones, I guess.
	That would definitely be.
	It's fair Bolton.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Nibiru 2029.
	Who pays for these studies is the real question.
	That's right.
	I think we all know who's paying.
	Whoever funds it controls it, and that's especially true of the studies.
	You look at that, you know, and that is where you start.
	It's just like, you know, when you look at the legal immunity they have for any damage that they've done.
	To me, that was, you know, as soon as I saw that, it's like, okay, now we're done.
	You know, if they have absolutely no risk in terms of products that they do if they harm somebody, then that's not a product that I want.
	And they wouldn't be seeking that if they didn't know that it was harmful.
	And as I've said, it is we can never make it safe.
	I forget exactly what the term was they said.
	But I said it was unavoidably harmful or risky, something like that.
	Unavoidably harmful, I believe was the exact wording.
	So we've got to have protection from you in order to make this happen.
	A Syrian girl says Paxton should also be suing the doctors who allow themselves to be bribed, traitors to humanity.
	Yeah, throw them all in jail.
	Yeah.
	Throw them in prison.
	You're right.
	Really should be going after the doctors who accepted the bribes.
	It's kind of like letting the rapist for Epstein go free and unnamed as well.
	Just throw them all.
	in.
	And I say remove the 1986 law that gives immunity and retroactively allow them to be sued for everything.
	Well, wouldn't you think they should at least have their licenses revoked or some kind of a warning thing on there saying this person took a bribe in order to do this.
	But it's the people that report what is happening that lose their license.
	I mean, I don't know what law exactly they're breaking, but if you accept a bribe, and then put out something false and people get injured because of it, it seems like that should be more than just a civil thing.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Well, you know, that was one of the things when they came after Bob Menendez, gold break Bob, you know, the guy that had the gold bars.
	The first time they came after him, that was about government fraud in terms of Medicare or something like that.
	He was working with a doctor who was inflating costs and things.
	And that's essentially what they're doing if they go with the more expensive stuff.
	They're inflating the costs.
	It would probably be hard to prove that they picked brand A over brand B. They could always say, well, based on what they told me, I thought it was the better drug or whatever, right?
	They could always come up a talking point.
	The pharma rep had a nicer boat in the pitch.
	He had free nurses.
	I mean, we that's a new thing, I guess.
	We've moved on from TikTok nurses to free nurses.
	They brought a bigger pile of cocaine to the party that we went to.
	Yeah.
	Trucker Chris for the Wind says the UK now arrests twelve thousand people a year for posts on the internet.
	Russia arrests twelve hundred a year.
	Yeah.
	Big brother.
	Oh brother, as all said.
	Well, they arrested over four hundred fifty people with just one event.
	You know, that was absolutely amazing.
	The UK is so monumentally and ruthlessly authoritarian at this point.
	It's hard to believe that it was ever the country you read about in history books.
	And peaceful protesters, a guy who was in a wheelchair, right?
	They arrested him claiming that he was a threat, a danger.
	BL Houghton, I'm glad my doctor is not a shot pusher.
	If you find one like that, be sure to hang on to them because they're a failing commodity.
	They're disappearing.
	They're vanishing.
	And they're vanishing rapidly.
	A lot of them are a lot of the older doctors and they retire.
	They've put their time in and they want to go live their life, you know, whatever way they can.
	Sometimes what you have to do for these people to continue the practice because of the pressure, the economic pressure that the insurance companies do, you have to get into a situation like you found where you pay them like a membership thing.
	You pay to have them as your doctor.
	The doctor we found for our son, we found through friends, thankfully, but her practice, they don't push vaccines.
	They'll say, would you like to vaccinate?
	If you say no, they go, okay.
	And they leave you alone.
	Because of that, most of her clientele does not vaccinate.
	They don't meet the standard.
	So the insurance companies don't give them any money at all.
	That's what puts them out of business.
	She said that she's seen, I think she said it was between four and five of her friends that were doctors go out of business because of the same thing.
	Wow.
	It's kind of what they do to podcasts too.
	I mean, they find a way to come after you, don't they?
	They'll.
	It's amazing.
	If they can get rid of your money, they can get rid of you.
	Yeah.
	DJ Hi Yonah, health care workers are still under federal VAC mandate.
	Yeah, well, of course.
	And we were always told by the MAGA people, yeah, but Trump didn't mandate, he just keeps it going.
	It wasn't him.
	Yeah.
	It wasn't, it was the Keebler elf, Fauci.
	CJP rumble, mercury in your mouth, aluminum in the sky, fluoride in your water.
	Well, when you put it like that, it sounds a little bleak.
	Yeah.
	It sounds like some kind of giant alchemical experiment.
	They're trying to transmute the world into gold or something.
	And glyphosate in your food.
	Whoa.
	It's poison, poison, poison, everywhere you look.
	Honor Seeker, the Grand Canyon was created because a dentist dropped a nickel down a gofer.
	That's pretty good.
	Be my Valentine, dental offices forever contaminated with mercury from drilling those out of patients' teeth.
	Yeah.
	It seems like if you Oh, that's the thing.
	You have to be careful how you get it out out of there too.
	They can sometimes expose you even more than you're getting with it being there if you're not careful about how you take it out.
	So if you get it out, they're going to have to drill out a lot of the tooth around the amalgam filling.
	Guard Goldsmith, it was always a good reminder that when I was watching actors when I was a kid and I saw aliens in Star Trek open their mouths and their feeling, their fillings would appear.
	Well, maybe dental technology hasn't advanced in the I don't know when Star Trek is set.
	Guard, you'll have to let me know.
	I've seen about four episodes of Star Trek in total.
	Intergalactic aliens have amalgam fillings.
	Well, you know.
	There's only so much you can do.
	You've got to focus on holodeck technology.
	CJP Rumble picked up some xylitol toothpaste last week along with gum.
	Good stuff.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Heron's Holler at David Knight bought the starter kit yesterday from the RNC store thanks to the code.
	Strange that on Hubby's FB page an ad for the RNC store appeared last night and his FB email is not the one I used to order the apricot seeds.
	They know what you're doing.
	Yeah, on Facebook.
	Yeah.
	We reported about it and people say, you know, they never went to any websites, but they just to see that they didn't have cats.
	So they start talking to each other about cats.
	Next thing they know, Facebook is giving them cat food ads.
	Well, that's good.
	I'm glad that you got the starter kit there at RNC Stores.
	RNC Store.com.
	Oh, yes.
	I'm sorry.
	I always want to add an S to that.
	RNC Store.com.
	You know, again, that book, and they had it when I interviewed John Richardson.
	He gave people a code to be able to download a PDF version for free of G.O. Griffin.
	of J. R. Griffin's book A World Without Cancer.
	But of course you can also get that at the store now.
	And I think it's important to think outside of the pharmaceutical box that they try to put everybody in.
	Yeah.
	Of course, again, RNC store.com promo code night for ten percent off the products that are available there.
	Go check them out.
	Hopefully they can help you stay out of the clutches of the medical industrial complex.
	Zaksov, Aksas, if you want to get rich, start a medical journal that reports on big pharma corruption and take bribes to not report on them.
	That's right.
	If you're completely amoral, if you have.
	Hey, Amoral, if you have no scruples at all, feel free to go start a medical journal and sell out.
	We never tried that.
	When we first monetized the podcast, for the first month, we had pharma ads on there.
	We had Pfizer running ads on our podcast and people were sending that stuff to me and it's like, well, I think that's funny.
	I do more in terms of talking about Pfizer pharmaceutical stuff than they do.
	But that didn't last too long.
	That lasted about a week or two.
	I guess we should have called them up and said, hey, I know you're sending me money.
	You want to keep sending me money and I'll shut up, right?
	No, it doesn't work that way.
	No.
	No, no bribery here.
	We refuse to take it.
	Skunk Hollow Rose Gardens, your social credit score prevents you from getting crickets on your pizza, so you starve from protein deficiency.
	Truly, a bleak vision of the future you have there, Skunk Hollow Rose Gardens.
	Tunnel Lord, one, three, three, seven.
	Good news.
	I'm working on a bill to nullify the National Childhood Injury Act, and it now has an endorsement from one of my state reps.
	That's incredible.
	Great.
	Fantastic to hear that, Tunnel Lord.
	Good.
	That's good.
	You know, that can be done at state level.
	You're exactly right.
	Washington, these people are bought and sold.
	That's how they got there.
	But I don't see anything that's going to come out of that.
	But of course, you can still hold people liable for that.
	You know, it's kind of interesting when you think about some of these laws, you know, if you poison somebody, there shouldn't be a statute of limitations on that.
	It's one of the things that we saw with, talk about frequently, the very, very short statute of limitation on pedophilia.
	I wonder why.
	Yeah.
	And yet, as we saw with both California and New York, you know, if something is a crime, then but you've got a short statute of limitations and you can't come after them if they remove that statute of limitations which they did temporarily in New York and in California then you can come after the people because it was always a crime.
	Unless they flee to Israel.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	You can't do ex post facto.
	In other words, you can't pass a law and make something a crime and then come after somebody for doing it before it was a crime.
	But if it was a crime and they did it and the statute of limitations is stopping you from coming after them, you can remove that statute of limitations and come after them.
	And so you had several cases of that.
	Trump was one example of that in one of his rape trials, I think.
	But you also had some high-profile rock stars as well as Paramount itself in terms of Franco Zeffarelli's Romeo and Juliet, the two young stars said that they were maneuvered into doing a nude scene when they were told that they would not be doing that.
	The director manipulated them into doing that, and so they sued Paramount.
	Unfortunately, the judge did not work against them, but I think they had a real case.
	Hollywood has always been filled to the brim with disgusting perverts.
	It is the same as it ever was.
	Tunnel Lord 1337 says my rep has now given that endorsement to my state's health freedom organization.
	This organization also likes the bill enough that they want to offer help to lobby for its enactment.
	This group is responsible for getting the Idaho Health Freedom Act, which was the first in the nation to forbid the government from mandating that people take any form of medical intervention.
	That's fantastic to hear from you.
	Oh, that's excellent.
	That's excellent.
	You're doing the right thing.
	Thank you for doing that.
	And again, focusing on the right place.
	I mean, I really do think that trying to get things done in Washington is like pushing on a rope.
	I'm going to have to get you on the show to talk about it.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Before we take a break, I want to thank Jonathan L for generous Cash App.
	I think it's the first time that we've gotten something from Jonathan.
	And I would also like to thank people who have contributed on Zell as well if I can get this thing pulled up here in the size that I can read it.
	Let's see, where did I leave off here last time?
	I'll tell you what, we will, oh, here it is.
	Okay, thank you very much on Zell.
	I just want to thank some of the people who have contributed last week or so.
	Gretchen C, William R, Benjamin R, Susan L, Robert A, J. H., Thomas H., Marilyn G, and Julie W. Thank you so much, all of you.
	And one of those on there, Marilyn G, I think is also a new first time contributor.
	But the other people have been very regular contributors and I really do thank them.
	They're the ones who keep this show going on a regular basis.
	Thank you so much.
	We're now at about five eighths here on the 20th, so we got about another 11 days or so.
	And so I just wanted to thank everybody for your support of this show.
	Yes, thank you all so very, very much.
	Really do appreciate it.
	Yeah, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and Pfizer are not giving us any funds.
	No, not at all.
	They would probably siphon money off of us if they could just shut down our bank accounts if possible.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Well, when we come back, we're going to talk about election rigging and give you the latest updates on gerrymandering but of course that's just the tip of the iceberg in terms of election rigging and you can see how both sides are doing that just like they're involved in all the other aspects of election rigging they're mandering gerry they're mandering yeah go full creamer on this okay we're gonna take a quick break and we'll be right back You're
	listening to The David Knight Show.
	The David Knight Show
	You're listening to listening to the David Knight Show.
	They're doing what?
	In the place they named after me?
	Good thing I have the David Knight Show to keep me informed on the plots of these traitors.
	Making sense common again.
	This is The David Knight Show.
	Elvis.
	Ladies and gentlemen, the Beatles.
	And the sweet sounds of Motown.
	Find them on the Oldies channel at APSradio.com.
	The Oldies channel at APSradio.com
	Liberty.
	It's your move.
	And now, the David Knight Show.
	Welcome back folks.
	We're going to be talking about gerrymandering and election rigging in this segment.
	They go hand in hand.
	Yeah, I'm actually glad that it's getting the attention and people are starting to see how corrupt this is.
	We now got this war essentially.
	Trump started it.
	He said, hey, we need to make sure we're going to win the midterms this time.
	So get some more Republican congressmen.
	So they started this in Texas.
	Then you got blue states, as they like to call them, who are pushing back California and Illinois was also getting involved in this tangentially.
	But saying, well, we'll do redistricting and we will make, we'll turn some of the Republican seats in California.
	Who knew they had Republican seats in California?
	What a shock.
	Now the question is, are these California Republicans?
	How close are these to actual conservatives?
	Actually, do these matter?
	Are these basically Democrats by just another name?
	Yeah, probably is the case.
	Although you do have some very conservative areas of California around Orange County and things like that.
	I've had people write me and say, wait a minute, there's conservatives here.
	Don't write us off.
	You know, we're fighting pretty hard here.
	But it looks like there's going to be five seats, they're saying, that are going to be wiped out by redistricting.
	California Democrats have gained five more seats and they know which ones they're going to target.
	They can redraw the maps and change this.
	A good example is the only one that I recognize his name, and that's Representative Daryl Issa.
	He is, by the way, the richest person in Congress, at least at one point.
	Now, maybe with their backroom stock deals and stuff, some of the other people have surpassed him.
	I don't know.
	But for the longest time, he was the richest person in Congress.
	But his seat, they would change his district.
	So he picks up a section of another one that was a very, very Democrat area and said it promises to swing his district to a plus four Democrat advantage.
	His district went plus 15 in favor of Trump.
	But under the new boundaries, it would have gone plus three in favor of La La Harris, according to the Cook Political Report.
	So this is the way they do it.
	They pick the voters.
	It's an election.
	But you don't get the choice.
	They get the choice.
	Once they pick the voters, it's a foregone conclusion.
	And so they said of the five seats that are going to be impacted, two of these would be turned into leaning Democrat districts, they could still possibly be winnable by Republican candidate who then becomes kind of a Democrat as you're talking about.
	But if you've got a solid conservative district, which is the way they've typically done in the past, we're going to put all the Republicans in this one district, and then you can still have a conservative congressman from California in theory.
	Now they're going to have five of them.
	It's going to be either leaning Democrat or hardcore Democrat.
	And meanwhile, in Texas now, the Democrats have come back after two a two week walk out and all the threats about how they're going to arrest them, criminally charge them for bribery, maybe even kick him.
	Arrest him!
	Maybe even kick them out of Congress, out of the state legislature, I should say.
	Before we move on to the other news story, I just wanted to say what an ignoble accomplishment it is to be the richest man in Congress.
	Here's a place where everyone gets the same salary and the real difference in wealth is mainly due to corruption.
	And you're the richest of them, so.
	Insider trading, yeah.
	That doesn't speak well of you.
	Yeah, that's right.
	Well, you know, I just want you to think about how the elections are rigged.
	And, well, before I do that, what is happening in Texas, as they point out, Trump expressed support for congressional redistricting in Republican states to give them a better chance to keep the House.
	The U.S. Department of Justice sent Greg Abbott, the Texas governor, a letter that raised concerns that four congressional districts in the Houston and Dallas area were unconstitutional because of racial gerrymandering.
	Current boundaries run a foul, said the Trump Department of Justice.
	They run a foul of the vot Voting Rights Act because they rely on racial demographics to group minority voters into coalition districts where no single racial group forms a majority.
	So what they're saying is you're making these districts based on racial demographics, so that has to be redrawn.
	And of course, they will then use that as an excuse to redraw it for more favoring Republicans.
	And the computer programs keep getting better and better.
	And I'm glad that that Trump has drawn attention to this, inadvertently perhaps, because people need to stop and take a step back.
	Everybody is so focused on getting their people elected, they think, and thinking that that's going to make a difference by getting their party elected in Washington.
	And I just want you to think about how elections are rigged before voting, during voting, and after voting.
	Before the voting even begins, you've got not just the gerrymandering where they pick who's going to be able to vote for which candidates by party, but you also have ballot access that keeps in.
	anybody other than Republicans and Democrats off of the ballot.
	You have debate access which keeps anybody but Republicans and Democrats from being involved in the debate.
	And then you have gerrymandering.
	All that happens before there's even any voting.
	And then when you have the voting, you have voting machines which have all kinds of issues in terms of being able to go back and audit and to verify it, as does the vote by mail stuff.
	And vote by mail was put in by Trump himself.
	But the voting machines, a long history of corruption.
	Remember their inception.
	Yeah, exactly.
	They began with Smartmatic in Venezuela and it was started by some friends of Hugo Chavez.
	And after they started that and started using electronic voting machines, of course, he never lost an election.
	And then they had long history of controversy in some Mexican provinces, in Brazil, and in the Philippines.
	This is not something that is a wild-eyed conspiracy theory from Trump.
	This is something that's been well documented for a very, very long time, as well as the vulnerabilities of these voting machines.
	And in Texas, they removed the ability to be able to audit them.
	They're supposed to, under the Constitution, keep a copy of the original ballots that people did, but they destroy them.
	And that's under the direction of the current supervisor of elections.
	And then after the election, you know, that custody and audit ability that has been taken away.
	So the elections are corrupt from the get-go, even if the individuals weren't corrupt.
	But it's these corrupt individuals and these corrupt political parties that have set up this system to make peaceful change impossible there.
	That's why, you know, what Listener was doing there, working at the state level, there are still some possibilities in some states that you can make some changes at the state and local level.
	But I don't think you're going to change anything at the federal level.
	No, the corruption that we have here in the United States is more well hidden.
	It's less visible on the surface.
	I saw a video recently of an Indian politician.
	He's in some fancy car and he's just got a wad of cash and he's rolling through the slums and he's got his window down and he's handing bills out to people out the window.
	And he's literally buying votes right then, right there.
	We don't do that kind of thing here in America.
	That's right.
	It's more hidden.
	It's more subtle.
	We like to have this pretense of, oh, our vote matters.
	We're actually a part of the system.
	We're not getting scammed here.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	It's not this obvious, you know.
	And he's this large, heavy set individual and all the people in the slums are very thin.
	And he just this.
	picture perfect, you know, of this heavy-set, corrupt politician just, you know, with his rings and things on.
	Yeah.
	And you don't see that much anymore here, but it's just as corrupt, probably even more so.
	In fact, there's almost a level of honesty to that kind of corruption.
	That's right.
	Where you can see it.
	Now it all happens in the background with these big corporations and stuff.
	The way you saw it in our election was the Trump inauguration with all of the Silicon Valley technocrats lined up there behind Trump.
	You know, they had given him money instead of him handing out money to other people because they knew that he's going to ultimately turn around and hand the money back to them.
	I want to just focus on it because I've said this many times.
	When I ran for Congress 30 years ago, essentially 1996, I ran on the Bill of Rights because it was right after Newt Gingrich had done his 10-point contract with America.
	And I said, okay, here's my 10-point contract with America.
	It's called the Bill of Rights.
	And here's how it's all being violated.
	I said, if I were to run again, which I never would.
	I'm not interested at all in the federal government.
	But if I were to run again at any level, I would focus on usury because I think this is one of the most vicious things that we fight and I think that would cut across political lines I mean who wants to pay usurious interest rates?
	And there was an interesting article from JD Hall.
	Sorry, before you go on, Lance says he has the video of the Indian politician he can play this class if you're interested.
	Yeah, let's see that.
	Yeah.
	Oh, yeah.
	Boss Hogg, right there.
	Yep, you can see him.
	He's even got the siren going on.
	Yeah, you vote for me?
	Okay, great.
	We'll do this again next election if you keep me in.
	And you can see he's in some kind of very nice car, the leather seats, the rich interior.
	Oh, yeah, a limousine.
	And again, I find this to be more honest.
	You know, I prefer this kind of corruption than to the type of thing we have here.
	Yeah.
	Like the rich lord handing out to the build me peasants.
	Yes, my peasants.
	Here is a $100 bill for you.
	Oh, that's amazing.
	Wow.
	Yeah, okay.
	Well, we're going to bring that system here, I guess.
	Maybe, you know, at least we'll get a few hundred dollars here or there when they roll through our slums to bribe us.
	So JD Hall talks about the history of usury laws and how that was something that Christians used to be against.
	The headline here is the biblical sin of usury and why Christians don't hate it nearly enough.
	It's something that I absolutely hate.
	I think it is.
	You talk about open corruption when the banks are charging you 30, 40 percent on credit card things, or when they're charging you 7 percent or more on a home loan, and they pay you like one hundredth of a percent at Bank of America on a savings account.
	To me, that is usury, and that's something needs to be turned around.
	He said, Most modern Christians don't know what it is or why the Bible condemns it so strongly.
	The history of usury and what they never wanted us debt cattle to know, he said.
	It's hard if not impossible for somebody in their forty fifties and beyond to comprehend the daunting challenges of young Americans like you, Travis, unless they have kids living through it.
	The median existing home now sells for four hundred thirty five thousand dollars.
	With a thirty year mortgage hovering in the mid sixes, the typical household would have to throw almost half of its income at the payment on a median-priced home.
	The old 30% rule has been ground into the dust.
	And of course, it's difficult to accumulate capital because they won't pay you any money on the savings account.
	And even if they did pay you money, it's not going to be keeping up with the inflation that is there.
	But I pointed out when they were talking about, well, look at interest rates drop down to like 5% or something.
	This is where they were in the early 1960s.
	I went back to look to see what the banks who were charging people 5% on home mortgages, what were they paying on the savings account?
	And it was like 4%.
	So 1% spread versus a charging you seven percent and paying you one hundredth of a percent.
	It was like seven hundred factor there.
	He says the treadmill isn't just a metaphor.
	It is a business model.
	He says, for example, our newly wed home in two thousand three, a medium sized two bedroom home rented out at two hundred twenty five dollars a month.
	The landlord offered to sell it to us for twenty five K. He said prices aren't just high.
	Entry is booby trapped.
	A median income family would need something like a seventeen thousand dollars raise to afford the so called so-called typical home on median wages.
	The monthly squeeze doesn't stop at the front door.
	The average new car price is now near forty eight thousand dollars.
	Even a used car is five hundred and twenty one dollars a month with nearly twelve percent interest.
	Wages are limping along, costs are sprinting, and mortgage rates are parked above six percent.
	Keep the gate locked even when list prices flatten thanks to the federal deficit.
	Investors now scoop up roughly one in six homes at sell, turning starter homes into permanent renters.
	They bid in cash.
	They rent back to the very generation that they just outbid.
	You aren't competing with a couple down the block.
	You're competing with a portfolio of an investment house.
	in some far away city, you know, somebody like Larry Fink running Black Rock and Davos.
	He said the Biblical Foundation's what usury meant and why it was banned.
	In scripture, usury does not only mean outrageous interest.
	In Israel's law, it commonly meant any interest taken on a loan to a fellow Israelite, especially when the borrower was poor.
	The Hebrew words for interest carry the sense of a bite, and that is a very impressive image.
	He said, In an agrarian world, most loans were not speculative investments.
	They were survival loans after a failed harvest, sickness, or loss of livestock.
	Interest on that kind of borrowing does not reward productive risk.
	It takes a bite out of a wound.
	Israel's economy was therefore shaped to prevent debt from becoming a trap.
	Land was allotted by clan and it was meant to remain within families.
	Gleaning laws told farmers to leave margins for the poor.
	They would go through harvest it, they would leave some behind for poor people to walk through the fields and have what was left.
	Sabbath years released debts, and the Jubilee returned alienated land, so when you would it would be priced into the cost of a loan, if you were to borrow money that debt was going to be forgiven every seven years and every forty nine years, the Jubilee year, they were going to have a massive repeal of things like that and indebtedness.
	Charging interest on need was forbidden.
	While charging outsiders was permitted, the aim was to build a people of neighbors rather than a market of clients.
	Wisdom literature and the prophets reinforce the same moral picture by praising the person who lended freely to the needy and condemning those who profited from distress.
	In the New Testament, the call to love enemies and lend without demanding back presses the same principle into the heart of Christian ethics.
	The point was not to paralyze trade.
	The point was to protect households from becoming permanent revenue streams for the rescuers.
	And so the early church saw this as a direct violation of neighborly love.
	And as Christianity started moving into government, you had people who called it first of all the Basil of Caesarea called interest taking a war on the poor, Augustine folded the practice into his wider attack on greed,
	the council of Alvira barred clergy who lent at interest, the council of Nicaea in 325 condemned clerical usury again, grounding it on the pastoral duty to feed the flock rather than to feed on it.
	And so this is something that first began in the church and then gradually worked its way into civil government.
	And we had usury laws until the late 1970s.
	Loan sharking was a province of organized crime alone.
	It was considered criminal and exploitative to do the kinds of things that all the credit card companies are doing today.
	You charge somebody 20, 30 percent interest.
	I don't even know if the loan sharks charge people 50 percent interest like some of these credit c cards do.
	I ain't a monster.
	Come on.
	Yeah, you've got to wet their beak.
	So this is where it was.
	What changed all that?
	And I remember when it changed.
	They had a cap of 10%.
	And that was the legal limit that you could pay.
	And of course, because of competition in the marketplace, it was effectively lower than that until government inflation got out of control.
	They couldn't control it.
	Neither party could control it.
	You had Trell Ford with his whip inflation now nonsense.
	They had these win buttons, right?
	And Jimmy Carter couldn't control it.
	It was all kicked off by a government that was spending too much and then also the shock that went through with OPEC.
	And before you know it, interest rates started soaring.
	Our first home, we had a 13% fixed interest rate on it.
	It did not end well in Houston and for a lot of people, us included.
	But they removed the cap because inflation was so high and we never got it back.
	And now it has just continued to go in the other direction where they keep cutting the rates that they pay on savings account and keep increasing the credit card amounts.
	As he points out in this article, he said Jewish money lending grew under Christian bans because whatever, whenever you've got an outright ban on something for which there is a lot of demand, you're going to have some way to get around that.
	And of course, as we pointed out, the Jews would not charge interest to other Jews, but they would charge it to non-Jews.
	And the governments were...
	You know, if Christians started doing that as a bank, they would get jailed, but they would go to the Jews who had money and they would look the other way and ignore enforcing the laws for them.
	And of course that made their community incredibly rich.
	And that's why you have the large banking concerns that are Jewish that grew out of that.
	But as he points out, there needs to be some kind of reform of this.
	This is one of the things that needs to be reformed.
	And it's another example, I think, of when we lose Christian principles, whether you're talking about a just war principle, whether you're talking about usury laws.
	These things were there.
	They were what made Western civilization better.
	And they were based on Christian principles that were there, not exploiting your neighbor and that type of stuff.
	Now it's like, you know, whoever can get the most money and the most toys wins regardless of how they get it.
	That's the only thing that matters.
	Ethics has been completely removed from government.
	We have no foundational principles that we will abide by, not even the legal principles that are in the Bill of Rights or the Constitutions.
	I take an oath to that as a condition of office and then ignore it.
	So that's the real issue that's there.
	But I think that it is something that if you were to have a movement on that, I think everybody would be in favor of that.
	Nobody would be opposed to that except the big bankers.
	And of course, they have a lot of outsized influence on the outcome of elections.
	Sadly, because they've been practicing usury for so long, they've got a lot of money to throw around.
	Well, I think it would be a good way to begin a, you know, a pushback against this whole system is to start with the bankers and to push back against the banking system.
	But the reality is that the inflation is there and it's with us.
	And so one of the things that you need to be aware of in terms of both the permission society that, you know, the stablecoins that are going to be coming from the Genius Act and all the rest of the stuff as well.
	as the inflation you need to start protecting yourself and try to get into some real money that is physical that is private that is outside of their system gold and silver that's why we always talk about tony arduin he's always been a good supporter of this program but he also supports you in trying to get your independence it's very important go to wisewolf.gold davidnight.gold yeah that's right davidnight.gold and thank you for correcting me i'm getting a little bit tired
	here i'm going to let you talk a little bit we've got some uh we've got some comments here but go there and uh take a look at what Tony's got.
	Right now, gold is kind of dipping around, pushed around a little bit by some fake news that's out there.
	But you know what the long-term trends are.
	And you know that they're not changing in terms of the massive deficit and the high interest rates and the inflation that they are understating.
	All that stuff is real.
	And regardless of what their phony numbers say, we know that inflation is going up significantly.
	And the best hedge you can have against that is going to be gold.
	It's also going to give you privacy that you're not going to get with any of the other bitcoins or anything like that.
	It is completely private because, you know, there's no tra tracking built into it.
	It is whoever you give it to.
	If they decide to report on it, that's their business, but there's no way the government to track it individually.
	We got a comment here that I saw when we were talking, when you were talking about usury, it came up.
	It said, David and Travis, you all should check Michael Hoffman's book, The Mortal Sin That Christendom Forgot.
	I pulled that one.
	I didn't grab who said it, so I apologize for that, but thank you very much.
	I will make a note of that and we'll look at that.
	But we do have a lot of other comments here.
	Nibiru twenty twenty nine says, start a medical journal, no medical knowledge required.
	You might actually end up with some good medical information there if you didn't have to induct all the brainwashing.
	You are free to choose one of our selections.
	That's right.
	We've given you a list of candidates that we feel are acceptable, and you can choose whichever one of these losers you want.
	That's why I said, you know, through all the January the 6 stuff and everything, everybody is so upset about one tiny facet of these corrupt elections.
	I said, you realize that the corruption in the election begins with who they allow you to vote for, and it begins with ballot access and debates.
	And, you know, it runs through all these other things as well.
	But nobody wanted to pay any attention to that.
	I'm glad that they're putting some emphasis on the beginning of the process by Trump inadvertently drawing so much attention to the computerized state of gerrymandering now.
	Of course, when Elon was talking about starting his own party, we even saw the Libertarian Party come in and say, you know, getting on the ballots, real difficult.
	Or we're already on the ballot, just groveling for his billions.
	Yeah, that kind of went away, didn't it?
	Yeah, it vanished.
	Yeah, he's not having heard about that.
	Where's that third party, Elon?
	Maybe he asked somebody about the practical aspects of a third party.
	I don't know.
	One thing that he would have done, which I think would have been that he was talking about doing, which is a smarter strategy than the Libertarian Party.
	The Libertarian Party wanted to focus on 50 state ballot access and running somebody for president.
	And that was always their strategy.
	And that was a strategy doomed to failure.
	You look at the ballot retention laws in most states like in North Carolina where we were, you had to get 10% of the vote for either governor or president to remain on the ballot.
	And if you didn't, it was back to the Sisyphus task of rolling the giant boulder up the hill again.
	One must imagine the Libertarian Party happy.
	Yeah.
	So it was, you know, it was a strategy that was destined.
	That was a strategy that was destined to fail.
	The correct strategy, as Musk said, he said, Congress is so narrowly divided between these two parties that if we were to focus on a few races, we could hold the balance of power on different issues by aligning ourselves with one party or the other.
	Switch it.
	And that is a strategy that could work if you had somebody that was honest about that.
	But I wouldn't trust anybody once they get to Washington.
	And of course, I mean, I have no respect left for the corporate libertarian party.
	They've become nothing but the materialism party.
	They have fully embraced this idea that all that matters is your own personal pleasure.
	They have no code of conduct, ethics or morals.
	We actually had some people when I was in it, the libertarian name, libertarian, was not understood like it is today.
	And so some of them became the Libertine Party.
	That's what they have become.
	And actually, when they sold out to, what was the name?
	Gary Johnson.
	Gary Johnson.
	Mexico.
	Yeah.
	And Bill Weld, the former governor, Republican governor of Massachusetts.
	You can imagine where he was on the spectrum.
	But when they sold out to those two guys, you know, just going for name brands, you know, these two guys were governors and we got two governors on our ticket.
	It was really all over.
	And we saw that in 2020 when they completely caved on the lockdown stuff.
	That should have been their moment to shine.
	Yeah.
	And they completely caved on it.
	We had two governors.
	Sadly, no libertarians, but two governors.
	That's right.
	And was it the...
	We're seeing the flaws with the libertarian system on display right here right now.
	My biggest issue, it's always been funny to me the idea that you're going to get a bunch of hyper-hyper-individuals to come together as a singular entity is sort of a self-defeating premise.
	The libertarians will sit there and argue over a fraction of a percent on taxes, and if you aren't right with them, I could never vote for that man.
	He's half a percent.
	That's why we need to not focus as much on the individual as we need to focus on the family.
	The family still gets you back to the situation of protecting humans and individual humans, but it has that core there that is both Christian and libertarian.
	If you focus on the family and if you see that society is made up not of a collection necessarily of individuals, but a collection of households.
	You know, when we would go to Colonial Williamsburg, I remember standing outside the courthouse and they used to love to do this.
	They'd say, okay, we're going to find out if any of you here would be allowed to vote.
	Okay, first of all, you know, you've got to be male and you've got to, or head of household.
	They did make it clear that, you know, if you're a woman and let's say that you're a widow or something like that, but if you have your own household and you're a woman, you are allowed to vote.
	It was just one vote per household, not one vote per man, which is what Nelson Mandela of the Communists wanted, right?
	It was one vote per household.
	And so you would work together as a household.
	And I think that is actually a better model.
	But it gets us past this radical individualism who are fighting over everything.
	Yeah.
	And the actually owning land, I think, is a good thing.
	You had to own land.
	It's a good thing as well.
	You have stake in the actual.
	country.
	You have something to lose if things go south.
	You're not just going to sit there and think, well, how much of this can I get out of it?
	How much can I extract from the system before it collapses?
	You had to own land, and it was the head of household who would get the vote.
	Time to go back to that system.
	I don't care if it disenfranchises me.
	That's one of those things.
	People would be like, well, people would lose the right to vote.
	It's like, yeah, some people are going to lose the right to vote.
	I'm sorry.
	If you were to tell me, if someone were to come to me and say, We found out that redheads are the problem.
	They're the ones that continually vote wrong.
	I'd take one for the team.
	It's like, all right, sorry, ax it.
	All my vote, it's gone.
	That is what it is.
	But for the team, I will take it.
	That's fine.
	We've got more comments here.
	It says, Nibiru 2029, the Money Masters provide the end choices for the sheeple to pick from.
	It's been that way dates back for a long time now.
	No one in my lifetime has been anyone I would choose.
	Knights of the Storm, maybe Ron Paul, perhaps Ron Paul, but that's about it.
	Knights of the Storm solution is to have local government and shrink the federal.
	And even local government should only exist to determine outcomes between individual disputes.
	That would be a good system.
	Minimize the amount of government, minimize involvement, get rid of the bureaucracy.
	But not in the dog sense of we're going to put this giant technocratic system over you that will crush you beneath its metal heel.
	We're going to get rid of all the human bureaucrats and we're going to place them with the federal.
	That's when we replace them with deep thought, you know.
	The AI that's going to rule over you.
	The answer to life, the universe, and everything will be determined, I'm sure.
	Assyrian girl, this country is toast.
	We can't get rid of these criminals in government because they have too many ways to subvert constitutional influence, starting with redistricting, ending with corrupt counting of the votes.
	Yeah, the whole system is corrupt from top to bottom.
	Well, that's why if we redistrict ourselves by focusing on our families and our communities and on things that are local, that's the way that we get around them with a parallel society.
	It's important to build your own community.
	If you're interested in learning a set of skills that will help you do that, you can go to jacklawsonbooks.com and get the Civil Defense Manual.
	It will teach you how to defend your own community, how to find water and prepare for civil unrest.
	So if that's something you're interested in, again, jacklawsonbooks.com.
	And a big part of that is, you know, how do you organize things with your neighbors?
	Yeah, that's a very big part of it.
	It's important to have those kinds of skills because you don't want to be put in a situation where there are issues with supply chain.
	You don't want to be put in a situation where it's you're forced or you're tempted to steal or hurt others to better your own situation.
	And Jack has got a lot of experience with that.
	I mean, he's put together a group right now, but he's been a soldier in a country that was torn apart by civil war and all these other things.
	He's got a lot of experience to draw from.
	Yes, and he's done interviews and got passages from other people who also have a lot of experience.
	The Civil Defense Manuals, there's two volumes, both of them are very, very large.
	It is a very informationally dense set of books.
	It comes with a lot of info there.
	And he sells it deliberately as a pair and he sells it deliberately as a book rather than something that's electronic.
	Yeah, if the grid goes down, you will still have access to the book.
	It's not going to evaporate on you.
	You will still be able to have that information at your fingertips.
	But again, Jack Lawson books dot com, the civil defense manual.
	As much as we love gold and silver, if you don't have water, if you don't have food, the gold or silver may not do you any good.
	You might be able to trade for it, but you want to have those skills for yourself.
	You want to have many different skills and gold and silver.
	So go check that stuff out.
	Angry tigers, Den, elections are rigged by the Uni Party.
	The only difference between them is they might give you some lip service on a social issue or two, but economic policy always stays the same.
	That's right.
	That's what I've said about Trump is he proved that even just paying lip service to the American people is.
	You can't do that.
	If you do, they will come after you.
	That's the only reason, in my opinion.
	Not because you actually accomplished anything, but reminding the American people that they're a voting block where it's being catered to is a problem.
	They don't like that.
	They don't want the American people to actually wake up again.
	And look at this one big, beautiful bill, you know, I mean, it is the classic Pelosi strategy that was criticized by Republicans until they got the majority and then they embraced it wholeheartedly.
	And Trump is not.
	No, Lindsey Graham was over there.
	Man, I hate reading too.
	Well, I mean, you know, he is Trump is just a tax and spend politician.
	You know, you're going to spend your way into prosperity and tax your way into prosperity.
	No different.
	Remember, you can just steal all the money from your people and you'll become rich.
	The Knights of the Storm says about that Indian politician says, I'd be handing out chicken wings.
	Those kids look like they are starving.
	Man, maybe a pork barrel.
	Are they allowed to eat pork under Hinduism?
	I don't know.
	Yeah, I don't know.
	Maybe they're not allowed to eat chickens either.
	I don't know.
	It's a mystery to me.
	I don't know much about Hinduism.
	I guess if he was serving them food food, you could say he was carrying flavor.
	All this food talk is making me hungry.
	I didn't eat breakfast.
	This is a problem.
	ZJP Rumble, that guy obviously has all the food.
	That's right.
	He's hoarding it.
	He's he's got it in vast supply.
	He stored it up for a future date.
	Caboose 888.
	Wait, doesn't that system already exist with food stamps and welfare?
	Talking about bribing the people with a little bit here or there.
	Yes, it does.
	The people in the slums get free stuff and that's what counts to them.
	And when they're the system is.
	rigged against them to some extent.
	I'm not going to sit here and pretend that there isn't stuff that is affecting them negatively by the system as well.
	BT Taylor 246.
	Oh, this is that comment again.
	Thank you, Lance, for grabbing that in the name.
	BT Taylor is the one that said, David Travis, you all should check out Michael Hoffman's book, Usury, the Mortal Sin that Christendom forgot.
	Lance, please write that down in an email so we can remember that.
	We don't want to forget about it.
	Nebaru 2029.
	Banks and credit card companies are making more money than ever since Jimmy Cotta in the 1970s, as a Celentee would say.
	Little Jimmy Cotta.
	Well, the person who was running that administration was the big new Brzezinski, the technocrat and a trilateral commission overlord.
	I find it, I find Gerald, he's a lot of fun to talk to.
	His passion is really fun.
	He's the only person I've ever heard besides you that has a bad thing to say about Jimmy Carter.
	Everyone else treats him like he's some kind of saint.
	Oh, well, he bit.
	He was part of the habitat for humanity.
	And, you know, Gerald is just apoplectic about him, which is, again, you've always told me Jimmy Carter was an absolutely terrible president.
	No, he was awful.
	And I find I appreciate the fact that there's someone else out there that doesn't just bow the knee to Jimmy Carter and pretend like he's some kind of, you know, sanctified figure.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, he's a Sunday school teacher, but he pushed this LGBT stuff very early in the day.
	My favorite story about Jimmy Carter was when he was attacked by a rabbit.
	I haven't heard that one.
	Yeah.
	He was out in the woods or something and he claimed that some rabbit had attacked him.
	I thought that was really funny because it came out right about the time as Monty Python's Holy Grail.
	There's that rabbit and that was the way I always remembered that and envisioned that.
	Now, are we talking like a little bunny or are you talking like one of those Flemish giant rabbits that's about the size of a, you know, a large cat?
	Because, you know, maybe.
	I don't know if he had any Flemish rabbits.
	I'm not sure if you had any Flemish rabbits there in Plains, Georgia.
	Knights of the Storm says banks and CC companies make money from thin air every time they're used.
	Of course, that's credit card companies.
	That's right.
	There's a lot of money to be made on our scam system.
	CJP Rumble, remember when you could actually gain a little interest at the bank when the people had access to capital?
	I don't.
	Not in my lifetime has it been that way.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Now if you have access to the capital, they run a J six thing on you.
	Sorry.
	Goodbye.
	No longer.
	Yeah.
	Knights of the Storm.
	My grandmother taught us about gleaning and we did that when I was a kid., we gleaned corn from our neighboring farmers to feed our livestock.
	Oh, that's great.
	Yeah, that's really great.
	That's really fun.
	My wife grew up next to a large, extremely large cornfield.
	It's not there anymore.
	It's been built over for more houses and things like that, sad to say, but after they had kind of harvested everything, they would occasionally go in and just take a few heads for grilling and things like that.
	Not enough that it was ever going to harm anything.
	And after they had already gotten the majority of them, but they would occasionally go in and glean just a few ears of corn here and there.
	That's cool.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And of course, as I said., that cornfield is gone.
	It's replaced by more.
	We used to go up and get apples at Carter Mountain.
	I thought it was interesting.
	We didn't start doing it with other people.
	You would go out and you'd pick the apples yourself and they had at any given time, they had different areas that were planted with different varieties of apples.
	Pink ladies were our favorites.
	Yeah, and you could kind of tell which one you wanted.
	You were free to go out there and just take an apple and Yeah, they said it was totally fine.
	Feel free to pick, you know, as many apples and eat them while you're here because they knew that You can't possibly make a dent.
	You would make yourself sick long before you ever made an impact on them.
	That's right.
	CJP Rumble says it's too bad we can't charge our government interest on the money they stole from us.
	Good luck trying to enforce.
	You want to see the boot come down hard and fast.
	They'd call in the Marines so quickly.
	Audi MRR says thanks to Debbie Wasserman Schultz loan sharking is totally legal now with title loans slash payday lenders.
	Their interest would offend a pimp.
	Yeah, that's another example there.
	That is so exploitative.
	And he actually mentions this in his article.
	I didn't get into it, but he talks about the payday loan people and how abusive that is.
	And that's precisely the principle that.
	was behind stopping usury stuff, no pun intended there in terms of the principle.
	So yeah.
	We need to get interested in usury.
	The puns don't stop.
	Because we were all up to our net necks and all that kind of stuff.
	There's no getting away from it.
	And of course, as people point out, there's no savings account that even matches inflation at this point.
	Not even close.
	No.
	They charge you a massive amount but give you an extremely small amount back.
	Nights of the Storm, your government takes your money all year and then returns some of it at a lower purchasing power.
	Isn't that kind of of of them?
	Hi, Boost.
	Our entire economic platform is based on useries since 1913.
	That is a bear that no one can overtake.
	That's right.
	Yeah, monetizing the debt has always been a very important strategy for them.
	The problem is that the debt has gotten so large that it is eating up all the capital and it is unsustainable.
	It's going to become, in just a couple of years, it's going to become the biggest item in the federal government's budget.
	That's why, you know, they've got to do something about it.
	But it's been a long-term process that we create inflation and then we can pay back this debt with cheaper dollars.
	We've got Psycho Babel SID.
	Rank choice voting is a good idea.
	That's something that you've talked about for a long time.
	I like that idea.
	The problem with it is that you have to trust them to accurately process it.
	Like we were talking about how the New England Journal of Medicine rigged the stats on that thing.
	In theory, you've got everybody on the ballot and in theory you've got more than just two candidates there.
	And so you can rank your choices and that avoids the idea of saying we're going to vote for the lesser two evils.
	I know this guy doesn't have a chance.
	Well, you can always make that person your first choice and then if they don't get enough votes if they are the lowest vote getter then you go to your second choice so you haven't lost your vote you just get to rank all the ones and so that helps to get rid of this game that the two parties play saying you're going to waste your vote by doing it but the problem I have with it is how do you audit that and that's a big part of the issue as well custody auditing those
	are the back end frauds that they pull on us but it is important to have something like that in order to have a third party it's that's right it's critical uh there's that's right it'll never happen without that.
	Something's law, when you have first-past-the-post voting, it always evolves into a two-party duopoly because you wind up with everyone going to one of two extremes and they don't want to vote for a similar candidate they like better because that would dilute the vote.
	There's another style of voting called approval voting where you rate everyone from one to ten.
	depending on how much you like them and then you just add up all the points that each person got.
	That has the same effect as ranked choice, but it's also easier to count.
	count.
	It's almost as easy to count as First Pass of the Post.
	I don't know why we don't see more people talking about that type of voting.
	Well, I tell you, the Republicans hate that idea because it's going to open up, you know, they have flourished on saying, look at how bad the Democrats are.
	They're grooming our kids and all this other kind of stuff, trying to change their gender, and they can always scare people into voting for them on those kinds of bases.
	So they don't want there to be another choice that's out there.
	So they make any of these alternative schemes, they demonize them to the infinite degree.
	But yeah, you have to have something like that.
	Something has got to change.
	It's hard not to look like a saint when the Democrats have gone completely satanic.
	When the opposition is literally out there putting pedophile drag queens in front of children, what else can you do?
	Sometimes it's just like, well, if I don't vote for this guy, sure he's bad in his own way, but the other option is this guy is going to put drag queens in front of my children.
	They've kind of monopolized the system through that.
	We've got Hi Boo.
	No, wait, Knights of the Storm says it's a matter of time till we have the AI party.
	It's probably.
	Well, they're just going to turn governance over to artificial intelligence.
	That's the key.
	There'll be a GOP AI and a Democrat AI.
	Technocracy doesn't really care about your vote.
	They aren't even going to pretend to pretend that there's an election.
	I like this comment from We're All Dead.
	I wonder if AI will also be a pedo.
	It's a government requirement at this point.
	We had that story at the beginning about us being taught to groom children.
	So that's clearly a preparation for it being put into government.
	Yeah, that's right.
	We could make Meta the Speaker of the House.
	Maybe they trained it on some Dennis Hastart data.
	Does Epstein have a whole bunch of logs of AI chats with minors.
	The Epstein AI.
	Yeah, that's why they can't find the data.
	They already transferred it over to ChatGPT to program these.
	Exactly.
	Hi, Booth says, Once Rothschild became, Once Rothschild became Uber wealthy, he sent out his five sons to set up banks all over Europe.
	And well, here we are.
	The Rothschilds have been a plague upon us.
	Yeah, the Rothschilds.
	For years.
	And of course, still connected, you know, to Trump even.
	You know, you go back and look at Wilbur Ross, who was Trump's Commerce Secretary.
	That's where they're going to do the stuff to help individual corporations.
	That's where the crony capitalism really meets the road.
	Well, he put Wilbur Ross in.
	Wilbur Ross was a Rothschild agent who when Trump was bankrupting his casinos pulled up and saw the big crowd around him.
	And he openly talked about, He said, Yeah, I called my bosses and told them, I think we can use this guy.
	You know, let's work with him.
	And so the question is, how are they using him, I guess?
	DG eight, we've got to thank you for the tip, DG eight, we appreciate it.
	David, rank choice, voting sounds great, but the honey left-right paradigm will control it.
	Remember when Perot ran, they rolled out Rush Limball to paint you in a box left or right, no independent.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	and told you that he was a crazy conspiracy theorist because he said they were out to get him and had threatened him.
	I think today people would look at that and would have no problem believing Ross Perot after what we have seen in the intervening years.
	Well, let's take a quick look.
	We're starting to get short on time, and I wanted to get to what Trump had to say in one of his interviews with Fox News.
	First of all, I'll preface it by saying, do you remember back when Michael Bloomberg ran?
	It was actually an interview that he gave with New York Times published april fifteenth, twenty fourteen.
	He said, I'm telling you that if there's a God, when I get to heaven, I'm not stopping to be interviewed, I'm heading straight in.
	I have earned my place in heaven.
	It's not even close, said Bloomberg, referring to his work on gun control, obesity, and smoking cessation.
	Okay, so that's the basis on which he's going to stand before God.
	Now Trump says that based on what he is doing with the war stuff, that's going to be how he's going to get into heaven.
	I want to end it.
	You know, we're not losing Amer American lives.
	We're not losing American soldiers.
	We're losing Russian and Ukrainian, mostly soldiers, some people as missiles hit wrong spots or get lobbed into cities like Kiev and towns.
	But if I can save seven thousand people a week from being killed, I think that's a pretty I want to try and get to heaven if possible.
	I'm hearing I'm not doing well.
	I'm really at the bottom of the totem pole.
	But if I can get to heaven, this will be one of the reasons.
	Well, I think I saved a lot of lives with India.
	Pakistan, they were going at it.
	They were the planes were being shot down.
	That was going to be maybe a nuclear war.
	war if I let that go and I did that through trade I was I think the Lord Jesus Christ is going to have one answer for him mRNA it's like I mean seven thousand people a week that would be on the small side for mRNA and then of course what is openly happening right now in Gaza you know it's um they're kind of selective about what they want to do he's got spiritual advisors what I don't think Trump really wants to stand before God and point to his foreign policy or why he should be led into heaven Yeah,
	or any of his policies, quite frankly.
	I don't think he wants to point to his spiritual advisors either.
	I don't think he's going to be able to say, but Paula White and, I think that's one of the reasons when you look at billionaires like Bloomberg and Trump, it's one of the reasons why Jesus said it's harder for a rich man to get into heaven, kingdom of heaven, I should say, than it is for a camel to get through the eye of a needle.
	But with God, all things are possible.
	It is possible.
	You should pray for Trump.
	because he's had a lot of really bad advice from people like Paula White.
	He's not heard the gospel.
	He's not heard the free gift of salvation from God.
	as all other religions see it, it is what you can do for God, you know, some system of things that you do, some good stuff that you do, and you hope that the good outweighs the bad.
	It can never outweigh the bad that you have done.
	And the only hope is to do something with your sins.
	And so I looked at this, and we've got a lot of, I've seen this over and over again, this guy who is a Texas cattle rancher, his name is Byron Stinson.
	And what he's trying to do is to breed a red heifer so they can bring back animal sacrifices in Israel.
	He's a Zionist, and he's been really surprising to me when I see this.
	You know, we need to think about the fact that the Jewish religion as given by Moses has not been practiced for two thousand years.
	The temple was there as a place where they would do animal sacrifices, and the Sionists, Christian Sionists, as well as some of the Jewish Sionists, want to build a third temple, they want to start animal sacrifices again.
	I'm just surprised when I see Christians embrace this to the extent that they have.
	They don't realize that, they don't believe the New Testament when it says it's not possible for the blood of bulls and goats, even if they're red, to take away sin.
	They were a picture of what Christ would do.
	The temple was a picture of what Christ would do, as a matter of fact.
	The temple as well as the tabernacle, that was all a picture of Christ.
	And when he came, he fulfilled that.
	And I think it's amazing to me the amount of effort that this guy is spending.
	It is just as delusional as what Trump and Bloomberg are trying to do in terms of earning their way to heaven.
	But he was accompanied by Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, Mike Johnson, the House Speaker, and a pastor called Jim Garlow, forty lawmakers, Republican, all of them attended a public prayer on a variety of topics.
	House Majority Leader Steve Scalise was also there, Randy Fine from Florida, Andy Ogles of Tennessee, Kate Britt of Alabama.
	So they were all gathered at the Museum of the Bible near the National Mall for this hours long prayer session.
	And then when that was concluded, the prayer section was concluded, this Texas cattleman got up and gave his spiel about how they're going to build the third temple and start sacrifices again.
	That's not what the Jewish people or anybody needs.
	What they need is a sacrifice that has been done once for all and they ignore that.
	What they need is the gospel.
	Hey, I've got the blood of bulls and goats here.
	Isn't that great?
	Yeah, and it's kind of interesting.
	The details of the story I thought were kind of funny because they have to inspect these cows and make sure that there's not a single white hair or something on it.
	It has to be all red hair, a ginger cow.
	So this is so they're going over the magnifying glass, I guess.
	That's right.
	We've got a team of rabbis out there.
	they've got a single white hair that disqualifies them and if they have an ear tag which is very common for cattle that also disqualifies them so they they went around he this guy this texas cattleman says he spends half of his time doing this so he goes around with jewish rabbis and they find this red cow that doesn't have any flaws and they tell uh the people who have the cow you know don't put an ear tag on it all this kind of stuff and we will buy it and then they had to transfer it to
	israel and the problem was is that when they transferred uh the they're not not allowed to import cattle into Israel.
	So they had to first of all declare that they were pets and they were able to get around the importation law by claiming that these cattle were pets.
	But then as part of the shipping process, it is standard required procedure that you put a micro tag on any cattle that you are shipping.
	And so now it's a big problem.
	So he gets all of these people together.
	He says, you have three rabbis in a room, you'll get twelve opinions.
	He said, if you put three hundred of them in a room, you get twelve thousand opinions.
	And so nobody could decide whether or not that was a flaw on the red heifers that they're doing.
	So now they've got these red heifers there.
	There are heifer's there and they're going to try to crossbreed them in country in order to get a pure red heifer.
	This is the kind of legalism.
	What if it has an mRNA vaccine?
	Does that...
	But this is what legalism always leads to.
	How much and to what level of detail does your life have to be pure?
	Do you have a single flaw in your life?
	Because God demands perfection.
	That was a sacrifice that Christ gave.
	So accept no substitutes on any of this stuff.
	And what he needs to be doing is he needs to be, if he really loves the Jewish people, he needs to be giving them the gospel.
	But of course, Paul of White doesn't give Trump the gospel, neither does Norman Vincent Peel.
	They were all about the prosperity gospel and success and all the rest of that.
	Which is not the gospel.
	One of the things this guy says, he says, it's all about a long term plan of God to bring about peace on earth and for us to study and make relationships between the Jewish fathers of faith and Christians worldwide.
	That's not about that at all.
	The long term plan for peace was not peace between men.
	You know, that's something we always hear at Christmas time.
	You know, Jesus came for peace on earth.
	He came, he said, he was going to create a sword between different groups.
	They were going to fight over what was required, but he said he came for peace between God and man.
	That's what he made peace for, and that's the important one.
	And if we were at peace with God, that will be the outcome.
	We will be at peace with each other, but that is done through Jesus Christ.
	That's what the gospel is about, and that's what Zionists, whether they're Christian or Jewish, do not understand.
	And this guy doesn't have an idea about what's going on with it.
	And it's troubling, I think, to see that Pete Hegseth is another person who's pushing for a third temple.
	So pray for these people, pray for Trump that somebody will point him towards the real gospel, the real good news.
	It's also interesting, if you go back and you look at the original Zionists, they were not strictly focused on Palestine.
	They were also considering a lot of different places.
	Uganda was one place they were looking at.
	They were also looking at setting up a couple of different areas in New York.
	They thought if they got maybe into a rural area that was in New York, New Jersey area where they could draw on the large Jewish population in New York, or maybe just have a clean start.
	Galveston was one that was under consideration by the Zionists at the time.
	Galveston isn't a very nice place.
	I'm sure they're looking at it like, I don't know.
	Yeah, I think they take a trip there and said, I don't think so.
	But, you know, when you look at what these people are doing, he makes comments.
	He said, "Yeah, we want to bring about "the second coming of Christ." And as I've said before, this is what They decided that God was taking too long.
	And so they were going to speed the process up and do it their way.
	And I think all of this Zionism suffers from the Hagar experience.
	We wouldn't have, ironically, we wouldn't have the kind of conflict that we have with Jews and Arabs in the Middle East right now if it wasn't.
	for what Abraham and Sarah did, producing Ismail as they decided that they were going to do it.
	They're trying to enact God's plan in their own way.
	Trying to take it into their own hands.
	We've got some comments here and we're almost out of time, so I want to make sure we get to them.
	We are all dead, says, quote, unquote, earned my place in heaven.
	Good luck with that.
	Be My Valentine says, I never knew you.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Mav 2022 says, They know they are not going to heaven.
	That's why they want to live in machines forever.
	They know what's waiting for them.
	Yeah, the I never knew you.
	And of course, we remember that.
	if somebody says, I did all these things in your name.
	I mean, none of this stuff Trump and Bloomberg are doing in Christ's name.
	They're doing it in their name, right?
	Look at how I got people to stop smoking.
	Yeah, he said, Yeah, I didn't even if you're doing it in my name and you think that that's what recommends you to me, then you've missed the point.
	Even secular philosophy.
	Right, so a storm has gone.
	The third temple is us.
	It is not a building.
	That's absolutely right.
	We are, Christ is the cornerstone, and we are the living stones that are built into that third temple.
	The temple and the tabernacle were pictures of what Christ would do.
	It's not to say that we don't believe the Bible literally, but the Old Testament Kingdom prophecies were about the Lord Jesus Christ.
	He even told them that.
	He said, You search the Scriptures, the Old Testament, to have eternal life, but they testify of me.
	And that's the point that these people are missing.
	It's really sad to see it.
	Yes.
	Guard Goldsmith says, Red hair dye.
	That's right.
	Rabbis do like to argue and sort of wheedle things out, like, well, we can't work on the Sabbath, but we can bring in people to push buttons for us.
	Maybe they can work something out there.
	What if we dye the cow red.
	God will never notice.
	I also wonder if they're paying ranchers large amounts for a totally red cow.
	That's some incentive right there.
	That's right.
	Ranchers may be doing that.
	Who knows?
	Yeah.
	Of course, aged beef, it's going to have some flaws and it's going to start turning gray.
	Well, that's it for today's broadcast.
	Thank you so much for joining us.
	Have a good day.
	God bless you all.
	The Common Man music They created Common Corps to dumb down our children.
	They created Common Past to track and control us.
	Their Commons Project to make sure the commoners own nothing.
	And the communist future.
	They see the common man as simple, unsophisticated, ordinary.
	But each of us has worth and dignity created in the image of God.
	That is what they want to take away.
	Their most powerful weapons are isolation, deception, intimidation.
	They desire to know everything about us while they hide everything from us.
	It's time to turn that around and expose what they want to hide.
	Please share the information and links you'll find at thedavidnightshow dot com dot Thank you for listening.
	Thank you for sharing.
	If you can't support us financially, please keep us in your prayers.

▲